1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for metal processing and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for depositing and annealing metal films.
2. Background of the Related Art
Copper has gained increasing popularity as a metal interconnect in advanced integrated circuit fabrication. Copper can be deposited using electrochemical deposition from electrolytes such as copper sulfate or from electroless processes. Typically, electrolytes also contain carriers and additives to achieve certain desired characteristics in electroplated films. Some copper films, e.g., those deposited from electrolytes containing organic additives, exhibit “self-annealing” or re-crystallization behavior. For example, abnormal grain growth may occur in the as-deposited film such that film properties such as resistivity, stress and hardness may be adversely affected. The rate of grain growth may depend on the electroplating recipe, electrolyte types, as well as the organic additive concentrations.
These continual changes in microstructure at room temperature may lead to formation of stress-induced voids, or affect subsequent chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) behavior because of varying polishing rates for the film. Therefore, thermal annealing is usually performed on the as-deposited copper film to stabilize the film by promoting grain growth prior to subsequent processing.
Typically, copper films are annealed in a high temperature furnace or using rapid thermal anneal processing, both of which require relatively expensive and complex equipments. Furnace anneal of electroplated copper films, for example, is a batch process that is performed at an elevated temperature of typically about 400° C., either under a vacuum or in a nitrogen environment for at least about 30 minutes, which is a rather high thermal budget, time-consuming and costly process.
Therefore, there is a need for a method and apparatus for annealing copper that would allow film stabilization to be performed at a relatively low operating temperature in a simple gas environment with wide process windows, along with high throughput and relatively low cost.
The present invention provides a method and apparatus for annealing copper by forming a copper layer on a substrate in an integrated processing system, and then treating the copper layer in an annealing gas environment.
In one embodiment of the invention, the annealing process is performed in-situ. The gas environment comprises a gas selected from nitrogen, argon, helium, or other inert gases. Annealing is performed at a temperature between about 100 and about 500° C., for a time duration of less than about 5 minutes. In another embodiment, the annealing gas further comprises a hydrogen-containing gas, e.g., hydrogen. In another aspect of the invention, the annealing gas environment is controlled so that the concentration of an oxidizing gas, e.g., oxygen, is less than about 100 parts per million.
The teachings of the present invention can be readily understood by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a–c depict cross-sectional views of a substrate undergoing various stages of metal processing.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures.
The method of the present invention performs annealing of a copper layer by exposing the copper layer to an annealing gas environment at an elevated temperature.
In one embodiment of the invention, the annealing is performed in-situ—i.e., within the same apparatus as that used for depositing the copper layer. The annealing gas environment comprises a gas selected from nitrogen (N2), argon (Ar) or helium (He), or other inert gases. Annealing is performed at a temperature between about 100 and about 500° C. for a time duration less than about 5 minutes. In another embodiment, the annealing gas environment further comprises hydrogen (H2), preferably a mixture of less than about 5% of H2 in N2 or other inert gas. In another aspect of the invention, the annealing gas environment preferably has an oxygen concentration of less than about 100 parts per million (ppm), more preferably less than about 30 ppm. By exposing the copper layer to the annealing gas environment within a short time, e.g., less than about five minutes, at an annealing temperature between about 100 and about 500° C., the microstructure of the copper layer can be stabilized and a reduced film resistivity and/or enhanced reflectivity of the copper layer can be achieved.
Apparatus
A detailed description of the chamber 102 has been disclosed in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Heating and Cooling Substrates”, Ser. No. 09/396,007, filed on Sep. 15, 1999, and is incorporated herein by reference. A brief description of the apparatus 100 is given below.
