1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a magnetic tunnel junction device and a method of manufacturing the same, particularly to a magnetic tunnel junction device with a high magnetoresistance and a method of manufacturing the same.
2. Description of Related Art
Magnetoresistive random access memories (MRAMs) refer to a large-scale integrated memory circuit that is expected to replace the currently widely used DRAM memories. Research and development of MRAM devices, which are fast and non-volatile memory devices, are being extensively carried out, and sample products of a 4 Mbit MRAM have actually been delivered.
Thus, a single non-volatile MRAM memory cell can be formed by a single MOSFET 100 and a single MTJ device 117. The MRAMs are therefore suitable where high levels of integration are required.
Although there are prospects for achieving MRAMs with capacities on the order of 64 Mbits based on the current technologies, the characteristics of the MTJ device, which is the heart of MRAM, needs to be improved if higher levels of integration are to be achieved. In particular, in order to increase the output voltage of the MTJ device, the magnetoresistance must be increased and the bias voltage characteristics must be improved.
It is an object of the invention to increase the output voltage of a MTJ device. It is another object of the invention to provide a memory device with a high magnetoresistance for stable operation.
In one aspect, the invention provides a magnetoresistive device comprising a magnetic tunnel junction structure comprising: a tunnel barrier layer; a first ferromagnetic material layer of the BCC structure formed on a first side of the tunnel barrier layer; and a second ferromagnetic material layer of the BCC structure formed on a second side of the tunnel barrier layer, wherein the tunnel barrier layer is formed by a single-crystal MgOx (001) layer or a poly-crystalline MgOx (0<x<1) layer in which the (001) crystal plane is preferentially oriented.
The invention further provides a magnetoresistive device comprising a magnetic tunnel junction structure comprising: a tunnel barrier layer comprising MgO(001); a first ferromagnetic material layer comprising Fe(001) formed on a first side of the tunnel barrier layer; and a second ferromagnetic material layer comprising Fe(001) formed on a second side of the tunnel barrier layer, wherein the MgO layer is formed by a single-crystalline MgOx (001) layer or a poly-crystalline MgOx (0<x<1) layer in which the (001) crystal plane is preferentially oriented. In a preferred embodiment, the band discontinuity value (the height of the tunnel barrier) between the bottom of the conduction band of the MgO(001) layer and the Fermi energy of the Fe(001) layer is smaller than an ideal value of a perfect single-crystal without defect. These features increase the magnetoresistance and thereby allow the output voltage of the MTJ device to be increased. By using any of the aforementioned MTJ devices as a load for a single transistor, a non-volatile memory can be formed.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method of manufacturing a magnetoresistive device comprising: preparing a substrate; depositing a first Fe(001) layer on the substrate; depositing a tunnel barrier layer on the first Fe(001) layer by electron beam evaporation under high vacuum, the tunnel barrier layer comprising a single-crystalline MgOx (001) or a poly-crystalline MgOx (0<x<1) in which the (001) crystal plane is preferentially oriented; and forming a second Fe(001) layer on the tunnel barrier layer.
The invention furthermore provides a method of manufacturing a MTJ device comprising a first step of preparing a substrate comprising a single-crystalline MgOx(001) or a poly-crystalline MgOx (0<x<1) in which the (001) crystal plane is preferentially oriented, a second step of depositing a first Fe(001) layer on the substrate and performing an annealing process to make the surface flat, a third step of depositing a tunnel barrier layer on the first Fe(001) layer by electron beam evaporation, the tunnel barrier layer comprising a single-crystalline MgOx(001) or a poly-crystalline MgOx (0<x<1) in which the (001) crystal plane is preferentially oriented, and a fourth step of forming a second Fe(001) layer on the tunnel barrier layer. The method may further comprise the step of growing a seed layer between the first and the second steps, the seed layer comprising a single-crystalline MgOx(001) or a poly-crystalline MgOx (0<x<1) in which the (001) crystal plane is preferentially oriented. The MgO layer may be deposited using a target with the value of x in MgO, adjusted. The value of x in MgOx may be adjusted in the step of forming the MgO.
