Schottky gated transistor with interfacial layer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9455327
  • Patent Number
    9,455,327
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 5, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 27, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A Schottky gated transistor having reduced gate leakage current is disclosed. The Schottky gated transistor includes a substrate and a plurality of epitaxial layers disposed on the substrate. Further included is a gate contact having an interfacial layer disposed on a surface of the plurality of epitaxial layers and having a thickness that is between about 5 Angstroms (Å) and 40 Å. The interfacial layer can be made up of non-native materials in contrast to a native insulator such as silicon dioxide (SiO2) that is used as an insulating gate layer with silicon-based power transistors. The Schottky gated transistor further includes at least one metal layer disposed over the interfacial layer. A source contact and a drain contact are disposed on the surface of the plurality of epitaxial layers, wherein the source contact and the drain contact are spaced apart from the gate contact and each other.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure pertains to reducing gate leakage current in high-power transistors.


BACKGROUND

Schottky gate gallium nitride (GaN) transistors used in power switching applications suffer from undesirably high gate leakage current, which results in lower operational efficiency due to excessive power dissipation. Reverse gate leakage for a Schottky contact on a GaN device is typically 10 μA to 1 mA per millimeter (mm) of gate width depending on the construction of the device. For a Schottky gated GaN power transistor with 100 mm gate periphery, the gate-to-drain leakage would be on the order of 1 mA to 100 mA. In contrast, silicon-based power transistors having a dielectric deposited under the gate to provide an “insulated gate” have a much lower leakage current that ranges from about 1 nA to around 100 nA. Moreover, silicon has a natural advantage of an extremely high-quality native oxide, which is silicon dioxide (SiO2). As such, silicon metal oxide field effect transistors (Si MOSFETs) and insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) are relatively easily fabricated. Consequently, Si MOSFET devices and IGBT devices dominate the power transistor market. For many years, alternative semiconductors fabricated using wide bandgap semiconductors such as silicon carbide (SiC) and GaN have been evaluated in an attempt to achieve better performance than silicon devices. In most cases, a primary obstacle has been a lack of a high-quality insulator material.


Gallium nitride (GaN) metal oxide semiconductor—high electron mobility transistors (MOSHEMTs) using dielectrics such as SiO2, silicon nitride (SiN), hafnium dioxide (HfO2), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and aluminum nitride (AlN) have been proposed, but the performance and reliability of these dielectrics have been limited by the poor interface properties of dielectrics on GaN. One problem is a large hysteresis in current-voltage (ID-VG) transfer characteristics after an application of drain voltage. Another problem is time-dependent gate oxide breakdown (TDDB) caused by relatively large reverse bias voltages applied during operation. Still other problems include threshold voltage instability and mobility degradation due to columbic scattering.


Compounding these problems is a need for an undesirably thick dielectric to support high electric fields that occur in high-voltage GaN transistors that operate under drain voltages that range between 600V and 1200V. For example, a typical high-voltage GaN MOSHEMT typically has an insulating gate layer with a thickness that ranges between 100 Angstroms (Å) and 500 Å. Further still, for a given density of trapped interface charge (Qit) a thick dielectric with a relatively low areal capacitance (Cox) results in a significant threshold voltage (Vth) shift (Δ) that is governed by the following mathematical relationship.

ΔVth=Qit/Cox  EQ. 1


As illustrated by EQ. 1, a larger ΔVth occurs for a given Qit as Cox decreases as the insulating gate layer gets thicker. As a result, performance of a GaN MOSHEMT is degraded with increased gate layer thickness. At some point, the Vth is shifted too much to be practical. Thus, there exists a need for a low-leakage gate for GaN transistors that does not suffer from the disadvantages of insulated gate structures.


SUMMARY

A Schottky gated transistor having reduced gate leakage current is disclosed. The Schottky gated transistor includes a substrate and a plurality of epitaxial layers disposed on the substrate. Further included is a gate contact having an interfacial layer disposed on a surface of the plurality of epitaxial layers and having a thickness that is between about 5 Angstroms (Å) and 40 Å. In at least some embodiments, the interfacial layer is made up of non-native materials in contrast to a native insulator such as silicon dioxide (SiO2) that is used as an insulating gate layer with silicon-based power transistors.


The Schottky gated transistor further includes at least one metal layer disposed over the interfacial layer. A source contact and a drain contact are disposed on the surface of the plurality of epitaxial layers, wherein the source contact and the drain contact are spaced apart from the gate contact and each other. A benefit of embodiments of the present disclosure is that the interfacial layer provides forward conduction characteristics that are substantially the same as traditional Schottky gated transistors while gate leakage current under reverse gate voltage conditions is reduced by several orders of magnitude in comparison to traditional Schottky transistors.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description in association with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional diagram depicting the structure of a Schottky gated transistor with an interfacial layer in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 2 is a graph of current-voltage (I-V) curves comparing the gate current of Schottky gated transistor with the interfacial layer to a Schottky gated transistor without an interfacial layer.



FIG. 3 is a graph of gate I-V curves for a related art silicon dioxide (SiO2) metal oxide semiconductor heterostructure field effect transistor (MOSHFET) having a relatively thick gate insulator compared to a Schottky gate HFET (HFET is another term for HEMT).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure and illustrate the best mode of practicing the disclosure. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawings, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.


This disclosure provides a Schottky gated transistor with an interfacial layer comprising a gate contact that substantially reduces gate leakage current in comparison to traditional Schottky gated transistors. Moreover, the disclosed interfacial layer is ultra-thin having an atomic scale thickness that allows carrier tunneling, which prevents persistent charge trapping.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional diagram depicting the structure of a Schottky gated transistor 10 that is structured in accordance with the present disclosure. The Schottky gated transistor 10 includes a substrate 12 over which epitaxial layers 14 are disposed. At least one of the epitaxial layers is a gallium nitride (GaN) based layer. In at least one embodiment, the Schottky gated transistor 10 is a power transistor that is adapted for power switching applications. In one embodiment, the Schottky gated transistor 10 has a drain-to-source breakdown voltage that ranges from greater than 200V to around 600V. In another embodiment, the Schottky gated transistor 10 has a drain-to-source breakdown voltage that ranges from greater than 600V to around 1200V.


A gate contact 16 includes an interfacial layer 18 that is disposed on a surface 20 of the epitaxial layers 14. The interfacial layer 18 is made up of a substantially thin layer of relatively high-resistivity material. In some embodiments, the interfacial layer 18 is deposited using atomic layer deposition of aluminum oxide (Al2O3), aluminum nitride (AlN), or aluminum oxynitrides (AlOxNy). In some embodiments, the interfacial layer 18 is deposited using atomic layer deposition or pulsed chemical vapor deposition of silicon oxide (SiO2), silicon nitrides (SiNx), or silicon oxynitrides (SiOxNy). More extensive lists of exemplary compounds that are usable as the interfacial layer 18 are given further below.


Independent of the material used to make up the interfacial layer 18, the thickness of the interfacial layer is less than 40 Angstroms (Å) but greater than about 5 Å. In at least some embodiments, the thickness of the interfacial layer 18 is between about 5 Å and 15 Å. In other embodiments, the thickness of the interfacial layer 18 is between 15 Å and 25 Å. Yet in other embodiments, the thickness of the interfacial layer 18 is between 25 Å and 40 Å.


The gate contact 16 further includes Schottky metal layers, which in this exemplary embodiment include a first metal layer 22 disposed on the interfacial layer 18, a second metal layer 24 disposed on the first metal layer 22, and an Nth layer 26 disposed over the second metal layer 22. The Schottky metal layers are made up of metals that include, but are not limited to, nickel (Ni), platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), platinum silicide (PtSi), gold (Au), titanium (Ti), iridium (Ir), and iridium oxide (IrO2).


The Schottky gated transistor 10 also includes a source contact 28 and a drain contact 30, which are both disposed on the surface 20. The gate contact 16, source contact 28, and the drain contact 30 are spaced apart along the surface 20.


A typical GaN-type Schottky gated transistor without the interfacial layer 18 will have a leakage current under reverse gate voltage conditions that ranges from around 10 μA to around 1 mA per mm of gate periphery. The interfacial layer 18 is adapted to substantially reduce leakage current in the GaN-type Schottky gated transistor 10 under reverse gate voltage conditions. The interfacial layer 18 substantially reduces leakage current while maintaining practically the same forward conduction current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of the typical GaN-type Schottky gated transistor that does not include the interfacial layer 18. The reduction of leakage current under reverse gate voltage conditions is on the order of 1 to 3 orders of magnitude. Exemplary embodiments of interfacial layer 18 reduce leakage current to within a range of on the order of 1 nA to about 100 nA per mm of gate periphery under reverse gate voltage conditions that range between −1 V to around −20V.


Another benefit provided by the interfacial layer 18 is that a brief period of forward conduction through a gate diode formed between the gate contact and the surface 20 when the Schottky gated transistor 10 is switched on prevents persistent charge trapping and hysteresis. In addition, the relative thinness of the interfacial layer 18 makes it difficult for charges to become trapped. Thus, switching performance of the Schottky gated transistor 10 is enhanced by incorporation of the interfacial layer 18.


A first exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer 18 includes, but is not limited to, aluminum oxide (Al2O3), bismuth trioxide (Bi2O3), calcium hafnium oxide (CaHfO), calcium oxide (CaO), cerium(III) oxide (Ce2O3), and copper oxides (CuOx). A second exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer 18 includes, but is not limited to, dysprosium(III) oxide (Dy2O3), erbium oxide (ErO3), europium(III) oxide (Eu2O3), iron(III) oxide (Fe2O3), gallium(III) oxide (Ga2O3), and gadolinium(III) oxide (Gd2O3). A third exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer 18 includes, but is not limited to, hafnium oxide (HfO2) holmium(III) oxide (Ho2O3), indium(III) oxide (In2O3), lanthanum oxide (La2O3), lutetium(III) oxide (Lu2O3), and magnesium oxide (MgO).


A fourth exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer 18 includes, but is not limited to, nickel monoxide (NiO), niobium pentoxide (Nb2O5), lead monoxide (PbO), praseodymium(III) oxide (Pr2O3), platinum oxides (PtOx), rhodium(III) oxide (Rh2O3), and ruthenium oxide (RuOx). A fifth exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer 18 includes, but is not limited to, scandium(III) oxide (Sc2O3), silicon dioxide (SiO2), samarium(III) oxide (Sm2O3), tin dioxide (SnO2), strontium oxide (SrO), and tantalum(V) oxide (Ta2O5). A sixth exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer 18 includes, but is not limited to, titanium dioxide (TiO2), thulium(III) oxide (Tm2O3), vanadium oxides (V2Ox), tungsten oxide (WOx), yttrium oxide (Y2O3), zinc oxide (ZnO), and zirconium dioxide (ZrO2).


A seventh exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer 18 includes, but is not limited to, aluminum nitride (AlN), cobalt nitride (CoN), nitrified copper (CuNx), hafnium nitride (Hf3N4), molybdenum nitride (MoN), nickel nitrides (NiNx), silicon nitrides (SiNx), tantalum nitride (TaN), titanium nitride (TiN), and zirconium nitride (Zr3N4). An eighth exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer 18 includes, but is not limited to, lanthanum fluoride (LaF3) and zinc fluoride (ZnF). A ninth exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer 18 includes, but is not limited to, lead sulfide (PbS), cadmium sulfide (CdS), cupric sulfide (CuS), manganese sulfide (MnS), tin(II) sulfide (SnS), and zinc sulfide (ZnS). An tenth exemplary list of compounds for making up the interfacial layer includes, but is not limited to, oxynitrides of the compounds in the first exemplary list through the ninth exemplary list above.



FIG. 2 is a graph of current-voltage (I-V) curves comparing gate current of the Schottky gated transistor 10 (FIG. 1) with the interfacial layer 18 (FIG. 1) with gate current for a Schottky gated transistor (not shown) without an interfacial layer. Notice that with positive gate voltage applied, gate current for the Schottky gated transistor 10 with the interfacial layer 18 as presently disclosed has practically the same I-V curve forward conduction as a traditional Schottky gated transistor without the interfacial layer 18. In contrast, with a reverse gate voltage applied the Schottky gated transistor 10 with the interfacial layer 18 shows a 1 to 3 order of magnitude reduction in gate leakage current in comparison to the traditional Schottky gated transistor without the interfacial layer 18.



FIG. 3 is a graph of I-V curves for a related art SiO2 metal oxide semiconductor heterostructure field effect transistor (MOSHFET) having a relatively thick gate insulator compared with a Schottky gate heterostructure field effect transistor (HFET). Note that for the purpose of this disclosure, HFET is another term for high electron mobility transistor (HEMT). Both the related art MOSHFET and the related art HFET each have a gate length LG=50 μM. As illustrated by the region in the dashed circle, the related art MOSHFET shows a substantially altered I-V curve forward conduction characteristic compared with the I-V curve forward conduction characteristic for the Schottky gate HFET. This is a result of either using a specific material for an insulating layer having a poor interface with the surface 20 and or increased material thickness for the insulating layer needed to achieve a satisfactory low gate leakage current. As the material thickness for the insulating layer increases, the forward conductance gets lower, as indicated by the downwardly sloping arrow within the dashed circle, indicating an increasingly MOSHFET-like transistor. A take away from FIG. 3 is that the interface layer 18 (FIG. 1) provides superior reduced gate leakage compared with the Schottky gate HFET of FIG. 3 under reverse gate voltage conditions, while maintaining an unaltered I-V forward conduction characteristic and avoiding the disadvantages of the MOSHFET-like devices (charge trapping and TDDB in the thicker insulating layer that is serving as the gate dielectric). In particular, the Schottky gated transistor forward conduction characteristics of a gate diode formed under the gate contact are substantially unchanged in comparison with forward conduction characteristics of a gate diode formed under a gate contact that does not include the interfacial layer.


Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A Schottky gated transistor comprising: a substrate;a plurality of epitaxial layers disposed on the substrate, wherein at least one of the epitaxial layers is gallium nitride (GaN) based;a gate contact comprising: an interfacial layer disposed on a surface of the plurality of epitaxial layers and having a thickness that is between about 5 Angstroms (Å) and 40 Å, wherein the interfacial layer is formed from a material that limits gate leakage current to a range of 1 nA to 100 nA per mm of gate periphery under reverse gate voltage conditions that range from −1V to −20V; andat least one metal layer disposed over the interfacial layer;a source contact disposed on the surface of the plurality of epitaxial layers; anda drain contact disposed on the surface of the plurality of epitaxial layers, wherein the source contact and the drain contact are spaced apart from the gate contact and each other.
  • 2. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein a drain-to-source breakdown voltage ranges between about 200V and 600V.
  • 3. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein a drain-to-source breakdown voltage ranges between about 600V and 1200V.
  • 4. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the thickness of the interfacial layer is between about 5 Å and 15 Å.
  • 5. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the thickness of the interfacial layer is between about 15 Å and 25 Å.
  • 6. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the thickness of the interfacial layer is between about 25 Å and about 40 Å.
  • 7. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of bismuth trioxide (Bi2O3), calcium hafnium oxide (CaHfO), calcium oxide (CaO), cerium(III) oxide (Ce2O3), and copper oxides (CuOx).
  • 8. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of dysprosium(III) oxide (Dy2O3), erbium oxide (ErO3), europium(III) oxide (Eu2O3), iron(III) oxide (Fe2O3), gallium(III) oxide (Ga2O3), and gadolinium(III) oxide (Gd2O3).
  • 9. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of holmium(III) oxide (Ho2O3), indium(III) oxide (In2O3), lanthanum oxide (La2O3), lutetium(III) oxide (Lu2O3), and magnesium oxide (MgO).
  • 10. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of nickel monoxide (NiO), niobium pentoxide (Nb2O5), lead monoxide (PbO), praseodymium(III) oxide (Pr2O3), platinum oxides (PtOx), rhodium(III) oxide (Rh2O3), and ruthenium oxide (RuOx).
  • 11. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of scandium(III) oxide (Sc2O3), samarium(III) oxide (Sm2O3), tin dioxide (SnO2), strontium oxide (SrO), and tantalum(V) oxide (Ta2O5).
  • 12. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of titanium dioxide (TiO2), thulium(III) oxide (Tm2O3), vanadium oxides (V2Ox), tungsten oxide (WOx), yttrium oxide (Y2O3), zinc oxide (ZnO), and zirconium dioxide (ZrO2).
  • 13. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of cobalt nitride (CoN), nitrified copper (CuNx), hafnium nitride (Hf3N4), molybdenum nitride (MoN), nickel nitrides (NiNx), silicon nitrides (SiNx), tantalum nitride (TaN), titanium nitride (TiN), and zirconium nitride (Zr3N4).
  • 14. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of lanthanum fluoride (LaF3) and zinc fluoride (ZnF).
  • 15. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of lead sulfide (PbS), cadmium sulfide (CdS), cupric sulfide (CuS), manganese sulfide (MnS), tin(II) sulfide (SnS), and zinc sulfide (ZnS).
  • 16. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the material making up the interfacial layer is selected from the group consisting of aluminum oxide (Al2O3), aluminum nitride (AlN), silicon dioxide (SiO2), and hafnium oxide (HfO2).
  • 17. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the at least one metal layer is selected from the group consisting of nickel (Ni), platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), gold (Au), and titanium (Ti).
  • 18. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein the at least one metal layer is selected from the group consisting of iridium (Ir) and iridium oxide (IrO2).
  • 19. The Schottky gated transistor of claim 1 wherein forward conduction characteristics of a gate diode formed under the gate contact are substantially unchanged in comparison with forward conduction characteristics of a gate diode formed under a gate contact that does not include the interfacial layer.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 62/008,900, filed Jun. 6, 2014, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (226)
Number Name Date Kind
4317055 Yoshida et al. Feb 1982 A
4540954 Apel Sep 1985 A
4543535 Ayasli Sep 1985 A
4620207 Calviello Oct 1986 A
4788511 Schindler Nov 1988 A
5028879 Kim Jul 1991 A
5046155 Beyer et al. Sep 1991 A
5047355 Huber et al. Sep 1991 A
5107323 Knolle et al. Apr 1992 A
5118993 Yang Jun 1992 A
5208547 Schindler May 1993 A
5227734 Schindler et al. Jul 1993 A
5306656 Williams et al. Apr 1994 A
5361038 Allen et al. Nov 1994 A
5365197 Ikalainen Nov 1994 A
5389571 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1995 A
5414387 Nakahara et al. May 1995 A
5485118 Chick Jan 1996 A
5608353 Pratt Mar 1997 A
5629648 Pratt May 1997 A
5698870 Nakano et al. Dec 1997 A
5742205 Cowen et al. Apr 1998 A
5764673 Kawazu et al. Jun 1998 A
5834326 Miyachi et al. Nov 1998 A
5843590 Miura et al. Dec 1998 A
5864156 Juengling Jan 1999 A
5874747 Redwing et al. Feb 1999 A
5880640 Dueme Mar 1999 A
5914501 Antle et al. Jun 1999 A
5949140 Nishi et al. Sep 1999 A
6049250 Kintis et al. Apr 2000 A
6064082 Kawai et al. May 2000 A
6110757 Udagawa Aug 2000 A
6130579 Iyer et al. Oct 2000 A
6133589 Krames et al. Oct 2000 A
6177685 Teraguchi et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191656 Nadler Feb 2001 B1
6229395 Kay May 2001 B1
6265943 Dening et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271727 Schmukler Aug 2001 B1
6285239 Iyer et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306709 Miyagi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307364 Augustine Oct 2001 B1
6313705 Dening et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329809 Dening et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333677 Dening Dec 2001 B1
6342815 Kobayashi Jan 2002 B1
6356150 Spears et al. Mar 2002 B1
6369656 Dening et al. Apr 2002 B2
6369657 Dening et al. Apr 2002 B2
6373318 Dohnke et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376864 Wang Apr 2002 B1
6377125 Pavio et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384433 Barratt et al. May 2002 B1
6387733 Holyoak et al. May 2002 B1
6392487 Alexanian May 2002 B1
6400226 Sato Jun 2002 B2
6404287 Dening et al. Jun 2002 B2
6418174 Benedict Jul 2002 B1
6448793 Barratt et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455877 Ogawa et al. Sep 2002 B1
6475916 Lee et al. Nov 2002 B1
6477682 Cypher Nov 2002 B2
6521998 Teraguchi et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525611 Dening et al. Feb 2003 B1
6528983 Augustine Mar 2003 B1
6560452 Shealy May 2003 B1
6566963 Yan et al. May 2003 B1
6589877 Thakur Jul 2003 B1
6593597 Sheu Jul 2003 B2
6608367 Gibson et al. Aug 2003 B1
6614281 Baudelot et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621140 Gibson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624452 Yu et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627552 Nishio et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633073 Rezvani et al. Oct 2003 B2
6633195 Baudelot et al. Oct 2003 B2
6639470 Andrys et al. Oct 2003 B1
6656271 Yonehara et al. Dec 2003 B2
6657592 Dening et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660606 Miyabayashi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6701134 Epperson Mar 2004 B1
6701138 Epperson et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706576 Ngo et al. Mar 2004 B1
6720831 Dening et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723587 Cho et al. Apr 2004 B2
6724252 Ngo et al. Apr 2004 B2
6727762 Kobayashi Apr 2004 B1
6748204 Razavi et al. Jun 2004 B1
6750158 Ogawa et al. Jun 2004 B2
6750482 Seaford et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759907 Orr et al. Jul 2004 B2
6802902 Beaumont et al. Oct 2004 B2
6815722 Lai et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815730 Yamada Nov 2004 B2
6822842 Friedrichs et al. Nov 2004 B2
6861677 Chen Mar 2005 B2
6943631 Scherrer et al. Sep 2005 B2
7015512 Park et al. Mar 2006 B2
7026665 Smart et al. Apr 2006 B1
7033961 Smart et al. Apr 2006 B1
7042150 Yasuda May 2006 B2
7052942 Smart et al. May 2006 B1
7211822 Nagahama et al. May 2007 B2
7408182 Smart et al. Aug 2008 B1
7449762 Singh Nov 2008 B1
7459356 Smart et al. Dec 2008 B1
7557421 Shealy et al. Jul 2009 B1
7719055 McNutt et al. May 2010 B1
7768758 Maier et al. Aug 2010 B2
7804262 Schuster et al. Sep 2010 B2
7935983 Saito et al. May 2011 B2
7968391 Smart et al. Jun 2011 B1
7974322 Ueda et al. Jul 2011 B2
8017981 Sankin et al. Sep 2011 B2
8237198 Wu et al. Aug 2012 B2
8405068 O'Keefe Mar 2013 B2
8502258 O'Keefe Aug 2013 B2
8530978 Chu et al. Sep 2013 B1
8633518 Suh et al. Jan 2014 B2
8692294 Chu et al. Apr 2014 B2
8785976 Nakajima et al. Jul 2014 B2
8988097 Ritenour Mar 2015 B2
9070761 Johnson Jun 2015 B2
9082836 Senda Jul 2015 B2
9093420 Kobayashi et al. Jul 2015 B2
9124221 Vetury et al. Sep 2015 B2
9129802 Ritenour Sep 2015 B2
9136341 Kobayashi et al. Sep 2015 B2
20010040246 Ishii Nov 2001 A1
20010054848 Baudelot et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020005528 Nagahara Jan 2002 A1
20020031851 Linthicum et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020048302 Kimura Apr 2002 A1
20020079508 Yoshida Jun 2002 A1
20030003630 Iimura et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030122139 Meng et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030160307 Gibson et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030160317 Sakamoto et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030206440 Wong Nov 2003 A1
20030209730 Gibson et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030218183 Micovic et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040070003 Gaska et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040130037 Mishra et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040144991 Kikkawa Jul 2004 A1
20040227211 Saito et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040241916 Chau et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050110042 Saito et al. May 2005 A1
20050139868 Anda Jun 2005 A1
20050189559 Saito et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050189562 Kinzer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050194612 Beach Sep 2005 A1
20050212049 Onodera Sep 2005 A1
20050225912 Pant et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050271107 Murakami et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050274977 Saito et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060043385 Wang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060043501 Saito et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060054924 Saito et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068601 Lee et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060124960 Hirose et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060205161 Das et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060243988 Narukawa et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060246680 Bhattacharyya Nov 2006 A1
20060249750 Johnson et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060255377 Tu Nov 2006 A1
20070026676 Li et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070093009 Baptist et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070158692 Nakayama et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070164326 Okamoto et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070205433 Parikh et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070295985 Weeks, Jr. et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080023706 Saito et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080073752 Asai et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080112448 Ueda et al. May 2008 A1
20080121875 Kim May 2008 A1
20080142837 Sato et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080179737 Haga et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080190355 Chen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080272382 Kim et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080272422 Min Nov 2008 A1
20080283821 Park et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080308813 Suh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090072269 Suh et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090090984 Khan et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090146185 Suh et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090146186 Kub et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090166677 Shibata et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090200576 Saito et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090273002 Chiou et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090278137 Sheridan et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100025657 Nagahama et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100025737 Ishikura Feb 2010 A1
20100133567 Son Jun 2010 A1
20100187575 Baumgartner et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100207164 Shibata et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100230656 O'Keefe Sep 2010 A1
20100230717 Saito Sep 2010 A1
20100258898 Lahreche Oct 2010 A1
20110017972 O'Keefe Jan 2011 A1
20110025422 Marra et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110031633 Hsu et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110095337 Sato Apr 2011 A1
20110101300 O'Keefe May 2011 A1
20110108887 Fareed et al. May 2011 A1
20110115025 Okamoto May 2011 A1
20110127586 Bobde et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110163342 Kim et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175142 Tsurumi et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110199148 Iwamura Aug 2011 A1
20110211289 Kosowsky et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242921 Tran et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110290174 Leonard et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120018735 Ishii Jan 2012 A1
20120086497 Vorhaus Apr 2012 A1
20120126240 Won May 2012 A1
20120199875 Bhalla et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120211802 Tamari Aug 2012 A1
20120218783 Imada Aug 2012 A1
20120262220 Springett Oct 2012 A1
20130032897 Narayanan Feb 2013 A1
20130277687 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130280877 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140117559 Zimmerman et al. May 2014 A1
20140264266 Li et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140264454 Banerjee Sep 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
1826041 Aug 2007 EP
1187229 Mar 2013 EP
H10242584 Sep 1998 JP
2000031535 Jan 2000 JP
2003332618 Nov 2003 JP
2008148511 Jun 2008 JP
2008258419 Oct 2008 JP
20070066051 Jun 2007 KR
2004051707 Jun 2004 WO
2011162243 Dec 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (111)
Entry
Lin, C.K. et al., “GaN Lattice Matched ZnO/Pr2O3 Film as Gate Dielectric Oxide Layer for AlGaN/GaN HEMT,” IEEE International Conference of Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits, EDSSC 2009, IEEE, Dec. 25-27, 2009, Xi'an, China, pp. 408-411.
Lin, H. C. et al., “Leakage current and breakdown electric-field studies on ultrathin atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3 on GaAs,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 87, 2005, pp. 182094-1 to 182094-3.
Lossy, R. et al., “Gallium nitride MIS-HEMT using atomic layer deposited Al2O3 as gate dielectric,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films, vol. 31, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 2013, 6 pages.
Seok, O. et al., “High-breakdown voltage and low on-resistance AlGaN/GaN on Si MOS-HEMTs employing an extended Tan gate on HfO2 gate insulator,” Electronics Letters, vol. 49, No. 6, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Mar. 14, 2013, 2 pages.
Tang, K. et al., “Enhancement-mode Gan Hybrid MOS-HEMTs with Breakdown Voltage of 1300V,” 21st International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & IC's, ISPSD 2009, IEEE, Jun. 14-18, 2009, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 279-282.
Ye, P.D., et al., “GaN MOS-HEMT Using Atomic Layer Deposition Al2O3 as Gate Dielectric and Surface Passivation,” International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems, vol. 14, No. 3, 2004, pp. 791-796.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/914,060, mailed Nov. 13, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Sep. 3, 2014, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Dec. 3, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,698, mailed Nov. 5, 2014, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056132, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed Nov. 5, 2014, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056187, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed May 23, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Apr. 24, 2014, 13 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Dec. 5, 2014, 16 pages.
International Search Report for GB0902558.6, issued Jun. 15, 2010, by the UK Intellectual Property Office, 2 pages.
Examination Report for British Patent Application No. 0902558.6, mailed Nov. 16, 2012, 5 pages.
Examination Report for British Patent Application No. GB0902558.6, issued Feb. 28, 2013, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Feb. 9, 2012, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Apr. 4, 2013, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Jul. 19, 2012, 8 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed Apr. 16, 2012, 3 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225 mailed Feb. 1, 2012, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed May 2, 2012, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225 mailed Dec. 22, 2011, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,257 mailed Jan. 5, 2012, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,926, mailed Apr. 27, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/942,998, mailed Apr. 27, 2015, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Jun. 17, 2015, 11 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Sep. 3, 2015, 3 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 12 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Apr. 6, 2015, 3 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed May 14, 2015, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056126, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 7 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed Feb. 20, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed May 29, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Feb. 20, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,698, mailed Mar. 30, 2015, 7 pages.
Corrected/Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,689, mailed May 20, 2015, 3 pages.
Corrected/Supplement Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,689, mailed Jun. 9, 2015, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,698, mailed Jul. 20, 2015, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/557,940, mailed Aug. 31, 2015, 8 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056132, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056187, mailed Mar. 12, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed May 4, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Mar. 6, 2015, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,019, mailed Mar. 25, 2015, 7 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Feb. 15, 2005, 2 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Dec. 8, 2005, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed Nov. 9, 2012, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/749,274, mailed Feb. 22, 2016, 6 pages.
Corrected/Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/957,698, mailed Nov. 4, 2015, 4 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/557,940, mailed Feb. 8, 2016, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,019, mailed Oct. 13, 2015, 6 pages.
Author Unknown, “CGHV1J006D: 6 W, 18.0 GHz, GaN HEMT Die,” Cree, Inc., 2014, 9 pages.
Boutros, K.S., et al., “5W GaN MMIC for Millimeter-Wave Applications,” 2006 Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium, Nov. 2006, pp. 93-95.
Chang, S.J. et al., “Improved ESD protection by combining InGaN-GaN MQW LEDs with GaN Scholtky diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Mar. 2003, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 129-131.
Chao, C-H., et al., “Theoretical demonstration of enhancement of light extraction of flip-chip GaN light-emitting diodes with photonic crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 2006, 4 pages.
Cho, H., et al., “High Density Plasma Via Hole Etching in SiC,” Journal of Vaccuum Science & Technology A: Surfaces and Films, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2001, pp. 1878-1881.
Darwish, A.M., et al., “Dependence of GaN HEMT Millimeter-Wave Performance on Temperature,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Thoery and Techniques, vol. 57, No. 12, Dec. 2009, pp. 3205-3211.
Fath, P. et al., “Mechanical water engineering for high efficiency solar cells: An investigation of the induced surface damage,” Conference Record of the Twenty-Fourth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Dec. 5-9, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 1347-1350.
Han, D.S. et al., “Improvement of Light Extraction Efficiency of Flip-Chip Light-Emitting Diode by Texturing the Bottom Side Surface of Sapphire Substrate,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Jul. 1, 2006, vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 1406-1408.
Hibbard, D.L. et al., “Low Resistance High Reflectance Contacts to p-GaN Using Oxidized Ni/Au and Al or Ag,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, No. 2, Jul. 14, 2003, pp. 311-313.
Krüger, Olaf, et al., “Laser-Assisted Processing of VIAs for AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on SiC Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27, No. 6, Jun. 2006, pp. 425-427.
Lee, S.J., “Study of photon extraction efficiency in InGaN light-emitting diodes depending on chip structures and chip-mount schemes,” Optical Engineering, SPIE, Jan. 2006, vol. 45, No. 1, 14 pages.
Shchekin, O.B. et al., “High performance thin-film flip-chip InGaN—GaN light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 071109, Aug. 2006, 4 pages.
Sheppard, S.T., et al., “High Power Demonstration at 10 GHz with GaN/AlGaN HEMT Hybrid Amplifiers,” 2000 Device Research Conference, Conference Digest, Jun. 2000, pp. 37-38.
Wierer, J.J., et al., “High-power AlGalnN flip-chip light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78, No. 22, May 28, 2001, pp. 3379-3381.
Windisch, R. et al., “40% Efficient Thin-Film Surface-Textured Light-Emitting Diodes by Optimization of Natural Lithography,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Jul. 2000, vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 1492-1498.
Windisch, R. et al., “Impact of texture-enhanced transmission on High-efficiency surface-textured light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 8, 2001, vol. 79, No. 15, pp. 2315-2317.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Dec. 16, 2004, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Jul. 23, 2004, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed May 3, 2005, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,980, mailed Jan. 26, 2005, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,980, mailed May 12, 2005, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,279, mailed Oct. 31, 2007, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,279, mailed Apr. 17, 2008, 7 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Jun. 29, 2005, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Jan. 11, 2005, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Oct. 26, 2005, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,734, mailed Jan. 18, 2006, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,734, mailed Aug. 7, 2008, 6 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Nov. 19, 2009, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Mar. 18, 2010, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed May 29, 2009, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Feb. 28, 2011, 8 pages.
Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Nov. 24, 2010, 4 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Dec. 15, 2008, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Apr. 1, 2008, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Mar. 9, 2009, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,926, mailed Dec. 19, 2014, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/942,998, mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Dec. 16, 2014, 17 pages.
Invitation to Pay Fees for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Nov. 5, 2013, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Feb. 12, 2014, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Sep. 25, 2014, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Jan. 20, 2015, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056126, mailed Oct. 25, 2013, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,182, mailed May 1, 2014, 7 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,182, mailed Sep. 17, 2014, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed Oct. 28, 2014, 8 pages.
Huang, Xiucheng et al., “Analytical Loss Model of High Voltage GaN HEMT in Cascode Configuration,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 29, No. 5, May 2014, IEEE, pp. 2208-2219.
Lee, Han S., “GaN-on-Silicon-Based Power Switch in Sintered, Dual-Side Cooled Package,” PowerElectronics.com, Jan. 2, 2013, 5 pages, http://powerelectronics.com/discrete-power-semis/gan-silicon-based-power-switch-sintered-dual-side-cooled-package.
Liang, Zhenxian et al., “Embedded Power—An Integration Packaging Technology for IPEMs,” The International Journal of Microcircuits and Electronic Packaging, vol. 23, No. 4, 2000, pp. 461-487.
Li, Xueqing et al., “Investigation of SiC Stack and Discrete Cascodes” PowerPoint Presentation, PCIM Europe, May 20-22, 2014, Nuremberg, Germany, 26 slides.
Stevanovic, Ljubisa D. et al., “Low Inductance Power Module with Blade Connector,” 2010 Twenty-Fifth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Feb. 21-25, 2010, IEEE, Palm Springs, CA, pp. 1603-1609.
Liang, Zhenxian et al., “Embedded Power—A Multilayer Integration Technology for Packaging of IPEMs and PEBBs,” Proceedings of International Workshop on Integrated Power Packaging, Jul. 14-16, 2000, IEEE, pp. 41-45.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Mar. 8, 2016, 13 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/749,274, mailed Jun. 23, 2016, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/797,573, mailed Jul. 7, 2016, 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150357457 A1 Dec 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62008900 Jun 2014 US