The apparatus 100 allows for rapid heating and cooling of a substrate within a single chamber 102, which comprises a heating mechanism, a cooling mechanism and a transfer mechanism to transfer a substrate 190 between the heating and the cooling mechanisms. As shown in the embodiment of
To perform copper annealing, the substrate 190 is placed on the heated substrate support 104, which is preheated to a temperature between about 100° C. and about 500° C. A gas source 120 allows an annealing gas mixture to enter the chamber 102 via the gas inlet 124 and the mass flow controller 174. The substrate 190 having a deposited copper layer is then heated under the annealing gas environment for a sufficiently long time to obtain the desired film characteristics. For example, the copper layer may be annealed to achieve a desirable grain growth condition, a reduction in sheet resistance, or an increase in film reflectivity.
After annealing, the substrate 190 is optionally cooled to a desirable temperature, e.g., below about 100° C., preferably below about 80° C., and most preferably below about 50° C., within the chamber 102. This can be accomplished, for example, by bringing the substrate 190 in close proximity to the cooling plate 108 using the wafer lift hoop 110. For example, the cooling plate 108 may be maintained at a temperature of about 5 to about 25° C. by a cooling fluid supplied from the cooling fluid source 176.
As illustrated in
In general, the annealing chamber 102 may be used as a stand alone system for thermal annealing or wafer cooling. Alternatively, the chamber 102 may be used as part of a cluster tool or an integrated processing system having multiple process chambers associated therewith. As illustrated in
During integrated processing, a copper layer is formed on a substrate 190 in one of the processing chambers 202a–d using electroplating or other deposition techniques. After suitable cleaning processes inside the cleaning station 204 or 206, the substrate 190 having the deposited copper layer is transferred to the annealing chamber 102 by a transfer mechanism such as a robot 170. Thus, the integrated processing system allows in-situ annealing of the copper layer—i.e., annealing the deposited copper layer without removing the substrate from the system. One advantage of such in-situ processing is that the time delay between the cleaning and annealing steps can be kept relatively short, e.g., to about a few seconds. Therefore, undesirable oxidation of the deposited copper layer can be minimized. A controller (not shown) is also used to control the operation of the integrated processing system 200 in a manner similar to that previously described for the annealing chamber 102.
Process
According to the present invention, the copper layer is then annealed in step 305 in an annealing gas environment at an elevated temperature, e.g., between about 100 and about 500° C. In one embodiment, the annealing gas environment comprises a gas selected from nitrogen, argon and helium. In general, these and other inert gases may be used either singly or in combinations to form the annealing gas environment. In another embodiment, the annealing gas environment further comprises a hydrogen-containing gas, preferably hydrogen (H2). Alternatively, other hydrogen-containing gases, e.g., ammonia (NH3), may also be used. A total gas flow of up to about 50 standard liters per minute (slm) and a pressure of up to about 1000 torr may be used. In general, the process window for the operating pressure is relatively wide—e.g., in one embodiment, about 760 to about 1000 torr may be used. In addition, annealing may also be performed under a reduced pressure condition. The annealing step 305 results in a decrease in sheet resistance of the copper layer. Additionally, reflectivity of the copper layer may also be increased through the annealing step 305.
After annealing, the substrate may be subjected to a cooling step 307, e.g., for about 30 seconds, to cool the substrate to a temperature below about 100° C., preferably below about 80° C., and most preferably below about 50° C., before additional processing. Using the chamber 102, for example, annealing and cooling of the substrate can be performed in a single chamber within the integrated processing system. In general, the cooling step 307 serves several purposes, such as preventing oxidation of the copper layer when the substrate is exposed to ambient air, and providing a suitable temperature for wafer handling and reliable system operation. It has been found that there is no noticeable oxidation in a copper layer treated under the annealing gas environment of the present invention when the substrate is exposed to ambient air at below about 100° C.
a–c illustrate schematic cross-sectional views of a substrate structure 450 undergoing various stages of processing according to the process sequence 300.
