The present invention relates generally to integrated circuit fabrication, and more specifically to masking techniques.
Integrated circuits are continuously being made smaller as demand for portability, computing power, memory capacity and energy efficiency in modern electronics grows. Therefore, the size of the integrated circuit constituent features, such as electrical devices and interconnect line widths, is also decreasing continuously. The trend of decreasing feature size is evident in memory circuits or devices such as dynamic random access memory (“DRAM”), flash memory, nonvolatile memory, static random access memory (“SRAM”), ferroelectric (“FE”) memory, logic gate arrays and so forth.
For example, DRAM typically comprises millions of identical circuit elements, known as memory cells. In its most general form, a memory cell typically consists of two electrical devices: a storage capacitor and an access field effect transistor. Each memory cell is an addressable location that can store one binary digit (“bit”) of data. A bit can be written to a cell through the transistor and read by sensing charge on the storage electrode from the reference electrode side. By decreasing the sizes of constituent electrical devices and the conducting lines that access them, the sizes of the memory devices incorporating these features can be decreased. Thus, storage capacities can be increased by fitting more memory cells into the memory devices.
As another example, flash memory (for example, electrically erasable programmable read only memory or “EEPROM”) is a type of memory that is typically erased and reprogrammed in blocks instead of one byte at a time. A typical flash memory comprises a memory array, which includes a large number of memory cells. The memory cells include a floating gate field effect transistor capable of holding a charge. The data in a cell is determined by the presence or absence of the charge in the floating gate. The cells are usually grouped into sections called “erase blocks.” The memory cells of a flash memory array are typically arranged into a “NOR” architecture (each cell directly coupled to a bit line) or a “NAND” architecture (cells coupled into “strings” of cells, such that each cell is coupled indirectly to a bit line and requires activating the other cells of the string for access). The cells within an erase block can be electrically programmed in a random basis by charging the floating gate. The charge can be removed from the floating gate by a block erase operation, wherein all floating gate memory cells in the erase block are erased in a single operation.
The pitch of a pattern is defined as the distance between an identical point in two neighboring pattern features. These features are typically defined by openings in, and spaced from each other by, a material, such as an insulator or conductor. Thus, pitch can be understood as the sum of the width of a feature and the width of the space separating that feature from a neighboring feature.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a method for defining patterns in an integrated circuit comprises defining a plurality of features in a first photoresist layer using photolithography over a first region of a substrate. Pitch multiplication is used to produce at least two features in a lower masking layer for each feature in the photoresist layer. The features in the lower masking layer include looped ends. A second photoresist layer covers a second region of the substrate including the looped ends in the lower masking layer. A pattern of trenches is etched in the substrate through the features in the lower masking layer without etching in the second region. The trenches have a trench width.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method of making a plurality of conductive lines in an array comprises providing a film stack. The film stack includes a substrate in contact with a plurality of conductive plugs, an insulating film overlying the conductive plugs, a lower mask layer overlying the insulating film, and an array of spacers formed over the lower mask layer. A sacrificial film is deposited over the lower mask layer and the array of spacers. A secondary mask is formed over a portion of the sacrificial film. The secondary mask defines an opening in the array of spacers. The lower mask layer and the sacrificial film can be etched selectively with respect to the secondary mask. The sacrificial film is etched and a portion of the lower mask layer is exposed. The method further comprises etching the lower mask layer and exposing a portion of the insulating film. A plurality of trenches are etched in the insulating film, the lower mask layer, and the sacrificial film to expose at least a portion of the conductive plugs. A blanket metal deposition is performed. A planar surface is then formed, alternating between metal and insulating film in a damascene process.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method of pitch multiplication for damascene features in an integrated circuit comprises providing a substrate. A first masking process is performed to define an array of spacer lines over the substrate. The spacer lines are separated by a plurality of gaps. A second masking process is performed to block a portion of the spacer lines and that defines a plurality of interconnects in a logic region of the integrated circuit. A plurality of trenches are etched in the gaps between the spacer lines. A metal layer is deposited to form a plurality of metal lines in the gaps between the spacer lines. The integrated circuit is provided with a substantially planar surface in a damascene process.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method of forming integrated circuit components on a substrate comprises using a lithographic technique to pattern a first resist layer and define a plurality of lines. A pitch multiplication technique is used to form a pattern of spacers around a region defined by the plurality of lines. The spacers comprise elongate loops having loop ends. A second resist layer is deposited over the loop ends to define a blocked region of the substrate. The method further comprises selectively etching through the spacers to from a plurality of trenches in the substrate without etching in the blocked regions.
