The present specification relates to fiber-coupled scintillation detectors and to methods of their manufacture, and to systems and methods of X-ray inspection employing fiber-coupled scintillation detectors for efficient detection of X-rays.
Fiber-coupled scintillation detectors of radiation and particles have been employed over the course of the past 30 years. In some cases, the scintillator is pixelated, consisting of discrete scintillator elements, and in other cases, other stratagems are employed (such as orthogonally crossed coupling fibers) in order to provide spatial resolution. Examples of fiber-coupled scintillation detectors are provided by U.S. Pat. No. 6,078,052 (to DiFilippo) and U.S. Pat. No. 7,326,9933 (to Katagiri et al.), both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Detectors described both by DiFilippo and Katagiri et al. employ wavelength-shifting fibers (WSF) such that light reemitted by the core material of the fiber may be conducted, with low attenuation, to photo-detectors disposed at a convenient location, often distant from the scintillator itself. Spatial resolution is of particular value in applications such as neutron imaging. Spatial resolution is also paramount in the Fermi Large Area Space Telescope (formerly, GLAST) where a high-efficiency segmented scintillation detector employs WSF readout for detection of high-energy cosmic rays, as described in Moiseev, et al., High efficiency plastic scintillator detector with wavelength-shifting fiber readout for the GLAST Large Area Telescope, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 583, pp. 372-81 (2007), which is incorporated herein by reference.
Because of the contexts in which fiber-coupled scintillator detectors have been employed to date, all known fiber-coupled scintillator detectors have counted pulses produced by individual interactions of particles (photons or massive particles) with the scintillator, thereby allowing the energy deposited by the incident particle to be ascertained based on the cumulative flux of light reemitted by the scintillator.
The detection requirements of X-ray backscatter inspection systems, however, are entirely different from the requirements addressed by existing fiber-coupled scintillation detectors. Backscatter X-ray inspection systems have been used for more than 25 years to detect organic materials concealed inside baggage, cargo containers, in vehicles, and on personnel. Because organic materials in bulk preferentially scatter X rays (by Compton scattering) rather than absorb them, these materials appear as brighter objects in backscatter images. Insofar as incident X-rays are scattered into all directions, sensitivity far overrides spatial resolution as a requirement, and in most scatter applications, detector spatial resolution is of no concern at all, since resolution is governed by the incident beam rather than by detection.
The specialized detection requirements of large area and high sensitivity posed by X-ray scatter systems are particularly vexing in the case of “conventional” scintillation detectors 100 of the type shown in a side cross-section in
For an imaging detector, the photon statistical noise is calculated in terms of the photons absorbed by the detector and used to generate the image. Any photons which pass through the detector without being absorbed, or even those that are absorbed without generating image information, are wasted and do not contribute to reducing noise in the image. Since photons cannot be subdivided, they represent the fundamental quantum level of a system. It is common practice to calculate the statistical noise in terms of the smallest number of quanta used to represent the image anywhere along the imaging chain. The point along the imaging chain where the fewest number of quanta are used to represent the image is called a “quantum sink”. The noise level at the quantum sink determines the noise limit of the imaging system. Without increasing the number of information carriers (i.e., quanta) at the quantum sink, the system noise limit cannot be improved. Poor light collection can possibly create a secondary quantum sink, which is to say that it will limit the fraction of incident X rays resulting in PMT current. Moreover, it will increase image noise. Light collection efficiency can be improved by increasing the sensitive area of the photo-detectors, however, that path to efficiency is costly.
The structure of a scintillating screen typically employed in prior art X-ray scintillation detectors is now described with reference to
Scintillator structures have been produced using many manufacturing technologies, including, for example, die-casting, injection molding (as described by Yoshimura et al., Plastic scintillator produced by the injection-molding technique, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 406, pp. 435-41 (1998), and extrusion, (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,067,079, to Bross, et al.), both of which references are incorporated herein by reference.
As briefly discussed above, wavelength-shifting fibers (WSF) have long been employed for scintillation detection. Wavelength shifting fibers consist of a core with relatively high refractive index, surrounded by one or more cladding layers of lower refractive index. The core contains wavelength-shifting material, also referred to as dye. Scintillation light which enters the fiber is absorbed by the dye which, in turn, emits light with a longer wavelength. The longer wavelength light is emitted isotropically in the fiber material. Total internal reflection traps a fraction of that light and conducts it over long distances with relatively low loss. This is possible, as described with reference to
The use of WSF detectors in a flying spot X ray imaging system is known. A flying-spot scanner (FSS) uses a scanning source that is a spot of light, such as but not limited to, a high-resolution, high-light-output, low-persistence cathode ray tube (CRT), to scan an image. In contrast with film or digital X-ray detectors which have spatially sensitive detectors that establish the system resolution, flying spot X-ray systems are limited by the illumination beam spot size. The illumination beam spot size is determined by a number of factors including the X-ray focal spot size, the collimation length, the aperture size and the distance to the target.
The beam spot is the pinhole image of the focal spot, geometrically blurred by the relatively large size of the pinhole or aperture. In general, the shape of the aperture is substantially similar to the shape of the focal spot but typically larger. Accordingly, any internal structure is blurred out and only the overall dimension of the focal spot is relevant. The ideal beam spot is a sharp disk or rectangle. In reality, however, the edges are blurred. The umbra region is obtained by the projection of the aperture from the equivalent/virtual point source, which is, however, only well-defined for the case of round disk-shaped focal spot. The umbra region is defined as the region in which the entirety of the light source is obscured by the occluding body being imaged; while the penumbra is the image region where in which only a portion of the light source is obscured by the occluding body.
The actual two-dimensional intensity distribution describing the beam spot is controlled by the combination of both the focal spot and the collimator. Known collimation designs strive to minimize the size of the penumbra, as shown in
Mathematically, an umbra diameter (UD) 320 and a penumbra width (PW) 310 are related to the diameter of focal spot 312 (FS), the diameter of the aperture (AD) 322, collimation length (CL) 314, and target distance (TD) 324 through the following equations:
The resolution of currently available flying spot X-ray imaging systems is limited by the size of the flying spot. The detection system has little to no spatial sensitivity, and as a result, the spatial information is created by moving the spot across the detector with synchronization to the detector readout over time. The minimum spot size is limited by the X-ray source spot size and the collimation system used to generate the spot. Typically, in cargo imaging systems, the spot is 7-10 mm in size at the detector. As shown by the equations (1) and (2) above, reducing the size of the focal spot enables designing short length collimators for flying spot X-ray imaging systems and obtaining sharper images.
In light of the above, there is clearly a need for increased spatial sensitivity for X-ray detectors in a flying spot imaging system. There is also a need to develop a WSF system that is capable of determining both the high resolution content of an image as well as the low resolution mapping of the coarse location of the spot. Furthermore, there is a need to be able to generate a high resolution image with a minimum of individual channels, thus saving cost and complexity of the system. Finally, there is a need for an improved detection system that could be effectively used in any flying spot x-ray system and configured to generate improved resolution in one or two dimensions.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods, which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, and not limiting in scope. The present application discloses numerous embodiments.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present specification, systems and methods are provided that apply fiber-coupled scintillation detectors to problems in backscatter and transmission X-ray inspection.
For convenience of notation, a wavelength-shifted fiber-coupled scintillation detector may be referred to herein as an “Sc-WSF” detector.
The present specification discloses a handheld backscatter imaging system having a first detector configuration and a second detector configuration, comprising: a housing having a body and a handle attached to the body; a first backscatter detector positioned within a first plane of the housing; and a second plurality of backscatter detectors configured to attach to one or more edges positioned around the first backscatter detector, wherein, in the first detector configuration, the second plurality of backscatter detectors are not positioned within the first plane and wherein, in the second detector configuration, the second plurality of backscatter detectors are positioned within the first plane.
Optionally, the second plurality of detectors are configured to be moved to the first plane to detect threat materials.
Optionally, each of the second plurality of backscatter detectors is comprised of individual detectors having a length dimension of approximately 10 cm, a width dimension of approximately 10 cm, and a thickness of approximately 5 mm.
Optionally, a ratio of a) a square of a thickness of each of the second plurality of backscatter detectors to b) an active detector area of each of the second plurality of backscatter detectors is less than 0.001.
Optionally, at least one of the first backscatter detector or the second plurality of detectors has a total weight ranging from 0.5 Kg to 1 Kg.
Optionally, the handheld backscatter imaging system has a backscatter detection area of at least 2,000 cm2.
Optionally, the housing further comprises a radiation source adapted to emit at least one of a fan beam or a pencil beam. Optionally, the radiation source comprises an opening adapted to permit radiation to be emitted from the handheld backscatter imaging system and wherein the first backscatter detector is positioned to straddle the opening.
Optionally, each of the second plurality of detectors is foldably attached to the one or more edges positioned around the first backscatter detector wherein, when not positioned within the first plane, the second plurality of detectors are in a folded configuration.
Optionally, each of the second plurality of detectors is slidably attached to the one or more edges positioned around the first backscatter detector.
The present specification also discloses a handheld backscatter imaging system, comprising: a housing having a body; a first backscatter detector positioned within the housing and defining a first plane; and at least one second backscatter detector having a first configuration and a second configuration, wherein, in a first configuration, the at least one second backscatter detector is not positioned within the first plane, wherein, in a second detector configuration, the at least one second backscatter detector is positioned within the first plane, and wherein the at least one second backscatter detector is configured to attach to one or more edges of the housing positioned around the first backscatter detector and configured to be moved relative to the first backscatter detector.
Optionally, the housing further comprises a handle.
Optionally, each of the second plurality of backscatter detectors is comprised of individual detectors having a length dimension of approximately 10 cm, a width dimension of approximately 10 cm, and a thickness of approximately 5 mm. Optionally, a ratio of a) a square of a thickness of each of the second plurality of backscatter detectors to b) an active detector area of each of the second plurality of backscatter detectors is less than 0.001.
Optionally, at least one of the first backscatter detector or the at least one second backscatter detector has a total weight ranging from 0.5 Kg to 1 Kg.
Optionally, the handheld backscatter imaging system has a backscatter detection area of at least 2,000 cm2.
Optionally, the housing further comprises a radiation source adapted to emit at least one of a fan beam or a pencil beam. Optionally, the radiation source comprises an opening adapted to permit radiation to be emitted from the handheld backscatter imaging system and wherein the first backscatter detector is positioned to straddle the opening.
Optionally, the at least one second backscatter detector is foldably attached to the one or more edges of the housing positioned around the first backscatter detector wherein, when not positioned within the first plane, the at least one second backscatter detector is in a folded configuration.
Optionally, the at least one second backscatter detector is slidably attached to the one or more edges of the housing positioned around the first backscatter detector.
The present specification also discloses a handheld backscatter imaging system, comprising: a housing having a body; a first backscatter detector positioned within the housing and defining a first plane; and more than one second backscatter detectors having a first configuration and a second configuration, wherein, in a first configuration, the more than one second backscatter detectors are not positioned within the first plane, wherein, in a second detector configuration, the more than one second backscatter detectors are positioned within the first plane, and wherein the more than one second backscatter detectors are configured to attach to one or more edges positioned around the first backscatter detector and configured to be moved relative to the first backscatter detector.
Optionally, the housing further comprises a handle.
Optionally, each of the second plurality of backscatter detectors is comprised of individual detectors having a length dimension of approximately 10 cm, a width dimension of approximately 10 cm, and a thickness of approximately 5 mm. Optionally, a ratio of a) a square of a thickness of each of the second plurality of backscatter detectors to b) an active detector area of each of the second plurality of backscatter detectors is less than 0.001.
Optionally, at least one of the first backscatter detector or the more than one second backscatter detectors has a total weight ranging from 0.5 Kg to 1 Kg.
Optionally, the handheld backscatter imaging system has a backscatter detection area of at least 2,000 cm2.
Optionally, the housing further comprises a radiation source adapted to emit at least one of a fan beam or a pencil beam. Optionally, the radiation source comprises an opening adapted to permit radiation to be emitted from the handheld backscatter imaging system and wherein the first backscatter detector is positioned to straddle the opening.
Optionally, the more than one second backscatter detectors are foldably attached to the one or more edges positioned around the first backscatter detector and wherein, when not positioned within the first plane, the more than one second backscatter detectors are in a folded configuration.
Optionally, the more than one second backscatter detectors are slidably attached to the one or more edges positioned around the first backscatter detector.
The present specification also discloses a detector for an X-ray imaging system, the detector comprising: at least one high resolution layer comprising a plurality of high resolution wavelength-shifting optical fibers placed parallel to each other, wherein each of the fibers extends through and out of a detection region and loops back into the detection region under a scintillation screen covering the high resolution wavelength-shifting optical fibers, wherein each of the plurality of high resolution wavelength-shifting optical fibers occupies a distinct region of the detector; at least one low resolution layer comprising a plurality of low resolution regions having a plurality of low resolution optical fibers laid out in a parallel configuration, wherein each of the plurality of low resolution optical fibers is configured to shift received wavelengths; and a segmented multi-channel photomultiplier tube (PMT) for coupling signals obtained from the high resolution fibers and the low resolution regions.
Optionally, the plurality of high resolution fibers comprises a range of 0.2 mm to 2 mm high resolution fibers.
Optionally, the plurality of low resolution regions comprises a range of 1 mm to 3 mm low resolution fibers.
Optionally, the PMT comprises 8 to 16 channels.
Optionally, the detector comprises at least one scintillator layer optically coupled to the at least one high resolution layer.
Optionally, each of the plurality of high resolution fibers and each of the plurality of low resolution fibers are made of plastic.
Optionally, a diameter of each of the plurality of high resolution fibers and each of the plurality of low resolution fibers is less than 200 micro meters.
Optionally, each of the plurality of high resolution fibers and each of the plurality of low resolution fibers are coated with a scintillating material.
Optionally, the detector further comprises a scintillator layer positioned between the at least one high resolution layer and the at least one low resolution layer.
Optionally, the detector further comprises one or more scintillator filters embedded in at least one of the at least one high resolution layer or the at least one low resolution layer.
The present specification also discloses a detector for an X-ray imaging system, the detector comprising: a plurality of wavelength shifting fibers, wherein each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers has a first edge and a second edge; a first rigid strip connected to the first edges of each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers and configured to provide mechanical support to each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers; and a second rigid strip connected to the second edges of each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers and configured to provide mechanical support to each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers, wherein the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers are physically bound together by the first and second rigid strips to form a sheet and wherein the second edges of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers are optically coupled with a photomultiplier tube.
Optionally, each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers are positioned adjacent each other without a space in between each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers.
Optionally, each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers are covered with a scintillating material to form a scintillation screen for incident detecting X rays.
Optionally, a diameter of each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers is less than 200 micro meters.
The present specification also discloses a detector comprising a plurality of wavelength shifting fibers physically bound together by molded sheets and scintillator powder embedded between each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers to thereby form a detector sheet.
Optionally, a distance between each of the plurality of wavelength shifting (WSF) fibers is approximately 3 mm.
Optionally, each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers comprises a first end and a second end wherein at least one of the first end or the second end are in optical communication with a photomultiplier tube.
Optionally, the distance is a function of a concentration of the scintillator powder.
The present specification also discloses a method of forming a detector having a predefined signal response, comprising positioning a plurality of wavelength shifting fibers to define a detector sheet; establishing a variability of the predefined signal response by changing a space between each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers in the detector sheet; binding together the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers using molded sheets of a transparent, flexible plastic binder; and embedding scintillator powder between each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers to thereby form the detector sheet.
Optionally, the method of claim 19 further comprises decreasing the variability of the signal response by decreasing the space between each of the plurality of wavelength shifting fibers.
The present specification also discloses a detector for an X-ray imaging system, the detector comprising: a scintillation screen defining a detection region; at least one high resolution layer, optically coupled to the scintillation screen, comprising a first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a first fiber radius and a first spacing between adjacent ones of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers extends through the detection region and under the scintillation screen, and wherein the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is configured to receive radiation and generate signals; at least one low resolution layer comprising a second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers wherein each of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a second fiber radius and a second spacing between adjacent ones of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, and wherein at least one of the second fiber radius is larger than the first fiber radius or the second spacing is greater than the first spacing, and wherein the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is configured to receive the radiation that passes through the at least one high resolution layer and generate signals; and a segmented multi-channel photomultiplier tube configured to receive signals obtained from the at least one low resolution layer and to receive signals obtained from the at least one high resolution layer.
Optionally, each of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers in the detection region is placed parallel to each other.
Optionally, each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers in the detection region is placed parallel to each other.
Optionally, each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers extends through and out of a detection region and loops back into the detection region under the scintillation screen.
Optionally, each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers occupies a distinct region of the detector.
Optionally, each of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is configured to shift wavelengths of received radiation.
Optionally, the first radius is in a range of 0.2 mm to 2 mm high resolution fibers.
Optionally, the second radius is in a range of 1 mm to 3 mm.
Optionally, the segmented multi-channel photomultiplier tube comprises 8 to 16 channels.
Optionally, the detector comprises at least one scintillator layer optically coupled to the at least one high resolution layer.
Optionally, each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers and each of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers comprise plastic.
Optionally, the first radius and the second radius are each less than 200 micrometers.
Optionally, the detector further comprises a scintillator layer between the at least one high resolution layer and the at least one low resolution layer.
Optionally, the detector further comprises one or more scintillator filters embedded in at least one of the at least one high resolution layer or the at least one low resolution layer.
The present specification also discloses a method of forming a detector with at least one high resolution layer and at least one low resolution layer, wherein the at least one high resolution layer has a first predefined signal response and wherein the at least one low resolution layer has a second predefined signal response, the method comprising: positioning a first plurality of wavelength shifting fibers to define the at least one high resolution layer; establishing a variability of the first predefined signal response by changing a first space between each of the first plurality of wavelength shifting fibers; binding together the first plurality of wavelength shifting fibers using molded sheets of a transparent, flexible plastic binder; embedding scintillator powder between each of the first plurality of wavelength shifting fibers to form the at least one high resolution layer; positioning a second plurality of wavelength shifting fibers to define the at least one low resolution layer; establishing a variability of the second predefined signal response by changing a second space between each of the second plurality of wavelength shifting fibers; binding together the second plurality of wavelength shifting fibers using molded sheets of a transparent, flexible plastic binder; and embedding scintillator powder between each of the second plurality of wavelength shifting fibers to form the at least one low resolution layer, wherein the first space is less than the second space.
Optionally, the method further comprises decreasing the variability of the first signal response by decreasing the first space between each of the first plurality of wavelength shifting fibers.
Optionally, the method further comprises decreasing the variability of the second signal response by decreasing the second space between each of the second plurality of wavelength shifting fibers.
The present specification also discloses a detector for an X-ray imaging system, the detector comprising: at least one high resolution layer comprising a first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a first fiber radius and a first spacing between adjacent ones of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers extends through the detection region and under the scintillation screen, and wherein the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is coated with scintillation material and is configured to receive radiation and generate signals; at least one low resolution layer comprising a second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers wherein each of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a second fiber radius and a second spacing between adjacent ones of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, and wherein at least one of the second fiber radius is larger than the first fiber radius or the second spacing is greater than the first spacing, and wherein the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is coated with scintillation material and is configured to receive the radiation that passes through the at least one high resolution layer and generate signals; and a segmented multi-channel photomultiplier tube configured to receive signals obtained from the at least one low resolution layer and to receive signals obtained from the at least one high resolution layer.
