Material detection in x-ray security screening

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12019035
  • Patent Number
    12,019,035
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 16, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 25, 2024
    8 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Rapiscan Holdings, Inc. (Hawthorne, CA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Osinski; Michael S
    Agents
    • Novel IP
Abstract
A method for detecting the maximum potential presence of a material in an object. The method includes obtaining raw x-ray image data comprising a plurality of pixels for the object from an X-ray scanning device, wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels has associated therewith an attenuation value and an effective atomic number (Zeff) for the pixel. The method further includes converting, for each pixel having a Zeff value greater than a threshold effective atomic number (Zeff-threshold), the Zeff at the pixel to the Zeff-threshold while applying a correction factor to the attenuation value for the pixel to bring the attenuation value into correspondence with the conversion of the Zeff value for the pixel and determining a maximum potential amount of the material present at each pixel based on the corrected attenuation value at the pixel. This renders material more apparent in visual display.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to a system and method for material detection in x-ray security screening. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a system and method for detecting the presence of organic materials, such as explosives, in x-ray security screening.


BACKGROUND

X-ray inspection systems are used for detecting threats (e.g., explosives, drugs or other potentially dangerous materials) in cargo, baggage and parcels in airports, ports and other check-points. The images produced by the X-ray machines are used to detect potential threats either visually by operator analysis, or automatically using software algorithms. However, cargo and baggage are often cluttered and layered with various objects. In the resultant X-ray images, it may be difficult for a human operator reviewing the information produced by an x-ray scanning operation to distinguish an organic material from other overlaying or underlaying inorganic materials like metals. Many objects and materials of interest are organic in nature. Some examples may include explosive materials. In other instances, the material of interest in x-ray screening images may be metals, such as Aluminum. Therefore, providing information to human operators which makes the presence of a material of interest more apparent in cluttered bags is still a challenge.


X-ray systems with image processing functionalities like inorganic stripping (organic only) mode and effective atomic number-based coloration have been developed to help address this problem. However, these methods only show the organic material that is present and reliably detected and accordingly is not necessarily very apparent to a human operator reviewing the information. For example, a very thin layer of organic material may be very difficult to distinguish without further processing to enhance coloration. Explosive detection algorithms have also been created to enhance automated detection of explosives and other threats. Other solutions include using computed tomography (CT) scanners for detection of explosives. However, these tend to be more expensive as compared to X-ray scanners.


It is therefore desired to have an X-ray screening system that allows an operator to visually see if an image region contains a material of interest and therefore a potential threat.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure generally relates to a system and method for material detection in x-ray security screening. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a system and method for detecting the presence of organic materials, such as explosives, in an x-ray security screening.


In one aspect, there is provided a method for detecting the presence of a material in an object. The method includes obtaining raw x-ray image data for the object from an X-ray scanning device, the raw x-ray image data comprising a plurality of pixels, wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels has associated therewith an attenuation value and an effective atomic number (Zeff) value, and converting, for each pixel having a Zeff value greater than a threshold effective atomic number (Zeff-threshold), the Zeff at the pixel to the Zeff-threshold while applying a correction factor to the attenuation value for the pixel to bring the attenuation value into correspondence with the conversion of the Zeff value for the pixel. The method further includes determining a maximum potential amount of material present at each pixel based on the corrected attenuation value at the pixel.


The method may further include the step of generating an image showing the maximum potential amount of the material that is present at each pixel of the image. In a further aspect, the image may be visually displayed to a human operator. This information makes the presence of the material more apparent and therefore makes it easier to identify potential threats.


In one aspect, the method includes the step of determining the Zeff-threshold value based on an effective atomic number of a calibration material. In a further aspect, the material to be detected is an organic material and the calibration material is plexiglass. In another aspect, the material to be detected is an inorganic material like aluminum and the calibration material is aluminum.


In one aspect, when the Zeff value of a pixel is converted to the Zeff-threshold, the correction factor applied to the attenuation value of the pixel is based on a difference between the Zeff at the pixel and the Zeff-threshold. The correction factor can be obtained from a look-up table storing attenuation values and Zeff values for various material overlaps. The corrected attenuation value of a pixel is used to identify the maximum amount of the material that maybe present at the pixel.


In another aspect, there is provided a system for detecting the presence of a material in an object. The system includes an x-ray scanning device for obtaining raw x-ray image data, the raw x-ray image data comprising a plurality of pixels, wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels has associated therewith an attenuation value and an effective atomic number (Zeff) for the pixel. The system further includes at least one processor configured to convert, for each pixel having a Zeff value greater than a threshold effective atomic number (Zeff-threshold), the Zeff at the pixel to the Zeff-threshold while applying a correction factor to the attenuation value for the pixel to bring the attenuation value into correspondence with the conversion of the Zeff value for the pixel, and determine a maximum potential amount of the material that is present at each pixel based on the corrected attenuation value at the pixel.


The processor may be further configured to generate an image showing the maximum amount of the material that is present at each pixel of the image. In a further aspect, the processor is further configured to provide the image to a display. This visual display of the image makes the presence of the material more apparent and therefore makes it easier to identify potential threats.


