1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of optical proximity correction (OPC), and, more particularly, to an optical proximity correction method for increasing the overlapping area between interconnect patterns and line patterns.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In the fabrication of semiconductors, semiconductor devices are connected by multiple interconnect layers at different levels. Interlayer connections of various conductive layers are achieved by interconnection means such as vias or contacts. Accordingly, in the design of integrated circuit (IC) layout for each level, it is essential to consider the interconnect relation and the layout alignment of upper and lower levels as well as the limitations induced by process capability. However, as the scale of integration for nowadays electronic devices continues to shrink, the critical dimension (CD) required for semiconductor devices becomes smaller. In this condition, it is quite difficult to design layouts having necessary critical dimensions for every component while still maintaining a precise alignment of the layouts and reliable interconnections between the conductive layers.
To meet the demand of reliable interconnections for nowadays semiconductor devices, a method of optical proximity correction is provided in the present invention which may modify the original layout pattern, such as a line pattern, to achieve a precise alignment of the interconnect structures between upper and lower layers while still maintaining the critical dimension uniformity (CDU) of the device pattern and providing a sufficient process window, ex. a PR window.
A method of optical proximity correction executed by a computer system is provided according to one embodiment of the present invention and includes the following steps: first, providing an integrated circuit layout with parallel line patterns and interconnect patterns disposed corresponding to the parallel line patterns; then, using the computer to modify the integrated circuit layout based on a position of the interconnect patterns so as to generate a convex portion and a concave portion respectively on two sides of each of the parallel line patterns. Portions of the line pattern in front of and behind the convex portion and the concave portion are straight lines and have an identical critical dimension.
Also, another method of optical proximity correction executed by a computer system is provided according to another embodiment of the present invention and includes the following steps: providing an integrated circuit layout with parallel line patterns; then, using the computer system to modify the integrated circuit layout by forming a convex portion and a corresponding concave portion respectively on both sides of the line pattern based on a position of an interconnect pattern of another integrated circuit layout. The interconnect pattern is stacked on the parallel line patterns, and portions of the line pattern in front of and behind the convex portion and the concave portion are straight lines and have an identical critical dimension.
An integrated circuit with an integrated circuit layout is provided according to still another embodiment of the present invention. The integrated circuit layout includes line patterns and an interconnect pattern stacked on the line pattern. At least one of the line patterns has a convex portion and a corresponding concave portion. Portions of the line pattern in front of and behind the convex portion and the concave portion are straight lines and have an identical critical dimension.
These and other objectives of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment that is illustrated in the various figures and drawings.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the embodiments, and are incorporated in and constitute apart of this specification. The drawings illustrate some of the embodiments and, together with the description, serve to explain their principles. In the drawings:
It should be noted that all the figures are diagrammatic. Relative dimensions and proportions of parts of the drawings have been shown exaggerated or reduced in size, for the sake of clarity and convenience in the drawings. The same reference signs are generally used to refer to the same features in modified and different embodiments.
In the following detailed description of the present invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof and is shown by way of illustration and specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient details to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical, and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
Please refer to
With regard to process requirement and alignment deviation, some design rules allow the interconnect pattern to exceed the extent of underlying line pattern, as shown in
Please refer to
Even though the problems of incomplete stacking and alignment may be solved by the above-mentioned approach of forming convex portions 101a, other problems may successively occur. For example, since the local critical dimension of the convex portion 101a is larger than the original critical dimension of the line pattern 101, the critical dimension uniformity (CDU) of the line patterns 101 may decrease. Furthermore, since the line pattern 101 with convex portion 101a is no longer a regular straight line, it is prone to induce hot spots in the photoresist formed by the line patterns, thereby lowering the process window of the photolithographic process. Besides, when the spacing between the line patterns 101 is small, the convex portion 101a is prone to short the nearest line pattern 101.
To resolve the above-mentioned problem, please refer to
The advantages of OPC method of the present invention is: by modifying the original straight line pattern into a line pattern with convex portions and corresponding concave portions correlative to the deviation value of the interconnect pattern, the incomplete stacking and misalignment of integrated circuit layouts may be easily solved, while still maintaining the default CD and process window of the line pattern.
According to the above-disclosed OPC method, please refer again to
Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device and method may be made while retaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/859,718, filed on Apr. 9, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6033811 | Lee | Mar 2000 | A |
6395438 | Bruce | May 2002 | B1 |
6470489 | Chang | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6546540 | Igarashi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6576486 | Lin | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6684382 | Liu | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6753115 | Zhang | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763514 | Zhang | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6852453 | Wu | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6961920 | Zach | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7188322 | Cohn | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7266801 | Kotani | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7386829 | Lee | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7425391 | Zhang | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7434195 | Hsu | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7617475 | Lin | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624369 | Graur | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7669153 | Wu | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7669170 | Cohn | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7784019 | Zach | Aug 2010 | B1 |
8065652 | Salowe | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8201110 | Gu | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8386969 | Hsu | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8627242 | Kuo | Jan 2014 | B1 |
20050081167 | Kever | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060066339 | Rajski | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080633 | Hsu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085772 | Zhang | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060088772 | Zhang | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136861 | Lucas | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161452 | Hess | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195809 | Cohn | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070011638 | Watanabe | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070143728 | Cohn | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080256504 | Oishi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270969 | Wu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090193385 | Yang | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090271759 | Torres Robles | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278569 | Taoka | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300576 | Huang | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036644 | Yang | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070944 | Wu | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086862 | Yang | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115765 | Hamamoto | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131914 | Wu | May 2010 | A1 |
20100175041 | Krasnoperova | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110029939 | Yang | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110294263 | Ogawa | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120185807 | Tsai | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130086541 | Luo | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130207198 | Becker | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150137369 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13859718 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 14607051 | US |