The present invention relates to probe assemblies of the type commonly used for testing integrated circuits (IC) and, in particular, the present invention relates to a membrane probing assembly having contacts which scrub, in a locally controlled manner, across the respective input/output conductors of each device so as to reliably wipe clear the surface oxides that are normally found on those conductors thereby ensuring good electrical connection between the probing assembly and each device.
The trend in electronic production has been toward increasingly smaller geometries particularly in integrated circuit technology wherein a very large number of discrete circuit elements are fabricated on a single substrate or “wafer.” After fabrication, this wafer is divided into a number of rectangular-shaped chips or “dice” where each die presents a rectangular or other regular arrangement of metallized contact pads through which input/output connections are made. Although each die is eventually packaged separately, for efficiency sake, testing of the circuit formed on each die is preferably performed while the dies are still joined together on the wafer. One typical procedure is to support the wafer on a flat stage or “chuck” and to move the wafer in X, Y and Z directions relative to the head of the probing assembly so that the contacts on the probing assembly move from die to die for consecutive engagement with each die. Respective signal, power and ground lines are run to the probing assembly from the test instrumentation thus enabling each circuit to be sequentially connected to the test instrumentation.
Probe structures have been developed to compensate for the inductance at the probe tips. One such design is exemplified by Lockwood et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,697,143. Lockwood et al. disclose a ground-signal-ground arrangement of strip like conductive traces formed on the underside of an alumina substrate so as to create coplanar transmission lines. These coplanar transmission lines extend from the pads of the DUT at one end to a coaxial cable at the other end. The associated pair of ground traces on each coplanar transmission line is connected to the outer conductor of the coaxial cable and the interposed signal trace is connected to the inner conductor. Areas of wear-resistant conductive material are provided to reliably establish an electrical connection with the respective pads of the DUT. Layers of ferrite-containing microwave absorbing material are mounted about the substrate to absorb spurious microwave energy over a major portion of the length of each ground-signal-ground trace pattern. In accordance with this type of construction, a high frequency impedance (e.g., 50 ohms) can be presented at the probe tips to the device under test. Thus broadband signals of eighteen gigahertz or less can travel with little loss across the coplanar transmission lines formed by each ground-signal-ground trace pattern.
The problem with this type of probing assembly is that the needle-like tips, due to their narrow geometry, exhibit high inductance so that signal distortion is large in high frequency measurements made through these tips. Also, these tips can act in the manner of a planing tool as they wipe across their respective pads, thereby leading to excessive pad damage. This problem is magnified to the extent that the probe tips bend out of shape during use or otherwise fail to terminate in a common plane which causes the more forward ones of the tips to bear down too heavily on their respective pads. Also, it is impractical to mount these tips at less than 100 micron center-to-center spacing or in a multi-row grid-like pattern so as to accommodate the pad arrangement of more modern, higher density dies. Also, this type of probing assembly has a scrub length of the needle tips of 25 microns or more, which increases the difficulty of staying within the allowed probing area.
In order to reduce inductive losses, decrease pad wear and accommodate smaller device geometries, a second type of probing assembly has been developed that uses a flexible membrane structure for supporting the probing contacts. In this assembly, lead lines of well-defined geometry are formed on one or more plies of flexible insulative film, such as polyimide or MYLAR.™. If separate plies are used, these plies are bonded together to form, for example, a multilayered transmission line structure. In the central portion of this flexible structure or membrane, each conductive line is terminated by a respective probing contact which is formed on, and projects outwardly from, an outer face of the membrane. These probing contacts are arranged in a predetermined pattern that matches the pattern of the device pads and typically are formed as upraised bumps for probing the flat surfaces conventionally defined by the pads. The inner face of the membrane is supported on a supporting structure. This structure can take the form, for example, of a truncated pyramid, in which case the inner face of the center portion of the membrane is supported on the truncated end of the support while the marginal portions of the membrane are drawn away from the center portion at an angle thereto so as to clear any upright components that may surround the pads on the device.
With respect to the membrane probing assembly just described, excessive line inductance is eliminated by carefully selecting the geometry of the lead lines, and a photolithographic process is preferably used to enable some control over the size, spacing, and arrangement, of the probing contacts so as to accommodate higher density configurations. However, although several different forms of this probing assembly have been proposed, difficulties have been encountered in connection with this type of assembly in reducing pad wear and in achieving reliable clearing of the oxide layer from each of the device pads so as to ensure adequate electrical connection between the assembly and the device-under-test.
One conventional form of membrane probing assembly, for example, is exemplified by the device shown in Rath European Patent Pub. No. 259,163A2. This device has the central portion of the sheet-like membrane mounted directly against a rigid support. This rigid support, in turn, is connected by a resilient member comprising an elastomeric or rubber block to the main body of the assembly so that the membrane can tilt to match the tilt of the device. Huff U.S. Pat. No. 4,918,383 shows a closely related device wherein radially extending leaf springs permit vertical axis movement of the rigid support while preventing it from tilting so that there is no slippage or “misalignment” of the contact bumps on the pads and further so that the entire membrane will shift slightly in the horizontal plane to allow the contacts to “scrub” across their respective pads in order to clear surface oxides from these pads.
In respect to both of these devices, however, because of manufacturing tolerances, certain of the contact bumps are likely to be in a recessed position relative to their neighbors and these recessed bumps will not have a satisfactory opportunity to engage their pads since they will be drawn away from their pads by the action of their neighbors on the rigid support. Furthermore, even when “scrub” movement is provided in the manner of Huff, the contacts will tend to frictionally cling to the device as they perform the scrubbing movement, that is, there will be a tendency for the pads of the device to move in unison with the contacts so as to negate the effect of the contact movement. Whether any scrubbing action actually occurs depends on how far the pads can move, which depends, in turn, on the degree of lateral play that exists as a result of normal tolerance between the respective bearing surfaces of the probe head and chuck. Hence this form of membrane probing assembly does not ensure reliable electrical connection between each contact and pad.
A second conventional form of membrane probing assembly is exemplified by the device show in Barsotti European Patent Pub. No. 304,868A2. This device provides a flexible backing for the central or contact-carrying portion of the flexible membrane. In Barsotti, the membrane is directly backed by an elastomeric member and this member, in turn, is backed by a rigid support so that minor height variations between the contacts or pads can be accommodated. It is also possible to use positive-pressure air, negative-pressure air, liquid or an unbacked elastomer to provide flexible backing for the membrane, as shown in Gangroth U.S. Pat. No. 4,649,339, Ardezzone U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,772, Reed, Jr. et al. U.S. Pat. No. 3,596,228 and Okubo et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,134,365, respectively. These alternative devices, however, do not afford sufficient pressure between the probing contacts and the device pads to reliably penetrate the oxides that form on the pad surfaces.
In this second form of membrane probing assembly, as indicated in Okubo, the contacts may be limited to movement along the Z-axis in order to prevent slippage and resulting misalignment between the contacts and pads during engagement. Thus, in Barsotti, the rigid support underlying the elastomeric member is fixed in position although it is also possible to mount the support for Z-axis movement in the manner shown in Huff U.S. Pat. No. 4,980,637. Pad damage is likely to occur with this type of design, however, because a certain amount of tilt is typically present between the contacts and the device, and those contacts angled closest to the device will ordinarily develop much higher contact pressures than those which are angled away. The same problem arises with the related assembly shown in European Patent Pub. No. 230,348A2 to Garretson, even though in the Garretson device the characteristic of the elastomeric member is such as to urge the contacts into lateral movement when those contacts are placed into pressing engagement with their pads. Yet another related assembly is shown in Evans U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,638 which uses a pivotably mounted support for backing the elastomeric member so as to accommodate tilt between the contacts and the device. However, the Evans device is subject to the friction clinging problem already described insofar as the pads of the device are likely to cling to the contacts as the support pivots and causes the contacts to shift laterally.
Yet other forms of conventional membrane probing assemblies are shown in Crumly U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,253, Barsotti et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,059,898 and Evans et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,638. In Crumly, the center portion of a stretchable membrane is resiliently biased to a fully stretched condition using a spring. When the contacts engage their respective pads, the stretched center portion retracts against the spring to a partially relaxed condition so as to draw the contacts in radial scrub directions toward the center of the membrane. In Barsotti, each row of contacts is supported by the end of a respective L-shaped arm so that when the contacts in a row engage their respective pads, the corresponding arm flexes upwardly and causes the row of contacts to laterally scrub simultaneously across their respective pads. In both Crumly and Barsotti, however, if any tilt is present between the contacts and the device at the time of engagement, this tilt will cause the contacts angled closest to the device to scrub further than those angled further away. Moreover, the shorter contacts will be forced to move in their scrub directions before they have had the opportunity to engage their respective pads due to the controlling scrub action of their neighboring contacts. A further disadvantage of the Crumly device, in particular, is that the contacts nearer to the center of the membrane will scrub less than those nearer to the periphery so that scrub effectiveness will vary with contact position.
In Evans et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,355,079 each contact constitutes a spring metal finger, and each finger is mounted so as to extend in a cantilevered manner away from the underlying membrane at a predetermined angle relative to the membrane. A similar configuration is shown in Higgins U.S. Pat. No. 5,521,518. It is difficult, however, to originally position these fingers so that they all terminate in a common plane, particularly if a high density pattern is required. Moreover, these fingers are easily bent out of position during use and cannot easily be rebent back to their original position. Hence, certain ones of the fingers are likely to touch down before other ones of the fingers, and scrub pressures and distances are likely to be different for different fingers. Nor, in Evans at least, is there an adequate mechanism for tolerating a minor degree of tilt between the fingers and pads. Although Evans suggests roughening the surface of each finger to improve the quality of electrical connection, this roughening can cause undue abrasion and damage to the pad surfaces. Yet a further disadvantage of the contact fingers shown in both Evans and Higgins is that such fingers are subject to fatigue and failure after a relatively low number of “touchdowns” or duty cycles due to repeated bending and stressing.
Referring to
The probe head 40 includes a probe card 52 on which the data/signal lines 48 and 50 are arranged. Referring to
Referring to
When the support element 54 is mounted on the upper side of the probe card 52 as shown in
A feature of the probing assembly 42 is its capability for probing a somewhat dense arrangement of contact pads over a large number of contact cycles in a manner that provides generally reliable electrical connection between the contacts and pads in each cycle despite oxide buildup on the pads. This capability is a function of the construction of the support element 54, the flexible membrane assembly 72 and their manner of interconnection. In particular, the membrane assembly is so constructed and connected to the support element that the contacts on the membrane assembly preferably wipe or scrub, in a locally controlled manner, laterally across the pads when brought into pressing engagement with these pads. The preferred mechanism for producing this scrubbing action is described in connection with the construction and interconnection of a preferred membrane assembly 72a as best depicted in
The membrane assembly is interconnected to the flat support surface 70 by an interposed elastomeric layer 98, which layer is coextensive with the support surface and can be formed by a silicone rubber compound such as ELMER'S STICK-ALL.™. made by the Borden Company or Sylgard 182 by Dow Corning Corporation. This compound can be conveniently applied in a paste-like phase which hardens as it sets. The flat support surface, as previously mentioned, is made of incompressible material and is preferably a hard dielectric such as polysulfone or glass.
In accordance with the above-described construction, when one of the contacts 88 is brought into pressing engagement with a respective pad 100, as indicated in
Because the elastomeric layer 98 is backed by the incompressible support surface 70, the elastomeric layer exerts a recovery force on each tilting beam 90 and thus each contact 93 to maintain contact-to-pad pressure during scrubbing. At the same time, the elastomeric layer accommodates some height variations between the respective contacts. Thus, referring to
Referring to
Unfortunately, the aforementioned construction technique results in a structure with many undesirable characteristics.
First, several beams 90, contact bumps 92, and contacting portions 93 (each of which may be referred to as a device) proximate one another results in different localized current densities within the electroplating bath, which in turn results in differences in the heights of many of the beams 90, contact bumps 92, and contacting portions 93. Also, different densities of the ions within the electroplating bath and “random” variations in the electroplating bath also results in differences in heights of many of the beams 90, contact bumps 92, and contacting portions 93. The different heights of many of the beams 90, contact bumps 92, and contacting portions 93 is compounded three fold in the overall height of many of the devices. Accordingly, many devices will have a significantly different height than other devices. Using membrane probes having variable device height requires more pressure to ensure that all the contacting portions 93 make adequate contact with the test device than would be required if all the devices had equal overall height. For high density membrane probes, such as 2000 or more devices in a small area, the cumulate effect of the additional pressure required for each device may exceed the total force permitted for the probe head and probe station. The excess pressure may also result in bending and breaking of the probe station, the probe head, and/or the membrane probing assembly. In addition, the devices with the greatest height may damage the pads on the test device because of the increased pressure required to make suitable contact for the devices with the lowest height.
Second, the ability to decrease the pitch (spacing) between the devices is limited by the “mushrooming” effect of the electroplating process over the edges of the polyimide 77 and photoresist layers 79 and 81. The “mushrooming” effect is difficult to control and results in a variable width of the beams 90, contact bumps 92, and contacting portions 93. If the height of the beams 90, the contact bumps 92, or the contacting portions 93 are increased then the “mushrooming” effect generally increases, thus increasing the width of the respective portion. The increased width of one part generally results in a wider overall device which in turn increases the minimum spacing between contacting portions 93. Alternatively, decreasing the height of the beams 90, the contact bumps 92, or the contacting portions 93 generally decreases the width of the “mushrooming” effect which in turn decreases the minimum spacing between contacting portions 93. However, if the height of the contacting portions 93 relative to the respective beam 90 is sufficiently reduced, then during use the rearward end of the beam 90 may sufficiently tilt and contact the test device in an acceptable location, i.e., off the contact pad.
Third, it is difficult to plate a second metal layer directly on top of a first metal layer, such as contacting portions 93 on the contact bumps 92, especially when using nickel. To provide a bond between the contact bumps 92 and the contacting portions 93, an interface seed layer such as copper or gold is used to make an improved interconnection. Unfortunately, the interface seed layer reduces the lateral strength of the device due to the lower sheer strength of the interface layer.
Fourth, applying a photoresist layer over a non-uniform surface tends to be semi-conformal in nature resulting in a non-uniform thicknesses of the photoresist material itself. Referring to
Fifth, separate alignment processes are necessary to align the beams 90 on the traces 76a, the contact bumps 92 on the beams 90, and the contacting portions 93 on the contact bumps 92. Each alignment process has inherent variations that must be accounted for in sizing each part. The minimum size of the contacting portions 93 is defined primarily by the lateral strength requirements and the maximum allowable current density therein. The minimum size of the contacting portions 93, accounting for the tolerances in alignment, in turn defines the minimum size of the contact bumps 92 so that the contacting portions 93 are definitely constructed on the contact bumps 92. The minimum size of the contact bumps 92, in view of the contacting portions 93 and accounting for the tolerances in alignment, defines the minimum size of the beams 90 so that the contact bumps 92 are definitely constructed on the beams 90. Accordingly, the summation of the tolerances of the contact bumps 92 and the contacting portions 93, together with a minimum size of the contacting portions 93, defines the minimum device size, and thus defines the minimum pitch between contact pads.
