Methods, structures, and designs for self-aligning local interconnects used in integrated circuits

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10734383
  • Patent Number
    10,734,383
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 2, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 4, 2020
    3 years ago
Abstract
An integrated circuit includes a gate electrode level region that includes a plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures. Each of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures is defined to extend lengthwise in a first direction. Some of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures form one or more gate electrodes of corresponding transistor devices. A local interconnect conductive structure is formed between two of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures so as to extend in the first direction along the two of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention generally relates to integrated circuits and particularly, but without limitation, to the design and fabrication of self-aligned local interconnects for interconnecting semiconductor devices in an integrated circuit.


As semiconductor technology continues to advance, a continuing trend is towards ultra large-scale integration with the fabrication of smaller and smaller integrated circuits containing more and more devices on a single semiconductor chip.


Scaling of devices has long been used to increase the density of logic and memory functions. This scaling has been possible because of improvements in photolithography and other process steps. However, as optical lithography reaches the end of the cost effective improvement curve, other approaches to improve density are needed.


Interconnect provides connections between NMOS and PMOS transistors and other components such as resistors and capacitors in a semiconductor chip. Interconnects are generally fabricated by first depositing and planarizing dielectric layers on the semiconductor devices and passive components. Next, feed-thrus are formed in the dielectric layers. Finally, conductors are formed and routed over the dielectric layers to connect the feed-thrus. A stack is formed of multiple layers of dielectrics, feed-thrus, and conductors to complete the circuit node interconnection. This process of fabricating interconnects is generally termed “metallization.” As the density of devices on the semiconductor chip is increased, the complexity of metallization has also increased.


Local interconnects can be a special form of interconnects. Local interconnects are generally used for short distances, such as within a functional cell. Conventional circuits use the same interconnect levels for both local and global connections.


Traditionally, diffusion regions to Vdd and Vss contacts require fabricating L shaped or T shaped bent diffusion regions extending towards Vdd and Vss lines from PMOS and NMOS diffusion regions, respectively. The bent regions are not preferred because they require more costly photolithography equipment to fabricate. Alternatively, Vdd and Vss rails may be extended over rectangular diffusion regions and contacts may be formed to the diffusion regions. However, it is inefficient to have the power rails over the diffusion regions because they occupy tracks that could be used for signals and they are no longer located at a cell boundary so they can not be shared between vertically adjacent cells.


It is within this context that embodiments of the invention arise.


SUMMARY

Broadly speaking, embodiments of the present invention defines methods of fabrication, structures, layouts, design methodologies, and conductive structures to enable the definition of local interconnects of a circuit. The local interconnects, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, are referred to herein as “self-aligned” local interconnects, as they align, in response to the fabrication process, in channels or regions between or beside gate electrodes. The local interconnects, are ones defined in the self-aligned orientation that can be patterned to remove some of the material, leaving only those portions that are needed to complete selected local interconnections.


One of many beneficial features is that a circuit layout can be done with rectangular or substantially diffusion regions. These rectangular diffusion regions can be fabricated with better fidelity than diffusion regions with bends or extensions. Additionally, the self-aligned local interconnects can be used to make the power connections (i.e., Vdd and Vss) with the source and drains of transistors, without requiring diffusion region extensions. Self-aligned local interconnects can also eliminate the need for certain contacts to transistor diffusion regions. As will be described in greater detail below, the local interconnects make direct and integral contact with the diffusion regions. Thus, the local interconnects provide previously unavailable metal routing on the substrate level, which serves to eliminate the need for certain first metal tracks, certain vias, and in some cases, a second metal track (e.g., for connections between NMOS transistor source/drains and PMOS transistor source/drains).


Still further, by eliminating traditional diffusion contacts in active transistor channels, the strain layer in the diffusion regions are not altered. This improves the effectiveness of mobility enhancing strain layers. In addition, allowing the diffusion contacts to be connected to a wider choice of metal-1 tracks gives more flexibility in circuit design, thus enhancing layout and making for more efficient place & route.


In one embodiment, a method for designing local interconnect structures is disclosed. The method includes designing diffusion regions to be in a substrate. Some of a plurality of gates are designed to be active gates and some of the plurality of gates are designed to be formed over isolation regions. The method includes designing the plurality of gates in a regular and repeating alignment along a same direction, and each of the plurality of gates are designed to have dielectric spacers. The method also includes designing a local interconnect layer between or adjacent to the plurality of gates. The local interconnect layer is conductive and disposed over the substrate to allow electrical contact and interconnection with or to some of the diffusion regions of the active gates. The local interconnect layer is self-aligned by the dielectric spacers of the plurality of gates.


The advantages of the present inventions are numerous. Most notably, the self-aligned local interconnects permit diffusion region with fewer bends, extensions, etc. The self-aligned local interconnects also reduces the number of contacts needed, metal 1 track usage, number of vias needed to make contact to diffusions, and in turn metal 2 track usage. Thus, more tracks are opened up for routing. Furthermore, use of the self-aligned local interconnects reduces use of metal to diffusion contacts, which reduces interference with strain materials on the substrate. Thus, by eliminating most metal to diffusion regions, device efficiency is boosted significantly. The self-aligned local interconnect also provide more flexibility in metal-1 track assignments for connections within a cell or cells, improving density and simplifying subsequent place and route.


Another advantage of the self-aligning process for the fabrication of local interconnects over photo aligned process is that the fabrication of the self-aligned local interconnects does not require dependence on the lithography for aligning the local interconnects with the side wall spacers of the gates. It is well known that the lithography has a margin of error, hence, even if minor shift in the local interconnect layer towards the side wall spacers of the gates in the integrated circuit may “short” the device or will result in an unwanted outcome.


In one embodiment, a semiconductor device is disclosed. The semiconductor device includes a substrate portion and a plurality of diffusion regions formed in the substrate portion to define source and drain regions of transistor devices. The semiconductor device also includes a gate electrode layer including a number of linear-shaped conductive structures each defined to extend lengthwise over the substrate portion in only a single common direction. Portions of some of the linear-shaped conductive structures that extend over the plurality of diffusion regions form a plurality of gate electrode segments of corresponding transistor devices. The semiconductor device also includes local interconnect metal disposed on the substrate portion between the linear-shaped conductive structures of the gate electrode layer. The local interconnect metal is configured to form connections to, from, or between the source and drain regions, or between selected source or drain regions and one or more of the linear-shaped conductive structures that form one or more gate electrode segments. The local interconnect metal is disposed beneath an inter-metal dielectric material.


In another embodiment, a semiconductor device is disclosed. The semiconductor device includes a substrate portion and a number of diffusion regions formed within the substrate portion. The number of diffusion regions are separated from each other by a number of isolation regions formed within the substrate portion. The semiconductor device also includes a gate electrode layer defined over the substrate portion to include a number of linear-shaped conductive structures each formed to extend in a single common direction over the substrate portion. Portions of some of the linear-shaped conductive structures extend over one or more of the number of diffusion regions formed within the substrate to form gate electrodes. The gate electrode layer further includes dielectric side spacers formed along side surfaces of the linear-shaped conductive structures. Channels exist within the gate electrode layer between dielectric side spacers formed along facing side surfaces of each pair of adjacently disposed linear-shaped conductive structures. The semiconductor device further includes a number of local interconnect structures disposed on the substrate regions within portions of one or more of the channels. Portions of the number of local interconnect structures are self-aligned according to disposal of the linear-shaped conductive structures and have a corresponding linear-shape along the single common direction in which the number of linear-shaped conductive structures extend.


In another embodiment, an integrated circuit includes a gate electrode level region that includes a plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures. Each of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures is defined to extend lengthwise in a first direction. Some of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures form one or more gate electrodes of corresponding transistor devices. A local interconnect conductive structure is formed between two of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures so as to extend in the first direction along the two of the plurality of linear-shaped conductive structures.


In another embodiment, an integrated circuit includes a gate electrode level region that includes first, second, and third linear-shaped conductive structures positioned in a side-by-side and spaced-apart manner, such that the second linear-shaped conductive structure is positioned between the first and third linear-shaped conductive structures. Each of the first, second, and third linear-shaped conductive structures is formed to extend lengthwise in a first direction. The second linear-shaped conductive structure extends over a diffusion region of a first diffusion type to form a gate electrode of a transistor of a first transistor type. The second linear-shaped conductive structure also extends over a diffusion region of a second diffusion type to form a gate electrode of a transistor of a second transistor type. A first local interconnect conductive structure is formed between the first and second linear-shaped conductive structures so as to extend in the first direction along the first and second linear-shaped conductive structures. A second local interconnect conductive structure is formed between the second and third linear-shaped conductive structures so as to extend in the first direction along the second and third linear-shaped conductive structures.


Other aspects and advantages of the present inventions will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the present invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. To facilitate this description, like reference numerals designate like structural elements.



FIG. 1 shows a generalized stack of layers used to define a dynamic array architecture, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2A is shows an exemplary base grid to be projected onto the dynamic array to facilitate definition of the restricted topology, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2B shows separate base grids projected across separate regions of the die, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 shows a diffusion layer layout of an exemplary dynamic array, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4A shows a gate electrode layer and the diffusion layer of FIG. 3, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4B is an illustration showing a gate electrode layer and a diffusion contact layer above and adjacent to the diffusion layer of FIG. 4A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4C is an illustration showing a gate electrode contact layer defined above and adjacent to the gate electrode layer of FIG. 4B, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4D is an illustration showing a semiconductor chip structure, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4E shows an example layout architecture defined in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5A illustrates a circuit representation of a logic inverter using a PMOS and an NMOS transistor, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5B illustrates a plan view of an exemplary logic inverter to demonstrate a use of the self-aligned local interconnects, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6A illustrates a plan view of an exemplary logic inverter showing transistor source/drains, electrodes, and sidewall spacers surrounding the gate electrodes, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6B illustrates a cross-section view of cutline A-A′ of the exemplary logic inverter of FIG. 6A showing a transistor well, transistor source/drains, gate electrodes, sidewall spacers, and STI regions, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7A shows a section of an exemplary logic inverter with a local interconnect layer covering the underlying elements shown in FIG. 6A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7B is a cross-section view of a section of an exemplary logic inverter with a local interconnect layer covering the underlying elements shown in FIG. 6B, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 8A illustrates formation of silicide through annealing of the local interconnect layer, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 8B illustrates depositing a hard mask layer on top of the local interconnect layer over the substrate, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 9A illustrates a polymer layer covering the elements of FIG. 8B, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 9B illustrates a cross section view of the substrate in which the polymer layer is partially removed through plasma etch, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 9C illustrates a plan view of the substrate in which the polymer layer is etched back to approximately the top of the gate electrodes, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 10A illustrates a plan view of the exemplary logic inverter after a wet etch to remove the polymer from the dielectric spacers, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 10B illustrates a cross-section view of the exemplary logic inverter after removal of the polymer covering the dielectric spacers, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 11A illustrates a cross section view of the exemplary logic inverter after etching the local interconnect layer and the hard mask layer from the gate electrodes and dielectric spacers, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 11B illustrates a cross section view of the exemplary logic inverter after selective etch of the remaining polymer layer and hard mask layer, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 12 illustrates a plan view of the exemplary logic inverter after selective etch of the remaining polymer layer and hard mask layer, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 13 illustrates a plan view of the exemplary logic inverter after masking portions of the local interconnect layer to protect the local interconnect layer at desired places, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 14 illustrates a plan view of the exemplary logic inverter showing remaining regions of silicided and non-silicided local interconnect, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 15 illustrates a plan view of an exemplary logic inverter as in FIG. 14, with contacts and metal lines added to shown a functional interconnection, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 16 illustrates a plan view of an exemplary logic inverter showing the self-aligned local interconnect in a gap of a gate line, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 17A-17D illustrate cross-sectional views of an exemplary logic inverter, which uses the local interconnect metal to make connections to a gate, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 18 illustrates a plan view of an exemplary logic inverter showing the self-aligned local interconnect in a gap of a gate line and making connection to a gate upon “climbing” a spacer, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of an invention for methods and processes for designing, layout-out, making, fabricating and implementing “self-aligned local interconnects” in integrated circuits, are disclosed. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. In one embodiment, a process of fabricating self-aligned local interconnects is provided. In other embodiments, method and layout techniques are disclosed, which illustrate ways of using the self-aligned local interconnects. The benefits and advantages of using these self-aligned local interconnects are also outlined below, with specific reference to a particular logic cell. However, it should be understood that the example logic cell is not limiting on the use of local interconnects that are self-aligned. The use of self-aligned local interconnects can be extended to any circuit layout, logic device, logic cell, logic primitive, interconnect structure, design mask, etc. Therefore, in the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.


The self-aligned local interconnects have numerous applications in the fabrication of integrated circuits. The self-aligning of the local interconnects in integrated circuits eliminates lithography error margins and resulting device loss, as even a minor misalignment of a local interconnect on the integrated circuit may cause an electric short and/or render the device inoperable.


Furthermore, self-aligned local interconnects may be used for various other purposes. One such purpose is to use the self-aligned local interconnects to move away metal contacts from the diffusion regions of transistors.


Additionally, the process of fabricating “self-aligned” local interconnects in integrated circuits is advantageous over other techniques, which require precise aligning through lithography processes. As is known, as feature sizes continue to shrink, the ability to accurately align masks has not kept pace. Additionally, interference patterns from neighboring shapes can create constructive or destructive interference. In the case of constructive interference, unwanted shapes may be inadvertently created. In the case of destructive interference, desired shapes may be inadvertently removed. In either case, a particular shape is printed in a different manner than intended, possibly causing a device failure. Correction methodologies, such as optical proximity correction (OPC), attempt to predict the impact from neighboring shapes and modify the mask such that the printed shape is fabricated as desired. As noted, however, the quality of the light interaction prediction is declining as process geometries shrink and as the light interactions become more complex.


With this overview in mind, the following figures will illustrate example structures, fabrication steps, layout geometries, masks, and interconnect layouts. All of which can be presented in either a layout, masks, computer files having mask definitions, and resulting layers on a semiconductor substrate. Consequently, it should be understood that the fabrication processes described below are only exemplary, and some steps may be omitted or replaced by other steps, so long as the spirit and definition of a “self-aligned” local interconnect line is maintained.


In one embodiment, the methods and structures of the present invention take advantage of a consistent feature orientation, which defines a canvas of substantially uniform feature orientations. In a canvas, a number of diffusion regions are defined within the substrate to define active regions for transistor devices. The canvas also includes a number of linear gate electrode segments oriented in a common direction over the substrate. Some of the linear gate electrode segments are disposed over a diffusion region. Each of the linear gate electrode segments that is disposed over a diffusion region includes a necessary active portion defined over the diffusion region and a uniformity extending portion defined to extend over the substrate beyond the diffusion region. Additionally, the linear gate electrode segments are defined to have variable lengths to enable logic gate functionality. The canvas further includes a number of linear conductor segments disposed within a level over the gate electrode segments, so as to cross the common direction of the gate electrode segments in a substantially perpendicular direction. The number of linear conductor segments is defined to minimize an end-to-end spacing between adjacent linear conductor segments within a common line over the substrate.


In describing the figures and explaining the embodiments, various details of the fabrication process that are well known in the art, have been left out for providing clarity and focus on the embodiments being described. Furthermore, many terms related with the fabrication process are not described in detail because these terms are well known in the art.


I. Overview of Canvas Design Implementing Consistent Relative Feature Orientation



FIG. 1 is an illustration showing a generalized stack of layers used to define a dynamic array architecture, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. It should be appreciated that the generalized stack of layers used to define the dynamic array architecture, as described with respect to FIG. 1, is not intended to represent an exhaustive description of the CMOS manufacturing process. However, the dynamic array is to be built in accordance with standard CMOS manufacturing processes. Generally speaking, the dynamic array architecture includes both the definition of the underlying structure of the dynamic array and the techniques for assembling the dynamic array for optimization of area utilization and manufacturability. Thus, the dynamic array is designed to optimize semiconductor manufacturing capabilities.


