The following description relates to processing of integrated circuits (“ICs”). More particularly, the following description relates to techniques for packaging dies or wafers, and other microelectronic assemblies.
Microelectronic elements often comprise a thin slab of a semiconductor material, such as silicon or gallium arsenide, commonly called a semiconductor wafer. A wafer can be formed to include multiple integrated chips or dies on a surface of the wafer and/or partly embedded within the wafer. Dies that are separated from a wafer are commonly provided as individual, prepackaged units. In some package designs, the die is mounted to a substrate or a chip carrier, which is in turn mounted on a circuit panel, such as a printed circuit board (PCB). For example, many dies are provided in packages suitable for surface mounting.
Packaged semiconductor dies can also be provided in “stacked” arrangements, wherein one package is provided, for example, on a circuit board or other carrier, and another package is mounted on top of the first package. These arrangements can allow a number of different dies or devices to be mounted within a single footprint on a circuit board and can further facilitate high-speed operation by providing a short interconnection between the packages. Often, this interconnect distance can be only slightly larger than the thickness of the die itself. For interconnection to be achieved within a stack of die packages, interconnection structures for mechanical and electrical connection may be provided on both sides (e.g., faces) of each die package (except for the topmost package).
Additionally, dies or wafers may be stacked in a three-dimensional arrangement as part of various microelectronic packaging schemes. This can include stacking a layer of one or more dies, devices, and/or wafers on a larger base die, device, wafer, substrate, or the like, stacking multiple dies or wafers in a vertical or horizontal arrangement, and various combinations of both.
Dies or wafers may be bonded in a stacked arrangement using various bonding techniques, including direct dielectric bonding, non-adhesive techniques, such as ZiBond® or a hybrid bonding technique, such as DBI®, both available from Invensas Bonding Technologies, Inc. (formerly Ziptronix, Inc.), an Xperi company. The direct dielectric bonding techniques include a spontaneous covalent bonding process that takes place at ambient conditions when two prepared dielectric surfaces are brought together, without adhesive or an intervening material, and the hybrid bonding technique adds direct metal-to-metal bonds of respective metallic bond pads at the bonding surfaces of the respective dies or wafers, also without an intervening material, forming unified conductive structures (see for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,864,585 and 7,485,968, which are incorporated herein in their entirety). Heated annealing of the metallic bond pads may be used to augment the metal-to-metal bonds.
Respective mating surfaces (i.e., bonding surfaces) of the bonded dies or wafers (which may comprise an insulating material such as an oxide, for example) often include embedded conductive interconnect structures (which may be metal), or the like. In some examples, the bonding surfaces are arranged and aligned so that the conductive interconnect structures from the respective surfaces are joined during the bonding. The conductive interconnect structures may be formed by damascene techniques, for example, and may include structures having varying widths and sizes. The joined interconnect structures form continuous conductive interconnects (for signals, power, etc.) between the stacked dies or wafers. One or more bonding surfaces of the dies that include the embedded interconnect structures is usually planarized (using chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP), or the like) to prepare the surface(s) for bonding.
Double-sided dies or wafers can be similarly formed and prepared for stacking and bonding, where both sides of the dies or wafers will be bonded to other substrates, wafers, or dies, such as with multiple die-to-die, die-to-wafer, or wafer-to-wafer applications. Preparing both sides of the die or wafer includes finishing both surfaces to meet dielectric roughness specifications and metallic layer (e.g., copper, etc.) recess specifications. The hybrid bonding surfaces may be prepared for bonding with another die, wafer, or other substrate using a CMP process, plasma processes, wet and dry cleaning methods, or the like.
There can be a variety of challenges to implementing stacked die and wafer arrangements. When bonding stacked dies or wafers using a direct bonding or hybrid bonding technique, it is usually desirable that the surfaces of the dies or wafers to be bonded be extremely flat, smooth, and clean. For instance, in general, the surfaces should have a very low variance in surface topology (i.e., nanometer scale variance), so that the surfaces can be closely mated to form a lasting bond. The low variance in surface topology at the bonding surfaces allows the insulator material from each of the dies or wafers to bond at low temperatures (e.g., room temperature or less than 37 degrees C.), when they are brought into contact with each other. However, heated annealing (at least 300 degrees C.) is often used to join the conductive interconnect structures.
The use of higher temperatures for annealing can be damaging to applications that are sensitive to these temperatures. For example, many applications that include chip packaging, including 3D packages and other stacked arrangements, are not able to withstand the high temperatures. Further, epoxies, adhesives, and other package components and materials may also be altered by the high temperatures. This can limit the use of direct hybrid bonding in these applications that could benefit from its performance advantages.
The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
For this discussion, the devices and systems illustrated in the figures are shown as having a multiplicity of components. Various implementations of devices and/or systems, as described herein, may include fewer components and remain within the scope of the disclosure. Alternately, other implementations of devices and/or systems may include additional components, or various combinations of the described components, and remain within the scope of the disclosure.
Polycrystalline materials such as metals and other conductive materials are made up of grains separated by grain boundaries. The grains at the surface of a conductive interconnect structure (including the size, quantity, and orientation of the grains) determine the texture of the surface, which can determine the mobility of the atoms of the material at the surface. The size, quantity, and orientation of the grains may be altered by altering the energy or conditions of the materials. For instance, the application of heat to the material may result in recrystallization of the material and grains having a larger size, with increased surface mobility of the atoms of the material. Grain growth occurs when grain boundaries move, with adjacent grains growing into each other. Different grain sizes and properties can be achieved by either allowing heated material to cool slowly or causing the material to rapidly cool.
Another way to manipulate the grain size of a material is to introduce additional materials or impurities into the material. Accordingly, forming alloys (metals combined with a predetermined quantity of other metals or non-metals, e.g., impurities) can result in smaller grain sizes and materials with greater strength and reduced surface mobility, as well as other desired properties.
In general, increasing the grain size of a material reduces its strength but makes it more ductile and malleable. Further, larger grain sizes exhibit greater surface mobility. In contrast, decreasing the grain size of a material increases strength but makes it more brittle, and reduces the surface mobility of the atoms of the material.
When bonding conductive interconnect structures together during direct hybrid bonding, the grains of the conductive materials of the interconnect structures (copper or copper alloy, for example) mate to form a bond. Opposite surfaces with compatible textures (e.g., size, quantity, and orientation of the grains) may mate more closely.
The textures of the surfaces of the respective interconnect structures and the surface mobility of the atoms at each of the surfaces can determine the temperature at which a reliable bond may occur. For instance, the surface mobility can determine the rate of diffusion at the bond line between the conductive interconnects being bonded. While higher temperatures can increase surface mobility and the diffusion rate of copper or a copper alloy, achieving greater surface mobility and diffusion at lower temperatures is desirable, since it can extend the range of potential device applications of direct hybrid bonding and improve manufacturing efficiency. For example, package-type applications, assemblies that use epoxies, have filled or unfilled polymeric materials, or opposing substrates with different coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE), and the like, can benefit from lower processing temperatures.
