Non-contact etch annealing of strained layers

Abstract
The present invention provides for treating a surface of a semiconductor material. The method comprises exposing the surface of the semiconductor material to a halogen etchant in a hydrogen environment at an elevated temperature. The method controls the surface roughness of the semiconductor material. The method also has the unexpected benefit of reducing dislocations in the semiconductor material.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention relate to controlling the growth and morphology of surface roughness during an annealing and relaxation process of strained films, and more particularly to decreasing surface crystalline dislocations during a relaxation process.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the conventional art, many semiconductor device fabrication processes utilize planar surfaces. Furthermore, as semiconductor fabrication technology progresses, increasing carrier mobility and decreasing lattice dislocation density become increasingly critical. Improving device yields by reducing dislocations provides for improved manufacturing efficiencies and cost.


In the conventional art, a silicon layer is used as the active device medium upon which semiconductor devices are fabricated. Single-crystal silicon has a specific carrier mobility value that is fundamental to the material. The mobility value is a key parameter in many active semiconductor devices. Often, it is desired to enhance or increase the device carrier mobility value to increase the switching speed and therefore the performance of the fabricated devices such as transistors. Because of the many fundamental and specific advantages in utilizing silicon as the semiconductor material, it is highly desirable to adopt methods to enhance silicon mobility instead of utilizing higher mobility materials that are harder to process such as Germanium or Galium Arsenide.


One practical method of enhancing silicon mobility is by straining the silicon layer. By placing the active silicon under tension, as demonstrated for N-type MOSFET transistors [paper on strained MOS IDSAT . . . ], significantly higher mobility resulting in higher device switching speed and drive currents can be achieved.


A method of generating such tensile strained silicon involves growing the silicon layer epitaxially above a relaxed silicon germanium film of a specific composition. This effect occurs because the silicon lattice constant, about 5.45 Angstroms, is smaller than the lattice constant of a fully relaxed silicon germanium alloy film. Such alloys can be engineered to have a lattice spacing linearly varying from 5.45 Angstroms (100% silicon) to 5.65 Angstroms (100% germanium). For the pure germanium film, the lattice spacing is about 4% larger than pure silicon. Thus for example, a Si0.75Ge0.25 alloy (25% germanium content) would have a lattice constant about 1% larger than silicon.


The strained silicon film could therefore be advantageously fabricated by epitaxially growing the device silicon film on a relaxed silicon Germanium (SiGe) alloy film of the requisite composition.


A fundamental complication of this mobility enhancement approach is the requirement of a relaxed SiGe film. If the SiGe film is grown onto a base silicon wafer, the film will first grow in a lattice-matched manner as a compressive layer. This means that the SiGe alloy will be compressed to the natural silicon lattice spacing and will itself be strained. Since the function of the alloy film requires a relaxation of the compressive strain, there must be a step where the SiGe alloy is relaxed to its unstrained state. Such a step necessarily introduces numerous dislocations in the SiGe layer to accommodate the lattice spacing and volume increase. The film also usually “buckles” and roughens significantly during this relaxation process.


The major parameters characterizing a practical relaxed SiGe alloy film include the amount that the film has been relaxed from its strained state (i.e. 50% relaxation would mean that the film has relaxed half of its strain), the roughness of the film, and the dislocation defect density that would be affecting the subsequent growth of the strained silicon device film.


The surface dislocation density is a critical parameter affecting the electrical properties of semiconductor materials since they are highly dependent upon crystalline defects. Dislocations can comprise insertion of an extra half-plane of atoms into a regular crystal structure, displacement of whole rows of atoms from their regular lattice position, and/or displacement of one portion of the crystal relative to another portion of the crystal. Dislocations present on the device layer can tend to short-circuit p-n junctions and also scatter electrons in a uniform n-type crystal, impeding their motion and reducing their mobility. Dislocations also cause highly localized distortion of the crystal lattice leading to the formation of “trapping” sites where the recombination of positive (holes) and negative (electrons) carriers is enhanced. This may cause, for example, the electrons from the n-p-n transistor emitter to recombine with holes in the p-type base regions before they can be collected at the n-type collector region, reducing the transistor current gain. This electron “lifetime” may be significantly reduced when as few as one out of 1011 atoms/cm3 of silicon are removed from their normal lattice sites by recombination. Although some dislocations can be removed from a semiconductor material by thermal annealing, many dislocations are permanent and thermally stable. Many of the relaxation approaches are therefore tuned to minimize the defect density of the type that can be translated to the device layer and cause device performance degradation, failure and yield losses.