With regard to the definition of the underlying structure of the dynamic array, the dynamic array is built-up in a layered manner upon a base substrate (e.g. semiconductor wafer) 201, e.g., upon a silicon substrate, or silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate. Diffusion regions 203 are defined in the base substrate 201. The diffusion regions 203 are generally separated by the isolation regions or Shallow Trench Isolation (STI) regions. The diffusion regions 203 represent selected regions of the base substrate 201 within which impurities are introduced for the purpose of modifying the electrical properties of the base substrate 201. Above the diffusion regions 203, diffusion contacts 205 are defined to enable connection between the diffusion regions 203 and conductor lines. For example, the diffusion contacts 205 are defined to enable connection between source and drain diffusion regions 203 and their respective conductor nets. Also, gate electrode features 207 are defined above the diffusion regions 203 to form transistor gates. Gate electrode contacts 209 are defined to enable connection between the gate electrode features 207 and conductor lines. For example, the gate electrode contacts 209 are defined to enable connection between transistor gates and their respective conductor nets.


Interconnect layers are defined above the diffusion contact 205 layer and the gate electrode contact layer 209. The interconnect layers include a first metal (metal 1) layer 211, a first via (via 1) layer 213, a second metal (metal 2) layer 215, a second via (via 2) layer 217, a third metal (metal 3) layer 219, a third via (via 3) layer 221, and a fourth metal (metal 4) layer 223. The metal and via layers enable definition of the desired circuit connectivity. For example, the metal and via layers enable electrical connection of the various diffusion contacts 205 and gate electrode contacts 209 such that the logic function of the circuitry is realized. It should be appreciated that the dynamic array architecture is not limited to a specific number of interconnect layers, i.e., metal and via layers. In one embodiment, the dynamic array may include additional interconnect layers 225, beyond the fourth metal (metal 4) layer 223. Alternatively, in another embodiment, the dynamic array may include less than four metal layers.


The dynamic array is defined such that layers (other than the diffusion region layer 203) are restricted with regard to layout feature shapes that can be defined therein. Specifically, in each layer other than the diffusion region layer 203, substantially linear-shaped layout features are allowed. A linear-shaped layout feature in a given layer is characterized as having a consistent vertical cross-section shape and extending in a single direction over the substrate. Some minor perpendicular extrusions would be allowed, however, if contacts need to be made to some lines, but these minor perpendicular extrusions should not constitute a substantial change in direction. Thus, the linear-shaped layout features define structures that are one-dimensionally varying. The diffusion regions 203 are not required to be one-dimensionally varying, although they are allowed to be if necessary. Specifically, the diffusion regions 203 within the substrate can be defined to have any two-dimensionally varying shape with respect to a plane coincident with a top surface of the substrate. In one embodiment, the number of diffusion bend topologies is limited such that the interaction between the bend in diffusion and the conductive material, e.g., polysilicon, that forms the gate electrode of the transistor is predictable and can be accurately modeled. The linear-shaped layout features in a given layer are positioned to be parallel with respect to each other. Thus, the linear-shaped layout features in a given layer extend in a common direction over the substrate and parallel with the substrate.


In one embodiment, the underlying layout methodology of the dynamic array may (but does not have to) use constructive light interference of light waves in the lithographic process to reinforce exposure of neighboring shapes in a given layer. Therefore, the spacing of the parallel, linear-shaped layout features in a given layer is designed around the constructive light interference of the standing light waves such that lithographic correction (e.g., OPC/RET) is minimized or eliminated. Thus, in contrast to conventional OPC/RET-based lithographic processes, the dynamic array defined herein exploits the light interaction between neighboring features, rather than attempting to compensate for the light interaction between neighboring features.


Because the standing light wave for a given linear-shaped layout feature can be accurately modeled, it is possible to predict how the standing light waves associated with the neighboring linear-shaped layout features disposed in parallel in a given layer will interact. Therefore, it is possible to predict how the standing light wave used to expose one linear-shaped feature will contribute to the exposure of its neighboring linear-shaped features. Prediction of the light interaction between neighboring linear-shaped features enables the identification of an optimum feature-to-feature spacing such that light used to render a given shape will reinforce its neighboring shapes. The feature-to-feature spacing in a given layer is defined as the feature pitch, wherein the pitch is the center-to-center separation distance between adjacent linear-shaped features in a given layer.


In one embodiment, to provide the desired exposure reinforcement between neighboring features, the linear-shaped layout features in a given layer are spaced such that constructive and destructive interference of the light from neighboring features will be optimized to produce the best rendering of all features in the neighborhood. The feature-to-feature spacing in a given layer is proportional to the wavelength of the light used to expose the features. The light used to expose each feature within about a five light wavelength distance from a given feature will serve to enhance the exposure of the given feature to some extent. The exploitation of constructive interference of the light waves used to expose neighboring features enables the manufacturing equipment capability to be maximized and not be limited by concerns regarding light interactions during the lithography process.


As discussed above, the dynamic array incorporates a restricted topology in which the features within each layer (other than diffusion) are required to be substantially linear in shape, and are oriented in a parallel manner to traverse over the substrate in a common direction. With the restricted topology of the dynamic array, the light interaction in the photolithography process can be optimized such that an accurate transfer of the layout onto the resist is achieved.



FIG. 2A is an illustration showing an exemplary base grid to be projected onto the dynamic array to facilitate definition of the restricted topology, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The base grid can be used to facilitate parallel placement of the linear-shaped features in each layer of the dynamic array at the appropriate optimized pitch. Although not physically defined as part of the dynamic array, the base grid can be considered as a projection on each layer of the dynamic array. Also, it should be understood that the base grid is projected in a substantially consistent manner with respect to position on each layer of the dynamic array, thus facilitating accurate feature stacking and alignment.


In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 2A, the base grid is defined as a rectangular grid, i.e., Cartesian grid, in accordance with a first reference direction (x) and a second reference direction (y). The gridpoint-to-gridpoint spacing in the first and second reference directions can be defined as necessary to enable definition of the linear-shaped features at the optimized feature-to-feature spacing. Also, the gridpoint spacing in the first reference direction (x) can be different than the gridpoint spacing in the second reference direction (y). In one embodiment, a single base grid is projected across the entire die to enable location of the various linear-shaped features in each layer across the entire die. However, in other embodiments, separate base grids can be projected across separate regions of the die to support different feature-to-feature spacing requirements within the separate regions of the die. FIG. 2B is an illustration showing separate base grids projected across separate regions of the die, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.


The layout architecture of the dynamic array follows the base grid pattern. Thus, it is possible to use grid points to represent where changes in direction occur in diffusion, wherein gate electrode and metal linear-shaped features are placed, where contacts are placed, where opens are in the linear-shaped gate electrode and metal features, etc. The pitch of the gridpoints, i.e., the gridpoint-to-gridpoint spacing, should be set for a given feature line width, such that exposure of neighboring linear-shaped features of the given feature line width will reinforce each other, wherein the linear-shaped features are centered on gridpoints. With reference to the dynamic array stack of FIG. 1 and the exemplary base grid of FIG. 2A, in one embodiment, the gridpoint spacing in the first reference direction (x) is set by the required gate electrode pitch. In this same embodiment, the gridpoint pitch in the second reference direction (y) is set by the metal 1 pitch. For example, in a 90 nm logic process technology, the gridpoint pitch in the second reference direction (y) is about 0.24 micron. In one embodiment, metal 1 and metal 2 layers will have a common spacing and pitch. A different spacing and pitch may be used above the metal 2 layer.


The various layers of the dynamic array are defined such that the linear-shaped features in adjacent layers extend in a crosswise manner with respect to each other. For example, the linear-shaped features of adjacent layers may extend orthogonally, i.e., perpendicularly with respect to each other. Also, the linear-shaped features of one layer may extend across the linear-shaped features of an adjacent layer at an angle, e.g., at about 45 degrees. For example, in one embodiment the linear-shaped feature of one layer extend in the first reference direction (x) and the linear-shaped features of the adjacent layer extend diagonally with respect to the first (x) and second (y) reference directions. It should be appreciated that to route a design in the dynamic array having the linear-shaped features positioned in the crosswise manner in adjacent layers, opens can be defined in the linear-shaped features, and contacts and vias can be defined as necessary.


The dynamic array minimizes the use of bends (or substantial changes in direction) in layout shapes to eliminate unpredictable lithographic interactions. Specifically, prior to OPC or other RET processing, the dynamic array allows bends in the diffusion layer to enable control of device sizes, but does not allow substantial bends (or substantial changes in direction) in layers above the diffusion layer.


An exemplary buildup of dynamic array layers from diffusion through metal 2 are described with respect to FIGS. 3 and 4A. It should be appreciated that the dynamic array described with respect to FIGS. 3 through 4A is provided by way of example only, and is not intended to convey limitations of the dynamic array architecture. The dynamic array can be used in accordance with the principles presented herein to define essentially any integrated circuit design, any logic cell, a base cell, an architecture, or design layouts. Designs can be on physical chips, wafers, substrates or drawn on paper, film, or stored in files. If stored in files, the files can be stored on any computer readable device. The computer readable device can be stored on a local computer, on a networked computer and the files can be transferred, shared or used over the Internet or local network.



FIG. 3 shows a diffusion layer layout of an exemplary dynamic array, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The diffusion layer of FIG. 3 shows a p-diffusion region 401 and an n-diffusion region 403. While the diffusion regions are defined according to the underlying base grid, the diffusion regions are not subject to the linear-shaped feature restrictions associated with the layers above the diffusion layer. However, it is noted that the implant layouts are simpler than in prior art designs, which would otherwise require more shape extension and bends. As shown, n+ implant regions (412) and p+ implant regions (414) are defined as rectangles on the (x), (y) grid with no extraneous jogs or notches. This style permits use of larger implant regions, reduces need for OPC/RET, and enables use of lower resolution and lower cost lithographic systems, e.g., i-line illumination at 365 nm.



FIG. 4A is an illustration showing a gate electrode layer above and adjacent to the diffusion layer of FIG. 3, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As those skilled in the CMOS art will appreciate, the gate electrode features 501 define the transistor gates. The gate electrode features 501 are defined as linear shaped features extending in a parallel relationship across the dynamic array in the second reference direction (y). In one embodiment, the gate electrode features 501 are defined to have a common width. However, in another embodiment, one or more of the gate electrode features can be defined to have a different width. The pitch (center-to-center spacing) of the gate electrode features 501 is minimized while ensuring optimization of lithographic reinforcement, i.e., resonant imaging, provided by neighboring gate electrode features 501. For discussion purposes, gate electrode features 501 extending across the dynamic array in a given line are referred to as a gate electrode track.


The gate electrode features 501 form n-channel and p-channel transistors as they cross the diffusion regions 403 and 401, respectively. Optimal gate electrode feature 501 printing is achieved by drawing gate electrode features 501 at every grid location, even though no diffusion region may be present at some grid locations. Also, long continuous gate electrode features 501 tend to improve line end shortening effects at the ends of gate electrode features within the interior of the dynamic array. Additionally, gate electrode printing is significantly improved when substantially all bends are removed from the gate electrode features 501.


Each of the gate electrode tracks may be interrupted, i.e., broken, any number of times in linearly traversing across the dynamic array in order to provide required electrical connectivity for a particular logic function to be implemented. When a given gate electrode track is required to be interrupted, the separation between ends of the gate electrode track segments at the point of interruption is minimized to the extent possible taking into consideration the manufacturing capability and electrical effects. In one embodiment, optimal manufacturability is achieved when a common end-to-end spacing is used between features within a particular layer.


As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/683,402, which is incorporated by reference herein, FIG. 4B is an illustration showing a gate electrode layer and a diffusion contact layer above and adjacent to the diffusion layer of FIG. 4A, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As those skilled in the CMOS arts will appreciate, the gate electrode features 501 define the transistor gates. The gate electrode features 501 are defined as linear shaped features extending in a parallel relationship across the dynamic array in the second reference direction (y). In one embodiment, the gate electrode features 501 are defined to have a common width. However, in another embodiment, one or more of the gate electrode features can be defined to have a different width. For example, FIG. 4B shows a gate electrode features 501A that has a larger width relative to the other gate electrode features 501. The pitch (center-to-center spacing) of the gate electrode features 501 is minimized while ensuring optimization of lithographic reinforcement, i.e., resonant imaging, provided by neighboring gate electrode features 501. For discussion purposes, gate electrode features 501 extending across the dynamic array in a given line are referred to as a gate electrode track.


The gate electrode features 501 form n-channel and p-channel transistors as they cross the diffusion regions 403 and 401, respectively. Optimal gate electrode feature 501 printing is achieved by drawing gate electrode features 501 at every grid location, even though no diffusion region may be present at some grid locations. Also, long continuous gate electrode features 501 tend to improve line end shortening effects at the ends of gate electrode features within the interior of the dynamic array. Additionally, gate electrode printing is significantly improved when all bends are removed from the gate electrode features 501.


Each of the gate electrode tracks may be interrupted, i.e., broken, any number of times in linearly traversing across the dynamic array in order to provide required electrical connectivity for a particular logic function to be implemented. When a given gate electrode track is required to be interrupted, the separation between ends of the gate electrode track segments at the point of interruption is minimized to the extent possible taking into consideration the manufacturing capability and electrical effects. In one embodiment, optimal manufacturability is achieved when a common end-to-end spacing is used between features within a particular layer.


Minimizing the separation between ends of the gate electrode track segments at the points of interruption serves to maximize the lithographic reinforcement, and uniformity thereof, provided from neighboring gate electrode tracks. Also, in one embodiment, if adjacent gate electrode tracks need to be interrupted, the interruptions of the adjacent gate electrode tracks are made such that the respective points of interruption are offset from each other so as to avoid, to the extent possible, an occurrence of neighboring points of interruption. More specifically, points of interruption within adjacent gate electrode tracks are respectively positioned such that a line of sight does not exist through the points of interruption, wherein the line of sight is considered to extend perpendicularly to the direction in which the gate electrode tracks extend over the substrate. Additionally, in one embodiment, the gate electrodes may extend through the boundaries at the top and bottom of the cells, i.e., the PMOS or NMOS cells. This embodiment would enable bridging of neighboring cells.


With further regard to FIG. 4B, diffusion contacts 503 are defined at each diffusion square 405 to enhance the printing of diffusion contacts via resonant imaging. The diffusion squares 405 are present around every diffusion contact 503 to enhance the printing of the power and ground connection polygons at the diffusion contacts 503.


The gate electrode features 501 and diffusion contacts 503 share a common grid spacing. More specifically, the gate electrode feature 501 placement is offset by one-half the grid spacing relative to the diffusion contacts 503. For example, if the gate electrode features 501 and diffusion contact 503 grid spacing is 0.36 μm, then the diffusion contacts are placed such that the x-coordinate of their center falls on an integer multiple of 0.36 μm, while the x-coordinate of the center of each gate electrode feature 501 minus 0.18 μm should be an integer multiple of 0.36 μm. In the present example, the x-coordinates are represented by the following:

    • Diffusion contact center x-coordinate=I*0.36 μm, where I is the grid number;
    • Gate electrode feature center x-coordinate=0.18 μm+I*0.36 μm, where I is the grid number.


The grid based system of the dynamic array ensures that all contacts (diffusion and gate electrode) will land on a horizontal grid that is equal to a multiple of one-half of the diffusion contact grid and a vertical grid that is set by the metal 1 pitch. In the example above, the gate electrode feature and diffusion contact grid is 0.36 μm. The diffusion contacts and gate electrode contacts will land on a horizontal grid that is a multiple of 0.18 μm. Also, the vertical grid for 90 nm process technologies is about 0.24 μm.


As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/683,402, which is incorporated by reference herein, FIG. 4C is an illustration showing a gate electrode contact layer defined above and adjacent to the gate electrode layer of FIG. 4B, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In the gate electrode contact layer, gate electrode contacts 601 are drawn to enable connection of the gate electrode features 501 to the overlying metal conduction lines. In general, design rules will dictate the optimum placement of the gate electrode contacts 601. In one embodiment, the gate electrode contacts are drawn on top of the transistor endcap regions. This embodiment minimizes white space in the dynamic array when design rules specify long transistor endcaps. In some process technologies white space may be minimized by placing a number of gate electrode contacts for a cell in the center of the cell. Also, it should be appreciated that in the present invention, the gate electrode contact 601 is oversized in the direction perpendicular to the gate electrode feature 501 to ensure overlap between the gate electrode contact 601 and the gate electrode feature 501.


As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/683,402, which is incorporated by reference herein, FIG. 4D is an illustration showing a semiconductor chip structure 1400, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The semiconductor chip structure 1400 represents an exemplary portion of a semiconductor chip, including a diffusion region 1401 having a number of conductive lines 1403A-1403G defined thereover. The diffusion region 1401 is defined in a substrate 1405, to define an active region for at least one transistor device. The diffusion region 1401 can be defined to cover an area of arbitrary shape relative to the substrate 1405 surface.


