This invention relates generally to the deposition of silicon-containing materials in semiconductor processing, and relates more specifically to epitaxial deposition of silicon-containing materials in recessed source and drain regions of semiconductor substrates.
In forming integrated circuits, epitaxial layers are often desired in selected locations, such as active area mesas among field isolation regions, or even more particularly over defined source and drain regions. While non-epitaxial material, which can be amorphous or polycrystalline, can be selectively removed from over the field isolation regions after deposition, it is typically considered more efficient to simultaneously provide chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”) and etching chemicals, and to tune conditions to result in zero net deposition over insulating regions and net epitaxial deposition over exposed semiconductor windows. This process, known as selective epitaxial CVD, takes advantage of slow nucleation of typical semiconductor deposition processes on insulators like silicon oxide or silicon nitride. Such selective epitaxial CVD also takes advantage of the naturally greater susceptibility of amorphous and polycrystalline materials to etchants, as compared to the susceptibility of epitaxial layers.
Examples of the many situations in which selective epitaxial formation of semiconductor layers is desirable include a number of schemes for producing strain. The electrical properties of semiconductor materials, such as silicon, carbon-doped silicon, germanium, and silicon germanium alloys, are influenced by the degree to which the materials are strained. For example, semiconductor materials can exhibit enhanced electron mobility under tensile strain, which is particularly desirable for NMOS devices; and enhanced hole mobility under compressive strain, which is particularly desirable for PMOS devices. Methods of enhancing the performance of semiconductor materials are of considerable interest and have potential applications in a variety of semiconductor processing applications. Semiconductor processing is typically used in the fabrication of integrated circuits, which entails particularly stringent quality demands, as well as in a variety of other fields. For example, semiconductor processing techniques are also used in the fabrication of flat panel displays using a wide variety of technologies, as well as in the fabrication of microelectromechanical systems (“MEMS”).
A number of approaches for inducing strain in silicon- and germanium-containing materials have focused on exploiting the differences in the lattice constants between various crystalline materials. For example, the lattice constant for crystalline germanium is 5.65 Å, the lattice constant for crystalline silicon is 5.431 Å, and the lattice constant for diamond carbon is 3.567 Å. Heteroepitaxy involves depositing thin layers of a particular crystalline material onto a different crystalline material in such a way that the deposited layer adopts the lattice constant of the underlying crystal material. For example, using this approach, strained silicon germanium layers can be formed by heteroepitaxial deposition onto single crystal silicon substrates. Because the germanium atoms are slightly larger than the silicon atoms and the deposited heteroepitaxial silicon germanium is constrained to the smaller lattice constant of the silicon beneath it, the silicon germanium is compressively strained to a degree that varies as a function of the germanium content. Typically, the band gap for the silicon germanium layer decreases monotonically from 1.12 eV for pure silicon to 0.67 eV for pure germanium as the germanium content in the silicon germanium increases. In another approach, tensile strain is formed in a thin single crystalline silicon layer by heteroepitaxially depositing the silicon layer onto a relaxed silicon germanium layer. In this example, the heteroepitaxially deposited silicon is strained because its lattice constant is constrained to the larger lattice constant of the relaxed silicon germanium beneath it. A tensile strained channel typically exhibits increased electron mobility, and a compressively strained channel exhibits increased hole mobility.
In these examples, strain is introduced into single crystalline silicon-containing materials by replacing silicon atoms with other atoms in the lattice structure. This technique is typically referred to as substitutional doping. For example, substitution of germanium atoms for some of the silicon atoms in the lattice structure of single crystalline silicon produces a compressive strain in the resulting substitutionally doped single crystalline silicon material because the germanium atoms are larger than the silicon atoms that they replace. It is possible to introduce a tensile strain into single crystalline silicon by substitutional doping with carbon because carbon atoms are smaller than the silicon atoms that they replace. Additional details are provided in “Substitutional Carbon Incorporation and Electronic Characterization of Si1-yCy/Si and Si1-x-yGexCy/Si Heterojunctions” by Judy L. Hoyt, Chapter 3 in “Silicon-Germanium Carbon Alloy”, Taylor and Francis, pp. 59-89 (New York 2002), referred to herein as “the Hoyt article.” However, non-substitutional impurities will not induce strain.
Similarly, electrical dopants should also be substitutionally incorporated into epitaxial layers in order to be electrically active. Either the dopants are incorporated as deposited or the substrate should be annealed to achieve the desired level of substitutionality and dopant activation. In situ doping of either impurities for tailored lattice constant or electrical dopants is often preferred over ex situ doping followed by annealing to incorporate the dopant into the lattice structure because the annealing consumes thermal budget. However, in practice in situ substitutional doping is complicated by the tendency for the dopant to incorporate non-substitutionally during deposition, for example, by incorporating interstitially in domains or clusters within the silicon rather than by substituting for silicon atoms in the lattice structure. Non-substitutional doping complicates, for example, carbon doping of silicon, carbon doping of silicon germanium, and doping of semiconductors with electrically active dopants. As illustrated in FIG. 3.10 at page 73 of the Hoyt article, prior deposition methods have been used to make crystalline silicon having an in situ doped substitutional carbon content of up to 2.3 atomic %, which corresponds to a lattice spacing of over 5.4 Å and a tensile stress of less than 1.0 GPa.
Source and drain recesses can be filled with a silicon-containing alloy as a “stressor” to exert a compressive or tensile strain on the silicon channel between the source and drain. For example, strained epitaxial silicon germanium (“SiGe”) in source and drain recesses can exert a compressive strain on the silicon channel and enhance hole mobility. Similarly, a carbon-doped silicon (“Si:C”) epitaxial alloy under a tensile strain in source/drain recesses can introduce a tensile strain on the channel and enhance electron mobility. In general, the strain on the channel is related to the concentration of the impurity, such as C or Ge. In other words, the higher the Ge or C content, the higher the strain produced.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a method is provided for selectively forming semiconductor material. A substrate is provided within a chemical vapor deposition chamber. The substrate includes insulating surfaces and single-crystal semiconductor surfaces. The single-crystal semiconductor surfaces include a recess. Semiconductor stressors are selectively formed in the recess. The semiconductor stressor is graded such that an upper portion of the semiconductor stressor within the recess has a higher amount of strain than lower portions and the upper portion extends to sidewalls of the recesses.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for selectively forming heteroepitaxial semiconductor material. Semiconductor material is deposited over the bottom and sidewall surfaces of a recessed single-crystal semiconductor region of a substrate. Portions of the semiconductor material are selectively removed from the sidewall surfaces of the recessed region while leaving a heteroepitaxial layer of the semiconductor material over the bottom surfaces. Depositing and selectively removing are repeated, wherein a subsequently deposited heteroepitaxial layer of the semiconductor material contains a different concentration of a strain-inducing impurity compared to a previously deposited heteroepitaxial layer of the semiconductor material.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for forming semiconductor material in a recess. A substrate with insulating regions and the recess formed therein is provided. A liner layer of heteroepitaxial silicon-containing material is deposited in the recess. The liner layer includes a strain-inducing impurity and partially fills the recess. The recess is filled with a filler including silicon-containing material having a lower concentration of the impurity than the liner layer by depositing the filler over the liner layer.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a semiconductor device is provided, including a recess in the substrate, a heteroepitaxial liner, a filler, and a transistor channel adjacent the recess. The heteroepitaxial silicon-containing liner covers substantially all single-crystal sidewall surfaces of the recess. The liner includes an impurity that alters a lattice constant. The filler is formed over the liner and fills the recesses. The filler includes a silicon-containing material having a lower concentration of the impurity than the liner over which the filler is formed.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention, a semiconductor substrate is provided, comprising a recess, and a transistor channel adjacent the recess. The recess is filled with a heteroepitaxial stressor material. An upper portion of the stressor material within the recess has a first impurity concentration and a lower portion of the stressor material within the recess has a second impurity concentration. The first impurity concentration is higher than the second impurity concentration and the upper portion extends to contact sidewalls of the recess.
Exemplary embodiments of the methods and systems disclosed herein are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, which are for illustrative purposes only. The drawings include the following figures, in which like numerals indicate like parts.
The term “impurity” is used herein to refer to additives, such as germanium or carbon, that alter the semiconductor lattice constant relative to silicon alone; the resultant semiconductor compound is often referred to as an alloy, or simply as a heteroepitaxial layer. “Dopants” can refer to either impurities or electrical dopants, such as phosphorous, arsenic, boron, or the like. The term “silicon-containing material” and similar terms are used herein to refer to a broad variety of silicon-containing materials, including without limitation, silicon (including crystalline silicon), carbon-doped silicon (“Si:C”), silicon germanium (“SiGe”), and carbon-doped silicon germanium (“SiGe:C”). As used herein, “carbon-doped silicon”, “Si:C”, “silicon germanium”, “SiGe,” “carbon-doped silicon germanium”, “SiGe:C” and similar terms refer to materials that contain the indicated chemical elements in various proportions and, optionally, minor amounts of other elements. For example, “silicon germanium” is a material that comprises silicon, germanium and, optionally, other elements, for example, dopants such as carbon and electrically active dopants. Shorthand terms such as “Si:C” and “SiGe:C” are not stoichiometric chemical formulas per se and thus are not limited to materials that contain particular ratios of the indicated elements. Furthermore, terms such as Si:C and SiGe:C are not intended to exclude the presence of other dopants, such that a phosphorous and carbon-doped silicon material is included within the term Si:C and the term Si:C:P. The percentage of a dopant, such as carbon or germanium, in a silicon-containing film is expressed herein in atomic percent on a whole film or sub-film basis, unless otherwise stated. It will be understood that the concentration of impurity dopants, such as carbon or germanium, but excluding other elements, such as electrical dopants, in a silicon-containing film, as described herein, is at least about 0.3 atomic %. The skilled artisan will understand, however, that electrical dopants can induce strain in layers and thus may also be included in such layers.
It is possible to determine the amount of impurity, such as germanium or carbon, substitutionally doped into a silicon-containing material, for example, by measuring the perpendicular lattice spacing of the doped silicon-containing material by x-ray diffraction, then applying Vegard's Law by performing a linear interpolation between single crystal silicon and single crystal germanium for SiGe alloys or applying the Kelires/Berti relation for carbon within Si:C alloys. Additional details on this technique are provided in the Hoyt article. Secondary ion mass spectrometry (“SIMS”) can be used to determine the total impurity content in the doped silicon. It is possible to determine the non-substitutional or interstitial impurity content by subtracting the substitutional impurity content from the total impurity content. The amount of other elements substitutionally doped into other silicon-containing materials can be determined in a similar manner.
“Substrate,” as that term is used herein, refers either to the workpiece upon which deposition is desired, or the surface exposed to one or more deposition gases. For example, in certain embodiments, the substrate is a single crystal silicon wafer, a semiconductor-on-insulator (“SOI”) substrate, or an epitaxial silicon surface, a silicon germanium surface, or a III-V material deposited upon a wafer. Workpieces are not limited to wafers, but also include glass, plastic, or other substrates employed in semiconductor processing. In the illustrated embodiments, the substrate has been patterned to have two or more different types of surfaces. In certain embodiments, silicon-containing layers are selectively formed over single crystal semiconductor materials while minimizing, and more preferably avoiding, deposition over adjacent dielectrics or insulators. In other embodiments, deposition occurs epitaxially over single-crystal semiconductor surfaces while depositing amorphous or polycrystalline material over adjacent insulators. Examples of dielectric or insulator materials include silicon dioxide, including low dielectric constant forms, such as carbon-doped and fluorine-doped oxides of silicon, silicon nitride, metal oxide and metal silicate.
The terms “epitaxial,” “epitaxially,” “heteroepitaxial,” “heteroepitaxially” and similar terms are used herein to refer to the deposition of a crystalline silicon-containing material onto a crystalline substrate in such a way that the deposited layer adopts or follows the lattice constant of the underlying layer or substrate. Epitaxial deposition is heteroepitaxial when the composition of the deposited layer is different from that of the underlying layer or substrate. Epitaxial deposition is homoepitaxial when the composition of the deposited layer is the same as that of the underlying layer or substrate.
In certain applications, a patterned substrate has a first surface having a first surface morphology and a second surface having a second surface morphology. Even if surfaces are made from the same elements, the surfaces are considered different if the morphologies or crystallinity of the surfaces are different. Amorphous and crystalline are examples of different morphologies. Polycrystalline morphology is a crystalline structure that consists of a disorderly arrangement of orderly crystals and thus has an intermediate degree of order. The atoms in a polycrystalline material are ordered within each of the crystals, but the crystals themselves lack long range order with respect to one another. Single crystal morphology is a crystalline structure that has a high degree of long range order. Epitaxial films are characterized by an in-plane crystal structure and orientation that is identical to the substrate upon which they are grown, typically single crystal. The atoms in these materials are arranged in a lattice-like structure that persists over relatively long distances on an atomic scale. Amorphous morphology is a non-crystalline structure having a low degree of order because the atoms lack a definite periodic arrangement. Other morphologies include microcrystalline and mixtures of amorphous and crystalline material. “Non-epitaxial” thus encompasses amorphous, polycrystalline, microcrystalline and mixtures of the same. As used herein, “single-crystal” or “epitaxial” are used to describe a predominantly large crystal structure having a tolerable number of faults therein, as is commonly employed for transistor fabrication. The crystallinity of a layer generally falls along a continuum from amorphous to polycrystalline to single-crystal; a crystal structure is often considered single-crystal or epitaxial despite low density faults. Specific examples of mixed substrates having more than two different types of surfaces, whether due to different morphologies and/or different materials, include without limitation: single crystal/polycrystalline, single crystal/amorphous, epitaxial/polycrystalline, epitaxial/amorphous, single crystal/dielectric, epitaxial/dielectric, conductor/dielectric, and semiconductor/dielectric. Methods described herein for depositing silicon-containing films onto mixed substrates having two types of surfaces are also applicable to mixed substrates having three or more different types of surfaces.
When grown into recessed source/drain areas to thicknesses below its critical thickness, tensile strained silicon-containing material induces uniaxial tensile strain into the silicon channel adjacent to the recessed source/drain areas. Such tensile strained materials include, without limitation, carbon-doped silicon films (Si:C films) and carbon-doped silicon germanium films (SiGe:C films) in which the germanium concentration is less than about 8-10× the carbon concentration), causing enhanced electron mobility, which is particularly beneficial for NMOS devices. This eliminates the need to provide a relaxed silicon germanium buffer layer to support the strained silicon layer. In such applications, electrically active dopants are incorporated by in situ doping, using dopant sources or dopant precursors. Typical n-type dopant sources include arsenic vapor and dopant, hydrides, such as phosphine and arsine. Silylphosphines, for example (H3Si)3-xPRx, and silylarsines, for example, (H3Si)3-xAsRx, where x=0, 1 or 2 and Rx=H and/or deuterium (D), are alternative precursors for phosphorous and arsenic dopants. Phosphorous and arsenic are particularly useful for doping source and drain areas of NMOS devices. SbH3 and trimethylindium are alternative sources of antimony and indium, respectively. Such dopant precursors are useful for the preparation of films as described below, preferably phosphorous-, antimony-, indium-, and arsenic-doped silicon, Si:C, and SiGe:C films and alloys.
When grown into recessed source/drain areas to thicknesses below the critical thickness, compressively strained silicon-containing material induces uniaxial compressive strain in the silicon channel adjacent to the recessed source/drain areas, causing enhanced hole mobility, which is particularly beneficial for PMOS devices. Such compressively strained materials include, without limitation, silicon germanium films (“SiGe films”) and carbon-doped silicon germanium films (“SiGe:C films”) in which the germanium concentration is greater than about 8-10× the carbon concentration. In such applications, electrically active dopants are incorporated by in situ doping, using dopant sources or dopant precursors. Typical p-type dopant precursors include diborane (B2H6) and boron trichloride (BCl3) for boron doping. Other p-type dopants for Si include Al, Ga, In, and any metal to the left of Si in the Mendeleiev table of elements. Such dopant precursors are useful for the preparation of films as described below, preferably boron-doped silicon, SiGe, and SiGe:C films and alloys.
There are limits on the thickness of the layer of SiGe or Si:C that can be grown in recessed source and regions without excessive dislocations. The thickness of the layer that can be grown is generally inversely proportional to the impurity content. Currently, SiGe alloys of uniform composition and thicknesses in the range of about 10-50 nm can be deposited with acceptable dislocation amounts for SiGe with less than about 40 atomic % Ge and Si:C with less than about 3 atomic % C. Beyond these limits, the allowable thickness of the layer and growth rates decrease dramatically as the process temperature is decreased in order to inhibit dislocation nucleation. For example, typically, only a few monolayers of pure Ge can be grown on silicon without dislocation. Beyond the critical thickness, a significant amount of dislocation, which is detrimental to the performance of the device, is produced in the layer. High overall impurity content can cause dislocations. In the preferred embodiments described herein, overall impurity content in a stressor is reduced while still maximizing the effects of strain by localizing it at the sidewalls of recesses adjacent the transistor channel.
Techniques have now been developed for forming a strained film comprising a silicon-containing material, such as Si:C, SiGe, and SiGe:C, in exposed semiconductor windows. In the illustrated embodiments, the strained films are deposited into recessed source/drain regions to exert stress on an adjacent channel region, and are therefore also referred to as “stressors.” According to preferred embodiments, strained heteroepitaxial semiconductor material is deposited in recessed source/drain regions to increase the strain induced on an adjacent transistor channel region relative to the overall stress induced in the substrate. Because the stressors have different compositions at different regions within the recesses, the stressors are graded, but grading can be either continuous or stepwise in two or more discrete layers.
Graded Stressor with Maximum Strain at Surface Extending to Recess Sidewall
It is possible to form recessed source/drain regions by dry etching with subsequent HF cleaning and in situ anneal. In embodiments wherein a dry etch is used, deposition of a selectively grown, thin (between approximately 1 nm and approximately 3 nm) silicon seed layer helps reduce etch damage. A seed layer also helps to cover damage caused by prior dopant implantation processes. In an example embodiment, such a seed layer might be selectively deposited using simultaneous provision of HCl and dichlorosilane at a deposition temperature between about 700° C. and about 800° C.
In accordance with certain embodiments, a cyclical blanket deposition and etch process is illustrated in the flowchart provided in
In particular,
An embodiment that involves the specific example of carbon-doped silicon (Si:C) for NMOS applications is described below. As illustrated schematically in
According to an embodiment, the regions of amorphous or polycrystalline deposition 120 and the sidewall epitaxial deposition 130 are then selectively etched, thus resulting in the structure that is schematically illustrated in
As discussed in more detail below, in exemplary embodiments, the vapor etch chemistry preferably comprises a halide, such as fluorine-, bromine- or chlorine-containing vapor compounds, and particularly a chlorine source, such as HCl or Cl2. In some embodiments, the etch chemistry also contains a germanium source, such as a germane like a monogermane (GeH4), GeCl4, metallorganic Ge precursors, or solid source Ge. The skilled artisan will appreciate that the same etch chemistries are also suitable for SiGe and SiGe:C films.
After the selective etch process described above with respect to
This cyclical process, including blanket deposition of a Si:C layer having a progressively higher carbon concentration followed by a selective etch process, is repeated until a target thickness of epitaxial Si:C film thickness is achieved over the recessed source/drain regions 114, as indicated by decisional block 40 shown in
While
The selective formation process may further include additional cycles of blanket deposition and selective etch back to remove deposited material from dielectric regions to form an optional capping layer 150, as shown in
In one embodiment, to aid in maintaining high concentrations of substitutional carbon and electrically active dopants, while at the same time minimizing temperature ramp/stabilization times, the substrate temperature, at least during the etch phases 30 of
As illustrated in
Table A provides exemplary process parameters for depositing epitaxial Si:C films in recessed source/drain regions, as discussed above with respect to
During the etch process disclosed herein, epitaxial Si:C is etched significantly slower than amorphous or polycrystalline Si:C in each etch phase with an etch selectivity in the range between about 10:1 and 30:1. Sidewall epitaxial material is also preferentially removed in the etch phases. In a preferred embodiment, the cyclical deposition and etch process conditions are tuned to reduce or eliminate net growth over the amorphous insulator 110 while achieving net growth in each cycle in the epitaxial recessed source/drain regions 114, particularly on the bottom surfaces of the recesses 114. This cyclical process is distinguishable from conventional selective deposition processes in which deposition and etching reactions occur simultaneously.
Tables B and C below give two examples of deposition and etch durations and resultant thicknesses using a recipe similar to that of Table A. The recipes are differently tuned to modulate both deposition and etch rates by increasing the partial pressure of the Si3H8 and optimizing etchant partial pressures.
As noted above, in alternative embodiments, instead of the cyclical blanket deposition/selective etching process described above, other selective deposition techniques may be used to deposit graded stressors in the recesses in a bottom-up fill manner.
Retrograded Stressor with Maximum Strain Lining Recesses.
According to another embodiment, the heteroepitaxial liner layer 225 may be formed by selectively depositing a blanket layer of a silicon-containing material, such as SiGe, SiGe:C, or Si:C, over a mixed substrate having insulator regions and recessed source/drain regions and selectively etching the blanket layer such that the deposited silicon-containing material remains only in the recessed source/drain regions, as described above with respect to
As shown in
The remaining portions of the recessed regions 214 are then filled with a filler 260, as illustrated in
Retrograded Stressor with Maximum Strain at Recess Sidewalls
The liner layer may be annealed to redistribute the epitaxial liner layer material such that the material migrates to corners at the sidewalls of the recesses. Typically, such an anneal causes the epitaxial material to be tapered, having a faceted side cross-sectional shape. The annealed epitaxial material is generally wider at the bottoms of the recesses than at the tops. The annealed epitaxial material, which preferably covers substantially all sidewall surface of the recesses, exerts a lateral strain on the adjacent transistor channel.
As a result of the annealing process, the silicon and dopant atoms in the liner layer 225, shown in
This faceted epitaxial material 230 is also dislocation free and strained, but has a higher alloy content than the epitaxial liner 225 of
In the illustrated embodiment, some of the epitaxial material of the original liner 225 remains on the bottom surfaces of the recessed regions 214 after annealing. As shown in
The remaining portions of the recessed regions 214 are then filled with a filler 260, as illustrated in
It will be understood that because the volume of the more highly strained epitaxial silicon-containing material 280, 230 is dramatically decreased by use of a thin lining layer rather than completely filling the recess with the highly strained material, the critical thickness constraint is relaxed and a substantial gain in strain engineering and thermal budget results. The impurity content of the epitaxial silicon-containing material 280, 230 can be adjusted, resulting in a different amount of strain produced. The process temperature can be increased significantly, leading to a significant increase in growth rate.
While the foregoing detailed description discloses several embodiments of the present invention, it should be understood that this disclosure is illustrative only and is not limiting of the present invention. It should be appreciated that the specific configurations and operations disclosed can differ from those described above, and that the methods described herein can be used in contexts other than fabrication of semiconductor devices.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4058430 | Suntola et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4210925 | Morcom et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4413022 | Suntola et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4578142 | Corboy, Jr. et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4698316 | Corboy, Jr. et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4704186 | Jastrzebski | Nov 1987 | A |
4710241 | Komatsu | Dec 1987 | A |
4728623 | Lu | Mar 1988 | A |
4735918 | Parsons | Apr 1988 | A |
4747367 | Posa | May 1988 | A |
4749440 | Blackwood et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4749441 | Christenson | Jun 1988 | A |
4758531 | Beyer | Jul 1988 | A |
4761269 | Conger et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4778775 | Tzeng | Oct 1988 | A |
4786615 | Liaw | Nov 1988 | A |
4793872 | Meunier | Dec 1988 | A |
4834809 | Kakihara | May 1989 | A |
4857479 | McLaughlin | Aug 1989 | A |
4870030 | Markunas et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4873205 | Critchlow | Oct 1989 | A |
4891092 | Jastrzebski | Jan 1990 | A |
4897366 | Smeltzer | Jan 1990 | A |
4923826 | Jastrzebski | May 1990 | A |
4966861 | Mieno | Oct 1990 | A |
4981811 | Feygenson | Jan 1991 | A |
5004705 | Blackstone | Apr 1991 | A |
5011789 | Burns | Apr 1991 | A |
5028973 | Bajor | Jul 1991 | A |
5037775 | Reisman | Aug 1991 | A |
5045494 | Choi | Sep 1991 | A |
5059544 | Burghartz | Oct 1991 | A |
5061644 | Yue | Oct 1991 | A |
5061655 | Ipposhi | Oct 1991 | A |
5071670 | Kelly | Dec 1991 | A |
5112439 | Reisman | May 1992 | A |
5129958 | Nagashima et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5144376 | Kweon | Sep 1992 | A |
5146304 | Yue | Sep 1992 | A |
5148604 | Bantien | Sep 1992 | A |
5158644 | Cheung et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5164813 | Blackstone et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175121 | Choi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5182619 | Pfiester | Jan 1993 | A |
5201995 | Reisman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5211796 | Hansen | May 1993 | A |
5234857 | Kim et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5236546 | Mizutani | Aug 1993 | A |
5252841 | Wen et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5269876 | Mizutani | Dec 1993 | A |
5282926 | Trah et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5285089 | Das | Feb 1994 | A |
5306666 | Izumi | Apr 1994 | A |
5319220 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323032 | Sato et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324679 | Kim et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326992 | Yoder | Jul 1994 | A |
5356510 | Pribat et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5373806 | Logar | Dec 1994 | A |
5378901 | Nii | Jan 1995 | A |
5380370 | Niino et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5403434 | Moslehi | Apr 1995 | A |
5403751 | Nishida et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416354 | Blackstone | May 1995 | A |
5421957 | Carlson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5422302 | Yonehara et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5422502 | Kovacic | Jun 1995 | A |
5425842 | Zijlstra | Jun 1995 | A |
5470799 | Itoh et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5496745 | Ryum et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5508536 | Twynam et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512772 | Maeda et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517943 | Takahashi | May 1996 | A |
5557117 | Matsuoka et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557118 | Hashimoto | Sep 1996 | A |
5563085 | Kohyama | Oct 1996 | A |
5591492 | Hirai et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609721 | Tsukune et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5670801 | Nakano | Sep 1997 | A |
5674781 | Huang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5693147 | Ward et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5711811 | Suntola et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5729033 | Hafizi | Mar 1998 | A |
5766999 | Sato | Jun 1998 | A |
5769950 | Takasu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783495 | Li et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5798278 | Chan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5831335 | Miyamoto | Nov 1998 | A |
5859447 | Yang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5879459 | Gadgil et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899752 | Hey et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904565 | Nguyen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916365 | Sherman | Jun 1999 | A |
5926743 | Xi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933761 | Lee | Aug 1999 | A |
5967794 | Kodama | Oct 1999 | A |
5986287 | Eberl et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998305 | Holmer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6031255 | Delage et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037258 | Liu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042654 | Comita et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043519 | Shealy et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048790 | Iacoponi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049098 | Sato | Apr 2000 | A |
6057200 | Prall et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058945 | Fujiyama et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060397 | Seamons et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069068 | Rathore et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074478 | Oguro | Jun 2000 | A |
6077775 | Stumborg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083818 | Stumborg et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093368 | Chu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100184 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6139700 | Kang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146517 | Hoinkis | Nov 2000 | A |
6153010 | Kiyoku et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6164295 | Ui et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181012 | Edelstein et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184128 | Wang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188134 | Stumborg et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190453 | Boydston et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190976 | Shishiguchi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200893 | Sneh | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203613 | Gates et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207487 | Kim et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207567 | Wang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221168 | Carter et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225213 | Urabe | May 2001 | B1 |
6225650 | Tadatomo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235568 | Murthy et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270572 | Kim et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287965 | Kang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291876 | Stumborg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303523 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6316795 | Croke, III | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335251 | Miyano et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6340619 | Ko | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342448 | Lin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343183 | Halpin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348096 | Sunakawa et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348098 | McLoughlin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351039 | Jin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358829 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6368954 | Lopatin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376318 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380065 | Komai et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391785 | Satta et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391796 | Akiyama et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6444495 | Leung et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454854 | Ose | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6482733 | Raaijmakers et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6555839 | Fitzgerald | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555845 | Sunakawa et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6566279 | Suemitsu et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6583015 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6593191 | Fitzgerald | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6593211 | Sato | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6657223 | Wang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6727169 | Raaijmakers et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6821825 | Todd et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6881633 | Hokazono | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6900115 | Todd | May 2005 | B2 |
6969875 | Fitzgerald | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974730 | Diaz et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6998305 | Arena et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7108748 | Brabant et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7176481 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7312128 | Kim | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335959 | Curello et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7405131 | Chong et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20010001742 | Huang et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010034123 | Jeon et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010046766 | Asakawa | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020023520 | Hu | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020168868 | Todd | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030036268 | Brabant et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030082300 | Todd et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040171238 | Arena et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224089 | Singh et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040262694 | Chidambaram | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050079692 | Samoilov et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050250298 | Bauer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060011984 | Currie | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014366 | Currie | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060115933 | Ye et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060166414 | Carlson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060169668 | Samoilov | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060169669 | Zojaji et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205194 | Bauer | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228842 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234504 | Bauer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240630 | Bauer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060289900 | Thirupapuliyur et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070287272 | Bauer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090075447 | Meunier-Beillard | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19820147 | Jul 1999 | DE |
WO 9617107 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9941423 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9962109 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0011721 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0013207 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0015866 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0015881 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0016377 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0022659 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0055895 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0075964 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0079576 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0115220 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0136702 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0145149 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0166832 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0178123 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0178124 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0199166 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090075029 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |