1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to an ion implanter and implant method, and more particularly, relates to an ion implanter and an ion implant method that achieves a two-dimensional scan by moving a wafer and an aperture for filtering an ion beam along different directions separately.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Ion implantation is a popular and important processing step performed during semiconductor manufacture. To effectively implant a wafer with a required dose distribution, a two-dimensional scan path is typically used.
When the ion beam 20 is movable, it is difficult to precisely control the properties of the implantation on the wafer 10. For example, the incident angle between the implanted ion beam and the surface of the wafer varies among different portions of the wafer 10. This variance causes the wafer 10 to be non-uniformly implanted whereby an additional step may be required to improve the uniformity.
Hence, a popular implementation involves fixing the ion beam and moving the wafer to achieve the two-dimensional scan, regardless of whether a spot ion beam or a ribbon ion beam is used.
However, when the size of the wafer 10 is increased, the required movement distance of the wafer 10 must also be increased to ensure proper implantation of the whole wafer 10. Hence, the cost and complexity of the mechanism for moving the wafer 10 are correspondingly increased. Of course, a solution is to increase the height of the ion beam 20, such that the wafer 10 can be properly implanted by the ion beam 20 without having to significantly move the wafer 10. However, increasing the height of ion beam 20 causes the uniformity of the ion beam 20 to be decreased, so that the problem of meeting the required movement distance of the wafer 10 still persists and remains significant.
For the disadvantages mentioned above, there is a need to propose a novel ion implanter and a novel ion implant method for achieving the two-dimensional scan.
The present invention provides a new approach for achieving a two-dimensional scan. According to a feature of the invention, conventional two-dimensional movement of the wafer is replaced by a one-dimensional movement of the wafer and a one-dimensional movement of an aperture for filtering an ion beam before the wafer is implanted. Hence, when the wafer and the aperture are moved along different directions respectively, a two-dimensional scan of a projection of the ion beam on the wafer can be achieved without using the conventional two-dimensional movement of the wafer.
One embodiment is an ion implant method. The ion implant method includes the following steps. Initially, a wafer and an ion beam are provided. Also an aperture mechanism (e.g., panel) is provided with an aperture capable of filtering the ion beam before the wafer is implanted, especially to filter out partial ion beam and only allow other portions of the ion beam to be implanted. Next, the wafer is moved along a first direction, and the aperture mechanism is moved along a second direction intersecting with the first direction respectively, such that a projection of the ion beam is two-dimensionally scanned over the wafer.
Another embodiment is an ion implanter. The ion implanter includes one or more of an ion source, a mass analyzer, a wafer driving mechanism (e.g., advancer), an aperture mechanism, and an aperture driving mechanism (e.g., advancer). The ion source is capable of generating an ion beam, and the mass analyzer is capable of analyzing the ion beam. The wafer driving mechanism is configured to drive a wafer to be implanted by the ion beam, wherein the wafer is, is capable of being, is operated to be, or is configured to be, movable only along a first direction. The aperture mechanism has an aperture that is configured to filter an ion beam before the wafer is implanted. The aperture driving mechanism is used for driving the aperture mechanism, wherein the aperture is, is capable of being, is operated to be, and/or is configured to be, movable along a second direction. A two-dimensional scan of the ion beam on the wafer is achieved by both the wafer driving mechanism and the aperture driving mechanism driving the wafer and the aperture along different directions.
A detailed description of the present invention will be discussed in connection with the following embodiments, which are intended not to limit the scope of the present invention but rather to be adaptable for other applications. While the drawings are illustrated in detail, it is appreciated that the quantity of the disclosed components may be greater or less than that disclosed except for instances expressly restricting such components.
By comparison with the conventional two-dimensional scan, one advantage of the embodiment is clear. In the prior art, the wafer is moved along both the X-axis and the Y-axis. In contrast, in the inventive embodiment, the wafer is moved along the X-axis, and the aperture 241 is moved along the Y-axis. Clearly, the size of the aperture mechanism 240 can be significantly smaller than that of the wafer 10, especially the size along the X-axis. Note that the aperture mechanism 240 is used only to provide the aperture 241, in other words, to block portions of the ion beam 20 other than the portion directly passing through the aperture 241. Hence, along the Y-axis, the mechanism for driving the aperture mechanism 240 provided by the embodiment can be significantly simpler, even cheaper, than that of the mechanism for driving the wafer 10 required by the prior art.
Although
Furthermore, according to an optional feature, the wafer 10 is moved with a first velocity and the aperture mechanism 240 is moved with a second velocity, wherein the first velocity is independent of the second velocity, and one or more (e.g., both) of the first velocity and the second velocity are adjustable. Therefore, the ion beam projection can be scanned through different points of the wafer 10 by an adjustable velocity, such that different portions of the wafer 10 can be scanned with different velocities. When a non-uniform implantation over the wafer 10 is required, or when a different scan rate is an important factor of implantation over the wafer 10, the option is valuable.
By analogy, the function of the aperture 241 can be likened to that of a raster, whereby for instance only a portion of the wafer 10 exposed by the aperture 241 is implanted. Therefore, when the aperture 241 is moved, different portions of the wafer 10 can be implanted without corresponding movement of the wafer 10 or adjusting of the mass analyzer 220.
Owing to its movability over the wafer 10, another advantage of the embodiment is the motion of the aperture 241 being flexible such that one or more of the scan path and the scan rate of the aperture 241 over the wafer 10 are adjustable. Therefore, depending on the kind of dose distribution over the wafer 10 that is required, each of the scan path and the scan rate of the aperture 241 may be adjusted correspondingly to achieve the required dose distribution. Of course, the scan path and the scan rate of the wafer 10 also may be adjusted correspondingly to further elastically adjust the motion of the projection of the ion beam 20 on the wafer 10. Furthermore, the size of the aperture 241 may be significantly smaller than the diameter of the wafer 10, such that the unit size of the filtered ion beam projection over the wafer 10 can be significantly reduced. Therefore, to compare with the conventional two-dimensional scan where the unit size is the size of the whole ion beam projection, the embodiment is more effective for implanting a wafer with non-uniform dose distribution.
One further advantage of the embodiment is that the dose rate control of different portions of the wafer 10 can be achieved separately. As well known, different scan rates of the ion beam 20 may induce different effects on the semiconductor structures formed in and on the wafer 10. Therefore, as discussed above, when the unit size of the projection of the filtered ion beam 20 is smaller than the size of the ion beam 20, it is easy to adjust the dose rate effect over different portions of the wafer 10.
Moreover, it is well-known that an aperture can be used to adjust the ion beam to be implanted into the wafer 10, wherein the aperture has a fixed shape and is located in a fixed position. Hence, details of the aperture 241 are omitted herein, except for main characteristics being briefly introduced. For example, a shape of the aperture 241 may be adjusted to ensure a beam current distribution of a filtered ion beam dropping to zero gradually at the edge of the aperture 241, or to ensure a current distribution of the filtered ion beam having a Gaussian distribution. As may be typical, the shape of aperture 241 may comprise one or more (e.g., combination or complex shape) of a circle, oval, ellipse and diamond. Also, the material of the aperture mechanism 240, especially the material of a part of the aperture mechanism 240 close to the aperture 241, may be graphite to minimize the possible pollution induced by collision with the ion beam 20. Besides, to further minimize possible pollution, a shield capable of preventing the aperture driving mechanism 250 from being implanted by the ion beam 20 optionally may be implemented. According to a non-illustrated embodiment, the shield may be made of graphite and located between the aperture mechanism 240 and the mass analyzer 220 for covering most of the aperture mechanism 240 and exposing essentially only the aperture 241.
As may be typical, calculation of the scan rate and the scan path, and/or even other scan parameters, can be based on an assumption that the whole aperture 241 is filled by the ion beam 20 and the whole filtered (i.e., passing through the aperture 241) ion beam is implanted into the wafer 10. The assumption almost is correct when the aperture 241 is located over the wafer 10. However, when the aperture 241 is located nearby the ends of the cross-section of the ion beam 20, the aperture 241 may not be completely filled by the ion beam. However, when the aperture 241 is located near the edge of the wafer 10, the filtered ion beam passing through the aperture 241 may not be completely projected onto the wafer 10. In such case, it is desired to correct the scan path and the scan rate, and/or even other scan parameters, according to the real ion beam passing through the aperture 241 and arriving on the wafer 10, to thereby provide what usually is referred to as an “edge correction factor.”
Two practical examples for block 302 are briefly discussed below with reference to
Referring to
Here, as examples, the height of the ribbon beam is 350 mm if the wafer 10 is a 300 mm wafer, the uniformity of the ribbon beam is about 5% and usually not less than 1%, and the aperture 241 has an oval shape or diamond shape. To ensure that the current density of the ion beam 20 has a Gaussian distribution, the lengthwise dimension L of the aperture 241 is about 150 mm, and the lateral dimension W of the aperture 241 is about 60 mm.
Considering aperture 241,
Thereafter, the aperture 241 can be moved to a second position (or, alternatively, held at its current position) of the Y-axis, and the wafer 10 is positioned (e.g., in the drawing, moved up in the X-direction) for the next step. As shown in
Another practical embodiment is now briefly described. Referring to
Referring to
Furthermore, to more elastically adjust the shape of the filtered ion beam, the aperture 241 optionally can be slightly moved around the ion beam 20. For example, keep the aperture 241 in a fixed point of the Y-axis but slightly move aperture 241 along the x-axis. Hence, as shown in
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention, which is intended to be limited solely by the appended claims.