In a direct bonding process between smooth surfaces, very small spurious particles may appear at the bonding interface. These spurious particles are small, and the concentration of the particles is usually not high enough to be detrimental to the direct bond, even if the particles are spaced at 0.05-0.10 microns (μm) from each other. This is because the spurious particles themselves are so very small. At sizes around 1-10 nanometers (nm), as shown in
But when the direct boding process is hybrid and includes metal-to-metal direct bonding in conjunction with direct bonding of dielectric materials, very small conductive particles in the 1-10 nm size range may be present in great enough quantity to cause leakage or change in bias of conductive features, especially in microelectronic devices with submicron wiring rules or submicron trace pitches. If higher voltage is present, then in unbonded substrates the unwanted particles can also become nucleation sites for electrochemical or non-electrochemical reactions at the bonding interface or near conductive traces, and in some cases can cause slight micro-delamination of direct bonded constituents near conductive features. In the presence of voltage or other energy forces, one of the main negative effects of the spurious particles is that they may cause signal leakage between adjacent conductive features. A nominal 1 μm or submicron horizontal spacing, for example a 0.05 μm spacing, between adjacent or vertical conductors at the direct bonding interface might be bridged, or capacitively biased or breached by intervening conductive nanoparticles
The extraneous conductive nanoparticles may be present as planarization defects, as the aftermath of a brush scrubbing step of chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP), or from a plasma ashing or activation step. The particles may also be present from a simple surface cleaning operation or from a particle redeposition during a sputtering operation or plasma processing operations. If the surface to be direct bonded is on a die, then the die singulation process also generates particles, contaminants, and edge defects, and so the die preparation process may require more cleaning effort than does wafer-to-wafer bonding prior to subsequent dicing. The die handling steps can also add particle contamination if the process is not well designed and controlled. But the leftover tiniest particles at sizes between 1-10 nm, for example, are generally the aftermath of cleaning and surface polishing and planarization processes or plasma processing among others, not the dicing process, which tends to produces larger substrate and dielectric particles that can be more easily removed.
Reliable hybrid bonded apparatuses are provided. An example process cleans nanoparticles from at least the smooth dielectric top layer of a surface to be hybrid bonded after the surface has already been activated for the hybrid bonding. Conventionally, after the activation step, the activated surface is cleaned with deionized water (DIW) and cleaning with other chemicals is often discouraged. However, the example cleaning processes described herein increase the electrical reliability of microelectronic devices. Extraneous conductive and non-conductive particles, for example metal nanoparticles, can enable undesirable current and signal leakage between finely spaced conductive features, such as lines or trenches or vias, especially at higher voltages with ultra-fine trace pitches. In some applications, the conductive features are planar conductive layers embedded in a planar dielectric layer (e.g., damascene structures). In other applications, the conductive features of interest may be disposed over a dielectric layer (e.g., redistribution layers (RDLs)). In the apparatuses and techniques described herein, the extraneous nanoparticles may be both physically removed and/or dissolved without detriment to the activated bonding surface, the conductive features, the dielectric layer, or combinations thereof.
This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Overview
This disclosure describes reliable hybrid bonded apparatuses. Hybrid bonding is a conventionally reliable technology capable of easily creating 150,000,000 interconnects on a 200 mm wafer with a 99.999% success rate. As the lead spacing and conductive features pitches decrease approaching 1 micron (μm) and submicron spacing, the presence of very small artifactual metal particles from various cleaning and fabrication operations can come into play to effect electrical performance involving currents and signals of the conductive features or traces, and can seed various local discontinuities. Extraneous metal particles as small as 1-10 nm can register measurable compromises in reliability. Moreover, hybrid bonding technology is considered to be capable of attaining much smaller pads, and finer pitches are under development. As the spacing and conductive features pitches go under 1 μm, the presence of the extraneous metal nanoparticles becomes proportionately more significant due to their effect on the electrical operation of the microelectronic device. In some applications, the conductive features described herein include planar conductive layer(s) embedded in one or more planar dielectric layer(s) (e.g., damascene structures). In other applications, the conductive features of interest may be disposed over a dielectric layer and vice versa (e.g., redistribution layers (RDLs)).
An example process described herein takes the counterintuitive step of cleaning the smooth oxide surface and its metal recesses after the surface has already been activated for hybrid bonding, generally with plasma or other means of creating free radicals with ion charges at the ultimate surface of the bonding layer. This example process and cleaning procedure goes against conventional wisdom which holds that the ultra-flat, ultra-smooth, and ultra-clean oxide surface about to participate in direct bonding is sacrosanct and not to be further touched or interacted with in any way, prior to imminent direct bonding with another like surface. Conventionally, apart from post surface activation rinsing with deionized water (DIW), the plasma surface activation step is the de facto last step before direct bonding of the surface molecules takes place, much like the newly exposed adhesive of a paper sticker or a band-aid should be directly applied to its target with no intervening compromise. The example method described herein, however, adds an extra step and further cleans the activated surface, even after activation. As above, this is beneficial because horizontal spacing between conductive leads, posts, pads, and interconnects at the direct bonding surface is becoming so small that metal nanoparticles which were ignorable before, can no longer be ignored due to their propensity to seed electrical leakage between conductive features that are spaced so finely.
The cleaning process may apply very gentle metal etching reagents that meet stringent requirements for etching metals at nanometer scale sizes and rates, without forming excessive recesses in the conductive layers of interest, or roughening the dielectric bonding surface. In an implementation, the concentration of the acid or key active agent in the cleaning fluid is less than 1% of the formulary by volume, for example, and preferably less than 0.05% by volume. The cleaning times may range from 2 seconds to preferably less than 180 seconds. The particle removal rate of a given cleaning fluid may be reduced or modulated by the addition of a second or third chemical, for example one or more compounds containing a polyol. In one example, the polyol compound may be glycerin or a glyceride. The concentration of the polyol may range from 0.2% to 15% by volume and preferably less than 10% by volume. The higher the concentration of the polyol content, the lower the etch rate of the cleaning fluid. Also, polyols such as glycerin can serve as a wetting agent in the formulation to improve the uniformity of etching globally across the substrate.
In one embodiment, the cleaning fluid may include a combination of an inorganic acid and an organic acid. In some applications, the cleaning fluid may contain a very small amount of an inorganic or organic peroxide or one or more other inorganic compounds. In some applications, the cleaning fluid may include a quaternary ammonium compound, for example tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide. The concentration of the quaternary ammonium compound may range between 0.1 to 5% by volume and preferably less than 2.5% by volume.
Still in another embodiment the unwanted nanoparticles may be mechanically removed by application of carbon dioxide particles (dry ice) in a spray cleaning.
Various forms of hybrid bonding provide wafer-to-wafer (W2W) bonding, die-to-wafer (D2W) bonding, and panel-to-panel bonding in various circumstances. For example, cavities and trenches are formed in the wafer surfaces by known methods, and then metal is formed to overfill the cavities and trenches of interest by a damascene process, for example. The formed metal may include an adhesion or barrier layer disposed between the dielectric layer and the metal. The barrier layer may be conductive or nonconductive. The metal and surface layers are planarized, with conductive features, for example metal bond pads and metal features ending up very flat or very slightly recessed from the dielectric surface layer because of very slight dishing from the polishing of a CMP process. The recess may be typically less than 35 nm at greatest depth from the polished top surface and preferably less than 25 nm. The bonding surface is then rinsed with DIW or with other cleaning solutions. In some applications the cleaned surface may be further exposed to oxygen plasma (ashing step) to remove organic residues from the planarized surface. The ashing step may end up sputtering the spurious nanoparticles from the metal pad region to portions of the dielectric surface. Routinely, the ashing surface is cleaned with the deionized water (DIW). The surface is then activated by exposure or bombardment with nitrogen plasma or other ionized species (activation step). The plasma activation step may be another source of the spurious nanoparticles. The activated surface may be cleaned with DIW again before the bonding operation. Conventionally, the cleaned surfaces of interest are then aligned and instantly direct bonded to each other at room temperature through mere contact of the surfaces. But the example cleaning procedures described herein intervene between the surface activation step and the direct bonding or hybrid bonding steps.
Once direct bonding contact has been made between dielectric surfaces to initiate dielectric-to-dielectric bonding, mechanical mating and bonding of the recessed metal interconnects on each side of the bonding interface between the surfaces takes place during a subsequent higher temperature annealing. The substrate stacking operation may comprise for example, bonding two or more wafers to form a bonded wafer stack (W2W or multiple W2Ws), or bonding one or more smaller substrates to a larger substrate as in a die to wafer (D2W) operation, or bonding one die to another die or to a stack of dies (D2D). For a die to die bonding operation, the first die may be larger than the second die. Hybrid bonding allows wafers to be bonded with exceptionally fine pitched 3D electrical interconnects. In some embodiments, the annealing process comprises a batch anneal on multiple W2W or D2W stacks.
The polishing and dishing steps are achieved using standard chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) tools with known CMP polishing slurries and known post-polishing CMP slurry cleaning methods. The surface activation step may be accomplished with nitrogen-based chemistries and are then applied through conventional plasma etch tools. After the cleaning procedures described herein, the prepared, activated, and cleaned wafers can then simply be aligned and placed together resulting in the spontaneous formation of chemical bonds between the prepared dielectric surfaces. During the annealing process, the metal bond pads expand mating into one another to form a homogeneous metallic interconnect. In some embodiments, one or more metal grains may grow across the bond interface from the pads of the first substrate to the opposing pads of the second substrate. Concurrently, the chemical bond between oxides is also significantly strengthened by the annealing process, ensuring high reliability without requiring underfill.
At block 402, a surface for hybrid bonding is prepared.
At block 404, the surface for hybrid bonding is activated. For example, the surface may be activated with plasma, such as nitrogen plasma or oxygen plasma or combinations thereof. The surface activation increases the overall bond energy of the completed hybrid bonds.
At block 406, after activating the bonding surface, the surface is cleaned to remove particles disposed at the surface.
At block 408, the surface is hybrid bonded to another surface.
At block 502, a cavity is formed in a surface of a first wafer to be hybrid bonded.
At block 504, a metal is formed in the cavity. The metal may be deposited by a damascene process, including seeding the cavity or trench, and depositing the metal, such as copper, by deposition, electroplating, and so forth. The metal plated substrate can be further annealed by thermal treatment before the planarization step.
At block 506, at least the metal is planarized with a suitable flattening technique, such as chemical mechanical planarization (CMP).
At block 508, the bonding surface is cleaned after the CMP step to remove any residual polishing slurry material on the bonding surface. At block 510, the prepared bonding surface is surface activated with plasma or other activation means. An ashing step may precede this activation step or vice versa. In some applications, the ashing step may comprise the surface activation step.
At block 512, after activating the surface, the surface is cleaned of nanoparticles, so that there are no remaining particles or fewer than 2 particles per square micron of the mutual surface area of both surfaces to be hybrid bonded together. Cleaning as used herein means one or both or any combination of physically removing the metal nanoparticles or dissolving the metal nanoparticles with a reagent or cleaning solution, such as an acid or base (alkali) solution. The cleaning step may comprise applying DIW to rinse off the cleaning fluid from the bonding surface prior to drying the cleaned substrate.
At block 514, after the cleaning of metal nanoparticles, the activated and cleaned bonding surface is hybrid bonded to a first surface of a second wafer or to the receiving surface of interest. The receiving surface of interest may include a dielectric surface or the surface of another die.
The method 500 may be repeated on the second surface of the second wafer (or die) and repeated thence to create a stack of wafers (or dies, or both) making a 3D or a 2.5D stacked microelectronic package or device of hybrid bonded wafers (or dies) that have had their respective metal nanoparticles between each layer removed, preserving the integrity of the electrical operation of the entire stacked micropackage.
Reiterating the example processes and apparatuses described, an example method includes preparing a surface for hybrid bonding, the hybrid bonding comprising direct bonding between opposing dielectric materials and direct metal-to-metal bonding between opposing conductive materials, activating the surface for the hybrid bonding, then after activating the surface, cleaning the surface to remove particles disposed at the surface, and then hybrid bonding the surface to another surface.
Preparing the surface for hybrid bonding can include forming cavities in the surface, forming a conductive metal in the cavities, and planarizing the surface to provide a smooth oxide surface and conductive metal recesses.
The example method can further include ashing the smooth oxide surface and conductive metal recesses to remove organic traces of unwanted organic materials, and rinsing the surface with deionized water or other rinsing or cleaning reagent.
Activating the surface for the hybrid bonding usually includes plasma activating the surface.
The operation of cleaning the surface to remove particles can include physically removing the particles or dissolving the particles.
In an implementation, cleaning the surface to remove particles disposed at the surface applies an alkaline developer solution to remove or dissolve the particles. A concentration or pH of the alkaline developer can be selected to remove 1-10 nm copper or metal particles in a selected amount of time without affecting the activated surface and/or without significantly damaging or degrading the activated bonding surface. The cleaning operation can also optionally include applying a megasonic agitation to the cleaning solution to assist removing the particles disposed at the surface.
In various implementations, cleaning the surface to remove particles disposed at the surface can further include applying a reagent containing at least one agent selected from hydrogen peroxide, tetra methyl ammonium hydroxide, and sulfuric acid, for example. A concentration or a pH of the agent is selected to dissolve 1-10 nm copper or metal particles in a selected amount of time without degrading the activated surface or the prepared bonding surface. With the select cleaning solution or reagent, a megasonic agitation may be applied to the solution or reagent to assist removing the particles disposed at the surface.
An example apparatus has a directly bonded bonding interface, and less than two extraneous metal nanoparticles on average per square micron of the bonding interface area. Ideally, the directly bonded bonding interface has no extraneous metal nanoparticles.
An example hybrid bonding method for wafer-to-wafer or die-to-wafer micropackaging includes forming a cavity in a surface of a first wafer to be hybrid bonded, forming a conductive metal in the cavity, planarizing the conductive metal to form a smooth bonding surface, rinsing the bonding surface, activating the bonding surface, after activating the bonding surface, cleaning the bonding surface to remove nanoparticles, and hybrid bonding the activated and cleaned bonding surface to a first surface of a second wafer.
This example method further includes annealing the hybrid bonded bonding surface at an elevated temperature that may range between 150 to 350° C., and preferably less than 305° C. The example method further includes preparing a second surface of the second wafer or substrate for hybrid bonding, activating the second surface of the second substrate, then after activating the second surface of the second substrate, cleaning the second surface of the second substrate to remove nanoparticles, and hybrid bonding the activated and cleaned second surface of the second substrate to a next surface of a next substrate of interest. In some applications, the cleaned prepared bonding surface of the second substrate, without further plasma processing, may be directly bonded to the other surface of interest.
The example method further includes repeating the method for X number of bonding surfaces of Y number of wafers or dies, to make a hybrid bonded stack of wafers or dies Y layers thick. In an implementation, the example method further includes performing at least part of the hybrid bonding method in a flip chip bonder. Ashing the bonding surface with oxygen plasma or another ashing agent may also included in the method after the planarization step. The operation of rinsing the bonding surface after planarizing can be done with deionized water. Also, the substrate cleaning steps and the plasma processing steps may be performed in a batch mode in various appropriate batch reactors. As above, cleaning the bonding surface after activation to remove metal nanoparticles can use a reagent containing at least one agent selected from an alkaline developer, hydrogen peroxide, tetra methyl ammonium hydroxide, and inorganic and organic acid, among others. A concentration or a pH of the agent is selected to dissolve or remove 1-10 nm copper particles in a selected amount of time without degrading the activated surface or the prepared bonding surface.
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice those embodiments. For example, any of the specific dimensions, quantities, material types, fabrication steps and the like can be different from those described above in alternative embodiments. The term “coupled” is used herein to express a direct connection as well as a connection through one or more intervening circuits or structures. The terms “example,” “embodiment,” and “implementation” are used to express an example, not a preference or requirement. Also, the terms “may” and “can” are used interchangeably to denote optional (permissible) subject matter. The absence of either term should not be construed as meaning that a given feature or technique is required.
Various modifications and changes can be made to the embodiments presented herein without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments can be applied in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
While the present disclosure has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations possible given the description. It is intended that the appended claims cover such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the disclosure.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/003,026, filed Mar. 31, 2020, titled “RELIABLE HYBRID BONDED APPARATUS,” the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5051802 | Prost et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5753536 | Sugiyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771555 | Eda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6080640 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6423640 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6465892 | Suga | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6887769 | Kellar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908027 | Tolchinsky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7045453 | Canaperi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7105980 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7193423 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7550366 | Suga et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7582971 | Kameyama et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7663231 | Chang et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7686912 | Suga et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7750488 | Patti et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759751 | Ono | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7803693 | Trezza | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8168458 | Do et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8183127 | Patti et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8193632 | Chang et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8263434 | Pagaila et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8268699 | Park et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8318586 | Libralesso et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8349635 | Gan et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8377798 | Peng et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8441131 | Ryan | May 2013 | B2 |
8476165 | Trickett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8482132 | Yang et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8501537 | Sadaka et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524533 | Tong et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8618659 | Sato et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620164 | Heck et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8647987 | Yang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8697493 | Sadaka | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716105 | Sadaka et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8791575 | Oganesian et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8802538 | Liu | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8809123 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8841002 | Tong | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8866305 | Sadaka et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8878353 | Haba et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9093350 | Endo et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9136293 | Yee et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9142459 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9142517 | Liu | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9171756 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184125 | Enquist et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9224704 | Landru | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230941 | Chen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9252172 | Chow et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9257399 | Kuang et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9299736 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312229 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331149 | Tong et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9337235 | Chen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9385024 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9394161 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9431368 | Enquist et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9437572 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443796 | Chou et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9461007 | Chun et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9476898 | Takano | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9496239 | Edelstein et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9536848 | England et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559081 | Lai et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9620481 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9656852 | Cheng et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9723716 | Weinhold | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9728521 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741620 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9799587 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9852988 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9893004 | Yazdani | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9929050 | Lin | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941241 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9941243 | Kim et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9953941 | Enquist | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9960142 | Chen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9971777 | Bertin et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10002844 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10026605 | Doub et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10075657 | Fahim et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10204893 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10269756 | Uzoh | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10269853 | Katkar et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276619 | Kao et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276909 | Huang et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10418277 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10446456 | Shen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446487 | Huang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446532 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10508030 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10515925 | Uzoh | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10522499 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10566219 | Kurita et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10707087 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10714449 | Uzoh | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10727219 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10784191 | Huang et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790262 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10840135 | Uzoh | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840205 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854578 | Morein | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10879212 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10886177 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10892246 | Uzoh | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10923408 | Huang et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923413 | DeLaCruz | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10937755 | Shah et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10950547 | Mohammed et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10964664 | Mandalapu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10985133 | Uzoh | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10991804 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998292 | Lee et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11004757 | Katkar et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011494 | Gao et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011503 | Wang et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11031285 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11037919 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11056348 | Theil | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11069734 | Katkar | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11088099 | Katkar et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11127738 | DeLaCruz et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11158606 | Gao et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11171117 | Gao et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11176450 | Teig et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11256004 | Haba et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11264357 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2022 | B1 |
11276676 | Enquist et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11329034 | Tao et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11348898 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11355443 | Huang et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
20020003307 | Suga | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020048906 | Sakai et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020053730 | Mashino | May 2002 | A1 |
20040084414 | Sakai et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040235266 | Tong | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050009246 | Enquist et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031795 | Chaudhury et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060057945 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060087042 | Kameyama et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070075417 | Hwang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070111386 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080308928 | Chang | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090227089 | Plaut et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090298264 | Arai et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100167534 | Iwata | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110175243 | Jo et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120187516 | Sato | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194719 | Churchwell et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130026643 | England et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130252399 | Leduc et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130270328 | Di Cioccio | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140001949 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140011324 | Liu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140175655 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140312511 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314370 | Hatori et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150064498 | Tong | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150118825 | Ishizuka | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150255349 | Holden et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150314385 | Abe et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160126218 | Kurita | May 2016 | A1 |
20160343682 | Kawasaki | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20180005977 | Lin et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180012787 | Oka et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180175012 | Wu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182639 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182666 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190580 | Haba et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190583 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219038 | Gambino et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180308819 | Uzoh | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180323177 | Yu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180323227 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180331066 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190096741 | Uzoh et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190115277 | Yu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131277 | Yang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190157333 | Tsai | May 2019 | A1 |
20190198409 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190199058 | Pierer et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190252364 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190265411 | Huang et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190326252 | Mandalapu et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190333550 | Fisch | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190348336 | Katkar et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190358955 | Giusti et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190371761 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385935 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385966 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200013637 | Haba | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013754 | Gao et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013765 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035641 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200075520 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075534 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075553 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200118973 | Wang et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200126906 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200194396 | Uzoh | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200227367 | Haba et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200243380 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200279821 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294908 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200299127 | Brioschi et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200321307 | Uzoh | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328162 | Haba et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328164 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328165 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200335408 | Gao et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200365575 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200371154 | DeLaCruz et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200395321 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200411483 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210098412 | Haba et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210118864 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210143125 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210181510 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193603 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193624 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193625 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210242152 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210296282 | Gao et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210366820 | Uzoh | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210375850 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210407941 | Haba | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220077063 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220077087 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220139867 | Uzoh | May 2022 | A1 |
20220139869 | Gao et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220208650 | Gao et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208702 | Uzoh | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208723 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220246497 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220285303 | Mirkarimi et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220319901 | Suwito et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320035 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320036 | Gao et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230005850 | Fountain, Jr. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230019869 | Mirkarimi et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230036441 | Haba et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230067677 | Lee et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230069183 | Haba | Mar 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104246971 | Dec 2014 | CN |
106409650 | Feb 2017 | CN |
107331759 | Nov 2017 | CN |
1011133 | Jun 2000 | EP |
2002-353416 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2008-130603 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008-244080 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009-514185 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2011-104633 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2013-33786 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2015-517217 | Jun 2015 | JP |
2016-072316 | May 2016 | JP |
2018-160519 | Oct 2018 | JP |
201401573 | Jan 2014 | TW |
201423873 | Jun 2014 | TW |
201612965 | Apr 2016 | TW |
WO 0059006 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2005-043584 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2007021639 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2008112101 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2009158378 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2012133760 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO 2016003709 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO 2018194827 | Oct 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Inoue, F. et al., “Influence of composition of SiCN as interfacial layer on plasma activated direct bonding,” ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2019, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. P346-P350. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2021/024312, dated Jul. 15, 2021, 10 pages. |
Ker, Ming-Dou et al., “Fully Process-Compatible Layout Design on Bond Pad to Improve Wire Bond Reliability in CMOS ICs,” IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Jun. 2002, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 309-316. |
Moriceau, H. et al., “Overview of Recent Direct Wafer Bonding Advances and Applications”, Advances in Natural Sciences—Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2010, 12 pages. |
Nakanishi, H. et al., “Studies on SiO2—SiO2 Bonding with Hydrofluoric Acid. Room Temperature and Low Stress Bonding Technique for MEMS,” Tech. Research Lab., 200, Elsevier Science S.A., 8 pages. |
Oberhammer et al., “Sealing of Adhesive Bonded Devices on Wafer Level,” in Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 110, No. 1-3, pp. 407-412, Feb. 29, 2004, see pp. 407-412; and figures 1(a)-1(l), 6 pages. |
Plobi et al., “Wafer Direct Bonding: Tailoring Adhesion Between Brittle Materials,” Materials Science and Engineering Review Journal, 1999, 88 pages. |
Suga et al., “Bump-less Interconnect for Next Generation System Packaging”, IEEE, 2001 and ECTC, 2001, 6 pages. |
Suga et al., “Feasibility of surface activated bonding for ultra-fine pitch interconnection—a new concept of bump-less direct bonding for system level packaging”, IEEE, 2000, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210305202 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63003026 | Mar 2020 | US |