The conductive lines 1403A-1403G are arranged to extend over the substrate 1405 in a common direction 1407. It should also be appreciated that each of the number of conductive lines 1403A-1403G are restricted to extending over the diffusion region 1401 in the common direction 1407. In one embodiment, the conductive lines 1403A-1403G defined immediately over the substrate 1405 are polysilicon lines. In one embodiment, each of the conductive lines 1403A-1403G is defined to have essentially the same width 1409 in a direction perpendicular to the common direction 1407 of extension. In another embodiment, some of the conductive lines 1403A-1403G are defined to have different widths relative to the other conductive lines. However, regardless of the width of the conductive lines 1403A-1403G, each of the conductive lines 1403A-1403G is spaced apart from adjacent conductive lines according to essentially the same center-to-center pitch 1411.


As shown in FIG. 4D, some of the conductive lines (1403B-1403E) extend over the diffusion region 1401, and other conductive lines (1403A, 1403F, 1403G) extend over non-diffusion portions the substrate 1405. It should be appreciated that the conductive lines 1403A-1403G maintain their width 1409 and pitch 1411 regardless of whether they are defined over diffusion region 1401 or not. Also, it should be appreciated that the conductive lines 1403A-1403G maintain essentially the same length 1413 regardless of whether they are defined over diffusion region 1401 or not, thereby maximizing lithographic reinforcement between the conductive lines 1403A-1403G across the substrate. In this manner, some of the conductive lines, e.g., 1403D, defined over the diffusion region 1401 include a necessary active portion 1415, and one or more uniformity extending portions 1417.


It should be appreciated that the semiconductor chip structure 1400 represents a portion of the dynamic array described above with respect to FIGS. 1-4C. Therefore, it should be understood that the uniformity extending portions 1417 of the conductive lines (1403B-1403E) are present to provide lithographic reinforcement of neighboring conductive lines 1403A-1403G. Also, although they may not be required for circuit operation, each of conductive lines 1403A, 1403F, and 1403G are present to provide lithographic reinforcement of neighboring conductive lines 1403A-1403G.


The concept of the necessary active portion 1415 and the uniformity extending portions 1417 also applies to higher level interconnect layers. As previously described with regard to the dynamic array architecture, adjacent interconnect layers traverse over the substrate in transverse directions, e.g., perpendicular or diagonal directions, to enable routing/connectivity required by the logic device implemented within the dynamic array. As with the conductive lines 1403A-1403G, each of the conductive lines within an interconnect layer may include a required portion (necessary active portion) to enable required routing/connectivity, and a non-required portion (uniformity extending portion) to provide lithographic reinforcement to neighboring conductive lines. Also, as with the conductive lines 1403A-1403G, the conductive lines within an interconnect layer extend in a common direction over the substrate, have essentially the same width, and are spaced apart from each other according to an essentially constant pitch.


In one embodiment, conductive lines within an interconnect layer follow essentially the same ratio between line width and line spacing. For example, at 90 nm the metal 4 pitch is 280 nm with a line width and line spacing equal to 140 nm. Larger conductive lines can be printed on a larger line pitch if the line width is equal to the line spacing.


As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/683,402, which is incorporated by reference herein, FIG. 4E shows an example layout architecture defined in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The layout architecture follows a grid pattern and is based upon a horizontal grid and a vertical grid. The horizontal grid is set by the poly gate pitch. The vertical pitch is set by the metal 1/metal 3 pitch. All of the rectangular shapes should be centered on a grid point. The layout architecture minimizes the use of bends to eliminate unpredictable lithographic interactions. Bends are allowed on the diffusion layer to control transistor device sizes. Other layers should be rectangular in shape and fixed in one dimension.


II. Logic Cell Design Using Self-Aligned Local Interconnects on Canvas



FIG. 5A illustrates a circuit representation of the exemplary logic inverter. However, as noted above, the logic inerter is only being shown and discussed to convey the process of making the self-aligned local interconnects, which can be implemented any other primitive, cell, logic device, or process methodology. As shown, the PMOS transistor 110 and the NMOS transistor 112 are coupled to make a logic inverter. The source of the PMOS transistor 110 is connected to Vdd 118 and the drain of the PMOS transistor 112 is connected to the drain of the NMOS transistor 112. The source of the NMOS transistor 112 is connected to the ground (Vss) 120. A common input 116 is provided to the transistors and the output 114 is provided at the connection of the drain of the PMOS transistor 110 and the drain of the NMOS transistor 112. Again, the inverter logic is used as an example to provide an understanding of the embodiments of the present invention. A person skilled in the art, however, would appreciate that the embodiments may also be employed in the fabrication of any other types of logic cells, devices, and integrated circuits.



FIG. 5B illustrates a plan view of an exemplary logic inverter having self-aligned local interconnects 58/60 to connect P 64 and N 68 diffusion regions to Vdd 50 and Vss 54, respectively. A self-aligned local interconnect 62 is also being used to connect the drain of the PMOS transistor to the drain of the NMOS transistor. In one embodiment, all self-aligned local interconnects in an integrated circuit run parallel to the gate electrode channels on the substrate. One of many advantages of laying the local interconnects in one direction is that the local interconnect layer can replace one metal layer that would otherwise be needed to make the connections that are being made using the self-aligned local interconnects. Metal 1 lines 50, 72, 70, and 54 are aligned in one direction that is perpendicular to the gate electrode line 74. The alignment of metal lines can be different in other embodiments.


Still referring to FIG. 5B, there are numerous advantages of employing the self-aligned local interconnects. In one example, the self-aligned local interconnect 58 connecting P diffusion region 64 to Vdd line 50 eliminates the need of fabricating an L shaped diffusion region extending towards the Vdd line 50. In some designs, the self-aligned local interconnect 58 eliminates the need for a metal strap to connect the diffusion region 64 to the Vdd line 50. Elimination of the metal strap and associated contact increases device performance and reduces device size. Performance is increased because a metal strap connecting to the diffusion regions would require one or more contacts, which interferes with beneficial straining of silicon. Thus, reducing metal contacts to the diffusion regions, unless necessary for some design configurations, will boost device performance.



FIG. 6A illustrates a plan view of a partially fabricated integrated circuit showing a P diffusion region 64 and a N diffusion region 68 and a gate electrode line 74 over the P diffusion region 64 and the N diffusion region 68. In this partial view example, the other gate electrode lines 74a, 74b are laid over shallow trench isolation (STI) regions. The gate electrodes 74, 74a, 74b include dielectric spacers (or gate sidewall spacers) on both sides.


Although not shown for ease of discussion, the ends of the gate electrodes may also have dielectric spacers. Since, by design, the gate electrode lines are uniformly placed on the substrates, some of the gate electrode lines are formed over the STI regions. Thus, gates formed over the STI are inactive gates. An active gate is formed when a gate electrode is placed over a diffusion region, and a transistor can be defined. In one embodiment, the partially fabricated integrated circuit is fabricated using a standard CMOS fabrication process.



FIG. 6B illustrates a cross-section of a partially fabricated integrated circuit of FIG. 6A. It should be understood that the figures are not meant to provide an exact representation of dimensions or exact relative dimensions. On the other hand, the figures should be understood to generally convey the placement of features, layers and the example sequence of processing. Additionally, it should be understood that some sequence steps are not pictorially illustrated, as they are known to those skilled in the art, and not important to the process and sequence flows illustrated herein.


With this in mind, the partially fabricated integrated circuit, is formed over a silicon wafer, and includes a well 182 and shallow trench isolation (STI) regions 180, to provide isolation between adjacent active devices in the integrated circuit. The well 182 includes diffusion regions 184 and a gate electrode 74. The gate electrodes include dielectric spacers (also known as sidewall spacers) 230 formed along the sides of the gate electrode lines. As discussed above, to optimize the design, the gate electrodes (or lines) are fabricated in a parallel orientation, relative to each other. As described herein, therefore, “channels” are defined between the respective gate electrodes. The spacing between two adjacent gate electrode channels is therefore dictated by the regular spacing of the gate electrode lines. As will be discussed in more detail below, the resulting self-aligned local interconnects will reside in the channels between adjacent gate electrodes (or beside a gate electrode if no neighboring gate electrode is present). Because they will predominantly remain in the channels, the self-aligned local interconnects will be self-aligning.


In FIGS. 7A and 7B, a local interconnect layer 196 is formed over the diffusion regions 184, the gate electrodes 74, 74a, 74b, and the spacers. By way of example, formation of the local interconnect layer 196 can be through a metal deposition process. For ease of visualizing, the local interconnect layer 196 is shown in FIG. 7A as a semi-transparent layer. The cross-section of FIG. 7B shows the local interconnect layer 196 deposited over the features of FIG. 6B.


In one embodiment, the local interconnect layer 196 is generally metallic. In a more specific embodiment, the metal may be predominantly nickel (Ni). In other embodiments, the metal can be titanium, platinum, or cobalt. In yet another embodiment, a combination of nickel and platinum can be used. Preferably, the purity of the metal used in the local interconnect layer should comply with the industry standard metals. In one embodiment, the local interconnect layer is deposited using physical vapor deposition (PVD) technique. In other embodiments, the deposition of the local interconnect layer may be done through chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or atomic layer deposition (ALD).


After depositing the interconnect layer 196, the metal of the interconnect layer is reacted with the underlying silicon and if present in the gate electrode, polysilicon. In one example, the reaction is facilitated through a thermal processing step. The reaction can be carried out under a number of process conditions, but as an example, the temperature can be in a range of between about 200 to 400 degree Celsius, and run for a time in a range of about 5 to about 60 seconds for a nickel layer; higher temperatures may be used for other metals. In another example, the temperature can be set to about 300 degrees Celsius, and processed for about 30 seconds. The reaction step is generally performed in a chamber that uses nitrogen or other inert gases.


As shown in FIG. 8A, as a result of the reaction process, silicide 196′ is formed over the exposed silicon areas. Thus, the silicidation (i.e. formation of silicide 196′) occurs over the exposed silicon substrate portion and exposed polysilicon gate if present. As is known, silicide 196′ provides good conduction even if the layer is thin. Portions of the local interconnect layer 196 metal not touching silicon will, of course, remain as a metal after the reaction process. In the drawings, FIG. 8A shows the silicide 196′ as shaded, in contrast to the metal of the local interconnect layer 196 which did not react.



FIG. 8B illustrates the result after a hard mask layer 199 is deposited over the local interconnect layer 196. In one embodiment, the hard mask layer 199 is an oxide (e.g., SiO2, etc.). In another embodiment, the hard mask layer 199 is a nitride (e.g., silicon nitride, etc.). In yet another embodiment, the hard mask layer 199 is an amorphous carbon (APF). The hard mask layer 199 can be formed in a number of ways, and one such exemplary way is by employing one of a CVD, ALD, or PECVD process. The hard mask layer 199, in this embodiment, is used to protect the local interconnect layer 196 during subsequent removal steps, which remove portions of the local interconnect layer 196 where no conductive connection is needed.



FIG. 9A shows the cross-section of FIG. 8B after a polymer layer 210 is formed over the hard mask layer 199, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The polymer layer 210 can be applied in a number of ways know in the art. In one example, the polymer layer 210 is preferably spin coated over the surface of the hard mask layer 199. In another embodiment, the polymer layer 210 can be photoresist material, either positive or negative, depending on the desired development process. Other types of photoresist can include, for example, unsensitized photoresists, polymethyl methacrylate resists (PMMA), etc. Once applied, the polymer layer 210 is partially and evenly removed until the hard mask layer 199 is exposed, as shown in FIG. 9B. The removal is preferably performed using a plasma etching operation. One example etching process can take place in an oxygen plasma. The etching process, in this step, is preferably anisotropic in nature, so as to achieve a substantially even removal profile down to the first exposed hard mask layer 199. Standard end-point detection techniques may be used to determine when to stop the etch operation illustrated in FIG. 9B. FIG. 9C is a plan view, showing the exposed hard mask layer 199 and the remaining polymer layer 210. At this stage, the gate sidewall spacers (i.e. dielectric spacers) 230 are also still covered by the polymer layer 210.


It should be noted that another advantage of placing the gate electrode lines at a uniform regular spacing is that the polymer layer 210 is defined uniformly, having a substantially equal thickness. Without such uniform spacing, the polymer layer 210 could exhibit variations in thickness, which would not be desired. For example, if the thickness of the polymer layer 210 is not substantially uniform over the substrate, some gate electrodes with relatively less polymer material cover may be exposed first, causing possible over etching of the hard mask over certain gates.


Once the hard mask layer 199, over the top of the gate electrodes 74, 74a, 74b is exposed, an isotropic etch is performed. The isotropic etching is designed to remove lateral parts 238 of the polymer layer 210, such as the polymer layer 210 on the gate electrode dielectric spacers 230. As illustrated in FIGS. 10A and 10B, after this isotropic etch is complete, the polymer layer 210 should remains in the form of strips between the gate electrodes 74, 74a, 74b, offset and self-aligned to the gate dielectric spacers 230. Thus, the polymer layer 210 will remain everywhere on the substrate except on the gate electrode lines 74, 74a, 74b and the gate dielectric spacers 230.



FIG. 11A illustrates a cross-section of the substrate after the hard mask layer 199, which is not covered by the polymer layer 210, is removed. Depending on the material of the chosen hard mask, the removal can be performed using a number of known wet or dry etching processes. In one embodiment, once the exposed hard mask layer 199 is removed, the etching can continue so as to remove part of the local interconnect layer 196 material from over the dielectric spacers 230. Removal of this part of the local interconnect layer 196 will provide for a slight separation between the local interconnect layer 196/silicide 196′ and the dielectric spacers 230. At this point, the remaining local interconnect layer 196 material, silicide 196′ material and hard mask layer 199, as covered by the polymer layer 210, will run in channels between and aligned by the dielectric spacers 230.



FIG. 11B illustrates a cross-section of the substrate after another selective etching operation is performed to remove the polymer layer 210 and the hard mask layer 199, from above the local interconnect layer 196 (including silicide portions 196′). As can be seen, the local interconnect layer 196 material and the silicide portions 196′ will be self-aligned between the dielectric spacers 230. FIG. 12 shows a plan view of substrate in FIG. 11B. As shown, the local interconnect layer 196 runs in the channels between the gate dielectric spacers 230. As noted above, as a result of the etching, the self-aligned local interconnect layer 196 is also spaced a distance 231 apart from dielectric spacers 230. FIG. 12 also illustrates the P 64 and N 68 diffusion regions (both these regions are illustrated in the cross-section illustrations as diffusion region 184).



FIG. 13 illustrates a patterning operation that will facilitate etching, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In one embodiment, a photoresist can be spin coated and then exposed using standard photolithography, to define mask 300. The mask 300, as shown, is defined to cover portions of the local interconnect layer 196 that is to remain after an etching operation is performed. The reacted material that forms the silicide 196′, over the exposed silicon or polysilicon if present, will also remain after the etch, even though it is not covered by the mask 300. In one embodiment, the mask 300 can be easily defined without tight layout constraints, as the mask 300 can be defined to loosely lie over the gate electrodes 74, 74a, 74b.


It should be appreciated that tight layout constraints are not needed, as the local interconnect layer 196 material only lies in the channels, and has already been self-aligned between the dielectric spacers 230. Again, the silicide 196′ material, will however remain after the etching that is employed to remove the unprotected portions of the local interconnect layer 196. Electrically, the local interconnect layer 196 and the silicide 196′ material will define a conductive link or connection or conductive line, similar to a regular interconnect metallization line.



FIG. 14 illustrates a plan view of the substrate after the etching and subsequent removal of the mask 300. As shown, the local interconnect layer 196 will remain in the channels, where the mask 300 protected the material, thus forming true self-aligned local interconnect features. The local interconnect layer 196 that remains, therefore, will functionally complete any interconnection desired within the channel defined between the dielectric spacers 230. After removal of the mask 300, an annealing operation can be performed. The annealing could be, for example, a rapid thermal annealing (RTA) process, that is operated at approximately 450 degrees Celsius, for approximately 30 seconds for nickel.