In another aspect, there is provided a method for enhancing a display of raw x-ray image data of an object to identify if a region of the object contains organic material. The method includes obtaining the raw x-ray image data of the object, wherein the raw image data comprises a plurality of pixels, and wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels has associated therewith an attenuation value and an effective atomic number (Zeff), converting, for each pixel having a Zeff value greater than a threshold effective atomic number for the organic material (Zeff-threshold), the Zeff at the pixel to the Zeff-threshold while applying a correction factor to the attenuation value for the pixel to bring the attenuation value into correspondence with the conversion of the Zeff value for the pixel, and displaying an image of the object showing a maximum potential amount of the organic material present at each pixel based on the corrected attenuation value of the pixel.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Exemplary non-limiting embodiments are described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is an illustration of an exemplary x-ray scanning device which may be used in accordance with the invention;



FIG. 2 is a diagram representation of a system which may be used in one aspect of the invention;



FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a material detection process according to one aspect of the invention;



FIG. 4A is top view of an original x-ray image generated in accordance with one aspect of the invention; and,



FIG. 4B is top view of a modified x-ray image generated in accordance with one aspect of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure generally relates to a system and method for material detection in x-ray security screening. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a system and method for detecting the presence of organic materials, such as explosives, in an x-ray security screening.


According to the aspect shown in FIG. 1, there is provided an exemplary x-ray scanning device 100. The x-ray scanning device 100 includes a housing 102 having openings 104 at either end thereof. The openings 104 provide access to a scanning chamber 106 passing through the housing 102. The system 100 may further include a displacement assembly 108, such as a conveyor, which extends through the scanning chamber 106 and which may be used to displace at least one object of interest to be scanned using the x-ray scanning device 100. The x-ray scanning device 100 further includes a source assembly 110. The source assembly 110 includes a source (not shown) for emitting electromagnetic radiation such as x-rays, a source assembly housing 112 at least partially enclosing the source, a pedestal 114 to which the source assembly housing 112 is mounted and a collimator 116 mounted to the source assembly housing 112 for directing x-rays emitted from the source. Collimator 116 may for example be a fan-shaped collimator for directing the x-rays in a fan-shaped beam. However, collimator 116 may be of any suitable shape and not only fan-shaped.


The x-ray scanning device 100 may further include a group of detectors including at least one detector 120 and preferably a plurality of detectors 120 each mounted to the bracket 122. In one aspect, the bracket is an L-shaped bracket which is positioned within the scanning chamber 106 such that the plurality of detectors 120 are mounted at least partially about the scanning chamber 106. In the aspect shown in FIG. 1 there is shown mounted within the scanning chamber a single bracket 122. In other aspects, the scanning chamber may include more than one bracket positioned within the scanning chamber and that the brackets do not have to have same orientation or angular position. It should be further understood that the bracket 122 does not have to be L-shaped. Rather, the bracket 122 may be linear or arc shaped or any other suitable shape.


In some embodiments, each detector 120 includes a detector card having a center point and edges. The center point corresponds to the geometric center of the detector cards. The edges of each detector card define the boundaries of the detector 120.


As shown in FIG. 2, each detector 120 may comprise a first scintillator 202, a filter 204 and a second scintillator 206. All of these may be sandwiched together as shown in FIG. 2 or may be otherwise suitably arranged. In a scanning operation, broad-spectrum x-rays are emitted by the source and are directed by the collimator 116 toward the plurality of detectors 120 within the scanning chamber 106. In the case of each detector 120, a plurality of the emitted x-rays encounters the first scintillator 202 which may be configured to detect the lower portion of the emitted x-ray signal spectrum. Residual low energy x-ray signals may then be stopped by the filter 204 and remaining x-ray signals from the emitted x-rays reach the second scintillator 206 which may be configured to detect a higher portion of the x-ray signal spectrum.


With further reference to FIG. 2, in one aspect, each of the scintillators 202, 206 converts the detected x-ray energy to light. Each of these scintillators 202, 206 is coupled with a photodiode 208 which captures the light from the respective scintillator 202, 206 and generates a corresponding analog electric signal, such as a photo current signal. The electric signal is further digitized by a converter 210. The digitized signal value is associated with a pixel of an image for providing a visual representation of a portion of an object within the scanning volume being scanned. The detectors thus measure to what degree the x-ray signal has attenuated due to passing through a defined inspection volume.


In the conversion of the light into an electric signal by the photodiodes 208, some uncertainties may be introduced in that a given light source may result in different electric signals since every detector card reacts slightly differently to the presence or absence of the electromagnetic radiation of an x-ray. In order to correct these variations and for the final image to appear more homogenously, each pixel of the image may be normalized by correcting an offset and gain in the light conversion. Such a normalization procedure may be executed for example using a normalization module 212 as shown in FIG. 2 in order to compensate for slight variations in offset and gain for each detector, as well as for estimating the expected uncertainties in the low-energy and high-energy signals and/or attenuation for each detector.


Detectors 120 and the x-ray scanning device 100 may be linked to one or more local central processing units (CPU) 200 or other local processing device coupled with the x-ray scanning device 100 via a suitable communication means such as input port 203. Thereby, x-ray signals detected by the detectors 120 may be analyzed locally using, for example, analysis module 214a. The information output from the analysis module 214a may be output locally. Such output may include output of an image to a display 228 for review by security personnel or to a suitable data storage volume, database or preferably data management system 226. Alternatively, the CPU may be configured to provide the x-ray scanning data to a remote location or cloud system for remote analysis 214b, via a suitable communication means, such as a network connection, for processing and may be further configured to receive from the remote location 214b the processed information sent back to the x-ray scanning device or a computer or monitor operably coupled therewith.


