1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to stacked integrated circuit memory.
2. State of the Art
Manufacturing methods for increasing the performance and decreasing the cost of electronic circuits, nearly without exception, are methods that increase the integration of the circuit and decrease its physical size per equivalent number of circuit devices such as transistors or capacitors. These methods have produced as of 1996 microprocessors capable of over 100 million operations per second that cost less than $1,000 and 64 Mbit DRAM circuits that access data in less than 50 ns and cost less than $50. The physical size of such circuits is less than 2 cm2. Such manufacturing methods support to a large degree the economic standard of living in the major industrialized countries and will most certainly continue to have significant consequences in the daily lives of people all over the world.
Circuit manufacturing methods take two primary forms: process integration and assembly integration. Historically the line between these two manufacturing disciplines has been clear, but recently with the rise in the use of MCMs (Multi-Chip Modules) and flip-chip die attach, this clear separation may soon disappear. (The predominate use of the term Integrated Circuit (IC) herein is in reference to an Integrated Circuit in singulated die form as sawed from a circuit substrate such as s semiconductor wafer versus, for example, an Integrated Circuit in packaged form.) The majority of ICs when in initial die form are presently individually packaged, however, there is an increasing use of MCMs. Die in an MCM are normally attached to a circuit substrate in a planar fashion with conventional IC die I/O interconnect bonding methods such as wire bonding, DCA (Direct Chip Attach) or FCA (Flip-Chip Attach).
Integrated circuit memory such as DRAM, SRAM, flash EPROM, EEPROM, Ferroelectric, GMR (Giant MagnetoResistance), etc. have the common architectural or structural characteristic of being monolithic with the control circuitry integrated on the same die with the memory array circuitry. This established (standard or conventional) architecture or circuit layout structure creates a design trade-off constraint between control circuitry and memory array circuitry for large memory circuits. Reductions in the fabrication geometries of memory cell circuitry has resulted in denser and denser memory ICs, however, these higher memory densities have resulted in more sophisticated control circuitry at the expense of increased area of the IC. Increased IC area means at least higher fabrication costs per IC (fewer ICs per wafer) and lower IC yields (fewer working ICs per wafer), and in the worst case, an IC design that cannot be manufactured due to its non-competitive cost or unreliable operation.
As memory density increases and the individual memory cell size decreases more control circuitry is required. The control circuitry of a memory IC as a percentage of IC area in some cases such as DRAMs approaches or exceeds 40%. One portion of the control circuitry is the sense amp which senses the state, potential or charge of a memory cell in the memory array circuitry during a read operation. The sense amp circuitry is a significant portion of the control circuitry and it is a constant challenge to the IC memory designer to improve sense amp sensitivity in order to sense ever smaller memory cells while preventing the area used by the sense amp from becoming too large.
If this design constraint or trade-off between control and memory circuits did not exist, the control circuitry could be made to perform numerous additional functions, such as sensing multiple storage states per memory cell, faster memory access through larger more sensitive sense amps, caching, refresh, address translation, etc. But this trade-off is the physical and economic reality for memory ICs as they are presently made by all manufacturers.
The capacity of DRAM circuits increase by a factor of four from one generation to the next; e.g. 1 Mbit, 4 Mbit, 16 Mbit and 64 Mbit DRAMs. This four times increase in circuit memory capacity per generation has resulted in larger and larger DRAM circuit areas. Upon introduction of a new DRAM generation the circuit yields are too low and, therefore, not cost effective for high volume manufacture. It is normally several years between the date prototype samples of a new DRAM generation are shown and the date such circuits are in volume production.
Assembling die in a stacked or three dimensional (3D) manner is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,354,695 of the present inventor, incorporated herein by reference. Furthermore, assembling die in a 3D manner has been attempted with regard to memory. Texas Instruments of Dallas Tex., Irvine Sensors of Costa Mesa Calif. and Cubic Memory Corporation of Scotts Valley Calif., have all attempted to produce stacked or 3D DRAM products. In all three cases, conventional DRAM circuits in die form were stacked and the interconnect between each DRAM in the stack was formed along the outside surface of the circuit stack. These products have been available for the past several years and have proved to be too expensive for commercial applications, but have found some use in space and military applications due to their small physical size or footprint.
The DRAM circuit type is referred to and often used as an example in this specification, however, this invention is clearly not limited to the DRAM type of circuit. Undoubtedly memory cell types such as EEPROMs (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memories), flash EPROM, Ferroelectric, or combinations (intra or inter) of such memory cells can also be used with the present Three Dimensional Structure (3DS) methods to form 3DS memory devices.
The present invention furthers, among others, the following objectives:
1. Several-fold lower fabrication cost per megabyte of memory than circuits conventionally made solely with monolithic circuit integration methods.
2. Several-fold higher performance than conventionally made memory circuits.
3. Many-fold higher memory density per IC than conventionally made memory circuits.
4. Greater designer control of circuit area size, and therefore, cost.
5. Circuit dynamic and static self-test of memory cells by an internal controller.
6. Dynamic error recovery and reconfiguration.
7. Multi-level storage per memory cell.
8. Virtual address translation, address windowing, various address functions such as indirect addressing or content addressing, analog circuit functions and various graphics acceleration and microprocessor functions.
The present 3DS memory technology is a stacked or 3D circuit assembly technology. Features include:
1. Physical separation of the memory circuits and the control logic circuit onto different layers;
2. The use of one control logic circuit for several memory circuits;
3. Thinning of the memory circuit to less than about 50 μm in thickness forming a substantially flexible substrate with planar processed bond surfaces and bonding the circuit to the circuit stack while still in wafer substrate form; and
4. The use of fine-grain high density inter layer vertical bus connections.
The 3DS memory manufacturing method enables several performance and physical size efficiencies, and is implemented with established semiconductor processing techniques. Using the DRAM circuit as an example, a 64 Mbit DRAM made with a 0.25 μm process could have a die size of 84 mm2, a memory area to die size ratio of 40% and a access time of about 50 ns for 8 Mbytes of storage; a 3DS DRAM IC made with the same 0.25 μm process would have a die size of 18.6 mm2, use 17 DRAM array circuit layers, a memory area to die size ratio of 94.4% and an expected access time of less than 10 ns for 64 Mbytes of storage. The 3DS DRAM IC manufacturing method represents a scalable, many-fold reduction in the cost per megabyte versus that of conventional DRAM IC manufacturing methods. In other words, the 3DS memory manufacturing method represents, at the infrastructure level, a fundamental cost savings that is independent of the process fabrication technology used.
The present invention may be further understood from the following description in conjunction with the appended drawing. In the drawing:
Referring to
The pattern 107a, 107b, etc. in the bond and interconnect layers 105a, 105b, etc. defines the vertical interconnect contacts between the integrated circuit layers and serves to electrically isolate these contacts from each other and the remaining bond material; this pattern takes the form of either voids or dielectric filled spaces in the bond layers.
The 3DS memory stack is typically organized as a controller circuit 101 and some number of memory array circuit layers 103, typically between nine (9) and thirty-two (32), but there is no particular limit to the number of layers. The controller circuit is of nominal circuit thickness (typically 0.5 mm or greater), but each memory array circuit layer is a thinned and substantially flexible circuit with net low stress, less than 50 μm and typically less than 10 μm in thickness. Conventional I/O bond pads are formed on a final memory array circuit layer for use with conventional packaging methods. Other metal patterns may be used such as insertion interconnection (disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,323,035 and 5,453,404 of the present inventor), DCA (Direct Chip Attach) or FCA (Flip-Chip Attach) methods.
Further, the fine grain inter-layer vertical interconnect can be used for direct singulated die bonding between a 3DS memory die and a conventional die (wherein the conventional die could be the controller circuit as shown in
As shown in
Fine-grain busing vertically connects the controller independently to each memory array layer such that the controller can provide drive (power) or enable signals to any one layer without affecting the state of any of the other layers. This allows the controller to test, read or write independently each of the memory circuit layers.
Referring to
One implementation of a 4:1 gate-line bus multiplexer 500 is shown in
Referring again to
Note that at the memory layer level, each memory block 301 is electrically isolated from every other memory block 301. Accordingly, the yield probability for each memory block is independent.
Additional read/write ports can be added as can additional gate-line vertical interconnections; additional vertical interconnection can be used in a redundant manner to improve vertical interconnect yield. The 3DS memory circuit can be designed to have one or more data read and write bus port interconnections. Referring to
As an example, the overhead of the vertical interconnect shown in
The 3DS memory device decouples control functions that normally would be found adjacent the memory cells of monolithic memory circuits and segregates them to the controller circuit. The control functions, rather than occurring on each memory array layer as in conventional memory ICs, occur only once in the controller circuit. This creates an economy by which several memory array layers share the same controller logic, and therefore, lowers the net cost per memory cell by as much as a factor of two versus conventional memory design.
The segregation of the control functions to a separate controller circuit allows more area for such functions (i.e., an area equal to the area one or several of the memory array blocks). This physical segregation by function also allows fabrication process segregation of the two very different fabrication technologies used for the control logic and the memory array, again realizing additional fabrication cost savings versus the more complicated combined logic/memory fabrication process used for conventional memory. The memory array can also be fabricated in a process technology without consideration of the process requirements of control logic functions. This results in the ability to design higher performance controller functions at lower cost than is the case with present memory circuits. Furthermore, the memory array circuit can also be fabricated with fewer process steps and nominally reduce memory circuit fabrication costs by 30% to 40% (e.g., in the case of a DRAM array, the process technology can be limited to NMOS or PMOS transistors versus CMOS).
Hence, although bonding of sufficiently planar surfaces of a memory controller substrate and a memory array substrate using thermal diffusion metal bonding is preferred, in the broader aspects of the present invention, the invention contemplates bonding of separate memory controller and memory array substrates by any of various conventional surface bonding methods, such as anisotropically conductive epoxy adhesive, to form interconnects between the two to provide random access data storage.