Optionally, the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is coated with scintillation material.
In a first embodiment of the present specification, a detector of penetrating radiation is provided that has an unpixelated volume of scintillation medium for converting energy of incident penetrating radiation into scintillation light. The detector has multiple optical waveguides, aligned substantially parallel to each other over a scintillation light extraction region that is contiguous with the unpixelated volume of the scintillation medium. The optical waveguides guide light derived from the scintillation light to a photo-detector for detecting photons guided by the waveguides and for generating a detector signal.
In other embodiments of the present specification, the detector may also have an integrating circuit for integrating the detector signal over a specified duration of time.
In an alternate embodiment of the specification, a detector of penetrating radiation is provided that has a volume of scintillation medium for converting energy of incident penetrating radiation into scintillation light and a plurality of optical waveguides, aligned substantially parallel to each other over a scintillation light extraction region contiguous with the volume of the scintillation medium. The optical waveguides guide light derived from the scintillation light to a photo-detector that generates a detector signal. Finally, an integrating circuit for integrating the detector signal over a specified duration of time.
In further embodiments of the specification, the optical waveguides in the foregoing detectors may be adapted for wavelength shifting of the scintillation light and, more particularly, may be wavelength-shifting optical fibers. The scintillation medium may include a lanthanide-doped barium mixed halide such as barium fluorochloride. The photo-detector may include a photomultiplier.
In yet further embodiments of the specification, the square of the thickness of any of the foregoing detectors, divided by the area of the detector, may be less than 0.001. At least one of the plurality of waveguides may lack cladding and the scintillation medium may be characterized by an index of refraction of lower value than an index of refraction characterizing the waveguide. The optical waveguides may be disposed in multiple parallel planes, each of the parallel planes containing a subset of the plurality of optical waveguides.
In other embodiments of the specification, the detector may have a plurality of layers of scintillator medium successively encountered by an incident beam, and the layers may be characterized by distinct spectral sensitivities to the incident beam. Alternating layers of scintillator may include Li6F:ZnS(Ag) alternating with at least one of fiber-coupled BaFCl(Eu) and fiber-coupled BaFI(Eu). A first of the plurality of layers of scintillator medium may be a wavelength-shifting fiber-coupled detector preferentially sensitive to lower-energy X rays, and a last of the plurality of layers of scintillator medium may be a plastic scintillator.
Segments of scintillator medium may be disposed in a plane transverse to a propagation direction of an incident beam and may be distinctly coupled to photo-detectors via optical fibers.
In accordance with another aspect of the present specification, a method for manufacturing a scintillation detector, the method comprising extruding a shell of scintillating material around an optical waveguide, and, in a particular embodiment, the optical waveguide is a wavelength-shifting optical fiber.
In an alternate embodiment, a method for detecting scattered X-ray radiation has steps of: providing a detector characterized by a plurality of individually read-out segments; and summing a signal from a subset of the individually read-out segments, wherein the subset is selected on a basis of relative signal-to-noise.
In another aspect of the specification, a method is provided for detecting scattered X-ray radiation. The method has steps of: providing a detector characterized by a plurality of individually read-out segments; and summing a signal from a subset of the individually read-out segments, wherein the subset is selected on a basis of a known position of a primary illuminating beam.
A mobile X-ray inspection system is provided in accordance with another embodiment. The inspection system has a source of X-ray radiation disposed upon a conveyance having a platform and ground-contacting members, and a fiber-coupled scintillation detector deployed outside the conveyance during inspection operation for detecting X rays that have interacted with the inspected object.
The mobile X-ray inspection system may also have a fiber-coupled scintillation awning detector deployed above the inspected object during a course of inspection, and the awning detector may slide out from a roof of the conveyance prior to inspection operation. There may also be a skirt detector deployed beneath the platform of the conveyance, and a roof detector for detection of spaces higher than the conveyance, as well as substantially horizontal and substantially upright fiber-coupled scintillator detector segments. The substantially horizontal and substantially upright fiber-coupled scintillator detector segments may be formed into an integral structure.
In accordance with another aspect of the present specification, an apparatus is provided for detecting radiation incident upon the apparatus, the apparatus comprising: a plurality of substantially parallel active collimation vanes comprising wavelength-shifted fiber-coupled scintillation detectors sensitive to the radiation for generating at least a first detection signal; a rear broad area detector for detecting radiation that passes between substantially parallel active collimation vanes of the plurality of active collimator vanes and generating a second detection signal; and a processor for receiving and processing the first and second detection signals.
In accordance with an alternate embodiment of the specification, a top-down imaging inspection system is provided for inspecting an object disposed on an underlying surface. The top-down imaging inspection system has a source of substantially downward pointing X rays and a linear detector array disposed within a protrusion above the underlying surface. The linear detector array may include wavelength-shifted fiber-coupled scintillation detectors.
In accordance with another aspect of the specification, an X-ray inspection system is provided for inspecting an underside of a vehicle. The X-ray inspection system has a source of substantially upward pointing X-rays coupled to a chassis and a wavelength-shifting fiber-coupled scintillator detector disposed on the chassis for detecting X-rays scattered by the vehicle and by objects concealed under or within the vehicle. The chassis may be adapted to be maneuvered under the vehicle by at least one of motor and manual control.
The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present specification shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.
These and other features and advantages of the present specification will be further appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:
In accordance with embodiments of the present specification, the optical coupling of scintillator material to optical waveguides, and, more particularly, to wavelength-shifting fibers, advantageously enables objectives including those peculiar to the demands of X-ray scatter detection.
The term “image” shall refer to any unidimensional or multidimensional representation, whether in tangible or otherwise perceptible form, or otherwise, whereby a value of some characteristic (such as fractional transmitted intensity through a column of an inspected object traversed by an incident beam, in the case of X-ray transmission imaging) is associated with each of a plurality of locations (or, vectors in a Euclidean space, typically R2) corresponding to dimensional coordinates of an object in physical space, though not necessarily mapped one-to-one there onto. An image may comprise an array of numbers in a computer memory or holographic medium. Similarly, “imaging” refers to the rendering of a stated physical characteristic in terms of one or more images.
For purposes of the present description, in some embodiments, a ‘high resolution layer’ is defined as a layer of a detector comprising a first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a first fiber radius and a first spacing between adjacent ones of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers extends through a detection region and under a scintillation screen of the detector, and wherein the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is configured to receive radiation and generate signals.
For purposes of the present description, in some embodiments, a ‘low resolution layer’ is defined as a layer of a detector comprising a second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers wherein each of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a second fiber radius and a second spacing between adjacent ones of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, and wherein at least one of the second fiber radius is larger than the first fiber radius of the ‘high resolution layer’ or the second spacing is greater than the first spacing of the ‘high resolution layer’, and wherein the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is configured to receive the radiation that passes through the ‘high resolution layer’ and generate signals.
For purposes of the present description, and in any appended claims, the term “thickness,” as applied to a scintillation detector, shall represent the mean extent of the detector in a dimension along, or parallel to, a centroid of the field of view of the detector. The term area, as applied to a detector, or, equivalently, the term “active area” shall refer to the size of the detector measured in a plane transverse to centroid of all propagation vectors of radiation within the field of view of the detector.
Terms of spatial relation, such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” and the like, may be used herein for ease of description to describe the relationship of one element to another as shown in the figures. It will be understood that such terms of spatial relation are intended to encompass different orientations of the apparatus in use or operation in addition to the orientation described and/or depicted in the figures.
As used herein, and in any appended claims, the term “large-area detector” shall refer to any single detector, or to any detector module, subtending an opening angle of at least 30° in each of two orthogonal transverse directions as viewed from a point on an object undergoing inspection, equivalently, characterized by a spatial angle of at least π steradians.
A “conveyance” shall be any device characterized by a platform borne on ground-contacting members such as wheels, tracks, treads, skids, etc., used for transporting equipment from one location to another.
Where an element is described as being “on,” “connected to,” or “coupled to” another element, it may be directly on, connected or coupled to the other element, or, alternatively, one or more intervening elements may be present, unless otherwise specified.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments and is not intended to be limiting. The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the,” are intended to include the plural forms as well.
In the description and claims of the application, each of the words “comprise” “include” and “have”, and forms thereof, are not necessarily limited to members in a list with which the words may be associated. It should be noted herein that any feature or component described in association with a specific embodiment may be used and implemented with any other embodiment unless clearly indicated otherwise.
The present specification is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the specification. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the specification. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present specification is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the specification have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present specification.
It should be noted herein that any feature or component described in association with a specific embodiment may be used and implemented with any other embodiment unless clearly indicated otherwise.
WSF Detectors
Referring, first, to
One advantage to using composite scintillation screen in the present application is that it allows for fabrication by extrusion of a fiber-coupled scintillation detector.
Composite scintillator 403 is structurally supported by exterior layers 404 of plastic, or other material, providing mechanical support. Optical contact between the fiber cladding 401 and the composite scintillator 403 is established by filling the voids with index-matching material 405 of suitable refractive index which is transparent to the scintillation light. The refractive index of the filling material is chosen to optimize the collection of primary light photons into the WSF and the capture of wavelength-shifted photons in the fiber. Filling material 405 may be optical grease or optical epoxy, for example, though any material is within the scope of the present specification.
Upon incidence of X-ray photons, scintillation light emitted by scintillator 403 is coupled via cladding 401 into core 407 of the respective fibers, down-shifted in frequency (i.e., red-shifted) and propagated to one or more photo-detectors 805 (shown in
Referring now to
In yet another embodiment of the specification, described now with reference to
A wavelength-shifting polymer optical fiber may be manufactured, in accordance with an embodiment of the specification now described with reference to the system schematic depicted in
For all embodiments of a scintillation detector in accordance with the present specification, it is advantageous that the thickness of the scintillator material be optimized for the energy of the radiation to be detected. The design should ensure sufficient light collection to avoid a secondary quantum sink. In particular, embodiments of the specification described herein provide for detectors of extraordinary thinness relative to their area.
Embodiments of the present specification, even those with as many as 8 WSF layers, have ratios of the square of detector thickness to the active detector areas that are less than 0.001. For example, an 8-layer detector with an area of 48″×12″ has a thickness no greater than 0.5″, such that the ratio of the square of the thickness to the detector area is 0.0005. This thickness-squared-to-area ratio is typically an order of magnitude, or more, smaller than the comparable ratio for backscatter detectors where scintillator light is directly detected by a photo-detector.
In accordance with a further embodiment of the specification depicted in
An embodiment of a wavelength-shifted scintillator detector in accordance with the present specification is shown in
Advantages of the detector, the specification of which is described herein, include the efficiency of detection, and the low geometrical profile of implementation. This allows greater freedom in designing a detection system and it makes entirely new, space constrained applications possible. The mechanical flexibility of the detector structure allows shaping the detector surface to conform to the application, such as an implementation in which an imaged object is surrounded by detector volume. The low profile also makes it relatively easy to orient and shield the detector area in ways to minimize the detection of unwanted scatter radiation (crosstalk) from a nearby X-ray imaging system.
The extraction of scintillation light over a large region of scintillator enables detectors of large width-to-depth aspect ratio. In particular, detectors subtending spatial angles of 0.1 sr, or more, are facilitated by embodiments of the present specification.
In a typical backscatter X-ray imaging system, an X-ray pencil beam scans an imaged target in a linear motion, while elongated radiation detectors are arranged on both sides of an exit aperture of an X-ray source. As the pencil beam moves, the detector area closest to the beam will typically receive the strongest signal and detector area further from the beam less. If the detector area is segmented into individually readable sections the signal to noise ratio of the detection system can be improved by only reading the segments with a good signal to noise ratio and neglecting the segments which would contribute predominantly noise to the summed signal. The selection of contributing detector segments can be made based on the actually detected signal or based on the known position of the pencil beam.
The extrusion, or “automated coating” process, described above with reference to
Deployable Detectors to Increase the Geometric Efficiency of Scattered X Rays:
Some mobile X-ray systems, such as those described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,764,683, to Swift, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 7,099,434, to Chalmers et al., both of which are incorporated herein by reference, use the method of backscattered X rays (BX) to inspect cars and trucks from one side. The former uses detectors deployed outside a conveyance during operation, whereas the latter uses a detector area entirely contained within an enclosure, namely the skin of a conveyance. Both use large-area detectors to maximize the efficiency of detecting the scattered X rays. The areal backscatter detector coverage in the case of a product in accordance with the teachings of the Chalmers '434 Patent covers on the order of 20 square feet of the interior surface of an enclosure that faces the target. This covert detector area has relatively poor geometrical efficiency for collecting the scattered radiation from high or low targets. The intrinsically deep geometrical profile of such detectors, necessary for direct capture of the scintillation light by photomultipliers, is inimical to deployment outside the van.
An Sc-WSF detector, in accordance with embodiments of the present specification, makes practical the unobtrusive storage of large-area detectors that can be quickly deployed outside the van in positions that substantially enhance detection efficiency.
Referring, now, to
Scanning pencil beams of X rays not only reveal interior objects by analyzing the backscattered radiation but, in some applications, can obtain additional information by the simultaneous analysis of transmission (TX) and forward scattered (FX) radiation. The TX and FX detectors need not be segmented since the cross-sectional area of the pencil beam, together with the integration time of the signal, defines the pixel size. Moreover, the TX and FX detectors only need to be total energy detectors since, in most applications, the flux of the TX or FX X rays is too high for pulse counting. Scintillation screens are the traditional detectors for such scanning beam applications. Sc-WSF detectors substantially extend the range of applications of present TX and FX scintillation detectors, as the following examples make clear.
TX for X-Ray Beams Up to at Least 250 keV:
The absorption efficiency of traditional scintillation screens, made, for example, of BaFCl(Eu) or Gadox, drops below 50% for X-ray energies above ˜80 keV. The 50% point for two layers is about 100 keV. By way of distinction, Sc-WSF detector can be made with more than two layers of scintillators without substantially increasing the profile of the detector. A cost-effective Sc-WSF detector, with 4 layers, can be used for TX with scanning X-ray beams generated by a standard 140 keV X-ray tube. A multi-layer detector such as the 9-layer detector, as shown in
Transportable TX Detector for a Top-Down Imager in Three-Sided Portal Inspection:
The thin profile of the multi-layer transmission (TX) detector makes practical a top-of-the-road transmission (TX) detector.
Segmented TX Detector for Determining the Scan Beam Intensity Profile:
Referring now to
The relative position of the detector plane and the plane of scanning X rays can be controlled automatically. The detector for this concept is shown schematically in
With a single data channel for a transmission signal, the spatial resolution along the traffic direction (transverse to a fan-shaped illuminating X-ray beam) is determined by the smaller of the following two dimensions: the width of the sensitive detector area or the beam size across the TX detector. (For heuristic purposes, the case of undersampling is not considered in this description.) Spatial resolution may be improved, however, by narrowing the sensitive detector area, as now described with reference to
Another configuration within the scope of the present specification include a combination of the vertical detector 1141 shown in
In yet another embodiment of the specification, a transmission detector array 1450 (regardless of geometrical orientation, whether vertical, horizontal, L-shaped, etc.) is segmented into a plurality of units; such as B, C and A of
Dual-Energy and Multi-Energy TX Detectors for Material Identification:
Separating the signals from front and back layers of scintillators allows the front layer to give a measure of the low-energy component of each pixel while the back layer gives a measure of the high-energy components. Putting a layer of absorbing material between the front and back scintillators is a standard way to enhance the difference between low and high energy components, and that is easily done with a Sc-WSF detector.
The Sc-WSF detector makes practical a dual-energy detector consisting of a layer of Sc-WSF, such as BaFCl-WSF, on top of a plastic scintillator detector; the BaFCl is sensitive to the low-energy X rays and not the high-energy X rays, while the plastic detector is sensitive to the high-energy X rays and very insensitive to low energy X rays.
An alternative and potentially more effective material discriminator can be made by using more than two independent layers of Sc-WSF, with separate readouts for each layer. A passive absorber, such as an appropriate thickness of copper, can be inserted after the top Sc-WSF to enhance dual energy application, as is practiced with segmented detectors. Alternatively, the middle scintillator can be used as an active absorbing layer. The measurement of three independent parameters allows one to get a measure of both the average atomic number of the traversed materials and the extent of beam hardening as well. The Sc-WSF can be further extended to obtain more than three energy values for each pixel, the limit being the statistical uncertainties, which increase with the number of components. Detector 1400 shown in
An important application of Dual-Energy TX is for X-ray personnel scanners at airport terminals. Providing TX images simultaneously with BX has proved useful for inspection. Adding dual-energy to the TX images has hitherto been impractical primarily because of size constraints imposed by conventional detectors. Sc-WSF eliminates those constraints and promises to significantly improve performance, since multiple detectors, with distinct energy sensitivities, may be stacked, as shown in
Compact Radiation Detector for Gamma and Neutron Radiation:
The Sc-WSF method makes practical a small, lightweight, inexpensive, monitor of neutrons and gamma rays 1601. BaFCl(Eu)-WSF is quite sensitive to gamma radiation while being insensitive to neutrons, while Li6F:ZnS(Ag)-WSF is insensitive to gamma rays and quite sensitive to detecting thermal neutrons.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/163,854 (to Rothschild), entitled “Detector with Active Collimators,” and incorporated herein by reference, describes a backscatter detector module 30 that increases the depth of inspection by distinguishing scatter from the near and far field of inspected objects, as depicted in
A useful addition to a standard backscatter unit would be a “venetian blind” collimator made of scintillator. The slats intercept radiation that does not enter directly through the gaps between the slats so that the box detectors preferentially detect deeper interior objects. The active collimators record the rejected radiation. The light from the active collimators is detected by PMTs, whose collection efficiency decreases rapidly as the gap between collimators decrease. Replacing the PMTs and scintillator vanes with vanes consisting of Sc-WSF detectors solves major shortcomings and makes venetian-blind collimators practical. First, light collection is independent of the gap width between vanes. Second, the active area of the PMTs or silicon photomultipliers used to collect the light from the active collimators is generally much smaller than the active area of needed PMTs, so that the cost of the photo-detectors is less. Third, the placement of the photo-detector at the end of the WSF bundles is not critical to the efficiency of the light collection. Fourth, the signals from the WSFs from each slat can be processed independently, giving considerable scope for maximizing the information about the interior of the inspected object. Fifth, the light from the thin scintillator screens on the front and back of each vane can be collected by independent WSFs, which can significantly improve the depth discrimination.
Detectors for Mini-Backscatter Inspection Systems:
The thinness of Sc-WSF detectors provides a unique potential for applications in which low weight and power are drivers. Referring to
The thin profile of Sc-WSF detectors described herein provide for fitting contoured detectors into tight spaces. For example, detectors may be adapted for personnel scanners constrained to fit into constricted airport inspection spaces.
Back-Scatter Inspection of the Underside of Stationary Vehicles:
The inspection of the underside of vehicles by a portable X-ray backscattering system presents special problems. The road clearance of cars is not more than 8″ and can be as little as 6″. Fixed inspection systems, such as portals, can place a detector in the ground, or, as described above, can be placed on the ground using Sc-WSF. Mobile under-vehicle inspection systems, however, which are needed for security in many areas, have never been developed. Inspectors rely on passive inspection tools such as mirrors and cameras, which miss contraband in the gas tank or are camouflaged to appear innocuous.
The Sc-WSF detectors make practical an X-ray backscatter system that is not more than 6″ high. A sketch of a practical system is now described with reference to
Mobile Transmission Inspection with L-Shaped Detector Array Segments:
In accordance with another aspect of the present specification, a mobile inspection system, designated generally by numeral 240, is now described with reference to
Each of the horizontal and upright segments 246 and 247 of L-shaped detector unit 245 may be comprised of multiple parallel layers 249, providing for dual- or, more generally, multiple-, energy resolution of detected X rays, so as to provide material identification, as described above with reference to
Enhanced Resolution WSF Detectors:
In an embodiment, the present specification provides a system and method for enhancing the resolution of WSF detectors employed in an X-ray imaging system, and particularly in a flying spot X-ray imaging system. In an embodiment, an enhanced resolution WSF detector comprises at least a high resolution detection layer for detecting the intensities of incident radiation and a low resolution layer for detecting location of incidence radiation; thereby providing enhanced radiation detection.
In an embodiment, the enhanced resolution WSF detector of the present specification increases spatial sensitivity for X-ray detectors in an X-ray imaging system through the use of multiplexed WSF coupled to a multi-anode PMT. In an embodiment, the detector comprises multiple layers of WSF in order to determine both the high resolution content of the image by detecting the intensity captured by individual fibers, as well as low resolution mapping in order to determine a coarse location of the focal spot. In this way, a high resolution image is generated with a minimum of data individual channels, thus saving cost and complexity of the system.
The low resolution layer 2204 comprises a plurality of parallel positioned fibers that are bundled from each of the low resolution regions of the detector 2200. In an embodiment, a position of an illumination beam spot i.e. the spatial resolution of the detector 2200 is determined by the signal detected in the low resolution layer 2204 of the detector. The signal intensity from the high resolution channels is subsequently placed in a correct spatial location using the information from the low resolution layer. In embodiments, the maximum intensity of the low resolution layer 2204 is used to identify the location of the flying spot X-ray beam on the detector.
Light absorbed in the high resolution fiber layer 2202 spreads, which degrades the spatial resolution of the WSF detector 2200. The spreading of light can be improved by utilizing a thin scintillator material 2206 as well as thin film deposited columnar materials which limit light scatter, coupled with the high resolution layer 2202, as shown in
The spatial resolution of the detector 2200 is limited by the fiber diameter and spacing in the direction perpendicular to the fibers in the high resolution layer 2204. The spatial resolution in the orthogonal direction is limited by an illumination width of an incident fan beam of X rays. The fan beam width can be improved by using an X-ray source with a small focal spot size, and by using a narrow fan-beam collimator.
Hence, the spatial resolution of the WSF detector is determined by the fiber geometry of the high resolution layer, including spacing, shape and diameter of the fibers. In various embodiments, plastic wave-shifting optical fibers are made with diameters as low as 200 micro meters. By offsetting the fibers, the one dimensional spacing can further be reduced below 200 micro meters. In various embodiments, the high resolution layer comprises fibers having a diameter no greater than about 1 mm with no spacing between said adjacent fibers. Thus, in embodiments, the adjacent fibers are in physical contact with one another.
In some embodiments of the present specification, detectors for an X-ray imaging system comprise: a scintillation screen defining a detection region; at least one high resolution layer, optically coupled to the scintillation screen, comprising a first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a first fiber radius and a first spacing between adjacent ones of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers extends through the detection region and under the scintillation screen, and wherein the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is configured to receive radiation and generate signals; at least one low resolution layer comprising a second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers wherein each of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a second fiber radius and a second spacing between adjacent ones of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, and wherein at least one of the second fiber radius is larger than the first fiber radius or the second spacing is greater than the first spacing, and wherein the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is configured to receive the radiation that passes through the at least one high resolution layer and generate signals; and a segmented multi-channel photomultiplier tube configured to receive signals obtained from the at least one low resolution layer and to receive signals obtained from the at least one high resolution layer.
In some embodiments of the present specification, detectors for an X-ray imaging system comprise: at least one high resolution layer comprising a first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a first fiber radius and a first spacing between adjacent ones of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, wherein each of the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers extends through the detection region and under the scintillation screen, and wherein the first plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is coated with scintillation material and is configured to receive radiation and generate signals; at least one low resolution layer comprising a second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers wherein each of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is defined by a second fiber radius and a second spacing between adjacent ones of the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers, and wherein at least one of the second fiber radius is larger than the first fiber radius or the second spacing is greater than the first spacing, and wherein the second plurality of wavelength-shifting optical fibers is coated with scintillation material and is configured to receive the radiation that passes through the at least one high resolution layer and generate signals; and a segmented multi-channel photomultiplier tube configured to receive signals obtained from the at least one low resolution layer and to receive signals obtained from the at least one high resolution layer.
In an embodiment, the high resolution layer 2202 comprises a set of 8 (only 5 shown in
The density of the scintillators for each layer of the detector 2300 is tuned so that the detector achieves a high resolution in a front scintillator but would allow enough X-ray through to affect detection of both high energy and low energy radiation.
As described above, the ends of the WSF are bundled and optically coupled to at least one photodetector. In an embodiment the detector resolution is enhanced by detecting the signal intensity for individual WSF fibers with a multi-channel PMT. In an embodiment, in order to reduce the number of channels to a manageable size, individual read-outs corresponding to each WSF fiber are multiplexed between high and low resolution layers of the WSF detector.
Enhanced Resolution WSF Detector Panels:
In an embodiment, the present specification provides a detector panel comprising WSF detectors. The detector panel is designed for placement at any position relative to a portable/handheld scanner. In an embodiment where said detector panel is placed in the direct beam of an X-ray source, the detector panel acts as a transmission detector.
With the use of detector panels along with portable/hand held scanners, as shown in
The challenge, therefore, is to create a detector panel where X-ray spot generates same amount of light at a PMT corresponding to any spot that X-ray hits the detector panel so that no gain correction is required. The more uniform the response, the lower the variability. With the use of conventional fixed X-ray source detector configurations, a variability ranging from 30% to 40% may be tolerated. However, for handheld scanner and detector configurations, a variability of 10% or less is required.
The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system and method of present specification. Although only a few embodiments of the present specification have been described herein, it should be understood that the present specification might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the specification. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the specification may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/855,683, entitled “Spectral Discrimination Using Wavelength-Shifting Fiber-Coupled Scintillation Detectors” and filed on Apr. 22, 2020, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/382,951, of the same title, filed on Apr. 12, 2019, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,670,740 on Jun. 2, 2020, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/242,163, entitled “Spectral Discrimination using Wavelength-Shifting Fiber-Coupled Scintillation Detectors” and filed on Jan. 8, 2019, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/490,787, of the same title, filed on Apr. 18, 2017, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,209,372 on Feb. 19, 2019, which, in turn, is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/050,894, of the same title, filed on Feb. 23, 2016, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,658,343 (the “'343 patent”) on May 23, 2017. The '343 patent is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/758,189, entitled “X-Ray Inspection Using Wavelength-Shifting Fiber-Coupled Scintillation Detectors”, filed on Feb. 4, 2013, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,285,488 (the '488 patent), on Mar. 15, 2016. The '488 patent, in turn, claims priority from the following applications: U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 61/607,066, entitled “X-Ray Inspection using Wavelength-Shifting Fiber-Coupled Detectors”, filed on Mar. 6, 2012; U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 61/598,521, entitled “Distributed X-Ray Scintillation Detector with Wavelength-Shifted Fiber Readout”, and filed on Feb. 14, 2012; and U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 61/598,576, entitled “X-Ray Inspection Using Wavelength-Shifting Fiber-Coupled Detectors”, and filed on Feb. 14, 2012. The above-mentioned applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
663072 | Coy | Dec 1900 | A |
2831123 | Daly | Apr 1958 | A |
2972430 | Johnson | Feb 1961 | A |
3766387 | Heffan | Oct 1973 | A |
3780291 | Stein | Dec 1973 | A |
3784837 | Holmstrom | Jan 1974 | A |
3961186 | Leunbach | Jun 1976 | A |
3971948 | Pfeiler | Jul 1976 | A |
4031401 | Jacob | Jun 1977 | A |
4045672 | Watanabe | Aug 1977 | A |
4047035 | Dennhoven | Sep 1977 | A |
4064440 | Roder | Dec 1977 | A |
4139771 | Dennhoven | Feb 1979 | A |
4180737 | Kingsley | Dec 1979 | A |
4200800 | Swift | Apr 1980 | A |
4210811 | Dennhoven | Jul 1980 | A |
4216499 | Dennhoven | Aug 1980 | A |
4242583 | Annis | Dec 1980 | A |
4259582 | Albert | Mar 1981 | A |
4260898 | Annis | Apr 1981 | A |
4267446 | Brown | May 1981 | A |
4315146 | Rudin | Feb 1982 | A |
4342914 | Bjorkholm | Aug 1982 | A |
4366382 | Kotowski | Dec 1982 | A |
4380817 | Harding | Apr 1983 | A |
4420182 | Kaneshiro | Dec 1983 | A |
4430568 | Yoshida | Feb 1984 | A |
4472822 | Swift | Sep 1984 | A |
4494001 | Peck | Jan 1985 | A |
4497062 | Mistretta | Jan 1985 | A |
4503332 | Annis | Mar 1985 | A |
4511799 | Bjorkholm | Apr 1985 | A |
4525854 | Molbert | Jun 1985 | A |
4566113 | Doenges | Jan 1986 | A |
4599740 | Cable | Jul 1986 | A |
4620099 | Schoenig | Oct 1986 | A |
4641330 | Herwig | Feb 1987 | A |
4646339 | Rice | Feb 1987 | A |
4692937 | Sashin | Sep 1987 | A |
4718075 | Horn | Jan 1988 | A |
4736401 | Donges | Apr 1988 | A |
4788436 | Koechner | Nov 1988 | A |
4788704 | Donges | Nov 1988 | A |
4799247 | Annis | Jan 1989 | A |
4809312 | Annis | Feb 1989 | A |
4825454 | Annis | Apr 1989 | A |
4839913 | Annis | Jun 1989 | A |
4864142 | Gomberg | Sep 1989 | A |
4870670 | Geus | Sep 1989 | A |
4884289 | Glockmann | Nov 1989 | A |
4979202 | Siczek | Dec 1990 | A |
4991189 | Boomgaarden | Feb 1991 | A |
5022062 | Annis | Jun 1991 | A |
5056129 | Steinmeyer | Oct 1991 | A |
5065418 | Bermbach | Nov 1991 | A |
5068883 | DeHaan | Nov 1991 | A |
5077771 | Skillicorn | Dec 1991 | A |
5091924 | Bermbach | Feb 1992 | A |
5098640 | Gozani | Mar 1992 | A |
5103099 | Bourdinaud | Apr 1992 | A |
5179581 | Annis | Jan 1993 | A |
5181234 | Smith | Jan 1993 | A |
5182764 | Peschmann | Jan 1993 | A |
5224144 | Annis | Jun 1993 | A |
5237598 | Albert | Aug 1993 | A |
5247561 | Kotowski | Sep 1993 | A |
5253283 | Annis | Oct 1993 | A |
5281820 | Groh | Jan 1994 | A |
5289510 | Mihalczo | Feb 1994 | A |
5302817 | Yokota | Apr 1994 | A |
5313511 | Annis | May 1994 | A |
5319547 | Krug | Jun 1994 | A |
5338927 | De Groot | Aug 1994 | A |
5343046 | Smith | Aug 1994 | A |
5367552 | Peschmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5376795 | Hasegawa | Dec 1994 | A |
5379334 | Zimmer | Jan 1995 | A |
5391878 | Petroff | Feb 1995 | A |
5394454 | Harding | Feb 1995 | A |
5420959 | Walker | May 1995 | A |
5430787 | Norton | Jul 1995 | A |
5446288 | Tumer | Aug 1995 | A |
5493596 | Annis | Feb 1996 | A |
5524133 | Neale | Jun 1996 | A |
5548123 | Perez-Mendez | Aug 1996 | A |
5550380 | Sugawara | Aug 1996 | A |
5600144 | Worstell | Feb 1997 | A |
5600303 | Husseiny | Feb 1997 | A |
5600700 | Krug | Feb 1997 | A |
5629515 | Maekawa | May 1997 | A |
5629523 | Ngo | May 1997 | A |
5638420 | Armistead | Jun 1997 | A |
5642393 | Krug | Jun 1997 | A |
5642394 | Rothschild | Jun 1997 | A |
5665969 | Beusch | Sep 1997 | A |
5666393 | Annis | Sep 1997 | A |
5687210 | Maitrejean | Nov 1997 | A |
5692028 | Geus | Nov 1997 | A |
5692029 | Husseiny | Nov 1997 | A |
5696806 | Grodzins | Dec 1997 | A |
5734166 | Czirr | Mar 1998 | A |
5751837 | Watanabe | May 1998 | A |
5763886 | Schulte | Jun 1998 | A |
5764683 | Swift | Jun 1998 | A |
5768334 | Maitrejean | Jun 1998 | A |
5783829 | Sealock | Jul 1998 | A |
5784507 | Holm-Kennedy | Jul 1998 | A |
5787145 | Geus | Jul 1998 | A |
5805660 | Perion | Sep 1998 | A |
5838759 | Armistead | Nov 1998 | A |
5856673 | Ikegami | Jan 1999 | A |
5866907 | Drukier | Feb 1999 | A |
5903623 | Swift | May 1999 | A |
5910973 | Grodzins | Jun 1999 | A |
