This invention relates to the field of deposition of films. More particularly, this invention relates to the field of deposition of films onto a substrate where a prior processing step includes desorbing or precleaning of the substrate.
Deposition of a metal film in semiconductor processing often requires desorb and preclean steps prior to the deposition of the metal film. The desorb and preclean steps assure good adhesion of the metal film to a substrate and also provides better contact resistance between a substrate metal and the metal film.
In the prior art, the desorb step, the preclean step, and the deposition of the metal film take place within a cluster tool so that the substrate is not exposed to atmosphere between the desorb or preclean steps and the deposition of the metal film.
The desorb step of the prior art heats the substrate under vacuum in order to degas the substrate. By heating the substrate under vacuum, material adsorbed to the surface of the substrate or absorbed within the substrate are removed from the substrate. Typical process conditions include vacuum of 10−3 Torr or higher vacuum, and temperature within the range of 200 and 400° C. Generally, higher temperatures are employed in order to minimize process times, which for the higher temperatures are generally within the range of 30 and 60 s.
The preclean step of the prior art exposes the substrate to ion bombardment in what is often referred to as a sputter-etch preclean. In the sputter-etch preclean, argon ions, hydrogen ions, helium ions, or some combination thereof, and electrons form a plasma, which bombards a surface of the substrate to sputter away a thin layer of material. Typically, in the semiconductor processing, an etching step precedes the deposition of the metal film. The etching step forms trenches and via holes in the substrate to an underlying metal layer. After the etching step, an oxide forms on an exposed surface of the underlying metal layer at the via holes due to exposure of the substrate to atmosphere. The sputter-etch preclean attempts to etch away the oxide and any remaining residue after ashing and wet cleaning. The sputter-etch preclean typically requires a vacuum of 10−3 Torr or higher vacuum.
A particular metal deposition process of the prior art deposits a barrier metal layer and a copper seed layer onto a semiconductor substrate forming contacts with an underlying copper layer at the via holes. In the etching step, the via holes are formed through silicon dioxide and silicon nitride layers to the underlying copper layer. In another etching step of the prior art, the via holes are formed in low-k dielectric materials such as a polymer-based materials and fluorine or carbon containing oxides. After the etching step and before the deposition of the metal film, a plasma ashing step and a wet cleaning step substantially remove photoresist, photoresist residue, and etch residue leaving material adsorbed to the surface of the substrate and leaving a thin copper oxide layer on the underlying copper layer at the via holes. The desorb step of the prior art removes the material adsorbed to the surface of the substrate. The sputter-etch preclean removes the copper oxide layer within the via holes and removes an exposed layer of the substrate surrounding the via holes. The barrier metal is then deposited followed by the copper seed layer. Subsequently, an electroplating step deposits an additional copper layer on the copper seed layer.
The cluster tool of the prior art includes a handoff station, a front transfer module, a back transfer module, a degas module, a sputter-etch module, and a metal deposition module. The front transfer module includes a first robot. The back transfer module includes a second robot. The handoff station is coupled to the front transfer module by a first valve or loadlock. The degas module and the sputter-etch module are coupled to the front transfer module. The back transfer module is coupled to the front transfer module by a second valve or loadlock. The metal deposition module is coupled to the back transfer module. Often, the cluster tool includes two degas modules, two sputter-etch modules, and two or more metal deposition modules. In operation, the front and back transfer modules operate at vacuum. A second cluster tool for performing the desorb, preclean and metal deposition of the prior art includes a single transfer module, the degas module, the sputter-etch module, and the metal deposition module, where the degas module, the sputter-etch module, and the metal deposition module are coupled to the single transfer module.
Operation of the cluster tool begins with the first robot transferring a substrate from the handoff station to the degas module, where the desorb step takes place. The first robot then transfers the substrate to the sputter-etch module where the sputter-etch preclean takes place. The first robot then transfers the substrate to the second robot, which places the substrate in the metal deposition module. After the deposition of the metal film, the second robot then returns the substrate to the first robot, which returns the substrate to the handoff station.
Because the desorb step of the prior art operates at elevated temperatures, there is potential for temperature induced damage of the substrate. This concern is especially apt for polymer materials because future integrated circuits may employ the polymer materials as insulators due to their low dielectric constant properties.
In the preclean step, the plasma can cause plasma damage of the surface of the substrate. Also, it is well known that the sputter-etch preclean causes corner clipping at edges of the trenches and at edges of the via holes creating facets. The corner clipping is especially detrimental to smaller dimension integrated circuits since the corner clipping reduces separation of adjacent lines leading to unacceptable electrical interference between the adjacent lines. Not only does the sputter-etch preclean cause physical damage of integrated circuits, it could also causes electrical damage.
Further, sputtering of the underlying metal layer in the trenches and the via holes can cause barreling as well as causing deposition of sputtered material on sidewalls of the trenches and the via holes. For example, sputter-etch preclean of the copper oxide layer within the via holes causes copper and copper oxide to deposit on the sidewalls of the via holes. Moreover, the sputter-etch preclean is inappropriate for precleaning polymer based materials due to expected damage caused by the physical bombardment in the sputter-etch preclean. Also, even if the sputter-etch preclean can be used, the hydrogen ions cannot be used when the polymer materials are exposed since the hydrogen will hydrate the polymer-based materials. Additionally, the sputter-etch preclean becomes less effective as an aspect ratio (depth divided by width) of the trenches and of the via holes increases.
Both the degas module and the sputter-etch module require high vacuum pumps and associated vacuum plumbing, which increases purchase and maintenance costs of the cluster tool. The sputter-etch module further increases the purchase and maintenance costs of the cluster tool because it relatively complex and requires frequent maintenance to ensure that it does not become a source of particulate contamination.
What is needed is a desorb method compatible with metal deposition that does not require excessive temperatures.
What is needed is a preclean method compatible with metal deposition that does not use a plasma.
What is needed is a desorb method compatible with low-k materials such as polymer materials, and fluorine or carbon containing oxides.
What is needed is a preclean method compatible with low-k materials such as polymer materials, and fluorine or carbon containing oxides.
What is needed is a desorb method compatible with metal deposition which is less expensive.
What is needed is a preclean method compatible with metal deposition which is less expensive.
A method of depositing a metal film on a substrate includes a supercritical preclean step, a supercritical desorb step, and a metal deposition step. Preferably, the preclean step comprises maintaining supercritical carbon dioxide and a chelating agent in contact with the substrate in order to remove an oxide layer from a metal surface of the substrate. More preferably, the preclean step comprises maintaining the supercritical carbon dioxide, the chelating agent, and an acid in contact with the substrate where the acid dissolves the oxide layer while the chelating agent attaches to loose metal ions and carries away the loose metal ions. Alternatively, the preclean step comprises maintaining the supercritical carbon dioxide and an amine in contact with the oxide layer where the amine dissolves the oxide layer and carries away metal ions. The desorb step comprises maintaining supercritical carbon dioxide in contact with the substrate in order to remove adsorbed material from the substrate. The metal deposition step then deposits the metal film on the substrate without exposing the substrate to an oxidizing material which oxidizes the metal surface of the precleaned substrate and without exposing the substrate to a nonvolatile adsorbing material which adsorbs to the substrate.
An apparatus for depositing the metal film on a substrate includes a transfer module, a supercritical processing module, a vacuum module, and a metal deposition module. The supercritical processing module is coupled to the transfer module. The vacuum module couples the metal deposition module to the transfer module. In operation, the apparatus for depositing the metal film performs the supercritical preclean step, the supercritical desorb step, and the metal deposition step.
The preferred method of the present invention is schematically illustrated in
The preferred method 20 comprises a supercritical preclean step 22, a supercritical desorb step 24, and a metal deposition step 26. In the supercritical preclean step 22, the substrate is maintained in a supercritical chamber and is preferably exposed to supercritical carbon dioxide and a chelating agent. The chelating agent in conjunction with the supercritical carbon dioxide reacts with an oxide on the underlying metal layer to form chelates of the underlying metal. The supercritical carbon dioxide carries away the chelates. In the supercritical desorb step 24, the substrate is maintained within the supercritical chamber and exposed to supercritical carbon dioxide, which desorbs adsorbed materials or absorbed materials from the substrate.