Referring to
The size of the 3DS memory circuit die is not dependent on the present constraint of containing the necessary number of memory cells and control function logic on one monolithic layer. This allows the circuit designer to reduce the 3DS circuit die size or choose a die size that is more optimal for the yield of the circuit. 3DS memory circuit die size is primarily a function of the size and number of memory array blocks and the number of memory array layers used to fabricate the final 3DS memory circuit. (The yield of a nineteen (19) layer, 0.25 μm process 3DS DRAM memory circuit may be shown to be greater than 90% as described below.) This advantage of selecting the 3DS circuit die size enables an earlier first production use of a more advanced process technology than would normally be possible for conventional monolithic circuit designs. This, of course, implies additional cost reductions and greater performance over the conventional memory circuits.
3DS Memory Device Fabrication Methods
There are two principal fabrication methods for 3DS memory circuits. The two 3DS memory fabrication methods, however, have a common objective which is the thermal diffusion metal bonding (also referred to as thermal compression bonding) of a number of circuit substrates onto a rigid supporting or common substrate which itself may optionally also be a circuit component layer.
The supporting or common substrate can be a standard semiconductor wafer, a quartz wafer or a substrate of any material composition that is compatible with the processing steps of the 3DS circuit, the operation of the circuit and the processing equipment used. The size and shape of the supporting substrate is a choice that best optimizes available manufacturing equipment and methods. Circuit substrates are bonded to the supporting substrate and then thinned through various methods. Circuit substrates may be formed on standard single crystal semiconductor substrates or as polysilicon circuits formed on an appropriate substrate such as silicon or quartz.
Polysilicon transistor circuits have the important cost saving option of incorporating a parting layer (film) that allows the substrate upon which the polysilicon circuits are formed to be released and reused. Polysilicon transistor or TFTs (Thin Film Transistor) devices are widely used, and need not be made solely from silicon.
The various circuit layers of the 3DS memory circuit are bonded together by use of thermal diffusion of two metal surfaces, typically aluminum. The surface of the circuits to be bonded are smooth and sufficiently planar as is the case with the surface of an unprocessed semiconductor wafer or a processed semiconductor wafer that has been planarized with the CMP (Chemical Mechanical Processing) method with a surface planarity of less than 1 μm and preferably less than 1,000 Å over at least the area of the surface of the circuit (formed on the substrate) to be bonded. The metal bonding material on the surfaces of the circuits to be bonded are patterned to be mirror images of each other and to define the various vertical interconnect contacts as indicated in
The thermal diffusion bonding of the circuit layers takes place preferably in an equipment chamber with controlled pressure and atmospheric components such as N2 with little H2O and O2 content. The bonding equipment aligns the patterns of the substrates to be bonded, presses them together with a set of programmed pressures and at one or more temperatures for a period of time as required by the type of metal used as the bonding material. The thickness of the bonding material is nominally in a range of 500 Å to 15,000 Å or greater with a preferred thickness of 1,500 Å. The initial bonding of the substrates is preferably done at lower than standard pressure such as a negative pressure between 1 torr and 740 torr depending on the design of the bond pattern. This can leave an interior negative pressure between the bonding surfaces once external atmospheric pressure is returned which further assists in the formation of the bond and enhances the reliability of the bond.
The preferred bonding material is pure aluminum or an alloy of aluminum, but it is not limited to aluminum and may include, for example, such metals as Sn, Ti, In, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cu, Pt, Au or alloys of such metals that provide acceptable surface bond diffusion capabilities at acceptable temperatures and forming periods. The bonding material is not limited to metal, and could be a combination of bonding materials, such as highly conductive polysilicon, some of which are non-conducting such as silicon dioxide, and the foregoing exemplary types of bond material choices should not be considered to be limitations on how the circuit layers can be bonded.
In the case where metal bond materials form a native surface oxide that either inhibits the forming of a satisfactory bond or may increase the resistance in the vertical interconnections formed by the bond, the oxide should be removed. The bonding equipment provides an oxide reduction capability such that bonding surfaces of the bond material are rendered without native surface oxide. The methods of forming gas atmospheres for the reduction of surface oxides are well known, and there are other methods for removing the native oxide such as sputter etching, plasma etching or ion mill etching. In the case where aluminum is used as the bonding material, it is preferred that the thin native aluminum oxide film of approximately 40 Å on the bonding surfaces be removed prior to bonding.
The thinned (substantially flexible) substrate circuit layers of the 3DS memory circuit are typically memory array circuits, however, the thinned substrate circuit layers are not limited to memory circuits. Other circuit layer types can be controller circuits, non-volatile memory such as EEPROM, additional logic circuitry including microprocessor logic and application specific logic functions such as those that support graphic or database processing, etc. The selection of such circuit layer types follows from the functional requirements of the design of the circuit and is not limited by the 3DS memory fabrication process.
The thinned (substantially flexible) substrate circuit layers are preferably made with dielectrics in low stress (less than 5×108 dynes/cm2) such as low stress silicon dioxide and silicon nitride dielectrics as opposed to the more commonly used higher stress dielectrics of silicon oxide and silicon nitride used in conventional memory circuit fabrication. Such low stress dielectrics are discussed at length in U.S. Pat. No. 5,354,695 of the present inventor, incorporated herein by reference. The use of dielectrics with conventional stress levels could be used in the assembly of a 3DS DRAM circuit, however, if more than a few layers comprise the stacked assembly, each layer in the assembly will have to be stress balanced so that the net stress of the deposited films of a layer is less than 5×108 dynes/cm2. The use of intrinsically low stress deposited films is the preferred method of fabrication versus the use of the method where the stress of individually deposited films are not equal but are deposited to create a net balanced lower stress.
Method A, 3DS Memory Device Fabrication Sequence
This fabrication sequence assumes that several circuit layers will be bonded to a common or support substrate and subsequently thinned in place. An example of a resulting 3DS memory circuit is shown in
1. Align, and bond to the common substrate the topside of a second circuit substrate.
2A. Grind the backside or exposed surface of the second circuit substrate to a thickness of less than 50 μm and then polish or smooth the surface. The thinned substrate is now a substantially flexible substrate.
Optionally an etch stop may be incorporated in the second substrate from less than a micron to several microns below the semiconductor surface prior to device fabrication. This etch stop can be an epitaxially formed film such as GeB (described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,354,695 and 5,323,035 of the present inventor, incorporated herein by reference) or a low density implanted layer of O2 or N2 to form a buried oxide or nitride barrier etch stop layer just below the device layer on the topside of the second substrate. After a preliminary grinding of a significant portion of the backside of the substrate, the remaining portion of the backside of the second substrate is then selectively etched in a chemical bath which stops on the surface of the epitaxial or implanted layer. Subsequent polishing and RIE steps as necessary can then be used to complete the thinning of the second substrate.
Alternately, a parting layer such as H2 implanted into the topside surface of the second substrate prior to device fabrication can be used with a thermal step to crack off the majority of the backside of the second substrate, allowing its reuse.
2B. The second substrate may alternatively be a circuit formed of polysilicon transistors or TFTs over a parting layer such as aluminum, titanium, AlAs, KBr, etc. which can be activated by a specific chemical release agent. The backside of the second substrate is then removed upon activating (dissolving) the release layer and followed as needed by interconnect semiconductor processing steps.
3. Process the thinned backside of the second substrate to form vertical interconnections such as that shown in
Referring more particularly to
After bonding and thinning of the backside of the second substrate to about 1-8 μm of silicon (or other semiconductor) substrate 415, feed-throughs 417 are then formed in registration with the contacts 403. A passivation layer 419 and contacts 421 are then formed. The contacts 421 may be formed so as to form a mirror image of the contacts 413, allowing for the bonding of further wafers.
4. If another circuit layer is to be bonded to the 3DS circuit stack, steps 1-3 are repeated.
5A. The circuits of the finished 3DS memory substrate are then conventionally sawed into die (singulated), resulting in a circuit of the type shown in
5B. The circuits of the finished 3DS memory substrate are then conventionally sawed and then individually aligned and thermal diffusion bonded (metal pattern down) to the surface of a second (conventional IC) die or MCM substrate in a manner similar to that used in the bonding of the circuit substrates of step 1 above. (The conventional die or MCM substrate may have a larger area than the 3DS memory substrate and may include a graphics controller, video controller or microprocessor, such that the 3DS becomes embedded as part of another circuit.) This final bonding step typically incorporates a fine-grain interconnect between the 3DS memory circuit and the die or MCM substrate, but could also use a conventional interconnect pattern. Further, a 3DS memory circuit can be bonded face up to a conventional IC in die form or MCM substrate and wire bonding used to form conventional I/O interconnections.
Method B, 3DS Memory Device Fabrication Sequence
This fabrication sequence assumes that a circuit substrate will first be bonded to a transfer substrate, thinned and then bonded to a common substrate as a layer of the circuit stack. The transfer substrate is then released. This method has the advantage over Method A of allowing substrates to be thinned prior to being bonded to the final circuit stack and allows for simultaneous thinning and vertical interconnect processing of substrate circuit layers.
1. Bond to a transfer substrate a second circuit substrate using a release or parting layer. A transfer substrate may have high tolerance parallel surfaces (TTV or Total Thickness Variance of less than 1 μm) and may be perforated with an array of small holes to assist the parting process. The parting layer can be a blanket deposition of a bonding metal. Precise alignment of the surfaces is not required.
2. Perform step 2A or 2B of Method A.
3. Process the backside of the second substrate to form interconnections with the bonded topside surface of the second substrate as shown in
4. Bond the second circuit to a common or support substrate (3DS stack) and release the transfer substrate by activating the parting layer between it and the second circuit.
5. Process the now exposed topside of the second substrate to form interconnections for subsequent substrate bonding or a terminal pattern for conventional I/O bonding (wire bonding) pad pattern, a pattern for thermal diffusion bonding of the 3DS memory circuit to another die (either another 3DS circuit or a conventional die), or a pattern for conventional insertion interconnect, DCA (Direct Chip Attach) or FCA (Flip-Chip Attach). If another circuit layer is to be bonded to the 3DS circuit stack, steps 1 through 4 are repeated.
6. Perform step 5A or 5B of Method A.
3DS Memory Device Yield Enhancement Methods
The 3DS circuit may be considered a vertically assembled MCM (Multi-Chip Module) and as with an MCM the final yield is the product of the yield probabilities of each component circuit (layer) in the completed 3DS circuit. The 3DS circuit uses several yield enhancement methods that are synergistic in their combined usage within a single memory IC. The yield enhancement methods used in the 3DS memory circuit include small memory array block size, memory array block electrical isolation through physically unique or separate vertical bus interconnections, intra memory array block gate-line sparing, memory array layer sparing (inter-block gate-line sparing), controller sparing and ECC (Error Correcting Codes). The term sparing is used to mean substitution by a redundant element.
The selected size of the memory array block is the first component in the yield equation for the 3DS memory circuit. Each memory array block is individually (uniquely) accessed and powered by the controller circuit and is physically independent of each and every other memory array block including those on the same memory array layer in addition to those on a different memory array layer. The size of the memory array block is typically less than 5 mm2 and preferably less than 3 mm2, but is not limited to a specific size. The size of memory array block, the simplicity of its NMOS or PMOS fabrication process and its physical independence from each of the other memory array blocks, for nearly all production IC processes, provides a conservatively stated nominal yield of greater than 99.5%. This yield assumes that most point defects in the memory array block such as open or shorted interconnect lines or failed memory cells can be spared (replaced) from the intra-block or inter-block set of redundant gate-lines. Major defects in a memory array block which render the complete memory array block unusable result in the complete sparing of the block from a redundant memory array layer or the rejection of the 3DS circuit.
In the example of a 3DS DRAM circuit the yield of a stack of memory array blocks is calculated from the yield equation Ys=((1−(1−Py)2)n)b, where n is the number DRAM array layers, b is the number of blocks per DRAM array and Py is the effective yield (probability) of a DRAM array block less than 3 mm2 in area. Assuming a DRAM array block redundancy of 4% for gate-lines in the DRAM array block lines and one redundant DRAM array layer, and assuming further that the number of blocks per layer is 64, the number of memory array layers in the stack is 17 and the effective value for Py is 0.995, then the stack yield Ys for the complete memory array (including all memory array block stacks) is 97.47%.
The Ys memory array stack yield is then multiplied by the yield of the controller Yc. Assuming a die size of less than 50 mm2, a reasonable Yc for a controller fabricated from a 0.5 μm BiCMOS or mixed signal process would be between 65% and 85%, giving a net 3DS memory circuit yield of between 63.4% and 82.8%. If a redundant controller circuit layer is added to the 3DS memory stack, the yield probabilities would be between 85.7% and 95.2%.
The effective yield of a memory array block can be further increased by the optional use of ECC logic. ECC logic corrects data bit errors for some group size of data bits. The syndrome bits necessary for the operation of ECC logic would be stored on redundant gate-lines of any of the memory array layers in a vertically associated block stack. Further, if necessary, in order to accommodate the storage of ECC syndrome bits, additional memory array layers could be added to the circuit.
Advantageous 3DS Memory Device Controller Capabilities
As compared to a conventional memory circuit, the 3DS memory controller circuit can have various advantageous capabilities due the additional area available for controller circuitry and the availability of various mixed signal process fabrication technologies. Some of these capabilities are self-test of memory cells with dynamic gate-line address assignment, virtual address translation, programmable address windowing or mapping, ECC, data compression and multi-level storage.
Dynamic gate-line address assignment is the use of programmable gates to enable the layer and gate-line for a read/write operation. This allows the physical order of memory storage to be separate or different from the logical order of stored memory.
The testing of each generation of memory devices has resulted in significantly increased test costs. The 3DS memory controller reduces the cost of testing by incorporating sufficient control logic to perform an internal test (self-test) of the various memory array blocks. Circuit testing in the conventional ATE manner is required only for verification of controller circuit functions. The scope of the internal test is further extended to the programmable (dynamic) assignment of unique addresses corresponding to the various gate-lines of each memory array block on each layer. Self-test capability of the 3DS controller circuit can be used anytime during the life of the 3DS memory circuit as a diagnostic tool and as a means to increase circuit reliability by reconfiguring (sparing) the addresses of gate-lines that fail after the 3DS memory circuit is in use in a product.
ECC is a circuit capability that, if included in the controller circuit, can be enabled or disabled by a programming signal or made a dedicated function.
Data compression logic will allow the total amount of data that can be stored in the 3DS memory array to be increased. There are various generally known data compression methods available for this purpose.
Larger sense amps allow greater dynamic performance and enable higher speed read operations from the memory cells. Larger sense amps are expected to provide the capability to store more than one bit (multi-level storage) of information in each memory cell; this capability has already been demonstrated in non-volatile memory circuits such as flash EPROM. Multi-level storage has also been proposed for use in the 4 Gbit DRAM generation circuits.
It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential character thereof. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalents thereof are intended to be embraced therein.
This application is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 10/222,816 filed Aug. 19, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,504,732, which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 09/776,885 filed Feb. 6, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,551,857, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/607,363 filed Jun. 30, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,706, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/971,565 filed Nov. 17, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,133,640, which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 08/835,190 filed Apr. 4, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,915,167.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2915722 | Foster | Dec 1959 | A |
3044909 | Schokley | Jul 1962 | A |
3202948 | Farrand | Aug 1965 | A |
3387286 | Dennard | Jun 1968 | A |
3430835 | Patzer et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3508980 | Jackson, Jr. et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3559282 | Lesk | Feb 1971 | A |
3560364 | Burkhardt | Feb 1971 | A |
3602982 | Kooi | Sep 1971 | A |
3615901 | Medicus | Oct 1971 | A |
3636358 | Groschwitz | Jan 1972 | A |
3716429 | Napoli et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3777227 | Krishna et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3780352 | Redwanz | Dec 1973 | A |
3868565 | Kuipers | Feb 1975 | A |
3922705 | Yerman | Nov 1975 | A |
3932932 | Goodman | Jan 1976 | A |
3997381 | Wanlass | Dec 1976 | A |
4028547 | Eisenberger | Jun 1977 | A |
4070230 | Stein | Jan 1978 | A |
4104418 | Park et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4131985 | Greenwood et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4142004 | Hauser, Jr. et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4196232 | Schnable et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4246595 | Noyori et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4249302 | Crepeau | Feb 1981 | A |
4251909 | Hoeberechts | Feb 1981 | A |
4262631 | Kubacki | Apr 1981 | A |
4393127 | Greschner et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4394401 | Shioya et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4401986 | Trenkler et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4416054 | Thomas et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4500905 | Shibata | Feb 1985 | A |
4528072 | Kurosawa et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4539068 | Takagi et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4566037 | Takatsu et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4585991 | Reid et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4597163 | Tsang | Jul 1986 | A |
4604162 | Sobczak | Aug 1986 | A |
4612083 | Yasumoto et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4617160 | Belanger et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4618397 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4618763 | Schmitz | Oct 1986 | A |
4622632 | Tanimoto et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4633438 | Kume et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637029 | Hayakawa et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4663559 | Christensen | May 1987 | A |
4684436 | Burns et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4693770 | Hatada | Sep 1987 | A |
4702336 | Seibert et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702936 | Maeda et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4706166 | Go | Nov 1987 | A |
4721938 | Stevenson | Jan 1988 | A |
4724328 | Lischke | Feb 1988 | A |
4761681 | Reid | Aug 1988 | A |
4766670 | Gazdik et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4784721 | Holmen et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4810673 | Freeman | Mar 1989 | A |
4810889 | Yokomatsu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4825277 | Mattox et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4835765 | Bergmans et al. | May 1989 | A |
4841483 | Furuyama | Jun 1989 | A |
4849857 | Butt et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4855867 | Gazdik et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4857481 | Tam et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4877752 | Robinson | Oct 1989 | A |
4890157 | Wilson | Dec 1989 | A |
4892753 | Wang et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4892842 | Corrie et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897708 | Clements | Jan 1990 | A |
4919749 | Mauger et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4924589 | Leedy | May 1990 | A |
4928058 | Williamson | May 1990 | A |
4934799 | Chu | Jun 1990 | A |
4937653 | Blonder et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939568 | Kato | Jul 1990 | A |
4939694 | Eaton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4940916 | Borel et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4943937 | Kasano et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4948482 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4950987 | Vranish et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4952446 | Lee et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954865 | Rokos | Sep 1990 | A |
4954875 | Clements | Sep 1990 | A |
4957882 | Shinomiya | Sep 1990 | A |
4965415 | Young et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4966663 | Mauger | Oct 1990 | A |
4983251 | Haisma et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4988423 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4990462 | Sliwa, Jr. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994336 | Benecke et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994735 | Leedy | Feb 1991 | A |
5000113 | Wang et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5008619 | Keogh et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5010024 | Allen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019943 | Fassbender et al. | May 1991 | A |
5020219 | Leedy | Jun 1991 | A |
5034685 | Leedy | Jul 1991 | A |
5045921 | Lin et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5051326 | Celler et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5051865 | Kato | Sep 1991 | A |
5059556 | Wilcoxen | Oct 1991 | A |
5062689 | Koehler | Nov 1991 | A |
5064275 | Tsunoda et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070026 | Greenwald et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5071510 | Findler et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5087585 | Hayashi | Feb 1992 | A |
5098865 | Machado et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103557 | Leedy | Apr 1992 | A |
5110373 | Mauger | May 1992 | A |
5110712 | Kessler et al. | May 1992 | A |
5111278 | Eichelberger | May 1992 | A |
5116777 | Chan et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117282 | Salatino | May 1992 | A |
5119164 | Sliwa et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5130894 | Miller | Jul 1992 | A |
5132244 | Roy | Jul 1992 | A |
5144142 | Fueki et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151775 | Hadwin | Sep 1992 | A |
5156909 | Henager, Jr. et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5160998 | Itoh et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5162251 | Poole et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166962 | Murooka et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5169805 | Mok et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5188706 | Hori et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5191405 | Tomita et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198888 | Sugano et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198965 | Curtis et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202754 | Bertin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203731 | Zimmerman | Apr 1993 | A |
5208782 | Sakuta et al. | May 1993 | A |
5225771 | Leedy | Jul 1993 | A |
5229647 | Gnadinger | Jul 1993 | A |
5236118 | Bower et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240458 | Linglain et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241454 | Ameen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5245277 | Nguyen | Sep 1993 | A |
5259247 | Bantien | Nov 1993 | A |
5262341 | Fueki et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262351 | Bureau et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270261 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273940 | Sanders | Dec 1993 | A |
5274270 | Tuckerman | Dec 1993 | A |
5278839 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279865 | Chebi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5283107 | Bayer et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284796 | Nakanishi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284804 | Moslehi | Feb 1994 | A |
5293457 | Arima et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300444 | Hachisuka et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5321884 | Ameen et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323035 | Leedy | Jun 1994 | A |
5323060 | Fogal et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324687 | Wojnarowski | Jun 1994 | A |
5338975 | Cole, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343075 | Nishino | Aug 1994 | A |
5343366 | Cipolla et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345563 | Uihlein et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5347428 | Carson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354695 | Leedy | Oct 1994 | A |
5357473 | Mizuno et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358909 | Hashiguchi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363021 | MacDonald | Nov 1994 | A |
5373189 | Massit et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374564 | Bruel | Dec 1994 | A |
5374569 | Yilmaz et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374920 | Evens | Dec 1994 | A |
5385632 | Goossen | Jan 1995 | A |
5385909 | Nelson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5397747 | Angiulli et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5399505 | Dasse et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
RE34893 | Fujii et al. | Apr 1995 | E |
5420458 | Shimoji | May 1995 | A |
5424245 | Gurtler et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5424920 | Miyake | Jun 1995 | A |
5426072 | Finnila | Jun 1995 | A |
5426363 | Akagi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432444 | Yasohama et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432681 | Linderman | Jul 1995 | A |
5432729 | Carson et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432999 | Capps et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434500 | Hauck et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5448106 | Fujitsu | Sep 1995 | A |
5450603 | Davies | Sep 1995 | A |
5451489 | Leedy | Sep 1995 | A |
5453404 | Leedy | Sep 1995 | A |
5457879 | Gurtler et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5463246 | Matsunami | Oct 1995 | A |
5468606 | Bogart et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470693 | Sachdev et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476813 | Naruse | Dec 1995 | A |
5478781 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480842 | Clifton et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481133 | Hsu | Jan 1996 | A |
5489554 | Gates | Feb 1996 | A |
5500312 | Harriott et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502333 | Bertin et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502667 | Bertin et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503704 | Bower et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512397 | Leedy | Apr 1996 | A |
5514628 | Enomoto et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517457 | Sakui et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527620 | Schulz-Harder | Jun 1996 | A |
5527645 | Pati et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5529829 | Koskenmaki et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534465 | Frye et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5555212 | Toshiaki et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561622 | Bertin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563084 | Ramm et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563086 | Bertin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571741 | Leedy | Nov 1996 | A |
5572689 | Gallup et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5574729 | Kinoshita et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577050 | Bair et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5580687 | Leedy | Dec 1996 | A |
5581498 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5582939 | Pierrat | Dec 1996 | A |
5583688 | Hornbeck | Dec 1996 | A |
5592007 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5592018 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5595933 | Heijboer | Jan 1997 | A |
5606186 | Noda | Feb 1997 | A |
5615163 | Sakui et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620915 | Chen et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627106 | Hsu | May 1997 | A |
5627112 | Tennant et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629137 | Leedy | May 1997 | A |
5633209 | Leedy | May 1997 | A |
5637536 | Val | Jun 1997 | A |
5637907 | Leedy | Jun 1997 | A |
5654127 | Leedy | Aug 1997 | A |
5654220 | Leedy | Aug 1997 | A |
5656552 | Hudak et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661339 | Clayton | Aug 1997 | A |
5675185 | Chen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694588 | Ohara et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703747 | Voldman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712194 | Kanazawa | Jan 1998 | A |
5715144 | Ameen et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719438 | Beilstein, Jr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725995 | Leedy | Mar 1998 | A |
5731945 | Bertin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733814 | Flesher et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736448 | Saia et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745076 | Turlington et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745673 | Di Zenzo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5750211 | Weise et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753536 | Sugiyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753564 | Fukada | May 1998 | A |
5760478 | Bozso et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763943 | Baker et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767001 | Bertagnolli et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773152 | Okonogi | Jun 1998 | A |
5777379 | Karavakis et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786116 | Rolfson | Jul 1998 | A |
5786628 | Beilstein, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786629 | Faris | Jul 1998 | A |
5787445 | Daberko | Jul 1998 | A |
5793115 | Zavracky et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798937 | Bracha et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801437 | Burns | Sep 1998 | A |
5810923 | Yano et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818748 | Bertin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831280 | Ray | Nov 1998 | A |
5834162 | Malba | Nov 1998 | A |
5834334 | Leedy | Nov 1998 | A |
5840593 | Leedy | Nov 1998 | A |
5847929 | Bernier et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851894 | Ramm | Dec 1998 | A |
5856695 | Ito et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868949 | Sotokawa et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5869354 | Leedy | Feb 1999 | A |
5870176 | Sweatt et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877034 | Ramm et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880010 | Davidson | Mar 1999 | A |
5882532 | Field et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892271 | Takeda et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902118 | Hubner | May 1999 | A |
5902650 | Feng et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907178 | Baker et al. | May 1999 | A |
5915167 | Leedy | Jun 1999 | A |
5940031 | Turlington et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946559 | Leedy | Aug 1999 | A |
5953635 | Andideh | Sep 1999 | A |
5976953 | Zavracky et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985693 | Leedy | Nov 1999 | A |
5998069 | Cutter et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6008530 | Kano | Dec 1999 | A |
6017658 | Rhee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020257 | Leedy | Feb 2000 | A |
6023098 | Higashiguchi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027958 | Vu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
RE36623 | Wang et al. | Mar 2000 | E |
6045625 | Houston | Apr 2000 | A |
6050832 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6084284 | Adamic, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087284 | Brix et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092174 | Roussakov | Jul 2000 | A |
6097096 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6133626 | Hawke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133640 | Leedy | Oct 2000 | A |
6154809 | Ikenaga et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6166438 | Davidson | Dec 2000 | A |
6166711 | Odake | Dec 2000 | A |
6194245 | Tayanaka | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197456 | Aleshin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208545 | Leedy | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230233 | Lofgren et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236602 | Pati | May 2001 | B1 |
6239495 | Sakui et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6261728 | Lin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288561 | Leedy | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294909 | Leedy | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300935 | Sobel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301653 | Mohamed et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313517 | Lauterbach et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320593 | Sobel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322903 | Siniaguine et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335491 | Alagaratnam et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6355976 | Faris | Mar 2002 | B1 |
RE37637 | Clifton et al. | Apr 2002 | E |
6376909 | Forbes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392304 | Butler | May 2002 | B1 |
6417027 | Akram | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6437990 | Degani et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445006 | Brandes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6518073 | Momohara | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6551857 | Leedy | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563224 | Leedy | May 2003 | B2 |
6617671 | Akram | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632706 | Leedy | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6682981 | Leedy | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6707160 | Yamaji | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6713327 | Leedy | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714625 | Leedy | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6734539 | Degani et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740964 | Sasaki | May 2004 | B2 |
6747347 | Farrar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765279 | Leedy | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6838896 | Leedy | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867486 | Hong | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873057 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891387 | Leedy | May 2005 | B2 |
6894392 | Gudesen et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6979895 | Akram et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7106646 | Schoenfeld et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138295 | Leedy | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7176545 | Leedy | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176579 | Konishi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7193239 | Leedy | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7223696 | Leedy | May 2007 | B2 |
7230316 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242012 | Leedy | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7307020 | Leedy | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7354798 | Pogge et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7385835 | Leedy | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402897 | Leedy | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7474004 | Leedy | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7479694 | Leedy | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485571 | Leedy | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7485955 | Kang et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7489025 | Chen et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7504732 | Leedy | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7521785 | Damberg et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7550805 | Leedy | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7615837 | Leedy | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7670893 | Leedy | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7705466 | Leedy | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7736948 | Dekker et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7763948 | Leedy | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7820469 | Leedy | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7911012 | Leedy | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8410617 | Leedy | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010002711 | Gonzalez | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010013423 | Dalal et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010014051 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020117689 | Akimoto | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127775 | Haba et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020132465 | Leedy | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030011032 | Umebayashi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030173608 | Leedy | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184976 | Brandenburg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030197253 | Gann et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030218182 | Leedy | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223535 | Leedy | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000708 | Rapport et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021212 | Hamaguchi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040070063 | Leedy | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040140547 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040197951 | Leedy | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040245617 | Damberg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251557 | Kee | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023656 | Leedy | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050051841 | Leedy | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050051904 | Kim et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082641 | Leedy | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060231927 | Ohno | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070035033 | Ozguz et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080237591 | Leedy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251941 | Leedy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254572 | Leedy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080284611 | Leedy | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080302559 | Leedy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090014897 | Ohno | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090067210 | Leedy | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090174082 | Leedy | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175104 | Leedy | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194768 | Leedy | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218700 | Leedy | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090219742 | Leedy | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090219743 | Leedy | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090219744 | Leedy | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090219772 | Leedy | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090230501 | Leedy | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100148371 | Kaskoun et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171224 | Leedy | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171225 | Leedy | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172197 | Leedy | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100173453 | Leedy | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110042829 | Kaskoun et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110198672 | Leedy | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3233195 | Mar 1983 | DE |
0189976 | Aug 1986 | EP |
0201380 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0224418 | Jun 1987 | EP |
0238089 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0314437 | May 1989 | EP |
0 444 943 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0419898 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0455455 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0 496 543 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0487302 | May 1992 | EP |
0503816 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0518283 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0518774 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0526551 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0531723 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0554063 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0555252 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 672 931 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0 676 797 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 689 036 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 700 088 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0703618 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0703619 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0731525 | Sep 1996 | EP |
2641129 | Jun 1990 | FR |
2125168 | Feb 1984 | GB |
2215168 | Feb 1984 | GB |
2 256 967 | Dec 1992 | GB |
2 274 945 | Aug 1994 | GB |
2 276 979 | Oct 1994 | GB |
6074643 | Apr 1985 | JP |
60126871 | Jul 1985 | JP |
6130059 | Feb 1986 | JP |
61-288455 | Dec 1986 | JP |
61-288456 | Dec 1986 | JP |
61-288457 | Dec 1986 | JP |
62-272556 | Nov 1987 | JP |
62272556 | Nov 1987 | JP |
63076484 | Apr 1988 | JP |
01199476 | Sep 1988 | JP |
63229862 | Sep 1988 | JP |
A 120049 | May 1989 | JP |
HI-120049 | May 1989 | JP |
01157561 | Jun 1989 | JP |
02027600 | Jan 1990 | JP |
02037655 | Feb 1990 | JP |
02082564 | Mar 1990 | JP |
2239627 | Sep 1990 | JP |
03127816 | May 1991 | JP |
3-151637 | Jun 1991 | JP |
H8-125120 | Jun 1991 | JP |
HS-151637 | Jun 1991 | JP |
03174715 | Jul 1991 | JP |
03284871 | Dec 1991 | JP |
4-10649 | Jan 1992 | JP |
4010649 | Jan 1992 | JP |
04042957 | Feb 1992 | JP |
4-76946 | Mar 1992 | JP |
04076946 | Mar 1992 | JP |
04083371 | Mar 1992 | JP |
H4-76946 | Mar 1992 | JP |
04107964 | Apr 1992 | JP |
456956 | Dec 1992 | JP |
5-53689 | Mar 1993 | JP |
H5-53689 | Mar 1993 | JP |
05109977 | Apr 1993 | JP |
05-250900 | Sep 1993 | JP |
05283607 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06-251172 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06-291250 | Oct 1994 | JP |
7-14982 | Jan 1995 | JP |
7-245432 | Sep 1995 | JP |
08-017962 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8-125120 | May 1996 | JP |
H3-151637 | May 1996 | JP |
H8-125120 | May 1996 | JP |
04196263 | Jul 1996 | JP |
09152979 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10107065 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10209371 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2847890 | Nov 1998 | JP |
261001 | Sep 1999 | JP |
WO 8910255 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 9009093 | Aug 1990 | WO |
9100683 | Jan 1991 | WO |
WO 9105366 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9203848 | Mar 1992 | WO |
WO 9217901 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9409513 | Apr 1994 | WO |
9413121 | Jun 1994 | WO |
9509438 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9509438 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9641204 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9641624 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO9641264 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9819337 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 03078305 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bollmann et al., Three Dimensional Metallization for Vertically Integrated Circuits, MAM'97—Materials for Advanced Metallization. |
Interview Summary filed Oct. 16, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,874. |
Bollmann et al., Three Dimensional Metallization for Vertically Integrated Circuits, Materials for Advanced Metallization, 1997, European Workshop; Date of Conference: Mar. 16-19, 1997. |
Aboaf, J.A., “Stresses in SiO2 Films Obtained from the Thermal Decomposition of Tetraethylorthosilicate—Effect of Heat Treatment and Humidity,” J. Electrochem. Soc.: Solid State Science; 116(12): 1732-1736 (Dec. 1969). |
Allen, Mark G.; Senturia, Stephen D.; “Measurement of polyimide interlayer adhesion using microfabricated structures”; 1988; pp. 352-356. |
Alloert, K., et al., “A Comparison Between Silicon Nitride Films Made by PCVD of N2-SiH4/Ar and N2-SiH4/He,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society vol. 132, No. 7, pp. 1763-1766, (Jul. 1985). |
Bailey, R., “Glass for Solid-State Devices: Glass film has low intrinsic compressive stress for isolating active layers of magnetic-bubble and other solid-state devices,” NASA Tech Brief (1982). |
Boyer, P.K.; Collins, G.J.; Moore, C.A.; Solanski, R.; Ritchie, W.K.; Roche, G.A.; Collins, G.J.; “Laser photolytic deposition of thin films”; 1983; pp. 119-127. |
Chang, E.Y.; Cibuzar, G.T.; Pande, K.P.; “Passivation of GaAs FETs with PECVD silicon nitride films of different stress states”; Sep. 1988; pp. 1412-1418. |
Chen, Y.S.; Fatemik, H.; “stress measurements on multilevel thin film dielectric layers used in Si integrated circuits”; May-Jun. 1986; pp. 645-649. |
“Christensens Physics of Diagnostic Radiology,” Currey et al., pp. 29-33, 1990. |
Draper, B.L.; Hill, T.A.; “Stress and stress relaxation in integrated circuit metals and dielectrics”; Jul.-Aug. 1991; pp. 1956-1962. |
Garino, T.J.; Harrington, H.M.; “Residual stress in PZT films and its effect on ferroelectric properties”; 1992; pp. 341-347. |
Guckel, H.; “Surface micromachined pressure transducers”; 1991; pp. 133-146. |
Hendricks et al., “Polyquinoline Coatings and Films: Improved Organic Dielectrics for ICs and MCMs, Eleventh IEEE/CHMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium,” pp. 361-365 (1991). |
Hsieh, et al., “Directional Deposition of Dielectric Silicon Oxide by Plasma Enhanced TEOS Process,” 1989 Proceedings, Sixth International IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference, pp. 411-415 (1989). |
“Partitioning Function and Packaging of Integrated Circuits for Physical Security of Data,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, IBM Corp.; 32(1): 46-49 (Jun. 1989). |
Jones, R.E., Jr. “An evaluation of methods for passivating silicon integrated circuits”; Apr. 1972; pp. 23-28. |
Knolle, W.R., et al., “Characterization of Oxygen-Doped, Plasma-Deposited Silicon Nitride,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 135, No. 5, pp. 1211-1217, (May 1988). |
Kochugova, I.V.; Nikolaeva, L.V.; Vakser, N.M., (M.I. Kalinin Leningrad Polytechnic Institute (USSR); “Electrophysical investigation of thin-layered inorganic coatings”; 1989; pp. 826-828. |
Mitsumasa Koyanagi et al.; “Design of 4-DBIT X 4-layer Optically Coupled Three-Dimensional Common Memory for Parallel Processor System,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, No. 1, Feb. 1, 1990. |
Maw, T.; Hopla, R.E.; “Properties of a photoimageable thin polyimide film”; Nov. 26-29, 1990; pp. 71-76. |
“Miniature Electron Microscopes Without Vacuum Pumps, Self-Contained Microfabricated Devices with Short Working Distances, Enable Operation in Air,” NASA Tech Briefs 39-40 (1998). |
Nguyen, S.V., Plasma Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposited Thin Films for Microelectronic Applications, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. vol. B4, No. 5, pp. 1159-1167, (Sep./Oct. 1986). |
Olmer, et al., “Intermetal Dielectric Deposition by Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Fifth IEEE/CHMT. |
International Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium—Design-to-Manufacturing Transfer Cycle, pp. 98-99. |
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP 02009643 (Oct. 8, 2002). |
Phys. Rev. B., Condens, Matter Mater. Phys. (USA), Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics), Mar. 15, 2003, APS through AIP, USA. |
Reche, J.J.H.; “Control of thin film materials properties used in high density multichip interconnect”; Apr. 24-28, 1989; p. 494. |
Riley, P.E.; Shelley, A.; “Characterization of a spin-applied dielectric for use in multilevel metallization”; May 1988; pp. 1207-1210. |
Runyan, W.R., “Deposition of Inorganic Thin Films,” Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Processing Technology, p. 142 (1990). |
Salazar, M.; Wilkins, C.W., Jr.; Ryan, V.W.; Wang, T.T.; “low stress films of cyclized polybutadiene dielectrics by vacuum annealing”; Oct. 21-22, 1986; pp. 96-102. |
Scheuerman, R.J., “Fabrication of Thin Dielectric Films with Low Internal Stresses,” J. Vac. Sci. and Tech., 7(1): 143-146 (1970). |
“IC Tower Patent: Simple Technology Receives Patent on the IC Tower, a Stacked Memory Technology,” http://www.simpletech.com/whatsnew/memory/©60824.htm (1998). |
Sun, R.C.; Tisone, T.C.; Cruzan, P.D.; “Internal stresses and resistivity of low-voltage sputtered tungsten films (microelectronic cct. conductor)”; Mar. 1973; pp. 1009-1016. |
Sung et al., “Well-aligned carbon nitride nanotubes synthesized in anodic alumina by electron cyclotron resonance chemical vapor deposition,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 74, No. 2, 197, 1999, Jan. 11, 1999. |
Svechnikov, S.V.; Kobylyatskaya, M.F.; Kimarskii, V.I.; Kaufman, A.P.; Kuzolvlev, Yu.I.; Cherepov, Ye. I.; Fomin, B.I.; “A switching plate with aluminum membrane crossings of conductors”; 1972. |
Sze, S.M., “surface Micromachining,” Semiconductor Sensors, pp. 58-63 (1994). |
Tamura, H.; Nishikawa, T.; Wakino, K.; Sudo, T.; “Metalized MIC substrates using high K dielectric resonator materials”: Oct. 1988; pp. 117-126. |
Tessler, et al., “An Overview of Dielectric Materials for Multichip Modules,” SPE, Electrical & Electronic Div.; (6): 260-269 (1991). |
Tielert, et al., “Benefits of Vertically Stacked Integrated Circuits for Sequential Logic,” IEEE, XP-000704550, 121-124 (Dec. 5, 1996). |
Townsend, P.H.; Huggins, R.A.; “Stresses in borophosphosilicate glass films during thermal cycling”; Oct. 21-22, 1986; pp. 134-141. |
Treichel, et al., “Planaized Low-Stress Oxide/Nitride Passivation for ULSI Devices,” J. Phys IV, Colloq. (France), 1 (C2): 839-846 (1991). |
Vossen, John L., “Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Thin Film Processes II, pp. 536-541 (1991). |
Wade, T.E.; “low temperature double-exposed polyimide/oxide dielectric for VLSI multilevel metal interconnection”; 1982; pp. 516-519. |
S. Wolf, Silicon Processing, 1990, Lattice Press, vol. 2, p. 111. |
Wolf, Stanley and Richard N. Tauber; Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, vol. 1: Process Technology; Sunset Beach, CA; Lattice Press, 1986, pp. 191-194. |
Wolf, Stanley, “Basics of Thin Films,” Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, pp. 115, 192, 193, and 199 (1986). |
Chu et al., ed., 3D Packaging for Integrated Circuit Systems, Sandia Report SAND96-2801, UC-704, Nov. 1996. |
Hayashi et al., A New Three Dimensional IC Fabrication Technology, Stacking Thin Film Dual-CMOS Layers, NEC Microelectronics Research Laboratories, 1991 IEEE. |
Krishmamoorthy, et al., “3-D Integration of MQW Modulators Over Active Submicron CMOS Circuits: 375 Mb/s Transimpedance Receiver-Transmitter Circuit,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2(11): 1288-1290 (Nov. 1995). |
Boyer et al., “Microelectronic Thin Film Deposition by UV Laser Photolysis” Proc. Soc. of Photo-Instrumentation Eng., Jan. 1983. |
Olmer, et al., “Intermetal Dielectric Deposition by Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Fifth IEEE/CHMT International Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium—Design-to-Manufacturing Transfer Cycle, pp. 98-99; Oct. 10, 1988. |
“3D Multichip Module to be Demonstrated,” Electronic Design, Apr. 4, 1994, p. 27. |
“3D Processor Module Stacked Standard ICs,” Electronic Design, Sep. 10, 1996, p. 27. |
“DRAMS set for orbit,” Military & Aerospace Electronics, Sep. 1995, p. 4. |
“High Density Interconnects Prove to be Reusable,” Electronic Design, Jun. 11, 1996, p. 27. |
“Irvine Bears Short Stack Markets,” Electronic New, vol. 40 No. 2033, Sep. 26, 1994. |
“Invine Sensors Now Sampling Short Stacks,” Electronic News, Sep. 12, 1994, p. 74. |
“Stacked RAMs Shrink Solid-State Recorders,” Electronic Design, Jan. 24, 1994. p. 27. |
Abbott, D., S. F. Al-sarawi, and Paul D. Franzon, “3D packaging technology for portable systems.” IEEE. 1997. |
Abbott, M., et al. “Durable memory RS/6000 system design.” Fault-Tolerant Computing, 1994. FTCS-24. Digest of Papers, Twenty-Fourth International Symposium on IEEE, 1994. |
Adler, Michael S. “GE high-density interconnect: a solution to the system interconnect problem” Boston-DL tentative. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1991. |
Agarwal et al., Potential Failure Mechanisms in Overlaid High Density Interconnects, ICMCM Proceedings, 1992. |
Akasaka, Y., et al “The 3-D IC with 4-layer structure for the fast range sensing system.” Microelectronic Engineering 15.1-4 (1991). 183-186. |
Akasaka, Yoichi. “3D technologies.” Microelectronic Engineering 8.3 (1988): 219-233. |
Akasaka, Yoichi. “Three-dimensional IC trends.” Proceedings of the IEEE74.12 (1988): 1703-1714. |
Akasaka, Yoichi. “Three-dimensional integrated circuit: technology and application prospect.” Microelectronics Journal 20.1 (1989): 105-112. |
Akasaka, Yoichi, “Trends in three-dimensional integration.” Solid State Device Research Conference, 1987, ESSDERC'87, 17th European, IEEE, 1987. |
Al-Sarawi, Said F., Dersk Abbott, and Paul D. Frenzon. “A review of 3-D packaging technology.” Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part B: Advanced Packaging, IEEE Transactions on 21.1 (1998): 2-14. |
Anthony, T. R. “Forming electrical interconnections through semiconductor wafers.” Journal of Applied Physics 52.8 (1981): 5340-5349. |
Aubert, Jeffrey M. “Boundary scan modification to enhance multichip module testing,” Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1992. NAECON 1992, Proceedings of the IEEE 1992 National. IEEE, 1992. |
Barrett, J., et al. “Performance and reliability of a three-dimensional plastic moulded vertical multichip module (MCM-V).” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 1995. Proceedings., 45th, IEEE, 1995. |
Benson, Donald, et al. “Advantages in MCM packaging for microprocessors.” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 1996. Proceedings., 46th. IEEE, 1996. |
Berlin, Claude L., David J. Perlman, and Stuart N. Shanken. “Evaluation of a 3D memory cube system.” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 1993. Proceedings., 43rd. IEEE, 1993. |
Bollmann, D., et al. “Three dimensional metallization for vertically integrated circuits.” Materials for Advanced Metallization, 1997. MAM'97 Abstracts Booklet, European Workshop, IEEE, 1997. |
Brown, Chet, “New IC stacking process ideal for high-density memory module and hybrid applications,” Electro/95 International Professional Program Proceedings, IEEE, 1995. |
Burdick, Bill, and Ray Fillion. “Extension of the Chip-on-Flex Technology to Known Good Die.” 1996 International Conference on Multichip Modules, 5 th, Denver, CO, 1998. |
Bustillo, James M., Roger T. Howe, and Richard S. Mueller. “Surface micromachining for microelectromechanical systems.” Proceedings of the IEEE 86.8 (1998): 1552-1574. |
Campbell, Michael L., and Scot T. Toborg, “3-D wafer scale architectures for neural computing.” Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, IEEE Transactions on 16.7 (1993): 646-655. |
Carlson, “A high density copper/polymimide overlay interconnection.” Proceedings of International Electronics Packaging Conference, Nov. 7-10, 1988. |
Carlson, R. O., et al. “High Density Interconnect Overlay for Bare Chip Packaging.” Second ASM International Electronic Materials and Processing Congress, Philadelphia, PA. 1989. |
Carson, By John. “The emergence of stacked 3D silicon and its impact on microelectronics systems integration.” Innovative Systems in Silicon, 1996. Proceedings., Eighth Annual IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 1996. |
Chu, Dahwey, and W. Doyle Miller. “Laser micromachining of through via innterconnects in active die for 3D multichip module.” Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, 1995. ‘Manufacturing Technologies-Present and Future’. |
Chu, Nhi-Anh, and Henry Dardy. A Survey of High Density Packaging for High Performance Computing System, No. NRL/FR/5560-92-9329. Naval Research Lab Washington DC, 1992. |
Chu, Wen-Hwa, and Mehran Mehregany. “study of risidual stress distribution through the thickness of p+ silicon films [thermal oxidation effects].” Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on 40.7 (1993): 1245-1250. |
Cole, H. S., et al. “Laser Processing for Interconnect Technology.” 1968 Los Angeles Symposium—OE/LASE'68. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1988. |
Concept One CVD System Process Specifications, Novellus, Nov. 1991. |
Cook, Rick. “More memory in less space.” Byte 20.8 (1995): 3. |
Cote, Donna R., et al. “Low-temperature chemical vapor deposition processes and dielectrics for microelectronic circuit manufacturing at IBM,”IBM Journal of Research and Development 39.4 (1995): 437-464. |
Crowley, Robert T., and E Jan Vardaman. “3-D Multichip Packaging for Memory Modules,” Multichip Modules, 1994. Proceedings of the International Conference on. IEEE, 1994. |
Cubic to unleash new wave 3-D chip. Wilmington Morning Star, Sep. 22, 1994. |
Datasheet, Intel 430HX PCSET 82439HX System Controller (TXC), Apr. 1997. |
Daum, Wolfgang, William E. Burdick Jr, and Raymond A. Fillion. “Overlay high-density interconnect: A chips-first multichip module technology,”Computer 26.4 (1993). 23-29. |
Dual-Port Dynamic RAM Controller, Intel Memory Components Handbook 1986, p. 3-76. |
EerNisse, E. P. “Stress in thermal SiO2 during growth,” Applied Physics Letters 35.1 (1979); 8-10. |
Eichelberger, C W., et al. “High-density interconnects for electronic packaging.” 1988 Los Angeles Symposium—OE/LASE'88. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1988. |
Electronic Packaging Technology, Dec. 1991 (In Japanese). |
Fahey, Paul M., et al. “Stress-induced dislocations in silicon integrated circuits.” IBM journal of research and development 36.2 (1992): 158-182. |
File History, U.S. Pat. No. 5,327,327 issued Jul. 5, 1994. |
Fillion, R. A. “Status and update on the GE HDI multichip module technology.” ISHM—Multichip Advanced Technology Workshop, Workshop Presentation. 1990. |
Fillion, R. A., et al. “3-D stacking using the GE high density multichip module technology.” MCM and VLSI Packaging Techniques and Manufacturing Technologies, 1994. Workshop on IEEE, 1994. |
Fillion, R. A., et al. “Non-digital extensions of an embedded chip MCM technology,” Multichip Modules, 1994. Proceedings of the 1994 International Conference on. IEEE, 1994. |
Fillion, R. A., R. J. Wojnarowski. and W. Daum. “Bare chip test techniques for multichip modules.” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 1990.., 40th, IEEE, 1990. |
Fillion, R. S., et al. “Multichip Modules-Chips First vs. Chips Last Analysis.”Proceedings—SPIE the International Society for Optical Engineering. SPIE International Society for Optical, 1992. |
Fillion, Raymond A. “A forecast on the future of hybrid wafer scale integration technology.” Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, IEEE Transactions on 16.7 (1993): 615-625. |
Fillion, Raymond A., et al. “Conformal multichip-on-flex (MCM-F) technology.” Multichip Modules, vol. 2575. 1995. |
Fillion, Raymond A.. et al. “Demonstration of a Chip Scale, Chip-On Technology.” Multichip Modules. vol. 2794. 1996. |
Forman, G. A., et al. “Development of GE's plastic thin-zero outline package (TZOP) technology.” Electric Components and Technology Conference, 1996, Proceedings. 45th. IEEE, 1995. |
Frew, Dean L. “High-density memory packaging technology high-speed imaging applications.” San Diego'90, Jul. 8-13. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1991. |
Fultz, William W., and Gerold W. Neudeck. “A Nitrided-oxide Dielectric for Epitaxial Lateral Overgrowth Applications.” (1995). |
Ganasan, Jaya R. “3D packaging—combining chip on chip (COC) and chip on board (COB) packages—process and design considerations.” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 1997. Proceedings., 47th. IEEE, 1997. |
Garrou, Philip. “Polymer dielectrics for multichip module packaging.”Proceedings of the IEEE 80.12 (1992): 1942-1954. |
Gdula, M., et al. “A 36-chip multiprocessor multichip module made with the General Electric high density interconnect technology.” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 1991. Proceedings., 41st. IEEE, 1991. |
Gdula, Michael, et al. “The GE high density overlay MCM interconnect method solves high power needs of GaAs system design.” Wafer Scale Integration. 1993. Proceedings., Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on. IEEE. 1993. |
Gdula, Michael, William P. Kornrumpf, and Barry K. Gilbert. “An overlay interconnect technology for 1 GHz and above MCMs” Multi-Chip Module Conference, 1992. MCMC-92. Proceedings 1992 IEEE. IEEE, 1992, pp. 171-174. |
Gösele, U. M., et al. “History and future of semiconductor wafer bonding.”Solid State Phenomena. vol. 47. Trans Tech Publications, 1995. |
Gösele, Ulrich M., M. Reiche, and Q-Y, Tong. “Wafer bonding: an overview.”Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, 1995 4th International Conference on. IEEE, 1995. |
Grief, Malcolm K., and James A. Steele Jr. “Warpage and mechanical strength studies of ultra thin 150 mm wafers.” Electronics Manufacuring Technology Symposium, 1996., Nineteenth IEEE/CPMT. IEEE. 1996. |
Haller et al., “CAD for the GE high density interconnect process.” Proceedings, National Electronic Packaging and Production Conference (NEPCON) West, Mar. 26-Feb. 1, 1990; Cahners Exposition Group, 1990. |
Haller, Theodore R., et al. “High frequency performance of GE high density interconnect modules.” Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, IEEE Transactions on 16.1 (1993); 21-27. |
Hass et al., Physics of Thin Films: Advances in Research and Development (1966). |
Hayashi, Y. “Evaluation of CUBIC (CUmulatively Bonded IC) Devices.”Extended Abstracts of 9th Symposium on Future Electron Devices. 1990. |
Hayashi, Y. et al. “A new three dimensional IC fabrication technology, stacking thin film dual-CMOS layers.” Electron Devices Meeting, 1991. IEDM'91. Technical Digest., International. IEEE, 1991. |
Hayashi, Yasuhim, et al. “Fabrication of three-dimensional IC usingcumulatively bonded IC'(CUBIC) technology” VLSI Technology, 1990. Digest of Technical Papers. 1990 Symposium on IEEE, 1990. |
Hirano, K., et al. “A New three-dimensional multiport memory for shared memory in high performance parallel processor system.” Solid State Devices and Materials (1996): 824-826. |
Hoffman, R. W. “The mechanical properties of thin condensed films.”Physics of thin films 3 (1966): 211-273. |
Inoue, Ken, et al. “A 10 Mb 3D frame buffer memory with Z-compare and alpha-blend units.” Solid-State Circuits Conference, 1995. Digest of Technical Papers. 41st ISSCC, 1995 IEEE International IEEE, 1995. |
Irvine Sensors Corporation, High Density Inter-chip Optical Interconnect, ISC Proposal CMP 9411, vol. I of II, Phase II Proposal, Jan. 18, 1994. Submitted to: Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO). |
Isrnail, Mohd Saileh. Technology and Application of Aligned Wafer Bonding for Three Dimensional Microstructures and Microdevices. 1993. |
Isobe, Atsuo, et al. “Dielectric film influence on stress-migration.” VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference, 1990. Proceedings., Seventh International IEEE. IEEE, 1990. |
Kaneko, Shinji, et al. “Monolithic fabrication of flexible film and thinned integrated circuits.” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 1997, MEMS'97, Proceedings, IEEE.. Tenth Annual International Workshop on, IEEE, 1997. |
Kim, N. P., et al. “Thin film passive components integrated into silicon based multi-chip modules for aerospace applications,” Advanced Packaging Materials, Proceedings., 3rd International Symposium on, IEEE, 1997. |
Kleiner, Michael B., et al. “Performance improvement of the memory hierarchy of RISC-systems by application of 3-D technology.” Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part B: Advanced Packaging, IEEE Transactions on 19.4. |
Kleiner, Michael B., et al. “Thermal analysis of vertically integrated circuits.”Electron Devices Meeting, 1995. IEDM'95., International, IEEE, 1995. |
Kleiner, Michael B., Stefan A. Kühn, and Werner Weber, “Modeling the impact of 3-D-Technology on the performace of the Memory Hierarchy of RISC Systems.” Circuits and Systems. 1995. ISCAS'95., 1995 IEEE International Symposium on vol. 3, pp. 2305-2308. |
Klokholm, Erik. “Delamination and fracture of thin films.” IBM journal of research and development 31.5(1987): 585-591. |
Koren, Israel, and Adit D. Singh. “Fault tolerance in VLSI circuits.” Computer7 (1990): 73-83. |
Koyanagi, M. “Roadblocks in achieving three-dimensional LSI.” Extended Abstracts of 8th Symp. on Future Electron Devices. 1989. |
Koyanagi, Mitsumasa, et al. “Future system-on-silicon LSI chips.” Micro, IEEE (1998): 17-22. |
Koyanagi, Mitsumasa, et al. “Neuromophic vision chip fabricated using three-dimensional integration technology.” Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2001. Digest of Technical Papers. ISSCC. 2001 IEEE International. IEEE, 2001. |
Koyanagi, Mitsumasa, et al. “Three-dimensional integration technology based on wafer bonding with vertical buried interconnections.” Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on 53.11 (2006): 2799-2808. |
Kühn, Stefan A., et al. “Interconnect capacitances, crosstalk, and signal delay in vertically integrated circuits.” Electron Devices Meeting. 1995. IEDM'95., International, IEEE, 1995. |
Kuhn, Stefan A., et al. “Performance modeling of the interconnect structure ofa three-dimensional integrated RISC processor/cache system.”Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part B: Advanced Packaging, IEEE, (1996) pp. 706-727. |
Kunio, T., et al. “Three dimensional ICs, having four stacked active device layers,” Electron Devices Meeting, 1989. IEDM'89. Technical Digest., International. IEEE, 1989. |
Kunio, Takemitsu, “Three Dimensional IC Technology, Using Cubic Method.” Journal of the JWS, Japan Welding Society 63.3 (1994), 185-189. |
Kurino, H., et al. “Intelligent image sensor chip with three dimensional structure.” Electron Devices Meeting. 1999. IEDM'99. Technical Digest. International. IEEE, 1999. |
Kurino, H., et al. “Three-dimensional integration technology for real time micro-vision system,” Innovative Systems in Silicon, 1997, Proceedings., Second Annual IEEE International Conference on. IEEE. 1997. |
Kurino, Hiroyuki, et al. “A new wafer scale chip-on-chip (W-CoC) packaging technology using adhesive injection method.” Japanese journal of applied physics 38.4S (1999): 2406. |
Kurino, Hiroyuki, et al. “Smart vision chip fabricated using three dimensional integration technology.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13 (2001): 720-726. |
Laconte, Jean, Denis Flandre, and Jean-Pierre Raskin. Micromachined thin-film sensors for SOI-CMOS co-integration Chapter 2, Thin dielectric films stress extraction; Springer Science & Business Media, 2006. |
Lau, John H. “Evolution, challenge, and outlook of TSV, 3D IC integration and 3D silicon integration.” Advanced Packaging Materials (APM). 2011 International Symposium on IEEE, 2011. |
Lee, K. W., et al. “Three-dimensional shared memory fabricated using wafer stacking technology.” Electron Devices Meeting, 2000. IEDM'00, Technical Digest. International, IEEE, 2000. |
Levinson, L. M., et al. “High density interconnects using laser lithography.”ISHM. vol. 88. 1988. |
Lim, “The impact of wafer back surface finish on chip strength.” Proceedings, Reliability Physics, Apr. 11-13, 1989; IEEE, 1989. |
Lim, Thiam Beng. “The impact of wafer back surface finish on chip strength.” Reliability Physics Symposium, 1989. 27th Annual Proceedings., International. IEEE, 1989. |
Linder, Stefan. Chip stacks for memory applications. Diss. Techn. Wiss. ETH Zürich, Nr. 11347, 1996. Ref.: H. Baltes; Korref.; ML Reed, 1996. |
Lui, Y. S., H. S. Cole, and R. Guida. “Laser ablation of polymers for high-density interconnect.” Microelectronic engineering 20.1 (1993); 15-29. |
Lyke, James. “Two-and-three-dimensional high performance, patterned overlay multi-chip module technology.” (1993). |
Matiniak, David. “Memory-chip stacks send density skyward.” Electronic Design 42.17 (1994): 69. |
Matsumoto et al., Three-Dimensional Integration Technology Based on Wafer Bonding Technique Using Micro-Bumps, Extended Abstracts of the 1995 International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials, Aug. 21-24, 1995, Osaka, pp. 1073-1074. |
Matsumoto, Takuji, et al. “New three-dimensional wafer bonding technology using the adhesive injection method.” Japanese journal of applied physics 37.3S (1998): 1217. |
Matsunami, Mitsuo, Masayoshi Koba, and Ryuichiro Miyake. “A study of high density multilayer LSI.”Wafer Scale Integration, 1990. Proceedings.,[2nd] International Conference on. IEEE, 1990. |
MB9887514-80 DRAM Memory Card data sheet, Fujitisu Memory Products 1994 Data Book. |
Minahan, J. A., et al. “The 3D stack in short form [memory chip packaging].”Electronic Components and Technology Conference. 1992, Proceedings., 42nd. IEEE, 1992. |
Mitani, Kiyoshi, and Takao Abe, “Wafer bonding technology for SOI applications: a review.” SOI Conference, 1992. IEEE International. IEEE, 1992. |
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki, et al. “Development of high density memory IC package by stacking IC chips.” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 1995. Proceedings., 45th IEEE, 1995. |
NASA Tech Briefs, May 1993. |
Neugebauser, C. A., et al. “High-Performance Interconnections Between VLSI Chips.” Solid State Technology 31.6 (1988): 93-96. |
Neugebauer, C., et al. “Multichip module designs for high performance applications.” Microelectronics International 7.1 (1990); 28-32. |
Nishimura, T., et al. “Three dimensional IC for high performance image signal processor.” Electron Devices Meeting, 1987 International, vol. 33, IEEE, 1987. |
Novellus datasheet. |
Obeng, Yaw S., et al. “Dielectric Materials for Advanced VLSI and ULSI Technologies.” AT&T Technical Journal 73.3 (1994): 94-111. |
O'Malley, C. “RIP PCMCIA.” Popular Science 246.2 (1995): 36. |
Paik, Kyung W., “Evaluation of Various AIN Substrate Materials for High Density Interconnection Applications.” International Sumposium on Microelectronics, Oct. 19-21, 1992; SPIE, 1992. |
Paik, Kyung W., and Edward S. Bernard. “Reliability studies on GE high density interconnect (HDI) modules.” MRS Proceedings. vol. 323. Cambridge University Press. 1993. |
Ryan, James G., et al. “The evolution of interconnection technology at IBM.”IBM Journal of Research and Development 39.4 (1995): 371-381. |
Sailer, Philip M., et al. “Creating 3D circuits using transferred films.” Circuits and Devices Magazine, IEEE 13.6 (1997): 27-30. |
Semiconductor Technology Symposium, Semicon Korea 1997; Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International, 1997. |
Semiconductor World, Sep. 1990 (In Japanese). |
Shimoto, Tadanori, et al. “High-density multilayer substrate using benzocyclobutene dielectric.” NEC research & development 34.2 (1993); 191-198. |
Spinoff 1996, NASA. |
Sugahara, K., et al. “SOI/SOI/bulk-Si triple-level structure for three-dimensional devices.” Electron Device Letters, IEEE 7.3 (1986); 193-195. |
Sutardja, Pantas, William G. Oldham, and Dah B. Kao. “Modeling of stress-effects in silicon oxidation including the non-linear viscosity of oxide.” Electron Devices Meeting, 1987 International. vol. 33. IEEE, 1987. |
Takahashi, Kenji, et al. “Current status of research and development for three-dimensional chip stack technology.” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 40.4S (2001): 3032. |
Takahashi, Shuji, et al. “A new 3-D MCM fabrication technology for high-speed chip-to-chip communication: vertically connected thin-film chip (VCTC) technology.” VLSI Technology, 1995. Digest of Technical Papers. 1995 Symposium on. IEEE, 1995. |
Takahashi, Shuji, et al. “Characteristics of thin-film devices for a stack-type MCM.” Multi-Chip Module Conference, 1992. MCMC-92. Proceedings 1992 IEEE. IEEE, 1992. |
Tetsuno, Sheridan “Japan's push into creative semiconductor research: 3-dimensional IC's.” Solid State Technol (1987): 29-30. |
Technical Seminar—Advanced Passivation System for sub 0.35um VLSI Manufacturing by K.P. MacWilliams et al.; Novellus, Spring 1997. |
Technical Seminar—Characterization of PECVD SIN Sidewall Integrity for Integrated Circuit Passivation by K. MacWilliams et al.; Novellus, Spring 1997. |
Technologies and Applications of 3-D ICs by T. Nishimura et al, Fourth International Symposium on Silicon-on-Insulators Technology and Devices, Electrochemical Society, 1990. |
Terao et al., Purposes of Three-Dimensional Circuits, IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, Nov. 1987. |
Terrill, Rob, and Gary L. Beene. “3D packaging technology oveiview and mass memory applications.” Aerospace Applications Conference, 1996. Proceedings., 1995 IEEE, vol. 2. IEEE, 1996. |
Test, Howard. “Trends in semiconductor packaging, a merchant house view.” Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1988. Proceedings of the IEEE 1988. IEEE, 1988. |
Tong, Q-Y., and U. Gösele. “Semiconductor wafer bonding: recent developments.” Materials Chemisty and Physics 37.2 (1994): 101-127. |
Tuckerman, D. B., et al. “Laminated memory: a new 3-dimensional packaging technology for MCMs.” Muiti-Chip Module Conference, 1994 MCMC-94, Proceedings., 1994 IEEE. IEEE, 1994. |
Van de Ven, Evert P., I-Wen Connick, and Alain S. Harrus. “Advantages of dual frequency PECVD for deposition of ILD and passivation films.” VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference, 1990. Proceedings., Seventh International IEEE. IEEE, 1990. |
Walter, David. “Flexibility and Performance of Texas Instruments Multi-Layer Thin Film/Laminate Interconnect Technology.” Multichip Modules . vol. 2575. 1995. |
Williams, Ronald, and Ogden Marsh. “Future WSI technology: stacked monolithic WSI.” Components, Hybridsm and Manufacturing Technology, IEEE Transactions on 16.7 (1993): 610-614. |
Windischmann, Henry. “Intrinsic stress in sputter-deposited thin films.” Critical Reviews in Solid State and Material Sciences 17.6 (1992): 547-596. |
Wojnarowski, R. J., et al. “Three dimensional hybrid wafer scale integration using the GE high density interconnect technology.” Wafer Scale Integration. 1993. Proceedings., Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1993. |
Wolf, Stanley, and Richard N. Tauber. Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era vol. 1: Process technology, 1986. |
Wolf, Stanley, and Richard N. Tauber. “Silicon Processing for the VLSI ERA, 1986.” Chapter 4. Basics of Thin Films; Lattice Press. |
Wolf, Stanley, and Richard N. Tauber. “Silicon Processing for the VLSI ERA, 1986.” Lattice Press. |
Wolf, Stanley. “PhD., Silicon Procewing for the VLSI Era, vol. 2-Process Integration,” (1990). |
Wong. C. P. “Thermal-mechanical enhanced high-performance silicone gels and elastomeric encapsulants in microelectronic packaging.” Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part A, IEEE Transactions on 18.2 (1995): 270-273. |
Yamazaki, K., et al. “4-layer 3-D IC technologies for parallel signal processing.” Electron Devices Meeting, 1990, IEDM'90. Technical Digest., International, IEEE, 1990. |
Yasumoto, M., H. Hayama, and T. Enomoto, “Promissing new fabrication process developed for stacked LSI's.” Electron Devices Meeting. 1984 International. vol. 30. IEEE, 1984. |
Yeh, Ching-Fa, Shyue-Shyh Lin, and Water Lur. “Stress in Liquid-Phase Deposited Oxide Films.” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 143.8 (1998): 2658-2662. |
Yu et al., Real-time microvision systems with three-dimensional integration structure: in Multisensor fusion and integration for intelligent systems, p. 831; Springer, 2009. |
Yu, Kee-Ho. et al. “Development of real-time microvision system based on three-dimensional LSI technology.” Journal of intelligent material systems and structures 7.3 (1996): 342-345. |
Yu, Kee-Ho, et al. “Real-time microvision system with three-dimensional integration structure.” Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, 1995. IEEE/SICE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 1996. |
Zanotti, L., et al. “Process characterization for LPCVD TEOS-ozone based SiO2 films.” Le Journal de Physique IV 3.C3 (1993): C3-337. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090175104 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10222816 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 12405232 | US | |
Parent | 09776885 | Feb 2001 | US |
Child | 10222816 | US | |
Parent | 08835190 | Apr 1997 | US |
Child | 08971565 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09607363 | Jun 0200 | US |
Child | 09776885 | US | |
Parent | 08971565 | Nov 1997 | US |
Child | 09607363 | US |