Semiconductor electronic devices and components, and a variety of circuit applications in which the devices and components may be utilized are described.
To date, most transistors used in power electronic applications have typically been fabricated with silicon (Si) semiconductor materials. Common transistor devices for power applications include Si CoolMOS, Si Power MOSFETs, and Si Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs). While Si power devices are inexpensive, they suffer from a number of disadvantages, including relatively low switching speeds and high levels of electrical noise. More recently, silicon carbide (SiC) power devices have been considered due to their superior properties. III-N semiconductor devices, such as gallium nitride (GaN) devices, are now emerging as attractive candidates to carry large currents, support high voltages and to provide very low on-resistance and fast switching times. While numerous III-N transistors and diodes have been demonstrated, improvements in reliability are still necessary in order to enable large scale manufacturing and more widespread adoption of these devices.
In typical power switching applications in which switching transistors are used, the transistor is at all times in one of two states. In the first state, which is commonly referred to as the “on state”, the voltage at the gate electrode relative to the source electrode is higher than the transistor threshold voltage, and substantial current flows through the transistor. In this state, the voltage difference between the source and drain is typically low, usually no more than a few volts, such as about 0.1-5 volts. In the second state, which is commonly referred to as the “off state”, the voltage at the gate electrode relative to the source electrode is lower than the transistor threshold voltage, and no substantial current flows through the transistor. Whether the device is on or off depends on whether or not current is able to flow through the device (off=no current). Current flow is determined by the voltage on the gate. When the device is on (gate voltage is high), only a small voltage (0.1-5V) at the drain is required to keep the current flowing. Whereas, when the device is off (gate voltage is low), no substantial current flows regardless of how much voltage is applied to the drain (up to the high voltage limit of the device, at which point the device breaks down).
In the off state, the voltage between the source and drain can range anywhere from about 0V to the value of the circuit high voltage supply, which in some cases can be as high as 100V, 300V, 600V, 1200V, 1700V, or higher. When the transistor is in the off state, it is said to be “blocking a voltage” between the source and drain. As used herein, the term “blocking a voltage” refers to the ability of a transistor to prevent substantial current, such as a current that is greater than 0.001 times the operating current during regular conduction, from flowing through the transistor when a voltage is applied across the transistor. In other words, while a transistor is blocking a voltage applied across it, the total current passing through the transistor will not be greater than 0.001 times the operating current during regular conduction.
As used herein, a “high-voltage device”, such as a high-voltage transistor, is an electronic device which is optimized for high-voltage switching applications. That is, when the transistor is off, it is capable of blocking high voltages, such as about 300V or higher, about 600V or higher, about 1200V or higher, or about 1700V or higher, and when the transistor is on, it has a sufficiently low on-resistance (RON) for the application in which it is used, i.e., it experiences sufficiently low conduction loss when a substantial current passes through the device. A high-voltage device can at least be capable of blocking a voltage equal to the high-voltage supply or the maximum voltage in the circuit for which it is used. A high-voltage device may be capable of blocking 300V, 600V, 1200V, 1700V, or other suitable blocking voltage required by the application. In other words, a high-voltage device can block any voltage between 0V and at least Vmax, where Vmax is the maximum voltage that could be supplied by the circuit or power supply. In some implementations, a high-voltage device can block any voltage between 0V and at least 2*Vmax.
In one aspect, a transistor device having a short-circuit survival time is described. The transistor device includes a source, a gate, a drain, and a semiconductor material which includes a gate region, the gate region being between the source and the drain. The transistor device further includes a plurality of channel access regions in the semiconductor material between the source and the gate and between the drain and the gate, respectively, a channel in the semiconductor material having an effective width in the gate region and in the channel access regions, and an isolation region in the gate region serving to reduce the effective width of the channel in the gate region without substantially reducing the effective width of the channel in the access regions.
In another aspect, a transistor device is described that includes a source, a gate, a drain, and a semiconductor material which includes a gate region, the gate region being between the source and the drain. The transistor device further includes a plurality of channel access regions in the semiconductor material between the source and the gate and between the drain and the gate, respectively, a channel in the semiconductor material, and an isolation region in or near a region of the semiconductor material which has a high electric field or is at a low electric potential during device operation, serving to improve the efficiency of hole collection from the semiconductor material.
In yet another aspect, a transistor device is described that includes a source having a source width, the transistor device having a maximum current and an on-resistance. The maximum current per unit source width of the transistor device is less than 500 milliamps/millimeter, and the on-resistance multiplied by the source width is less than 30 ohm-millimeters.
For all devices described herein, one or more of the following may be applicable. The device can include a plurality of isolation regions in the gate region. An isolation region can be a region etched through the channel. The device can include a field plate, which can be along an edge of the isolation region or can lie over the channel access region between the gate and the drain. The field plate can be a slant field plate. The field plate can be connected to one of the gate, the source, the drain, ground or a DC voltage. The isolation region can lie beneath or near to the field plate. The isolation region can contain dopants implanted into the semiconductor material to a depth greater than the depth of the channel, and the dopants can be selected from the group consisting of Mg, Al and Fe. The device can be a III-N transistor. The device can be a field effect transistor. The isolation region can be capable of collecting holes generated in the semiconductor material. The gate or the source can contact a surface of the isolation region. The isolation region can increase the short-circuit survival time of the transistor. The device can be a high-voltage device. The isolation region can lie beneath or near the source. The isolation region can lie beneath or near the gate. The isolation region can lie between the source and the gate. The device may further include a metal electrode contacting a surface of the isolation region. The device can be capable of blocking at least 600V. The on-resistance multiplied by the source width can be less than 15 ohm-millimeters. The maximum current can be less than 50 A. The on-resistance can be less than 1 ohm. The product of the maximum current and the on-resistance can be less than about 5 Amp-ohms.
Isolation regions can be used in transistor devices to limit the maximum current that can flow through the device without substantially increasing the on-resistance of the device. Alternatively, isolation structures or regions can be configured to collect holes that are generated in the transistor device. The isolation regions may simultaneously achieve both of these functions.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Referring to
When a semiconductor device such as a transistor is operated in the off state, large electric fields may be present in the material layers, especially when the device is used in high-voltage applications. These large electric fields can result in the creation of holes, such as by impact ionization, in regions in which these electric fields are large. The holes, which have a positive electrical charge, migrate within the device structure towards regions of low electric potential (i.e., low voltage). The presence of these positively charged holes can lead to shifts in the device threshold voltage, reduced reliability, and other undesirable effects. Hence, it is desirable to minimize or eliminate the effects of these holes.
Furthermore, in some circuit or system applications in which high-voltage transistors are used, during failure of the circuit or system, the transistor can be operated in the on state (i.e. conducting current) with a large voltage between the source and drain, for short periods of time. During this short time, the current flowing through the transistor is the maximum current that the transistor is capable of conducting. This maximum current value is typically referred to as the “short-circuit current” and is represented by the symbol Imax. For example, in a motor drive circuit, there are times in which the motor can stop turning, accompanied by a simultaneous large current (i.e., short-circuit current) through the high-voltage transistors in the motor drive circuit, and a large voltage across the source and drain terminals of these transistors. The control circuitry, which can send a voltage signal to the gate of the transistors to turn the devices off and thereby prevent further current from flowing, has a finite response time, typically about 10 microseconds. Hence this high current, high voltage mode of operation is sustained for this entire response time of the control circuitry.
During the high current, high voltage mode of operation described above, the high-voltage transistors and/or other circuit components can become damaged or rendered inoperable. The length of time for which the high current, high voltage mode of operation can be sustained without damaging the transistor, known as the “short-circuit survival time,” is represented by the symbol τ and given by the equation τ=[ΔT*m*C]/[Imax*V], where ΔT is the maximum temperature rise of the transistor before damage is incurred, m is the thermal mass of the transistor (i.e., the mass of material in the vicinity of the transistor channel, such as the mass of the material within about 5 microns of the transistor channel), C is the average thermal capacity of the material in the vicinity of the transistor channel, Imax is the maximum current that the transistor is capable of conducting (i.e., the short-circuit current), and V is the average voltage across the transistor during the high current, high voltage mode of operation.
As seen from the equation for τ above, one way to increase τ is to decrease the short-circuit current Imax without substantially affecting any of the other parameters in the equation for τ. For example, this can be accomplished by designing the transistor with a lower channel charge density and/or lower channel conductivity. However, reducing Imax by this method, as well as by many other methods, increases the transistor's on-resistance Ron, hence increasing the power loss during normal operation. It is therefore desirable to reduce Imax without substantially affecting any of these other parameters in the equation for τ, while only minimally increasing the on-resistance.
Most conventional III-N high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) and related transistor devices are normally on, i.e., have a negative threshold voltage, which means that they can conduct current at zero gate voltage. These devices with negative threshold voltages are known as depletion-mode (D-mode) devices. It can be preferable in some power electronics applications to have normally-off devices, i.e., devices with positive threshold voltages, that cannot conduct current at zero gate voltage, in order to avoid damage to the device or to other circuit components by preventing accidental turn-on of the device. Normally-off devices are commonly referred to as enhancement-mode (E-mode) devices.
Referring to
Isolation regions 20-22 are regions through which substantial channel current cannot flow, i.e., they provide a break in the device channel between source 14 and drain 15. They can be etched regions where semiconductor material has been etched through the channel, or ion-implanted regions implanted with Al, Mg or Fe ions, for example. As shown in the cross-sectional views of
As seen in
The slant field plates 27-30 shown in
Still referring to
In some implementations, isolation regions 20, 21 and 22 are used to limit Imax. They can be formed by implanting ions into the semiconductor material structure 32. For III-N devices, ions that may be implanted may include, but are not limited to, Al, Mg, or Fe. Or, the isolation regions can be formed by etching the semiconductor material at least to a depth greater than the depth of the device channel, thereby physically removing a portion of the device channel. The isolation regions can extend at least all the way from the side of the gate region 31 nearest the source 14, to the other side of the gate region 31 nearest the drain 15, as this may be necessary to ensure that current is reduced by a factor (Wsource−Wtot)/Wsource, compared to an otherwise identical device which does not include isolation regions.
For devices with a field plate or multiple field plates 27, 28, 29 and 30 connected to the drain-side edge of the gate, as shown in
Isolation regions 20, 21 and 22 may also be used to collect holes that are formed in the device material layers 32 during times when the electric fields in the device are sufficiently high, such as when the device is in the off-state and is blocking a high voltage. Isolation regions used as hole collectors can cause the holes to be transported away from the vicinity of the device channel, thereby mitigating their deleterious effects on device performance and reliability. The isolation regions can be placed in a region of low electric potential (voltage), such that holes are drawn towards the isolation regions. Once the holes approach or are incident upon the isolation regions, they can be drawn away from the vicinity of the channel or other active regions of the device. For example, in some implementations, the holes can recombine with electrons near to or within the isolation regions 20, 21 and 22. In other implementations, a metal electrode (not shown) is connected to the surface of an isolation region, and a sufficiently low or negative voltage is applied to that electrode to carry the holes away through the electrode as an electrical current. In other implementations, the gate metal is in electrical contact with the surface of the isolation region. Since the gate 16 is typically at a low or negative voltage when the transistor 1 is in the off state, the voltage on the gate may be sufficient to draw the holes away from the vicinity of the device channel or other active regions.
For isolation regions to function as hole collectors, in many cases it can be necessary for the gate metal 16 to electrically contact at least a portion of the underlying semiconductor material in the isolation regions 20, 21 and 22. Many transistors include gate dielectrics 17, which are insulators between the gate metal 16 and the underlying semiconductor material 12. When gate dielectrics are used, a break in the dielectric may be required over at least a portion of isolation region 20, 21 and 22 in order to allow the gate metal 16 or other electrode to contact the underlying isolation region.
Isolation regions 20, 21 and 22 used as hole collectors can have the following properties. They can be regions in which the semiconductor material is etched, in some cases at least through the device channel. In this case, a metal electrode or a portion of the gate metal electrically contacts at least a portion of the semiconductor surface which was exposed by the etch. Alternatively, they can be ion implanted regions in the semiconductor material, where the implanted regions can extend through the channel region, thereby forming a break in the device channel. Ion implanted regions may be capable of conducting substantial hole, but not substantial electron currents. For example they can be p-type or nominally p-type regions. Isolation regions can be placed in regions of high electric field, or in the vicinity of regions of high electric fields. Since holes may be generated in regions of high electric field, placing an isolation region near the region where the holes are generated can improve hole collection efficiency. Examples of regions that typically have high electric fields during device operation include the regions between the gate and the drain electrode, particularly near the drain-side edge of the gate electrode, or near or beneath a field plate.
Isolation regions can also be placed in regions of low voltage or low electric potential, or in the vicinity of regions of low voltage or low electric potential. Since holes are drawn towards regions of low voltage or low electric potential, placing an isolation region near where the holes are drawn to can improve hole collection efficiency. Examples of regions that are typically at low voltage or low electric potential during device operation include the regions near or beneath the source electrode, the regions near or beneath the gate electrode, or the regions between the source and the gate electrode. Alternatively, isolation regions can be placed in regions of high electric fields (i.e., regions that have high electric fields during device operation). Since holes are generated in regions of high electric fields, placing an isolation region near where the holes are generated can improve hole collection efficiency. Examples of locations that hole collectors can be placed include, but are not limited to, beneath or near the source electrode 14 shown in
A III-N high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) with isolation regions that serve to limit the maximum current can have a maximum current level Imax per unit source width which is less than 500 mA/mm, such as less than 350, 150, or 50 mA/mm, while the product of the on-resistance Ron and the source width is less than about 30 ohm-millimeters, such less than about 15, 5, 3, 2, or 1 ohm-millimeters. The on-resistance is typically larger for devices that are designed to block larger voltages. Hence, a device designed to be capable of blocking 1200V may have an on-resistance that is about 30 ohm-millimeters or less, while a device designed to be capable of blocking 600V may have an on-resistance that is about 15 ohm-millimeters or less. In some implementations, the maximum current level of a transistor which includes an isolation region is less than 50 A, such as less than 25, 10, or 5 A. In other implementations, the on-resistance of a transistor which includes an isolation region is less than 1 ohm, such as less than 0.5, 0.2, or 0.1 ohms. In yet other implementations, the product of the maximum current level and the on-resistance can be less than about 5 Amp-ohms.
A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the techniques and devices described herein. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/968,704, filed Dec. 15, 2010, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4300091 | Schade, Jr. | Nov 1981 | A |
4532439 | Koike | Jul 1985 | A |
4645562 | Liao et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4728826 | Einzinger et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4821093 | Iafrate et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4914489 | Awano | Apr 1990 | A |
5051618 | Lou | Sep 1991 | A |
5329147 | Vo et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5618384 | Chan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5646069 | Jelloian et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5663091 | Yen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5705847 | Kashiwa et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714393 | Wild et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5909103 | Williams | Jun 1999 | A |
5998810 | Hatano et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008684 | Ker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6097046 | Plumton | Aug 2000 | A |
6100571 | Mizuta et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6292500 | Kouchi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307220 | Yamazaki | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316793 | Sheppard et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6373082 | Ohno et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6475889 | Ring | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486502 | Sheppard et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6504235 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6515303 | Ring | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6548333 | Smith | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6583454 | Sheppard et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586781 | Wu et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6649497 | Ring | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6727531 | Redwing et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6777278 | Smith | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6849882 | Chavarkar et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6946739 | Ring | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6979863 | Ryu | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6982204 | Saxler et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7030428 | Saxler | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038252 | Saito et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045404 | Sheppard et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053413 | D'Evelyn et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071498 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084475 | Shelton et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109552 | Wu | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7125786 | Ring et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126212 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7161194 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170111 | Saxler | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7230284 | Parikh et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238560 | Sheppard et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253454 | Saxler | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265399 | Sriram et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7268375 | Shur et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7304331 | Saito et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321132 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326971 | Harris et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332795 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7364988 | Harris et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7388236 | Wu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7419892 | Sheppard et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7432142 | Saxler et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7456443 | Saxler et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7465967 | Smith et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7488992 | Robinson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7501669 | Parikh et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7544963 | Saxler | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7547925 | Wong et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548112 | Sheppard | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7550783 | Wu et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7550784 | Saxler et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7566580 | Keller et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7566918 | Wu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7573078 | Wu et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7592211 | Sheppard et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598108 | Li et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605017 | Hayashi et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612363 | Takeda et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7612390 | Saxler et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7615774 | Saxler | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7638818 | Wu et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7678628 | Sheppard et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7692263 | Wu et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7709269 | Smith et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7709859 | Smith et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7745851 | Harris | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755108 | Kuraguchi | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759700 | Ueno et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7777252 | Sugimoto et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7777254 | Sato | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795642 | Suh et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7812369 | Chini et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7855401 | Sheppard et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859020 | Kikkawa et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859021 | Kaneko | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7875537 | Suvorov et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875914 | Sheppard | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7884395 | Saito | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892974 | Ring et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893424 | Eichler et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893500 | Wu et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898004 | Wu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7901994 | Saxler et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7906799 | Sheppard et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7915643 | Suh et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7915644 | Wu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919791 | Flynn et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7928475 | Parikh et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7939391 | Suh et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948011 | Rajan et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955918 | Wu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7955984 | Ohki | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960756 | Sheppard et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7985986 | Heikman et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7985987 | Kaneko | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8039352 | Mishra et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044380 | Lee | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8049252 | Smith et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8093606 | Sonobe et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8237196 | Saito | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8237198 | Wu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8390000 | Chu et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8431960 | Beach et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8471267 | Hayashi et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8476125 | Khan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8519438 | Mishra et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8525231 | Park et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8598937 | Lal et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603880 | Yamada | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8716141 | Dora et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8742460 | Mishra et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20010032999 | Yoshida | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040247 | Ando et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020036287 | Yu et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020121648 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020167023 | Chavarkar et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003724 | Uchiyama et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030006437 | Mizuta et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020092 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030056 | Callaway, Jr. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040041169 | Ren et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061129 | Saxler et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040119067 | Weeks, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040164347 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050001235 | Murata et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050077541 | Shen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050133816 | Fan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050189561 | Kinzer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050189562 | Kinzer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050194612 | Beach | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050253168 | Wu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050274977 | Saito et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011915 | Saito et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060043499 | De Cremoux et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060871 | Beach | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076677 | Daubenspeck et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060102929 | Okamoto et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060108602 | Tanimoto | May 2006 | A1 |
20060108605 | Yanagihara et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121682 | Saxler | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060124962 | Ueda et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145189 | Beach | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157729 | Ueno et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060186422 | Gaska et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189109 | Fitzgerald | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060202272 | Wu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220063 | Kurachi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060226442 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060255364 | Saxler et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289901 | Sheppard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070007547 | Beach | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018187 | Lee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018199 | Sheppard et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018210 | Sheppard | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070045670 | Kuraguchi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080672 | Yang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070128743 | Huang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070131968 | Morita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070132037 | Hoshi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134834 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070145390 | Kuraguchi | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070145417 | Brar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070158692 | Nakayama et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070164315 | Smith et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070164322 | Smith et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070194354 | Wu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205433 | Parikh et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070210329 | Goto | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215899 | Herman | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224710 | Palacios et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228477 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070241368 | Mil'shtein et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249119 | Saito | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070278518 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295985 | Weeks, Jr. et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080073670 | Yang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093626 | Kuraguchi | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080121876 | Otsuka et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080157121 | Ohki | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080203430 | Simin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080230784 | Murphy | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237606 | Kikkawa et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080237640 | Mishra et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272397 | Koudymov et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080274574 | Yun | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283844 | Hoshi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296618 | Suh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080308813 | Suh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001409 | Takano et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032820 | Chen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090032879 | Kuraguchi | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090045438 | Inoue et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050936 | Oka | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090065810 | Honea et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090072240 | Suh et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090072269 | Suh et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075455 | Mishra | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085065 | Mishra et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121775 | Ueda et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140262 | Ohki et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146185 | Suh et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090201072 | Honea et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218598 | Goto | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090267078 | Mishra et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100019225 | Lee | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019279 | Chen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025730 | Heikman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100065923 | Charles et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100067275 | Wang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100133506 | Nakanishi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100201439 | Wu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100203234 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219445 | Yokoyama et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244087 | Horie et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100288998 | Kikuchi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110006346 | Ando et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012110 | Sazawa et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110249359 | Mochizuki et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120153390 | Mishra et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168822 | Matsushita | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120193638 | Keller et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120211800 | Boutros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120217512 | Renaud | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120267637 | Jeon et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130056744 | Mishra et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130328061 | Chu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140015066 | Wu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140084346 | Tajiri | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1748320 | Mar 2006 | CN |
101002332 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101107713 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101312207 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101897029 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102017160 | Apr 2011 | CN |
103477543 | Dec 2013 | CN |
103493206 | Jan 2014 | CN |
1 998 376 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2 188 842 | May 2010 | EP |
11-224950 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-058871 | Feb 2000 | JP |
3129264 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2003-229566 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-244943 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004-260114 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2006-032749 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-033723 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-253559 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007-036218 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-215331 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008-199771 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2010-087076 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010-539712 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011-0033584 | Mar 2011 | KR |
200924068 | Jun 2009 | TW |
200924201 | Jun 2009 | TW |
200947703 | Nov 2009 | TW |
201010076 | Mar 2010 | TW |
201027759 | Jul 2010 | TW |
201027912 | Jul 2010 | TW |
201036155 | Oct 2010 | TW |
201322443 | Jun 2013 | TW |
WO 2004070791 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004098060 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005036749 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005070007 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005070009 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2006114883 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007077666 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007108404 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008120094 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009036181 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009036266 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009039028 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009039041 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009076076 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009132039 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2010039463 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010068554 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010090885 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010132587 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2011031431 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011072027 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Authorized officer Chung Keun Lee, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2008/076030, mailed Mar. 23, 2009, 10 pages. |
Authorized officer Yolaine Cussac, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2008/076030, Mar. 25, 2010, 5 pages. |
Authorized officer Chung Keun Lee, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2008/076079, mailed Mar. 20, 2009, 11 pages. |
Authorized officer Nora Lindner, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2008/076079, mailed Apr. 1, 2010, 6 pages. |
Authorized officer Keon Hyeong Kim, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2008/076160 mailed Mar. 18, 2009, 11 pages. |
Authorized officer Simin Baharlou, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2008/076160, mailed Mar. 25 2010, 6 pages. |
Authorized officer Chung Keun Lee, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2008/076199, mailed Mar. 24, 2009, 11 pages. |
Authorized officer Dorothée Mülhausen, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2008/076199, mailed Apr. 1, 2010, 6 pages. |
Authorized officer Keon Hyeong Kim, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2008/085031, mailed Jun. 24, 2009, 11 pages. |
Authorized officer Yolaine Cussac, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2008/085031, mailed Jun. 24, 2010, 6 pages. |
Authorized officer Tae Hoon Kim, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2009/041304, mailed Dec. 18, 2009, 13 pages. |
Authorized officer Dorothée Mülhausen, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, in PCT/US2009/041304, mailed Nov. 4, 2010, 8 pages. |
Authorized officer Sung Hee Kim, International Search Report and the Written Opinion in PCT/US2009/057554, mailed May 10, 2010, 13 pages. |
Authorized Officer Gijsbertus Beijer, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2009/057554, mailed Mar. 29, 2011, 7 pages. |
Authorized officer Cheon Whan Cho, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2009/066647, mailed Jul. 1, 2010, 16 pages. |
