This application is also related to and incorporates the following by reference in their entireties: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/931,771 to Tran et al., filed Aug. 31, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/934,778 to Abatchev et al., filed Sep. 2, 2004.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to masking techniques for semiconductor fabrication, and more particularly to masking techniques including pitch multiplication.
2. Description of the Related Art
As a consequence of many factors, including demand for increased portability, computing power, memory capacity and energy efficiency, integrated circuits are continuously being reduced in size. The sizes of the constituent features that form the integrated circuits, e.g., electrical devices and interconnect lines, are also constantly being decreased to facilitate this size reduction.
The trend of decreasing feature size is evident, for example, in memory circuits or devices such as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), flash memory, static random access memories (SRAMs), ferroelectric (FE) memories, etc. To take one example, DRAM typically comprises millions of identical circuit elements, known as memory cells. DRAM memory cells typically include two electrical devices: a storage capacitor and an access field effect transistor. Each memory cell is an addressable location that can store one bit (binary digit) of data. A bit can be written to a cell through the transistor and can be read by sensing charge in the capacitor. By decreasing the sizes of the electrical devices that constitute a memory cell and the sizes of the conducting lines that access the memory cells, the memory devices can be made smaller. Additionally, storage capacities can be increased by fitting more memory cells on a given area in the memory devices. Other examples of integrated circuit memories include MRAM (including magneto resistive elements), programmable fuse memories, programmable conductor memories (including metal-doped chalcogenide glass elements), SRAM, SDRAM, EEPROM and other volatile and non-volatile memory schemes.
Photolithography is commonly used to pattern features, such as conductive lines. The concept of pitch can be used to describe the sizes of these features. Pitch is defined as the distance between an identical point in two neighboring features. These features are typically defined by spaces between adjacent features. Spaces are typically filled by a material, such as an insulator. As a result, for regular patterns (e.g., in arrays) pitch can be viewed as the sum of the width of a feature and of the width of the space on one side of the feature separating that feature from a neighboring feature. However, due to factors such as optics and light or radiation wavelength, photolithography techniques each have a minimum pitch below which a particular photolithographic technique cannot reliably form features. Consequently, the minimum pitch of a photolithographic technique is an impediment to further feature size reduction.
“Pitch multiplication” or “pitch doubling” is one proposed method for extending the capabilities of photolithographic techniques beyond their minimum pitch. A pitch multiplication method is illustrated in
While the pitch is actually halved in the example above, this reduction in pitch is conventionally referred to as pitch “doubling,” or, more generally, pitch “multiplication.” Thus, conventionally, “multiplication” of pitch by a certain factor actually involves reducing the pitch by that factor. Pitch can thus be used in two converse senses: the distance between identical elements in a regular pattern and the number of features in a fixed linear distance. The conventional terminology is retained herein.
Because the layer 50 of spacer material typically has a single thickness 90 (see
The reduction in feature sizes through pitch doubling and the concomitant increase in the complexity of device features may be met with an increase in the number of processing steps in semiconductor fabrication, which may in turn effect an increase in the processing time. Thus, the reduction of features sizes may increase the costs associated with semiconductor fabrication. Accordingly, there is a need for methods of forming features of different sizes, especially where some features are formed below the minimum pitch of a photolithographic technique, while minimizing the number of processing steps and/or processing time, in addition to the costs associated with semiconductor fabrication.
The invention will be better understood from the Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments and from the appended drawings, which are meant to illustrate and not to limit the invention, and wherein:
Due to the continual reduction in feature sizes, pitch multiplication is being investigated as a means of reducing the dimensions of features on semiconductor devices. Complicated process flows associated with pitch multiplication (see below) and the processing time required to produce pitch multiplied features make this method expensive to repeat. Thus, there is a need for a methodology that offers the benefit of pitch multiplication (i.e. reduced features sizes) while precluding the drawbacks.