The detected x-ray energy signals resulting from the steps described above, once digitized, provide one or more raw x-ray image data sets which can be displayed in graphical form and can be recognized by a human technician as indicating the presence of particular structures representing a specific class of objects or materials in the object.


In another aspect, the x-ray scanning device 100 may include a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detector. CZT detectors are designed with a thin layer of metal deposited on the detector surfaces to act as electrodes. These electrodes allow the CZT detectors to be electrically biased to creating an electrical potential across the detector. CZT detectors can directly convert x-rays into electrons and provide high detection efficiency and the capability of multi-energy imaging.



FIG. 3 is a flowchart summarizing the operational process 300 of one aspect of the invention. In a first step 302, an object is scanned using an x-ray scanning device. In one aspect, the object may be scanned using the x-ray scanning device 100 described above with reference to FIG. 1. At step 304, raw x-ray image data, is generated from scanning the object. In one aspect, the raw x-ray data images may be produced by performing an x-ray scanning operation on an object using an x-ray scanning device, for example, in the manner described above with reference to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2.


The raw x-ray image data sets are made up of a plurality of pixels. Each pixel in the plurality of pixels has associated therewith an attenuation value and an effective atomic number (Zeff) value. The attenuation value of a pixel, among other factors, represents the reduction in intensity of an x-ray beam as it traverses the matter present in the object being scanned. The attenuation value can vary depending on the type and thickness of the matter through which the x-ray beam passes. The Zeff value associated with a pixel represents the effective atomic number of the various materials composing the object through which the x-ray beam passes. Zeff values vary for different types of materials. For instance, organic materials like food, clothing, explosives and other toxic materials have lower Zeff values while inorganic materials like metals have higher Zeff values. The attenuation values and Zeff values associated with each pixel are identified at step 304.


At step 306, the Zeff values associated with each pixel in the raw data image is compared with a threshold effective atomic number for a material of interest (Zeff-threshold). The threshold effective atomic number can be predetermined prior to method 300 or determined as a precursor to step 306.


For every pixel having a Zeff value lower than the Zeff-threshold value, the attenuation value of the pixel is representative of the potential maximum amount of the material of interest present in that region of the object. Since the attenuation value of the pixel is already representative of the potential maximum amount of the material of interest present in that region of the object, no transformation or correction is required at that pixel.


For every image pixel having a Zeff value greater than the Zeff-threshold value, the attenuation value of the pixel may represent contribution from the x-ray passing through different types of materials. It would be advantageous to convert the signal at pixels having a Zeff value greater than the Zeff-threshold value, to show the potential contribution from the x-ray passing through only a material of interest. This would allow for an improved detection of the material of interest in an object.


At step 308, to identify the maximum potential contribution to the signal from only the material of interest, for every image pixel having a Zeff value greater than the Zeff-threshold value, the Zeff value is converted to the Zeff-threshold while simultaneously applying a correction factor to correct the attenuation value of the pixel. The attenuation value is corrected based on a difference between Zeff and Zeff-threshold (ΔZeff). The correction factor to be applied is a function of attenuation and Zeff of the overlapping materials. The correction factor for different material overlaps may be predetermined and stored for retrieval during the operation described herein. Such storage may, for example, take the form of one or more lookup tables created through repeated scanning of reference materials. The reference materials may include various combinations of organic and inorganic materials, organic materials only or inorganic materials only. In one instance, the reference materials used include plexiglass, aluminum, and steel. Preferably, the lookup tables store attenuation values and effective atomic number values for a wide variety of organic material and inorganic material overlaps. Thereby, the x-ray signal information for a variety of organic and inorganic material overlaps may be easily retrieved during an image raw data processing or enhancement operation.


At step 310, the corrected attenuation value for each pixel is used to determine the potential maximum amount or thickness of the material of interest that is present at each pixel. In a preferred aspect, an image may then be generated representing the potential maximum amount of the material of interest that is present at each pixel. If no material of interest is present in a given region of the object, then the corresponding image pixel will be blank. If the material of interest is present in a given region of the object, the potential maximum amount, or thickness, of the material of interest can be determined from the corrected attenuation value of the pixel. For a region of the object having a higher amount of the material of interest, the corresponding pixel may be darker or more intensely colored as compared to a pixel for a region of the object having a lower amount of the material of interest. Displaying this information as an image allows a human operator to make a visual assessment as to which areas of an image, and hence a scanned object, may have a higher likelihood of containing the material of interest.