Exemplary embodiments of the integrated circuits and integrated circuit fabrication techniques are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, which are for illustrative purposes only. The drawings comprise the following figures, which are not necessarily drawn to scale. In the figures like numerals indicate like parts.
The continual reduction in feature size places ever greater demands on techniques used to form the features. For example, photolithography is commonly used to pattern features, such as lines, on a substrate. The concept of pitch can be used to describe the size of these features. Due to optical factors such as light or radiation wavelength, however, photolithography techniques have a minimum pitch below which features cannot be formed reliably. Thus, the minimum pitch of a photolithographic technique can limit feature size reduction.
Pitch doubling is one method proposed for extending the capabilities of photolithographic techniques beyond their minimum pitch. Such a method is illustrated in
While the pitch is actually halved in the example above, this reduction in pitch is conventionally referred to as pitch “doubling,” or, more generally, pitch “multiplication”. That is, conventionally “multiplication” of pitch by a certain factor actually involves reducing the pitch by that factor. The conventional terminology is retained herein. Note that by forming spacers upon spacers, the definable feature size can be further decreased. Thus, pitch multiplication refers to the process generally, regardless of the number of times the spacer formation process is employed.
Because the layer 50 of spacer material typically has a single thickness 90 (see
Some proposed methods for forming patterns at the periphery and at the array involve three separate masks. For example, in one method, a first mask and pitch doubling are used to form a spacer pattern, which typically comprises spacer loops in one region of a chip, such as the array region of a memory device. Then, a second mask is performed to form a second pattern in another region of the chip, such as the peripheral region of a memory device. This second peripheral pattern is formed in a layer overlying the spacer pattern. This covers the central portion of the spacer loops while the looped ends of the spacers are left exposed to an etching process. Then, a third mask is performed to form a third pattern that includes interconnects in and/or from the peripheral region. Both the “chopped” spacer pattern and the third pattern are then transferred to an underlying masking layer which can be etched relative to an underlying substrate. This allows features having different sizes—as compared to each other and as compared to the spacer loops—to be formed in the circuit peripheral region. Such features include, for example, interconnect patterns. These features can overlap with the spacer loops, can be consolidated with features in the circuit array region, and can be subsequently etched.
In accordance with the foregoing, improved techniques have been developed for forming features of different sizes, especially pitch-multiplied features having overlapping patterns.
In certain embodiments, part of the feature pattern to be transferred to a substrate has a pitch below the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique used for processing the substrate. Additionally, certain embodiments can be used to form devices having arrays of electrical devices, including logic or gate arrays and volatile and non-volatile memory devices such as DRAM, read only memory (“ROM”), flash memory and gate arrays. In such devices, pitch multiplication is usable to form, for example, transistor gate electrodes and conductive lines in the array region of the chips, while conventional photolithography is usable to form larger features, such as contacts, at the peripheries of the chips. Exemplary masking steps in the course of fabricating a memory device are illustrated in the figures and are described herein.
