Embodiments of the invention relate generally to integrated circuit device fabrication and, more particularly, to patterning techniques utilizing pitch reduction to fabricate a portion of the device, and associated structures.
As a consequence of many factors, including demand for increased portability, computing power, memory capacity and energy efficiency, electronic devices such as integrated devices, are continuously being reduced in size. The sizes of the constituent features that form the devices, e.g., electrical elements and interconnect lines, are also constantly being decreased to facilitate this size reduction.
The trend of decreasing feature size is evident, for example, in memory devices or devices such as dynamic random access memories (DRAM), Flash memory, static random access memories (SRAM), ferroelectric (FE) memories, etc. To take one example, DRAM may comprise thousands to billions of identical device components in the form of memory cells. By decreasing the sizes of the electrical device structures that comprise a memory cell and the widths and lengths of the conducting lines to access the memory cells, the memory devices can be made smaller. Additionally, storage capacities can be increased by fitting more memory cells on a given area in the memory devices.
The continual reduction in feature sizes places ever greater demands on the techniques used to form the features. For example, photolithography is commonly used to pattern features, such as conductive lines and pads. The concept of pitch can be used to describe the sizes of these features. Pitch may be defined as the distance between identical points in two neighboring features. These features are typically defined by spaces between adjacent features, which spaces are typically filled by a material, such as an insulator. As a result, pitch can be viewed as the sum of the width of a feature and of the width of the space on one side of the feature separating that feature from a neighboring feature. However, due to factors such as limitations of optics and usable light or other radiation wavelengths, photolithography techniques each have a minimum achievable pitch, below which a particular photolithographic technique cannot reliably form features. Thus, the minimum pitch of a photolithographic technique is an obstacle to continued feature size reduction.
“Pitch doubling” or “pitch multiplication” is one method for extending the capabilities of photolithographic techniques beyond their minimum pitch. One pitch multiplication method is illustrated in
While the pitch is actually halved in the example above, this reduction in pitch is conventionally referred to as pitch “doubling,” or, more generally, pitch “multiplication.” Thus, conventionally, “multiplication” of pitch by a certain factor actually involves reducing the pitch by that factor. The conventional terminology is retained herein.
Because the layer 50 of spacer material typically has a single thickness 90 (see
To overcome such limitations, some proposed methods for forming patterns at the periphery and in the array involve separately etching patterns into the array region and then peripheral region of a substrate. A pattern in the array region is first formed and transferred to the substrate or intermediate hard mask layer using one mask and then another pattern in the periphery region is formed and separately transferred to the substrate using another mask. Because such methods require forming the pattern in the array region first before forming the other pattern in the periphery region in order to thereafter transfer the patterns to the same level to be subsequently transferred to a substrate, such methods are limited in their ability to form equivalent or higher quality patterns suitable for forming the conductive lines of the array without additional masking and etching steps required for forming the pattern for the periphery features if the array pattern is to be adequately protected. One limitation affecting the quality of the array pattern is defects. Defects may be caused, for example, by the photoresist material deposited between spacers so that features of a larger size may be formed in the periphery. Undesirably, the process conventionally used to form smaller, dimensionally critical, spacers in the pattern of the array while the other larger features in the pattern of the periphery are formed adds expense to the process flow without reducing defect potential in the array.
In addition to problems encountered in forming differently sized features on an integrated circuit device, it has been found that conventional pitch-doubling techniques may experience difficulty transferring a pattern of spacers to a substrate. In conventional methods of transferring the pattern, both the spacers and the underlying substrate layer or layers are exposed to an etchant. The etchants, however, may also etch the material of the spacers, albeit at a slower rate. Thus, over the course of subsequently forming another pattern of features in a peripheral region of the same substrate and then transferring the patterns to an underlying material, the etchant used to form the pattern of features in the peripheral region may remove an unacceptable amount of the material of the spacers before the pattern transfer is completed in both central and peripheral regions.
Also, a layer of material overlaid on the spacers while the features in the peripheral region are formed may leave residual material between adjacent spacers which may potentially cause defects or shorts therein which are subsequently transferred to one or more underlying layers. These difficulties are exacerbated by the trend towards decreasing feature size, which, for example, leads to the need to form trenches which have increasingly higher depth to width, or “aspect” ratios, increasing the potential for defects when subjected to additional steps in the process flow in order to obtain features of various sizes. Thus, in conjunction with difficulties in producing structures having different feature sizes, pattern transfer limitations make the application of pitch multiplication principles to integrated circuit device manufacture even more difficult.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide enhanced methods of forming features of different sizes on semiconductor device structures, especially where some features are formed below the minimum size achievable using photolithographic and other conventional lithography techniques, and in conjunction with pitch multiplication.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a method for semiconductor device fabrication by what may be termed “reverse pitch reduction flow” includes patterning a first pattern of features above a substrate and patterning a second pattern of pitch-multiplied spacers subsequent to patterning the first pattern of features. In embodiments of the invention, the first pattern of features may be formed using conventional lithography and the second pattern of pitch-multiplied spacers may be formed by a pitch multiplication technique. Embodiments of the invention also encompass structures associated with the methods disclosed.
