1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to integrated circuit fabrication and, more particularly, to masking techniques.
2. Description of the Related Art
As a consequence of many factors, including demand for increased portability, computing power, memory capacity and energy efficiency in modern electronics, integrated circuits are continuously being reduced in size. To facilitate this size reduction, the sizes of the constituent features, such as electrical devices and interconnect line widths, that form the integrated circuits are also constantly being decreased.
The trend of decreasing feature size is evident, for example, in memory circuits or devices such as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), static random access memories (SRAMs), ferroelectric (FE) memories, etc. To take one example, DRAM typically comprises millions of identical circuit elements, known as memory cells. In its most general form, a memory cell typically consists of two electrical devices: a storage capacitor and an access field effect transistor. Each memory cell is an addressable location that can store one bit (binary digit) of data. A bit can be written to a cell through the transistor and read by sensing charge on the storage electrode from the reference electrode side. By decreasing the sizes of constituent electrical devices and the conducting lines that access them, the sizes of the memory devices incorporating these features can be decreased. Additionally, storage capacities can be increased by fitting more memory cells into the memory devices.
The continual reduction in feature sizes places ever greater demands on techniques used to form the features. For example, photolithography is commonly used to pattern features, such as conductive lines, on a substrate. The concept of pitch can be used to describe the size of these features. Pitch is defined as the distance between an identical point in two neighboring features. These features are typically defined by spaces between adjacent features, which are typically filled by a material, such as an insulator. As a result, pitch can be viewed as the sum of the width of a feature and of the width of the space separating that feature from a neighboring feature. Due to factors such as optics and light or radiation wavelength, however, photolithography techniques each have a minimum pitch below which a particular photolithographic technique cannot reliably form features. Thus, the minimum pitch of a photolithographic technique can limit feature size reduction.
“Pitch doubling” is one method proposed for extending the capabilities of photolithographic techniques beyond their minimum pitch. Such a method is illustrated in
It will be appreciated that while the pitch is actually halved in the example above, this reduction in pitch is conventionally referred to as pitch “doubling,” or, more generally, pitch “multiplication.” That is, conventionally “multiplication” of pitch by a certain factor actually involves reducing the pitch by that factor. The conventional terminology is retained herein.
The critical dimension of a mask scheme or circuit design is the scheme's minimum feature dimension. Due to factors such as geometric complexity and different requirements for critical dimensions in different parts of an integrated circuit, typically not all features of the integrated circuit will be pitch multiplied. Consequently, pitch multiplied features will often need to be connected to or otherwise aligned with respect to non-pitch multiplied features in some part of the integrated circuit. Because these non-pitch multiplied features generally have larger critical dimensions than the pitch multiplied features, the margin of error for aligning the non-pitch multiplied features to contact the pitch multiplied features can be small. Moreover, because the critical dimensions of pitch-multiplied lines may be near the resolution and/or overlay limits of many photolithographic techniques, shorting neighboring pitch multiplied features is an ever-present possibility. Such shorts can undesirably cause the integrated circuit to malfunction.
Accordingly, there is a need for methods which allow increased margins of error for forming contacts between features of different sizes, especially for forming contacts between pitch multiplied and non-pitch multiplied features.
According to one aspect of the invention, a method is provided for forming an integrated circuit. The method comprises providing a substrate with an overlying temporary layer and a photodefinable layer overlying the temporary layer. A pattern is formed in the photodefinable layer and transferred to the temporary layer to form a plurality of placeholders in the temporary layer. A blanket layer of spacer material is then deposited over the plurality of placeholders. The spacer material is selectively removed from horizontal surfaces. The placeholders are selectively removed relative to the spacer material to form a plurality of spacer loops. The spacer loops are etched to form a pattern of separated spacers. An other photodefinable layer is formed around and on the same level as the separated spacers. Interconnects are patterned in the other photodefinable layer. The interconnects are wider than the spacers and contact the spacers and are aligned with one long side of the interconnects inset from or collinear with a corresponding long side of the spacers.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for semiconductor fabrication. The method comprises providing a substrate and forming an elongated spacer over the substrate by pitch multiplication. A photoresist line is then formed. The photoresist line is in contact with an end of the spacer in a contact region. The spacer forms a boundary for only two faces of the photoresist line in the contact region.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a process is provided for fabricating an integrated circuit. The process comprises forming a first plurality of mask lines and forming a photodefinable layer around the mask lines. The photodefinable layer has a thickness less than a height of the mask lines. A plurality of features is patterned in the photodefinable layer.