5930326 | Rothschild | Jul 1999 | A |
5936240 | Dudar | Aug 1999 | A |
5940468 | Huang | Aug 1999 | A |
5968425 | Bross | Oct 1999 | A |
5974111 | Krug | Oct 1999 | A |
6018562 | Willson | Jan 2000 | A |
6031890 | Bermbach | Feb 2000 | A |
6055111 | Nomura | Apr 2000 | A |
6058158 | Eiler | May 2000 | A |
6067344 | Grodzins | May 2000 | A |
6078052 | DiFilippo | Jun 2000 | A |
6081580 | Grodzins | Jun 2000 | A |
6094472 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6151381 | Grodzins | Nov 2000 | A |
6188747 | Geus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192101 | Grodzins | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192104 | Adams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195413 | Geus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198795 | Naumann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203846 | Ellingson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212251 | Tomura | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218943 | Ellenbogen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236709 | Perry | May 2001 | B1 |
6249567 | Rothschild | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252929 | Swift | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256369 | Lai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278115 | Annis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282260 | Grodzins | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292533 | Swift | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301326 | Bjorkholm | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6320933 | Grodzins | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333502 | Sumita | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6356620 | Rothschild | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6407392 | Tsuyuki | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421420 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424695 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434219 | Rothschild | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435715 | Betz | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442233 | Grodzins | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445765 | Frank | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453003 | Springer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453007 | Adams | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456684 | Mun | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459761 | Grodzins | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459764 | Chalmers | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473487 | Le | Oct 2002 | B1 |
RE37899 | Grodzins | Nov 2002 | E |
6483894 | Hartick | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507025 | Verbinski | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532276 | Hartick | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542574 | Grodzins | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542578 | Ries | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542580 | Carver | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543599 | Jasinetzky | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546072 | Chalmers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552346 | Verbinski | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556653 | Hussein | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563903 | Kang | May 2003 | B2 |
6567496 | Sychev | May 2003 | B1 |
6580778 | Meder | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584170 | Aust | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597760 | Beneke | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606516 | Levine | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621888 | Grodzins | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636581 | Sorenson | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6637266 | Froom | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645656 | Chen | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645657 | Huang | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653588 | Gillard-Hickman | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658087 | Chalmers | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663280 | Doenges | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665373 | Kotowski | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665433 | Roder | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687326 | Bechwati | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6747705 | Peters | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763635 | Lowman | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785357 | Bernardi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6812426 | Kotowski | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816571 | Bijjani | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837422 | Meder | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6839403 | Kotowski | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6843599 | Le | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859607 | Sugihara | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6876719 | Ozaki | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879657 | Hoffman | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6909770 | Schramm | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920197 | Kang | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922457 | Nagata | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6965662 | Eppler | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7010094 | Grodzins | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7039159 | Muenchau | May 2006 | B2 |
7067079 | Bross | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072440 | Mario | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7099434 | Adams | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103137 | Seppi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110493 | Kotowski | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7115875 | Worstell | Oct 2006 | B1 |
RE39396 | Swift | Nov 2006 | E |
7162005 | Bjorkholm | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190758 | Hagiwara | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203276 | Arsenault | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207713 | Lowman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215737 | Li | May 2007 | B2 |
7217929 | Hirai | May 2007 | B2 |
7218704 | Adams | May 2007 | B1 |
7233645 | Feda | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7253727 | Jenkins | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7308076 | Studer | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7322745 | Agrawal | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326933 | Katagiri | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333587 | De | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333588 | Mistretta | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7366282 | Peschmann | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369463 | Van Dullemen | May 2008 | B1 |
7369643 | Kotowski | May 2008 | B2 |
7379530 | Hoff | May 2008 | B2 |
7400701 | Cason | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7403588 | Bruder | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409033 | Zhu | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7409042 | Bertozzi | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417440 | Peschmann | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7486768 | Allman | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496178 | Turner | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505556 | Chalmers | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505562 | Dinca | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508910 | Safai | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7517149 | Agrawal | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7519148 | Kotowski | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7538325 | Mishin | May 2009 | B2 |
7551715 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551718 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555099 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7579845 | Peschmann | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583779 | Tkaczyk | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593506 | Cason | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593510 | Rothschild | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7630472 | Tsuyuki | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7672422 | Seppi | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7711090 | Schweizer | May 2010 | B2 |
7720195 | Allman | May 2010 | B2 |
7742557 | Brunner | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742568 | Smith | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783004 | Kotowski | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783005 | Kaval | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7796733 | Hughes | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7796734 | Mastronardi | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809109 | Mastronardi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817776 | Agrawal | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7848480 | Nakanishi | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7856079 | Nielsen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7856081 | Peschmann | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864920 | Rothschild | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876880 | Kotowski | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7924979 | Rothschild | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7963695 | Kotowski | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7995705 | Allman | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7995707 | Rothschild | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000436 | Seppi | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8045781 | Nakanishi | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8054938 | Kaval | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8094774 | Noshi | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8135110 | Morton | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8135112 | Hughes | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8138770 | Peschmann | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8148693 | Ryge | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8194822 | Rothschild | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8199996 | Hughes | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8275091 | Morton | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275092 | Zhang | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8300763 | Shedlock | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8325871 | Grodzins | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8331535 | Morton | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8345819 | Mastronardi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8389942 | Morton | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401147 | Ryge | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8428217 | Peschmann | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433036 | Morton | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8439565 | Mastronardi | May 2013 | B2 |
8442186 | Rothschild | May 2013 | B2 |
8451974 | Morton | May 2013 | B2 |
8457274 | Arodzero | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8483356 | Bendahan | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8503605 | Morton | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8503606 | Rothschild | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8532823 | McElroy | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8576982 | Gray | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8582720 | Morton | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8605859 | Mastronardi | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8638904 | Gray | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8668386 | Morton | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690427 | Mastronardi | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8731137 | Arroyo | May 2014 | B2 |
8735833 | Morto | May 2014 | B2 |
8750452 | Kaval | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8750454 | Gozani | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8774357 | Morton | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774362 | Hughes | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8798232 | Bendahan | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8804899 | Morton | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824632 | Mastronardi | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831176 | Morto | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842808 | Rothschild | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8861684 | Al-Kofahi | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8884236 | Rothschild | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8885794 | Morton | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903045 | Schubert | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8903046 | Morton | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8908831 | Bendahan | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8923481 | Schubert | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8929509 | Morton | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8958526 | Morton | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971487 | Mastronardi | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8993970 | Morton | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995619 | Gray | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9014339 | Grodzins | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9020100 | Mastronardi | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9020103 | Grodzins | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9042511 | Peschmann | May 2015 | B2 |
