Selective planishing method for making a semiconductor device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10438816
  • Patent Number
    10,438,816
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 6, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 8, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
In a method for fabricating semiconductor devices a leadframe pattern is formed from a flat tape of base metal. A plurality of additional metal layers is plated on the patterned tape of base metal. The surface of the metal layers is roughed. A plurality of sites for assembling semiconductor chips are created. The sites alternate with zones for connecting the leadframe pattern to molding compound runners A selected first set of leadframe areas are selectively planished creating flattened areas offsetting a second set of leadframe areas. A semiconductor chip is attached to each site.
Description
FIELD

The embodiments of the invention are related in general to the field of semiconductor devices and processes, and more specifically to the structure and fabrication process of flood-plated rough metallic leadframes in semiconductor packages having selectively planished portions to reduce the leadframe adhesion to molding compound in zones exposed to compound in mold runners.


DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART

Based on their functions, semiconductor packages include a variety of different materials. Metals formed as leadframes and bonds are employed for mechanical stability and electrical and thermal conductance, and insulators, such as polymeric molding compounds, are used for encapsulations and form factors. In the packaging fabrication flow, it is common practice to attach a plurality of semiconductor chips to a strip of leadframe, to connect the chips to their respective leads, and then to encapsulate the assembled chips in packages, which protect the enclosed parts against mechanical damage and environmental influences such as moisture and light while providing trouble-free electrical connections. After the encapsulation step, the package chips are separated from the leadframe strip into discrete units by a trimming and forming step.


A popular encapsulation technique is the transfer molding method. A leadframe strip with the attached and connected chips is placed in a steel mold, which forms a cavity around each assembled chip. A semi-viscous thermoset polymeric compound is pressured through runners across the leadframe strip to enter each cavity through a gate. After filling the cavities, the compound is allowed to harden by polymerization. Finally, in the degating step, the compound in the runner is broken off at each gate from the compound filling the cavity.


To ensure the unity and coherence of the package, the metallic and non-metallic materials are expected to adhere to each other during the lifetime of the product, while tolerating mechanical vibrations, temperature swings, and moisture variations. Failing adhesion would allow moisture ingress into the package, causing device failure by electrical leakage and chemical corrosion.


Today’ semiconductor technology employs a number of methods to raise the level of adhesion between the diversified materials so that the package passes accelerated tests and use conditions without delamination. As an example, the adhesion between copper-based leadframes and epoxy-based molding compounds and chip-attach compounds can be improved by adding design features such as indentations, grooves or protrusions to the leadframe surface. Another example to improve adhesion is the method of chemically modifying the leadframe surface by oxidizing the metal surface, for instance creating copper oxide.


Another example of known technology to increase adhesion between leadframe, chip, and encapsulation compound in semiconductor packages, is the roughening of the whole leadframe surface by chemically etching the leadframe surface after stamping or etching the pattern from a metal sheet. Chemical etching is a subtractive process using an etchant. Chemical etching creates a micro-crystalline metal surface with a roughness on the order of 1 μm or less. To roughen only one surface of the leadframe adds about 10 to 15% cost to the non-roughened leadframe.


Yet another known method to achieve a rough surface is the use of a specialized metal plating bath, such as a nickel plating bath, to deposit a rough metal (such as nickel) layer. This method is an additive process; the created surface roughness is on the order of 1 to 10 μm. Roughening of the leadframe surface may have some unwelcome side effects. General roughening of the surface impacts wire bonding negatively, since vision systems have trouble seeing the roughened surface; the rough surface shortens capillary life; and micro-contaminants on the rough surface degrades bonding consistency. General rough surfaces tend to allow more bleeding, when the resin component separates from the bulk of the chip attach compound and spreads over the surface of the chip pad; the resin bleed, in turn, can degrade moisture level sensitivity and interfere with down bonds on the chip pad.


In order to avoid these disadvantages, a selective roughening technique is sometimes employed, which involves reusable silicone rubber masks or gaskets; consequently, selective roughening is expensive. For example, protective masks to restrict the chemical roughening to the selected leadframe areas add about 35 to 40% cost to the non-roughened leadframe.


SUMMARY

Among dominating market trends for semiconductor products are the demand for increased insensitivity against temperature variations and moisture level exposure, and the need to keep fabrication cost down by employing inexpensive process steps. For semiconductor packages, the first trend implies an increased need for creating reliable adhesion between the different package parts and maintaining the adhesion through mechanically rough process steps, such as degating, deflashing, and trimming and forming. The second trend implies a necessity to avoid expensive process techniques such as selective plating and to select inexpensive process steps throughout such as flood plating.


For reliable adhesion, applicant recognized that besides chemical affinity between the molding compound and the metal finish of the leadframe, the surface roughness of the leadframe is essential, especially in view of the technical trend of shrinking package dimensions, offering ever less surface area for adhesion. In addition, the requirement to use lead-free solders pushes the reflow temperature range into the neighborhood of about 260° C., making it more difficult to maintain mold compound adhesion to the leadframes.


Analyzing quality and productivity issues of molded plastic devices, applicant observed that the process steps of degating after molding frequently causes deformation of the leadframe during the gate removal step. As a consequence of this deformation, yield losses of approximately 5% may occur at the process step of trimming-and-forming.


In a careful failure analysis, applicant discovered as the root cause of the leadframe deformation the enhanced adhesion between the roughened leadframe surfaces and the molding compound in zones such as the mold runners where the plastic crosses the leadframe strip outside the package.


Applicant saw that cost reduction pressures in many product lines exclude a solution of this problem by selective roughening of the leadframe surface using masks such as costly dry film photoresists. Likewise, modifying the auto-molding equipment for degating is too expensive. Further, efforts for removing leadframe material by design change in the gate area have not been effective.


Applicant solved the degating and deflashing problem while maintaining low-cost leadframe roughening methods when he discovered that locally un-roughened surfaces can be obtained by adding a planishing station to the offset-and-cutting tool already in use. While requiring no extra process step, the planishing station selectively lightly coins, or planishes, the rough surface locally in the gate area to remove the rough texture. The planishing process has been especially effective in stamped or etched leadframes with flood-roughened surfaces of plated nickel or nickel-palladium-gold layers.


One embodiment of the invention is a method for fabricating plastic semiconductor devices on a strip of leadframe including the step of stamping, or etching, the base metal strip to form the leadframe geometry, followed by the step of plating with flood roughening metal layers such as nickel on the base metal. For the next step of planishing, this operation is preferably performed in conjunction with the standard operations of leadframe offsetting and cutting by a single tool, a press. For the planishing portion, a planishing station has been added to the press, which is suitable to selectively and lightly coin local leadframe areas in order to flatten the rough texture. The planished areas partially regain the reflective, shiny surface appearance of the leadframe right after the stamping or etching step. Using a slightly altered existing tool means that no extra process step needs to be inserted into the fabrication flow.


Another embodiment of the invention is a leadframe strip as used for semiconductor device fabrication, which exhibits, before the step of molding encapsulation, optically matte appearing zones of roughened surface alternating with optically shiny appearing zones of smoothed surface. While the smoothed surface appears shiny, it is microscopically not as flat as the leadframe base material without roughening.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A shows a top view of a portion of a leadframe strip with molded devices after degating.



FIG. 1B shows a close-up view of an optical trace of a leadframe deformation caused by pulling away hardened molding compound, which adhered to the roughened leadframe surface.



FIG. 1C shows another close-up view of an optical trace of a leadframe deformation caused by pulling away hardened molding compound, which adhered to the roughened leadframe surface.



FIG. 2 shows a magnified perspective view of a leadframe location near the entry gate into a mold cavity, where molding compound in the feeding mold runner had been adhering to the leadframe metal.



FIG. 3 is an AFM (Atomic Force Microscope) scan of a rough surface of a rough-plated nickel layer on copper.



FIG. 4 is an AFM (Atomic Force Microscope) scan of a smooth surface of a plated nickel layer on copper.



FIG. 5 shows a perspective view of a leadframe strip to indicate preferred areas for applying planishing action.



FIG. 6 is a microscopic picture of a planished leadframe surface (left portion) adjacent to a rough-plated surface (right portion) (5000×).



FIG. 7 is a microscopic picture of a step transitioning a planished leadframe zone (bottom portion) and a rough-plated zone (top portion) (8000×).



FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of the process flow of selective leadframe planishing.



FIG. 9A shows a top view of a unit of a leadframe strip for Quad Flat Packages (QFP) with an assembled and molded chip after degating including a mechanically smooth surface portion surrounded by rough leadframe surfaces.



FIG. 9B illustrates a perspective view of the unit of FIG. 9A, including a portion adjacent to the exposed leadframe strap end, which has a mechanically smooth surface transitioning into the rough surface of the remainder of the strap.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1A illustrates a portion of an exemplary leadframe strip 101 with molded semiconductor devices 110 after the strip has been removed from the mold press, in which the encapsulation process by molding had been completed. A leadframe strip is preferably etched or stamped from a thin sheet of base metal such as copper, copper alloy, iron-nickel alloy, aluminum, Kovar™, and others, in a typical thickness range from 120 to 250 μm. The technology trend is towards thinner leadframes. As used herein, the term base metal has the connotation of starting material and does not imply a chemical characteristic.


A leadframe provides a stable support pad for firmly positioning the semiconductor chip. Further, a leadframe offers a multitude of conductive leads to bring various electrical conductors into close proximity of the chip. Any remaining gap between the tip of the leads and the chip terminals is typically bridged by thin bonding wires; alternatively, in flip-chip technology the chip terminals may be connected to the leads by metal bumps. For the leadframe, the desired shape of pad, leads, and other geometrical features are etched or stamped from the original metal sheet. When required by leadframe functionality and within certain limits, the thinness of the base metal and the fine features of the leads allow a forming process by an external force acting on those leads with the goal of creating leadframe portions in a plane offset from the plane of the starting sheet. An outside force, applied along the length of a lead, can stretch the lead in the direction of the length, while the dimension of the width is only slightly reduced, so that the new shape appears elongated. For elongations small compared to the length, and up to a limit called the elastic limit given by the metal characteristics, the amount of elongation is linearly proportional to the force.


As pointed out below, the possibility of affecting leadframe features by external forces may have an undesirable side effect, whereby yield-reducing deformations of leadframe portions can be created unintentionally in zones 120 between encapsulated devices.


It is an irrevocable leadframe characteristic to facilitate reliable adhesion to the attached chip and to encapsulation compounds. Besides chemical affinity between the molding compound and the metal finish of the leadframe, reliable adhesion necessitates leadframe surface roughness, especially in view of the technical trend of shrinking package dimensions, which offers ever less surface area for adhesion. In addition, the requirement to use lead-free solders pushes the reflow temperature range into the neighborhood of about 260° C., making it more difficult to maintain mold compound adhesion to the leadframes at elevated temperatures.


In order to keep fabrication cost low, the preferred method of roughening the leadframe surface is flood roughening included in the plating process of layers such as nickel. The roughening is preferably applied on both leadframe surfaces. A leadframe strip with roughened surface is then used to attach the semiconductor chip onto the pad, to connect the chip terminals to the respective leadframe leads by wire-bonding or flip-chip assembly, and finally to place the assembled strip in a steel mold press for encapsulating the assembled devices. The bottom and top halves of the steel mold are designed to form individual cavities for each device of the leadframe strip. Each cavity has a precision entry gate through which the molding compound will be pressed to fill the respective cavity in a controlled fashion. The compound, in turn, is supplied to the gates in runners engraved in the mold steel. During the molding process, the compound in the runners contacts the roughened leadframe surface on its way to each gate.


After filling the cavities with compound and polymerizing (hardening) the compound, the top mold half is lifted so that the leadframe strip with the encapsulated devices can be removed from the press. At this stage, the hardened compound in the runners remains on the strip, since the compound adheres to the roughened leadframe surface. In the following process step of degating, the compound of the runners is broken off each gate and the attached length of the leadframe. The compound of the runners exerts resistance against the force needed in this removal step, since the compound adheres to the roughened leadframe surface. As a consequence, the leadframe metal is bent and distorted along the paths of the runners. FIG. 1A indicates the leadframe metal distortion 102 along the runner paths to each gate, as observable by a change of the optical light reflection of the plated metal. The top view photographs of FIGS. 1B and 1C illustrate more complete lengths 103 and 104 of distorted leadframe metal along the complete runner lengths.


A more detailed analysis of the extension of the distorted metal along the runner paths, as indicated for an example by the enlarged perspective photograph of FIG. 2, reveals the bending of the leadframe metal by the enhanced reflection of microscope light. It is noted how clearly the metal, distorted by the forceful removal of the adhering molding compound, follows the bend (arrows 201 and 202) in the path of the runner in front of the gate to the device cavity.


The strong adhesion of the molding compound to the leadframe metal is explained by the amount of surface roughness of the plated metal layer on the leadframe. The Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) pictures of FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate a quantitative comparison of the un-roughened nickel surface roughness of e the starting base copper leadframes and the roughened surface of the plated layer of nickel. FIG. 3 depicts a sample with the smooth (non-rough) plated surface, and FIG. 4 depicts a sample of the rough surface of the plated layer. The parameter most conveniently indicating the amount of roughness is the so-called surface area ratio S. Ratio S is defined as the surface area shown (three-dimensional) relative to a geometrically flat surface area (two-dimensional). The quantitative parameter values are based on a detailed analysis of the surface contours. The sample in FIG. 3 shows a surface area ratio of S=1.07, while the sample of FIG. 4 reveals a much larger surface area ratio of S=1.52. FIG. 3 indicates an average surface roughness of Ra=37±20 nm, while FIG. 4 shows a much large surface average roughness of Ra=80±20 nm. The root mean square of the sample in FIG. 3 is RMS=47 nm, while the root mean square of the sample in FIG. 4 is RMS=99 nm.


In order to selectively eliminate or at least reduce the adhesion to molding compound in zones of the plated leadframe surface, a stamping or punching tool suitable for planishing action can be constructed so that it is an additional feature of the already installed manufacturing machines for leadframe offsetting and cutting. (In the offset action, chip pads of the leadframe are depressed relative to the plane of the starting sheet, and in the cutting action, the leadframe sheet is cut into strips.) The planishing tool is preferably made of a hard, abrasion-resistant material such as stainless steel. Its surface involved in the stamping action is preferably flat. The contours of the stamping surface are designed to either affect the general leadframe area affected by unwanted adhesion to molding compound runners, as generally marked in FIG. 5, or to affect specifically selected leadframe areas, as indicated, for example, by the distortions observed in FIG. 2. The stamping force of the tool applied during its impact on the rough leadframe surface, can be varied and computer controlled. Due to the ability to set the stamping force to the desired level, the degree of smoothing a rough leadframe surface can be varied from just reducing rough peaks to almost complete flattening. Accordingly, a step between the un-planished area and the planished area will mark the borderline of the planishing action, the height of the step depending on the planishing force.


In the exemplary leadframe strip shown in FIG. 5 and generally designated 500, a plurality of sites 510 are designed to assemble semiconductor chips. Sites 510 alternate with zones 520 for connecting the leadframe to the runners delivering the molding compound to the cavities in the steel mold. Sites 510 have a mechanically rough and optically matte surface; some of these surfaces are designated 511 and 512 in FIG. 5. Preferably, both sides of the leadframe have rough surface. In contrast, zones 520 have at least portions with mechanically flattened and optically shiny surfaces, approximately outlined as areas 521 and 522 in FIG. 5. These flattened and shiny areas of zones 520 are created by planishing actions to smoothen and flatten surface roughness for reducing and preventing unwanted adhesion to polymeric encapsulation compounds after the packaging process.


A specific planishing tool should be designed so that the planishing action of the tool captures the layout of the runners for the polymeric compound and especially includes those leadframe surfaces, which are in close proximity to the device gates. Preferably the planishing tool should be designed so that the planishing action on the leadframe captures even a distance of about 10 to 20 μm inside the gate, i.e. 15±5 μm inside the perimeter of the package-to-be-created.


As an example, a planishing tool shaped approximately like the imprint depicted in FIG. 2 would be capable of planishing a leadframe area contacted by the molding compound in the runner crossing the leadframe surface in order to reach the gate; such tool is capable of reducing the surface roughness just in the area where strong metal adhesion to the molding compound is causing the detrimental deformation illustrated in FIG. 2. As mentioned, when the planishing tool impacts the rough leadframe surface, the impact force may create a step between the planished (smoothened) and un-planished (still rough) surface areas.


The magnified microscopic photographs of FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate examples of the effect of planishing action on a nickel-plated layer deposited on the surface of a copper leadframe. At a magnification of 5000×, the top view of FIG. 6 shows a rough-plated section at the right hand side of the figure, approximately up to the arrows, and a planished section at the left hand side. The force used in the planishing action was relatively light, but clearly resulted in a partial flattening of the steep peaks dominant in the un-planished section.


At a magnification of 8000×, the slightly perspective view of FIG. 7 shows the step between a planished (bottom section) and a non-planished (top section) surface. The force in the planishing action was relatively light so that the step is only about 1.5 μm high. Using a considerably stronger force for the impact, the planishing action may result in a thickness reduction of the plated metal between about 5 and 15%. At a 10% reduction of the leadframe thickness of 150 μm, the thickness reduction and thus the step may amount to about 15 μm. Experiments have shown that the flatness of the surface corresponding to a thickness reduction of about 5 to 10% will diminish the adhesion to the leadframe metal of the molding compound along the path of the runner to such degree that it has practically vanished.


While plated metal with rough surfaces has a matte optical appearance, a planished surface looks more reflective and shiny. It is, therefore, easy to identify the extent of a planishing action by a simple optical inspection. In order to maximize adhesion between polymeric compounds and metal leadframes, it is advantageous to have rough and thus matte surfaces on both sides of a leadframe. The planishing action, on the other hand, is advantageous only on the leadframe side where the mold runners are positioned. It would, therefore, be sufficient to use the planishing tool only on one side of the leadframe. From a practical fabrication standpoint, however, counterbalancing the impact force of the planishing tool is most easily achieved by planishing corresponding areas on both sides of a leadframe.


A surface step of the order of 10 μm is clearly visible in an unaided-eye inspection of a leadframe surface, especially when accompanied by a change in optical reflectivity. The application of a planishing tool by a leadframe supplier is thus easily detectable in the proximity of mold gates. Since the step of trimming the leadframe for singulating the finished package after completing the encapsulation step will likely remove the planished leadframe portions, only about 10 to 20 μm inside the gate of the finished package will continue to show marks of the planishing action.


Another embodiment of the invention is a method for fabricating a leadframe strip for use in plastic encapsulated semiconductor devices. Certain steps of the process flow are shown in the block diagram of FIG. 8. In step 801, the geometrical form of a leadframe is etched or stamped from a starting sheet of a base metal. As stated above, preferred base metals include copper, copper alloy, iron-nickel alloy, aluminum, and Kovar™, and preferred starting sheets are in the thickness range from 120 to 250 μm; thicknesses under 100 μm are becoming more common. The term base metal has the connotation of starting material and does not imply a chemical characteristic.


In the next step 802, the leadframe is plated to promote bondability and solderability and to enhance adhesion to polymeric encapsulation compounds. Preferred metals for plating include nickel, palladium, gold, and combinations and alloys thereof. For some devices, another option includes tin. For strengthening adhesion without additional cost, it is preferred to employ a flood roughening technique involving the entire leadframe surface, preferably on both sides of the leadframe. A preferred roughness is in the range of 90±20 nm, which results in a surface area ratio of about 150 to 160 square-units for a square area measuring 10 by 10 units side-length (instead of a surface area ratio of 100 square-units for a flat surface). The 50 to 60% increase in active surface originates the enhanced adhesion. It has been described above that the strong adhesion has the unwelcome side-effect of leadframe deformation in the degating and deflashing process steps. To prevent these side effects, the next process step includes the feature of adding a light coining step for reducing or removing the rough texture in selected leadframe zones, especially in the neighborhood of the mold gate areas.


In step 803, the standard machine for off-setting (depressing chip pads from the sheet plane) and cutting (creating leadframe strips) is enriched by an additional station for planishing. By adding the planishing tool to an existing machine, no extra process step is needed and the planishing step remains low cost. In the planishing process step, the computer-controlled machine positions the leadframe sheet precisely under the planishing tool, which is shaped to impact selected areas of the leadframe on both sides of the sheet. Controlled by the computer, the planishing tool impacts the selected area with pre-determined force. Process control can verify the planishing result by visual inspection, since the impact changes the optical reflection of the leadframe surface to shiny from matte.


The computer-controlled machine for process step 803 may execute the functions of offsetting, planishing, and cutting simultaneously or consecutively.


After leadframe strips have been cut from the sheet in step 803 in the next station of the machine, the strips are shipped in step 804 to the next process stations for assembling and packaging semiconductor chips.



FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate the result of the assembling and packaging process steps for an example of the Quad Flat Package (QFP) family. FIG. 9A shows the result after the steps of attaching and wire bonding a semiconductor chip on a unit of an exemplary leadframe strip 901. The unit of the leadframe includes a pad 920 for attaching the chip; pad 920 is held by straps 921 onto the rails of the leadframe. The unit further includes a plurality of leads, each lead having a first portion 922a near chip pad 920 and a second portion 922b remote from the chip pad. The leads are stabilized for the wire bonding process by rails 923, which will be cut out (trimmed) after the encapsulation step. Pad 920, straps 921, and the leads 922a, 922b have a mechanically rough surface as described above.


In the example of FIG. 9A, a semiconductor chip 930 is attached to pad 920 and bonded by wires 940 to the first lead portions 922a. Preferably, the wire bonding comprises ball bonding with the balls 941 attached to chip 930 and stitches 942 attached to first lead portions 922a.


In FIG. 9B, a package of plastic compound 950 (preferably opaque, but shown as being transparent for clarity purposes) is encapsulating chip 930, pad 920, straps 921, the bonding wires 940, and the first lead portions 922a. The second lead portions 922b are left un-encapsulated. The preferred encapsulation method is a transfer molding technique using a polymeric epoxy compound mixed with a high percentage of inorganic fillers.


After completing the encapsulation step, the leadframe strip with the packaged devices is subjected to the trimming operation of the leadframe rails and the forming operation of the exposed second lead portions 922b. The trimming step also cuts the straps from the leadframe rails so that the strap ends are exposed on the surface of the package.


As FIG. 9B illustrates, at least one of the straps includes a portion 921a adjacent to the exposed strap end, the portion having a mechanically smooth surface transitioning by a step into the rough surface of the remainder of the strap. FIG. 9B shows that portion 921a is a protuberance of the planished zone 960 of the leadframe, which had been flattened to create low adhesion of molding compound to mold runners, and thus to enable easy removal of residual compound for device singulation.


While this invention has been described in reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. As an example, the invention applies to products using any type of semiconductor chip, discrete or integrated circuit, and the material of the semiconductor chip may comprise silicon, silicon germanium, gallium arsenide, or any other semiconductor or compound material used in integrated circuit manufacturing.


As another example, the invention applies to all leadframe-based semiconductor packages.


As yet another example, the invention applies to any shape of the planishing tool and to any degree of planishing effect.


It is therefore intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiment.