Imprint lithography, combined with pitch multiplication, has the potential for forming device features on semiconductor surfaces while substantially reducing the production cost of semiconductor fabrication. A method of forming templates for use in imprint lithography is described by U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/155,167 to Sandhu et al., filed Jun. 17, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Imprint lithography entails pressing a template comprising a pattern into a transfer layer overlying a substrate, more specifically a semiconductor device. The pattern on the template deforms the transfer layer to form a negative or inverse image of the pattern in the transfer layer. The template is subsequently removed, and an anisotropic etching process conveys the transfer layer pattern to the substrate.
The size of the features on the pattern and the corresponding features on the substrate are similar. Unlike photolithography, where a mask or reticle pattern is reduced substantially (e.g., 4×) in size when transferred to the surface of the semiconductor device, imprint lithography is considered a “1×” pattern transfer process because it provides no demagnification of the pattern on the template that is transferred to the semiconductor device. Hence, there is a one-to-one correspondence between the dimensions of the pattern on the template and the pattern on the semiconductor device. However, despite the advantages of imprint lithography, forming templates comprising high-resolution patterns by conventional photolithography poses an obstacle to the reduction of features sizes.
Pitch multiplication coupled with imprint lithography can overcome this obstacle. By using pitch multiplication and conventional photolithography without pitch multiplication to pattern features on a template, the practical application of imprint lithography in semiconductor fabrication is made possible.
In addition to problems with forming differently-sized features, it has been found that pitch multiplication techniques can encounter difficulty in transferring spacer patterns to a substrate. In common methods of transferring patterns, both the spacers and the underlying substrate are exposed to an etchant, which preferentially etches away the substrate material. The etchant, however, can also wear away the small spacers, albeit at a slower rate, and change the intended pattern dimensions. Thus, over the course of transferring a pattern to an underlying material, the etchant can wear away the spacers before the pattern transfer is complete. These difficulties are exacerbated by the trend towards decreasing feature size, which, for example, increasingly leads to the need to form trenches or spaces which have increasingly higher depth-to-width ratios. Thus, in conjunction with difficulties in producing structures having different feature sizes, pattern transfer limitations make the application of pitch multiplication principles to integrated circuit manufacturing even more difficult. In view of these difficulties, the preferred embodiment disclosed herein allows for improved pattern transfer and for the formation of differently sized features in conjunction with pitch multiplication.
A template including pitch multiplied and non-pitch multiplied features configured for use in imprint lithography is disclosed. The template includes a first pattern formed by pitch multiplication and second pattern formed using lithography (e.g., photolithography) without pitch multiplication. The topography of the first pattern and the second pattern on the template is preferably used to imprint features on a transfer layer overlying a second substrate during integrated circuit fabrication. As described in more detail below, bringing the template in contact with the transfer layer imprints the template pattern in the transfer layer. The pattern in the transfer layer is subsequently transferred to the second substrate through a series of etching steps. The pattern formed in the second substrate is a negative image of the pattern in the template.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, a template configured for use in imprint lithography including pitch multiplied and non-pitch multiplied features is formed by defining a first pattern using pitch multiplication and a second pattern using photolithography without pitch multiplication on a suitable substrate (e.g., silicon or quartz), conformally depositing a planar layer over the substrate comprising the first pattern and the second pattern, bonding a plate (e.g., quartz wafer) to the surface of the planar layer opposite the substrate and etching away the substrate, leaving the planar layer in contact with the plate, which define the template.
In a first phase of methods according to the preferred embodiment, a first pattern and a second pattern are defined separately in the array and periphery regions, respectively, and separately or simultaneously transferred to the substrate. This method, shown schematically in
Reference will now be made to the Figures, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout. It will be appreciated that these Figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. Furthermore, while the description below specifies particular materials, the skilled artisan will readily appreciate that other combinations of materials can be employed with fewer or greater number of hard mask layers as long as suitable selective etches are available for the transfer steps described.
With reference to
Next, the trenches 122 are preferably widened by isotropically etching (“shrink etch”) the photoresist lines 124 to form modified spaces 122a and lines 124a, as shown in
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
In a second phase of methods according to the preferred embodiment, a substantially planar layer is formed in contact with a substrate including pitch multiplied and non-pitch multiplied features.
