The present invention relates to a sensor with a microelectromechanical and nanoelectromechanical structure or MEMS&NEMS (microelectromechanical and nanoelectromechanical systems) with an out-of-plane detection.
MEMS&NEMS sensors with an out-of-plane detection are for example used to realise accelerometers, gyrometers, force or magnetic-field sensors. They comprise a mass suspended with respect to a support, which is intended to have an out-of-plane movement, i.e. substantially orthogonal to the plane of the sensor, under the effect of an outside force for example an acceleration or a Coriolis force.
The document FR 3 000 050 describes a microelectromechanical device used as a force sensor, comprising a mass suspended from a support by at least one beam intended to be deformed by bending and beams intended to be deformed by torsion. The beams define an axis of rotation and the mass pivots about this axis under the effect of an outside force. Piezoresistive gauges are suspended between the support and the mobile mass, each is stressed in tension or in compression. The electric resistance of the gauges varies proportionally to the stress applied to the mass and a signal is emitted by the gauges, this variation being representative of the out-of-plane movement of the mass.
In order to provide a sensor with good performance, it is sought to realise a sensor having a high sensitivity in the out-of-plane direction, called sensibility here, and a low sensitivity, or even an insensibility, in the directions of the plane.
The bending beams of the sensor of the document FR3 000 050 extend in a direction orthogonal to the out-of-plane direction and to the axis of the pivot. They have a high rigidity in this direction, which has the effect of substantially reducing the cross sensitivity in this direction, however they also have the effect of reducing the sensitivity in the out-of-plane direction.
The document EP 2 211 185 describes a MEMS sensor comprising a thick mobile mass, suspension beams having a thickness less than or equal to that of the mass and detection gauges having a thickness of less than the suspension beams. When the sensor is subjected for example to a force in a direction orthogonal to the out-of-plane direction and to the axis of the pivot, on the one hand the force exerts:
On the other hand, the forces applied are not coplanar, this results in a torque exerted on the mass which has an inverse effect on the gauges (compression of the first gauge and tension on the second gauge). These effects do not compensate for each other in general, this results in a non-zero differential stress in the gauges and thus a sensitivity of the sensor to a stress in the direction orthogonal to the out-of-plane direction and to the axis of the pivot.
Moreover this cross sensitivity is not controlled.
It is possible to overcome this parasite sensitivity, in the case in which the sensor with an out-of-plane detection is associated with at least one sensor with detection in the crosswise direction, indeed in this case the error due to the parasite sensitivity can be corrected, however this solution imposes the implementation of a second sensor, which increases the production cost and the bulk, and this results in a complexification of the electronics required.
It is therefore a goal of the present invention to offer a microelectromechanical and nanoelectromechanical sensor offering both a high sensitivity in the out-of-plane direction and a cross sensitivity controlled in a simple manner.
The goal stated above is achieved by a microelectromechanical and nanoelectromechanical sensor comprising a structure comprising a mass suspended from a support by suspension means in such a way as to be mobile in an out-of-plane direction, said suspension means comprising at least one beam stressed by bending. The sensor also comprises means for detection of the out-of-plane movement of the mass, comprising at least one stress gauge suspended between the support and the mass and extending orthogonally to the axis of rotation. The thickness of at least the bending beam is thus chosen with respect to the thickness of the mass, according to the cross sensitivity which is accepted for the sensor.
Indeed, the inventors have determined, in a surprising manner, that it is relatively easy to control the value of the cross sensitivity by adequately choosing the thicknesses of the beams stressed by bending and of the mass. They have determined that the thickness tf of the beam(s), which is or are stressed by bending, can be linked to the thickness of the mass tM and to the desired cross sensitivity ST by the following relation:
With larm: distance between the centre of gravity of the seismic mass and the centre of the beam(s) stressed by bending projected onto the first longitudinal direction.
Thus, it is possible to determine the structure of the sensor in order for it to have the expected specifications in terms of cross sensitivity.
The mass is stressed about two different axes of rotation according to whether the stress is in the out-of-plane direction or in a direction contained in the plane. The inventors have determined that they could design a structure in such a way that the axis of rotation of the structure, when it is subjected to a stress in the plane, moves towards the middle plane of the stress gauge or of stress gauges. The closer this axis is to the middle plane of the gauges, the more the sum of the stresses in the plane seen by the gauges is reduced. The cross sensitivity of the structure is thus reduced. Preferably the axis of rotation of the structure, when it is subjected to a stress in the plane, is moved in such a way as to be located in the middle plane of the gauges in order to completely cancel out the sum of the stresses seen by the latter. The gauges do not therefore undergo any extension.
