Removal of photoresist and residue from substrate using supercritical carbon dioxide process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6500605
  • Patent Number
    6,500,605
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 25, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 31, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method of removing photoresist and residue from a substrate begins by maintaining supercritical carbon dioxide, an amine, and a solvent in contact with the substrate so that the amine and the solvent at least partially dissolve the photoresist and the residue. Preferably, the amine is a tertiary amine. Preferably, the solvent is selected from the group consisting of DMSO, EC, NMP, acetyl acetone, BLO, acetic acid, DMAC, PC, and a mixture thereof. Next, the photoresist and the residue are removed from the vicinity of the substrate. Preferably, the method continues with a rinsing step in which the substrate is rinsed in the supercritical carbon dioxide and a rinse agent. Preferably, the rinse agent is selected from the group consisting of water, alcohol, a mixture thereof, and acetone. In an alternative embodiment, the amine and the solvent are replaced with an aqueous fluoride.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the field of removal of photoresist and residue from a substrate. More particularly, the present invention relates to the field of removal of photoresist and residue from a substrate using supercritical carbon dioxide.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Semiconductor fabrication uses photoresist in ion implantation, etching, and other processing steps. In the ion implantation steps, the photoresist masks areas of a semiconductor substrate that are not implanted with a dopant. In the etching steps, the photoresist masks areas of the semiconductor substrate that are not etched. Examples of the other processing steps include using the photoresist as a blanket protective coating of a processed wafer or the blanket protective coating of a MEMS (micro electro-mechanical system) device.




Following the ion implantation steps, the photoresist exhibits a hard outer crust covering a jelly-like core. The hard outer crust leads to difficulties in a photoresist removal.




Following the etching steps, remaining photoresist exhibits a hardened character that leads to difficulties in the photoresist removal. Following the etching steps, photorcsist residue mixed with etch residue coats sidewalls of etch features. Depending on a type of etching step and material etched, the photoresist residue mixed with the etch residue presents a challenging removal problem since the photoresist residue mixed with the etch residue often strongly bond to the sidewalls of the etch features.




Typically, in the prior art, the photoresist and the photoresist residue are removed by plasma ashing in an O


2


plasma followed by stripping in a stripper bath.





FIG. 1

illustrates an n-p-n FET (field effect transistor) structure


10


subsequent to an ion implantation and prior to a photoresist removal. The n-p-n FET structure


10


includes a source region


12


, a gate region


14


, and a drain region


16


with isolation trenches


18


separating the n-p-n FET structure


10


from adjacent electronic devices. A first photoresist


20


masks all but the source and drain regions,


12


and


16


. In the ion implantation, a high energy ion source implanted an n-dopant into the source and drain regions,


12


and


16


. The high energy ion source also exposed the first photoresist


20


to the n-dopant which creates a hard crust on an upper surface


22


of the first photoresist


20


. In the prior art, the first photoresist


20


is removed by the plasma ashing and the stripper bath of the prior art.





FIG. 2

illustrates a first via structure


30


of the prior art subsequent to an RIE (reactive ion etching) etch and prior to a photoresist and residue removal. The first via structure


30


includes a via


32


which is etched into a first SiO


2


layer


34


to a first TiN layer


36


. In the first via structure


30


, the via


32


stops at the first TiN layer


36


because the first TiN layer


36


provides an etch stop for the RIE etch of the first SiO


2


layer


34


. Etching through the first TiN layer


36


complicates the RIE etch by requiring an additional etch chemistry for the first TiN layer


36


; so for this particular etch, the TiN layer


36


is not etched. The first TiN layer


36


lies on a first Al layer


38


, which lies on a first Ti layer


40


. A first residue, which comprises photoresist residue


42


mixed with SiO


2


etch residue


44


, coats sidewalls


46


of the via


32


. Second photoresist


48


remains on an exposed surface


50


of the first SiO


2


layer


34


. In the prior art, the second photoresist


48


, the photoresist residue


42


, and the SiO


2


etch residue


44


are removed using the plasma ashing and the stripper bath of the prior art.




Note that specific layer materials and specific structure described relative to the first via structure


30


, and to other thin film structures discussed herein, are illustrative. Many other layer materials and other structures are commonly employed in semiconductor fabrication.





FIG. 3

illustrates a second via structure


60


of the prior art subsequent to the RIE etch and prior to the photoresist and residue removal. The second via structure


60


includes a second via


62


which is etched through the first SiO


2


layer


34


and the first TiN layer


36


to the first Al layer


38


. By etching through the first TiN layer


36


, a device performance is improved because a contact resistance with the first Al layer


38


is lower than the contact resistance with the first TiN layer


36


. The second via structure


60


also includes the first Ti layer


40


. The first residue, which comprises the photoresist residue


42


mixed with the SiO


2


etch residue


44


, coats second sidewalls


64


of the second via


62


. A second residue, which comprises the photoresist residue


42


mixed with TiN etch residue


66


, coats the first residue. The second photoresist


48


remains on the exposed surface


50


of the first SiO


2


layer


34


. In the prior art, the second photoresist


48


, the photoresist residue


42


, the SiO


2


etch residue


44


, and the TiN etch residue


66


are removed using the plasma ashing and the stripper bath of the prior art.




Note that the first residue (

FIGS. 2 and 3

) and the second residue (

FIG. 3

) are worst case scenarios. Depending upon a specific etch process, the first residue or the second residue might not be present.





FIG. 4

illustrates a metal line structure


70


subsequent to a metal RIE etch and prior to a residue removal. The metal line structure


70


includes a second TiN layer


72


on a second Al layer


74


which is on a second Ti layer


76


. The second TiN layer


72


, the second Al layer


74


, and the second Ti layer


76


form a metal line. The second Ti layer


76


contacts a W via


78


, which in turn contacts the first Al layer


38


. The W via


78


is separated from the first SiO


2


layer


34


by a sidewall barrier


80


. A third residue, which comprises a halogen residue


82


mixed with metal etch residue


84


, lies on the exposed surface


50


of the first SiO


2


layer


34


. The third residue, which comprises the halogen residue


82


and the metal etch residue


84


, also lies on a second exposed surface


86


of the second TiN layer


72


. A fourth residue, which comprises a combination of the photoresist residue


42


mixed with metal etch residue


84


, coats sides


88


of the metal line. Skirts


90


of the fourth residue extend above the second exposed surface


86


of the second TiN layer


72


. In the prior art, the photoresist residue


42


, the halogen residue


82


, and the metal etch residue


84


are removed using the plasma ashing and the stripper bath of the prior art.





FIG. 5

illustrates a dual damascene structure


100


of the prior art subsequent to a dual damascene RIE etch and prior to the photoresist and photoresist residue removal. The dual damascene structure


100


includes a dual damascene line


102


formed above a dual damascene via


104


. The dual damascene line


102


is etched through a second SiO


2


layer


106


and a first SiN layer


108


. The dual damascene via


104


is etched through a third SiO


2


layer


110


and a second SiN layer


112


. The dual damascene via is etched to an underlying Cu layer


114


.




In processing subsequent to the photoresist and residue removal, exposed surfaces of the dual damascene line and via,


102


and


104


, are coated with a barrier layer and then the dual damascene line and via,


102


and


104


, are filled with Cu.




Returning to

FIG. 5

, a fifth residue, which comprises the photoresist residue


42


mixed with the SiO


2


etch residue


44


, coats line sidewalls


116


and via sidewalls


118


. A sixth residue, which comprises the photoresist residue


42


mixed with SiN etch residue


120


, coats the fifth residue. A seventh residue, which comprises the photoresist residue


42


mixed with Cu etch residue


122


, coats the sixth residue. The photoresist


48


remains on a second exposed surface of the second SiO


2


layer


106


. In the prior art, the photoresist


48


, the photoresist residue


42


, the SiO


2


etch residue


44


, the SiN etch residue


120


, and the Cu etch residue


122


are removed by the plasma ashing and the stripper bath of the prior art.




Note that the fifth, sixth, and seventh residues are worst case scenarios. Depending upon a specific etch process, the fifth, sixth, or seventh residue might not be present.




Recent developments in semiconductor technology have led to proposed replacement of the second and third dielectric layers,


106


and


110


, of the dual damascene structure


100


with low dielectric constant materials. Replacing the second and third dielectric layers,


106


and


110


, with the low dielectric constant materials enhances an electronic device speed. Current efforts to develop the low dielectric constant materials have led to first and second categories of the low dielectric constant materials. The first category of low dielectric constant materials is a C—SiO


2


material in which C (carbon) lowers an SiO


2


dielectric constant. The second category of dielectric materials are spinon polymers, which are highly cross-linked polymers specifically designed to provide a low dielectric constant. An example of the spin-on polymers is Dow Chemical's SILK. SILK is a registered trademark of Dow Chemical.




Via and line geometries are progressing to smaller dimensions and larger depth to width ratios. As the via and line geometries progress to the smaller dimensions and larger depth to width ratios, the plasma ashing and the stripper bath of the prior art are becoming less effective at removal of photoresist and photoresist residue. Further, replacement of SiO


2


with low dielectric constant materials raises difficulties with continued use of the plasma ashing. For the C—SiO


2


material, the O


2


plasma attacks the C. For the C—SiO


2


material, the O


2


plasma can be replaced with a H


2


plasma but this reduces an overall effectiveness of the plasma ashing. For the spin-on polymers, especially Dow Chemical's SILK, the plasma ashing is not a feasible method for removing the photoresist or the photoresist residue since the plasma ashing attacks the spin-on polymers.




What is needed is a more effective method of removing photoresist.




What is needed is a more effective method of removing residue.




What is needed is a more efficient method of removing photoresist.




What is needed is a more efficient method of removing residue.




What is needed is a method of removing photoresist from a substrate in which via and line geometries have small dimensions.




What is needed is a method of removing residue from a substrate in which via and line geometries have small dimensions.




What is needed is a method of removing photoresist from a substrate in which via and line geometries have large depth to width ratios.




What is needed is a method of removing residue from a substrate in which via and line geometries have large depth to width ratios.




What is needed is a method of removing photoresist from a substrate in which features are etched into a C—SiO


2


low dielectric constant material.




What is needed is a method of removing residue from a substrate in which features are etched into a C—SiO


2


low dielectric constant material.




What is needed is a method of removing photoresist from a substrate in which features are etched into a spin-on polymer low dielectric constant material.




What is needed is a method of removing residue from a substrate in which features are etched into a spin-on polymer low dielectric constant material.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is a method of removing photoresist and residue from a substrate. Typically, the photoresist—or the photoresist and the residue, or the residue—remains on the substrate following a preceding semiconductor processing step such as ion implantation or etching. The method begins by maintaining supercritical carbon dioxide, an amine, and a solvent in contact with the substrate so that the amine and the solvent at least partially dissolve the photoresist and the residue.




Preferably, the amine is a secondary amine or a tertiary amine. More preferably, the amine is the tertiary amine. Even more preferably, the amine is selected from the group consisting of 2-(methylamino)ethanol, PMDETA, triethanolamine, triethylamine, and a mixture thereof. Most preferably, the amine is selected from the group consisting of the 2-(methylamino)ethanol, the PMDETA, the triethanolamine, and a mixture thereof. Preferably, the solvent is selected from the group consisting of DMSO, EC, NMP, acetylacetone, BLO, acetic acid, DMAC, PC, and a mixture thereof.




Next, the photoresist and the residue are removed from the vicinity of the substrate. Preferably, the method continues with a rinsing step in which the substrate is rinsed in the supercritical carbon dioxide and a rinse agent. Preferably, the rinse agent is selected from the group consisting of water, alcohol, acetone, and a mixture thereof. More preferably, the rinse agent is a mixture of the alcohol and the water. Preferably, the alcohol is selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, ethanol, and other low molecular weight alcohols. More preferably, the alcohol is the ethanol.




In a first alternative embodiment, the amine and the solvent are replaced with an aqueous fluoride. In a second alternative embodiment, the solvent is added to the aqueous fluoride of the first alternative embodiment. In a third alternative embodiment, the amine is added to the aqueous fluoride and the solvent of the second alternative embodiment.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

illustrates an n-p-n FET structure of the prior art subsequent to an ion implantation and prior to a photoresist removal.





FIG. 2

illustrates a first via structure of the prior art subsequent to an RIE etch and prior to a photoresist and residue removal.





FIG. 3

illustrates a second via structure of the prior art subsequent to the RIE etch and prior to the photoresist and residue removal.





FIG. 4

illustrates a metal line structure of the prior art subsequent to the RIE etch and prior to a residue removal.





FIG. 5

illustrates a dual damascene structure of the prior art subsequent to the RIE etch and prior to the photoresist and residue removal.





FIG. 6

is a flow chart illustrating steps of the preferred method of the present invention.





FIG. 7

illustrates the preferred processing system of the present invention.





FIG. 8

is the preferred timeline of the present invention.





FIG. 9

is a first SEM photo of a via structure taken after the photoresist and residue removal in a first specific embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 10A through 10C

are second through fourth SEM photos of a metal line structure where the second SEM photo was taken before a residue removal and the third and fourth SEM photos were taken after the residue removal in a second specific embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 11A and 11B

are fifth and sixth SEM photos of a SiO


2


via structure where the fifth SEM photo was taken before a photoresist removal and the sixth SEM photo was taken after the photoresist removal in a fifth specific embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 12

is a seventh SEM photo of a second SiO


2


via structure taken after the photoresist removal in a sixth specific embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 13

is an eighth SEM photo of a C—SiO


2


damascene structure following the photoresist and residue removal in a seventh specific embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




The present invention is a method of removing photoresist and residue from a substrate using supercritical carbon dioxide. The residue includes photoresist residue and etch residue. Generally, the substrate is a semiconductor wafer. Alternatively, the substrate is a non-wafer substrate such as a puck. Typically, the photoresist was placed on the wafer to mask a portion of the wafer in a preceding semiconductor fabrication process step. Such preceding process steps include ion implantation and etching steps.




In the ion implantation step, the photoresist masks areas of the wafer that are not implanted with a dopant while allowing the dopant to implant the wafer in non-masked regions. The ion implantation step forms a hardened crust on the photoresist leaving a jelly-like core under the hardened crust.




In the etching step, the photoresist masks areas of the wafer that are not etched while the non-masked regions are etched. In the etching step, the photoresist and the wafer are etched producing etch features while also producing the photoresist residue and the etch residue. Etching of the photoresist produces the photoresist residue. Etching of the etch features produces the etch residue. The photoresist and etch residue generally coat sidewalls of the etch features.




In some etching steps, the photoresist is not etched to completion so that a portion of the photoresist remains on the wafer following the etching step. In these etching steps, the etching process hardens remaining photoresist. In other etching steps, the photoresist is etched to completion so no photoresist remains on the wafer in such etching steps. In the latter case only the residue, that is the photoresist residue and the etch residue, remains on the wafer.




The present invention is preferably directed to removing photoresist for 0.25 micron and smaller geometries. In other words, the present invention is preferably directed to removing I-line exposed photoresists and smaller wavelength exposed photoresists. These are UV, deep UV, and smaller geometry photoresists. Alternatively, the present invention is directed to removing larger geometry photoresists.




It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that while the present invention is described in terms of removing the photoresist and the residue it is equally applicable to removing the photoresist and the residue, or to removing the photoresist only, or to removing the residue only.




The preferred embodiment of the present invention removes the photoresist and the residue from the wafer using supercritical carbon dioxide, an amine, and a solvent. Preferably, the amine is selected from the group consisting of a secondary amine and a tertiary amine. More preferably the amine is the tertiary amine. Even more preferably, the amine is selected from the group consisting of 2-(methylamino)ethanol, PMDETA (pentamethyldiethylenetriamine), triethanolamine, triethylamine, and a mixture thereof. Most preferably, the amine is selected from the group consisting of 2-(methylamino)ethanol, PMDETA, triethanolamine, and a mixture thereof. Preferably, the solvent is selected from the group consisting of DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide), EC (ethylene carbonate), NMP (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone), acetyl acetone, BLO (butyrolactone), acetic acid, DMAC (N,N′-dimethylacetamide), PC (propylene carbonate), and a mixture thereof. More preferably, the solvent is selected from the group consisting of DMSO, EC, NMP, acetyl acetone, BLO, glacial acetic acid, and a mixture thereof.




The preferred method of the present invention is illustrated as a block diagram in FIG.


6


. The preferred method


200


begins by placing the wafer, with the photoresist and the residue on the wafer, within a pressure chamber and sealing the pressure chamber in a first process step


202


. In a second process step


204


, the pressure chamber is pressurized with carbon dioxide until the carbon dioxide becomes the supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO


2


). In a third process step


206


, the supercritical carbon dioxide carries the amine and the solvent into the process chamber. In a fourth process step


208


, the supercritical carbon dioxide, the amine, and the solvent are maintained in contact with the wafer until the photoresist and the residue are removed from the wafer. In the fourth process step


208


, the amine and the solvent at least partially dissolve the photoresist and the residue. In a fifth process step


210


, the pressure chamber is partially exhausted. In a sixth process step


212


, the wafer is rinsed. In a seventh process step


214


, the preferred method


200


ends by depressurizing the pressure chamber and removing the wafer.




The preferred supercritical processing system of the present invention is illustrated in FIG.


7


. The preferred supercritical processing system


220


includes a carbon dioxide supply vessel


222


, a carbon dioxide pump


224


, the pressure chamber


226


, a chemical supply vessel


228


, a circulation pump


230


, and an exhaust gas collection vessel


234


. The carbon dioxide supply vessel


222


is coupled to the pressure chamber


226


via the carbon dioxide pump


224


and carbon dioxide piping


236


. The carbon dioxide piping


236


includes a carbon dioxide heater


238


located between the carbon dioxide pump


224


and the pressure chamber


226


. The pressure chamber


226


includes a pressure chamber heater


240


. The circulation pump


230


is located on a circulation line


242


, which couples to the pressure chamber


226


at a circulation inlet


244


and at a circulation outlet


246


. The chemical supply vessel


228


is coupled to the circulation line


242


via a chemical supply line


248


, which includes a first injection pump


249


. A rinse agent supply vessel


250


is coupled to the circulation line


242


via a rinse supply line


252


, which includes a second injection pump


253


. The exhaust gas collection vessel


234


is coupled to the pressure chamber


226


via exhaust gas piping


254


. It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that the preferred supercritical processing system


220


includes valving, control electronics, filters, and utility hookups which are typical of supercritical fluid processing systems.




It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that additional chemical supply vessels could be coupled to the first injection pump


249


or that the additional chemical supply vessels and additional injection pumps could be coupled to the circulation line


242


.




Referring to both

FIGS. 6 and 7

, implementation of the preferred method


200


begins with the first process step


202


, in which the wafer, having the photoresist or the residue or both the photoresist and the residue, is placed in a wafer cavity


256


of the pressure chamber


226


and, then, the pressure chamber


226


is sealed. In the second process step


204


, the pressure chamber


226


is pressurized by the carbon dioxide pump


224


with the carbon dioxide from the carbon dioxide supply vessel


222


. During the second step


204


, the carbon dioxide is heated by the carbon dioxide heater


238


while the pressure chamber


226


is heated by the pressure chamber heater


240


to ensure that a temperature of the carbon dioxide in the pressure chamber


226


is above a critical temperature. The critical temperature for the carbon dioxide is 31° C. Preferably, the temperature of the carbon dioxide in the pressure chamber


226


is within a range of 45° C. to 75° C. Alternatively, the temperature of the carbon dioxide in the pressure chamber


226


is maintained within a range of from 31° C. to about 100° C.




Upon reaching initial supercritical conditions, the first injection pump


249


pumps the amine and the solvent from the chemical supply vessel


228


into the pressure chamber


226


via the circulation line


242


while the carbon dioxide pump further pressurizes the supercritical carbon dioxide in the third process step


206


. Once a desired amount of the amine and the solvent has been pumped into the pressure chamber


226


and desired supercritical conditions are reached, the carbon dioxide pump


224


stops pressurizing the pressure chamber


226


, the first injection pump


249


stops pumping the amine and the solvent into the pressure chamber


226


, and the circulation pump


230


begins circulating the supercritical carbon dioxide, the amine, and the solvent in the fourth process step


208


. By circulating the supercritical carbon dioxide, the amine, and the solvent, the supercritical carbon dioxide maintains the amine, and the solvent in contact with the wafer. Additionally, by circulating the supercritical carbon dioxide, the amine, and the solvent, a fluid flow enhances removal of the photoresist and the residue from the wafer.




Preferably, the wafer is held stationary in the pressure chamber


226


during the fourth process step


208


. Alternatively, the wafer is spun within the pressure chamber


226


during the fourth process step


208


.




After the photoresist and the residue has been removed from the wafer, the pressure chamber


226


is partially depressurized by exhausting some of the supercritical carbon dioxide, the amine, the solvent, removed photoresist, and removed residue to the exhaust gas collection vessel


234


in order to return conditions in the pressure chamber


226


to near the initial supercritical conditions in the fifth process step


210


.




In the sixth process step


212


, the second injection pump


253


pumps a rinse agent from the rinse agent supply vessel


250


into the pressure chamber


226


via the circulation line while the carbon dioxide pump


224


pressurizes the pressure chamber


226


to near the desired supercritical conditions and, then, the circulation pump


230


circulates the supercritical carbon dioxide and the rinse agent in order to rinse the wafer. Preferably, the rinse agent is selected from the group consisting of water, alcohol, acetone , and a mixture thereof. More preferably, the rinse agent is the mixture of the alcohol and the water. Preferably, the alcohol is selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, ethanol, and other low molecular weight alcohols. More preferably, the alcohol is selected from the group consisting of the isopropyl alcohol and the ethanol. Most preferably, the alcohol is the ethanol.




Preferably, the wafer is held stationary in the pressure chamber


226


during the sixth process step


212


. Alternatively, the wafer is spun within the pressure chamber


226


during the sixth process step


212


.




In the seventh process step


214


, the pressure chamber


226


is depressurized, by exhausting the pressure chamber


226


to the exhaust gas collection vessel


234


and, finally, the wafer is removed from the pressure chamber


226


.




The preferred timeline of the present invention is graphically illustrated in FIG.


8


. The preferred timeline


260


indicates the preferred method


200


as a function of time and also indicates pressure


262


as a function of the time. It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that the time axis in

FIG. 8

is only illustrative and as such does not indicate relative time periods to scale. Ideally, of course, all times would be minimized within reason to obtain an economical and efficient processing method.




Prior to an initial time to, the wafer is placed within the pressure chamber


226


and the pressure chamber is sealed in the first process step


202


. From the initial time to through a first time t


1


to a second time t


2


, the pressure chamber


226


is pressurized in the second process step


204


. The pressure chamber reaches critical pressure P


c


at the first time t


1


. The critical pressure P


c


for the supercritical carbon dioxide is 1,070 psi. Preferably, the amine and the solvent are injected into the pressure chamber


226


between the first time t


1


and the second time t


2


in the third process step


206


. Preferably, an amine and solvent injection begins upon reaching about 1100-1200 psi. Alternatively, the amine and the solvent are injected into the pressure chamber around the second time t


2


or after the second time t


2


. The pressure chamber reaches an operating pressure P


op


at the second time t


2


. Preferably, the operating pressure P


op


is about 2,800 psi. Alternatively, the operating pressure P


op


is within the range of from 1,070 psi to about 6,000 psi.




The preferred timeline


260


continues in the fourth process step


208


with maintaining the supercritical carbon dioxide, the amine, and the solvent in contact with the wafer until the photoresist and the residue are removed from the wafer, which takes place from the second time t


2


to a third time t


3


. In the fifth process step


210


, the pressure chamber


226


is partially exhausted from the third time t


3


to a fourth time t


4


. Preferably, this is accomplished by dropping from the operating pressure P


op


to about the 1,100-1,200 psi in a first exhaust, raising from the 1,100-1,200 psi to the operating pressure P


op


in a first pressure recharge, and dropping again to the 1,100-1,200 psi in a second exhaust. Alternatively, the pressure recharge and the second exhaust are not performed as part of the fifth process step


210


. Further alternatively, additional recharges and exhausts are performed as part of the fifth process step


210


where one or more of the exhausts can be a full exhaust.




The preferred timeline


260


continues in the sixth process step


212


with rinsing of the wafer from the fourth time t


4


through a fifth time t


5


to a sixth time t


6


. The sixth process step


212


begins with a second pressure recharge during which the rinse agent is preferably injected into the pressure chamber


226


from the fourth time t


4


to the fifth time t


5


. In the seventh process step


214


, the pressure chamber


226


is exhausted from the sixth time t


6


to a seventh time t


7


. Preferably, this is accomplished by dropping the operating pressure P


op


to about the 1,100-1,200 psi in a third exhaust, raising from the 1,100-1,200 psi to the operating pressure P


op


in a third pressure recharge, and finally dropping to atmospheric pressure in a final exhaust. Alternatively, the third exhaust and the third pressure recharge are not performed as part of the seventh process step


214


. Further alternatively, additional exhausts and recharges are performed as part of the seventh process step


210


.




A first alternative embodiment of the present invention adds an aqueous fluoride to the preferred embodiment. In the first alternative embodiment, the supercritical carbon dioxide, the amine, the solvent, and the aqueous fluoride remove the photoresist and the residue. Preferably, the aqueous fluoride is selected from the group of fluoride bases and fluoride acids. More preferably, the aqueous fluoride is selected from the group consisting of aqueous ammonium fluoride (aqueous NH


4


F), and aqueous hydrofluoric acid (HF).




The first alternative embodiment is useful when at least a portion of the photoresist or a portion of the residue is removed from a silicon dioxide (SiO


2


) surface. The aqueous fluoride undercuts the SiO


2


surface from the photoresist and the residue by slightly etching the SiO


2


surface. While the aqueous fluoride is useful in removing the photoresist or the residue form the SiO


2


surface of the wafer, the aqueous fluoride cannot be used when the wafer includes an exposed aluminum layer. This is because the aqueous fluoride will rapidly etch the exposed aluminum layer.




A second alternative embodiment of the present invention adds additional water to the first alternative embodiment. The additional water enhances the first alternative embodiment because the photoresist is hydrophillic while the SiO


2


surface is hydrophobic. Thus, the additional water separates the photoresist from the SiO


2


surface.




A third alternative embodiment of the present invention uses the supercritical carbon dioxide and the aqueous fluoride to remove the photoresist and residue. In the third alternative embodiment, the amine is not used and the solvent is not used.




A fourth alternative embodiment of the present invention adds the additional water to the supercritical carbon dioxide and the aqueous fluoride.




A fifth alternative embodiment of the present invention adds the solvent to the third alternative embodiment.




In a first alternative timeline, the fourth process step


208


is performed at an initial cleaning pressure and a final cleaning pressure. Preferably, the initial cleaning pressure is about the 1,100-1,200 psi and the final cleaning pressure is about the 2,800 psi. At the initial cleaning pressure, a first solubility of some of the chemicals is lower than a second solubility at the final cleaning pressure. During an initial cleaning phase which takes place at the initial cleaning pressure, lower solubility chemicals condense on the wafer. This provides greater concentration of the lower solubility chemicals on the photoresist and the residue and, thus, enhances separation of the photoresist and the residue from the wafer. During a final cleaning phase which takes place at the final cleaning pressure, the lower solubility chemicals either no longer condense or condense less on the wafer and, thus, concentration of the lower solubility chemicals on the wafer is reduced in anticipation of finishing the fourth process step


208


.




In a second alternative timeline of the present invention, a second rinse is performed after performing the first rinse.




Specific Embodiments




First through seventh specific embodiments of the present invention are discussed below. Each of the first through seventh specific embodiments is a summary of a specific chemistry and a specific method employed in a lab system, similar to the preferred supercritical processing system


220


. The lab system was used to remove the photoresist, or to remove the photoresist and the residue, or to remove the residue from test wafers. The lab system featured a combined internal volume for the pressure chamber


226


, the circulation pump


230


, and the circulation line


242


of about 1.8 liters. The first through seventh specific embodiments were performed as part of a proof-of-concept feasibility study intended to show feasibility of the present invention for use in semiconductor fabrication. Before an incorporation of the present invention in the semiconductor fabrication, it is envisioned that further process refinements would be made.




First Specific Embodiment




In the first specific embodiment, the photoresist and the residue were removed from an SiO


2


via structure formed in a preceding via etching step, where the etching step ended upon reaching an aluminum etch stop. The specific chemistry employed was as follows: 2 ml of 2-methyl amino ethanol (the amine), 20 ml of DMSO (a first component of the solvent), and 20 ml of EC (a second component of the solvent). The pressure chamber was maintained at 50° C. The amine and the solvent were circulated for 5 minutes at 2,800 psi. Two partial exhausts and one full exhaust were employed between the removal and rinse steps in which the pressure was dropped from the 2,700 psi to 1,100 psi for the partial exhausts and the pressure was dropped from 2,700 psi to atmospheric pressure in the full exhaust. The rinse agent for the rinse step was 56 ml of the acetone. The rinse agent and the supercritical carbon dioxide were circulated for 5 minutes. One partial exhaust was performed prior to performing a complete exhaust following the rinse step.





FIG. 9

is a first SEM photo taken subsequent to removal of the photoresist and the residue in the first specific embodiment. The first SEM photo shows that the photoresist and the residue were removed in the first specific embodiment.




Second Specific Embodiment




In the second specific embodiment, the residue, including the photoresist residue and the etch residue, was removed from a metal line structure formed in a preceding metal line etching step, where the etching step ended upon reaching an oxide etch stop. (The test wafer for the second specific embodiment was provided courtesy of Lucent Technologies.) The specific chemistry employed was as follows: 1.5 ml of PMDETA (the amine), 7.5 ml of NMP (the first component of the solvent), and 6 ml of acetyl acetone (the second component of the solvent). The pressure chamber was maintained at 50° C. The amine and the solvent were circulated for 2 minutes at 2,800 psi. One partial exhaust and one full exhaust were employed between the removal and the rinse steps. The rinse agent for the rinse step was 20 ml of an 80% ethanol and 20% water mixture, by volume. The rinse agent and the supercritical carbon dioxide were circulated for 1 minute. A complete exhaust was performed following the rinse step.





FIG. 10A

is a second SEM photo taken prior to removal of the residue in the second specific embodiment. The second SEM photo shows the residue on sidewalls of metal lines, shows skirts of the residue protruding above the metal lines, and shows the residue remaining on tops of the metal lines.

FIGS. 10B and 10C

are third and fourth SEM photos taken subsequent to removal of the residue in the second specific embodiment. The third and fourth SEM photos show that the residue was removed in the second specific embodiment.




Third Specific Embodiment




In the third specific embodiment, the photoresist was removed from a wafer following a medium dose ion implant. The specific chemistry employed was as follows: 0.15 ml of 24% by volume aqueous ammonium fluoride (the aqueous fluoride), 20 ml of BLO (the first component of the solvent), 20 ml of DMSO (the second component of the solvent), 0.15 ml of glacial acetic acid (a third component of the solvent), and 1 ml of additional water. The pressure chamber was maintained at 70° C. The aqueous fluoride and the solvent were circulated for 2 minutes at 1,250 psi after which the pressure chamber was pressurized to 2,800 psi. Two partial exhausts and one full exhaust were employed between the removal and rinse steps in which the pressure was dropped from the 2,700 psi to 1,100 psi for the partial exhausts and the pressure was dropped from 2,700 psi to atmospheric pressure in the full exhaust. The rinse agent for the rinse step was 20 ml of a mixture of 80% ethanol and 20% water. The rinse agent and the supercritical carbon dioxide were circulated for 1 minute. One partial exhaust was performed prior to performing a complete exhaust following the rinse step.




Before and after XPS (x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) tests demonstrated that the photoresist was removed in the third specific embodiment.




Fourth Specific Embodiment




In the fourth specific embodiment, the photoresist was removed from a wafer following a high dose ion implant. The specific chemistry employed was as follows: 0.22 ml of 24% by volume aqueous ammonium fluoride (the aqueous fluoride), 20 ml of DMSO (a first component of the solvent), 20 ml of EC (a second component of the solvent), and 2 ml of the additional water. The pressure chamber was maintained at 70° C. The aqueous fluoride and the solvent were circulated for 2 minutes at 2,800 psi. Two partial exhausts and one full exhaust were employed between the removal and rinse steps in which the pressure was dropped from the 2,700 psi to 1,100 psi for the partial exhausts and the pressure was dropped from 2,700 psi to atmospheric pressure in the full exhaust. The rinse agent for the rinse step was 20 ml of a mixture of 80% ethanol and 20% water. The rinse agent and the supercritical carbon dioxide were circulated for 1 minute. One partial exhaust was performed prior to performing a complete exhaust following the rinse step.




Before and after XPS tests demonstrated that the photoresist was removed in the fourth specific embodiment.




Fifth Specific Embodiment




In the fifth specific embodiment, the photoresist was removed from an SiO


2


via structure formed in a preceding via etching step, where the etching step ended upon reaching a TiN etch stop. The specific chemistry employed was as follows: 0.15 ml of 24% by volume aqueous ammonium fluoride (the aqueous fluoride) and 8 ml of additional water. The pressure chamber was maintained at 50° C. The aqueous fluoride and the additional water were circulated for 2 minutes at 1,500 psi. Two partial exhausts and one full exhaust were employed between the removal step and the first rinse step in which the pressure was dropped from the 1,500 psi to 1,050 psi for the partial exhausts and the pressure was dropped from 1,500 psi to atmospheric pressure in the full exhaust.




The rinse agent for the first rinse step was 12 ml of water. In the first rinse step, the rinse agent and the supercritical carbon dioxide were circulated for 1 minute at 1,500 psi following which the pressure was raised to 2,800 psi. Two partial exhausts and one full exhaust were employed between the first rinse step and the second rinse step in which the pressure was dropped from the 2,800 psi to 1,100 psi for the partial exhausts and the pressure was dropped from 2,800 psi to atmospheric pressure in the full exhaust. The rinse agent for the second rinse was 20 ml of methanol. In the second rinse step, the rinse agent and the supercritical carbon dioxide were circulated for 1 minute at the 2,800 psi. One partial exhaust was performed prior to performing a complete exhaust following the second rinse step.





FIG. 11A

is a fifth SEM photo taken prior to removal of the photoresist in the fifth specific embodiment. The fifth SEM photo shows the photoresist above the SiO


2


via structure and the TiN etch stop at a bottom of the via.

FIG. 11B

is a sixth SEM photo taken subsequent to removal of the photoresist in the fifth specific embodiment. The sixth SEM photo shows that the photoresist was removed in the fifth specific embodiment.




Sixth Specific Embodiment




In the sixth specific embodiment, the photoresist was removed from an SiO


2


via structure formed in a preceding via etching step. The specific chemistry employed was as follows: 1.5 ml of 24% by volume aqueous ammonium fluoride (the aqueous fluoride), and 8 ml of DMSO (the solvent) and 4 ml of additional water. The pressure chamber was maintained at 50° C. The aqueous fluoride, the solvent, and the additional water were circulated for 2 minutes at 2,800 psi. One partial exhaust and one full exhaust were employed between the removal step and the rinse step. The rinse agent was 20 ml of 80% ethanol and 20% water. The rinse agent and the supercritical carbon dioxide were circulated for 1 minute at 2,700 psi. One partial exhaust was performed prior to performing a complete exhaust following the rinse step.





FIG. 12

is a seventh SEM photo taken subsequent to removal of the photoresist in the sixth specific embodiment. The seventh SEM photo shows that the photoresist was removed in the sixth specific embodiment.




Seventh Specific Embodiment




In the seventh specific embodiment, the photoresist and the residue were removed from a C—SiO


2


damascene structure formed in a preceding via etching step. The specific chemistry employed was as follows: 0.15 ml of 24% by volume aqueous ammonium fluoride (the aqueous fluoride), 20 ml of BLO (the first component of the solvent), 20 ml of DMSO (the second component of the solvent), 0.15 ml of glacial acetic acid (the third component of the solvent), and 1 ml of additional water. The pressure chamber was maintained at 70° C. The aqueous fluoride, the solvent, and the additional water were circulated for 2 minutes at 2,800 psi. Two partial exhausts and one full exhaust were employed between the removal step and the rinse step. The rinse agent for the rinse step was 20 ml of 50% ethanol and 50% water. The rinse agent and the supercritical carbon dioxide were circulated for 1 minute at 2,700 psi. One partial exhaust was performed prior to performing a complete exhaust following the rinse step.





FIG. 13

is an eighth SEM photo taken subsequent to removal of the photoresist and residue in the seventh specific embodiment. The eighth SEM photo shows that the photoresist and the residue were removed in the seventh specific embodiment.




It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that other various modifications may be made to the preferred embodiment without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of processing a substrate comprising the steps of:a. maintaining supercritical carbon dioxide and an aqueous fluoride in contact with the substrate, the substrate having a silicon dioxide surface which supports a material selected from the group consisting of photoresist, photoresist residue, etch residue, and a combination thereof, such that the aqueous fluoride undercuts the silicon dioxide surface from the material, whereby the material becomes undercut material; b. maintaining water and the supercritical carbon dioxide in contact with the undercut material such that the undercut material separates from the silicon dioxide surface, whereby the undercut material becomes separated material; and c. removing the separated material from the vicinity of the substrate.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the aqueous fluoride is selected from the group consisting of aqueous ammonium fluoride, hydrofluoric acid, and a mixture thereof.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the aqueous fluoride is the aqueous ammonium fluoride.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of removing the separated material from the vicinity of the substrate comprises flowing supercritical carbon dioxide over the substrate.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of at least partially dissolving the undercut material using a solvent.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of BLO, DMSO, acetic acid, EC, DMAC, NMP, and a mixture thereof.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of the BLO, the DMSO, the acetic acid, the EC, and a mixture thereof.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the solvent is the BLO.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of at least partially dissolving the separated material using a solvent.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of BLO, DMSO, acetic acid, EC, DMAC, NMP, and a mixture thereof.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of the BLO, the DMSO, the acetic acid, the EC, and a mixture thereof.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 wherein the solvent is the BLO.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of rinsing the substrate in the supercritical carbon dioxide and a rinse agent.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein the rinse agent comprises water.
  • 15. The method of claim 13 wherein the rinse agent comprises alcohol.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein the alcohol comprises ethanol.
  • 17. The method of claim 13 wherein the rinse agent comprises acetone.
  • 18. The method of claim 1 wherein the substrate comprises a low dielectric constant material.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the low dielectric constant material comprises a spin-on polymer.
  • 20. The method of claim 18 wherein the low dielectric constant material comprises a C—SiO2 material.
  • 21. A method of removing a material from a silicon dioxide surface, the material selected from the group consisting of photoresist, photoresist residue, etch residue, and a combination thereof, the method comprising the steps of:a. maintaining supercritical carbon dioxide and an aqueous fluoride in contact with the material and the silicon dioxide surface such that the aqueous fluoride undercuts the silicon dioxide surface from the material; b. maintaining water and the supercritical carbon dioxide in contact with the material such that the material separates from the silicon dioxide surface; and c. removing the material from the vicinity of the silicon dioxide surface.
  • 22. A method of processing a substrate comprising the steps of:a. maintaining supercritical carbon dioxide, an amine, and a solvent in contact with a material on a surface of the substrate, the material selected from the group consisting of a photoresist, a photoresist residue, an etch residue, and a combination thereof, such that the amine and the solvent at least partially dissolve the material; and b. removing the material from the vicinity of the substrate.
  • 23. The method of claim 22 wherein the amine comprises a secondary amine.
  • 24. The method of claim 22 wherein the amine comprises a tertiary amine.
  • 25. The method of claim 24 wherein the tertiary amine is selected from the group consisting of 2-methyl amino ethanol, PMDETA, triethanol amine, triethyl amine, and a mixture thereof.
  • 26. The method of claim 25 wherein the amine is selected from the group consisting of 2-methyl amino ethanol, the PMDETA, the triethanol amine, and a mixture thereof.
  • 27. The method of claim 22 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of DMSO, EC, NMP, acetyl acetone, BLO, acetic acid, DMAC, PC, and a mixture thereof.
  • 28. The method of claim 22 wherein the amine is selected from the group consisting of a secondary amine, a tertiary amine, di-isopropyl amine, tri-isopropyl amine, diglycol amine, and a mixture thereof.
  • 29. The method of claim 22 further comprising the step of rinsing the substrate in the supercritical carbon dioxide and a rinse agent.
  • 30. The method of claim 29 wherein the rinse agent comprises water.
  • 31. The method of claim 29 wherein the rinse agent comprises alcohol.
  • 32. The method of claim 31 wherein the alcohol comprises ethanol.
  • 33. The method of claim 29 wherein the rinse agent comprises acetone.
  • 34. A method of processing a substrate having a material on a surface of the substrate, the material selected from the group consisting of a photoresist, a photoresist residue, an etch residue, and a combination thereof, the method comprising the steps of:a. maintaining supercritical carbon dioxide, an amine, and a solvent in contact with the material such that the amine and the solvent at least partially dissolve the material; and b. removing the material from the vicinity of the substrate.