According to another aspect of the invention, a partially fabricated integrated circuit is provided. The partially fabricated integrated circuit comprises a substrate and a first plurality of mask lines overlying the substrate. A photodefinable layer contacts the mask lines. The photodefinable layer has a thickness less than a height of the mask lines.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, an integrated circuit is provided. The integrated circuit comprises a plurality of interconnects, each having a first portion with a first width in an array region and a second portion with a second width in a periphery region. The second width is larger than the first width. An end of each of the second interconnect portions contacts an end of each of the first interconnect portions. One side of each of the second interconnect portions, extending along a length of one of the second interconnect portions, is substantially collinear with or inset from one side of each of the first interconnect portions, extending along a length of one of the first interconnect portions.
According to another aspect of the invention, an integrated circuit is provided. The integrated circuit comprises a plurality of interconnects each having a first portion and a second portion. The first portion of the interconnects are substantially parallel to each other between first and second spaced planes extending perpendicular to the lines. In addition, the first portion and the second portion contact in an overlap region. Only one corner of the second portion protrudes beyond a side of the first portion in the overlap region.
The invention will be better understood from the Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments and from the appended drawings, which are meant to illustrate and not to limit the invention, and wherein:
Typically, separately defined features contacting lines are nominally centered perfectly on the lines to maximize the separation of the features from neighboring pitch-multiplied lines.
Various types of misalignments can occur in the overlap region 93 in which the lines 91 and 92 contact, however. For example, the lines 92 may all be misaligned in one direction. Because the lines 92 are wider than the space separating the lines 91, a single line 92 can short two lines 91 if the misalignment is severe. Another form of misalignment can occur when a line 92 is skewed in one direction, relative to other lines 92. This can also cause a short if neighboring lines 92 contact. In reality, all these forms of misalignments can occur concurrently. In addition, because the lines 91 are also formed with a certain margin of error in size and location, any misalignment of the lines 92 may be exacerbated by misalignments or deviations in size of the lines 91. Thus, to minimize the possibility of shorts or otherwise sub-optimal contacts, the tolerances for misalignments of the lines 92 and 91 are preferably large. For lines 92 and 94 each having a given width, the distances 94 between each line 92 and each line 91 and the distances 95 between neighboring lines 92 are preferably each maximized to maximize tolerances. More preferably, both of the distances 94 and 95 are maximized. It will be appreciated that the same principles apply when the features are contacts, contact pads or other features that are to be kept separate.
Reference will now be made to the Figures, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout. It will be appreciated that the Figures are not necessarily drawn to scale.
With reference initially to
Thus, preferably only one corner 96 of the wider second feature protrudes substantially beyond the narrow first feature. As discussed below, the protruding corner 96 can be formed rounded. By utilizing this rounding, the distance, e.g., distance 94, between neighboring features, e.g., the lines 91 and 92, in the overlap region, e.g., region 93, can be increased relative to lines 92 without rounding.
Moreover, as also discussed below, the second feature is preferably formed in photoresist by photolithography. The photoresist is preferably formed below the vertical height of the first feature, as illustrated in
Advantageously, any misalignments can be weighted in one direction, e.g., in the direction of the sides 91b, while still maintaining an adequate distance 94 between lines 92 and 91. Moreover, the photoresist can be overdeveloped to narrow the second features to further minimize the possibility of shorting. It will be appreciated that the overdevelopment can include any process which reduces the critical dimension of the lines 92. For example, the overdevelopment can include extending the development period and/or performing an additional treatment or technique to controllably remove resist, e.g., partially exposed resist. For example, the overdevelopment can remove resist in the exposure threshold or “gray” area between the area fully exposed to radiation transmitted through the reticle and lens system and the area that is “dark” or exposed to a light intensisty below the exposure threshold for the resist.
While not limited by theory, three effects have been found to be advantageously present in the preferred embodiments. It will be appreciated that each of these effects are independently advantageous and are not each necessarily present in all embodiments. Nevertheless, all three effects can be found in particularly advantageous embodiments.