9052271 | Grodzins | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9052403 | Morton | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9057679 | Morton | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9069084 | Frank | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9069101 | Arroyo, Jr. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9099279 | Rommel | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117564 | Rommel | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9121958 | Morton | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9128198 | Morton | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9146201 | Schubert | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9158030 | Morton | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9182516 | Gray | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183647 | Morton | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9194828 | Turner | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9207195 | Gozani | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9208988 | Morton | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9223050 | Kaval | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9251915 | Lai | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9257208 | Rommel | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9268058 | Peschmann | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9285325 | Gray | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9285488 | Arodzero | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9291582 | Grodzins | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9291741 | Gray | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9306673 | Macrae | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9316760 | Bendahan | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9417060 | Schubert | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9442083 | Turner | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9465135 | Morton | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9466456 | Rommel | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9535019 | Rothschild | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9541510 | Arodzero | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9562866 | Morton | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9576766 | Morton | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9606245 | Czarnecki | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9606259 | Morton | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9618630 | Kross | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9632205 | Morton | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9658343 | Arodzero | May 2017 | B2 |
9791590 | Morton | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9823201 | Morton | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9841386 | Grodzins | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9915752 | Peschmann | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9958569 | Morton | May 2018 | B2 |
10134254 | Jarvi | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10168445 | Morton | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10209372 | Arodzero | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10228487 | Mastronardi | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10266999 | Rothschild | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10295483 | Morton | May 2019 | B2 |
10408967 | Morton | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10670740 | Couture | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10724192 | Rothschild | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10762998 | Rothschild | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10770195 | Rothschild | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10794843 | Rothschild | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10830911 | Couture | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10976465 | Morton | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11143783 | Morton | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11448606 | Rothschild | Sep 2022 | B2 |
20010016028 | Adams | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010046275 | Hussein | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020082492 | Grzeszczuk | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085674 | Price | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020117625 | Pandelisev | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020121604 | Katagiri | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030002628 | Wilson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030223549 | Winsor | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004482 | Bouabdo | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040057554 | Bjorkholm | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040086078 | Adams | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104347 | Bross | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109653 | Kerr | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136493 | Konno | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140431 | Schmand | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141584 | Bernardi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040218714 | Faust | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251415 | Verbinski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256565 | Adams | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018814 | Kerschner | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050053199 | Miles | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073740 | Phillips | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050078793 | Ikeda | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100124 | Hsieh | May 2005 | A1 |
20050135560 | Dafni | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050185757 | Kresse | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190878 | De Man | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226371 | Kautzer | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236577 | Katagiri | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060078091 | Lasiuk | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060251211 | Grodzins | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009088 | Edic | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019781 | Haras | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070029493 | Kniss | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070098142 | Rothschild | May 2007 | A1 |
20070206726 | Lu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222981 | Ponsardin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070235655 | Rhiger | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237294 | Hoff | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258562 | Dinca | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280417 | Kang | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002806 | Nishide | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037707 | Rothschild | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043913 | Annis | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080099692 | Poreira | May 2008 | A1 |
20080152081 | Cason | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080197279 | Kang | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219804 | Chattey | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080273652 | Arnold | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090067575 | Seppi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086907 | Smith | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103686 | Rothschild | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116617 | Mastronardi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090188379 | Hiza | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090230295 | Waring | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090230925 | Nathan | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090257555 | Chalmers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268871 | Rothschild | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274270 | Kotowski | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090309034 | Yoshida | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100061509 | D Ambrosio | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069721 | Webler | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100072398 | Fruehauf | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100108859 | Andressen | May 2010 | A1 |
20100270462 | Nelson | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276602 | Clothier | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100314546 | Ronda | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110079726 | Kusner | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110490 | Samant | May 2011 | A1 |
20110204243 | Bendahan | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110206179 | Bendahan | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110215222 | Eminoglu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110309253 | Rothschild | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309257 | Menge | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120033791 | Mastronardi | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120061575 | Dunleavy | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120076257 | Star-Lack | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120104265 | Workman | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147987 | Calderbank | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120148020 | Arroyo, Jr. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120199753 | Chuang | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120241628 | Hesser | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120280132 | Nakamura | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298864 | Morishita | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130039463 | Mastronardi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130156156 | Roe | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130195248 | Rothschild | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130202089 | Schubert | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208857 | Arodzero | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130315368 | Turner | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130315369 | Turner | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140105367 | Horvarth | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140133631 | Wood | May 2014 | A1 |
20140182373 | Sbihli | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150016794 | Mori | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150055751 | Funk | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150060673 | Zimdars | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150168589 | Morton | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150377803 | Turner | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160025888 | Peschmann | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160025889 | Morton | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160033426 | Georgeson | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160106384 | Park | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160170044 | Arodzero | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160170077 | Morton | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160223706 | Franco | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170023695 | Zhang | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170045630 | Simon | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170059739 | Mastronardi | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170184516 | Chen | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170245819 | Rothschild | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170299526 | Morton | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170299764 | Morton | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170315242 | Arodzero | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170358380 | Rothschild | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180038969 | McCollough | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180038988 | Morton | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180128935 | Morton | May 2018 | A1 |
20180136340 | Nelson | May 2018 | A1 |
20180252841 | Grodzins | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180284316 | Morton | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180286624 | Rommel | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180294066 | Rothschild | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180313770 | Morton | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180328861 | Grodzins | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190139385 | Jarvi | May 2019 | A1 |
20190242834 | Rothschild | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190293810 | Couture | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190346382 | Rothschild | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190383953 | Arodzero | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190391280 | Couture | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200025955 | Gozani | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200033274 | Couture | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200073008 | Parikh | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200103357 | Morton | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200103547 | Morton | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200158908 | Morton | May 2020 | A1 |
20200191991 | Morton | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200233100 | Rothschild | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200326291 | Rothschild | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200326436 | Couture | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200355631 | Yu | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200355632 | Morton | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210018650 | Morton | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210132239 | Couture | May 2021 | A1 |
20220003693 | Rothschild | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220091054 | Rothschild | Mar 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1270318 | Oct 2000 | CN |
1493176 | Apr 2004 | CN |
1745296 | Mar 2006 | CN |
101142497 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101166469 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101578534 | Nov 2009 | CN |
102519988 | Jun 2012 | CN |
104204854 | Dec 2014 | CN |
107193034 | Sep 2017 | CN |
107209282 | Sep 2017 | CN |
2639631 | Mar 1978 | DE |
4017100 | Dec 1990 | DE |
102013102749 | Oct 2013 | DE |
113291 | Jul 1984 | EP |
0261984 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0813692 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0813692 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0864884 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0971215 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1113291 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1168249 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1135700 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1254384 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2054741 | May 2009 | EP |
1733213 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2049888 | May 2014 | EP |
3271709 | Jan 2018 | EP |
2492159 | Apr 1982 | FR |
1505498 | Mar 1978 | GB |
2084829 | Apr 1982 | GB |
2150526 | Jul 1985 | GB |
2277013 | Oct 1994 | GB |
2400480 | Oct 2004 | GB |
2482024 | Jan 2012 | GB |
58103678 | Jun 1983 | JP |
62147349 | Jul 1987 | JP |
S63299100 | Dec 1988 | JP |
10232284 | Feb 1997 | JP |
