Low cost high density rectifier matrix memory

Abstract
A high density memory device is fabricated three dimensionally in layers. To keep points of failure low, address decoding circuits are included within each layer so that, in addition to power and data lines, only the address signal lines need be interconnected between the layers.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to semiconductor storage devices, and more particularly to low cost memory resulting from manufacturing efficiencies which construct the devices in three-dimensions and which incorporate efficient testing mechanisms.


2. Description of Prior Art


Many versions of three-dimensional memory arrays have been disclosed in the prior art and they might be classified as being one of two types—stacked chips and layered manufacture.


Layered approaches are discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,525,921, 4,646,128, and 5,432,729 wherein Carson disclosed a technique for bonding two or more memory chips one on top another to form a three-dimensional memory array. There have been variations on this design, such as by Kato in U.S. Pat. No. 5,051,865, in which he discloses an enhancement comprising heat sink layers which are bonded between memory circuit layers to help reduce overheating.


Of greater interest to the present invention, Zhang, in his U.S. Pat. No. 5,835,396, discloses an approach for manufacturing a layered memory device based on diode storage devices at the intersections of the rows and columns within each layer and Rosner, in his U.S. Pat. No. 4,442,507, discloses an electrically programmable read-only memory. Both of these devices are manufactured upon a semiconductor substrate having decoding logic for the associated bit lines of the memory layers.


However, all of these devices have shortcomings. The bonding of multiple chips creates many points of failure and has high associated assembly costs. Manufacturing devices in layers as disclosed in the prior art has the high cost of the base substrate and its electronic circuitry (manufactured using traditional semiconductor manufacturing means) and its associated complexity as well as the many potential points of failure of interconnecting the vast number of row and column bit lines of the various layers.


What is needed is a three-dimensional memory device which can retain the advantage of lower cost manufacturing by not requiring a base layer comprising the bit line decoding circuitry and the high reliability of few layer interconnects. The present invention accomplishes this by including the decoding circuitry on each memory layer thereby eliminating the need for a base layer comprising bit line decoding circuitry and thereby dramatically reducing the number of layer interconnects to just power and a few address and data lines.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

As advances continue to be made in the area of high density semiconductor storage, the need to keep the cost of these devices low is critical for many applications. Many storage solutions, such as FLASH memory (a non-volatile, rewritable memory technology), are currently very expensive. As a result, many users of FLASH memory must upload and download the contents of their memory to other storage means, such as a computer with a hard disk. This is because FLASH is so expensive that rather than have many FLASH memory devices, users will typically own very few FLASH memory devices which they will reuse depending on their current needs.


The present invention is a means for constructing a high density rectifier matrices (as might be used to construct electronic memory) such that the costs are kept low. By constructing memory devices in three dimensions and integrating simple test circuitry that can rapidly verify the operation of such devices, storage densities can be made very high while keeping testing time (and the associated costs of testing) very low. It is believed that memory devices can be manufactured which will be dramatically lower cost than current technologies.


The present invention also offers advantages over existing technology in that this memory technology could be added to a variety of existing semiconductor devices. Also, a one time programmable variation of the device could be created with little additional effort.


Finally, the present invention also offers advantages over existing technology in that this memory technology, by virtue of its exceptionally simple design, will retain its cost savings even when manufactured three-dimensionally in layers.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1. Illustrates a prepared substrate for the present invention.



FIG. 2. Illustrates a front and side view after etching rows.



FIG. 3. Illustrates a front and side view of the rows following a passivation step.



FIG. 4. Illustrates a front and side view of the passivated rows following etching to open contacts through the passivation layer.



FIG. 5. Illustrates a front and side view of the device following final metallization and etching to create columns.



FIG. 6. Illustrates a second layer of the device having been manufactured upon a first layer of the device.



FIG. 7. Illustrates an interconnection pattern for quick testing of the device.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The present invention is a means for fabricating semiconductor memory in three dimensions. This memory will be fabricated using a process similar to that used to construct Thin Film Transistor (TFT) flat panel displays—in particular, using deposited semiconductor material on insulating substrates.