Referring back to FIG. 5B, metal 1 lines can be fabricated perpendicular to the gate electrode lines 74, 74a, 74b, as shown in FIG. 15. Furthermore, contacts are formed at desired places, to provide electrical conduction between various layers, that is necessary to form the exemplary logic circuit.


In one embodiment, the metal-1 tracks 702 can be fabricated closer to each other, which may enable easier routing and desired connections. Of course, the pitch between lines will depend on the manufacturing capability, the particular circuit, layout, and layout constraints for the type of design and/or circuit. As the self-aligned local interconnects 196 are aligned perpendicular to metal-1 tracks 702, a greater degree of freedom in term of space is available for defining/selecting a contact between the self-aligned local interconnects 196 and selected metal-1 tracks. Therefore, besides the previously discussed advantages of the self-aligned local interconnects, the self-aligned local interconnects also help to provide more freedom in routing metal tracks in levels above, which in turn provide for flexibility in design and fabrication.



FIG. 16 illustrates an exemplary inverter logic cell, which is fabricated using the self-aligned local interconnects of the present invention. The circuit is similar to the one illustrated in FIG. 5A, except that the gate electrode line 74a is broken into two sections, to provide a gate electrode gap 703. It may be noted that only one gap is shown for the ease of illustration only. In other embodiments, one or more gate electrode lines can have one or more gate electrode gaps. In one embodiment, the gate electrode gap 703 can be used to fabricate the self-aligned local interconnects that are aligned perpendicular to the gate electrode line 74a. The self-aligned local interconnects in these gate electrode gaps 703 can be used to connect two or more devices or two self-aligned local interconnects that are parallel to the gate electrode line 74a. The self-aligned local interconnects in the gate electrode gaps 703 can also ease metal track routing and eliminate the need for some of the metal-1 tracks.



FIG. 17A-17D illustrate process operations used to fabricate a connection using the local interconnect layer 196, to make contact to a gate electrode 74, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. For ease of understanding, reference is made to a cross-section 400, which is also shown in FIG. 18. FIG. 17A represents a stage in processing that is similar to that described up to FIG. 10B. However, a mask 404 is also formed over a region 402, which lies substantially over the sidewall of the spacer 230 of gate electrode 74. The exact sizing is not particularly important, so long as protection is provided over the material that lies along the spacer 230. This protects the local interconnect material 196 in this region from later etching. The mask 404 can be defined from either hard masks or photoresist masks, depending on the chosen fabrication process.



FIG. 17B shows the processing after an etching operation is used to remove the exposed hard mask layer 199. As shown, the exposed hard mask layer 199 and local interconnect layer 196 is removed, similar to the process of FIG. 11A. Now, the mask 404, the polymer layer 210, and the hard mask 199 is removed, leaving the local interconnect layer 196, as shown in FIG. 17C. FIG. 17C also shows a mask 300′ that is used to protect the local interconnect layer 196 in places where it is intended to remain. The mask 300′ is shown protecting up to and over to the local interconnect layer 196 in region 402. Thus, because the mask 404 was used, the local interconnect layer 106 will remain on the side wall of the spacer 230, thus allowing the resulting connection of the local interconnect layer 196 to the silicide 196′ material of the gate electrode 74. As a result, the connection is made at the level of the substrate, without the need for upper metal levels and contacts, for making a connection to the gate electrode 74.



FIG. 18 shows an example use of a local interconnect layer 196, which climbs the dielectric spacer 230 to make a connection to the gate electrode 74 in Region 402. In this example, the local interconnect layer 196 (which goes over the spacer 230), makes electrical connection to the gate electrode 74. It should be understood, however, that the structures and methods used to form the connections that climb up the spacers 230 can be used in many different designs, circuits, cells, and logic interconnections.


Methods, designs, layouts, and structures have been disclosed, which define ways of using the self-aligned local interconnects. It should be kept in mind that the benefits and advantages of using these self-aligned local interconnects are not tied to any particular circuit, cell or logic. To the contrary, the disclosure of these self-aligned local interconnect methodologies and structures can be extended to any circuit layout, logic device, logic cell, logic primitive, interconnect structure, design mask, etc. And, the resulting layout, design, configuration or data used to define the self-aligned local interconnects (in any part or region of a chip, larger overall system or implementation), can be stored electronically on a file. The file can be stored on a computer readable media, and the computer readable media can be shared, transferred or communicated over a network, such as the Internet.


