Patent Grant
11646198
An Application Data Sheet is filed concurrently with this specification as part of the present application. Each application that the present application claims benefit of or priority to as identified in the concurrently filed Application Data Sheet is incorporated by reference herein in their entireties and for all purposes.
Various thin film layers for semiconductor devices may be deposited with atomic layer deposition (ALD) processes. However, existing ALD processes may not be suitable for depositing ultrathin films having a thickness less than about 50 Å. For example, many existing ALD processes for depositing ultrathin films result in a high wafer-to-wafer variation between films deposited from substrate to substrate.
Methods and apparatuses for processing semiconductor substrates are provided herein. One aspect involves a method for depositing a silicon oxide film by atomic layer deposition on a semiconductor substrate by: (a) inserting a substrate into a chamber; (b) after inserting the substrate into the chamber and prior to performing a first cycle of atomic layer deposition at a deposition temperature, raising the substrate's temperature to about the deposition temperature by exposing the substrate to a soak gas for a duration of about 500 seconds or less; and (c) performing the atomic layer deposition, whereby a cycle of the atomic layer deposition includes exposing the substrate to a silicon-containing precursor in a non-plasma environment for a duration sufficient to substantially adsorb the silicon-containing precursor to the surface of the substrate and exposing the substrate to an oxidant in a plasma environment to form at least a portion of the silicon oxide film; where soaking the substrate includes exposing the substrate to a soak gas including only one or more gases used when exposing the substrate to the oxidant in the plasma environment during the atomic layer deposition cycle to form the at least a portion of the silicon oxide film; and where the thickness of the silicon oxide film deposited by the atomic layer deposition is less than about 5 nm.
The soak gas in (b) may contain only a gas or gases used when exposing the substrate to the oxidant in the plasma environment to form the at least a portion of the silicon oxide film. In some embodiments, the soak gas in (b) includes two or more gases, and no other gases, used when exposing the substrate to the oxidant in the plasma environment to form the at least a portion of the silicon oxide film, and where the two or more gases are present in the soak gas in substantially the same proportion as they are in the oxidant.
In various embodiments, the soak gas in (b) is selected from the group consisting of argon, nitrogen, oxygen, nitrous oxide, and combinations thereof. The soak gas in (b) may include no helium.
The flow rate of the soak gas in (b) may be within about 10% of a maximum flow rate achievable by the chamber. In some embodiments, the flow rate of the soak gas in (b) is at least about 15 slm. In various embodiments, the flow rate of the soak gas in (b) is at least about 25% to about 200% of the flow rate of the one or more gases used when exposing the substrate to the oxidant in the plasma environment during the atomic layer deposition cycle.
Wafer-to-wafer variation of the average silicon oxide film thickness over the surface of the substrate may be less than about ±2 Å.
In various embodiments, (c) includes performing two or more atomic layer deposition cycles to deposit the silicon oxide film on the substrate. In some embodiments, between two and about fifty atomic layer deposition cycles are performed.
The silicon-containing precursor may be selected from the group consisting of silane, disilane, trisilane, tetrasilane, halogen-substituted versions of any of the foregoing silanes, amine-substituted versions of any of the foregoing silanes, and trisilylamine. The oxidant may be selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrous oxide, and combinations thereof. The atomic layer deposition may be performed at a temperature of between about 30° C. and about 70° C. In various embodiments, the cycle of the atomic layer deposition further includes purging the chamber between each exposing operation.
Another aspect involves a method for depositing a film by atomic layer deposition on a semiconductor substrate by: (a) inserting a substrate into a chamber; and (b) after inserting the substrate into the chamber and prior to performing a first cycle of atomic layer deposition at a deposition temperature, raising the substrate's temperature to about the deposition temperature by exposing the substrate to a soak gas for a duration of about 500 seconds or less; and (c) performing the atomic layer deposition, where a cycle of the atomic layer deposition includes exposing the substrate to a precursor in a non-plasma environment for a duration sufficient to substantially adsorb the precursor to the surface of the substrate, and exposing the substrate to a second reactant in a plasma environment to form at least a portion of the film; and where soaking the substrate includes exposing the substrate to a soak gas including only one or more gases used when exposing the substrate to the second reactant in the plasma environment during the atomic layer deposition cycle to form the at least a portion of the film; and where the thickness of the film deposited by the atomic layer deposition is less than about 5 nm.
The soak gas in (b) may contain only a gas or gases used when exposing the substrate to the second reactant in the plasma environment to form the at least a portion of the film. In various embodiments, the soak gas in (b) includes two or more gases, and no other gases, used when exposing the substrate to the second reactant in the plasma environment to form the at least a portion of the film, and where the two or more gases are present in the soak gas in substantially the same proportion as they are in the second reactant.
The soak gas in (b) may be selected from the group consisting of argon, nitrogen, oxygen, nitrous oxide, and combinations thereof. The soak gas in (b) may include no helium.
In various embodiments, the flow rate of the soak gas in (b) is within 10% of a maximum flow rate achievable by the chamber. In some embodiments, the flow rate of the soak gas in (b) is at least about 15 slm. In various embodiments, the flow rate of the soak gas in (b) is at least about 25% to about 200% of the flow rate of the one or more gases used when exposing the substrate to the oxidant in the plasma environment during the atomic layer deposition cycle.
Wafer-to-wafer variation of the average film thickness over the surface of the substrate may be less than about ±2 Å. In some embodiments (c) includes performing two or more atomic layer deposition cycles to deposit the film on the substrate. For example, in some embodiments, between two and about fifty atomic layer deposition cycles are performed.
The film deposited by the atomic layer deposition may be selected from the group consisting of silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, metal oxide, doped silicon oxide, doped silicon nitride, doped silicon carbide, and doped metal oxide. In some embodiments, the film deposited by the atomic layer deposition is an oxide and the atomic layer deposition is performed at a temperature of about 50° C. In some embodiments, the film deposited by the atomic layer deposition is a nitride or carbide and the atomic layer deposition is performed at a temperature of between about 200° C. and about 300° C.
The precursor may include a chemical selected from the group consisting of silicon, metals, electron-donating atoms, and electron-donating groups. In various embodiments, the second reactant is a reductant or oxidant.
The cycle of the atomic layer deposition may further include purging the chamber between each exposing operation.
Another aspect involves an apparatus for processing semiconductor substrates, the apparatus including: (a) one or more stations, each reaction station including a pedestal for holding a substrate; (b) at least one outlet for coupling to a vacuum; (c) one or more process gas inlets for coupling to precursor and reactant sources; (d) a robot for inserting substrates into the one or more reaction chambers; and (e) a controller for controlling operations in the apparatus, including machine-readable instructions for: (i) inserting a substrate into one of the one or more stations, (ii) introducing a soak gas for a duration of about 500 seconds or less; (iii) introducing a silicon-containing precursor for a duration sufficient to substantially adsorb the silicon-containing precursor onto the surface of the substrate; (iv) introducing a second reactant into the one or more reaction chambers and igniting a plasma; and (v) repeating (iii) and (iv) to form a film on the substrate, the film having a thickness less than about 5 nm, where the soak gas in (ii) includes only one or more gases used in (iv).
The controller may further include machine-readable instructions for performing (ii) at least once after each new substrate is inserted into one of the one or more stations by the robot. In some embodiments, the apparatus includes two or more stations.
These and other aspects are described further below with reference to the drawings.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the presented embodiments. The disclosed embodiments may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well-known process operations have not been described in detail to not unnecessarily obscure the disclosed embodiments. While the disclosed embodiments will be described in conjunction with the specific embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the disclosed embodiments.
Manufacture of semiconductor devices typically involves depositing one or more conformal thin films on a substrate in an integrated fabrication process. For example, some front-end-of-the-line processes may involve deposition of conformal films by atomic layer deposition (ALD). ALD is a technique that deposits thin layers of material using sequential self-limiting reactions. ALD processes use surface-mediated deposition reactions to deposit films on a layer-by-layer basis in cycles. As an example, an ALD cycle may include the following operations: (i) delivery/adsorption of a silicon-containing precursor, (ii) purging of silicon-containing precursor from the chamber, (iii) delivery of a second reactant and ignite plasma, and (iv) purging of byproducts from the chamber.
As devices shrink, conformal layers become thinner and fewer and fewer ALD cycles are used to deposit a film on a substrate. As a result, it is desirable to accurately control film thickness from substrate to substrate. Film thickness of a substrate may be measured by taking an average film thickness over the surface of the substrate. Variation in thickness from substrate to substrate may be known as “wafer-to-wafer variation.” In thicker films deposited by ALD, variations in thickness in initial cycles of ALD has a smaller impact than in thinner films because there are more cycles of ALD performed in depositing a thicker film. For example, a wafer-to-wafer variation of ±5 Å in thickness between films deposited to a thickness of 500 Å is a small fraction compared to a wafer-to-wafer variation of ±5 Å in thickness between films having a thickness of 10 Å. Thus, for deposition of ultrathin films, such as films having an average film thickness less than about 50 Å, accurate control of wafer-to-wafer variation is of particular interest. Ultrathin films may be used in various applications, such as fabrication of front-end-of-line spacers, plug liners, and cap layers. As devices shrink, other forms of variation also become problematic. Such variations include within wafer variation: i.e., layer thickness variations from one position to another position on a single wafer. While most of the discussion herein concerns wafer-to-wafer variations, the disclosed improvements may be equally applicable to other forms of variation.
Variation may depend on a number of factors, including the chamber conditions prior to performing ALD cycles on a substrate. Conventional ALD methods typically begin by placing a substrate on a pedestal in a chamber or station, which may be part of an apparatus, reactor, or tool for fabricating semiconductor substrates. To perform ALD at a desired deposition temperature, the pedestal is set to a desired deposition temperature and once the substrate is placed on the pedestal, the substrate is heated such that the substrate temperature is approximately the same as the pedestal temperature. Prior to being placed on the pedestal, the substrate may be at a temperature different from that of the pedestal temperature. For example, substrate temperatures may be at room temperature, such that the substrate temperature is raised to a deposition temperature on the pedestal. Conventional methods for stabilizing the substrate temperature involved exposing the substrate to certain conditions to more efficiently bring the substrate temperature up to a temperature at or near the deposition temperature. Exposure to these conditions is sometimes called “soak.” To increase throughput and reduce the time required for the substrate temperature to be raised, conventionally the wafer is exposed to helium, which has a high thermal conductivity, to stabilize the substrate temperature. However, conventional methods contaminate or increase the wafer-to-wafer variation of films deposited between substrates. For example, although the chamber may be purged after the substrate is exposed to helium, some helium may still be present in the chamber such that when the plasma ignites, the plasma has a slight purple color, which is consistent with helium plasma, and nucleation and incubation periods for the ALD process are affected, thereby increasing wafer-to-wafer variation between substrates.
Provided herein are methods of soaking a substrate prior to performing ALD to reduce wafer-to-wafer variation between substrates. Methods may be used to deposit ultrathin films, which are defined as films having a thickness of about 50 Å or less, or about 30 Å or less, or about 20 Å or less, or about 10 Å or less. Methods involve exposing the substrate to a soak gas including one or more gases used with the second reactant of an ALD cycle. In various embodiments, the soak gas only includes gases used with the second reactant of an ALD cycle. Deposited films are uniform from substrate to substrate, with wafer-to-wafer variation less than about ±2 Å for deposition of ultrathin films, or less than about ±1 Å. In various embodiments, wafer-to-wafer variation of less than about ±2 Å is achieved where between about 2 and about 10 cycles of ALD are performed. Disclosed embodiments are suitable for deposition of any film deposited by ALD, such as dielectric films, metal films, semiconductor films, and films of any material used in the fabrication of semiconductor substrates. For example, disclosed embodiments may be used to deposit silicon oxide (SiO), silicon nitride (SiN), silicon carbide (SiC), silicon oxynitride (SiON), silicon oxycarbonitride (SiOCN), metal oxide, doped silicon oxide, doped silicon nitride, doped silicon carbide, or doped metal oxide. In some embodiments, disclosed embodiments may be used to deposit titanium nitride, tantalum nitride, tungsten, aluminum oxide, and aluminum nitride. The deposited materials may have normal stoichiometry (e.g., SiO2) or variants thereof.
The methods provided herein involve deposition by ALD. Unlike a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique, ALD processes use surface-mediated deposition reactions to deposit films on a layer-by-layer basis. In one example of an ALD process, a substrate surface, including a population of surface active sites, is exposed to a gas phase distribution of a first precursor in a dose provided to a process station housing the substrate. Molecules of this first precursor are adsorbed onto the substrate surface, including chemisorbed species and/or physisorbed molecules of the first precursor. It should be understood that when the compound is adsorbed onto the substrate surface as described herein, the adsorbed layer may include the compound as well as derivatives of the compound. For example, an adsorbed layer of a silicon-containing precursor may include the silicon-containing precursor as well as derivatives of the silicon-containing precursor. In certain embodiments, an ALD precursor dose partially saturates the substrate surface. In some embodiments, the dose phase of an ALD cycle concludes before precursor contacts the substrate to evenly saturate the surface. Typically, the precursor flow is turned off or diverted at this point, and only purge gas flows. By operating in this sub-saturation regime, the ALD process reduces the cycle time and increases throughput. However, because precursor adsorption is not saturation limited, the adsorbed precursor concentration may vary slightly across the substrate surface. Examples of ALD processes operating in the sub-saturation regime are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/061,587, filed Oct. 23, 2013, titled “SUB-SATURATED ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITION AND CONFORMAL FILM DEPOSITION,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. After a first precursor dose, the reactor is then evacuated to remove any first precursor remaining in gas phase so that only the adsorbed species remain. A second reactant is introduced to the reactor so that some of these molecules react with the first precursor adsorbed on the surface. In some processes, the second reactant reacts immediately with the adsorbed first precursor. In other embodiments, the second reactant reacts only after a source of activation is applied, such as plasma. In various embodiments described herein, the second reactant reacts with the adsorbed first precursor when a plasma is ignited. The reactor may then be evacuated again to remove unbound second reactant molecules. In some implementations, the ALD methods include plasma activation. As described herein, the ALD method and apparatuses described herein may be conformal film deposition (CFD) methods, which are described generally in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/084,399 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,728,956), filed Apr. 11, 2011, and titled “PLASMA ACTIVATED CONFORMAL FILM DEPOSITION,” and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/084,305, filed Apr. 11, 2011, and titled “SILICON NITRIDE FILMS AND METHODS,” which are herein incorporated by reference in its entireties.
The concept of an ALD “cycle” is relevant to the discussion of various embodiments herein. Generally a cycle is the minimum set of operations used to perform a surface deposition reaction one time. The result of one cycle is production of at least a partial silicon oxide film layer on a substrate surface. Typically, an ALD cycle includes operations to deliver and adsorb at least one reactant to the substrate surface, and then react the adsorbed reactant with one or more reactants to form the partial layer of film. The cycle may include certain ancillary operations such as sweeping one of the reactants or byproducts and/or treating the partial film as deposited. Generally, a cycle contains one instance of a unique sequence of operations. ALD cycles may be used to build film thickness.
In operation 101 of
In some embodiments, the feature may have an aspect ratio of at least about 2:1, at least about 4:1, at least about 6:1, at least about 10:1, or higher. The feature may also have a dimension near the opening, e.g., an opening diameter or line width of between about 10 nm to 500 nm, for example between about 25 nm and about 300 nm. Disclosed methods may be performed on substrates with features having an opening less than about 150 nm. A feature via or trench may be referred to as an unfilled feature or a feature. A feature that may have a re-entrant profile that narrows from the bottom, closed end, or interior of the feature to the feature opening.
During operation 101, the pedestal is set to a deposition temperature. For example, the pedestal may be set to the temperature to be used during deposition of a film by ALD in subsequent operations. In various embodiments, the pedestal is set to a temperature greater than room temperature, or greater than about 20° C., or greater than about 25° C. The deposition temperature depends on the type of film to be deposited on the substrate and the chemistry used for depositing the film. For example, in some embodiments, deposition temperature for depositing an oxide may be less than about 100° C., or less than about 50° C., or about 50° C. In some embodiments, deposition temperature for depositing a nitride or carbide may be less than about 400° C., or less than about 300° C., or less than about 200° C., or between about 200° C. and about 300° C. In some embodiments, deposition temperature may be greater than about 400° C.
In operation 150, the substrate is exposed to a soak gas prior to performing the first cycle of ALD on the substrate. The substrate is exposed to the soak gas to raise the temperature of the substrate to a temperature at or near the deposition temperature. For example, a substrate inserted into to the process chamber from an outside environment may be at a room temperature of about 20° C., and the substrate is exposed to a soak gas to raise the temperature of the substrate to a temperature of about 50° C. for oxide deposition. The process of raising the substrate temperature when exposed to the soak gas is referred to as “soak.”
In various embodiments, the soak gas is helium-free, such that no helium is present in the process chamber during operation 150. The soak gas may be a carrier gas or any second reactant used in ALD, or any combination thereof. In various embodiments, the soak gas is one or more gases used with the second reactant in the plasma step of the ALD cycle, which is described below with respect to operation 111. Additional examples of soak gases include argon (Ar), helium (He), hydrogen (H2), xenon (Xe), krypton (Kr), nitrogen (N2), oxygen (O2), nitrous oxide (N2O), ammonia (NH3), hydrazine, ozone (O3), nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur monoxide (SO), and water (H2O). In some implementations, the soak gas contains no gases other than gases present when the second reactant is introduced during the ALD cycle. For example, if the only gases present during this phase are argon, oxygen, and nitrous oxide, the soak gas would include one or more of argon, oxygen, and nitrous oxide, but no other gases.
For deposition of silicon oxide, the soak gas may be an oxidant and/or a carrier gas used when the substrate is exposed to the oxidant in a plasma environment in an ALD cycle. Examples of soak gases for deposition of silicon oxide include, but are not limited to, Ar, N2, O2, N2O, O3, peroxides including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), H2O, alcohols such as methanol, ethanol and isopropanol, NO, NO2, CO, and CO2. In some embodiments, the oxidizer may be a mixture of O2 and a weak oxidizer such as N2O, CO, CO2, NO, NO2, SO, SO2, CxHyOz and/or H2O.
For deposition of silicon nitride, the soak gas may be a nitrogen-containing reactant and/or a carrier gas used when the substrate is exposed to the nitrogen-containing reactant in a plasma environment in an ALD cycle. Example soak gases for deposition of silicon nitride include Ar, H2, N2, and NH3. Additional examples of nitrogen-containing reactants include compounds containing at least one nitrogen, for example, hydrazine, amines (amines bearing carbon) such as methylamine, dimethylamine, ethylamine, isopropylamine, t-butylamine, di-t-butylamine, cyclopropylamine, sec-butylamine, cyclobutylamine, isoamylamine, 2-methylbutan-2-amine, trimethylamine, diisopropylamine, diethylisopropylamine, di-t-butylhydrazine, as well as aromatic containing amines such as anilines, pyridines, and benzylamines. Amines may be primary, secondary, tertiary or quaternary (for example, tetraalkylammonium compounds). A nitrogen-containing reactant can contain heteroatoms other than nitrogen, for example, hydroxylamine, t-butyloxycarbonyl amine and N-t-butyl hydroxylamine are nitrogen-containing reactants.
The composition of soak gases used may depend on the composition used when the substrate is exposed to the second reactant in a plasma environment of an ALD cycle. In some embodiments, the soak gas contains only carrier gas. In some embodiments, the soak gas contains only the second reactant.
All percentages and ratios listed herein are by flow rate. In some embodiments, the composition of soak gases in operation 150 is identical to the composition of gases in operation 111. In some embodiments, the composition of soak gases in operation 150 is different from the composition of gases in operation 111. For example, the flow rate of soak gases in operation 150 may be at least about 25% to at least about 200% of the flow rate of the gases in operation 111. In some embodiments, the composition of soak gases in operation 150 includes a carrier gas and the second reactant, where the second reactant may include one or more gases, and the flow rate of the carrier gas may be between about 25% and about 200% of the flow rate of the carrier gas in operation 111. Likewise, the flow rate of the second reactant in operation 150 may be at least about 25% to about 200% of the flow rate of the second reactant in operation 111.
For example, in deposition of oxides, the composition of soak gases may include argon, nitrogen, and oxygen. The flow rate of each of argon, nitrogen, and oxygen may be at least about 25% to about 200% of the flow rate of argon, nitrogen, and oxygen respectively used in operation 111. In another example, the composition of soak gases used prior to depositing an oxide may include nitrous oxide and oxygen such that the flow rate ratio of nitrous oxide to oxygen may be between about 1:5 and about 2:1.
In deposition of nitrides, example compositions of soak gases may include compositions having a carrier gas and a nitrogen-containing gas. In deposition of metal compounds, example compositions of soak gases may include compositions including a carrier gas and a nitrogen-containing gas. The carrier gas and the nitrogen-containing gas may be at least about 25% to about 200% of the flow rate of the respective gas used when the carrier gas and nitrogen-containing gas are used in operation 111.
In deposition of carbides, example compositions of soak gases may include a carrier gas, and a carbon-containing gas. The carrier gas and the carbon-containing gas may be at least about 25% to about 200% of the flow rate of the respective gas used when the carrier gas and carbon-containing gas are used in operation 111.
The flow rate of the soak gases during operation 150 may be at least about 500 sccm for a chamber including four stations, each station of which includes a substrate. In some embodiments, the flow rate of the soak gases during operation 150 is within about 10% of a maximum flow rate achievable by the chamber. For example, the flow rate of the soak gases may be at least about 15 slm, or at least about 20 slm, or between about 15 slm and about 20 slm, for example about 17 slm.
In operation 150, the substrate is exposed to the soak gas or gases for a short period of time. A short period is defined as a duration less than about 150 seconds, or less than about 100 seconds, or less than about 60 seconds. For example, the substrate may be exposed to the soak gas or gases for a duration between about 5 seconds and about 60 seconds, for example, about 5 seconds.
Operation 150 may be performed each time a new substrate is inserted into a process chamber in the apparatus, which may be a multi-station tool including one or more stations. In some embodiments, the apparatus includes four stations for processing substrates. Further description of example apparatuses are described below with respect to
Returning to
In operation 103 of
In various embodiments, the first precursor includes an electron-donating atom or electron-donating group. In various embodiments, the first precursor is a silicon-containing precursor or a metal-containing precursor. In some embodiments, the first precursor is a silicon-containing precursor suitable for depositing a silicon oxide film by ALD. The first precursor may also be a mixture of two or more compounds. In some embodiments, the silicon-containing precursor is chosen depending on the type of silicon-containing film to be deposited.
Example silicon-containing precursors include, but are not limited to, silanes, polysilanes, halosilanes, and aminosilanes. A silane contains hydrogen and/or carbon groups, but does not contain a halogen. A polysilane may have the formula (H3Si—(SiH2)n—SiH3), where n≥1. Examples of silanes include silane (SiH4), disilane (Si2H6), trisilane, tetrasilane and organo silanes such as methylsilane, ethylsilane, isopropylsilane, t-butylsilane, dimethylsilane, diethylsilane, di-t-butylsilane, allylsilane, sec-butylsilane, thexylsilane, isoamylsilane, t-butyldisilane, di-t-butyldisilane, tetra-ethyl-ortho-silicate (also known as tetra-ethoxy-silane or TEOS) and the like.
A halosilane contains at least one halogen group and may or may not contain hydrogens and/or carbon groups. A halosilane may have a formula SiXaHy whereby X═Cl, F, I, or Br, and a+y=4, where a≥1. A halosilane may have a formula SiXaHy(CH3), where X═Cl, F, I, or Br, and a+y+z=4, where a≥1. Examples of halosilanes are iodosilanes, bromosilanes, chlorosilanes and fluorosilanes. Although halosilanes, particularly fluorosilanes, may form reactive halide species that can etch silicon materials, in certain embodiments described herein, the silicon-containing precursor is not present when a plasma is struck. Specific chlorosilanes are tetrachlorosilane (SiCl4), trichlorosilane (HSiCl3), dichlorosilane (H2SiCl2), monochlorosilane (ClSiH3), chloroallylsilane, chloromethylsilane, dichloromethylsilane, chlorodimethylsilane, chloroethylsilane, t-butylchlorosilane, di-t-butylchlorosilane, chloroisopropylsilane, chloro-sec-butylsilane, t-butyldimethylchlorosilane, thexyldimethylchlorosilane, monochlorotrimethylsilane, and the like.
An aminosilane includes at least one nitrogen atom bonded to a silicon atom, but may also contain hydrogens, oxygens, halogens and carbons. Examples of aminosilanes are mono-, di-, tri- and tetra-aminosilane (H3Si(NH2)4, H2Si(NH2)2, HSi(NH2)3 and Si(NH2)4, respectively), as well as substituted mono-, di-, tri- and tetra-aminosilanes, for example, t-butylaminosilane, methylaminosilane, tert-butylsilanamine, bis(tertiarybutylamino)silane (SiH2(NHC(CH3)3)2 (BTBAS), tert-butyl silylcarbamate, SiH(CH3)—(N(CH3)2)2, SiHCl—(N(CH3)2)2, (Si(CH3)2NH)3, di(sec-butylamino)silane (DSBAS), di(isopropylamido)silane (DIPAS), bis(diethylamino)silane (BDEAS), and the like. A further example of an aminosilane is trisilylamine (N(SiH3)3).
Examples of silicon-containing precursors for depositing silicon carbide include siloxanes, alkyl silane or hydrocarbon-substituted silane, or a nitrogen-containing carbon-containing reactant. Example siloxanes include 2,4,6,8-tetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane (TMCTS), heptamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (HMCTS), silsesquioxane, disiloxanes, such as pentamethyldisiloxane (PMDSO) and tetramethyldisiloxane (TMDSO), and trisiloxanes such as hexamethyltrisiloxane, heptamethyltrisiloxane. Alkyl silanes include a central silicon atom with one or more alkyl groups bonded to it as well as one or more hydrogen atoms bonded to it. In some embodiments, any one or more of the alkyl groups contain 1-5 carbon atoms. The hydrocarbon groups may be saturated or unsaturated (e.g., alkene (e.g., vinyl), alkyne, and aromatic groups). Examples include but are not limited to trimethylsilane (3MS), triethylsilane, pentamethyl disilamethane ((CH3)2Si—CH2—Si(CH3)3), and dimethylsilane (2MS). Additionally, disilanes, trisilanes, or other higher silanes may be used in place of monosilanes. In some embodiments, one of the silicon atoms can have a carbon-containing or hydrocarbon group attached to it, and one of the silicon atoms can have a hydrogen atom attached to it. Example carbon-containing reactants including a nitrogen include methyl-substituted disilazanes and trisilazanes, such as tetramethyldisilazane and hexamethyl trisilazane.
Example first precursors used for depositing oxygen-doped silicon carbide films include siloxanes such as cyclotetrasiloxanes such as heptamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (HMCTS) and tetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane. Other cyclic siloxanes can also include but are not limited to cyclotrisiloxanes and cyclopentasiloxanes. For depositing oxygen doped silicon carbide films, other examples of suitable precursors include linear siloxanes such as, but not limited to, disiloxanes, such as pentamethyldisiloxane (PMDSO), tetramethyldisiloxane (TMDSO), hexamethyl trisiloxane, and heptamethyl trisiloxane. For undoped silicon carbide, examples of suitable precursors include monosilanes substituted with one or more alkyl, alkene, and/or alkyne groups containing, e.g., 1-5 carbon atoms. Examples include but are not limited to trimethylsilane (3MS), dimethylsilane (2MS), triethylsilane (TES), and pentamethyldisilamethane. Additionally, disilanes, trisilanes, or other higher silanes may be used in place of monosilanes. An example of one such disilane from the alkyl silane class is hexamethyldisilane (HMDS). Another example of a disilane from the alkyl silane class can include pentamethyldisilane (PMDS). Other types of alkyl silanes can include alkylcarbosilanes, which can have a branched polymeric structure with a carbon bonded to a silicon atom as well as alkyl groups bonded to a silicon atom. Examples include dimethyl trimethylsilyl methane (DTMSM) and bis-dimethylsilyl ethane (BDMSE). For depositing nitrogen doped silicon carbide (SiNC) films, examples of suitable precursors include, e.g., alkyldisilazanes and possibly compounds including amino (—NH2) and alkyl groups separately bonded to one or more silicon atoms. Alkyldisilazanes include silizanes and alkyl groups bonded to two silicon atoms. An example includes 1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisilazane (TMDSN).
In some embodiments, the first precursor is a metal-containing precursor. Example precursors may include metal alkylamines, metal alkoxides, metal alkylamides, metal halides, metal β-diketonates, metal carbonyls, etc. The metal-containing precursors may also include organometallic compounds such as alkyl metal compounds as well as metal halides having a high vapor pressure under deposition conditions. Such compounds exist in a vapor state and are readily delivered to the substrate and adsorb thereon. Some methods described herein may be suitable for ALD deposition of metal-containing films. Examples of metals include titanium (Ti), hafnium (Hf), zirconium (Zr), manganese (Mn), tungsten (W), and tantalum (Ta). Appropriate metal-containing precursors will include the metal that is desired to be incorporated into the film. For example, a tantalum-containing layer may be deposited by reacting pentakis(dimethylamido)tantalum with ammonia or another reducing agent as a second reactant. Further examples of metal-containing precursors that may be employed include trimethylaluminum, aluminum acetate, alkoxide, aluminum halidte, traethoxytitanium, tetrakis-dimethyl-amido titanium, hafnium tetrakis(ethylmethylamide), bis(cyclopentadienyl)manganese, bis(n-propylcyclopentadienyl)magnesium, tridimethylaminotitanium (TDMAT), tetraethoxytitanium, tetrakis-dimethyl-amido titanium, titanium isopropoxide, titanium tetraisopropoxide, and compounds having the formula TiXn, where n is an integer between and including 2 through 4, and X is a halide. Specific examples include TiI4, TiCl4, TiF4, and TiBr4.
Operation 103 may correspond to first precursor exposure phase 220A of
Returning to
Operation 105 may correspond to purge phase 240A of
In some embodiments, purge phase 240A may include one or more evacuation subphases for evacuating the process station. Alternatively, it will be appreciated that purge phase 240A may be omitted in some embodiments. Purge phase 240A may have any suitable duration, such as between about 0 seconds and about 60 seconds, or about 0.01 seconds. In some embodiments, increasing a flow rate of a one or more purge gases may decrease the duration of purge phase 240A. For example, a purge gas flow rate may be adjusted according to various reactant thermodynamic characteristics and/or geometric characteristics of the process station and/or process station plumbing for modifying the duration of purge phase 240A. In one non-limiting example, the duration of a purge phase may be adjusted by modulating sweep gas flow rate. This may reduce deposition cycle time, which may improve substrate throughput. After a purge, the silicon-containing precursors remain adsorbed onto the substrate surface.
Returning to
“Plasma” refers to a plasma ignited in a reaction chamber or remotely and brought into the reaction chamber. Plasmas can include the reactants described herein and may include other agents, for example, a carrier gas, or reactive species such as hydrogen gas. The reactants and other agents may be present in a reaction chamber when a plasma is struck, or a remote plasma may be flowed into a chamber where the reactants are present and/or the reactants and/or carrier gas may be ignited into a plasma remotely and brought into the reaction chamber. A “plasma” is meant to include any plasma known to be technologically feasible, including inductively-coupled plasmas and microwave surface wave plasmas.
In various embodiments, the plasma is an in-situ plasma, such that the plasma is formed directly above the substrate surface in the chamber. The in-situ plasma may be ignited at a power per substrate area between about 0.2122 W/cm2 and about 2.122 W/cm2. For example, the power may range from about 600 W to about 6000 W for a chamber processing four 300 mm wafers. Plasmas for ALD processes may be generated by applying a radio frequency (RF) field to a gas using two capacitively coupled plates. Ionization of the gas between plates by the RF field ignites the plasma, creating free electrons in the plasma discharge region. These electrons are accelerated by the RF field and may collide with gas phase reactant molecules. Collision of these electrons with reactant molecules may form radical species that participate in the deposition process. Residual gases in the chamber that are not used to deposit the film by ALD affect the ionization of gases during operation 111, thereby reducing the quality of the film being deposited. For example, if any helium is adsorbed on the surface of the substrate from prior processing, the plasma ignited in operation 111 has a purple color typical of helium plasma and not usually used in ALD processes, thereby causing the deposited film on the film to be thinner than desired. By using a soak gas in operation 150 that is one or more gases used in operation 111, the quality and thickness of the film to be deposited and formed in operation 111 is preserved. For example, for a deposition of a silicon oxide film, if the soak gas used in operation 150 is a mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide in a ratio of about 1:1, then if the same gases and same mixture ratios of gases are used in operation 111, the quality or thickness of the deposited silicon oxide film may not be affected by the soak gas. This may insure that the soak gas may be used multiple times in the deposition process, such as every time a new substrate is inserted into a chamber, without affecting the deposited films.
During operation 111, it will be appreciated that the RF field may be coupled via any suitable electrodes. Non-limiting examples of electrodes include process gas distribution showerheads and substrate support pedestals. It will be appreciated that plasmas for ALD processes may be formed by one or more suitable methods other than capacitive coupling of an RF field to a gas. In some embodiments, the plasma is a remote plasma, such that the second reactant is ignited in a remote plasma generator upstream of the station, then delivered to the station where the substrate is housed.
The second reactant may be an oxidant or reductant. In various embodiments, the second reactant is an oxygen-containing reactant, or a nitrogen-containing reactant, or a halogen-containing reactant, or a carbon-containing reactant, or a dopant. The second reactant may include one or more of these compounds.
Example oxidants include, but are not limited to, ozone (O3), peroxides including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), oxygen (O2), water (H2O), alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, and isopropanol, nitric oxide (NO), nitrous dioxide (NO2) nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2). Example oxygen-containing reactants include oxygen, ozone, nitrous oxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, sulfur monoxide, sulfur dioxide, water, oxygen-containing hydrocarbons (CxHyOz), etc.
A nitrogen-containing reactant contains at least one nitrogen, for example, N2, ammonia, hydrazine, amines (amines bearing carbon) such as methylamine, dimethylamine, ethylamine, isopropylamine, t-butylamine, di-t-butylamine, cyclopropylamine, sec-butylamine, cyclobutylamine, isoamylamine, 2-methylbutan-2-amine, trimethylamine, diisopropylamine, diethylisopropylamine, ethylenediamine, tertbutylamine, di-t-butylhydrazine, as well as aromatic containing amines such as anilines, pyridines, and benzylamines. Amines may be primary, secondary, tertiary or quaternary (for example, tetraalkylammonium compounds). A nitrogen-containing reactant can contain heteroatoms other than nitrogen, for example, hydroxylamine, tertbutylamine (TBA), t-butyloxycarbonyl amine and N-t-butyl hydroxylamine are nitrogen-containing reactants.
In some embodiments, the flow rate of the second reactant may be between about 0.1 slm and about 20 slm (e.g., between about 1 slm and about 10 slm). In some embodiments, a carrier gas may be used during the exposure to the second reactant. An example of a suitable carrier gas is nitrogen (N2), and if nitrogen is used as a carrier gas and co-flowed with the second reactant, the nitrogen may be flowed at a flow rate between about 500 sccm and 10 slm.
Operation 111 may correspond to second reactant with plasma exposure phase 260A. As shown in
Returning to
In operation 115 of
Apparatus
ALD process station 300 fluidly communicates with reactant delivery system 301 for delivering process gases to a distribution showerhead 306. Reactant delivery system 301 includes a mixing vessel 304 for blending and/or conditioning process gases for delivery to showerhead 306. One or more mixing vessel inlet valves 320 may control introduction of process gases to mixing vessel 304.
As an example, the embodiment of
In some embodiments, liquid precursor or liquid reactant may be vaporized at a liquid injector. For example, a liquid injector may inject pulses of a liquid reactant into a carrier gas stream upstream of the mixing vessel. In one embodiment, a liquid injector may vaporize the reactant by flashing the liquid from a higher pressure to a lower pressure. In another example, a liquid injector may atomize the liquid into dispersed microdroplets that are subsequently vaporized in a heated delivery pipe. Smaller droplets may vaporize faster than larger droplets, reducing a delay between liquid injection and complete vaporization. Faster vaporization may reduce a length of piping downstream from vaporization point 303. In one scenario, a liquid injector may be mounted directly to mixing vessel 304. In another scenario, a liquid injector may be mounted directly to showerhead 306.
In some embodiments, a liquid flow controller (LFC) upstream of vaporization point 303 may be provided for controlling a mass flow of liquid for vaporization and delivery to process station 300. For example, the LFC may include a thermal mass flow meter (MFM) located downstream of the LFC. A plunger valve of the LFC may then be adjusted responsive to feedback control signals provided by a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller in electrical communication with the MFM. However, it may take one second or more to stabilize liquid flow using feedback control. This may extend a time for dosing a liquid reactant. Thus, in some embodiments, the LFC may be dynamically switched between a feedback control mode and a direct control mode. In some embodiments, this may be performed by disabling a sense tube of the LFC and the PID controller.
Showerhead 306 distributes process gases toward substrate 312. In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, a microvolume 307 is located beneath showerhead 306. Practicing disclosed embodiments in a microvolume rather than in the entire volume of a process station may reduce reactant exposure and purge times, may reduce times for altering process conditions (e.g., pressure, temperature, etc.) may limit an exposure of process station robotics to process gases, etc. Example microvolume sizes include, but are not limited to, volumes between 0.1 liter and 2 liters. This also impacts productivity throughput. In some embodiments, the disclosed embodiments are not performed in a microvolume.
In some embodiments, pedestal 308 may be raised or lowered to expose substrate 312 to microvolume 307 and/or to vary a volume of microvolume 307. For example, in a substrate transfer phase, pedestal 308 may be raised to position substrate 312 within microvolume 307. In some embodiments, microvolume 307 may completely enclose substrate 312 as well as a portion of pedestal 308 to create a region of high flow impedance.
Optionally, pedestal 308 may be lowered and/or raised during portions the process to modulate process pressure, reactant concentration, etc., within microvolume 307. In one scenario where process chamber body 302 remains at a base pressure during the process, lowering pedestal 308 may allow microvolume 307 to be evacuated. Example ratios of microvolume to process chamber volume include, but are not limited to, volume ratios between 1:500 and 1:10. It will be appreciated that, in some embodiments, pedestal height may be adjusted programmatically by a suitable computer controller 350.
In another scenario, adjusting a height of pedestal 308 may allow a plasma density to be varied during plasma activation and/or treatment cycles included in the process. At the conclusion of the process phase, pedestal 308 may be lowered during another substrate transfer phase to allow removal of substrate 312 from pedestal 308.
While the example microvolume variations described herein refer to a height-adjustable pedestal, it will be appreciated that, in some embodiments, a position of showerhead 306 may be adjusted relative to pedestal 308 to vary a volume of microvolume 307. Further, it will be appreciated that a vertical position of pedestal 308 and/or showerhead 306 may be varied by any suitable mechanism within the scope of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, pedestal 308 may include a rotational axis for rotating an orientation of substrate 312. It will be appreciated that, in some embodiments, one or more of these example adjustments may be performed programmatically by one or more suitable computer controllers 350.
In some embodiments where plasma may be used as discussed above, showerhead 306 and pedestal 308 electrically communicate with a radio frequency (RF) power supply 314 and matching network 316 for powering a plasma. In some embodiments, the plasma energy may be controlled by controlling one or more of a process station pressure, a gas concentration, an RF source power, an RF source frequency, and a plasma power pulse timing. For example, RF power supply 314 and matching network 316 may be operated at any suitable power to form a plasma having a desired composition of radical species. Examples of suitable powers are included above. Likewise, RF power supply 314 may provide RF power of any suitable frequency. In some embodiments, RF power supply 314 may be configured to control high- and low-frequency RF power sources independently of one another. Example low-frequency RF frequencies may include, but are not limited to, frequencies between 50 kHz and 500 kHz. Example high-frequency RF frequencies may include, but are not limited to, frequencies between 1.8 MHz and 2.45 GHz, for example 2 MHz, 13.56 MHz, or 27 MHz. It will be appreciated that any suitable parameters may be modulated discretely or continuously to provide plasma energy for the surface reactions. In one non-limiting example, the plasma power may be intermittently pulsed to reduce ion bombardment with the substrate surface relative to continuously powered plasmas.
In some embodiments, the plasma may be monitored in-situ by one or more plasma monitors. In one scenario, plasma power may be monitored by one or more voltage, current sensors (e.g., VI probes). In another scenario, plasma density and/or process gas concentration may be measured by one or more optical emission spectroscopy sensors (OES). In some embodiments, one or more plasma parameters may be programmatically adjusted based on measurements from such in-situ plasma monitors. For example, an OES sensor may be used in a feedback loop for providing programmatic control of plasma power. It will be appreciated that, in some embodiments, other monitors may be used to monitor the plasma and other process characteristics. Such monitors may include, but are not limited to, infrared (IR) monitors, acoustic monitors, and pressure transducers.
In some embodiments, instructions for a controller 350 may be provided via input/output control (IOC) sequencing instructions. In one example, the instructions for setting conditions for a process phase may be included in a corresponding recipe phase of a process recipe. In some cases, process recipe phases may be sequentially arranged, so that all instructions for a process phase are executed concurrently with that process phase. In some embodiments, instructions for setting one or more reactor parameters may be included in a recipe phase. For example, a first recipe phase may include instructions for setting a flow rate of an inert and/or a reactant gas (e.g., the second reactant) as a soak gas, instructions for setting a flow rate of a carrier gas (such as nitrogen), instructions for setting a pedestal temperature, and time delay instructions for the first recipe phase. A second, subsequent recipe phase may include instructions for modulating or stopping a flow rate of an inert and/or a reactant gas, and instructions for modulating a flow rate of a carrier or purge gas and time delay instructions for the second recipe phase. A third recipe phase may include instructions for setting a flow rate of an inert and/or reactant gas (e.g., the first precursor), instructions for modulating a flow rate of a carrier gas, and time delay instructions for the third recipe phase. A fourth recipe phase may include instructions for modulating or stopping a flow rate of an inert and/or a reactant gas, instructions for modulating the flow rate of a carrier or purge gas, and time delay instructions for the fourth recipe phase. A fifth recipe phase may include instructions for setting a flow rate of an inert and/or reactant gas which may be the same as or different from the gas used in the first recipe phase (e.g., the second reactant), instructions for modulating a flow rate of a carrier gas, and time delay instructions for the fifth recipe phase. It will be appreciated that these recipe phases may be further subdivided and/or iterated in any suitable way within the scope of the present disclosure.
In some embodiments, pedestal 308 may be temperature controlled via heater 310. The pedestal may be set to a deposition temperature. For example, the pedestal may be set to a temperature between about 200° C. and about 300° C. for deposition of a nitride or carbide. Further, in some embodiments, pressure control for process station 300 may be provided by butterfly valve 318. As shown in the embodiment of
As described above, one or more process stations may be included in a multi-station processing tool.
The depicted processing chamber 414 comprises four process stations, numbered from 1 to 4 in the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, system controller 450 controls all of the activities of process tool 400. System controller 450 executes system control software 458 stored in mass storage device 454, loaded into memory device 456, and executed on processor 452. Alternatively, the control logic may be hard coded in the controller 450. Applications Specific Integrated Circuits, Programmable Logic Devices (e.g., field-programmable gate arrays, or FPGAs) and the like may be used for these purposes. In the following discussion, wherever “software” or “code” is used, functionally comparable hard coded logic may be used in its place. System control software 458 may include instructions for controlling the timing, mixture of gases, amount of gas flow, chamber and/or station pressure, chamber and/or station temperature, substrate temperature, target power levels, RF power levels, substrate pedestal, chuck and/or susceptor position, and other parameters of a particular process performed by process tool 400. System control software 458 may be configured in any suitable way. For example, various process tool component subroutines or control objects may be written to control operation of the process tool components used to carry out various process tool processes. System control software 458 may be coded in any suitable computer readable programming language.
In some embodiments, system control software 458 may include input/output control (IOC) sequencing instructions for controlling the various parameters described above. Other computer software and/or programs stored on mass storage device 454 and/or memory device 456 associated with system controller 450 may be employed in some embodiments. Examples of programs or sections of programs for this purpose include a substrate positioning program, a process gas control program, a pressure control program, a heater control program, and a plasma control program.
A substrate positioning program may include program code for process tool components that are used to load the substrate onto pedestal 418 and to control the spacing between the substrate and other parts of process tool 400.
A process gas control program may include code for controlling gas composition (e.g., first precursor gas, soak gas, second reactant gas, and purge gases as described herein) and flow rates and optionally for flowing gas into one or more process stations prior to deposition in order to stabilize the pressure in the process station. A pressure control program may include code for controlling the pressure in the process station by regulating, for example, a throttle valve in the exhaust system of the process station, a gas flow into the process station, etc.
A heater control program may include code for controlling the current to a heating unit that is used to heat the substrate. Alternatively, the heater control program may control delivery of a heat transfer gas (such as the soak gas) to the substrate.
A plasma control program may include code for setting RF power levels applied to the process electrodes in one or more process stations in accordance with the embodiments herein.
A pressure control program may include code for maintaining the pressure in the reaction chamber in accordance with the embodiments herein.
In some embodiments, there may be a user interface associated with system controller 450. The user interface may include a display screen, graphical software displays of the apparatus and/or process conditions, and user input devices such as pointing devices, keyboards, touch screens, microphones, etc.
In some embodiments, parameters adjusted by system controller 450 may relate to process conditions. Non-limiting examples include process gas composition and flow rates, temperature, pressure, plasma conditions (such as RF bias power levels), pressure, temperature, etc. These parameters may be provided to the user in the form of a recipe, which may be entered utilizing the user interface.
Signals for monitoring the process may be provided by analog and/or digital input connections of system controller 450 from various process tool sensors. The signals for controlling the process may be output on the analog and digital output connections of process tool 400. Non-limiting examples of process tool sensors that may be monitored include mass flow controllers, pressure sensors (such as manometers), thermocouples, etc. Appropriately programmed feedback and control algorithms may be used with data from these sensors to maintain process conditions.
System controller 450 may provide program instructions for implementing the above-described deposition processes such as processes that employ a soak prior to initiating ALD for a substrate inserted into the reaction chamber, with the soak performed under any of the soak conditions described herein. The program instructions may control a variety of process parameters, such as DC power level, RF bias power level, pressure, temperature, etc. The instructions may control the parameters to operate in-situ deposition of film stacks according to various embodiments described herein.
The system controller will typically include one or more memory devices and one or more processors configured to execute the instructions so that the apparatus will perform a method in accordance with disclosed embodiments. Machine-readable media containing instructions for controlling process operations in accordance with disclosed embodiments may be coupled to the system controller.
In some implementations, the system controller 450 is part of a system, which may be part of the above-described examples. Such systems can include semiconductor processing equipment, including a processing tool or tools, chamber or chambers, a platform or platforms for processing, and/or specific processing components (a wafer pedestal, a gas flow system, etc.). These systems may be integrated with electronics for controlling their operation before, during, and after processing of a semiconductor wafer or substrate. The electronics may be referred to as the “controller,” which may control various components or subparts of the system or systems. The system controller 450, depending on the processing conditions and/or the type of system, may be programmed to control any of the processes disclosed herein, including the delivery of processing gases, temperature settings (e.g., heating and/or cooling), pressure settings, vacuum settings, power settings, radio frequency (RF) generator settings, RF matching circuit settings, frequency settings, flow rate settings, fluid delivery settings, positional and operation settings, wafer transfers into and out of a tool and other transfer tools and/or load locks connected to or interfaced with a specific system.
Broadly speaking, the system controller 450 may be defined as electronics having various integrated circuits, logic, memory, and/or software that receive instructions, issue instructions, control operation, enable cleaning operations, enable endpoint measurements, and the like. The integrated circuits may include chips in the form of firmware that store program instructions, digital signal processors (DSPs), chips defined as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or one or more microprocessors, or microcontrollers that execute program instructions (e.g., software). Program instructions may be instructions communicated to the system controller 450 in the form of various individual settings (or program files), defining operational parameters for carrying out a particular process on or for a semiconductor wafer or to a system. The operational parameters may, in some embodiments, be part of a recipe defined by process engineers to accomplish one or more processing steps during the fabrication of one or more layers, materials, metals, oxides, silicon, silicon dioxide, surfaces, circuits, and/or dies of a wafer.
The system controller 450, in some implementations, may be a part of or coupled to a computer that is integrated with, coupled to the system, otherwise networked to the system, or a combination thereof. For example, the system controller 450 may be in the “cloud” or all or a part of a fab host computer system, which can allow for remote access of the wafer processing. The computer may enable remote access to the system to monitor current progress of fabrication operations, examine a history of past fabrication operations, examine trends or performance metrics from a plurality of fabrication operations, to change parameters of current processing, to set processing steps to follow a current processing, or to start a new process. In some examples, a remote computer (e.g. a server) can provide process recipes to a system over a network, which may include a local network or the Internet. The remote computer may include a user interface that enables entry or programming of parameters and/or settings, which are then communicated to the system from the remote computer. In some examples, the system controller 450 receives instructions in the form of data, which specify parameters for each of the processing steps to be performed during one or more operations. It should be understood that the parameters may be specific to the type of process to be performed and the type of tool that the system controller 450 is configured to interface with or control. Thus as described above, the system controller 450 may be distributed, such as by including one or more discrete controllers that are networked together and working towards a common purpose, such as the processes and controls described herein. An example of a distributed controller for such purposes would be one or more integrated circuits on a chamber in communication with one or more integrated circuits located remotely (such as at the platform level or as part of a remote computer) that combine to control a process on the chamber.
Without limitation, example systems may include a plasma etch chamber or module, a deposition chamber or module, a spin-rinse chamber or module, a metal plating chamber or module, a clean chamber or module, a bevel edge etch chamber or module, a physical vapor deposition (PVD) chamber or module, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) chamber or module, an ALD chamber or module, an atomic layer etch (ALE) chamber or module, an ion implantation chamber or module, a track chamber or module, and any other semiconductor processing systems that may be associated or used in the fabrication and/or manufacturing of semiconductor wafers.
As noted above, depending on the process step or steps to be performed by the tool, the system controller 450 might communicate with one or more of other tool circuits or modules, other tool components, cluster tools, other tool interfaces, adjacent tools, neighboring tools, tools located throughout a factory, a main computer, another controller, or tools used in material transport that bring containers of wafers to and from tool locations and/or load ports in a semiconductor manufacturing factory.
An appropriate apparatus for performing the methods disclosed herein is further discussed and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/084,399, filed Apr. 11, 2011, and titled “PLASMA ACTIVATED CONFORMAL FILM DEPOSITION”; and Ser. No. 13/084,305, filed Apr. 11, 2011, and titled “SILICON NITRIDE FILMS AND METHODS,” each of which is incorporated herein in its entireties.
The apparatus/process described herein may be used in conjunction with lithographic patterning tools or processes, for example, for the fabrication or manufacture of semiconductor devices, displays, LEDs, photovoltaic panels and the like. Typically, though not necessarily, such tools/processes will be used or conducted together in a common fabrication facility. Lithographic patterning of a film typically includes some or all of the following operations, each operation enabled with a number of possible tools: (1) application of photoresist on a workpiece, i.e., substrate, using a spin-on or spray-on tool; (2) curing of photoresist using a hot plate or furnace or UV curing tool; (3) exposing the photoresist to visible or UV or x-ray light with a tool such as a wafer stepper; (4) developing the resist so as to selectively remove resist and thereby pattern it using a tool such as a wet bench; (5) transferring the resist pattern into an underlying film or workpiece by using a dry or plasma-assisted etching tool; and (6) removing the resist using a tool such as an RF or microwave plasma resist stripper.
An experiment was conducted comparing film thickness between films deposited by ALD using helium as a soak gas prior to ALD and films deposited using gases to be used during the plasma environment operation of ALD prior to ALD. The pedestal was set to a temperature of 50° C. Substrates were placed on the pedestal to bring the substrate temperature up to 50° C. from room temperature.
In one trial, the substrate was exposed to a helium soak gas for seven seconds prior to performing ALD cycles sufficient to deposit 8.8 Å of silicon oxide. Only 5.0 Å of silicon oxide was deposited. In a second trial, the substrate was exposed to an argon soak gas for nine seconds prior to performing ALD cycles sufficient to deposit 8.8 Å of silicon oxide. Argon was used as a carrier gas during the oxidant exposure with plasma in the ALD cycle. The thickness of the silicon oxide film deposited was 8.7 Å. In a third trial, the substrate was exposed to a mixture of nitrous oxide (N2O) and oxygen (O2) for nine seconds prior to performing ALD cycles sufficient to deposit 8.8 Å of silicon oxide. The same mixture of N2O and O2 was used in each cycle during the oxidant exposure with plasma phase. The thickness of the silicon oxide film deposited was 8.7 Å. In the fourth trial, the substrate was exposed to nitrogen (N2) for nine seconds prior to performing ALD cycles sufficient to deposit 8.8 Å of silicon oxide. Nitrogen was used as a carrier gas in each cycle during the oxidant exposure with plasma phase. The thickness of the silicon oxide film deposited was 8.6 Å. As shown in Table 1 below, films deposited using gases that were used in the second reactant phase with plasma of the ALD cycle achieved thicknesses closer to the thickness to be deposited as measured by the number of ALD cycles. Using a helium soak resulted in a film thickness sufficiently lower than desired.
An experiment was conducted to measure the wafer-to-wafer variation between films deposited using disclosed embodiments. One hundred substrates were deposited using the same sequence of ALD cycles in a four-station tool. The tool was indexed after sufficient cycles were deposited for each substrate. Each time a substrate was inserted into the tool, the tool introduced nitrogen (N2) as a soak gas for 60 seconds before resuming the ALD cycles. Each ALD cycle included exposure to N2, purging with N2 purge gas, exposure to nitrous oxide (N2O) and oxygen (O2) and a plasma, and purging with N2 purge gas. Each substrate was exposed to sufficient ALD cycles to ideally deposit 8.8 Å of silicon oxide.
One set of experimental data obtained for thickness of films deposited for various wafers is shown in
Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the processes, systems, and apparatus of the present embodiments. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the embodiments are not to be limited to the details given herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/457,635 filed on Jun. 28, 2019, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,101,129; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/664,545 filed on Mar. 20, 2015, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,566,187.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4500563 | Ellenberger et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 5094984 | Liu et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5223443 | Chinn et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5230929 | Caporiccio et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5318928 | Gegenwart et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5344454 | Clarke et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5496608 | Matsuda et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5593914 | Evans, Jr. et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5670432 | Tsai | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5856003 | Chiu | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5874368 | Laxman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5916365 | Sherman | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5932286 | Beinglass et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6069058 | Hong | May 2000 | A |
| 6100202 | Lin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6156149 | Cheung et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6218293 | Kraus et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6270572 | Kim et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6346741 | Buskirk et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6391803 | Kim et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399221 | Marks et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6416822 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428859 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6465272 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468924 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6482726 | Aminpur et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6509601 | Lee et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6528430 | Kwan et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6541398 | Grill et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6551893 | Zheng et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6569501 | Chiang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6576053 | Kim et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6576345 | Van Cleemput et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6602784 | Sneh | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6632478 | Gaillard et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6645574 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6689220 | Nguyen | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6723595 | Park | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6730614 | Lim et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6743738 | Todd | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6756318 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6765303 | Krivokapic et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6809421 | Hayasaka et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6828218 | Kim et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6835417 | Saenger et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6861356 | Matsuse et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6884466 | Kaloyeros et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6930058 | Hill et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6930060 | Chou et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6943092 | Kim | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6962876 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6987240 | Jennings et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7001844 | Chakravarti et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7041335 | Chung | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7077904 | Cho et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7081271 | Chung et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7084076 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7097886 | Moghadam et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7109129 | Papasouliotis | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7115166 | Vaartstra et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7115528 | Vaartstra et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7122222 | Xiao et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7122464 | Vaartstra | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7125815 | Vaartstra | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7132353 | Xia et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7141278 | Koh et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7148155 | Tarafdar et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7151039 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7172792 | Wang et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7176084 | Lee et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7205187 | Leith et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7223649 | Oh et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7235484 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7241686 | Marcadal et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7244668 | Kim | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7250083 | Sneh | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7259050 | Chen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7261919 | Mehregany et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7294582 | Haverkort et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7297641 | Todd et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7300885 | Hasebe et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7314835 | Ishizaka et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7341959 | Brcka | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7351668 | Chou et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7361538 | Luan et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7361611 | Chakravarti et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7390743 | Shin | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7393561 | Paranjpe | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7399388 | Moghadam et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7419888 | Yang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7435454 | Brcka | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7435684 | Lang et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7462571 | Hasebe et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7482247 | Papasouliotis et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7488694 | Kim et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7507676 | Chou et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510984 | Saito et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7521331 | Park et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7524762 | Marcadal et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7544615 | Vaartstra | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7572052 | Ravi et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7592231 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7595010 | Chakravarti et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7601648 | Chua et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7615438 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7615449 | Chung et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7622369 | Lee et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7622383 | Kim et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7629267 | Wan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632757 | Matsuura | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7633125 | Lu et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7638170 | Li | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7645484 | Ishizaka | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7651729 | Kim et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7651730 | Hasebe | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7651953 | Todd et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7651959 | Fukazawa et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7682657 | Sherman | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7687409 | Ahn et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7713592 | Nguyen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7745346 | Hausmann et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7758920 | Hasebe et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7776733 | Hasegawa | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7790633 | Tarafdar et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7825039 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7863190 | Papasouliotis et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
| 7906168 | Hasebe et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7919416 | Lee et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7923068 | Dickey et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7923378 | Hasebe et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7959985 | Ishizaka et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7964241 | Hasebe et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7964513 | Todd et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7972980 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7981473 | Kim et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7989365 | Park et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8034673 | Kadonaga et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8080290 | Hasebe et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8101531 | Li et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8119424 | Mather et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8119544 | Hasebe et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8133797 | Van Schravendijk et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8178448 | Nodera et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8227032 | Dussarrat et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8257789 | Matsunaga et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8278224 | Mui et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8334218 | Van Nooten et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8338312 | Sato et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8357619 | Hasebe et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8366953 | Kohno et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8383525 | Raisanen et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8394466 | Hong et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8524612 | Li et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8592328 | Hausmann et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8633050 | Pierreux | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8637411 | Swaminathan et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8647993 | Lavoie et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8669185 | Onizawa et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8728955 | Lavoie et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8728956 | LaVoie et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8829636 | Ohchi et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8846484 | Lee et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8956983 | Swaminathan et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8999859 | Swaminathan et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9023693 | Lin et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
| 9076646 | Sims et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9214334 | Swaminathan et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9230800 | Lavoie et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9257274 | Kang et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9287113 | Kang et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9355839 | Swaminathan et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9355886 | Swaminathan et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9373500 | Swaminathan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9406693 | Pang et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
| 9502238 | Danek et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9564312 | Henri et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9570274 | Swaminathan et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9570290 | Swaminathan et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9611544 | Lavoie et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9627221 | Zaitsu et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
| 9673041 | Swaminathan et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9685320 | Kang et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9704713 | Guo et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
| 9773643 | Singhal et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
| 9786570 | Kang et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9793110 | Kang et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9875891 | Henri et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9892917 | Swaminathan et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9997357 | Arghavani et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10008428 | Kang et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10037884 | Ou et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10043655 | Swaminathan et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10043657 | Swaminathan et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10062563 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10269559 | Abel et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10361076 | Kang et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10373806 | Singhal et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10559468 | Arghavani et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10566187 | Qian | Feb 2020 | B2 |
| 10679848 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10741458 | Kang et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 11011379 | Arghavani et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
| 11101129 | Qian | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 20010041250 | Werkhoven et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020066411 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020076507 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020153101 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020175393 | Baum et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030008070 | Seutter et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030024477 | Okuda et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030143839 | Raaijmakers et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200917 | Vaartstra | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216006 | Li et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040033698 | Lee et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043633 | Vaartstra | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053515 | Comita et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040067308 | Zheng et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121164 | Iacovangelo et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040129212 | Gadgil et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040146644 | Xiao et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040151845 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040157472 | Sugino et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040171280 | Conley, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219746 | Vaartstra et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219784 | Kang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040231799 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005851 | Keshner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050009368 | Vaartstra | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050042865 | Cabral, Jr. et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079661 | Cho et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109276 | Iyer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050118837 | Todd et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050142795 | Ahn et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050158983 | Hoshi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159017 | Kim et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181535 | Yun et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050184397 | Gates et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196977 | Saito et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208718 | Lim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050230047 | Collins et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050233553 | Kountz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050260347 | Narwankar et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276099 | Horng et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276930 | Gates et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050282346 | Barth et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050287775 | Hasebe et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060003557 | Cabral, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060009041 | Iyer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030148 | Seutter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060032442 | Hasebe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060032443 | Hasebe et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084283 | Paranjpe et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088985 | Haverkort et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105106 | Balseanu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165890 | Kaushal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178019 | Senzaki et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183055 | O'Neill et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199357 | Wan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060216418 | Matsuura | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060228868 | Ahn et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060244100 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060286774 | Singh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060286776 | Ranish et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060286818 | Wang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070010071 | Matsuura | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026540 | Nooten et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070032047 | Hasebe et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070048455 | Koh et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070065576 | Singh et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070065578 | McDougall | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070087574 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070087581 | Singh et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116887 | Faguet | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070119370 | Ma et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070134942 | Ahn et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070137572 | Matsuura et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070145483 | Ono | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070163488 | Tois et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167028 | Chou et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070215036 | Park et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070218701 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070231487 | Ishizaka | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070232082 | Balseanu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243693 | Nemani et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070245959 | Paterson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070251444 | Gros-Jean et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259110 | Mahajani et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070281495 | Mallick et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298585 | Lubomirsky et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080014759 | Chua et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038936 | Todd et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063791 | Hasebe et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080075881 | Won et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080081470 | Clark | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080085610 | Wang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080087890 | Ahn et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113097 | Mahajani | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080119098 | Palley et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123394 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080131601 | Kim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080138996 | Nishizuka | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139003 | Pirzada et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080142483 | Hua et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207007 | Thridandam et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213479 | Chou et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080233762 | Hong | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080242116 | Clark | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080260969 | Dussarrat et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080274302 | Hasebe et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311760 | Nodera et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317972 | Hendriks et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090001510 | Matz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018668 | Galbraith | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090039349 | Honda | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090041952 | Yoon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090065896 | Hwang | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090075490 | Dussarrat | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085095 | Kamath et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148625 | Yeom et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155606 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155968 | Min et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090163012 | Clark et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090191687 | Hong et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090191722 | Hasebe et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090203197 | Hanawa et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090203227 | Hasebe | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090208880 | Nemani et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090278224 | Kim et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090286381 | Van Schravendijk et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090286402 | Xia et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100022078 | Rockenberger et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100022099 | Van Nooten et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025824 | Chen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100048011 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100051578 | Chang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100051579 | Kobayashi | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100078316 | Edakawa et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100081293 | Mallick et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100096687 | Balseanu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100096688 | Balseanu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100099236 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100099271 | Hausmann et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100102417 | Ganguli et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100120262 | Vorsa et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100124618 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100124621 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136260 | Matsunaga et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136313 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100144162 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100167555 | Maula et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100190353 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197129 | Ishikawa | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100216268 | Katayama et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100221925 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100244114 | Konno et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100255218 | Oka et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100304047 | Yang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100304574 | Nodera et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100310791 | Shimazu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110003445 | Murata et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110008972 | Damjanovic et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110014795 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110014796 | Hayashi | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110014798 | Mallick et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110042744 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110064969 | Chen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110086516 | Lee et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110121354 | Schmid et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110124187 | Afzali-Ardakani et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110139176 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110143548 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151142 | Seamons et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151246 | Ramon Moreno et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151674 | Tang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151678 | Ashtiani et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110159202 | Matsushita et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110159673 | Hanawa et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110171775 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110176967 | Okuda et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110198756 | Thenappan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110201210 | Sato et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110215445 | Yang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110256726 | LaVoie et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110256734 | Hausmann et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110262642 | Xiao | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110298099 | Lee et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110309475 | Lee | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120009802 | LaVoie et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120009803 | Jung et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120021252 | Lee | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120028454 | Swaminathan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120028469 | Onizawa et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120058282 | Hong et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120064682 | Jang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120074844 | York et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120077349 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120086048 | Park et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108079 | Mahajani | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120113672 | Dubrow et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120128897 | Xiao et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120149213 | Nittala | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120164846 | Ha et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120193693 | Kanaya | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120213940 | Mallick | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120280200 | Tada et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120282418 | Chou et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120315394 | Ito | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130040447 | Swaminathan et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130043512 | Huang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130058161 | Yamanaka et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130058162 | Yamanaka et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130065404 | Weidman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130071580 | Weidman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130084688 | O'Meara et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130113073 | Liu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130115783 | Kim et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189854 | Hausmann et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130196516 | Lavoie et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130230987 | Draeger | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130252437 | Sano et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130309415 | Swaminathan et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130319329 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130323923 | Koehler et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130330935 | Varadarajan | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130344248 | Clark | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140030444 | Swaminathan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140051262 | Lavoie et al. | Feb 2014 | A9 |
| 20140065842 | Anthis et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140087066 | Wang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140106574 | Kang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140113457 | Sims et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140120270 | Tour et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140120737 | Swaminathan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140134827 | Swaminathan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140141542 | Kang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140141626 | Hausmann et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140182619 | Goto et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140199854 | Chen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140209562 | LaVoie et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140216337 | Swaminathan et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140262038 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140264555 | Ahn et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273428 | Shero et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140295084 | Shirai et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140302686 | Pan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140356549 | Varadarajan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150041867 | Han | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150093902 | Huang et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150109814 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150118863 | Rathod | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150126042 | Pasquale et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150147483 | Fukazawa | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150159271 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150170900 | LaVoie | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150206719 | Swaminathan et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150235835 | Swaminathan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150243883 | Swaminathan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150249007 | Xiao et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150249013 | Arghavani et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150294905 | Wu et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160020092 | Kang et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160064211 | Swaminathan et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160118246 | Kang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160148800 | Henri et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160148806 | Henri et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160155676 | Kang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160163539 | Kang et al. | Jun 2016 | A9 |
| 20160163972 | Swaminathan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160240428 | Tung et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160251756 | Lansalot-Matras et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160276148 | Qian et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160293398 | Danek et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160293838 | Swaminathan et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160322371 | Yonemochi | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160329206 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160329423 | Kawahara et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160336178 | Swaminathan et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160340782 | Chandrasekharan et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160365425 | Chen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160379826 | Arghavani et al. | Dec 2016 | A9 |
| 20170009346 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170092735 | Hashemi et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170103891 | Lee et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170110364 | Song et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170110533 | Huang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170117134 | Henri et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170117150 | Liao et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170140926 | Pore et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170148628 | Swaminathan et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170170026 | Hudson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170226637 | Lubomirsky et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170263450 | Swaminathan et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170316988 | Kang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170323786 | Kang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180005801 | Singhal et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180005814 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180061628 | Ou et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180127592 | Lei et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180138028 | Henri et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180247875 | Kang et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180269061 | Arghavani et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180323057 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190080903 | Abel et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190311897 | Kang et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190378710 | Qian et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190385820 | Singhal et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190385850 | Arghavani et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200152446 | Qian et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20220098727 | Varadarajan | Mar 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1732288 | Feb 2006 | CN |
| 1768158 | May 2006 | CN |
| 1841676 | Oct 2006 | CN |
| 1926668 | Mar 2007 | CN |
| 101006195 | Jul 2007 | CN |
| 101255548 | Sep 2008 | CN |
| 101328578 | Dec 2008 | CN |
| 101378007 | Mar 2009 | CN |
| 101416293 | Apr 2009 | CN |
| 101535524 | Sep 2009 | CN |
| 101736326 | Jun 2010 | CN |
| 101889331 | Nov 2010 | CN |
| 102005462 | Apr 2011 | CN |
| 102191479 | Sep 2011 | CN |
| 102471885 | May 2012 | CN |
| 102687249 | Sep 2012 | CN |
| 102906304 | Jan 2013 | CN |
| 103137864 | Jun 2013 | CN |
| 103928396 | Jul 2014 | CN |
| 105391427 | Mar 2016 | CN |
| 105719954 | Jun 2016 | CN |
| 112635563 | Apr 2021 | CN |
| 10137088 | Mar 2008 | DE |
| 0277766 | Aug 1988 | EP |
| 0541212 | May 1993 | EP |
| 1081754 | Mar 2001 | EP |
| 1174527 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1703552 | Sep 2006 | EP |
| 2278046 | Jan 2011 | EP |
| S4843472 | Jun 1973 | JP |
| H0293071 | Apr 1990 | JP |
| H0311635 | Jan 1991 | JP |
| H05226279 | Sep 1993 | JP |
| H06177120 | Jun 1994 | JP |
| H09102494 | Apr 1997 | JP |
| H09219401 | Aug 1997 | JP |
| H1098032 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| H10189467 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| H11172439 | Jun 1999 | JP |
| 2001274404 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2001338922 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002009072 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002134497 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2002164345 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002539640 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2005210076 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2005310927 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006060091 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 2006303431 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 2007165883 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007180362 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2007189173 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2007521658 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2007287889 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2007287890 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2008500742 | Jan 2008 | JP |
| 2008506262 | Feb 2008 | JP |
| 2008060455 | Mar 2008 | JP |
| 2008109093 | May 2008 | JP |
| 2008517479 | May 2008 | JP |
| 2008522405 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 2008182199 | Aug 2008 | JP |
| 2008258591 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2008294260 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2008306093 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2009065203 | Mar 2009 | JP |
| 2009170823 | Jul 2009 | JP |
| 4364320 | Nov 2009 | JP |
| 2009540128 | Nov 2009 | JP |
| 2010010497 | Jan 2010 | JP |
| 2010043081 | Feb 2010 | JP |
| 2010103484 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2010118664 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2010152136 | Jul 2010 | JP |
| 2010183069 | Aug 2010 | JP |
| 2010530127 | Sep 2010 | JP |
| 2010245518 | Oct 2010 | JP |
| 2010251654 | Nov 2010 | JP |
| 2010283388 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 2010539730 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 2011023576 | Feb 2011 | JP |
| 2011023655 | Feb 2011 | JP |
| 2011054968 | Mar 2011 | JP |
| 2011067744 | Apr 2011 | JP |
| 2011187934 | Sep 2011 | JP |
| 2012506640 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 2012199306 | Oct 2012 | JP |
| 2013102130 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2013166965 | Aug 2013 | JP |
| 2013196822 | Sep 2013 | JP |
| 2013225655 | Oct 2013 | JP |
| 2013240042 | Nov 2013 | JP |
| 2014532304 | Dec 2014 | JP |
| 20010111448 | Dec 2001 | KR |
| 100356473 | Oct 2002 | KR |
| 20040001036 | Jan 2004 | KR |
| 20050069986 | Jul 2005 | KR |
| 20060056883 | May 2006 | KR |
| 100721503 | May 2007 | KR |
| 20070060104 | Jun 2007 | KR |
| 100734748 | Jul 2007 | KR |
| 20080052499 | Jun 2008 | KR |
| 20090057665 | Jun 2009 | KR |
| 20090080019 | Jul 2009 | KR |
| 20090081396 | Jul 2009 | KR |
| 20090116433 | Nov 2009 | KR |
| 20090126318 | Dec 2009 | KR |
| 20100133377 | Dec 2010 | KR |
| 20110016916 | Feb 2011 | KR |
| 20110082025 | Jul 2011 | KR |
| 20110086090 | Jul 2011 | KR |
| 20110132534 | Dec 2011 | KR |
| 20110134521 | Dec 2011 | KR |
| 20130032343 | Apr 2013 | KR |
| 20130056608 | May 2013 | KR |
| 20150025224 | Mar 2015 | KR |
| 10-2019-0045649 | May 2019 | KR |
| 188537 | Apr 2013 | SG |
| 483103 | Apr 2002 | TW |
| 200701341 | Jan 2007 | TW |
| 200721306 | Jun 2007 | TW |
| 201009942 | Mar 2010 | TW |
| 201042706 | Dec 2010 | TW |
| 201113934 | Apr 2011 | TW |
| 201140695 | Nov 2011 | TW |
| 201144475 | Dec 2011 | TW |
| WO-03051946 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004032196 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO-2006014471 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006018441 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006026350 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006104741 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007043709 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007118026 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO-2011087580 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011087850 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011130326 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011130397 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012040317 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012048094 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012087737 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013032786 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013043330 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013065806 | May 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013095396 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013112727 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Won, Seok-Jun, et al., “Growth and electrical properties of silicon oxide grown by atomic layer deposition using Bis(ethyl-methyl-amino)silane and ozone”. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 30(1), 01A126 (2012) pp. 1-7. |
| O'Neill, Mark L., et al., “Impact of Aminosilane Precursor Structure on Silicon Oxides by Atomic Layer Deposition”. The Electrochemical Society Interface, Winter 2011, pp. 34-37. |
| Pena, Luis Fabian, et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition of Silicon Dioxide Using Aminosilanes Disec-butylaminosilane and Bis(tert-butylamino)silane with Ozone”. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120, 10927-10935. |
| Huang, Liang, et al., “Design of efficient mono-aminosilane precursors for atomic layer deposition of SiO2 thin films”. RSC Advances, 2017, 7, 22672-22678. |
| Lee, Won-Jun, et al., “Characteristics of SiO2 Film Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition as the Gate Insulator of Low-Temperature Polysilicon Thin-Film Transistors”. Solid State Phenomena vols. 124-126 (2007) pp. 247-250. |
| Burton, B.B., et al., “SiO2 Atomic Layer Deposition Using Tris(dimethylamino)silane and Hydrogen Peroxide Studied by in Situ Transmission FTIR Spectroscopy”. J. Phys. Chen. C2009, 113, 8249-8257. |
| Arl, D., et al., “SiO2 thin film growth through a pure atomic layer deposition technique at room temperature”. RSC Adv., 2020, 10, pp. 18073-18081. |
| Ashurbekova, et al., “Molecular layer deposition of hybrid siloxane thin films by ring opening of cyclic trisiloxane (V3D3) and azasilane”. Chem. Commun., 2020, 56, 8778-8781. |
| Cecchi et al., (2007) “Ultra-thin conformal pore-sealing of low-k materials by plasma-assisted ALD,” University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM, 1 page. |
| Chabal et al. (2016) “Atomic Layer Deposition of Silicon Dioxide Using Aminosilanes Di-sec-butylaminosilane and Bis(tert-butylamino)silane with Ozone,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, ACS Publications, American Chemical Society, 120:10927-10935. |
| Chinese Fifth Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2020 issued in Application No. CN 201510091775.9. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201510086588.1. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201380006994.1. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2020 issued in Application No. CN 201710347032.2. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2020 issued in Application No. CN 201710839679.7. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2015 issued in Application No. CN 201180045808.6. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201610206201.6. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated May 19, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201310021460.8. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated May 27, 2017 issued in Application No. CN 201510091775.9. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2015 issued in Application No. CN 201280046487.6. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201410521390.7. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2015 issued in Application No. CN 201280053888.4. |
| Chinese First Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201710522311.8. |
| Chinese Fourt Office Action dated May 16, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201310021460.8. |
| Chinese Fourth Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2019 issued in Application No. CN 201510091775.9. |
| Chinese Notification of Reexamination dated Apr. 17, 2020 issued in Application No. CN 201310021460.8. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2017 issued in Application No. CN 201310021460.8. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2020 issued in Application No. CN 201710347032.2. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201280053888.4. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201280046487.6. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201180045808.6. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2017 issued in Application No. CN 201380006994.1. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2019 issued in Application No. CN 201610206201.6. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2019 issued in Application No. CN 201710522311.8. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2017 issued in Application No. CN 201510086588.1. |
| Chinese Second Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201510091775.9. |
| Chinese Third Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2017, issued in Application No. CN 201380006994.1. |
| Chinese Third Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201510091775.9. |
| Chinese Third Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2017 issued in Application No. CN 201310021460.8. |
| Choi, Gyu-Jin et al., (2009) “Plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of TiO2 and Al-doped TiO2 films using N2O and O2 reactants,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 156(9):G138-G143. |
| Ek, Satu, et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition of a High-Density Aminopropylsiloxane Network on Silica through Sequential Reactions of y-Aminopropyltrialkoxysilanes and Water”. Langmuir 2003, 19, pp. 10601-10609. |
| Elam et al.,(2003) “Growth of ZnO/Al2O3 Alloy Films Using Atomic Layer Deposition Techniques,” Chemistry of Materials, 2003, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 1020-1028. doi:10.1021/cm020607+. |
| European Examination Report dated Dec. 11, 2017 issued in Application No. EP 13 15 2046. |
| European Extended Search Report dated Apr. 14, 2014 issued in Application No. EP13152046.2. |
| Faraz et al., (2015) “Atomic Layer Etching: What Can We Learn from Atomic Layer Deposition?,” ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 4(6):N5023-N5032. |
| Final Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/457,635. |
| Hausmann et al., (2002) “Atomic Layer Deposition of Hafnium and Zirconium Oxides Using Metal Amide Precursors,” Chem. Mater. 14(10):4350-4358. |
| Hiller, D., et al., “Low temperature of silicon dioxide by thermal atomic layer deposition: Investigation of material properties”. Journal of Applied Physics 107, 064313 (2010), pp. 1-10. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 26, 2020 issued in Application No. PCT/US2018/050049. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 25, 2019 issued in Application No. PCT/US2018/050049. |
| Japanese Decision of Refusal dated Dec. 5, 2017 issued in Application No. JP2014-554825. |
| Japanese Decision of Rejection dated Jan. 9, 2018 issued in Application No. JP 2013-007612. |
| Japanese Decision to Grant dated Sep. 10, 2018 issued in Application No. JP2013-230782. |
| Japanese First Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2018 issued in Application No. JP 2014-262248. |
| Japanese First Office Action dated May 29, 2019 issued in Application No. JP 2018-090402. |
| Japanese First Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2017 issued in Application No. JP 2013-230782. |
| Japanese Notice of Reason for Refusal dated Jul. 24, 2018 issued in Application No. JP 2017-159931. |
| Japanese Notification of Reasons for Rejection dated Jan. 10, 2017 issued in Application No. JP2014-554825. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2016 issued in Application No. JP 2015-21804. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2016 issued in Application No. JP 2014-531838. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2017 issued in Application No. JP 2013-231188. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2017 issued in Application No. JP 2013-007612. |
| Japanese Reason for Refusal dated Apr. 2, 2019 issued in Application No. JP 2013-007612. |
| Japanese Second Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2019 issued in Application No. JP 2017-159931. |
| Japanese Second Office Action dated May 22, 2018 issued in Application No. JP 2013-230782. |
| Japanese Second Office Action [Decision of Rejection] dated Dec. 4, 2018 issued in Application No. JP 2013-231188. |
| Japanese Second Office Action [Decision of Rejection] dated Jan. 14, 2020 issued in Application No. JP 2018-090402. |
| Japanese Third Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2020 issued in Application No. JP 2017-159931. |
| Kim, Dae Hyun, et al., “Thermal Atomic Layer Deposition of Device-Quality SiO2 Thin Films under 100 ° C Using an Aminodisilane Precursor”. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, pp. 5502-5508. |
| Kim, H., et al., (2002) “The Growth of Tantalum Thin Films by Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition and Diffusion Barrier Properties,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 716:B8.5.1-B8.5.6. |
| King, Sean W., (Jul./Aug. 2011) “Plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition of SiNx:H and SiO2,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A29(4):041501-1 through 041501-9 (9 pages). |
| Ko, Myoung-Gyun, et al., “Characterization of ruthenium thin film deposited by rf-direct plasma atomic layer deposition,” 209th ECS Meeting, Abstract #50, p. 1 [Downloaded on Jun. 9, 2014]. |
| Ko, Myoung-Gyun, et al., (Oct. 2008) “Correlation of Carbon Content with the Thermal Stability of Ruthenium Deposited by Using RF-Direct Plasma-Enhanced Atomic-Layer Deposition,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 53(4):2123-2128. |
| Korean Decision for Grant of Patent, dated Jul. 25, 2018, issued in Application No. KR 10-2013-7010291. |
| Korean Decision for Grant of Patent, dated May 17, 2019 issued in Application No. KR 10-2014-7008696. |
| Korean Decision from the Patent Tribunal of the KIPO (description) dated May 26, 2015 issued in Application No. KR 10-2012-0043797. |
| Korean Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2014 issued in Application No. KR 10-2012-0043797. |
| Korean Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2016, issued in Application No. KR 10-2015-0022610. |
| Korean First Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2019 issued in Application No. KR 10-2019-7012231. |
| Korean First Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2016, issued in Application No. KR 10-2015-0022610. |
| Korean First Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2020 issued in Application No. KR 10-2013-0135907. |
| Korean First Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2021 issued in Application No. KR 10-2020-0143459. |
| Korean First Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2019 issued in Application No. KR 10-2013-0056776. |
| Korean First Office Action dated May 14, 2020 issued in Application No. KR 10-2013-0135905. |
| Korean First Office Action dated May 27, 2020 issued in Application No. KR 10-2013-0126834. |
| Korean First Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2018 issued in Application No. KR 10-2014-7010949. |
| Korean First Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2017 issued in Application No. KR 10-2014-7008696. |
| Korean Notice of Provisional Rejection dated Dec. 6, 2013 issued in Application No. KR 10-2012-0043797. |
| Korean Office Action, dated Aug. 23, 2017, issued in Application No. KR 10-2017-7020548. |
| Korean Office Action, dated Feb. 7, 2017, issued in Application No. KR 10-2012-7004925. |
| Korean Office Action, dated May 23, 2017, issued in Application No. KR 10-2013-7010291. |
| Korean Office Action, dated Nov. 27, 2017, issued in Application No. KR 10-2013-7010291. |
| Korean Second Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2018 issued in Application No. KR 10-2014-7008696. |
| KR Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2021, in Application No. KR1020210140454 with English translation. |
| Lavareda et al., (2004) “Properties of a-Si:H TFTs using silicon carbonitride as dielectric,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 338-340:797-801. |
| Lee et al., (2005) “Chemically conformal deposition of SrTiO3 thin films by Atomic Layer Deposition using conventional metal organic precursors and remote-plasma activated H2O,” School of Materials Science and Engineering, and Inter-university Semiconductor Research Center, Seoul National University, Microelectronic Engineering 80:158-161. |
| Lee, Jong Ju, (2005) “Low-impurity, highly conformal atomic layer deposition of titanium nitride using NH3-Ar-H2 plasma treatment for capacitor electrodes,” Materials Letters, 59:615-617. |
| Li, Xingcun, et al., (2011) “Atomic Layer Deposition A1203 Thin Films in Magnetized Radio Frequency Plasma Source,” Physics Procedia 18:100-106. |
| Mallikarjunan, Anupama, et al., “Designing high performance precursors for atomic layer deposition of silicon oxide”. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 33 (1 ), 01A 137 (2015), pp. 1-4. URL:https://doi .org/10.1116/1.4903275. |
| Man P.F. et al., (Feb. 11-15, 1996) “Elimination of Post-Release Adhesion in Microstructures Using Conformal Fluorocarbon Coatings,” MEMS '96 Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 55-60. |
| Nguyen, S.V. et al., (Jan./Mar. 1999) “Plasma-assist chemical vapor deposition of dielectric thin films for ULSI semiconductor circuits,” IBM J.Res.Develop. 43(1.2):5-38. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 19, 2021 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/457,635. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 7, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/034,022. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2021 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/556,122. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/457,635. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Apr. 3, 2014, issued in Application No. PCT/US2012/052769. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Apr. 4, 2013 issued in Application No. PCT/US2011/052537. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Aug. 7, 2014, issued in Application No. PCT/US2013/022977. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Mar. 13, 2014, issued in Application No. PCT/US2012/051740. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 26, 2012, issued in PCT/US2011/032303. |
| PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 26, 2012, issued in Application No. PCT/US2011/032186. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 18, 2012, issued in Application No. PCT/US2012/052769. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 20, 2012, issued in PCT/US2011/032303. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2013, issued in Application No. PCT/US2012/051740. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 2, 2012 issued in Application No. PCT/US2011/052537. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 27, 2013, issued in Application No. PCT/US2013/022977. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 20, 2011, issued in Application No. PCT/US2011/032186. |
| PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees; Communication Re Partial International Search, dated Dec. 16, 2011, issued in Application No. PCT/US2011/032303. |
| Plasma Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition (PEALD), Website: http://www.asm.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=19&Itemid=161 (2010), 1 page. |
| “PlasmaProTM NGP® 80 Range,” Oxford Instruments (2010), 8 pages. |
| Pritchett, Merry, (May 2004) “Adherence/Diffusion Barrier Layers for Copper Metallization: Amorphous Carbon:Silicon Polymerized Films,” Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Texas, 113pp. |
| Puurunen, Riikka L. (2005) “Surface chemistry of atomic layer deposition: A case study for the trimethylaluminum/water process,” Journal of Applied Physics, 97:121301-1-121301-52. |
| Singapore Eligibility to Grant w/Supplemental Examinatinon Report dated Apr. 23, 2019 issued in Application No. SG 10201408801Q. |
| Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 14, 2019 issued in Application No. SG 10201807090Q. |
| Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 19, 2020 issued in Application No. SG 10201607194P. |
| Singapore Second Written Opinion dated Jan. 24, 2020 issued in Application No. SG 102018070900. |
| Singapore Supplementary Examination Report dated Aug. 11, 2016 issued in Application No. SG 11201404315R. |
| Singapore Supplementary Examination Report dated Jun. 1, 2016 issued in Application No. SG 11201400633R. |
| STREM brochure, “MOCVD, CVD &ALD Precursors”. Strem Chemicals, Inc., CVD Nov. 2018, pp. 1-70. |
| Taiwan Examination Report dated Jan. 11, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 102138326. |
| Taiwan Examination Report dated Jul. 13, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 102140721. |
| Taiwan Examination Report dated Mar. 29, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 102102054. |
| Taiwan First Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 103145386. |
| Taiwan First Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 106122777. |
| Taiwan First Office Action dated May 3, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 103133765. |
| Taiwan First Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2019 issued in Application No. TW 105109955. |
| Taiwan First Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2018, issued in Application No. TW 104104648. |
| Taiwan First Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 106140906. |
| Taiwan Notice of Allowance and Search Report dated Aug. 30, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 104104471. |
| Taiwan Notice of Allowance and Search Report dated Dec. 18, 2015 issued in Application No. TW 101134692. |
| Taiwan Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 2, 2020, issued in Application No. TW 108119661. |
| Taiwan Office Action and Search Report dated Jan. 27, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 101131556. |
| Taiwan Office Action and Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 102102879. |
| Taiwan Office Action and Search Report dated Nov. 9, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 101131556. |
| Taiwan Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 100113041. |
| Taiwan Office Action dated May 5, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 100134208. |
| Taiwan Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 105130207. |
| Taiwan Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 102117772. |
| Taiwan Rejection Decision dated Aug. 17, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 102117772. |
| Taiwan Second Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 106122777. |
| Taiwanese First Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 104122669. |
| Taiwanese First Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 104106165. |
| U.S. Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief (filed May 22, 14) Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board dated Aug. 14, 2014 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,240. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/084,305. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/453,237. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,785. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,145. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/609,864. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,569. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/144,107. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,744. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,554. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/963,212. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2016 issued U.S. Appl. No. 14/607,997. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,549. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/683,397. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2013 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,240. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,616. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/084,399. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,549. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/556,122. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/034,022. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance [Corrected Notice of Allowability] dated Apr. 19, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,785. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance [Corrected Notice of Allowability] dated Nov. 28, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/224,347. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 18, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/178,474. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 9, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,221. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 22, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,542. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 31, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,554. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 5, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,287. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 7, 2014 issued U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,239. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 5, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,917. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 10, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/178,474. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 11, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/061,587. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 12, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/074,596. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,549. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,785. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 25, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,145. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/084,399. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 29, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/650,662. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 15, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/678,736. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 26, 2013, issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,619. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 15, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/015,952. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 16, 2016 issued U.S. Appl. No. 14/607,997. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 19, 2013 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/242,084. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 20, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,542. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 19, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/144,107. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 21, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,785. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 26, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/253,301. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 27, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/178,474. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 28, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/426,889. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 28, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/683,397. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 30, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/965,628. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 7, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/654,186. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 9, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/609,864. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated May 28, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,744. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated May 6, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,569. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 17, 2016 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,240. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/607,386. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 20, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/074,617. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 26, 2014 issued U.S. Appl. No. 14/133,239. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 4, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,785. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 1, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,860. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 13, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/019,904. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 3, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/976,793. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 4, 2013 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,282. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 4, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/224,347. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 8, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/607,386. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 19, 2013 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/242,084. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 26, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,011. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 27, 2016 issued U.S. Appl. No. 14/607,997. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 28, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/399,637. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 30, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,132. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance (Supplemental Notice of Allowability) dated Feb. 21, 2017 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,240. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance [Supplemental Notice of Allowability] dated Mar. 1, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/061,587. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance [Supplemental Notice of Allowability] dated Oct. 22, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,860. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/556,122. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,785. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,549. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2013 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,240. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2013 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/242,084. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,132. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,569. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/932,869. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/061,587. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,221. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/609,864. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/074,596. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/074,596. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/015,952. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2020 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/453,237. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,542. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/963,212. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,554. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/963,212. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/683,397. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/963,212. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/144,107. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,917. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,145. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,744. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,616. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/019,904. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2013 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,619. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/224,347. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/084,399. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,860. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/976,793. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/034,022. |
| U.S. Office Action dated May 15, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/074,617. |
| U.S. Office Action dated May 21, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/607,386. |
| U.S. Office Action dated May 24, 2013 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,282. |
| U.S. Office Action dated May 25, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/552,011. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/178,474. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/654,186. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/965,628. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,549. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/253,301. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/084,305. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2015 issued U.S. Appl. No. 14/607,997. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/426,889. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/036,784, inventors Ou et al., filed Jul. 16, 2018. |
| U.S. Patent Board Decision on Appeal Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Examiner Affirmed) dated Aug. 11, 2016 issued U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,240. |
| KR Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2022, in Application No. KR10-2021-0140454 with English translation. |
| KR Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2023 in Application No. KR10-2021-0174878 with English translation. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210343520 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16457635 | Jun 2019 | US |
| Child | 17305938 | US | |
| Parent | 14664545 | Mar 2015 | US |
| Child | 16457635 | US |