Refer now to the figures which show a preferred embodiment of the invention. FIG. 1 shows a possible configuration of a prepared substrate. This substrate consists of a base (1) that is typically made of glass, of Silicon Dioxide on a silicon wafer, or of other insulating material. On top of this is deposited about 1000 Å of metal (2) such as TiAu (Ti-gold), Ni (Nickel), or Al (Aluminum). Next is deposited 250 Å of N+ amorphous Silicon (N+δSi:H) (3) followed by 1000 Å of δSi:H (4). Finally, 100 Å of metal (5) is deposited. It should be noted that the metals and the thicknesses are not critical, so long as certain functional requirements are met. Bottom metal (2) can be made of any material that will form an ohmic contact with the layer (3) above it. Bottom metal (2) should be thick enough to carry enough current to provide the operational speed desired given any circuit capacitances. Layer (4) can be one of many materials that will form an ohmic connection between layers (2) and (4) and need only be thick enough to prevent layers (2) and (4) from interacting in a non-linear way (i.e., not a rectifying contact). Layer (4) can be one of many materials that will form a rectifying contact with top metal layer (5) and need only be thick enough to allow for an adequate junction depth for proper operation of that rectifying contact. Top metal (5) can be made of any material that will form a rectifying contact with the layer (4) below it and need not be very thick because additional metal will be deposited directly on top of this in a later step. Finally all thicknesses must be thin enough to not create unacceptable aspect ratios (i.e., very tall, thin rows that are too tall for their widths), given the design feature size, when these layers are etched as described below.



FIG. 2 shows the device following etching steps that result in many parallel rows having many “towers” of rectifiers on each of them. The width of these rows must be proportional to the thickness of the substrate layers so that the aspect ratio are manageable; if the rows or towers are too tall, given their footprints, they will fall over. The width of the channels between the rows and towers must be wide enough to minimize interaction of adjacent rows and columns.



FIG. 3 shows the rows following passivation—that is to say, the channels between the rows and columns are filled in with insulating material (6) for structural strength, to provide a smooth surface for subsequent photolithography steps, and to insulate the sides of the rows and columns from the deposition of the top metal layer for the column connections.



FIG. 4 shows the array following an etch to create openings to the towers through insulating material (6) These openings are made selectively in order to program the device according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,889,694. Note that the thickness of the passivated material on top of those towers where no opening is etched must be sufficient to ensure electrical insulation from the top metal layer (yet to be deposited). It should also be noted that all data bit connections could be opened in the case of a programmable or writable device. Such a programmable device might have an additional layer or might otherwise provide for a fusable or antifusable link in each of the towers used for data storage. This additional layer might also be made of a thin-film material that is a phase-change chalcogenide alloy similar to the film used to store information on commercial CD-RW and DVD-RAM optical disks. Note that some of the etches go all the way down to the bottom metal layer (2) to enable the formation of direct connections to the bottom metal rows. Steps 3 and 4 can be partly combined by using a photosensitive spin-on insulator, such as Polyimide, which can be deposited and then photolithographically patterned and developed.



FIG. 5 shows the final device following the deposition of top metal layer (7) and the etching of that layer into columns orthogonal to the rows. The result of this process will result in a 2 dimensional array of rectifying contacts (in this case, schottky diodes). The rows will be connected by the top metal layer (7) and the columns will be connected by the bottom metal layer (2). This top layer is expected to be about 2000 Å thick, but should be thick enough to carry enough current to provide the operational speed desired given any circuit capacitances without creating any of the previously mentioned aspect ratio problems when the columns are etched.


It is believed that the simplest construction would be as described above utilizing schottky type rectifying contacts. However, many other rectifying structures could be used; the bottom metal layer (2) and top metal contact (5) could be ohmic and the junction between layers (3) and (4) could form the rectifying contact. For example, if layer (3) was doped N+ and layer (4) was doped P+, a P-N rectifying junction could be formed. Alternatively, some other semiconducting material, such as an organic molecule, could be used in place of amorphous silicon. Another variation could include multiple rectifying junctions in series. This might be achieved by constructing a P-N junction and a schottky junction. With this multiple stacked rectifying towers design, if one of the rectifying devices was defective and formed an ohmic connection instead of a rectifying connection, the others in the series would result in the tower still being a rectifying connection between the top column and the bottom row as required for such a rectifier storage matrix.



FIG. 6 shows the result of this process if repeated on a substrate which has already had this process performed once. Note that the first layer will most likely be planarized with a polishing step before depositing an insulating film to start the second layer. In the case of the DRS memory constructed in multiple layers, these layers can be wired mostly in parallel (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,889,694), only the bonding pads (9) would be interconnected by vias. As can be seen, the structure is identical except for the inclusion of vias (8) to interconnect the bonding points for power, ground and the complementary address inputs of each layer. The data bonding pads would be brought to the surface layer independently so that each data bonding pad would connect to a single layer. Other configurations of wiring are possible. For example, if the data lines of each layer were interconnected by vias and separation was instead accomplished by having some address lines connected to specific layers so as to in effect enable only a single layer at a time and thereby multiplex the data connections. This would be the equivalent of implementing the selective powering of the device as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,889,694 whereby each individually powered section of the device was comprised in a separate layer.



FIG. 7 shows an interconnection technique for the rows (and would be repeated for the columns) to enable the quick and inexpensive testing of the device. The most common faults expected to occur during the fabrication of the present invention are breaks in a line or shorts between two adjacent lines. With the present interconnection technique, all the alternate rows are connected end to end with a top layer connection thereby creating two conductive snakes—one comprising all the even numbered rows (10) and the other comprising all the odd numbered rows (11). By doing so, one can test the device by probing the two ends of each snake and checking for continuity. This will enable instantaneously checking the all the rows for any breaks with just four probe points. Also, shorts between rows can be identified simultaneously by checking for any continuity between the two snakes. The columns would be simultaneously checked in an identical fashion. Also, in the same way and at the same time, the device can be checked for shorts between the top columns and bottom rows (taking care to select one range of voltage levels for the rows and another range of voltage levels for the columns such that the diodes are reverse biased). By combining this test technique with the multiple stacked rectifying towers design, if a device passes this instantaneous test, one can be highly confident of having a working device. After identifying any defective devices (which, if the devices are manufactured inexpensively enough, would most likely just be marked to be discarded), these top layer connections are etched away to separate the lines or the edges of the chips where the interconnections are found could be cut back just enough to remove those edges and their interconnections.


This process is initiated by depositing layers on an insulating substrate such as plastic or glass. But, it should be noted that this insulating substrate does not have to be limited to plastic or glass. As has been shown in the prior art, this process could be performed on top of a normally fabricated semiconductor device such as a memory controller chip, an error detection and correction chip, a data decryption (and, optionally, encryption) chip (such as for security like DES or PGP or for storage efficiency like MP3), or a microprocessor, or the like that has been passivated with a top layer of protecting glass or other insulator. An array of LEDs or diode optical sensors might be constructed upon an image processor to construct a micro display or camera. In its simplest form, a diode matrix (such as was disclosed by Robb in his U.S. Pat. No. 3,245,051, issued in 1965) could be constructed on top of a memory controller comprising the address decoding, the row and column selection logic, the line driver-amplifiers, and the sense amplifiers; in this case, the individual connections to the rows and columns would be made up from the controller substrate. Since a storage array could cover a greater area then, say, a memory controller chip, multiple memory controllers could be placed on the chip to be covered according to the present invention thereby providing redundant controller circuits to operate the storage array, resulting in higher fabrication yields. Furthermore, this process can be performed on top of itself resulting in a three-dimensional construction of this memory device with many layers. One would only then simply have to interconnect the two or more layers with vertical via connections. In the case of the DRS memory constructed in multiple layers, these layers can be wired mostly in parallel; just as the DRS array can be divided into multiple areas on one layer (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,889,694), these multiple areas could be constructed vertically with this technique.


Other variations would include the fabrication of integrated memory circuits using other than traditional photolithographic semiconductor manufacturing techniques. By combining lower cost manufacturing techniques with the higher densities resulting from three-dimensional fabrication, the cost per bit can be driven even lower.