H09318757 | Dec 1997 | JP |
H10185842 | Jul 1998 | JP |
H10232284 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000515629 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2002071816 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2004045250 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2006505805 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2013205122 | Oct 2013 | JP |
3195776 | Feb 2015 | JP |
9701089 | Jan 1997 | WO |
1997001089 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9802763 | Jan 1998 | WO |
1998002763 | Jan 1998 | WO |
1998003889 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9805946 | Feb 1998 | WO |
1998020366 | May 1998 | WO |
9913323 | Mar 1999 | WO |
1999039189 | Aug 1999 | WO |
2000033060 | Jun 2000 | WO |
2000037928 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0159485 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0173415 | Oct 2001 | WO |
02091023 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03075037 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004010127 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004043740 | May 2004 | WO |
2005079437 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005098400 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005103759 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005103759 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006111323 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006111323 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006137932 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007051092 | May 2007 | WO |
2008021807 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008024825 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008063695 | May 2008 | WO |
2008105782 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009027667 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009067394 | May 2009 | WO |
2010129926 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011008718 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011011583 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011014445 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011053972 | May 2011 | WO |
2011149566 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011163108 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011163108 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012058207 | May 2012 | WO |
2012109307 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012142453 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012142456 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012174265 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013112819 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013116058 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013122763 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013116549 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014058495 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2016003547 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016081881 | May 2016 | WO |
2018064434 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2019217596 | Nov 2019 | WO |
2020041161 | Feb 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Rose, Kathryn, “NuMl Off-Axis Experiment” Datasheet (online). University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, 2003. <URL: https://slideplayer.com/slide/8765673/>. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2019/027252, dated Aug. 2, 2019. |
Williams et al.: “PET Detector Using Waveshifting Optical Fibers and Microchannel Plate PMT with Delay Line Readout”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY, US, vol. 45, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1998 (Apr. 1, 1998), pp. 195-205, XP011087844, ISSN: 0018-9499, DOI: 10.1109/23.664171. |
Beznosko et al., “FNAL-NICADD Extruded Scintillator,” FERMILAB-CONF-04-216-E, pp. 1-4 (Sep. 2004). |
Case et al., “Wavelength-shifting fiber readout of LaC13 and LaBr3 scintillators,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5898, UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XIV, pp. 58980K-1-58980K-8 (2005). |
Gundiah, “Scintillation properties of Eu.sup.2+-activated barium fluoroiodide,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, pp. 1-10 (Feb. 2011). |
Hutchinson et al., “Optical Readout for Imaging Neutron Scintillation Detectors,” Engineering Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 6 pages. (Nov. 2002). |
Keizer, “The optimal cosmic ray detector for High-Schools,” 21 pages (2011). |
Maekawa et al., “Thin Beta-ray Detectors using Plastic Scintillator Combined with Wavelength-shifting Fibers for Surface Contamination Monitoring,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 886-894 (Dec. 1998). |
Moiseev et al., “High-efficiency plastic scintillator detector with wavelength-shifting fiber readout for the GLAST Large Area Telescope,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 583, pp. 372-381 (2007). |
Nishikido et al. “X-ray detector made of plastic scintillators and WLS fiber for real-time dose distribution monitoring in interventional radiology,” IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record. |
Pla-Dalmau et al., “Extruded Plastic Scintillator for MINERvA,” FERMILAB-CONF-05-506-E, pp. 1298-1300 (2005). |
Yoshimura et al., “Plastic scintillator produced by the injection-molding technique,” Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, vol. 406, pp. 435-441 (1998). |
Jae Yul Ahn, Authorized officer Korean Intellectual Property Office, International Search Report—Application No. PCT/US2013/024585, dated Jun. 2, 2013, along with Written Opinion of the International Searchi. |
Nishikido et al. “X-ray detector made of plastic scintillators and WLS fiber for real-time dose distribution monitoring in interventional radiology,” IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Reco, pp. 1272-1274 (2012). |
International Search Report for PCT/US17/54211, dated Jan. 18, 2018. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2019/027242, dated Jul. 17, 2019. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/024585, dated Jun. 2, 2013. |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISM_band#Common_non-ISM_uses., downloaded from Internet Nov. 23, 2020. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/023125, dated May 15, 2013. |
International Search Report for PCT/US99/29185, dated Sep. 27, 2000. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2016/023240, dated Jul. 12, 2016. |
Nittoh et al., “Discriminated neutron and X-ray radiography using multi-color scintillation detector,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 428, pp. 583-588 (1999). |
Novikov, “A method for monitoring of Gd concentration in Gd-loaded scintillators,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 366, pp. 413-414 (1995). |
Osswald et al. “Injection Molding Handbook”, p. 394, Chemical Industry Press, Mar. 31, 2005. |
Yoshiaki et al. “Development of ultra-high sensitivity bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) using firefly luciferas”, Abstract, Luminescence, vol. 16, Issue 4, Jul. 31, 2001. |
International Search Report for PCT/US01/09784, dated Jan. 28, 2002. |
International Search Report for PCT/US02/13595, dated Aug. 6, 2002. |
International Search Report for PCT/US03/35232, dated Nov. 8, 2004. |
International Search Report for PCT/US03/05958, dated Jun. 27, 2003. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/011382, dated Oct. 21, 2005. |
International Seach Report for PCT/US2008/083741, dated Oct. 30, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2007/066936, dated Sep. 30, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/060158, dated Jul. 5, 2007. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2007/076497, dated Jul. 28, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2007/075323, dated Feb. 5, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/043201, dated Oct. 29, 2010. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/024248, dated Jul. 9, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT/US11/23143, dated Nov. 25, 2011. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/033581, dated Oct. 31, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041033, dated Feb. 17, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/033585, dated Nov. 29, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/022715, dated May 15, 2013. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2015/031115, dated Jul. 29, 2015. |
Chou, C, “Fourier coded-aperture imaging in nuclear medicine”, IEEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 141. No. 3, May 1994, pp. 179-184. |
Mertz, L.N., et al, “Rotational aperture synthesis for x rays”, Journal. Optical Society of America, vol. 3, Dec. 1986, pp. 2167-2170. |
International Bureau of WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2005/011382, dated Oct. 19, 2006, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/041757, dated Oct. 12, 2010. |
European Patent Office, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US99/28266, dated Sep. 6, 2000, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2007/066936, dated Sep. 30, 2008, 7 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US1999/028035, dated Sep. 15, 2000, 6 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US1998/18642, dated Jul. 7, 1999, 4 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2007/066936; dated Sep. 30, 2008, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2005/011382, dated Oct. 21, 2005. |
International Search Report for PCT/US20/61866, dated Feb. 11, 2021. |
Roderick D. Swift, Roy P. Lindquist, “Medium energy x-ray examination of commercial trucks”, Proc. SPIE 2276, Cargo Inspection Technologies, (Oct. 6, 1994); doi: 10.1117/12.189174. |
Zhang et al., “A multi-beam x-ray imaging system based on carbon nanotube field emitters”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 6142, 614204, (2006), doi: 10.1117/12.654006. |
U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,562 Prosecution File History. |
Declaration of Richard Lanza, Ph.D. , Case No. IPR2022-00028; U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,562, Oct. 28, 2021. |
Cheng et al., “Dynamic radiography using a carbonnanotube-based field emission x-ray source,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 75, No. 10. Oct. 2004. |
Zhang et al., “Stationary scanning x-ray source based on carbon nanotube field emitters”, Applied Physics Letters 86, 184104 (2005). |
Zhang et al., “A nanotube-based field emission x-ray source for microcomputed tomography”, Review of Scientific Instruments 76, 094301 (2005). |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/737,471, filed Mar. 31, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/787,810, filed Apr. 1, 2005. |
AS& E's Opposition to Viken's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, Case 1:20-cv-11883 (Dist. Of Mass.), Feb. 26, 2021. |
Viken's Memorandum of Law In Support of Defendant's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, Case 1:20-cv-11883 (Dist. Of Mass.), Feb. 8, 2021. |
Motion Hearing Transcript, dated Aug. 16, 2021, Case 1:20-cv-11883 (Dist. Of Mass.). |
Waiver of the Service of Summons, Oct. 20, 2020; Case 1:20-cv-11883, (Dist. Of Mass.). |
Evans, R. D., The Atomic Nucleus, Ch. 23-25, & Appendix A, TATA McGraw-Hill, Bombay, New Delhi (1955). |
Knoll, G. F., Radiation Detection and Measurements, Ch. 2, 4, 8, & 9, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York (2000). |
American Science and Engineering, Inc. 2002 Annual Report. |
American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. Viken Detection Corp., U.S.D.C. (D. Mass.) Case No. 1:20-cv-11883-LTS, Joint Proposed Scheduling Order (Doc. 63), filed Oct. 12, 2021. |
Viken Detection Corporation v. AS&E , Case No. IPR2022-00028, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,562, Oct. 28, 2021. |
U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,701 Prosecution File History. |
Declaration of Richard C. Lanza, Ph.D.,, Case No. IPR2021-01585; U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,701, Sep. 29, 2021. |
Tateno, Y, & Tanaka, H., “Low-Dosage X-Ray Imaging System Employing Flying Spot X-Ray Microbeam (DynamicScanner)1,” Radiation Physics, 121(1):189-195 (1976). |
Vike Detection Corporationv. AS&E, Case No. IPR2021-01585, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,400,701, Sep. 30, 2021. |
U.S. Pat. No. 8,300,763 Prosecution File History. |
Declaration of Richard C. Lanza, Ph.D., Case No. IPR2022-00027, U.S. Pat. No. 8,300,763, Oct. 20, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/228,335 (priority document for '763 Patent), dated Jul. 24, 2009. |
Chapter 10, Ghilani, Adjustment Computations: Spatial Data Analysis, Sixth Edition, 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (“Weights Of Observations”). |
Chambers Dictionary of Science and Tech. (1999) (definition of “weighting observation”). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/423,582 (“Gray '582”), Dec. 15, 2010. |
Viken Detection Corporation v. AS&E , Petition for Inter Partes Review, Case No. IPR2022-00027, U.S. Pat. No. 8,300,763, Oct. 20, 2021. |
AS&E v. Viken, Defendant Viken Detection Corp.'s Preliminary Patent Related DisclosuresCase No. 1:20-cv-11833-LTS, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Jan. 7, 2022. |
Appendix C—U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,562 Invalidity Claim Chart. |
Appendix D—U.S. Pat. No. 8,300,763 Claim Charts. |
Z Portal for Trucks & Cargo, Multi-View, Multi-Technology, Cargo and Vehicle Screening System, 2022 downloaded from the following URL: https://www.rapiscan-ase.com/products/portal/z-portal-for-trucks-cargoscreening. |
Defense Dept, contracts for X-ray tech, Apr. 7, 2009 downloaded from the following URL https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/2009/04/07/Defense-Dept-contracts-for-X-ray-tech/61051239114877/. |
AS&E pulls in $4.4M deal from U.S. agency, Apr. 27, 2009, downloaded from the following URL https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/mass-high-tech/2009/04/ase-pulls-in-44m-deal-from-us-agency.html. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210132239 A1 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61607066 | Mar 2012 | US | |
61598521 | Feb 2012 | US | |
61598576 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13758189 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 15050894 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16855683 | Apr 2020 | US |
Child | 17124260 | US | |
Parent | 16382951 | Apr 2019 | US |
Child | 16855683 | US | |
Parent | 15490787 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 16242163 | US | |
Parent | 15050894 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15490787 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16242163 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 16382951 | US |