This invention relates to semiconductor wafer processing and, particularly, to preparing singulated semiconductor integrated circuit die.
At some stage in die preparation, the wafer is cut to singulate the die. That is, the wafer is cut (for example, by sawing the wafer along “streets” between active circuit regions of the die), forming an array of die (a “wafer array”) on the wafer support. The singulated die can then be manipulated individually (for example by use of a “pick-and-place” tool) for further treatment.
Many die preparation procedures can be carried out at the wafer level, that is, prior to die singulation. However, some procedures for preparing die require access to die sidewalls. For example, it may be necessary to provide electrical insulation over the die edge and sidewalls, to prevent shorting of the semiconductor body of the die with electrical conductors that may be employed for interconnection of the die, and that may contact the die edge or die sidewall.
Such procedures can be carried out on individual singulated die. However, for increased throughput it can be advantageous to carry out such procedures on the die prior to removing the die from the wafer array.
Typically, singulated die may shift on the support. Singulated die may rotate, for example, or may move in relation to the array and, as a result, the shifted die are no longer in proper register. In particular, movement of the dicing saw during the wafer cutting procedure may cause die to shift out of register.
Out-of-register die can present challenges for subsequent preparation of the die in the array.
For example, die shift may result in a narrowing of the spaces between the die in the array, so that the streets are narrowed at some places, or are not straight. Where a subsequent die preparation procedure calls for an additional pass of a cutting tool through the street, the tool may impact and damage shifted die during the additional pass. For example, it may be desirable to apply a die attach film to the backside of the die array, and then to cut the die attach film by passing a cutting tool through the streets in the array, resulting in an array of individual film-backed singulated die.
And, for example, die shift may result in displacement of features on the die out of register. Where a subsequent die preparation procedure calls for treatment of these features, the displaced features may be no longer accessible to equipment for carrying out the subsequent procedure. Shift of the features out of register may cause failure of such procedures. For example, it may be desirable using a patterned mask or stencil or an automated tool to address the interconnect pads on the die to apply an interconnect terminal, for example, or to remove a passivation layer that overlies the pads.
Die shift can in such instances frustrate an effort to increase throughput, by resulting in damaged die or in unsuccessful procedures.
According to the invention, die shift is reduced or substantially eliminated, by cutting the wafer in two stages. In some embodiments a first wafer cutting procedure is carried out prior to thinning the wafer to the prescribed die thickness; and in other embodiments the wafer is thinned to the prescribed die thickness prior to carrying out a first wafer cutting procedure.
In the first wafer cutting procedure, cuts are performed along a set of streets to a depth at least as great as the prescribed die thickness; and, optionally, cuts are performed along another set of streets to a depth less than the prescribed die thickness. The cuts along the first set of streets result in die sidewalls, and the cuts along the second set of streets, where optionally made, result in partial sidewalls. The result of the first cutting procedure and wafer thinning is an array of rows of die (in some embodiments, blocks of die), where the rows or blocks are separated from one another, while the die within each row or block remain connected by the uncut portion of the wafer in the set of streets that were not cut or were cut to a depth less than the die thickness. The rows or blocks of die are less subject to shift than singulated die would be, primarily in part because they have a greater area of contact with the underlying wafer support. In a later cutting procedure the die are singulated by carrying out a second wafer cutting procedure along the second set of streets, passing completely through the thinned wafer array.
One or more die preparation procedures may be carried out following the first cutting procedure. Some such die preparation procedures may require access to selected die edges or die sidewalls. For example, it may be desirable to apply an electrically insulative coating to an interconnect die edge and/or to a die sidewall adjacent an interconnect die edge, to electrically protect the edge and/or the sidewall in the event of contact with an electrical interconnection wire or tab or trace. Accordingly, during the first wafer cutting procedure in such instances, the first set of streets (where the cutting is performed to a depth at least as great as the die thickness) includes the streets that are fronted by interconnect die edges. Other such die preparation procedures include an operation relating to features on the die, for example the die pads. For example, a previously applied passivation layer may cover the die pads, and for subsequent electrical connection at the pads it is necessary to selectively remove the passivation layer over the pads to reveal the pad surface for electrical contact. Or, for example, it may be desirable to attach an interconnect terminal at selected die pads, to facilitate subsequent electrical connection.
In one general aspect (first wafer cutting procedure before wafer thinning) the invention features a method for preparing singulated semiconductor die by: providing a wafer having a front side in which semiconductor chip active regions are formed, the active regions being bounded by saw streets, the active regions having interconnect pads arranged in an interconnect margin along an interconnect edge thereof; performing a first wafer cutting procedure, wherein cuts are made along a first set of streets from the front side to a depth at least as great as the prescribed die thickness and, optionally, cuts are performed along a second set of streets to a depth less than the prescribed die thickness; thereafter carrying out a die preparation procedure; and thereafter performing a second wafer cutting procedure along the second set of streets, passing completely through the thinned wafer array. The first wafer cutting procedure defines die edges, and performing the cuts to a depth at least as great as the die thickness in the first wafer cutting procedure defines die sidewalls. In some embodiments the first set of streets includes streets fronted by interconnect die edges, and performing the cuts to a depth at least as great as the die thickness defines interconnect edges and interconnect sidewalls. In some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes applying an electrical insulation onto at least the interconnect edges and in some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes applying an electrical insulation onto at least the interconnect sidewalls. In some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes applying an electrically insulating layer, such as a die attach film, onto the backside of the thinned wafer array. In some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes cutting a die attach film. In some embodiments the active side of the die are covered by a protective film, and the die preparation procedure includes forming openings in the film to expose features (such as die interconnect pads). In some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes mass processing of features in the interconnect pads, such as, for example, mass formation of bumps or other features on the interconnect pads, or mass coining of bumps on the interconnect pads, or mass formation of electrically conductive tabs or ribbons on the interconnect pads. In some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes mass processing of features in the interconnect pads, such as, for example, mass formation of bumps or other features on the interconnect pads, or mass coining of bumps on the interconnect pads, or mass formation of electrically conductive tabs or ribbons on the interconnect pads. Other die preparation procedures are contemplated.
In embodiments where a first wafer cutting procedure is carried out prior to thinning the wafer, in saw streets fronted by interconnect margins of the die, the wafer is cut to a depth in the wafer at least as great as the prescribed die thickness, so that the sidewalls along these streets are fully formed through the entire die thickness. Accordingly, these sidewalls are available for further treatment. In saw streets not fronted by interconnect margins of the die, the wafer may optionally (prior to carrying out a die preparation procedure) be cut only partway through the thickness of the wafer, so that the die are not fully severed during the wafer thinning procedure. Where the interconnect margins of the die in the wafer are all arranged along parallel streets running in one direction (the “N-S streets”), the thinning procedure results in an array of rows of die, in which the die in each row remain connected (at the “E-W streets”) or partly connected (at the partly cut “E-W streets”), and in which the rows are separated by N-S streets. The rows or blocks of partly-severed die are less likely to shift out of register (die shift) than fully-singulated die. A later cutting procedure completes the separation of the die (die singulation). (As will be appreciated, the designations “N-S” and “E-W” herein are arbitrary and are made for convenient reference, and are not related to any particular view of the wafer.)
In another general aspect (wafer thinning before wafer cutting) the invention features a method for preparing singulated semiconductor die by: providing a wafer having a front side in which semiconductor chip active regions are formed, the active regions being bounded by saw streets, the active regions having interconnect pads arranged in an interconnect margin along an interconnect edge thereof; thinning the wafer to a die thickness; performing a first wafer cutting procedure, wherein cuts are made along a first set of streets from the front side to a depth at least as great as the prescribed die thickness (and, typically, all the way through the wafer) and, optionally, cuts are performed along a second set of streets to a depth less than the prescribed die thickness; thereafter carrying out a die preparation procedure; and thereafter performing a second wafer cutting procedure along the second set of streets, passing completely through the thinned wafer array. The first wafer cutting procedure defines die edges, and performing the cuts to a depth at least as great as the die thickness (and, typically, all the way through the wafer) in the first wafer cutting procedure defines die sidewalls. In some embodiments the first set of streets includes streets fronted by interconnect die edges, and performing the cuts to a depth at least as great as the die thickness defines interconnect edges and interconnect sidewalls. In some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes applying an electrical insulation onto at least the interconnect edges and in some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes applying an electrical insulation onto at least the interconnect sidewalls. In some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes applying an electrically insulating layer, such as a die attach film, onto the backside of the thinned wafer array. In some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes cutting a die attach film. In some embodiments the active side of the die are covered by a protective film, and the die preparation procedure includes forming openings in the film to expose features (such as die interconnect pads). In some embodiments the die preparation procedure includes mass processing of features in the interconnect pads, such as, for example, mass formation of bumps or other features on the interconnect pads, or mass coining of bumps on the interconnect pads, or mass formation of electrically conductive tabs or ribbons on the interconnect pads. Other die preparation procedures are contemplated.
In embodiments where the wafer is thinned to die thickness before cutting, in saw streets fronted by interconnect margins of the die the wafer is cut entirely through the thinned wafer, so that the die sidewalls along these streets are fully formed through the entire die thickness. Accordingly, these sidewalls are available for further treatment. In saw streets not fronted by interconnect margins of the die, the wafer may optionally (prior to carrying out a die preparation procedure) be cut only partway through the thinned wafer, so that the die are not fully severed (or are not severed at all) at these streets. Where the interconnect margins of the die in the wafer are all arranged along parallel streets running in one direction (the “N-S streets”), the partial cut results in an array of rows of die, in which the die in each row remain connected (at the uncut “E-W streets”) or partly connected (at the partly cut “E-W streets”), and in which the rows are separated by N-S streets. The rows or blocks of partly-severed (or not severed) die are less likely to shift out of register (die tilt) than fully-singulated die. A later cutting procedure through the semiconductor material of the die completes the separation of the die (die singulation).
In another aspect the invention features an array of rows of semiconductor die (in some embodiments, blocks of die) on a wafer support, the rows or blocks of die being separated at a first set of streets, and the die in each row or block being connected by wafer material in a second set of streets.
In some embodiments an electrically insulative film is applied onto the exposed backsides of the array of rows of die (in some embodiments, blocks of die), and the die are singulated by cutting through the film. Cutting can be accomplished by, for example, a mechanical technique (sawing, breaking, tearing); or laser cutting or ablation; or water jet cutting; or by a combination of cutting techniques.
In some such embodiments the electrically insulative film includes an adhesive film, such as a die attach adhesive film, a thermal management film, or any film configured as media for attachment to, for example, a printed circuit board, or other die, or a substrate.
The methods of the invention can be used to prepare semiconductor die for any of a variety of devices, including for example stacked die assemblies, multiple chip modules, biomedical components, optoelectronics apparatus, MEMS, and vertically interconnected semiconductor assemblies. The devices may be used, for example, for building computers, telecommunications equipment, and consumer and industrial electronics devices.
In another aspect the invention features an assembly including a stack of devices as described above, electrically interconnected die-to-die.
In another aspect the invention features an assembly including a die or a stack of die as described above, electrically interconnected to underlying circuitry (for example in a substrate or a circuit board).
The assemblies according to the invention can be used for building computers, telecommunications equipment, and consumer and industrial electronics devices.
In the preceding FIGs., the corresponding FIGs. labeled “A” (where presented) are in a plan view, and FIGs. labeled “B” and “C” (where presented) show sections taken generally perpendicular to one another; for example, the orientation of the sectional view shown in
The invention will now be described in further detail by reference to the drawings, which illustrate alternative embodiments of the invention. The drawings are diagrammatic, showing features of the invention and their relation to other features and structures, and are not made to scale. For improved clarity of presentation, in the FIGs. illustrating embodiments of the invention, elements corresponding to elements shown in other drawings are not all particularly renumbered, although they are all readily identifiable in all the FIGs. Also for clarity of presentation certain features are not shown in the FIGs., where not necessary for an understanding of the invention. For example, details of the circuitry within the die are omitted.
Turning now to
In
In
As is apparent in
According to the invention, die shift is reduced or substantially eliminated, by cutting the wafer in two stages.
One or more die preparation procedures can then be carried out on the array of rows or blocks of die. Thereafter, the die are singulated by carrying out a second wafer cutting procedure along the second set of streets, passing completely through the thinned wafer array.
In some instances the die preparation procedure that is carried out following the first cutting procedure requires access to selected die edges or die sidewalls. For example, it may be desirable to apply an electrically insulative coating to an interconnect die edge and/or to a die sidewall adjacent an interconnect die edge, to electrically protect the edge and/or the sidewall in the event of contact with an electrical interconnection wire or tab or trace. Accordingly, during the first wafer cutting procedure in such instances, the first set of streets (where the cutting is performed to a depth at least as great as the die thickness) includes the streets that are fronted by interconnect die edges.
In some instances the die preparation procedure that is carried out following the first cutting procedure includes an operation relating to features on the die, for example the die pads. For example, a previously applied passivation layer may cover the die pads, and for subsequent electrical connection at the pads it is necessary to selectively remove the passivation layer over the pads to reveal the pad surface for electrical contact. Or, for example, it may be desirable to attach an interconnect terminal at selected die pads, to facilitate subsequent electrical connection.
First Wafer Cutting Prior to Wafer Thinning
Turning now to
As appears in
The wafer as provided may have any thickness; a typical wafer may have a nominal thickness about 30 mils, or about 760 μm. The finished die may in some embodiments have a thickness in a range about 20 μm to about 250 μm; and the depth of the trenches will be determined according to the desired finished die thickness. In some embodiments, for example, the finished die may have a “standard” thickness, in a range about 120 μm to about 250 μm; or it may be “thin”, having a thickness in a range about 80 μm to about 120 μm; or it may be “ultra thin”, having a thickness in a range about 20 μm to about 80 μm.
The mounted wafer is subjected to a first cutting procedure in which the wafer is cut (for example by cutting using a dicing saw) along a first set of streets and, optionally, along a second set of streets.
The first part and the second part (if employed) of the first wafer cutting procedure may be carried out in any order; that is, the second part may be carried out prior to the first cut, or the first part may be carried out prior to the second part; and not all the cuts along one set of streets need be completed before cuts are completed along the other set of streets.
This shallow cut part of the first cutting procedure may be omitted altogether. However, there may be some advantage to performing a shallow cut to at least define the die edges; particularly, for example where an electrically insulating coating is applied to the array following the first cutting procedure, the coating will be formed over the die edges (and onto the partial die sidewalls) defined by the shallow cut (as well as over the die edges and sidewalls defined by the deeper cut). Thereafter, when a subsequent cut along the second set of streets is carried out, any tearing or shredding of the coating at the cut edge will be located in the shallow trench, rather than at the edge of the die front surface.
Various cutting depths may be specified. In one example, a standard wafer may have a thickness about 29 mil and, where a die thickness of 50 μm is desired, the streets fronted by interconnect margins may be cut to a depth about 65 μm (about 15 μm deeper than the eventual die thickness), and the other streets may be cut to a depth nominally about 15 μm, defining die edges along those streets.
Then a support 49 such as a backgrinding tape is applied to the front side of the wafer and, if a dicing tape was used earlier, the dicing tape is removed to expose the back side of the wafer. Then the wafer is thinned, for example by backgrinding, to the eventual die thickness. A resulting construct is shown in
Subsequent to the first cutting procedure, the array is mounted on a support such as a backing tape, and the backgrinding tape is removed to expose the front side of the array of thinned and separated strips. A result is shown in
As noted above, the shallow cut part of the first cutting procedure (and the resulting stage shown in
Subsequent to the thinning procedure, a tape such as a dicing tape is placed onto the back side of the wafer array. Optionally, and in some embodiments preferably, a die attach film is placed onto the back side of the wafer array, and then the tape (dicing tape) is placed on the die attach film. The backgrind tape is then removed to expose the front side of the array of thinned and separated strips. A result, where the shallow cut part of the first cutting procedure is omitted, is shown in
Other examples of die preparation procedures that might advantageously be made prior to performing a second wafer cutting procedure are contemplated. These include, for example, mass formation of bumps on die interconnect pads, for example by screen printing; or formation of an under bump metallization on interconnect pads. Where the die preparation procedure requires heating, a heat-resistant tape may be used to support the array.
Thereafter singulation of the die is completed in a second cutting procedure, in which the wafer is cut through (either from the front or the backside of the array) to remove wafer material remaining along the second set of streets between the die. A resulting array of singulated die is shown in
Wafer Thinning Prior to First Wafer Cutting
As noted above, the first wafer cutting procedure may be carried out in phases: in one (“first”) phase the wafer is cut along a first set of streets to a depth at least as great as the die thickness, and in another (optional “second”) phase the wafer is cut along a second set of streets to a depth less than the die thickness. Where both phases of the first wafer cutting procedure are carried out, they may be carried out in any order; that is, the optional second phase may be carried out prior to the first phase, or the first phase may be carried out prior to the optional second phase; and not all the cuts along one set of streets need be completed before cuts are completed along the other set of streets. And, as noted above, the second phase may be omitted.
Whether or not the optional cutting to form shallower trenches is carried out, a die preparation procedure can now be carried out on exposed parts of the array, as described above; particularly, for example, any of a variety of procedures can be carried out on features on the front side of the die (such as the interconnect pads), and/or any of a variety of procedures can be carried out on the sidewalls or in the spaces between the strips. Examples are given above.
Following the die preparation procedure the die may be singulated by cutting through the wafer to a depth s3 at least as great as the die thickness d in the second set of streets (here, the E-W streets) (
In the foregoing examples, the die have interconnect pads arrayed in rows alongside two opposite edges of the active region; that is, each die has two opposite interconnect edges. In other embodiments the die may have interconnect pads arrayed alongside only one edge; that is, each die may have only one interconnect edge. Or, in still other embodiments the die may have interconnect pads arrayed alongside two adjacent edges; that is, each die may have two interconnect edges that meet at a corner of the die. The pads may be located in this manner in the wafer as provided (that is, the original die pads may be suitably arranged peripheral pads); or, rerouting circuitry may connect pads on the wafer as provided to the desired peripheral interconnect locations.
In such an arrangement, a first cutting procedure may be carried out in streets 151′, and alternating parallel streets 151 are left uncut. In the terminology used in the foregoing examples, the streets 151′ constitute a first set of streets, and the remaining streets constitute a second set of streets. A result is shown in
The first cutting procedure may be complete at this stage; or, as in the foregoing examples, a shallower cut may optionally be made along some or all of the remaining streets. Die singulation results from carrying out a second cutting procedure, to remove wafer material remaining along the remaining streets.
In such an arrangement, a first cutting procedure may be carried out in streets 161′, 163′, and alternating parallel streets, respectively 161, 163, are left uncut or are only partially cut. In the terminology used in the foregoing examples, the streets 161′, 163′ constitute a first set of streets, and the remaining streets constitute a second set of streets. A result is shown in
The first cutting procedure may be complete at this stage; or, as in the foregoing examples, a shallower cut may optionally be made along some or all of the remaining streets. Die singulation results from carrying out a second cutting procedure, to remove wafer material remaining along the remaining streets.
Example: First Wafer Cutting Prior to Wafer Thinning; Coated Die Surface and Die Attach Film
The following example illustrates in detail steps in a die separation process in which at least some die surfaces have an electrically insulative polymer coating, and the die are provided with a die attach film.
The process begins with a semiconductor wafer, containing semiconductor circuitry defining active die regions bounded by saw streets. Each active die region has interconnect pads situated along at least one edge (an “interconnect edge”). The pads may be so situated in the wafer as provided from the fab; or, rerouting circuitry may be formed on the wafer as provided, to connect the original die pads to interconnect pads situated along one or more interconnect edges. For example, the die in the wafer as provided may be center pad die. Or, where the die in the wafer as provided are peripheral pad die, the pads may not be suitably arranged for the end use: the pads may not be situated on the desired interconnect edge; or the pads may be situated too close together for the desired interconnect technique.
The wafer is then subjected to the first cutting procedure. As outlined above, the first cutting procedure includes a first part, in which cuts are made in a first set of streets which are fronted by interconnect die edges, from the front side of the wafer to a depth at least as great as the eventual die thickness. It may be advantageous to take some care in selecting cutting parameters, particularly the cut width and the cut depth.
Generally, the saw kerf must be narrower than the street width. The cut width is a process parameter, and where it is desirable to have the die pads close to the resulting die edge, the cut should be made as wide as possible, but not so wide that the cut may damage the die seal at the die edges. The street width is determined by specification or by direct measurement, and a narrower saw blade is selected; according to one standard rule, the blade width is preferably about 35 μm less than the street width, and is preferably at least about equal to and usually greater than half the street width. For example, for a street width of 80 μm, a blade providing a cut width at least 40 μm wide and less than 50 μm is selected; a “DF” blade, providing a cut width in the range 40-50 μm (nominally, 45 μm wide), may be suitable for this requirement.
As noted above, the trenches resulting from the cuts in the first set of streets must be deep enough so that the subsequent wafer thinning fully separates the strips or blocks of connected die; that is, the cut depth must be at least as great as the eventual die thickness. In a conventional “dice-before-grind” die singulation process, the cut is typically made to a depth about 50 μm deeper than the eventual die thickness; that is, for a 50 μm thick die, the cut would be made to a depth about 100 μm in the wafer (a 50 μm “overcut”). For such a conventional cut, backgrinding continues through as much as 50 μm of the wafer after the trenches are encountered. The backgrinding tool imposes stresses on the wafer during the thinning procedure, and as soon as the trenches (or some of them) are encountered during backgrinding, these stresses may tend to force the resulting separated strips of blocks of die out of alignment. Accordingly, it may be advantageous to limit the backgrinding time to near the minimum required to encounter all the trenches and effect separation of all of the strips or blocks, to limit the amount of wafer material that must be ground away after all the trenches are encountered. This can be accomplished according to the invention by limiting the cut depth to near the eventual die thickness, that is, by limiting the overcut. The cut depth should exceed the eventual die thickness by only a small amount, to accommodate any variation in the actual cut and in the thickness of the wafer after backgrinding. This may be accomplished by programming the dicing saw to cut to a target depth only slightly deeper (such as 15 μm) than the die thickness. For example, for a desired die thickness about 50 μm, the saw may be set to cut to a depth about 65 μm (a 15 μm overcut).
The cutting height may be indexed in any of a variety of ways. In a conventional approach, the saw is set to cut to a specified height above the cutting table. The cutting height is determined by subtracting the desired cut depth from the overall thickness of the wafer plus dicing tape. Then the saw is set to cut to the cutting height. For example, in a conventional approach, where the wafer has a thickness about 760 μm, and it is mounted on a dicing tape having a thickness about 110 μm, the total thickness of the wafer plus tape is 870 μm; for a desired die thickness of 50 μm and a desired 50 μm overcut, the blade height is programmed to 770 μm over the cutting table. Typically a 50 μm overcut is required when the cutting height is indexed to the cutting table, to compensate for greater variations in thickness; and a 15 μm overcut may not be reliably achievable using this conventional approach.
In an alternative approach, which may be preferred, the cut depth is indexed from the front side of the wafer, rather than from the cutting table. This capability may be provided in programmable saws made by, for example, Disco Corporation (Japan). In one approach, the wafer is placed on the cutting table, and a test cut is made near the edge of the wafer. A noncontact device, such as one made by, for example, Keyence Corporation (Japan), is used to measure the depth of the test cut, to calibrate the apparatus. Then the saw is programmed to cut to the desired depth below the wafer front side surface. The apparatus may be programmed to recalibrate at various intervals during the first cutting procedure (as frequently as following completion of the cut along each street, for example).
As described above, the trenches formed by the cuts along streets fronted by interconnect edges define interconnect sidewalls adjacent interconnect edges along which the die pads are arrayed. The front side of the die and the interconnect edges and sidewalls are thus made available for further treatment.
Optionally, as outlined above, a second part of the first cutting procedure may be carried out, constituting making cuts along streets not fronted by interconnect edges, to a depth less than the eventual die thickness. A shallow trench depth about 15 μm may be suitable. Where this procedure is carried out, the resulting shallower trenches define noninterconnect edges, and partial noninterconnect sidewalls, which are thus additionally made available for further treatment.
Because according to the invention the die are not singulated by the first cutting procedure, it may not be necessary to mount the wafer on a dicing tape prior to the first cutting procedure. On the other hand, a dicing tape may protect the back side of the wafer array during subsequent treatment. If a dicing tape is desired, the wafer is mounted onto a dicing tape, and the dicing tape is mounted onto a film frame (for example, a dicing ring), prior to carrying out the first cutting procedure. Following the first cutting procedure, the dicing tape is cut between the outer edge of the wafer and the inner edge of the frame, to free the wafer from the film frame while leaving the dicing tape on the back side of the wafer.
After the first cutting procedure is complete, features exposed on the wafer by the first cutting procedure may be subject to a die preparation procedure. In this example, a parylene coating is applied to all the exposed surfaces of the partially cut wafer.
A standard parylene process is employed. The partially cut wafer may be plasma cleaned (for example, using an oxygen plasma), and an adhesion promoter may be applied to ensure good adhesion of the parylene to the surfaces. Suitable adhesion promoters include, for example, any of various “silane” adhesion promoters; a methacryloxy silane such as one marketed under the name “Silquest”, e.g., “Silquest A-174”. The partially cut wafer, preferably having the back side protected by a tape (for example, a dicing tape) is placed in the parylene chamber, and parylene is deposited on all the exposed surfaces, including the front side, the walls and floors of the deeper trenches, and the walls and sides of the optional shallower trenches (if present). The parylene deposition process results in a generally uniform conformal coating on all exposed surfaces. The thickness of the resulting coating can be controlled by, for example, controlling the process time. The parylene process is carried out to provide a continuous coating, preferably free of pinholes. In various examples various parylene thicknesses have been used; a coating of parylene C having a thickness about 2.5 μm may suffice, for example. In other examples coating thicknesses about 10 μm have been used.
Thicker parylene coatings (such as 10 μm) may be torn by a saw cut made following parylene deposition. The protective value of the parylene may be compromised by a tear in the coating near a die edge. Tears at the floor of a trench may not have a detrimental effect and, accordingly, where such a thicker parylene coating is used, cutting to form shallower trenches may be advantageous. On the other hand, thinner parylene coatings (such as 2.5 μm) are less likely to be torn by the saw cut and, where a thinner parylene coating is used, a second phase of the first cutting procedure may be unnecessary.
As noted above, the parylene process results in deposition of parylene on all exposed surfaces, and the parylene precursor molecules can invade very thin spaces. Parylene on the back side of the wafer can interfere with a subsequent backgrinding process, by loading the grinding wheel. Accordingly, it may be advantageous to protect the back side of the wafer (for example, by leaving a tape in place until the parylene process is complete), so that no parylene forms there. After the parylene process has been completed, the dicing tape (where present) may be removed from the back side of the wafer.
One or more additional die preparation procedures may be carried out. Particularly, where, as in this example, interconnect pads are obscured by the parylene coating on all the exposed surfaces of the partially cut wafer, the pads at which electrical interconnection of the die is to be made must be exposed. A particularly suitable technique for exposing pads is laser ablation, and this can advantageously be carried out at a wafer array stage, before the die have been singulated, so that the die have not shifted and the die (and the pads) are properly aligned. The laser apparatus can be set up and aligned, and then robotically stepped from pad to pad and from die to die.
Following the die preparation procedure(s) a wafer thinning procedure can be conducted, for example by backgrinding using selected grinding wheels (cups, discs). The wafer is mounted onto a grinding tape, by applying the tape to the (parylene coated, in this example) front side of the wafer. Once the dicing tape (where one was used) has been removed, the back side of the wafer is exposed for backgrinding.
It may be advantageous to follow a particular protocol for the backgrinding. The protocol in this example is directed to minimizing mechanical impact of the grinding wheel on the wafer and on the wafer array during the thinning operation, to minimize shifting of the strips or blocks, or die, in the array and to minimize propagation of stress through the wafer. It may be preferred to carry out the thinning procedure in stages: in this example a first stage employs a coarse grinding wheel (for example a 320 grit); a second stage employs a finer vitrified grinding wheel (for example a vitrified 4800 grit); and a third stage employs a polishing wheel. A vitrified (vitreous inorganic fiber) wheel is available from, for example, Disco Corporation (Japan). Separation of the strips or blocks of die occurs during the second stage, when mechanical impact is reduced by use of the vitrified wheel.
In this example, a die attach film is applied to the polished back side of the thinned wafer. Preferred die attach films include films available from Hitachi (e.g., FH 900) or from Nitto (e.g., EM 500, EM 700), for example, and the film may be permitted to “set” for a time (for example at least about 4 hours) to ensure reliable adhesion to the wafer array and, particularly, to minimize die shift during removal of the grinding tape from the front side.
Once the die attach film has sufficiently set, the grinding tape is removed by peeling it away. In a conventional grinding tape removal, the tape is peeled from the die in a corner-to-corner direction, for example in a direction at about a 45° angle with respect to the die edges. In this example, the tape is preferably removed by peeling in a direction parallel to the interconnect edge streets (or, for die blocks, parallel to longer interconnect edges), to minimize sideways stresses on the strips or blocks.
Then the die attach film is cut in the deep trenches fronted by interconnect edges. Because array shift has been minimized, the die attach film cut can confidently be made without damaging the die or the parylene film (where present) on the interconnect die sidewalls. Where a saw is used for this cut the saw must be narrow enough so that it does not impact the die or the parylene film (where present) on the interconnect sidewalls. As may be appreciated, thicker parylene films will occupy a greater portion of the street width, and this will require a thinner saw. Also, it may be advantageous to refine the control of the saw for the die attach film cut. In a conventional saw procedure, the saw is aligned for a first cut, and is thereafter stepped across the wafer from street to street, relying for proper alignment on the specified step interval. In one refinement, the saw may be realigned/recalibrated before cutting at selected ones or all of the streets using fiducials associated with each street. In another refinement, a number of measurements may be made in or on the street, and the data may be treated statistically to determine a best saw path for the street.
Then a second wafer cutting procedure is carried out, to cut all the way through the wafer material remaining in the streets not fronted by interconnect die edges, and through the die attach film below these streets, resulting in singulated die. The singulated die array is now ready for further treatment, including for example, removal and placement using a pick-and-place tool.
Other embodiments are within the claims.
This application is a Divisional of R. Co et al. U.S. Application Ser. No. 12/323,288, which was filed Nov. 25, 2008 and is now U.S. Pat. No. 7,863,159. The said U.S. application Ser. No. 12/323,288 claims the benefit of the filing date of R. Co et al. U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/132,708, titled “Semiconductor die separation method”, which was filed Jun. 19, 2008. This application is related to S.J.S. McElrea et al. U.S. application Ser. No. 12/142,589, which was filed 10 Jun. 19, 2008 and which is now U.S. Pat. No. 7,923,349. The above-referenced applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4323914 | Berndlmaier et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4336551 | Fujita et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4363076 | McIver | Dec 1982 | A |
4500905 | Shibata | Feb 1985 | A |
4784972 | Hatada | Nov 1988 | A |
5107325 | Nakayoshi | Apr 1992 | A |
5138438 | Masayuki et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5200362 | Lin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5218234 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5311401 | Gates, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5331591 | Clifton | Jul 1994 | A |
5334872 | Ueda et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5434745 | Shokrgozar et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5466634 | Beilstein, Jr. et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5538758 | Beach et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5571754 | Bertin et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5616953 | King et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629566 | Doi et al. | May 1997 | A |
5691248 | Cronin et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5698895 | Pedersen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5721151 | Padmanabhan et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5731631 | Yama et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737191 | Horiuchi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5870351 | Ladabaum et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879965 | Jiang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891761 | Vindasius et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5910687 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5946545 | Bertin et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5965947 | Nam et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6030854 | Mashimoto et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034438 | Petersen | Mar 2000 | A |
6087716 | Ikeda | Jul 2000 | A |
6107164 | Ohuchi | Aug 2000 | A |
6175158 | Degani et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6228686 | Smith et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6255726 | Vindasius et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262476 | Vidal | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271598 | Vindasius et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6297657 | Thiessen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303977 | Schroen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315856 | Asagiri et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326244 | Brooks et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6326689 | Thomas | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338980 | Satoh | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351030 | Havens et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6472746 | Taniguchi et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476467 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6569709 | Derderian | May 2003 | B2 |
D475981 | Michii | Jun 2003 | S |
6580165 | Singh | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582992 | Poo et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6593648 | Emoto | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607938 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607941 | Prabhu et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621155 | Perino et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621172 | Nakayama et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6656827 | Tsao et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667543 | Chow et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6670701 | Matsuura et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674159 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686655 | Moden et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6706971 | Albert et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722213 | Offen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730997 | Beyne et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6737743 | Urakawa | May 2004 | B2 |
6747348 | Jeung et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750547 | Jeung et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756252 | Nakanishi | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6802446 | Chaudhuri et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6844623 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6849802 | Song et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6908784 | Farnworth et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6910268 | Miller | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6940022 | Vinciarelli et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6956283 | Peterson | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6964915 | Farnworth et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972480 | Zilber et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6973718 | Sheppard, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984885 | Harada et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7005324 | Imai | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7029949 | Farnworth et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7061125 | Cho et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7115986 | Moon et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7180168 | Imai | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190060 | Chiang | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7196262 | Gronet | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208335 | Boon et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208345 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215018 | Vindasius et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221051 | Ono et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245021 | Vindasius et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259455 | Seto | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7279363 | Cherukuri et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285865 | Kwon et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7335533 | Derderian | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7355274 | Lim | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7405138 | Ohuchi et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7408243 | Shiffer | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7452743 | Oliver et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7514350 | Hashimoto | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521288 | Arai et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7535109 | Robinson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7564142 | Hashimoto | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7595222 | Shimoishizaka et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601039 | Eldridge et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7638869 | Irsigler et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7662670 | Noma et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7704794 | Mess et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7732912 | Damberg | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7768795 | Sakurai et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7829438 | Haba et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7888185 | Corisis et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901989 | Haba et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919846 | Hembree | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7952195 | Haba | May 2011 | B2 |
8022527 | Haba et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8076788 | Haba et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010012725 | Maeda et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010031548 | Elenius et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020006686 | Cloud et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020027257 | Kinsman et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045290 | Ball | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020096349 | Hedler et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020127775 | Haba et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020168798 | Glenn et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020180010 | Tsubosaki et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020185725 | Moden et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187260 | Sheppard et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038353 | Derderian | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038356 | Derderian | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038357 | Derderian | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030060034 | Beyne et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071338 | Jeung et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071341 | Jeung et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080403 | Jeung et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092326 | Nishikawa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030096454 | Poo et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099085 | Duva | May 2003 | A1 |
20030122243 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030209772 | Prabhu | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040113283 | Farnworth et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040142509 | Imai | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150095 | Fraley et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173892 | Nakanishi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040195667 | Karnezos | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040198033 | Lee et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212083 | Yang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217446 | Headley et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227235 | Hashimoto | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238933 | Chen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251520 | Sasaki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262035 | Ko et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013927 | Yamazaki | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050067680 | Boon et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067694 | Pon et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082651 | Farnworth et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085050 | Draney et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101039 | Chen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104179 | Zilber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050148160 | Farnworth et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050230802 | Vindasius et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248021 | Morkner | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258530 | Vindasius et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050287705 | Yang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003552 | Okada | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060035408 | Derderian | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060055050 | Numata et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068567 | Beyne et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076690 | Khandros et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094165 | Hedler et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060097356 | Fujii et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060103000 | Kurosawa | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121645 | Ball | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138626 | Liew et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060220262 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060267173 | Takiar et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273365 | Cross et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278971 | Barnes et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070065987 | Mess et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070102801 | Ishida et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132082 | Tang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070158799 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070158807 | Lu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070170572 | Liu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181989 | Corisis et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194462 | Kim et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070222054 | Hembree | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070252262 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284716 | Vindasius et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080083976 | Haba et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083977 | Haba et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112150 | Jones | May 2008 | A1 |
20080166836 | Jobetto | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080173792 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180242 | Cottingham | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080203566 | Su | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206915 | Yamazaki | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208043 | Smith et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080251913 | Inomata | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080284044 | Myers | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303131 | McElrea et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080308921 | Kim | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090020887 | Mizuno et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020889 | Murayama et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090065948 | Wang | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090102038 | McElrea et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090146137 | Kim et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160065 | Haba et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090230528 | McElrea et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090316378 | Haba et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100140753 | Hembree | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100207277 | Bauer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110006432 | Haba et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031629 | Haba et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033979 | Haba et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049696 | Haba et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110187007 | Haba et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110248410 | Avsian et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120061846 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120080807 | Haba et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133057 | Haba et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130099392 | McElrea et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1531069 | Sep 2004 | CN |
102004039906 | Aug 2005 | DE |
1041624 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1763894 | Mar 2007 | EP |
2704690 | Nov 1994 | FR |
07-509104 | Oct 1995 | JP |
11-260851 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000269411 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001210782 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2003-142518 | May 2003 | JP |
2003163324 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004-119473 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004153130 | May 2004 | JP |
2004158536 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-214548 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005005529 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006-351793 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007073803 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007523482 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008236688 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009-026969 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009027039 | Feb 2009 | JP |
20-1994-0004952 | Jul 1994 | KR |
10-1999-0008537 | Feb 1999 | KR |
20010062722 | Jul 2001 | KR |
20050009036 | Jan 2005 | KR |
20070018057 | Feb 2007 | KR |
100813624 | Mar 2008 | KR |
20080045259 | May 2008 | KR |
20080069549 | Jul 2008 | KR |
200425356 | Nov 2004 | TW |
200527549 | Aug 2005 | TW |
9425987 | Nov 1994 | WO |
9907015 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9909599 | Feb 1999 | WO |
0164344 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2005081315 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005101492 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2009052150 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009114670 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Advisory Action mailed Oct. 10, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Advisory Action, mailed Oct. 20, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,153. |
Advisory Action, mailed Oct. 20, 2008, App. No. 111744,153. |
Amendment A filed Aug. 7, 2006 in response to Feb. 7, 2006 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,829. |
Amendment A filed Aug. 7, 2006 in response to Feb. 7, 2006 Quayle Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/090,969. |
Amendment and RCE filed Nov. 26, 2008 in response to Oct. 20, 2008 Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,153. |
Amendment and RCE filed Feb. 7, 2011 in repsonse to Aug. 5, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,157. |
Amendment and RCE filed Mar. 16, 2011 in response to Mar. 18, 2010 Office Action, App No. 11/1744,142. |
Amendment and RCE filed Mar. 16, 2011 in response to Mar. 18, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,142. |
Amendment filed Jan. 18, 2011 in response to Aug. 18, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/046,651. |
Amendment filed Jan. 21, 2011 in response to Jul. 21, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,162. |
Amendment filed Jan. 22, 2007 in response to Jul. 19, 2007 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Amendment filed Jan. 24, 2007 in response to Jan. 8, 2007 Office Action, App. No. 111097,829. |
Amendment filed Jan. 29, 2010 in response to Dec. 28, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/403,175. |
Amendment filed Oct. 1, 2008 in response to Jul. 1, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,153. |
Amendment filed Oct. 11, 2008 in response to Jul. 1, 2010 Office Action, App. No. 111744,153. |
Amendment filed Oct. 14, 2008 in response to Sep. 15, 2008 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Amendment filed Nov. 9, 2009 in response to Oct. 7, 2009 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,162. |
Amendment filed Nov. 9, 2009 in response to Oct. 7, 2009 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,157. |
Amendment filed Dec. 3, 2009 in response to Aug. 3, 2009 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,142. |
Amendment filed Dec. 3, 2009 in response to 813109 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,142. |
Amendment filed Dec. 9, 2010 in response to Jun. 9, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,624. |
Amendment filed Feb. 14, 2011 in response to Oct. 14, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,097. |
Amendment filed Feb. 22, 2010 in response to Feb. 21, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/046,651. |
Amendment filed Mar. 27, 2009 in response to Jan. 27, 2009 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,162. |
Amendment filed Mar. 4, 2010 in response to Feb. 4, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,624. |
Amendment filed Apr. 1, 2008 in response to Dec. 31, 2007 Office Action , U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,153. |
Amendment filed Apr. 11, 2008 in response to Dec. 31, 2007 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,153. |
Amendment filed Apr. 8, 2009 in response to Dec. 15, 2008 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Amendment filed May 22, 2009 in response to Apr. 20, 2009 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,142. |
Amendment filed May 29, 2007 in response to Mar. 30, 2007 Notice, U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,829. |
Amendment filed Jun. 21, 2007 in response to Dec. 22, 2006 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Amendment filed Jun. 27, 2008 in response to Mar. 27, 2008 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Amendment filed Jun. 30, 2009 in response to Dec. 30, 2009 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,157. |
Amendment filed Jul. 26, 2010 in response to May 24, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,097. |
Amendment filed Jul. 8, 2009 in response to Jun. 24, 2009 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,162. |
Amendment filed Sep. 19, 2007 in response to Jul. 19, 2007 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Amendment filed Jan. 24, 2007 in response to Jan. 8, 2007 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,829. |
International Search Report and Written Opnion, PCT/US2007/021552 dated May 29, 2008. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2009/003643, dated Aug. 28, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US08/09207, dated Jan. 16, 2009. |
Amendment filed Jun. 26, 2010 in response to May 24, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,097. |
EP Supplemental Search Report mailed Nov. 5, 2007, EP Application No. 05736129.7. |
EP Supplementary Search Report dated Jun. 5, 2008 and mailed Jun. 12, 2008 for EP App. No. 05735136.3. |
EP Supplementary Search Report mailed Jun. 5, 2008, EP App. No. 05735136.3. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action mailed 217/06, U.S. Appl. No. 11/090,969. |
Final Office Action mailed 118/07, U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,829. |
Final Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,624. |
Final Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,142. |
Final Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2010, App No. 111744,142. |
Final Office Action mailed Jul. 1, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,153. |
Final Office Action mailed Jul. 19, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 8, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,829. |
Final Office Action, mailed Aug. 5, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,157. |
International Search Report & Wrillen Opinion, Application N90. PCT/US2008/066561, dated Dec. 31, 2008. |
International Search Report and Wrillen Opinion, Appl. No. PCT/US2008/067722, dated Feb. 25, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 12, 2010, App. No. PCTIUS2009/55421. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 17, 2009, App. No. PCTIUS2008/079948. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 26, 2011, App. No. PCT/US2010/39639. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 6, 2009, App. No. PCT/US2008/173365. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2009 , App. No. PCTIUS2009/36921. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/047389 dated Jan. 14, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/065788, mailed Sep. 30, 2008. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/067386 dated Jul. 1, 2010. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2010/039639 dated Jan. 26, 2011. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2010/055472 dated Jul. 27, 2011. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/065793, mailed Dec. 22, 2008. |
International Search Report mailed Mar. 23, 2009, International Application No. PCT/US2008/74450. |
Ko, et al. Development of three-dimensional memory die stack packages using polymer insulated sidewall technique, 1999. |
Notice of Allowability, mailed Oct. 19, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/090,969. |
Notice of Allowability, mailed Oct. 19, 2006 U.S. Appl. No. 11/090,969. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 17, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 27, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,153. |
Notice of Allowance, mailed Feb. 12, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,829. |
Notice of Appeal filed Sep. 16, 2010 in response to Mar. 18, 2010 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,142. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/054325 dated Jul. 28, 2011. |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 200980149285.2 dated Feb. 28, 2014. |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2011540873 dated Jan. 22, 2014. |
Notice to File Corrected Papers, mailed Mar. 30, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,829. |
Office Action (Restriction) mailed Jan. 21, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/046,651. |
Office Action (Restriction) mailed Oct. 7, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,162. |
Office Action (Restriction) mailed Oct. 7, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,157. |
Office Action (Restriction) mailed Dec. 28, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/403,175. |
Office Action (Restriction) mailed Feb. 4, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,624. |
Office Action (Restriction) mailed Apr. 20, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,142. |
Office Action (Restriction) mailed May 24, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,097. |
Office Action (Restriction) mailed Jun. 24, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,162. |
Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,162. |
Office Action mailed Oct. 14, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,097. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 22, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,157. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 31 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,153. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 31, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,153. |
Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,829. |
Office Action mailed 217106, U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,829. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 1. 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,157. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2008, EP Application No. 05736129.7. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 27, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 9, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,624. |
Office Action mailed Jul. 15, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 1010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/849,162. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 18, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/046,651. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/744,142. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2009, App No. 111744,142. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,157. |
Response filed Oct. 19, 2007 to Oct. 10, 2007 Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Response filed Aug. 5, 2009 in response to Jul. 15, 2009 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,558. |
Supplemental Amendement filed Aug. 5, 2009, App. No. 111849,162. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/124,097, filed May 20, 2008. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. No. PCT/US2010/055472 dated Jul. 27, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2009/067386 dated Jul. 1, 2010. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2010/039639 dated Jan. 26, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2010-550853 dated Sep. 18, 2013. |
Taiwanese Office Action for Application No. 098119939 dated Aug. 29, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110101505 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61132708 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12323288 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 12982376 | US |