In yet another aspect, the invention provides a magnetoresistive device comprising a magnetic tunnel junction structure comprising a tunnel barrier layer comprising MgO(001), a first ferromagnetic material layer comprising an amorphous magnetic alloy formed on a first side of the tunnel barrier layer, and a second ferromagnetic material layer comprising an amorphous magnetic alloy formed on a second side of the tunnel barrier layer, wherein the discontinuous value (the height of the tunnel barrier) between the bottom of the conduction band of the MgO(001) layer and the Fermi energy of the first or the second ferromagnetic material layer comprising the amorphous magnetic alloy is lower than an ideal value of a perfect single-crystal with no defect.
In the context of the present specification, because MgO has a cubic crystal structure (NaCl structure), the (001) plane, the (100) plane, and the (010) plane are all equivalent. The direction perpendicular to the film surface is herein considered to be the z-axis so that the film plane can be uniformly described as (001). Also in the context of the present specification, BCC structure, which the crystalline structure of ferromagnetic electrode layer, means body-centered cubic lattice structure. More specifically, BCC structure includes the BCC structure with no chemical ordering so-called A2-type structure, the BCC structure with chemical ordering such as B2-type structure and L21-type structure, and also the aforementioned structures with slight lattice distortion.
The term “ideal value” with regard to a perfect single-crystal without defect herein refers to a value that has been estimated from ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy experiments (see W. Wulfhekel, et al.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 (2001) 509.). The term “ideal value” is used herein because the aforementioned state can be considered to be an upper limit value of the potential barrier height of the tunnel barrier of an ideal single-crystal MgO with hardly any oxygen vacancy defect or lattice defect.
Before describing the preferred embodiments of the invention, an analysis conducted by the inventors is discussed. The magnetoresistance (MR) ratio of a MTJ device can be expressed by the following equation:
ΔR/Rp=(Rap−Rp)/Rp
where Rp and Rap indicate the tunnel junction resistance in the cases of parallel and antiparallel magnetization alignments, respectively, of two electrodes. According to the Jullire's formula, the MR ratio at low bias voltage can be expressed by:
MR ratio=(Rap−Rp)/Rp=2P1P2/(1−P1P2), and
Pα=(Dα↑(EF)−Dα↓(EF))/(Dα↑(EF)+Dα↓(EF), (1)
where α=1, 2
In the above equations, Pa is the spin polarization of an electrode, and Dα↑(EF) and Dα↓(EF) are the density of state (DOS) at the Fermi energy (EF) of the majority-spin band and the minority-spin band, respectively. Since the spin polarization of ferromagnetic transition metals and alloys is approximately 0.5 or smaller, the Jullire's formula predicts a highest estimated MR ratio of about 70%.
Although the MR ratio of approximately 70% has been obtained at room temperature when a MTJ device was made using an amorphous Al—O tunnel barrier and polycrystalline electrodes, it has been difficult to obtain the output voltage of 200 mV, which is comparable to the output voltages of DRAMs, thereby preventing the realization of MRAM as mentioned above.
The inventors tried an approach to deposit a MTJ device in which the tunnel barrier comprises a single-crystal (001) of magnesium oxide (MgO) or a poly-crystalline MgO in which the (001) crystal plane is preferentially oriented. It is the inventors' theory that, because magnesium oxide is a crystal (where the atoms are arranged in an orderly fashion), as opposed to the conventional amorphous Al—O barrier, the electrons are not scattered and the coherent states of electrons are concerved during the tunneling process.
In the following, a MTJ device according to a first embodiment of the invention and a method of manufacturing the same will be described with reference to the drawings.
As shown in
The aforementioned MgO evaporation using an electron beam involved the formation of a film under ultrahigh vacuum of 10−9 Torr. It can be seen that in this method, the film, even when formed on a glass substrate Co the thickness of 300 nm, was colorless and transparent, showing that a good crystal film was formed.
However, it should be noted that other factors, such as the influence of the aforementioned coherent tunneling, might also be involved. The value of x in MgOx due to oxygen vacancy defects is such that 0.98<x<1, and more preferably 0.99<x<1. These are the ranges such that the sole presence of Mg is excluded and the characteristics of MgO can be basically maintained.