“Middle plane” means a plane parallel to the plane in which the structure extends, i.e. the plane XY, and located at an equal distance from the ends of the gauge in the out-of-plane direction.
Preferably, the desired cross sensitivity is at most 1%.
Very advantageously, by choosing one or more bending beams having a thickness equal to ¾ of the thickness of the mass, the MEMS&NEMS sensor has a cross sensitivity of zero.
Thanks to the invention, it is therefore possible to control or even avoid the error due to the cross sensitivity of the sensor without implementing a second sensor.
The subject-matter of the present invention is therefore a microelectromechanical sensor with an out-of-plane detection having a cross sensitivity with a value of ST according to, a first direction in the plane, said sensor comprising a support, an inertial mass suspended from the support by suspension means, a first axis of rotation about which the inertial mass pivots with respect to the support in an out-of-plane direction when the sensor is subjected to a stress in the out-of-plane direction, said suspension means comprising at least one first beam extending in the plane of the sensor, said at least one first beam being anchored by a longitudinal end to the support and by another longitudinal end to the inertial mass, in such a way that during a movement of the inertial mass in the out-of-plane direction, said at least first beam is stressed by bending, and means for detection of the movement of the mass in the out-of-plane direction, said detection means comprising at least one stress gauge suspended by a first end from the inertial mass and by a second end from the support and extending in parallel to said at least one first beam, wherein said at least first beam has a dimension tf in the out-of-plane direction and the inertial mass has a dimension tM in the out-of-plane direction such that
larm being the distance between the centre of gravity of the inertial mass and the centre of the at least one first beam projected onto the first longitudinal direction.
Another subject-matter of the present invention is also a method for designing a microelectromechanical sensor with an out-of-plane detection having a cross sensitivity in a first direction in the plane with a value ST, said sensor comprising a support, an inertial mass suspended from the support by suspension means in such a way that the inertial mass is capable of moving in rotation with respect to the support in an out-of-plane direction, about a first axis of rotation, said suspension means comprising at least one first beam extending in the plane of the sensor and orthogonally to the first axis of rotation of the suspension means, said at least one first beam being anchored by a longitudinal end to the support and by another longitudinal end to the inertial mass in such a way that during a movement of the inertial mass in the out-of-plane direction said at least first beam is stressed by bending, and means for detection of the movement of the inertial mass in the out-of-plane direction, said detection means comprising at least one first stress gauge suspended by a first end from the inertial mass and by a second end from the support and extending in parallel to said at least one first beam, the design method comprising a step of determination of the dimension tf in the out-of-plane direction of the at least one first beam and of the out-of-plane dimension tM of the inertial mass such that
larm being the distance between the centre of gravity of the inertial mass and the centre of the at least one first beam projected onto the first direction.
Another subject-matter of the present invention is also a method for manufacturing a sensor according to the invention, comprising:
Another subject-matter of the present invention is also a method for manufacturing a sensor according to the invention, comprising:
The present invention will be better understood on the basis of the following description and of the appended drawings in which:
The present invention applies to inertial sensors with a microelectromechanical and nanoelectromechanical structure or MEMS&NEMS or M&NEMS, i.e. comprising elements of a micrometric size, such as the mass and the beams for suspension of the mass, and elements of a nanometric size, such as the stress gauges. For reasons of simplicity, “microelectromechanical sensor” will designate a sensor comprising both one or more microelectromechanical elements and one or more nanoelectromechanical elements.
The plane of the sensor is the plane in which the sensor extends that is parallel to the substrate from which the sensor is manufactured. The directions of the plane are designated X and Y and the out-of-plane direction designated Z is orthogonal to the plane of the sensor and to the directions X and Y.
Moreover the sensors are inertial sensors with an out-of-plane detection, i.e. intended to detect a value in the out-of-plane direction Z. The sensors comprise at least one mass which is intended to be moved in the out-of-plane direction under the effect of a force resulting from the value to be detected, such as acceleration, Coriolis forces, a magnetic field, a force . . . .
The present invention allows to create M&NEMS sensors with an out-of-plane detection having a controlled cross sensitivity. “Cross sensitivity” or “parasite sensitivity” means the sensitivity of the sensor, i.e. the sensitivity of the detection means, to a value in a direction orthogonal to the out-of-plane direction Z and to the direction in the plane about which the mass is articulated, this direction is designated X. “Sensitivity” means the sensitivity of the sensor with an out-of-plane detection, to the value in the out-of-plane direction, i.e. to the value to be detected for which the sensor is designed.
The sensor comprises a support 2 extending in a plane XY, a mass 4 suspended with respect to the support 2 in such a way as to be mobile with respect to the support in the out-of-plane direction Z.
The mass 4 is suspended from the support 2 by means 6 for articulation in rotation.
The articulation means 6 comprise, in the example shown, two beams 8 extending in the direction Y. Each beam 8 is on the one hand anchored, by a first longitudinal end, to the mass and, by a second longitudinal end, to the support. The beams 8 are intended to be deformed by torsion, when the mass is moved. The beams 8 ensure a retention in the direction Y.
The articulation means also comprise two first beams 10 extending orthogonally to the axis Y and anchored by a first end to the mass and by a second end to the support. The first beams 10 are intended to be stressed by bending.
When the mass is subjected to a stress according to Z, it moves in rotation with respect to the support 2 about a first pivot axis Y1 parallel to the direction Y. When the mass 4 is subjected to a stress along the X, it moves in rotation with respect to the support about a second pivot axis Y2 parallel to the direction Y.
The sensor also comprises means 12 for detection of the movement of the mass, comprising at least one stress gauge 14 suspended between the mass and the support in such a way as to undergo a stress in tension or of compression, when the mass moves about the axis Y1. Preferably, the detection means 12 comprise two stress gauges 14 mounted differentially in such a way that, when one gauge is stressed in tension, the other gauge is stressed in compression.
The stress gauges are for example piezoresistive or piezoelectric gauges.
In the example shown, the gauges are disposed in alignment of the face of the bending beams 10 and of the mass facing the support.
The locations of the first pivot axis Y1 and of the second pivot axis Y2 depend on the stiffnesses of the bending beams and of the gauges and on their thickness.
In
Thanks to the invention, the first beams stressed by bending and the mass are dimensioned in such a way that the cross sensitivity ST or parasite sensitivity is controlled.
The inventors have determined that a relation could be established between the thickness of the mass, the thickness of the beams stressed by bending and the parasite sensitivity, in order to create a sensor structure having a parasite sensitivity with a given value, which can be zero.
θ is the angle of rotation of the mass with respect to the plane YZ and δx is the movement of the mass in the direction X under the effect of the acceleration γx. The translation of the mass is expressed in the middle of the bending beams
The torsion beams cause an out-of-plane stiffness such that the movement in Z is considered to be negligible. Inversely, their stiffness in X is considered to be negligible and they will not be taken into account in the total force below.
The case is considered in which θ is small.
In the case in which θ is large, the expressions would be different but the relation between the thicknesses of the mass and of the bending beams is the same.
When the structure is subjected to an acceleration γx in the direction X, it is subjected to the following forces:
An inertial force: Fi=mγx,
m being the mass of the inertial mass.
A return force of the bending beams applied by the bending beams: Frf=kfδx, with kf the stiffness of the two beams 14′.
A return force of the gauge: Frg=kg(δx+θdg), with kg the stiffness of the gauge.
dg is the distance between the middle of the bending beams and the middle plane XY of the gauges, in the direction Z.
By writing the equilibrium of the forces and the equilibrium of the moments in the point A, the following system is obtained:
mγx−kfδx−kg(δx+θdg)=0 (1)
mγxt+Csθ+kg(δx+θdg)dg=0
With Cs the rotary spring constant (or angular stiffness) of the bending beams, and t the distance between the two planes XY respectively containing the centre of gravity C of the mass and the first axis of rotation Y1. It should be noted that in the case of the structure shown in
From the system of equation (1), the expression of the elongation of the gauge when the structure is subjected to an acceleration along the axis X is calculated:
The force exerted on the gauge, which is equal to the product of its stiffness times its elongation, is then calculated:
The total force and total moments are therefore written:
0=kfδx+kg(δx+θdg)
−mγzlarm=Csθ+kg(δx+θdg)dg
With larm: distance in the plane between the centre of gravity C of the seismic mass and the centre of the bending beams projected onto X. The value of larm is set during the design of the sensor, the dimensions of the sensor in the plane being fixed. Since small signals are worked with, the elongation of the bending beams is negligible during the movement of the mass.
