Dynamic compensation of a robot arm mounted on a flexible arm

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11842124
  • Patent Number
    11,842,124
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 17, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 12, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A control system for a base supporting a boom assembly comprises long telescopic boom and telescopic stick. Mounted to the remote end of the stick is an end effector that supports a robot arm that moves a further end effector to manipulate the items. The robot arm has a robot base, and mounted above the robot base is a first target in the form of a position sensor, that provides position coordinates relative to a fixed ground reference. Mounted on the end of the robot arm immediately above the end effector is a second target that provides position coordinates relative to the fixed around reference. The fixed ground reference tracks the sensors and feeds data to the control system to move the stick with slow dynamic response and to control movement of the robotic arm and end effector with fast dynamic response.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to control of an end effector on a flexible arm, and in particular to the improved control of the position of the end effector on a flexible arm such as a boom. The invention has particular application where a robot works over a large area and requires high precision.


BACKGROUND ART

The following discussion of the background art is intended to facilitate an understanding of the present invention only. It should be appreciated that the discussion is not an acknowledgement or admission that any of the material referred to was part of the common general knowledge as at the priority date of the application.


The following definitions apply to terminology used throughout this patent specification. A robot arm is a programmable mechanical manipulator. In this specification a robot arm includes multi axis jointed arms, parallel kinematic robots (such as Stewart Platform, Delta robots), spherical geometry robots, Cartesian robots (orthogonal axis robots with linear motion) etc.


A boom is an elongate support structure such as a slewing boom, with or without stick or dipper, with or without telescopic elements, telescoping booms, telescoping articulated booms. Examples include crane booms, earthmover booms, truck crane booms, all with or without cable supported or cable braced elements. A boom may also include an overhead gantry structure, or cantilevered gantry, or a controlled tensile truss (the boom may not be a boom but a multi cable supported parallel kinematics crane (see PAR systems, Tensile Truss—Chernobyl Crane)), or other moveable arm that may translate position in space.


An end effector is the device at the end of a robotic arm designed to interact with the environment. An end effector may include a gripper, nozzle, sand blaster, spray gun, wrench, magnet, welding torch, cutting torch, saw, milling cutter, router cutter, hydraulic shears etc.


TCP is an abbreviation of tool centre point. This is the location on the end effector (or tool), whose position and orientation define the coordinates of the controlled object. It is typically located at the distal end of the kinematic chain. Kinematic chain refers to the chain of linkages and their joints between the base of a robot arm and the end effector.


CNC is an abbreviation for computer numerical control, used for automation of machines by computer/processor/microcontroller executed pre-programmed sequences of machine control commands.


The application of coordinate transformations within a CNC control system is usually performed to allow programming in a convenient coordinate system. It is also performed to allow correction of workpiece position errors when clamped in a vice or fixture on a CNC machining centre.


These coordinate transformations are usually applied in a static sense to account for static coordinate shifts or to correct static errors.


Robots and CNC machines are programmed in a convenient Cartesian coordinate system, and kinematic transformations are used to convert the Cartesian coordinates to joint positions to move the pose of the robot or CNC machine.


Measuring the position of a robot arm end effector close to the TCP in real time increases the accuracy of a robot. This is performed on static end effectors on robots used for probing and drilling. This is achieved by a multi-step process of moving to the programmed position, taking a position measurement, calculating a correction vector, adding the compensation vector to the programmed position and then moving the TCP to the new position. This process is not done in hard real time and relies on a static robot arm pose.


WO 2007/076581 describes a control system that moves a boom and end effector to a desired location or along a desired path. The boom was located on a base, which was in used fixed to the ground. A robot arm having a base was fixed to the end of the boom. A scanner-target measuring system measured the actual position and orientation of a target located on the end of the boom. The measuring system measured the actual position and orientation of the target with six degrees of freedom (x,y,z axes, and pitch, roll, and yaw) hereafter “6 DOF”. The target located on the end of the boom is fixed relative to the base of the robotic arm. The control system then calculated a 6 DOF offset between the programmed position of the base of the robot arm (where it was expected to be) and the actual measured position of the base of the robot arm, and then applied a correction to the kinematic chain of the robot arm so that the end effector was translated to the correct position. The robot arm was programmed in a coordinate system relative to its base, not the ground. Thus, to program the TCP of the end effector it was necessary to transform its 6 DOF position in ground coordinates to the base coordinates of the robot arm mounted on the tip of the boom. Effectively what was done was to program the robot arm with a sub program that was always used to control the end effector to lay a brick in the same relative position to the robot arm base coordinate system. The tip of the boom was programmed to be in the required location for robot arm to be in the desired location for the brick to be laid in the desired location.


A problem with this methodology is that the working coordinate system cannot be shifted after the program has been written. Common CNC coordinate shifts (eg G54) cannot be used for set up because the end effector is not programed in the ground or working coordinate system (it is programmed in the base coordinate system of the end effector which moves on the tip of the boom). The disadvantage with this arrangement was that the actual position of the end effector (or laid brick) in ground coordinates was not obvious in the program that controlled the entire machine (because it is programmed in a different coordinate system, ie the robot arm base coordinate system).


The arrangement described in WO 2007/076581 went a long way toward solving the problem of long booms deflecting due to gravity, wind, movement of the end effector, and movement of the boom, whether mounted on a stationary base, but especially also if the boom is mounted on a moving vehicle; however the inventor found that even with the arrangement described in WO 2007/076581, errors in positioning of the end effector could still occur, particularly as the distance from the base of the robot and the end effector increased.


It is an object of the invention to provide an arrangement that can provide improvements in stabilising an end effector to compensate for structural deflection and structural dynamics, and external interference such as wind, throughout a very large work space.


Throughout the specification unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention uses a cascading system of positioning devices, measurement systems and control channels. In one embodiment, a wide ranging inaccurate gross motion system guides a vehicle which supports a large area coarse positioning boom which then supports a small dynamic compensation and fine positioning robot which then in turn supports an even finer dynamic compensation and positioning mechanism.


The present invention describes dynamic coordinate systems and methods of moving machines and stabilising end effectors. In preferred embodiments, methods of transitioning compensation on and off, or damping transitioning are provided, so that the robot arm moving the end effector may work alternately in a head coordinate system and a ground or work coordinate system.


It is advantageous to code a kinematic transformation as a stand-alone piece of software. This means that the CNC kernel does not have to be modified to accommodate different kinematic chains. By using a dynamic coordinate system as the base of the end effector robot kinematic chain, the end effector can be programmed in a work coordinate system and all of the normal CNC coordinate shifts and transformations work, such as offsets for work coordinates and coordinate system rotation.


With a dynamic coordinate system for the base of the kinematic chain of the robot arm the concept of a compensation amount is abstract. If the base of the kinematic chain of the robot arm was at its programmed location there would be no compensation amount and the robot arm would be in a first pose. If the base is at its actual location and the robot arm was in the first pose, the end effector would be at the wrong location (and in the wrong orientation), the difference being the compensation amount.


In accordance with one aspect of the invention there is provided a control system for an arm supported from an arm base, said arm having an end effector mounted therefrom, said end effector having a further arm supported by a further arm base and said further arm having a further end effector mounted thereon, said arm being moveable relative to said arm base by an arm controller interfaced with an arm actuator to position said end effector to a programmed location, said further arm being movable by a further arm controller interfaced with a further arm actuator to position said further end effector at a programmed position; said control system having a tracker system to track the position of a first target located by an offset proximal to said further arm base or end effector, and to track the position and orientation of a second target located with a TCP offset from said further end effector; wherein said tracker system tracks the position of said first target and feeds data to said arm controller to operate said arm actuator with a slow dynamic response to dynamically position said first target close to said offset to position said further arm base close to said programmed location, and said tracker system tracks the position and orientation of said second target and feeds data to said further arm controller to operate said further arm actuator with a fast dynamic response to dynamically position and optionally orientate said second target to said TCP offset from said programmed position and optionally orientation. The TCP offset may be defined by position and optionally orientation data. The difference between the slow dynamic response and the fast dynamic response is inversely proportional to the potential inertia of the arm and the further arm. Where the further arm is much smaller than the arm, the further arm will possess less potential inertia and may be moved with a relatively fast dynamic response.


Preferably said second target is located with said TCP offset from said further end effector so as to move with movement and pose of said further end effector. In this case the TCP offset is defined by position and orientation data, and said tracker system measures the position and orientation of said second target.


By “close to” said programmed location, the further arm base is moved sufficiently close that the further end effector is within range of its programmed task, i.e. the further arm can move the further end effector to a position in order that the task the further end effector is to perform can be completed. By dynamically position and dynamically position and orientate, it is to be understood that as the position of the further arm base varies due to deflection, its position (and orientation if applicable, see hereinafter) is constantly under review and adjusted by the arm actuator with slow dynamic response, and the position and orientation of the further end effector is also constantly under review and adjusted by the further arm actuator with fast dynamic response.


Preferably said further arm base is mounted proximal to a remote end of said arm, away from said arm base.


Preferably said further arm base and said first target is mounted on a head, mounted to the remote end of the arm.


Preferably said head is pivotally mounted to the remote end of the arm.


Preferably said head is pivotally mounted about a horizontal axis to the remote end of the arm.


Preferably said tracker system tracks the position and orientation of said first target, and feeds data to said arm controller to operate said arm actuator with a slow dynamic response to position and orientate said first target close to said offset to position said further arm base close to said programmed location.


Where the head is pivotally mounted to the remote end of the arm, the poise of the head may be controlled by a separate controller to the arm controller, in which case the arm controller need only operate the arm actuator to position the first target along three orthogonal axes. However, control of the poise of the head may be integrated into the arm controller, in which case the position and orientation of the first target must be tracked.


Where the head is pivotally mounted to the remote end of the arm about a multi axis mechanism, the position and orientation of the first target must be tracked with six degrees of freedom. The position and orientation of the second target must be tracked with six degrees of freedom.


Preferably said tracker system includes separate target tracking devices for said first target and said second target.


Preferably said further arm controller may be controllably switched between a first state wherein said further arm controller is responsive to positioning feedback data derived from said tracker system, to a second state where pre-calibrated positioning data referenced to the further arm base (and hence the remote end of the arm) is relied on, and when switched between said first state and said second state, said further arm controller controls movement of said further arm to dampen movement of the further arm, to avoid sudden movement of said further arm and said further end effector. Such sudden movement could feed back to the arm, causing the arm to undergo reactive movement.