Embodiments of the invention may have particular utility in fabrication of NAND Flash devices, wherein the first pattern of features may comprise gates in a peripheral region of the device and the second pattern of features may comprise word lines in a central region thereof. Embodiments of the invention may also be employed in fabrication of DRAM memory, phase change memory and programmable gate array (PGA) devices.
Reference will now be made to the Figures, wherein like numerals refer to like features and elements throughout. It will be appreciated that these Figures are not necessarily drawn to scale.
In embodiments of the invention, a sequence of material layers is formed that allows formation of a mask for processing a substrate.
The integrated circuit device 100 includes a central region 102, which may be termed the “array,” at least partially bounded by a peripheral region 104, which may be termed the “periphery.” It will be appreciated that, in a completed integrated circuit device, the array 102 will typically be densely populated with conducting lines and electrical devices such as transistors and capacitors. In a memory device, the electrical devices form a plurality of memory cells, which are conventionally arranged in a regular grid pattern at the intersections of word lines and bit lines. Desirably, pitch multiplication may be used to form features in the array 102, as discussed below. On the other hand, the periphery 104 typically comprises features larger than those in the array 102. Conventional photolithography, rather than pitch multiplication techniques, is generally used to pattern features, such as logic circuitry, in the periphery 104, because the geometric complexity of logic circuits located in the periphery 104 makes using pitch multiplication difficult, whereas the regular grid typical of element patterns in the array 102 is conducive to pitch multiplication. In addition, some devices in the periphery require larger geometries due to electrical constraints, making pitch multiplication less advantageous than conventional photolithography for such devices. In addition to possible differences in relative scale, it will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that the relative positions, and the number, of periphery 104 and array 102 regions in the integrated circuit device 100 may vary from that depicted.
The materials for the layers 120-150 overlying the substrate 110 are selectively chosen based upon consideration of the chemistry and process conditions for the pattern forming and pattern transferring steps discussed herein. Because the layers 120-150 between a topmost selectively definable layer 150 and the substrate 110 function to transfer a pattern derived from the selectively definable layer 150 to the substrate 110, the layers 120-140 between the selectively definable layer 150 and the substrate 110 are chosen so that they may be selectively etched relative to other exposed materials. It will be appreciated that a material is considered selectively, or preferentially, etched when the etch rate for that material upon exposure to a given etchant is substantially greater, on the order of at least about 2-3 times greater to at least about 40 times greater than the etch rate for adjacent materials exposed to the same etchant. Because a function of the layers 130-150 overlying the primary hard mask layer 120 is to allow well-defined patterns to be formed in layer 120, it will be appreciated that one or more of the layers 130-150 may be omitted or substituted if suitable other materials, chemistries and/or process conditions are used.
In the illustrated embodiment, the selectively definable layer 150, which may comprise an optically or mechanically patternable layer overlies a hard mask, or etch stop, layer 140, which overlies a hard mask layer 130, which overlies the mask layer 120, which overlies the substrate 110 to be processed (e.g., etched) through a mask. Beneficially, the mask through which the substrate 110 is processed is formed in the hard mask layer 130 and/or in the mask layer 120.
With continued reference to
The material for the hard mask layer 130, which functions as an etch stop and exhibits anti-reflective properties, comprises an inorganic material. Suitable materials for hard mask layer 130 include silicon oxide (SiO2) or a deep ultra-violet (DUV) dielectric anti-reflective coating (DARC), such as a silicon-rich silicon oxynitride. In this embodiment of the invention, the hard mask layer 130 is a dielectric anti-reflective coating (DARC). Using a DARC for the hard mask layer 130 may be particularly advantageous for forming patterns having pitches near the resolution limits of a particular photolithographic technique. The DARC may enhance resolution by minimizing light reflections, thus increasing the precision with which photolithography may define the edges of a pattern. By way of nonlimiting example, the DARC layer may comprise a DUV DARC of about 200-400 Å (20-40 nm) thickness. Other suitable materials that exhibit adequate etch stop and anti-reflective properties may be used for the hard mask layer 130.