The aforementioned tunnel barrier height φ was determined by fitting the electric conductance characteristics of the MTJ device (the relationship between tunnel current density J and bias voltage V) onto the Simmons' formula (Equation (20) in a non-patent document by J. G. Simmons: J. Appl. Phys. 34, pp. 1793-1803 (1963)) based on the WKB approximation, using the least squares method. The fitting was performed using the free electron mass (m=9.11×10−31 kg) as the electron's effective mass. When a bias voltage V (which is normally on the order of 500 mV to 1000 mV) is applied until non-linearity appears in the J-V characteristics, the height φ of the tunnel barrier and the effective thickness Δs of the tunnel barrier can be simultaneously determined by fitting the J-V characteristics using the Simmons' formula.
The effective thickness Δs of the tunnel barrier was determined to be smaller than the thickness of the actual MgO(001) tunnel barrier layer (tMgO) determined from a cross-sectional transmission electron microscope image of the MTJ device by approximately 0.5 nm. This is the result of the effective thickness Δs of the tunnel barrier having been reduced from the actual MgO(001) layer thickness by the effect of the image potential produced at the interface between the MgO(001) layer and the alloy layer consisting mainly of Fe and Co.
It is noted that, in the event that tMgO can be accurately determined using the cross-sectional transmission electron microscope (TEM) image, the height φ of the tunnel barrier can be more simply determined by the following technique. Namely, when the bias voltage V applied to the MTJ device is small (normally 100 mV or smaller), the tunnel current density J is proportional to the bias voltage V, such that the J-V characteristics become linear. In such a low-bias voltage region, the Simmons' formula can be described as follows:
J=[(2mφ)1/2/Δs](e/h)2×exp[−(4πΔs/h)×(2mφ)1/2]×V (2)
where m is the mass of the free electron (9.11×10−31 kg), e is the elementary electric charge (1.60×10−19C), and h is the Planck's constant (6.63×10−34 J·s). The effective thickness of the tunnel barrier As is approximately tMgo−0.5 nm. By fitting the J-V characteristics of the MTJ device in the low-bias voltage region onto Equation (2), the height φ of the tunnel barrier can be simply and yet accurately estimated.
a) shows the bias voltage dependency of the MR ratio at room temperature. It will be seen that the bias voltage dependency of the MR ratio is fairly small. Although the characteristics are asymmetric, the voltage Vhalf at which the MR ratio is reduced in half of the zero-bias value is 1250 mV, which is a very high value. In this connection, it is noted that the voltage Vhalf at which the MR ratio is reduced in half of the zero-bias value in the conventional MTJs with Al—O tunnel barrier is 300 to 600 mV.
Although in the above-described embodiment Fe(001) of BCC was employed, an Fe alloy of BCC, such as an Fe—Co alloy, Fe—Ni alloy, or Fe—Pt alloy, may be used instead. Alternatively, a layer of Co or Ni with the thickness of one or several monoatomic layers may be inserted between the electrode layer and the MgO(001) layer.
Hereafter, a MTJ device according to a second embodiment of the invention and a method of manufacturing the same will be described. In the method of manufacturing a Fe(001)/MgO(001)/Fe(001) MTJ device according to the present embodiment, MgO(001) is initially deposited in a poly-crystalline or amorphous state by sputtering or the like, and then an annealing process is performed such that a poly-crystal in which the (001) crystal plane is preferentially oriented or a single-crystal is obtained. The sputtering conditions were such that, for example, the temperature was room temperature (293K), a 2-inch (I) MgO was used as a target, and sputtering was conducted in an Ar atmosphere. The acceleration power was 200 W and the growth rate was 0.008 nm/s. Because MgO that is deposited under these conditions is in an amorphous state, a crystallized MgO was obtained by increasing the temperature to 300° C. from room temperature and maintaining that temperature for a certain duration of time.
Oxygen vacancy defects may be introduced by a method whereby oxygen vacancy defects is produced during growth, a method whereby oxygen vacancy defects is introduced subsequently, or a method whereby a state with oxygen vacancy defects is subjected to an oxygen plasma process or natural oxidation so as to achieve a certain oxygen deficit level.
As described above, in accordance with the MTJ device technology of the present embodiment, an annealing process is carried out for crystallization after an amorphous MgO has been deposited by sputtering, thereby eliminating the need for large-sized equipment.
Hereafter, a MTJ device according to a variation of the embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
As the amorphous magnetic alloy, FeCoB, FeCoBSi, FeCoBP, FeZr, and CoZr may be used, for example. Although an anneal process after the preparation of the MTJ device might cause the amorphous magnetic alloy in the electrode layers to be partially or entirely crystallized, this would not lead to a significant deterioration of the MR ratio. Thus, such a crystallized amorphous magnetic alloy may be used in the electrode layers.
While the MTJ device according to various embodiments of the invention has been described, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to those specific embodiments and various other modifications, improvements and combinations are possible. For example, the height of the tunnel barrier may be adjusted by doping Ca or Sr, instead of introducing an oxygen vacancy defects to the MgO layer. Further, while the MgO layer has been described to be deposited by electron-beam evaporation or sputtering, it should be obvious that other deposition methods are also possible. The term “high vacuum” refers to values on the order of no more than 10−6 Pa in the case where oxygen is not introduced, for example. In the case where oxygen is introduced, the term refers to values on the order of 10−4 Pa.
In accordance with the invention, a larger magnetoresistance than in the conventional MTJ device can be obtained, and the output voltage of the MTJ device can be increased. At the same time, the resistance value of the MTJ device can be reduced so that it is optimized for MRAM. The invention thus enables the level of integration of MRAM using the MTJ device to be readily increased. In accordance with the invention, the output voltage value of the MRAM roughly doubles over prior art, making the MTJ device of the invention suitable for very large scale integrated MRAMs of gigabit class.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004-071186 | Mar 2004 | JP | national |
2004-313350 | Oct 2004 | JP | national |
The present application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/923,643 filed on Sep. 30, 2010, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/591,947 filed on Sep. 8, 2006, which is a National Stage Application of PCT/JP2005/004720 filed on Mar. 10, 2005. Priority is claimed from U.S. Ser. No. 12/923,643 filed on Sep. 30, 2010, which claims priority from U.S. application Ser. No. 10/591,947 filed on Sep. 8, 2006, which claims priority from PCT/JP2005/004720 filed on Mar. 10, 2005, which claims priority from Japanese Application Nos. 2004-313350 and 2004-071186 filed Oct. 28, 2004 and Mar. 12, 2004, respectively, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference into this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5506063 | Kamijo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514484 | Nashimoto | May 1996 | A |
5759265 | Nashimoto et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5817366 | Arai et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5945694 | Reyes et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6054226 | Takeda et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6181537 | Gill | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201672 | Pinarbasi | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6252750 | Gill | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275362 | Pinarbasi | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6379978 | Goebel et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6544801 | Slaughter et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6767655 | Hiramoto et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6828260 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831312 | Slaughter et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839206 | Saito et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6911685 | Anthony et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927952 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6999287 | Hayashi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7149105 | Brown | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7220498 | Nagahama et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7252852 | Parkin | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7262064 | Ohba et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7270896 | Parkin | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276384 | Parkin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7408749 | Gill | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7443639 | Parkin | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453672 | Dieny et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7570463 | Parkin | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7598555 | Papworth Parkin | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7884403 | Yuasa | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020064595 | Nomura et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020080641 | Asao et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020149962 | Horiguchi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159203 | Saito et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020191355 | Hiramoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030128483 | Kamijo | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040082201 | Sharma et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040136232 | Hosomi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139914 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144995 | Nagahama et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040234818 | Tanahashi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040245553 | Hosomi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257719 | Ohba et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050110004 | Parkin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050207071 | Sato et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060003185 | Parkin | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012926 | Parkin | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060056115 | Djayaprawira et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060125034 | Ohba et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060261425 | Suemitsu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070128470 | Nagahama et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070195592 | Yuasa | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070258170 | Yuasa | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080055793 | Djayaprawira et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062581 | Parkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080124454 | Djayaprawira et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080180862 | Djayaprawira et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080182342 | Parkin | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080212243 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253039 | Nagamine et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090128167 | Hamada et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090324814 | Parkin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 145 403 | Jun 1985 | EP |
1 061 592 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 085 586 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 494 295 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1 633 007 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 633 007 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 793 434 | Jun 2007 | EP |
H05-144729 | Jun 1993 | JP |
11-097766 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2000-030236 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2001-101645 | Apr 2001 | JP |
1 391 942 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-204004 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-246567 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-270790 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-270921 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-289943 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002-319722 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002-359413 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-86863 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003-283001 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003-304010 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003-304012 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2003-318465 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-022599 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-022599 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-063592 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-128015 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004-153258 | May 2004 | JP |
2006-080116 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2008-004956 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2002-0042448 | Jun 2002 | KR |
2003-0097904 | Dec 2003 | KR |
WO 0156090 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0299905 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2004025744 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2005088745 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 03085750 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report of PCT/JP2005/004720 mailed Jun. 21, 2005. |
Wolf, S.A. et al., “Spintronics: A Spin-Based Electronics Vision for the Future”, Science, vol. 294, Nov. 16, 2001, pp. 1488-1495. |
Wulfhekel, W. et al., “Single-Crystal Magnetotunnel Junctions”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78, No. 4, Jan. 22, 2001, pp. 509-511. |
Juluere, M., “Tunneling Between Ferromagnetic Films”, Physical Letters, vol. 54A, No. 3, Sep. 8, 1975, pp. 225-226. |
Soulen R.J., Jr. et al., “Measuring the Spin Polarization of a Metal with a Superconducting Point Contact”. Science, vol. 282, Oct. 2, 1998, pp. 85-88. |
Saito, Y. et al., “Correlation between Barrier Width, Barrier Height, and DC Bias Voltage Dependences on the Magnetoresistance Ratio in ir-Mn Exchange Biased Single and Double Tunnel Junctions”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 39 (2000), pp. L1035-L1038. |
Iura, S. et al., “Enhancement of Thermal Stability in Ferromagnetic Tunnel Junctions Prepared by the Radical Oxidation Method”, Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan, vol. 26, No. 6 (2002), pp. 839-842, abstract only in English. |
Bowen, M. et al., “Large Magnetoresistance in Fe/MgO/FeCo(001) Epitaxial Tunnel Junctions on GaAs(001)”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 11, Sep. 10, 2001, pp. 1655-1657. |
Simmons, John G., “Generalized Formula for the Electric Tunnel Effect between Similar Electrodes Separated by a thin Insulating Film”, Journal of Applied Physcis, vol. 34, No. 6, Jun. 1963, pp. 1793-1803. |
Vassent, J.L. et al., “A Study of Growth and the Relaxation of Elastic Strain in MgO on Fe(001)”, J. Appl. Phys. vol. 80, No. 10, Nov. 15, 1996, pp. 5727-5735. |
Faure-Vincent, J. et al., “High Tunnel Magnetoresistance in Expitaxial Fe/MgO/Fe Tunnel Junctins”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82, No. 25, Jun. 23, 2003, pp. 4507-4509. |
Meyerheim, H.L. et al., “Geometrical and Compositional Structure at Metal Oxide Interfaces: MgO on Fe(001)”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 18, No. 7, Aug. 13, 2001, pp. 0761021-1-076102-4. |
Butler, W.H., et al., “Spin-dependent Tunneling Conductance of Fe[MgO]Fe Sandwiches”, Physical Review B., vol. 63, 054416, 2001, pp. 054416-1-054416-12. |
Mathon, J. et al., “Theory of Tunneling Magnetoresistance of an Epitaxial Fe/MgO/Fe(001) Junction”, Physical Review B., vol. 63, 220403(R), 2001, pp. 220403-1-220403-4. |
Zhang, X.-G. et al., “Effects of the Iron-Oxide Layer in Fe-FeO-MgO-Fe Tunneling Junctions”, Physical Review B, vol. 68, 092402, 2003, pp. 092402-1-092402-4. |
Zhang, X.-G. et al., “Large Magnetoresistance in bcc Co/MgO/Co and FeCo/MgO/FeCo Tunnel Junctions”, Physical Review B., vol. 70, 172407, 2004, pp. 172407-1-172407-4. |
Gibson, A. et al., “Stabiltiy of Vacancy Defects in MgO: The role of Charge Neutrally”, Physical Review B., vol. 50, No. 4, Jul. 15, 1994-II, pp. 2582-2592. |
Yuasa, S. et al., “High Tunnel Magnetoresistance at Room Temperature in Fully Expitaxial Fe/MgO/Fe Tunnel Junctions Due to Coherent Spin-Polarized Tunneling”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 43, No. 4B, 2004, pp. L588-L590. |
Mitani, S., et al., “Fe/MgO/FeCo (100) Epitaxial Magnetic Tunnel Junctins Prepared by Using in situ Plasma Oxidation”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 93, No. 10, Parts 2 and 3, May 15, 2003, pp. 8041-8043. |
Popova, E., et al., “Epitaxial MgO Layer for Low-Resistance and Coupling-Free Magnetic Tunnel Junctions”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81, No. 6, Aug. 5, 2002, pp. 1035-1037. |
Boubeta C. Martinez, et al., “Magnetic Coupling in Epitaxial TM/MgO/Fe(001) (TM=FeCo, Fe/Co, Fe) Macroscopic and MicroscopicTrilayers”, Journal of Applied Physics, Vo. 94, No. 6, Sep. 15, 2003, pp. 4006-4012. |
Supplementary European Search Report from European Patent Office for Application No. 05720955.3 2222, Patent No. 1737065, PCT/JP2005004720 dated Jul. 2, 2008. |
Office Action from European Patent Office dated Nov. 6, 2009. |
F. Ernult et al., “Preparation of Nanometer-Scale Iron Dots on Insultating Layer”, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 4, (2003), pp. 383-389. |
David J. Smith et al., “Structural Characterization of Thin Film Ferromagnetic Tunnel Junctions”, Journal of Applied Physcis, vol. 83, No. 10, May 15, 1998, pp. 5154-5158. |
X. W. Li et al., “Fabrication of Properties of Heteroepitaxial Magnetite (Fe3O4) Tunnel Junctions”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, No. 22, Nov. 30, 1998, pp. 3282-3284. |
C. L. Platt, et al., “Spin Polarized Tunneling in Reactively Sputtered Tunnel Junctions”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 81, No. 8, Apr. 15, 1997, pp. 5523-5525. |
P. Turban et al., “Growth and Characterization of Single Crystalline NiMnSb Thin Films and Epitaxial NiMnSb/MgO/NiMnSb(001) Trilayers”, 2002 The American Physical Society, Physical Review B., vol. 65, pp. 134417-1-134417-13. |
T. Moriyama et al., “Preparation and Magnetoresistance in Single-Crystal and Polycrystal Fe/MgO/FeCo Tunnel Junctions”, The Physical Society of Japan, 2003 Spring meeting, Abstracts Book 58(1-3), 460, (Mar. 6, 2003). |
Jagadeesh S. Moodera et al., Ferromagnetic-Insulator-Ferromagnetic Tunneling: Spin-Dependent Tunneling and Large Magnetoresistance in Trilayer Junctions (invited), Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 79, No. 8, Apr. 15, 1996, pp. 4724-4729. |
Masayoshi Tonouchi et al., “Epitaxial Growth of NbN on an Ultrathin MgO/Semiconductor System”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 62, No. 3, Aug. 1, 1987, pp. 961-966. |
“Giant tunnel magnetoresistance in magnetic tunnel junctions with a crystalline MgO(001) barrier,” S. Yuasa and D.D. Djayaprawira, Journal of Applied Physics D: Applied Physics, 1 Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 (2007) R337-R354. |
Office Action issued from Japanese Patent Office, in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-226907, dated Jan. 31, 2012, pp. 1-3. |
Araki et al., “Fabrication and Electric Properties of Lapped Type of TMR Heads for˜50 Gb/In2 and Beyond,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 72-77, Jan. 2002. |
