The present disclosure relates to substrate processing, and more particularly to structures of a plasma source and pedestal.
The background description provided here is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
Substrate processing systems may be used to etch film on a substrate such as a semiconductor wafer. The substrate processing systems typically include a substrate processing chamber, a gas distribution device and a substrate support. During processing, the substrate is arranged on the substrate support. Different gas mixtures may be introduced into the substrate processing chamber and radio frequency (RF) plasma may be generated to activate chemical reactions. The RF plasma may be an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) or a transformer coupled plasma (TCP). The ICP or TCP may be provided by a plasma source as a result of charging one or more coils. The plasma source includes an upper portion of a substrate processing chamber and the one or more coils.
A chamber member of an ICP source may be cylindrically-shaped or dome-shaped. A chamber member of a TCP source may be flat-shaped. A cylindrically-shaped chamber member of an ICP source has coils located around a circumference of the chamber member. A dome-shaped chamber member of an ICP source is spherically-shaped and has coils disposed above the chamber member. A flat-shaped chamber member of a TCP source includes a flat circular dielectric window above which coils are mounted.
Plasma sources with cylindrical, dome and flat shaped chamber members have associated disadvantages. The disadvantage of the cylindrically-shaped chamber member is that all of the corresponding coils are located around the circumference of a cylinder, which does not allow for adjusting a radial plasma density from a center (e.g., vertical centerline extending through a center of the cylindrically-shaped chamber) to an outer circumferential edge of the cylindrically-shaped chamber member.
The dome-shaped chamber member may have a center mounted coil and an outer mounted coil. The center mounted coil may be located near a top and center of the dome-shaped chamber member. The outer mounted coil may be located further down on and near a perimeter of the dome-shaped chamber. The disadvantage of the dome-shaped chamber member is that a larger distance exists between the center mounted coil and a center of a substrate as compared to a distance between the outer mounted coil and the substrate. This longer distance in the center of the corresponding plasma source can result in longer residence times for plasma species generated in the center versus the outer edge. This affect is more pronounced when high pressure gases are supplied and/or when electronegative gases are supplied due to localized areas with high density plasma.
The disadvantage of the flat-shaped chamber member is that the corresponding coils are typically located a considerable distance away from the plasma due to a thick dielectric window (e.g., 1-2 inches in thickness). The dielectric window is thick to withstand mechanical forces generated by a difference in pressure across the dielectric window. The physical separation between the chamber member and the plasma reduces efficiency of the corresponding TCP source because mutual inductance between the coils and plasma is decreased. This results in increased current flowing through the coils and increased copper loss (i.e. increased magnetic field loss). The further away the coils are from an interior chamber region of the chamber member the more magnetic field loss and thus the more current needed to provide the required magnetic field in the interior chamber region.
A chamber member of a plasma source is provided and includes a sidewall, a transition member, a top wall and an injector connecting member. The sidewall is cylindrically-shaped and surrounds an upper region of a substrate processing chamber. The transition member is connected to the sidewall. The top wall is connected to the transition member. The injector connecting member is connected to the top wall, positioned vertically higher than the sidewall, and configured to connect to a gas injector. Gas passes through the injector connecting member via the gas injector and into the upper region of the substrate processing chamber. A center height to low inner diameter ratio of the chamber member is 0.25-0.5 and/or a center height to outer height ratio of the chamber member is 0.4-0.85.
In other features, a pedestal is provided and includes a radio frequency electrode, lift pins, a c-ring, insulators, and a ground shield. The lift pins are located radially outside the radio frequency electrode. The c-ring receives a substrate, where the lift pins move the c-ring relative to the pedestal. The radio frequency electrode, the lift pins, and the insulators are disposed in the ground shield, where the insulators isolate the radio frequency electrode from the lift pins and the ground shield.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description, the claims and the drawings. The detailed description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In the drawings, reference numbers may be reused to identify similar and/or identical elements.
Examples are disclosed herein for improved etching uniformity of a substrate including edge uniformity and tunable radial uniformity. The improved etching uniformity is prodded with reduced risk of substrate damage due to plasma and allows for various options for injecting gas into a substrate processing chamber. The examples include chamber members of plasma sources with geometries and corresponding coil configurations that allow for controlled and uniform generation of plasma across a substrate. The plasma sources allow for controlled densities of the plasma near a center of the plasma sources unlike traditional plasma sources with dome-shaped chamber members. The disclosed plasma sources place center coils closer to substrates than traditional plasma sources with dome-shaped chamber members. This reduces residence time of plasma between top center surfaces of the disclosed chamber members and substrates. Residence time refers to an amount of time for plasma to pass between areas adjacent to the top center surfaces and centers of corresponding substrates.
The examples also provide pedestal designs that allow for easy removal of substrates from pedestals. The pedestal designs include lift pins that do not pass through an RF electrode and/or plate. This improves thermal and RF uniformity across the pedestal and backsides (sides facing the pedestal) of substrates. The pedestal designs also reduce risk of arcing in lift pin areas since the lift pins are not located in areas where RF energy is emitted.
Referring now to
Referring again to
The upper chamber region 104 is defined by an upper surface of the gas distribution device 114 and an inner surface of the upper portion 118. In some examples, the upper portion 118 rests on a first annular support 121. In some examples, the first annular support 121 includes one or more spaced holes 123 for delivering process gas to the upper chamber region 104, as will be described further below. In some examples, the process gas is delivered by the one or more spaced holes 123 in an upward direction at an acute angle relative to a plane including the gas distribution device 114, although other angles/directions may be used. In some examples, a gas flow channel 134 in the first annular support 121 supplies gas to (i) the one or more spaced holes 123, and/or (ii) one or more channels or injectors 136, which direct the gas upward (indicated by arrow 138) to mix with gas and/or plasma in the upper chamber region 104.
The first annular support 121 may be disposed above and/or on a second annular support 125. The second annular support 125 defines one or more spaced holes 127 for delivering process gas from a gas flow channel 129 to the lower chamber region 102. In some examples, holes 131 in the gas distribution device 114 align with the holes 127. In other examples, the gas distribution device 114 has a smaller diameter and the holes 131 are not needed. In some examples, the process gas is delivered by the one or more spaced holes 127 in a downward direction towards a substrate 126 at an acute angle relative to the plane including the gas distribution device 114, although other angles/directions may be used.
In other examples, the upper chamber region 104 is cylindrical with a flat top surface. In still other examples, a single chamber may be used with a spacer located between a showerhead 128 and a substrate support 122.
The substrate support 122 is arranged in the lower chamber region 102. In some examples, the substrate support 122 includes an electrostatic chuck (ESC), although other types of substrate supports can be used. A substrate 126 is arranged on an upper surface of the substrate support 122 during etching. In some examples, a temperature of the substrate 126 may be controlled by heating elements (or a heater plate) 133, an optional cooling plate with fluid channels and one or more sensors (not shown); although any other suitable substrate support temperature control system may be used.
In some examples, the gas distribution device 114 includes a showerhead (for example, a plate 128 having a plurality of spaced holes 129 is shown). The plurality of spaced holes 129 extend from the upper surface of the plate 128 to the lower surface of the plate 128. In some examples, the spaced holes 129 have a diameter in a range from 0.4″ to 0.75″ and the showerhead is made of a conducting material such as aluminum or a non-conductive material such as ceramic with an embedded electrode made of a conducting material.
One or more inductive coils 140 may be arranged around an outer portion of the upper portion 118. When energized, the one or more inductive coils 140 create an electromagnetic field inside of the upper portion 118. In some examples, an upper coil and a lower coil are used. A gas injector 142 injects one or more gas mixtures from a gas delivery system 150-1.
In some examples, a gas delivery system 150-1 includes one or more gas sources 152, one or more valves 154, one or more mass flow controllers (MFCs) 156, and a mixing manifold 158, although other types of gas delivery systems may be used. A gas splitter (not shown) may be used to vary flow rates of a gas mixture. Another gas delivery system 150-2 may be used to supply an etch gas or an etch gas mixture to the gas flow channels 129 and/or 134 (in addition to or instead of etch gas from the gas injector 142).
Suitable gas delivery systems are shown and described in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/945,680, entitled “Gas Delivery System” and filed on Dec. 4, 2015, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Suitable single or dual gas injectors and other gas injection locations are shown and described in commonly assigned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/275,837, entitled “Substrate Processing System with Multiple Injection Points and Dual Injector” and filed on Jan. 7, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In some examples, the gas injector 142 includes a center injection location that directs gas in a downward direction and one or more side injection locations that inject gas at an angle with respect to the downward direction. In some examples, the gas delivery system 150-1 delivers a first portion of the gas mixture at a first flow rate to the center injection location and a second portion of the gas mixture at a second flow rate to the side injection location(s) of the gas injector 142. In other examples, different gas mixtures are delivered by the gas injector 142. In some examples, the gas delivery system 150-1 delivers tuning gas to the gas flow channels 129 and 134 and/or to other locations in the processing chamber as will be described below.
A plasma generator 170 may be used to generate RF power that is output to the one or more inductive coils 140. Plasma 190 is generated in the upper chamber region 104. In some examples, the plasma generator 170 includes an RF generator 172 and a matching network 174. The matching network 174 matches an impedance of the RF generator 172 to the impedance of the one or more inductive coils 140. In some examples, the gas distribution device 114 is connected to a reference potential such as ground. A valve 178 and a pump 180 may be used to control pressure inside of the lower and upper chamber regions 102, 104 and to evacuate reactants.
A controller 176 communicates with the gas delivery systems 150-1 and 150-2, the valve 178, the pump 180, and/or the plasma generator 170 to control flow of process gas, purge gas, RF plasma and chamber pressure. In some examples, plasma is sustained inside the upper portion 118 by the one or more inductive coils 140. One or more gas mixtures are introduced from a top portion of the substrate processing chamber 101 using the gas injector 142 (and/or holes 123) and plasma is confined within the upper portion 118 using the gas distribution device 114.
Confining the plasma in the upper portion 118 allows volume recombination of plasma species and effusing desired etchant species through the gas distribution device 114. In some examples, there is no RF bias applied to the substrate 126. As a result, there is no active sheath on the substrate 126 and ions are not hitting the substrate 126 with any finite energy. Some amount of ions will diffuse out of the plasma region through the gas distribution device 114. However, the amount of plasma that diffuses is an order of magnitude lower than the plasma located inside the upper portion 118. Most of ions in the plasma are lost by volume recombination at high pressures. Surface recombination loss at the upper surface of the gas distribution device 114 also lowers ion density below the gas distribution device 114.
In other examples, the substrate processing system 100 includes an RF bias generator 186 and a matching network 188. The RF bias generator 186 generates a RF bias that can be used to create plasma between the gas distribution device 114 and the substrate support 122 or to create a self-bias on the substrate 126 to attract ions. The controller 176 may control the RF bias. The output frequencies of the RF bias generator 186 and/or the matching network 188 may be 0.5-60 mega-hertz (MHz).
Although the substrate processing system 100 is primarily described as operating with an ICP source, the substrate processing system 100 may also or alternatively operate as a capacitively-coupled plasma (CCP) reactor and/or a parallel plate reactor, where a RF electrode of the substrate support 122 is serves as a lower plate and the showerhead 128 or the chamber member of the plasma source serves as the upper plate depending on whether the showerhead 128 is included.
Referring now also to
The sidewall 202 may be cylindrically-shaped and oriented in a vertical direction relative to the first annular support 121, the substrate support 122, and/or other horizontally oriented element of the substrate processing system 100. The transition member 204 connects the sidewall 202 to the top wall 206 and sets an angle α between the sidewall 202 and the top wall 206. The angle α may be between 100-145° depending on which portion of the top wall the angle α is being determined from. In one embodiment, the angle α is 115-135°. A cross-section of the top wall 206 and/or a portion of the cross-section of the top wall 206 may be semi-linear or linear shaped. The top wall 206 extends between the transition member 204 and the injector connecting member 208. The top wall 206 may be concave-shaped and/or hemisperically-shaped. The top wall 206 is not spherically-shaped. The elements 202, 204, 206, and/or 208 may have a same thickness.
In another embodiment, the angle α between sidewall 202 and the top wall 206 may be smaller than shown in
Referring now to
The dome-shaped chamber portion 220 may have an outer height to center height ratio of 0.18. The chamber portion 230 may have an outer height to center height ratio of 0.4-0.85. In one embodiment, the chamber portion 230 has an outer height to center height ratio of 0.5-0.6. In another embodiment, the chamber portion 230 has an outer height to center height ratio of 0.55. The outer height for the dome-shaped chamber portion 220 refers to height between (i) a bottom of the dome-shaped chamber portion 220 or a top surface of the support plate 222 and (ii) a height at a point along the inner surface of the dome-shaped chamber portion 220 at which the dome-shaped chamber portion 220 begins to cure inward (an example point 237 is shown). The outer height and center height are represented by arrows 226 and 228. The outer height for the chamber portion 230 may refer to height between (i) a bottom of the chamber portion 230 or a top surface of the support plate 222 and (ii) a height at a point along the inner surface of the chamber portion 230 at which the chamber portion 230 begins to curve inward (an example point 239 is shown). The outer height may be equal to a height of the sidewall 232. The outer height and the center height are represented by arrows 238, 240.
The geometries of the chamber portions of the herein disclosed plasma sources provide good plasma generation near an outer edge of plasma sources due to outer coils being placed radially outward from generated plasma. The geometries also enable good control of plasma density near a center of the chamber portions using center coils located near and above center areas of the plasma sources. These configurations also locate center plasma closer to a substrate reducing (i) residence time of plasma in center areas, and as a result (ii) differences in residence times between plasma in the center areas and plasma near substrate edges. The reduced residence times in the center areas prevents changes in the plasma that may occur during longer residence times. For example, when plasma is generated atoms may be separated. During longer residence times, some of the atoms may recombine thereby reducing effectiveness of the plasma.
The disclosed squashed-shaped design also allows coils to be closer to plasma as compared to a flat TCP configuration due to the ability to support pressure on the upper portions of substrate processing chambers with thinner wall thicknesses. For example, the thicknesses of the elements 202, 204, 206, 208 of
The squashed dome shape provides an efficient plasma source with good uniformity and the ability to radially tune the plasma density. The plasma sources disclosed herein provide smaller equipment foot prints with increased product yields due to improved uniformity characteristics.
As an alternative, the inner and outer coils of any of the plasma sources disclosed herein may be connected in a parallel configuration as shown in
As shown, the capacitances are located above the ground shield 346 and the plasma source 342 is located below the ground shield 346. The ground shield 346 isolates the electromagnetic fields created by the RF components located above the ground shield 346 and corresponding connections from the plasma source 342.
Connector pins 360 may be included in the first area 350 and connect and/or plug into the matching network 174 of
The c-ring 452 is provided to raise and lower a substrate (e.g., the substrate 438) relative to the pedestal 430. The c-ring 452 may be have a same or greater thickness than the substrate and has a tapered or stepped inner surface 453, which is in contact with the substrate when the substrate is set on the c-ring 452. The inner surface 453 may be shaped to receive and hold the substrate. The outer diameter of the substrate may match an inner diameter of the inner surface 453. The lift pins 450 may be translated in a z-direction (or vertically) or the pedestal 430 may be translated in the z-direction to move the c-ring 452 and thus the substrate relative to the pedestal 430. If the pedestal 430 is moved in the z-direction, bottoms of the lift pins 450 may come in contact with a bottom of the substrate processing chamber and cause the lift pins 450 to move upward relative to the pedestal 430, thereby lifting the substrate 438 off of the pedestal. Movement of the substrate 438 relative to the pedestal 430 and the shape of the c-ring 452 allow the substrate 438 to be placed on and removed from the pedestal 430 via a substrate transfer plate (or paddle). The lift pins 450 are located outside of the RF electrode 436 and are not under the substrate 438. The transfer plate may be laterally inserted in the open end of the c-ring 452.
The lift pins 450 may be translated via one or more pneumatic, electrical, and/or mechanical actuators (a single actuator 460 is shown), which may be located within the pedestal 430 and as an example below the RF electrode 436. The controller 176 may be connected to and control positions of the lift pins 450 relative to the pedestal 430. Each of the actuators and/or corresponding actuator assemblies may include a low voltage solenoid, a low voltage electrical motor, a pneumatic motor, linkages, etc.
Incorporation of the lift pins 450 outside of the RF electrode 436 provides improved thermal uniformity and RF uniformity in the RF electrode 436. This is because the RF electrode 436 does not have holes for the lift pins and gases cannot be ionized within holes of the RF electrode 436 associated with lift pins, as with a traditional pedestal. There is also less risk of arcing in lift pin areas since the lift pins 450 are not in the RF electrode 436 and are insulated from the RF electrode 436 via the insulators 432. This improves system reliability.
For further defined structure of the controller and/or other devices of the substrate processing system 100 of
The method may begin at 500. At 502, a substrate is arranged on a substrate support (e.g., the substrate support 122 or the pedestal 430) in the lower chamber region 102. This may be done by moving the pedestal 430 and/or the c-ring 452 in the z-direction such that the c-ring 452 is moved away from the pedestal 430 and/or RF electrode 436 and allows for the substrate to be set on the c-ring 452. Once the substrate is set on the c-ring 452, the c-ring 452 may be moved towards the pedestal 430 and/or RF electrode 436. The substrate may include multiple layers including one or more film layers. The one or more film layers, such as a semiconductor film layer formed of SiN.
At 504, one or more etch gases and/or one or more etch gas mixtures is provided by the gas delivery system 150-1 and/or 150-2 via the gas injector 142 to the upper chamber region 104. The etch gas mixture may include an etch precursor, such as carbon tetrafluoride (CF4), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) and/or other etch precursor.
At 506, the plasma is struck in the upper chamber region 104. At 508, an RF bias is optionally supplied to the substrate support via the RF generator 186 and matching network 188. At 510, the controller 176 may determine whether a predetermined etch period has ended. If the etch period has ended, task 512 is performed. At 512, the plasma is extinguished when the predetermined etch period ends. At 514, the RF bias is terminated if used. At 515, the substrate may be removed from the pedestal 430. This may include actuating pedestal and/or the c-ring 452 to move the substrate away from the pedestal 430 and/or RF electrode 436. The substrate may then be removed from the c-ring 452 via a transfer plate (or paddle). The method may end at 516.
The above-described tasks are meant to be illustrative examples; the tasks may be performed sequentially, synchronously, simultaneously, continuously, during overlapping time periods or in a different order depending upon the application. Also, any of the tasks may not be performed or skipped depending on the implementation and/or sequence of events.
The foregoing description is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses. The broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent upon a study of the drawings, the specification, and the following claims. It should be understood that one or more steps within a method may be executed in different order (or concurrently) without altering the principles of the present disclosure. Further, although each of the embodiments is described above as having certain features, any one or more of those features described with respect to any embodiment of the disclosure can be implemented in and/or combined with features of any of the other embodiments, even if that combination is not explicitly described. In other words, the described embodiments are not mutually exclusive, and permutations of one or more embodiments with one another remain within the scope of this disclosure.
Spatial and functional relationships between elements (for example, between modules, circuit elements, semiconductor layers, etc.) are described using various terms, including “connected,” “engaged,” “coupled,” “adjacent,” “next to,” “on top of,” “above,” “below,” and “disposed.” Unless explicitly described as being “direct,” when a relationship between first and second elements is described in the above disclosure, that relationship can be a direct relationship where no other intervening elements are present between the first and second elements, but can also be an indirect relationship where one or more intervening elements are present (either spatially or functionally) between the first and second elements. As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C should be construed to mean a logical (A OR B OR C), using a non-exclusive logical OR, and should not be construed to mean “at least one of A, at least one of B, and at least one of C.”
In some implementations, a controller is part of a system, which may be part of the above-described examples. Such systems can comprise semiconductor processing equipment, including a processing tool or tools, chamber or chambers, a platform or platforms for processing, and/or specific processing components (a wafer pedestal, a gas flow system, etc.). These systems may be integrated with electronics for controlling their operation before, during, and after processing of a semiconductor wafer or substrate. The electronics may be referred to as the “controller,” which may control various components or subparts of the system or systems. The controller, depending on the processing requirements and/or the type of system, may be programmed to control any of the processes disclosed herein, including the delivery of processing gases, temperature settings (e.g., heating and/or cooling), pressure settings, vacuum settings, power settings, radio frequency (RF) generator settings, RF matching circuit settings, frequency settings, flow rate settings, fluid delivery settings, positional and operation settings, wafer transfers into and out of a tool and other transfer tools and/or load locks connected to or interfaced with a specific system.
Broadly speaking, the controller may be defined as electronics having various integrated circuits, logic, memory, and/or software that receive instructions, issue instructions, control operation, enable cleaning operations, enable endpoint measurements, and the like. The integrated circuits may include chips in the form of firmware that store program instructions, digital signal processors (DSPs), chips defined as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or one or more microprocessors, or microcontrollers that execute program instructions (e.g., software). Program instructions may be instructions communicated to the controller in the form of various individual settings (or program files), defining operational parameters for carrying out a particular process on or for a semiconductor wafer or to a system. The operational parameters may, in some embodiments, be part of a recipe defined by process engineers to accomplish one or more processing steps during the fabrication of one or more layers, materials, metals, oxides, silicon, silicon dioxide, surfaces, circuits, and/or dies of a wafer.
The controller, in some implementations, may be a part of or coupled to a computer that is integrated with the system, coupled to the system, otherwise networked to the system, or a combination thereof. For example, the controller may be in the “cloud” or all or a part of a fab host computer system, which can allow for remote access of the wafer processing. The computer may enable remote access to the system to monitor current progress of fabrication operations, examine a history of past fabrication operations, examine trends or performance metrics from a plurality of fabrication operations, to change parameters of current processing, to set processing steps to follow a current processing, or to start a new process. In some examples, a remote computer (e.g. a server) can provide process recipes to a system over a network, which may include a local network or the Internet. The remote computer may include a user interface that enables entry or programming of parameters and/or settings, which are then communicated to the system from the remote computer. In some examples, the controller receives instructions in the form of data, which specify parameters for each of the processing steps to be performed during one or more operations. It should be understood that the parameters may be specific to the type of process to be performed and the type of tool that the controller is configured to interface with or control. Thus as described above, the controller may be distributed, such as by comprising one or more discrete controllers that are networked together and working towards a common purpose, such as the processes and controls described herein. An example of a distributed controller for such purposes would be one or more integrated circuits on a chamber in communication with one or more integrated circuits located remotely (such as at the platform level or as part of a remote computer) that combine to control a process on the chamber.
Without limitation, example systems may include a plasma etch chamber or module, a deposition chamber or module, a spin-rinse chamber or module, a metal plating chamber or module, a clean chamber or module, a bevel edge etch chamber or module, a physical vapor deposition (PVD) chamber or module, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) chamber or module, an atomic layer deposition (ALD) chamber or module, an atomic layer etch (ALE) chamber or module, an ion implantation chamber or module, a track chamber or module, and any other semiconductor processing systems that may be associated or used in the fabrication and/or manufacturing of semiconductor wafers.
As noted above, depending on the process step or steps to be performed by the tool, the controller might communicate with one or more of other tool circuits or modules, other tool components, cluster tools, other tool interfaces, adjacent tools, neighboring tools, tools located throughout a factory, a main computer, another controller, or tools used in material transport that bring containers of wafers to and from tool locations and/or load ports in a semiconductor manufacturing factory.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/294,574, filed on Feb. 12, 2016. The entire disclosure of the application referenced above is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4262686 | Heim et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4374698 | Sanders et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4431477 | Zajac | Feb 1984 | A |
4793897 | Dunfield et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
5329965 | Gordon | Jul 1994 | A |
5346578 | Benzing | Sep 1994 | A |
5605179 | Strong, Jr. et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5660673 | Miyoshi | Aug 1997 | A |
5662143 | Caughran | Sep 1997 | A |
5744695 | Forbes | Apr 1998 | A |
5762714 | Mohn et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5907221 | Sato | May 1999 | A |
6022609 | Fan | Feb 2000 | A |
6042687 | Singh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044534 | Seo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050283 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060400 | Oehrlein et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074959 | Wang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6152168 | Ohmi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6206976 | Crevasse et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210593 | Ohkuni et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217937 | Shealy | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6376386 | Oshima | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6492774 | Han et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6589352 | Yudovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6736931 | Collins | May 2004 | B2 |
6744212 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6818560 | Koshimizu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6841943 | Vahedi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6896765 | Steger | May 2005 | B2 |
6898558 | Klekotka | May 2005 | B2 |
6962879 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7129171 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7288482 | Panda et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7309646 | Heo et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7338907 | Li et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7757541 | Monkowski et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7758698 | Bang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7968469 | Collins et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8137463 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8552334 | Tappan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8555920 | Hirata et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8592328 | Hausmann et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8889024 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8956980 | Chen et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8999106 | Liu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011637 | Yamamoto | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9051647 | Cooperberg et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9059678 | Long et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9142391 | Yamamoto | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9318343 | Ranjan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9471065 | Koyomogi et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9640409 | Yang et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
20010002581 | Nishikawa et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010004903 | Ohmi et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010013363 | Kitayama et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010035530 | Udagawa | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020038669 | Yamagishi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042205 | McMillin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045265 | Bergh et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046991 | Smith et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048536 | Bergh et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072240 | Koike | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088542 | Nishikawa et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020160125 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174905 | Latino et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175144 | Hung et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030201069 | Johnson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236592 | Shajii et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236638 | Shajii et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236643 | Shajii et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040053428 | Steger | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040089240 | Dando et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094206 | Ishida | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112538 | Larson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112539 | Larson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112540 | Larson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040149389 | Fink | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163601 | Kadotani et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168719 | Nambu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040173270 | Harris et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200529 | Lull et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050005994 | Sugiyama et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050067021 | Bevers et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082007 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050155625 | Jangjian et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050199342 | Shajii et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050241763 | Huang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060011237 | Tison et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060060141 | Kamaishi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097644 | Kono et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124169 | Mizusawa et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060207595 | Ohmi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060237063 | Ding et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070026684 | Parascandola et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066038 | Sadjadi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070158025 | Larson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175391 | Mizusawa | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204797 | Fischer | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070204914 | Kurosawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233412 | Gotoh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240778 | L'Bassi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256785 | Pamarthy et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070256786 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070259112 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080115834 | Geoffrion et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121178 | Bang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080202588 | Gold et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202609 | Gold et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202610 | Gold et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223873 | Chen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236749 | Koshimizu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090056629 | Katz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061083 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061640 | Wong et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061644 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067954 | Lanee et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090090174 | Paul et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090095364 | Itoh et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090183548 | Monkowski et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183549 | Monkowski et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090197423 | Koshimizu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221117 | Tan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236313 | Qiu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090272717 | Pamarthy | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090320754 | Oya et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012310 | Christensen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025369 | Negishi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030390 | Yamaguchi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071438 | Davis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100144539 | Bergh et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145633 | Yasuda | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100178770 | Zin | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100229976 | Hirata et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264117 | Ohmi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269924 | Yasuda | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110019332 | Chistyakov | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031111 | Kobayashi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110094596 | Sugiyama et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135821 | Ding | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110253225 | Beeby et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265883 | Cruse et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287631 | Yamamoto | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110303696 | Kelekar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120031500 | Hirose et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120034786 | Dhindsa et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120097266 | Cobb et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120149213 | Nittala et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152364 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120156363 | Quinn et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120174990 | Yasuda | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190208 | Ozu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120238102 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238103 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244715 | Lebouitz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120247386 | Sanchez et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289057 | DeDontney | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298221 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120305184 | Singh et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328780 | Yamagishi | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130008607 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025715 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029494 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029496 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130045605 | Wang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130085618 | Ding | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104996 | Oh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130106286 | Banna