Therefore, with the above embodiments in mind, it should be understood that the invention may employ other variations in the fabrication process, fabrication steps, sequence of the fabrication steps, chemical used in the fabrication, processes used in the fabrication, configurations and relative positions of the various components. While this invention has been described in terms of several preferable embodiments, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon reading the specifications and studying the drawings will realize various alternation, additions, permutations and equivalents thereof. It is therefore intended that the present invention includes all such alterations, additions, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An integrated circuit, comprising: a local interconnect conductive structure including a first portion and a second portion, the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure having a substantially rectangular shape with a length measured in a first direction and a width measured in a second direction, the second portion of the local interconnect conductive structure having a substantially rectangular shape with a length measured in the second direction and a width measured in the first direction, the second portion of the local interconnect conductive structure connected to the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure at a location in the second direction between neighboring gate electrode level conductive structures, wherein the first portion of the local interconnect structure is self-aligned between the neighboring gate electrode level conductive structures.
  • 2. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 1, wherein the length of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is greater than the width of the second portion of the local interconnect conductive structure.
  • 3. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 1, wherein the length of the second portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is greater than the width of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure.
  • 4. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 1, wherein the length of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is greater than the width of the second portion of the local interconnect conductive structure, and wherein the length of the second portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is greater than the width of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure.
  • 5. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 1, further comprising: a contact conductive structure formed to physically contact the second portion of the local interconnect conductive structure.
  • 6. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 5, wherein the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is not contacted by any contact conductive structure.
  • 7. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 5, further comprising: a first gate electrode level conductive structure having a substantially rectangular shape with a length measured in the first direction and a width measured in the second direction; anda second gate electrode level conductive structure having a substantially rectangular shape with a length measured in the first direction and a width measured in the second direction,wherein a first part of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is positioned between the first gate electrode level conductive structure and the second gate electrode level conductive structure.
  • 8. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 7, wherein the first part of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is separated from the first gate electrode level conductive structure by a first distance as measured in the second direction, and wherein the first part of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is separated from the second gate electrode level conductive structure by the first distance as measured in the second direction.
  • 9. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 8, further comprising: a third gate electrode level conductive structure having a substantially rectangular shape with a length measured in the first direction and a width measured in the second direction,wherein a second part of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is positioned between the first gate electrode level conductive structure and the third gate electrode level conductive structure.
  • 10. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 9, wherein the second part of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is separated from the first gate electrode level conductive structure by the first distance as measured in the second direction, and wherein the second part of the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is separated from the third gate electrode level conductive structure by the first distance as measured in the second direction.
  • 11. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 10, wherein the second portion of the local interconnect conductive structure extends in the second direction between the second gate electrode level conductive structure and the third gate electrode level conductive structure.
  • 12. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 11, wherein the contact conductive structure is not positioned between the second gate electrode level conductive structure and the third gate electrode level conductive structure.
  • 13. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 12, wherein the second gate electrode level conductive structure is separated from the first gate electrode level conductive structure by a second distance as measured in the second direction, and wherein the third gate electrode level conductive structure is separated from the first gate electrode level conductive structure by the second distance as measured in the second direction.
  • 14. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 13, further comprising: a first diffusion region of a first diffusion type, wherein the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure physically contacts the first diffusion region of the first diffusion type.
  • 15. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 14, further comprising: a first diffusion region of a second diffusion type, wherein the first portion of the local interconnect conductive structure physically contacts the first diffusion region of the second diffusion type.
  • 16. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 15, wherein a first portion of the first gate electrode level conductive structure and the first diffusion region of the first diffusion type form parts of a transistor of a first transistor type.
  • 17. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 16, wherein a second portion of the first gate electrode level conductive structure and the first diffusion region of the second diffusion type form parts of a transistor of a second transistor type.
  • 18. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 17, further comprising: a second diffusion region of the first diffusion type forming part of the first transistor of the first transistor type; anda second diffusion region of the second diffusion type forming part of the first transistor of the second transistor type.
  • 19. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 18, further comprising: a first interconnect level conductive structure formed to physically connect with the contact conductive structure.
  • 20. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 19, wherein the first interconnect level conductive structure has a substantially rectangular shape with a length measured in the second direction and a width measured in the first direction.
  • 21. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 20, wherein the contact conductive structure formed to physically contact the second portion of the local interconnect conductive structure is a first contact conductive structure, the integrated circuit further comprising a second contact conductive structure formed to physically contact the first gate electrode level conductive structure.
  • 22. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 21, wherein the second contact conductive structure is positioned to contact the first gate electrode level conductive structure at a location in the first direction between the transistor of the first transistor type and the transistor of the second transistor type.
  • 23. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 22, further comprising: a second interconnect level conductive structure formed to physically connect with the second contact conductive structure.
  • 24. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 23, wherein the second interconnect level conductive structure has a substantially rectangular shape with a length measured in the second direction and a width measured in the first direction.
  • 25. The integrated circuit as recited in claim 24, wherein the width of the second interconnect level conductive structure is substantially equal to the width of the first interconnect level conductive structure.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/995,110, filed on Jan. 13, 2016, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,859,277, on Jan. 2, 2018, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/188,321, filed on Feb. 24, 2014, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,240,413, on Jan. 19, 2016, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/189,433, filed on Jul. 22, 2011, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,680,626, on Mar. 25, 2014, which is a continuation application under 35 U.S.C. 120 of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/814,411, filed Jun. 11, 2010, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,994,545, on Aug. 9, 2011, which is a divisional application under 35 U.S.C. 121 of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 11/969,854, filed Jan. 4, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,763,534, on Jul. 27, 2010, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/983,091, filed Oct. 26, 2007. The disclosure of each above-identified patent application and patent is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/683,402, filed on Mar. 7, 2007, entitled “Dynamic Array Architecture,” by Becker et al., now U.S. Pat. No. 7,446,352, issued on Nov. 4, 2008, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/781,288, filed on Mar. 9, 2006. The disclosure of each above-identified patent application and patent is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (909)
Number Name Date Kind
3521242 Katz Jul 1970 A
4069493 Bobenrieth Jan 1978 A
4197555 Uehara et al. Apr 1980 A
4417161 Uya Nov 1983 A
4424460 Best Jan 1984 A
4575648 Lee Mar 1986 A
4602270 Finegold Jul 1986 A
4613940 Shenton et al. Sep 1986 A
4657628 Holloway et al. Apr 1987 A
4682202 Tanizawa Jul 1987 A
4745084 Rowson et al. May 1988 A
4780753 Shinichi et al. Oct 1988 A
4801986 Chang et al. Jan 1989 A
4804636 Groover, III Feb 1989 A
4812688 Chu et al. Mar 1989 A
4884115 Michel et al. Nov 1989 A
4890148 Ikeda Dec 1989 A
4928160 Crafts May 1990 A
4975756 Haken et al. Dec 1990 A
5005068 Ikeda Apr 1991 A
5047979 Leung Sep 1991 A
5057895 Beasom Oct 1991 A
5068603 Mahoney Nov 1991 A
5079614 Khatakhotan Jan 1992 A
5097422 Corbin et al. Mar 1992 A
5117277 Yuyama et al. May 1992 A
5121186 Wong et al. Jun 1992 A
5208765 Turnbull May 1993 A
5224057 Igarashi Jun 1993 A
5242770 Chen et al. Sep 1993 A
5268319 Harari Dec 1993 A
5298774 Ueda et al. Mar 1994 A
5313426 Sakuma et al. May 1994 A
5338963 Klaasen Aug 1994 A
5351197 Upton et al. Sep 1994 A
5359226 DeJong Oct 1994 A
5365454 Nakagawa et al. Nov 1994 A
5367187 Yuen Nov 1994 A
5378649 Huang Jan 1995 A
5396128 Dunning et al. Mar 1995 A
5420447 Waggoner May 1995 A
5461577 Shaw et al. Oct 1995 A
5471403 Fujimaga Nov 1995 A
5486717 Kokubo Jan 1996 A
5497334 Russell et al. Mar 1996 A
5497337 Ponnapalli et al. Mar 1996 A
5526307 Lin et al. Jun 1996 A
5536955 Ali Jul 1996 A
5545904 Orbach Aug 1996 A
5581098 Chang Dec 1996 A
5581202 Yano et al. Dec 1996 A
5612893 Hao et al. Mar 1997 A
5636002 Garofalo Jun 1997 A
5656861 Godinho et al. Aug 1997 A
5682323 Pasch et al. Oct 1997 A
5684311 Shaw Nov 1997 A
5684733 Wu et al. Nov 1997 A
5698873 Colwell et al. Dec 1997 A
5705301 Garza et al. Jan 1998 A
5717635 Akatsu Feb 1998 A
5723883 Gheewalla Mar 1998 A
5723908 Fuchida et al. Mar 1998 A
5740068 Liebmann et al. Apr 1998 A
5745374 Matsumoto Apr 1998 A
5754826 Gamal May 1998 A
5756385 Yuan May 1998 A
5764533 deDood Jun 1998 A
5774367 Reyes et al. Jun 1998 A
5780909 Hayashi Jul 1998 A
5789776 Lancaster et al. Aug 1998 A
5790417 Chao et al. Aug 1998 A
5796128 Tran et al. Aug 1998 A
5796624 Sridhar et al. Aug 1998 A
5798298 Yang et al. Aug 1998 A
5814844 Nagata et al. Sep 1998 A
5825203 Kusunoki et al. Oct 1998 A
5834851 Ikeda et al. Nov 1998 A
5838594 Kojima Nov 1998 A
5841663 Sharma et al. Nov 1998 A
5847421 Yamaguchi Dec 1998 A
5850362 Sakuma et al. Dec 1998 A
5852562 Shinomiya et al. Dec 1998 A
5858580 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5898194 Gheewala Apr 1999 A
5900340 Reich et al. May 1999 A
5905287 Hirata May 1999 A
5908827 Sirna Jun 1999 A
5915199 Hsu Jun 1999 A
5917207 Colwell et al. Jun 1999 A
5920486 Beahm et al. Jul 1999 A
5923059 Gheewala Jul 1999 A
5923060 Gheewala Jul 1999 A
5929469 Mimoto et al. Jul 1999 A
5930163 Hara et al. Jul 1999 A
5935763 Caterer et al. Aug 1999 A
5949101 Aritome Sep 1999 A
5973369 Hayashi Oct 1999 A
5973507 Yamazaki Oct 1999 A
5977305 Wigler et al. Nov 1999 A
5977574 Schmitt et al. Nov 1999 A
5984510 Ali Nov 1999 A
5998879 Iwaki et al. Dec 1999 A
6009251 Ho et al. Dec 1999 A
6026223 Scepanovic et al. Feb 2000 A
6026225 Iwasaki Feb 2000 A
6034433 Beatty Mar 2000 A
6037613 Mariyama Mar 2000 A
6037617 Kumagai Mar 2000 A
6044007 Capodieci Mar 2000 A
6054872 Fudanuki et al. Apr 2000 A
6063132 DeCamp et al. May 2000 A
6077310 Yamamoto et al. Jun 2000 A
6080206 Tadokoro et al. Jun 2000 A
6084255 Ueda Jul 2000 A
6084437 Sako Jul 2000 A
6091845 Pierrat et al. Jul 2000 A
6099584 Arnold et al. Aug 2000 A
6100025 Wigler et al. Aug 2000 A
6114071 Chen et al. Sep 2000 A
6144227 Sato Nov 2000 A
6159839 Jeng et al. Dec 2000 A
6166415 Sakemi et al. Dec 2000 A
6166560 Ogura et al. Dec 2000 A
6174742 Sudhindranath et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182272 Andreev et al. Jan 2001 B1
6194104 Hsu Feb 2001 B1
6194252 Yamaguchi Feb 2001 B1
6194912 Or-Bach Feb 2001 B1
6207479 Liew et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209123 Maziasz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6230299 McSherry et al. May 2001 B1
6232173 Hsu et al. May 2001 B1
6240542 Kapur May 2001 B1
6249902 Igusa et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255600 Schaper Jul 2001 B1
6255845 Wong et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262487 Igarashi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269472 Garza et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275973 Wein Aug 2001 B1
6282696 Garza et al. Aug 2001 B1
6291276 Gonzalez Sep 2001 B1
6295224 Chan Sep 2001 B1
6297668 Schober Oct 2001 B1
6297674 Kono et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303252 Lin Oct 2001 B1
6323117 Noguchi Nov 2001 B1
6331733 Or-Bach et al. Dec 2001 B1
6331791 Huang Dec 2001 B1
6335250 Egi Jan 2002 B1
6338972 Sudhindranath et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347062 Nii et al. Feb 2002 B2
6356112 Tran et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359804 Kuriyama et al. Mar 2002 B2
6370679 Chang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378110 Ho Apr 2002 B1
6380592 Tooher et al. Apr 2002 B2
6388296 Hsu May 2002 B1
6393601 Tanaka et al. May 2002 B1
6399972 Masuda et al. Jun 2002 B1
6400183 Yamashita et al. Jun 2002 B2
6408427 Cong et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415421 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 B2
6416907 Winder et al. Jul 2002 B1
6417549 Oh Jul 2002 B1
6421820 Mansfield et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425112 Bula et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425117 Pasch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426269 Haffner et al. Jul 2002 B1
6436805 Trivedi Aug 2002 B1
6445049 Iranmanesh Sep 2002 B1
6445065 Gheewala et al. Sep 2002 B1
6467072 Yang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469328 Yanai et al. Oct 2002 B2
6470489 Chang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476493 Or-Bach et al. Nov 2002 B2
6477695 Gandhi Nov 2002 B1
6480032 Aksamit Nov 2002 B1
6480989 Chan et al. Nov 2002 B2
6482689 Trivedi Nov 2002 B2
6492066 Capodieci et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496965 van Ginneken et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504186 Kanamoto et al. Jan 2003 B2
6505327 Lin Jan 2003 B2
6505328 van Ginneken et al. Jan 2003 B1
6507941 Leung et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509952 Govil et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514849 Hui et al. Feb 2003 B1
6516459 Sahouria Feb 2003 B1
6523156 Cirit Feb 2003 B2
6525350 Kinoshita et al. Feb 2003 B1
6534805 Jin Mar 2003 B1
6536028 Katsioulas et al. Mar 2003 B1
6543039 Watanabe Apr 2003 B1
6553544 Tanaka et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553559 Liebmann et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553562 Capodieci et al. Apr 2003 B2
6566720 Aldrich May 2003 B2
6570234 Gardner May 2003 B1
6571140 Wewalaarachchi May 2003 B1
6571379 Takayama May 2003 B2
6574786 Pohlenz et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578190 Ferguson et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583041 Capodieci Jun 2003 B1
6588005 Kobayashi et al. Jul 2003 B1
6590289 Shively Jul 2003 B2
6591207 Naya et al. Jul 2003 B2
6609235 Ramaswamy et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610607 Armbrust et al. Aug 2003 B1
6617621 Gheewala et al. Sep 2003 B1
6620561 Winder et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621132 Onishi et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632741 Clevenger et al. Oct 2003 B1
6633182 Pileggi et al. Oct 2003 B2
6635935 Makino Oct 2003 B2
6642744 Or-Bach et al. Nov 2003 B2
6643831 Chang et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650014 Kariyazaki Nov 2003 B2
6661041 Keeth Dec 2003 B2
6662350 Fried et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664587 Guterman et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673638 Bendik et al. Jan 2004 B1
6675361 Crafts Jan 2004 B1
6677649 Minami et al. Jan 2004 B2
6687895 Zhang Feb 2004 B2
6690206 Rikino et al. Feb 2004 B2
6691297 Misaka et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700405 Hirairi Mar 2004 B1
6703170 Pindo Mar 2004 B1
6709880 Yamamoto et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714903 Chu et al. Mar 2004 B1
6732334 Nakatsuka May 2004 B2
6732338 Crouse et al. May 2004 B2
6732344 Sakamoto et al. May 2004 B2
6734506 Oyamatsu May 2004 B2
6737199 Hsieh May 2004 B1
6737318 Murata et al. May 2004 B2
6737347 Houston et al. May 2004 B1
6745372 Cote et al. Jun 2004 B2
6745380 Bodendorf et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749972 Yu Jun 2004 B2
6750555 Satomi et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760269 Nakase et al. Jul 2004 B2
6765245 Bansal Jul 2004 B2
6777138 Pierrat et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777146 Samuels Aug 2004 B1
6787469 Houston et al. Sep 2004 B2
6787823 Shibutani Sep 2004 B2
6789244 Dasasathyan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6789246 Mohan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792591 Shi et al. Sep 2004 B2
6792593 Takashima et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794677 Tamaki et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794914 Sani et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795332 Yamaoka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795358 Tanaka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6795952 Stine et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795953 Bakarian et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800883 Furuya et al. Oct 2004 B2
6806180 Cho Oct 2004 B2
6807663 Cote et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809399 Ikeda et al. Oct 2004 B2
6812574 Tomita et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818389 Fritze et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818929 Tsutsumi et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819136 Or-Bach Nov 2004 B2
6820248 Gan Nov 2004 B1
6826738 Cadouri Nov 2004 B2
6834375 Stine et al. Dec 2004 B1
6835991 Pell, III Dec 2004 B2
6841880 Matsumoto et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850854 Naya et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854096 Eaton et al. Feb 2005 B2
6854100 Chuang et al. Feb 2005 B1
6867073 Enquist Mar 2005 B1
6871338 Yamauchi Mar 2005 B2
6872990 Kang Mar 2005 B1
6877144 Rittman et al. Apr 2005 B1
6879511 Dufourt Apr 2005 B2
6881523 Smith Apr 2005 B2
6884712 Yelehanka et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885045 Hidaka Apr 2005 B2
6889370 Kerzman et al. May 2005 B1
6897517 Houdt et al. May 2005 B2
6897536 Nomura et al. May 2005 B2
6898770 Boluki et al. May 2005 B2
6904582 Rittman et al. Jun 2005 B1
6918104 Pierrat et al. Jul 2005 B2
6920079 Shibayama Jul 2005 B2
6921982 Joshi et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922354 Ishikura et al. Jul 2005 B2
6924560 Wang et al. Aug 2005 B2
6928635 Pramanik et al. Aug 2005 B2
6931617 Sanie et al. Aug 2005 B2
6953956 Or-Bach et al. Oct 2005 B2
6954918 Houston Oct 2005 B2
6957402 Templeton et al. Oct 2005 B2
6968527 Pierrat Nov 2005 B2
6974978 Possley Dec 2005 B1
6977856 Tanaka et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978436 Cote et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978437 Rittman et al. Dec 2005 B1