David D. Djayaprawira et al., “230% Room-Temperature Magnetoresistance in CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB, Magnetic Tunnel Junctions,” IEICE Technical Report, vol. 104, No. 713, Mar. 4, 2005. |
David D. Djayaprawira et al., “Novel Sputtering Technology of Magnetic Tunnel Junctions for MRAM Application,” Papers 01 the 66th Symposium on Semiconductors and Integrated Circuits Technology, vol. 66, pp. 58-61, 2004. |
H. Domon et al., “Effect of Ge Addition on Postannealed CoCrGePt Thin Film Media,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 91, No. 10, pp, 8632-8634, May 15, 2002. |
H. Domon et al. “Reduction of Magnetic Interaction in CoB/Pd Multilayer Perpendicular Media Using a Phase-Separated Pd-SiO Underlayer,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 93, No. 10, pp. 8164-8166, May 15, 2003. |
Extended European Search Report, issued from European Patent Office, of European Application No. 08159511.8, dated Jun. 5, 2009. |
T. Kakuta et al., “ Novel PVD Tool for Magnetoresistive Random Access Memory (MRAM) Mass Production,” Anelva Technical Report, vol. 10, pp, 27-33, Jan. 25, 2004. |
A. Kobayashi et al., “TMR Devices Fabricated with RIE Etching Using Co+NH3,” Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan, vol. 28, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2004. |
J.S. Moodera et al., “Large Magnetoresistance at Room Temperature in Ferromagnetic Thin Film Tunnel Junctions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 74, No. 16, pp. 3273-3276, Apr. 17, 1995. |
J.S. Moodera, “Interface Magnetism and Spin Wave Scattering in Ferromagnet-Insulator-Ferromagnet Tunnel Junctions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, No. 13, pp. 2941-2944, Mar. 30, 1998. |
J. Murai et al., “Direct Observation of Magnon Excitation in a Ferromagnetic Tunnel Junction Using Inelastic-Electron-Tunneling Spectroscopy,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 38, pp. L1106-L1108, Oct. 1, 1999. |
K. Nagasaka et al., “CPP Operational Mode of GMR Head,” Fujitsu Sci. Tech. J., vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 192-200, Dec. 2001. |
T. Osada et al., “Dry Etching of Magnetic Thin Film Stacks Using CO/NH3 and CH3OH Gases for Tunneling Magneto-Resistance Devices,” 2004 Dry Process International Symposium, vol. 4, pp. 127-131, 2004. |
Stuart S.P. Parkin et al.“Giant Tunnelling Magnetoresistance At Room Temperature with MgO (100) Tunnel Barriers,” Nature Materials, vol. 3, pp. 862-867, Dec. 2004. |
M. Takagishi et al., “The Applicability of CPP-GMR Heads for Magnetic Recording,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 2277-2282, Sep. 2002. |
A. Tanaka et al., “Spin-Valve Heads in the Current-Perpendicular-to-Plane Mode for Ultrahigh-Density Recording,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, No. 1, Jan. 2002. |
K. Tsunekawa et al., “Surface Treatment Techniques in Fabrication of GMR and TMR Films, ”Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan, vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 1074-1080, Nov. 1, 2004. |
D. Wang et al., “70% TMR at Room Temperature for SDT Sandwich Junctions With CoFeB as Free and Reference Layers,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 2270-2271, Jul. 2004. |
S. Yoshimura et al., “ Magnetic Grain Size Reduction by Using Oxygen Exposure Process Onto Very Thin Islandlike WCr Seedlayer in Longitudinal Recording Media,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 91, No. 10, pp. 8629-8631, May 15, 2002. |
S. Yoshimura et al. Grain Size Reduction by Utilizing A Very Thin, High-Melting-Point WCr Seedlayer in Longitudinal Media: Media Noise Reduction in High Hkgrain Media, vol. 25, No. 4-2, pp. 627-630 (2001). |
Yu et al., “Electron Transport Properties in Magnetic Tunnel Junctions with Epitaxial NiFe (111) Ferromagnetic Bottom Electrodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82, No. 26, pp. 4735-4737, Jun. 30, 2003. |
S. Yuasa et al. “Magnetic Tunnel Junctions With Single-Crystal Electrodes: A Crystal Anisotropy of Tunnel Magneto-Resistance,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 344-350 Nov. 1, 2000. |
S. Yuasa et al., “Giant Room-Temperature Magnetoresistance in Single-Crystal Fe/MgO/Fe Magnetic Tunnel Junctions,” Nature Materials vol. 3, pp. 868-871, Oct. 31, 2004. |
S. Yuasa et al., “Spin-Polarized Resonant Tunneling in Magnetic Tunnel Junctions,” Science, vol. 297, pp. 234-237, Jul. 12, 2002. |
S. Zhang et al. “Quenching of Magnetoresistance by Hot Electrons in Magnetic Tunnel Junctions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 79, No. 19, pp. 3744-3747, Nov. 10, 1997. |
David D. Djayaprawira et al., “230% Room-Temperature Magnetoresistance in CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB Magnetic Tunnel Junctions,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, 092502 (2005), doi: 10.1063/1.1871344, pp. 1-4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120161262 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12923643 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13400340 | US | |
Parent | 10591947 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12923643 | US |