Integrated circuit processes and structures to allow for improved semiconductor substrate treatment are disclosed.
Placement of dopants in MOSFET transistors is increasingly difficult as transistor size is reduced. Misplaced dopants can reduce transistor performance and increase transistor variability, including variability of channel transconductance, capacitance effects, threshold voltage, and leakage. Such variability increases as transistors are reduced in size with each misplaced dopant atom having a greater relative effect on transistor properties consequent to the overall reduction in number of dopant atoms. One common source of misplaced dopants occurs as a result of damage to crystal structure of a transistor during manufacture, which increases defect pathways and creates excess silicon interstitials that allow enhanced dopant movement in undesired regions of the transistor.
A pre-amorphizing implant (PAI) can be used in semiconductor processing as a way to set up for dopant substitutionality. A PAI process generally involves introducing a dopant species using a high energy ion implantation to impart damage and thereby amorphize the implanted region. The damage and amorphization are important so that dopants from a previous or subsequent ion implantation can more easily move into substitutional sites. If PAI is used, then a subsequent anneal is performed to render the substrate crystalline again.
However, with the typical anneal process that is used, which is either a solid phase epitaxy (SPE) or high temperature anneal such as RTA, there remains residual damage from PAI which can create a pathway for leakage current by acting as localized generation/recombination sites.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts, in which:
Unwanted transient enhanced diffusion (TED) resulting from defects and injected silicon interstitials from defect clusters can easily reduce or destroy transistor functionality, particularly for nanometer scale transistors having complex dopant profiles such as disclosed, for example, in embodiments of various transistor structures and manufacturing processes more completely described in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/708,497 titled “Electronic Devices and Systems, and Methods for Making and Using the Same”, U.S. application Ser. No. 12/971,884 titled “Low Power Semiconductor Transistor Structure and Method of Fabrication Thereof”, U.S. application Ser. No. 12/971,955 titled “Transistor with Threshold Voltage Set Notch and Method of Fabrication Thereof”, and U.S. application Ser. No. 12/895,785 titled “Advanced Transistors With Threshold Voltage Set Dopant Structures”, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
As shown in
With reference to
As shown in
In certain embodiments, an optional threshold voltage set layer is formed above the screen layer 120, typically formed as a thin doped layer. The threshold voltage set layer can be either adjacent to, incorporated within, or vertically offset from the screen layer 120. In certain embodiments, the threshold voltage set layer is formed by implantation prior to the formation of the undoped epitaxial layer 110. In alternative embodiments, the threshold voltage set layer can be formed by way of controlled out-diffusion of dopant material from the screen layer 120 into an undoped epitaxial layer, controlled in-situ doped epitaxial deposition either as part of screen layer 120 formation or separate from the formation of the screen layer 120, controlled formation before the substantially undoped epitaxial layer 110 is formed, or by implant after the substantially undoped epitaxial layer 110 is formed. Setting of the threshold voltage for the transistor is implemented by suitably selecting dopant concentration and depth of the threshold voltage set layer as well as maintaining a separation of the threshold voltage set layer from the gate dielectric 140, leaving a substantially undoped channel layer 110 directly adjacent to the gate dielectric. In certain embodiments, the threshold voltage set layer has a dopant concentration between about 1×1017 dopant atoms/cm3 and about 1×1019 dopant atoms per cm3. In alternative embodiments, the threshold voltage set layer has a dopant concentration that is approximately less than half of the concentration of dopants in the screen layer 120.
The channel layer 110 contacts and extends between the source/drain 106 and supports movement of mobile charge carriers between the source and the drain. In certain embodiments, the channel layer 110 is formed above the screen layer 120 and threshold voltage set layer (the screen layer 120, threshold voltage set layer, and APT suppression layer 122 are also referred to as well implant layers) by way of a blanket or selective silicon EPI deposition, resulting in an intrinsic substantially undoped channel layer 110 of a thickness tailored to the technical specifications of the device. As a general matter, the thickness of the substantially undoped channel layer 110 ranges from approximately 5-30 nm, with the selected thickness based upon the desired threshold voltage and other transistor performance metrics for the transistor and transistor design node (i.e. a 20 nm gate length transistor may typically have a thinner channel thickness than a 45 nm gate length transistor). Preferably, the substantially undoped channel region 110 has a dopant concentration less than 5×1017 dopant atoms per cm3 adjacent or near the gate dielectric 140. In some embodiments, the substantially undoped channel layer 110 may have a dopant concentration that is specified to be approximately less than one tenth of the dopant concentration in the screen layer 120. In still other embodiments, depending on the transistor characteristics desired, the substantially undoped channel layer 110 may contain dopants so that the dopant concentration is elevated to above 5×1017 dopant atoms per cm3 adjacent or near the gate dielectric 140. Preferably, the substantially undoped channel layer 110 remains substantially undoped by avoiding the use of halo or other channel implants. In one embodiment, the channel layer 110 is formed by a blanket (or selective) epitaxial deposition step that is performed after forming the screen layer 120.
The isolation structure 104 of
In operation, when gate electrode 142 voltage is applied to the transistor 100 at a predetermined level, a depletion region formed in the substantially undoped channel layer 110 may extend to the screen layer 120. The screen layer 120, if fabricated according to specification, effectively pins the depletion region to define the depletion zone depth.
The threshold voltage (Vt) in conventional field effect transistors (FETs) can be set by directly implanting a “threshold voltage implant” into the channel, raising the threshold voltage to an acceptable level that reduces transistor off-state leakage while still allowing speedy transistor switching. Alternatively, the threshold voltage in conventional FETs can also be set by a technique variously known as “halo” implants, high angle implants, or pocket implants. Such implants create a localized graded dopant distribution near a transistor source and drain that extends a distance into the channel. Halo implants are often required by transistor designers who want to reduce unwanted source/drain leakage conduction or “punch through” current and other short channel effects, but have the added advantage of adjusting the threshold voltage. Unfortunately, halo implants introduce additional process steps, thereby increasing the manufacturing cost. Also, halo implants can introduce additional dopants in random unwanted locations in the channel. These additional dopants increase the variability of the threshold voltage between transistors and decrease mobility and channel transconductance due to the adverse effects of additional and unwanted dopant scattering centers in the channel. Eliminating or greatly reducing the halo implants is desirable for reducing manufacture time and making more reliable wafer processing. By contrast, the techniques for forming the transistor 100 use different threshold voltage setting techniques that do not rely on halo implants (i.e. haloless processing) or channel implants to set the threshold voltage to a desired range. By maintaining a substantially undoped channel near the gate, these transistors further allow for greater channel mobility for electron and hole carriers with reduced variation in threshold voltage from device to device.
As will also be appreciated, position, concentration, and thickness of the screen layer 120 are important factors in the design of the DDC transistor 100. In certain embodiments, the screen layer 120 is located above the bottom of the source and drain junctions 106 and below the LDD junctions 108. To dope the screen layer 120 so as to cause its peak dopant concentration to define the edge of the depletion width when the transistor is turned on, methods such as delta doping, conventional dopant implants, or in-situ doping is preferred, since the screen layer 120 should have a finite thickness to enable it to adequately screen the well while avoiding creating a path for excessive junction leakage. With such a screen layer 120, the transistor 100 can simultaneously have good threshold voltage matching, low junction leakage, good short channel effects, and still have an independently controllable body due to a strong body effect. In addition, multiple transistors having different threshold voltages can be easily implemented by customizing the position, thickness, and dopant concentration of the threshold voltage set layer and/or the screen layer 120 while at the same time achieving a reduction in the threshold voltage variation.
In one embodiment, the screen layer 120 is positioned such that the top surface of the screen layer 120 is located approximately at a distance of Lg/1.5 to Lg/5 below the gate dielectric 140 (where Lg is the gate length). In one embodiment, the threshold voltage set layer has a dopant concentration that is approximately 1/10 of the screen layer 120 dopant concentration. In certain embodiments, the threshold voltage set layer is thin so that the combination of the threshold voltage set layer and the screen layer 120 is located approximately within a distance of Lg/1.5 to Lg/5 below the gate dielectric 140.
Modifying threshold voltage by use of a threshold voltage set layer positioned above the screen layer 120 and below the substantially undoped channel layer 110 is an alternative technique to conventional threshold voltage implants for adjusting threshold voltage. Care must be taken to prevent dopant migration into the substantially undoped channel layer 110, with the use of low temperature anneals and dopant anti-migration techniques being recommended for many applications. More information about the formation of the threshold voltage set layer is found in pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/895,785, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Dopant migration resistant implants or layers of carbon, pre-amorphization implants, or the like, can be applied below, along with, or above the screen layer 120 to further limit dopant migration. In
Reducing unwanted damage effects while maintaining desired dopant profiles is possible with use of the following disclosed structures and processes.
The PMOS transistor 201 has carbon dopants in the PMOS screen layer 220 because the carbon doped silicon substrate is formed as a blanket epitaxial layer that is formed over both the NMOS and PMOS transistor regions 200 and 201 during the same process step. However, the carbon doping may be eliminated for the PMOS transistors 201 if the PMOS screen layer 220 is formed using dopants having a low diffusivity such that the diffusion of PMOS screen layer 220 dopant profile can be maintained without using carbon. Not using carbon in such embodiments can be advantageous because the carbon atoms can result in reduced mobility of the charge carriers and, therefore, affect the electrical characteristics of the PMOS transistor 201. Therefore, in alternative embodiments that use selective epitaxial layers to form the PMOS and NMOS screen layers 220, the PMOS transistors 201 can use a slow diffusing dopant species (such as As or Sb) to form the PMOS screen layer 220 and not have any carbon, while the NMOS transistors 200 can still use carbon to reduce the diffusion of NMOS screen layer 220 dopants.
Referring to
In step 910, a PMOS mask is photolithographically patterned on a wafer, which is then used in step 915 to form the PMOS well. In one embodiment, phosphorus (P) is implanted at 200-400 keV and at doses in the range of 1×1013 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the PMOS well. In steps 920 and 925, respectively, the PMOS APT suppression layer and the PMOS screen layer are formed. The PMOS well implant and/or the PMOS APT suppression layer implant can be done either directly into the in-situ carbon doped silicon or it can be directed to form a doped region below the in-situ carbon doped silicon. However, the PMOS screen implant is done directly into the in-situ carbon doped silicon layer so that the PMOS screen layer is formed within this substrate region. In one embodiment, arsenic (As) is implanted at 50-200 keV at doses in the range of 5×1012 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the PMOS APT suppression layer and antimony (Sb) is implanted at 10-50 keV at doses in the range of 5×1012 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the PMOS screen layer. The PMOS mask is removed at step 930 and an NMOS mask is formed at step 935. In step 940, the NMOS mask is used to form the NMOS well. In one embodiment, boron (B) is implanted at approximately 100-250 keV, at doses in the range of 1×1013 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the NMOS well. In step 945, the NMOS APT suppression layer is implanted in the NMOS well. In one embodiment additional B is implanted at 15-40 keV at doses in the range of 5×1012 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the shallow NMOS APT suppression layer.
In step 950 carbon is optionally implanted to form a deep carbon implant layer that is positioned between the NMOS screen layer and the NMOS APT layer. Embodiments of DDC transistors having a deep carbon implant layer have been described previously with reference to
Various embodiments of the process 900 can include some but not all of the process steps for forming one or more of the carbon doped silicon layers described above, i.e. steps 905, 950, and 975. In one such embodiment, step 905 is performed so that the DDC transistors are formed in a silicon substrate with carbon dopants, while steps 950 and 975 are performed to form the deep carbon implant layer below the screen layer and the thin in-situ carbon doped silicon layer above the screen layer, respectively. In alternative embodiments, only one of the steps 905, 950, and 975 are performed such that only one carbon doping is used to limit the diffusion of screen layer dopants. In other embodiments, all three of these steps are performed, such that three carbon dopings are used to limit the diffusion of screen layer dopants.
In step 1007, the STI structures are optionally formed for an embodiment using an STI first process flow, thereby defining the areas where the NMOS and PMOS DDC transistors are to be formed. In an alternative embodiment using an STI last process flow, step 1007 can be omitted and STI structures are not formed at this stage of the process. In step 1010, a PMOS mask is lithographically patterned on the wafer, which is then used in step 1015 to form the PMOS well. In one embodiment, phosphorus (P) is implanted at 200-400 keV, at doses in the range of 1×1013 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the PMOS well. In steps 1020 and 1025, respectively, the PMOS APT suppression layer and the PMOS screen layer are formed. In one embodiment, arsenic (As) is implanted at 50-200 keV at doses in the range of 5×1012 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the PMOS APT suppression layer and antimony (Sb) is implanted at 10-50 keV at doses in the range of 5×1012 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the PMOS screen layer. The PMOS mask is removed at step 1030 and an NMOS mask is formed at step 1035. In step 1040, the NMOS mask is used to form the NMOS well. In one embodiment, boron (B) is implanted at approximately 100-250 keV, at doses in the range of 1×1013 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the NMOS well. In step 1045, the NMOS APT suppression layer is implanted in the NMOS well. In one embodiment, additional B is implanted at 15-40 keV at doses in the range of 5×1012 to 5×1013 atoms/cm2 to form the shallow NMOS APT suppression layer.
In step 1050, an optional deep carbon implant can be performed to implant carbon above the APT suppression layer, followed by step 1055 that forms the NMOS screen layer above the carbon implant region. The deep carbon implant layer formed in step 1050 can limit the diffusion of NMOS screen layer dopants by trapping interstitials generated below the screen layer. The deep carbon implant layer may be used in addition to or in lieu of the carbon doped silicon substrate formed in step 1005. Typically, either the deep carbon implant layer or the carbon doped silicon substrate is used in a particular embodiment, with the deep carbon implant layer being used when the DDC transistors are formed in a silicon substrate instead of the carbon doped silicon substrate. Thus, the step 1050 for forming the deep carbon implant layer can be omitted in certain embodiments of the process 1000. Step 1050 can result in a deep carbon implant that is positioned between the APT layer and the screen layer for the NMOS transistor, such that the deep carbon implant can limit the diffusion of NMOS screen layer dopants (such as boron). In one embodiment, carbon is implanted at 20-60 keV at concentrations in the range of 1×1014 to 1×1015 to form the deep carbon implant layer. In one embodiment, B is implanted at 0.5 to 10 keV at concentrations in the range of 5×1012 to 5×1013 to form the NMOS screen layer. Typically, the implant conditions for the NMOS screen layer are selected such that the NMOS screen layer is formed within the carbon doped silicon substrate formed in step 1005 and positioned above the deep carbon implant layer formed in step 1050. Since the deep carbon implant layer protects the NMOS screen layer from interstitials generated below the screen layer, it is typically positioned either close to the NMOS screen layer or above the source of interstitials below the screen layer (e.g., an area where the lattice structure may be damaged). In alternative embodiments, fluorine can be implanted instead of carbon to form the deep implant layer. The use of fluorine instead of carbon can be advantageous because fluorine can be fully activated with a normal spike anneal, while carbon may only be partially activated. In step 1060, a 900° C.-1250° C. RTP/laser well anneal is performed.
In step 1065, the NMOS mask is removed and, in step 1068, an optional hardmask may be formed. The hardmask formed in step 1068 can be used to define the regions of the NMOS and PMOS transistors such that the STI islands are masked off in process embodiments that use an STI first process flow so that subsequent steps that form selective epitaxial layers for the NMOS and PMOS transistors do not form polysilicon over the STI islands. Moreover, the hardmask of step 1068 can be used to define transistors having a predetermined threshold voltage such that the subsequent steps that form epitaxial layers for the transistors can form selective epitaxial layers of different thicknesses for transistors having different threshold voltages. For example, epitaxial layers having different thicknesses can be formed for LVt transistors having a low threshold voltage and HVt transistors having a high threshold voltage, and different hardmasks can be formed to define the LVt and HVt transistor areas. In an alternative embodiment, different hardmasks can be formed to define the NMOS and PMOS transistor areas, permitting the use of different epitaxial layers for the NMOS and PMOS transistors. For example, a NMOS hardmask can be used to form carbon doped silicon epitaxial layers for the NMOS transistors and a PMOS hardmask can be used to form a substantially undoped epitaxial layer for the PMOS transistor so the PMOS transistors have no carbon dopants.
In one embodiment of the process 1000, shown in step 1070, a selective epitaxial layer of substantially undoped silicon is grown over the regions where the NMOS and PMOS transistors are to be formed. In an alternative embodiment, shown in steps 1075 and 1080 respectively, an intermediate selective epitaxial carbon doped silicon layer can be grown followed by a selective epitaxial layer of substantially undoped silicon. Typically thin (about 5-10 nanometers or so), the carbon doped silicon epitaxial layer formed at step 1075 can act to reduce diffusion of dopants from the screen layer into the substantially undoped epitaxial layer and it can also consume unwanted silicon interstitials to further reduce boron diffusion in the device structure. In one embodiment, the selective epitaxial layers grown in steps 1070 and 1074 can have a thickness that is approximately in the range of 5-40 nanometers. In certain embodiments, a hardmask can be formed in step 1068 to support the subsequent selective epitaxial deposition steps. For example, a hardmask defining the PMOS transistor regions can be used to perform step 1070 for the PMOS transistors and a different hardmask defining the NMOS transistor regions can be used to perform steps 1075 and 1080 for the NMOS transistor regions.
In one embodiment of the process 1000, the carbon implant layer and the carbon doped silicon substrate is formed only for the NMOS transistors while PMOS transistors are kept free of carbon. Such an embodiment can be advantageously used if low diffusivity dopant species are used to form the PMOS screen layer such that the dopant profile of the PMOS screen layer can be maintained without using carbon. Eliminating carbon in the PMOS transistor can be beneficial because the presence of carbon dopants can reduce the charge carrier mobility and may have an effect on transistor electrical characteristics. In order to accommodate this, the optional step 1005 is omitted such that the corresponding carbon doped silicon substrate is not formed. A selective silicon etch for the NMOS transistor regions is performed (step 1072) prior to forming the thin in-situ carbon doped silicon selective epitaxial layer (step 1073) for the NMOS transistors. The purpose of the selective etch for the NMOS transistors is to recess the silicon region of the NMOS transistors such that, after deposition of the carbon doped silicon substrate in step 1005, the NMOS transistor regions can have substantially the same step height as the PMOS transistor regions. Subsequently, a substantially undoped silicon epitaxial layer is grown as selective epitaxial layer in step 1074 such that a selective epitaxial layer is formed over the screen layers of both the NMOS and PMOS transistors.
In step 1085, a low temperature STI process step is performed to form STI structures for a process embodiment using an STI last process flow. In step 1090, remaining elements of the NMOS and PMOS transistors are formed, such as gate structures, source/drain implants, etc.
Referring to
In step 1160, a NMOS transistor threshold implant can be optionally performed, if the NMOS transistors have a threshold set region. In step 1170, the NMOS mask is removed, and in step 1175 various thermal processing steps can be performed, including at step 1175 a 500° C.-800° C. SPE or a 900° C.-1250° C. RTP well anneal. In step 1180, a blanket epitaxial layer of substantially undoped silicon is formed such that the epitaxial layer is formed over the screen layers of both the NMOS and PMOS transistors. In one embodiment, the blanket epitaxial layer can have a thickness that is approximately in the range of 5-40 nanometers. After formation of the DDC transistor elements (such as the well implant layers and the substantially undoped channel layer described above), a low temperature STI formation is performed at step 1185 followed by gate formation at step 1190. Remaining transistor process modules are performed to complete the formation of the DDC transistor.
Transistors created according to the foregoing embodiments, structures, and processes can have a reduced threshold voltage mismatch arising from diffusion mediated dopant variations as compared to conventional MOS analog or digital transistors. This is particularly important for transistor circuits that rely on closely matched transistors for optimal operation, including differential matching circuits, analog amplifying circuits, and many digital circuits in widespread use such as SRAM cells. Variation can be even further reduced by adoption of structures such as a screen layer, an undoped channel, or a Vt set layer as described herein to further effectively increase headroom which the devices have to operate. This allows high-bandwidth electronic devices with improved sensitivity and performance, but still having reduced power consumption.
The present disclosure discusses building the screen and channel of advanced transistors such as a deeply depleted channel (DDC) type transistor. However, the methods and techniques described above can also be used by one skilled in the art to improve the securement of dopant profiles in other transistor types or transistor features such as shallow lightly doped drains (LDD) and S/D regions in advanced transistors.
Although the present disclosure has been described in detail with reference to a particular embodiment, it should be understood that various other changes, substitutions, and alterations may be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Numerous other changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be ascertained by those skilled in the art and it is intended that the present disclosure encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/600,865 filed Jan. 20, 2015 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/046,147 and now U.S. Pat. No. 8,937,005 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/473,403 and now U.S. Pat. No. 8,569,156, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/486,494, each being hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3958266 | Athanas | May 1976 | A |
4000504 | Berger | Dec 1976 | A |
4021835 | Etoh | May 1977 | A |
4242691 | Kotani | Dec 1980 | A |
4276095 | Beilstein, Jr. | Jun 1981 | A |
4315781 | Henderson | Feb 1982 | A |
4518926 | Swanson | May 1985 | A |
4559091 | Allen | Dec 1985 | A |
4578128 | Mundt | Mar 1986 | A |
4617066 | Vasudev | Oct 1986 | A |
4662061 | Malhi | May 1987 | A |
4761384 | Neppl | Aug 1988 | A |
4780748 | Cunningham | Oct 1988 | A |
4819043 | Yazawa | Apr 1989 | A |
4885477 | Bird | Dec 1989 | A |
4908681 | Nishida | Mar 1990 | A |
4945254 | Robbins | Jul 1990 | A |
4956311 | Liou | Sep 1990 | A |
5034337 | Mosher | Jul 1991 | A |
5144378 | Hikosaka | Sep 1992 | A |
5156989 | Williams | Oct 1992 | A |
5156990 | Mitchell | Oct 1992 | A |
5166765 | Lee | Nov 1992 | A |
5208473 | Komori | May 1993 | A |
5294821 | Iwamatsu | Mar 1994 | A |
5298763 | Shen | Mar 1994 | A |
5369288 | Usuki | Nov 1994 | A |
5373186 | Schubert | Dec 1994 | A |
5384476 | Nishizawa | Jan 1995 | A |
5426328 | Yilmaz | Jun 1995 | A |
5444008 | Han | Aug 1995 | A |
5552332 | Tseng | Sep 1996 | A |
5559368 | Hu | Sep 1996 | A |
5608253 | Liu | Mar 1997 | A |
5622880 | Burr | Apr 1997 | A |
5624863 | Helm | Apr 1997 | A |
5625568 | Edwards | Apr 1997 | A |
5641980 | Yamaguchi | Jun 1997 | A |
5663583 | Matloubian | Sep 1997 | A |
5712501 | Davies | Jan 1998 | A |
5719422 | Burr | Feb 1998 | A |
5726488 | Watanabe | Mar 1998 | A |
5726562 | Mizuno | Mar 1998 | A |
5731626 | Eaglesham | Mar 1998 | A |
5736419 | Naem | Apr 1998 | A |
5753555 | Hada | May 1998 | A |
5754826 | Gamal | May 1998 | A |
5756365 | Kakumu | May 1998 | A |
5763921 | Okumura | Jun 1998 | A |
5780899 | Hu | Jul 1998 | A |
5847419 | Imai | Dec 1998 | A |
5856003 | Chiu | Jan 1999 | A |
5861334 | Rho | Jan 1999 | A |
5877049 | Liu | Mar 1999 | A |
5885876 | Dennen | Mar 1999 | A |
5889315 | Farrenkopf | Mar 1999 | A |
5895954 | Yasumura | Apr 1999 | A |
5899714 | Farremkopf | May 1999 | A |
5918129 | Fulford, Jr. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923067 | Voldman | Jul 1999 | A |
5923987 | Burr | Jul 1999 | A |
5936868 | Hall | Aug 1999 | A |
5946214 | Heavlin | Aug 1999 | A |
5985705 | Seliskar | Nov 1999 | A |
5989963 | Luning | Nov 1999 | A |
6001695 | Wu | Dec 1999 | A |
6020227 | Bulucea | Feb 2000 | A |
6043139 | Eaglesham | Mar 2000 | A |
6060345 | Hause | May 2000 | A |
6060364 | Maszara | May 2000 | A |
6066533 | Yu | May 2000 | A |
6072217 | Burr | Jun 2000 | A |
6087210 | Sohn | Jul 2000 | A |
6087691 | Hamamoto | Jul 2000 | A |
6088518 | Hsu | Jul 2000 | A |
6091286 | Blauschild | Jul 2000 | A |
6096611 | Wu | Aug 2000 | A |
6103562 | Son | Aug 2000 | A |
6121153 | Kikkawa | Sep 2000 | A |
6147383 | Kuroda | Nov 2000 | A |
6153920 | Gossmann | Nov 2000 | A |
6157073 | Lehongres | Dec 2000 | A |
6175582 | Naito | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184112 | Maszara | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190979 | Radens | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194259 | Nayak | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198157 | Ishida | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218892 | Soumyanath | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218895 | De | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221724 | Yu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229188 | Aoki | May 2001 | B1 |
6232164 | Tsai | May 2001 | B1 |
6235597 | Miles | May 2001 | B1 |
6245618 | An | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6268640 | Park | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271070 | Kotani | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6271551 | Schmitz | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288429 | Iwata | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297132 | Zhang | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300177 | Sundaresan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313489 | Letavic | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319799 | Ouyang | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320222 | Forbes | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323525 | Noguchi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326666 | Bernstein | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335233 | Cho | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358806 | Puchner | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6380019 | Yu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391752 | Colinge | May 2002 | B1 |
6426260 | Hshieh | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426279 | Huster | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432754 | Assaderaghi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444550 | Hao | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444551 | Ku | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449749 | Stine | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461920 | Shirahata | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461928 | Rodder | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6472278 | Marshall | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482714 | Hieda | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489224 | Burr | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6492232 | Tang | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500739 | Wang | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503801 | Rouse | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6503805 | Wang | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506640 | Ishida | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518623 | Oda | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521470 | Lin | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534373 | Yu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541328 | Whang | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6541829 | Nishinohara | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6548842 | Bulucea | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551885 | Yu | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552377 | Yu | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6573129 | Hoke | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6576535 | Drobny | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6600200 | Lustig | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6620671 | Wang | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624488 | Kim | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627473 | Oikawa | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630710 | Augusto | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6660605 | Liu | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662350 | Fried | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667200 | Sohn | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670260 | Yu | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6693333 | Yu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6730568 | Sohn | May 2004 | B2 |
6737724 | Hieda | May 2004 | B2 |
6743291 | Ang | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6743684 | Liu | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751519 | Satya | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753230 | Sohn | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760900 | Rategh | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770944 | Nishinohara | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787424 | Yu | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797553 | Adkisson | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797602 | Kluth | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797994 | Hoke | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6808004 | Kamm | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6808994 | Wang | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6813750 | Usami | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821825 | Todd | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821852 | Rhodes | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822297 | Nandakumar | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831292 | Currie | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835639 | Rotondaro | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6852602 | Kanzawa | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852603 | Chakravarthi | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6881634 | Watt | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881641 | Wieczorek | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881987 | Sohn | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891439 | Jachne | May 2005 | B2 |
6893947 | Martinez | May 2005 | B2 |
6900519 | Cantell | May 2005 | B2 |
6901564 | Stine | May 2005 | B2 |
6916698 | Mocuta | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917237 | Tschanz | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6927463 | Iwata | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928128 | Sidiropoulos | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6930007 | Bu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930360 | Yamauchi | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957163 | Ando | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963090 | Passlack | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6995397 | Yamashita | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002214 | Boyd | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7005333 | Li | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008836 | Algotsson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013359 | Li | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7015546 | Herr | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015741 | Tschanz | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022559 | Barnak | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036098 | Eleyan | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038258 | Liu | May 2006 | B2 |
7039881 | Regan | May 2006 | B2 |
7045456 | Murto | May 2006 | B2 |
7057216 | Ouyang | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7061058 | Chakravarthi | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064039 | Liu | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064399 | Babcock | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071103 | Chan | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078325 | Curello | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078776 | Nishinohara | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089513 | Bard | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089515 | Hanafi | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091093 | Noda | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7105399 | Dakshina-Murthy | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7109099 | Tan | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7119381 | Passlack | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122411 | Mouli | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127687 | Signore | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7132323 | Haensch | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7169675 | Tan | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170120 | Datta | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176137 | Perng | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186598 | Yamauchi | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189627 | Wu | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7199430 | Babcock | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202517 | Dixit | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208354 | Bauer | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211871 | Cho | May 2007 | B2 |
7221021 | Wu | May 2007 | B2 |
7223646 | Miyashita | May 2007 | B2 |
7226833 | White | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7226843 | Weber | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7230680 | Fujisawa | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235822 | Li | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7256639 | Koniaris | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7259428 | Inaba | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260562 | Czajkowski | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7294877 | Rueckes | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297994 | Wieczorek | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301208 | Handa | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304350 | Misaki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7307471 | Gammie | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312500 | Miyashita | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7323754 | Ema | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7332439 | Lindert | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7348629 | Chu | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354833 | Liaw | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7380225 | Joshi | May 2008 | B2 |
7398497 | Sato | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402207 | Besser | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7402872 | Murthy | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7416605 | Zollner | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427788 | Li | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442971 | Wirbeleit | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7449733 | Inaba | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462908 | Bol | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469164 | Du-Nour | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470593 | Rouh | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485536 | Jin | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7487474 | Ciplickas | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491988 | Tolchinsky | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494861 | Chu | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496862 | Chang | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496867 | Turner | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498637 | Yamaoka | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7501324 | Babcock | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503020 | Allen | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7507999 | Kusumoto | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514766 | Yoshida | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521323 | Surdeanu | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531393 | Doyle | May 2009 | B2 |
7531836 | Liu | May 2009 | B2 |
7538364 | Twynam | May 2009 | B2 |
7538412 | Schulze | May 2009 | B2 |
7562233 | Sheng | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7564105 | Chi | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7566600 | Mouli | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7569456 | Ko | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7586322 | Xu | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7592241 | Takao | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595243 | Bulucea | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7598142 | Ranade | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605041 | Ema | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605060 | Meunier-Beillard | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605429 | Bernstein | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608496 | Chu | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7615802 | Elpelt | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622341 | Chudzik | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7638380 | Pearce | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7642140 | Bae | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7644377 | Saxe | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7645665 | Kubo | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651920 | Siprak | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655523 | Babcock | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673273 | Madurawe | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675126 | Cho | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675317 | Perisetty | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678638 | Chu | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681628 | Joshi | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682887 | Dokumaci | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683442 | Burr | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7696000 | Liu | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704822 | Jeong | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704844 | Zhu | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7709828 | Braithwaite | May 2010 | B2 |
7723750 | Zhu | May 2010 | B2 |
7737472 | Kondo | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741138 | Cho | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741200 | Cho | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7745270 | Shah | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750374 | Capasso | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7750381 | Hokazono | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7750405 | Nowak | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7750682 | Bernstein | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7755144 | Li | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7755146 | Helm | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759206 | Luo | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759714 | Itoh | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761820 | Berger | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7795677 | Bangsaruntip | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808045 | Kawahara | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7808410 | Kim | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811873 | Mochizuki | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811881 | Cheng | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818702 | Mandelman | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821066 | Lebby | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7829402 | Matocha | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831873 | Trimberger | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7846822 | Seebauer | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855118 | Hoentschel | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859013 | Chen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863163 | Bauer | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867835 | Lee | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883977 | Babcock | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888205 | Herner | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7888747 | Hokazono | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895546 | Lahner | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7897495 | Ye | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7906413 | Cardone | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7906813 | Kato | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7910419 | Fenouillet-Beranger | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919791 | Flynn | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926018 | Moroz | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7935984 | Nakano | May 2011 | B2 |
7941776 | Majumder | May 2011 | B2 |
7945800 | Gomm | May 2011 | B2 |
7948008 | Liu | May 2011 | B2 |
7952147 | Ueno | May 2011 | B2 |
7960232 | King | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960238 | Kohli | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968400 | Cai | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968411 | Williford | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968440 | Seebauer | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968459 | Bedell | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7989900 | Haensch | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7994573 | Pan | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004024 | Furukawa | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012827 | Yu | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8029620 | Kim | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8039332 | Bernard | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046598 | Lee | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048791 | Hargrove | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8048810 | Tsai | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8051340 | Cranford, Jr. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8053340 | Colombeau | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8063466 | Kurita | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067279 | Sadra | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067280 | Wang | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067302 | Li | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8076719 | Zeng | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8097529 | Krull | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103983 | Agarwal | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105891 | Yeh | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106424 | Schruefer | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106481 | Rao | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8110487 | Griebenow | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8114761 | Mandrekar | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8119482 | Bhalla | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8120069 | Hynecek | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8129246 | Babcock | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8129797 | Chen | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134159 | Hokazono | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8143120 | Kerr | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8143124 | Challa | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8143678 | Kim | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8148774 | Mori | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8163619 | Yang | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8169002 | Chang | May 2012 | B2 |
8170857 | Joshi | May 2012 | B2 |
8173499 | Chung | May 2012 | B2 |
8173502 | Yan | May 2012 | B2 |
8176461 | Trimberger | May 2012 | B1 |
8178430 | Kim | May 2012 | B2 |
8179530 | Levy | May 2012 | B2 |
8183096 | Wirbeleit | May 2012 | B2 |
8183107 | Mathur | May 2012 | B2 |
8185865 | Gupta | May 2012 | B2 |
8187959 | Pawlak | May 2012 | B2 |
8188542 | Yoo | May 2012 | B2 |
8196545 | Kurosawa | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8201122 | Dewey, III | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214190 | Joshi | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8217423 | Liu | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8225255 | Ouyang | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8227307 | Chen | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236661 | Dennard | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8239803 | Kobayashi | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8247300 | Babcock | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255843 | Chen | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8258026 | Bulucea | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266567 | El Yahyaoui | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273617 | Thompson | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286180 | Foo | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8288798 | Passlack | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299562 | Li | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8324059 | Guo | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20010014495 | Yu | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020042184 | Nandakumar | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030006415 | Yokogawa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030047763 | Hieda | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030122203 | Nishinohara | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030173626 | Burr | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183856 | Wieczorek | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215992 | Sohn | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040075118 | Heinemann | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040075143 | Bae | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084731 | Matsuda | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087090 | Grudowski | May 2004 | A1 |
20040126947 | Sohn | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175893 | Vatus | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180488 | Lee | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050106824 | Alberto | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116282 | Pattanayak | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050250289 | Babcock | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280075 | Ema | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060022270 | Boyd | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060049464 | Rao | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068555 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068586 | Pain | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071278 | Takao | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060131665 | Murthy | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154428 | Dokumaci | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197158 | Babcock | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060203581 | Joshi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220114 | Miyashita | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060223248 | Venugopal | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070040222 | Van Camp | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070117326 | Tan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070158790 | Rao | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070212861 | Chidambarrao | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238253 | Tucker | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080067589 | Ito | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080108208 | Arevalo | May 2008 | A1 |
20080169493 | Lee | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169516 | Chung | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080197439 | Goerlach | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080227250 | Ranade | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237661 | Ranade | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258198 | Bojarczuk | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272409 | Sonkusale | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090057746 | Sugll | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090108350 | Cai | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134468 | Tsuchiya | May 2009 | A1 |
20090224319 | Kohli | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090302388 | Cai | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309140 | Khamankar | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090311837 | Kapoor | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321849 | Miyamura | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012988 | Yang | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100038724 | Anderson | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100100856 | Mittal | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100148153 | Hudait | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149854 | Vora | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100187641 | Zhu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100207182 | Paschal | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100270600 | Inukai | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110059588 | Kang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073961 | Dennard | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074498 | Thompson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079860 | Verhulst | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110079861 | Shifren | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110095811 | Chi | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110147828 | Murthy | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169082 | Zhu | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175170 | Wang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110180880 | Chudzik | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193164 | Zhu | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212590 | Wu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230039 | Mowry | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242921 | Tran | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110248352 | Shifren | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110294278 | Eguchi | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309447 | Arghavani | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120021594 | Gurtej | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034745 | Colombeau | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056275 | Cai | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065920 | Nagumo | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120108050 | Chen | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132998 | Kwon | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138953 | Cai | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120146155 | Hoentschel | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167025 | Gillespie | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120187491 | Zhu | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190177 | Kim | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120223363 | Kronholz | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0274278 | Jul 1988 | EP |
0312237 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0531621 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0683515 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0889502 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1450394 | Aug 2004 | EP |
59193066 | Nov 1984 | JP |
4186774 | Jul 1992 | JP |
8153873 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8288508 | Nov 1996 | JP |
2004087671 | Mar 2004 | JP |
794094 | Jan 2008 | KR |
WO2011062788 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Werner, P. et al., “Carbon Diffusion in Silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, No. 17, pp. 2465-2467, Oct. 1998. |
Yan, Ran-Hong et al., “Scaling the Si MOSFET: From Bulk to SOI to Bulk,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 39, No. 7, Jul. 1992. |
Abiko, H. et al., “A Channel Engineering Combined with Channel Epitaxy Optimization and RED Suppression for 0.15 μm n-n Gate CMOS Technology.” 1995 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 23-24, 1995. |
Chau, R. et al., “A 50nm Depleted-Substrate CMOS Transistor (DST)”, Electron Device Meeting 2001, IEDM Technical Digest, IEEE International, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4, 2001. |
Ducroquet, F. et al. “Fully Depleted Silicon-On Insulator nMOSFETs with Tensile Strained High Carbon Content Sil-yCy Channel”, ECS 210th Meeting, Abstract 1033, 2006. |
Ernst, T. et al., “Nanoscaled MOSFET Transistors on Strained Si, SiGe, Ge Layers: Some Integration and Electrical Properties Features”, ECS Trans. 2006, vol. 3, Issue 7, pp. 947-961, 2006. |
Goesele, U. et al., “Diffusion Engineering by Carbon in Silicon”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610, pp. 1-12, 2000. |
Hokazono, A. et al., “Steep Channel & Halo Profiles Utilizing Boron-Diffusion-Barrier Layers (Si:C) for 32 nm Node and Beyond”, 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 112-113, 2008. |
Hokazono, A. et al., “Steep Channel Profiles in n/pMOS Controlled by Boron-Doped Si:C Layers for Continual Bulk-CMOS Scaling”, IEDM09-676 Symposium, pp. 29.1.1-29.1.4, 2009. |
Holland, OW and Thomas, DK “A Method to Improve Activation of Implanted Dopants in SiC”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, pp. 1-9, 2001. |
Kotaki, H., et al., “Novel Bulk Dynamic Threshold Voltage MOSFET (B-DTMOS) with Advanced Isolation (SITOS) and Gate to Shallow-Well Contact (SSS-C) Processes for Ultra Low Power Dual Gate CMOS”, IEDM 96, pp. 459-462, 1996. |
Lavéant, P. “Incorporation, Diffusion and Agglomeration of Carbon in Silicon”, Solid State Phenomena, vols. 82-84, pp. 189-194, 2002. |
Noda, K. et al., “A 0.1-μm Delta-Doped MOSFET Fabricated with Post-Low-Energy Implanting Selective Epitaxy” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 809-814, Apr. 1998. |
Ohguro, T. et al., “An 0.18-μm CMOS for Mixed Digital and Analog Applications with Zero-Volt-Vth Epitaxial-Channel MOSFET's”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1378-1383, Jul. 1999. |
Pinacho, R. et al., “Carbon in Silicon: Modeling of Diffusion and Clustering Mechanisms”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 1582-1588, Aug. 2002. |
Robertson, LS et al., “The Effect of Impurities on Diffusion and Activation of Ion Implanted Boron in Silicon”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. vol. 610, 2000. |
Scholz, R. et al., “Carbon-Induced Undersaturation of Silicon Self-Interstitials”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(2), pp. 200-202, Jan. 1998. |
Scholz, RF et al., “The Contribution of Vacancies to Carbon Out-Diffusion in Silicon”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 392-394, Jan. 1999. |
Stolk, PA et al., “Physical Mechanisms of Transient Enhanced Dopant Diffusion in Ion-Implanted Silicon”, J. Appl. Phys. 81(9), pp. 6031-6050, May 1997. |
Thompson, S. et al., “MOS Scaling: Transistor Challenges for the 21st Century”, Intel Technology Journal Q3 1998, pp. 1-19, 1998. |
Wann, C., et al., “Channel Profile Optimization and Device Design for Low-Power High-Performance Dynamic Threshold MOSFET”, IEDM 96, pp. 113-116, 1996. |
Komaragiri, R. et al., “Depletion-Free Poly Gate Electrode Architecture for Sub 100 Nanometer CMOS Devices with High-K Gate Dielectrics”, IEEE IEDM Tech Dig., San Francisco CA, 833-836, Dec. 13-15, 2004. |
Samsudin, Ket al., “Integrating Intrinsic Parameter Fluctuation Description into BSIMSOI to Forecast sub-l5nm UTB SOI based 6T SRAM Operation”, Solid-State Electronics (50), pp. 86-93, 2006. |
Wong, H et al., “Nanoscale CMOS”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vo. 87, No. 4, pp. 537-570, Apr. 1999. |
Banerjee, et al. “Compensating Non-Optical Effects using Electrically-Driven Optical Proximity Correction”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 7275 7275OE, 2009. |
Cheng, et al. “Extremely Thin SOI (ETSOI) CMOS with Record Low Variability for Low Power System-on-Chip Applications”, Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 2009. |
Cheng, et al. “Fully Depleted Extremely Thin SOI Technology Fabricated by a Novel Integration Scheme Feturing Implant-Free, Zero-Silicon-Loss, and Faceted Raised Source/Drain”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 212-213, 2009. |
Drennan, et al. “Implications of Proximity Effects for Analog Design”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 169-176, Sep. 2006. |
Hook, et al. “Lateral Ion Implant Straggle and Mask Proximity Effect”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 1946-1951, Sep. 2003. |
Hori, et al., “A 0.1 μm CMOS with a Step Channel Profile Formed by Ultra High Vacuum CVD and In-Situ Doped Ions”, Proceedsing of the International Electron Devices Meeting, New York, IEEE, US, pp. 909-911, Dec. 5, 1993. |
Matshuashi, et al. “High-Performance Double-Layer Epitaxial-Channel PMOSFET Compatible with a Single Gate CMOSFET”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 36-37, 1996. |
Shao, et al., “Boron Diffusion in Silicon: The Anomalies and Control by Point Defect Engineering”, Materials Science and Engineering R: Reports, vol. 42, No. 3-4, pp. 65-114, Nov. 1, 2003. |
Sheu, et al. “Modeling the Well-Edge Proximity Effect in Highly Scaled MOSFETs”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 11, pp. 2792-2798, Nov. 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170040225 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61486494 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14600865 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 15298933 | US | |
Parent | 14046147 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 14600865 | US | |
Parent | 13473403 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14046147 | US |