The foregoing description of an example of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the variations thereon have been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by any claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. An electronic memory device comprising: a substrate; anddisposed above the substrate, a plurality of layers of memory circuitry defining a memory array, each layer of memory circuitry comprising a plurality of storage locations,wherein (i) the memory array is organized as a plurality of individually enableable sub-arrays, and (ii) the substrate comprises at least one of address decoding logic, row and column selection logic, a line driver-amplifier, or a sense amplifier.
  • 2. The electronic memory device of claim 1, wherein, during operation, at least one of the sub-arrays is enabled and at least one of the sub-arrays is not enabled.
  • 3. The electronic memory device of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of layers corresponds to a sub-array.
  • 4. The electronic memory device of claim 1, wherein the substrate comprises a semiconductor material.
  • 5. An electronic memory device comprising: a substrate; anddisposed above the substrate, a plurality of layers of memory circuitry defining a memory array, each layer of memory circuitry comprising a plurality of storage locations,wherein (i) the memory array is organized as a plurality of individually enableable sub-arrays, and (ii) the substrate comprises at least one of error detection and correction logic, data decryption logic, data encryption logic, data compression logic, or data decompression logic.
  • 6. An electronic memory device of comprising: a substrate; anddisposed above the substrate, a plurality of layers of memory circuitry defining a memory array, each layer of memory circuitry comprising a plurality of storage locations,wherein (i) the memory array is organized as a plurality of individually enableable sub-arrays, and (ii) each sub-array is individually powered.
  • 7. An electronic memory device of claim 1 comprising: a substrate; anddisposed above the substrate, a plurality of layers of memory circuitry defining a memory array, each layer of memory circuitry comprising a plurality of storage locations,wherein (i) the memory array is organized as a plurality of individually enableable sub-arrays, and (ii) the substrate consists essentially of an insulating material.
  • 8. An electronic memory device of claim 1 comprising: a substrate; anddisposed above the substrate, a plurality of layers of memory circuitry defining a memory array, each layer of memory circuitry comprising a plurality of storage locations,wherein (i) the memory array is organized as a plurality of individually enableable sub-arrays, and (ii) the substrate comprises a plurality of memory controllers.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/780,909, filed Jul. 20, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/229,941, filed Sep. 19, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,460,384, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/887,201, filed on Jun. 22, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,956,757, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/213,419, filed on Jun. 22, 2000, the entire disclosure of each application being hereby incorporated by reference. This application makes references to U.S. Pat. No. 5,889,694 for a “Dual-Addressed Rectifier Storage Device” issued March 1999, to U.S. Pat. No. 3,245,051 for “Information Storage Matrices” issued April 1966, and those patents are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (155)
Number Name Date Kind
2709042 Couffignal May 1955 A
3091754 Nazare May 1963 A
3245051 Robb Apr 1966 A
3308433 Lochinger Mar 1967 A
3373406 Cannon et al. Mar 1968 A