More preferably, the supercritical preclean step 22 comprises maintaining an acid as well as the supercritical carbon dioxide and the chelating agent in contact with the substrate. The acid acts to dissolve the oxide while the chelating agent attaches to loose metal ions and carries away the loose metal ions.
Preferably, the chelating agent is selected from the group comprising 2,4-pentane-dione, 1,1,1,6,6,6-hexafluoro-2,4-pentanedione, 1,1,1-trifluoropentane-2,4-dione, 2,6-dimethylheptane-3,5-dione,2,2,7-trimethyloctane-2,4-dione, 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-heptane-3,5-dione, ethylenediamine diacetic acid (EDTA), and nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA).
Preferably, the acid is selected from the group comprising an organic acid or an inorganic acid depending upon the particular oxide that is being precleaned. Preferably, the organic acid is used for a preclean of copper oxide. More preferably, for the preclean of copper oxide, the organic acid is selected from the group comprising acetic acid, formic acid, oxalic acid and malonic acid; alpha hydroxy acids such as glycolic acid, citric acid, malic acid or lactic acid; or amino acids such as glycine, alanine, leucine, valine, glutamine or lysine.
Preferably, the inorganic acid is used for a preclean of aluminum oxide. More preferably, for the preclean of aluminum oxide, the inorganic acid is selected from the group comprising hydrofluoric acid and buffered hydrofluoric acid formulations such as ammonium fluoride and ammonium bifluoride.
Alternatively, in the preclean step 22, the chelating agent and the acid are replaced by an amine. The amine acts to dissolve the oxide and to carry away metal ions. Preferably, the amine is selected from the group comprising triethanolamine, 2-methylaminoethanol, pyridine, 2,2′-bipyridine, and pentamethyldiethylenetriamine.
In the supercritical preclean step 22, the supercritical chamber is preferably pressurized to an elevated pressure exceeding the critical pressure and the supercritical carbon dioxide and the chelating agent are flowed over the substrate. More preferably, the supercritical carbon dioxide, the chelating agent, and the acid are flowed over the substrate. Alternatively, the supercritical carbon dioxide and the amine are flowed over the substrate.
In order to achieve supercritical conditions within the supercritical chamber, temperature within the chamber must be maintained at or above a critical temperature, which is 30.5° C. Following this, the pressure is cycled at least one and a half times between the elevated pressure and a lower pressure. Preferably, the lower pressure is above the critical pressure.
The supercritical desorb step 24 is preferably part of the supercritical preclean step 22. Gases and liquids adsorbed to the substrate or absorbed within the substrate will desorb during the supercritical preclean step 22. Elevating the temperature within the chamber is anticipated to improve the supercritical desorb step 24. Alternatively, the supercritical desorb step 24 is performed as a separate step, either before or after the supercritical preclean step 22.
Preferably, during the supercritical preclean and desorb steps, 22 and 24, the temperature within the chamber is within the range of 31 and 100° C. Alternatively, the temperature within the chamber is maintained below a temperature limit of the substrate.
The metal deposition step 26 comprises depositing the metal film on the substrate. Preferably, the substrate includes the via holes to the underlying metal layer. The metal deposition step 26 preferably deposits the metal film within the via holes so that the metal film contacts the underlying metal layer. Preferably, the metal deposition step 26 is a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. Alternatively, the metal deposition step 26 is a physical vapor deposition (PVD) process.
It is important that between the supercritical preclean, supercritical desorb, and metal deposition steps, 22, 24, and 26, the substrate is not exposed to atmosphere or other gases which will form a nonvolatile adsorbate on the substrate, which will not form a nonvolatile absorbate within the substrate, or which will react with the substrate. Forming a volatile adsorbate on the substrate is not detrimental because a brief exposure to vacuum at an end of the supercritical preclean step 22 or at the end of the supercritical desorb step 24 will cause the volatile adsorbate to quickly desorb from the substrate. Similarly, forming a volatile absorbate is not detrimental because the brief exposure to vacuum will cause the volatile absorbate to quickly desorb from the substrate. Preferably, the substrate is maintained in vacuum between the supercritical preclean, supercritical desorb, and metal deposition steps, 22, 24, and 26. Alternatively, the substrate is maintained in an inert gas environment between the supercritical preclean, supercritical desorb, and metal deposition steps, 22, 24, and 26, where the inert gas environment does not form the nonvolatile adsorbate nor the nonvolatile absorbate.
By using the supercritical preclean step 22 rather than a sputter-etch preclean step, plasma damage of the substrate is avoided. Further, using the supercritical preclean step 22 rather than the sputter-etch preclean step avoids corner clipping and facet creation at edges of trenches and of via holes, avoids barreling of the trenches and of the via holes, and avoids deposition of sputtered material onto sidewalls of the trenches and of the via holes. Additionally, using the supercritical preclean step 22 rather than the sputter-etch preclean step avoids electrical damage of an integrated circuit that is fabricated on the substrate. Moreover, the supercritical preclean step 22 will cause less damage to polymer based dielectric materials than the sputter-etch preclean step.
Using the supercritical desorb step 24 rather than heating the substrate under vacuum to degas the substrate avoids use of excessive temperature in processing the substrate, which is especially important for the polymer based dielectric materials.
Depending on specific process requirements, either the supercritical preclean step 22 or the supercritical desorb step 24 may be unneeded. In a first alternative method of the present invention, the supercritical preclean step 22 and the metal deposition step 26 are performed but the supercritical desorb step 24 is not performed. In a second alternative method of the present invention the supercritical desorb step 24 and the metal deposition step 26 are performed but the supercritical preclean step 22 is not performed. In a third alternative method of the present invention, the metal deposition step 26 of the second alternative method is replaced by an alternative deposition step. In the alternative deposition step, a film other than the metal film is deposited on the substrate.
A fourth alternative method of the present invention is schematically illustrated in
The preferred metal deposition cluster tool of the present invention is illustrated in
The loader module 42, the front transfer module robot 46, the first through fourth supercritical modules, 48–51, are coupled to the front transfer module. The back transfer module 52 is coupled to the front transfer module via a valve 66. The back transfer module robot 54 and the first through fourth metal deposition modules 56–59 are coupled to the back transfer module 52.
In operation, first and second front opening unit pods (FOUP's), 68 and 70, employing a standard mechanical interface (SMIF) concept couple with the loader module 42. Preferably, the first pod 68 initially contains semiconductor substrates 72 which were etched, ashed, and cleaned in a wet clean process. The loader robot 64 transfers a semiconductor substrate 72 from the first pod 68 to the first loadlock 60. The loadlock 60 closes and is pumped to vacuum. The loadlock 60 is then opened to the front transfer module 46, which is at vacuum. The front transfer module robot 46 transfers the semiconductor substrate 72 to the first supercritical module 48 where the supercritical preclean and desorb steps, 22 and 24 (
Once the supercritical preclean and desorb steps, 22 and 24, are complete, the semiconductor substrate 72 is transferred from the first supercritical module 48 to the back transfer module robot 52 through the valve 66. The back transfer module 52 also operates at vacuum. The back transfer module robot 54 then transfers the semiconductor substrate 72 to the first metal deposition module 56 where the metal deposition step 26 (
Once the metal deposition step 26 is complete, the semiconductor substrate 72 is transferred from the first metal deposition module 56 to the first transfer module robot 46 by the second transfer module robot 54. The first transfer module robot 46 then transfers the semiconductor substrate 72 to the first loadlock 60, which is pressurized to atmosphere. The semiconductor substrate 72 is then transferred by the loader module robot 46 to the first pod 68. Subsequently, the additional semiconductor substrates are transferred from the second through third metal deposition modules, 57–59, to the first pod 68. Later, more semiconductor substrates are processed from the second pod 70 and then returned to the second pod 70.
It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that more or less supercritical processing modules can be coupled to front transfer module 44. Further, it will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that more or less metal deposition module can be coupled to the back transfer module 52. Moreover, it will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that a single loadlock for the front transfer module 44 will suffice for the entrance to the front transfer module 44.
In a first alternative metal deposition cluster tool, the front transfer module 44 operates at atmospheric pressure and provides an inert gas environment for the semiconductor wafer. In the first alternative metal deposition cluster tool, third and fourth loadlocks couple the front transfer module 44 to the back transfer module 52. Also in the first alternative metal deposition cluster tool, an inert gas injection arrangement is coupled to the front transfer module.
In a second alternative metal deposition cluster tool, the first and second supercritical processing modules, 48 and 49, and the first and second metal deposition modules, 56 and 57, are coupled to a single transfer module. The first alternative metal deposition tool is less preferred than the preferred metal deposition tool 40 because the preferred metal deposition tool separates the supercritical processing modules from the metal deposition modules by arranging the modules about respective transfer modules. This allows for a cleaner metal deposition process The first alternative metal deposition tool is taught in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/704,641 filed on Nov. 1, 2000, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that other various modifications may be made to the preferred embodiment without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This Patent Application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/841,800, filed Apr. 24, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,890,853, entitled “METHOD OF DEPOSITING METAL FILM AND METAL DEPOSITION CLUSTER TOOL INCLUDING SUPERCRITICAL DRYING/CLEANING MODULE.” This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/199,580 filed on Apr. 25, 2000, which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2439689 | Hyde et al. | Apr 1948 | A |
2617719 | Stewart | Nov 1952 | A |
2993449 | Harland | Jul 1961 | A |
3135211 | Pezzillo | Jun 1964 | A |
3642020 | Payne | Feb 1972 | A |
3890176 | Bolon | Jun 1975 | A |
3900551 | Bardoncelli et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4029517 | Rand | Jun 1977 | A |
4091643 | Zucchini | May 1978 | A |
4219333 | Harris | Aug 1980 | A |
4341592 | Shortes et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4349415 | DeFilippi et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4474199 | Blaudszun | Oct 1984 | A |
4475993 | Blander et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4592306 | Gallego | Jun 1986 | A |
4601181 | Privat | Jul 1986 | A |
4670126 | Messer et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4693777 | Hazano et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4749440 | Blackwood et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4788043 | Kagiyama et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4825808 | Takahashi et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838476 | Rahn | Jun 1989 | A |
4865061 | Fowler et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4877530 | Moses | Oct 1989 | A |
4879004 | Oesch et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4917556 | Stark et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923828 | Gluck et al. | May 1990 | A |
4924892 | Kiba et al. | May 1990 | A |
4925790 | Blanch et al. | May 1990 | A |
4933404 | Beckman et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4944837 | Nishikawa et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4951601 | Maydan et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4960140 | Ishijima et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4983223 | Gessner | Jan 1991 | A |
5011542 | Weil | Apr 1991 | A |
5013366 | Jackson et al. | May 1991 | A |
5068040 | Jackson | Nov 1991 | A |
5071485 | Matthews et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5091207 | Tanaka | Feb 1992 | A |
5105556 | Kurokawa et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5143103 | Basso et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5158704 | Fulton et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5174917 | Monzyk | Dec 1992 | A |
5185058 | Cathey, Jr. | Feb 1993 | A |
5185296 | Morita et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186718 | Tepman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5193560 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5196134 | Jackson | Mar 1993 | A |
5201960 | Starov | Apr 1993 | A |
5213619 | Jackson et al. | May 1993 | A |
5215592 | Jackson | Jun 1993 | A |
5225173 | Wai | Jul 1993 | A |
5236602 | Jackson | Aug 1993 | A |
5237824 | Pawliszyn | Aug 1993 | A |
5238671 | Matson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250078 | Saus et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261965 | Moslehi | Nov 1993 | A |
5266205 | Fulton et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267455 | Dewees et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5269815 | Schlenker et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5269850 | Jackson | Dec 1993 | A |
5274129 | Natale et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5285352 | Pastore et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5288333 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290361 | Hayashida et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5294261 | McDermott et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5298032 | Schlenker et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5304515 | Morita et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306350 | Hoy et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312882 | DeSimone et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313965 | Palen | May 1994 | A |
5314574 | Takahashi | May 1994 | A |
5316591 | Chao et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320742 | Fletcher et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328722 | Ghanayem et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5334332 | Lee | Aug 1994 | A |
5334493 | Fujita et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5337446 | Smith et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339844 | Standford, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352327 | Witowski | Oct 1994 | A |
5355901 | Mielnik et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356538 | Wai et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364497 | Chau et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368171 | Jackson | Nov 1994 | A |
5370740 | Chao et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370741 | Bergman | Dec 1994 | A |
5370742 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377705 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5397220 | Akihisa et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5401322 | Marshall | Mar 1995 | A |
5403621 | Jackson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5403665 | Alley et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412958 | Iliff et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417768 | Smith, Jr. et al. | May 1995 | A |
5456759 | Stanford, Jr. et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5470393 | Fukazawa | Nov 1995 | A |
5474812 | Truckenmuller et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482564 | Douglas et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486212 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5494526 | Paranjpe | Feb 1996 | A |
5500081 | Bergman | Mar 1996 | A |
5501761 | Evans et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505219 | Lansberry et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509431 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514220 | Wetmore et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522938 | O'Brien | Jun 1996 | A |
5526834 | Mielnik et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533538 | Marshall | Jul 1996 | A |
5547774 | Gimzewski et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550211 | DeCrosta et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5580846 | Hayashida et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589082 | Lin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589105 | DeSimone et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5629918 | Ho et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632847 | Ohno et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635463 | Muraoka | Jun 1997 | A |
5637151 | Schulz | Jun 1997 | A |
5641887 | Beckman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656097 | Olesen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665527 | Allen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669251 | Townsend et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676705 | Jureller et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679169 | Gonzales et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679171 | Saga et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683473 | Jureller et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683977 | Jureller et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688879 | DeSimone | Nov 1997 | A |
5700379 | Biebl | Dec 1997 | A |
5714299 | Combes et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725987 | Combes et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726211 | Hedrick et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730874 | Wai et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736425 | Smith et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739223 | DeSimone | Apr 1998 | A |
5766367 | Smith et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783082 | DeSimone et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797719 | James et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798438 | Sawan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5804607 | Hedrick et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807607 | Smith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5847443 | Cho et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5866005 | DeSimone et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868856 | Douglas et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868862 | Douglas et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872061 | Lee et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872257 | Beckman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873948 | Kim | Feb 1999 | A |
5881577 | Sauer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882165 | Maydan et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888050 | Fitzgerald et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893756 | Berman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896870 | Huynh et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
5904737 | Preston et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908510 | McCullough et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5928389 | Jevtic | Jul 1999 | A |
5932100 | Yager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5934856 | Asakawa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944996 | DeSimone et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954101 | Drube et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955140 | Smith et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965025 | Wai et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976264 | McCullough et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979306 | Fujikawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980648 | Adler | Nov 1999 | A |
5992680 | Smith | Nov 1999 | A |
5994696 | Tai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005226 | Aschner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017820 | Ting et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021791 | Dryer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024801 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037277 | Masakara et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6063714 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067728 | Farmer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077321 | Adachi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099619 | Lansbarkis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100198 | Grieger et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110232 | Chen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114044 | Houston et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128830 | Bettcher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140252 | Cho | Oct 2000 | A |
6149828 | Vaartstra | Nov 2000 | A |
6171645 | Smith et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186722 | Shirai | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200943 | Romack et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216364 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224774 | DeSimone et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228563 | Starov et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228826 | DeYoung et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232238 | Chang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232417 | Rhodes et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235634 | White et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239038 | Wen | May 2001 | B1 |
6242165 | Vaartstra | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244121 | Hunter | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251250 | Keigler | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255732 | Yokoyama et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262510 | Lungu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270531 | DeYoung et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6270948 | Sato et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277753 | Mullee et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284558 | Sakamoto | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286231 | Bergman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306564 | Mullee | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319858 | Lee et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331487 | Koch | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6333268 | Starov et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343503 | Goh | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6344243 | McClain et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358673 | Namatsu | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361696 | Spiegelman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367491 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380105 | Smith et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425956 | Cotte et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436824 | Chooi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454945 | Weigl et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458494 | Song et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6461967 | Wu et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6465403 | Skee | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485895 | Choi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486078 | Rangarajan et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492090 | Nishi et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500605 | Mullee et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508259 | Tseronis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6509141 | Mullee | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6537916 | Mullee et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6558475 | Jur et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6562146 | DeYoung et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6592938 | Pessey et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6596093 | DeYoung et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6635565 | Wu et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641678 | DeYoung et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6764552 | Joyce et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6890853 | Biberger et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7044143 | DeYoung et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20010019857 | Yokoyama et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010024247 | Nakata | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010029971 | Farmer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041455 | Yun et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041458 | Ikakura | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001929 | Biberger et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014257 | Chandra et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020055323 | McClain et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020074289 | Sateria et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020081533 | Simons et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088477 | Cotte et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098680 | Goldstein et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106867 | Yang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112740 | DeYoung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112746 | DeYoung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115022 | Messick et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117391 | Beam | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123229 | Ono et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020127844 | Grill et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020132192 | Namatsu | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141925 | Wong et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020142595 | Chiou | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150522 | Heim et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164873 | Masuda et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170671 | Matsushita et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003762 | Cotte et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030008238 | Goldfarb et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030008518 | Chang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013311 | Chang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036023 | Moreau et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030047533 | Reid et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051741 | DeSimone et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030106573 | Masuda et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125225 | Xu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172954 | Verhaverbeke | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198895 | Toma et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205510 | Jackson | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217764 | Masuda et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040011386 | Seghal | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040020518 | DeYoung et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040087457 | Korzenski et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103922 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112409 | Schilling | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134515 | Castrucci | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177867 | Schilling | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211440 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040259357 | Saga | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060003592 | Gale et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
39 04 514 | Aug 1990 | DE |
40 04 111 | Aug 1990 | DE |
39 06 724 | Sep 1990 | DE |
39 06 735 | Sep 1990 | DE |
39 06 737 | Sep 1990 | DE |
44 29 470 | Mar 1995 | DE |
43 44 021 | Jun 1995 | DE |
198 60 084 | Jul 2000 | DE |
0 244 951 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0 272 141 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0 283 740 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 302 345 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0 370 233 | May 1990 | EP |
0 391 035 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 518 653 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0 536 752 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 572 913 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0 587 168 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0 620 270 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 679 753 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 711 864 | May 1996 | EP |
0 726 099 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0 727 711 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0 822 583 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0 829 312 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 836 895 | Apr 1998 | EP |
2 193 482 | Feb 1988 | GB |
56-142629 | Nov 1981 | JP |
60-192333 | Sep 1985 | JP |
60-238479 | Nov 1985 | JP |
60-246635 | Dec 1985 | JP |
61-231166 | Oct 1986 | JP |
62-125619 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-303059 | Dec 1988 | JP |
1-045131 | Feb 1989 | JP |
1-246835 | Oct 1989 | JP |
2-148841 | Jun 1990 | JP |
2-209729 | Aug 1990 | JP |
2-304941 | Dec 1990 | JP |
7-142333 | Jun 1995 | JP |
8-186140 | Jul 1996 | JP |
8-222508 | Aug 1996 | JP |
10-144757 | May 1998 | JP |
2000-106358 | Apr 2000 | JP |
WO 8707309 | Dec 1987 | WO |
WO 9006189 | Jun 1990 | WO |
WO 9013675 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO 9112629 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9314255 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9314259 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9320116 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 9627704 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 99186603 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9949998 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0073241 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0110733 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0133613 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0133615 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0209894 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0211191 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0216051 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040229449 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60199580 | Apr 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09841800 | Apr 2001 | US |
Child | 10870871 | US |