What is desired, therefore, is a membrane probe construction technique and structure that results in a more uniform device height, decreased spacing between devices, maximized lateral strength, desired geometries, and proper alignment.
The present invention overcomes the aforementioned drawbacks of the prior art by providing a substrate, preferably constructed of a ductile material. A tool having the desired shape of the resulting device for contacting contact pads on a test device is brought into contact with the substrate. The tool is preferably constructed of a material that is harder than the substrate so that a depression can be readily made therein. A dielectric (insulative) layer, that is preferably patterned, is supported by the substrate. A conductive material is located within the depressions and then preferably planarized to remove excess from the top surface of the dielectric layer and to provide a flat overall surface. A trace is patterned on the dielectric layer and the conductive material. A polyimide layer is then preferably patterned over the entire surface. The substrate is then removed by any suitable process.
The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
a-5b are schematic side elevational views illustrating how the support element and membrane assembly are capable of tilting to match the orientation of the device under test.
a-7b are sectional views taken along lines 7a-7a in
a and 9b illustrate the deformation of the elastomeric layer to bring the contacts into contact with its pad.
The currently employed construction techniques for membrane probes involves starting with the flat rigid substrate to support additional layers fabricated thereon. To decrease the pitch and provide devices with increased uniformity requires increasingly more complex and expensive processing techniques. In direct contrast to the current techniques of constructing layers from the “bottom up” upon a supporting substrate, the present inventors came to the realization that by using a suitable tool a substrate may be coined to create the desired beams, contact bumps, and contacting portions. The remaining layers are then constructed “top down” on the beam. The substrate itself is thereafter removed.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It is expensive to manufacture masks for exposing the polyimide layer 220 that have tolerances sufficient to precisely align the openings for the depressions 216. The tool 210, in combination with the dimpling machine, can be aligned to the actual location of one of the openings that results from exposing and etching the polyimide layer 220 with a relatively inexpensive, and somewhat inaccurate mask. The present inventors came to the realization that localized regions of the mask, and thus the openings resulting therefrom, tend to be relatively well aligned for purposes of dimpling. Likewise, regions of the mask distant from one another tend not to be relatively well aligned for purposes of dimpling. Accordingly, automatically dimpling the substrate 200 to match an anticipated pattern with many depressions 216 distant from one another, with an accurate dimpling machine, will result in the dimpling tool not accurately being aligned with the openings at regions distant from the initial alignment point. To improve the accuracy of the alignment process the present inventors came to the realization that the dimpling machine may be realigned to the actual openings in the polyimide layer 220 at different remote locations, so that each localized region is relatively accurately aligned, while the overall alignment may be somewhat off. In this manner a relatively inexpensive mask may be used.
Preferably the dimpling machine includes accurate z-axis movement so that the depth of each depression is identical, or substantially identical. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The aforementioned “top-down” construction process provides numerous advantages over the traditional “bottom-up” processing technique of constructing layers upon a supporting substrate. These advantages also permit the capability of constructing devices with improved characteristics.
First, there are no limitations to the height of the resulting devices which were previously imposed by limitations of photoresist processing. The ability to construct devices having any suitable height also relieves the limitations imposed by attempting to electroplate into a tall narrow openings in photoresist, which is difficult.
Second, the elevation of the contacting portions 260 of the devices is extremely uniform because it is defined solely by the tooling process, which is mechanical in nature. Different localized current densities of the electroplating bath, different densities of the ions within the electroplating bath, and “random” variations in the electroplating bath are eliminated from impacting the overall shape and height of the resulting devices. With substantially uniform elevation of the devices, less force is required for the devices to make adequate contact with the test device which, in turn, decreases the likelihood of bending and breaking the probe station, the probe head, and/or the membrane probing assembly. Also, the substantially uniform elevation of the devices decreases the likelihood of damaging contact pads on the test device with excessive pressure.
Third, the contacting portion 260 of the devices are stronger because the device is constructed of a single homogenous material during one depositing process requiring no interfacial layers, as previously required for the multiple processing steps. This permits reducing the size of the contacting portions to the limitation of the maximum current density allowable therein during testing and not the minimum sheer force of the interfacial layers.
Fourth, the shape of the resulting devices are customizable to effectively probe different materials The shape of the device may have steep sidewall angles, such as 85 degrees, while still providing mechanical strength, stability, and integrity. The steep sidewalls permit narrower devices to be constructed which allows for a greater density of devices for increasingly denser arrangements of contact pads on the test device. Moreover, the angle of the sidewalls are not dependent (e.g. independent) on the crystalline structure of the substrate.
Fifth, the shape of the contacting portion is known precisely, and is uniform between devices, which permits uniform contact with the contact pads of the test device.
Sixth, the alignment of the different portions of the resulting device are exactly uniform between devices because each device was constructed using the same tooling process. With exact alignment of the lower portions of each device (beam and contact bump) in relation to the contacting portion, there is no need to provide additional leeway to accommodate processing variations inherent in photoresist processes and in electroplating processes. Also, the “mushrooming” effect of the electroplating process is eliminated which also reduces the required size of the device. The alignment variability reduction, and virtual elimination, of different devices 300 allows a significantly decreased pitch to be obtained, suitable for contact pads on the test device that have increased density.
Seventh, the shape of the resulting devices may be tailor shaped to provide optimal mechanical performance. To provide the scrubbing function, as described in the background portion, the device should have a beam and bump structure that tilts upon contact. The device 300 may include an inclined surface 304 between its tail 302 and the contacting portion 260. The inclined surface 304 provides for increased strength along portions of the length of the device 300 which permits the tail 302 to be thinner than its head 306. The torque forces applied to the device 300 during the tilting process of the device 300 tend to decrease over the length of the device 300 which has a correspondingly thinner material defined by the inclined surface 304. With a thinner tail 302 and material proximate the tail 302, the tail 302 of the device 300 has less likelihood of impacting the test device if excess tiling occurs. The improved shape of the device 300 also decreases the amount of metal material required.
Eighth, “look-up” cameras are used to obtain an image of the lower portion of the membrane probe to determine the precise location of the devices 300 relative to the contact pads on the test device. Using “look-up” cameras permits automatic alignment of the membrane devices relative to the contact pads so that automatic testing may be performed. In order to obtain an image of the devices 300 on the membrane probe the “look-up” cameras normally utilize light to illuminate the devices 300. Unfortunately, the traditional planar processing techniques result in relatively flat surfaces on the beams, contact bumps, and contacting portions, in a perpendicular orientation to the “look up” cameras each of which reflects light back to the “look-up” camera. The light reflecting back to the “look up” camera from all the surfaces frequently results in some confusion regarding the exact location of the contacting portions 260. The inclined surface 304 of the devices 300 tends to reflect incident light away from lowerly disposed “look-up” cameras, while the contacting portions 306 tend to reflect incident light back to lowerly disposed “look-up” cameras. Light returning to the “look-up” camera primarily from the contacting portions 306 results in less potential confusion regarding the exact location of the contacting portions.
Ninth, the initial polishing of the top surface 202 of the substrate 200 results in a matching smooth lower surface for the polyimide layer 220 patterned thereon. After etching away, or otherwise removing, the substrate 200 the lower surface of the polyimide layer 220 is smooth and the resulting polyimide layer 220 is generally optically clear. Accordingly, the spaces between the traces and the metallized devices 300 is relatively optically transmissive so that an operator positioning the device can readily see through the device between the traces and devices. This assists the operator in manually positioning the membrane probe on the devices which are otherwise obscured. In addition, the pyramidal shape of the devices 300 allows the operator to more easily determine the exact location of the contacting portions relative to the contact pads on the test device, which were previously obscured by the wide beam structures (relative to the contacting portions).
Tenth, referring to
Eleventh, the texture of the contacting portion 260 may be selected to provide the described scrubbing effect on the contact pads of the test device. In particular, the tool may include a roughened surface pattern on the corresponding contacting portion to provide a uniform texture for all devices.
Thirteenth, using the construction technique of the present invention is relatively quick to construct the devices because of the decreased number of processing steps, resulting in a substantial cost savings.
The aforementioned construction technique also provides several advantages related to the shape of the devices which would be otherwise difficult, if not impossible, to construct.
First, the tool may provide any desired shape, such as a simple bump, if no scrubbing action is desired.
Second, the inclined supporting sides of the test device up to the contacting portion 260 provides superior mechanical support for the contacting portion 260, as opposed to merely a portion of metal supported by a larger contact bump. With such support from the inclined sides, the contacting portion may be smaller without risk of it becoming detached from the device. The smaller contacting portion provides improved contact with the contact pad of the test device when the device tilts to penetrate the oxide buildup on the surface of the contact pad. In addition, the tail 302 of the device may be substantially thinner than the remainder of the device which decreases the likelihood of the tail 302 portion impacting the contact-pad of the test device during testing when the device tilts.
Third, the pressure exerted by the contacting portions of the devices, given a predefined pressure exerted by the probe head, is variable by changing the center of rotation of the device. The center of rotation of the device can be selected by selecting the length of the device and the location/height of the contacting portion relative thereto. Accordingly, the pressures can be selected, as desired, to match characteristics of two different contact pads.
Fourth, referring to
Fifth, the capability of constructing contacting portions that are raised high from the lower surface of the device, while still maintaining uniformity in the device height and structural strength, allows the device to provide scrubbing action while the lower surface of the device requires little movement. The small movement of the lower surface of the device to make good electrical contact during testing decreases the stress on the layers under the lower surface of the device. Accordingly, the likelihood of cracking the polyimide layers and the conductive traces is reduced.
When probing an oxide layer on solder bumps, or solder balls on wafers that are to be used with “flip-chip” packaging technology, such as the solder bumps on the printed circuit boards, the oxide layer developed thereon is difficult to effectively penetrate. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Previous device construction techniques resulted in devices that included contacting portions that were rather large and difficult to assure alignment of Referring to
It is to be noted that none to all of the aforementioned advantages may be present in devices constructed accordingly to the present invention, depending on the technique used, desired use, and structure achieved.
The present application is a continuation of application U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/705,014 filed Nov. 10, 2003 which is a continuation of Ser. No. 10/814,593, filed Mar. 22, 2001 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,386; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/115,571, filed Jul. 14, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,256,882.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1337866 | Whitaker | Apr 1920 | A |
2142625 | Zoethout | Jan 1939 | A |
2376101 | Tyzzer | May 1945 | A |
2389668 | Johnson | Nov 1945 | A |
3176091 | Hanson et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3193712 | Harris | Jul 1965 | A |
3230299 | Radziejowski | Jan 1966 | A |
3401126 | Miller et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
3429040 | Miller | Feb 1969 | A |
3441315 | Paes et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3442831 | Dickstein et al. | May 1969 | A |
3445770 | Harmon | May 1969 | A |
3484679 | Hodgson et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3541222 | Parks et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3595228 | Simon et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3596228 | Reed, Jr. et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3609539 | Gunthert | Sep 1971 | A |
3634807 | Grobe et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3654585 | Wickersham | Apr 1972 | A |
3680037 | Nellis et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3700998 | Lee et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3710251 | Hagge et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3714572 | Ham et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3740900 | Youmans et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3806801 | Bove | Apr 1974 | A |
3829076 | Sofy | Aug 1974 | A |
3839672 | Anderson | Oct 1974 | A |
3849728 | Evans | Nov 1974 | A |
3858212 | Tompkins et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3862790 | Davies et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3866093 | Kusters et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3936743 | Roch | Feb 1976 | A |
3952156 | Lahr | Apr 1976 | A |
3970934 | Aksu | Jul 1976 | A |
3971610 | Buchoff et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3976959 | Gaspari | Aug 1976 | A |
3992073 | Buchoff et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4008900 | Khoshaba | Feb 1977 | A |
4027935 | Byrnes et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4038599 | Bove et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4038894 | Knibbe et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4049252 | Bell | Sep 1977 | A |
4066943 | Roch | Jan 1978 | A |
4072576 | Arwin et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4093988 | Scott | Jun 1978 | A |
4099120 | Aksu | Jul 1978 | A |
4115735 | Stanford | Sep 1978 | A |
4135131 | Larsen et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4184729 | Parks et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4275446 | Blaess | Jun 1981 | A |
4277741 | Faxvog et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4284033 | del Rio | Aug 1981 | A |
4284682 | Frosch et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4287473 | Sawyer | Sep 1981 | A |
4312117 | Robillard et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4327180 | Chen | Apr 1982 | A |
4330783 | Toia | May 1982 | A |
4357575 | Uren et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4376920 | Smith | Mar 1983 | A |
4383217 | Shiell | May 1983 | A |
4401945 | Juengel | Aug 1983 | A |
4425395 | Negishi et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4453142 | Murphy | Jun 1984 | A |
4468629 | Choma, Jr. | Aug 1984 | A |
4487996 | Rabinowitz et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4515133 | Roman | May 1985 | A |
4515439 | Esswein | May 1985 | A |
4528504 | Thornton, Jr. et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4531474 | Inuta | Jul 1985 | A |
4552033 | Marzhauser | Nov 1985 | A |
4567321 | Harayama | Jan 1986 | A |
4581679 | Smolley | Apr 1986 | A |
4588950 | Henley | May 1986 | A |
4593243 | Lao et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4621169 | Petinelli et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4626618 | Takaoka et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4636722 | Ardezzone | Jan 1987 | A |
4636772 | Yasunaga | Jan 1987 | A |
4641659 | Sepponen | Feb 1987 | A |
4642417 | Ruthrof et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646005 | Ryan | Feb 1987 | A |
4649339 | Grangroth et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4651115 | Wu | Mar 1987 | A |
4663840 | Ubbens et al. | May 1987 | A |
4673839 | Veenendaal | Jun 1987 | A |
4684883 | Ackerman et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4691163 | Blass et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697143 | Lockwood et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4705447 | Smith | Nov 1987 | A |
4707657 | Boegh-Petersen | Nov 1987 | A |
4711563 | Lass | Dec 1987 | A |
4713347 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4725793 | Igarashi | Feb 1988 | A |
4727391 | Tajima et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4727637 | Buckwitz et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4742571 | Letron | May 1988 | A |
4744041 | Strunk et al. | May 1988 | A |
4746857 | Sakai et al. | May 1988 | A |
4749942 | Sang et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4754239 | Sedivec | Jun 1988 | A |
4755746 | Mallory et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4755747 | Sato | Jul 1988 | A |
4755874 | Esrig et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4757255 | Margozzi | Jul 1988 | A |
4766384 | Kleinberg et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4772846 | Reeds | Sep 1988 | A |
4780670 | Cherry | Oct 1988 | A |
4791363 | Logan | Dec 1988 | A |
4793814 | Zifcak et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4795962 | Yanagawa et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4805627 | Klingenbeck et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4812754 | Tracy et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4827211 | Strid et al. | May 1989 | A |
4831494 | Arnold et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837507 | Hechtman | Jun 1989 | A |
4839587 | Flatley et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4849689 | Gleason et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4853624 | Rabjohn | Aug 1989 | A |
4853627 | Gleason et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4859989 | McPherson | Aug 1989 | A |
4864227 | Sato | Sep 1989 | A |
4871883 | Guiol | Oct 1989 | A |
4871964 | Boll et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4891584 | Kamieniecki et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4893914 | Hancock et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4894612 | Drake et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4899998 | Teramachi | Feb 1990 | A |
4904933 | Snyder et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4904935 | Calma et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4906920 | Huff et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4912399 | Greub et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4916002 | Carver | Apr 1990 | A |
4916398 | Rath | Apr 1990 | A |
4918383 | Huff et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4922128 | Dhong et al. | May 1990 | A |
4922186 | Tsuchiya et al. | May 1990 | A |
4922192 | Gross et al. | May 1990 | A |
4929893 | Sato et al. | May 1990 | A |
4975638 | Evans et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4980637 | Huff et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4983910 | Majidi-Ahy et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4987100 | McBride et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4991290 | MacKay | Feb 1991 | A |
4998062 | Ikeda | Mar 1991 | A |
5001423 | Abrami et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5003253 | Majidi-Ahy et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5020219 | Leedy | Jun 1991 | A |
5021186 | Ota et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5030907 | Yih et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041782 | Marzan | Aug 1991 | A |
5045781 | Gleason et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5059898 | Barsotti et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5061192 | Chapin et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5061823 | Carroll | Oct 1991 | A |
5066357 | Smyth, Jr. et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5069628 | Crumly | Dec 1991 | A |
5082627 | Stanbro | Jan 1992 | A |
5084671 | Miyata et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5089774 | Nakano | Feb 1992 | A |
5091692 | Ohno et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5091732 | Mileski et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5095891 | Reitter | Mar 1992 | A |
5097101 | Trobough | Mar 1992 | A |
5097207 | Blanz | Mar 1992 | A |
5107076 | Bullock et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5126286 | Chance | Jun 1992 | A |
5133119 | Afshari et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134365 | Okubo et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5136237 | Smith et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142224 | Smith et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5145552 | Yoshizawa et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148103 | Pasiecznik, Jr. | Sep 1992 | A |
5159264 | Anderson | Oct 1992 | A |
5159267 | Anderson | Oct 1992 | A |
5159752 | Mahant-Shetti et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5160883 | Blanz | Nov 1992 | A |
5164319 | Hafeman et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166606 | Blanz | Nov 1992 | A |
5172049 | Kiyokawa et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5172050 | Swapp | Dec 1992 | A |
5172051 | Zamborelli | Dec 1992 | A |
5177438 | Littlebury et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180977 | Huff | Jan 1993 | A |
5187443 | Bereskin | Feb 1993 | A |
5198752 | Miyata et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198753 | Hamburgen | Mar 1993 | A |
5202558 | Barker | Apr 1993 | A |
5207585 | Byrnes et al. | May 1993 | A |
5214243 | Johnson | May 1993 | A |
5214374 | St. Onge | May 1993 | A |
5225037 | Elder et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5227730 | King et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5232789 | Platz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5233197 | Bowman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5233306 | Misra | Aug 1993 | A |
5245292 | Milesky et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5266889 | Harwood et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267088 | Nomura | Nov 1993 | A |
5270664 | McMurtry et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274336 | Crook et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5280156 | Niori et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293175 | Hemmie et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5298972 | Heffner | Mar 1994 | A |
5304924 | Yamano et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5313157 | Pasiecznik, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5315237 | Iwakura et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321352 | Takebuchi | Jun 1994 | A |
5321453 | Mori et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326412 | Schreiber et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5355079 | Evans et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357211 | Bryson et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363050 | Guo et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367165 | Toda et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368634 | Hackett | Nov 1994 | A |
5369368 | Kassen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371654 | Beaman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5373231 | Boll et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374938 | Hatazawa et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376790 | Linker et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5389885 | Swart | Feb 1995 | A |
5395253 | Crumly | Mar 1995 | A |
5397855 | Ferlier | Mar 1995 | A |
5404111 | Mori et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408188 | Katoh | Apr 1995 | A |
5408189 | Swart et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412330 | Ravel et al. | May 1995 | A |
5412866 | Woith et al. | May 1995 | A |
5414565 | Sullivan et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416429 | McQuade et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422574 | Kister | Jun 1995 | A |
5441690 | Ayala-Esquilin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451722 | Gregoire | Sep 1995 | A |
5451884 | Sauerland | Sep 1995 | A |
5453404 | Leedy | Sep 1995 | A |
5457398 | Schwindt et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467024 | Swapp | Nov 1995 | A |
5469324 | Henderson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475316 | Hurley et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476211 | Khandros | Dec 1995 | A |
5477011 | Singles et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5478748 | Akins, Jr. et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479108 | Cheng | Dec 1995 | A |
5479109 | Lau et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481196 | Nosov | Jan 1996 | A |
5481936 | Yanagisawa | Jan 1996 | A |
5487999 | Farnworth | Jan 1996 | A |
5488954 | Sleva et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493070 | Habu | Feb 1996 | A |
5493236 | Ishii et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500606 | Holmes | Mar 1996 | A |
5505150 | James et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506498 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506515 | Godshalk et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510792 | Ono et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511010 | Burns | Apr 1996 | A |
5512835 | Rivera et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517126 | Yamaguchi | May 1996 | A |
5521518 | Higgins | May 1996 | A |
5521522 | Abe et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523694 | Cole, Jr. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528158 | Sinsheimer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530372 | Lee et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531022 | Beaman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5532608 | Behfar-Rad et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537372 | Albrecht et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539323 | Davis, Jr. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539676 | Yamaguchi | Jul 1996 | A |
5565788 | Burr et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565881 | Phillips et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569591 | Kell et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571324 | Sago et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578932 | Adamian | Nov 1996 | A |
5583445 | Mullen | Dec 1996 | A |
5584120 | Roberts | Dec 1996 | A |
5584608 | Gillespie | Dec 1996 | A |
5589781 | Higgins et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600256 | Woith et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601740 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610529 | Schwindt | Mar 1997 | A |
5617035 | Swapp | Apr 1997 | A |
5623213 | Liu et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623214 | Pasiecznik, Jr. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628057 | Phillips et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631571 | Spaziani et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633780 | Cronin | May 1997 | A |
5634267 | Farnworth et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5635846 | Beaman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642298 | Mallory et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644248 | Fujimoto | Jul 1997 | A |
5653939 | Hollis et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5656942 | Watts et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659421 | Rahmel et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666063 | Abercrombie et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669316 | Faz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670322 | Eggers et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670888 | Cheng | Sep 1997 | A |
5672816 | Park et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675499 | Lee et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675932 | Mauney | Oct 1997 | A |
5676360 | Boucher et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685232 | Inoue | Nov 1997 | A |
5686317 | Akram et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700844 | Hedrick et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704355 | Bridges | Jan 1998 | A |
5715819 | Svenson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720098 | Kister | Feb 1998 | A |
5723347 | Hirano et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726211 | Hedrick et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731920 | Katsuragawa | Mar 1998 | A |
5742174 | Kister et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744383 | Fritz | Apr 1998 | A |
5744971 | Chan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748506 | Bockelman | May 1998 | A |
5751252 | Phillips | May 1998 | A |
5756021 | Hedrick et al. | May 1998 | A |
5767690 | Fujimoto | Jun 1998 | A |
5772451 | Dozier, II et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773780 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777485 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785538 | Beaman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792668 | Fuller et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793213 | Bockelman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794133 | Kashima | Aug 1998 | A |
5804607 | Hedrick et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804982 | Lo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804983 | Nakajima et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806181 | Khandros et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807107 | Bright et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810607 | Shih et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811751 | Leong et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811982 | Beaman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813847 | Eroglu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814847 | Shihadeh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818249 | Momohara | Oct 1998 | A |
5820014 | Dozier, II et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821763 | Beaman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824494 | Feldberg | Oct 1998 | A |
5829128 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5829437 | Bridges | Nov 1998 | A |
5831442 | Heigl | Nov 1998 | A |
5832601 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833601 | Swartz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838160 | Beaman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841288 | Meaney et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846708 | Hollis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847569 | Ho et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848500 | Kirk | Dec 1998 | A |
5852232 | Samsavar et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854608 | Leisten | Dec 1998 | A |
5864946 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867073 | Weinreb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5869326 | Hofmann | Feb 1999 | A |
5869974 | Akram et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874361 | Collins et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876082 | Kempf et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878486 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883522 | O'Boyle | Mar 1999 | A |
5883523 | Ferland et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884398 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888075 | Hasegawa et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892539 | Colvin | Apr 1999 | A |
5896038 | Budnaitis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900737 | Graham et al. | May 1999 | A |
5900738 | Khandros et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903143 | Mochizuki et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905421 | Oldfield | May 1999 | A |
5910727 | Fujihara et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912046 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914613 | Gleason et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914614 | Beaman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916689 | Collins et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917707 | Khandros et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926029 | Ference et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926951 | Khandros et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944093 | Viswanath | Aug 1999 | A |
5945836 | Sayre et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949383 | Hayes et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949579 | Baker | Sep 1999 | A |
5959461 | Brown et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963364 | Leong et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970429 | Martin | Oct 1999 | A |
5973504 | Chong | Oct 1999 | A |
5974662 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981268 | Kovacs et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982166 | Mautz | Nov 1999 | A |
5983493 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990695 | Daugherty, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993611 | Moroney, III et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994152 | Khandros et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995914 | Cabot | Nov 1999 | A |
5996102 | Haulin | Nov 1999 | A |
5998228 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5998768 | Hunter et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5998864 | Khandros et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999268 | Yonezawa et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001760 | Katsuda et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002426 | Back et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013586 | McGhee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019612 | Hasegawa et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6020745 | Taraci | Feb 2000 | A |
6023103 | Chang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028435 | Nikawa | Feb 2000 | A |
6029344 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031383 | Streib et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032356 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6032714 | Fenton | Mar 2000 | A |
6033935 | Dozier, II et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6034533 | Tervo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037785 | Higgins | Mar 2000 | A |
6042712 | Mathieu | Mar 2000 | A |
6043563 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049216 | Yang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049976 | Khandros | Apr 2000 | A |
6050829 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051422 | Kovacs et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052653 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054651 | Fogel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054869 | Hutton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059982 | Palagonia et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060888 | Blackham et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060892 | Yamagata | May 2000 | A |
6061589 | Bridges et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062879 | Beaman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064213 | Khandros et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064217 | Smith | May 2000 | A |
6064218 | Godfrey et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066911 | Lindemann et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078183 | Cole, Jr. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078500 | Beaman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090261 | Mathieu | Jul 2000 | A |
6091236 | Piety et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091255 | Godfrey | Jul 2000 | A |
6096567 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100815 | Pailthorp | Aug 2000 | A |
6104201 | Beaman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104206 | Verkuil | Aug 2000 | A |
6110823 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114864 | Soejima et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6114865 | Lagowski et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118287 | Boll et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118894 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124725 | Sato | Sep 2000 | A |
6127831 | Khoury et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137302 | Schwindt | Oct 2000 | A |
6144212 | Mizuta | Nov 2000 | A |
6147502 | Fryer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147851 | Anderson | Nov 2000 | A |
6150186 | Chen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160407 | Nikawa | Dec 2000 | A |
6160412 | Martel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166333 | Crumly et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166553 | Sinsheimer | Dec 2000 | A |
6168974 | Chang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169410 | Grace et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172337 | Johnsgard et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174744 | Watanabe et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175228 | Zamborelli et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176091 | Kishi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181144 | Hembree et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181149 | Godfrey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181297 | Leisten | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181416 | Falk | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184053 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184587 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184845 | Leisten et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191596 | Abiko | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194720 | Li et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206273 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208225 | Miller | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211663 | Moulthrop et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211837 | Crouch et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215196 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215295 | Smith, III | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215670 | Khandros | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218910 | Miller | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222031 | Wakabayashi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229327 | Boll et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232149 | Dozier, II et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232787 | Lo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232788 | Schwindt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233613 | Walker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236223 | Brady et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242803 | Khandros et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242929 | Mizuta | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245692 | Pearce et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246247 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251595 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255126 | Mathieu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256882 | Gleason et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257564 | Avneri et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265950 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268015 | Mathieu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268016 | Bhatt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271673 | Furuta et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274823 | Khandros et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275738 | Kasevich et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278051 | Peabody | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278411 | Ohlsson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281691 | Matsunaga et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286208 | Shih et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292760 | Burns | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295729 | Beaman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300775 | Peach et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300780 | Beaman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307161 | Grube et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307387 | Gleason et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307672 | DeNure | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310483 | Taura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320372 | Keller | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320396 | Nikawa | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327034 | Hoover et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329827 | Beaman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330164 | Khandros et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332270 | Beaman et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6334247 | Beaman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6335625 | Bryant et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339338 | Eldridge et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340568 | Hefti | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6340895 | Uher et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351885 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6352454 | Kim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359456 | Hembree et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362792 | Sawamura et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366247 | Sawamura et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369776 | Leisten et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376258 | Hefti | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6384614 | Hager et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395480 | Hefti | May 2002 | B1 |
6396296 | Tarter et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396298 | Young et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400168 | Matsunaga et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6404211 | Hamel et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6404213 | Noda | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6407562 | Whiteman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409724 | Penny et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414478 | Suzuki | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415858 | Getchel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418009 | Brunette | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419500 | Kister | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420722 | Moore et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6420887 | Kister et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424164 | Kister | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424316 | Leisten | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429029 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441315 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442831 | Khandros et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447339 | Reed et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448788 | Meaney et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448865 | Miller | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452406 | Beaman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452411 | Miller et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456099 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456103 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459343 | Miller | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459739 | Vitenberg | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468098 | Eldridge | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475822 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6476333 | Khandros et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476442 | Williams et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476630 | Whitten et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479308 | Eldridge | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480013 | Nayler et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480978 | Roy et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481939 | Gillespie et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482013 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483327 | Bruce et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488405 | Eppes et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6490471 | Svenson et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6491968 | Mathieu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499121 | Roy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501343 | Miller | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509751 | Mathieu et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512482 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520778 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525552 | Kister | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525555 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526655 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6528984 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6528993 | Shin et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529844 | Kapetanic et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530148 | Kister | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534856 | Dozier, II et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538214 | Khandros | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538538 | Hreish et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6539531 | Miller et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6548311 | Knoll | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549022 | Cole, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549106 | Martin | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551884 | Masuoka | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559671 | Miller et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6566079 | Hefti | May 2003 | B2 |
6573702 | Marcuse et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578264 | Gleason et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580283 | Carbone et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582979 | Coccioli et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586956 | Aldaz et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6587327 | Devoe et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597187 | Eldridge et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603322 | Boll et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603323 | Miller et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603324 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605951 | Cowan | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605955 | Costello et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606014 | Miller | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6606575 | Miller | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608494 | Bruce et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611417 | Chen | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615485 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6616966 | Mathieu et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6617862 | Bruce | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621082 | Morita et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621260 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622103 | Miller | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624648 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627461 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627483 | Ondricek et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627980 | Eldridge | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628503 | Sogard | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628980 | Atalar et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633174 | Satya et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636182 | Mehltretter | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639461 | Tam et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640415 | Eslamy et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6640432 | Mathieu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6642625 | Dozier, II et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6643597 | Dunsmore | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6644982 | Ondricek et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646520 | Miller | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653903 | Leich et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6655023 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6657455 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6657601 | McLean | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661316 | Hreish et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664628 | Khandros et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669489 | Dozier, II et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6672875 | Mathieu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6677744 | Long | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678850 | Roy et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678876 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6680659 | Miller | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685817 | Mathieu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6686754 | Miller | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690185 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701265 | Hill et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6701612 | Khandros et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707548 | Kreimer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708386 | Gleason et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708403 | Beaman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6710798 | Hershel et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713374 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714828 | Eldridge et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717426 | Iwasaki | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720501 | Henson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6722032 | Beaman et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724205 | Hayden et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724928 | Davis | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727579 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727580 | Eldridge et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727716 | Sharif | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6729019 | Grube et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731804 | Carrieri et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6734687 | Ishitani et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6737920 | Jen et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741085 | Khandros et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741092 | Eldridge et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744268 | Hollman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753679 | Kwong et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753699 | Stockstad | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759311 | Eldridge et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764869 | Eldridge | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768328 | Self et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770955 | Coccioli et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6771806 | Satya et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6777319 | Grube et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778140 | Yeh | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778406 | Grube et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780001 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784674 | Miller | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784677 | Miller et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784679 | Sweet et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788093 | Aitren et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6788094 | Khandros et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791176 | Mathieu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794888 | Kawaguchi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794950 | Du Toit et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798225 | Miller | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798226 | Altmann et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806724 | Hayden et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806836 | Ogawa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807734 | Eldridge et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809533 | Anlage et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6811406 | Grube | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6812691 | Miller | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6812718 | Chong et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6815963 | Gleason et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816031 | Miller | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6817052 | Grube | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6818840 | Khandros | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822463 | Jacobs | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6822529 | Miller | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825052 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825422 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827584 | Mathieu et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835898 | Eldridge et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836962 | Khandros et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6838885 | Kamitani | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6838890 | Tervo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6839964 | Henson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845491 | Miller et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856129 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856150 | Sporck et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860009 | Gleason et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6862727 | Stevens | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6864105 | Grube et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6864694 | McTigue | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870381 | Grube | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882239 | Miller | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882546 | Miller | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887723 | Ondricek et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6888362 | Eldridge et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6891385 | Miller | May 2005 | B2 |
6900646 | Kasukabe et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900647 | Yoshida et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900652 | Mazur | May 2005 | B2 |
6900653 | Yu et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902416 | Feldman | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6902941 | Sun | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6903563 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906506 | Reano et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6906539 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906542 | Sakagawa et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906543 | Lou et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907149 | Slater | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908364 | Back et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909297 | Ji et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909300 | Lu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909983 | Sutherland | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910268 | Miller | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911814 | Miller et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911826 | Plotnikov et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911834 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911835 | Chraft et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912468 | Marin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913468 | Dozier, II et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6914244 | Alani | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6914427 | Gifford et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6914430 | Hasegawa et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6914580 | Leisten | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917195 | Hollman | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917210 | Miller | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917211 | Yoshida et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917525 | Mok et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917732 | Miyata et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919732 | Yoshida et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922069 | Jun | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924653 | Schaeffer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6924655 | Kirby | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927078 | Saijyo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927079 | Fyfield | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6927586 | Thiessen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927587 | Yoshioka | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927598 | Lee et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930498 | Tervo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933713 | Cannon | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933717 | Dogaru et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6933725 | Lim et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933736 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933737 | Sugawara | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937020 | Munson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937037 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937039 | Barr et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937040 | Maeda et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937042 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937045 | Sinclair | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937341 | Woollam et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940264 | Ryken, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6940283 | McQueeney | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943563 | Martens | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943571 | Worledge | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943574 | Altmann et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944380 | Hideo et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6946375 | Hattori et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946859 | Karavakis et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946860 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948391 | Brassell et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948981 | Pade | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6970001 | Chheda et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987483 | Tran | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7001785 | Chen | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7002133 | Beausoleil et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002363 | Mathieu | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002364 | Kang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003184 | Ronnekleiv et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7005842 | Fink et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7005868 | McTigue | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7005879 | Robertazzi | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006046 | Aisenbrey | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007380 | Das et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7009188 | Wang | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7009383 | Harwood et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7009415 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011531 | Egitto et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012425 | Shoji | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012441 | Chou et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013221 | Friend et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7014499 | Yoon | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015455 | Mitsuoka et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015689 | Kasajima et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015690 | Wang et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015703 | Hopkins et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015707 | Cherian | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015708 | Beckous et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015709 | Capps et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015710 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015711 | Rothaug et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019541 | Kittrell | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019544 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7019701 | Ohno et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020360 | Satomura et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020363 | Johannessen | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022976 | Santana, Jr. et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7022985 | Knebel et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7023225 | Blackwood | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7023226 | Okumura et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7023231 | Howland, Jr. et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025628 | LaMeres et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026832 | Chaya et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026833 | Rincon et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026834 | Hwang | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026835 | Farnworth et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030599 | Douglas | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030827 | Mahler et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032307 | Matsunaga et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034553 | Gilboe | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035738 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7088981 | Chang | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096133 | Martin et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7148711 | Tervo et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7187188 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7188037 | Hidehira | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7266889 | Gleason et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7368927 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7681312 | Gleason et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7761986 | Gleason et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7888957 | Smith et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893704 | Gleason et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7956627 | Kasukabe et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960989 | Breinlinger et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8111080 | Kister | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8253428 | Komoto | Aug 2012 | B2 |
RE43739 | Romanov | Oct 2012 | E |
8305101 | Desta et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20010002794 | Draving et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010009061 | Gleason et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010009377 | Schwindt et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010010468 | Gleason et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010020283 | Sakaguchi | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010024116 | Draving | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010030549 | Gleason et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010043073 | Montoya | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044152 | Burnett | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010045511 | Moore et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010054906 | Fujimura | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020005728 | Babson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020008533 | Ito et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009377 | Shafer | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009378 | Obara | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011859 | Smith et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011863 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020050828 | Seward, IV et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070743 | Felici et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020070745 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079911 | Schwindt | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020109514 | Brandorff et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118034 | Laureanti | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020149377 | Hefti et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153909 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163769 | Brown | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020168659 | Hefti et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020180466 | Hiramatsu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197709 | van der Weide et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030010877 | Landreville et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030822 | Finarov | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032000 | Liu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040004 | Hefti et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057513 | Leedy | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057957 | McQuade et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062915 | Arnold et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072549 | Facer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077649 | Cho et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088180 | vanVeen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030119057 | Gascoyne et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139662 | Seidman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139790 | Ingle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030155939 | Lutz et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030170898 | Gundersen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184332 | Tomimatsu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040015060 | Samsoondar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021475 | Ito et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040061514 | Schwindt et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066181 | Thies | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069776 | Fagrell et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090223 | Yonezawa | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095145 | Boudiaf et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095641 | Russum et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100276 | Fanton | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100297 | Tanioka et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040108847 | Stoll et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113640 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124861 | Zaerpoor | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040130787 | Thome-Forster et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040132222 | Hembree et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040134899 | Hiramatsu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147034 | Gore et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162689 | Jamneala et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175294 | Ellison et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186382 | Modell et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193382 | Adamian et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197771 | Powers et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199350 | Blackham et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207072 | Hiramatsu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207424 | Hollman | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040239338 | Jonsson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040246004 | Heuermann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251922 | Martens et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050024069 | Hayden et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050026276 | Chou | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030047 | Adamian | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054029 | Tomimatsu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062533 | Vice | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083130 | Grilo | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101846 | Fine et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050156675 | Rohde et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164160 | Gunter et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165316 | Lowery et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168722 | Forstner et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050174191 | Brunker et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050178980 | Skidmore et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195124 | Puente Baliarda et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236587 | Kodama et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237102 | Tanaka | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060052075 | Galivanche et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060155270 | Hancock et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060226864 | Kramer | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070024506 | Hardacker | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030021 | Cowan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20090178277 | Gleason et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100271060 | Gleason et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0230348 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0259163 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0304868 | Mar 1989 | EP |
WO 9807040 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 0073905 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0107207 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0169656 | Sep 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English-language abstract of Chinese Patent No. CN 1083975, Mar. 16, 1994. |
English-language abstract of German Patent No. DE 3637549, May 11, 1988. |
English-language abstract of German Patent No. DE 19522774, Jan. 2, 1997. |
English-language abstract of German Patent No. DE 10000324, Jul. 19, 2001. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 53-037077, Apr. 5, 1978. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 53-052354, May 12, 1978. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 55-115383, Sep. 5, 1980. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 56-007439, Jan. 26, 1981. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 57-075480, May 12, 1982. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 62-098634, May 8, 1987. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 63-143814, Jun. 16, 1988. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 63-318745, Dec. 27, 1988. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 1-296167, Nov. 29, 1989. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 2-124469, May 11, 1990. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 51-57790, Jun. 25, 1993. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 51-66893, Jul. 2, 1993. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 60-71425, Mar. 15, 1994. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 7-005078, Jan. 10, 1995. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 10-116866, May 6, 1998. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 11-023975, Jan. 29, 1999. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 2001-189285, Jul. 10, 2001. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 2001-189378, Jul. 10, 2001. |
English-language abstract of Japanese Patent No. JP 2002-243502, Aug. 28, 2002. |
English-language abstract of PCT Patent Application Publication No. WO 2004/065944, Aug. 5, 2004. |
English-language abstract of PCT Patent Application Publication No. WO 2004/079299, Sep. 16, 2004. |
English-language abstract of PCT Patent Application Publication No. WO 2005/062025, Jul. 7, 2005. |
Aebersold, Ruedi, et al., “insight review articles, Mass spectrometry-based proteomics,” Nature, vol. 422, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 198-207. |
Afsar, Mohammed Nurul, et al., “The Measurement of the Properties of Materials,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 74, No. 1, Jan. 1986, pp. 183-199. |
Basu, Saswata, et al., “A Membrane Quadrant Probe for R&D Applications,” Microwave Symposium Digest, 1997, IEEE MTT-S International, Jun. 8-13, 1997, vol. 3, pp. 1671-1673. |
Basu, Saswata, et al., “An SOLR Calibration for Accurate Measurement of Orthogonal On-Wafer DUTS,” 1997 IEEE MTT-S Digest, pp. 1335-1338. |
Boguski, Mark S., et al., “Biomedical informatics for proteomics,” insight: review article, Nature, vol. 422, pp. 233-237, Mar. 13, 2003; doi:10.1038/nature01515. |
Cascade Microtech, Inc., “Probe Heads, Care and cleaning of coaxial input microwave probes,” Microwave Probe Care and Cleaning Instruction Manual, 1990, 28 pages. |
Cascade Microtech, Inc., “Information Sheet for Pyramid Probe,” 5 pages, 2001. |
Fink, Donald G., et al., “Bridge Circuits, Detectors, and Amplifiers, Principles of Bridge Measurements,” Electronics Engineers' Handbook, First Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1975, pp. 17-22-17-27. |
Grober, Robert D., et al., “Optical antenna: Towards a unity efficiency near-field optical probe,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 (11), Mar. 17, 1997, American Institute of Physics, 1997, pp. 1354-1356. |
Hanash, Sam, “insight review articles, Disease proteomics,” Nature, vol. 422, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 226-232. |
Hayden, Leonard, “A Multi-Line TRL Calibration,” Feb. 2, 1994, 5 pages. |
Kim, Yong-Dae, et al., “Fabrication of a Silicon Micro-Probe for Vertical Probe Card Application,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 37, pp. 7070-7073, 1998. |
Kraszewski, Andrzej W., et al., “Use of a Microwave Cavity for Sensing Dielectric Properties of Arbitrarily Shaped Biological Objects,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 338, No. 7, Jul. 1990, pp. 858-863. |
Liang, Qingqing, et al., “Accurate ac Transistor Characterization to 110 GHz Using a New Four-port Self-Calibrated Extraction Technique,” IEEE, 2004 Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems, pp. 282-285. |
Marte, Barbara, Senior Editor, “Nature Insight Proteomics,” Nature, vol. 422, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 191-194. |
Martens, J., “Multiport SOLR Calibrations: Performance and an Analysis of Some Standards Dependencies,” ARFTG Microwave Measurements Conference, Dec. 4-5, 2003, pp. 205-213. |
Phizicky, Eric, et al., “insight: review article, Protein analysis on a proteomic scale,” Nature, vol. 422, pp. 208-215, Mar. 13, 2003; doi: 10.1038/nature01512. |
Purroy, Francesc, et al., “New Theoretical Analysis of the LRRM Calibration Technique for Vector Network Analyzers,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 50, No. 5, Oct. 2001, pp. 1307-1313. |
Risacher, Christophe, et al., “Waveguide-to-Microstrip Transition With Integrated Bias-T,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 262-264. |
Sali, Andrej, et al., “insight: review article, From words to literature in structural proteomics,” Nature, vol. 422, pp. 216-225, Mar. 13, 2003; doi: 10.1038/nature01513. |
Seguinot, Christophe, et al., “Multimode TRL—A New Concept in Microwave Measurements: Theory and Experimental Verification,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 46, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 536-542. |
Sohn, L. L., et al., “Capacitance cytometry: Measuring biological cells one by one,” PNAS Sep. 26, 2000, vol. 97, No. 20, pp. 10687-10690, www.pnas.org. |
Tinti, Roberto, et al., “Proposed System Solution for 1/f Noise Parameter Extraction,” Agilent Technologies, Inc., www.agilent.com, 2008, 8 pages. |
Tyers, Mike, et al., “insight overview, From genomics to proteomics,” Nature, vol. 422, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 193-197. |
van der Weide, Daniel, “THz Frequency Science & Technology, Biomolecular Interaction Sensing with Sub-Terahertz Fields,” University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2 pages. |
Venkatesh, M. S., et al., “An overview of dielectric properties measuring techniques,” Canadian Biosystems Engineering, vol. 47, 2005, pp. 7.15-7.30. |
Xu, Deming, et al., “Measurement of the Dielectric Properties of Biological Substances Using an Improved Open-Ended Coaxial Line Resonator Method,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-35, No. 12, Dec. 1987, pp. 1424-1428. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100271060 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10705014 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 12818521 | US | |
Parent | 09814593 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10705014 | US | |
Parent | 09115571 | Jul 1998 | US |
Child | 09814593 | US |