With continued reference to
The methods and templates described herein can be advantageously applied to form features in an integrated circuit, and larger systems (e.g., computers) incorporating the same. For example, the first pattern 320 may define features of a shallow trench isolation (STI) structure or pattern, metal interconnect, control gate stack for a NAND flash memory, logic array, gate array or memory array. The methods are particularly advantageously applied to form devices having dense arrays of electrical devices or lines, including memory cell arrays for volatile and non-volatile memory devices, such as DRAM, ROM or flash memory, including NAND flash memory, or having logic or gate arrays. For example, the logic array can be a field programmable gate array (FPGA) having a core array similar to a memory array and a periphery with supporting logic circuitry. Consequently, the integrated circuit pattern 310 can be a pattern comprising, e.g., a memory chip or a processor, which can include both a logic array and embedded memory, or any other integrated circuit having a logic or a gate array.
The substrate 200 may be a wafer formed of an opaque material, such as silicon, ceramic, or a metal. Preferably a conventional silicon wafer is employed, although in other arrangements (see
With reference to
In a third phase of methods according to the preferred embodiment, a plate 430 is bonded to the planar surface of the transparent layer 410 through an adhesive layer 420 bonded to the planar layer 410 and the plate 430, as shown in
In the fourth phase of methods according to the preferred embodiment, the substrate 200 is removed from the transparent layer 410 to define the template 450, as shown in
With continued reference to
The combined pattern 550 in the template 450 may be collectively termed the “imprint pattern.” The imprint pattern 550 includes a plurality pitch multiplied and non-pitch multiplied features (represented by spaces, recesses or trenches in the template 450) of satisfactory size, configuration and orientation on the surface of the transparent layer 410. The non-pitch multiplied features may overlap the pitch multiplied features, and the degree of overlap may vary with application.
With reference to
With continued reference to
It will be appreciated that the material configured to produce the template can include material transparent to resist curing (e.g., UV) radiation, selected from the group including quartz, magnesium fluoride, titanium oxide, calcium fluoride, silicon oxide, silicon dioxide, polycarbonate, Pyrex® material, sapphire, silicon germanium carbon, gallium nitride, germanium, gallium arsenide, gate oxide, and mixtures and combinations thereof. In the preferred embodiment, the substrate material is a form of silicon oxide in the form of a quartz wafer.
In another embodiment, a template, such as that produced by the process of
With reference to
The transfer layer 850 overlying the substrate 810 may be applied to designated regions of the semiconductor device 800 using technology that is available to those skilled in the art. The layers discussed herein can be formed by various methods. For example, spin-on-coating processes can be used to form the transfer layer 850. Various vapor deposition processes, preferably a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process, can be used to form the protective layer 840, the hard mask layer 830 and the primary mask layer 820.
A preferred material for the primary mask layer 820 is amorphous carbon. In the preferred embodiment, the primary mask layer 820 comprises a material having good etch selectivity relative to the substrate 810, and vice versa, to allow for an effective transfer and later mask removal. The hard mask layer 830 is preferably preferentially etchable relative to the primary mask layer 820. The hard mask layer 830 is preferably formed of a material that can be deposited at low temperatures, preferably performed at less than about 550° C. and, more preferably, at less than about 450° C. and, most preferably, at less than about 400° C. The hard mask layer 830 is preferably formed of an inorganic material, with examples including silicon oxide (SiO2), a dielectric anti-reflective coating (DARC) (e.g., a silicon oxynitride), a silicon oxide or silicon. The protective layer 840 is preferably formed of an anti-reflecting coating (ARC), e.g., organic bottom anti-reflective coating (BARC).
As noted above, in common methods of transferring patterns, the mask and the underlying substrate are exposed to etchant, which can wear away a mask before the pattern transfer is complete. These difficulties are exacerbated where the substrate comprises multiple different materials to be etched. It is due to its excellent etch selectivity relative to a variety of materials, including oxides, nitrides and silicon, that the primary mask layer 820 is preferably formed of amorphous carbon and, more preferably, transparent carbon.
With continued reference to
With continued reference to
In the next phase of methods according to the preferred embodiment, the imprinted patterns 860 and 870 in the transfer layer 850 is transferred from the transfer layer 850 to the substrate 810 to define pitch multiplied and non-pitch multiplied features in the semiconductor device 800, as shown in
It will be appreciated that the “substrate” to which patterns 860 and 870 are transferred can include a layer of a single material, a plurality of layers of different materials, a layer or layers having regions of different materials or structures in them, etc. These materials can include semiconductors, insulators, conductors, or combinations thereof. For example, the substrate can comprise doped polysilicon, an electrical device active area, a silicide, or a metal layer, such as a tungsten, aluminum or copper layer, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the mask features can directly correspond to the desired placement of conductive features, such as interconnects, in the substrate 810. In other embodiments, the substrate 810 can be an insulator and the location of mask features can correspond to the desired location of insulators, such as in etching trenches of spaces in an insulator for damascene metallization. Examples of structures formed in the substrate include gate stacks and shallow trench isolation structures.
It will be understood that in common methods of transferring patterns, both the mask and the underlying substrate are exposed to an etchant, which preferentially etches away the substrate material. The etchants, however, also wear away the masking materials, albeit at a slower rate. Thus, over the course of transferring pattern, the mask can be worn away by the etchant before the pattern transfer is complete. In such cases, the primary masking layer 820 is desirable to prevent the mask pattern from being worn away before the pattern transfer complete.
Preferably, the primary masking layer 820 is the masking layer that directly overlies and, due to etch selectivity, is primarily used as the mask to pattern the substrate 810. In particular, the primary masking layer 820 is preferably formed of a material that allows good etch selectivity relative to both the immediately overlying hard mask layer 830 and the substrate material 810, thereby allowing: the imprinted patterns 860 and 870 to be effectively transferred to it; the primary masking layer 820 to be selectively removed without harming the substrate; and the imprinted patterns 860 and 870 to be effectively transferred to the substrate 810. It will be appreciated that a material is considered selectively, or preferentially, etched when the etch rate for that material is at least about 2-3 times greater, preferably at least about 10 times greater, more preferably at least about 20 times greater and, most preferably, at least about 40 times greater than that for surrounding materials.
In addition to selecting appropriate materials for the various layers, the thicknesses of the layers 820-850 are preferably chosen depending upon compatibility with the etch chemistries and process conditions described herein. For example, when transferring a pattern from an overlying layer to an underlying layer by selectively etching the underlying layer, materials from both layers are removed to some degree. Thus, the overlying layer is preferably thick enough so that it is not worn away over the course of the etch of the underlying layer. The selected thickness, of course, depends in part on the level of selectivity of the etch chemistry.
In any of the steps described herein, transferring the imprinted patterns 860 and 870 from an overlying level to an underlying level involves forming features in the underlying level that generally correspond to features in the overlying level. For example, the path of lines in the underlying level will generally follow the path of lines in the overlying level and the location of other features in the underlying level will correspond to the location of similar features in the overlying level. The precise shapes and sizes of features can vary from the overlying level to the underlying level, however. For example, depending upon etch chemistries and conditions, the sizes of and relative spacings between the features forming the transferred pattern can be enlarged or diminished relative to the pattern on the overlying level, while still resembling the same initial “pattern.” Thus, even with some changes in the dimensions of the features, the transferred pattern is still considered to be the same pattern as the initial pattern.
In the illustrated embodiment, the transfer layer 850 is formed of a UV curable photoresist material, the protective layer 840 is formed of bottom anti-reflective coating (BARC), the hard mask layer 830 is formed of dielectric anti-reflective coating (DARC), the primary mask layer 820 is formed of amorphous carbon and the substrate 810 is formed of silicon, preferably in the form of a silicon wafer.