The cross sensitivity ST is generally expressed as a percentage of the axial sensitivity.
The cross sensitivity is therefore defined by:
With
moment arm or the structure when ignoring the thickness of the gauge.
The Bernoulli beam model allows to express the stiffnesses according to the Young's modulus and their geometry:
The gauge pivot distance can also be expressed according to the geometry of the beams
From which:
Thus, the cross sensitivity is only dependent on the moment arm of the structure and on the ratio of the thicknesses of the mass and of the flexion arms.
This cross sensitivity is cancelled out for tf=3/4tM. Thus it is possible to define a structure of a sensor with an out-of-plane detection having a cross sensitivity of zero plus or minus the approximations due to the calculation hypotheses, which means that in a structure thus dimensioned the gauge does not undergo any elongation along X, when an acceleration in the direction X is applied. Indeed, by choosing such a ratio, the second axis of rotation of the structure Y2, during a stress in the plane, is located in the middle plane of the gauges the sum of the stresses is thus zero. In the specific case of
Generally, specifications in terms of cross sensitivity are set for each sensor model.
Via the invention, knowing the value of ST specified it is possible to define what the thickness of the bending beams and of the mass to be chosen are, in order to obtain a sensor with a sensitivity ST.
Indeed, on the basis of the relation (2), the following can be written:
For example, the specification on the maximum cross sensitivity is in general less than 1%. Thus, for STmax=+/−0.5%, tM=20 μm and larm=246 μm, tf can be determined.
13.1μm<tf<16.8μm
Good agreement between the analytical model established by the inventors and the finite-element simulation is observed. The sensitivity ST is cancelled out for tf=14.6 μm.
These drawings show that the second axis of rotation Y2 moves towards the plane containing the gauges and is contained in this plane for a thickness of the bending beams equal to 14.6 μm. For this thickness, the axis Y2 is in the middle plane of the gauge, the sum of the stresses along X is zero, the cross sensitivity ST is zero.
It should be noted that the sensitivity S of the sensor with an out-of-plane detection, i.e. its sensitivity in the direction Z, decreases with an increase in the thickness of the bending beams, since their stiffness increases. It is possible to compensate for this decrease in sensitivity by increasing the seismic mass. This increase is obtained either by increasing the surface of the mass, i.e. its dimensions in the plane and/or by using a denser material.
Examples of a method for realisation of a sensor with an out-of-plane detection having a controlled cross sensitivity will now be described.
During the design of the sensor, the desired cross sensitivity ST is set and the dimensions of the structure, namely the thickness of the mass and of the bending beams are determined. It is thus sought to create a sensor with a mass having a thickness tM and one or more bending beams having a thickness tf such that the relation (3) is satisfied.
A silicon on insulator substrate 100 or SOI (Silicon on Insulate in Anglo-Saxon terminology) comprising a support layer of silicon 102, a layer of electric insulator 104 and a layer of silicon 106 is used.
The substrate 100 is shown in
During a first step, the stress gauges are realised. For example, an implantation of the silicon of the layer 106 is carried out in order to adjust the resistance and the piezoresistive coefficient of the gauges. Then the layer 106 is structured in order to form the gauges, for example by photolithography and etching. The gauges 14 have nanometric dimensions.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the gauges are protected, for example by the deposition of a layer of oxide 107, for example a layer of silicon oxide.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, a layer of silicon 108 is formed on the layer of silicon 106 in order to obtain a thickness of silicon equal to the desired thickness tM of the mass, i.e. the sum of the thickness of the layer 106 and that of the layer 108 equal to tM. The thickness of the layer 106 is for example between 0.1 μm and 1 μm and the thickness of the layer 108 is example between 1 μm and 2 μm. Preferably, the layer 108 is formed by epitaxy. Preferably, the materials of the layers 106 and 108 are the same.
Alternatively, the layer 108 is formed by molecular gluing of a substrate, for example silicon, followed by a thinning.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, a first mask M1, for example made of oxide, intended to define the structure, namely the mass 4, and a second mask M2, for example made of resin are realised on the location of the bending beam(s).
