Memory bandwidth has become a bottleneck to system performance in high-performance computing, high-end servers, graphics, and (very soon) mid-level servers. Microprocessor enablers are doubling cores and threads-per-core to greatly increase performance and workload capabilities by distributing work sets into smaller blocks and distributing them among an increasing number of work elements, i.e. cores. Having multiple computer elements per processor results in an increasing amount of memory per computer element. This results in a greater need for memory bandwidth and memory density to be tightly coupled to a processor to address these challenges. Current memory technology roadmaps do not provide the performance to meet the central processing unit (CPU) and graphics processing unit (GPU) memory bandwidth goals.
To address the need for memory bandwidth and memory density to be tightly coupled to a processor, a hybrid memory cube (HMC) may be implemented so that memory may be placed on the same substrate as a controller enabling the memory system to perform its intended task more optimally. The HMC may feature a stack of individual memory die connected by internal vertical conductors, such as through-silicon vias (TSVs), which are vertical conductors that electrically connect a stack of individual memory die with a controller, such as to combine high-performance logic with dynamic random-access memory (DRAM). HMC delivers bandwidth and efficiencies while less energy is used to transfer data and provides a small form factor. In one embodiment of a HMC, the controller comprises a high-speed logic layer that interfaces with vertical stacks of DRAM that are connected using TSVs. The DRAM handles data, while the logic layer handles DRAM control within the HMC.
In other embodiments, a HMC may be implemented on, for example, a multi-chip module (MCM) substrate or on a silicon interposer. A MCM is a specialized electronic package where multiple integrated circuits (ICs), semiconductor dies or other discrete components are packaged onto a unifying substrate thereby facilitating their use as a component (e.g., thus appearing as one larger IC). A silicon interposer is an electrical interface routing between one connection (e.g., a socket) and another. The purpose of an interposer is to spread a connection to a wider pitch or to reroute a connection to a different connection.
However, the DRAM stack in a HMC has more bandwidth and signal count than many applications can use. The high signal count and high bandwidth of the DRAM stack in a HMC makes a cost effective host interface difficult.
The following description and the drawings sufficiently illustrate specific embodiments to enable those skilled in the art to practice them. Other embodiments may incorporate structural, logical, electrical, process, and other changes. Portions and features of some embodiments may be included in, or substituted for, those of other embodiments. Embodiments set forth in the claims encompass available equivalents of those claims.
A flexible memory system may be provided by tying vaults together (e.g., above, within or below the DRAM stack) to create a solution with a low contact count while keeping a low power profile. Herein, contacts refer to the leads, pins, solder balls or other types of interconnects that couple an integrated circuit to another device, such as a circuit board. Thus, leads, pins, solder balls or other types of interconnects may be used interchangeably.
The flexible memory system provides a range of solutions from no vaults tied together for the highest bandwidth to tying the available vaults together for a low contact count solution. The low contact count solution can be applied to high density memory modules and low cost/low power system on a chip (SOC).
A DRAM die may be segmented into multiple autonomous partitions, e.g. 16 partitions, e.g., see description of
Considering ball grid arrays, for example, existing fine pitch flip-chip technologies may be used and may provide a 50 μm (130)×150 μm (132) contact pitch in a die package having a vault pitch in length 140 of 1.35 mm and a width 142 of 1.8 mm. The vault interface block 100 may be matched in width to the effective DRAM vault pitch to minimize the footprint on the controller.
In
Each of the n 72 bit vault interface blocks 420, 422, 424 may include a command interface block (CIB) 430 and two data interface blocks (DIB) 440, 450. As described above, memory vaults may be formed by a stacked plurality of memory arrays and tied together (e.g., below the DRAM stack) to create a low contact count solutions while keeping a low power profile. As shown above with respect to
As shown in
Memory 460 is also shown in
The DRAM hybrid memory cube (HMC) 470 provides memory on the same substrate as a controller. As described above with reference to
A low power solution may be obtained by slightly increasing the individual input/output (10 or I/O) buffer drive strength versus generating power for an interconnect that multiplexes vaults 472, 474, vaults 476, 478, and vaults 480, 482, respectively. Signal count can be further reduced by combining the address/command bus with a data line (DQ) bus and use of a header. This resembles a packet interface to the DRAM hypercube 470. The first few clocks of the request involve a command header. This is followed by write data for a write command. A very low contact count solution is useful for large modules. Increased bandwidth may be obtained through the use of multiple stacks. The buffer cost and density of the module is driven by the signal count to the DRAM hypercube 470. Thus, a reduction in contact count reduces the buffer cost and density.
Thus, the DRAM hypercube 470 provides a flexible method to configure a host physical layer and multi-chip module (MCM) interconnect for a wide range of solutions. The highest bandwidth may be provided by not tying all the vaults 470-782 together, whereas a low pin count solution may be provided by tying all the vaults 470-782 together. Accordingly, the low pin count solution can be applied to high density memory modules and low cost/low power SOC's.
The DRAM hypercube 730 may include multiple DRAM die 736 that are stacked using through-silicon vias (TSVs) 738. Signals from the connections 712 of the ASIC 710 and the connections 732 of the DRAM hypercube 730 flow through blind vias that do not fully penetrate the MCM substrate 720. The blind vias only go deep enough to reach a routing layer. Other signals from either the ASIC or DRAM which need to connect to the system through solder balls 722 will use vias that fully penetrate the MCM substrate. The MCM memory system 700 provides a specialized electronic package where multiple integrated circuits (ICs), semiconductor dies or other discrete components are packaged onto a unifying substrate, thereby facilitating their use as a component (e.g., appearing as one larger IC). The ASIC 710 may also include logic blocks 750 corresponding to vault interface blocks. The logic blocks 750 may provide host interface logic for processing signals between a host (e.g., CPU 710 in
In some embodiments, the functionality of a logic layer may be implemented at the ASIC 710, e.g., in logic blocks 750. Thus, the DRAM hypercube 730 may not include a high-speed logic layer coupled to the vertical stacks of DRAM 736. However, in other embodiments, the DRAM hypercube 730 may include a high-speed logic layer that is coupled to the vertical stacks of DRAM 736.
The DRAM 736, along with the logic blocks 750, may handle data and DRAM control within the hypercube 730. The TSVs 738 that pass through the DRAM 736 provide a high level of concurrent connections. Memory access by the controller 710 is carried out on a highly efficient interface 780 that supports high transfer rates, e.g., 1 Tb/s or more.
Referring to
Vaults 760, 762 of the DRAM hypercube 730 are paired to form vault pair 770. Thus, the vault pair 770 serves one of vault interface blocks 1-8 (e.g., 752) of the controller 710. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that a different number of vault interface blocks may be implemented. Moreover, vault blocks 1-8 may be tied together in pairs, fours, eights, etc., depending on the number of vault interface blocks to which they will be coupled, for example.
Referring to
The above detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments that may be practiced. These embodiments are also referred to herein as “examples.” Such examples can include elements in addition to those shown or described. However, also contemplated are examples that include the elements shown or described. Moreover, also contemplate are examples using any combination or permutation of those elements shown or described (or one or more aspects thereof), either with respect to a particular example (or one or more aspects thereof), or with respect to other examples (or one or more aspects thereof) shown or described herein.
Publications, patents, and patent documents referred to in this document are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, just as if individually incorporated by reference. In the event of inconsistent usages between this document and those documents so incorporated by reference, the usage in the incorporated reference(s) are supplementary to that of this document; for irreconcilable inconsistencies, the usage in this document controls.
In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one, independent of any other instances or usages of “at least one” or “one or more.” In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to suggest a numerical order for their objects.
The above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-described examples (or one or more aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Other embodiments can be used, such as by one of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The Abstract is to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure, for example, to comply with 37 C.F.R. § 1.72(b) in the United States of America. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. Also, in the above Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together to streamline the disclosure. An unclaimed disclosed feature is not to be interpreted essential to any claim. Rather, embodiments may include fewer features than those disclosed in a particular example. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with an individual claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment. The scope of the embodiments disclosed herein is to be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/620,490, filed Jun. 12, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/919,503, filed Jun. 17, 2013, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,679,615, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/791,182, filed Mar. 15, 2013, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7889578 | Schuetz et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7978721 | Jeddeloh et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8010866 | LaBerge et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8203901 | Jeddeloh | Jun 2012 | B2 |
9679615 | Jeddeloh et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
10283172 | Jeddeloh et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
20040257847 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060071272 | Alvarado et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070291557 | Nishio et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291830 | Hori | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080025124 | Rajan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090021974 | Nonomura | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090059641 | Jeddeloh | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090210600 | Jeddeloh | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090300269 | Radke et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014364 | Laberge et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042889 | Hargan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100195421 | Jeddeloh | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238693 | Jeddeloh | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110026303 | Choi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110161748 | Casper et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110246746 | Keeth et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120137040 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120284436 | Casper et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300555 | Shin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140281204 | Jeddeloh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160163377 | Oh | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170352388 | Jeddeloh et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100442503 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101350345 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101946245 | Jan 2011 | CN |
102822966 | Dec 2012 | CN |
105144377 | Dec 2015 | CN |
ZL201480023543.3 | Sep 2018 | CN |
109599134 | Apr 2019 | CN |
2003503855 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2005191172 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2006108670 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2008182229 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2011512598 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2012517066 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2013524519 | Jun 2013 | JP |
1020110131976 | Dec 2011 | KR |
1020130018812 | Feb 2013 | KR |
101756575 | Jul 2017 | KR |
201515176 | Sep 2014 | TW |
201926612 | Jul 2019 | TW |
WO-2011126893 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO-2014149851 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 10,242,718 B2, 03/2019, Jeddeloh et al. (withdrawn) |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480023543.3, Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2017”, With English Translation, 29 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480023543.3, Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2017”, w/English Translation, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480023543.3, Response filed Mar. 5, 2018 to Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2017”, w/ English Translation, 40 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480023543.3, Response filed Jun. 14, 2018 to Examiner Interview Summary”, w/ English Translation, 40 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480023543.3, Response filed Sep. 8, 2017 to Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2017”, w/English Claims, 20 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14767760.3, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Feb. 22, 2019”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14767760.3, Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2016”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14767760.3, Response filed Jul. 4, 2019 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Feb. 22, 2019”, w/ English Claims, 10 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/021211, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 24, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/021211, International Search Report dated Jun. 26, 2014”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/021211 , Written Opinion dated Jun. 26, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2016-500737, Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2016”, W/ Machine Translation, 13 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2016-500737, Response filed Oct. 18, 2016 to Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2016”, W/ English Claims, 19 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2015-7029587, Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2016”, with English Translation, 7 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2015-7029587, Response filed Dec. 23, 2016 to Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“Taiwanese Application Serial No. 099137534, Voluntary Amendment filed Sep. 19, 2014”, w/ English Claims, 29 pgs. |
“Taiwanese Application Serial No. 103109311, Decision of Rejection dated Mar. 27, 2018”, w/English Translation, 25 pgs. |
“Taiwanese Application Serial No. 103109311, Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2017”, w/ English Translation, 24 pgs. |
“Taiwanese Application Serial No. 103109311, Response filed Nov. 13, 2017 to Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2017”, w/English Translation, 26 pgs. |
“Taiwanese Application Serial No. 107143387, Translation of Replacement Specification filed Apr. 3, 2019”, w/ English Claim, 17 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190385646 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61791182 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15620490 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 16279590 | US | |
Parent | 13919503 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 15620490 | US |