In the illustrated embodiment, the hard mask or etch stop layer 140 is formed of silicon, e.g., poly amorphous silicon, or a film of another material that exhibits good etch selectivity to oxide. Other suitable materials for the first hard mask layer 140 may include a silicon oxide, e.g., a low silane oxide (LSO), low temperature nitride, and a thin layer of aluminum oxide, such as Al2O3. The LSO is formed by chemical vapor deposition using a relatively low silane flow and a relatively high N2O precursor flow. Advantageously, such a deposition can be performed at relatively low temperatures, e.g., less than about 550° C., for example, less than about 400° C., to prevent damage to the underlying primary mask layer 120, when the layer 120 is formed of a temperature-sensitive material. It will be appreciated that oxides may typically be etched with greater selectivity relative to silicon than nitrides. For example, conventional etch chemistries for oxides may remove the oxides at a rate more than 10 times faster than amorphous silicon, while conventional etch chemistries for nitrides typically only remove the nitrides at a rate of about three times faster than poly amorphous silicon. As a result, both the spacers (discussed below) and the second hard mask layer are preferably formed of the same material, in the form of an oxide, when the first hard mask layer is formed of poly amorphous silicon.
The mask layer 120 may be formed of amorphous carbon due to the excellent etch selectivity of this material relative to many other materials, including a very high etch selectivity relative to the hard mask materials. Further, the transparent carbon is a form of amorphous carbon that is highly transparent to light and that offers further improvements for photo alignment by being transparent to the wavelengths of light used for such alignment. Deposition techniques for forming such transparent carbon are known to those of ordinary skill in the art and, so, need not be further described. The amorphous carbon is particularly advantageous for transferring patterns to difficult-to-etch substrates, such as the substrate 110 comprising multiple materials or multiple layers of materials, or for forming small and high aspect ratio features therein.
The combination of materials for the hard mask layers 130 and 140 are selectably chosen based upon the material used to form a first feature in the periphery 104 in combination with providing the material used to form the spacers in the array 102 allowing transfer of the pattern or mask formed by the layers, as discussed below, into the underlying mask layer 120. As previously mentioned, the mask layer 120 of the current embodiment is formed of amorphous carbon and layer 150 is formed of photoresist. Optionally, other combinations of materials may be utilized to advantage, for example and without limitation, including (spacer material/first hard mask material/second hard mask material): oxide/amorphous silicon/oxide; nitride/amorphous silicon/oxide; nitride/oxide/amorphous silicon; amorphous silicon/oxide/amorphous silicon; carbon/amorphous silicon/oxide; and carbon/oxide/amorphous silicon. It will be appreciated that the oxide may be a form of silicon oxide and the nitride may be silicon nitride. Where the spacer material is oxide, as discussed below, the associated hard mask layer 120 is a material that is preferentially etchable relative to the oxide. For example, the hard mask layer 120 may be formed of a silicon-containing material. Depending on the selection of appropriate etch chemistries and neighboring materials; examples of other materials include amorphous carbon and etchable high dielectric materials.
In addition to selecting appropriate materials for the various layers, the thicknesses of the layers 120-150 are selectively chosen depending upon compatibility with the etch chemistries and process conditions described herein. As discussed above, when transferring a pattern from an overlying layer to an underlying layer by selectively etching the underlying layer, materials from both layers are removed to some degree. Thus, the upper layer is sufficiently thick so that it is not removed over the course of the pattern transfer to the underlying layer but no so thick as to create an undesirable topography.
In the illustrated embodiment, the selectively definable layer 150 is about 2000 angstroms (“Å”) (200 nm) in thickness and, in other embodiments, may range in thickness from 500-3000 Å (50-300 nm). It is also recognized that the thickness of the selectively definable layer 150 may be to a greater or lesser extent than the 2000 Å illustrated. It will be appreciated that, in cases where the layer 150 is a photoresist, the thickness of the layer 150 may vary depending upon the wavelength of light used to pattern the layer 120. A thickness of about 500-3000 Å (50-300 nm) thick and, more specifically, a thickness of about 2000-2500 Å (200-250 nm), is particularly advantageous for 248 nm wavelength systems.
The hard mask layer 140 has a thickness of about 150-200 Å (20 nm) and, in other embodiments, may range in thickness to a greater or lesser extent than the 200 Å illustrated. One particularly suitable thickness is 100 Å. The hard mask layer 140 may have a thickness ranging from about 100 Å (10 nm) to about 400 Å (40 nm). The hard mask layer 130 is about 200-600 Å (20-60 nm) thick and, in other embodiments, may range in thickness to a greater or lesser extent. For example, the layer 130 may have a thickness of about 300-500 Å (30-50 nm).
As discussed above, the thickness of the mask layer 120 is chosen based upon the selectivity of the etch chemistry for etching the substrate and based upon the materials and complexity of the substrate. Advantageously, a thickness for mask layer 120 of about 3000 Å (300 nm) and, in other embodiments a thickness between 1000-5000 Å (100-500 nm) is particularly effective for transferring patterns to a variety of substrates, including substrates having a plurality of different materials to be etched during the transfer.
Transferring patterns into a variety of substrates is accommodated readily when utilizing a mask layer 120 of sufficient thickness. For example, the illustrated substrate 110 comprising a plurality of layers (not shown) may be etched to form word lines over an array of gate stacks. The layers of the substrate 110 may include a tungsten silicide layer overlying a polysilicon layer, which overlies an oxide-nitride-oxide (ONO) composite layer, which overlies a polysilicon layer, the layers in combination and as previously processed comprising an array of gate stacks.
The various layers discussed herein may be formed by various conventional methods. For example, spin-on-coating processes may be used to form photoresist, selectively definable layers. Various vapor deposition processes, such as chemical vapor deposition, may be used to form hard mask layers. Depositing each layer of materials may include depositing a material by coating, layering, or spinning, for example.
A low temperature chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process may be used to deposit the hard mask layers or any other materials, e.g., spacer material described herein, over the mask layer 120, especially in cases where the mask layer 120 is formed of amorphous carbon. Advantageously, it is known to those of ordinary skill in the art that the hard mask layers 140 and 130 may be deposited at relatively low temperatures of less than about 550° C., lower than about 450° C., and even lower than about 400° C. Such low temperature deposition processes advantageously prevent chemical or physical disruption of a mask layer 120 made of amorphous carbon material. Various methods for forming these layers are known to those of ordinary skill in the art and are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,115,525, 6,573,030, and U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2006/0211260, the entire disclosures of each of which documents are incorporated herein by reference.
After formation of the various layers 120-150 as described above, to improve and enhance the quality of a pattern of spacers formed by pitch multiplication, a first pattern of features is formed according to an embodiment of the invention. Then, a second pattern of spacers may be formed by pitch multiplication, followed by subjecting the patterns to a so-called “loop chop” process to eliminate closed loops formed in the mask. The pattern of features and the pattern of spacers at this point are consolidated for transferring into the substrate. The quality of the final structure formed within the substrate is improved by forming of the first pattern of features before forming the second pattern of spacers during a masking process. Specifically, as the second pattern of spacers is more sensitive to masking-related sensitivities and transferring processes than the first pattern of features, this process flow according to embodiments of the invention enables quality improvement in the second pattern of spacers by first subjecting the less dimensionally sensitive structures of the first pattern to the forming process.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a first pattern of features is formed principally in the periphery of the device. Each feature of the first pattern includes, particularly at minimum or larger critical dimensions that are directly formable in the photodefinable material of the selectively definable layer, and do not require a pitch reduction or multiplication technique as is required to obtain smaller critical dimensions of the spacers of the second pattern, as will be discussed below.
With reference to
After forming the first pattern 106, the hard mask layer 140 is etched to transfer the first pattern 106 formed in layer 150 down to the hard mask layer 140 as shown in
With reference to
Next, a second pattern of spacers is formed by pitch multiplication over the first pattern 106 of features 105′. The second pattern comprises spacers having smaller critical dimensions than the first pattern 106 of features 105′ as formed. In addition, the second pattern may be formed completely, partially, or not overlapping the first pattern 106.
Turning to
As with the selectively definable layer 150, the selectively definable layer 160 may be photodefinable, e.g., formed of a photoresist, including any suitable photoresist known in the art, such as a trimmable mandrel material. In addition, in other embodiments, the selectively definable layer 160 may be formed of a resist suitable for patterning by nano-imprint lithography.
Optionally, while not necessarily required, a planar surface (not shown) may be formed prior to depositing the layer 160 by depositing a planarizing material (not shown) around the features 105′ and upon the second hard mask layer 130 when required for improving the planarity of structure of the to-be-patterned array for forming spacers. Specifically, the planarizing layer may be employed where the resolution of the spacers to be formed in the second pattern may not be adequately defined without first providing a planarized surface. For example, a spin-on antireflective coating may be used for planarization purposes.
With reference to
The process flow as described below results in the second pattern 108 that includes a pitch or feature size smaller than the minimum pitch or resolution of the photolithographic technique used in forming it, unlike the first pattern 106 that includes pitch or feature size equal to or greater than the minimum pitch or resolution of the photolithographic technique used to form the first pattern 106. It will be appreciated that the second pattern 108 in the array 102 may be used to form arrays of conductive feeds, contacts and other semiconductor components when transferred into the substrate 110, for example and without limitation.
The second pattern 108 includes spaces or trenches 162, which are delimited by photodefinable material features, or lines, 164 formed in the photodefinable layer 160. The trenches 162 may be formed by, for example, photolithography with 248 nm or 193 nm wavelengths light, in which the layer 160 is exposed to radiation through a reticle and then developed as is known by a person of ordinary skill in the art. After being developed, the remaining photodefinable material, photoresist in the illustrated embodiment, forms mask features such as the array of lines 164 (shown in cross-section only) as illustrated.
The resulting pitch of the lines 164 is equal to the sum of the width of a line 164 and the width of a neighboring space 162. To minimize the critical dimensions of features formed using this pattern of lines 164 and spaces 162, the pitch may be at or near the limits of the photolithographic technique used to pattern the photodefinable layer 160. For example, for photolithography utilizing 248 nm light, the pitch of the lines 164 can be about 1000 Å (100 nm). Thus, the pitch may be at the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique and the spacer formed in the pattern as discussed below may advantageously have a pitch below the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique.
As shown in
Next, as shown in
Methods for depositing the material of the spacer layer 170 may include chemical vapor deposition, e.g., using O3 and TEOS to form silicon oxide, and atomic layer deposition, e.g., using a silicon precursor with an oxygen or nitrogen precursor to form silicon oxides and nitrides, respectively. The thickness of the spacer layer 170 is preferentially determined based upon the desired width of the spacers 172 (
Turning now to
Optionally, in other embodiments of the invention as shown in
Thus, pitch reduction or multiplication for spacers 172 has been accomplished. In the illustrated embodiment, the pitch of the spacers 172 is roughly half that of the photoresist lines 164 and spaces 162 (
Optionally, a second pattern of spacers may be formed after the first pattern of features is formed by utilizing other methods of pitch multiplication. Other methods of pitch multiplication may require layering different or select layers of material above the substrate in addition to the layers mentioned herein. For example, a method of forming a pattern of spacers by pitch multiplication is described in paragraphs [0056]-[0092] and FIGS. 2A-10 of U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0046422 to Tran et al., dated Mar. 2, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
In methods according to embodiments of the invention, spacer material in the form of loops of spacer material connecting adjacent spacers 172 is etched to remove the loops and isolate the spacers 172. This etch may be used to form two separate lines of spacers 172 initially connected at their adjacent ends by a loop of spacer material extending around the end of a line 164a corresponding to two separate conductive paths to be formed in the substrate 110. It will be appreciated that more than two lines may be formed, if desired, by etching the spacers 172 at more than two locations. Other suitable method for cutting off the ends of the loops is disclosed in U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0046422 to Tran et al., dated Mar. 2, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
To form the separate lines, a protective mask is formed over parts of the lines to be retained and the exposed, unprotected part of the loop of spacer material connecting the spacer lines are then etched. The protective mask is then removed to leave a plurality of physically separated and electrically isolated lines comprised of spacers 172.
With reference to
In other embodiments, it will be appreciated that the protective layer 181 may be formed of any material that may be selectively removed, e.g., relative to the spacers 172, the layers 130, 140, 160a, and 170. In those cases, the protective mask 182 may be formed in another material, e.g., photoresist, overlying the protective layer 181.
Advantageously, where the ends of the spacers 172 extend in a straight line, the length and simple geometry of the straight lines may minimize the precision required for forming the protective mask 182; that is, the protective mask need only be formed so that it leaves the ends of the spacers 172 exposed. Thus, by centering the mask a selected distance from the ends of the spacers 172, a misaligned mask may cause slightly more or less of the spacers 172 to be exposed, but may still accomplish the objective of leaving the ends adequately exposed. While the margin of error for aligning the protective mask 182 is larger than if the protective mask 182 were required to form a geometrically complex shape, it is recognized that other shapes may be formed in the protective mask 182 different from the rectangular shape of the protective mask 182 as illustrated. See, for example, U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0046422 to Tran et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
With reference to
Optionally, where the protective mask 182 is sufficiently thick and the lines 164a were not previously removed, the exposed portions of the photoresist lines 164a may be descummed or etched away in order to facilitate etching the exposed portions of the spacers 172. For example, an O2/N2 reactive ion etch, an O2 etch, or a CF4 and/or CHF3 plasma etch may be employed. Also, the exposed surface of the partially fabricated device 100, i.e., the portion not protected by the protective mask 182, may be cleaned prior to the etching the exposed portions of the spacers 172.
With reference to
According to embodiments of the invention, the modified pattern 109 comprising the spacers 172 and the features 105′ of the patterns 108 and 106, respectively, may be simultaneously transferred to the substrate 110.