3576549 Hess et al. Apr 1971 A
3626389 Waaben Dec 1971 A
3701119 Waaben et al. Oct 1972 A
3721964 Barrett et al. Mar 1973 A
3806896 Mar Apr 1974 A
3838405 Arnett et al. Sep 1974 A
3942071 Krebs et al. Mar 1976 A
4010453 Lewis Mar 1977 A
4070654 Tachi Jan 1978 A
4090190 Rostkovsky et al. May 1978 A
4240151 Kawagoe Dec 1980 A
4308595 Houghton Dec 1981 A
4312046 Taylor Jan 1982 A
4322822 McPherson Mar 1982 A
4342102 Puar Jul 1982 A
4347585 Eardley Aug 1982 A
4385368 Principi et al. May 1983 A
4394752 Boudon et al. Jul 1983 A
4404480 Ransom et al. Sep 1983 A
4419471 Nelsen et al. Dec 1983 A
4424579 Roesner Jan 1984 A
4442507 Roesner Apr 1984 A
4479200 Sato et al. Oct 1984 A
4525921 Carson et al. Jul 1985 A
4534008 Fuchs et al. Aug 1985 A
4554640 Wong et al. Nov 1985 A
4561070 Armstrong Dec 1985 A
4608672 Roberts et al. Aug 1986 A
4646128 Carson et al. Feb 1987 A
4646266 Ovshinsky et al. Feb 1987 A
4661927 Graebel Apr 1987 A
4710900 Higuchi Dec 1987 A
4721885 Brodie Jan 1988 A
4757475 Awaya Jul 1988 A
4772886 Hasegawa Sep 1988 A
4782340 Czubatyj et al. Nov 1988 A
4800529 Ueno Jan 1989 A
4845679 Vu Jul 1989 A
4884238 Lee et al. Nov 1989 A
4888631 Azuma et al. Dec 1989 A
4920516 Tsuchimoto Apr 1990 A
5051865 Kato et al. Sep 1991 A
5095355 Shiomi et al. Mar 1992 A
5148256 Potash et al. Sep 1992 A
5163328 Holland et al. Nov 1992 A
5203731 Zimmerman Apr 1993 A
5296716 Ovshinsky et al. Mar 1994 A
5357471 Alapat Oct 1994 A
5390145 Nakasha et al. Feb 1995 A
5397957 Zimmerman Mar 1995 A
5432729 Carson et al. Jul 1995 A
5441907 Sung et al. Aug 1995 A
5463269 Zimmerman Oct 1995 A
5463583 Takashina Oct 1995 A
5493533 Lambrache Feb 1996 A
5569973 Zimmerman Oct 1996 A
5576986 Matsuzaki et al. Nov 1996 A
5640343 Gallagher et al. Jun 1997 A
5668032 Holmberg et al. Sep 1997 A
5673218 Shepard Sep 1997 A
5675531 McClelland et al. Oct 1997 A
5700626 Lee et al. Dec 1997 A
5719589 Norman et al. Feb 1998 A
5740099 Tanigawa Apr 1998 A
5807791 Bertin et al. Sep 1998 A
5835396 Zhang Nov 1998 A
5837564 Sandhu et al. Nov 1998 A
5840608 Chang Nov 1998 A
5889694 Shepard Mar 1999 A
5933364 Aoyama et al. Aug 1999 A
5998828 Ueno et al. Dec 1999 A
6055180 Gudesen et al. Apr 2000 A
6075723 Naiki et al. Jun 2000 A
6088252 Fujisawa et al. Jul 2000 A
6117720 Harshfield Sep 2000 A
6133640 Leedy Oct 2000 A
6163475 Proebsting Dec 2000 A
6185122 Johnson et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198682 Proebsting Mar 2001 B1
6236587 Gudesen et al. May 2001 B1
6256767 Kuekes et al. Jul 2001 B1
6259132 Pio Jul 2001 B1
6351023 Gates et al. Feb 2002 B1
6385075 Taussig et al. May 2002 B1
6424016 Houston Jul 2002 B1
6459095 Heath et al. Oct 2002 B1
6462998 Proebsting Oct 2002 B1
6478231 Taussig Nov 2002 B1
6492690 Ueno et al. Dec 2002 B2
6552409 Taussig et al. Apr 2003 B2
6559468 Kuekes et al. May 2003 B1
6566217 Maki May 2003 B1
6567295 Taussig et al. May 2003 B2
6586327 Shepard Jul 2003 B2
6587394 Hogan Jul 2003 B2
6597037 Forbes et al. Jul 2003 B1
6598164 Shepard Jul 2003 B1
6613650 Holmberg Sep 2003 B1
6703673 Houston Mar 2004 B2
6721223 Matsumoto et al. Apr 2004 B2
6744681 Hogan Jun 2004 B2
6768685 Scheuerlein Jul 2004 B1
6839260 Ishii Jan 2005 B2
6879505 Scheuerlein Apr 2005 B2
6956757 Shepard Oct 2005 B2
7018904 Yamada et al. Mar 2006 B2
7032083 Jensen et al. Apr 2006 B1
7054219 Petti et al. May 2006 B1
7088613 Lue et al. Aug 2006 B2
7149934 Shepard Dec 2006 B2
7183206 Shepard Feb 2007 B2
7190602 Johnson et al. Mar 2007 B2
7242601 Dehon et al. Jul 2007 B2
7330369 Tran Feb 2008 B2
7376008 Shepard May 2008 B2
7408798 Bernstein et al. Aug 2008 B2
7460384 Shepard Dec 2008 B2
7471547 Schloesser Dec 2008 B2
7548453 Nestler Jun 2009 B2
7548454 Nestler Jun 2009 B2
7554873 Lee et al. Jun 2009 B2
7592209 Chang Sep 2009 B2
7593246 Shepard Sep 2009 B2
7593256 Nestler Sep 2009 B2
7646664 Cho et al. Jan 2010 B2