et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131300 | Olmscheid et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145816 | Lowe | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130157388 | Grimbergen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130220433 | Sawada et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130255784 | Ye et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270997 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130288477 | Rieschl et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140033828 | Larson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140080308 | Chen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140120737 | Swaminathan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141621 | Ren et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140144471 | Kahlon et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140182689 | Shareef et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213055 | Himori et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140248780 | Ingle et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140262038 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140273460 | Reyland et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010381 | Cai | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150017810 | Guha | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150059859 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150181684 | Banna et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150184287 | Tsung et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150287572 | Daugherty et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150340209 | Koltonski | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150371831 | Rozenzon et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160111258 | Taskar et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160181116 | Berry, III et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160211165 | McChesney et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160211166 | Yan et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160215392 | Yudovsky et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160247688 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160293431 | Sriraman et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170018407 | Kondo | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032982 | Drewery et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170069511 | Yang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170110335 | Yang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170200586 | Treadwell et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170213758 | Rice et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170236688 | Caron et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236694 | Eason et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236741 | Angelov et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236743 | Severson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170278679 | Angelov et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170287682 | Musselman et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170287753 | Musselman et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180053629 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190013232 | Yan et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1701421 | Nov 2005 | CN |
102243077 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102315150 | Jan 2012 | CN |
103730318 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104299929 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104752141 | Jul 2015 | CN |
104851832 | Aug 2015 | CN |
105336561 | Feb 2016 | CN |
107093569 | Aug 2017 | CN |
0424299 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0424299 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0838842 | Apr 1998 | EP |
2001-230239 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2015201552 | Nov 2015 | JP |
20040050080 | Jun 2004 | KR |
20050008792 | Jan 2005 | KR |
20080023569 | Mar 2008 | KR |
20130137962 | Dec 2013 | KR |
20140001540 | Jan 2014 | KR |
101974420 | May 2019 | KR |
101974422 | May 2019 | KR |
506234 | Oct 2002 | TW |
201207933 | Feb 2012 | TW |
201324653 | Jun 2013 | TW |
201436089 | Sep 2014 | TW |
WO-0040776 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-2007008509 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2011051251 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2013123617 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2014068886 | May 2014 | WO |
WO-2014163742 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bohr, Mark, “The New Era of Scaling in an SoC World” Intel Logic Technology Development; ISSCC; 2009; 66 Pages. |
Dusa, Mircean et al., “Pitch Doubling Through Dual Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets,” Optical Microlithography XX, vol. 6520, 65200G, (2007); 10 pages. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/576,020 [LAMRP146]. |
Blain et al. (Jul./Aug. 1996) “Role of nitrogen in the downstream etching of silicon nitride,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 14(4):2151-2157. |
Blain (Mar./ Apr. 1999) “Mechanism of nitrogen removal from silicon nitride by nitric oxide,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 17(2):665-667. |
Kastenmeier et al. (Nov/Dec. 1999) “Highly selective etching of silicon nitride over silicon and silicon dioxide,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, American Vacuum Society, I7 (6):3179-3184. |
Kastenmeier et al. (Sep./Oct. 1996) “Chemical dry etching of silicon nitride and silicon dioxide using CF4/02/N2 gas mixtures,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A14(5):2802-2813. |
Oehrlein et al. (1996) “Study of plasma-surface interactions: chemical dry etching and high-density plasma etching,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 5:193-199. |
Tajima et al. (2013) “Room-Temperature Si Etching in NO/F2 Gases and the Investigation of Surface Reaction Mechanisms,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 117:5118-5125. |
Yun et al. (2007) “Large Etch Rate Enhancement by NO-Induced Surface Chemical Reaction during Chemical Dry Etching of Silicon Oxide in F2 Remote Plasmas,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 154(4):D267-D272. |
U.S. Final Ofice Action dated Feb. 26, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/576,020 [LAMRP146]. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/576,020 [LAMRP146]. |
European Extended Search Report dated May 30, 2016 issued in EP 15 199 363.1 [LAMRP146EP]. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/106,407, filed Jan. 22, 2015, in the names of Joseph Yudovsky et al., & entitled “Injector for Spatially Separated Atomic Layer Deposition Chamber” pp. 1-68. (Year: 2015). |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/065,497, entitled “Gas Supply Delivery Arrangement Including a Gas Splitter for Tunable Gas Flow Control,” filed Oct. 17, 2014, in the names of Mark Taskar et al. (Year: 2014). |
MP125E N-470 Linear Drive User Manual Version 1.1.0; Date Sep. 18, 2014; 54 Pages; Physik lnstrumente (PI) GmbH & Co. KG, Auf der Roemerstr, 1, 76228 Karlsruhe, Germany. |
First Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2017 corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 201610032252.1, 12 pages. |
First Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2018 corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 201710036188.9, 7 pages. |
First Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. CN201710076420.1 dated Dec. 17, 2019. No translation provided. 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170236688 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62294574 | Feb 2016 | US |