6980211 Lin et al. Dec 2005 B2
6992394 Park et al. Jan 2006 B2
6992925 Peng Jan 2006 B2
6993741 Liebmann et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994939 Ghandehari et al. Feb 2006 B1
6998722 Madurawe Feb 2006 B2
7003068 Kushner et al. Feb 2006 B2
7009862 Higeta et al. Mar 2006 B2
7016214 Kawamata Mar 2006 B2
7022559 Barnak et al. Apr 2006 B2
7028285 Cote et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041568 Goldbach et al. May 2006 B2
7052972 Sandhu et al. May 2006 B2
7053424 Ono May 2006 B2
7063920 Baba-Ali Jun 2006 B2
7064068 Chou et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065731 Jacques et al. Jun 2006 B2
7079413 Tsukamoto et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079989 Wimer Jul 2006 B2
7093208 Williams et al. Aug 2006 B2
7093228 Andreev et al. Aug 2006 B2
7103870 Misaka et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105871 Or-Bach et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107551 de Dood et al. Sep 2006 B1
7115343 Gordon et al. Oct 2006 B2
7115920 Bernstein et al. Oct 2006 B2
7120882 Kotani et al. Oct 2006 B2
7124386 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7126837 Banachowicz et al. Oct 2006 B1
7132203 Pierrat Nov 2006 B2
7137092 Maeda Nov 2006 B2
7141853 Campbell et al. Nov 2006 B2
7143380 Anderson et al. Nov 2006 B1
7149999 Kahng et al. Dec 2006 B2
7152215 Smith et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155685 Mori et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155689 Pierrat et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159197 Falbo et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174520 White et al. Feb 2007 B2
7175940 Laidig et al. Feb 2007 B2
7176508 Joshi et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177215 Tanaka et al. Feb 2007 B2
7183611 Bhattacharyya Feb 2007 B2
7185294 Zhang Feb 2007 B2
7188322 Cohn et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194712 Wu Mar 2007 B2
7200831 Kitabayashi Apr 2007 B2
7200835 Zhang et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202517 Dixit et al. Apr 2007 B2
7205191 Kobayashi Apr 2007 B2
7208794 Hofmann et al. Apr 2007 B2
7214579 Widdershoven et al. May 2007 B2
7219326 Reed et al. May 2007 B2
7221031 Ryoo et al. May 2007 B2
7225423 Bhattacharya et al. May 2007 B2
7227183 Donze et al. Jun 2007 B2
7228510 Ono Jun 2007 B2
7231628 Pack et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235424 Chen et al. Jun 2007 B2
7243316 White et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252909 Shin et al. Aug 2007 B2
7257017 Liaw Aug 2007 B2
7264990 Rueckes et al. Sep 2007 B2
7266787 Hughes et al. Sep 2007 B2
7269803 Khakzadi et al. Sep 2007 B2
7278118 Pileggi et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279727 Ikoma et al. Oct 2007 B2
7287320 Wang et al. Oct 2007 B2
7294534 Iwaki Nov 2007 B2
7302651 Allen et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308669 Buehler et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312003 Cote et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312144 Cho Dec 2007 B2
7315994 Aller et al. Jan 2008 B2
7327591 Sadra et al. Feb 2008 B2
7329938 Kinoshita Feb 2008 B2
7329953 Tu Feb 2008 B2
7335583 Chang Feb 2008 B2
7335966 Ihme et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337421 Kamat Feb 2008 B2
7338896 Vanhaelemeersch et al. Mar 2008 B2
7345909 Chang et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346885 Semmler Mar 2008 B2
7350183 Cui et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353492 Gupta et al. Apr 2008 B2
7358131 Bhattacharyya Apr 2008 B2
7360179 Smith et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360198 Rana et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366997 Rahmat et al. Apr 2008 B1
7367008 White et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376931 Kokubun May 2008 B2
7383521 Smith et al. Jun 2008 B2
7397260 Chanda et al. Jul 2008 B2
7400627 Wu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402848 Chang et al. Jul 2008 B2
7404154 Venkatraman et al. Jul 2008 B1
7404173 Wu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7411252 Anderson et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421678 Barnes et al. Sep 2008 B2
7423298 Mariyama et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424694 Ikeda Sep 2008 B2
7424695 Tamura et al. Sep 2008 B2
7424696 Vogel et al. Sep 2008 B2
7426710 Zhang et al. Sep 2008 B2
7432562 Bhattacharyya Oct 2008 B2
7434185 Dooling et al. Oct 2008 B2
7441211 Gupta et al. Oct 2008 B1
7442630 Kelberlau et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444609 Charlebois et al. Oct 2008 B2
7446352 Becker et al. Nov 2008 B2
7449371 Kemerling et al. Nov 2008 B2
7458045 Cote et al. Nov 2008 B2
7459792 Chen Dec 2008 B2
7465973 Chang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7466607 Hollis et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469396 Hayashi et al. Dec 2008 B2
7480880 Visweswariah et al. Jan 2009 B2
7480891 Sezginer Jan 2009 B2
7484197 Allen et al. Jan 2009 B2
7485934 Liaw Feb 2009 B2
7487475 Kriplani et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492013 Correale, Jr. Feb 2009 B2
7500211 Komaki Mar 2009 B2
7502275 Nii et al. Mar 2009 B2
7503026 Ichiryu et al. Mar 2009 B2
7504184 Hung et al. Mar 2009 B2
7506300 Sezginer et al. Mar 2009 B2
7508238 Yamagami Mar 2009 B2
7509621 Melvin, III Mar 2009 B2
7509622 Sinha et al. Mar 2009 B2
7512017 Chang Mar 2009 B2
7512921 Shibuya Mar 2009 B2
7514355 Katase Apr 2009 B2
7514959 Or-Bach et al. Apr 2009 B2
7523429 Kroyan et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527900 Zhou et al. May 2009 B2
7535751 Huang May 2009 B2
7538368 Yano May 2009 B2
7543262 Wang et al. Jun 2009 B2
7563701 Chang et al. Jul 2009 B2
7564134 Lee et al. Jul 2009 B2
7568174 Sezginer et al. Jul 2009 B2
7569309 Walter et al. Aug 2009 B2
7569310 Wallace et al. Aug 2009 B2
7569894 Suzuki Aug 2009 B2
7575973 Mokhlesi et al. Aug 2009 B2
7592247 Yang et al. Sep 2009 B2
7592676 Nakanishi Sep 2009 B2
7598541 Okamoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7598558 Hashimoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7614030 Hsu Nov 2009 B2
7625790 Yang Dec 2009 B2
7632610 Wallace et al. Dec 2009 B2
7640522 Gupta et al. Dec 2009 B2
7646651 Lee et al. Jan 2010 B2
7647574 Haruki Jan 2010 B2
7653884 Furnish et al. Jan 2010 B2
7665051 Ludwig et al. Feb 2010 B2
7700466 Booth, Jr. et al. Apr 2010 B2
7712056 White et al. May 2010 B2
7739627 Chew et al. Jun 2010 B2
7749662 Matthew et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755110 Gliese et al. Jul 2010 B2
7770144 Dellinger Aug 2010 B2
7781847 Yang Aug 2010 B2
7791109 Wann et al. Sep 2010 B2
7802219 Tomar et al. Sep 2010 B2
7816740 Houston Oct 2010 B2
7825437 Pillarisetty et al. Nov 2010 B2
7842975 Becker et al. Nov 2010 B2
7873929 Kahng et al. Jan 2011 B2
7882456 Zach Feb 2011 B2
7888705 Becker et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898040 Nawaz Mar 2011 B2
7906801 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908578 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910958 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910959 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917877 Singh et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917879 Becker et al. Mar 2011 B2
7923266 Thijs et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923337 Chang et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923757 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7926001 Pierrat Apr 2011 B2
7932544 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932545 Becker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7934184 Zhang Apr 2011 B2
7939443 Fox et al. May 2011 B2
7943966 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7943967 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7948012 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7948013 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7952119 Becker et al. May 2011 B2
7956421 Becker Jun 2011 B2
7958465 Lu et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962867 White et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962878 Melzner Jun 2011 B2
7962879 Tang et al. Jun 2011 B2
7964267 Lyons et al. Jun 2011 B1
7971160 Osawa et al. Jun 2011 B2
7989847 Becker et al. Aug 2011 B2
7989848 Becker et al. Aug 2011 B2
7992122 Burstein et al. Aug 2011 B1
7994583 Inaba Aug 2011 B2
8004042 Yang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8022441 Becker et al. Sep 2011 B2
8030689 Becker et al. Oct 2011 B2
8035133 Becker et al. Oct 2011 B2
8044437 Venkatraman et al. Oct 2011 B1
8058671 Becker et al. Nov 2011 B2
8058690 Chang Nov 2011 B2
8072003 Becker et al. Dec 2011 B2
8072053 Li Dec 2011 B2
8088679 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088680 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088681 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088682 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089098 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089099 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089100 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089101 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089102 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089103 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8089104 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8101975 Becker et al. Jan 2012 B2
8110854 Becker et al. Feb 2012 B2
8129750 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129751 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129752 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129754 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129755 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129756 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129757 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8129819 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8130529 Tanaka Mar 2012 B2
8134183 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134184 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134185 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8134186 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8138525 Becker et al. Mar 2012 B2
8161427 Morgenshtein et al. Apr 2012 B2
8178905 Toubou May 2012 B2
8178909 Venkatraman et al. May 2012 B2
8198656 Becker et al. Jun 2012 B2
8207053 Becker et al. Jun 2012 B2
8214778 Quandt et al. Jul 2012 B2
8217428 Becker et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225239 Reed et al. Jul 2012 B2
8225261 Hong et al. Jul 2012 B2
8245180 Smayling et al. Aug 2012 B2
8247846 Becker Aug 2012 B2
8253172 Becker et al. Aug 2012 B2
8253173 Becker et al. Aug 2012 B2
8258547 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258548 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258549 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258550 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258551 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258552 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8258581 Becker Sep 2012 B2
8259286 Maly Sep 2012 B2
8264007 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264008 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264009 Becker et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264044 Becker Sep 2012 B2
8274099 Becker Sep 2012 B2
8283701 Becker et al. Oct 2012 B2
8294212 Wang et al. Oct 2012 B2
8316327 Herold Nov 2012 B2
8356268 Becker et al. Jan 2013 B2
8363455 Rennie et al. Jan 2013 B2
8378407 Audzeyeu et al. Feb 2013 B2
8395224 Becker et al. Mar 2013 B2
8402397 Robles et al. Mar 2013 B2
8405163 Becker et al. Mar 2013 B2
8422274 Tomita et al. Apr 2013 B2
8436400 Becker et al. May 2013 B2
8453094 Kornachuk et al. May 2013 B2
8575706 Becker et al. Nov 2013 B2
8667443 Smayling et al. Mar 2014 B2
8701071 Kornachuk et al. Apr 2014 B2
8735995 Becker et al. May 2014 B2
8756551 Becker et al. Jun 2014 B2
8836045 Becker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8839162 Amundson et al. Sep 2014 B2
8839175 Smayling et al. Sep 2014 B2
8847329 Becker et al. Sep 2014 B2
8863063 Becker et al. Oct 2014 B2
8921896 Becker et al. Dec 2014 B2
9006841 Kumar et al. Apr 2015 B2
9035359 Becker et al. May 2015 B2
9202779 Kornachuk et al. Dec 2015 B2
9269423 Sever Feb 2016 B2
9336344 Smayling May 2016 B2
9425272 Becker Aug 2016 B2
9425273 Becker Aug 2016 B2
9443947 Becker Sep 2016 B2
9633987 Smayling Apr 2017 B2
9917056 Smayling Mar 2018 B2
20010049813 Chan et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020003270 Makino Jan 2002 A1
20020015899 Chen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020024049 Nii Feb 2002 A1
20020030510 Kono et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020063582 Rikino May 2002 A1
20020068423 Park et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020079516 Lim Jun 2002 A1
20020079927 Katoh et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020149392 Cho Oct 2002 A1
20020166107 Capodieci et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020194575 Allen et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030042930 Pileggi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030046653 Liu Mar 2003 A1
20030061592 Agrawal et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030088839 Watanabe May 2003 A1
20030088842 Cirit May 2003 A1
20030090924 Nii May 2003 A1
20030103176 Abe et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030106037 Moniwa et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030107085 Gudesen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030117168 Uneme et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030124847 Houston et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030125917 Rich et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030126569 Rich et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030128565 Tomita Jul 2003 A1
20030145288 Wang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145299 Fried et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030177465 MacLean et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030178648 Bansal Sep 2003 A1
20030185076 Worley Oct 2003 A1
20030203287 Miyagawa Oct 2003 A1
20030229868 White et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229875 Smith et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040029372 Jang et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049754 Liao et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040063038 Shin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040115539 Broeke et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040139412 Ito et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145028 Matsumoto et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153979 Chang Aug 2004 A1
20040161878 Or-Bach et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040164360 Nishida et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040169201 Hidaka Sep 2004 A1
20040194050 Hwang et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040196705 Ishikura et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040229135 Wang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040232444 Shimizu Nov 2004 A1
20040243966 Dellinger Dec 2004 A1
20040245547 Stipe Dec 2004 A1
20040262640 Suga Dec 2004 A1
20050001271 Kobayashi Jan 2005 A1
20050009312 Butt et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050009344 Hwang et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050012157 Cho et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050044522 Maeda Feb 2005 A1
20050055828 Wang et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050076320 Maeda Apr 2005 A1
20050087806 Hokazono Apr 2005 A1
20050093147 Tu May 2005 A1
20050101112 Rueckes et al. May 2005 A1
20050110130 Kitabayashi et al. May 2005 A1
20050135134 Yen Jun 2005 A1
20050136340 Baselmans et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138598 Kokubun Jun 2005 A1
20050156200 Kinoshita Jul 2005 A1
20050185325 Hur Aug 2005 A1
20050189604 Gupta et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050189614 Ihme et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050196685 Wang et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205894 Sumikawa et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050212018 Schoellkopf et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050224982 Kemerling et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050229130 Wu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251771 Robles Nov 2005 A1
20050264320 Chan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050264324 Nakazato Dec 2005 A1
20050266621 Kim Dec 2005 A1
20050268256 Tsai et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050274983 Hayashi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278673 Kawachi Dec 2005 A1
20050280031 Yano Dec 2005 A1
20060036976 Cohn Feb 2006 A1
20060038234 Liaw Feb 2006 A1
20060050588 Osada Mar 2006 A1
20060063334 Donze et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060065893 Jin et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068531 Breitwisch et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070018 Semmler Mar 2006 A1
20060073694 Chang Apr 2006 A1
20060084261 Iwaki Apr 2006 A1
20060091550 Shimazaki et al. May 2006 A1
20060095872 McElvain May 2006 A1
20060101370 Cui et al. May 2006 A1
20060112355 Pileggi et al. May 2006 A1
20060113533 Tamaki et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060113567 Ohmori et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060120143 Liaw Jun 2006 A1
20060121715 Chang et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060123376 Vogel et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060125024 Ishigaki Jun 2006 A1
20060131609 Kinoshita et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136848 Ichiryu et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060146638 Chang et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060151810 Ohshige Jul 2006 A1
20060158270 Gibet et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060170108 Hiroi Aug 2006 A1
20060177744 Bodendorf et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060181310 Rhee Aug 2006 A1
20060195809 Cohn et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195810 Morton Aug 2006 A1
20060197557 Chung Sep 2006 A1
20060203530 Venkatraman Sep 2006 A1
20060206854 Barnes et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060223302 Chang et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060248495 Sezginer Nov 2006 A1
20060261417 Suzuki Nov 2006 A1
20060277521 Chen Dec 2006 A1
20060289861 Correale, Jr. Dec 2006 A1
20070001304 Liaw Jan 2007 A1
20070002617 Houston Jan 2007 A1
20070004147 Toubou Jan 2007 A1
20070007574 Ohsawa Jan 2007 A1
20070038973 Li et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070074145 Tanaka Mar 2007 A1
20070094634 Seizginer et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101305 Smith et al. May 2007 A1
20070105023 Zhou et al. May 2007 A1
20070106971 Lien et al. May 2007 A1
20070113216 Zhang May 2007 A1
20070172770 Witters et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070186196 Tanaka Aug 2007 A1
20070196958 Bhattacharya et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070204253 Murakawa Aug 2007 A1
20070209029 Ivonin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070210391 Becker et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070211521 Kawasumi Sep 2007 A1
20070218685 Sivakumar et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070234252 Visweswariah et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070234262 Uedi et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070241810 Onda Oct 2007 A1
20070251771 Huang Nov 2007 A1
20070256039 White Nov 2007 A1
20070257277 Takeda et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070264758 Correale Nov 2007 A1
20070274140 Joshi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070277129 Allen et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288882 Kniffin et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070290361 Chen Dec 2007 A1
20070294652 Bowen Dec 2007 A1
20070297249 Chang et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080001176 Gopalakrishnan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080005712 Charlebois et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021689 Yamashita et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080022247 Kojima et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080046846 Chew et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080073717 Ha Mar 2008 A1
20080081472 Tanaka Apr 2008 A1
20080082952 O'Brien Apr 2008 A1
20080083991 Yang et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086712 Fujimoto Apr 2008 A1
20080097641 Miyashita et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098334 Pileggi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080098341 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080099795 Bernstein et al. May 2008 A1
20080127000 Majumder et al. May 2008 A1
20080127029 Graur et al. May 2008 A1
20080134128 Blatchford et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080137051 Maly Jun 2008 A1
20080144361 Wong Jun 2008 A1
20080148216 Chan et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163141 Scheffer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168406 Rahmat et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080169868 Toubou Jul 2008 A1
20080211028 Suzuki Sep 2008 A1
20080216207 Tsai Sep 2008 A1
20080244494 McCullen Oct 2008 A1
20080251779 Kakoschke et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080265290 Nielsen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080276105 Hoberman et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080283910 Dreeskornfeld et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080283925 Berthold et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285331 Torok et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080308848 Inaba Dec 2008 A1