With reference to
Optionally, before transferring the modified pattern into the layers 120 and 130, the modified pattern 109 is cleaned. As noted above, the carbon material forming the layers 130 and 181 may polymerize upon contact with etchants, leaving a residue around features or spacers on the hard mask layer 130, causing a modified pattern 109 having undesirably non-uniform feature sizes. Thus, the modified pattern 109 is cleaned by stripping off an organic material. The cleaning may be accomplished using, e.g., an isotropic etch with O2 plasma and may be done simultaneously while stripping of the protective mask 182. For example, O2 wet clean with an H2O, H2O2, NH4OH or so-called “SCI” solution.
Turning to
After the modified pattern 109 is transferred to the mask layer 120, the pattern 109 is transferred to the substrate 110 using the patterned mask layer 120 as a mask as shown in
The spacers 172 and the features 105′ of the modified pattern 109 may be employed to respectively form interconnect lines such as word lines and associated integrated device features, such as landing pads as transferred into the substrate. Methods for forming interconnects and landing pads are disclosed in U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0046422 to Tran et al., dated Mar. 2, 2006, the entire disclosure of which was previously incorporated herein by reference. Other methods for forming interconnects and landing pad are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,115,525 to Abatchev et al., dated Oct. 3, 2006, and U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0211260 to Tran et al., dated Sep. 21, 2006, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
It will also be appreciated that the pitch of the pattern 108 may be more than doubled as is shown in the drawing figures herein, particularly before the modified pattern 109 is transferred to the substrate. For example, the pattern 108 may be further pitch multiplied by forming spacers around the spacers 172, then removing the spacers 172, then forming spacers around the spacers that were formerly around the spacers 172, and so on. For example, a method for further pitch multiplication is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,328,810 to Lowrey et al., the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, while embodiments of the invention may advantageously be applied to form a modified pattern 109 having both pitch multiplied and conventionally photolithographically defined features, the patterns 106 and 108 may both be pitch multiplied or may have different degrees of pitch multiplication.
In addition, the embodiments of the invention may be employed multiple times throughout an integrated device fabrication process to form pitch multiplied features and conventional features in a plurality of layers or vertical levels, which may be vertically contiguous or non-contiguous and vertically separated. In such cases, each of the individual levels to be patterned would constitute a substrate 110 and the various layers 120-181 may be formed over the individual level to be patterned. It will also be appreciated that the particular composition and height of the various layers 120-181 discussed above may be varied depending upon a particular application. In one regard, the layer 120 may be sufficiently thin in order to provide structural stability to the mask, to protect the substrate material throughout fabrication, and to allow the mask to be transferred into the substrate 110 without complete removal of the material of layer 120 before the final etch is finished. For example, the thickness of the layer 120 may be varied depending upon the identity of the substrate 110, e.g., the chemical composition of the substrate, whether the substrate comprises single or multiple layers of material, the depth of features to be formed, for example, and the available etch chemistries, without limitation. In some cases, one or more layers of layers 120-181 may be omitted or more layers may be added. For example, the layer 120 may be omitted in cases where the hard mask layer 130 is sufficiently durable to adequately transfer a modified pattern 109 to the substrate 110.
Also, while “processing” through the various mask layers involves etching an underlying layer, processing through the mask layers may involve subjecting layers underlying the mask layers to any semiconductor fabrication process. For example, processing may involve ion implantation, diffusion doping, depositing, or wet etching, without limitation, through the mask layers and onto underlying layers. In addition, the mask layers may be used as a stop or barrier for chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) or CMP may be performed on any of the layers to allow for both planarization and etching of the underlying layers, as disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/666,031, filed Mar. 28, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
It will be appreciated that the “substrate” to which patterns are transferred may include a layer of a single material, a plurality of layers of different materials, a layer or layers having regions of different materials or structures in them, etc. These materials may include semiconductors, insulators, conductors, or combinations thereof. For example, the substrate may comprise doped polysilicon, an electrical device active area, a silicide, or a metal layer, such as a tungsten, aluminum or copper layer, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the mask features discussed herein may directly correspond to the desired placement of conductive features 190, such as interconnects, in the substrate, as shown in
Further, in any of the acts described herein above, transferring a pattern from an overlying level to an underlying level involves forming features or spacers in the underlying level that generally correspond to features or spacers in the overlying level. For example, the path of lines in the underlying level will generally follow the path of lines in the overlying level and the location of other features in the underlying level will correspond to the location of similar features or spacers in the overlying level. The precise shapes and sizes of features and spacers may vary from the overlying level to the underlying level, however. For example, depending upon etch chemistries and conditions, the sizes of and relative spacing between the features and spacers forming the transferred patterns may be enlarged or diminished relative to the pattern on the overlying level, while still resembling the same initial “pattern,” as are seen from the example of shrinking the lines in the embodiments described above. Thus, even with some changes in the dimensions of features or spacers, the transferred pattern, or patterns, is still considered to be the same pattern, or patterns, as the initial pattern. In contrast, forming spacers around mask features, e.g., the lines, may change the pattern.