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the layers of silicon of the layers 106 and 108 are structured in order to form the structure, namely the mass, and in order to access the gauges, for example by deep etching, for example by deep reactive-ion etching or DRIE (Deep Reactive Ion Etching in Anglo-Saxon terminology).
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the second mask M2 is removed.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the layer 108 is thinned at the location of the bending beam(s), i.e. at the location of the second mask M2. The layer 108 is thinned until the total thickness of the layer 106 and of the thinned layer 108 is equal to the value tf determined during the design of the sensor on the basis of the relation (3) for a given value of cross sensitivity.
The thinning is done by time for example by deep reactive-ion etching or DRIE (Deep Reactive Ion Etching in Anglo-Saxon terminology). The time of thinnings is calibrated.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the structure is released by removing the layer of oxide 104 under the mass, the beams and the gauges, the first mask M1 and the protective layer 107 of the gauges are advantageously simultaneously removed. The releasing is for example carried out via HF etching.
The element thus obtained is shown in
A silicon on insulator substrate 200 or SOI (Silicon on Insulate in Anglo-Saxon terminology) comprising a support layer of silicon 202, a layer of electric insulator 204 and a layer of silicon 206 is used.
The substrate 200 is shown in
During a first step, the stress gauges are realised. For example, an implantation of the silicon of the layer 206 is carried out in order to adjust the resistance and the piezoresistive coefficient of the gauges. Then the layer 206 is structured in order to form the gauges, for example by photolithography and etching. The gauges 14′ have nanometric dimensions.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the gauges are protected, for example by the deposition of a layer of oxide 207, for example a layer of silicon oxide.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, a layer of silicon 208 is formed on the layer 206 in such a way that the thickness formed by the layer 206 and of the layer 208 is equal to the desired thickness tf. The layer 208 is formed for example by epitaxy.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, a barrier layer is formed, for example a layer of oxide and then it is structured, for example by etching, in such a way as to only preserve a barrier portion 210 vertically aligned with the location of the bending beam(s). The layer of oxide is similar to the layer of oxide 207 formed in order to protect the gauges.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, a layer of silicon 212 is formed on the layer of silicon 208 and on the barrier portion Z10, for example by epitaxy. The thickness of the layer 212 is such that the sum of the thicknesses of layers 206, 208 and 112 is equal to the desired thickness tM of the mass.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, a first mask M1′, for example made of oxide, intended to define the structure, namely the mass, and a second mask M2′, for example made of resin are realised on the location of the bending beam(s).
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the layers of silicon of the layers 206, 208 and 212 are structured in order to form the structure, namely the mass, and in order to access the gauges, for example by deep etching, for example by deep reactive-ion etching or DRIE (Deep Reactive Ion Etching in Anglo-Saxon terminology).
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the second mask M2′ is removed.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the layer 212 is etched until the barrier portion 210 at the location of the bending beam(s), i.e. at the location of the second mask M2′, is reached.
The element thus obtained is shown in
During a following step, the structure is released by removing the layer of oxide 204 under the mass, the beams and the gauges, the first mask M1, the protective layer 207 of the gauges and the barrier portion 210 are advantageously simultaneously removed. The releasing is for example carried out by HF etching.
The element thus obtained is shown in
The thickness of the bending beam(s) is defined more precisely by the method of
The structure can be made from a semiconductor material other than silicon, it can be made for example the SiGe, SiC.
It is also understood that the substrate 100 can be realised during the manufacturing method.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
18 59118 | Oct 2018 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9581188 | Jourdan | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20140331770 | Jourdan | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20160130133 | Boillot | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 211 185 | Jul 2010 | EP |
3 000 050 | Jun 2014 | FR |
Entry |
---|
French Preliminary Search Report dated Sep. 11, 2019 in French Application 18 59118 filed on Oct. 2, 2018 (with English Translation of Categories of Cited Documents). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/248,756, filed Aug. 26, 2016, 2017/0059420 A1, Rey, P., et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/625,314, filed Jun. 16, 2017, 2017/0363424 A1, Maspero, F., et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/348,004, filed Mar. 7, 2019, Joet, L., et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/466,432, filed Jun. 4, 2019, Joet, L. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200102211 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |