Provided is a method of etching a semiconductor substrate with improved critical dimension uniformity. The method comprises supporting a semiconductor substrate on a substrate support in a plasma etch chamber; supplying a first etch gas to a central region over the semiconductor substrate; supplying a second gas comprising at least one silicon containing gas to a peripheral region over the semiconductor substrate surrounding the central region, wherein a concentration of silicon in the second gas is greater than a concentration of silicon in the first etch gas; generating plasma from the first etch gas and second gas; and plasma etching an exposed surface of the semiconductor substrate.
a-b show details of a two-zone injector;
During the manufacture of semiconductor-based products such as integrated circuits, etching and/or deposition steps may be used to build up or remove layers of material on a semiconductor substrate such as a wafer. A conventional etching procedure involves the use of one or more etch gases energized into a plasma state to effect plasma etching of a layer of material. Features to be etched include, for example, openings, vias, trenches, and gate structures.
Many plasma etch applications rely on the generation of a passivation layer to obtain a desired feature profile. The primary mechanism for profile control involves the balance of etch and deposition reactions. The etch reactions are generally directly controlled by the reaction chamber parameters such as input power, pressure, and gas flows. In plasma etching of silicon wafers, etch reaction products are the primary deposition source with the result that deposition mechanisms are indirectly controlled.
The critical dimension (CD) is the dimension of the smallest geometrical feature (for example, width of interconnect line, contacts, trenches, etc.) which can be formed during semiconductor device/circuit manufacturing using given technology. Critical dimension uniformity is provided when the critical dimension of features at the center of a wafer is the same as the critical dimension of features closer to the edge of the wafer. Critical dimension uniformity is highly desirable to a nearly perfect degree, with features etched near the center of a wafer being substantially uniform with equivalent features etched closer to the edge of the wafer, since otherwise the integrated circuits being fabricated will have electronic characteristics that deviate more than is desirable. With each increase in the size of wafer diameter, the problem of ensuring uniformity of integrated circuits formed across larger and larger wafers becomes more difficult.
Various etch gas chemistries are used in etch applications. For example, when using HBr—-O2 etch gas chemistries, the passivation layer is primarily made up of SixBryOz. For Cl2—O2 etch gas chemistries, the passivation layer is primarily made of SixClyOz. Other constituents of the passivation layer can include N, C, H and F. Moreover, as a result of etching of silicon wafers and/or chamber materials such as quartz components, volatile silicon etch byproducts are incorporated in the passivation layer.
Silicon can be incorporated in passivation layers due to etching of silicon sources such as silicon wafers and/or chamber materials. Such silicon sources are secondary products that are not directly controlled by the etch gas chemistry. Moreover, as the volatile silicon etch byproducts are transported from the wafer surface toward the vacuum evacuation port, there is a finite possibility of deposition of the silicon-containing byproducts on the wafer surface. Further, the volatile silicon etch byproducts may be dissociated in the plasma region into reactive agents with larger probabilities of deposition of the silicon-containing byproducts on the wafer surface. Deposition of the silicon-containing byproducts on the wafer surface can lead to non-uniform silicon byproduct concentration across the wafer and lead to non-uniformity of the etched feature critical dimension.
Provided is a method of etching a semiconductor substrate with improved critical dimension uniformity. The method comprises supporting a semiconductor substrate on a substrate support in a plasma etch chamber; supplying a first etch gas to a central region over the semiconductor substrate; supplying a second gas comprising at least one silicon containing gas to a peripheral region over the semiconductor substrate surrounding the central region, wherein a concentration of silicon in the second gas is greater than a concentration of silicon in the first etch gas; generating plasma from the first etch gas and second gas; and plasma etching an exposed surface of the semiconductor substrate. Preferably, features etched near the center of the semiconductor substrate are substantially uniform with equivalent features etched closer to the edge of the semiconductor substrate.
Exemplary silicon containing gases include, for example, SiCl4, SiHCl3, SiH2Cl2, SiH3Cl, SiH4, Si2H6, SiH3CH3, SiH(CH3)3, SiF4, SiBr4, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), or mixtures thereof. The second gas, which comprises at least one silicon containing gas, may further include: (1) an inert carrier gas such as, for example, He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, or mixtures thereof; (2) an etchant gas such as, for example, Cl2, CxFy, HBr, CxFyHz (e.g., CF, CF2, CF3, etc.), SF6, HCl, or mixtures thereof, such as, for example, a mixture of SF6 and CH2F2; and/or (3) a passivation gas such as, for example, O2, N2, or mixtures thereof.
The first etch gas may or may not contain silicon. The method may further comprise adjusting: (1) an amount of second gas supplied to the peripheral region; (2) an amount of silicon supplied to the peripheral region; and/or (3) a ratio of a concentration of silicon in the second gas to a concentration of silicon in the first etch gas.
The exposed surface of the semiconductor substrate may comprise a silicon layer, which can be a portion of a single crystal silicon wafer beneath a mask such as a silicon nitride, silicon oxide, or silicon oxynitride mask layer. Alternatively, the silicon layer can be an epitaxial layer, a strained silicon layer or a silicon-germanium layer on a substrate such as a single crystal silicon wafer. The silicon layer may comprise a layer of polycrystalline silicon on a silicon wafer wherein the polycrystalline silicon layer is between an underlying gate oxide and an overlying hard or soft mask layer such as a silicon nitride, silicon oxide, or silicon oxynitride mask layer or photoresist. Alternatively, the disclosed method of etching is applicable to additional etch applications such as etching of, for example, polycrystalline silicon gates, metal gates, high dielectric constants (K), W and WSi gates, and spacers.
For example, for a 300 mm wafer, the etched features are preferably less than 50 nm (e.g., 45 nm, 25 nm, 18 nm, etc.) and have less than or equal to 1.5 nm 3σ non-uniformity.
The plasma is preferably a high density plasma produced in a transformer coupled plasma (TCP™) reactor available from Lam Research Corporation which is also called inductively coupled plasma (ICP) reactor.
The presently disclosed method is preferably carried out in an inductively coupled plasma reactor maintained at a desired vacuum pressure by a vacuum pump connected to an outlet in a wall of the reactor. Etching gas can be supplied to a showerhead or injector arrangement by supplying gas from a gas supply to a plenum extending around the underside of a dielectric window. A high density plasma can be generated in the reactor by supplying RF energy from an RF source to an external RF antenna such as a planar or non-planar coil having one or more turns outside the dielectric window on top of the reactor. The plasma generating source can be part of a modular mounting arrangement removably mounted in a vacuum tight manner on the upper end of the reactor.
A wafer can be supported within the reactor on a substrate support such as a cantilever chuck arrangement removably supported by a modular mounting arrangement from a sidewall of the reactor. Such a substrate support is at one end of a support arm mounted in a cantilever fashion such that the entire substrate support/support arm assembly can be removed from the reactor by passing the assembly through an opening in the sidewall of the reactor. The substrate support can include a chucking apparatus such as an electrostatic chuck and the substrate can be surrounded by a dielectric focus ring. The chuck can include an RF biasing electrode for applying an RF bias to the substrate during an etching process. The etching gas supplied by a gas supply can flow through channels between the window and an underlying gas distribution plate and enter the interior of the chamber through gas outlets in the gas distribution plate. The reactor can also include a heated liner extending from the gas distribution plate.
Alternatively, etching gas can be supplied by a multi-zone gas injector mounted in the dielectric window as disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0070620 A1, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the flow rates of the various gases will depend on factors such as the type of plasma reactor, the power settings, the vacuum pressure in the reactor, the dissociation rate for the plasma source, etc.
The reactor pressure is preferably maintained at a level suitable for sustaining a plasma in the reactor. In general, too low a reactor pressure can lead to plasma extinguishment whereas in a high density etch reactor too high a reactor pressure can lead to the etch stop problem. For high density plasma reactors, the reactor is preferably at a pressure below 100 mTorr. Typical process regimes for producing a high density plasma in a TCP™ reactor include about 450 W power, 60 V RF bias, pressure of 5 to 70 mT, and gas flow rates of 50-1000 sccm. Due to plasma confinement at the semiconductor substrate undergoing etching, the vacuum pressure at the substrate surface may be higher than the vacuum pressure setting for the reactor.
The substrate support supporting the semiconductor substrate undergoing etching preferably cools the substrate enough to prevent deleterious side reactions such as burning of any photoresist on the substrate and formation of undesirable reactant gas radicals. In high density plasma reactors, it is sufficient to circulate a fluid in the substrate support to maintain a substrate temperature of −10 to +80° C. The substrate support can include a bottom electrode for supplying an RF bias to the substrate during processing thereof and an ESC for clamping the substrate. For example, the substrate can comprise a silicon wafer which is electrostatically clamped and temperature controlled by supplying helium (He) at a desired pressure between the wafer and top surface of the ESC. In order to maintain the wafer at a desired temperature, the He can be maintained at a pressure of 2 to 30 Torr in the space between the wafer and the chuck.
Particular gas chemistries may be supplied at the periphery of a substrate by injecting the gas through a dielectric window at the top of the reactor, through a sidewall, for example near the dielectric window, through a chuck, or through an outer radius of a substrate holder. In particular, with reference to
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that a reduction in radial variation in total SiClx concentration improves the uniformity in the flux of passivating species to the semiconductor substrate, thereby improving radial critical dimension uniformity of the etch process. More generally, a passivating species comprising silicon passivates sidewalls of etched features. This passivating species comprising silicon may result from the plasma etching (i.e., come from the semiconductor substrate) and/or may be the silicon containing gas in the second gas. Preferably, the etch gas contains chlorine, such as, for example, when plasma is formed from Cl2, and SiClx passivates sidewalls of etched features.
While various embodiments have been described, it is to be understood that variations and modifications may be resorted to as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such variations and modifications are to be considered within the purview and scope of the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4275752 | Collier et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4369031 | Goldman et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4835114 | Satou et al. | May 1989 | A |
5077875 | Hoke et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5100505 | Cathey, Jr. | Mar 1992 | A |
5200388 | Abe et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5288325 | Gomi | Feb 1994 | A |
5310426 | Mori | May 1994 | A |
5313982 | Ohmi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5460654 | Kikkawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5589110 | Motoda et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5620524 | Fan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5651825 | Nakahigashi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5865205 | Wilmer | Feb 1999 | A |
5950693 | Noah et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6039074 | Raaijmakers et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052176 | Ni et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058958 | Benkowski et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090210 | Ballance et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119710 | Brown | Sep 2000 | A |
6132515 | Gauthier | Oct 2000 | A |
6155289 | Carlsen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6192919 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6224681 | Sivaramakrishnan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245192 | Dhindsa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251792 | Collins et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253783 | Carlsen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296711 | Loan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302139 | Dietz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315858 | Shinozuka et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6415736 | Hao et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432831 | Dhindsa et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6457494 | Gregg et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6534416 | Ye et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6593245 | Chan | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6864174 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893975 | Yue et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6972258 | Chu et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7166536 | Laermer et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7250373 | Mui et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20010044212 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047760 | Moslehi | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010051439 | Khan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020014207 | Sivaramakrishnan et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020100416 | Sun et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108570 | Lindfors | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108933 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020144657 | Chiang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160125 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020170598 | Girard et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020192369 | Morimoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003696 | Gelatos et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019580 | Strang | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045114 | Ni et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030045131 | Verbeke et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030070620 | Cooperberg et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030094903 | Tao et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030136332 | Krishnaraj et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030186545 | Kamp et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030218427 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040018741 | Deshmukh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040038540 | Li et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056602 | Yang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079728 | Mungekar et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084406 | Kamp et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112539 | Larson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112540 | Larson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118344 | Ni et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040129211 | Blonigan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175950 | Puppo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050006346 | Annapragada et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009324 | Li et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050079704 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050079710 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050079725 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101135 | Annapragada et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050241763 | Huang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060000802 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060099816 | Dalton et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070293043 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |