Method of making an integrated circuit interconnect

Abstract
A method of encapsulating metal lines (130, 132, 134, 136, 138) by implantation of dopants to form surface regions (131, 133, 135, 137, 139) after the metal lines have been fabricated. The surface regions may act as passivation layers and electromigration inhibitors and so forth.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates. to semiconductor devices, and, more particularly, to integrated circuit interconnects and methods of fabrication.




Integrated circuits typically include field effect transistors with source/drains formed in a silicon substrate and insulated gates on the substrate together with multiple overlying metal (or polysilicon) interconnects formed in levels. An insulating layer lies between the gates/sources/drains and the interconnects formed from the first metal level (premetal dielectric) and also between successive metal levels (intermetal-level dielectric). Vertical vias in the insulating layers filled with metal (or polysilicon) provide connections between interconnects formed in adjacent metal levels and also between the gate/source/drain and the first metal level interconnects.




Typically the metal interconnects are made of aluminum due to its high conductivity and ease of fabrication. However, poor electromigration and stress voiding characteristics have driven the need to improve the reliability of aluminum interconnects. Alloying, dopant precipitation and intermetallic reaction layer formation affect electromigration, stress-migration robustness and mechanical properties of aluminum films. The simplest approach is to dope the aluminum with small amounts (0.5-4% by weight) of copper. Alloys with high copper content are difficult to etch and also have a tendency for whisker formation depending on the nature of the intermetallic precipitates that are formed. Excessive copper leads to etch residues and an increased tendency for metallic corrosion. These typically constrain the copper doping to below 2%.




Reliability of aluminum interconnects is improved by sandwiching the aluminum between other materials such as TiN and Ti. TiN reduces the tendency for hillock/void formation, serves as an anti-reflection coating to ease patterning, provides a current shunting path if voids are indeed formed, improves the texture of the aluminum, prevents stress migration at vias, and acts as a barrier to prevent interaction between the aluminum and other materials in the device structure. Titanium improves the texture of the aluminum and reacts with aluminum to form an intermetallic with improved electromigration characteristics. Preferred crystallographic orientation has long been recognized to playt an important role in interconnect reliability (i.e., thermal hillocks, grain collapse, stress voiding, and electromigration). A strong (111) texture improves electromigration lifetime. Deposition conditions and the presence of underlayers have the greatest influence on texture. As linewidths are scaled to below 0.5 μm, the percentage of Al surface area that is encapsulated with Ti and TiN gets smaller, and the effectiveness of this approach diminishes. For a 0.35 μm wide line, only the top and bottom surfaces can be protected with Ti/TiN layers, while the sides (0.6 μm tall) remain bare. Metal stacks are also harder to etch since a multiple step etch. with high selectivity to the underlayers is necessary.




Deposition conditions can also improve interconnect reliability. Higher deposition temperatures incrase grain size (electromigration performance is typically superior for larger grain sizes), but contact/via reliability can degrade. for high thermal budget processes. Thus there is a need for a method that provides complete Al encapsulation. One approach treats aluminum lines with a wet chemical bath of H


2


O


2


to oxidize the surfaces for passivation.




In general, addition of dopants (e.g., arsenic, antimony, metals, oxygen, nitrogen, and fluorine) into aluminum can modify electrical and mechanical properties. For example, arsenic improves elecrotromigration, and fluorine reduces stress-induced hillock formation.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides doping of interconnect surface regions to encapsulate the interconnect and improve properties such as electromigration and corrosion resistance and also serves as a barrier. In particular, preferred embodiments include implants of dopants into the sidewalls of clad or unclad aluminum interconnects and dopant implants into sidewalls of trenches formed in dielectrics followed by diffusion into copper interconnects filling the trenches.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The drawings are schematic for clarity.





FIGS. 1



a-c


illustrate in cross sectional elevation views the steps of a first preferred embodiment and method.





FIGS. 2



a-b


show implant angles.





FIGS. 3



a-b


illustrate a second preferred embodiment.





FIGS. 4



a-c


show repeated use of the preferred embodiments.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




First Preferred Embodiment





FIG. 1



a-c


illustrate in cross sectional elevation view the steps of a first preferred embodiment method of metal interconnect formation during integrated circuit fabrication. In particular, start with the partially fabricated circuit of

FIG. 1



a


which includes polysilicon gate


104


and field oxide


106


on silicon substrate


102


and overlying premetal level dielectric (PMD)


110


(which may be silicon dioxide). Metal (e.g., tungsten) filled vias


122


-


124


extending through PMD


110


and blanket clad aluminum metal layer including TiN


112


, aluminum


114


, and TiN


116


covers PMD


110


. TiN


112


and


116


may each be about 50 nm thick and aluminum


114


about 0.6 μm thick.




Next, photolithographically define interconnect patterns on the clad aluminum layer and anisotropically etch the clad aluminum to form interconnects


130


-


138


. Clean up after the anisotropic etch; the etch may be a chlorine based plasma etch. The interconnects may be 0.35-0.5 μm wide and 0.7 μm high with only 0.35-0.5 μm spacing between interconnects


130


-


132


-


134


and between interconnects


136


-


138


. Thus the area of exposed aluminum exceeds the area of clad aluminum at the surfaces of the interconnects, and the cladding effectively covers less than half of the aluminum surface.




Then modify the unclad vertical aluminum sidewall surface by ion implantation. See

FIG. 1



c


illustrating dopant implantation at angle θ tilted from the normal to the substrate; the implants form modified surface regions


131


,


133


,


135


,


137


, and


139


in the vertical sidewalls of the aluminum interconnects


130


,


132


,


134


,


136


, and


138


, respectively. Because interconnects tend to be laid out generally parallel to an edge of the integrated circuit's rectangular die, four angled implants with one implant angled in each of the four directions parallel the die edges suffice for good sidewall coverage.

FIG. 1



c


shows just one of the four implants; a second implant would have ions directed generally from upper righthand to lower lefthand in

FIG. 1



c


; and the other two implants would be directed at angles into and out of the plane of the figure. Alternatively, the wafer may be rotated to implant all exposed surfaces.




The implant dose for each of the four angled implants will be on the order of 10


15


atoms/cm


2


at a low energy such as 5-40 KeV. Dopants such as As, Sb, Si, Ti, O, N, F, . . . will have projected ranges of roughly 1-30 nm with the lighter ions having greater projected ranges for equal energies. This yields a surface region of doping concentration roughly 4×10


20


/cm


3


, or about 1% atomic. Such a concentration suffices to significantly modify the electrical and mechanical characteristics of aluminum and forms an encapsulation for the aluminum interconnect but has little effect on dielectric


110


, cladding on the aluminum, or the net resistance of the interconnect. Further, the top cladding on the aluminum could be omitted and the implanted dopants also provide the aluminum top surface encapsulation.




A thermal anneal (e.g., 200-450° C.) may be necessary after implantation to induce chemical reaction between the dopant and the metal in the modified surface layer and form the encapsulation of the interconnect. In particular, implanting As into aluminum yields a surface aluminum arsenide type region which helps suppress electromigration.




Similarly, implanting oxygen or nitrogen into aluminum gives a surface region of aluminum oxides or nitrides which passivate the surface.




Implantations of two or more types of dopants yield more complex modified surface layers which may provide more involved characteristics.





FIGS. 2



a-b


show the determination of the implant angle: (1) first, increasing the tilt angle θ increases the fraction of the implant lodging in (unshadowed) vertical sidewalls instead of horizontal surfaces, thus the greater the tilt angle the better the implant efficacy; and (2) most (e.g, at least 75%) of the exposed aluminum sidewall area should be implanted to achieve the desired effects, but this imposes an upper limit on the implant angle tilt due to shadowing by adjacent interconnects. For example, with a spacing between interconnects of about 0.35 μm and interconnects of height about 0.7 μm, the tilt angle for the implant should be about arctan(0.35/0.7) (about 26.5°) for full sidewall coverage as illustrated in

FIG. 2



a


. If only a portion of the sidewall need be implanted, then the angle is determined from the fraction of the sidewall implanted: the fraction equals Wcotθ/H with W the spacing between the sidewall and the adjacent shadowing structure of height H; see

FIG. 2



b


. These larger angle implants can be performed in special large angle ion implanters.




Second Preferred Embodiment





FIGS. 3



a-b


illustrate a second preferred embodiment method of tilted angle implant to affect metal surface properties, although the ions are originally implanted into the dielectric and then migrate into the metal after the metal deposition and anneal. In particular, form grooves of depth 0.7 μm and width 0.35 μm in dielectric


302


, and then implant Mg ions of dose 10


5


atoms/cm


2


at a low energy such as 5-20 KeV in each of the four tilt dirctions plus also implant with zero tilt to cover the bottom of the grooves. Again, the implant tilt angle for this height-to-width ratio is about 26.5; the illustration of implant angles in

FIGS. 2



a-b


still applies.

FIG. 3



a


shows sidewall implanted regions


310


, bottom implanted regions


312


, and top surface implanted regions


314


. Note that the angled implants also contribute to the surface regions


314


and to the bottom regions


312


if the groove is along the plane of the tilt direction. Thus very roughly the surface regions


314


have five times the dose of the sidewall regions


310


, and the bottom regions


312


have about three times the dose of the sidewall regions


310


. In fact, the zero tilt implant may be omitted if the angled implant sufficiently covers the groove bottoms.




After the Mg implant, fill the grooves with copper


320


by a blanket copper deposition followed by etchback. Then anneal at 200-350° C. to diffuse the Mg out of dielectric


302


into surface regions


322


of copper


320


to form Cu:Mg which encapsulates the copper surface; see

FIG. 3



b


. Dopants tend to segregate at interfaces; this phenomenom aids dopant diffusion and subsequent reaction at the dielectric-metal interface. The encapsulation serves as a diffusion, oxidation and corrosion barrier for the copper interconnects.




Multiple Metal Layers Preferred Embodiment





FIGS. 4



a-c


show two successive applications of the preferred embodiments for encapsulation of two successive metal levels. In particular,

FIG. 4



a


shows implanting dopants into the surfaces of dielectric


410


which contains trenches


412


-


416


. Next, a blanket metal deposition followed by chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) fills the trenches with metal and planarizes the surface to yield interconnects


422


-


426


in trenches


412


-


416


as illustrated in

FIG. 4



b


. An anneal (temperature depending upon the metal used) diffuses the dopants from the dielectric to react with and encapsulate metal interconnects


422


-


426


. Then deposit planar dielectric


430


and form metal-filled vias


432


, deposit a metal layer and pattern it to form interconnects


442


-


446


. Lastly, implant dopants to encapsulate interconnects


442


-


446


as shown in

FIG. 4



c.






Modifications




Modifications of the preferred embodiments feature of surface region modification after interconnect formation to encapsulate the interconnect include:




Use of different interconnect metals and dopants; application to structures other than interconnects; implantation of the surface region dopants through a thin layer deposited on the metal surface; various implant doses such as from low doses about 10


4


/cm


2


to high doses about 10


6


/cm


2


; multiple implants for multiple dopants; different interconnect. sizes and aspect ratios; and so forth.



Claims
  • 1. A method of encapsulating clad metal structures in an integrated circuit comprising the steps of:(a) providing a partially formed integrated circuit with a clad metal structure including a first metal structure and a cladding metal on a top horizontal surface of the first metal; and (b) implanting dopants into exposed first metal vertical sidewalls of said clad metal structure to form vertical surface regions of first metal-dopant mixtures.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:(a) after said implanting dopants, annealing said clad metal structure with said implanted dopants.
US Referenced Citations (32)
Number Name Date Kind
3682729 Gukelberger, Jr. et al. Aug 1972 A
3887994 Ku et al. Jun 1975 A
4161470 Calundann Jul 1979 A
4351918 Charbonneau et al. Sep 1982 A
4473682 Calundann et al. Sep 1984 A
4482394 Heinecke Nov 1984 A
4539386 Yoon Sep 1985 A
4626371 Ikenaga Dec 1986 A
4680584 Ho et al. Jul 1987 A
4720424 Eickman et al. Jan 1988 A
4742014 Hooper et al. May 1988 A
4746694 Charbonneau et al. May 1988 A
4920197 Hayashi et al. Apr 1990 A
4942138 Miki Jul 1990 A
4987099 Flanner Jan 1991 A
5047359 Nagatomo Sep 1991 A
5071518 Pan Dec 1991 A
5118636 Hosaka Jun 1992 A
5130274 Harper et al. Jul 1992 A
5156985 Yamada et al. Oct 1992 A
5158901 Kosa et al. Oct 1992 A
5236866 Yasue Aug 1993 A
5312774 Nakamura et al. May 1994 A
5391517 Gelatos et al. Feb 1995 A
5399527 Tabara Mar 1995 A
5409848 Han et al. Apr 1995 A
5426063 Kaneko et al. Jun 1995 A
5439835 Gonzalez Aug 1995 A
5459086 Yang Oct 1995 A
5488004 Yang Jan 1996 A
5595935 Chan et al. Jan 1997 A
5670420 Choi Sep 1997 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2 165 692 Apr 1986 GB
63-36633 Jul 1988 JP
63210309 Feb 1990 JP