  • 35. A method of processing a substrate comprising the steps of:a. maintaining supercritical carbon dioxide, a tertiary amine, and a solvent in contact with a material on a surface of the substrate, the material selected from the group consisting of a photoresist, a photoresist residue, an etch residue, and a combination thereof, such that the material is at least partially dissolved; and b. removing the material from the vicinity of the substrate.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/389,788, filed Sep. 3, 1999, which is a continuation of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/085,391, filed May 27, 1998, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/047,739, filed May 27, 1997, all of which are incorporated by reference. This application also claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/163,116, filed on Nov. 2, 1999, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/163,120, filed on Nov. 2, 1999, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/199,661, filed on Apr. 25, 2000, all of which are incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (132)
Number Name Date Kind
2617719 Stewart Nov 1952 A
3890176 Bolon Jun 1975 A
3900551 Bardoncelli et al. Aug 1975 A
4029517 Rand Jun 1977 A
4091643 Zucchini May 1978 A
4219333 Harris Aug 1980 A
4341592 Shories et al. Jul 1982 A
4474199 Blaudszun Oct 1984 A
4475993 Blander et al. Oct 1984 A
4601181 Privat Jul 1986 A
4693777 Hazano et al. Sep 1987 A
4749440 Blackwood et al. Jun 1988 A
4788043 Kagiyama et al. Nov 1988 A
4838476 Rahn Jun 1989 A
4865061 Fowler et al. Sep 1989 A
4877530 Moses Oct 1989 A
4879004 Oesch et al. Nov 1989 A
4923828 Gluck et al. May 1990 A
4924892 Kiba et al. May 1990 A
4933404 Beckman et al. Jun 1990 A
4944837 Nishikawa et al. Jul 1990 A
4960140 Ishijima et al. Oct 1990 A
4983223 Gessner Jan 1991 A
5011542 Weil Apr 1991 A
5013366 Jackson et al. May 1991 A
5068040 Jackson Nov 1991 A
5105556 Kurokawa et al. Apr 1992 A
5143103 Basso et al. Sep 1992 A
5158704 Fulton et al. Oct 1992 A
5174917 Monzyk Dec 1992 A
5185058 Cathey, Jr. Feb 1993 A
5185296 Morita et al. Feb 1993 A
5193560 Tanaka et al. Mar 1993 A
5201960 Starov Apr 1993 A
5213619 Jackson et al. May 1993 A
5215592 Jackson Jun 1993 A
5225173 Wai Jul 1993 A
5236602 Jackson Aug 1993 A
5237824 Pawliszyn Aug 1993 A
5238671 Matson et al. Aug 1993 A
5250078 Saus et al. Oct 1993 A
5261965 Moslehi Nov 1993 A
5266205 Fulton et al. Nov 1993 A
5267455 Dewees et al. Dec 1993 A
5269815 Schlenker et al. Dec 1993 A
5274129 Natale et al. Dec 1993 A
5288333 Tanaka et al. Feb 1994 A
5290361 Hayashida et al. Mar 1994 A
5294261 McDermott et al. Mar 1994 A
5298032 Schlenker et al. Mar 1994 A
5304515 Morita et al. Apr 1994 A
5306350 Hoy et al. Apr 1994 A
5312882 DeSimone et al. May 1994 A
5313965 Palen May 1994 A
5316591 Chao et al. May 1994 A
5334332 Lee Aug 1994 A
5334493 Fujita et al. Aug 1994 A
5337446 Smith et al. Aug 1994 A
5339844 Stanford, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5352327 Witowski Oct 1994 A
5355901 Mielnik et al. Oct 1994 A
5356538 Wai et al. Oct 1994 A
5364497 Chau et al. Nov 1994 A
5368171 Jackson Nov 1994 A
5370740 Chao et al. Dec 1994 A
5370742 Mitchell et al. Dec 1994 A
5377705 Smith, Jr. et al. Jan 1995 A
5401322 Marshall Mar 1995 A
5403621 Jackson et al. Apr 1995 A
5403665 Alley et al. Apr 1995 A
5412958 Iliff et al. May 1995 A
5417768 Smith, Jr. et al. May 1995 A
5456759 Stanford, Jr. et al. Oct 1995 A
5470393 Fukazawa Nov 1995 A
5474812 Truckenmuller et al. Dec 1995 A
5482564 Douglas et al. Jan 1996 A
5486212 Mitchell et al. Jan 1996 A
5494526 Paranjpe Feb 1996 A
5500081 Bergman Mar 1996 A
5501761 Evans et al. Mar 1996 A
5505219 Lansberry et al. Apr 1996 A
5509431 Smith, Jr. et al. Apr 1996 A
5514220 Wetmore et al. May 1996 A
5522938 O'Brien Jun 1996 A
5526834 Mielnik et al. Jun 1996 A
5533538 Marshall Jul 1996 A
5547774 Gimzewski et al. Aug 1996 A
5550211 DeCrosta et al. Aug 1996 A
5580846 Hayashida et al. Dec 1996 A
5589082 Lin et al. Dec 1996 A
5589105 DeSimone et al. Dec 1996 A
5629918 Ho et al. May 1997 A
5632847 Ohno et al. May 1997 A
5635463 Muraoka Jun 1997 A
5637151 Schulz Jun 1997 A
5641887 Beckman et al. Jun 1997 A
5656097 Olesen et al. Aug 1997 A
5665527 Allen et al. Sep 1997 A
5669251 Townsend et al. Sep 1997 A
5676705 Jureller et al. Oct 1997 A
5679169 Gonzales et al. Oct 1997 A
5679171 Saga et al. Oct 1997 A
5683473 Jureller et al. Nov 1997 A
5683977 Jureller et al. Nov 1997 A
5688879 DeSimone Nov 1997 A
5700379 Biebl Dec 1997 A
5726211 Hedrick et al. Mar 1998 A
5730874 Wai et al. Mar 1998 A
5739223 DeSimone Apr 1998 A
5783082 DeSimone et al. Jul 1998 A
5797719 James et al. Aug 1998 A
5798438 Sawan et al. Aug 1998 A
5804607 Hedrick et al. Sep 1998 A
5866005 DeSimone et al. Feb 1999 A
5868856 Douglas et al. Feb 1999 A
5868862 Douglas et al. Feb 1999 A
5872257 Beckman et al. Feb 1999 A
5873948 Kim Feb 1999 A
5881577 Sauer et al. Mar 1999 A
5888050 Fitzgerald et al. Mar 1999 A
5900354 Batchelder May 1999 A
5908510 McCullough et al. Jun 1999 A
5932100 Yager et al. Aug 1999 A
5944996 DeSimone et al. Aug 1999 A
5965025 Wai et al. Oct 1999 A
5976264 McCullough et al. Nov 1999 A
5980648 Adler Nov 1999 A
6017820 Ting et al. Jan 2000 A
6024801 Wallace et al. Feb 2000 A
6114044 Houston et al. Sep 2000 A
6149828 Vaarststra Nov 2000 A
6242165 Vaarststra Jun 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
0 283 740 Sep 1988 EP
0 391 035 Oct 1990 EP
0 518 653 Dec 1992 EP
0 536 752 Apr 1993 EP
0 572 913 Dec 1993 EP
0 620 270 Oct 1994 EP
0 679 753 Nov 1995 EP
0 711 864 May 1996 EP
0 726 099 Aug 1996 EP
0 822 583 Feb 1998 EP
0 829 312 Mar 1998 EP
0 836 895 Apr 1998 EP
60-192333 Sep 1985 JP
1045131 Feb 1989 JP
2-209729 Aug 1990 JP
8222508 Aug 1996 JP
WO 9006189 Jun 1990 WO
WO 9013675 Nov 1990 WO
WO 9314255 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9314259 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9320116 Oct 1993 WO
WO 9627704 Sep 1996 WO
WO 9949998 Oct 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (50)
Entry
Guan, Z. et al., “Fluorocarbon-Based Heterophase Polymeric Materials. 1. Block Copolymer Surfactants for Carbon Dioxide Applications,” Macromolecules, vol. 27, 1994, pp 5527-5532.
International Journal of Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing, vol. 2, No. 1, 1993, p. 83.
Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 72, No. 6, pp. 872-874.
Ziger, D.H. et al., “Compressed Fluid Technology: Application to RIE Developed Resists,” AIChE Journal, vol. 33, No. 10, Oct. 1987, pp 1585-1591.
Kirk-Othmer, “Encyclopedia of Chemical Terminology,” 3rd ed., Supplement Volume, “Alcohol Fuels to Toxicology,” 1984, pp. 872-893.
“Cleaning with Supercritical CO2,” NASA Tech Briefs, MFS-29611, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama, Mar. 1979.
Basta, N., “Supercritical Fluids: Still Seeking Acceptance,” Chemical Engineering, vol. 92, No. 3, Feb. 24, 1985, 14.
Takahashi, D., “Los Alamos Lab finds way to cut chip waste,” Wall Street Journal, Jun. 22, 1998.
Supercritical CO, process offers less mess from semiconductor plants, Chemical Engineering Magazine, pp. 27 & 29, Jul. 1998.
Sun, Y.P. et al., “Preparation of polymer-protected semiconductor nanoparticles through the rapid expansion of supercritical fluid solution,” Chemical Physics Letters, pp. 585-588, May 22, 1998.
Jackson, K. et al., “Surfactants and Micromulsions in Supercritical Fluids” in “Supercritical Fluid Cleaning.” Noyes Publications, Westwood, NJ, pp. 87-120, Spring 1998.
Kryszewski, M., “Production of Metal and Semiconductor Nanoparticles in Polymer Systems,” Polymeri, pp. 65-73, Feb. 1998.
Bakker, G.L. et al., “Surface Cleaning and Carbonaceous Film Removal Using High Pressure, High Temperature Water, and Water/CO2 Mixtures,” J. Electrochem, Soc, vol. 145, No. 1, pp. 284-291, Jan. 98.
Ober, C.K. et al., “Imaging polymers with supercritical carbon dioxide,” Advanced Materials, vol. 9, No. 13, 99. 1039-1043, Nov. 3, 1997.
Russick, E.M. et al., “Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of solvent from micromachined structures.” Supercritical Fluids Extraction and Pollution Prevention, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 670, pp. 255-269, Oct. 21, 1997.
Dahmen, N. et al., Supercritical fluid extraction of grinding and metal cutting waste contaminated with the oils, Supercritical Fluids—Extraction and Pollution Prevention, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 670, pp. 270-279, Oct. 21, 1997.
Wai, C.M., “Supercritical fluid extraction: metals as complexes,” J. Chromatography A, vol. 785, pp. 369-383, Oct. 17, 1997.
Xu, C. et al., Submicron-sized spherical yttrium oxide based phosphors prepared by supercritical CO2-assisted aerosolization and pyrolysis, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 71, No. 12, Sep. 22, 1997.
Tomioka Y. et al., “Decomposition of tetramethylammonium (TMA) in a positive photoresist developer by supercritical water,” Abstracts of Papers 214th ACS Natl Meeting, American Chemical Society, Abstract No. 108, Sep. 7, 1997.
Klein, H. et al., “Cyclic organic carbonates serve as solvents and reactive diluents,” Coatings Worlds, pp. 38-40, May 1997.
Buhler, J. et al., Liner array of complementary metal oxide semiconductor double-pass metal micromirrors, Opt. Eng., vol. 36, No. 5, pp 1391-1398, May 1997.
Jo, M.H. et al., Evaluation of SIO2 aerogel thin film with ultra low dielectric constant as an intermetal dielectric, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 33, pp. 343-348, Jan. 1997.
McClain, J.B. et al., “Design of Nonionic Surfactants for supercritical carbon dioxide,” Science, vol. 27, Dec. 20, 1996.
Znaidi, L. et al., “Batch and semi-continuous synthesis of magnesium oxide powders from hydrolysis and supercritical treatment of Mg(OCH3)2,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 1527-1335, Dec. 1996.
Tadros, M.E., “Synthesis of titanium dioxide particles in supercritical CO2” J. Supercritical Fluids, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 172-176, Sep. 1996.
Courtecuisse, V.G. et al., “Kinetics of the titanium isopropoxide decomposition in supercritical isopropyl alcohol,” ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 2539-2545, Aug. 1996.
Gabor, A. et al., “Block and random copolymer resists designed for 193 nm lithography and environmentally friendly supercritical CO2 Development,” Dept. Mat. Sci. & Eng. Cornell Univ., SPIE, vol. 2724, pp. 410-417, Jun. 1995.
Schimek, G. L. et al., “Supercritical ammonium synthesis and charaterization of four new alkali metal silver antimony sulfides . . . ,” J. Solid State Chemistry, vol. 123 pp. 277-284, May 1996.
Gallagher-Wetmore, P. et al., “Supercritical fluid processing: Opportunities for new resist materials and processes,” IBM research Division, SPIE, vol. 2725, pp. 289-299, Apr. 1996.
Papathomas, K.J. et al., “Debonding of photoresists by organic solvents,” J. Applied Polymer Science, vol. 59, pp. 2029-2037, Mar. 28, 1996.
Watkins, J.J. et al., “Polymer/metal nanocomposite synthesis in supercritical CO2,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 7, No. 11, Nov. 1995.
Gloyna, E.F. et al., “Supercritical water oxidation research and development update,” Environment Progess, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 182-192, Aug. 1995.
Gallagher-Wetmore, P. et al., Supercritical fluid processing: A new dry technique for photoresist developing, IBM Research Division, SPIE vol. 2438, pp. 694-708, Jun. 1995.
Gabor, A. H. et al., “Silicon-containing block copolymer resist materials” Microelectronics Technology—Polymers for Advanced Imaging and Packaging, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 614, pp. 281-298, Apr. 1995.
Tsiartas, P.C. et al., “Effect of molecular weight distribution on the dissolution properties of novolac blends,” SPIE, vol. 2438, pp. 264-271, 1995.
Allen, R.D. et al., “Performance properties of near-monodisperse novolak resins,”SPIE, vol. 2438, pp. 250-260, 1995.
Wood, P.T. et al., “Synthesis of new channeled structures in supercritical amines . . . , ” Inorg. Chem., vol. 33, pp. 1556-1558, 1994.
Jerome, J.E. et al., “Synthesis of new low-dimensional quaternary compounds . . . ,” Inorg. Chem, vol. 33, 1733-1734, 1994.
McHardy, J. et al., “Progress in supercritical CO2 cleaning,” SAMPE Jour., vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 20-27, Sep. 1993.
Purtell, R, et al., “Precision parts cleaning using supercritical fluids,” J. Vac, Sci, Technol. A. vol. 11, No. 4, Jul. 1993.
Bok, E. et al., “Supercritical fluids for single wafer cleaning,” Solids State Technology, pp. 117-120, Jun. 1992.
Adschiri, T. et al., “Rapid and continuous hydrothermal crystallization of metal oxide particles in supercritical water,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 1019-1022, 1992.
Hansen, B.N. et al., “Supercritical fluid transport—chemical deposition of films,”Chem. Mater., vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 749-752, 1992.
Page, S.H. et al., “Predictability and effect of phase behavior of CO2/ propylene carbonate in supercritical fluid chromatography,” J. Microl. Sep., vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 355369, 1991.
Brokamp, T. et al., “Synthese und Kristallstruktur eines gemischivalenten Lithium-Tantainirids Li2Ta3Ns,” J. Alloys and Compounds, vol. 176. pp. 47-60, 1991.
Hybertson, B.M. et al., “Deposition of palladium films by a novel supercritical fluid transport chemical deposition process,” Mat. Res. Bull., vol. 26, pp. 1127-1133, 1991.
Ziger, D. H. et al., “Compressed fluid technology: Application to RIE-Developed resists,” AiChE Jour., vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 1585-1591, Oct. 1987.
Matson, D.W. et al., “Rapid expansion of supercritical fluid solutions: Solute formation of powders, thin films, and fibers,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 26, No. 11, pp. 2298-2306, 1987.
Tolley, W.K. et al., “Stripping organics from metal and mineral surfaces using supercritical fluids,” Separation Sciences and Technology, vol. 22, pp. 1087-1101, 1987.
“Final report on the safety assessment of propylene carbonate,” J. American College of Toxicology, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 23-51.
Provisional Applications (4)
Number Date Country
60/047739 May 1997 US
60/163116 Nov 1999 US
60/163120 Nov 1999 US
60/199661 Apr 2000 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/085391 May 1998 US
Child 09/389788 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/389788 Sep 1999 US
Child 09/697227 US