The present invention generally relates to the area of polishing and methods for improving the life of polishing pads.
Chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) is used in semiconductor fabrication processes for obtaining full planarization of a semiconductor wafer. The method involves removing material (e.g., a sacrificial layer of surface material) from the wafer, (typically silicon dioxide (SiO2)) using mechanical contact and chemical erosion from (e.g., a moving polishing pad saturated with slurry). Polishing flattens out height differences, since areas of high topography (hills) are removed faster than areas of low topography (valleys).
It is known that the material removal rate provided by a given polishing pad decreases exponentially with time in the manner shown in FIG. 2. As a consequence, the polishing pad must be conditioned (e.g., using a conditioning disk 108), between polishing cycles. Doing so roughens the surface of the pad and restores, at least temporarily, its original material removal rate. When the pad can no longer be reconditioned, it is replaced.
A problem with conventional conditioning methods is that they may over condition, e.g., wear out, the planarizing surface, and thus may reduce the pad life of the polishing pads. Because of variation in material removal rates from pad to pad, the CMP tool must be recalibrated to achieve a desired material removal rate each time a pad is changed. The production time lost during pad changes translates into processing delays and lost efficiency.
In an attempt to extend the life of the pad, various methods are reported for selectively conditioning a polishing pad, and for varying the down force of the conditioning element (e.g., conditioning disk 108) along the surface of the CMP pad based upon the likely or perceived distribution of unacceptable pad conditions across the planarizing surface. Other methods report varying the conditioning recipe across the surface of the polishing pad in response to polishing pad non-uniformity. However, these reported CMP processes are typically more concerned with improving the CMP process, e.g., improving within water non-uniformity, than in extending pad life.
Methods and devices that would extend pad life and therefore reduce the frequency of pad replacement offer significant cost savings to the wafer fabrication process.
The present invention relates to a method, apparatus and medium for conditioning a planarizing surface of a polishing pad in order to extend the working life of the pad. The present invention uses physical and chemical models (which can be implemented as a single model or multiple models) of the pad wear and planarization processes to predict polishing pad performance and to extend pad life. This results in an increase in the number of semiconductor wafer or other substrates that can be polished with a single polishing pad, thereby providing significant cost savings in the CMP process, both in reducing the number of pads needed and the time devoted to pad replacement.
The model predicts polishing effectiveness (wafer material removal rate) based on the “conditioning” operating parameters of the conditioning process. In at least some embodiments of the present invention, conditioning parameters include pressure (conditioning disk down force) and velocity (rotational speed of the conditioning disk), and can also include other factors, such as the frequency of conditioning, duration of conditioning and translational speed of conditioning disk across the pad surface. The model selects, and then maintains, polishing pad conditioning parameters within a range that does not overcondition the pad while providing acceptable wafer material removal rates. Thus the present invention provides a process for the feedforward and feedbackward control of the CMP polishing process. Although the invention is described herein with respect to the use of a disk, having an abrading of surface thereon, which is pushed against and moved with respect the pad, the techniques of the invention may be applied to other conditioning mechanisms.
In one aspect of the invention, a method of conditioning a planarizing surface is provided in a chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) apparatus having a polishing pad against which a wafer is positioned for removal of material therefrom and a conditioning disk is positioned for conditioning of the polishing pad. The method includes providing a pad wear and conditioning model that defines wafer material removal rate as a function of at least one pad conditioning parameters, said at least one conditioning parameter having maximum and minimum values, polishing a wafer in the CMP apparatus under a first set of pad conditioning parameters selected to maintain wafer material removal rates within preselected minimum and maximum removal rates, determining a wafer material removal rate occurring during said polishing step, calculating updated pad conditioning parameters based upon said determined wafer material removal rate of said step (c) and the pad wear and conditioning model to maintain wafer material removal rates within the maximum and minimum removal rates, and conditioning the polishing pad using the updated conditioning parameters.
In at least some embodiments, the method includes polishing a wafer in the CMP apparatus under a first set of pad conditioning parameters selected to maintain wafer material removal rates within preselected minimum and maximum removal rates (which conditioning occurs simultaneously with polishing in at least some embodiments of the present invention); determining a wafer material removal rate occurring during the polishing step; calculating, based upon the wafer material removal rate, updated pad conditioning parameters to maintain wafer material removal rates within the maximum and minimum removal rates; and conditioning the polishing pad using the updated pad conditioning parameters. In at least some embodiments the polishing step includes polishing of a wafer or it includes polishing of two or more wafers, i.e. a polishing cycle. The wafer material removal rates can be averaged or the last polished wafer material removal rate can be used in updating pad conditioning parameters.
The updated pad conditioning parameters are calculated using a pad wear and conditioning model by determining wafer material removal rate as a function of pad conditioning parameters including conditioning disk down force and velocity of the conditioning disk; and determining the difference between the calculated and measured wafer material removal rates and calculating updated pad conditioning parameters to reduce said difference, wherein the updated pad conditioning parameters are updated according to the equation, k=(k1)+g*(k−(k1)), where k is a measured wafer material removal rate, k1 is a calculated wafer material removal rate, g is the estimate gain, and (k−(k1)) is the prediction error.
In at least some embodiments, the first set of pad conditioning parameters are determined empirically, or using historical data, or using the results of the design of experiment (DOE), a set of experiments used to define the model.
In at least some embodiments, the pad conditioning parameters of the pad wear and conditioning model includes frequency of conditioning, or time of conditioning, or the translational speed (a speed of motion of the disk other than disk rotation) of the conditioning disk during conditioning.
In at least some embodiments, wafer material removal rate includes measuring the wafer thickness before and after polishing. Calculating updated pad conditioning may include executing a recursive optimization process.
In at least some embodiments, the gain, g, is a value used to indicate the variability or reliability in the measured parameter.
In at least some embodiments, pad life is defined according to the relationship:
PadLife=f(Fdisk,ωdisk,tconditioning,f, T2),
where Fdisk is the down force applied by the conditioning disk to the CMP pad during conditioning, ωdisk is the angular velocity of the conditioning disk during conditioning of the polishing pad, t is the duration of conditioning, f is the frequency of condition and T2 is the sweep speed of the conditioning disk during conditioning.
In at least some embodiments, the wafer material removal rate is defined by the equation
where Fdisk is the down force applied by the conditioning disk to the CMP pad during conditioning, ωdisk is the angular velocity of the conditioning disk during conditioning of the polishing pad, t is the duration of conditioning, f is the frequency of condition, and T2 is the sweep speed of the conditioning disk during conditioning. In at least some embodiments, the maximum value for wafer material removal rate is the saturation point of the wafer material removal rate vs. conditioning down force curve i.e., where increases in down force do not affect removal rate. In at least some embodiments, the minimum value for wafer material removal rate and hence minimum acceptable conditioning parameters is defined by the maximum acceptable wafer polishing time.
In at least some embodiments, the wafer material removal rate is determined according to the equation:
ŷi=ρixi+Ii,
where ŷi is the wafer material removal rate for a conditioning parameter xi, ρi is the slope and Ii is the intercept of the curve of the defining the relationship between ŷi and xi where other factors that may affect wafer polishing are held constant.
In at least some embodiments, an updated pad conditioning parameter, xi+, is determined by solving the equation:
where ŷi+ is the target wafer material removal rate, Wi is the weighing factor for conditioning parameter xi, and Δy is the prediction error for wafer material removal rate.
In at least some aspects of the invention, an apparatus for conditioning polishing pads used to planarize substrates by removal of material therefrom includes a carrier assembly having an arm positionable over a planarizing surface of a polishing pad; a conditioning disk attached to the carrier assembly; and an actuator capable of controlling an operating parameter of the conditioning disk; a controller operatively coupled to the actuator, the controller operating the actuator to adjust the operating parameter of the conditioning disk as a function of a pad wear and conditioning model that predicts the wafer material removal rate of the polishing pad based upon polishing pad and wafer parameters. The conditioning down force and rotational speed of the conditioning disk is predicted by a model by determining wafer material removal rate as a function of pad conditioning parameters including conditioning disk down force and conditioning disk rotation rate.
In at least some embodiments, the wafer material removal rate is determined according to the equation:
ŷi=ρixi+Ii,
where ŷi is the wafer material removal rate for a conditioning parameter xi, ρi, is the slope and Ii is the intercept of the curve of the defining the relationship between ŷi and xi.
In at least some embodiments, the updated pad conditioning parameter, xi+, is determined by solving the equation:
where ŷi+ is the target wafer material removal rate, Wi is the weighing factor for conditioning parameter xi, and Δy is the prediction error for wafer material removal rate.
Thus, polishing pad life is extended by using a more desirable conditioning disk down force and angular velocity while keeping within the acceptable range of wafer material removal rate and by adjusting the conditioning parameters whenever the removal rate drops below the acceptable removal rate. By applying a “one size fits all” approach to pad conditioning parameters (e.g., by determining conditioning parameters without accounting for a change in actual wafer material removal rates), conventional processes overcompensate, thereby removing more pad material than is necessary and accelerating pad wear. The invention thus provides more optimal conditioning parameters, i.e., only those forces necessary to recondition the damaged pad.
Various objects, features, and advantages of the present invention can be more fully appreciated with reference to the following detailed description of the invention when considered in connection with the following drawings.
Novel methods for feedforward and feedback controls of the CMP process for maximizing the life of the polishing pad are described herein. Extended pad life results in reduced down time for the CMP process because the polishing pad can polish more wafers over a longer period of time without requiring replacement or adjustment (e.g., removal of the pad). The term wafer is used in a general sense to include any substantially planar object that is subject to polishing. Wafers include, in additional to monolith structures, substrates having one or more layers or thin films deposited thereon.
Most CMP pad materials comprise urethane or other polymers, which softens when exposed to water. Chemical reactions relating to the pads, shown in
The chemical and mechanical processes described above during planarization and conditioning of the polishing pad provide a model for optimization of the planarization process. By using this model, the pad life can be extended without compromise to the wafer material removal rate by adjusting the conditioning parameters during wafer polishing. In particular, conditioning disk down forces (F) and conditioning disk rotational (or angular) velocity (rpm), and optionally other conditioning parameters, for example, conditioning frequency, disk translation speed, and duration of conditioning, are adjusted during the polishing operation in a feedback and feedforward loop that predicts and then optimizes pad conditioning operating parameters.