When electroplated copper is to be used to form the metal interconnect, a relatively thin seed layer of metal 410, preferably copper, is vapor deposited over the barrier layer 408, as shown in
According to the present invention, the deposited copper layer 412 is then subjected to an annealing step under an annealing gas environment 414, as shown in
In another embodiment, the annealing gas environment 414 is also controlled to contain at most a low level of an oxidizing gas such as oxygen (O2), in order to avoid oxidation of the copper layer 412. If the annealing gas environment contains only nitrogen or an inert gas, but does not contain H2, then the level of O2 is preferably controlled to be less than about 30 ppm, preferably less than about 10 ppm, and most preferably, less than about 5 ppm. On the other hand, if H2 is present in the annealing gas environment 414, the level of O2 that can be tolerated may be higher, e.g., less than about 100 ppm, due to the reducing effect of H2 which minimizes oxidation of the copper layer. It is preferable that the O2 level be controlled to less than about 30 ppm, more preferably less than about 10 ppm, and most preferably, less than about 5 ppm.
In general, the copper layer 412 is annealed for a time duration of less than about 5 minutes, at a temperature of between about 100 to about 500° C. The specific annealing time may depend on the nature and thickness of the as-deposited copper layer 412 and the temperature of the substrate structure 450. For example, previous self-annealing studies conducted at room temperature show that to achieve stabilization of a 1 micron copper film, annealing has to be performed for a sufficiently long time to result in a sheet resistance change (i.e., decrease) of about 18–20%. From a manufacturing point of view, a shorter annealing time is preferable because it contributes to a higher process throughput. However, the optimal choice will depend on a proper balance of other process considerations—e.g., for certain applications, thermal budget concerns may suggest the use of a lower temperature along with a slightly longer treatment time. Thus, according to one embodiment of the invention, annealing is performed for a time duration between about 30 seconds to about 2 minutes, at a temperature between about 150 to about 400° C. In one preferred embodiment, the annealing time is about 30 seconds at a temperature of about 250° C.
Sheet Resistance
The data in
Reflectivity
Aside from sheet resistance, the reflectivity of the electroplated layer is also another factor for evaluating the annealing process. In general, the reflectivity of a copper layer may be affected by the copper grain size (affecting surface roughness) and the composition of the copper surface.
In general, the reflectivity of the Cu layer increases with increasing annealing time and temperature. For example, at an annealing temperature of about 200° C., the film reflectivity improves—i.e., has a positive reflectivity change, after annealing for about 60 seconds. When the temperature is increased to about 250° C., the electroplated copper layer achieves a maximum of about 15% improvement in reflectivity after being annealed for about 30 seconds. However, no additional improvement is obtained even at a longer annealing time of about 60 seconds. At about 300° C. or higher, the anneal time has little impact on reflectivity, and only about 15 seconds of annealing is needed to achieve the maximum reflectivity change of about 15%.
Thus, in order to improve reflectivity of a copper layer according to one embodiment of the present invention, copper annealing is preferably performed at a temperature of at least about 200° C., and preferably at least about 250° C. A copper layer annealed according to the embodiments of the invention can achieve a reflectivity of about 1.35 times that of a silicon reference, exceeding the typical customer requirement of about 1.2. In addition, it is found that the annealed copper layer can retain a high reflectivity without degradation after being exposed to ambient air environment.
Effect of H2 Content
The annealing effect is further investigated as a function of the hydrogen content in the chamber environment. This is illustrated in
On the other hand, the reflectivity change depends on the H2 content—e.g., at a H2 concentration of about 0.5% or higher, a 15% improvement in film reflectivity is achieved. It is believed that reflectivity is increased partly because H2 gas is effective in minimizing oxide formation on the surface of the copper layer. It is possible that, by adjusting other process parameters such as temperature, pressure, annealing time and gas environment, a lower H2 concentration, e.g., below about 0.5%, may also be effective in improving reflectivity of the copper layer.
Annealing according to the embodiments of the invention result in an increase of the grain size in the electroplated copper, as well as a decrease in film hardness. The final copper grain sizes achieved according to embodiments of the invention are comparable to those obtained from a conventional furnace anneal. Furthermore, comparable grain size and sheet resistance results can be achieved using in-situ annealing either at about 250° C. for 30 seconds or at about 350° C. for 60 seconds. Annealing according to certain embodiments of the invention, e.g., at temperatures greater than about 200° C., also result in a decrease of film hardness by about 50% (e.g., to about 150 Hv), compared to the as-deposited value of about 300 Hv.
After in-situ annealing, the copper layer 412 may be cooled to a temperature below about 100° C., preferably below about 80° C., and most preferably below about 50° C., prior to subsequent processing such as chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). Since the annealed copper layer 412 has larger grains and reduced film hardness, the CMP removal rate of the annealed copper is increased compared to that of non-annealed copper.
In general, annealing according to embodiments of the invention results in copper layers with improved characteristics such as microstructure stability, enhanced reflectivity and reduced resistivity. Typically, the resistivity of the fully annealed copper layer approaches that of the bulk resistivity of copper. Thus, the invention is an attractive alternative to conventional furnace or RTP annealing techniques, because it provides an annealing method with wide process margins at relatively low cost and high throughput.
Although several preferred embodiments which incorporate the teachings of the present invention have been shown and described in detail, those skilled in the art can readily devise many other varied embodiments that still incorporate these teachings.
This application is a divisional of now abandoned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/513,734, filed Feb. 18, 2000, which is a continuation-in-part of commonly-assigned U.S. patent application, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Heating and Cooling Substrates”, Ser. No. 09/396,007, filed on Sep. 15, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,276,072, and of commonly-assigned U.S. patent application, entitled “Apparatus for Electrochemical Deposition of Copper Metallization with the Capability of In-Situ Thermal Annealing”, Ser. No. 09/263,126, filed on Mar. 5, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,136,163, both of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2026605 | Antisell | Jan 1936 | A |
3649509 | Morawetz et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3727620 | Orr | Apr 1973 | A |
3770598 | Creutz | Nov 1973 | A |
4027686 | Shortes et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4092176 | Kozai et al. | May 1978 | A |
4110176 | Creutz et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4113492 | Sato et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4265943 | Goldstein et al. | May 1981 | A |
4315059 | Raistrick et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4326940 | Eckles et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4336114 | Mayer et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4376685 | Watson | Mar 1983 | A |
4405416 | Raistrick et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4428815 | Powell et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4435266 | Johnston | Mar 1984 | A |
4481406 | Muka et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4489740 | Rattan et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4510176 | Cuthbert et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4518678 | Allen | May 1985 | A |
4519846 | Aigo | May 1985 | A |
4568431 | Polan et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4693805 | Quazi | Sep 1987 | A |
4732785 | Brewer | Mar 1988 | A |
4786337 | Martin | Nov 1988 | A |
4789445 | Goffman et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4816098 | Davis et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4816638 | Ukai et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4854263 | Chang et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4904313 | Ames et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5039381 | Mullarkey | Aug 1991 | A |
5055425 | Leibovitz et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5069760 | Tsukamoto et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5092975 | Yamamura et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098198 | Nulman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100516 | Nishimura et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5155336 | Gronet et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156731 | Ogasawara et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162260 | Leibovitz et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168886 | Thompson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5222310 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224504 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230743 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5248384 | Lin et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5252807 | Chizinsky | Oct 1993 | A |
5256274 | Poris | Oct 1993 | A |
5259407 | Tuchida et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5290361 | Hayashida et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5292393 | Maydan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297910 | Yoshioka et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5314541 | Saito et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316974 | Crank | May 1994 | A |
5324684 | Kermani et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328589 | Martin | Jul 1994 | A |
5349978 | Sago et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5368711 | Poris | Nov 1994 | A |
5374594 | Van de Ven et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377425 | Kawakami et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5377708 | Bergman et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384284 | Doan et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5415890 | Kloider et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429733 | Ishida | Jul 1995 | A |
5431700 | Sloan | Jul 1995 | A |
5442235 | Parrillo et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447615 | Ishida | Sep 1995 | A |
5449447 | Branders | Sep 1995 | A |
5478429 | Komino et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484011 | Tepman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5510216 | Calabrese et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516412 | Andricacos et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527390 | Ono et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527739 | Parrillo et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5608943 | Konishi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609688 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616208 | Lee | Apr 1997 | A |
5625170 | Poris | Apr 1997 | A |
5639301 | Sasada et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651865 | Sellers | Jul 1997 | A |
5664337 | Davis et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665167 | Deguchi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673750 | Tsubone et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677244 | Venkatraman | Oct 1997 | A |
5681780 | Mihara et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5705223 | Bunkofske | Jan 1998 | A |
5716207 | Michina et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718813 | Drummond et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5723028 | Poris | Mar 1998 | A |
5731678 | Zila et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5807469 | Crafts et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820692 | Baecker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830045 | Togawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846598 | Semkow et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853486 | Ono et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855681 | Maydan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5884009 | Okase | Mar 1999 | A |
5885134 | Shibata et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885749 | Huggins et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891513 | Dubin et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907790 | Kellam | May 1999 | A |
5913147 | Dubin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5972110 | Akimoto | Oct 1999 | A |
5980706 | Bleck et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994675 | Bethune et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997712 | Ting et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004047 | Akimoto et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015749 | Liu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017777 | Kim et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017820 | Ting et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030208 | Williams et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037257 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6062852 | Kawamoto et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071388 | Uzoh | Jun 2000 | A |
6072163 | Armstrong et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091498 | Hanson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093291 | Izumi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6103638 | Robinson | Aug 2000 | A |
6113698 | Raaijimakers et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123825 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6136163 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151447 | Moore et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155275 | Shinbara | Dec 2000 | A |
6171922 | Maghsoudnia | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174388 | Sikka et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178623 | Kitazawa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182376 | Shin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187152 | Ting et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203582 | Berner et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207005 | Henley et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207937 | Stoddard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211495 | Stoddard et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213853 | Gonzalez-Martin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222164 | Stoddard et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228768 | Woo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241869 | Maeda | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242349 | Nogami et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258220 | Dordi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258223 | Cheung et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263587 | Raaijmakers et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264752 | Curtis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267853 | Dordi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276072 | Morad et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290833 | Chen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290865 | Lloyd et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290933 | Durga et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294059 | Hongo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294219 | Tsai et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296906 | Stimmell et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297154 | Gross et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307184 | Womack et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309520 | Woodruff et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355153 | Uzoh et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357143 | Morad et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6387182 | Horie et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6423947 | Womack et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6471913 | Weaver et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473993 | Yagi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477787 | Morad et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483081 | Batchelder | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6508920 | Ritzdorf et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512206 | McEntire et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529686 | Ramana et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6532772 | Robinson | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544338 | Batchelder et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566255 | Ito | May 2003 | B2 |
6635157 | Dordi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639189 | Ramana et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6658763 | Morad et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6929774 | Morad et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20010030101 | Berner et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020000271 | Ritzdorf et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004301 | Chen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022363 | Ritzdorf et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029961 | Dordi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020037641 | Ritzdorf et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020074233 | Ritzdorf et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020102837 | Ritzdorf et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030045095 | Ritzdorf et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040079633 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084301 | Dordl et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 421 735 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0829904 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0725427 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 881 673 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1 037 263 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 085 557 | Mar 2001 | EP |
54 148112 | Nov 1979 | JP |
58182823 | Oct 1983 | JP |
63118093 | May 1988 | JP |
04131395 | May 1992 | JP |
04280993 | Oct 1992 | JP |
6017291 | Jan 1994 | JP |
10 079432 | Mar 1998 | JP |
9317448 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9712079 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9940615 | Aug 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040003873 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09513734 | Feb 2000 | US |
Child | 10611589 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09396007 | Sep 1999 | US |
Child | 09513734 | US | |
Parent | 09263126 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 09396007 | US |