20080308880 Inaba Dec 2008 A1
20080315258 Masuda et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090014811 Becker et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024974 Yamada Jan 2009 A1
20090031261 Smith et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090032898 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090032967 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090037864 Becker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090057780 Wong et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090075485 Ban et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077524 Nagamura Mar 2009 A1
20090085067 Hayashi et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090087991 Yatsuda et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090101940 Barrows et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106714 Culp et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090155990 Yanagidaira et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090159950 Ishibashi Jun 2009 A1
20090181314 Shyu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187871 Cork Jul 2009 A1
20090206443 Juengling Aug 2009 A1
20090224408 Fox Sep 2009 A1
20090228853 Hong et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228857 Kornachuk et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090235215 Lavin Sep 2009 A1
20090273100 Aton et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090280582 Thijs et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090283921 Wang Nov 2009 A1
20090302372 Chang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319977 Saxena et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100001321 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006897 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006898 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006899 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006900 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006901 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006902 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006903 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006947 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006948 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006950 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006951 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100006986 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011327 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011328 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011329 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011330 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011331 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011332 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011333 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012981 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012982 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012983 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012984 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012985 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012986 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017766 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017767 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017768 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017769 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017770 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017771 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017772 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019280 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019281 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019282 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019283 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019284 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019285 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019286 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019287 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019288 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019308 Chan et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023906 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023907 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023908 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023911 Becker et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100025731 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025732 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025733 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025734 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025735 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025736 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032722 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032723 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032724 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032726 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037194 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100037195 Becker et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100096671 Becker et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100115484 Frederick May 2010 A1
20100187609 Moroz Jul 2010 A1
20100203689 Bernstein et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100224943 Kawasaki Sep 2010 A1
20100229140 Werner et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100232212 Anderson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100252865 Van Der Zanden Oct 2010 A1
20100252896 Smayling Oct 2010 A1
20100264468 Xu Oct 2010 A1
20100270681 Bird et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100287518 Becker Nov 2010 A1
20100301482 Schultz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110014786 Sezginer Jan 2011 A1
20110016909 Mirza et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110108890 Becker et al. May 2011 A1
20110108891 Becker et al. May 2011 A1
20110154281 Zach Jun 2011 A1
20110207298 Anderson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110260253 Inaba Oct 2011 A1
20110298025 Haensch et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110317477 Liaw Dec 2011 A1
20120012932 Perng et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120118854 Smayling May 2012 A1
20120131528 Chen May 2012 A1
20120273841 Quandt et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130097574 Balabanov et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130200465 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130200469 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130207198 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130207199 Becker et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130254732 Kornachuk et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140197543 Kornachuk et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150249041 Becker et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150270218 Becker et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160079159 Kornachuk et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160079276 Becker et al. Mar 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (92)
Number Date Country
0102644 Jul 1989 EP
0788166 Aug 1997 EP
1394858 Mar 2004 EP
1670062 Jun 2006 EP
1833091 Aug 2007 EP
1730777 Sep 2007 EP
2251901 Nov 2010 EP
2860920 Apr 2005 FR
58-182242 Oct 1983 JP
58-215827 Dec 1983 JP
61-182244 Aug 1986 JP
S61-202451 Sep 1986 JP
S62-047148 Feb 1987 JP
S63-310136 Dec 1988 JP
H01284115 Nov 1989 JP
03-165061 Jul 1991 JP
H05152937 Jun 1993 JP
H05211437 Aug 1993 JP
H05218362 Aug 1993 JP
H07-153927 Jun 1995 JP
2684980 Jul 1995 JP
1995-302706 Nov 1995 JP
09-282349 Oct 1997 JP
1997-09289251 Nov 1997 JP
10-116911 May 1998 JP
1999-045948 Feb 1999 JP
2000-164811 Jun 2000 JP
2001-068558 Mar 2001 JP
2001-168707 Jun 2001 JP
2001-306641 Nov 2001 JP
2002-026125 Jan 2002 JP
2002-026296 Jan 2002 JP
2002-184870 Jun 2002 JP
2001-056463 Sep 2002 JP
2002-258463 Sep 2002 JP
2002-289703 Oct 2002 JP
2001-272228 Mar 2003 JP
2003-100872 Apr 2003 JP
2003-264231 Sep 2003 JP
2004-013920 Jan 2004 JP
2004-200300 Jul 2004 JP
2004-241529 Aug 2004 JP
2004-342757 Dec 2004 JP
2005-020008 Jan 2005 JP
2003-359375 May 2005 JP
2005-123537 May 2005 JP
2005-135971 May 2005 JP
2005-149265 Jun 2005 JP
2005-183793 Jul 2005 JP
2005-203447 Jul 2005 JP
2005-268610 Sep 2005 JP
2006-073696 Mar 2006 JP
2005-114752 Oct 2006 JP
2006-303022 Nov 2006 JP
2007-012855 Jan 2007 JP
2007-013060 Jan 2007 JP
2007-043049 Feb 2007 JP
2007-141971 Jun 2007 JP
2010-141047 Jun 2010 JP
2011-515841 May 2011 JP
10-0417093 Jun 1997 KR
10-1998-087485 Dec 1998 KR
1998-0084215 Dec 1998 KR
10-1999-0057943 Jul 1999 KR
2000-0005660 Jan 2000 KR
10-2000-0028830 May 2000 KR
10-2002-0034313 May 2002 KR
10-2002-0070777 Sep 2002 KR
2003-0022006 Mar 2003 KR
2004-0005609 Jan 2004 KR
10-2005-0030347 Mar 2005 KR
2005-0037965 Apr 2005 KR
2006-0108233 Oct 2006 KR
10-2007-0077162 Jul 2007 KR
386288 Apr 2000 TW
200423404 Nov 2004 TW
200426632 Dec 2004 TW
200534132 Oct 2005 TW
200620017 Jun 2006 TW
200630838 Sep 2006 TW
200709309 Mar 2007 TW
200709565 Mar 2007 TW
200811704 Mar 2008 TW
200947567 Nov 2009 TW
WO 2005104356 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006014849 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2006052738 May 2006 WO
WO 2006090445 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2007014053 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007063990 Jun 2007 WO
WO 2007103587 Sep 2007 WO
WO 2009054936 Apr 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (240)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 60/625,342, filed May 25, 2006, Pileggi et al.
Acar, et al., “A Linear-Centric Simulation Framework for Parametric Fluctuations”, 2002, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University USA, pp. 1-8. Jan. 28, 2002.
Amazawa, et al., “Fully Planarized Four-Level Interconnection with Stacked VLAS Using CMP of Selective CVD-A1 and Insulator and its Application to Quarter Micron Gate Array LSIs”, 1995, IEEE, Japan, pp. 473-476, Dec. 10, 1995.
Axelrad et al. “Efficient Full-Chip Yield Analysis Methodology for OPC-Corrected VLSI Design”, 2000, International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 20, 2000.
Balasinski et al. “Impact of Subwavelength CD Tolerance on Device Performance”, 2002, SPIE vol. 4692, Jul. 11, 2002.
Burkhardt, et al., “Dark Field Double Dipole Lithography (DDL) for Back-End-Of-Line Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 26, 2007.
Capetti, et al., “Sub k1 = 0.25 Lithography with Double Patterning Technique for 45nm Technology Node Flash Memory Devices at λ = 193nm”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Mar. 27, 2007.
Capodieci, L., et al., “Toward a Methodology for Manufacturability-Driven Design Rule Exploration,” DAC 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, San Diego, CA.
Chandra, et al., “An Interconnect Channel Design Methodology for High Performance Integrated Circuits”, 2004, IEEE, Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 1-6, Feb. 16, 2004.
Cheng, et al., “Feasibility Study of Splitting Pitch Technology on 45nm Contact Patterning with 0.93 NA”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Chow, et al., “The Design of a SRAM-Based Field-Programmable Gate Array—Part II: Circuit Design and Layout”, 1999, IEEE, vol. 7 # 3 pp. 321-330, Sep. 1, 1999.
Clark et al. “Managing Standby and Active Mode Leakage Power in Deep Sub-Micron Design”, Aug. 9, 2004, ACM.
Cobb et al. “Using OPC to Optimize for Image Slope and Improve Process Window”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5130, Apr. 16, 2003.
Devgan “Leakage Issues in IC Design: Part 3”, 2003, ICCAD, Nov. 9, 2003.
DeVor, et al., “Statistical Quality Design and Control”, 1992, Macmillan Publishing Company, pp. 264-267, Jan. 3, 1992.
Dictionary.com, “channel,” in Collins English Dictionary—Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Source location: HarperCollins Publishers. Sep. 3, 2009.
Dusa, et al. “Pitch Doubling Through Dual Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series. vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
El-Gamal, “Fast, Cheap and Under Control: The Next Implementation Fabric”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 354-355.
Firedberg, et al., “Modeling Within-Field Gate Length Spatial Variation for Process-Design Co-Optimization,” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5756, pp. 178-188, Feb. 27, 2005.
Frankel, “Quantum State Control Interference Lithography and Trim Double Patterning for 32-16nm Lithography”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 27, 2007.
Garg, et al. “Lithography Driven Layout Design”, 2005, IEEE VLSI Design 2005, Jan. 3, 2005.
Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology Trends: Resource and Manufacturability Implications for the Implementation of Physical Designs” Apr. 1, 2001, ACM.
Grobman et al. “Reticle Enhancement Technology: Implications and Challenges for Physical Design” Jun. 18, 2001, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Enhanced Resist and Etch CD Control by Design Perturbation”, Oct. 4, 2006, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Gupta et al. “A Practical Transistor-Level Dual Threshold Voltage Assignment Methodology”, 2005, Sixth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Mar. 21, 2005.
Gupta et al. “Detailed Placement for Improved Depth of Focus and CD Control”, 2005, ACM, Jan. 18, 2005.
Gupta et al. “Joining the Design and Mask Flows for Better and Cheaper Masks”, Oct. 14, 2004, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Gupta et al. “Manufacturing-Aware Physical Design”, ICCAD 2003, Nov. 9, 2003.
Gupta et al. “Selective Gate-Length Biasing for Cost-Effective Runtime Leakage Control”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM.
Gupta et al. “Wafer Topography-Aware Optical Proximity Correction for Better DOF Margin and CD Control”, Apr. 13, 2005, SPIE.
Gupta, Puneet, et al., “Manufacturing-aware Design Methodology for Assist Feature Correctness,” SPIE vol. 5756, May 13, 2005.
Ha et al., “Reduction in the Mask Error Factor by Optimizing the Diffraction Order of a Scattering Bar in Lithography,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 46, No. 5, May 5, 2005, pp. 1213-1217.
Hakko, et al., “Extension of the 2D-TCC Technique to Optimize Mask Pattern Layouts,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 7028, 11 pages, Apr. 16, 2008.
Halpin et al., “Detailed Placement with Net Length Constraints,” Publication Year 2003, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications, pp. 22-27, Jun. 30, 2003.
Hayashida, et al., “Manufacturable Local Interconnect technology Fully Compatible with Titanium Salicide Process”, Jun. 11, 1991, VMIC Conference.
Heng, et al., “A VLSI Artwork Legalization Technique Base on a New Criterion of Minimum Layout Perturbation”, Proceedings of 1997 International Symposium on Physical Design, pp. 116-121, Apr. 14, 1997.
Heng, et al., “Toward Through-Process Layout Quality Metrics”, Mar. 3, 2005, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Hu, et al., “Synthesis and Placement Flow for Gain-Based Programmable Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 6, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 197-203.
Hur et al., “Mongrel: Hybrid Techniques for Standard Cell Placement,” Publication Year 2000, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, ICCAD-2000, pp. 165-170, Nov. 5, 2000.
Hutton, et al., “A Methodology for FPGA to Structured-ASIC Synthesis and Verification”, 2006, EDAA, pp. 64-69, Mar. 6, 2006.
Intel Core Microarchitecture White Paper “Introducing the 45 nm Next-Generation Intel Core Microarchitecture,” Intel Corporation, 2007 (best available publication date).
Jayakumar, et al., “A Metal and VIA Maskset Programmable VLSI Design Methodology using PLAs”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 590-594, Nov. 7, 2004.
Jhaveri, T. et al., Maximization of Layout Printability/Manufacturability by Extreme Layout Regularity, Proc. of the SPIE vol. 6156, Feb. 19, 2006.
Kang, S.M., Metal-Metal Matrix (M3) for High-Speed MOS VLSI Layout, IEEE Trans. on CAD, vol. CAD-6, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1987.
Kawashima, et al., “Mask Optimization for Arbitrary Patterns with 2D-TCC Resolution Enhancement Technique,” 2008 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6924, 12 pages, Feb. 24, 2008.
Kheterpal, et al., “Design Methodology for IC Manufacturability Based on Regular Logic-Bricks”, DAC, Jun. 13, 2005. IEEE/AMC, vol. 6520.
Kheterpal, et al., “Routing Architecture Exploration for Regular Fabrics”, DAC, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 204-207.
Kim, et al., “Double Exposure Using 193nm Negative Tone Photoresist”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Kim, et al., “Issues and Challenges of Double Patterning Lithography in DRAM”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Koorapaty, et al., “Exploring Logic Block Granularity for Regular Fabrics”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Feb. 16, 2004.
Koorapaty, et al., “Heterogeneous Logic Block Architectures for Via-Patterned Programmable Fabric”, 13th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL) 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Sep. 1, 2003, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2778, pp. 426-436.
Koorapaty, et al., “Modular, Fabric-Specific Synthesis for Programmable Architectures”, 12th International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL_2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)), Sep. 2, 2002, Springer-Verlag, vol. 2438 pp. 132-141.
Kuh et al., “Recent Advances in VLSI Layout,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 78, Issue 2, pp. 237-263, Feb. 1, 1990.
Lavin et al. “Backend DAC Flows for “Restrictive Design Rules””, 2004, IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004.
Li, et al., “A Linear-Centric Modeling Approach to Harmonic Balance Analysis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-6, Mar. 4, 2002.
Li, et al., “Nonlinear Distortion Analysis Via Linear-Centric Models”, 2003, IEEE, pp. 897-903, Jan. 21, 2003.
Liebmann et al., “Integrating DfM Components into a Cohesive Design-to-Silicon Solution,” Proc. SPIE 5756, Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing III, Feb. 27, 2005.
Liebmann et al., “Optimizing Style Options for Sub-Resolution Assist Features,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, Feb. 25, 2001, pp. 141-152.
Liebmann, et al., “High-Performance Circuit Design for the RET-Enabled 65nm Technology Node”, Feb. 26, 2004, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 5379 pp. 20-29.
Liebmann, L. W., Layout Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques: Impediment or Opportunity?, International Symposium on Physical Design, Apr. 6, 2003.
Liu et al., “Double Patterning with Multilayer Hard Mask Shrinkage for Sub 0.25 k 1 Lithography,” Proc. SPIE 6520, Optical Microlithography XX, Feb. 25, 2007.
Mansfield et al., “Lithographic Comparison of Assist Feature Design Strategies,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4000, Feb. 27, 2000, pp. 63-76.
Miller, “Manufacturing-Aware Design Helps Boost IC Yield”, Sep. 9, 2004, http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=47102054.
Mishra, P., et al., “FinFET Circuit Design,” Nanoelectronic Circuit Design, pp. 23-54, Dec. 21, 2010.
Mo, et al., “Checkerboard: A Regular Structure and its Synthesis, International Workshop on Logic and Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley, California, pp. 1-7. Jun. 1, 2003.
Mo, et al., “PLA-Based Regular Structures and Their Synthesis”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, IEEE, pp. 723-729, Jun. 1, 2003.
Mo, et al., “Regular Fabrics in Deep Sub-Micron Integrated-Circuit Design”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Entire Book, Jun. 1, 2002.
Moore, Samuel K., “Intel 45-nanometer Penryn Processors Arrive,” Nov. 13, 2007, IEEE Spectrum, http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/design/intel-45nanometer-penryn-processors-arrive.
Mutoh et al. “1-V Power Supply High-Speed Digital Circuit Technology with Multithreshold-Voltage CMOS”, 1995, IEEE, Aug. 1, 1995.
Op de Beek, et al., “Manufacturability issues with Double Patterning for 50nm half pitch damascene applications, using RELACS® shrink and corresponding OPC”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Or-Bach, “Programmable Circuit Fabrics”, Sep. 18, 2001, e-ASIC, pp. 1-36.
Otten, et al., “Planning for Performance”, DAC 1998, ACM Inc., pp. 122-127, Jun. 15, 1998.
Pack et al. “Physical & Timing Verification of Subwavelength-Scale Designs-Part I: Lithography Impact on MOSFETs”, 2003, SPIE vol. 5042, Feb. 23, 2003.
Pandini, et al., “Congestion-Aware Logic Synthesis”, 2002, IEEE, pp. 1-8, Mar. 4, 2002.
Pandini, et al., “Understanding and Addressing the Impact of Wiring Congestion During Technology Mapping”, ISPD Apr. 7, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 131-136.
Patel, et al., “An Architectural Exploration of Via Patterned Gate Arrays, ISPD 2003”, Apr. 6, 2003, pp. 184-189.
Pham, D., et al., “FINFET Device Junction Formation Challenges,” 2006 International Workshop on Junction Technology, pp. 73-77, Aug. 1, 2006.
Pileggi, et al., “Exploring Regular Fabrics to Optimize the Performance-Cost Trade-Offs, Proceedings of the 40th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2003”, Jun. 2, 2003, ACM Press, pp. 782-787.
Poonawala, et al., “ILT for Double Exposure Lithography with Conventional and Novel Materials”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Qian et al. “Advanced Physical Models for Mask Data Verification and Impacts on Physical Layout Synthesis” 2003 IEEE, Mar. 24, 2003.