According to at least some embodiments of the present invention, an initial model is developed based upon knowledge of the wafer polishing process, and is used in at least some embodiments of the present invention, as is shown in a flow diagram (FIG. 5). Based on that initial model for a given wafer polishing recipe, e.g. the wafer and polishing pad parameters remain constant, initial processing conditions are identified that will provide a wafer material removal rate between a preselected minimum and maximum value for a given set of conditioning parameters, hereinafter, the “acceptable” range for wafer material removal rates. The conditions are selected to prevent overconditioning of the pad. In step 500, wafers are polished according to the given wafer polishing recipe using the initial pad conditioning parameters. The thickness of the polished wafer is measured and a wafer material removal rate is calculated in step 510, which information is then used in a feedback loop to maintain the wafer material removal rate within the accepted range. The actual removal rate is compared with the predicted removal rate (derived from the pad wear model). Deviations, i.e., prediction errors, are used to calculate pad conditioning parameters in step 520 according to the model of the invention to compensate for the reduced polishing capability of the polishing pad as identified in the model and/or to correct for any unmodeled effects. The polishing pad is conditioned according to the updated conditioning parameters in step 530. Polishing is repeated in step 540 and the polishing results are used to further update the polishing conditions by repeating steps 510-530.
By maintaining the wafer material removal rate and conditioning parameters within the preselected minimum and maximum range, overconditioning of the pad is prevented, that is, conditioning parameters are sufficient to restore polishing pad effectiveness, but do not unduly damage the pad. In operation, it may be desirable to select pad conditioning parameters that result in wafer material removal rates that are close to the minimum acceptable rates, as these conditioning forces are less aggressive and therefore are more likely to avoid overconditioning of the polishing pad. However, one should be cautious (or at least cognizant) about operating too closely to the minimum removal rate since a sudden degradation in the pad condition may cause the wafer material removal rate to drop below the minimum acceptable rate.
As indicated previously, conventional art CMP processes do not change the conditioning down force (i.e., the pressure exerted by the conditioning disk on the pad) or the rotational speed uniformly across the surface, e.g., from conditioning event to conditioning event, where a single conditioning event can be, e.g., the conditioning of the entire polishing pad or a portion of the polishing pad that is in contact with the wafer during polishing. By applying a “one size fits all” approach to pad conditioning parameters, the conventional processes overcompensate, thereby removing more pad material than is necessary and accelerating pad wear. The invention thus provides far more optimal conditioning parameters.
Pad conditioning optimization is carried out with reference to a specific polishing system. That is, the conditions which improve pad lifetime are specific to the type of wafer being polished, the slurry used in polishing and the composition of the polishing pad. Once a wafer/slurry/polishing pad system is identified, the system is characterized using the models developed and as discussed herein. Exemplary polishing pad and wafer parameters include polishing pad size, polishing pad composition, slurry composition, wafer composition, rotational velocity of the polishing pad, polishing pad pressure and rotational and translational velocity of the wafer.
In at least some embodiments of the present invention, it is envisioned that a separate model (or at least a supplement to a composite model) is created for each slurry/polishing pad wafer combination (i.e., for each different type/brand of slurry and each type/brand of pad that may be used in production with a given type of wafer).
With reference to
Minimum and maximum values for the model variables are determined in step 610 of FIG. 6. The saturation point identifies the maximum (or substantially the maximum) removal rate for this polishing system where all other polishing parameters are held constant. It likewise identifies a maximum conditioning down force, since additional pressure overconditions the pad and does not substantially improve polishing rate. A minimum material removal rate is dictated by production goals, since a minimal wafer throughput rate is needed. Thus the minimal conditioning down force is also defined based on throughput. Once minimum and maximum values for conditioning down force are defined, the range is divided into n steps, e.g. n equal steps, which encompass the acceptable working range for conditioning down forces. The value for n is selected so that a step in value, e.g., from x to x+1, is meaningful, for use in updating model parameters in a feedback control algorithm.
In step 620, as contemplated by at least some embodiments of the present invention, the relationship between wafer material removal rate and a second conditioning parameter x2, e.g., conditioning disk rotational velocity, is determined in the same polishing system in the manner described above for conditioning down force. With reference to
The models provide maximum and minimum wafer material removal rates, maximum and minimum pad down forces, and maximum and minimum pad rotational rates. In addition, values for constants θ1-θ4 are determined. Although the above designs of experiment show a conditioning parameter that demonstrates an increase in wafer removal rate with increase in magnitude of the parameter, it is understood that the opposite relationship can exist, so that the minimal parameter value produces the maximum wafer removal rate. The models can be adjusted accordingly. Maximum and minimum conditions may be determined for any combination of polishing pad, wafer and polishing slurry known in the art. Additional pad conditioning parameters, up to xI, may be included in the model and their minimum and maximum values determined as indicated by steps 640 and 650.
The model can be represented as raw data that reflects the system, or it can be represented by equations, for example multiple input-multiple output linear, quadratic and non-linear equations, which describe the relationship among the variables of the system. Feedback and feedforward control algorithms can be constructed in step 660 based on the above models using various methods. The algorithms can be used to optimize parameters using various methods, such as recursive parameter estimation. Recursive parameter estimation is used in situations such as these, where it is desirable to model on line at the same time as the input-output data is received. Recursive parameter estimation is well-suited for making decisions on line, such as adaptive control or adaptive predictions. For more details about the algorithms and theories of identification, see Ljung L., System Identification—Theory for the User, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. 2nd edition, 1999.
The wear and reconditioning of the polishing pad may be modeled by eq. 1:
PadLife=f(Fdisk,ωdisk,tconditioning,f, T2) (1)
where Fdisk is the down force applied by the conditioning disk to the polishing pad during conditioning, ωdisk is the angular velocity (rotational speed, e.g., rpm) of the conditioning disk during conditioning of the polishing pad, t is the conditioning time, and f is frequency of conditioning, and T2 is the sweeping speed of the conditioning holder as shown in the example CMP device of
In at least some embodiments of the present invention, the wafer material removal rate is modeled according to eq. 2:
where Fdisk, ωdisk, f, tconditioning, T2, θ1, θ2, θ3, θ4 are defined above. The objective function is to maintain removal rates within the minimum and maximum allowable rates (the “acceptable rates”) by controlling the conditioning disk down forces, the rpm of the disk and, optionally, by controlling other factors such as frequency and duration of conditioning, and speed of translation of the conditioning disk across the pad surface, T2.
The CMP parameters (variables) and constants from the model may then be programmed into a computer, which may then constantly monitor and appropriately vary the parameters during the process to improve the wafer material removal rate and the pad life, as shown in FIG. 9. Parameters from the base study 901 are input into the computer or other controller 902, which runs the wafer polishing process, and the estimator 903, which monitors and modifies the process parameters. The actual output (i.e., measured removal rate) 904 is monitored and compared to the predicted output (i.e., target removal rate) 905 calculated by estimator 903. The difference 906 between the actual output 904 and the predicted output 905 is determined and reported 907 to the estimator 903, which then appropriately generates updated parameters 908 for the process 902. Updating model parameters for feedback control is based on eq. 3.
k=(k1)+g*(k−(k1)), (3)
where k is a current parameter, k, is previous parameter estimate, g is the estimate gain and (k−(k1)) is the prediction error. Estimate gain is a constant selected by the user, which is a measure of machine error or variability. Gain factor may be determined empirically or by using statistical methods.
By way of example, a series of curves may be generated for a polishing system of interest as described above for determining the relationship between wafer material removal rate and conditioning down force and conditioning disk rotational velocity. Curves are generated using a standard polishing procedure, with all polishing pad and wafer conditions held constant with the exception of the parameter(s) under investigation. Exemplary polishing pad and wafer parameters that are held constant include polishing pad size, polishing pad composition, wafer composition, polishing time, polishing force, rotational velocity of the polishing pad, and rotational velocity of the wafer. The parameters under investigation include at least the conditioning down force and the angular velocity of the conditioning disk. As is shown in greater detail in the analysis that follows, additional parameters may be incorporated into the model. Using curves generated as in
An algorithm which models the pad wear and pad recovery process is input into the estimator and a predicted wafer material removal rate is calculated based upon the model. The actual results are compared against the predicted results and the error of prediction is fed back into the estimator to refine the model. New conditioning parameters are then determined. Based upon the models described herein, these parameters are just sufficient to reactivate the pad surface without overconditioning. Thus, the smallest increment in conditioning parameters that meet the model criteria is selected for the updated conditioning parameters. Subsequent evaluation of the updated model will determine how good is the fit, and further modifications can be made, if necessary, until the process is optimized.
In at least some embodiments of the present invention, the conditioning parameters are updated in discrete increments or steps, defined by way of example, by the incremental curves shown in
Also, in at least some embodiments of the present invention, the updated conditioning parameters may be determined by interpolation to the appropriate parameters, which may lie between curves. Interpolation may be appropriate in those instances where a fewer number of curves are initially generated and the experimental results do not provide a fine resolution of the parameters.
While deviations from the predicted rate reflects, in part, the inability of the model to account for all factors contributing to the process (this may be improved with subsequent iterations of the feedback process), deviations from the predicted wafer material removal rate over time represent a degradation in CMP pad polishing. By identifying and modifying the pad conditioning process to account for these temporal changes in polishing performance, optimal wafer material removal rates are maintained without overconditioning of the condition pads, e.g., by operating below the saturation point of the system.
An additional feature of the method is the use of gain factor to qualify the prediction error, as shown in eq. 3. Thus, the method suggests that the model need not correct for 100% of the deviation from predicted value. A gain factor may be used to reflect uncertainty in the measured or calculated parameters, or to “damp” the effect of changing parameters too quickly or to a too great an extent. It is possible, for example, for the model to overcompensate for the prediction error, thereby necessitating another adjustment to react to the overcompensation. This leads to an optimization process that is jumpy and takes several iterations before the optimized conditions are realized. Use of a gain factor in updating the parameters for feedback control qualifies the extent to which the model will react to the prediction error.
Once the basic system is understood and optimized, it is possible to empirically vary other conditioning operating parameters and access their impact on pad conditioning and wafer polishing. A parameter, which had been set to a constant value in the initial study, can be increased (or decreased). The system is monitored to determine the effect this change has on the system. It should be readily apparent that other factors relevant to pad wear and conditioning may be evaluated in this manner. For example, conditioning frequency, which may be set to 1 in the initial study, may be increased to 2 (every second wafer), 3 (every third wafer), etc. The system is monitored to determine where degradation starts and the process can be backed off to just before this point. The greater the interval between conditioning events, the longer the pad lifetime. Maximizing this interval without loss of polishing quality is contemplated as a feature of the method of the invention.
It should be readily apparent that other factors relevant to pad wear and conditioning may be evaluated in this manner, either empirically or by mathematical modeling. By way of example, conditioning time (residence time of the disk on the pad), conditioning disk translational speed, and the like may be investigated in this manner.
It is envisioned that at least some embodiments of the present invention may be practiced using a device 1000 such as the one shown in FIG. 10. The apparatus has a conditioning system 1010 including a carrier assembly 1020, a conditioning disk 1030 attached to the carrier assembly, and a controller 1040 operatively coupled to the carrier assembly to control the down force (F) and rotation rate (ω) of the conditioning disk. The carrier assembly may have an arm 1050 to which the conditioning disk 1030 is attached and means 1060a-d to move the conditioning disk in and out of contact with the planarizing surface. For example, the controller 1040 may be operatively coupled to the moving means to adjust the height and position of the arm carrying the conditioning disk (1060a, 1060b, 1060c, 1060d). Similar controls for control of the position and movement of the wafer may also be present. In operation, the controller adjusts the operating parameters of the conditioning disk, e.g., down force and rotation rate, in response to changes in wafer material removal rate. The controller may be computer controlled to automatically provide conditioning according to the calculated conditioning recipe. Thus, the apparatus provides a means for selectively varying the pad conditioning parameters over the operating life of the pad 1080 in order to extend pad life without compromise to the planarization process of the wafer 1090. Other types of devices where, e.g., other components have their height, positions, and/or rotations adjusted are also contemplated by at least some embodiments of the present invention.
Additional apparatus utilized to implement the feedforward and feedback loop include a film thickness measurement tool to provide thickness data needed to calculate wafer material removal rate. The tool may be positioned on the polishing apparatus so as to provide in-line, in situ measurements, or it may be located remote from the polishing apparatus. The tool may use optical, electrical, acoustic or mechanical measurements methods. A suitable thickness measurement device is available from Nanometrics (Milpitas, Calif.) or Nova Measuring Instruments (Phoenix, Ariz.). A computer may be utilized to calculate the optimal pad conditioning recipe based upon the measured film thickness and calculated removal rate, employing the models and algorithm provided according to the invention. A suitable integrated controller and polishing apparatus (Mirra with iAPC or Mirra Mesa with iAPC) is available from Applied Materials, California.
Exemplary semiconductor wafers that can be polished using the concepts discussed herein including, but are not limited to those made of silicon, tungsten, aluminum, copper, BPSG, USG, thermal oxide, silicon-related films, and low k dielectrics and mixtures thereof.
The invention may be practiced using any number of different types of conventional CMP polishing pads. There are numerous polishing pads in the art which are generally made of urethane or other polymers. However, any pad which can be reconditioned can be evaluated and optimized using the invention herein. Exemplary polishing pads include Epic™ polishing pads (Cabot Microelectronics Corporation, Aurora Ill.) and Rodel® IC 1000, IC1010, IC1400 polishing pads (Rodel Corporation, Newark, Del.), OXP series polishing pads (Sycamore Pad), Thomas West Pad 711, 813, 815, 815-Ultra, 817, 826, 828, 828-E1 (Thomas West).
Furthermore, any number of different types of slurry can be used in the methods of the invention. There are numerous CMP polishing slurries in the art, which are generally made to polish specific types of metals in semiconductor wafers. Exemplary slurries include Semi-Sperse® (available as Semi-Sperse® 12, Semi-Sperse® 25, Semi-Sperse® D7000, Semi-Sperse® D7100, Semi-Sperse® D7300, Semi-Sperse® P1000, Semi-Sperse® W2000, and Semi-Sperse® W2585) (Cabot Microelectronics Corporation, Aurora Ill.), Rodel ILD1300, Klebesol series, Elexsol , MSW1500, MSW2000 series, CUS series and PTS (Rodel).
An example of the algorithm for calculating the conditioning recipe from wafer material removal rate data may be defined as:
ŷi=ρixi+Ii, (4)
where ŷi is the wafer material removal rate for the conditioning parameter xi, ρi is the slope and Ii is the intercept of the curve of the defining the relationship between ŷi and xi. Letting X1=Fdisk, x2=ωdisk, x3=f, x4=tconditioning, and x5=T2, the following relationships may be established from the model:
ŷ1=ρ1x1+I1 for N1≦x1≦Ni+k; (5)
ŷ2=ρ2x2+I2 for Nj≦x2≦Nj+k; (6)
ŷ3=ρ3x3+I3 for Nk≦x3≦Nk+k; (7)
ŷ4=ρ4x4+I4 for Nl≦x4≦Nl+k; (8)
ŷ5=ρ5x5+I5 for Nm≦x5≦Nm+k; (9)
where ŷ is the predicted removal rate, ρ is the slope and I is the intercept in each equation. N and N+ represent the upper and lower boundary conditions for a particular pad conditioning parameter. Models of the invention may include all or a subset of these pad conditioning parameters.
Each of the pad conditioning factors contributing to wafer material removal rate may be combined in a single equation, which defines the weighted contribution of each factor to the wafer material removal rate. The wafer material removal rate may be defined by eq. 10,
ŷ=W1ŷ1+W2ŷ2+W3ŷ3+W4ŷ4+W5ŷ5. (10)
where Wi is a weighing factor and WT=W1+W2+W3+W4+W5. The weighing factors are determined by minimizing any penalties, e.g., materials defects, nonuniformity of deposition, etc., that are associated with xi for satisfying ŷ in eq. 10. The penalty function may be determined empirically or by using historical data.
The prediction error for wafer material removal rate, Δŷ, is the difference between the predicted removal rate, ŷ, and the measured removal rate, y, shown in eq. 11.
Δŷ=y−ŷ (11)
The prediction error is used to generate an updated wafer material removal rate, ŷ1+.
The new predictor based upon the feedback eq. 12 will be:
and optimized parameter xi+ is determined by eq. 13.
where ŷi+ is the target wafer material removal rate.
The optimized parameters are used to update the new CMP polishing recipe that is sent to the tool for use in subsequent polishing steps. Thus, the model is able to adapt as more data is received to improve the process without any external control over the process.
The present invention is described above under conditions where wafer polishing parameters are held constant. However, the methodology can also be used together with an optimization engine when the wafer polishing parameters are changing through an optimization engine.
In at least some embodiments, pad conditioning optimization may be carried out together with optimization of wafer polishing. This can be accomplished through optimization by having the optimization search engine's objective function minimize a function that describes both polishing and conditioning parameters.
Assuming n number of polishing parameters to be changed during the wafer polishing, N1, N2, N3 . . . Nn, and y number of control parameters, Y1, Y2 , . . . Yy, then
S=N1(N1previous−N1current)2+WN2(N2previous−N2current) 2+. . . WNn(Nnprevious−
Nncurrent)+WF(Fprevious−Fcurrent)2+Wω(ωprevious−ωcurrent) 2+WY1(Y1previous−
Y1current)2+WY2(Y2previous−Y2current)2+WYy(Yyprevious−Yycurrent)2,
where Wx is a weighing factor for parameter x (e.g., N1, N2, Y1, Y1, F, etc.), F is the conditioning down force and ω is the pad rotational velocity. Other pad conditioning parameters can be included in the function. The optimization process then seeks to minimize S. Thus, the method of the present invention can be used under conditions when the polishing parameters are held constant or when the polishing parameters are to be changed through optimization.
Various aspects of the present invention that can be controlled by a computer, including computer or other controller 902, can be (and/or be controlled by) any number of control/computer entities, including the one shown in FIG. 11. Referring to
A display interface 1172 interfaces display 1148 and permits information from the bus 1156 to be displayed on display 1148. Display 1148 can be used in displaying a graphical user interface. Communications with external devices such as the other components of the system described above can occur utilizing, for example, communication port 1174. Optical fibers and/or electrical cables and/or conductors and/or optical communication (e.g., infrared, and the like) and/or wireless communication (e.g., radio frequency (RF), and the like) can be used as the transport medium between the external devices and communication port 1174. Peripheral interface 1154 interfaces the keyboard 1150 and mouse 1152, permitting input data to be transmitted to bus 1156. In addition to these components, system 1111 also optionally includes an infrared transmitter and/or infrared receiver. Infrared transmitters are optionally utilized when the computer system is used in conjunction with one or more of the processing components/stations that transmits/receives data via infrared signal transmission. Instead of utilizing an infrared transmitter or infrared receiver, the computer system may also optionally use a low power radio transmitter 1180 and/or a low power radio receiver 1182. The low power radio transmitter transmits the signal for reception by components of the production process, and receives signals from the components via the low power radio receiver. The low power radio transmitter and/or receiver are standard devices in industry.
Although system 1111 in
In general, it should be emphasized that the various components of embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software or a combination thereof. In such embodiments, the various components and steps would be implemented in hardware and/or software to perform the functions of the present invention. Any presently available or future developed computer software language and/or hardware components can be employed in such embodiments of the present invention. For example, at least some of the functionality mentioned above could be implemented using the C, C++, or any assembly language appropriate in view of the processor(s) being used. It could also be written in an interpretive environment such as Java and transported to multiple destinations to various users.
Although various embodiments which incorporate the teachings of the present invention have been shown and described in detail herein, those skilled in the art can readily devise many other varied embodiments that incorporate these teachings.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from now abandoned application Ser. No. 60/298,878 filed Jun. 19, 2001 and entitled “Advanced Process Control for Semiconductor Manufacturing Process.” This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from now abandoned application Ser. No. 60/305,782, filed Jul. 16, 2001 and entitled “Feedforward and Feedback Control for Conditioning of Chemical Mechanical Polishing Pad.” This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from now abandoned application Ser. No. 60/318,741, filed Sep. 12, 2001 and entitled “Feedforward and Feedback Control for Conditioning of Chemical Mechanical Polishing Pad.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3205485 | Noltingk | Sep 1965 | A |
3229198 | Libby | Jan 1966 | A |
3767900 | Chao et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3920965 | Sohrwardy | Nov 1975 | A |
4000458 | Miller et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4207520 | Flora et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4209744 | Gerasimov et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4302721 | Urbanek et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4368510 | Anderson | Jan 1983 | A |
4609870 | Lale et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4616308 | Morshedi et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4663703 | Axelby et al. | May 1987 | A |
4698766 | Entwistle et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4750141 | Judell et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4755753 | Chern | Jul 1988 | A |
4757259 | Charpentier | Jul 1988 | A |
4796194 | Atherton | Jan 1989 | A |
4901218 | Cornwell | Feb 1990 | A |
4938600 | Into | Jul 1990 | A |
4957605 | Hurwitt et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4967381 | Lane et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5089970 | Lee et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5108570 | Wang | Apr 1992 | A |
5208765 | Turnbull | May 1993 | A |
5220517 | Sierk et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226118 | Baker et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5231585 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5236868 | Nulman | Aug 1993 | A |
5240552 | Yu et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5260868 | Gupta et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270222 | Moslehi | Dec 1993 | A |
5283141 | Yoon et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295242 | Mashruwala et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5309221 | Fischer et al. | May 1994 | A |
5329463 | Sierk et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5338630 | Yoon et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347446 | Iino et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5367624 | Cooper | Nov 1994 | A |
5369544 | Mastrangelo | Nov 1994 | A |
5375064 | Bollinger | Dec 1994 | A |
5398336 | Tantry et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402367 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5408405 | Mozumder et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410473 | Kaneko et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5420796 | Weling et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427878 | Corliss | Jun 1995 | A |
5444837 | Bomans et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5469361 | Moyne | Nov 1995 | A |
5485082 | Wisspeintner et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490097 | Swenson et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495417 | Fuduka et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497316 | Sierk et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5497381 | O'Donoghue et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503707 | Maung et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5508947 | Sierk et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511005 | Abbe et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519605 | Cawlfield | May 1996 | A |
5525808 | Irie et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526293 | Mozumder et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534289 | Bilder et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541510 | Danielson | Jul 1996 | A |
5546312 | Mozumder et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553195 | Meijer | Sep 1996 | A |
5586039 | Hirsch et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599423 | Parker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602492 | Cresswell et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603707 | Trombetta et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617023 | Skalski | Apr 1997 | A |
5627083 | Tounai | May 1997 | A |
5629216 | Wijaranakula et al. | May 1997 | A |
5639388 | Kimura et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642296 | Saxena | Jun 1997 | A |
5646870 | Krivokapic et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649169 | Berezin et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654903 | Reitman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5655951 | Meikle et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657254 | Sierk et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661669 | Mozumder et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663797 | Sandhu | Sep 1997 | A |
5664987 | Renteln | Sep 1997 | A |
5665199 | Sahota et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665214 | Iturralde | Sep 1997 | A |
5666297 | Britt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5667424 | Pan | Sep 1997 | A |
5674787 | Zhao et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694325 | Fukuda et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695810 | Dubin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5698989 | Nulman | Dec 1997 | A |
5719495 | Moslehi | Feb 1998 | A |
5719796 | Chen | Feb 1998 | A |
5735055 | Hochbein et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740429 | Wang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743784 | Birang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751582 | Saxena et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754297 | Nulman | May 1998 | A |
5761064 | La et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761065 | Kittler et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764543 | Kennedy | Jun 1998 | A |
5777901 | Berezin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787021 | Samaha | Jul 1998 | A |
5787269 | Hyodo | Jul 1998 | A |
5808303 | Schlagheck et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812407 | Sato et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823854 | Chen | Oct 1998 | A |
5824599 | Schacham-Diamand et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825356 | Habib et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825913 | Rostami et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828778 | Hagi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831851 | Eastburn et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832224 | Fehskens et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838595 | Sullivan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838951 | Song | Nov 1998 | A |
5844554 | Geller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857258 | Penzes et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859777 | Yokoyama et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859964 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859975 | Brewer et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862054 | Li | Jan 1999 | A |
5863807 | Jang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867389 | Hamada et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870306 | Harada | Feb 1999 | A |
5871805 | Lemelson | Feb 1999 | A |
5883437 | Maruyama et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889991 | Consolatti et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5901313 | Wolf et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903455 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904608 | Watanabe | May 1999 | A |
5904609 | Fukuroda et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910011 | Cruse | Jun 1999 | A |
5910846 | Sandhu | Jun 1999 | A |
5912678 | Saxena et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916016 | Bothra | Jun 1999 | A |
5923553 | Yi | Jul 1999 | A |
5926690 | Toprac et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930138 | Lin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940300 | Ozaki | Aug 1999 | A |
5943237 | Van Boxem | Aug 1999 | A |
5943550 | Fulford, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960185 | Nguyen | Sep 1999 | A |
5960214 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961369 | Bartels et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963881 | Kahn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975994 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978751 | Pence et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982920 | Tobin, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002989 | Shiba et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012048 | Gustin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017771 | Yang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6036349 | Gombar | Mar 2000 | A |
6037664 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041263 | Boston et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041270 | Steffan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6054379 | Yau et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059636 | Inaba et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064759 | Buckley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072313 | Li et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074443 | Venkatesh et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077412 | Ting et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078845 | Friedman | Jun 2000 | A |
6093080 | Inaba et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094688 | Mellen-Garnett et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096649 | Jang | Aug 2000 | A |
6097887 | Hardikar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6100195 | Chan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108092 | Sandhu | Aug 2000 | A |
6111634 | Pecen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112130 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113462 | Yang | Sep 2000 | A |
6114238 | Liao | Sep 2000 | A |
6127263 | Parikh | Oct 2000 | A |
6128016 | Coelho et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136163 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141660 | Bach et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143646 | Wetzel | Nov 2000 | A |
6148099 | Lee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148239 | Funk et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148246 | Kawazome | Nov 2000 | A |
6150270 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157864 | Schwenke et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159075 | Zhang | Dec 2000 | A |
6159644 | Satoh et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161054 | Rosenthal et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169931 | Runnels | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172756 | Chalmers et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173240 | Sepulveda et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175777 | Kim | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178390 | Jun | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181013 | Liu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183345 | Kamono et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185324 | Ishihara et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186864 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191864 | Sandhu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192291 | Kwon | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197604 | Miller et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204165 | Ghoshal | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210983 | Atchison et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211094 | Jun et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212961 | Dvir | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214734 | Bothra et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217412 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219711 | Chari | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222936 | Phan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226563 | Lim | May 2001 | B1 |
6226792 | Goiffon et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228280 | Li et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230069 | Campbell et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236903 | Kim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237050 | Kim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240330 | Kurtzberg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240331 | Yun | May 2001 | B1 |
6245581 | Bonser et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245679 | Cook et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246972 | Klimasauskas | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248602 | Bode et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249712 | Boiquaye | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252412 | Talbot et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253366 | Mutschler, III | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259160 | Lopatin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263255 | Tan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268270 | Scheid et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271670 | Caffey | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276989 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277014 | Chen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278899 | Piche et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280289 | Wiswesser et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281127 | Shue | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284622 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287879 | Gonzales et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290572 | Hofmann | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291367 | Kelkar | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292708 | Allen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298274 | Inoue | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298470 | Breiner et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303395 | Nulman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304999 | Toprac et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307628 | Lu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314379 | Hu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317643 | Dmochowski | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320655 | Matsushita et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324481 | Atchison et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334807 | Lebel et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336841 | Chang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339727 | Ladd | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340602 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345288 | Reed et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345315 | Mishra | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346426 | Toprac et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355559 | Havemann et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360133 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360184 | Jacquez | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363294 | Coronel et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366934 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368879 | Toprac | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368883 | Bode et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368884 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375791 | Chiesl et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379980 | Toprac | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381564 | David et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388253 | Su | May 2002 | B1 |
6389491 | Jacobson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391780 | Shih et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397114 | Eryurek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398152 | Burchert et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6400162 | Mallory et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405096 | Toprac et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405144 | Toprac et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409580 | Lougher et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417014 | Lam et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427093 | Toprac | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432728 | Tai et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435952 | Boyd et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438438 | Takagi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440295 | Wang | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442496 | Pasadyn et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449524 | Miller et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455415 | Lopatin et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455937 | Cunningham | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465263 | Coss, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470230 | Toprac et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479902 | Lopatin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479990 | Mednikov et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482660 | Conchieri et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484064 | Campbell | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486492 | Su | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492281 | Song et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495452 | Shih | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503839 | Gonzales et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515368 | Lopatin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517413 | Hu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517414 | Tobin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6528409 | Lopatin et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529789 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532555 | Miller et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535783 | Miller et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537912 | Agarwal | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540591 | Pasadyn et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6541401 | Herner et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546508 | Sonderman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556881 | Miller | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560504 | Goodwin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6563308 | Nagano et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567717 | Krivokapic et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6580958 | Takano | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587744 | Stoddard et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590179 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604012 | Cho et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605549 | Leu et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607976 | Chen et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609946 | Tran | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616513 | Osterheld | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618692 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624075 | Lopatin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625497 | Fairbairn et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6630741 | Lopatin et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640151 | Somekh et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652355 | Wiswesser et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660633 | Lopatin et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678570 | Pasadyn et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6708074 | Chi et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708075 | Sonderman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725402 | Coss, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728587 | Goldman et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735492 | Conrad et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6751518 | Sonderman et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6774998 | Wright et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6969297 | Moore et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
20010001755 | Sandhu et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010003084 | Finarov | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010006873 | Moore | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010012751 | Boyd et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010030366 | Nakano et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039462 | Mendez et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010040997 | Tsap et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042690 | Talieh | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044667 | Nakano et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020032499 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058460 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070126 | Sato et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077031 | Johansson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020081951 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089676 | Pecen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102853 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107599 | Patel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107604 | Riley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113039 | Mok et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127950 | Hirose et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128805 | Goldman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020149359 | Crouzen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165636 | Hasan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183986 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020185658 | Inoue et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193899 | Shanmugasandram et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193902 | Shanmugasundram et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197745 | Shanmugasundram et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197934 | Paik | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199082 | Shanmugasundram et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030017256 | Shimane | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020909 | Adams et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020928 | Ritzdorf et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030154062 | Daft et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2050247 | Aug 1991 | CA |
2165847 | Aug 1991 | CA |
2194855 | Aug 1991 | CA |
0 397 924 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0 621 522 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 747 795 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 869 652 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0877308 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 881 040 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 895 145 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0 910 123 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0 932 194 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0 932 195 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1 066 925 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 067 757 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 071 128 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 083 470 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 092 505 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1072967 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1 182 526 | Feb 2002 | EP |
2 347 885 | Sep 2000 | GB |
2 365 215 | Feb 2002 | GB |
61-66104 | Apr 1986 | JP |
61-171147 | Aug 1986 | JP |
01-283934 | Nov 1989 | JP |
3-202710 | Sep 1991 | JP |
05-151231 | Jun 1993 | JP |
05-216896 | Aug 1993 | JP |
05-266029 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06-110894 | Apr 1994 | JP |
06-176994 | Jun 1994 | JP |
6-184434 | Jul 1994 | JP |
06-252236 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06-260380 | Sep 1994 | JP |
8-23166 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8-50161 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08-149583 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8-304023 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09-34535 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9-246547 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-34522 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-173029 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-67853 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-126816 | May 1999 | JP |
11-135601 | May 1999 | JP |
2000183001 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001-76982 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-284299 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001-305108 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-9030 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-343754 | Nov 2002 | JP |
434103 | May 2001 | TW |
436383 | May 2001 | TW |
455938 | Sep 2001 | TW |
455976 | Sep 2001 | TW |
WO 9534866 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9805066 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9845090 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9909371 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9925520 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9959200 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0000874 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0005759 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0035063 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0054325 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0079355 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0111679 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0115865 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0118623 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0125865 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0133277 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0133501 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0152055 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0152319 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0157823 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 01080306 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0217150 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0231613 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0231613 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0233737 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02074491 | Sep 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030027424 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60298878 | Jun 2001 | US | |
60305782 | Jul 2001 | US | |
60318741 | Sep 2001 | US |