20020126526 Taussig et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020184459 Taussig et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020191434 Taussing et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020192895 Taussig et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196659 Hurst et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030003633 Mei et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030026120 Scheuerlein Feb 2003 A1
20030028699 Holtzman et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030087495 Forbes et al. May 2003 A1
20040145938 Tihanyi Jul 2004 A1
20040160805 Rinerson et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050067675 Shepard Mar 2005 A1
20050127350 Furkay et al. Jun 2005 A1
20060072427 Kanda et al. Apr 2006 A1
20070028150 Shepard Feb 2007 A1
20070242494 Nestler Oct 2007 A1
20070247890 Shepard Oct 2007 A1
20080013354 Shepard Jan 2008 A1
20080016414 Shepard Jan 2008 A1
20090109726 Shepard Apr 2009 A1
20090141535 Yang et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090161420 Shepard Jun 2009 A1
20090225579 Shepard et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090225621 Shepard Sep 2009 A1
20090296445 Shepard Dec 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
1011454 Jul 1957 DE
1011454 Jul 1957 DE
57-203293 Dec 1982 JP
57-203294 Dec 1982 JP
2-98898 Apr 1990 JP
WO-9939394 Aug 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (17)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/045931, dated Jan. 21, 2010, 15 pages.
“Summary Page National Radio Institute 832,” Old-Computers.com, <http://old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=884&st=1>, (Apr. 4, 2007), 2 pages.
Berger, “Models for Contacts to Planar Devices,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 15, (1972), pp. 145-158.
Crawford, et al. “An Improved Tunnel Diode Memory System,” IBM Journal, (Jul. 1963) pp. 199-206.
De Graaf, et al. “A Novel High-Density Low-Cost Diode Programmable Read Only Memory,” IEEE IEDM, session 7.6.1, (1996), pp. 189-192.
Hodges, et al. “Analysis and Design of Digital Integrated Circuits,” McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 27-32.
Hurst, “A Survey of Published Information on Universal Logic Arrays,” Microelectronics and Reliability, vol. 16, (1977), pp. 663-674.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/007792 mailed Oct. 30, 2007 (3 pages).
McConnell, et al. “Diode-Transistor Logic,” Digital Electronics, Chapter 5, West Virginia University, (2002), pp. 1-14.
Near, et al. “Read-Only Memory Adds to Calculator's Repertoire,” Electronics, (Feb. 3, 1969), pp. 70-77.
Wang, et al, “High-Current-Density Thin-Film Silicon Diodes Grown at Low Temperature,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85(11), (Sep. 13, 2004), pp. 2122-2124.
Wang, et al, “Low Temperature Thin-Film Silicon Diodes for Consumer Electronics,” Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 862, (2005), pp. A15.5.1-A15.5.6.
International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/US99/02239, mailed May 31, 1999.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/US07/011020, mailed Jul. 18, 2008 (14 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/075986, mailed Jan. 22, 2009 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/082503, mailed Feb. 25, 2009 (10 pages).
Partial International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/US07/011020, mailed Apr. 14, 2008, 6 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110019455 A1 Jan 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60213419 Jun 2000 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09887201 Jun 2001 US
Child 11229941 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11780909 Jul 2007 US
Child 12898205 US
Parent 11229941 Sep 2005 US
Child 11780909 US