This invention relates to transmitting digital signals from electronic devices such as testers, memory devices, etc., and, more particularly, to a system and method for precisely controlling the timing at which a digital signals are output from the electronic devices.
Digital signals are received and transmitted by many types of digital electronic devices at ever increasing rates. For example, the rate at which command, address and write data signals are applied to memory devices, such as dynamic random access memory (“DRAM”) devices, continues to increase, as does the rate at which read data signals are output from memory devices. As the rate at which such signals are transmitted continues to increase, it has become more difficult to ensure that the signals are transmitted at the proper time and in synchronism with each other. For example, typical clock trees 10, 14 are shown in
The other clock tree 14 receives a second internal clock signal ICLK2, and couples the ICLK2 signal through buffers 22 to the clock inputs of respective latches 24a,b. The data inputs of the latches 24a,b are coupled to a logic “1” level. The latch 24a therefore outputs a high data strobe signal to the DQS terminal responsive to the rising edge of the ICLK2 signal. This high at the output of the latch 24a also resets the latch 24b. The latch 24b receives the ICLK2 signal through an odd number of buffers 22 so that it outputs a high complementary data strobe signal DQS* responsive to the falling edge of the ICLK2 signal. The high at the output of the latch 24b also resets the latch 24a. The DQS and DQS* signals are considered to be in the same pin group, which is different from the DQ signal pin group.
The clock trees 10, 14 shown in
As the speed at which data signals are transmitted continues to increase, it has become more difficult to ensure that the DQ signals are all transmitted at the same time, and that the DQS and DQS* signals have the proper timing relative to the DQ signals. With further reference to
It can also be seen from
While the number of buffers 22 through which the ICLK2 signal propagates is different from the number of buffers 18 through which the ICLK1 signal propagates, the number of buffers 18 through which the ICLK1 signal propagates to reach each of the latches 20 is the same for all branches of the clock tree 10. Therefore, the timing at which the ICLK1 signal reaches each of the latches 20 will theoretically be the same despite process, voltage and temperature variations. However, the lengths of the conductors through which the ICLK1 signal must propagate to reach each of the latches 20 will generally not be the same. Furthermore, it is generally not possible to compensate for these different propagation times by, for example, inserting additional buffers in the signal path because the propagation times of the buffers, but not the propagation time of conductors, will generally vary with process, voltage and temperature variations.
The manner in which the propagation delay of the buffers 18, 22 vary with, for example, temperature is shown in the graph of
There is therefore a need for a system and method for ensuring that digital signals are transmitted from electronic devices, such as memory devices, memory controllers, testing systems and the like, with precisely controlled timing.
A system for controlling the timing at which a signal is transmitted includes a first signal distribution tree having a plurality of branches. A first digital input signal is applied to an input node of the tree and is coupled through the respective branches to a plurality of respective first output nodes. The first signal distribution tree further includes a phase interpolator through which the digital input signal is coupled between the input node and each of the first output nodes. At least one branch through which the input signal is coupled to at least one of the first output nodes includes a delay line coupled in series with the phase interpolator. A second signal distribution tree also has a plurality of branches. A second digital input signal is applied to an input node of the second signal distribution tree, and is coupled through the respective branches to a plurality of respective second output nodes. The second signal distribution tree also includes a delay line in at least one of its branches from the input node to a respective one of the second output nodes. The delay lines in the first signal distribution tree may be adjusted so that the input signal is coupled through the first signal distribution tree from the input node to each of the first output nodes at substantially the same time. Similarly, the delay lines in the second signal distribution tree may be adjusted so that the input signal is coupled through the second signal distribution tree from the input node to each of the second output nodes at substantially the same time. The delay of the phase interpolator may be adjusted to provide a predetermined timing relationship between the coupling of the input signal to the first output nodes and the coupling of the input signal to the second output nodes.
The first and second clock distribution trees may be used in a memory controller or memory device to control the timing of data signals coupled between the memory controller and memory device relative to each other as well as relative to the timing of a data strobe signal coupled between the memory controller and memory device.
The first and second clock distribution trees may also be used in an integrated circuit tester to apply test signals to an integrated circuit having a range of timing relationships relative to a strobe signal that is also applied to the integrated circuit being tested. The tester then receives results signals from the integrated circuit being tested, which indicate the performance of the integrated circuit to various timing relationships in the range.
A system and method for controlling the output times of digital signals according to one example of the invention is shown in
The ICLK signal is also coupled through a second clock tree 50 to a pair of latches, although only one latch 52 is shown for purposes of clarity. The second clock tree generates complementary DQS and DQS* signals. The tree 50 is considered to be lightly loaded because the ICLK signal is coupled to the latches 52 through only two branches, each containing a single buffer 56. As a result of the different loadings of the clock trees 40, 50, as well as differences in the number of buffers and lengths of conductors in the trees 40, 50, it is difficult to control the timing of the DQ signals relative to each other and to the DQS signal. According to one example of the invention, this difficulty is largely overcome by offsetting the phase of the ICLK signal using a respective phase interpolator 60, 62 in each of the trees 40, 50. As is well-known in the art, a phase interpolator is able to interpolate between the phase of two input signals by a precisely controlled amount. The phase interpolators 60, 62 each receive the ICLK signal and its complement ICLK*. The degree of precision of the delay of a signal generated by a phase interpolator depends on the precision of the input signal frequency. The phase interpolators 60, 62 can, for example, interpolate between the phases of the ICLK and ICLK* signals in 100 increments. If the ICLK and ICLK* signals have a frequency of 5 mHz, the phase offset of the signals output from the phase interpolators 60, 62 can then be adjusted in 1 nanosecond increments. The degree of precision of the delay depends on the precision of the input signal frequency, and is thus not adversely affected by process, supply voltage or temperature variations.
The outputs of the interpolators 60, 62 are coupled through branches of the respective clock trees 40, 50, each of which contains a buffer, although only one buffer 64, 66 is shown in each branch in
In operation, the phase interpolators 64, 66 are adjusted to maintain a predetermined timing relationship between the signals in the DQ signal pin group and the signal in the DQS pin group. The phase interpolators 60, 62 primarily compensate for differences in the wire delays in the clock trees 40, 50. Like the wire delays, the delays of the phase interpolators 60, 62 are relatively insensitive to process, supply voltage or temperature variations. The delay lines 68, 70 primarily compensate for differences in the delays in each branch of the clock trees 40, 50 so that the DQ signals all transition at the same time, and both of the DQS signals transition at the same time. The delay lines 68, 70 are sensitive to process, supply voltage or temperature variations, and they roughly therefore track propagation delay variations of the buffers 48, 56, 64, 66 and other semiconductor circuit elements resulting from those same factors.
Another advantage to placing a delay line in series with a phase interpolator in the clock trees is that it is possible to control the slope and magnitude of the delay as a function of processing, supply voltage, and temperature variations. For example, with reference to
The system and method for controlling the timing at which digital signals are output can also be used to test the timing margins of digital circuits, such as memory devices. For example, two memory device timing parameters that are normally tested are the maximum data set-up time, which is abbreviated as tDS, and the minimum data hold time, which is abbreviated as tDH. As mentioned above, in source synchronous data transfers, write data signals DQ are transmitted in synchronism with a data strobe signal DQS. The maximum time needed for the write data signals DQ to become valid after the transition of DQS, i.e., the data set up time tDS, is normally specified for a memory device. Similarly, the minimum time that the write data signals DQ must remain valid after the transition of DQS, i.e., the data hold time tDH, is also normally specified for a memory device.
The time between tDS and tDH is the data valid period. The length of the data valid period may be excessively reduced by any increase in the set-up time beyond the specified maximum set-up time tDS or any decrease of the data hold time from the specified minimum data hold time tDH. As the length of the data hold period gets smaller, it becomes more difficult for the memory device to position transitions of the DQS signal in the data valid period. It is therefore important to determine the data set-up and data hold times of a memory device being tested to ensure that a sufficient data valid period can be achieved.
A memory device can be tested to determine the values of tDS and TDH, as well as other timing parameters, by varying the timing relationship between the write data signals DQ and the data strobe signal DQS, and determining which relationships allow the DQ signals to be written to the memory device. For example, with reference to
One example of the write data signal generating circuitry 86 is shown in
In operation, the delay lines 94-100 are adjusted so that the DQ signals are output from all of the latches 120-126 at the same time. The phase interpolator 90 is then adjusted to vary the delay time of the phase interpolator 90 over a range of delay values. The timing of a data strobe signal DQS (
As mentioned above, the system and method for controlling the output times of digital signals shown in
The computer system 200 also includes a DRAM device 220 that is coupled to the memory controller 206 through a control bus 222, an address bus 224 and a data bus 230. The memory controller 206 includes a write data output circuit 234 similar to the circuit shown in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to the disclosed examples, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, although clock trees using various examples of the present invention generally have a phase interpolator in each tree and a delay line in each branch, it will be understood that it may be possible to omit a phase interpolator in one or more clock trees and use a phase interpolator in another tree to match the timing in the clock tree with the omitted phase interpolator. Similarly, it may be possible to omit a delay line in one or more branch of a clock tree and use a delay line in another branch to match the timing in the branch with the omitted delay line. Such modifications are well within the skill of those ordinarily skilled in the art. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/150,576, filed Jun. 1, 2011, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,411,521, on Apr. 2, 2013, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/956,791, filed Nov. 30, 2010, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,969,815 on Jun. 28, 2011, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/122,414, filed May 16, 2008, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,855,928 B2 on Dec. 21, 2010, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/262,275, filed Oct. 28, 2005, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,379,382 on May 27, 2008. These applications and patents are each incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety, for any purpose.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5444667 | Obara | Aug 1995 | A |
6002279 | Evans et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6340909 | Zerbe et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6359486 | Chen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6380774 | Saeki | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6385126 | Jung et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6397042 | Prentice et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6484268 | Tamura et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6509773 | Buchwald et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6513103 | Garlepp et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525584 | Seo et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6707727 | Tamura et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6791360 | Gauthier et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791388 | Buchwald et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794912 | Hirata et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6815986 | Roy et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826390 | Tamura | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6854002 | Conway et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6900676 | Tamura | May 2005 | B1 |
6900681 | Takano | May 2005 | B2 |
6922372 | Suzuki | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6943606 | Dunning et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947510 | Dietl et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7158587 | Yang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7321524 | Shaeffer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7366966 | LeBerge | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7379382 | LaBerge | May 2008 | B2 |
7484122 | Natarajan et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7592824 | Ware et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7855928 | LaBerge | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7969815 | LaBerge | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8411521 | LaBerge | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010007136 | Tamura et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020079938 | Saeki | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080883 | Tamura et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087820 | Garlepp et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087922 | Glenn et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030038659 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043926 | Terashima et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030208713 | Evans | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040013217 | Dietrich et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022339 | Nakao | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052323 | Zhang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066873 | Cho et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040168036 | Garlepp et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050024117 | Kubo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050025252 | Tate et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030110 | Yen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047495 | Yoshioka | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050134300 | Kushiyama et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135527 | Masui et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147194 | Koenenkamp | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190193 | Freker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193290 | Cho et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201500 | Shizuki | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050259504 | Murtugh et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070097778 | LaBerge | May 2007 | A1 |
20080211557 | LaBerge | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20110069561 | LaBerge | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110231143 | LaBerge | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130241618 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12956791 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 13150576 | US | |
Parent | 12122414 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 12956791 | US | |
Parent | 11262275 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 12122414 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13150576 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13855553 | US |