Preferably, the first mask features, such as the lines 91, are first formed and then the second mask features, such as the lines 92, are overlaid the first features. The second features are preferably patterned in photoresist that overlaps the first features. It will be appreciated that the photoresist is typically patterned by being exposed to radiation through a reticle and then developed. In the case of negative photoresist, radiation, e.g., light, is focused on parts of the photoresist which are to be retained, e.g., on the areas where the lines 92 are to be formed. Typically, the radiation activates a photosensitive compound, e.g., a photo-induced acid generator (PAG), which decreases the solubility of the photoresist, e.g., by causing it to polymerize. Such photoactivated chemicals, however, can diffuse, thereby causing the lines 92 to expand to areas that are not irradiated. In addition to decreasing the precision with which the lines 92 are formed, this diffusion can also cause the lines 92 to expand, thereby decreasing alignment tolerances by decreasing distances 94 between the lines 91 and 92.
In the preferred embodiments, the photoresist is preferably formed at a level below the top of the first mask features, such as the lines 91. The photoresist is then patterned to form the second features. Advantageously, in this arrangement, the first mask features act as a wall, only allowing diffusion of photogenerated acid from PAG's in a direction away from those first mask features. Thus, the misalignment tolerance in the region 93 can be increased by an amount approximately equal to the amount that the photogenerated acids would have otherwise diffused to expand the lines 92. Since diffusion can only occur in one direction, the risk of shorting from diffusion is effectively halved in the overlap region.
In addition, due to various factors, including diffusion of photogenerated acids and diffraction of radiation, photolithography will form corners that are rounded. Thus, by aligning features such as the lines 91 and 92 so that each narrow line 91 is closest to a rounded corner of a neighboring line 92, the rounding effect can be used to increase the distance between the wider lines 92 and adjacent narrower lines 91. This advantageously also increases misalignment margins by increasing corner-to-corner distances, such as the distance 94.
Also, while the preferred embodiments may be applied using any photodefinable material, including positive or negative photoresist, negative photoresist is utilized in particularly advantageous embodiments. Advantageously, by using negative photoresist to form the lines 92 and forming that photoresist below the level of the second features, such as the lines 91, the rounding effect can be increased. It will be appreciated that light reaching the photoresist between lines 91 is attenuated due to a shadowing affect caused by the presence of the taller lines 91. Moreover, this attenuation will increase with increasing distance down the lines 91 away from the ends of the lines 91. Advantageously, because the formation of the lines 92 depends upon light hitting the negative photoresist, the attenuation further rounds off and narrows the width of the lines 92 between lines 91. As a result, the distances between the wider lines 92 and the neighboring narrower lines 91 can be further increased, thereby further increasing misalignment margins.
More preferably, a combination of positive and negative photoresist is used, with the positive photoresist used in forming (preferably via a process utilizing spacers) the lines 91 and the negative photoresist using in forming the lines 92. The negative photoresist advantageously increases the rounding discussed above, while the positive photoresist advantageously allows a higher resolution relative to the negative photoresist.
With reference to
The materials for the layers 120-160 overlying the substrate 110 are preferably chosen based upon consideration of the chemistry and process conditions for the various pattern forming and pattern transferring steps discussed herein. Because the layers between a topmost selectively definable layer 120, which preferably is definable by a lithographic process, and the substrate 110 will preferably function to transfer a pattern derived from the selectively definable layer 120 to the substrate 110, the layers between the selectively definable layer 120 and the substrate 110 are preferably chosen so that they can be selectively etched relative to other exposed materials. It will be appreciated that a material is considered selectively, or preferentially, etched when the etch rate for that material is at least about 5 times greater, preferably about 10 times greater and, most preferably, at least about 40 times greater than that for surrounding materials.
In the illustrated embodiment, the selectively definable layer 120 overlies a first hard mask, or etch stop, layer 130, which overlies a temporary layer 140, which overlies a second hard mask, or etch stop, layer 150, which overlies an additional mask layer 160, which overlies the substrate 110 to be processed (e.g., etched) through a mask. Preferably, the mask through which the substrate 110 is processed is formed in the second hard mask layer 150 or in the additional mask layer 160.
It will be understood that in common methods of transferring patterns, both the mask and the underlying substrate are exposed to an etchant, which preferentially etches away the substrate material. The etchants, however, also wear away the mask materials, albeit at a slower rate. Thus, over the course of transferring a pattern, the mask can be worn away by the etchant before the pattern transfer is complete. These difficulties are exacerbated where the substrate 110 comprises multiple different materials to be etched. In such cases, the additional mask layer 160, which preferably comprises a thick layer of amorphous carbon, is desirable to prevent the mask pattern from being worn away before the pattern transfer is complete. The illustrated embodiment shows the use of the additional mask layer 160.
It will also be understood, however, that because the various layers are chosen based upon the requirements of chemistry and process conditions, one or more of the layers can be omitted in some embodiments. For example, the additional mask layer 160 can be omitted in embodiments where the substrate 110 is relatively simple, e.g., where the substrate 110 is a single layer of material and where the depth of the etch is moderate. In such cases, the second hard mask layer 150 may be a sufficient mask for transferring a pattern to the substrate 110. Similarly, for a particularly simple substrate 110, the various other layers, such the second hard mask layer 150 itself, may be omitted and overlying mask layers may be sufficient for the desired pattern transfer. The illustrated sequence of layers, however, is particularly advantageous for transferring patterns to difficult to etch substrates, such as a substrate 110 comprising multiple materials or multiple layers of materials, or for forming small and high aspect ratio features.
With reference to
The material for the first hard mask layer 130 preferably comprises an inorganic material, and exemplary materials include silicon oxide (SiO2), silicon or a dielectric anti-reflective coating (DARC), such as a silicon-rich silicon oxynitride. In the illustrated embodiment, the first hard mask layer 130 is a dielectric anti-reflective coating (DARC). The temporary layer 140 is preferably formed of amorphous carbon, which offers very high etch selectivity relative to the preferred hard mask materials. More preferably, the amorphous carbon is a form of transparent carbon that is highly transparent to light and which offers further improvements for photo alignment by being transparent to wavelengths of light used for such alignment. Deposition techniques for forming a highly transparent carbon can be found in A. Helmbold, D. Meissner, Thin Solid Films, 283 (1996) 196-203, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Advantageously, using DARCs for the first hard mask layer 130 can be particularly advantageous for forming patterns having pitches near the resolution limits of a photolithographic technique. The DARCs can enhance resolution by minimizing light reflections, thus increasing the precision with which photolithography can define the edges of a pattern. Optionally, a bottom anti-reflective coating (BARC) (not shown) can similarly be used in addition to the first hard mask layer 130 to control light reflections.
The second hard mask layer 150 preferably comprises a dielectric anti-reflective coating (DARC) (e.g., a silicon oxynitride), silicon or aluminum oxide (Al2O3). A bottom anti-reflective coating (BARC) (not shown) can optionally be used to control light reflections. In addition, like the temporary layer 140, the additional mask layer 160 is preferably formed of amorphous carbon due to its excellent etch selectivity relative to many materials.
In addition to selecting appropriate materials for the various layers, the thicknesses of the layers 120-160 are preferably chosen depending upon compatibility with the etch chemistries and process conditions described herein. For example, when transferring a pattern from an overlying layer to an underlying layer by selectively etching the underlying layer, materials from both layers are removed to some degree. Thus, the upper layer is preferably thick enough so that it is not worn away over the course of the pattern transfer.
In the illustrated embodiment, the selectively definable layer 120 is a photodefinable layer preferably between about 50-300 nm thick and, more preferably, between about 200-250 nm thick. The first hard mask layer 130 is preferably between about 100-400 nm thick and, more preferably, between about 150-300 nm thick. The temporary layer 140 is preferably between about 100-200 nm thick and, more preferably, between about 120-150 nm thick. The second hard mask layer 150 is preferably between about 20-80 nm thick and, more preferably, about 50 nm thick and the additional mask layer 160 is preferably between about 200-500 nm thick and, more preferably, about 300 nm thick.
The various layers discussed herein can be formed by various methods known to those of skill in the art. For example, various vapor deposition processes, such as chemical vapor deposition, can be used to form hard mask layers. Preferably, a low temperature chemical vapor deposition process is used to deposit the hard mask layers or any other materials, e.g., spacer material, over the mask layer 160, where the mask layer 160 is formed of amorphous silicon. Such low temperature deposition processes advantageously prevent chemical or physical disruption of the amorphous carbon layer. Spin-on-coating processes can be used to form photodefinable layers. In addition, amorphous carbon layers can be formed by chemical vapor deposition using a hydrocarbon compound, or mixtures of such compounds, as carbon precursors. Exemplary precursors include propylene, propyne, propane, butane, butylene, butadiene and acetelyne. A suitable method for forming amorphous carbon layers is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,573,030 B1, issued to Fairbairn et al. on Jun. 3, 2003, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the amorphous carbon may be doped. A suitable method for forming doped amorphous carbon is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/652,174 to Yin et al., the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In a first phase of methods in accordance with the preferred embodiments and with reference to
With reference to
The pitch of the resulting lines 124 is equal to the sum of the width of a line 124 and the width of a neighboring space 122. To minimize the critical dimensions of features formed using this pattern of lines 124 and spaces 122, the pitch is preferably at or near the limits of the photolithographic technique used to pattern the photodefinable layer 120. For example, for photolithography utilizing 248 nm light, the pitch of the lines 124 can be about 100 nm. Thus, the pitch may be at the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique and the spacer pattern discussed below can advantageously have a pitch below the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique.
As shown in
The pattern in the (modified) photodefinable layer 120 is preferably transferred to the temporary layer 140 to allow for deposition of a layer 170 of spacer material (
In the illustrated embodiment, in addition to having higher heat resistance than photoresist, the material forming the temporary layer 140 is preferably selected such that it can be selectively removed relative to the material for the spacers 175 (
The pattern in the photodefinable layer 120 is preferably first transferred to the hard mask layer 130, as shown in
The pattern in the photodefinable layer 120 is then transferred to the temporary layer 140, as shown in
Next, as shown in
As shown in
With reference to
Thus, pitch multiplication has been accomplished. In the illustrated embodiment, the pitch of the spacers 175 is roughly half that of the photoresist lines 124 and spaces 122 (
Next, in a second phase of methods according to the preferred embodiments, the loops formed by the spacers 175 are separated into individual lines. This separation is preferably accomplished by an etch that for each loop forms two separate lines of spacers 175 corresponding to two separate conductive paths in the substrate 110. It will be appreciated that more than two lines can be formed, if desired, by etching the spacers 175 at more than two locations.
To form the separate lines, a protective mask is preferably formed over parts of the lines to be retained and the exposed, unprotected parts of the spacer loops are then etched. The protective mask is then removed to leave a plurality of electrically separated lines.
With reference to
With reference to
In other embodiments, it will be appreciated that the protective layer 300 can be formed of any material that can be selectively removed, e.g., relative to the spacers 175, the layers 150-160 and the substrate 110. In those cases, the protective mask 310 can be formed in another material, e.g., photoresist, overlying the layer 300.
With reference to
With reference to
Next, in a third phase of methods according to the preferred embodiments, a second pattern is stitched or overlapped with the pattern of spacers 320. In the illustrated embodiments, the second pattern is overlaid on the spacers 320 to pattern features that will contact the features defined by the spacers 320. To form this second pattern, a photodefinable layer 400 is preferably formed around the spacers 320, as shown in
The photoresist can be deposited to the desired height using a scan coating method, such as that commercially available from Tokyo Electron Limited (TEL) of Tokyo, Japan. In other embodiments, a relatively thick layer of photoresist can be deposited and then etched back to the desired height. Preferably, the etch back does not activate PAG's or otherwise detrimentally effect the photoresist for subsequent exposure and development steps. The photodefinable layer 400 is preferably about 80% or less and, more preferably, about 75-50% of the height of the spacers 320.
A pattern corresponding to line extensions or contacts to features to be defined by the spacers 320 is next formed in the photodefinable layer 400. It will be appreciated that the photodefinable layer 400 can be patterned using any photolithographic technique, including the same photolithographic technique used to pattern the photodefinable layer 120. Preferably, the photodefinable layer 400 is patterned using a higher resolution technique than the photodefinable layer 120. For example, where the photodefinable layer 120 is patterned using 248 nm photolithography to form features having a pitch of about 100 nm, the photodefinable layer 400 can be patterned using 193 nm photolithography to form features having a pitch of about 140 nm. Preferably, the photodefinable layer 400 is patterned using a lithographic technique that allows patterning with a pitch less than that of the spacers 320. For example, electron beam lithography, which has high resolution but relatively poor alignment capabilities, can be used to pattern the photodefinable layer 400.
With reference to
In addition, the reticle can be positioned so that the features 410 align with one of their long sides 410a inset from the corresponding long sides 320a of the spacers 320 to ensure that the sides 410a do not extend beyond the sides 320a. Thus, while illustrated inset from the sides 320a a certain distance, in other embodiments, due to the limitations of photolithography, the sides 410a may be further inset from the sides 320a or may be collinear with the sides 320a. Preferably, however, a targeted or desired position of the sides 410a is collinear with or slightly inset from the sides 320a.
As known in the art, the photoresist is developed after being irradiated, leaving the pattern of features 410 shown.
With reference to
The pattern of features 410 and spacers 320 can next be transferred to the additional mask layer 160. Preferably, the additional mask layer 160 comprises a material having good etch selectivity to the material(s) of the substrate 110, and vice versa, to allow for an effective transfer and later mask removal. To transfer to the pattern, the hard mask layer 150 overlying the additional mask layer 160 is first etched (
Preferably, the substrate 110 comprises a conductor suitable for acting as electrical interconnects between electrical devices. For example, the substrate comprises doped silicon or a metal layer, such as an aluminum or copper layer. Thus, the mask lines 320 and 410 can directly correspond to the desired placement of interconnects in the substrate 110.
It will be appreciated that formation of contacts according to the preferred embodiments offers numerous advantages. For example, because the spacers 320 block photogenerated chemicals, such as acid from PAG's, from diffusing in one direction, the features 410 are prevented from growing in that direction in the region of contact with the spacers 320. Thus, the misalignment tolerance, especially in the direction in which diffusion is blocked, may be thought of as increasing by the amount that the features 410 would have otherwise expanded. In the other direction, the rounding of the corners, due partially to shadowing from the taller spacers extending above the second resist layer, also increases the misalignment tolerance by increasing the distance between the spacers 320 and the features 410. Moreover, given that diffusion is prevented in one direction, any misalignment can be weighted in that direction, since further expansion in that direction is minimized, especially where the photoresist is overdeveloped. Because the features 410 preferably contact the spacers 320 both at butting ends and from the side, a relatively high contact area can be achieved. Preferably, as illustrated, the spacers 320 form a boundary for exactly two faces of the features 410, e.g., line end faces and on one side of the features 320. Moreover, a high contact area can advantageously be maintained even after trimming by overdevelopment. For example, if the features 410 were centered on the spacers 320, trimming may leave the features 410 only contacting the spacers 320 ends. The off-set positioning above, however, allows the features 410 to contact the spacers 320 both at butting ends and from the side, thereby increasing the contact area between those two parts.
It will be appreciated that, in any of the steps described herein, transferring a pattern from a first level to a second level involves forming features in the second level that generally correspond to features on the first level. For example, the path of lines in the second level will generally follow the path of lines on the first level and the location of other features on the second level will correspond to the location of similar features on the first level. The precise shapes and sizes of features can vary from the first level to the second level, however. For example, depending upon etch chemistries and conditions, the sizes of and relative spacings between the features forming the transferred pattern can be enlarged or diminished relative to the pattern on the first level, while still resembling the same initial “pattern.” Thus, the transferred pattern is still considered to be the same pattern as the initial pattern. In contrast, forming spacers around mask features can change the pattern.
It will also be appreciated that various modifications of the illustrated embodiments are possible. For example, the pitch of the spacers 320 can be more than doubled. For example, further pitch multiplication can be accomplished by forming additional spacers around the spacers 320, then removing the spacers 320, then forming spacers around the spacers that were formerly around the spacers the 175, and so on. An exemplary method for further pitch multiplication is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,328,810 to Lowrey et al.
In addition, while illustrated equally spaced for ease of illustration, the spacers 320 or the features 410 can each be spaced at varying distances to each other. Moreover, while all are illustrated contacting the spacers 320 from the same side, some of the features 410 can be positioned on different, e.g., sides. Moreover, while illustrated parallel over their entire lengths for illustrate, the distance between the spacers 320 can vary over some or all of their lengths. Preferably, however, the spacers 320, and resulting interconnects 420, are parallel over some distance, e.g., between first and second planes 500 and 502 extending perpendicular to the spacers 320 (
Also, more than two patterns, e.g., corresponding to landing pads and interconnects, can be consolidated on a mask layer before transferring the consolidated pattern to the substrate. In some embodiments, additional mask layers can be deposited above the layer 150. For example, patterns corresponding to landing pads and additional interconnects can be transferred to a supplemental mask layer (not shown) overlying the hard mask layer 150 and then an overlying photodefinable layer (not shown) can be patterned and the pattern transferred to underlying layers. The substrate 110 can then be processed through the resulting mask pattern.
It will be appreciated that while “processing” through the various mask layers preferably involve etching an underlying layer, processing through the mask layers can involve subjecting layers underlying the mask layers to any semiconductor fabrication process. For example, processing can involve ion implantation, diffusion doping, depositing, or wet etching, etc. through the mask layers and onto underlying layers. In addition, the mask layers can be used as a stop or barrier for chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) or CMP can be performed on the mask layers to allow for both planarizing of the mask layers and etching of the underlying layers.
It will also be appreciated that while the preferred embodiments will find application in any context in which features in different mask patterns are overlaid one other, in particularly advantageous embodiments, features formed by pitch multiplication or employing spacers on soft or hard masks are “stitched” or aligned with features formed by a masking technique with a lower resolution. Preferably, pitch multiplied mask features are made to contact features formed by conventional photolithography. Thus, the pitch multiplied features preferably have a pitch below the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique used for patterning the other features. In addition, while the preferred embodiments can be used to form any integrated circuit, they are particularly advantageously applied to form devices having arrays of electrical devices, including logic or gate arrays and volatile and non-volatile memory devices such as DRAM, ROM or flash memory.
Moreover, the principles and advantages discussed herein are applicable to a variety of contexts in which two or more adjacent mask patterns are to be mated within overlapping regions.
Accordingly, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various other omissions, additions and modifications may be made to the methods and structures described above without departing from the scope of the invention. All such modifications and changes are intended to fall within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/636,317, filed Dec. 11, 2009, entitled METHOD TO ALIGN MASK PATTERNS, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/934,317, filed Sep. 2, 2004, entitled METHOD TO ALIGN MASK PATTERNS (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,655,387). The entire disclosures of these priority documents are incorporated herein by reference. This application is related to the following: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/931,772 to Abatchev et al., filed Aug. 31, 2004, entitled Critical Dimension Control; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/932,993 to Abatchev et al., filed Sep. 1, 2004, entitled Mask Material Conversion; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/934,778 to Abatchev et al., filed Sep. 2, 2004, entitled Method for Integrated Circuit Fabrication Using Pitch Multiplication; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/931,771 to Tran et al., filed Aug. 31, 2004, entitled Methods for Increasing Photo-Alignment Margins.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4234362 | Riseman | Nov 1980 | A |
4419809 | Riseman et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4432132 | Kinsbron et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4502914 | Trumpp et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508579 | Goth et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4570325 | Higuchi | Feb 1986 | A |
4648937 | Ogura et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4716131 | Okazawa et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4776922 | Bhattascharyya et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4803181 | Buchmann et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4838991 | Cote et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5013680 | Lowrey et al. | May 1991 | A |
5047117 | Roberts | Sep 1991 | A |
5053105 | Fox, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5117027 | Bernhardt et al. | May 1992 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330879 | Dennison | Jul 1994 | A |
5470661 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5514885 | Myrick | May 1996 | A |
5593813 | Kim | Jan 1997 | A |
5670794 | Manning | Sep 1997 | A |
5753546 | Koh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5789320 | Andricacos et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795830 | Cronin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5830332 | Babich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858620 | Ishibashi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5895740 | Chien et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899746 | Mukai | May 1999 | A |
5998256 | Juengling | Dec 1999 | A |
6004862 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010946 | Hisamune et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020255 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042998 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057573 | Kirsch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063688 | Doyle et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071789 | Yang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110837 | Linliu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143476 | Ye et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6207490 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211044 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6288454 | Allman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291334 | Somekh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297554 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335257 | Tseng | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348380 | Weimer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362057 | Taylor, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383907 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395613 | Juengling | May 2002 | B1 |
6423474 | Holscher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455372 | Weimer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475867 | Hui et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486066 | Cleeves et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6495870 | Sekiguchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500756 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514884 | Maeda | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522584 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534243 | Templeton | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548396 | Naik et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559017 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566280 | Meagley et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6596578 | Takeuchi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602779 | Li et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620715 | Blosse et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632741 | Clevenger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638441 | Chang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6667237 | Metzler | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673684 | Huang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686245 | Mathew et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689695 | Lui et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706571 | Yu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709807 | Hallock et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6734107 | Lai et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744094 | Forbes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762449 | Uchiyama et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773998 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6794699 | Bissey et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800930 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818141 | Plat et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6835662 | Erhardt et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6867116 | Chung | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875703 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6893972 | Rottstegge et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6916594 | Bok | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924191 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955961 | Chung | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962867 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6982494 | Anzai | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015124 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7074668 | Park et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7180182 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183205 | Hong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183597 | Doyle | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202174 | Jung | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7208379 | Venugopal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7271107 | Marks et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288445 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291560 | Parascandola et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7378727 | Caspary et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7435536 | Sandhu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442976 | Juengling | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455956 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7537866 | King Liu | May 2009 | B2 |
7655387 | Sandhu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7851135 | Jung | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20010005631 | Kim et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020042198 | Bjarnason et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045308 | Juengling | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063110 | Cantell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068243 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094688 | Mitsuiki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020127810 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030006410 | Doyle | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030044722 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030109102 | Kujirai et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119307 | Bekiaris et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127426 | Chang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157436 | Manger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030207207 | Li | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207584 | Sivakumar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215978 | Maimon et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216050 | Golz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030230234 | Nam et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000534 | Lipinski | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017989 | So | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018738 | Liu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023475 | Bonser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023502 | Tzou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041189 | Voshell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043623 | Liu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053475 | Sharma | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079988 | Harari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106257 | Okamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040235255 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050074949 | Jung et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050112886 | Asakawa et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142497 | Ryou | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153562 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164454 | Leslie | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167394 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186705 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050272259 | Hong | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003182 | Lane et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011947 | Juengling | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024940 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024945 | Kim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046161 | Yin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046200 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046201 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046422 | Tran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046484 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083996 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060115978 | Specht | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172540 | Marks et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189150 | Jung | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211260 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216923 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231900 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060263699 | Abatchev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267075 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273456 | Sant et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070026672 | Tang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045712 | Haller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048674 | Wells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049011 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049030 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049032 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049035 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049040 | Bai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050748 | Juengling | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077524 | Koh | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070210449 | Caspary et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215874 | Furukawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215960 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070275309 | Liu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080054350 | Breitwisch et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080292991 | Wallow | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
280851 | Jul 1990 | DD |
42 36 609 | May 1994 | DE |
0 227 303 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0 491 408 | Jun 1992 | EP |
1 357 433 | Oct 2003 | EP |
57-048237 | Mar 1982 | JP |
64-035916 | Feb 1989 | JP |
05343370 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H8-55908 | Feb 1996 | JP |
H8-55920 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2000-208434 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-357736 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2004-080033 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-152784 | May 2004 | JP |
2005-150333 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-351861 | Jan 2012 | JP |
10-1995-0034748 | Dec 1995 | KR |
10-0122315 | Sep 1997 | KR |
1999-0001440 | Jan 1999 | KR |
1999-027887 | Apr 1999 | KR |
WO 9415261 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 02099864 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2004001799 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004003977 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2005010973 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034215 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006-026699 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bergeron, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques for the 90nm Technology Node and Beyond,” Future Fab International, Issue 15, Jul. 11, 2003, 4 pages. |
Bhave et al., “Developer-soluble Gap fill materials for patterning metal trenches in Via-first Dual Damascene process,” preprint of Proceedings of SPIE: Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XXI, vol. 5376, John L. Sturtevant, editor, 2004, 8 pages. |
Bruek, S.R.J., “Optical and interferometric lithography—Nanotechnology enablers,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 93, No. 10, Oct. 2005, pp. 1704-1721. |
Cerofolini et al., “Strategies for nanoelectronics”, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 81, pp. 405-419. |
Choi et al. “Sublithographic nanofabrication technology for nanocatalysts and DNA chips,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., pp. 2951-2955 (Nov./Dec. 2003). |
Chung et al., “Nanoscale Multi-Line Patterning Using Sidewall Structure,” Jpn., J. App.. Phys. vol. 41 (2002) Pt. 1, No. 6B, pp. 4410-4414. |
Chung et al., “Pattern multiplication method and the uniformity of nanoscale multiple lines*,” J.Vac.Sci.Technol. B21(4), Jul./Aug. 2003, pp. 1491-1495. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/543,515, filed Oct. 24, 2006”. |
Ex Parte Cantell, unpublished decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Mar. 4, 2005. |
Joubert et al., “Nanometer scale linewidth control during etching of polysilicon gates in high-density plasmas,” Microelectronic Engineering 69 (2003), pp. 350-357. |
Oehrlein et al., “Pattern transfer into low dielectic materials by high-density plasma etching,” Solid State Tech., May 2000, 8 pages. |
Sheats et al., “Microlithography: Science and Technology,” Marcel Dekkar, Inc., pp. 104-105 (1998). |
U.S. Office Action issued Jul. 11, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/367,020, filed Mar. 2, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action issued Jun. 2, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/219,067, filed Sep. 1, 2005. |
U.S. Office Action issued Jun. 5, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/514,117, filed Aug. 30, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130105976 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12636317 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13725695 | US | |
Parent | 10934317 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 12636317 | US |