An upper interlevel dielectric (“ILD”) insulator 106 is formed over the substrate, and contact is made through the ILD 106 by etching contact holes and filling with conductive plugs 110. In one embodiment, the conductive plugs 110 comprise polycrystalline silicon, although other electrically conductive materials can be used in other embodiments. Portions of an etch stop layer 112, such as a nitride layer, are disposed over the insulator 106; the etch stop layer 112 is used in the formation of the conductive plugs 110. In certain embodiments, the insulator 105 is aligned with the substrate/plug interface. However, in other embodiments the insulator 105 extends slightly above the substrate/plug interface, as illustrated in
In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Between the spacers 118 are gaps 120 that correspond to regions of the integrated circuit where conductive material is to be deposited. In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment, the spacing between the spacers 118 and the gaps 120 varies between the array region 102 and the peripheral region 104 of the integrated circuit 100. This is further illustrated in
As illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment, the minimum width of the openings 128 depends on the native resolution of the photolithographic process, which in one embodiment is as low as 100 nm, which in another embodiment is as low as 65 nm, and which in another embodiment is as low as 45 nm. Other dimensions can be used in other embodiments. In an exemplary embodiment, the spacers 118 in the circuit array region 104 are sufficiently spaced apart to allow contacts 132 to be “landed” to provide interconnections to other levels of the integrated circuit.
In an exemplary embodiment, after the second mask is performed, the BARC 122 is etched, as illustrated in
The BARC etch is followed by an etch of the hard mask layer 116, which can be selectively etched with respect to the spacers 118. The resulting structure is illustrated in
Regardless of how the trenches are formed, the etch processes illustrated in
As illustrated in
A flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for forming certain of the integrated circuit structures disclosed herein is provided in
In certain embodiments, the peripheral interconnects are also optionally used to form electrical connections between the array region 102 and the peripheral region 104. This is illustrated in operational block 166 of
Certain of the integrated circuit fabrication techniques disclosed herein offer significant advantages over conventional techniques. For example, conventional methodology requires three separate masks to define the array region, to define the peripheral region, and to remove the looped ends of circuit features. In contrast, certain of the techniques disclosed herein allow pitch reduced features to be formed in a damascene process that uses only two masks. As described herein, in exemplary embodiments the looped ends of array features can be blocked with the same mask that is used to define periphery features.
In another aspect of certain embodiments, rules are provided to facilitate circuit designers to implement the integrated circuit fabrication methods disclosed herein. The configuration of the masks indirectly corresponds to the integrated circuit patterns that are formed, particularly when the gaps between the spacer loops, some of which are enclosed and some of which are not, define the circuit features of interest. Such features can be formed as disclosed herein using pitch multiplication and damascene techniques. The rules discussed below provide a circuit designer with guidelines for building a circuit that is formable using the techniques disclosed herein. As described herein, building a circuit is compliance with these rules allows mixed use of interconnects with varying pitch size while using only two masks. Specifically, a spacer layer mask, or “spacer”, is used to define pitch-reduced spacers between dense interconnect lines in the circuit array region, and a metal layer mask, or “metal”, is used to define the interconnect pattern in the circuit periphery region.
In an exemplary embodiment, the design rules for defining the spacer and metal are based on two scaling factors. For a given lithography, F is the minimum feature size that can be resolved, and D is the maximum misalignment allowed between the two masks. The variable x is a pitch multiplication scaling constant corresponding to a feature size of the spacer loops used to define the metal lines (0<x<1). Because a single pitch-multiplication technique is used, the actual interconnect pitch achievable using the techniques disclosed herein is F.
In one embodiment, the spacer loops are drawn in a plurality of distinct closed loops that to not overlap or cross. Two exemplary spacer loops 140 are illustrated in
In such embodiments, a plurality of metal features 144 are defined by a plurality of spacer loops 140. Because a damascene process is used in the preferred embodiments, the gaps between the spacer loops, some of which are enclosed and some of which are not, define the metal features 144 that will subsequently be deposited (for example, by physical vapor deposition or chemical vapor deposition) or electroplated with conductive material. In addition, metal features 142 are defined only one side by the spacer loops 140. The metal features 144 that are defined on both sides by the spacer loops 140 have a minimum width of (1−x)F. The metal features 142 that are defined on only one side by a spacer loop 140 have a minimum width of ((1−x)F+D). Metal features can also be formed without restriction by a spacer loop 140 with a minimum width corresponding to the minimum resolution of the lithography technique F. As illustrated in
The circuit design rules expounded herein are based on the integrated circuit fabrication techniques disclosed herein. In particular, using an oversized spacer mask to define subsequently pitch-reduced features limits the spacing of metal lines that are defined by the pitch-reduced features.
Separately defining the metal and spacer layers according to the rules provided by the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein allows circuit designers to build an integrated circuit based on the actual circuit features that will appear on the wafer. These rules advantageously account for the inherent limitations that arise when pitch multiplication techniques are used to form circuit features. The use of the scaling parameter x allows these design rules to work with future pitch multiplication technologies capable of producing smaller feature sizes.
Certain embodiments disclosed herein are usable to form a wide variety of integrated circuits. Examples of such integrated circuits include, but are not limited to, circuits having arrays of electrical devices, such as memory cell arrays for volatile and non-volatile memory devices such as DRAM, ROM or flash memory, NAND flash memory, and integrated circuits having logic or gate arrays. For example, the logic array can be a field programmable gate array (“FPGA”) having a core array similar to a memory array and a periphery with supporting logic circuitry. Therefore, the integrated circuit formed using the techniques disclosed herein can be, for example, a memory chip or a processor, which can include both a logic array and embedded memory, or other integrated circuits having a logic or gate array.
While the foregoing detailed description discloses several embodiments of the present invention, it should be understood that this disclosure is illustrative only and is not limiting of the present invention. It should be appreciated that the specific configurations and operations disclosed can differ from those described above, and that the methods described herein can be used in contexts other than integrated circuit fabrication.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/486,890 (filed 15 Sep. 2014), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/962,208 (filed 8 Aug. 2013), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/445,797 (filed 12 Apr. 2012), now U.S. Pat. No. 8,507,341, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/850,511 (filed 4 Aug. 2010), now U.S. Pat. No. 8,158,476, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/119,831 (filed May 13, 2008), now U.S. Pat. No. 7,776,683, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/216,477 (filed 31 Aug. 2005), now U.S. Pat. No. 7,611,944, which is a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/666,031 (filed 28 Mar. 2005). The entire disclosure of all of these priority applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/932,993 (filed 1 Sep. 2004), now U.S. Pat. No. 7,910,288, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/934,778 (filed 2 Sep. 2004), now U.S. Pat. No. 7,115,525, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/931,771 (filed 31 Aug. 2004), now U.S. Pat. No. 7,151,040, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/934,317 (filed 2 Sep. 2004), now U.S. Pat. No. 7,655,387, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/215,982 (filed 31 Aug. 2005), now U.S. Pat. No. 7,829,262, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/662,323 (filed 15 Mar. 2005), and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/134,982 (filed 23 May 2005), now U.S. Pat. No. 7,429,536. The entire content of all of these related applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4234362 | Riseman | Nov 1980 | A |
4419809 | Riseman et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4432132 | Kinsbron et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4502914 | Trumpp et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508579 | Goth et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4570325 | Higuchi | Feb 1986 | A |
4648937 | Ogura et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4716131 | Okazawa et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4776922 | Bhattacharyya et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4838991 | Cote et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5013680 | Lowrey et al. | May 1991 | A |
5047117 | Roberts | Sep 1991 | A |
5053105 | Fox, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5117027 | Bernhardt et al. | May 1992 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330879 | Dennison | Jul 1994 | A |
5470661 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5514885 | Myrick | May 1996 | A |
5593813 | Kim | Jan 1997 | A |
5670794 | Manning | Sep 1997 | A |
5753546 | Koh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5789320 | Andricacos et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795830 | Cronin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5830332 | Babich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5899746 | Mukai | May 1999 | A |
5923981 | Qian | Jul 1999 | A |
5998256 | Juengling | Dec 1999 | A |
6004862 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010946 | Hisamune et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020255 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6022815 | Doyle et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042998 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057573 | Kirsch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063688 | Doyle et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071789 | Yang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110837 | Linliu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143476 | Ye et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6207490 | Lee et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211044 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6282113 | DeBrosse | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288454 | Allman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291334 | Somekh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297554 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335257 | Tseng | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348380 | Weimer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362057 | Taylor, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383907 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395613 | Juengling | May 2002 | B1 |
6404056 | Kuge et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423474 | Holscher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455372 | Weimer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475867 | Hui et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500756 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514884 | Maeda | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522584 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534243 | Templeton | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548385 | Lai | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548396 | Naik et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559017 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566280 | Meagley et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602779 | Li et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620715 | Blosse et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632741 | Clevenger et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635917 | Juengling | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638441 | Chang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6664028 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667237 | Metzler | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673684 | Huang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686245 | Mathew et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689695 | Lui et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703312 | Golz et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706571 | Yu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709807 | Hallock et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6710387 | Nakamura | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716761 | Mitsuiki | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723607 | Nam | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734107 | Lai et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744094 | Forbes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756284 | Sharma | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762449 | Uchiyama et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764949 | Bonser et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768663 | Ogata | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773998 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6777725 | Willer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6794699 | Bissey et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800930 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818141 | Plat et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6835662 | Erhardt et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6835663 | Lipinski | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6846618 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867116 | Chung | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875703 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888755 | Harari | May 2005 | B2 |
6893972 | Rottstegge et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905628 | Bjarnason et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913871 | So | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6916594 | Bok | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924191 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6926843 | Cantell et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939808 | Tzou et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951703 | Chae et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6951709 | Li | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6955961 | Chung | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962867 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967140 | Doyle | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987043 | Kujirai et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998319 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6998332 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7005240 | Manger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7015124 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7045383 | Maimon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064078 | Liu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074666 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7074668 | Park et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7084076 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115525 | Abatchev et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119020 | Okamura et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7151040 | Tran et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7175944 | Yin et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7179672 | Asakawa et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183142 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183205 | Hong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183597 | Doyle | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202174 | Jung | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7208379 | Venugopal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226853 | Bekiaris et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7253118 | Tran et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271107 | Marks et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288445 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291560 | Parascandola et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7351666 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355273 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7390746 | Bai et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393789 | Abatchev et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7396781 | Wells | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7413981 | Tang et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7429536 | Abatchev et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442976 | Juengling | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446049 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7473644 | Lane et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7537866 | Liu | May 2009 | B2 |
7547599 | Sandhu et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7560390 | Sant et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7572572 | Wells | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7611944 | Tran et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7648919 | Tran et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655387 | Sandhu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7687342 | Haller et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7737227 | Jung | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7759197 | Tran | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7776683 | Tran et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776744 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7851135 | Jung | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8507341 | Tran et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
9147608 | Tran | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20010005631 | Kim et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020042198 | Bjarnason et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045308 | Juengling | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063110 | Cantell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068243 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094688 | Mitsuiki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020127810 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130348 | Tran | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020158273 | Satoh et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030006410 | Doyle | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030044722 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030109102 | Kujirai et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119307 | Bekiaris et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127426 | Chang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157436 | Manger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030207207 | Li | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207584 | Sivakumar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215978 | Maimon et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216050 | Golz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030230234 | Nam et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000534 | Lipinski | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017989 | So | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018738 | Liu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023475 | Bonser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023502 | Tzou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041189 | Voshell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043623 | Liu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053475 | Sharma | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079988 | Harari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106257 | Okamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040235255 | Tanaka | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050074949 | Jung et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050112812 | Jang | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112886 | Asakawa et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142497 | Ryou | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153562 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164454 | Leslie | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167394 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186705 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050272259 | Hong | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003182 | Lane et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011947 | Juengling | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024940 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024945 | Kim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028859 | Forbes | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046161 | Yin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046200 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046201 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046422 | Tran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046484 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083996 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060115978 | Specht | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172540 | Marks et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189150 | Jung | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211260 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216923 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231900 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234138 | Fehlhaber et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240361 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060263699 | Abatchev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267075 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273456 | Sant et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278911 | Eppich | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018345 | Chao | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026672 | Tang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045712 | Haller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048674 | Wells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049011 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049030 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049032 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049035 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049040 | Bai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050748 | Juengling | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077524 | Koh | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070145450 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148968 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070190762 | Van Haren et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200178 | Yun et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210449 | Caspary et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215874 | Furukawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215960 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070275309 | Liu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080054350 | Breitwisch et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080057610 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081461 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080085612 | Smythe et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080292991 | Wallow | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
280 851 | Jul 1990 | DE |
42 36 609 | May 1994 | DE |
0 227 303 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0 491 408 | Jun 1992 | EP |
1 357 433 | Oct 2003 | EP |
57-048237 | Mar 1982 | JP |
64-035916 | Feb 1989 | JP |
05-343370 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H8-55908 | Feb 1996 | JP |
H8-55920 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2000-208434 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-307084 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000-357736 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-358061 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2003-273211 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-080033 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004 152784 | May 2004 | JP |
2005-150333 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-351861 | Jan 2012 | JP |
10-1999-0001440 | Jan 1999 | KR |
10-1999-027887 | Apr 1999 | KR |
10-2005-0052213 | Jun 2005 | KR |
WO 9415261 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 02099864 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2004001799 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004003977 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2005034215 | Apr 2005 | WO |
PCTUS2005029984 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005010973 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2006026699 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bergeron, et al., “Resolution Enhancement Techniques for the 90nm Technology Node and Beyond,” Future Fab International, Issue 15, Jul. 11, 2003, 4 pages. |
Bhave et al. “Developer-soluble Gap fill materials for patterning metal trenches in via-first Dual Damascene process,” preprint of Proceedings of SPIE: Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XXI, vol. 5376, 2004, John L. Sturtevant, editor, 8 pages. |
Bruek, “Optical and Interferometric Lithography—Nanotechnology Enablers,” Oct. 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 93, No. 10, pp. 1704-1721. |
Choi et al. “Sublithographic nanofabrication technology for nanocatalysts and DNA chips,” J.Vac. Sci. Technol., Nov./Dec. 2003; pp. 2951-2955. |
Chung et al. “Pattern multiplication method and the uniformity of nanoscale multiple lines,” J.Vac.Sci.Technol. B21(4), Jul./Aug. 2003, pp. 1491-1495. |
Chung et al. “Nanoscale Multi-Line Patterning Using Sidewall Structure,” Jpn., J. App.. Phys. vol. 41 (2002) Pt. 1, No. 6B, pp. 4410-4414. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/543,515, filed Oct. 5, 2006, MICRON Ref No. 2005-1173.00/US”. |
English translation of the Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-504064 mailed on Aug. 30, 2011. |
English translation of the Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-504064 mailed on Nov. 27, 2012. |
“Ex parte Cantell, unpublished decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Mar. 5, 2005”. |
Joubert et al. “Nanometer scale linewidth control during etching of polysilicon gates in high-density plasmas,” Microelectronic Engineering 69 (2003), pp. 350-357. |
Lim, B. Nature, vol. 2 Nov. 2003, pp. 749-753. |
Oehrlein et al. “Pattern transfer into low dielectic materials by high-density plasma etching,” Solid State Tech., May 2000, 8 pages. |
Sheats et al., “Microlithography: Science and Technology,” 1998, Marcel Dekkar, Inc., pp. 104-105. |
U.S. Office Action of May 15, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/492,513, filed Jul. 24, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action of Jun. 2, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/219,067, filed Sep. 1, 2005. |
U.S. Office Action of Jun. 3, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/492,323, filed Jul. 24, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action of Jun. 5, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/514,117, filed Aug. 30, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action of Jul. 11, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/367,020, filed Mar. 2, 2006. |
U.S. Office Action issued Mar. 6, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/407,429, filed Apr. 20, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/932,993, filed Sep. 1, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/934,778, filed Sep. 2, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,771, filed Aug. 31, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/934,317, filed Sep. 2, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/214,544, filed Aug. 29, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160005601 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60666031 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12850511 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13445797 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14486890 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 14855845 | US | |
Parent | 13962208 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14486890 | US | |
Parent | 13445797 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 13962208 | US | |
Parent | 12119831 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 12850511 | US | |
Parent | 11216477 | Aug 2005 | US |
Child | 12119831 | US |