Authorized officer Athina Nikitas-Etienne, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2009/066647, mailed Jun. 23, 2011, 12 pages. |
Authorized officer Sung Chan Chung, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/021824, mailed Aug. 23, 2010, 9 pages. |
Authorized officer Beate Giffo-Schmitt, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2010/021824, mailed Aug. 18, 2011, 6 pages. |
Authorized officer Sang Ho Lee, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/034579, mailed Dec. 24, 2010, 9 pages. |
Authorized officer Nora Lindner, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2010/034579, mailed Nov. 24, 2011, 7 pages. |
Authorized officer Jeongmin Choi, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/046193, mailed Apr. 26, 2011, 13 pages. |
Authorized officer Philippe Bécamel, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2010/046193, mailed Mar. 8, 2012, 10 pages. |
Authorized officer Sang Ho Lee, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/059486, mailed Jul. 26, 2011, 9 pages. |
Authorized officer Nora Lindner, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2010/059486, mailed Jun. 21, 2012, 6 pages. |
Authorized officer Kwan Sik Sul, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/063975, mailed May 18, 2012, 8 pages. |
Authorized officer Simin Baharlou, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/063975, mailed Jun. 27, 2013, 5 pages. |
Authorized officer Sang-Taek Kim, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/061407, mailed May 22, 2012, 10 pages. |
Authorized officer Jeongmin Choi, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/027146, mailed Sep. 24, 2012, 12 pages. |
European Search Report in Application No. 10 81 5813.0, mailed Mar. 13, 2012, 9 pages. |
Search Report and Action in TW Application No. 098132132, issued Dec. 6, 2012, 8 pages. |
Chinese First Office Action for Application No. 200880120050.6, Aug. 2, 2011, 8 pages. |
Chinese First Office Action for Application No. 200980114639.X, May 14, 2012, 13 pages. |
Ando et al., “10-W/mm AlGaN—GaN HFET with a Field Modulating Plate,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2003, 24(5):289-291. |
Arulkumaran et al., “Enhancement of Breakdown Voltage by AlN Buffer Layer Thickness in AlGaN/GaN High-electron-mobility Transistors on 4 in. Diameter Silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, 2005, 86:123503-1-3. |
Arulkumaran et al. “Surface Passivation Effects on AlGaN/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors with SiO2, Si3N4, and Silicon Oxynitride,” Applied Physics Letters, 2004, 84(4):613-615. |
Barnett and Shinn, “Plastic and Elastic Properties of Compositionally Modulated Thin Films,” Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 1994, 24:481-511. |
Chen et al., “High-performance AlGaN/GaN Lateral Field-effect Rectifiers Compatible with High Electron Mobility Transistors,” Applied Physics Letters, 2008, 92, 253501-1-3. |
Cheng et al., “Flat GaN Epitaxial Layers Grown on Si(1 1 1) by Metalorganic Vapor Phase Epitaxy Using Step-graded AlGaN Intermediate Layers,” Journal of Electronic Materials, 2006, 35(4):592-598. |
Coffie, “Characterizing and Suppressing DC-to-RF Dispersion in AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors,” 2003, PhD Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 169 pages. |
Coffie et al., “Unpassivated p-GaN/AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with 7.1 W/mm at 10 GhZ,” Electronic Letters, 2003, 39(19):1419-1420. |
Chu et al., “1200-V Normally Off GaN-on-Si Field-effect Transistors with Low Dynamic On-Resistance,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2011, 32(5):632-634. |
Dora et al., “High Breakdown Voltage Achieved on AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with Integrated Slant Field Plates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2006, 27(9):713-715. |
Dora et al., “ZrO2 Gate Dielectrics Produced by Ultraviolet Ozone Oxidation for GaN and AlGaN/GaN Transistors,” J. Vac. Sci. TechnoI. B, 2006, 24(2)575-581. |
Dora, “Understanding Material and Process Limits for High Breakdown Voltage AlGaN/GaN HEMTs,” PhD Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, Mar. 2006, 157 pages. |
Fanciulli et al., “Structural and Electrical Properties of HfO2 Films Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition on Si, Ge, GaAs and GaN,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 2004, vol. 786, 6 pages. |
Green et al., “The Effect of Surface Passivation on the Microwave Characteristics of Undoped AlGaN/GaN HEMT's,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2000, 21(6):268 270. |
Gu et al., “AlGaN/GaN MOS Transistors using Crystalline ZrO2 as Gate Dielectric,” Proceedings of SPIE, 2007, vol. 6473, 64730S-1-8. |
Higashiwaki et al. “AlGaN/GaN Heterostructure Field-Effect Transistors on 4H-SiC Substrates with Current-Gain Cutoff Frequency of 190 GHz,” Applied Physics Express, 2008, 021103-1-3. |
Hwang et al., “Effects of a Molecular Beam Epitaxy Grown AIN Passivation Layer on AlGaN/GaN Heterojunction Field Effect Transistors,” Solid-State Electronics, 2004, 48:363-366. |
Im et al., “Normally Off GaN MOSFET Based on A1GaN/GaN Heterostructure with Extremely High 2DEG Density Grown on Silicon Substrate,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2010, 31(3):192-194. |
Karmalkar and Mishra, “Enhancement of Breakdown Voltage in AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors Using a Field Plate,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2001, 48(8):1515-1521. |
Karmalkar and Mishra, “Very High Voltage AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors Using a Field Plate Deposited on a Stepped Insulator,” Solid-State Electronics, 2001, 45:1645-1652. |
Keller et al., “GaN—GaN Junctions with Ultrathin AlN Interlayers: Expanding Heterojunction Design.” Applied Physics Letters, 2002, 80(23):4387-4389. |
Keller et al., “Method for Heteroepitaxial Growth of High Quality N-Face GaN, InN and AlN and their Alloys by Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/866,035, filed Nov. 15, 2006, 31 pages. |
Khan et al., “AlGaN/GaN Metal Oxide Semiconductor Heterostructure Field Effect Transistor,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2000, 21(2):63-65. |
Kim, “Process Development and Device Characteristics of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs for High Frequency Applications,” PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2007, 120 pages. |
Kumar et al., “High Transconductance Enhancement-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on SiC Substrate,” Electronics Letters, 2003, 39(24):1758-1760. |
Kuraguchi et al., “Normally-off GaN-MISFET with Well-controlled Threshold Voltage,” Phys. Stats. Sol., 2007, 204(6):2010-2013. |
Lanford et al., “Recessed-gate Enhancement-mode GaN HEMT with High Threshold Voltage, ” Electronic Letters, 2005, 41(7):449-450. |
Lee et al., “Self-aligned Process for Emitter- and Base-regrowth GaN HBTs and BJTs,” Solid-State Electronics, 2001, 45:243-247. |
Marchand et al., “Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition on GaN on Si(1 1 1): Stress Control and Application to Filed-effect Transistors,” Journal of Applied Physics, 2001, 89(12):7846-7851. |
Mishra et al., “N-face High Electron Mobility Transistors with Low Buffer Leakage and Low Parasitic Resistance,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/908,914, filed Mar. 29, 2007, 21 pages. |
Mishra et al., “Polarization-induced Barriers for N-face Nitride-based Electronics,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/940,052, filed May 24, 2007, 29 pages. |
Mishra et al., “Growing N-polar III-nitride structures,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/972,467, filed Sep. 14, 2007, 7 pages. |
Mishra et al., “AlGaN/GaN HEMTs—An Overview of Device Operation and Applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 2002, 90(6):1022-1031. |
Nanjo et al., “Remarkable Breakdown Voltage Enhancement in AlGaN Channel High Electron Mobility Transistors,” Applied Physics Letters 92 (2008), 3 pages. |
Napierala et al., “Selective GaN Epitaxy on Si(1 1 1) Substrates Using Porous Aluminum Oxide Buffer Layers,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2006. 153(2):G125-G127, 4 pages. |
Ota and Nozawa, “AlGaN/GaN Recessed MIS-gate HFET with High-threshold-voltage Normally-off Operation for Power Electronics Applications,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2008, 29(7):668-670. |
Palacios et al., “AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with an InGaN-based Back-barrier,” Device Research Conference Digest, 2005, DRC '05 63rd, pp. 181-182. |
Palacios et al., “AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors with InGaN Back-Barriers,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2006, 27(1):13-15. |
Palacios et al., “Fluorine Treatment to Shape the Electric Field in Electron Devices, Passivate Dislocations and Point Defects, and Enhance the Luminescence Efficiency of Optical Devices,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/736,628, filed Nov. 15, 2005, 21 pages. |
Palacios et al., “Nitride-based High Electron Mobility Transistors with a GaN Spacer,” Applied Physics Letters, 2006, 89:073508-1-3. |
Pei et al., “Effect of Dielectric Thickness on Power Performance of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2009, 30(4):313-315. |
“Planar, Low Switching Loss, Gallium Nitride Devices for Power Conversion Applications,” SBIR N121-090 (Navy), 3 pages. |
Rajan et al., “Advanced Transistor Structures Based on N-face GaN,” 32M International Symposium on Compound Semiconductors (ISCS), Sep. 18-22, 2005, Europa-Park Rust, Germany, 2 pages. |
Reiher et al., “Efficient Stress Relief in GaN Heteroepitaxy on Si(1 1 1) Using Low-temperature Aln Interlayers,” Journal of Crystal Growth, 2003, 248:563-567. |
Saito et al., “Recessed-gate Structure Approach Toward Normally Off High-voltage AlGaN/GaN HEMT for Power Electronics Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Device, 2006, 53(2):356-362. |
Shelton et al., “Selective Area Growth and Characterization of AlGaN/GaN Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2001, 48(3):490-494. |
Shen, “Advanced Polarization-based Design of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs,” Jun. 2004, PhD Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 192 pages. |
Sugiura et al., “Enhancement-mode n-channel GaN MOSFETs Fabricated on p-GaN Using HfO2 as Gate Oxide,” Electronics Letters, 2007, vol. 43, No. 17, 2 pages. |
Suh et al., “High Breakdown Enhancement Mode GaN-based HEMTs with Integrated Slant Field Plate,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/822,886, filed Aug. 18, 2006, 16 pages. |
Suh et al. “High-Breakdown Enhancement-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with Integrated Slant Field-Plate,” Electron Devices Meeting, 2006, IEDM '06 International, 3 pages. |
Suh et al., “III-Nitride Devices with Recessed Gates,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/972,481, filed Sep. 14, 2007, 18 pages. |
Tipirneni et al. “Silicon Dioxide-encapsulated High-Voltage AlGaN/GaN HFETs for Power-Switching Applications, ” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2007, 28(9):784-786. |
Vetury et al., “Direct Measurement of Gate Depletion in High Breakdown (405V) Al/GaN/GaN Heterostructure Field Effect Transistors,” IEDM 98, 1998, pp. 55-58. |
Wang et al., “Comparison of the Effect of Gate Dielectric Layer on 2DEG Carrier Concentration in Strained AlGaN/GaN Heterostructure,” Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 2007, vol. 831, 6 pages. |
Wang et al., “Enhancement-mode Si3N4/AlGaN/GaN MISHFETs,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2006, 27(10):793-795. |
Wu, “AlGaN/GaN Microwave Power High-Mobility Transistors,” PhD Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, Jul. 1997, 134 pages. |
Wu et al., “A 97.8% Efficient GaN HEMT Boost Converter with 300-W Output Power at 1MHz,”Electronic Device Letters, 2008, IEEE, 29(8):824-826. |
Yoshida, “AlGan/GaN Power FET,” Furukawa Review, 2002, 21:7-11. |
Zhang, “High Voltage GaN HEMTs with Low On-resistance for Switching Applications,” PhD Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, Sep. 2002, 166 pages. |
Zhanghong Content, Shanghai Institute of Metallurgy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, “Two-Dimensional Electron Gas and High Electron Mobility Transistor (HEMT),” Dec. 31, 1984, 17 pages. |
Authorized officer Lingfei Bai, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/061407, mailed Jun. 6, 2013, 7 pages. |
Authorized officer Athina Nickitas-Etienne, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2012/027146, mailed Sep. 19, 2013, 9 pages. |
Authorized officer Kwan Sik Sul, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/023160, mailed May 24, 2012, 9 pages. |
Authorized officer Simin Baharlou, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2012/023160, mailed Aug. 15, 2013, 6 pages. |
Authorized officer Tae Hoon Kim, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2013/035837, mailed Jul. 30, 2013, 9 pages. |
Authorized officer Agnés Wittmann-Regis, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2013/035837, mailed Oct. 23, 2014, 6 pages. |
Authorized officer Sang Won Choi, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2013/048275, mailed Oct. 14, 2013, 17 pages. |
Authorized officer Hye Lyun Park, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2013/050914, mailed Oct. 18, 2013, 11 pages. |
Authorized officer Sang Won Choi, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2013/024470, mailed May 27, 2013, 12 pages. |
Authorized officer Simin Baharlou, International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2013/024470, mailed Aug. 14, 2014, 9 pages. |
Authorized officer June Young Son, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/016298, mailed May 23, 2014, 15 pages. |
Authorized officer Tae Hoon Kim, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/027523, mailed Jul. 30, 2014, 14 pages. |
Authorized officer June Young Son, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/024191, mailed Aug. 7, 2014, 11 pages. |
Authorized officer June Young Son, International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/046030, mailed Oct. 21, 2014, 12 pages. |
Search Report and Action in TW Application No. 098141930, issued Jul. 10, 2014, 7 pages. |
First Office Action in CN Application No. 201180059979.4, issued Jul. 27, 2015, 20 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140231929 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12968704 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 14260808 | US |