Direct-bonding processes take place between two nonmetal, dielectric surfaces, or may take place between two surfaces that also have metal pads or conductive features to be bonded together, for making an electrical interconnect, for example. When metal or conductive features are also present in the bonding interface, the bonding process may be called direct hybrid bonding.
The detrimental voids in the bonding interface may occur due to lack of a buffer area in the interface to make space for stray particles and other undesirable byproducts of the direct-bonding processes. With nowhere else to go, the stray particles stay between the surfaces being joined causing random voids in the bond. Some stray particles, foreign materials, and other imperfections have a tendency to create relatively large voids between the surfaces being bonded. In direct bond interconnect (DBI®) hybrid bonding processes (available from Invensas Bonding Technologies, Inc., formerly Ziptronix, Inc., an Xperi Corporation company, San Jose, CA), these concerns are magnified because the undesirable voids can occur on electrical leads that are only a few hundred nanometers or even a few tens of nanometers in width. High performance is often required of such ultrafine electrical leads. High bandwidth memory, such as HBM2 memory, for example, may demand signal speeds up to 2.4 Gbps per pin or even higher speeds, and SerDes signaling may need to pass through a bonded interface at 112 Gbps, for example.
In
Such voids 10 have been observed in direct-bonding of silicon wafers that have only a thin layer of native oxide. Because crystalline silicon does not have enough defect sites to capture gas contamination during an annealing step, the formation of voids results from gaseous byproducts. Similarly, when one of the surfaces being bonded is a silicon nitride, the nitride layer is impermeable to the escape of water vapor, hydrogen gas, and other reactant byproducts through diffusion, resulting in formation of the voids 10 during the annealing step. A poor-quality oxide surface that contains residual components from the oxide deposition process may also result in outgassing, and subsequent formation of voids 10 at the bonded interface. Apart from gases that are released during the annealing step, particles and other contaminants on the surfaces prior to bonding, that were not removed during the cleaning processes or that were deposited even after the cleaning processes, also lead to the formation of voids 10.
In addition, the edges of the surfaces 20 being bonded may have chipping 50, micro-fractures 60, and residue that are present from being diced or sawn along the edges. These likewise create bonding voids 10, that may weaken the bond between surfaces being joined, even when they do not interfere with electrical conduction of an interconnect.
The tendency of small particles or defects 40 to create voids 10 during bonding is accentuated in microelectronic fabrication processes by the bonding surfaces typically being ultra-flat, after flattening processes such as chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP). Because the bonding surfaces are so flat, a small particle 40 (for example, one micron in diameter) may cause a bonding void of three to ten microns or larger in diameter.
Structures and techniques provide bond enhancement in microelectronics by trapping contaminants and defect-producing byproducts during bonding processes and arresting the propagation of cracks. Example surfaces for direct-bonding are provided with predesigned recesses, sinks, traps, trenches, or cavities (hereinafter “recesses”) to capture small particles and gaseous byproducts of bonding that would otherwise create detrimental voids between microscale surfaces being joined. The recesses can also prevent cracks, fissures, and delamination processes from propagating along a surface or across a layer. Such random voids are detrimental and can compromise both bond integrity and electrical conductivity of interconnects being bonded.
In example systems, a predesigned recess space or predesigned pattern of recesses placed in the bonding interface captures particles and gases, reducing the formation of detrimental random voids, thereby improving and protecting the bond as it forms. The recess space or pattern of recesses may be placed where particles collect (defect sink) on the bonding surface, through example methods of determining where mobilized particles move during bond wave propagation. A recess may be repeated in a stepped reticule pattern at the wafer level, for example, or placed by an aligner or alignment process. The recess in some examples may be less than 20 nm in width and may be nonoperational such that the particles or contaminants do not come in contact with operational components or circuitry.
This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Certain embodiments of the disclosure will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying figures illustrate the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein.
This disclosure describes bond enhancement in microelectronics by trapping contaminants and arresting cracks during direct-bonding processes. Example surface structures and confinement techniques provide bond enhancement for fabrication of microelectronic components by capturing and sequestering particles, contaminants, and gaseous byproducts in predesigned recesses in the bonding surface during direct-bonding processes, and by arresting the propagation of cracks, chipping, and delamination processes. Direct-bonding processes may comprise dielectric-to-dielectric bonding between nonmetals, or may be direct hybrid bonding that also includes metal-to-metal or conductive layer-to-conductive layer bonding at the bonding interface.
In example systems, bonding surfaces that have been planarized to a high degree of flatness are provided with recesses, sinks, traps, or cavities at predetermined places to capture small particles, gaseous byproducts of bonding, contaminants or some other undesirable defects that can create relatively undesirable voids between the two surfaces being joined. Example recesses may be manufactured into a die or wafer during fabrication, at locations where particles collect when the particles move during bond wave propagation, during the direct-bonding. The recesses may also be generated in arrays, patterns, or bands at predetermined locations by etching a surface to be bonded. Recesses may be repeated in a stepped reticule pattern at the wafer level, for example, or may be placed by an aligner or alignment process.
Scenario 204 shows movement of contaminant particles during direct-bonding. It has been discovered that certain direct-bonding processes cause contaminants, such as particles on the bonding surface, to move during bond wave propagation, as shown in scenario 204. When a pair of wafers with numerous small particles on the bonding surface are bonded together with the bonding initiated at the wafer center 206, the particles become mobile and are moved outward along the propagating bonding wave and then deposited by these forces in rings, for example rings 208 & 210 & 212 on the wafer. In scenario 214, when a pair of wafers with much fewer particles is bonded together, the particles also move and come to rest in a ring or rings along the bonding wave, although in fewer numbers. One or more example predesigned recesses 216 may be placed at or near each ring of maximum particle concentration to trap these particles or undesirable defects.
Example systems determine locations where mobilized particles collect, and then place one or more predesigned recesses 216 next to the critical bonding areas as sinks or traps to collect and store the particles to prevent formation of bonding voids 10 in these critical areas.
In an implementation, a microelectronic component presents a first bonding surface 300. A second bonding surface 302 is suitable for bonding with the first bonding surface 300. Both surfaces are typically ultra-flat after CMP for direct-bonding or direct hybrid bonding. The two surfaces 300 & 302 may be surfaces of a first die and a second die in a D2D package construction, or a die and a wafer in D2W package construction, or may both be wafer surfaces in a W2W process, for example. In direct dielectric-to-dielectric bonding, the two surfaces 300 & 302 may be nonmetals, such as inorganic dielectric materials, such as stoichiometric or nonstoichiometric silicon oxide, for example. In direct hybrid bonding the two surfaces 300 & 302 may include both dielectrics and conductive materials for example metal conductors 301 & 303, such as pads, vias, trenches, MEMS membranes, pins, leads, and connectors to be joined across the bonding interface.
In an implementation, the first bonding surface 300 is provided with predesigned recesses 304 & 304′ to capture at least one substance detrimental to the bond between the first bonding surface 300 and the second bonding surface 302. The planar dimension of the predesigned recess 304 can range from submicron in extent to tens or hundreds of microns. The depths of each predesigned recess 304 can vary from a few nanometers to several microns. Oxide-to-oxide direct-bonding, or other types of dielectric bonding, may release water vapor, hydrogen gas, and unknown materials, for example. Chemical vapor deposited (CVD) oxides (for example, some nonstoichiometric oxides) may also outgas during an annealing phase, as shown in scenario 202 of
Sometimes, if the dielectric layer being bonded has enough inherent defects, the gaseous byproducts are sinked innately, and detrimental voids 10 that could form randomly during an annealing step do not occur. Design of bonding surfaces 300 & 302 may include providing materials for the surfaces 300 & 302 that have inherent recesses with dimensions calculated to capture particles or other contaminants of the direct-bonding process at hand. Various schemes may be applied to create or provide surfaces 300 & 302 with a calculated degree of porosity, for example. If the dielectric layer does not have enough inherent spaces or pores to trap at least gases, then the gas molecules tend to aggregate in random locations to cause formation of the detrimental voids 10 during annealing or subsequent higher temperature processing. In contrast to the randomly formed bonding voids 10 which negatively affect electrical performance of the parts, the predesigned recess areas 304 & 304′ in designated places do not impact electrical performance adversely, but may improve the bond. In some cases predesigned recess 304 & 304′ can even enhance electrical performance.
Spacing between example recesses 304 & 304′ can be configured to relate to the relative cleanliness of the bonding process, the type of materials being bonded, and to the type of contaminants and bonding byproducts being generated by the bonding step or annealing step. If there is little debris and only a low level of byproducts, then the recesses 304 & 304′ may be smaller, and/or spaced further apart. (The recesses 304 shown in
The recesses 304 may be provided on only one surface 300. Or, recesses 306 & 308 may also be provided on both surfaces 300 & 302, with random alignment of the recesses 306 & 308 with respect to each other across the bonding interface.
Recesses 310 & 312 may be provided on both surfaces 300 & 302 and aligned with each other, so that each recess 310 & 312 forms half or some other fractional part of a resulting final recess 314 at the bonded interface 316. Aligning the recesses 310 & 312 with each other minimizes the unbonded surface area between the first bonding surface 300 and the second bonding surface 302.
Although the recesses 304 & 306 & 308 & 310 & 312 shown in
In
In an implementation, a coating or deposition of palladium metal 408 or other hydride-forming metal (for example tantalum, titanium, etc.) may be added to the predesigned recesses to absorb hydrogen gas byproducts. Palladium, as used in microelectronics can absorb up to 900 times its own volume in hydrogen. Also, besides depositing palladium or a hydride-forming metal, any other metal or dielectric that can absorb and/or occlude reaction byproduct gases, moisture or a contaminant may also be deposited in the one or more predesigned recesses 402, 404, 406, 408. For example, one or more recesses may also be deposited with getter materials. Different getter materials can have different properties. For example, aluminum (Al) can have a getter capacity of about 1 Pa-l/mg against oxygen (O2). Barium (Ba) can have a getter capacity of about 0.69 Pa-l/mg against carbon dioxide (CO2), about 11.5 Pa-l/mg against hydrogen (H2), and about 2 Pa-l/mg against (O2). Titanium (Ti) can have about 4.4 Pa-l/mg against (O2). Thus, in some embodiments, the deposited material can be selected based on the types of gases that are likely to be present in the environment in which the bonded structure will be used.
In an implementation, a distributed pattern or array of recesses 402 & 404 & 406 & 408 may have first recesses 404 sized and spaced from each other for trapping fine particle contaminants, and second recesses 406 sized and spaced from each other for trapping a reaction byproduct, such as a gas, from a direct-bonding or annealing step. The recess 408 may run along the entire outer perimeter of the die. A contaminant to be captured may be a gaseous byproduct of an oxide-to-oxide direct-bonding process, a gaseous byproduct of a hybrid direct-bonding process, a gaseous byproduct of a bonding processes involving a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) oxide, a gaseous byproduct of a bonding processes involving a thermal oxide (TOX) silicon wafer or die, a gaseous byproduct of a bonding processes involving a silicon nitride surface, or a gaseous byproduct of a silicon-to-silicon direct-bonding process, for example.
In one scenario, at example bonding interface 502, propagation of the bonding wave front proceeds from one side to the other of an active bonding area 504 and sweeps the contaminants off their original positions in the direction of the propagating bonding wave front. The bonding interface 502 may be used in an example die-to-wafer (D2W) process using a porous bond head with left-edge-first contact that creates transverse bonding wave propagation, with moving particles distributed to a right side position. Predesigned traps, such as lines 506 & 508 of recessed areas can be placed at or near right angles to the direction of bonding wave propagation to collect the particles, for example near the active bonding area 504. The lines 506 and 508 of recessed areas can be placed such that the series of recesses in line 508 coincides with the series of openings of the recesses in lines 506 so that the contaminants not trapped in the line 506 of recesses move further in the direction of bonding wave propagation and are trapped in the line 508 of recesses. In the example D2W process, one or more linear bands of the recesses 506 & 508 can be placed at the locations of maximum particle distribution on the right side, for example.
In one technique, the recessed areas 506 & 508 can be allocated near bonding initiation locations to avoid contamination of the active bonding area 504 from the outset. When an active bonding area 504 is near the end of bonding wave propagation, then large traps 506 & 508 can be placed ahead of the active bonding area 504 to collect contaminants swept from other areas. These placement techniques can be useful in die-to-wafer (D2W) and die-to-die (D2D) direct-bonding processes. Some placements of the recesses 506 & 508 are useful for wafer-to-wafer (W2W) processes too.
At example bonding interface 509, propagation of the bonding wave front proceeds from a center line and proceeds to two sides 510 & 512, sweeping the contaminants off their original positions and in the direction of the propagating bonding wave fronts. For example, the lines of recessed areas 516/518 and 514/520 are placed such that the series of recesses in lines 514/520 coincides with the series of openings of the recesses in lines 516/518 so that the contaminants not trapped in the recesses of lines 516/518 move further in the direction of bonding wave propagation and are trapped in the recesses of lines 514/520. The bonding interface 509 may be used in an example D2W process using a curved bond head for the center-line-first contact moving to top and bottom edges, with the moving particles directed to the top side 510 and bottom side 512. Predesigned traps, such as recessed lines 514 & 516 and 518 & 520 can be placed at right angles to the direction of bonding wave propagations to collect the particles, for example near the active bonding area 522. The one or more linear bands of the recesses 514 & 516 and 518 & 520 can be placed at the top location 510 and bottom location 512 where maximum particle distribution occurs, for example.
At example bonding interface 524, propagation of the bonding wave front proceeds from a center point and proceeds outward to four sides 526 & 528 & 530 & 532, sweeping the contaminants off their original positions and in the direction of the propagating bonding wave fronts. Predesigned traps, such as recessed lines or arrays 534 & 536, 538 & 540, 542 & 544, and 546 & 548 can be placed at right angles to the direction of bonding wave propagations to collect the particles, for example near the active bonding area 550. Concentric rings, lines, or bands of the recesses can be placed near the peripheries where maximum particle distribution occurs, for example.
In an example center-first W2W process, direct-bonding may move particles to a particular ring (e.g., 216 in
The various predesigned recesses in
In an implementation, the large area recess 602 completely surrounds the bonding footprint 604. In an implementation, another peripheral bonding area 606 may surround the large area recess 602 as part of the overall bonding area between the two surfaces that are being joined on either side of the bonding interface. The large area recess 602 can also capture particles and contaminants from the bonding reactions and/or annealing steps of the peripheral bonding area 606.
Multiple instances of the bonding surface 600 of a die or wafer can be bonded together in a stack 608. The recesses 602 for any one bonding interface can be additive when both sides of a bonding interface have recesses 602 that align. Or, the recess 602 of one bonding surface can capture contaminants for both bonding surfaces, even when one of the bonding surfaces is flat, without any recesses.
In
In an implementation, narrow encompassing recess 702 forms a moat around bonding area 704, that prevents void propagation or a delaminating process from intruding into the bonding area 704 from outside the bonding area 704. Although, only one encompassing recess 702 is shown in
Likewise, a peripheral recess 708 prevents delamination from originating at the edges of the bonding surface 700, where the die has been sawn or diced, and where contaminant particles are likely to have collected. The ratio of the bonded surface 704 & 706 to recessed non-bonding surface areas 702 & 708 can vary, and can be any ratio between what is illustrated in
The recessed areas 702 in a stack 710 formed by two or more bonded dies or wafers, can arrest the stress forces caused by a particle 40 and the resulting delamination 10. Such stresses can also be arrested and relieved by a recessed area 702, when the recessed area 702 is present in only one of the two surfaces being bonded.
As shown in stack 808, particles up to a certain size fit in the large area recesses 802 & 802′, where they cannot further delaminate the bonded areas 804 & 804′. The large area recess 802 or 802′ can accommodate contaminant particles 40 that are twice as large as the particles captured by the large area recess 602 in
Although
Alternatively, larger pads 1112 may be intentionally recessed from the bonding surface 1100 by design and manufacture. Such recessed pads 1112 can be wide or narrow, depending on the amount of contaminants to be captured to protect the bond. As the bond is formed, some particles and gaseous byproducts of the bonding reaction tend to move to any space available as the gap between surfaces 1100 & 1102 disappears, resulting in contaminants and byproducts being trapped in the recess 1114. Locations of particle build-up can also be determined by calculation or observation. The larger pads 1112 with predesigned recesses 1114 can be placed at the determined locations of particle build-up.
CSAM, or confocal scanning acoustic microscopy images, have shown that the predesigned recesses successfully sequester particles and bond reaction byproducts, resulting in very few bonding voids. The absence of voids provides a strong bond with high bond integrity and full electrical connection of bonded interconnects. Electrical tests of the bonded interconnects affirm the results of the CSAM images, that the example predesigned recesses result in a notable absence of undesirable bonding voids.
At block 1202, recesses are provided in a bonding surface of a die or wafer.
At block 1204, the bonding surface is planarized to flatness for direct-bonding. The example method 1200 may be used with other general types of bonding operations. CMP or other measures may be used to obtain a surface flatness suitable for direct-bonding and direct hybrid bonding processes. Some or all of the recesses may be formed during or after this step instead of at block 1202.
At block 1206, the bonding surface is joined in a direct-bonding operation or a direct hybrid bonding operation to another bonding surface, allowing the recesses to capture particles, contaminants, and bonding reaction byproducts.
At block 1302, a location is determined at which particles collect during a direct-bonding process between a first bonding surface and a second bonding surface, wherein propagation of a bonding wave front during the direct-bonding process mobilizes and moves the particles.
At block 1304, a recess is placed in the first bonding surface or the second bonding surface at the location to prevent the particles from interfering with the direct-bonding process.
At block 1306, the first surface and the second surface are direct-bonded together.
A recess may be placed in both the first bonding surface and the second bonding surface at or near the location.
A first recess in the first bonding surface may be vertically aligned with a second recess in the second bonding surface across a bonding interface between the first bonding surface and the second bonding surface, to make an additive or composite recess across the bonding interface.
In an implementation, predesigned recesses can be created in a bonding surface by etching. Locations where build-up of particles occurs in higher concentrations can be determined by calculating or observing propagation of a bonding wave front proceeding from one side of an active bonding area to an opposing side of the active bonding area. Or, the bonding wave front may proceed from a center line of an active bonding area to two opposing sides of the active bonding area. Likewise, the bonding wave front may proceed from a center point of an active bonding area to four sides of the active bonding area (or may propagate in even more directions and to more sides).
Linear recesses, or a pattern of one or more lines of point recesses, may be placed at right angles to a direction of bonding wave propagation to collect the particles.
Recess dimensions can vary according to application and according to the likely contaminants. In an implementation, the horizontal width of a recess may be less than one micron or may even be nanometers in extent, and larger up to hundreds of microns in width.
The depth dimension of an example recess can range from a few nanometers to several microns. The depth of the recess (es) may be larger than pad thickness used in a direct hybrid bonding (e.g., DBI) bonding process. The recess (es) may be devoid of active componentry, MEMS devices, etc., in order to isolate the contaminants away from potentially sensitive areas of the microelectronic devices. The recess (es) may also be limited in the x, y, and z directions to maximize regions for circuitry, MEMS, or other operational features.
In an implementation, predesigned recesses can also be implemented in some wafers, for example, by selecting or creating a material with a given porosity or other inherent pattern of recesses.
At block 1402, a location or the direction of likely propagation of a stress force is determined for a bonding interface of a direct-bonding operation.
At block 1404, one or more recesses are placed in a bonding surface at the location or along the direction, to arrest propagation of the stress force. In an implementation, a pattern of periodic recesses or holes can provide “breaks” for stress forces acting in the horizontal plane of a microscale direct-bonding interface.
At block 1406, the bonding surface with the one or more recesses is direct-bonded to another surface.
At block 1502, a large area recess is formed completely around an active bonding area for direct-bonding, the active bonding area within a horizontal plane of a bonding surface.
At block 1504, the bonding surface is direct-bonded to another surface, with the large area recess capturing contaminants adverse to the direct-bonding in the active bonding area.
At block 1602, a large area recess is formed near an active bonding area for direct-bonding. The active bonding area is within a horizontal plane of a bonding surface.
At block 1604, a conductive trace is routed through the large area recess. The large area recess lowers the dielectric loss and/or capacitive loss of the conductive trace.
At block 1606, the bonding surface is direct-bonded to another surface. The large area recess captures contaminants adverse to the direct-bonding that occurs in the active bonding area.
At block 1702, pads placed at a bonding surface are indented, or dished by a chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) process.
At block 1704, the bonding surface is direct-bonded to another surface, while the indented or dished pads capture contaminants detrimental to the direct-bonding process.
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice those embodiments. For example, any of the specific dimensions, quantities, material types, fabrication steps and the like can be different from those described above in alternative embodiments. The term “coupled” is used herein to express a direct connection as well as a connection through one or more intervening circuits or structures. The terms “example,” “embodiment,” and “implementation” are used to express an example, not a preference or requirement. Also, the terms “may” and “can” are used interchangeably to denote optional (permissible) subject matter. The absence of either term should not be construed as meaning that a given feature or technique is required.
Various modifications and changes can be made to the embodiments presented herein without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments can be applied in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
While the present disclosure has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations possible given the description. It is intended that the appended claims cover such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the disclosure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/553,535, filed Aug. 28, 2019, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent No. 62/724,270 to Gao et al., filed on Aug. 29, 2018, the disclosures of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5341979 | Gupta | Aug 1994 | A |
5753536 | Sugiyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771555 | Eda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6080640 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6423640 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6465892 | Suga | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6887769 | Kellar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908027 | Tolchinsky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7045453 | Canaperi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7105980 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7193423 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7385283 | Wu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7566634 | Beyne et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7750488 | Patti et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7790578 | Furui | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803693 | Trezza | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8026181 | Arita et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8147630 | George | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8183127 | Patti et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8349635 | Gan et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8377798 | Peng et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8441131 | Ryan | May 2013 | B2 |
8476165 | Trickett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8482132 | Yang et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8501537 | Sadaka et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513088 | Yoshimura et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513810 | Tago | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524533 | Tong et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8620164 | Heck et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8647987 | Yang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8697493 | Sadaka | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716105 | Sadaka et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8802538 | Liu | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8809123 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8841002 | Tong | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8901736 | Shen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8975163 | Lei et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9029242 | Holden et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9076860 | Lei et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9076929 | Katsuno et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9093350 | Endo et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9142517 | Liu et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9171756 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184125 | Enquist et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9224704 | Landru | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230941 | Chen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9257399 | Kuang et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9299736 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312229 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331149 | Tong et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9337235 | Chen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9373527 | Yu et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9385024 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9391143 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9394161 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9431368 | Enquist et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9437572 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443796 | Chou et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9461007 | Chun et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9496239 | Edelstein et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9524959 | Yeh et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9536848 | England et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559081 | Lai et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9564414 | Enquist et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9620481 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9656852 | Cheng et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9673096 | Hirschler et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9674939 | Scannell | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9704827 | Huang et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9716033 | Enquist et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9723716 | Meinhold | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9728521 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741620 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9768133 | Wu et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9799587 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9852988 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9893004 | Yazdani | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9899442 | Katkar | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9929050 | Lin | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941241 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9941243 | Kim et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9953941 | Enquist | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9960142 | Chen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10002844 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10026605 | Doub et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10075657 | Fahim et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10204893 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10269756 | Uzoh | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276619 | Kao et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276909 | Huang et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10410976 | Asano et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10418277 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10434749 | Tong | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446456 | Shen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446487 | Huang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446532 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10508030 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10522499 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10707087 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10727219 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10784191 | Huang et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790262 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10840135 | Uzoh | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840205 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854578 | Morein | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10879212 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10886177 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10892246 | Uzoh | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10923408 | Huang et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923413 | DeLaCruz | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10950547 | Mohammed et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10964664 | Mandalapu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10985133 | Uzoh | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10985204 | Von Kanel | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10991804 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998292 | Lee et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11004757 | Katkar et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011494 | Gao et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011503 | Wang et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11031285 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11037919 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11056348 | Theil | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11056390 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11069734 | Katkar | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11088099 | Katkar et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11127738 | DeLaCruz et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11158573 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11158606 | Gao et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11169326 | Huang et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11171117 | Gao et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11176450 | Teig et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11195748 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11205625 | DeLaCruz et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11222863 | Hua et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
11244920 | Uzoh | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11256004 | Haba et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11264357 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2022 | B1 |
11276676 | Enquist et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11296044 | Gao et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11296053 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11329034 | Tao et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11348898 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11355404 | Gao et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11355443 | Huang et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11373963 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11385278 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11387202 | Haba et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11387214 | Wang et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11393779 | Gao et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11437423 | Takachi | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11462419 | Haba | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11476213 | Haba et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11515291 | DeLaCruz et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11626363 | Haba et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11631647 | Haba | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11652083 | Uzoh et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11664357 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11721653 | DeLaCruz et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11728273 | Haba | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11735523 | Uzoh | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11742314 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11749645 | Gao et al. | Sep 2023 | B2 |
11762200 | Katkar et al. | Sep 2023 | B2 |
11764177 | Haba | Sep 2023 | B2 |
11842894 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2023 | B2 |
11876076 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jan 2024 | B2 |
20020003307 | Suga | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030071106 | Bendat et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030148591 | Guo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040084414 | Sakai et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050101130 | Lopatin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050161795 | Tong et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161808 | Anderson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060057945 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070111386 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123061 | Evertsen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070148912 | Morita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070262468 | Nasu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080006938 | Patti et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080064189 | Daubenspeck et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080268614 | Yang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090029274 | Olson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090095399 | Zussy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100096699 | Miyata | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110084403 | Yang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110308738 | Maki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120068355 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120119258 | Liang | May 2012 | A1 |
20120238070 | Libbert et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130009321 | Kagawa et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140015088 | Chapelon | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140145338 | Fujii | May 2014 | A1 |
20140175655 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140187040 | Enquist et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140264948 | Chou et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140319656 | Marchena et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150064498 | Tong | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150145140 | Haba et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150364434 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160013099 | Tanida et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160071770 | Albermann et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160181228 | Higuchi | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160197055 | Yu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160233175 | Dubey et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160343682 | Kawasaki | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170154768 | Zhao | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170200756 | Kao et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170250172 | Huang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180102286 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180175012 | Wu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182639 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182666 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190580 | Haba et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190583 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219038 | Gambino et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180226371 | Enquist | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180323177 | Yu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180323227 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180331066 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190088527 | Uzoh | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190115277 | Yu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131277 | Yang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190148336 | Chen | May 2019 | A1 |
20190152773 | Herbsommer | May 2019 | A1 |
20190198409 | Katkar | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190333550 | Fisch | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190371763 | Agarwal et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385935 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385966 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200013637 | Haba | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013765 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035641 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200043910 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200058617 | Wu et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200075520 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075533 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075534 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075553 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200118973 | Wang et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200227367 | Haba et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200243380 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200279821 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294908 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200328162 | Haba et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328164 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200335408 | Gao et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200371154 | DeLaCruz et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200395321 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200411483 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210098412 | Haba et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210118864 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210143125 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210181510 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193603 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193624 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193625 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210242152 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210296282 | Gao et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210305202 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210366820 | Uzoh | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210407941 | Haba | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220077063 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220077087 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220139867 | Uzoh | May 2022 | A1 |
20220139869 | Gao et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220208650 | Gao et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208702 | Uzoh | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208723 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220246497 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220285213 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220285303 | Mirkarimi et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220319901 | Suwito et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320035 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320036 | Gao et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230005850 | Fountain, Jr. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230019869 | Mirkarimi et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230036441 | Haba et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230067677 | Lee et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230069183 | Haba | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230100032 | Haba et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230115122 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230122531 | Uzoh | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230123423 | Gao et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230125395 | Gao et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230130259 | Haba et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230132632 | Katkar et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230140107 | Uzoh et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230142680 | Guevara et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230154816 | Haba et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230154828 | Haba et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230187264 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187317 | Uzoh | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187398 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187412 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197453 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197496 | Theil | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197559 | Haba et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197560 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197655 | Theil et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207402 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207437 | Haba | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207474 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207514 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230215836 | Haba et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230245950 | Haba et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230268300 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230282610 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
20230299029 | Theil et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
20230343734 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
20230360950 | Gao | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230361074 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230369136 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230375613 | Haba et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103681646 | Mar 2014 | CN |
2 339 614 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2 685 491 | Jan 2014 | EP |
04-337694 | Nov 1992 | JP |
2000-100679 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-102479 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-353416 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2004-193493 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2009-135348 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2010-073964 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2013-033786 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2017-130610 | Jul 2017 | JP |
2018-160519 | Oct 2018 | JP |
10-0386954 | Jun 2003 | KR |
10-2004-0020827 | Mar 2004 | KR |
10-2015-0097798 | Aug 2015 | KR |
WO 2005043584 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2009005898 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2010024678 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2014052445 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO 2015134227 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO 2017151442 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bush, Steve, “Electronica: Automotive power modules from on Semi,” ElectronicsWeekly.com, indicating an ONSEMI AR0820 product was to be demonstrated at a Nov. 2018 trade show, https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/products/power-supplies/electronica-automotive-power-modules-semi-2018-11/ (published Nov. 8, 2018; downloaded Jul. 26, 2023). |
Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2023 with Search Report, Chinese Application No. 201980064165.6, 8 pages. |
Leissa, A.W., “Vibration of Plates,” NASA SP-160, 1969, 362 pages. |
Lim, K. et al., “Design and simulation of symmetric wafer-to-wafer bonding compensating a gravity effect,” 2020 IEEE 70th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), doi: 10.1109/ECTC32862.2020.00234 (2020), 6 pages. |
Morrison, Jim et al., “Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Teardown,” Tech Insights (posted Apr. 24, 2016), includes description of hybrid bonded Sony IMX260 dual-pixel sensor, https://www.techinsights.com/blog/samsung-galaxy-s7-edge-teardown, downloaded Jul. 11, 2023, 9 pages. |
ONSEMI AR0820 image, cross section of a CMOS image sensor product. The part in the image was shipped on Sep. 16, 2021. Applicant makes no representation that the part in the image is identical to the part identified in the separately submitted reference Bush, Nov. 8, 2018, ElectronicsWeekly.com (“Bush article”); however, the imaged part and the part shown in the BUSH article share the part number “ONSEMI AR0820.” |
Sony IMX260 image, cross section of Sony dual-pixel sensor product labeled IMX260, showing peripheral probe and wire bond pads in a bonded structure. The part in the image was shipped in Apr. 2016. Applicant makes no representation that the part in the image is identical to the part identified in the separately submitted reference Morrison et al. (Tech Insights article dated Apr. 24, 2016), describing and showing a similar sensor product within the Samsung Galaxy S7; however the imaged part and the part shown in the Morrison et al. article share the part name “Sony IMX260.” |
Zgheib, Elia et al., “Multilayered models for determining the Young's modulus of thin films by means of Impulse Excitation Technique,” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167663619304752,Manuscript_68d36734cad5d1ad97e7c65bfb45f5d1, 2019, 39 pages. |
Fukushima, Takafumi et al., “Oxide-oxide thermocompression direct bonding technologies with capillary self-assembly for multichip-to-wafer heterogeneous 3D system integration,” Micromachines, Oct. 2016, vol. 7, No. 184, p. 18 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/048736, dated Aug. 29, 2019, 13 pages. |
Ker, Ming-Dou et al., “Fully process-compatible layout design on bond pad to improve wire bond reliability in CMOS Ics,” IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Jun. 2002, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 309-316. |
Moriceau, H. et al., “Overview of recent direct wafer bonding advances and applications,” Advances in Natural Sciences-Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2010, 11 pages. |
Nakanishi, H. et al., “Studies on SiO2—SiO2 bonding with hydrofluoric acid. Room temperature and low stress bonding technique for MEMS,” Sensors and Actuators, 2000, vol. 79, pp. 237-244. |
Oberhammer, J. et al., “Sealing of adhesive bonded devices on wafer level,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2004, vol. 110, No. 1-3, pp. 407-412, see pp. 407-412, and Figures 1(a)-1(I), 6 pages. |
Plobi, A. et al., “Wafer direct bonding: tailoring adhesion between brittle materials,” Materials Science and Engineering Review Journal, 1999, R25, 88 pages. |
Suga et al., “Bump-less interconnect for next generation system packaging,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1003-1008. |
Suga, T., “Feasibility of surface activated bonding for ultra-fine pitch interconnection—a new concept of bump-less direct bonding for system level packaging,” The University of Tokyo, Research Center for Science and Technology, 2000 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2000 IEEE, pp. 702-705. |
“Die-to-Wafer Fusion and Hybrid Bonding,” EV Group, https://www.evgroup.com/technologies/die-to-wafer-fusion-and-hybrid-bonding/, printed Sep. 21, 2022, 8 pages. |
“Photo Etching DBC for Power Circuits—Direct Bond Copper (DBC) on Ceramic Used for Power Circuits,” Conard Corporation, 2021, downloaded Nov. 9, 2021, https://www.conardcorp.com/photo-etching-dbc-for-power-circuits/, 2 pages. |
“The effects of edge trimming—Engineering R&D Division, Operation V,” DISCO Technical Review Mar. 2016, 3 pages. |
“Lecture 29: Productivity and process yield,” National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL), MM5017: Electronic materials, devices, and fabrication, 16 pages. |
Amirfeiz et al., “Formation of silicon structures by plasma-activated wafer bonding,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2000, vol. 147, No. 7, pp. 2693-2698. |
Ceramic Microstructures: Control at the Atomic Level, Recent Progress in Surface Activated Bonding, 1998, pp. 385-389. |
Chang, T.C. et al., “A method for fabricating a superior oxide/nitride/oxide gate stack,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2004, vol. 7, No. 7, pp. G138-G140. |
Chung et al., “Room temperature GaAs—Si and InP—Si wafer direct bonding by the surface activate bonding method,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Jan. 2, 1997, vol. 121, Issues 1-4, pp. 203-206. |
Chung et al., “Wafer direct bonding of compound semiconductors and silicon at room temperature by the surface activated bonding method,” Applied Surface Science, Jun. 2, 1997, vols. 117-118, pp. 808-812. |
Farrens et al., “Chemical free room temperature wafer to wafer direct bonding,” J. Electrochem. Soc., The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Nov. 1995, vol. 142, No. 11. pp. 3949-3955. |
Farrens et al., “Chemical free wafer bonding of silicon to glass and sapphire,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings vol. 95-7, 1995, pp. 72-77. |
Frumusanu, Andrei, “TSMC's version of EMIB is ‘LSI’: Currently in pre-qualification,” AnandTech, https://www.anandtech.com/show/16031/tsmcs-version-of-emib-Isi-3dfabric, Aug. 25, 2020, 6 pages. |
Gao, G. et al., “Low temperature hybrid bonding for die to wafer stacking applications,” 2021 IEEE 71st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), IEEE, Jun. 1, 2021-Jul. 4, 2021. |
Gösele et al., “Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: a flexible approach to materials combinations in microelectronics; micromechanics and optoelectronics,” IEEE, 1997, pp. 23-32. |
Hooper, A. et al. “Review of wafer dicing techniques for via-middle process 3DI/TSV ultrathin silicon device wafers,” 2015 IEEE 65th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC). |
Hosoda et al., “Effect of the surface treatment on the room-temperature bonding of Al to Si and SiO2,” Journal of Materials Science, Jan. 1, 1998, vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 253-258. |
Hosoda et al., “Room temperature GaAs—Si and InP—Si wafer direct bonding by the surface activated bonding method,” Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research B, 1997, vol. 121, Nos. 1-4, pp. 203-206. |
Howlader et al., “A novel method for bonding of ionic wafers,” Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2006, IEEE, p. 7-pp. |
Howlader et al., “Bonding of p-Si/n-InP wafers through surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Indium Phosphide and Related Materials, 2001, IEEE International Conference on, pp. 272-275. |
Howlader et al., “Characterization of the bonding strength and interface current of p-Si/ n-InP wafers bonded by surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Journal of Applied Physics, Mar. 1, 2002, vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 3062-3066. |
Howlader et al., “Investigation of the bonding strength and interface current of p-SionGaAs wafers bonded by surface activated bonding at room temperature,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2114-2118. |
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of fritting contacts utilized for micromachined wafer probe cards,” 2000 American Institute of Physics, AIP Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 71, 2000, pp. 2224. |
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of low force contact process for MEMS probe cards,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Apr. 1, 2002, vols. 97-98, pp. 462-467. |
Itoh et al., “Development of MEMS IC probe card utilizing fritting contact,” Initiatives of Precision Engineering at the Beginning of a Millennium: 10th International Conference on Precision Engineering (ICPE) Jul. 18-20, 2001, Yokohama, Japan, 2002, Book Part 1, pp. 314-318. |
Itoh et al., “Room temperature vacuum sealing using surface activated bonding method,” The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Boston, Jun. 8-12, 2003, 2003 IEEE, pp. 1828-1831. |
Jin, H. et al., “Silicon / Silicon Oxide / LPCVD Silicon Nitride Stacks: the Effect of Oxide Thickness on Bulk Damage and Surface Passivation,” Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia, 3 pages. |
Kim et al., “Low temperature direct Cu—Cu bonding with low energy ion activation method,” Electronic Materials and Packaging, 2001, IEEE, pp. 193-195. |
Kim et al., “Room temperature Cu—Cu direct bonding using surface activated bonding method,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 2003 American Vacuum Society, Mar./Apr. 2003, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 449-453. |
Kim et al., “Wafer-scale activated bonding of Cu—CU, Cu—Si, and Cu—SiO2 at low temperature,” Proceedings—Electrochemical Society, 2003, vol. 19, pp. 239-247. |
Lei, W.S. et al., “Die singulation technologies for advanced packaging: a critical review,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 30(4), Apr. 6, 2012, Jul./Aug. 1012, pp. 040801-1-040801-27. |
Marinov, Val et al., “Laser-enabled advanced packaging of ultrathin bare dice in flexible substrates,”IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Apr. 2012, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 569-577. |
Matsuzawa et al., “Room-temperature interconnection of electroplated Au microbump by means of surface activated bonding method,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, 51st Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 384-387. |
NASA SBIR/STTR Technologies, Proposal No. 09-1 S5.05-9060—Reliable Direct Bond Copper Ceramic Packages for High Temperature Power Electronics, Contract No. NNX10CE23P, PI: Ender Savrun, PhD, Sienna Technologies, Inc.—Woodinville, WA, 1 page. |
Onodera et al., “The effect of prebonding heat treatment on the separability of Au wire from Ag-plated Cu alloy substrate,” Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions, Jan. 2002, vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 5-12. |
Reiche et al., “The effect of a plasma pretreatment on the Si/Si bonding behaviour,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1998, vol. 97-36, pp. 437-444. |
Roberds et al., “Low temperature , in situ, plasma activated wafer bonding,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1997, vol. 97-36, pp. 598-606. |
Shigetou et al., “Room temperature bonding of ultra-fine pitch and low-profiled Cu electrodes for bump-less interconnect,” 2003 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 848-852. |
Shigetou et al., “Room-temperature direct bonding of CMP-Cu film for bumpless interconnection,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 51st Proceedings, 2001, IEEE, pp. 755-760. |
Shingo et al., “Design and fabrication of an electrostatically actuated MEMS probe card,” TRANDUCERS, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 12th International Conference, Jun. 8-12, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1522-1525. |
Suga et al., “A new approach to Cu—Cu direct bump bonding,” IEMT/IMC Symposium, 1997, Joint International Electronic Manufacturing Symposium and the International Microelectronics Conference, Apr. 16-18, 1997, IEEE, pp. 146-151. |
Suga et al., “A new bumping process using lead-free solder paste,” Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on (vol. 25, Issue 4), IEEE, Oct. 2002, pp. 253-256. |
Suga et al., “A new wafer-bonder of ultra-high precision using surface activated bonding (SAB) concept,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1013-1018. |
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding—an approach to joining at room temperature,” Ceramic Transactions: Structural Ceramics Joining II, The American Ceramic Society, 1993, pp. 323-331. |
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding for new flip chip and bumpless interconnect systems,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 105-111. |
Suga, “UHV room temperature joining by the surface activated bonding method,” Advances in science and technology, Techna, Faenza, Italie, 1999, pp. C1079-C1089. |
Suga, T., “Room-temperature bonding on metals and ceramics,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings, vol. 93-29 (1993), pp. 71-80. |
Takagi et al., “Wafer-scale room-temperature bonding between silicon and ceramic wafers by means of argon-beam surface activation,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2001, MEMS 2001, The 14th IEEE International Conference, Jan. 25, 2001, IEEE, pp. 60-63. |
Takagi et al., “Effect of surface roughness on room-temperature wafer bonding by Ar beam surface activation,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1998, vol. 37, Part 1, No. 1, pp. 4197. |
Takagi et al., “Low temperature direct bonding of silicon and silicon dioxide by the surface activation method,” Solid State Sensors and Actuators, 1997, TRANSDUCERS '97 Chicago, 1997 International Conference, vol. 1, pp. 657-660. |
Takagi et al., “Room temperature silicon wafer direct bonding in vacuum by Ar beam irradiation,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS '97 Proceedings, 1997, IEEE, pp. 191-196. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature bonding of lithium niobate and silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999. vol. 74, pp. 2387. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of Si to LiNbO3, LiTaO3 and Gd3Ga5O12 by Ar-beam surface activation,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2001, vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 348. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of silicon and lithium niobate by means of arbon-beam surface activation,” Integrated Ferroelectrics: an International Journal, 2002, vol. 50, Issue 1, pp. 53-59. |
Takagi et al., “Surface activated bonding silicon wafers at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2222 (1996). |
Takagi et al., “Wafer-scale spontaneous bonding of silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation at room temperature,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Jun. 15, 2003, vol. 105, Issue 1, pp. 98-102. |
Tong et al., “Low temperature wafer direct bonding,” Journal of Microelectomechanical systems, Mar. 1994, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 29-35. |
Topol et al., “Enabling technologies for wafer-level bonding of 3D MEMS and integrated circuit structures,” 2004 Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2004 IEEE, pp. 931-938. |
Uhrmann, T. et al., “Heterogeneous integration by collective die-to-wafer bonding,” Chip Scale Review, Nov./Dec. 2018, vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 10-12. |
Urteaga, M. et al., “THz bandwidth InP HBT technologies and heterogeneous integration with Si CMOS,” 2016 IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (BCTM), 2016, pp. 35-41, doi: 10.1109/BCTM.2016.7738973. |
Wang et al., “Reliability and microstructure of Au—Al and Au—Cu direct bonding fabricated by the Surface Activated Bonding,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 915-919. |
Wang et al., “Reliability of Au bump—Cu direct interconnections fabricated by means of surface activated bonding method,” Microelectronics Reliability, May 2003, vol. 43, Issue 5, pp. 751-756. |
Weldon et al., “Physics and chemistry of silicon wafer bonding investigated by infrared absorption spectroscopy,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Jul./Aug. 1996, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 3095-3106. |
Xu et al., “New Au—Al interconnect technology and its reliability by surface activated bonding,” Electronic Packaging Technology Proceedings, Oct. 28-30, 2003, Shanghai, China, pp. 479-483. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220246564 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62724270 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16553535 | Aug 2019 | US |
Child | 17681019 | US |