In one method according to the conventional art, the SiGe alloy is grown with a slowly varying grade from 0% germanium to the required alloy composition at a sufficiently low temperature to grow a dislocation free initial film and through subsequent annealing, the slow gradient helps to accommodate film relaxation through the generation of dislocations that are buried within the SiGe layer. This technology is explained in Legoues & al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,659,187 “Low defect density/arbitrary lattice constant heteroepitaxial layers”). To limit the production of dislocations threading to the surface, the SiGe grade is usually less than 2% composition increase per 1000 Angstroms of SiGe film growth. This shallow gradient approach is lower in productivity due to its relatively thick SiGe layer composition and may require numerous growth/anneal cycles to achieve roughness and dislocation goals.


In yet another method according to the conventional art, the surface roughness or the SiGe alloy layer can be reduced using a chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process such as taught by Fitzgerald (U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,321 “Controlling threading dislocation densities in Ge on Si using graded GeSi layers and planarization” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,653, “Controlling threading dislocation densities in Ge on Si using graded GeSi layers and planarization”). CMP utilizes a combination of vertical force between a wafer and an abrasive pad as well as a chemical action of a slurry, to polish the surface of the wafer to a highly planar state. The roughness of the resulting semiconductor surface can typically be reduced to approximately 1 Angstrom RMS when measured by an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). However, CMP is relatively costly as a result of the slurry and the amount of time it takes to perform the process. Furthermore, the CMP process does not generally reduce the dislocation density in the wafer. Finally, this linear growth/anneal/CMP sequence is costly as it requires numerous sequential process and wafer handling steps.


Another method uses miscut wafers to help the grown film to relax as much as possible and accommodate the lattice mismatches. See for example Fitzgerald & al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,803, “Utilization of miscut substrates to improve relaxed graded silicon-germanium and germanium layers on silicon”) that teaches the improvement of using base wafers having 1 to about 8 degrees of miscut from a true [100] orientation to help grow a less defective, relaxed layer of a second semiconductor material. Although the base substrate miscut can improve the relaxed defect density to some extent, the improvements are generally considered insufficient for leading edge applications.


Referring to FIG. 1, a flow diagram of a process according to the conventional art is shown. This process produces a relaxed film of SiGe alloy material by first growing a strained film on a base wafer 110, subjecting the strained film to an anneal step to relax the film and concurrent generation of surface roughening (buckling) and dislocations 120, followed by a planarization smoothing step such as CMP 130. The use of an epitaxial step such as CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition) or MBE (Molecular Beam Epitaxy) followed by a planarization step such as CMP significantly complicates the film relaxation preparation process since multiple equipment, cleans, and wafer handling are required. This in turn would increase the manufacturing cost of the relaxed film fabrication process.


Referring now to FIGS. 3A-3C, various sectional views of a semiconductor layer are shown to illustrate the anneal/CMP conventional art such as disclosed by Fitzgerald in more detail. As depicted in FIG. 3A, a single crystalline semiconductor surface formed by an epitaxial process wherein a strained SiGe film 310 is grown onto a base silicon wafer 320. The semiconductor layer is comprised of single crystalline silicon-germanium having a surface roughness 330 of approximately 1-2 Angstrom RMS. The silicon-germanium layer typically was grown at a sufficiently low temperature where the film is supercritically stressed but no relaxation has taken place. The dislocation defect density 340 is therefore very low, on the order of 1 dislocations/cm2 or less.


As depicted in FIG. 3B, an anneal is performed on the substrate to relax the SiGe alloy film which generates substantial surface roughening 250 and dislocation defects 260. The resulting surface may have a buckled roughening 250 exceeding 200-300 Angstroms RMS and a dislocation defect density 260 exceeding approximately 107 dislocations/cm2.


As depicted in FIG. 3C, a separate CMP process generally reduces surface roughness 270 to approximately 1-5 Angstroms RMS. However, the CMP process generally does not decrease dislocations 260 in the silicon-germanium layer 310 and must be accompanied by comprehensive clean processes.


Thus, the conventional art is disadvantageous in that planarizing processes are relatively costly and time-consuming processes. The conventional art also suffers from relatively high levels of dislocations. A better and less costly approach that can fully relax strained SiGe alloy films while controlling surface roughness and dislocation defect levels is highly desirable.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method for etch annealing a semiconductor layer is disclosed. In addition to its significant effect in controlling the roughness increases during the relaxation process, the method has the unexpected benefit of substantially reducing dislocations. The reduced dislocation density is advantageous in that carrier mobility and yield are increased.


In one embodiment, the method includes exposing a surface of a strained, unrelaxed SiGe alloy layer to a mixture of hydrogen gas and a halogen gas, such as hydrogen chloride. The ratio of halogen gas to hydrogen is approximately 0.001 to 10. The process is performed at an elevated temperature of between 700-1200 C. The process is performed for a period of time sufficient to remove a thickness of the alloy film material, such that the surface roughness is kept low and controlled. By using etch annealing, the final surface roughness can be reduced by approximately fifty percent or more and the dislocation density is reduced by approximately two orders of magnitude compared to a conventional anneal process.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 shows a flow diagram of a conventional art process for controlling the surface roughness and dislocations of a semiconductor material.



FIG. 3A shows a sectional view of a strained semiconductor layer having an initial surface roughness, according to the conventional art.



FIG. 3B shows a sectional view of a relaxed semiconductor layer having a substantially higher surface roughness and dislocation density after an annealing step, according to the conventional art.



FIG. 3C shows a sectional view of a semiconductor layer having a planar surface after a CMP process is performed on the conventionally annealed surface, according to the convention art.



FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of a process for controlling the surface roughness and dislocations of a semiconductor material in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4A shows a sectional view of a strained semiconductor layer having an initial surface roughness, according to the conventional art.



FIG. 4B shows a section view of a relaxed semiconductor layer having a planar surface and reduced dislocation density after performing a method according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4C shows a section view of a device layer deposited onto the relaxed semiconductor layer made using a method according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5A shows an experimental resulting surface roughness according to the conventional art.



FIG. 5B shows an experimental resulting surface roughness in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6A shows an experimental resulting dislocation defect density according to the conventional art.



FIG. 6B shows an experimental resulting dislocation defect density in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.


Referring to FIG. 2, a flow diagram of a process for controlling the surface roughness and reducing dislocations of a strained SiGe alloy film in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention is shown. As depicted in FIG. 2, the process begins with a wafer where a strained SiGe alloy layer having a surface with a substantially planar surface with few as-grown dislocations, at step 210. The roughness is low since the as-grown wafer is close to being or is fully strained and has not been subjected to thermal cycles that would have started the relaxation process. At step 220, the surface is “etch annealed” utilizing, for example, an epitaxial chamber subjecting the wafer to a high temperature anneal in an etching ambient. A similar process has been shown to smooth unstrained films in a process referred to as an “epi-smoothing” process. The epi-smoothing process is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,941, granted Sep. 11, 2001, entitled “Surface Finishing of SOI Substrates Using an EPI Process,” which is incorporated by reference herein. Since the etching process applied to relaxing strained films controls the overall roughness rather than smoothes the surface, it will hereinafter called “etch annealing.”


The etch annealing process comprises subjecting the surface of the strained semiconductor material to an etchant including a halogen bearing compound such as HCl, HF, HI, HBr, SF6, CF4, NF3, CCl2F2, or the like. The etch annealing process is performed at an elevated temperature of 700-1200° C., or greater. The concurrent use of an etchant and a temperature sufficient to relax the strained SiGe film has been found to help reduce or eliminate the generation of dislocations with a concurrent reduction in relaxation roughening of the surface. This favorable effect is believed linked to a reduction of the stress inducing cycloidic cusp tips present during a non-etch anneal (H. Gao & W. D. Nix, “Surface Roughening of Heteroepitaxial Thin Films”, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1999, 29, pg. 173-209). In the work by Gao and Nix, it is explained that the strain caused by the lattice mismatch drives the generation of an undulating profile on the surface that has periodic sharp cusp tips that favor the creation of dislocations at these highly stressed locations. The concurrent etching process during film relaxation is believed to significantly blunt or round the cusp tips that reduce the stress concentration and thus reduces the surface dislocation density by affecting its creation kinetics. The surface roughening is also disfavored by the etch ambient.


The etch annealing process may be performed at a range of elevated temperatures that would favor the concentration of the dislocations away from the surface to relax the lattice structure of the SiGe layer. The thermal treatment may be from a resistance heater, RF heater, high intensity lamps, or the like. The thermal treatment means should be capable of heating the semiconductor material at a rate of approximately 10-20° C./sec, or more.


Because the strained film growth, step 210, is made within an epitaxial reactor and the etch annealing step 220 is also made within the same system, repetition of these steps is straightforward and the general economy of the process can be fully appreciated since no cleans, external anneals or CMP planarization steps are needed. The subsequent growth of the device layer 330 can also be made in-situ within the same epitaxial reactor, further improving the efficiency and cost of the process.


The etch annealing process removes strained semiconductor material in a manner that blunts sharpening (roughening) features that form on the surface upon film relaxation. The rate of etching is a function of time, temperature, and the etchant type and concentration. Therefore, controlling these parameters during the etch annealing process controls the amount of etching. The etch annealing process is performed until the process reduces surface roughness by approximately fifty percent or more compared to an anneal without the etchant. Thus, the etch annealing process acts to control surface roughening during film relaxation sufficient for subsequent semiconductor device fabrication processes. The method also provides the added benefit of reducing dislocations by up to two orders of magnitudes or more.


Furthermore, unlike convention CMP processes that are limited to removing a few tens of nano-meters or less, the etch annealing process can be used to remove as much as a few hundreds of nano-meters or more of semiconductor material.


The etch annealed semiconductor layer 320 may be utilized for fabricating additional layers thereupon or device regions therein. The reduced dislocation density of the resulting semiconductor layer 330 advantageously results in higher carrier mobility. The higher carrier mobility improves characteristics of devices, such as field effect transistors, bipolar transistors, and the like.


In an exemplary implementation, the process begins at step 210 with a semiconductor layer of single crystalline silicon-germanium (SiGe). The as-grown strained silicon-germanium layer has a roughness of approximately 2 Angstroms root-mean-square (RMS), and less than approximately 1 dislocations/cm2.


At steps 220, the surface of the silicon-germanium layer is exposed to a hydrogen-chloride containing gas, at an elevated temperature of 700-1200° C., in an etch annealing process, such that:

SiGe(solid)+8HCl(gas)→SiCl4(gas)+4H2(gas)+GeCl4(gas)

This process is substantially the reversal of an epitaxial deposition process for growing a silicon-germanium layer. The difference being that if the concentration of hydrogen chloride is too high, the wafer surface is etched instead of silicon-germanium being deposited. The etch annealing process removes silicon-germanium concurrently with the strain relaxation process and has been shown to help mitigate the undesirable emergence of dislocations and surface roughening. Thus, the etch annealing process acts to control surface roughening and lower dislocation density while achieving substantially complete film relaxation.


In one embodiment of the invention as illustrated in FIGS. 4A-C, the etch annealing process yields a less costly alternative than the conventional art by allowing for a usable strained silicon device layer without costly external planarization steps. In FIG. 4A, a strained SiGe layer 410 is grown on a base silicon wafer 420 having a low surface roughness 430 of approximately 1-2 Angstrom RMS and a unrelaxed, low dislocation defect density 440 on the order of 1 dislocations/cm2 or less.


As illustrated in FIG. 4B, the etch annealing process, according to one embodiment of the present invention, generally controls the surface roughness 450 to approximately 2-10 Angstroms RMS. One skilled in the art would expect that etch annealing would not affect the generation of the dislocation process. However, the etch annealing process results in the unexpected benefit of decreasing the dislocation density to approximately 105 dislocations/cm2, as compared to an anneal made without an etch ambient of approximately 107 dislocations/cm2. The etch annealing process is also highly effective in fully relaxing the film, rendering it suitable as a base to grow a strained silicon device film 470 as shown in FIG. 4C.


The resulting relaxed semiconductor layer can be utilized for fabricating semiconductor layers thereupon or device regions therein. The reduced dislocation nature of the semiconductor layer advantageously results in higher carrier mobility. The high carrier mobility in the semiconductor layer improves characteristics of the devices formed therein.


Referring now to FIGS. 5A-5B and FIGS. 6A-6B, these images illustrate the experimental results achievable by a method in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, and should not limit the scope of the claims herein. In this example, the initial SiGe layer was a 1500A thick constant composition silicon-germanium layer (25% Germanium content) grown at 680 C. All as-grown wafers showed a sub-nm RMS surface roughness prior to thermal or etch anneal treatments. All as-grown wafers were also shown to be largely unrelaxed while after the etch anneal or thermal treatment at 1100 C, the samples were found to be relaxed to a level exceeding 90%.


Generally, the relaxation or strain state of SiGe layers on Si substrates was determined by grazing incidence/grazing exit Xray reflections from (224) planes using high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD). For a SiGe layer on a Si substrate, the degree of relaxation is determined from a comparison of the angular shift of the two reflections from the Si substrate reflection. For a 100% relaxed structure, the SiGe lattice will be fully cubic and the two SiGe (224) reflections (grazing incidence and grazing reflection) will be shifted by the identical angle from the Si substrate reflection. As strain increases the difference in these shifts increases. Typical values of relaxation percent for a Si—Ge (25%) layer exposed to a 1100 C thermal treatment for 300 seconds is well over 90%, where percentage relaxation is given by:







Relax

%

=




a
SiGe

-

a
Si




a
SiGe
Re

-

a
Si



*
100






where aSiGe and aSi are the lattice constants of Si and SiGe respectively. The Re indicates fully relaxed.


As depicted in FIG. 5A, one wafer was thermally annealed at 1100 C for 300 seconds and showed a post-thermal roughness exceeding 60 Angstroms RMS, considered too high for device processing. In this context, roughness is simply defined as the standard deviation of the surface height of the wafer. This is usually referred to as the root-mean-square (RMS) roughness. The roughness was measured using a Digital Instrument Tapping Mode Automatic Force Microscope (AFM) measured on a 2 micron square area. The RMS roughness is calculated from the standard deviation of the height or z values taken from AFM images of the wafer surface. FIG. 5B shows the AFM measurement of a similar starting sample subjected to a 1100 C, 300 second etch anneal process. The RMS roughness of this sample was measured to be about 6 Angstroms, over 10 times lower than the equivalent thermal treatment without etch annealing.


In these experiments, the surface was subjected to the thermal and etch annealing processes using an Applied Materials single-wafer atmospheric “epi” chamber called the Epi Centura™. The chamber has two modules with radial lamp arrays to provide radiant heat to the sample silicon-germanium. The chamber includes a closed-loop temperature control which utilizes two optical pyrometers capable of providing independent temperature measurement of both the sample and the susceptor therein. The chamber temperature was ramped from the growth temperature at a controlled rate and then maintained at approximately 1100° C. for 300 seconds. The gas introduced into the chamber was H2 gas for the thermal anneal treatment and a mixture of HCl and H2 gases for the etch anneal treatment. The HCl flow rate for the etch anneal treatment was less than 1 liter/minute, and the H2 gas flow was approximately 100 liters/minute. The chamber pressure was generally maintained at approximately 1 atmosphere. Other parameters were controlled in a standard manner.


The mechanism of relaxation entails the formation of dislocations, which are line defects that are ideally confined to the Si SiGe interface and run parallel to it. These are referred to as misfit dislocations. However, in practical relaxation, many dislocations emerge from the surface as well. These are referred to as threading dislocations. They occur essentially because entropy opposes spontaneous deformation of the relaxing film only in directions parallel to the surface. Like all dislocations, threading dislocations are line defects, wherein the crystal lattice is locally distorted to accommodate plastic deformation of a crystal material. As such, the surface etch rate of Si or SiGe can be different in the vicinity of threading dislocations emerging from the surface due to strained or dangling bonds. To measure the dislocation defect density in this work, a dilute Schimmel (5 parts of 0.2 M CrO3 and 4 parts of 49% hydrofluoric acid) was used to reveal threading dislocations that emerge from the surface. Each dislocation that extends to the surface exposed to this etch solution for 5 to 15 seconds results in an etch pit that can be viewed in an optical microscope that employs diffraction-interference-contrast (DIC), sometimes referred to as a Nomarski microscope. The number of pits within a known field of view per unit area is defined as the density of dislocations.


The samples processed as described above (5A and 5B) were then decorated for dislocation defect density using a Schimmel etch. As depicted in FIG. 6A, the sample treated according to the conventional art showed a schimmel etch dislocation defect density exceeding 106 dislocations/cm2. The etch annealed sample was similarly decorated and showed a much lower dislocation defect density of less than 5×104 dislocations/cm2.


These results clearly show the significant quality and cost advantages that etch annealing brings to the process of fabricating a relaxed lattice mismatched semiconductor layer onto a base wafer.


The experimental results are merely exemplary, and should not limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that many other variations, alternatives, and modifications can be made. For example, the process can be carried out at different temperatures, different pressures, flow rates, utilizing different chemicals, and the like, without departing from the scope of the claimed invention.


The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method of fabricating a semiconductor comprising: heating a strained semiconductor material; andupon the heated strained semiconductor material reaching about 700° C.; annealing the heated strained semiconductor material in an etching ambient sufficient to relax the strained semiconductor material and to minimize increases in surface roughness and defect density.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: growing a second semiconductor material over said relaxed semiconductor material.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein said second semiconductor material comprises a first lattice constant and said relaxed semiconductor material comprises a second lattice constant which is different than said first lattice constant.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said surface roughness is reduced by at least approximately fifty percent as compared to surface roughness without said etching ambient being present during said annealing.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein dislocation density in said semiconductor material is reduced by approximately two orders of magnitude as compared to dislocation density without said etching ambient being present.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein etch annealing said surface of said semiconductor material comprises exposing said semiconductor material to an etch ambient comprising a halogen bearing etchant.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein said halogen bearing etchant is hydrogen chloride.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein said halogen bearing etchant is hydrogen fluoride.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, wherein etch annealing said surface of said semiconductor material further comprises exposing said semiconductor material to hydrogen.
  • 10. The method of claim 6, wherein etch annealing said surface of said semiconductor material further comprises increasing a temperature of said semiconductor material to between 700 and 1200 degrees Celsius.
  • 11. A method of minimizing dislocations in a semiconductor material comprising: heating a strained semiconductor material; andupon the heated strained semiconductor material reaching about 700° C.; etch annealing the heated strained semiconductor material, wherein a relaxed semiconductor material is produced.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 further comprising: growing a second semiconductor material over said relaxed semiconductor material.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein said second semiconductor material comprises a first lattice constant and said relaxed semiconductor material comprises a second lattice constant which is different than said first lattice constant.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein said roughness of said surface of said semiconductor material is reduced by at least fifty percent as compared to roughness using an inert ambient thermal anneal.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein dislocations in said semiconductor material are reduced by at least two orders of magnitude as compared to using an inert ambient thermal anneal.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein etch annealing said surface of said semiconductor material comprises exposing said semiconductor material to an etch ambient comprising a halogen bearing etchant.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein said halogen bearing etchant is hydrogen chloride.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein said halogen bearing etchant is hydrogen fluoride.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein etch annealing said surface of said semiconductor material further comprises exposing said semiconductor material to hydrogen.
  • 20. The method of claim 16, wherein etch annealing said surface of said semiconductor material further comprises increasing a temperature of said semiconductor material to between 700 and 1200 degrees Celsius.
US Referenced Citations (184)
Number Name Date Kind
2614055 Senarelens Oct 1952 A
3117002 Bronson et. al. Jan 1964 A
3225820 Riordan Dec 1965 A
3390033 Brown Jun 1968 A
3392069 Merkel et al. Jul 1968 A
3551213 Boyle Dec 1970 A
3770499 Crowe et al. Nov 1973 A
3786359 King Jan 1974 A
3806380 Kitada et al. Apr 1974 A
3832219 Nelson et. al. Aug 1974 A
3900636 Curry et al. Aug 1975 A
3901423 Hillberry et al. Aug 1975 A
3915757 Engel Oct 1975 A
3946334 Yonezu Mar 1976 A
3957107 Altoz et al. May 1976 A
3964957 Walsh Jun 1976 A
3993909 Drews et al. Nov 1976 A
4006340 Gorinas Feb 1977 A
4039416 White Aug 1977 A
4074139 Pankove Feb 1978 A
4107350 Berg et al. Aug 1978 A
4108751 King Aug 1978 A
4116751 Zaromb Sep 1978 A
4121334 Wallis Oct 1978 A
4170662 Weiss et al. Oct 1979 A
4216906 Olsen et al. Aug 1980 A
4237601 Woolhouse et al. Dec 1980 A
4244348 Wilkes Jan 1981 A
4252837 Auton Feb 1981 A
4255208 Deutscher et al. Mar 1981 A
4274004 Kanai Jun 1981 A
4342631 White et al. Aug 1982 A
4346123 Kaufmann Aug 1982 A
4361600 Brown Nov 1982 A
4368083 Bruel et al. Jan 1983 A
4412868 Brown et al. Nov 1983 A
4452644 Bruel et al. Jun 1984 A
4468309 White Aug 1984 A
4471003 Cann Sep 1984 A
4486247 Ecer et al. Dec 1984 A
4490190 Speri Dec 1984 A
4495219 Kato et al. Jan 1985 A
4500563 Ellenberger et al. Feb 1985 A
4508056 Bruel et al. Apr 1985 A
4530149 Jastrzebski et al. Jul 1985 A
4536657 Bruel Aug 1985 A
4539050 Kramler et al. Sep 1985 A
4566403 Fournier Jan 1986 A
4567505 Pease et al. Jan 1986 A
4568563 Jackson et al. Feb 1986 A
4585945 Bruel et al. Apr 1986 A
4684535 Heinecke et al. Aug 1987 A
4704302 Bruel et al. Nov 1987 A
4717683 Parrillo Jan 1988 A
4727047 Bozler et al. Feb 1988 A
4764394 Conrad Aug 1988 A
4837172 Mizuno et al. Jun 1989 A
4846928 Dolins et al. Jul 1989 A
4847792 Barna et al. Jul 1989 A
4853250 Boulos et al. Aug 1989 A
4883561 Gmitter et al. Nov 1989 A
4887005 Rough et al. Dec 1989 A
4891329 Reismann et al. Jan 1990 A
4894709 Phillips et al. Jan 1990 A
4906594 Yoneda Mar 1990 A
4931405 Kamijo et al. Jun 1990 A
4948458 Ogle Aug 1990 A
4952273 Popov Aug 1990 A
4960073 Suzuki et al. Oct 1990 A
4982090 Wittmaack Jan 1991 A
4983251 Haisma et al. Jan 1991 A
4996077 Moslehi et al. Feb 1991 A
5015353 Hubler et al. May 1991 A
5034343 Rouse et al. Jul 1991 A
5070040 Pankove Dec 1991 A
5082793 Li Jan 1992 A
5102821 Moslehi Apr 1992 A
5110748 Sarma May 1992 A
5133826 Dandl Jul 1992 A
5196355 Wittkower Mar 1993 A
5198371 Li Mar 1993 A
5202095 Houchin et al. Apr 1993 A
5203960 Dandl Apr 1993 A
5206749 Zavracky et al. Apr 1993 A
5213451 Frank May 1993 A
5234529 Johnson Aug 1993 A
5234535 Beyer et al. Aug 1993 A
5242861 Inaba Sep 1993 A
5250328 Otto Oct 1993 A
5252178 Moslehi Oct 1993 A
5256562 Vu et al. Oct 1993 A
5258320 Zavracky et al. Nov 1993 A
5258325 Spitzer et al. Nov 1993 A
5269880 Jolly et al. Dec 1993 A
5273610 Thomas, III et al. Dec 1993 A
5277748 Sakaguchi et al. Jan 1994 A
5303574 Matossian et al. Apr 1994 A
5304509 Sopori Apr 1994 A
5308776 Gotou May 1994 A
5317236 Zavracky et al. May 1994 A
5342472 Imahashi et al. Aug 1994 A
5344524 Sharma et al. Sep 1994 A
5354381 Sheng Oct 1994 A
5362671 Zavracky et al. Nov 1994 A
5363603 Miller et al. Nov 1994 A
5368710 Chen et al. Nov 1994 A
5370765 Dandl Dec 1994 A
5374564 Bruel Dec 1994 A
5376560 Aronowitz et al. Dec 1994 A
5377031 Vu et al. Dec 1994 A
5404079 Ohkuni et al. Apr 1995 A
5405480 Benzing et al. Apr 1995 A
5411592 Ovshinsky et al. May 1995 A
5413679 Godbey May 1995 A
5435880 Minato et al. Jul 1995 A
5438241 Zavracky et al. Aug 1995 A
5444557 Spitzer et al. Aug 1995 A
5459016 Debe et al. Oct 1995 A
5475514 Salerno et al. Dec 1995 A
5476691 Komvopoulos et al. Dec 1995 A
5480842 Clifton et al. Jan 1996 A
5487785 Horiike et al. Jan 1996 A
5494835 Bruel Feb 1996 A
5504328 Bonser Apr 1996 A
5528397 Zavracky et al. Jun 1996 A
5539245 Imura et al. Jul 1996 A
5558718 Leung Sep 1996 A
5559043 Bruel Sep 1996 A
5569620 Linn et al. Oct 1996 A
5581385 Spitzer et al. Dec 1996 A
5585304 Hayashi et al. Dec 1996 A
5611855 Wijaranakula Mar 1997 A
5643834 Harada et al. Jul 1997 A
5653811 Chan Aug 1997 A
5659187 Legoues Aug 1997 A
5705421 Matsushita et al. Jan 1998 A
5710057 Kenney Jan 1998 A
5714395 Bruel Feb 1998 A
5744852 Linn et al. Apr 1998 A
5755914 Yonehara May 1998 A
5763319 Ling et al. Jun 1998 A
5783022 Cha et al. Jul 1998 A
5793913 Kovacic Aug 1998 A
5804086 Bruel Sep 1998 A
5824595 Igel et al. Oct 1998 A
5827751 Nuyen Oct 1998 A
5854123 Sato et al. Dec 1998 A
5869387 Sato et al. Feb 1999 A
5877070 Goesele et al. Mar 1999 A
5882987 Srikrishnan Mar 1999 A
5909627 Egloff Jun 1999 A
5920764 Hanson et al. Jul 1999 A
5953622 Lee et al. Sep 1999 A
5966620 Sakaguchi et al. Oct 1999 A
5985742 Henley et al. Nov 1999 A
5993677 Biasse et al. Nov 1999 A
5994207 Henley et al. Nov 1999 A
6013563 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6013567 Henley et al. Jan 2000 A
6020052 Aspar et al. Feb 2000 A
6020252 Aspar et al. Feb 2000 A
6033974 Henley et al. Mar 2000 A
6039803 Fitzgerald et al. Mar 2000 A
6048411 Henley et al. Apr 2000 A
6077383 Laporte Jun 2000 A
6083324 Henley et al. Jul 2000 A
6107653 Fitzgerald Aug 2000 A
6120597 Levy et al. Sep 2000 A
8150239 Goesele et. al. Nov 2000 B2
6159824 Henley et al. Dec 2000 A
6171965 Kang Jan 2001 B1
6184111 Henley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6214701 Matsushita et al. Apr 2001 B1
6225192 Aspar et al. May 2001 B1
6287941 Kang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291321 Fitzgerald Sep 2001 B1
6455397 Belford Sep 2002 B1
6503773 Fitzgerald Jan 2003 B2
6514836 Belford Feb 2003 B2
6563152 Roberts et al. May 2003 B2
6809009 Aspar et al. Oct 2004 B2
20010039095 Marty Nov 2001 A1
20020174828 Stefanescu et al. Nov 2002 A1
20050118754 Henley et al. Jun 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (78)
Number Date Country
084287 Jul 1983 EP
099778 Feb 1984 EP
112238 Jul 1984 EP
155875 Sep 1985 EP
181249 May 1986 EP
112230 Apr 1987 EP
164281 Feb 1989 EP
355913 Feb 1990 EP
379828 Aug 1990 EP
459177 Dec 1991 EP
504714 Sep 1992 EP
533551 Mar 1993 EP
553852 Aug 1993 EP
665588 Feb 1995 EP
660140 Jun 1995 EP
665587 Aug 1995 EP
703609 Mar 1996 EP
763849 Mar 1997 EP
807970 Nov 1997 EP
867917 Sep 1998 EP
867921 Sep 1998 EP
905767 Mar 1999 EP
961312 Dec 1999 EP
1085562 Mar 2001 EP
1558881 Feb 1969 FR
2235474 Jan 1975 FR
2261802 Sep 1975 FR
2266304 Oct 1975 FR
2298880 Aug 1976 FR
22529383 Jun 1982 FR
2519437 Jul 1983 FR
2537768 Aug 1985 FR
2560426 Aug 1985 FR
2563377 Oct 1985 FR
2537777 Apr 1986 FR
2575601 Jul 1986 FR
2681472 Mar 1993 FR
2714524 Jun 1995 FR
2715501 Jul 1995 FR
2715502 Jul 1995 FR
2715503 Jul 1995 FR
2720189 Nov 1995 FR
2725074 Mar 1996 FR
2 211991 Jul 1989 GB
2 231197 Nov 1990 GB
53-104156 Sep 1978 JP
0193904 Apr 1983 JP
58-144475 Aug 1983 JP
59-046750 Mar 1984 JP
59-054217 Mar 1984 JP
59-114744 Jul 1984 JP
59-139539 Oct 1984 JP
60-083591 May 1985 JP
60-207237 Oct 1985 JP
60-235434 Nov 1985 JP
3-109731 May 1991 JP
3-132055 Jun 1991 JP
3-265156 Nov 1991 JP
4-246594 Sep 1992 JP
4-298023 Oct 1992 JP
4-076503 Nov 1992 JP
5-211128 Aug 1993 JP
7-215800 Aug 1995 JP
7-254690 Oct 1995 JP
7-263291 Oct 1995 JP
8-097389 Apr 1996 JP
61125012 Jun 1996 JP
10-200080 Jul 1998 JP
11-045840 Feb 1999 JP
2901031 Jun 1999 JP
2910001 Jun 1999 JP
2000-94317 Apr 2000 JP
WO 9510718 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9520824 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9531825 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9935674 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0063965 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0154175 Jul 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040067644 A1 Apr 2004 US