In various implementations, innovative techniques and devices are disclosed that improve bonding of conductive materials (such as copper and copper alloys, for example), such as with embedded conductive interconnect structures, at lower temperatures (<220° C.) for direct hybrid bonding applications. In the implementations, one or both of the conductive surfaces to be bonded are formed or prepared with predetermined characteristics including: surface roughness, the thickness of the conductive layer, the metallographic texture or orientation of the conductive layer, the concentration of impurities within the conductive layer, amongst others, which can influence surface mobility of the atoms at the bonding surfaces and result in reliable bonds at lower temperatures. Greater surface mobility or faster moving atoms at one or both of the bonding surfaces can result in reliable bonds between conductive interconnect structures at comparatively lower temperatures, for example, bonding at temperatures below 220° C. (rather than higher temperatures, such as 300° C. and above).
Various implementations and arrangements are discussed with reference to electrical and electronics components and varied carriers. While specific components (i.e., dies, wafers, integrated circuit (IC) chip dies, substrates, etc.) are mentioned, this is not intended to be limiting, and is for ease of discussion and illustrative convenience. The techniques and devices discussed with reference to a wafer, die, substrate, or the like, are applicable to any type or number of electrical components, circuits (e.g., integrated circuits (IC), mixed circuits, ASICS, memory devices, processors, etc.), groups of components, passive elements, MEMS (Micro-Electro Mechanical Systems) components, packaged components, structures (e.g., wafers, panels, boards, PCBs, etc.), and the like, that may be integrated and coupled to interface with each other, with external circuits, systems, carriers, and the like. Each of these different components, circuits, groups, packages, structures, and the like, can be generically referred to as a “microelectronic component” or “microelectronic assembly.” For simplicity, unless otherwise specified, components being bonded to another component will be referred to herein as a “die.”
Example Process
Blocks A and B of the sequence of
Dies 102 (or wafers) may be formed using various techniques, to include a base substrate 104 and one or more insulating or dielectric layers 106. For example, the dies 102 shown at
The base substrate 104 may be comprised of silicon, germanium, glass, quartz, a dielectric surface, direct or indirect gap semiconductor materials or layers or another suitable material. The insulating layer 106 is deposited or formed over the substrate 104, and may be comprised of an inorganic dielectric material layer such as oxide, nitride, oxynitride, oxycarbide, carbides, carbonitrides, diamond, diamond like materials, glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics, and the like.
Bonding surfaces 108 of the dies 102 can include conductive features 110, such as TSVs, traces, pads, and interconnect structures, for example, embedded into the insulating layer 106, and which may be coupled to one or more metallization layers (not shown for clarity). Embedded conductive traces that extend partially into the dielectric substrate 106 below the prepared surface 108 may be used to electrically couple the conductive features 110 to desired components throughout the die 102. The conductive features 110 can be arranged so that the conductive features 110 from respective bonding surfaces 108 of opposing devices 102 can be mated and joined during bonding, if desired. The joined (e.g., bonded) conductive features 110 can form continuous conductive interconnects 114 (for signals, power, ground, etc.) between stacked devices.
Conductive features 110 may be comprised of a conductive material, such as a metal or an alloy, or a combination of conductive materials. In some embodiments, copper or gold or their alloys may be used to form conductive features 110. The material of conductive features 110 may also include some impurities, such as carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, and so forth, which may typically be at a concentration below 15 ppm.
As shown at block A, the sequence includes bringing two dies 102 together, and joining the dies 102 at the bonding surfaces 108 of the dies 102. In the direct bonding process, the insulating layer 106 of each die 102 freely bonds to the other insulating layer 106 when brought into contact with each other at room temperature, without an adhesive or any other intervening material. Preparation of the bonding surfaces 108 by planarization (as well as with other process steps, if desired) can facilitate the instantaneous bonding of the insulating layers 106.
Heat is often applied (usually at least 300 degrees C. for smaller structures) to cause the material (e.g., copper) of associated embedded conductive features 110 to expand (based on the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the material) and to contact each other across (or on either side of) the bond line 112 (as shown at block B). The heated annealing of the conductive features 110 causes them to join into a single conductive interconnect 114.
However, as discussed above, some product applications, such as packaged dynamic random access memory (DRAM) components, require low thermal budgets. Accordingly, the high annealing temperatures used to join the conductive features 110 may damage the components. Processes that use lower temperatures are disclosed below.
As shown at
At block A, one or more trenches or cavities 202 are formed in the surface 108 of the insulating layer 106 of the die 102 or 102′. The cavities 202 may extend partly or fully through the thickness of the insulating layer 106, or may also extend into the base substrate 104 in some cases. In some examples, a barrier layer (not shown) may be deposited in the cavities 202 prior to depositing the material of the conductive features 110 or 110′, such that the barrier layer is disposed between the conductive features 110 or 110′ and the insulating layer 106. The barrier layer may be comprised of tantalum, titanium, tungsten layer or their combination with their various respective compounds or alloys, for example, or another conductive material, to prevent or reduce diffusion of the material of the conductive features 110 and 110′ into the insulating layer 106.
As shown at block B, a seed layer 204 (of copper or a copper alloy, for example) may be deposited over the interior of the cavity 202, which may extend over the insulating layer 106. The seed layer 204 may be sputtered or otherwise disposed over the cavity 202, and may be 5 to 100 nanometers thick. In an embodiment, the seed layer 204 may have a texture orientation of {111}. In an embodiment, the seed layer 204 comprises the barrier layer.
At block C, a conductive layer 206 that is several microns thick is formed over the seed layer 204 and fills the cavity 202 to form the conductive features 110 or 110′. For example, the conductive layer 206 may comprise copper or a copper alloy, for example, and may be formed using a plating bath, such as an acid bath, or the like, and may fully or partially fill the cavity 202.
In one example, to form the conductive features 110 of the first die 102, the copper layer 206 is formed using a plating bath containing halide ions with no organic additives. In an embodiment, the conductive layer 206 is initiated using direct current (DC) plating current densities of between 10 and 30 mA/cm2 and is finished with lower current densities, for instance less than 5 mA/cm2. Also pulse plating current mode may be used to fill or overfill the cavity 202 with the conductive layer 206. However, it is desirable to suppress the incorporation of excess chloride impurities in the plated metal during the metal deposition step. A method to avoid incorporating unwanted chloride ions in the plated layer may include avoiding incorporating an electrolytic etching step or steps in the DC or pulse plating step or steps. In one embodiment, a plating current density or densities less than 10 mA/cm2 may be used to fill the cavity. In some other applications, after filling the cavities of interest at lower current densities, for example, less than 10 mA/cm2, higher current densities in the range of 10 to 50 mA/cm2 may be applied to overfill the cavities
Alternatively, the conductive layer 206 can be formed using a plating bath containing a copper complexing agent, for example copper citrate or copper gluconate, at current densities less than 5 mA/cm2. Other techniques may also be used to form the copper layer 206.
As shown at block D1, the die 102 is planarized and polished (e.g., via CMP), to remove the excess of the conductive layer 206 and any other unwanted materials from the surface of the insulating layer 106, forming a planar bonding surface 108, which reveals the conductive features 110. The conductive features 110 can also be polished to form a flat surface for bonding. The planarization step may include annealing the conductive features 110 at temperatures between 40 and 200° C. in inert ambient or vacuum for times ranging from 30 minutes to 3 hours. Typically, the lower the annealing temperature, the longer the annealing times. The material of the conductive features 110 has a low concentration (less than 10 ppm or less than 5 ppm) of impurities or has no impurities, and may have a texture orientation of {111}. The conductive features 110 may be coplaner with the bonding surface or may be recessed below the bonding surface or may extend above the bonding surface.
In another example, to form the conductive features 110′ of the second die 102′, the copper layer 206 is formed using a plating bath containing halide ions with super-filling organic additives, using plating current densities of 2 to 40 mA/cm2. Typical impurities can comprise carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, etc., at a desired concentration typically below 50 ppm or preferably below 15 ppm for each of the incorporated impurities. In practice, depending on the nature of the organic super-filling additives, higher plating current densities tend to incorporate smaller additives concentrations. In an example, the impurities concentration may be between 5 ppm and 20 ppm.
As shown at block D2, the die 102′ is planarized and polished (e.g., via CMP), to remove the excess of the conductive layer 206, any conductive barrier layer, and any other unwanted materials from the surface of the insulating layer 106, forming a planar bonding surface 108, which reveals the conductive features 110′. In some applications, the barrier layer may be non-conductive and may comprise, cover, or be incorporate the bonding surface 108. Also in some applications where the barrier layer is non-conductive, the non-conductive barrier layer may be selectively removed from the bottom of the cavities 202 before coating the cavities 202 with the seed layer 206. The conductive features 110′ may be coplaner with the bonding surface or may be recessed below the bonding surface or may extend above the bonding surface.
The conductive features 110′ can also be polished to form a flat surface for bonding. The planarization step may include annealing the conductive features 110′ at temperatures between 40 and 200° C. in inert ambient or vacuum for times ranging from 30 minutes to 3 hours. Typically, the lower the annealing temperature, the longer the annealing times.
In an embodiment, the material of the conductive features 110′ has a predetermined higher concentration of impurities than the conductive features 110. The texture of the surface of the conductive features 110′ may have a (more or less) random orientation, based on the chemistry of the material of the conductive features 110′. Also, in an example, a proportion of the grains of the conductive features 110′ with {111} orientation is lower than those of the conductive features 110 by at least 5%.
Forming a bonding surface 108 includes finishing the surface 108 to meet insulating layer 106 roughness specifications and metallic layer (e.g., conductive features 110 and 110′) recess specifications (if specified), to prepare the surface 108 for hybrid bonding. In other words, the bonding surface 108 is formed to be as flat and smooth as possible, with very minimal (nanometer scale) surface topology variance. Various conventional processes, such as chemical mechanical polishing (CMP), dry or wet etching, and so forth, may be used to achieve the low surface roughness. Such processes provide the flat, smooth surface 108 that results in a reliable bond.
Referring to
Direct hybrid bonding includes direct insulator-to-insulator (e.g., dielectric-to-dielectric) bonding, without an adhesive or other intervening material, of the respective insulating layers 106 of each die 102 and 102′ (e.g., ZIBOND®), as well as direct metal-to-metal bonding, also without an intervening material, of the respective conductive features 110 and 110′ of each die 102 and 102′ (e.g., DBI®). The dielectric-to-dielectric bonding occurs spontaneously as the respective bonding surfaces 108 are brought together at ambient temperatures. The metal-to-metal bonding (which may include diffusion between the metal of the conductive features 110 and 110′) can occur with the aid of heat, however at a temperature lower than 220 degrees C. (e.g., 80 to 180 degrees C.) in this case.
Adding impurities to the materials (e.g., copper or copper alloy) of the conductive features 110′ can change various physical properties of the materials. For example, the addition of some impurities (e.g., carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, etc.) can improve the thermo-mechanical properties of the materials. With few exceptions, impurities concentration beyond a certain threshold tends to suppress room temperature grain growth in electroplated copper and gold. Conversely, reducing impurity concentration in plate copper or gold film does enhance grain growth at room temperature. In various implementations, adding impurities to some or all of the embedded conductive features 110′ of the pair, or to a portion of each of the embedded conductive features 110′ (at least at a portion of the bonding surface) creates an enhanced surface mobility reaction when it is bonded to another embedded conductive feature 110 with fewer or substantially no impurities, including at lower temperatures (e.g., <220 degrees C., or 80 to 180 degrees C.).
Accordingly, in various embodiments, the second conductive feature 110′ with a higher concentration of impurities (e.g., less than 50 ppm of the various individual impurities) is bonded to the first conductive feature 110 with a lower concentration of impurities or with no impurities content. In an example, during lower temperature thermal treatment (e.g., <220 degrees C.) of the bonded conductive features 110′ and 110, because of the significant impurities difference between the materials of the conductive features 110′ and 110, impurities diffuse from the region with higher impurity concentration of the second conductive feature 110′ across the bond line 112 to the lower impurities portion of the first conductive feature 110 (as illustrated by the arrows at block F). The enhanced diffusion results in the formation of the single conductive interconnect 114 at the lower temperatures.
In various embodiments, the bonding temperature may be controlled (e.g., reduced) by adjusting the concentration of impurities in one or both of the conductive features 110 and 110′. In an implementation, the bonding temperature may be reduced by reducing the concentration of impurities (such as C, O, N, S, and so forth) in the material of one of the conductive features 110 with respect to the other conductive feature 110′. For instance, the higher temperatures (>220°) associated with bonding copper interconnect structures may be reduced by reducing the concentration of impurities in at least a portion of some or all of the conductive features 110 to be bonded. Conversely, looking at a single bonding pair 110/110′, the bonding temperature may be reduced by increasing the concentration of impurities of one of the conductive features 110′ with respect to the other conductive feature 110.
In various other embodiments, the size of the grains of the respective materials of the conductive features 110 and 110′ is manipulated, controlled, or adjusted to control the surface mobility and diffusion rates of the materials of the conductive features 110 and 110′. In the embodiments, the size of the grains may be controlled by adjusting the respective impurity concentrations of the materials of the conductive features 110 and 110′. Increasing the size of the grains of the material can increase surface mobility and/or the diffusion rates of the materials at lower temperatures, resulting in direct bonding of the conductive features 110 to 110′ at the lower temperatures. As mentioned above, reducing the concentration of impurities in the materials can result in larger grain sizes (encourages grain growth), while increasing the concentration of impurities in the materials can result in smaller grain sizes (suppresses grain growth).
As shown at
At blocks A and B, one or more trenches or cavities 202 are formed in the surface 108 of the insulating layer 106 of the die 102″ as described above with reference to the process 200. In some examples, a barrier layer (not shown) comprised of tantalum, titanium, tungsten layer or their combination with their various respective compounds or alloys, for example, or another conductive material, may be deposited in the cavities 202 prior to depositing the material of the conductive features 110″. A seed layer 204 (of copper or a copper alloy, for example) may be deposited (e.g., sputtered, etc.) over the interior of the cavity 202, typically 5 to 100 nanometers thick, which may extend over the insulating layer 106. In an embodiment, the seed layer 204 may have a texture orientation of {111}.
At block C, a conductive layer 206 is formed over the seed layer 204 and only partially fills the cavity 202 (e.g., about 80% filled, and preferably less than 400 nanometers below the bonding surface 108) to form the conductive sub-feature 404. The conductive layer 206 may comprise copper or a copper alloy, for example, and may be formed using a plating bath, such as an acid bath, or the like. In one example, the copper layer 206 is formed using a plating bath containing halide ions with no organic additives. In an embodiment, the conductive layer 206 is initiated using plating current densities of between 10 and 30 mA/cm2 and is finished with lower current densities, for instance less than 5 mA/cm2.
Alternatively, the conductive layer 206 can be formed using a plating bath containing a copper complexing agent, for example copper citrate or copper gluconate, at current densities less than 5 mA/cm2. Other techniques may also be used to form the copper layer 206. The material of the conductive layer 206 has a low concentration of impurities or has no impurities, and may have a texture orientation of {111}.
At block D, a second conductive layer 402 is formed using a plating bath containing halide ions with super-filling organic additives, using plating current densities of 2 to 40 mA/cm2. Typical impurities can comprise carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, etc., at a desired concentration typically below 50 ppm or preferably below 15 ppm for each of the incorporated impurities. In one embodiment, the composition of the total impurities is less than 100 ppm in the second layer 402. The second layer 402 fills the remainder of the cavity 202 (preferably to a plated metal thickness less than 600 nm), to finish forming the conductive features 110″. In an embodiment, the material of the second copper layer 402 has a predetermined higher concentration of impurities than the material of the copper layer 206. The texture of the surface of the second copper layer 402 is oriented significantly {111}, with a smaller fraction (less than 10%) of other textures.
The two-step filling process has the advantage of filling the cavities 202 without forming a void in the cavities 202. The first fill 206 of low/no impurity concentration copper fills the cavities 202 in a conformal layer, coating the walls and the floor of the cavities 202 substantially evenly. The second fill 402 of higher impurity concentration copper fills more from the bottom of the cavities 202, resulting in a more complete fill of the cavities 202 without leaving a void in the cavities 202. Further, making the first fill 206 thicker (e.g., about 80%) allows the second thinner fill 402 to substantially retain the grain orientation or texture of the underlying conductive layer 206, plated from an organic additive-free plating bath.
As shown at block E, the die 102″ is planarized and polished (e.g., via CMP), to remove the excess of the conductive layer 206 and the second conductive layer 402, as well as any conductive barrier layer and any other unwanted materials from the surface of the insulating layer 106, forming a planar bonding surface 108. This reveals the conductive features 110″, which is comprised of the sub-features 406 (having the materials of the second conductive layer 402) surrounded by the sub-features 404 (having the materials of the conductive layer 206). In other words, the conductive structure 110″ is comprised of a first metal with a lower concentration or no impurities and a substantially {111} texture, beneath and surrounding a second metal having a higher concentration of impurities and a texture substantially similar to the texture of the first metal beneath.
In an alternate embodiment, after coating the cavity 202 with the first conductive layer 206 having a low impurity content and a known texture to substantially fill the cavity 202, a thinner second conductive layer comprising an alloy of the first conductive layer 206 may be applied to overfill the cavity 202. The choice of alloying element may be based on alloys that will enhance low temperature grain growth the least. The alloying element concentration of the second conductive layer can be less than 5%, and preferably less than 2%, and still preferably less than 0.5%. In one embodiment, the alloying element may comprise, for example cobalt, silver, or zinc, amongst other elements.
The conductive features 110″ can also be polished to form a flat surface for bonding. The planarization step may include annealing the conductive features 110″ at temperatures between 40 and 200° C. in inert ambient or vacuum for times ranging from 30 minutes to 3 hours. Typically, the lower the annealing temperature, the longer the annealing times.
Forming a bonding surface 108 includes finishing the surface 108 to meet insulating layer 106 roughness specifications and metallic layer (e.g., conductive features 110″) recess specifications (if specified), to prepare the surface 108 for hybrid bonding. In other words, the bonding surface 108 is formed to be as flat and smooth as possible, with very minimal (nanometer scale) surface topology variance. Various conventional processes, such as chemical mechanical polishing (CMP), dry or wet etching, and so forth, may be used to achieve the low surface roughness. This process provides the flat, smooth surface 108 that results in a reliable bond.
Referring to
In various implementations, adding impurities to one of the embedded conductive sub-features 406 of the pair of sub-features 404 and 406, or to a portion of the one of the embedded conductive sub-features 406 (at least at a portion of the bonding surface) creates an enhanced surface mobility reaction when it is layered with a surrounding embedded conductive sub-feature 404 with fewer or substantially no impurities.
In various embodiments, the bonding temperature of the conductive features 110″ may be controlled (e.g., reduced) by adjusting the concentration of impurities in one or both of the conductive sub-features 404 and 406. In an implementation, the bonding temperature may be reduced by reducing the concentration of impurities (such as C, O, N, S, and so forth) in the material of one of the conductive sub-features 404 with respect to the other conductive sub-feature 406. For instance, the higher temperatures (>220°) associated with bonding copper interconnect structures may be reduced by reducing the concentration of impurities in at least a portion of one of the conductive sub-features 404. Conversely, the bonding temperature may be reduced by increasing the concentration of impurities of one of the conductive sub-features 406 with respect to the other conductive sub-feature 404.
In various other embodiments, the size of the grains of the respective materials of the conductive sub-features 404 and 406 is manipulated, controlled, or adjusted to control the surface mobility and diffusion rates of the conductive features 110″. In the embodiments, the size of the grains may be controlled by adjusting the respective impurity concentrations of the materials of the conductive sub-features 404 and 406.
Similarly, with reference to
Referring to
Referring to
In various implementations, bonding a conductive feature 110′ or conductive feature 110 to a conductive feature 110″ creates an enhanced surface mobility reaction, based on the difference in impurities of the respective materials. In various embodiments, the bonding temperature for bonding conductive features 110″ to conductive features 110′ or to conductive features 110 may be controlled (e.g., reduced) by adjusting the concentration of impurities in one or both of the conductive sub-features 404 and 406, as well as within the conductive features 110′ or the conductive features 110. For instance, the higher temperatures (>220°) associated with bonding copper interconnect structures may be reduced by reducing the concentration of impurities in at least a portion of one of the conductive sub-features 404 or the conductive features 110. Conversely, the bonding temperature may be reduced by increasing the concentration of impurities of one of the conductive sub-features 406 or the conductive features 110′ with respect to the other conductive sub-feature 404 or the or the conductive features 110.
In various other embodiments, the size of the grains of the respective materials of the conductive sub-features 404 and 406 or the materials of the conductive features 110′ or the conductive features 110 is manipulated, controlled, or adjusted to control the surface mobility and diffusion rates of the conductive features 110″, 110′, and/or 110. In the embodiments, the size of the grains may be controlled by adjusting the respective impurity concentrations of the materials of the conductive sub-features 404 and 406 or the conductive features 110′ or 110.
Grain Orientation
Also, in various embodiments, the judicious choice or control of the metallographic textures or orientation of the grains at the bonding surface of one or both of the conductive features 110, 110′, or 110″ to be bonded, may be used to enhance bonding of the conductive features 110, 110′, or 110″ at lower temperatures (e.g., <220 degrees C.). For instance, a conductive feature 110, 110′, or 110″ having a very low concentration of impurities (or substantially no impurities) may have a texture with a high percentage (e.g., >97%) of {111} oriented grains. In contrast, a conductive feature 110, 110′, or 110″ having a higher concentration of impurities may have a texture with a more random arrangement of grain orientations, including {111}, {110}, {200}, {222}, and {311}. In many cases, a more random texture at the bonding surface of conductive features 110, 110′, or 110″ has been associated with high electro-migration lifetimes. In practice, adequate electro-migration lifetimes in the bonded conductive features 110, 110′, or 110″ is quite desirable. Techniques have been developed to control the texture and microstructure of metallic (e.g., copper) structures, including grain orientations (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,333,120 to Dehaven et al.). These and other techniques may be used to form conductive features 110, 110′, or 110″ according to this disclosure, and are incorporated in their entirety.
Additionally, theoretical models for correlating the melting temperature of copper to the size of copper particles are available. The models predict that the temperature of the melting point decreases with the reduction in size of the copper particles. Further, grain growth can initiate at a lower temperature of 75° C. for {111} nano-crystalline copper in contrast to a higher temperature of 150° C. for {100} oriented nano-crystalline copper. Thus, grain orientation may be used to control grain growth and atom surface mobility in copper and copper alloy structures, which can also be used to lower the bonding temperature of conductive features 110, 110′, and 110″, as discussed above.
In various implementations, when the bonding surfaces 108 of two different dies (i.e., 102, 102′, and 102″) are brought together for mating, the opposing conductive features (i.e., 110, 110′, and 110″) are aligned for intimate contact with each other. The assembly 100 is processed at temperatures below 200° C. (e.g., 80°-180° C.) for metal-to-metal intimate coupling. During the thermal treatment step, the grains of opposing conductive features (i.e., 110, 110′, and 110″) touch, and metallic bonding occurs by grain growth or inter-grain growth. Also, portions of the impurities diffuse from the higher impurities portions of the conductive features 110′ and 110″ with more random grain orientation and into the portion of the conductive features (i.e., 110, 110′, and 110″) with comparatively lower impurities and {111} grain orientation.
The incorporation of impurities into a conductive feature 110 with {111} orientation improves the electromigration of the conductive feature 110. Impurity gradients are formed as impurities diffuse from the higher impurity concentration material (which has a random texture) to the lower impurity concentration material (which has a high {111} orientation) across the bond line 112 during the annealing step. Longer annealing times tend to reduce the slope of the impurity gradients. The comparatively lower bonding temperatures may be mostly due to the higher surface mobility of copper atoms of the {111} planes at lower temperatures compared to other orientations such as {100} or {110}. Also the lower impurities content of the conductive features 110 (or the sub-features 406) did not impede grain growth process.
Additional embodiments may include a bonded interconnect comprising a first conductive layer with a first grain texture (e.g., grain orientation) bonded to a second conductive layer with a second grain texture, where the two grain textures are different. Similarly, an embodiment may include a bonded interconnect comprising a first conductive layer with a first impurity concentration and first texture bonded to a second conductive layer with a second grain texture, where the two grain textures are different.
Nanotexturing
According to the process 800, a die 102 is formed having one or more conductive features 110, as described in the process 200, blocks A to D1. The resulting metal plating 110 has very low to substantially no impurities, and has a texture that is typically {111} oriented. In alternate implementations, the process may form a die 102′ having one or more conductive features 110′, as described in the process 200, blocks A to D2, or a die 102″ having one or more conductive features 110″, as described in the process 400, blocks A to E.
While at block D, the microstructure of the conductive features 110 may be stabilized (e.g., by annealing) and then planarized. At block E, the planarized metal surface of the conductive features 110 is treated (e.g., by nanotexturing) to form nano-scale microstructures on the {111} textured surfaces, forming conductive features 110′″. For example, in an embodiment, the surface is treated with a very dilute sulfuric acid or methane sulfonic acid rinse, less than 2% and preferably less than 0.5%, and is spin dried in an oxygen ambient environment for less than 30 seconds, followed by a deionized water rinse and drying. In one embodiment, this forms screw dislocations on the surface of the conductive features 110′″.
In another embodiment, the surface of the conductive features 110 is rinsed in a low acid concentration copper sulfate plating solution, and spun dried in an oxygen ambient environment for less than 30 seconds, followed by a dilute acid rinse and then a deionized water rinse. In other embodiments, organic alcohols such as isopropanol, glycerol, or the like may be added the acid solution to form a shallower textured surface. Other techniques may be used to form the nano-scale microstructures on the planarized surface of the conductive features 110′″. The nano-texturing forms embedded copper nano-fingers or particles on the modified surface of the conductive features 110′″.
Referring to
Surface Peening
According to the process 1000, a die 102 is formed having one or more conductive features 110, as described in the process 200, blocks A to D1. The resulting metal plating 110 has very low to substantially no impurities, and has a texture that is typically {111} oriented. In alternate implementations, the process may form a die 102′ having one or more conductive features 110′, as described in the process 200, blocks A to D2, or a die 102″ having one or more conductive features 110″, as described in the process 400, blocks A to E.
A resulting die 102 with one or more conductive features 110 is shown at
The goal of the peening is to cold work the surface of the conductive features 110, and to reduce the grain sizes of the grains of the conductive material of the conductive features 110. This forms the conductive features 110″″ and the die 102″″.
At block C, the process 1000 includes cleaning, rinsing, and/or activating the dielectric bonding surface 108 of the die 102″″ in preparation for bonding. A second die 102″″ with an embedded conductive feature 110″″ may be prepared similarly for bonding to the first die 102″″. Alternately, the die 102″″ may be bonded to a die 102, a die 102′, or a die 102″ as desired.
At block D, the two dies 102″″ are assembled, including stacking the dies 102″″ with the bonding surfaces 108 together and aligning the conductive features 110″″ of each die 102″″. The dies 102″″ are direct bonded without adhesive, and the conductive features 110″″ are bonded together using a low temperature (less than 200° C.) to form a continuous conductive interconnect 1004.
In various embodiments the peening of the bonding surfaces of the conductive features 110″″ provides for greater surface mobility of the metal atoms at the surface of the conductive features 110″″, which enhances bonding at comparatively lower temperatures of less than 220° C. Additionally, the cold working of the surface of the conductive features 110″″ stores energy and compressive stress in the material of the conductive features 110″″. This energy may be released during bonding, to enhance the bonding process. In an embodiment, vacancies between the grain boundaries are annihilated as the grains are cold worked. In some cases, this process includes grain growth among the grains, with smaller grains becoming larger, as the vacancies are eliminated.
Although various implementations and examples are discussed herein, further implementations and examples may be possible by combining the features and elements of individual implementations and examples. In various embodiments, some process steps may be modified or eliminated, in comparison to the process steps described herein.
The techniques, components, and devices described herein are not limited to the illustrations of
Although the implementations of the disclosure have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the implementations are not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as representative forms of implementing example devices and techniques.
Each claim of this document constitutes a separate embodiment, and embodiments that combine different claims and/or different embodiments are within the scope of the disclosure and will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing this disclosure.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/715,532, filed Dec. 16, 2019, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(1) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/781,255, filed Dec. 18, 2018, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4939568 | Kato et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4998665 | Hayashi | Mar 1991 | A |
5087585 | Hayashi | Feb 1992 | A |
5236118 | Bower et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5322593 | Hasegawa et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5413952 | Pages et al. | May 1995 | A |
5442235 | Parrillo et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5489804 | Pasch | Feb 1996 | A |
5501003 | Bernstein | Mar 1996 | A |
5503704 | Bower et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516727 | Broom | May 1996 | A |
5610431 | Martin | Mar 1997 | A |
5734199 | Kawakita et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5753536 | Sugiyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771555 | Eda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5821692 | Rogers et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5866942 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5985739 | Plettner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998808 | Matsushita | Dec 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6063968 | Hubner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071761 | Jacobs | Jun 2000 | A |
6080640 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097096 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117784 | Uzoh | Sep 2000 | A |
6123825 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6147000 | You et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6232150 | Lin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258625 | Brofman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259160 | Lopatin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265775 | Seyyedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297072 | Tilmans et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316786 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333120 | DeHaven et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333206 | Ito et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348709 | Graettinger et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374770 | Lee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409904 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423640 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6465892 | Suga | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6528894 | Akram et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6552436 | Burnette et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555917 | Heo | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579744 | Jiang | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583515 | James et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589813 | Park | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600224 | Farquhar et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6624003 | Rice | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627814 | Stark | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632377 | Brusic et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6660564 | Brady | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667225 | Hau-Riege et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6828686 | Park | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837979 | Uzoh et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6864585 | Enquist | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6887769 | Kellar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902987 | Tong et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6908027 | Tolchinsky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909194 | Farnworth et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6962835 | Tong et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974769 | Basol et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7045453 | Canaperi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7078811 | Suga | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105980 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109063 | Jiang | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126212 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7193423 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7238919 | Kaneko et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7354798 | Pogge et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7485968 | Enquist et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7750488 | Patti et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7803693 | Trezza | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7998335 | Feeney et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8039966 | Yang et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8101858 | Hannour et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8168532 | Haneda et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8183127 | Patti et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8241961 | Kim et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8242600 | Yang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8314007 | Vaufredaz | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8349635 | Gan et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8377798 | Peng et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8435421 | Keleher et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8441131 | Ryan | May 2013 | B2 |
8476146 | Chen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8476165 | Trickett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8482132 | Yang et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8501537 | Sadaka et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524533 | Tong et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8620164 | Heck et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8647987 | Yang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8697493 | Sadaka | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716105 | Sadaka et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8728934 | Uzho et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8802538 | Liu | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8809123 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8841002 | Tong | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8988299 | Kam et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9000600 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9028755 | Itoh | May 2015 | B2 |
9093350 | Endo et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9123703 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9142517 | Liu et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9171756 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184125 | Enquist et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9224704 | Landru | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230941 | Chen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9257399 | Kuang et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9269612 | Chen et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9299736 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312229 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9318385 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331149 | Tong et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9337235 | Chen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9343330 | Brusic et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9349669 | Uzoh et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9368866 | Yu | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9385024 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9394161 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9431368 | Enquist et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9433093 | Uzoh | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9437572 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443796 | Chou et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9461007 | Chun et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9496239 | Edelstein et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9536848 | England et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559081 | Lai et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9620481 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633971 | Uzoh | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9656852 | Cheng et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9666573 | Sukekawa | May 2017 | B1 |
9723716 | Meinhold | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9728521 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741620 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9799587 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9852988 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9881882 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9893004 | Yazdani | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9899442 | Katkar | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9929050 | Lin | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941241 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9941243 | Kim et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9953941 | Enquist | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9960142 | Chen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10002844 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10026605 | Doub et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10075657 | Fahim et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10147641 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10204893 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10262963 | Enquist | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10269708 | Enquist et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10269756 | Uzoh | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276619 | Kao et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276909 | Huang et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10314175 | Sato et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10418277 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10434749 | Tong et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446456 | Shen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446487 | Huang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446532 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10508030 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10515913 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10522499 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10707087 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10784191 | Huang et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790262 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10840135 | Uzoh | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840205 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854578 | Morein | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10879212 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10886177 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10892246 | Uzoh | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10908173 | Yamasaki et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923408 | Huang et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923413 | DeLaCruz | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10937755 | Shah et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10950547 | Mohammed et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10964664 | Mandalapu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10985133 | Uzoh | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10991804 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998292 | Lee et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11004757 | Katkar et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011494 | Gao et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011503 | Wang et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11031285 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11056348 | Theil | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11088099 | Katkar et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11127738 | DeLaCruz et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11158606 | Gao et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11171117 | Gao et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11176450 | Teig et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11244920 | Uzoh | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11256004 | Haba et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11264357 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2022 | B1 |
11276676 | Enquist et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11329034 | Tao et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11348898 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11355443 | Huang et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11515279 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11769747 | Sawada et al. | Sep 2023 | B2 |
20020000328 | Motomura et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020003307 | Suga | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025665 | Juengling | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020074670 | Suga | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094661 | Enquist et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030092220 | Akram | May 2003 | A1 |
20030157748 | Kim et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040084414 | Sakai et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040238492 | Catabay et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060024950 | Choi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057945 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060220197 | Kobrinsky et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070096294 | Ikeda et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111386 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080073795 | Kohl | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080122092 | Hong | May 2008 | A1 |
20080237053 | Andricacos et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090197408 | Lehr et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090200668 | Yang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100255262 | Chen et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100327443 | Kim | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110074040 | Frank et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084403 | Yang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120211894 | Aoyagi | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212384 | Kam et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130009321 | Kagawa et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130020704 | Sadaka | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130221527 | Yang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130252399 | Leduc | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130320556 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140153210 | Uzoh | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175655 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140225795 | Yu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140252635 | Tran et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264948 | Chou et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140353828 | Edelstein et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150064498 | Tong | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150108644 | Kuang et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150206823 | Lin et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150206840 | Lin et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150279888 | Chen et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150340269 | Rivoire et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150364434 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380368 | Momose et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160020183 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160133598 | Baudin et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160276383 | Chuang et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160343682 | Kawasaki | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170025381 | Tsai et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170047307 | Uzoh | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170069575 | Haba et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086320 | Barber | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170141079 | Kao et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170194271 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170271242 | Lo et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170330855 | Tung | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170355040 | Utsumi et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180151523 | Chen et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180175012 | Wu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182639 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182665 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182666 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190580 | Haba et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190583 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219038 | Gambino et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180273377 | Katkar et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180295718 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180323177 | Yu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180323227 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180331066 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180350674 | Uzoh | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190096741 | Uzoh et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190115277 | Yu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131277 | Yang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190198407 | Huang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198409 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190244909 | Chiu et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190265411 | Huang et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190295954 | Nomura et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190319007 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190333550 | Fisch | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190348336 | Katkar et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190385935 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385966 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190393086 | Uzoh | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200006280 | Shah et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013637 | Haba | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013765 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035641 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200075520 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075534 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075553 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200098711 | Choi et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200126906 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200194396 | Uzoh | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200227367 | Haba et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200243380 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200279821 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294908 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200328162 | Haba et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328164 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328165 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200335408 | Gao et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200365575 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200371154 | DeLaCruz et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200381389 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200395321 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200411483 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210028136 | Said et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210028144 | Lu | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210098411 | Liff et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210098412 | Haba et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210118864 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210143125 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210181510 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193603 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193624 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193625 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210234070 | Brueck et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210242050 | Chiu | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210242152 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210257333 | Yan | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210296282 | Gao et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210305202 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210335737 | Katkar et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210366820 | Uzoh | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210407941 | Haba | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220077063 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220077087 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220139867 | Uzoh | May 2022 | A1 |
20220139869 | Gao et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220139975 | Kimura et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220149002 | Hou et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220157752 | Bourjot et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220165692 | Uzoh et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220208650 | Gao et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208723 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220246497 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220285303 | Mirkarimi et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220319901 | Suwito et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320035 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320036 | Gao et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230005849 | Chuang | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230005850 | Fountain, Jr. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230019869 | Mirkarimi et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230036441 | Haba et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230067677 | Lee et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230069183 | Haba | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230100032 | Haba et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230115122 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230122531 | Uzoh | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230123423 | Gao et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230125395 | Gao et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230130259 | Haba et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230132632 | Katkar et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230140107 | Uzoh et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230142680 | Guevara et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230154816 | Haba et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230154828 | Haba et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230187264 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187317 | Uzoh | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187412 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197453 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197496 | Theil | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197559 | Haba et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197560 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197655 | Theil et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207402 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207437 | Haba | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207474 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207514 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230215836 | Haba et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230245950 | Haba et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230268300 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230268307 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230299029 | Theil et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
20230343734 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
20230360950 | Gao | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230361074 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230369136 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230375613 | Haba et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20240038702 | Uzoh | Feb 2024 | A1 |
20240055407 | Workman et al. | Feb 2024 | A1 |
20240079376 | Suwito et al. | Mar 2024 | A1 |
20240105674 | Uzoh et al. | Mar 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1112286 | Nov 1995 | CN |
103531492 | Jan 2014 | CN |
106711131 | May 2017 | CN |
107256852 | Sep 2019 | CN |
2000-183061 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002-353416 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2013-033786 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2016-21497 | Feb 2016 | JP |
2018-129475 | Aug 2018 | JP |
2018-160519 | Oct 2018 | JP |
10-2008-0050129 | Jun 2008 | KR |
10-2016-0066272 | Jun 2016 | KR |
WO 2005043584 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2009021266 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2022147429 | Jul 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Akolkar, R., “Current status and advances in Damascene Electrodeposition,” Encyclopedia of Interfacial Chemistry: Surface Science and Electrochemistry, 2017, 8 pages. |
Che, F.X. et al., “Study on Cu protrusion of through-silicon via,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, May 2013, vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 732-739. |
Dela Pena, Eden M. et al., “Electrodeposited copper using direct and pulse currents from electrolytes containing low concentration of additives,” School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 2018 Surface and Coating Technology, 40 pages. |
De Messemaeker, Joke et al., “Correlation between Cu microstructure and TSV Cu pumping,” 2014 Electronic Components & Technology Conference, pp. 613-619. |
Di Cioccio, L. et al., “An overview of patterned metal/dielectric surface bonding: Mechanism, alignment and characterization,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2011, vol. 158, No. 6, pp. P81-P86. |
Ganesan, Kousik, “Capable copper electrodeposition process for integrated circuit—substrate packaging manufacturing,” A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirments for the degree Doctor of Philosophy, Arizona State University, May 2018, 320 pages. |
Gondcharton, P. et al., “Kinetics of low temperature direct copper-copper bonding,” Microsyst Technol, 2015, vol. 21, pp. 995-1001. |
Heryanto, A. et al., “Effect of copper TSV annealing on via protrustion for TSV wafer fabrication,” Journal of Electronic Materials, 2012, vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 2533-2542. |
Hobbs, Anthony et al., “Evolution of grain and micro-void structure in electroplated copper interconnects,” Materials Transactions, 2002, vol. 43, No. 7, pp. 1629-1632. |
Huang, Q., “Effects of impurity elements on isothermal grain growth of electroplated copper,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2018, vol. 165, No. 7, pp. D251-D257. |
Huang, Q., “Impurities in the electroplated sub-50 nm Cu lines: The effects of the plating additives,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2014, vol. 161, No. 9, pp. D388-D394. |
Jiang, T. et al., “Plasticity mechanism for copper extrusion in through-silicon vias for three-dimensional interconnects,” Applied Physics Letters, 2013, vol. 103, pp. 211906-1-211906-5. |
Ker, Ming-Dou et al., “Fully process-compatible layout design on bond pad to improve wire bond reliability in CMOS Ics,” IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Jun. 2002, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 309-316. |
Kim, Myung Jun et al., “Characteristics of pulse-reverse electrodeposited Cu thin film,” I. Effects of Anodic Step in the Absence of an Organic Additives, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2012, vol. 159, No. 9, pp. D538-D543. |
Kim, Myung Jun et al., “Characteristics of pulse-reverse electrodeposited Cu thin film,” II. Effects of Organic Additives, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2012, vol. 159, No. 9, pp. D544-D548. |
Liu, C. et al., “Low-temperature direct copper-to-copper bonding enabled by creep on (111) surfaces of nanotwinned Cu,” Scientific Reports, May 12, 2015, 5:09734, pp. 1-11. |
Liu, Chien-Min et al., “Effect of grain orientations of Cu seed layers on the growth of <111>-oriented nanotwinned Cu,” Scientific Reports, 2014, vol. 4, No. 6123, 4 pages. |
Mendez, Julie Marie, “Characterization of copper electroplating and electropolishing processes for semiconductor interconnect metallization,” Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Chemical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Aug. 2009, 140 pages. |
Menk, L.A. et al., “Galvanostatic plating with a single additive electrolyte for bottom-up filling of copper in Mesoscale TSVs,” Microsystems and Engineering Sciences Applications (MESA) Complex, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2019 J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, 17 pages. |
Moriceau, H. et al., “Overview of recent direct wafer bonding advances and applications,” Advances in Natural Sciences—Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2010, 11 pages. |
Mott, D. et al., “Synthesis of size-controlled and shaped copper nanoparticles,” Langmuir, 2007, vol. 23, No. 10, pp. 5740-5745. |
Nakanishi, H. et al., “Studies on SiO2—SiO2 bonding with hydrofluoric acid. Room temperature and low stress bonding technique for MEMS,” Sensors and Actuators, 2000, vol. 79, pp. 237-244. |
Oberhammer, J. et al., “Sealing of adhesive bonded devices on wafer level,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2004, vol. 110, No. 1-3, pp. 407-412, see pp. 407-412, and Figures 1(a)-1(l), 6 pages. |
Parthasaradhy, N.V., “Practical Electroplating Handbook,” 1989, Prentice-Hall, Inc., pp. 54-56. |
Plobi, A. et al., “Wafer direct bonding: tailoring adhesion between brittle materials,” Materials Science and Engineering Review Journal, 1999, R25, 88 pages. |
Saraswat, Stanford Presentation, Cu Interconnect slides, web page web.stanford.edu/class/ee311/NOTES/Cu_Interconnect_Slides.pdf, 19 pages, 2015. |
Song, Xiaohui, “Atomic study of copper-copper bonding using nanoparticles,” Journal of Electronic Packaging, Jun. 2020, vol. 142, 5 pages. |
Song, Xiaoning, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of electrodeposited copper films,” A thesis submitted to the College of Engineering and Physical Sciences of the University of Birmingham, 2011, web page etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/1764/, 111 pages. |
Swingle, Karen D., “Nanograin Copper Deposition Using an Impinging Jet Electrode,” A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science, University of California, San Diego, 2013, 102 pages. |
Takahashi, K. et al., “Transport phenomena that control electroplated copper filling of submicron vias and trenches, Journal of The Electrochemical Society,” 1999, vol. 146, No. 12, pp. 4499-4503. |
Zheng, Z. et al., “Study of grain size effect of Cu metallization on interfacial microstructures of solder joints,” Microelectronics Reliability, 2019, vol. 99, pp. 44-51. |
Juang, Jing-Ye et al., “Copper-to-copper direct bonding on highly (111)-oriented nanotwinned copper in no-vacuum ambient,” Scientific Reports, Sep. 17, 2018, vol. 8, 11 pages. |
Liu, Zi-Yu et al. “Detection and formation mechanism of micro-defects in ultrafine pitch Cu—Cu direct bonding,” Chin. Phys. B, 2016, vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 018103-1-018103-7. |
Lu, L. et al., “Grain growth and strain release in nanocrystalline copper,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, Issue 11, pp. 6408, Jun. 1, 2001. |
Ortleb, Thomas et al., “Controlling macro and micro surface topography for a 45nm copper CMP process using a high resolution profiler,” Proc. Of SPIE, 2008, vol. 6922, 11 pages, Sep. 25, 2015. |
Suga et al., “Bump-less interconnect for next generation system packaging,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1003-1008. |
Suga, T., “Feasibility of surface activated bonding for ultra-fine pitch interconnection—A new concept of bump-less direct bonding for system level packaging,” The University of Tokyo, Research Center for Science and Technology, 2000 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2000 IEEE, pp. 702-705. |
Basol et al., “Electrochemical mechanical deposition (ECMDT technique for semiconductor interconnect applications,” Microelectronic Engineering, 2002, vol. 64, pp. 43-51. |
Basol et al., “Planar copper plating and electropolishing techniques, ”Chemical Engineering Communication, Jul. 2006, 14 pages. |
Basol et al., “Study on the Mechanism of Electrochemical Mechanical Deposition of Copper Layers,” Nu Tool Inc., 1655 McCandless Drive, Milpitas, CA 95035, Electrochemical Processes in ULSI and MEMS, Proceedings of the International Symposium; Proceedings vol. 2004-17, pp. 155-160. |
Bush, Steve, “Electronica: Automotive power modules from On Semi,” ElectronicsWeekly.com, indicating an Onsemi AR0820 product was to be demonstrated at a Nov. 2018 trade show, https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/products/power-supplies/electronica-automotive-power-modules-semi-2018-11/ (published Nov. 8, 2018; downloaded Jul. 26, 2023). |
Khan, Muhammed et al., “Damascene Process and Chemical Mechanical Planarization,” http://www.ece.umd.edu/class/enee416/GroupActivities/Damascene%20Presentation.pdf, 25 pages. |
Morrison, Jim et al., “Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Teardown,” Tech Insights (posted Apr. 24, 2016), includes description of hybrid bonded Sony IMX260 dual-pixel sensor, https://www.techinsights.com/blog/samsung-galaxy-s7-edge-teardown, downloaded Jul. 11, 2023, 9 pages. |
Onsemi AR0820 image, cross section of a CMOS image sensor product. The part in the image was shipped on Sep. 16, 2021. Applicant makes No. representation that the part in the image is identical to the part identified in the separately submitted reference BUSH, Nov. 8, 2018, ElectronicsWeekly.com (“BUSH article”); however, the imaged part and the part shown in the BUSH article share the part number “Onsemi AR0820.”. |
Roy, A et al., “Annealing effects on the surface properties of Cu-TiC thin films,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, vol. 44, Part 1, pp. 170-175. |
Sony IMX260 image, a first cross section of Sony product labeled IMX260, showing a hybrid bonded back side illuminated CMOS image sensor with a pad opening for a wire bond. The second image shows a second cross-section with peripheral probe and wire bond pads in the bonded structure. The part in the images was shipped in Apr. 2016. Applicant makes No. representation that the part in the images is identical to the part identified in the separately submitted reference MORRISON et al. (Tech Insights article dated Apr. 24, 2016), describing and showing a similar sensor product within the Samsung Galaxy S7; however the imaged part and the part shown in the MORRISON et al. article share the part name “Sony IMX260 image.”. |
Zik, N. et al., “Thermally produced nano catalyst for biodiesel production: A review,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 2018, vol. 52, Issue 2, pp. 139-147. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220130787 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62781255 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16715532 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17570880 | US |