In a preferred embodiment, the material of interest is an organic material. The Zeff-threshold value for organic materials may be set using an organic material having a low Zeff value as a calibration material. In a preferred aspect, for detection of the presence of organic materials, plexiglass may be used as the calibration material to determine the Zeff-threshold value. The look-up tables may be created using plexiglass as a calibration material in combination with an inorganic material such as steel as the reference material. To identify the maximum potential contribution to the signal from only organic materials, for every image pixel having a Zeff value greater than the Zeff-threshold value, the Zeff value is converted to the Zeff-threshold while simultaneously applying a correction factor to correct the attenuation value of the pixel. When the correction factor is applied to the attenuation value for each pixel, the signal contribution from the inorganic material is removed and the corrected attenuation value represents the signal contribution from the organic material alone. In a physical sense, the signal contribution of the organic material at each pixel represents the maximum potential amount of organic material that may be present at that location in the scanned object. It should be noted that the corrected attenuation value determines the maximum amount of organic material that may be present at each pixel and not the actual amount of organic material present, which may be lower.


In another embodiment, the material of interest may be an inorganic material such as aluminum. The Zeff-threshold value for detecting the presence of aluminum can be set using aluminum as a calibration material. The look-up tables may be created using aluminum as a calibration material in combination with an inorganic material such as steel as the reference material. To identify the maximum potential contribution to the signal from aluminum, for every image pixel having a Zeff value greater than the Zeff-threshold value, the Zeff value is converted to the Zeff-threshold while simultaneously applying a correction factor to correct the attenuation value of the pixel. When the correction factor is applied to the attenuation value for each pixel, the corrected attenuation value represents the signal contribution from aluminum alone. In a physical sense, the signal contribution from aluminum at each pixel represents the maximum potential amount of aluminum that may be present at that location in the scanned object. It should be noted that the corrected attenuation value determines the maximum amount of aluminum that may be present at each pixel and not the actual amount of aluminum present, which may be lower.


In a preferred aspect, an image may then be generated representing the potential maximum amount of the material of interest that is present at each pixel. If no material of interest is present in a given region of the object, then the corresponding image pixel will be blank. If the material of interest is present in a given region of the object, the potential maximum amount, or thickness, of the material of interest can be determined from the corrected attenuation value of the pixel. For a region of the object having a higher amount of the material of interest, the corresponding pixel may be darker or more intensely colored as compared to a pixel for a region of the object having a lower amount of the material of interest. Displaying this information as an image allows a human operator to make a visual assessment as to which areas of an image, and hence a scanned object, may have a higher likelihood of containing the material of interest. In a still preferred aspect, the material of interest is an organic material and displaying an image showing the maximum potential amount of organic material that may be present at each pixel visually illustrates the areas in an object where an organic material may be present. Thereby, the operator can focus on specific areas of an image pixel or region which are more likely to potentially conceal a threat, for example, an explosive material.



FIG. 4A depicts a top view of an x-ray image generated as described above with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2. An object is passed though the x-ray scanning device 100 of FIG. 1 to generate an image 400 of the object. FIG. 4A illustrates a cluttered region 410 of the image that makes detection of potential threats difficult as the organic material cannot be clearly distinguished from the other materials that superimpose or underlay the organic material.



FIG. 4B depicts a top view of a modified x-ray image 500 of an object of interest obtained from the process 300 as described above with regard to FIG. 3. FIG. 4B illustrates that maximum amount of the organic material that may be present in each region of the image 500 of the object of interest. If a pixel is blank, then no organic material is present. If organic material is present, the potential maximum amount (thickness) can be determined from the corrected attenuation value. In one example, region 510 in FIG. 4B depicts a region with a greater amount of organic material that may be present as compared to the rest of the image. Presenting this additional image information to operators of x-ray scanning devices can greatly help them in identifying potential threat regions in an object. In another aspect, this image information can also be directly used by an automated threat detection algorithm with an image processing functionality that can highlight these regions for operator review.


While the invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, it is apparent that other forms could be adopted by one skilled in the art. For example, the methods described herein could be performed in a manner which differs from the embodiments described herein. The steps of each method could be performed using similar steps or steps producing the same result, but which are not necessarily equivalent to the steps described herein. Some steps may also be performed in different order to obtain the same result. Similarly, the apparatuses and systems described herein could differ in appearance and construction from the embodiments described herein, the functions of each component of the apparatus could be performed by components of different construction but capable of a similar though not necessarily equivalent function, and appropriate materials could be substituted for those noted. Accordingly, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described herein. It should also be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed above are for the purpose of disclosing the illustrated embodiments, and do not necessarily serve as limitations to the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for detecting a presence of a material in an object, the method comprising: obtaining x-ray image data of the object from an X-ray scanning device, the x-ray image data comprising a plurality of pixels, wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels has associated therewith an attenuation value and an effective atomic number (Zeff) value;for each pixel having a Zeff value greater than a threshold effective atomic number (Zeff-threshold), converting the Zeff value associated with the pixel to the Zeff-threshold;for each pixel having said Zeff value greater than said threshold effective atomic number (Zeff-threshold), applying a correction factor to the attenuation value associated with the pixel to generate a corrected attenuation value; and,determining a maximum potential amount of the material present at each pixel based on the corrected attenuation value at the pixel.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: determining the Zeff-threshold based on an effective atomic number of a calibration material.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the material is an organic material, and wherein the calibration material is plexiglass.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the material is aluminum, and wherein the calibration material is aluminum.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: generating an image showing the maximum potential amount of the material that is present at each pixel of the image.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of: providing the image to a display.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the correction factor is based on a difference between the Zeff at the pixel and the Zeff-threshold.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the correction factor is obtained from a look-up table comprising attenuation values and Zeff values for various material overlaps.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the material is an inorganic material.
  • 10. A system for detecting a presence of material in an object, the system comprising: an x-ray scanning device for obtaining x-ray image data for the object, the x-ray image data comprising a plurality of pixels, wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels has associated therewith an attenuation value and an effective atomic number (Zeff) value; andat least one processor configured to: for each pixel having a Zeff value greater than a threshold effective atomic number (Zeff-threshold), applying a correction factor to the attenuation value associated with the pixel to generate a corrected attenuation value; anddetermine a maximum potential amount of material present at each pixel based on the corrected attenuation value at the pixel.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one processor is configured to determine the Zeff-threshold based on an effective atomic number of a calibration material.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the material is an organic material, and wherein the calibration material is plexiglass.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the material is aluminum, and wherein the calibration material is aluminum.
  • 14. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to generate an image showing the maximum potential amount of the material that is present at each pixel of the image.
  • 15. The system of claim 13, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to provide the image to a display.
  • 16. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one processor is configured to determine the correction factor based on a difference between the Zeff value at the pixel and the Zeff-threshold.
  • 17. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one processor is configured to obtain the correction factor using a look-up table comprising attenuation values and Zeff values.
  • 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the material is an inorganic material.
  • 19. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to convert the Zeff value at the pixel to the Zeff-threshold for each pixel having the Zeff value greater than the Zeff-threshold.
  • 20. A method for enhancing a display of x-ray image data of an object to identify if a region of the object contains organic material, the method comprising: obtaining the x-ray image data of the object, wherein the image data comprises a plurality of pixels, and wherein each pixel of the plurality of pixels has associated therewith an attenuation value and an effective atomic number (Zeff) value;converting, for each pixel having a Zeff value greater than a threshold effective atomic number for organic material (Zeff-threshold), the Zeff value at the pixel to the Zeff-threshold while applying a correction factor to the attenuation value for the pixel to bring the attenuation value into correspondence with the conversion of the Zeff value for the pixel; anddisplaying an image of the object showing a maximum potential amount of the organic material present at each pixel based on the corrected attenuation value of the pixel.
US Referenced Citations (342)
Number Name Date Kind
4020346 Dennis Apr 1977 A
4349739 Annis Sep 1982 A
4482957 Bjorkholm Nov 1984 A
4618978 Cosman Oct 1986 A
4872188 Lauro Oct 1989 A
5022062 Annis Jun 1991 A
5044002 Stein Aug 1991 A
5164590 Coles Nov 1992 A
5179581 Annis Jan 1993 A
5224144 Annis Jun 1993 A
5253283 Annis Oct 1993 A
5528656 Annis Jun 1996 A
5532492 He Jul 1996 A
5541856 Hammermeister Jul 1996 A
5600700 Krug Feb 1997 A
5696806 Grodzins Dec 1997 A
5768334 Maitrejean Jun 1998 A
5838758 Krug Nov 1998 A
5872829 Wischmann Feb 1999 A
5930326 Rothschild Jul 1999 A
5974111 Krug Oct 1999 A
6005912 Ocleppo Dec 1999 A
6018562 Willson Jan 2000 A
6058159 Conway May 2000 A
6081580 Grodzins Jun 2000 A
6094472 Smith Jul 2000 A
6192101 Grodzins Feb 2001 B1
6218943 Ellenbogen Apr 2001 B1
6304629 Conway Oct 2001 B1
6379043 Zylka Apr 2002 B1
6434219 Rothschild Aug 2002 B1
6453003 Springer Sep 2002 B1
6453007 Adams Sep 2002 B2
6456072 Webb Sep 2002 B1
6459761 Grodzins Oct 2002 B1
RE37899 Grodzins Nov 2002 E
6490477 Zylka Dec 2002 B1
6590956 Fenkart Jul 2003 B2
6843599 Le Jan 2005 B2
6895072 Schrock May 2005 B2
6928137 Bruder Aug 2005 B2
6993111 Annis Jan 2006 B1
7010094 Grodzins Mar 2006 B2
7020241 Beneke Mar 2006 B2
7049814 Mann May 2006 B2
7062011 Tybinkowski Jun 2006 B1
7132637 Nygard Nov 2006 B2
7139406 McClelland Nov 2006 B2
7158611 Heismann Jan 2007 B2
7162005 Bjorkholm Jan 2007 B2
7164750 Nabors Jan 2007 B2
7221732 Annis May 2007 B1
7319737 Singh Jan 2008 B2
7322745 Agrawal Jan 2008 B2
7339159 Juh Mar 2008 B2
7366282 Peschmann Apr 2008 B2
7384194 Gatten Jun 2008 B2
7417440 Peschmann Aug 2008 B2
7440543 Morton Oct 2008 B2
7453987 Richardson Nov 2008 B1
7486768 Allman Feb 2009 B2
7486772 Lu Feb 2009 B2
7538325 Mishin May 2009 B2
7551718 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7555099 Rothschild Jun 2009 B2
7579845 Peschmann Aug 2009 B2
7606348 Foland Oct 2009 B2
7634051 Robinson Dec 2009 B2
7636418 Anwar Dec 2009 B2
7656995 Robinson Feb 2010 B2
7664230 Morton Feb 2010 B2
7668289 Proksa Feb 2010 B2
7672427 Chen Mar 2010 B2
7693261 Robinson Apr 2010 B2
7706507 Williamson Apr 2010 B2
7720195 Allman May 2010 B2
7724868 Morton May 2010 B2
7734066 DeLia Jun 2010 B2
7831012 Foland Nov 2010 B2
7856081 Peschmann Dec 2010 B2
7873201 Eilbert Jan 2011 B2
7876879 Morton Jan 2011 B2
7924979 Rothschild Apr 2011 B2
7929663 Morton Apr 2011 B2
7945017 Chen May 2011 B2
7949101 Morton May 2011 B2
7965816 Kravis Jun 2011 B2
7995705 Allman Aug 2011 B2
7995707 Rothschild Aug 2011 B2
8009799 Doyle Aug 2011 B2
8009800 Doyle Aug 2011 B2
8014493 Roux Sep 2011 B2
8031903 Paresi Oct 2011 B2
8098794 Fernandez Jan 2012 B1
8116428 Gudmundson Feb 2012 B2
8135110 Morton Mar 2012 B2
8138770 Peschmann Mar 2012 B2
D658294 Awad Apr 2012 S
8189889 Pearlstein May 2012 B2
8204173 Betcke Jun 2012 B2
8223919 Morton Jul 2012 B2
8233588 Gibson Jul 2012 B2
8243876 Morton Aug 2012 B2
8284896 Singh Oct 2012 B2
8311309 Siedenburg Nov 2012 B2
8320523 Zhang Nov 2012 B2
8331535 Morton Dec 2012 B2
8385501 Allman Feb 2013 B2
8401270 Eilbert Mar 2013 B2
8428217 Peschmann Apr 2013 B2
8451974 Morton May 2013 B2
8478016 Robinson Jul 2013 B2
8503605 Morton Aug 2013 B2
8513617 Iwanczyk Aug 2013 B2
8515010 Hurd Aug 2013 B1
8537968 Radley Sep 2013 B2
8552722 Lionheart Oct 2013 B2
8559592 Betcke Oct 2013 B2
8625735 Morton Jan 2014 B2
8633823 Armistead, Jr. Jan 2014 B2
8654922 Bendahan Feb 2014 B2
8674706 Peschmann Mar 2014 B2
8724774 Langeveld May 2014 B2
8774357 Morton Jul 2014 B2
8781066 Gudmundson Jul 2014 B2
8804899 Morton Aug 2014 B2
8831331 Gudmundson Sep 2014 B2
8842808 Rothschild Sep 2014 B2
8867816 Bouchard Oct 2014 B2
8879791 Drouin Nov 2014 B2
8885794 Morton Nov 2014 B2
8903046 Morton Dec 2014 B2
8908831 Bendahan Dec 2014 B2
8929509 Morton Jan 2015 B2
8958526 Morton Feb 2015 B2
8971485 Morton Mar 2015 B2
9020095 Morton Apr 2015 B2
9020096 Allman Apr 2015 B2
9036779 Morton May 2015 B2
9042511 Peschmann May 2015 B2
9048061 Morton Jun 2015 B2
9111331 Parikh Aug 2015 B2
9113839 Morton Aug 2015 B2
9158030 Morton Oct 2015 B2
9170212 Bouchard Oct 2015 B2
9183647 Morton Nov 2015 B2
9189846 Wismüller Nov 2015 B2
9194975 Drouin Nov 2015 B2
9196082 Pearlstein Nov 2015 B2
9223051 Bendahan Dec 2015 B2
9268058 Peschmann Feb 2016 B2
9285488 Arodzero Mar 2016 B2
9311277 Rinkel Apr 2016 B2
9404875 Langeveld Aug 2016 B2
9435752 Morton Sep 2016 B2
9442082 Morton Sep 2016 B2
9562866 Morton Feb 2017 B2
9576766 Morton Feb 2017 B2
9606259 Morton Mar 2017 B2
9618648 Morton Apr 2017 B2
9632205 Morton Apr 2017 B2
9632206 Parikh Apr 2017 B2
9638646 Morton May 2017 B2
9658343 Arodzero May 2017 B2
9681851 Rohler Jun 2017 B2
9714920 Lionheart Jul 2017 B2
9733385 Franco Aug 2017 B2
9746431 Grader Aug 2017 B2
9747705 Morton Aug 2017 B2
9772426 Armistead, Jr. Sep 2017 B2
9823383 Hanley Nov 2017 B2
9835756 Morton Dec 2017 B2
9915752 Peschmann Mar 2018 B2
9958569 Morton May 2018 B2
9989508 Awad Jun 2018 B2
10089956 Awad Oct 2018 B2
10107783 Lionheart Oct 2018 B2
10156642 Morton Dec 2018 B2
10175381 Morton Jan 2019 B2
10180483 Holdsworth Jan 2019 B2
10209372 Arodzero Feb 2019 B2
10254436 Awad Apr 2019 B2
10295483 Morton May 2019 B2
10302807 Yu May 2019 B2
10353109 Hanley Jul 2019 B2
10386532 Morton Aug 2019 B2
10408967 Morton Sep 2019 B2
10422919 Parikh Sep 2019 B2
10509142 Parikh Dec 2019 B2
10510319 Awad Dec 2019 B2
10555716 Rohler Feb 2020 B2
10557911 Holdsworth Feb 2020 B2
10578752 Morton Mar 2020 B2
10591424 Morton Mar 2020 B2
10598812 Franco Mar 2020 B2
10650783 Awad May 2020 B2
10670740 Couture Jun 2020 B2
10754057 Bendahan Aug 2020 B2
10768338 Yu Sep 2020 B2
10782440 Hanley Sep 2020 B2
10795047 St-Aubin Oct 2020 B2
10795048 St-Aubin Oct 2020 B2
10795049 St-Aubin Oct 2020 B2
10809414 St-Aubin Oct 2020 B2
10830911 Couture Nov 2020 B2
10830920 Parikh Nov 2020 B2
10901112 Morton Jan 2021 B2
10901114 St-Aubin Jan 2021 B2
10942291 Morton Mar 2021 B2
10955367 Couture Mar 2021 B2
10976271 Morton Apr 2021 B2
10976465 Morton Apr 2021 B2
11073486 Siegrist Jul 2021 B2
11099294 Parikh Aug 2021 B2
11116471 Rohler Sep 2021 B2
11143783 Morton Oct 2021 B2
11175245 Rommel Nov 2021 B1
11287391 Yu Mar 2022 B2
11307325 Morton Apr 2022 B2
11397276 Bendahan Jul 2022 B2
11430109 Cochran Aug 2022 B2
11478214 Siewerdsen Oct 2022 B2
11525930 Couture Dec 2022 B2
11536672 Couture Dec 2022 B2
11579327 Couture Feb 2023 B2
11822041 Morton Nov 2023 B2
20010014137 Bjorkholm Aug 2001 A1
20020031202 Callerame Mar 2002 A1
20020094059 Grodzins Jul 2002 A1
20030085348 Megerle May 2003 A1
20040091078 Ambrefe May 2004 A1
20040179643 Gregerson Sep 2004 A1
20050008126 Juh Jan 2005 A1
20050025280 Schulte Feb 2005 A1
20050058242 Peschmann Mar 2005 A1
20050117683 Mishin Jun 2005 A1
20050117700 Peschmann Jun 2005 A1
20060098866 Whitson May 2006 A1
20060251211 Grodzins Nov 2006 A1
20070003009 Gray Jan 2007 A1
20070116177 Chen May 2007 A1
20070132580 Ambrefe Jun 2007 A1
20070133742 Gatten Jun 2007 A1
20070172129 Tortora Jul 2007 A1
20070235652 Smith Oct 2007 A1
20070280502 Paresi Dec 2007 A1
20080025470 Streyl Jan 2008 A1
20080063140 Awad Mar 2008 A1
20080211431 Mishin Sep 2008 A1
20080232668 Kitamura Sep 2008 A1
20090010386 Peschmann Jan 2009 A1
20090060135 Morton Mar 2009 A1
20090196396 Doyle Aug 2009 A1
20090285353 Ellenbogen Nov 2009 A1
20100002834 Gudmundson Jan 2010 A1
20100027741 Doyle Feb 2010 A1
20100086185 Weiss Apr 2010 A1
20100098218 Vermilyea Apr 2010 A1
20100172476 Morton Jul 2010 A1
20100207741 Gudmundson Aug 2010 A1
20100208972 Bouchard Aug 2010 A1
20100223016 Gibson Sep 2010 A1
20100277312 Edic Nov 2010 A1
20100295689 Armistead, Jr. Nov 2010 A1
20100302034 Clements Dec 2010 A1
20110007870 Roux Jan 2011 A1
20110019797 Morton Jan 2011 A1
20110033118 Yildiz Feb 2011 A1
20110172972 Gudmundson Jul 2011 A1
20110228896 Peschmann Sep 2011 A1
20110235777 Gozani Sep 2011 A1
20120069964 Scholling Mar 2012 A1
20120093367 Gudmundson Apr 2012 A1
20120140879 Gudmundson Jun 2012 A1
20120230463 Morton Sep 2012 A1
20120275646 Drouin Nov 2012 A1
20130034268 Perron Feb 2013 A1
20130085788 Rowlan Apr 2013 A1
20130114788 Crass May 2013 A1
20130163811 Oelke Jun 2013 A1
20130292574 Levene Nov 2013 A1
20130294574 Peschmann Nov 2013 A1
20130301794 Grader Nov 2013 A1
20130336447 Morton Dec 2013 A1
20140072108 Rohler Mar 2014 A1
20140185755 Bendahan Jul 2014 A1
20140185923 Chen Jul 2014 A1
20140205059 Sharpless Jul 2014 A1