Claims
  • 1. A method of fabricating semiconductor device comprising: forming a leadframe having a pad with a plurality of straps, and a plurality of leads including first and second portions, each one of the plurality of straps has an end;roughing the pad, the plurality of straps, and the plurality of the leads;attaching a semiconductor chip to the pad;wire bonding the semiconductor chip to the first lead portions;encapsulating with a compound the semiconductor chip, the pad, the plurality of straps, the bonding wires and the first lead portions, leaving the second lead portions un-encapsulated;exposing at least one of the plurality of strap ends; andselectively planishing a portion adjacent to the at least one of the plurality of the exposed strap ends.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further including transitioning by a step into the rough surface of the remainder of the strap.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein roughing includes roughing both sides of the leadframe.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein planishing includes planishing both sides of the leadframe.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the rough metal surfaces have been created by a flood roughening method.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the rough metal surfaces have been created by a mechanical roughening method.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein roughing is done to an average roughness of 90±20 nm, enhancing the adhesion of the leadframe metal to the encapsulating compound.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the planishing process causes a thickness reduction of the rough-surface leadframe metal by 10±5%.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 wherein a step spacing the planished surface portions from the rough surface portions equals the thickness reduction of the rough-surface leadframe metal.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the strap portion at the strap end having a smooth surface extends about 15±5 μm inside from the strap end.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation-In-Part of and claims priority to U.S. Ser. No. 14/684,848, filed Apr. 13, 2015, which is a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. Ser. No. 13/937,590 filed on Jul. 9, 2013—now U.S. Pat. No. 9,006,038 that is a Divisional of and claims priority to U.S. Ser. No. 13/462,574 filed on May 2, 2012—now U.S. Pat. No. 8,587,099, the entire contents of all are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (89)
Number Name Date Kind
3719536 Rheingold et al. Mar 1973 A
3939559 Fendley et al. Feb 1976 A
4003073 Helda et al. Jan 1977 A
4132856 Hutchison et al. Jan 1979 A
5070039 Johnson et al. Dec 1991 A
5196725 Mita et al. Mar 1993 A
5304844 Horiuchi et al. Apr 1994 A
5437096 Mennucci Aug 1995 A
5622896 Knotter et al. Apr 1997 A
5637913 Kajihara et al. Jun 1997 A
5637916 Joshi Jun 1997 A
5659950 Adams et al. Aug 1997 A
5677245 Brown et al. Oct 1997 A
5682673 Fehr Nov 1997 A
5683943 Yamada Nov 1997 A
5773878 Lim et al. Jun 1998 A
5939778 Boutin et al. Aug 1999 A
5946198 Hoppe et al. Aug 1999 A
6008068 Yamada Dec 1999 A
6064115 Moscicki May 2000 A
6197615 Song et al. Mar 2001 B1
6229200 Mclellan et al. May 2001 B1
6348729 Li et al. Feb 2002 B1
6534861 Castro Mar 2003 B1
6600335 Tay et al. Jul 2003 B2
7368807 Abbott May 2008 B2
7415688 Sakakibara Aug 2008 B2
D588080 Harnden et al. Mar 2009 S
D588557 Harnden et al. Mar 2009 S
7504735 Shimizu et al. Mar 2009 B2
7637913 De Villiers et al. Dec 2009 B2
7678617 Bayan Mar 2010 B1
8133763 Koduri Mar 2012 B2
8184453 Kim et al. May 2012 B1
8188583 Arita et al. May 2012 B2
8338927 Nakamura et al. Dec 2012 B2
8377751 Amanai et al. Feb 2013 B2
8432023 Kim et al. Apr 2013 B1
8435867 Fujishima et al. May 2013 B2
8441110 Choi May 2013 B1
8575742 Kim et al. Nov 2013 B1
8587099 Abbott Nov 2013 B1
8610254 Zhao Dec 2013 B2
8674485 Kim et al. Mar 2014 B1
8829685 Fukushima et al. Sep 2014 B2
8866278 Bae et al. Oct 2014 B1
8963300 Abbott Feb 2015 B2
8969300 Rasmussen Mar 2015 B2
9006038 Abbott Apr 2015 B2
9136256 Joshi Sep 2015 B2
9153383 Chen Oct 2015 B2
9355946 Joshi May 2016 B2
9437367 Chen Sep 2016 B2
9972506 Abbott May 2018 B2
20030006488 Wakabayashi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030071333 Matsuzawa Apr 2003 A1
20030203539 Islam et al. Oct 2003 A1
20060189037 Abbott Apr 2006 A1
20060097366 Sirinorakul et al. May 2006 A1
20080012101 Zuniga-Ortiz et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080083972 Johnson Apr 2008 A1
20090166828 Upadhyayula et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090315159 Abbott Dec 2009 A1
20100062570 Test Mar 2010 A1
20100219520 Sung et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100295161 Koduri Nov 2010 A1
20100325885 Shimazaki et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001227 Ano Jan 2011 A1
20110108965 Hess et al. May 2011 A1
20120248588 Yamabe Oct 2012 A1
20120306065 Bin Mohd Arshad Dec 2012 A1
20130070452 Urano et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130292811 Abbott Nov 2013 A1
20130298393 Abbott Nov 2013 A1
20140035113 Kierse Feb 2014 A1
20140048920 Abbott Feb 2014 A1
20140151865 Koschmieder Jun 2014 A1
20140167240 Chew et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140268503 Chen Sep 2014 A1
20150214198 Lee Jul 2015 A1
20150221526 Abbott Aug 2015 A1
20150235999 Joshi Aug 2015 A1
20150262918 Tran Sep 2015 A1
20150262919 Tran Sep 2015 A1
20150348890 Joshi Dec 2015 A1
20150371783 Chen Dec 2015 A1
20160005712 Tran Jan 2016 A1
20160027721 Lee et al. Jan 2016 A1
20180204739 Abbott Jul 2018 A1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180204739 A1 Jul 2018 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13462574 May 2012 US
Child 13937590 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13937590 Jul 2013 US
Child 14684848 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14684848 Apr 2015 US
Child 15913499 US