Ran, et al., “An Integrated Design Flow for a Via-Configurable Gate Array”, 2004, IEEE, pp. 582-589, Nov. 7, 2004.
Ran, et al., “Designing a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). Proceedings of the IEEE, Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 423-426.
Ran, et al., “On Designing Via-Configurable Cell Blocks for Regular Fabrics” Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2004, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, s 198-203.
Ran, et al., “The Magic of a Via-Configurable Regular Fabric”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) Oct. 11, 2004.
Ran, et al., “Via-Configurable Routing Architectures and Fast Design Mappability Estimation for Regular Fabrics”, 2005, IEEE, pp. 25-32, Sep. 1, 2006.
Reis, et al., “Physical Design Methodologies for Performance Predictability and Manufacturability”, Apr. 14, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 390-397.
Robertson, et al., “The Modeling of Double Patterning Lithographic Processes”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Rosenbluth, et al., “Optimum Mask and Source Patterns to Print a Given Shape,” 2001 Proc. of SPIE vol. 4346, pp. 486-502, Feb. 25, 2001.
Rovner, “Design for Manufacturability in Via Programmable Gate Arrays”, May 1, 2003, Graduate School of Carnegie Mellon University.
Sengupta, “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1998, Thesis for Rice University, pp. 1-101, Nov. 1, 1998.
Sengupta, et al., “An Integrated CAD Framework Linking VLSI Layout Editors and Process Simulators”, 1996, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 2726; pp. 244-252, Mar. 10, 1996.
Sherlekar, “Design Considerations for Regular Fabrics”, Apr. 18, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 97-102.
Shi et al., “Understanding the Forbidden Pitch and Assist Feature Placement,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 4562, pp. 968-979, Mar. 11, 2002.
Smayling et al., “APF Pitch Halving for 22 nm Logic Cells Using Gridded Design Rules,” Proceedings of SPIE, USA, vol. 6925, Jan. 1, 2008, pp. 69251E-1-69251E-7.
Socha, et al., “Simultaneous Source Mask Optimization (SMO),” 2005 Proc. of SPIE vol. 5853, pp. 180-193, Apr. 13, 2005.
Sreedhar et al. “Statistical Yield Modeling for Sub-Wavelength Lithography”, 2008 IEEE, Oct. 28, 2008.
Stapper, “Modeling of Defects in Integrated Circuit Photolithographic Patterns”, Jul. 1, 1984, IBM, vol. 28 # 4, pp. 461-475.
Taylor, et al., “Enabling Energy Efficiency in Via-Patterned Gate Array Devices”, Jun. 7, 2004, ACM Press, pp. 874-877.
Tian et al. “Model-Based Dummy Feature Placement for Oxide Chemical Mechanical Polishing Manufacturability” IEEE, vol. 20, Issue 7, Jul. 1, 2001.
Tong, et al., “Regular Logic Fabrics for a Via Patterned Gate Array (VPGA), Custom Integrated Circuits Conference”, Sep. 21, 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 53-56.
Vanleenhove, et al., “A Litho-Only Approach to Double Patterning”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Wang, et al., “Performance Optimization for Gridded-Layout Standard Cells”, vol. 5567 SPIE, Sep. 13, 2004.
Wang, J. et al., Standard Cell Layout with Regular Contact Placement, IEEE Trans. on Semicon. Mfg., vol. 17, No. 3, Aug. 9, 2004.
Webb, Clair, “45nm Design for Manufacturing,” Intel Technology Journal, vol. 12, Issue 02, Jun. 17, 2008, ISSN 1535-864X, pp. 121-130.
Webb, Clair, “Layout Rule Trends and Affect upon CPU Design”, vol. 6156 SPIE, Feb. 19, 2006.
Wenren, et al., “The Improvement of Photolithographic Fidelity of Two-dimensional Structures Though Double Exposure Method”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Wilcox, et al., “Design for Manufacturability: A Key to Semiconductor Manufacturing Excellence”, 1998 IEEE, pp. 308-313, Sep. 23, 1998.
Wong, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques and Design for Manufacturability: Containing and Accounting for Variabilities in Integrated Circuit Creation,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Sep. 27, 2007, vol. 6(3), 2 pages.
Wu, et al., “A Study of Process Window Capabilities for Two-dimensional Structures under Double Exposure Condition”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Xiong, et al., “The Constrained Via Minimization Problem for PCB and VLSI Design”, 1988 ACM Press/IEEE, pp. 573-578, Jun. 12, 1998.
Yamamaoto, et al., “New Double Exposure Technique without Alternating Phase Shift Mask”, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Yamazoe, et al., “Resolution Enhancement by Aerial Image Approximation with 2D-TCC,” 2007 Proc. of SPIE vol. 6730, 12 pages, Sep. 17, 2007.
Yang, et al., “Interconnection Driven VLSI Module Placement Based on Quadratic Programming and Considering Congestion Using LFF Principles”, 2004 IEEE, pp. 1243-1247, Jun. 27, 2004.
Yao, et al., “Multilevel Routing With Redundant Via Insertion”, Oct. 23, 2006, IEEE, pp. 1148-1152.
Yu, et al., “True Process Variation Aware Optical Proximity Correction with Variational Lithography Modeling and Model Calibration,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Sep. 11, 2007, vol. 6(3), 16 pages.
Zheng, et al.“Modeling and Analysis of Regular Symmetrically Structured Power/Ground Distribution Networks”, DAC, Jun. 10, 2002, ACM Press, pp. 395-398.
Zhu, et al., “A Stochastic Integral Equation Method for Modeling the Rough Surface Effect on Interconnect Capacitance”, 2004 IEEE, Nov. 7, 2004.
Zhu, et al., “A Study of Double Exposure Process Design with Balanced Performance Parameters for Line/Space Applications”, 2007, SPIE Proceeding Series, vol. 6520; Feb. 25, 2007.
Zuchowski, et al., “A Hybrid ASIC and FPGA Architecture”, 2003 IEEE, pp. 187-194, Nov. 10, 2002.
Alam, Syed M. et al., “A Comprehensive Layout Methodology and Layout-Specific Circuit Analyses for Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” Mar. 21, 2002.
Alam, Syed M. et al., “Layout-Specific Circuit Evaluation in 3-D Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2003.
Aubusson, Russel, “Wafer-Scale Integration of Semiconductor Memory,” Apr. 1, 1979.
Bachtold, “Logic Circuits with Carbon,” Nov. 9, 2001.
Baker, R. Jacob, “CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (2nd Edition),” Nov. 1, 2004.
Baldi et al., “A Scalable Single Poly EEPROM Cell for Embedded Memory Applications,” pp. 1-4, Fig. 1, Sep. 1, 1997.
Cao, Ke, “Design for Manufacturing (DFM) in Submicron VLSI Design,” Aug. 1, 2007.
Capodieci, Luigi, “From Optical Proximity Correction to Lithography-Driven Physical Design (1996-2006): 10 years of Resolution Enhancement Technology and the roadmap enablers for the next decade,” Proc. SPIE 6154, Optical Microlithography XIX, 615401, Mar. 20, 2006.
Chang, Leland et al., “Stable SRAM Cell Design for the 32 nm Node and Beyond,” Jun. 16, 2005.
Cheung, Peter, “Layout Design,” Apr. 4, 2004.
Chinnery, David, “Closing the Gap Between ASIC & Custom: Tools and Techniques for High-Performance ASIC Design,” Jun. 30, 2002.
Chou, Dyiann et al., “Line End Optimization through Optical Proximity Correction (OPC): A Case Study,” Feb. 19, 2006.
Olein, Dan, “CMOS IC Layout: Concepts, Methodologies, and Tools,” Dec. 22, 1999.
Cowell, “Exploiting Non-Uniform Access Time,” Jul. 1, 2003.
Das, Shamik, “Design Automation and Analysis of Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuits,” May 1, 2004.
Dehaene, W. et al., “Technology-Aware Design of SRAM Memory Circuits,” Mar. 1, 2007.
Deng, Liang et al., “Coupling-aware Dummy Metal Insertion for Lithography,” p. 1, col. 2, Jan. 23, 2007.
Devoivre et al., “Validated 90nm CMOS Technology Platform with Low-k Copper Interconnects for Advanced System-on-Chip (SoC),” Jul. 12, 2002.
Embody, R. J., “Near-Optimal n-Layer Channel Routing,” Jun. 29, 1986.
Ferretti, Marcos et al., “High Performance Asynchronous ASIC Back-End Design Flow Using Single-Track Full-Buffer Standard Cells,” Apr. 23, 2004.
Garg, Manish et al., “Litho-driven Layouts for Reducing Performance Variability,” p. 2, Figs. 2b-2c, May 23, 2005.
Greenway, Robert et al., “32nm 1-D Regular Pitch SRAM Bitcell Design for Interference-Assisted Lithography,” Oct. 6, 2008.
Gupta et al., “Modeling Edge Placement Error Distribution in Standard Cell Library,” Feb. 23, 2006.
Grad, Johannes et al., “A standard cell library for student projects,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education, Jun. 2, 2003.
Hartono, Roy et al., “Active Device Generation for Automatic Analog Layout Retargeting Tool,” May 13, 2004.
Hartono, Roy et al., “IPRAIL—Intellectual Property Reuse-based Analog IC Layout Automation,” Mar. 17, 2003.
Hastings, Alan, “The Art of Analog Layout (2nd Edition),” Jul. 4, 2005.
Hurat et al., “A Genuine Design Manufacturability Check for Designers,” Feb. 19, 2006.
Institute of Microelectronic Systems, “Digital Subsystem Design,” Oct. 13, 2006.
Ishida, M. et al., “A Novel 6T-SRAM Cell Technology Designed with Rectangular Patterns Scalable beyond 0.18 pm Generation and Desirable for Ultra High Speed Operation,” IEDM 1998, Dec. 6, 1998.
Jakusovszky, “Linear IC Parasitic Element Simulation Methodology,” Oct. 1, 1993.
Jangkrajarng, Nuttorn et al., “Template-Based Parasitic-Aware Optimization and Retargeting of Analog and RF Integrated Circuit Layouts,” Nov. 5, 2006.
Kahng, Andrew B., “Design Optimizations DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial, part V),” Jul. 24, 2006.
Kang, Sung-Mo et al., “CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits Analysis & Design,” Oct. 29, 2002.
Kottoor, Mathew Francis, “Development of a Standard Cell Library based on Deep Sub-Micron SCMOS Design Rules using Open Source Software (MS Thesis),” Aug. 1, 2005.
Kubicki, “Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below): IDF Day 2 Coverage (available at http://www.anandtech.com/show/1468/4),” Sep. 9, 2004.
Kuhn, Kelin J., “Reducing Variation in Advanced Logic Technologies: Approaches to Process and Design for Manufacturability of Nanoscale CMOS,” p. 27, Dec. 12, 2007.
Kurokawa, Atsushi et al., “Dummy Filling Methods for Reducing Interconnect Capacitance and Number of Fills, Proc. of ISQED,” pp. 586-591, Mar. 21, 2005.
Lavin, Mark, “Open Access Requirements from RDR Design Flows,” Nov. 11, 2004.
Liebmann, Lars et al., “Layout Methodology Impact of Resolution Enhancement Techniques,” pp. 5-6, Apr. 6, 2003.
Liebmann, Lars et al., “TCAD development for lithography resolution enhancement,” Sep. 1, 2001.
Lin, Chung-Wei et al., “Recent Research and Emerging Challenges in Physical Design for Manufacturability/Reliability,” Jan. 26, 2007.
McCullen, Kevin W., “Layout Techniques for Phase Correct and Gridded Wiring,” pp. 13, 17, Fig. 5, Dec. 1, 2006.
MOSIS, “Design Rules MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) (Revision 8.00),” Oct. 4, 2004.
MOSIS, “MOSIS Scalable CMOS (SCMOS) Design Rules (Revision 7.2),” Jan. 1, 1995.
Muta et al., “Manufacturability-Aware Design of Standard Cells,” pp. 2686-2690, Figs. 3, 12, Dec. 1, 2007.
Na, Kee-Yeol et al., “A Novel Single Polysilicon EEPROM Cell With a Polyfinger Capacitor,” Nov. 30, 2007.
Pan et al., “Redundant Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005.
Park, Tae Hong, “Characterization and Modeling of Pattern Dependencies in Copper Interconnects for Integrated Circuits,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, May 24, 2002.
Patel, Chetan, “An Architectural Exploration of Via Patterned Gate Arrays (CMU Master's Project),” May 1, 2003.
Pease, R. Fabian et al., “Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics,” IEEE 2008, vol. 96, Issue 2, Jan. 16, 2008.
Serrano, Diego Emilio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Facultad De Ingenieria, Departamento De Electronica, “Diseño De Multiplicador 4 X 8 en VLSI, Introduccion al VLSI,” 2006 (best available publication date).
Pramanik, “Impact of layout on variability of devices for sub 90nm technologies,” 2004 (best available publication date).
Pramanik, Dipankar et al., “Lithography-driven layout of logic cells for 65-nm node (SPIE Proceedings vol. 5042),” Jul. 10, 2003.
Roy et al., “Extending Aggressive Low-K1 Design Rule Requirements for 90 and 65 Nm Nodes Via Simultaneous Optimization of Numerical Aperture, Illumination and Optical Proximity Correction,” J.Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(2), 023003, Apr. 26, 2005.
Saint, Christopher et al.. “IC Layout Basics: A Practical Guide,” Chapter 3, Nov. 5, 2001.
Saint, Christopher et al., “IC Mask Design: Essential Layout Techniques,” May 24, 2002.
Scheffer, “Physical CAD Changes to Incorporate Design for Lithography and Manufacturability,” Feb. 4, 2004.
Smayling, Michael C., “Part 3: Test Structures, Test Chips, In-Line Metrology & Inspection,” Jul. 24, 2006.
Spence, Chris, “Full-Chip Lithography Simulation and Design Analysis: How OPC is changing IC Design, Emerging Lithographic Technologies IX,” May 6, 2005.
Subramaniam, Anupama R., “Design Rule Optimization of Regular layout for Leakage Reduction in Nanoscale Design,” pp. 474-478, Mar. 24, 2008.
Tang, C. W. et al., “A compact large signal model of LDMOS,” Solid-State Electronics 46(2002) 2111-2115, May 17, 2002.
Taylor, Brian et al., “Exact Combinatorial Optimization Methods for Physical Design of Regular Logic Bricks,” Jun. 8, 2007.
Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Dummy Feature Placement for Chemical-Mechanical Uniformity in a Shallow Trench Isolation Process,” IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 63-71, Jan. 1, 2002.
Tian, Ruiqi et al., “Proximity Dummy Feature Placement and Selective Via Sizing for Process Uniformity in a Trench-First-Via-Last Dual-Inlaid Metal Process,” Proc. of IITC, pp. 48-50, Jun. 6, 2001.
Torres, J. A. et al., “Ret Compliant Cell Generation for sub-130nm Processes,” SPIE vol. 4692, Mar. 6, 2002.
Uyemura, John P., “Introduction to VLSI Circuits and Systems,” Chapters 2, 3, 5, and Part 3, Jul. 30, 2001.
Uyemura, John, “Chip Design for Submicron VLSI: CMOS Layout and Simulation,” Chapters 2-5, 7-9, Feb. 8, 2005.
Verhaegen et al., “Litho Enhancements for 45nm-nod MuGFETs,” Aug. 1, 2005.
Wong, Ban P., “Bridging the Gap between Dreams and Nano-Scale Reality (DAC-2006 DFM Tutorial),” Jul. 28, 2006.
Wang, Dunwei et al.. “Complementary Symmetry Silicon Nanowire Logic: Power-Efficient Inverters with Gain,” Aug. 17, 2006.
Wang, Jun et al., “Effects of grid-placed contacts on circuit performance,” pp. 135-139, Figs. 2, 4-8, Feb. 28, 2003.
Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with regularly placed contacts and gates (SPIE vol. 5379),” Feb. 22, 2004.
Wang, Jun et al., “Standard cell design with resolution-enhancement-technique-driven regularly placed contacts and gates,” J. Micro/Nanolith, MEMS MOEMS, 4(1), 013001, Mar. 16, 2005.
Watson, Bruce, “Challenges and Automata Applications in Chip-Design Software,” pp. 38-40, Jul. 16, 2007.
Weste, Neil et al., “CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective, 3rd Edition,” May 21, 2004.
Wingerden, Johannes van, “Experimental verification of improved printability for litho-driven designs,” Mar. 14, 2005.
Wong, Alfred K., “Microlithography: Trends, Challenges, Solutions, and Their Impact on Design,” Micro IEEE vol. 23, Issue 2, Apr. 29, 2003.
Xu, Gang, “Redundant-Via Enhanced Maze Routing for Yield Improvement,” Proceedings of ASP-DAC 2005, Jan. 18, 2005.
Yang, Jie, “Manufacturability Aware Design,” pp. 93, 102, Fig. 5.2, Jan. 16, 2008.
Yongshun, Wang et al., “Static Induction Devices with Planar Type Buried Gate,” Chinese Journal of Semiconductors, vol. 25, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2004.
Zobrist, George (editor), “Progress in Computer Aided VLSI Design: Implementations (Ch. 5),” Ablex Publishing Corporation, Feb. 1, 1990.
Petley, Graham, “VLSI and ASIC Technology Standard Cell Library Design,” from website www.vlsitechnology.org, Jan. 11, 2005.
Liebmann, Lars, et al., “Layout Optimization at the Pinnacle of Optical Lithography,” Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing II, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5042, Jul. 8, 2003.
Kawasaki, H., et al., “Challenges and Solutions of FinFET Integration in an SRAM Cell and a Logic Circuit for 22 nm node and beyond,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2009 IEEE International, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Dec. 7, 2009, pp. 1-4.
Intel Corporation v. Tela Innovations, Inc., “Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and Unenforceability, Demand for Jury Trial,” Case No. 3:18-2848, Dated May 15, 2018.
Uyemura, John P., “Introduction to VLSI Circuits and Systems,” 2002, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 67-69.
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) 2005 Edition, Lithography, Aug. 21, 2005.
M. Fritze et al., “Dense Only Phase Shift Template Lithography,” SPIE Design and Process Integration for Microelectronic Manufacturing II, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5042, Jul. 10, 2003.
M. Fritze et al., “Gratings of Regular Arrays and Trim Exposures for Ultralarge Scale Integrated Circuit Phase-Shift Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19(6), 2366, Nov./Dec. 2001.
R. Maziasz and J. Hayes, “Layout Minimization of CMOS Cells,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992, Second Printing 2000.
M. Fritze et al., “Hybrid Optical Maskless Lithography: Scaling Beyond the 45 nm Node,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena 23, 2743 (2005).
H. Ohta et al., High Performance 30 nm Gate Bulk CMOS for 45 nm Node with Σ-shaped SiGe-SD, IEEE, 2005.
Sankaran et al., “A 45 nm CMOS node Cu/Low-k/Ultra Low-k PECVD SiCOH (k=2.4) Beol Technology,” 2006.
T. Sugii, “High-performance bulk CMOS technology for 65/45 nm nodes,” Solid-State Electronics 50 (2006) 2-9, Oct. 10, 2005.
J. Watkins et al., “Fabrication of Sub 45-nm Structures for the Next Generation of Devices: A Lot of Effort for a Little Device,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 30, Dec. 2005.
S. Wolf, “Microchip Manufacturing,” Lattice Press, 2004.
J. Rabaey et al., Digital Integrated Circuits: A Design Perspective, Second Edition, Pearson Education, Inc., 2003, 1996.
Sedra et al., Excerpt from “Microelectronic Circuits, Fifth Edition,” Oxford University Press, Inc., 2004.
D. Hodges, “Analysis and Design of Digital Integrated Circuits, Third Edition,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004.
R. Geiger et al., “VLSI Design Techniques for Analog and Digital Circuits,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990.
R. Greenway et al., “Interference Assisted Lithography for Patterning of 1D Gridded Design,” Alternative Lithographic Technologies, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 7271, 72712U, Mar. 18, 2009.
X. Chen et al., “A Cost Effective 32 nm High-K/Metal Gate CMOS Technology for Low Power Applications with Single-Metal/Gate-First Process,” 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, IEEE, 2008.
Intel News Release, “Intel First to Demonstrate Working 45nm Chips,” Jan. 25, 2006.
Bohr, M., “Intel First to Demonstrate Working 45nm Chips,” Presentation, Jan. 2006.
K. Mistry et al., “A 45nm Logic Technology with High-k+Metal Gate Transistors, Strained Silicon, 9 Cu Interconnect Layers, 193nm Dry Patterning, and 100% Pb-free Packaging,” IEEE (2007) at 247-250.
C. Auth, “45nm High-K+Metal Gate Strain-Enhanced Transistors,” Intel Tech. J., vol. 12 No. 2 (2008) at 77-85.
Intel News Release, “Chip Shot: Peek Inside Intel's New 45nm Factory,” Nov. 8, 2007.
Intel Core™2 Extreme and Intel Xeon Processor Specs and Pricing, Nov. 12, 2007.
Scansen, “Under the Hood: 45 nm: What Intel Didn't Tell You,” EE Times, Jan. 21, 2008.
D. James, “Intel's Other IEDM Paper—Part 2,” posted on Chipworks blog and published in Solid State Technology magazine, Mar. 4, 2008.
Intel Corporation v. Tela Innovations, Inc., “Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and Unenforceability, Demand for Jury Trial,” Case No. 18-cv-02848-WHO, Dated Mar. 15, 2019.
Baker, R. Jacob, “CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (2nd Edition),” Table of Contents, Chapters 4, 7, 13, and 15, IEEE 2005.
Wolf, Stanley, “Microchip Manufacturing,” Table of Contents, Preface, Chapters 3, 4, 12, 17, 18, and 24, Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, California, 2004.
Hodges, David A. et al., “Analysis and Design of Digital Integrated Circuits: In Deep Submicron Technology (3rd Edition),” Table of Contents, Preface, Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2004.
Rabaey, Jan M. et al., “Digital Integrated Circuits: A Design Perspective (2nd Edition),” Preface, Table of Contents, Chapters 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2003.
Bencher, Christopher et al., “22nm Half-Pitch Patterning by CVD Spacer Self Alignment Double Patterning (SADP),” Optical Microlithography XXI, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 6924, 69244E, (2008).
Sedra, Adel S. et al., “Microelectronic Circuits (5th Edition),” Table of Contents, Preface, Chapters 4, 10, and 11, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2004.
Geiger, Randall L. et al., “VLSI Design Techniques for Analog and Digital Circuits,” Table of Contents, Preface, Chapter 2, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1990.
Maziasz, Robert L. et al., “Layout Minimization of CMOS Cells,” Table of Contents, Preface, Chapters 1, 2, and 6, Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA, 1992.
Rubin, Steven M., “Computer Aids for VLSI Design,” Chapter 11, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1987.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180145075 A1 May 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60983091 Oct 2007 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11969854 Jan 2008 US
Child 12814411 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 14995110 Jan 2016 US
Child 15860046 US
Parent 14188321 Feb 2014 US
Child 14995110 US
Parent 13189433 Jul 2011 US
Child 14188321 US
Parent 12814411 Jun 2010 US
Child 13189433 US