With reference to
With reference to
In some cases, performing an etch through the transfer layer 850 can result in polymerization of the transfer layer 850 material. This polymerization can leave deposits around pattern features, thereby distorting features of the imprinted patterns 860 and 870. This distortion can be particularly problematic given the small pitches for which pitch multiplication is typically used. As a result, after etching the imprinted patterns 860 and 870 into the hard mask layer 830, a cleaning step may be performed to remove the transfer layer 850 and protective layer 840, and any polymerized transfer layer 850 material. If the protective layer 840 and the transfer layer 850 are made of an organic material and the hard mask layer is made of an inorganic material, as in the illustrated embodiment, the transfer layer 850 and the protective layer 840 are removed using, e.g., an isotropic etch with O2 plasma. Because the transfer layer 850, the protective layer 840 and the underlying primary mask layer 820 are preferably all carbon-based materials, this cleaning step can undesirably etch the primary mask layer 820. This is especially a concern where the cleaning is accomplished using an isotropic etch, which can etch the primary mask layer 820 uncontrollably and typically does not form well-defined features. Thus, an additional hard mask layer (not shown) underlying the hard mask layer 830 may be used to protect the primary mask layer 820 during the cleaning step.
With reference to
With reference to
Where the substrate 810 comprises layers of different materials, a succession of different chemistries, preferably dry-etch chemistries, can be used to successively etch through the different layers. It will be appreciated that, depending upon the chemistry or chemistries used, the hard mask layer 830 may be etched, as shown in
With reference to
Thus, imprinted patterns 860 and 870, which include pitch multiplied and non-pitch multiplied features, respectively, are formed on the substrate 810. The imprinted patterns 860 and 870 in the substrate 810 are negative images of the patterns 760 and 770, respectively, in the template 750. Further, the imprinted patterns 860 and 870 in the substrate 810 are positive images of the pattern 320 and 330, respectively, in the first substrate 200. Since portions of the non-pitch multiplied features can overlap the pitch multiplied features, and the degree of overlap can vary depending on application, overlapping features of different sizes on both sides of the photolithographic limit, such as conducting lines and landing pads or periphery transistors can advantageously be formed on a semiconductor device 800.
In addition, the preferred embodiment can be employed multiple times throughout an imprint lithography process to form a plurality of patterns in or on a semiconductor wafer, e.g., at different levels. The plurality of patterns can be configured to produce memory cell arrays for volatile and non-volatile memory devices such as DRAM, ROM or flash memory, including NAND flash memory, or integrated circuits having logic or gate arrays.
Thus, according to one aspect, a template is provided for use in imprint lithography. The template includes a first pattern comprising pitch multiplied features and a second pattern comprising non-pitch multiplied features.
According to another aspect, a method is provided for forming a template for use in imprint lithography. The method comprises forming a first mask with pitch multiplication over a substrate, the first mask defining a first pattern. A second mask is formed separately by photolithography over the substrate, the second mask defining a second pattern. The first pattern and the second pattern are transferred to the substrate. The first pattern and the second pattern are transferred from the substrate to the template configured for use in imprint lithography.
According to yet another aspect, a method is provided for imprinting a pattern using a template in imprint lithography. The method comprises forming a first mask by pitch multiplication over a first substrate, the first mask defining a first pattern. A second mask is separately formed by photolithography over the first substrate, the second mask defining a second pattern. The first pattern and the second pattern are transferred to the first substrate. The first pattern and the second pattern are transferred from the first substrate to a template. The first pattern and the second pattern in the template are imprinted into a transfer layer overlying a second substrate. The first pattern and the second pattern are transferred from the transfer layer overlying the second substrate to the second substrate.
According to yet another aspect, a method is provided for imprinting a pattern using a template in imprint lithography. The method comprises providing a template including two patterns, wherein at least one of the patterns is pitch multiplied. The first pattern and the second pattern in the template are imprinted into a transfer layer overlying a substrate. The first pattern and the second pattern are transferred from the transfer layer overlying the substrate to the substrate.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various other omissions, additions and modifications may be made to the methods and structures described above without departing from the scope of the invention. All such modifications and changes are intended to fall within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4234362 | Riseman | Nov 1980 | A |
4419809 | Riseman et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4432132 | Kinsbron et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4502914 | Trumpp et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508579 | Goth et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4648937 | Ogura et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4716131 | Okazawa et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4776922 | Bhattacharyya et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4838991 | Cote et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5013680 | Lowrey et al. | May 1991 | A |
5053105 | Fox, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5117027 | Bernhardt et al. | May 1992 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330879 | Dennison | Jul 1994 | A |
5470661 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5514885 | Myrick | May 1996 | A |
5593813 | Kim | Jan 1997 | A |
5670794 | Manning | Sep 1997 | A |
5753546 | Koh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5789320 | Andricacos et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795830 | Cronin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5830332 | Babich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5899746 | Mukai | May 1999 | A |
5998256 | Juengling | Dec 1999 | A |
6004862 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010946 | Hisamune et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6042998 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057573 | Kirsch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060383 | Nogami et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063688 | Doyle et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071789 | Yang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110837 | Linliu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143476 | Ye et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6207490 | Lee et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211044 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6288454 | Allman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291334 | Somekh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297554 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335257 | Tseng | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348380 | Weimer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362057 | Taylor, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372649 | Han et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383907 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395613 | Juengling | May 2002 | B1 |
6423474 | Holscher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455372 | Weimer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6500756 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514884 | Maeda | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522584 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531067 | Shiokawa et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534243 | Templeton | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548396 | Naik et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559017 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566280 | Meagley et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602779 | Li et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6632741 | Clevenger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638441 | Chang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6667237 | Metzler | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673684 | Huang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686245 | Mathew et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689695 | Lui et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706571 | Yu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709807 | Hallock et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730571 | Chan et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6734107 | Lai et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744094 | Forbes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6773998 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6835662 | Erhardt et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6867116 | Chung | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875703 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6893972 | Rottstegge et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6924191 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955961 | Chung | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962867 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7015124 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7074668 | Park et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7084076 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7183205 | Hong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183597 | Doyle | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7208379 | Venugopal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7271107 | Marks et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288445 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291560 | Parascandola et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7537866 | King Liu | May 2009 | B2 |
7687408 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20020042198 | Bjarnason et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045308 | Juengling | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063110 | Cantell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068243 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094688 | Mitsuiki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020127810 | Nakamura | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030006410 | Doyle | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030044722 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030090002 | Sugawara et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109102 | Kujirai et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119307 | Bekiaris et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127426 | Chang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157436 | Manger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030207207 | Li | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207584 | Sivakumar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215978 | Maimon et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216050 | Golz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030230234 | Nam et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000534 | Lipinski | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017989 | So | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018738 | Liu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023475 | Bonser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023502 | Tzou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043623 | Liu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053475 | Sharma | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079988 | Harari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106257 | Okamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040235255 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050074949 | Jung et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087892 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050112886 | Asakawa et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142497 | Ryou | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153562 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167394 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186705 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050230882 | Watts et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050272259 | Hong | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003182 | Lane et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024940 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024945 | Kim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046161 | Yin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046200 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046201 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046422 | Tran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046484 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083996 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060115978 | Specht | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172540 | Marks et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189150 | Jung | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211260 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216923 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231900 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234138 | Fehlhaber et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261392 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263699 | Abatchev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267075 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273456 | Sant et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018345 | Chao | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026672 | Tang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045712 | Haller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048674 | Wells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049011 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049030 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049032 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049035 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049040 | Bai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050748 | Juengling | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070200178 | Yun et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210449 | Caspary et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215874 | Furukawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215960 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070275309 | Liu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080011998 | Lung | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080054350 | Breitwisch et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090258492 | Sant et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 36 609 | May 1994 | DE |
0227303 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0491408 | Jun 1992 | EP |
1357433 | Oct 2003 | EP |
57-048237 | Mar 1982 | JP |
05343370 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H8-55908 | Feb 1996 | JP |
H8-55920 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2004-152784 | May 2004 | JP |
1999-0001440 | Jan 1999 | KR |
1999-027887 | Apr 1999 | KR |
376582 | Dec 1999 | TW |
WO 9415261 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 02099864 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2004001799 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004003977 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2005034215 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006026699 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070261016 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |