Bump-on-Trace (BOT) structures have been used in flip chip packages, wherein metal bumps are bonded onto narrow metal traces in package substrates directly, rather than bonded onto metal pads that have greater widths than the respective connecting metal traces. The BOT structures require smaller chip areas, and the manufacturing cost of the BOT structures is relatively low. However, there are technical challenges related to BOT structures.
For a more complete understanding of the embodiments, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The making and using of the embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the embodiments provide many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative, and do not limit the scope of the disclosure.
Cross-sectional views of a package structure comprising a Bump-on-Trace (BOT) structure 150 is provided in
Work piece 100 may further include under-bump metallurgy (UBM) layer 110 and a copper post (or pillar) 112 on UBM layer 110. Throughout the description, the copper post 112 is also referred to as a copper-containing bump or metal bump. Although copper post 112 is used as an example in the description here and below, other types of metal bumps, such as solder bumps, may also be used in place of copper post 112. The UBM layer 110 is disposed on a metal pad 105, which is part of interconnect structure 104. Between the interconnect structure 104 and the UBM layer 110 not contacting the metal pad 105, there is a passivation layer 107. In some embodiments, the passivation layer 107 is made of polyimide.
Work piece 200 may be a package substrate, although it may be other package components such as interposers, for example. Work piece 200 may include metal lines and vias 202 connecting metal features on opposite sides of work piece 200. In an embodiment, metal trace(s) 210 on the topside of work piece 200 is electrically connected to ball grid array (B GA) balls 212 on the bottom side of work pieces 200 through metal lines and vias 202. Metal lines and vias 202 may be formed in dielectric layers 214, although they may also be formed in a semiconductor layer (such as a silicon layer, not shown) and in the dielectric layers that are formed on the semiconductor layer.
Metal trace 210 is formed over a top dielectric layer in dielectric layers 214. Metal trace 210 may be formed of substantially pure copper, aluminum copper, or other metallic materials such as tungsten, nickel, palladium, gold, and/or alloys thereof.
After the bonding of work pieces 100 and 200, a mold underfill (MUF) (not shown) may be filled into the space between work pieces 100 and 200, in accordance with some embodiments. Accordingly, a MUF may also be filled into the space between neighboring metal traces 210. Alternatively, no MUF is filled, while air fills the space between work pieces 100 and 200, and fills the space between neighboring metal traces 210.
In some other embodiments, the ratio of L1/W1 is greater than 1. In some embodiments, the ratio of L1/W1 is equal to or greater than about 1.2. In some embodiments, the L1 is in a range from about 10 μm to about 1000 μm. In some embodiments, W1 is in a range from about 10 μm to about 700 μm. In some embodiments, W2 is in a range from about 10 μm to about 500 μm. The structure as shown in
The solder layer 220 and copper post 112 may be formed by plating over the UBM layer 110, in accordance with some embodiments. Prior to the solder reflow, the solder layer 220 and copper post 112 share the same surfaces 113.
After reflow and under the pressure of being pressed against metal trace 211, solder layer 220 tends to protrude the most near the center region of the rectangle (N section). This could be due to less surface tension on the side walls of the center region (N section), in comparison to the edge sections (M sections).
As described above, the protrusion of the solder layer 220 (with a maximum protruding distance D1) increases the risk of shorting.
As mentioned above, solder layer 220 tends to protrude in the middle section (or N section). By reducing the width of the middle section, the reflowed solder will fill the recess space created by the reduced width of the middle section (or rectangular section N). As a result, the risk of shorting due to protruding solder material can be reduced and yield can be improved. Such reduction to reduce shorting and to improve yield is important for advanced packaging. In some embodiments, the recess region is region R, which is shown in
Rvolume=W3×LR×(H1+H2+H3) (1)
Although reducing W1 could reduce the risk of shorting, W1 cannot be reduced too much to prevent insufficient coverage of solder on the metal trace underneath. In addition, small W1 would lead to small UBM area, which could increase the stress at the interface 118 (as shown in
Other shapes of recess regions combined with various profiles of metal bumps may also be used to reduce solder metal protrusion.
The metal bumps described above without the recess regions have a cross section in the shape of a race track. Bumps with other shapes of cross sections may also be used. For example, the shape of a cross section may be an oval shape. The top views of metal bumps 400 may be in any elongated shapes, including a rectangle with rounded corners. Recess region(s) may be formed in such bumps to allow solder layers to fill (fully or partially) in the recess region(s) after reflow to reduce the risk of shorting.
The embodiments of bump and bump-on-trace (BOT) structures provide bumps with recess regions for reflowed solder to fill. The recess regions are placed in areas of the bumps where reflow solder is most likely to protrude. The recess regions reduce the risk of bump to trace shorting. As a result, yield can be improved.
Bump structure 500 is usable for connecting one die to another in a package. Bump structure 500 includes a conductive material. In some embodiments, the conductive material is copper, aluminum, tungsten, or another suitable conductive material. Bump structure 500 connects one die to another using a reflowed solder layer or a reflowed solder ball. During a reflow process, liquefied solder flows into recess 510. In comparison with bump structures which do not include recess 510, bump structure 500 is able to achieve a smaller pitch between adjacent bump structures with reduced risk of bridging between solder material of the adjacent bump structures. In some embodiments, bump structure 500 is part of a bump on trace (BOT) structure. In some embodiments, bump structure 500 is configured to connect to another bump structure. In some embodiments, the other bump structure includes at least one recessed side. In some embodiments, the other bump structure includes no recessed sides.
Ends 530 of bump structure 500 are continuous curves. In some embodiments, ends 530 are straight edges with rounded corners, such that a general shape of bump structure 500 is a rectangle having rounded corners as seen in
Bump structure 500 is usable for a 16 nanometer (nm) technology chip. In some embodiments, bump structure 500 is usable for a 28 nm technology chip. In some embodiments, bump structure 500 is usable for a 20 nm technology chip. In some embodiments, bump structure 500 is sized for a technology node other than 16 nm, 20 nm or 28 nm. In some embodiments, overall width “a” ranges from about 10 microns (μm) to about 200 μm. In some embodiments, overall width “a” ranges from about 25 μm to about 50 μm. If the overall width of bump structure 500 is too small, an electrical resistance of bump structure 500 increases and negatively impacts performance of a die connected to the bump structure; or a risk of the bump structure breaking during a packaging process increases. In addition, a risk of an open connection during a packaging operation due to misalignment increases if the overall width is too small. If the overall width of bump structure 500 is too great, a risk of bridging of solder materials of adjacent bump structures is increased. In some embodiments, overall length “b” ranges from about 20 μm to about 400 μm. In some embodiments, overall length “b” ranges from about 50 μm to about 80 μm. If the overall length of bump structure 500 is too small, the electrical resistance of the bump structure increases and adversely impacts performance of a device connected to the bump structure, in some instances. In addition, a mechanical strength of bump structure 500 is reduced and a risk of breaking during a packaging process increases if the overall length of the bump structure is too small. A risk of misalignment causing an open connection also increases if the overall length of bump structure 500 is too small. If the overall length of bump structure 500 is too large, a risk of bridging between solder materials of adjacent bump structures increases. In some embodiments, a ratio of overall width “a” to overall length “b” ranges from about 0.5 to about 1.0. If the ratio of overall width “a” to overall length “b” is too small, a mechanical strength of bump structure 500 is adversely impacted, in some instances. If the ratio of overall width “a” to overall length “b” is too great, a size of bump structure 500 is increased without a significant increase in performance and functionality, in some instances.
A surface of recess 510 closest to side 520 is parallel to side 520. In some embodiments, the surface of recess 510 closest to side 520 is angled with respect to side 520 (
First length “c” of recess 510 provides an opening for solder material to flow into the recess during a reflow process. In some embodiments, first length “c” ranges from about 5 μm to about 50 μm. In some embodiments, first length “c” ranges from about 8 μm to about 15 μm. In some embodiments, first length “c” is substantially equal to second length “d” (
Depth “e” of recess 510 provides a volume to receive solder material during a reflow process. In some embodiments, depth “e” ranges from about 0.5 μm to about 15 μm. In some embodiments, depth “e” ranges from about 1 μm to about 15 μm. In some embodiments, a ratio of depth “e” to overall width a ranges from about 0.05 to about 0.2. If depth “e” is too large or the ratio between depth “e” and overall width a is too great, the electrical resistance of bump structure 500 negatively impacts performance of a die connected to the bump structure, in some instances. Additionally, a risk of bump structure 500 breaking during a packaging process increases or an open connection during a packaging operation due to misalignment increases if depth “e” is too large or the ratio between depth “e” and overall width “a” is too great. If depth “e” is too small or the ratio between depth “e” and overall width “a” is too small, the size of recess 510 is not sufficient to reduce the risk of bridging between adjacent bump structures, in some instances.
As a pitch between bump structures decreases, an overall size of the bump structures is reduced. For example, a 28 nm technology node chip includes a bump pitch of about 100 μm to about 160 μm, in some instances. For a chip which is about 10 mm×10 mm, the number of bump structures is approximately 1000 bump structures to connect the chip to another structure. In contrast, a 16 nm technology node chip includes a bump pitch of about 80 μm to about 120 μm, in some embodiments. The 16 nm technology node chip will have 3-4 times the number of bump structures for a 10 mm×10 mm chip in comparison with the 28 nm technology node chip. In some embodiments, a 10 nm technology chip includes a bump pitch of about 40 μm to about 100 μm. The 10 nm technology chip will have even more bump structures for a 10 mm×10 mm chip than a 16 nm technology node chip. Due to the increased number of bump structures on a chip as technology nodes decrease, recessing both sides of the bump structures has a greater overall impact in an ability of a chip including the recessed bump structures to maintain functionality when packaged with another structure due to increased resistance. In addition, mechanical strength of a connection point between a bump structure having a single recess side (
A side of bump structures 750 including a recess is oriented toward a closest center line of center line 710a and center line 710b. That is, a bump structure, such as bump structure 750a, which is located closer to center line 710a than center line 710b includes a recess in the side of the bump structure facing center line 710a. Conversely, a bump structure, such as bump structure 750b, located closer to center line 710b than center line 710a includes a recess in the side of the bump structure facing center line 710b. In some embodiments, a bump structure, such as bump structure 750c, which is equidistant from center line 710a and center line 710b includes a recess in the side of the bump structure facing center line 710b. In some embodiments, a bump structure 750 which is equidistant from center line 710a and center line 710b includes a recess in the side of the bump structure facing center line 710a. In some embodiments, a first bump structure 750 which is equidistant from center line 710a and center line 710b has a recess in the side of the first bump structure facing center line 710a and a second bump structure 750 which is equidistant from center line 710a and center line 710b has a recess in the side of the second bump structure facing center line 710b. In some embodiments, pitch P between adjacent bump structures 750 ranges from about 40 μm to about 200 μm.
Bump structures 750 are bonded to another die using a solder reflow process. In some embodiments, bump structures 750 are part of an active die, a passive die, an interposer, or another suitable connection structure. The recess of bump structures 750 is oriented toward the closest center line 710a or 710b in order to capture reflowed solder material during a packaging process. During the solder reflow process, a die being bonded to bump structures 750 is heated. In some embodiments, the die is an active die, a passive die, an interposer or another suitable connection structure. When the die cools the die shrinks. A magnitude of the shrinkage of the die is based on a coefficient of thermal expansion of a material of the die and an overall size of the die. This shrinking causes edges of the bonded die to move inwardly in a plane parallel to array 700 toward center line 710a and center line 710b. The movement of the edges of the die pulls solder material, which is still cooling from the reflow process toward, center line 710a and center line 710b. For example, referring to
As discussed above, recessed bump structures have increased electrical resistance in comparison with a bump structure having non-recessed sides. The recessed bump structure also has a lower mechanical strength than non-recess bump structures. By concentrating recessed bump structures in regions of array 800 where a bridging risk is highest, the above drawbacks of recessing the sides of the bump structures are mitigated in other portions of array 800. Recess peripheral region 850 is a location of highest bridging risk of array 800 because the edge of the die bonded to the bump structures of array 800 experiences a largest magnitude of shrinkage following a reflow process.
Array 800 includes recess peripheral region 850 having a single row of bump structures. In some embodiments, recess peripheral region 850 includes multiple rows of bump structures. In some embodiments, array 800 includes a single recess peripheral region 850. In some embodiments, the single recess peripheral region 850 includes a single recessed bump structure. In some embodiments, the single recessed bump structure is adjacent to a corner region 830 of array 800.
In some embodiments, as the coefficient of thermal expansion of the die bonded to array 800 increases, a size of recess peripheral region 850 increases. In some embodiments, as the size of the die bonded to array 800 increases, the size of recess peripheral region 850 increases. In some embodiments, the size of recess peripheral region 850 is determined based on empirical evidence from previous package structures.
A first corner region extending parallel to center line 910a has a length x1 parallel to center line 910a. In some embodiment, a ratio of length x1 to an overall length L of die 900 parallel to center line 910a ranges from about 0.02 to about 0.1. If the ratio of length x1 to the overall length of die 900 is too great, a risk of bridging of bump structures within the first corner region increases, in some instances. If the ratio of length x1 to the overall length of die 900 is too small, a mechanical structure of the bump structures in the first corner region is needlessly reduced or the electrical resistance of the bump structures in the first corner region is needlessly increased, in some instances.
A first recess peripheral region extending parallel to center line 910a has a length y1 parallel to center line 910a. In some embodiment, a ratio of length y1 to an overall length L of die 900 parallel to center line 910a ranges from about 0.2 to about 0.3. If the ratio of length y1 to the overall length of die 900 is too great, a mechanical structure of the bump structures in the first recess peripheral region is needlessly reduced or the electrical resistance of the bump structures in the first recess peripheral region is needlessly increased, in some instances. If the ratio of length y1 to the overall length of die 900 is too small, a risk of bridging of bump structures within the first corner region increases, in some instances.
A second corner region extending parallel to center line 910a has a length x2 parallel to center line 910a. In some embodiment, a ratio of length x2 to an overall length of die 900 parallel to center line 910a ranges from about 0.02 to about 0.1. If the ratio of length x2 to the overall length L of die 900 is too great, a risk of bridging of bump structures within the first corner region increases, in some instances. If the ratio of length x2 to the overall length of die 900 is too small, a mechanical structure of the bump structures in the first corner region is needlessly reduced or the electrical resistance of the bump structures in the first corner region is needlessly increased, in some instances. In some embodiments, length x2 is equal to length x1. In some embodiments, length x2 is different from length x1. In some embodiments, a magnitude of length x1 or length x2 is determined based on empirical information, a coefficient of thermal expansion of a die bonded to die 900, or a size of the die bonded to die 900.
A second recess peripheral region extending parallel to center line 910a has a length y2 parallel to center line 910a. In some embodiment, a ratio of length y2 to an overall length L of die 900 parallel to center line 910a ranges from about 0.2 to about 0.3. If the ratio of length y2 to the overall length of die 900 is too great, a mechanical structure of the bump structures in the first recess peripheral region is needlessly reduced or the electrical resistance of the bump structures in the first recess peripheral region is needlessly increased, in some instances. If the ratio of length y2 to the overall length of die 900 is too small, a risk of bridging of bump structures within the first corner region increases, in some instances. In some embodiments, length y2 is equal to length y1. In some embodiments, length y2 is different from length y1. In some embodiments, a magnitude of length y1 or length y2 is determined based on empirical information, a coefficient of thermal expansion of a die bonded to die 900, or a size of the die bonded to die 900.
A third corner region extending parallel to center line 910b has a length i1 parallel to center line 910b. In some embodiment, a ratio of length i1 to an overall length K of die 900 parallel to center line 910b ranges from about 0.02 to about 0.1. If the ratio of length i1 to the overall length of die 900 is too great, a risk of bridging of bump structures within the first corner region increases, in some instances. If the ratio of length i1 to the overall length of die 900 is too small, a mechanical structure of the bump structures in the first corner region is needlessly reduced or the electrical resistance of the bump structures in the first corner region is needlessly increased, in some instances.
A third recess peripheral region extending parallel to center line 910b has a length j1 parallel to center line 910b. In some embodiment, a ratio of length j1 to an overall length K of die 900 parallel to center line 910b ranges from about 0.2 to about 0.3. If the ratio of length j1 to the overall length of die 900 is too great, a mechanical structure of the bump structures in the first recess peripheral region is needlessly reduced or the electrical resistance of the bump structures in the first recess peripheral region is needlessly increased, in some instances. If the ratio of length j1 to the overall length of die 900 is too small, a risk of bridging of bump structures within the first corner region increases, in some instances.
A fourth corner region extending parallel to center line 910b has a length i2 parallel to center line 910b. In some embodiment, a ratio of length i2 to an overall length K of die 900 parallel to center line 910b ranges from about 0.02 to about 0.1. If the ratio of length i2 to the overall length of die 900 is too great, a risk of bridging of bump structures within the first corner region increases, in some instances. If the ratio of length i2 to the overall length of die 900 is too small, a mechanical structure of the bump structures in the first corner region is needlessly reduced or the electrical resistance of the bump structures in the first corner region is needlessly increased, in some instances. In some embodiments, length i2 is equal to at least one of length x1, length x2 or length i1. In some embodiments, length x2 is different from at least one of length x1, length x2 or length i1. In some embodiments, a magnitude of length i1 or length i2 is determined based on empirical information, a coefficient of thermal expansion of a die bonded to die 900, or a size of the die bonded to die 900.
A fourth recess peripheral region extending parallel to center line 910b has a length j2 parallel to center line 910b. In some embodiment, a ratio of length j2 to an overall length K of die 900 parallel to center line 910b ranges from about 0.2 to about 0.3. If the ratio of length j2 to the overall length of die 900 is too great, a mechanical structure of the bump structures in the first recess peripheral region is needlessly reduced or the electrical resistance of the bump structures in the first recess peripheral region is needlessly increased, in some instances. If the ratio of length j2 to the overall length of die 900 is too small, a risk of bridging of bump structures within the first corner region increases, in some instances. In some embodiments, length j2 is equal to at least one of length y1, length y2 or length j1. In some embodiments, length j2 is different from at least one of length y1, length y2 or length j1. In some embodiments, a magnitude of length j1 or length j2 is determined based on empirical information, a coefficient of thermal expansion of a die bonded to die 900, or a size of the die bonded to die 900.
Bump structure 1001-1008 includes a conductive post 1022, a solder material 1024 and a UBM layer 1026. During a bonding process, solder material 1024 is reflowed in order to bond with a corresponding trace 1011-1018. When solder material 1024 is reflowed a portion of the reflowed solder material flows into recess 1050. The portion of solder material 1024 which flows into recess 1050 reduces a total width of the bonded bump structure 1001-1008 in comparison with a bump structure which does not include recess 1050. The reduced width of bump structure 1001-1008 reduces facilitates a reduced pitch between bump structures by reducing a risk of bridging between adjacent bump structures in an array having the reduced pitch. Reducing a pitch between bump structures 1001-1008 facilitates an increased density of connections between first work piece 100′ and second work piece 200′.
One aspect of this description relates to a semiconductor structure. The semiconductor structure comprises a first conductive structure and a second conductive structure arranged over a first substrate. A bump structure is arranged between the first conductive structure and a second substrate. A solder layer is configured to electrically couple the first conductive structure and the bump structure. The bump structure comprises a recess configured to reduce a protrusion of the solder layer in a direction extending from the first conductive structure to the second conductive structure.
Another aspect of this description relates to a semiconductor structure. The semiconductor structure comprises a conductive trace arranged on a first work piece. A conductive bump is arranged between the conductive trace and a second work piece. The conductive bump has a recess region. A solder bump is arranged between the conductive trace and the conductive bump. The solder bump fills the recess region at least partially.
Still another aspect of this description relates to a semiconductor structure. The semiconductor structure comprises a metal trace arranged on a first work piece. The metal trace extends in a first direction. A conductive bump is arranged on a second work piece. The conductive bump has a recess facing in a second direction that is different than the first direction. A solder layer is between the metal trace and the conductive bump. The solder layer fills a part of the recess.
Although the embodiments and their advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the embodiments as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, and composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the disclosure. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps. In addition, each claim constitutes a separate embodiment, and the combination of various claims and embodiments are within the scope of the disclosure.
This Application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/057,302 filed on Mar. 1, 2016, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/800,934 filed on Jul. 16, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,318,458 issued on Apr. 19, 2016), which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/507,189 filed on Oct. 6, 2014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,105,533 issued on Aug. 11, 2015), which is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/192,302 filed on Jul. 27, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,853,853 issued on Oct. 7, 2014). The contents of all the above-referenced Applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5477086 | Rostoker et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5569964 | Ikebe | Oct 1996 | A |
5767580 | Rostoker | Jun 1998 | A |
6037667 | Hembree et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6205660 | Fjelstad et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6562545 | Hembree et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
7057292 | Elenius et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7271483 | Lin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
8227332 | Coffy et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8288871 | Shieh et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8299367 | Ni et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8709935 | Choi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8853853 | Chang et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8970033 | Chen et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9024439 | Hwang et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9105533 | Chang et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20030052156 | Kim et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20070200234 | Gerber et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080073783 | Matsushima et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088016 | Ho et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090243006 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100044416 | Ogawa | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100187688 | Hochstenbach | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193944 | Castro et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100326715 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110248399 | Pendse | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110260321 | Pendse | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120032325 | Miyata et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance dated May 30, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,302. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 7, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/507,189. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,934. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 14, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,934. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,302. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 10, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,302. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170062371 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15057302 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 15353197 | US | |
Parent | 14800934 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15057302 | US | |
Parent | 14507189 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 14800934 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13192302 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 14507189 | US |