Preferably said arm base is provided with movement apparatus to move said arm base relative to the ground. The movement apparatus may be selected from a wheeled conveyance, incorporating locomotion or not, or self powered endless tracks. The movement apparatus may incorporate self levelling to level the arm base.


Preferably said arm base is mounted on an active suspension system, and said arm base incorporates a third target for said tracker system, said active suspension system having a suspension controller interfaced with a suspension actuator to control the position and orientation of said arm base in response to data from said tracker system reading the position and orientation of said third target.


Alternatively, said arm base is mounted to an object having larger inertia than said arm on an active suspension system, and said arm base incorporates a third target for said tracker system; said active suspension system having a suspension controller interfaced with a suspension actuator to control the position and orientation of said arm base relative to said object in response to data from said tracker system reading the position and orientation of said third target, said suspension actuator to control the position of said arm base with a slower dynamic response than said arm controller operates said arm actuator.


In accordance with a second aspect of the invention there is provided a control system for a boom supported from a boom base, said boom having a robot arm mounted by a robot base therefrom, said robot arm having an end effector, said boom being moveable relative to said boom base by a boom controller interfaced with a boom actuator to position said robot base to a programmed location, said robot arm being movable by a robot arm controller interfaced with a robot arm actuator to position said end effector at a programmed position and orientation; said control system having a tracker system to track the position of a first target located by an offset proximal to said robot base, and to track the position and orientation of a second target located with a TCP offset from said end effector TCP; wherein said tracker system tracks the position of said first target and feeds data to said boom controller to operate said boom actuator with a slow dynamic response to dynamically position said first target close to said offset to position said robot base close to said programmed location, and said tracker system tracks the position and orientation of said second target and feeds data derived from the second target, or derived from the second target and the first target to said robot arm controller to operate said robot arm actuator with a fast dynamic response to dynamically position and orientate said end effector TCP to said programmed position and orientation. The TCP offset may be defined by position and orientation data.


Preferably said second target is located with said TCP offset from said end effector TCP so as to move with movement and pose of said end effector.


By “close to” said programmed location, the robot base is moved sufficiently close that the end effector is within range of its programmed task, i.e. the robot arm can move the end effector to a position in order that the task the end effector is to perform can be completed. By dynamically position and dynamically position and orientate, it is to be understood that as the position of the robot base varies due to deflection, its position (and orientation if applicable, see hereinafter) is constantly under review and adjusted by the boom actuator with slow dynamic response, and the position and orientation of the end effector is also constantly under review and adjusted by the robot arm actuator with fast dynamic response.


Preferably said robot base is mounted proximal to a remote end of said boom, away from said boom base.


Preferably said robot base and said first target is mounted on a head, mounted to the remote end of the boom.


Preferably said head is pivotally mounted to the remote end of the boom.


Preferably said head is pivotally mounted about a horizontal axis to the remote end of the boom.


Preferably said tracker system tracks the position and orientation of said first target, and feeds data to said boom controller to operate said boom actuator with a slow dynamic response to position and orientate said first target close to said offset to position said robot base close to said programmed location.


Where the head is pivotally mounted to the remote end of the boom, the poise of the head may be controlled by a separate controller to the boom controller, in which case the boom controller need only operate the boom actuator to position the first target along three orthogonal axes. However, control of the poise of the head may be integrated into the boom controller, in which case the position and orientation of the first target must be tracked.


Where the head is pivotally mounted to the remote end of the boom about a multi axis mechanism, the position and orientation of the first target must be tracked with six degrees of freedom. The position and orientation of the second target must be tracked with six degrees of freedom.


Preferably said tracker system includes separate target tracking devices for said first target and said second target.


Preferably said robot arm controller may be controllably switched between a first state wherein said robot arm controller is responsive to positioning feedback data derived from said tracker system, to a second state where pre-calibrated positioning data referenced to the robot base (and hence the remote end of the boom) is relied on, and when switched between said first state and said second state, said robot arm controller controls movement of said robot arm to dampen movement of the robot arm, to avoid sudden movement of said robot arm and said end effector. Such sudden movement could feed back to the boom, causing the boom to undergo reactive movement.


Preferably said boom base is provided with movement apparatus to move said boom base relative to the ground. The movement apparatus may be a vehicle selected from a wheeled conveyance, incorporating locomotion or not, or self powered endless tracks. The movement apparatus may incorporate self levelling to level the boom base. Such self levelling should move the boom base to stabilise the boom base and hence the boom, against changes of position and orientation of the boom base, brought about by undulations in the ground over which the vehicle traverses.


Preferably said boom base is mounted on an active suspension system, and said boom base incorporates a third target for said tracker system, said active suspension system having a suspension controller interfaced with a suspension actuator to control the position and orientation of said boom base in response to data from said tracker system reading the position and orientation of said third target.


Alternatively, said boom base is mounted to an object having larger inertia than said boom on an active suspension system, and said boom base incorporates a third target for said tracker system; said active suspension system having a suspension controller interfaced with a suspension actuator to control the position and orientation of said boom base relative to said object in response to data from said tracker system reading the position and orientation of said third target, said suspension actuator to control the position of said boom base with a faster dynamic response than said boom controller operates said boom actuator.


The control system may include multiple tracker components at various positions on the machine so that a tracker (or multiple trackers) has or have line(s) of sight to one or more tracker components supported by the machine.


Preferably the control system of the machine includes algorithms to evaluate line of sight so that the best line of sight, between tracker and tracker component, in a particular pose can be chosen. The criteria for the best line of sight include, most accurate position and orientation solution (which may depend on the pose of the tracker or its sensor), field of view of the tracker or the sensor, distance to the end effector (closer is better), maintaining line of sight at all times during a programmed path or a critical operation.


Preferably said machine includes a further tracker component supported on said robotic arm, or on said end effector, and said machine uses a further tracker system to measure the position of the further tracker component and applies further compensating movement to the robotic arm assembly to correct for variance between programmed further tracker component position and measured further tracker component position.


The boom base may be a vehicle which may include a tracker component at a position on the vehicle or a plurality of tracker components at various positions on the vehicle. The tracker component(s) may be used to determine the position and orientation of the vehicle relative to a workspace coordinate system. The tracker component(s) may be used to determine the position and orientation of a vehicle for a moving vehicle. The tracker system may include multiple ground references to track the tracker targets as the vehicle progresses along a path.


The arrangements of the invention may achieve a high degree of dynamic motion quality and position tolerance over a large size of workspace. This results in smoother motion for end effectors located at the end of long booms or towers or supported on long cable trusses. The arrangements of the invention can smooth motion for an end effector supported by a long boom or tower supported by a moving vehicle.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Several embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an implementation of the invention according to a first embodiment;



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of an implementation of the invention according to a second embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a view of the tracker system for interfacing to control the position of an end effector on the end of a boom according to the broadest embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 4 is a view of the tracker system for interfacing to control the position of an end effector on the end of a boom according to a narrower and more preferred embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 5 is a graph showing implementation of damping of movement when stabilisation of the end effector is switched between a ground based first state and a machine based second state;



FIG. 6 is a view showing operation of an embodiment showing machine based second state operation;



FIG. 7 is a view showing operation of the embodiment of FIG. 6 switched to ground based first state operation;



FIG. 8 is a top plan view showing use of an embodiment being a mobile block laying machine incorporating the control system of the invention, in use to build a sound proofing wall along a freeway/motorway;



FIG. 9 is a side view showing use of a boom with a robotic arm mounted to a floating facility, in use to transfer items from a vessel subject to movement in ocean swell; and



FIG. 10 is a view of detail of the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 9; and



FIG. 11 is a view showing use of a boom with a robotic arm mounted to an oil rig, in use to transfer items from a supply vessel subject to movement in ocean swell.





DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

The control systems and methods of the invention have been developed by the inventor in connection with an automated brick laying machine 11. For a more detailed description of the brick laying machine, reference is made to the patent specification titled “Brick/Block Laying Machine Incorporated in a Vehicle” which is the subject of international patent application PCT/AU2017/050731, the contents of which are incorporated herein by cross-reference.


The automated brick laying machine 11 is built around a vehicle in the form of a truck 13 and has a base supporting a telescoping articulated boom assembly indicated generally at 15, comprising long telescopic boom 17 and telescopic stick 19. Mounted to the remote end 21 of the stick 19 is an end effector in the form of a laying head 23 that supports a 6 axis robot arm 25 that moves a further end effector 27 to manipulate the bricks 29. The robot arm 25 has a robot base 31, and mounted above the robot base 31 is a first target in the form of a 6 degree of freedom (6 DOF) high data rate position sensor 33, that provides 6 DOF position coordinates, relative to a fixed ground reference 35, to a control system. Mounted on the end of the robot arm 25 immediately above the end effector 27 is a second target in the form of a 6 degree of freedom (6 DOF) high data rate position sensor 37, that provides 6 DOF position coordinates, relative to the fixed ground reference 35, to the control system.


The head 23 is supported at the remote end of the stick assembly 19 (remote end of the boom 15) about a pivoting horizontal axis 38 (horizontal with reference to the state of the vehicle 13, assuming the vehicle is stabilised level, absent any torsion).


In a general embodiment, the vehicle 13 supports a boom 15 which supports a robotic arm 25 that supports an end effector 27. The head 23 may optionally be omitted between the boom 15 and the robot arm 25, but given the tasks to be performed by the end effector 27, particularly the application of adhesive in a brick laying application, it is more practical to include the head 23.


The vehicle 13 may be parked stationary or jacked up on support legs 39. As an alternative, the vehicle 13 may be programmed with a first CNC channel to move, or may be manually driven, along a path. In this case a further third target in the form of a 6 degree of freedom (6 DOF) high data rate position sensor 41 is provided, that also provides 6 DOF position coordinates, relative to the fixed ground reference 35, to the control system. Where the vehicle traverses a path in this manner, there will need to be multiple fixed ground references of the same type of the fixed ground reference 35. Alternatively, in another embodiment, a low data rate and low accuracy position sensor such as GPS could be utilised, but high data rate is preferred.


For faster data handling it may be desirable to have multiple ground references 35a, 35b, 35c, each dedicated to their respective sensor 33, 37 and 41, as illustrated in FIG. 2.


The boom 15 is programmed with a second CNC channel to move the TCP of its end effector (located at the tip) of the boom to the required coordinates.


The robot arm 25 is programmed with a third CNC channel to move the TCP of its end effector 27 to conduct tasks.


Optionally the end effector 27 may include a fine dynamic compensation mechanism for very accurate work. Such a system may include a galvo mirror to be used with a high power laser for laser cutting, engraving or 3D additive laser melting manufacture. The end effector is programmed with a fourth CNC channel to move the TCP of the fine dynamic compensation mechanism.


Referring to FIG. 4, detail of the most preferred embodiment is shown. A control system is provided for the boom 15 supported from a boom base in the form of the truck 13. The boom 15 has the head 23 mounted about a horizontal pivot axis 38 at the remote end of the stick assembly 19. The robot arm 25 is mounted by the robot base 31 to the head 23. The end effector 27 which comprises a gripper to pick up bricks is mounted for pitch roll and yaw movement to the end of the robot arm 27. The control system includes a boom controller interfaced with a boom actuator in the form of hydraulic rams 45 and 47 (and a rotating mechanism within the truck body—not shown) to move the boom 15 relative to the vehicle 13 by to position the head 23 and hence the robot base 31 to a programmed location. The control system also includes a robot arm controller interfaced with a robot arm actuator to position said end effector at a programmed position and orientation. The tracker system has fixed ground reference 35a to track the position of the first target 33 located by an offset proximal to the robot base 31. The tracker system has fixed ground reference 35b to track the position and orientation of one of two second targets 49 (whichever is visible) located with a TCP offset from the TCP of the end effector 27. The tracker system tracks the position of the first target 33 and feeds data to said boom controller to operate said boom actuator with a slow dynamic response to dynamically position said first target 33 close to said offset to position said robot base 31 close to said programmed location, so that the end effector 27 is within range of the position in which it is required to perform work. Since the targets 49 move with the end effector 27, and the end effector can move with six degrees of freedom, and the tracker system tracks both the position and orientation of said second target with six degrees of freedom and feeds data to the robot arm controller to operate said robot arm actuator (including the end effector) with a fast dynamic response to dynamically position and orientate said second target to said TCP offset from said programmed position and orientation.


The control system may controllably switch control of the robot arm controller between a first state where the robot arm controller is responsive to positioning feedback data derived from the tracker system, and a second state where pre-calibrated positioning data referenced to the robot base (and hence the remote end of the boom) is relied on. The movement at the end effector 27 relative to the robot base 31 is represented by trace 51 in FIG. 5, which shows deviations due to dynamic structural effects on the boom, wind deflection or vehicle movement, and the second state position for the robot arm is indicated at 53. When switched between the first state and the second state, said robot arm controller controls movement of the robot arm to damp or smooth movement of the robot arm, through the transition between the first state and the second state, indicated by trace 55, to avoid sudden movement of the robot arm and said end effector. Such sudden movement could feed back to the boom, causing the boom to undergo reactive movement.


The switching between first and second states deals with applications that require the end effector to alternately be controlled relative to the machine structure and then the ground, for example to pick up a brick from part of the machine and then to lay a brick on a wall relative to the ground. FIG. 6 shows the end effector 27 picking up a brick from the end of the boom. In this configuration the control system is in the second state and the tracker system need only track the first target 33. FIG. 7 shows the end effector 27 about to lay the brick. In this configuration the control system is in the first state, and the tracker system must track the first target 33 and the second target 37. The control system transitions from the second state to the first state and vice versa in a slow manner, over a period of about a second, to damp the movement of the end effector. If the compensation was turned on or off immediately, the pose of the compensating robot would have to change instantly, giving very large forces and disturbance to the boom. To overcome this problem, it is necessary for the compensation to be transitioned on or off or damped so that the amount of compensation is gradually increased or decreased to the required amount over a period of time, typically 0.2 to 0.5 seconds (or up to 10 seconds for large machines, or perhaps as low as in the order of milliseconds, up to 0.1 seconds for small machines). With a dynamic base coordinate system it is necessary to achieve the transitioning effect by moving the base coordinate system from its programmed position to the actual position over a period of time. It is important to check that the amount of compensation that will be applied is within the working range of the compensation robot. This is done by checking that the pose of the robot will be within the working envelope. (If the calculated amount of compensation to be applied would move the end effector beyond its working range, or exceed the robot arm dynamic limits of jerk, acceleration, or velocity), if the actual position and orientation of the dynamic base coordinate system would place the robot in a pose beyond its working range of axis travel or the TCP outside of the working envelope of the robot arm, or exceed the end effectors dynamic limits of jerk, acceleration, or velocity the amount of shift of the base dynamic coordinate system from the programmed location to the actual location (or the application of the compensation amount), may be scaled back, or motion may be held until the system is returned to within its working range and/or a warning can be issued within the controller.


Dynamic compensation transitioning works by, incrementing if compensation is turning on, or decrementing if compensation is turning off, a transition factor between a value of 0 and 1, so that it S curve ramps over the desired period of time, then, for each control cycle:

    • Measure the actual 6 dof coordinates of the tip tracker. Calculate the 6 DOF coordinates of the actual coordinate system of the base of the fine robot
    • If the transition factor is 1, then use the actual coordinate system of the base of the fine robot as the dynamic coordinate system.
    • If the transition factor is not 1 then:
    • Determine the programmed position of the coordinate system of the base of the fine robot by considering the programmed position of the boom tip and adding the kinematic transformation to the base of the fine robot.
    • If the transition factor is 0, then use the programmed position of the coordinate system as the dynamic coordinate system.
    • If the transition factor is between 0 and 1 then:
    • Calculate a 6 DOF delta vector from the programmed to the actual coordinate system of the base of the fine robot.
    • Scale the 6 DOF vector by the transition factor to give a scaled vector
    • Add the scaled vector to the programmed position of the coordinate system to give the dynamic coordinate system.
    • Check the pose and dynamics to ensure that the fine robot is within its working range. Go to warning, hold or scaling algorithms.
    • If the transition factor is less than 1, increment the transition factor, preferably using an S curve formula.


Preferably said machine includes a tracker component mounted to said head, wherein said head has said robotic arm assembly with said end effector and said machine uses a tracker system to measure the position and orientation of the tracker component and uses said measurement to calculate the position and orientation of a base coordinate system for said robotic arm assembly. The robot arm end effector TCP is programmed to do tasks in either a coordinate system fixed to the head, or in a coordinate system fixed to a workpiece (fixed to the ground). The programming can shift between the head coordinate system or the workpiece coordinate system. The switching is done by transitioning. Transitioning is explained below.


Transitioning to the dynamic base coordinate system involves moving the dynamic base coordinate system from a theoretical perfect position and orientation to an actual position and orientation (obtained by a measurement of the position and orientation of a tracker component fixed to the head), in a gradual and controlled way.


Transitioning from the dynamic base coordinate system involves moving the dynamic base coordinate system from an actual position and orientation (obtained by a measurement of the position and orientation of a tracker component fixed to the head), to the programmed (ie a theoretical) perfect position and orientation in a gradual and controlled way.


The most elegant mathematical approach to the arrangement is to have the boom TCP, tip tracker centre point and the dynamic coordinate system of the base of the robot arm coincident and aligned. In this way the kinematic transform set up in the boom CNC channel has its TCP coincident with the tip tracker centre point. The kinematic transform of the robot arm CNC channel has its dynamic base coordinate system coincident with the tip tracker.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the boom TCP could be at position different to the head base dynamic coordinate system and different to the tip tracker centre point and mathematical transforms can be used to calculate the theoretical perfect position of the robot arm base dynamic coordinate system. This is a more complicated and less elegant solution than that outlined above with coincident boom TCP, tip tracker CP and robot arm base dynamic coordinate system.


The control system uses a dynamic coordinate system offset or a plurality of dynamic coordinate system offsets to shift the base coordinate system of the robot arm in real time in the ground coordinate system. The control system then uses a kinematic transformation to calculate the required joint positions (angular or linear joints) to position the end effector at the programmed position in the ground coordinate system, rather than in the robot base co-ordinate system.


For large area tasks it may be necessary to move the vehicle relative to the ground. The vehicle movement relative to the ground may be automatically controlled or may be manually controlled within pre-calculated guidelines. In any case the location of the machine base is guided by either wheels or tracks, chains or rails or legs and feet and may not be very accurate. In this case, a multi stage control system is used, the first stage approximately positions the vehicle, the second stage positions a boom to a desired tip location and corrects at a slow rate any errors due to vehicle position and orientation and boom deflection and a third stage measures the position and orientation of a third stage robot arm base coordinate system and then precisely positions and compensates to stabilise and guide an end effector relative to the ground coordinate system. The number of stages of measurement and control may be extended to any plurality of control systems, dynamic coordinate systems and measurement systems. It is important for stability that the bandwidth of the control and the mechanical response speed of the motion systems increases from vehicle to end effector.


In some situations, it is necessary to stabilise the end effector relative to a moving object rather than the ground. Provided the relative position of the vehicle coordinate system and the tip tracker coordinate system is measured relative to the moving object coordinate system (or vis versa), compared to the vehicle, the moving object may be regarded as analogous to the ground, except that it is not an inertially fixed coordinate system. In this case, preferably a measurement to an inertially fixed coordinate system (eg earth or an INS, albeit a slowly rotating coordinate system) is also made to enable motion dynamic limits to be observed.


The control system can be used for tasks such as automated brick laying, precision mining, machining, robot assembly, painting and 3D printing. It has particular application for automated trenching for infrastructure pipelines, railway and road construction, automated pipe laying and for building long walls such as freeway sound wall.


The invention can be applied to airborne or seaborne equipment for applications such as dredging, seawall construction, oilfield and wind turbine maintenance, crew transfer, ship to ship transfer or air to air transfer or refuelling or helicopter powerline maintenance or helicopter logging.


The invention applies to multiple kinematic chains and multiple dynamic coordinate systems. The invention is particularly useful to stabilise, relative to the ground, an end effector, attached to a boom that is on a moving machine. When a machine moves, the acceleration of the machine imparts a dynamic force to the boom and the boom starts to oscillate at its natural frequency. Provided the compensating robot at the end of the boom has an amplitude larger than the amplitude of the boom motion, and a response much faster than the natural frequency of the boom (and vehicle), the compensating robot can correct for the boom motion due to bounce from the vehicle travel. The compensating robot does not have much range of motion so it is necessary to also correct the pose of the boom to keep the compensating robot within its available range of motion.


The actuation of the compensating robot imparts dynamic forces to the boom, which in turn further excite the boom. To minimise jerky motion of the boom, it is desirable for the boom to be rigid and free of mechanical play and backlash.


It is desirable for the (optional) moving vehicle to travel smoothly, so it is desirable for the ground it moves over to be graded and it is desirable for the vehicle to have suspension. Ideally the suspension is self-levelling. Optionally the vehicle may be fitted with a controllable blade so that it levels the ground before it drives over it. Optionally the end effector may be a blade or bucket and the machine may grade and level its own path prior to moving on to it.


To minimise jerky motion of the machine and the boom the control system of the vehicle of the machine is used to carefully control the motion. Preferably a mode of operation can be set when stabilised end effector operation is desired. The vehicle and boom motion is preferably jerk, acceleration and velocity limited. In an electro hydraulic control system, the electrical pilot system is controlled to limit the available control input. In a servo electric system, the servo dynamics are limited, preferably by the CNC channel and axis configuration. Preferably full CNC path planning is utilised rather than set point or point to point motion control. A full CNC path planner calculates path points for every control cycle (typically every ms). Preferably it calculates a path to optimise position, velocity, acceleration and jerk. A point to point control simply changes the set point to the desired end point, so that a large control feedback error value is created and the feedback control loop commands the motion to close the error.


The measurement of the vehicle position and orientation may be back calculated from the measurement of the 6 DOF tip tracker (using the inverse kinematic chain of the boom, which of course will not take into account deflection or vibration of the boom, unless it was measured for example by accelerometers, but would typically have the tip tracker motion heavily filtered to smooth the vibration component of the motion). Preferably the vehicle position and orientation is provided by a position tracking device fitted to the vehicle of the machine, or a part of the machine near the vehicle, such as the cab on an excavator. The vehicle tracking device may have a relatively low data rate and low accuracy such as GPS or total station target but the best performance would be achieved with an accurate sensor system such as a laser tracker and smart track sensor.


The motion of the boom is controlled at a bandwidth significantly less than its natural frequency (1% to 10% or 10% to 20% or 30% to 50% or 50% to 99%) so as to slowly compensate for boom motion errors and deflection and base motion errors or movement. The controlled motion of the boom aims to correct the position of the tip of the boom, but not necessarily the boom tip orientation. The boom control and response may have a bandwidth of 0.1 to 1 Hz, or 1 Hz to 10 Hz or 10 Hz to 30 Hz. The end effector compensating robot must have a high natural frequency (relative to the boom and base) and a fast dynamic response. The compensating robot compensates and stabilises in 6 DOF. The measurement system of the tip tracker must have a high data rate, preferably at the same servo loop control rate as the end effector control system, a minimum of 250 Hz and preferably 1000 Hz or greater (perhaps 10 kHz). If the data rate is significantly lower, the dynamic coordinate system position and orientation (ultimately resulting in a compensation input) has step changes that may induce structural vibration as the system responds to the actuator force inputs. If the step changes are filtered to provide a smooth change, a delay and motion lag is introduced and the end effector position is not accurate and may oscillate relative to the ground.


A chain of dynamic coordinate systems and a machine with a chain of compensating booms and robotic compensating end effectors is useful in many applications requiring fine position and motion control over a large working volume.


Some example applications are given below:


Ship Transfer


Ship to ship, or ship to oil rig, or ship to gas rig, or ship to wind turbine, transfer of goods, liquids or personnel, is a potential application for the control system of the invention. It is known to stabilise a vessel for position holding. It is also known to roll stabilise a vessel with gyros or thrusters. It is known to yaw stabilise a vessel with thrusters. It is also known to provide heave, pitch, roll and yaw compensation to working devices such as booms. However, it is known that for long booms in heavy sea states the existing methods of compensation have limitations. A coarse boom positioning and fine end effector positioning, or even additional stages of fine positioning would enable safer transfer, hook up, disconnection and operations in larger sea states and rougher weather. For example FIGS. 9 and 10 show a boom mounted on a FPSO 59 (Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading vessel) transferring LNG to a LNG tanker 57. The boom has a fine positioning arm which can approach close to or connect to the tanker. Trackers measure the relative position of the boom tip and the tip of the fine positioning arm. If the fine positioning arm is connected or engaged with the tanker 57, the control system is switched to a passive mode (ie no active control) so that the fine positioning arm now acts as a suspension system to absorb relative movement between the boom tip and the tanker.


Referring to FIG. 11, a platform stabilised in six degrees of freedom by a Stewart Platform 71 on the deck of a supply vessel 63, relative to an oil or gas rig 65 or FPSO (Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessel), as illustrated, would enable much safer transfer of goods and personnel using the existing cranes on the rig or FPSO. Tracker 67 on the rig 65 tracks target 69 on the vessel 63, while tracker 35a on the vessel tracks target 33 at the end of the boom 15. This data is fed to the control system located with the base of the boom on the rig via radio link as necessary to control the boom 15 and end effector 27 as discussed, and may also be fed back to assist to control the Stewart Platform 71 on the deck of the vessel 63. This provides a particularly significant operating advantage for handling large and expensive items. Currently when sea state reaches a limit, transfers have to be stopped.


This could have great benefit for petrochemical, renewable energy and military operators (and others) who require or desire to transfer things from vessel to vessel or vessel to fixed objects in all weather conditions.


Long Building


Long structures such as road freeway sound walls 61 can be built by the brick laying machine, however with the arrangements described to date in the patent application 20169 it is necessary to build from one location, then reposition periodically and build from the next stationary location. It would be advantageous to be able to build from a creeping machine. This would reduce lost time to reposition and would enable a smaller more compact machine with a shorter boom. A track mounted machine with a short boom would be ideal. Multiple fixed ground references 35 are provided to facilitate this, as shown in FIG. 8.


Long Trenching


Long trenches for infrastructure such as underground pipe lines and underground cables can be dug with known continuous trenching machines (such as made by Ditch Witch or Vermeer) or for larger cross section trenches with excavators (such as made by Caterpillar, Volvo, John Deere, Komatsu and others). For many applications the precise grade and location of the trench and pipe is important, such as for sewerage pipe. For many applications knowing the precise position is important, such as in cities to avoid damaging existing infrastructure such as pipes, cables, foundations and underground train and road tunnels. Current systems allow some control of the digging and provide feedback to the operator of dig depth or bucket position. In current system the base of the machine (the tracks) must be stationary.


The dynamic control system described allows precision digging to a tolerance that cannot be currently achieved by other methods. Further-more it allows pre-programmed digging for completely autonomous operation. Further-more it allows precision digging from a continuously moving machine such as a tracked excavator creeping along the path of the proposed trench.


Ground Contouring


It is known to use graders, bulldozers, loaders, gradall or automated screeding machines to smooth earth or concrete surfaces with blades or buckets. The inherent design of the machine will achieve a flatter surface than it moves over because the geometry of the machine provides a smoothing action. It is known that a more accurate and faster result can be achieved with automatic control to maintain the bucket or blade on a predefined level, grade or contour. The blade or bucket is moved up or down or tilted about a roll axis automatically to maintain a laser plane level or grade or to match a contour referenced by GPS or total station measurements. These known control systems have a low bandwidth and the machine achieves an accurate result because the inherent design of the machine will achieve a flatter surface than it drives over, even without machine guidance.


The present invention allows more complex machine arrangements such as a (modified) excavator, to be fitted with a multi axis controlled blade or bucket to achieve very complex earthmoving tasks in a completely programmable way.


Mining


It is known to use autonomous trucks for mining.


Excavators and face shovels are currently operated by machine operators. This technology enables autonomous control of excavators and face shovels by pre-programming the base movement (track base) and the dig program in mine coordinates.


Dredging


Excavators mounted on barges are used for dredging. Dredged channel depth, width, profile and location is extremely important for shipping safety. Dredging is expensive so it is advantageous to minimise the amount of spoil moved. The more accurate the dredging, the less spoil needs to be removed.


The barges are floating so as the excavator moves, the barge pitches and rolls and moves. Measuring the barge position and orientation in 6 dof in real time enables the bucket position to be precisely calculated (via known sensors that measure the pose of the excavator), or even controlled to a set of pre-programmed dig locations.


Elevated Work Platforms


It is known to use various kinds of elevated work platforms (EWP) such as boom lifts or scissor lifts or vertical telescoping lifts made by manufacturers such as JLG, Snorkel and Genie. It is known that very tall boom lifts sway with a large amplitude and make work difficult, dangerous or impossible. The sway is the limiting factor for the height that boom lifts can work at. It is known that driving the boom lift or EWP with the platform up excites sway and makes the platform uncomfortable or dangerous. The present invention provides means to make a stabilised platform so that the platform is stabilised relative to the ground, or to a desired trajectory when the platform or EWP is moved.


Cable Suspended Robots


It is known to support a robot on a platform suspended by cables in tension supported by an overhead gantry or towers (see PAR Systems—Tensile Truss and Chernobyl Crane and demolition robot). The cables can support high loads but the structure has low stiffness. The lateral stiffness is very low. The accuracy of the positioning of the robot and end effector would be greatly improved by adding a tracking component to the suspended platform to provide a 6 DOF position of the base of the robot arm. This would enable such a system to do accurate work, rather than the relatively inaccurate demolition work it is presently employed to do.


Very Accurate Applications


Such a system may include a galvo mirror to be used with a high power laser for laser cutting, laser engraving or 3D additive laser melting manufacture.


It should be appreciated that the scope of the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system including: a boom supported from a boom base, said boom having a robot arm mounted by a robot base therefrom, said robot arm having an end effector, said boom being moveable relative to said boom base by a boom controller interfaced with a boom actuator to position said robot base to a programmed location, said robot arm being movable by a robot arm controller interfaced with a robot arm actuator to position said end effector at a programmed position and orientation; and,a control system having a tracker system to track a position of the robot base based on a position of a first target located by an offset proximal to said robot base; wherein said tracker system tracks the position of said first target and feeds data to said boom controller while the control system operates said boom actuator to position and orientate said first target close to said offset and thereby position said robot base close to said programmed location, and said tracker system tracks a position of the end effector based on a position and orientation of a second target located with a tool centre point (TCP) offset from an end effector TCP, and said tracker system tracks the position and orientation of said second target while the boom actuator moves the robot base and feeds data derived from said second target and said first target to said robot arm controller while the control system operates said robot arm actuator to position and orientate said end effector TCP to said programmed position and orientation;wherein said boom controller operates said boom actuator with a slow dynamic response, and the robot arm controller operates said robot arm actuator with a fast dynamic response to thereby compensate for boom motion errors and deflection; and the fast dynamic response is faster than a natural frequency of the boom and the slow dynamic response is slower than the natural frequency of the boom.
  • 2. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein said second target is located with said TCP offset from said end effector TCP so as to move with movement and pose of said end effector.
  • 3. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein said robot base is mounted proximal to a remote end of said boom, away from said boom base.
  • 4. The system as claimed in claim 3 wherein said robot base and said first target is mounted on a head, mounted to the remote end of the boom.
  • 5. The system as claimed in claim 4 wherein said head is pivotally mounted to the remote end of the boom.
  • 6. The system as claimed in claim 4 wherein said head is pivotally mounted about a horizontal axis to the remote end of the boom.
  • 7. The system as claimed in claim 3 wherein said robot arm controller is controllably switched between a first state wherein said robot arm controller is responsive to positioning feedback data derived from said tracker system, to a second state where pre-calibrated positioning data referenced to the robot base (and hence the remote end of the boom) is relied on, and when switched between said first state and said second state, said robot arm controller controls movement of said robot arm to dampen movement of the robot arm, to avoid sudden movement of said robot arm and said end effector.
  • 8. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein a pose of the head is controlled by a separate controller to the boom controller, and the boom controller operates the boom actuator to position the first target along three orthogonal axes.
  • 9. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein control of a pose of the head is integrated into the boom controller, and the tracker system tracks the position and orientation of the first target.
  • 10. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein said tracker system includes separate target tracking devices for said first target and said second target.
  • 11. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein said boom base is provided with movement apparatus to move said boom base relative to the ground.
  • 12. The system as claimed in claim 11 wherein the movement apparatus is selected from a wheeled conveyance, incorporating locomotion or not, or self powered endless tracks.
  • 13. The system as claimed in claim 12 wherein the movement apparatus incorporates self levelling to level the boom base.
  • 14. The system as claimed in claim 11 wherein said boom base is mounted on an active suspension system, and said boom base incorporates a third target for said tracker system, said active suspension system having a suspension controller interfaced with a suspension actuator to control the position and orientation of said boom base in response to data from said tracker system reading the position and orientation of said third target.
  • 15. The system as claimed in claim 11 wherein said boom base is mounted to an object having larger inertia than said boom on an active suspension system, and said boom base incorporates a third target for said tracker system; said active suspension system having a suspension controller interfaced with a suspension actuator to control the position and orientation of said boom base relative to said object in response to data from said tracker system reading the position and orientation of said third target, said suspension actuator to control the position of said boom base with a slower dynamic response than said boom controller operates said boom actuator.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
2016902787 Jul 2016 AU national
PCT/AU2017/050731 Jul 2017 WO international
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/AU2017/050739 7/17/2017 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/009986 1/18/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (453)
Number Name Date Kind
1633192 Reagan Jun 1927 A
1829435 Barnhart Oct 1931 A
3438171 Demarest Apr 1969 A
3757484 Williamson et al. Sep 1973 A
3790428 Lingl Feb 1974 A
RE28305 Williamson et al. Jan 1975 E
3930929 Lingl Jan 1976 A
3950914 Lowen Apr 1976 A
4033463 Cervin Jul 1977 A
4106259 Taylor-smith Aug 1978 A
4221258 Richard Sep 1980 A
4245451 Taylor-smith Jan 1981 A
4303363 Cervin Dec 1981 A
4523100 Payne Jun 1985 A
4708562 Melan et al. Nov 1987 A
4714339 Lau Dec 1987 A
4758036 Legille et al. Jul 1988 A
4765789 Lonardi et al. Aug 1988 A
4790651 Brown et al. Dec 1988 A
4827689 Lonardi et al. May 1989 A
4852237 Tradt et al. Aug 1989 A
4911595 Kirchen et al. Mar 1990 A
4945493 Huang et al. Jul 1990 A
4952772 Zana Aug 1990 A
4954762 Miyake et al. Sep 1990 A
4969789 Searle Nov 1990 A
5004844 Van et al. Apr 1991 A
5013986 Gauggel May 1991 A
5018923 Melan et al. May 1991 A
5049797 Phillips Sep 1991 A
5080415 Bjornson Jan 1992 A
5196900 Pettersen Mar 1993 A
5284000 Milne et al. Feb 1994 A
5321353 Furness Jun 1994 A
5403140 Carmichael et al. Apr 1995 A
5413454 Movsesian May 1995 A
5419669 Kremer et al. May 1995 A
5420489 Hansen et al. May 1995 A
5469531 Faure et al. Nov 1995 A
5497061 Nonaka et al. Mar 1996 A
5523663 Tsuge et al. Jun 1996 A
5527145 Duncan Jun 1996 A
5557397 Hyde et al. Sep 1996 A
5737500 Seraji et al. Apr 1998 A
5838882 Gan et al. Nov 1998 A
6018923 Wendt Feb 2000 A
6049377 Lau et al. Apr 2000 A
6101455 Davis Aug 2000 A
6134507 Markey, Jr. et al. Oct 2000 A
6166809 Pettersen et al. Dec 2000 A
6166811 Long et al. Dec 2000 A
6172754 Niebuhr Jan 2001 B1
6213309 Dadisho Apr 2001 B1
6285959 Greer Sep 2001 B1
6310644 Keightley Oct 2001 B1
6330503 Sharp et al. Dec 2001 B1
6370837 Mcmahon et al. Apr 2002 B1
6427122 Lin Jul 2002 B1
6429016 Mcneil Aug 2002 B1
6512993 Kacyra et al. Jan 2003 B2
6516272 Lin Feb 2003 B2
6584378 Anfindsen Jun 2003 B1
6611141 Schulz Aug 2003 B1
6618496 Tassakos et al. Sep 2003 B1
6628322 Cerruti Sep 2003 B1
6643002 Drake, Jr. Nov 2003 B2
6664529 Pack et al. Dec 2003 B2
6681145 Greenwood et al. Jan 2004 B1
6683694 Cornil Jan 2004 B2
6704619 Coleman et al. Mar 2004 B1
6741364 Lange et al. May 2004 B2
6825937 Gebauer et al. Nov 2004 B1
6850946 Rappaport et al. Feb 2005 B1
6859729 Breakfield et al. Feb 2005 B2
6864966 Giger Mar 2005 B2
6868847 Ainedter et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873880 Hooke et al. Mar 2005 B2
6917893 Dietsch et al. Jul 2005 B2
6935036 Barber et al. Aug 2005 B2
6957496 Raab et al. Oct 2005 B2
6965843 Hobden et al. Nov 2005 B2
6970802 Ban et al. Nov 2005 B2
6996912 Raab et al. Feb 2006 B2
7044314 Nayfeh May 2006 B2
7050930 Hobden et al. May 2006 B2
7051450 Barber et al. May 2006 B2
7069664 Barber et al. Jul 2006 B2
7107144 Capozzi et al. Sep 2006 B2
7111437 Ainedter Sep 2006 B2
7130034 Barvosa-carter et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142981 Hablani Nov 2006 B2
7145647 Suphellen et al. Dec 2006 B2
7153454 Khoshnevis Dec 2006 B2
7174651 Barber et al. Feb 2007 B2
7230689 Lau Jun 2007 B2
7246030 Raab et al. Jul 2007 B2
7269910 Raab et al. Sep 2007 B2
7305094 Kashani Dec 2007 B2
7347311 Rudge Mar 2008 B2
7519493 Atwell et al. Apr 2009 B2
7551121 Oconnell et al. Jun 2009 B1
7564538 Sakimura et al. Jul 2009 B2
7570371 Storm Aug 2009 B1
7576836 Bridges Aug 2009 B2
7576847 Bridges Aug 2009 B2
7591078 Crampton Sep 2009 B2
7639347 Eaton Dec 2009 B2
7693325 Pulla et al. Apr 2010 B2
7701587 Shioda et al. Apr 2010 B2
7774159 Cheng et al. Aug 2010 B2
7800758 Bridges et al. Sep 2010 B1
7804602 Raab Sep 2010 B2
RE42055 Raab et al. Jan 2011 E
RE42082 Raab et al. Feb 2011 E
7881896 Atwell et al. Feb 2011 B2
7967549 Geist et al. Jun 2011 B2
7993289 Quistgaard et al. Aug 2011 B2
8036452 Pettersson et al. Oct 2011 B2
8054451 Karazi et al. Nov 2011 B2
8060344 Stathis Nov 2011 B2
8145446 Atwell et al. Mar 2012 B2
8166727 Pivac et al. May 2012 B2
8169604 Braghiroli et al. May 2012 B2
8185240 Williams et al. May 2012 B2
8195368 Leban et al. Jun 2012 B1
8229208 Pulla et al. Jul 2012 B2
8233153 Knuettel Jul 2012 B2
8244030 Pettersson et al. Aug 2012 B2
8248620 Wicks et al. Aug 2012 B2
8269984 Hinderling et al. Sep 2012 B2
8287522 Moses Oct 2012 B2
8322468 Nagasaka Dec 2012 B2
8327555 Champ Dec 2012 B2
8337407 Quistgaard et al. Dec 2012 B2
8345926 Clark et al. Jan 2013 B2
8346392 Walser et al. Jan 2013 B2
8352129 Yuan et al. Jan 2013 B2
8401698 Kamrani Mar 2013 B2
8405716 Yu et al. Mar 2013 B2
8467072 Cramer et al. Jun 2013 B2
8467888 Gahinet Jun 2013 B2
8537372 Siercks et al. Sep 2013 B2
8537376 Day et al. Sep 2013 B2
8558992 Steffey Oct 2013 B2
8588974 Aoba Nov 2013 B2
8593648 Cramer et al. Nov 2013 B2
8595948 Raab et al. Dec 2013 B2
8606399 Williams et al. Dec 2013 B2
8634950 Simonetti et al. Jan 2014 B2
8644964 Hendron et al. Feb 2014 B2
8670114 Bridges et al. Mar 2014 B2
8677643 Bridges et al. Mar 2014 B2
8792709 Pulla et al. Jul 2014 B2
8803055 Lau et al. Aug 2014 B2
8812155 Brethe Aug 2014 B2
8825208 Benson Sep 2014 B1
8832954 Atwell et al. Sep 2014 B2
8848203 Bridges et al. Sep 2014 B2
8875409 Kretschmer et al. Nov 2014 B2
8898919 Bridges et al. Dec 2014 B2
8902408 Bridges Dec 2014 B2
8913814 Gandyra Dec 2014 B2
8931182 Raab et al. Jan 2015 B2
8942940 York Jan 2015 B2
8965571 Peters et al. Feb 2015 B2
8996244 Summer et al. Mar 2015 B2
8997362 Briggs et al. Apr 2015 B2
9020240 Pettersson et al. Apr 2015 B2
9033998 Schaible et al. May 2015 B1
RE45565 Bridges et al. Jun 2015 E
9046360 Atwell et al. Jun 2015 B2
9074381 Drew Jul 2015 B1
9109877 Thierman Aug 2015 B2
9146315 Bosse et al. Sep 2015 B2
9151830 Bridges Oct 2015 B2
9163922 Bridges et al. Oct 2015 B2
9170096 Fowler et al. Oct 2015 B2
9188430 Atwell et al. Nov 2015 B2
9207309 Bridges Dec 2015 B2
9223025 Debrunner et al. Dec 2015 B2
9229108 Debrunner et al. Jan 2016 B2
9266238 Huettenhofer Feb 2016 B2
9267784 Atwell et al. Feb 2016 B2
9278448 Freeman Mar 2016 B2
9279661 Tateno et al. Mar 2016 B2
9303988 Tani Apr 2016 B2
9353519 Williams May 2016 B2
9354051 Dunne et al. May 2016 B2
9358688 Drew Jun 2016 B2
9367741 Le Marec Jun 2016 B2
9377301 Neier et al. Jun 2016 B2
9383200 Hulm et al. Jul 2016 B2
9395174 Bridges Jul 2016 B2
9405293 Meuleau Aug 2016 B2
9423282 Moy Aug 2016 B2
9437005 Tateno et al. Sep 2016 B2
9443308 Pettersson et al. Sep 2016 B2
9452533 Calkins et al. Sep 2016 B2
9454818 Cramer Sep 2016 B2
9476695 Becker et al. Oct 2016 B2
9482524 Metzler et al. Nov 2016 B2
9482525 Bridges Nov 2016 B2
9482746 Bridges Nov 2016 B2
9494686 Maryfield et al. Nov 2016 B2
9513100 Raab et al. Dec 2016 B2
9536163 Veeser et al. Jan 2017 B2
9541371 Pettersson et al. Jan 2017 B2
9561019 Mihailescu et al. Feb 2017 B2
9593046 Bastelberger Mar 2017 B2
9607239 Bridges et al. Mar 2017 B2
9618620 Zweigle et al. Apr 2017 B2
9658061 Wilson et al. May 2017 B2
9671221 Ruhland et al. Jun 2017 B2
9679385 Suzuki et al. Jun 2017 B2
9686532 Tohme Jun 2017 B2
9708079 Desjardien et al. Jul 2017 B2
9715730 Suzuki Jul 2017 B2
9720087 Christen et al. Aug 2017 B2
9734609 Pulla et al. Aug 2017 B2
9739595 Lau Aug 2017 B2
9746308 Gong Aug 2017 B2
9757859 Kolb et al. Sep 2017 B1
9768837 Charvat et al. Sep 2017 B2
9772173 Atwell et al. Sep 2017 B2
9803969 Gong Oct 2017 B2
9816813 Lettau et al. Nov 2017 B2
9829305 Gong Nov 2017 B2
9835717 Bosse et al. Dec 2017 B2
9844792 Pettersson et al. Dec 2017 B2
9879976 Bridges et al. Jan 2018 B2
9897442 Pettersson et al. Feb 2018 B2
9903939 Charvat et al. Feb 2018 B2
9909855 Becker et al. Mar 2018 B2
9915733 Fried et al. Mar 2018 B2
9921046 Gong Mar 2018 B2
9958268 Ohtomo et al. May 2018 B2
9958545 Eichenholz et al. May 2018 B2
9964398 Becker et al. May 2018 B2
9964402 Tohme et al. May 2018 B2
9967545 Tohme May 2018 B2
9987746 Bradski Jun 2018 B2
9989353 Bartmann et al. Jun 2018 B2
10012732 Eichenholz et al. Jul 2018 B2
10030972 Iseli et al. Jul 2018 B2
10041793 Metzler et al. Aug 2018 B2
10054422 Böckem et al. Aug 2018 B2
10058394 Johnson et al. Aug 2018 B2
10059003 Linnell et al. Aug 2018 B1
10073162 Charvat et al. Sep 2018 B2
10074889 Charvat et al. Sep 2018 B2
10082521 Atlas et al. Sep 2018 B2
10089586 Vestal Oct 2018 B2
10090944 Charvat et al. Oct 2018 B1
10094909 Charvat et al. Oct 2018 B2
10126415 Becker et al. Nov 2018 B2
10150653 Kyllingstad Dec 2018 B2
10189176 Williams Jan 2019 B2
10220511 Linnell et al. Mar 2019 B2
10240949 Peters et al. Mar 2019 B2
10627211 Luthi Apr 2020 B2
10635758 Pivac et al. Apr 2020 B2
10865578 Pivac et al. Dec 2020 B2
10876308 Pivac et al. Dec 2020 B2
11106836 Pivac et al. Aug 2021 B2
11364630 Henriksson Jun 2022 B2
20020126852 Kashani Sep 2002 A1
20020175594 Kornbluh et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020176603 Bauer et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030048459 Gooch Mar 2003 A1
20030090682 Gooch et al. May 2003 A1
20030120377 Hooke et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030206285 Lau Nov 2003 A1
20030208302 Lemelson Nov 2003 A1
20040073343 Nayfeh Apr 2004 A1
20040078137 Breakfield et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093119 Gunnarsson et al. May 2004 A1
20040200947 Lau Oct 2004 A1
20050007450 Hill et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050057745 Bontje Mar 2005 A1
20050060092 Hablani Mar 2005 A1
20050086901 Chisholm Apr 2005 A1
20050131619 Rappaport et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050196484 Khoshnevis Sep 2005 A1
20050252118 Matsufuji Nov 2005 A1
20060167587 Read Jul 2006 A1
20060215179 Mcmurtry et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070024870 Girard et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070106421 Kamrani May 2007 A1
20070229802 Lau Oct 2007 A1
20070284215 Rudge Dec 2007 A1
20080030855 Lau Feb 2008 A1
20080189046 Eliasson et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080235970 Crampton Oct 2008 A1
20090038258 Pivac et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090074979 Krogedal et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090240372 Bordyn Sep 2009 A1
20100025349 Khoshnevis Feb 2010 A1
20100095835 Yuan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100103431 Demopoulos Apr 2010 A1
20100138185 Kang Jun 2010 A1
20100143089 Hvass Jun 2010 A1
20100152899 Chang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100206651 Nagasaka Aug 2010 A1
20100274390 Walser et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100281822 Murray Nov 2010 A1
20100312364 Eryilmaz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110043515 Stathis Feb 2011 A1
20110066393 Groll et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110153524 Schnackel Jun 2011 A1
20110208347 Otake et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120038074 Khoshnevis Feb 2012 A1
20120053726 Peters Mar 2012 A1
20120099096 Bridges et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120136524 Everett et al. May 2012 A1
20120185089 Schreiber Jul 2012 A1
20120265391 Letsky Oct 2012 A1
20120277898 Kawai et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130028478 St-pierre et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130068061 Yoon Mar 2013 A1
20130103192 Huettenhofer Apr 2013 A1
20130104407 Lee May 2013 A1
20130222816 Briggs et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130250285 Bridges et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130286196 Atwell Oct 2013 A1
20130297046 Hendron Nov 2013 A1
20130310982 Scheurer Nov 2013 A1
20140002608 Atwell et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140067121 Brooks et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140176677 Valkenburg et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140192187 Atwell et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140309960 Vennegeerts et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140343727 Calkins et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140348388 Metzler et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140365258 Vestal Dec 2014 A1
20140366481 Benson Dec 2014 A1
20140376768 Troy Dec 2014 A1
20150082740 Peters et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150100066 Kostrzewski et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150134303 Chang et al. May 2015 A1
20150153720 Pettersson et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150158181 Kawamura Jun 2015 A1
20150165620 Osaka Jun 2015 A1
20150166413 Crampton Jun 2015 A1
20150241203 Jordil et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150258694 Hand et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150276402 Grsser et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150280829 Breuer Oct 2015 A1
20150293596 Krausen et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150309175 Hinderling et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150314890 Desjardien et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150345959 Meuleau Dec 2015 A1
20150352721 Wicks et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150355310 Gong et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150367509 Georgeson Dec 2015 A1
20150371082 Csaszar et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150377606 Thielemans Dec 2015 A1
20160005185 Geissler Jan 2016 A1
20160093099 Bridges Mar 2016 A1
20160153786 Liu et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160187130 Metzler et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160187470 Becker et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160194183 Kyllingstad Jul 2016 A1
20160221187 Bradski Aug 2016 A1
20160223364 Peters et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160239013 Troy Aug 2016 A1
20160242744 Mihailescu et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160263767 Williams Sep 2016 A1
20160274237 Stutz Sep 2016 A1
20160282107 Roland et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160282110 Vagman et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160282179 Nazemi et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160288331 Sivich et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160313114 Tohme et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160318187 Tani Nov 2016 A1
20160327383 Becker et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160340873 Eidenberger et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160341041 Puura et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160349746 Grau Dec 2016 A1
20160363436 Clark et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160363659 Mindell et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160363663 Mindell et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160363664 Mindell et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160364869 Siercks et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160364874 Tohme et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170028550 Terada Feb 2017 A1
20170066157 Peters et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170067739 Siercks et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170071680 Swarup Mar 2017 A1
20170082436 Siercks et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170091922 Siercks et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170091923 Siercks et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170108528 Atlas et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170122733 Brown May 2017 A1
20170122736 Dold et al. May 2017 A1
20170166399 Stubbs Jun 2017 A1
20170173795 Tan et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170173796 Kim et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170176572 Charvat et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170179570 Charvat Jun 2017 A1
20170179603 Charvat et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170191822 Becker et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170227355 Pettersson et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170236299 Valkenburg et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170254102 Peters et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170269203 Trishaun Sep 2017 A1
20170291805 Hao Oct 2017 A1
20170307757 Hinderling et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170314909 Dang Nov 2017 A1
20170314918 Shah Nov 2017 A1
20170333137 Roessler Nov 2017 A1
20170343336 Lettau Nov 2017 A1
20170371342 Hashimoto Dec 2017 A1
20180001479 Li et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180003493 Bernhard et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180017384 Siercks et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180023935 Atwell et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180038684 Fröhlich et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180043838 Ellerman et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180046096 Shibazaki Feb 2018 A1
20180052233 Frank et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180093380 Yoshida Apr 2018 A1
20180108178 Murugappan et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180121571 Tiwari et al. May 2018 A1
20180149469 Becker et al. May 2018 A1
20180156601 Pontai Jun 2018 A1
20180168749 Dozeman Jun 2018 A1
20180170719 Tasch et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180180416 Edelman et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180180740 Shaffer Jun 2018 A1
20180202796 Ziegenbein Jul 2018 A1
20180209156 Pettersson Jul 2018 A1
20180239010 Mindell et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180283017 Telleria et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180300433 Maxam et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190026401 Benjamin et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190032348 Parkes Jan 2019 A1
20190184555 Linnell et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190251210 Pivac et al. Aug 2019 A1
20200009723 Eisenwinter Jan 2020 A1
20200009730 Henriksson Jan 2020 A1
20200173777 Pivac et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200206923 Pivac et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200206924 Pivac et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200215688 Pivac et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200215692 Pivac et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200215693 Pivac et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200324981 Pivac et al. Oct 2020 A1
20210016437 Pivac et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210016438 Pivac et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210080582 Pivac et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210291362 Pivac et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210370509 Pivac et al. Dec 2021 A1
20210379775 Pivac et al. Dec 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (156)
Number Date Country
645640 Jan 1994 AU
673498 Mar 1990 CH
2730976 Oct 2005 CN
2902981 May 2007 CN
2923903 Jul 2007 CN
101100903 Jan 2008 CN
201184054 Jan 2009 CN
101360873 Feb 2009 CN
101476883 Jul 2009 CN
100557169 Nov 2009 CN
101694130 Apr 2010 CN
201972413 Sep 2011 CN
102359282 Feb 2012 CN
202248944 May 2012 CN
202292752 Jul 2012 CN
102995911 Mar 2013 CN
202925913 May 2013 CN
103363902 Oct 2013 CN
103698769 Apr 2014 CN
203701626 Jul 2014 CN
104141391 Nov 2014 CN
104153591 Nov 2014 CN
104493810 Apr 2015 CN
204295678 Apr 2015 CN
104612411 May 2015 CN
204311767 May 2015 CN
103774859 Nov 2015 CN
103753586 Dec 2015 CN
105113373 Dec 2015 CN
105178616 Dec 2015 CN
105257008 Jan 2016 CN
105544998 May 2016 CN
104806028 Nov 2016 CN
205668271 Nov 2016 CN
205840368 Dec 2016 CN
205990775 Mar 2017 CN
206185879 May 2017 CN
206189878 May 2017 CN
105089274 Jun 2017 CN
105064699 Jul 2017 CN
107217859 Sep 2017 CN
107237483 Oct 2017 CN
107357294 Nov 2017 CN
107605167 Jan 2018 CN
206844687 Jan 2018 CN
107654077 Feb 2018 CN
107675891 Feb 2018 CN
107740591 Feb 2018 CN
106088632 Mar 2018 CN
107762165 Mar 2018 CN
207063553 Mar 2018 CN
106088631 May 2018 CN
107975245 May 2018 CN
108061551 May 2018 CN
108222527 Jun 2018 CN
108301628 Jul 2018 CN
108331362 Jul 2018 CN
106150109 Aug 2018 CN
108457479 Aug 2018 CN
108708560 Oct 2018 CN
208023979 Oct 2018 CN
106881711 Apr 2019 CN
107083845 Jun 2019 CN
108016585 Jul 2019 CN
3430915 Mar 1986 DE
4038260 Jun 1991 DE
4207384 Sep 1993 DE
19509809 Oct 1995 DE
4417928 Nov 1995 DE
29601535 May 1997 DE
19600006 Jul 1997 DE
19603234 Sep 1997 DE
19743717 Apr 1999 DE
19849720 May 2000 DE
10230021 Jul 2003 DE
102006030130 Sep 2007 DE
102009018070 Oct 2010 DE
102009042014 Mar 2011 DE
202012100646 Jun 2013 DE
102013019869 May 2015 DE
190076 Aug 1986 EP
370682 May 1990 EP
456020 Jan 1995 EP
493020 Apr 1995 EP
495525 Apr 1995 EP
836664 Jan 1999 EP
674069 Dec 1999 EP
1375083 Jan 2004 EP
1918478 May 2008 EP
2112291 Oct 2009 EP
2219528 Aug 2010 EP
2249997 Nov 2010 EP
2353801 Aug 2011 EP
2631040 Aug 2013 EP
2199719 Oct 2014 EP
3084719 Oct 2016 EP
2296556 Apr 2008 ES
2230825 Dec 1974 FR
2524522 Oct 1983 FR
119331 Oct 1918 GB
2198105 May 1923 GB
673472 Jun 1952 GB
682010 Nov 1952 GB
839253 Jun 1960 GB
1067604 May 1967 GB
1465068 Feb 1977 GB
125079 D Dec 2001 GB
2422400 Jul 2006 GB
64006719 Jan 1989 JP
H07101509 Nov 1999 JP
2005283600 Oct 2005 JP
4294990 Apr 2009 JP
2009521630 Jun 2009 JP
5508895 Mar 2014 JP
87054 Jun 1989 LU
87381 Jun 1990 LU
88144 Apr 1994 LU
85392 Aug 2009 RU
9702397 Jan 1997 WO
2001076830 Oct 2001 WO
2004020760 Mar 2004 WO
2004083540 Feb 2005 WO
2005014240 Feb 2005 WO
2005017550 Feb 2005 WO
2005070657 Aug 2005 WO
2004011734 Nov 2005 WO
2006111827 Oct 2006 WO
2007076581 Jul 2007 WO
2008110559 Sep 2008 WO
2008124713 Oct 2008 WO
2009026641 Mar 2009 WO
2009026642 Mar 2009 WO
WO-2009026641 Mar 2009 WO
2010020457 Feb 2010 WO
2011077006 Jun 2011 WO
2013088154 Jun 2013 WO
2013134559 Sep 2013 WO
2018009978 Jan 2018 WO
2018009980 Jan 2018 WO
2018009981 Jan 2018 WO
2018009985 Jan 2018 WO
2018009986 Jan 2018 WO
2018052469 Apr 2018 WO
201899323 Jun 2018 WO
2018149502 Aug 2018 WO
2019006511 Jan 2019 WO
2019014701 Jan 2019 WO
2019014702 Jan 2019 WO
2019014705 Jan 2019 WO
2019014706 Jan 2019 WO
2019014707 Jan 2019 WO
2019033165 Feb 2019 WO
2019033166 Feb 2019 WO
2019033170 Feb 2019 WO
2019068128 Apr 2019 WO
2019071313 Apr 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (112)
Entry
Delgado, R. et al.: “Development and Control of an Omnidirectional Mobile Robot on an EtherCAT Network”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, vol. 11, No. 21, 2016, pp. 10586-10592, XP055574484 *.
Dorfler, K. et al.: “Mobile Robotic Brickwork ', Automation of a Discrete Robotic Fabrication Process Using an Autonomous Mobile Robot Robotic Fabrication in Architecture”, Art and Design 2016, Feb. 4, 2016 (Feb. 4, 2016), pp. 204-217, XP055567451 *.
Egerstedt, M. et al.: “Control of Mobile Platforms using a Virtual Vehicle Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 46, No. 11, Nov. 2001 (Nov. 1, 2001), XP055567515 *.
Fastbrick Robotics, Fastbrick Robotics: Hadrian 105 First Look Revealed, Nov. 16, 2015 (Nov. 16, 2015), XP054978174, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Zw7qHxMtrY> [retrieved on Nov. 16, 2015] *.
Fastbrick Robotics: Hadrian 105 Demonstrative Model Animation, Jun. 29, 2015 (Jun. 29, 2015), XP054979424, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rebqcsb61gY> [retrieved on Mar. 7, 2018] *.
Fastbrick Robotics: Hadrian 105 Time Lapse, Fastbrick Robotics Time Lapse, May 22, 2016 (May 22, 2016), XP054978173, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YcrO8ONcfY> [retrieved on May 22, 2016] *.
Feng, C. et al.: “Vision Guided Autonomous Robotic Assembly and as-built Scanning on Unstructured Construction Sites”, Automation in Construction, vol. 59, Nov. 2015 (Nov. 1, 2015), pp. 128-138, XP055567454 *.
Gao, X. et al.: “Complete Solution Classification for the Perspective-Three-Point Problem”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 2003 (Aug. 1, 2003), pp. 930-943, XP011099374 *.
Giftthaler, M. et al., “Efficient Kinematic Planning for Mobile Manipulators with Non-holonomic Constraints Using Optimal Control”, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Singapore, May 29-Jun. 3, 2017.
Heintze, H., “Design and Control of a Hydraulically Actuated Industrial Brick Laying Robot,” 264 pages.
Heintze, J. et al., “Controlled hydraulics for a direct drive brick laying robot,” Automation in Construction 5 (1996), pp. 23-29.
Helm, V. et al.: “Mobile Robotic Fabrication on Construction Sites: dimRob”, IEEE /RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 7, 2012 (Oct. 7, 2012), Vilamoura, Portugal, pp. 4335-4341, XP032287463 *.
http://www.new-technologies.org/ECT/Other/brickrob.htm. “Emerging Construction Technologies.” Dec. 1, 2006.
Huang, S. et al., “Applying High-Speed Vision Sensing to an Industrial Robot for High-Performance Position Regulation under Uncertainties,” Sensors, 2016, 16, 1195, 15 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050738; dated Jan. 15, 2019; 13 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050731; dated Jan. 15, 2019; 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050730; dated Aug. 23, 2017; 17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050731; dated Aug. 31, 2017; 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050738; dated Oct. 17, 2017; 19 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050739; dated Sep. 28, 2017; 9 pages.
Kazemi, M. et al.: “Path Planning for Image-based Control of Wheeled Mobile Manipulators”, 2012 IEEE /RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 7, 2012 (Oct. 7, 2012), Vilamoura, Portugal, XP055567470 *.
Kleinkes, M. et al.: “Laser Tracker and 6DoF measurement strategies in industrial robot applications”, CMSC 2011: Coordinate Metrology System Conference, Jul. 25, 2011 (Jul. 25, 2011), XP055456272 *.
Koren et al.: “End-effector guidance of robot arms”, Cirp Annals-Manufacturing Technology, vol. 36, No. 1, 1987, pp. 289-292, XP055456270 *.
Kwon, S. et al., “On the Coarse/Fine Dual-Stage Manipulators with Robust Perturbation Compensator,” IEEE, May 21-26, 2001, pp. 121-126.
Kyle in CMSC: Charlotte-Concord, Jul. 21-25, 2008.
Latteur, et al., “Drone-Based Additive Manufacturing of Architectural Structures,” IASS Symposium 2015, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Aug. 17-20, 2015; 12 pages.
Lippiello, V. et al.: “Position-Based Visual Servoing in Industrial Multirobot Cells Using a Hybrid Camera Configuration”, IEEE Transactions On Robotics, vol. 23, No. 1, Feb. 2007 (Feb. 1, 2007), XP011163518 *.
Liu, Z. et al.: “EtherCAT Based Robot Modular Joint Controller”, Proceeding of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, Aug. 2015 (Aug. 1, 2015), Lijiang, China, pp. 1708-1713, XP033222650 *.
Notice of Acceptance of Patent Application received for priority Australian Patent Application No. 2017294796, dated May 15, 2019 (158 pages).
Pless, R .: “Using Many Cameras as One”, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 18, 2003 (Jun. 18, 2003), Madison , WI, USA, pp. 1-7, XP055564465 *.
Posada et al.: “High accurate robotic drilling with external sensor and compliance model-based compensation”, Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016 IEEE International Conference, May 16, 2016 (May 16, 2016), pp. 3901-3907, XP032908649 *.
Pritschow, G. et al., “A Mobile Robot for On-Site Construction of Masonry,” Inst. of Control Tech. for Machine Tools and Manuf. Units, pp. 1701-1707.
Pritschow, G. et al., “Application Specific Realisation of a Mobile Robot for On-Site Construction of Masonry,” Automation and Robotics in Construction XI, 1994, pp. 95-102.
Pritschow, G. et al., “Configurable Control System of a Mobile Robot for ON-Site Construction of Masonry,” Inst. of Control Technology for Machine Tools and Manuf. Units, pp. 85-92.
Pritschow, G. et al., “Technological aspects in the development of a mobile bricklaying robot,” Automation in Construction 5 (1996), pp. 3-13.
Riegl Laser Measurement Systems. “Long Range & High Accuracy 3D Terrestrial Laser Scanner System—LMS-Z420i.” pp. 1-4.
Salcudean, S. et al., “On the Control of Redundant Coarse-Fine Manipulators,” IEEE, pp. 1834-1840.
Sandy, T. et al.: “Autonomous Repositioning and Localization of an In Situ Fabricator”, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 16, 2016 (May 16, 2016), pp. 2852-2858, XP055567467 *.
Skibniewski, M.J., “Current Status of Construction Automation and Robotics in the United States of America,” The 9th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Jun. 3-5, 1992, 8 pages.
Trimble ATS. “Advanced Tracking Sensor (ATS) with target recognition capability for stakeless machine control survey applications.” pp. 1-4.
Vincze, M. et al., “A Laser Tracking System to Measure Position and Orientation of Robot End Effectors Under Motion,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 13, No. 4, Aug. 1994, pp. 305-314.
Warszawski, A. et al., “Implementation of Robotics in Building: Current Status and Future Prospects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Jan./Feb. 1998, 124(1), pp. 31-41.
Willmann, J. et al.: “Robotic Timber Construction—Expanding Additive Fabrication to New Dimensions”, Automation in Construction, vol. 61, 2016, pp. 16-23, XP029310896 *.
Xu, H. et al.: “Uncalibrated Visual Servoing of Mobile Manipulators with an Eye-to-hand Camera”, Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Dec. 3, 2016 (Dec. 3, 2016), Qingdao, China, pp. 2145-2150, XP033071767 *.
Yu, S.N. et al., “Feasibility verification of brick-laying robot using manipulation trajectory and the laying pattern optimization,” Dept. of Mech. Eng., Automation in Construction (2009), pp. 644-655.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2018/050733; dated Jan. 21, 2020; 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2018/050734; dated Jan. 21, 2020; 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2018/050737; dated Jan. 21, 2020; 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2018/050739; dated Jan. 21, 2020; 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2018/050740; dated Jan. 21, 2020; 6 pages.
Partial Supplementary European Search Report dated Apr. 14, 2020 in European Patent Application No. 17826696.1, 10 pages.
Zaki, T., “Parametric modeling of Blackwall assemblies for automated generation of shop drawings and detailed estimates using BIM”, Master's Thesis, May 23, 2016, pp. 1-151.
Boston Dynamics: “Introducing Spot (previously SpotMini)”, Jun. 28, 2016, YouTube video, 1 page (screenshot of video); video retrieved at <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf7IEVTDjng>.
Examination Report dated Apr. 18, 2021 in GCC Patent Application No. 2018-35644, 5 pages.
Examination Report dated Apr. 30, 2021 in GCC Patent Application No. 2018-35643, 3 pages.
Examination Report dated Jun. 29, 2021 for India Patent Application No. 201927004006, 6 pages.
Examination Report dated Sep. 30, 2021 for Australian Patent Application No. 2017295316, 3 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 4, 2021 for European Patent Application No. 18865644.1, 7 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 16, 2021 for European Patent Application No. 18834565.6, 19 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 17, 2021 for European Patent Application No. 18835861.8, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 18, 2021 for European Patent Application No. 18834673.8, 14 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 18, 2021 for European Patent Application No. 18834893.2, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 18, 2021 for European Patent Application No. 18835737.0, 10 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 30, 2021 for European Patent Application No. 18845794.9, 13 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 5, 2021 for European Patent Application No. 18828425.1, 7 pages.
Fastbrick Robotics: Hadrian X Digital Construction System, published on Sep. 21, 2016 <URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bW1vuCgEaA >.
Gander H et al: “Application of a floating point digital signal processor to a dynamic robot measurement system”, Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 1994. IMTC/94. Conference Proceedings. 10th Anniversary. Advanced Technologies in I & M., 1994 IEEE Hamamatsu, Japan May 10-12, 1994, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, May 10, 1994 (May 10, 1994), pp. 372-375, XP010121924, DOI: 10.1109/IMTC.1994.352046, ISBN: 978-0-7803-1880-9, *whole document*.
Garrido, S. et al., “FM2: A real-time fast marching sensor based motion planner”, Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, 2007 IEEE/ASME International Conference on, IEEE, PI, Sep. 1, 2007 (Sep. 1, 2007), pp. 1-6.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/AU19/50742; dated Sep. 23, 2019; 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/AU19/50743; dated Oct. 1, 2019; 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/AU20/50367; dated Jun. 29, 2020; 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/AU20/50368; dated Jun. 25, 2020; 11 pages.
Kleinigger, M. et al: “Application of 6-DOF sensing for robotic disturbance compensation”, Automation Science and Engineering (Case), 2010 IEEE Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Aug. 21, 2010 (Aug. 21, 2010, pp. 344-349, XP031762876, ISBN: 978-1-4244-5477-1, *abstract*, *sections 1 to 3*.
Mercedes-Benz: “Mercedes-Benz “Chicken” Magic Body Control TV commercial”, YouTube, Sep. 23, 2013, 1 page. Retrieved from the internet: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v+nLwML2PagbY>.
Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2021 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-523148, 4 pages.
Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2021 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-523147, 3 pages.
Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2021 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-523145, 4 pages.
Office Action dated May 24, 2021 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880067520.0, 8 pages.
Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2021 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201780056460.8, 9 pages.
Siciliano, B. et al., “Robotics—chapters 2-4” Robotics, Dec. 31, 2009 (Dec. 31, 2009), Springer London, London, pp. 39-189.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/AU2017/050739; dated Jan. 15, 2019; 6 pages.
European search report dated Mar. 28, 2022 in European Patent Application No. 19837417.5, 10 pages.
European search report dated Mar. 7, 2022 in European Patent Application No. 198384307, 9 pages.
Examination report dated Feb. 24, 2022 in Australian Patent Application No. 2017295317, 3 pages.
Examination report dated Dec. 26, 2021 in Saudi Arabian Patent Application No. 519400899, 8 pages.
Examination report dated Feb. 9, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201880067520.0, with English translation, 14 pages.
“Critical Damping Ratio Explained.” EngineerExcel. 2022. 16 pages.
Fastbrick Robotics. “Fastbrick Robotics Building a revolution.” Jun. 2015. 14 pages.
HandWiki. Damping ratio. Cited by U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in Nov. 21, 2022 Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/631,404. 7 pages.
European search report dated Jul. 12, 2022 on European Patent Application No. 19885448.1.
Examination report dated Aug. 3, 2022 on European Patent Application No. 18835861.8.
Examination report dated Oct. 17, 2022 on European Patent Application No. 18834893.2.
Examination report dated Nov. 3, 2022 on European Patent Application No. 18835737.0.
Examination report dated Jan. 25, 2023 on European Patent Application No. 18834673.8.
Examination report dated Mar. 29, 2023 on European Patent Application No. 18834565.6.
Examination report dated May 2, 2022 on Australian Patent Application No. 2018295572.
Examination report dated Oct. 20, 2022 on Australian Patent Application No. 2018303330.
Examination report dated Nov. 14, 2022 on Australian Patent Application No. 2018317937.
Examination report dated Mar. 2, 2023 on Australian Patent Application No. 2018303330.
Examination report dated May 30, 2022 on Chinese Patent Application No. 201880067520.0.
Examination report dated Sep. 19, 2022 on Chinese Patent Application No. 201880057400.2.
Examination report dated Sep. 22, 2022 on Chinese Patent Application No. 2018800574110.
Examination report dated Sep. 29, 2022 on Chinese Patent Application No. 201880067283.8.
Examination report dated Oct. 21, 2022 on Chinese Patent Application No. 201880057441.1.
Examination report dated Oct. 24, 2022 on Chinese Patent Application No. 2018800573813.
Examination report dated Sep. 22, 2022 on Chinese Patent Application No. 201880057383.2.
Examination report dated Oct. 28, 2022 on Chinese Patent Application No. 201880067520.0.
Examination report dated Feb. 11, 2023 on Chinese Patent Application No. 2018800554140.
Examination report dated Jul. 13, 2022 on Chinese Patent Application No. 201780056460.8.
Examination report dated Feb. 2, 2023 on Chinese Patent Application No. 201780056460.8.
Examination report dated Sep. 27, 2022 on Saudi Arabian Patent Application No. 520411375.
Examination report dated Feb. 27, 2023 on Saudi Arabian Patent Application No. 520410931.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190224846 A1 Jul 2019 US