20140211917 Chen Jul 2014 A1
20140211980 Bouchard Jul 2014 A1
20140222385 Muenster Aug 2014 A1
20140241495 Gudmundson Aug 2014 A1
20140249536 Jajeh Sep 2014 A1
20150021342 Crass Jan 2015 A1
20150186732 Perron Jul 2015 A1
20150268016 Eshetu Sep 2015 A1
20150282781 Rohler Oct 2015 A1
20150355117 Morton Dec 2015 A1
20160025888 Peschmann Jan 2016 A1
20160033674 Allman Feb 2016 A1
20160223706 Franco Aug 2016 A1
20160252647 Awad Sep 2016 A1
20160260412 Awad Sep 2016 A1
20170103513 Heilmann Apr 2017 A1
20170184737 Dujmic Jun 2017 A1
20170184756 Miao Jun 2017 A1
20170236232 Morton Aug 2017 A1
20170299526 Morton Oct 2017 A1
20170309043 Li Oct 2017 A1
20170319169 Rohler Nov 2017 A1
20170328844 Li Nov 2017 A1
20170371010 Shanbhag Dec 2017 A1
20180038988 Morton Feb 2018 A1
20180106733 Li Apr 2018 A1
20180162584 Tauber Jun 2018 A1
20190003989 Miyazaki Jan 2019 A1
20190219729 St-Aubin Jul 2019 A1
20190346379 Awad Nov 2019 A1
20190346381 Awad Nov 2019 A1
20200085404 Siewerdsen Mar 2020 A1
20200103357 Morton Apr 2020 A1
20200103548 Yu Apr 2020 A1
20200110043 Marín Apr 2020 A1
20200146648 Rohler May 2020 A1
20200158909 Morton May 2020 A1
20200200690 Morton Jun 2020 A1
20200249179 Yamakawa Aug 2020 A1
20200348247 Bur Nov 2020 A1
20200355631 Yu Nov 2020 A1
20200378906 Morton Dec 2020 A1
20210004994 Kubo Jan 2021 A1
20210102907 Couture Apr 2021 A1
20210361254 Rohler Nov 2021 A1
20210381991 Desjeans-Gauthier Dec 2021 A1
20210405243 Parikh Dec 2021 A1
20220291148 Gill Sep 2022 A1
20230000459 St-Aubin Jan 2023 A1
20230147681 Dinca May 2023 A1
20230152475 Couture May 2023 A1
20230175984 Yoshida Jun 2023 A1
20230245847 Procter Aug 2023 A1
20240003834 Procter Jan 2024 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
1301371 May 1992 CA
2163884 Dec 1994 CA
2574402 Jan 2006 CA
2744690 Jun 2009 CA
2692662 Mar 2010 CA
2697525 Mar 2010 CA
2709468 Mar 2010 CA
2690163 Aug 2011 CA
2869201 Oct 2013 CA
102175698 Sep 2011 CN
103327901 Sep 2013 CN
104165896 Nov 2014 CN
108937992 Dec 2018 CN
114767137 Jul 2022 CN
116359257 Jun 2023 CN
3037401 Dec 2016 FR
3946612 Jul 2007 JP
9423458 Oct 1994 WO
2006137919 Dec 2006 WO
2008133765 Nov 2008 WO
2008139167 Nov 2008 WO
2008157843 Dec 2008 WO
2009114928 Sep 2009 WO
2010025538 Mar 2010 WO
2013149788 Oct 2013 WO
2018121444 Jul 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (18)
Entry
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/CA2019/051489, dated Dec. 30, 2019, (p. 4).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CA2020/051239, dated Dec. 16, 2020, (17 pages).
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/CA2013/050744, dated Jun. 10, 2014, (5 pages).
K. Wells; D.A. Bradley;, “A review of X-ray explosives detection techniques for checked baggage”, Applied Radiation and Isotopes., Elsevier, Oxford., GB, GB, (20120112), vol. 70, No. 8, doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.01.011, ISSN 0969-8043, pp. 1729-1746, XP028401820.
Richard D. R. Macdonald, “<title>Design and implementation of a dual-energy x-ray imaging system for organic material detection in an airport security application</title>”, Proceedings of SPIE, SPIE, (20010404), vol. 4301, doi:10.1117/12.420922, ISSN 0277786X, pp. 31-41, XP055104503.
International Search Report for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/050981 dated Jan. 5, 2015, 6 pgs.
International Search Report for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/051074 dated Jan. 20, 2015.
International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/CA2019/050616, dated Jul. 5, 2019, (15 pages).
International Search Report and Written for International Application No. PCT/CA2018/051673, dated Mar. 14, 2019, (8-pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CA2019/050617, dated Jul. 30, 2019, (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CA2018/051674, dated Mar. 29, 2019, (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CA2018/051675, dated Mar. 21, 2019, (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CA2018/051676, dated Mar. 26, 2019, (7 pages).
Hurd et al.(U.S. Pat. No. 8,515,010, hereafter referred to as Hurd), Ying et al.(“Dual Energy Volumetric X-ray Tomographic Sensor for Luggage Screening”, IEEE, SAS Feb. 2007) (Year: 2007).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CA2018/051677, dated Mar. 29, 2019, (8 pages).
Lehmann et al., Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography, Medical Physics, Sep. 1981, 659-667, 8-5, American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Bond et al., ZeCalc Algorithm Details, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Jan. 7, 2013, Livermore U.S.A.
Hassanpour et al(NPL “Illicit Material Detection using Dual-Energy X-ray Images”, The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, vol. 13, No. 4, Jul. 2016, p. 8) (Year: 2016).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230017006 A1 Jan 2023 US