Embodiments of the invention provide reverse pitch reduction flow enabling improved pattern transfer and the formation of differently sized features in conjunction with the use of pitch multiplication.
In methods according to embodiments of the invention, a sequence of layers of materials is formed that allow formation of a mask for processing a substrate to fabricate, for example, a memory chip or other integrated circuit device incorporating at least two regions on the active surface thereof having structural elements of substantially differing feature size. Thereafter, a first pattern of features is formed where conventional photolithography may be used to form the first pattern defining features in the mask, the features being generally formed in one region of the device, e.g., the peripheral region of the memory chip. Subsequently, a second pattern of spacers is formed using pitch multiplication. The second pattern of spacers form an element array in another region of the device, e.g., the memory array of the memory chip, advantageously eliminating acts conventionally required to form the spacers when subsequent features of various sizes are required to be formed therewith. The quality of the pattern of spacers may be improved and enhanced for subsequent transfer to the underlying substrate while potentially eliminating additional layering, cleaning, and etching acts otherwise conventionally required in order to form a device having respective features of diverse dimensions in the region of the memory array and in the peripheral region. The second pattern may completely or partially overlap the first pattern, or, in some embodiments, may be completely formed in different regions of the device, e.g., the periphery of the memory chip. The first pattern and the second pattern may be selectively covered by a protective mask and subjected to a so-called “loop chop” process to eliminate undesirable closed loops in order to obtain a modified pattern for transfer to the substrate. Optionally, a “loop chop” may be omitted during fabrication for a particular polarity of a level, thus saving an additional masking step.
Embodiments of the invention facilitate combining the patterns forming the differently sized spacers and features and successfully transferring the spacer and feature sizes and configurations to the underlying substrate while subjecting the spacers, with their size below the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique used for patterning them, to fewer process acts which might compromise the quality of the transfer.
In further embodiments of the invention, the pattern of pitch-multiplied resolution spacers may be configured as an array.
While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and other embodiments will occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, the invention is only limited in terms of the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/635,023, filed Mar. 2, 2015, now abandoned, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/830,449, filed Jul. 30, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,756, issued Mar. 17, 2015, the disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4091406 | Lewis | May 1978 | A |
5047117 | Roberts | Sep 1991 | A |
5254218 | Roberts et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5411909 | Manning et al. | May 1995 | A |
5488011 | Figura et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5573837 | Roberts et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5618383 | Randall | Apr 1997 | A |
5686357 | Howard | Nov 1997 | A |
5691547 | Manning et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5770479 | Brooks et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5835225 | Thakur | Nov 1998 | A |
5844254 | Manning et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851916 | Howard | Dec 1998 | A |
5866453 | Prall et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5869843 | Harshfield | Feb 1999 | A |
5897372 | Howard | Apr 1999 | A |
5980349 | Hofmann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6049093 | Manning et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077729 | Harshfield | Jun 2000 | A |
6100180 | Howard | Aug 2000 | A |
6117767 | Howard | Sep 2000 | A |
6121665 | Gonzalez et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124164 | Al-Shareef et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6271067 | Gonzalez et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274423 | Prall et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6294824 | Brooks et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297129 | Tran et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6307238 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326652 | Rhodes | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328620 | Hu | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329750 | Hofmann et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348411 | Ireland et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351005 | Al-Shareef et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6387600 | Hanson | May 2002 | B1 |
6410453 | Sandhu | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420250 | Cho et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420259 | Howard | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422906 | Hofmann et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455439 | Sandhu | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6465865 | Gonzalez | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475921 | Sandhu | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6492212 | Ieong et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495434 | Rhodes | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501114 | Cho et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6515350 | Moore | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6545406 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554671 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607944 | Tran et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624024 | Prall et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624085 | Sandhu | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638441 | Chang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656371 | Drewes | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6716080 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6717351 | Hu | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734502 | Gonzalez et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734619 | Hofmann et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740916 | Ireland et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6746907 | Gonzalez et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767811 | Rhodes | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770927 | Cho et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6806175 | Moore | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6823693 | Hofmann et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6844580 | Rhodes | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6933207 | Tran et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955961 | Chung | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6958519 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6981904 | Hofmann et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7037771 | Rhodes | May 2006 | B2 |
7045834 | Tran et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071067 | Ahmad | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7074717 | Rhodes | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7115506 | Ireland et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115525 | Abatchev et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7151040 | Tran et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153753 | Forbes | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7202171 | Trapp | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7253118 | Tran et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262428 | Forbes | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7268054 | Tran et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7341906 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7361569 | Tran et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7368362 | Tran et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7368790 | Forbes | May 2008 | B2 |
7390746 | Bai et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393789 | Abatchev et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7396781 | Wells | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7429536 | Abatchev et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7435536 | Sandhu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455956 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7473647 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7488685 | Kewley | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7517764 | Booth et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7547640 | Abatchev et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7560390 | Sant et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563712 | Jung | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7576010 | Lee et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579278 | Sandhu | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7611944 | Tran et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7611980 | Wells et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7629693 | Abatchev et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7648919 | Tran et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651951 | Tran et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655387 | Sandhu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666578 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7687408 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7709390 | Olson | May 2010 | B2 |
7718540 | Tran et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7732343 | Niroomand et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7759197 | Tran | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7776683 | Tran et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776744 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7790531 | Tran | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808053 | Haller et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7829262 | Tran | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7884022 | Bai et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7902074 | Niroomand et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7968403 | Ireland et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7993957 | Bez et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8003542 | Sant et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012674 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8030222 | Tran et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8039399 | Niroomand et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043915 | Tran | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048812 | Tran et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8053899 | Rhodes | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8076208 | Smith | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8119535 | Tran et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8158476 | Tran et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8173550 | Sant et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8207576 | Tran et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8216949 | Abatchev et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8334211 | Kewley | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8338085 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8389383 | Hopkins | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8390034 | Tran | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8426118 | Tran | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8431971 | Tran | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8450829 | Fischer et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8507341 | Tran et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8557704 | Wells et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8563229 | Tran | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8593001 | Hopkins | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8598041 | Sant et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8598632 | Tran et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8609324 | Tran | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8674512 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8859362 | Tran et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8865598 | Sant et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8883644 | Wells et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8889020 | Kewley | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8921034 | Hopkins | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8928111 | Smith | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8932960 | Tran | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8980756 | Tran et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9035416 | Fischer et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9048194 | Zhu | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9099314 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117766 | Sant et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9147608 | Tran et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9184159 | Niroomand et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9412591 | Tran | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9412594 | Tran et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9478497 | Wells et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9553082 | Kewley | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20010013612 | Tran et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010036743 | Sandhu | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010036745 | Sandhu | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030001182 | Tran et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030067017 | Ieong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050029619 | Forbes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050087842 | Forbes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050161721 | Iyer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060046200 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046201 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046407 | Juengling | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046422 | Tran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046483 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046484 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060208282 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211260 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216922 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216923 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228854 | Tran et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240362 | Sandhu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258109 | Juengling | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258162 | Abatchev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262511 | Abatchev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263699 | Abatchev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264000 | Tran et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264001 | Tran et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264002 | Tran et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267152 | Forbes | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273456 | Sant et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070045712 | Haller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048674 | Wells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049011 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049030 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049032 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049035 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049040 | Bai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070117310 | Bai et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128856 | Tran et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138526 | Tran et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148984 | Abatchev et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161251 | Tran et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070190463 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070224823 | Sandhu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238299 | Niroomand et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238308 | Niroomand et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249170 | Kewley | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070261016 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264830 | Huang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281219 | Sandhu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001187 | Booth et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008969 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014533 | Keller et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080057692 | Wells et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070165 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085612 | Smythe et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080122125 | Zhou | May 2008 | A1 |
20080162781 | Haller et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176406 | Ikeda et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080220600 | Alapati et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080280212 | Kumar | Nov 2008 | A9 |
20080299774 | Sandhu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090035584 | Tran et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090053892 | Meyer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090258492 | Sant et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100003797 | Smith | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100029081 | Wells et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100092890 | Sandhu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092891 | Tran et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100112489 | Fischer et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100203727 | Abatchev et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210111 | Tran et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100243161 | Tran | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110269252 | Sant et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291224 | Fischer et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120044735 | Tran et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120061807 | Tran | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074500 | Smith | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120202350 | Sant et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120256309 | Tran et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130105937 | Niroomand et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130105976 | Sandhu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130161799 | Hopkins | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130256827 | Fischer et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130323929 | Zhu | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140038416 | Wells et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140087563 | Sant et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140091434 | Hopkins | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150024602 | Sant et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150054168 | Wells et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150170905 | Tran et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160225634 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Tran et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/666,031 entitled Integrated Circuit Fabrication, filed Mar. 28, 2005. |
International Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/070407, dated Feb. 11, 2009, 4 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/070407, dated Feb. 11, 2009, 3 pages. |
International Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/070407, dated Feb. 2, 2010. |
Lam Research Corporation; Technical Glossary #C; 1 page; https://www.lamresearch.com/ technical-glossary/#C; definition of conformal. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190148135 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14635023 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 16249369 | US | |
Parent | 11830449 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 14635023 | US |