The present invention pertains to methods of forming layers of material on a semiconductor substrate. Specifically, the invention pertains to methods for forming silicon oxide layers by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).
Fabrication of semiconductor devices typically involves deposition and patterning of several layers of different materials. When several layers are deposited in a stack, stress characteristics of deposited layers become particularly important because highly stressed materials can lead to disruption in alignment of layers in a stack, buckling, delamination, and, ultimately, to patterning inaccuracy, and semiconductor device failure.
Most film deposition is associated with the introduction of residual stress in the deposited film due to both extrinsic factors (e.g., thermal expansion coefficient mismatch) and/or intrinsic factors (e.g., defects and/or dislocations within lattice). The stress can be either compressive or tensile depending, for instance, on the characteristics of the substrate, the type of film being deposited, its properties, the manner of its deposition, etc. Compressive stress in the deposited films can lead to blistering or buckling of the film whereas tensile stress may lead to film cracking. Additionally, the wafer distortion induced by these stresses can cause reliability issue in other device layers and, generally, adversely impact electrical and optical performance, as well as the mechanical integrity of the fabricated semiconductor device. Thus, in semiconductor device fabrication, film stress is a major concern of the device layer integration strategy.
Silicon oxide is widely used in semiconductor device manufacturing as a dielectric layer material, and is often deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition processes (PECVD). There is currently a need to deposit silicon oxide by PECVD at low temperature because many integration schemes involve substrates having layers of temperature-sensitive materials (e.g., organic dielectrics) that cannot withstand high temperature PECVD. However, conventional low temperature PECVD provides silicon oxide films having unacceptably high stress values. In addition, silicon oxide PECVD films deposited at low temperature are found to have high hydrogen content and relatively low density, which makes them less attractive for use as hardmasks.
It was unexpectedly discovered that plasma treatment, and, particularly, helium plasma treatment of silicon oxide films obtained by low temperature PECVD, modifies the films and is capable of reducing film stress to less than about 80 MPa in absolute value. Further, the plasma treatment increases density of the formed films such that low stress films with densities of at least 2.05 g/cm3, and at least 2.1 g/cm3 can be obtained.
In one aspect, a method for processing a semiconductor substrate is provided, wherein the method includes: (a) providing a semiconductor substrate to a PECVD process chamber; (b) depositing a layer of silicon oxide on the semiconductor substrate by PECVD at a temperature of less than about 200° C. (e.g., at a temperature of less than about 180° C.), wherein the depositing comprises flowing a silicon-containing precursor, an oxygen-containing reactant, and, optionally, an inert gas, such as helium, into the PECVD process chamber and forming a plasma; (c) stopping flow of the silicon-containing precursor after deposition; and (d) treating the deposited layer of silicon oxide with a plasma at a temperature of less than about 200° C. to thereby modify the deposited layer and to reduce the stress of the deposited layer to an absolute value of less than about 80 MPa. Silicon oxide films having stress of less than about 50 MPa and even less than about 10 MPa in absolute value can be obtained. In one example the deposition of the silicon oxide layer is performed by forming a plasma in a mixture of SiH4 (silicon-containing precursor), CO2 (oxygen-containing reactant), and helium (an inert gas) at a pressure of between about 1.5-5 torr. In some embodiments the method involves increasing power used for plasma generation from a first power level used in the deposition of the silicon oxide layer to a second, greater power level used in plasma treatment of the deposited layer. The plasma treatment step is performed, in some embodiments, in a process gas consisting essentially of helium. The plasma treatment step can be performed at the same pressure as the deposition step, or at a different pressure. In one example, the plasma treatment step is performed in the same process chamber and at substantially the same pressure and temperature as the deposition step. In some embodiments the plasma is not extinguished after deposition of the silicon oxide layer and before stopping the flow of the silicon-containing precursor into the process chamber. Further, the process may include purging the process chamber to remove the silicon-containing precursor from the process chamber after the deposition of the silicon oxide and before plasma treatment.
Advantageously, the process can be performed on a substrate containing one or more layers of temperature-sensitive materials. For example, in some embodiments the deposition and plasma treatment of low-stress silicon oxide is performed on a semiconductor substrate having one or more layers of temperature-sensitive material that is sensitive to temperatures of 250° C. and higher. Examples of temperature-sensitive materials include organic materials and spin-on dielectrics.
The plasma treatment of the layer of silicon oxide reduces the content of hydrogen in the layer of silicon oxide. In some embodiments the silicon oxide obtained after plasma treatment does not have a Si—H peak at 2200-2300 cm−1 on an IR spectrum.
The described process can be implemented in a single-station or in a multi-station apparatus. In one embodiment, the method includes depositing and plasma treating a portion of the silicon oxide at a first station of a multi-station PECVD apparatus, transferring the substrate to a second station of the multi-station PECVD apparatus, and repeating depositing and plasma treating another portion of the silicon oxide in the second station of the multi-station PECVD apparatus.
The methods provided herein can be integrated with the patterning methods. In some embodiments, the processes described herein further include applying photoresist to the semiconductor substrate; exposing the photoresist to light; patterning the photoresist and transferring the pattern to the semiconductor substrate; and selectively removing the photoresist from the semiconductor substrate.
In another aspect, a method for processing a semiconductor substrate involving UV treatment is provided. The method includes: (a) providing a semiconductor substrate to a PECVD process chamber; (b) depositing a layer of silicon oxide on the semiconductor substrate by PECVD at a temperature of less than about 200° C.; (c) stopping flow of the silicon-containing precursor after deposition; and (d) treating the deposited layer of silicon oxide with UV light having a wavelength of 180 nm or less at a temperature of less than about 200° C. to modify the deposited layer and to reduce the stress of the deposited layer to an absolute value of less than about 80 MPa.
According to another aspect, an apparatus for deposition and plasma treatment of silicon oxide films is provided. The apparatus includes a PECVD process chamber, a generator configured for forming a plasma in the PECVD process chamber, and a controller. The PECVD process chamber includes a substrate support for holding the substrate in place during deposition, and one or more inlets for introducing reactants into the process chamber. The controller includes program instructions for conducting any of the deposition and plasma treatment methods provided herein.
According to another aspect, an apparatus for deposition and UV treatment of silicon oxide films is provided. The apparatus includes a PECVD process chamber, a generator configured for generating UV radiation having a wavelength of 180 nm or less in the PECVD process chamber or in a different process chamber that is dedicated for UV treatment, and a controller. The PECVD process chamber includes a substrate support for holding the substrate in place during deposition, and one or more inlets for introducing reactants into the process chamber. The controller includes program instructions for conducting any of the deposition and UV treatment methods provided herein.
According to another aspect, a system is provided herein which includes any of the apparatuses described herein and a stepper.
According to another aspect, a non-transitory computer machine-readable medium is provided, which includes program instructions for control of any of the apparatuses provided herein. The instructions include code for any of deposition and treatment methods provided herein.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the associated drawings.
Formation of high quality silicon oxide at low temperature is accomplished by depositing a silicon oxide layer by PECVD on a semiconductor substrate at a low temperature, followed by treating the deposited layer with plasma and/or UV radiation having a wavelength of less than about 180 nm to reduce the stress of deposited layer to an absolute value of less than about 80 MPa.
The terms “semiconductor substrate” and “semiconductor wafer” refer to substrates that contain semiconductor material anywhere on the substrate, and may contain layers of other materials, such as conductors and dielectrics.
The term “silicon oxide” refers to a material that is composed of silicon, oxygen, and, optionally, hydrogen. Other elements, such as carbon, nitrogen, boron and fluorine may be also present as dopants in small concentration (e.g., up to about 10% atomic excluding hydrogen). “High quality silicon oxide” refers to silicon oxide having one or any combination of the following characteristics: stress of less than about 80 MPa in absolute value; density of greater than about 2.05 g/cm3; and refractive index (RI) of less than about 1.47. In some embodiments, the high quality silicon oxide films provided herein have all of the characteristics listed above.
The term “low temperature formation” or “low temperature deposition” refers to formation of films at a temperature of less than about 200° C. In some embodiments, low temperature films are formed at a temperature of between about 100-180° C., such as between about 150-180° C.
The term “PECVD”, as used herein refers to a deposition method that involves reacting one or more molecules with plasma assistance primarily in bulk. This method is distinct from atomic layer deposition (ALD), where the reaction occurs primarily on the surface of the substrate and reactions in the bulk of the process chamber are suppressed. The term “PECVD process chamber” or “PECVD apparatus” as used herein refers to any process chamber or apparatus that is capable of conducting reactions in PECVD mode.
In general, low temperature methods of forming high-quality silicon oxide films provided herein can be used in a variety of applications, such as in logic device fabrication, in fabrication of memory devices, complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor devices, etc. These methods are particularly useful for applications in which several layers of material (including one or more layers of high-quality silicon oxide provided herein) are deposited in a stack on a substrate, followed by patterning of one or more layers of the stack. In some embodiments high-quality silicon oxide is deposited as part of a planar stack of at least 3 layers, of at least 5 layers, or of at least 10 layers. The combination of low stress (less than about 80 MPa, preferably less than about 50 MPa in absolute value) and low roughness (RI of less than about 1.47) is particularly advantageous for these stacking applications, since stack distortion effects would be minimized, and patterning can be performed with high precision.
In some embodiments the high-quality silicon oxide provided herein is used as a hardmask or an etch stop layer. In these embodiments, the high-quality silicon oxide is also characterized by high density (at least about 2.05 g/cm3, such as at least about 2.1 g/cm3, or such as at least about 2.15 g/cm3) in addition to low stress. Density correlates with etch selectivity, with denser materials being more resistant to etching than materials of lower density, and, therefore, high density is a particularly desirable characteristic for hardmask and etch stop applications. Hardmask layers protect the layers that lie directly underneath the hardmask from being etched, while unprotected material is etched to form recessed features. In some embodiments the high-quality silicon oxide provided herein is used as an etch stop layer. For example it can serve as an etch stop layer during etching of SiOC material that lies directly above it.
In some embodiments, the high-quality silicon oxide hardmask is deposited over a first layer (e.g., a layer of ULK dielectric), the hardmask is patterned, such that the hardmask material is removed in selected locations, exposing the first layer, and the exposed first layer is etched in the presence of the exposed hardmask. For example, a low density SiOC can be etched in a presence of exposed hardmask with a fluorine-based chemistry (e.g., using CH2F2).
Formation of silicon oxide films at low temperature is particularly desirable for substrates containing temperature-sensitive materials that can structurally or functionally deteriorate at high temperatures. In some embodiments the substrate provided for deposition of high-quality silicon oxide contains one or more layers of temperature-sensitive materials. In some embodiments this material or materials start deteriorating at 200° C. and higher, or 250° C. and higher, or 275° C. and higher. Therefore, all manipulations with these substrates should be performed at lower temperatures in order to avoid undesired deterioration of these temperature-sensitive layers. Examples of temperature-sensitive materials include organic dielectrics (which are typically deposited by spin-on methods), such as polyimide, polynorbornenes, and benzocyclubutene-based polymers.
Prior to development of methods provided herein, formation of low-stress silicon oxide at low temperature using PECVD presented an unsolved problem, because it was not possible to lower the stress of PECVD films to less than 120 MPa in absolute value using variation of PECVD parameters, such as pressure, process gas composition, and power used in plasma generation. Films with stresses in excess of 100 MPa have limited utility, particularly in applications that involve patterning, and therefore new PECVD-based methods for producing high quality silicon oxide at low temperature were needed.
A method for dramatically reducing the stress of silicon oxide films to less than about 80 MPa, such as to less than about 50 MPa, or even to less than about 30 MPa has been unexpectedly discovered. The method involves, according to one aspect, treating the silicon oxide that was deposited by low temperature PECVD, with a plasma (such as with helium plasma) to thereby modify the silicon oxide layer and to reduce the stress of the formed layer to less than about 80 MPa in absolute value. In another aspect, the method involves treating the silicon oxide that was deposited by low temperature PECVD, with a UV radiation having a wavelength of less than about 180 nm to thereby modify the silicon oxide layer and reduce the stress of the formed layer to less than about 80 MPa in absolute value.
Methods for Forming Low Stress Silicon Oxide Films
Methods for forming low stress silicon oxide films at low temperature are illustrated in process flow diagrams shown in
After the substrate has been provided to the PECVD process chamber, in 303, a layer of silicon oxide is deposited by PECVD at a temperature of less than about 200° C. The deposition process involves providing a silicon-containing precursor and an oxygen-containing reactant to the process chamber and forming a plasma in the process chamber. Examples of suitable silicon-containing precursors include carbon-free precursors, e.g., silane (SiH4), disilane (Si2H6), trisialne (Si3H8), and dichlorosilane (SiH2Cl2); and carbon-containing precursors, such as alkoxysilanes, alkylsilanes, cyclic siloxanes, alkynylsilanes, and orthosilicates (e.g., tetraethylorthosilicate). Examples of suitable oxygen-containing reactants include O2, CO2, and N2O. When the silicon-containing precursor includes both silicon and oxygen (e.g., tetraethylorthosilicate), such single precursor may be used both as a silicon source and as an oxygen-containing reactant. The deposition process gas containing the silicon-containing precursor and the oxygen-containing reactant is typically flowed into the process chamber (in some cases with prior vaporization of liquid reactants) together with a diluent gas that is, in some embodiments, an inert gas that is not participating in the PECVD reaction. Examples of diluent gases include N2 and noble gases, such as helium, argon, neon, and krypton.
The temperature is maintained at less than about 200° C. during the deposition process. In some embodiments the deposition temperature is 180° C. or less. For example, films can be deposited at a temperature of between about 100-180° C. The pressure during deposition can vary, and in some embodiments is between about 1-10 torr, more preferably between about 1.5-5 torr, such as about 3.5 torr. The flow rates of individual components of the process gas depend on the size of the process chamber and can be in the range of between about 10-10,000 sccm, in some embodiments. In some embodiments the ratio of the flow rate of an oxygen-containing reactant to the flow rate of the silicon-containing precursor is less than about 300, such as about 200. In one example the ratio of the flow rate of CO2 to the flow rate of SiH4 is less than about 300.
The deposition is performed in some embodiments using only high frequency radio frequency (HF RF) plasma generation (single-frequency deposition). In other embodiments both high frequency and low frequency radio frequency (LF RF) plasma generation are used (dual frequency deposition). HF plasma is generated using frequencies of between about 1.8 MHz and 2.45 GHz, such as at 13.56 MHz. Low frequency plasma is generated using frequencies of between about 50 kHz and 900 kHz, such as 400 kHz. In some embodiments, deposition of silicon oxide is performed using a relatively low power in single frequency HF deposition. For example, the power used for generation of plasma can be in the range of about 100-500 W for deposition on a single 300 mm wafer, corresponding to the power density of between about 0.14 W/cm2 to about 0.71 W/cm2.
Deposition is performed until a desired amount of silicon oxide is formed on the substrate. In some embodiments a silicon oxide layer having a thickness of about 100-200 Å is deposited in a single step. In other embodiments, a portion of silicon oxide is deposited, and treated, and the process is repeated until a desired thickness of silicon oxide has been achieved.
Silicon oxide films immediately after deposition typically have low quality, and are characterized by relatively high hydrogen content and high stress. The IR spectrum of such films exhibits a prominent Si—H peak at about 2250 cm−1, and the stress values are typically in excess of 100 MPa in absolute value (films are compressive).
After these low-quality films have been deposited by low temperature PECVD, in operation 305 the deposited films are treated with a plasma in an absence of the silicon-containing precursor to reduce the stress of deposited films to less than about 80 MPa in absolute value. In some embodiments the flows of the silicon-containing precursor and of the oxygen-containing reactant are stopped after the silicon oxide film has been deposited, and the residual silicon containing precursor is removed from the process chamber by purging and/or evacuation. Next, a plasma treatment process gas, such as helium is provided into the process chamber, and the substrate is treated with a plasma. In some embodiments the plasma treatment is performed in a plasma treatment process gas consisting essentially of helium.
The deposition operation 303 and the treatment operation 305 can be advantageously performed in the same PECVD process chamber. In some embodiments, plasma is not extinguished after the deposition is completed and is maintained throughout the deposition, the purging and the plasma treatment steps. In other embodiments plasma may be extinguished after the deposition has been completed, and then re-ignited during plasma treatment. In yet other embodiments, plasma treatment 305 and silicon oxide deposition 303 are performed in different process chambers, or even in different apparatuses. In one of the preferred embodiments, the plasma treatment is performed shortly after the deposition is completed, such as within about 5 minutes or within 1 minute after deposition has been completed.
In some embodiments (particularly when deposition 303 and treatment 305 are performed in a single chamber without a vacuum break), the plasma treatment process gas (e.g. helium) is the same gas as the diluent gas used during deposition 303, and during purging of the process chamber after 303. In some embodiments the flow rate of the plasma treatment gas (e.g., helium) during plasma treatment is at least 1.5 times, such as at least 2 times greater than the flow rate of the diluent gas during deposition. For example, in some embodiments helium flow rate (as a diluent gas) during deposition 303 is about 1000 sccm, and this flow rate is increased to about 2500 in the plasma treatment step 305, where helium is used as the plasma treatment process gas. Further, the power used for plasma generation is greater during the plasma treatment step 305 than during the deposition step 303. In some embodiments the power used during the plasma treatment step is at least 2 times greater, such as at least 3 times greater than the power used during the deposition step.
The temperature during the plasma treatment step is preferably maintained at less than about 200° C., such as at 100-180° C. The pressure during plasma treatment ranges in some embodiments between about 1-10 torr, such as between about 1-5 torr. In some embodiments the temperature and pressure during the deposition step 303 is the same as the temperature and pressure during the plasma treatment 305. In other embodiments only one of these parameters is kept constant. The use of same pressure and/or temperature during deposition 303 and plasma treatment 305 increases the overall stability of the process.
The duration of the plasma treatment is typically in the range of between about 6 and 20 seconds and is one of parameters that can be changed to tune the stress of the formed silicon oxide layers.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for tuning the stress of silicon oxide to a desired level. The method involves modulating one or more parameters selected from the group consisting of plasma treatment pressure, plasma treatment duration, and power level used in plasma generation during plasma treatment.
Without wishing to be bound by a particular theory of operation, it is suggested that the improvement in stress obtained after helium plasma treatment is observed, at least in part, as a result of interaction between UV radiation formed in a helium plasma and the deposited silicon oxide layer. The UV radiation formed in a helium plasma has wavelength of less than 180 nm. In another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for forming high quality silicon oxide at low temperature using UV radiation having a wavelength of less than about 180 nm. The process flow diagram for this method is presented in
A specific example of a process that uses helium plasma treatment for reducing stress of a PECVD silicon oxide is illustrated in
Specific process conditions for the deposition step 401 are provided in Table 1. The parameters are provided for deposition on a single 300 mm wafer substrate and it is understood that plasma power levels and flow rates can be scaled to any desired substrate or a plurality of substrates. For example, when four wafers are processed simultaneously in an apparatus having four processing stations, plasma power and flow rates of gasses should be four times greater than those listed in the Tables 1-3.
Next, in the purge step 403, only helium is flowed into the process chamber and it purges the silane and carbon dioxide out of the process chamber. The plasma is not extinguished during this step, and plasma power is not changed. Table 2 lists the process parameters used during the purging step 403.
After the purge is completed, the deposited silicon oxide film is treated with a helium plasma in step 405. During this step, the plasma power and the helium flow rate are increased. Table 3 lists the process parameters for the plasma treatment step.
Apparatus
The present invention can be implemented in many different types of apparatus that allow deposition of silicon oxide in PECVD mode. Generally, the apparatus will include one or more chambers or “reactors” (sometimes including multiple stations) that house one or more wafers and are suitable for wafer processing. Each chamber may house one or more wafers for processing. The one or more chambers maintain the wafer in a defined position or positions (with or without motion within that position, e.g. rotation, vibration, or other agitation). In one embodiment, a wafer undergoing the deposition and plasma treatment is transferred from one station to another within the reactor during the process. For example in some implementations, a portion of silicon oxide is deposited on a wafer by PECVD and is plasma treated at a first station of the PECVD apparatus; the wafer is then transferred to a second station of the PECVD apparatus, where an addition portion of silicon oxide is deposited by PECVD and is treated. In one embodiment, formation of a high-quality silicon oxide layer of a desired thickness is deposited in four stations, where each station deposits and treats one fourth of the layer thickness. For example if a 100 Å is the target thickness of the layer, each station deposits and treats 25 Å thick silicon oxide film.
While in process, each wafer is held in place by a pedestal, wafer chuck and/or other wafer holding apparatus. For certain operations in which the wafer is to be heated, the apparatus may include a heater such as a heating plate. In one embodiment of the invention, a PECVD system is used both for deposition and treatment of the layer. When treatment is UV treatment, the source of UV radiation with a wavelength of less than 180 nm can be incorporated into the PECVD apparatus. In other embodiments, separate process chambers or even separate apparatuses may be used for the deposition and treatment steps.
Within the reactor, a wafer pedestal 518 supports a substrate 516. The pedestal typically includes a chuck, a fork, or lift pins to hold and transfer the substrate during and between the deposition reactions. The chuck may be an electrostatic chuck, a mechanical chuck or various other types of chuck as are available for use in the industry and/or research.
The process gases are introduced via inlet 512. Multiple source gas lines 510 are connected to manifold 508. The gases may be premixed or not. Appropriate valving and mass flow control mechanisms are employed to ensure that the correct gases are delivered during the deposition, purging, and plasma treatment, phases of the process. In case the chemical precursor(s) is delivered in the liquid form, liquid flow control mechanisms are employed. The liquid is then vaporized and mixed with other process gases during its transportation in a manifold heated above its vaporization point before reaching the deposition chamber.
Process gases exit chamber 500 via an outlet 522. A vacuum pump 526 (e.g., a one or two stage mechanical dry pump and/or a turbomolecular pump) typically draws process gases out and maintains a suitably low pressure within the reactor by a close loop controlled flow restriction device, such as a throttle valve or a pendulum valve.
A controller 530 is associated with the PECVD reactor 500 and can include program instructions for performing any of the processes described herein. For example the controller 530 can specify the necessary parameters for performing deposition of the PECVD silicon oxide at low temperature, for purging the process chamber to remove a silicon-containing precursor, and for plasma treating the deposited silicon oxide layer to reduce the stress of the silicon oxide layer.
In one of the embodiments a multi-station apparatus may be used for PECVD deposition and treatment. The multi-station reactor allows one to run different processes concurrently in one chamber environment, thereby increasing the efficiency of wafer processing. One example of such an apparatus is depicted in
According to one of the embodiments described above, all stations 603-609 are configured to perform the same function, and each station is configured for both PECVD deposition of silicon oxide and for treatment of deposited layer. An indexing plate 611 is used to lift the substrates off the pedestals and to accurately position the substrates at the next processing station. After the wafer substrate is loaded at station 603, it is indexed to station 605, where formation of the high quality silicon oxide film (including PECVD deposition and treatment) is performed. The wafer is then moved to station 607 where and additional portion of silicon oxide is deposited and treated. The substrate is further indexed to station 609, where further deposition and treatment of silicon oxide is performed, and then indexed to station 603 to deposit and treat more of diffusion silicon oxide layer. For example, each station may deposit and treat 25 Å of silicon oxide to form a 100 Å thick silicon oxide layer, or each station may deposit and treat 50 Å of silicon oxide to form a 200 Å thick silicon oxide layer. The processed wafer is unloaded at station 603, and the module is charged with a new wafer. During normal operation, a separate substrate occupies each station and each time the process is repeated the substrates are moved to new stations. Thus, an apparatus having four stations 603, 605, 607, and 609 allows simultaneous processing of four wafers. This type of processing that involves breaking down the film formation into substantially identical phases, where each phase includes deposition and treatment of a portion of the film, is particularly advantageous because it increases wafer-to wafer reproducibility of deposition.
The process conditions and the process flow itself can be controlled by a controller unit 613 which comprises program instructions for a monitoring, maintaining and/or adjusting certain process variables, such as RF plasma power, gas flow rates and times, temperature, pressure and the like. For example, instructions specifying flow rates of silane and CO2 for silicon oxide deposition may be included. The instructions may specify all of the parameters to perform operations, according to methods described above. For example, instructions may include parameters of PECVD deposition, purging, and plasma treatment. The controller may comprise different or identical instructions for different apparatus stations, thus allowing the apparatus stations to operate either independently or synchronously.
In some implementations, a controller is part of a system, which may be part of the above-described examples. Such systems can comprise semiconductor processing equipment, including a processing tool or tools, chamber or chambers, a platform or platforms for processing, and/or specific processing components (a wafer pedestal, a gas flow system, etc.). These systems may be integrated with electronics for controlling their operation before, during, and after processing of a semiconductor wafer or substrate. The electronics may be referred to as the “controller,” which may control various components or subparts of the system or systems. The controller, depending on the processing requirements and/or the type of system, may be programmed to control any of the processes disclosed herein, including the delivery of processing gases, temperature settings (e.g., heating and/or cooling), pressure settings, vacuum settings, power settings, radio frequency (RF) generator settings, RF matching circuit settings, frequency settings, flow rate settings, fluid delivery settings, positional and operation settings, wafer transfers into and out of a tool and other transfer tools and/or load locks connected to or interfaced with a specific system.
Broadly speaking, the controller may be defined as electronics having various integrated circuits, logic, memory, and/or software that receive instructions, issue instructions, control operation, enable cleaning operations, enable endpoint measurements, and the like. The integrated circuits may include chips in the form of firmware that store program instructions, digital signal processors (DSPs), chips defined as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or one or more microprocessors, or microcontrollers that execute program instructions (e.g., software). Program instructions may be instructions communicated to the controller in the form of various individual settings (or program files), defining operational parameters for carrying out a particular process on or for a semiconductor wafer or to a system. The operational parameters may, in some embodiments, be part of a recipe defined by process engineers to accomplish one or more processing steps during the fabrication of one or more layers, materials, metals, oxides, silicon, silicon dioxide, surfaces, circuits, and/or dies of a wafer.
The controller, in some implementations, may be a part of or coupled to a computer that is integrated with, coupled to the system, otherwise networked to the system, or a combination thereof. For example, the controller may be in the “cloud” or all or a part of a fab host computer system, which can allow for remote access of the wafer processing. The computer may enable remote access to the system to monitor current progress of fabrication operations, examine a history of past fabrication operations, examine trends or performance metrics from a plurality of fabrication operations, to change parameters of current processing, to set processing steps to follow a current processing, or to start a new process. In some examples, a remote computer (e.g. a server) can provide process recipes to a system over a network, which may include a local network or the Internet. The remote computer may include a user interface that enables entry or programming of parameters and/or settings, which are then communicated to the system from the remote computer. In some examples, the controller receives instructions in the form of data, which specify parameters for each of the processing steps to be performed during one or more operations. It should be understood that the parameters may be specific to the type of process to be performed and the type of tool that the controller is configured to interface with or control. Thus as described above, the controller may be distributed, such as by comprising one or more discrete controllers that are networked together and working towards a common purpose, such as the processes and controls described herein. An example of a distributed controller for such purposes would be one or more integrated circuits on a chamber in communication with one or more integrated circuits located remotely (such as at the platform level or as part of a remote computer) that combine to control a process on the chamber.
Without limitation, example systems may include a plasma etch chamber or module, a deposition chamber or module, a spin-rinse chamber or module, a metal plating chamber or module, a clean chamber or module, a bevel edge etch chamber or module, a physical vapor deposition (PVD) chamber or module, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) chamber or module, an atomic layer deposition (ALD) chamber or module, an atomic layer etch (ALE) chamber or module, an ion implantation chamber or module, a track chamber or module, and any other semiconductor processing systems that may be associated or used in the fabrication and/or manufacturing of semiconductor wafers.
As noted above, depending on the process step or steps to be performed by the tool, the controller might communicate with one or more of other tool circuits or modules, other tool components, cluster tools, other tool interfaces, adjacent tools, neighboring tools, tools located throughout a factory, a main computer, another controller, or tools used in material transport that bring containers of wafers to and from tool locations and/or load ports in a semiconductor manufacturing factory. Machine-readable media containing instructions for controlling process operations in accordance with the present invention may be coupled to the system controller.
The apparatus/process described hereinabove may be used in conjunction with lithographic patterning tools or processes, for example, for the fabrication or manufacture of semiconductor devices, displays, LEDs, photovoltaic panels and the like. Typically, though not necessarily, such tools/processes will be used or conducted together in a common fabrication facility. Lithographic patterning of a film typically comprises some or all of the following steps, each step enabled with a number of possible tools: (1) application of photoresist on a workpiece, i.e., substrate, using a spin-on or spray-on tool; (2) curing of photoresist using a hot plate or furnace or UV curing tool; (3) exposing the photoresist to visible or UV or x-ray light with a tool such as a wafer stepper; (4) developing the resist so as to selectively remove resist and thereby pattern it using a tool such as a wet bench; (5) transferring the resist pattern into an underlying film or workpiece by using a dry or plasma-assisted etching tool; and (6) removing the resist using a tool such as an RF or microwave plasma resist stripper.
Several embodiments of the described methods and devices will now be illustrated by specific examples.
A number of silicon oxide films were deposited by PECVD in a Vector PECVD reactor available from Lam Research Corporation, Fremont Calif., on planar 300 mm wafers at a temperature of 180° C., and pressures of 2.5 Torr-3.5 Torr. The process gas used during deposition consisted of SiH4 (provided at 30 sccm), CO2 (provided at 4200 sccm) and He. Plasma was generated in the process gas using HF RF generation at 13.56 MHz at a power level of 100-400 W. The deposition was conducted for 5 seconds; then the flows of SiH4 and CO2 into the process chamber were stopped, while the plasma and helium flow remained on for 5 seconds to purge the SiH4 and CO2 out of the process chamber. Next, plasma power was increased to 500-1000 W and helium flow was increased to 1000-4000 sccm and the deposited silicon oxide films were plasma treated under these conditions for 6-20 seconds. Temperature and pressure remained constant for each film throughout the process. The flow rates and plasma power levels are given for processing on a single wafer. The films were deposited to a thickness of 400 Å in order to facilitate accurate measurement of stress. After deposition, stress and density of the formed films were measured. Stress was calculated using a measurement of the bow change of the Si wafer substrate and the film thickness ellipsometry. Density was calculated by the change in mass on the Si substrate and the film thickness ellipsometry. The density and stress values of formed films are illustrated in the plot shown in
An FT IR spectrum of a low-stress silicon oxide material was obtained. The film was formed as described in Example 1, using the following process parameters: temperature of 180° C., pressure of 3.5 Torr, plasma power of 100 W (generated at 13.56 Mhz), SiH4 flow rate of 30 sccm, CO2 flow rate of 4200 sccm and He flow rate of 1250 sccm. The formed film had a stress of less than −40 MPa. It can be seen that the FT IR spectrum does not have a Si—H peak at about 2250 cm−1, which is typically present in silicon oxide films deposited by low temperature PECVD without plasma post-treatment. This indicates that plasma post-treatment reduces the concentration of hydrogen in the formed films.
A comparative silicon oxide film was deposited by low temperature PECVD to a thickness of 411 Å, and its stress, density and RI were measured. The deposition was conducted at a temperature of 180° C., and pressure of 3.5 Torr, using plasma power of 100 W (13.56 Mhz), SiH4 flow rate of 30 sccm, CO2 flow rate of 4200 sccm and He flow rate of 1250 sccm.
Another silicon oxide film was deposited by low temperature PECVD using the same process conditions as those used in the deposition of the comparative film above, and was then plasma treated at a temperature of 180° C., pressure of 3.5 Torr, using plasma power of 500 W (13.56 Mhz), and He flow rate of 1000 sccm. Stress, density, and RI of the treated film were measured.
Parameters for the comparative film and for the treated film are provided in Table 4.
It is noted that RI of greater than 1.47 was obtained due to a metrology offset for thin films. RI was measured using ellipsometry.
Four films were deposited and treated with helium plasma as described in Example 1. The following conditions were used: temperature of 180° C., plasma power of 100 W (13.56 MHz), SiH4 flow rate of 30 sccm, CO2 flow rate of 4200 sccm and He flow rate of 1250 sccm. The pressure during deposition was constant for all four films and was 3.5 Torr. Pressure during plasma treatment step was varied between 1.5 torr, 2.5 torr, 3.5 torr and 4.5 torr. Treatment pressure was the only process parameter that was varied during film formation.
Several films having different thicknesses were deposited and plasma treated with helium as described herein. The effect of duration of plasma treatment step on film stress was studied and is shown in
Several films having different thicknesses were deposited and plasma treated with helium as described herein. The effect of duration of plasma treatment step on film stress was studied and is shown in
Although various details have been omitted for clarity's sake, various design alternatives may be implemented. Therefore, the present examples are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3704219 | McDowell | Nov 1972 | A |
3983385 | Troue | Sep 1976 | A |
4313969 | Matthews et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4357451 | McDaniel | Nov 1982 | A |
4391663 | Hatter, III | Jul 1983 | A |
4563589 | Scheffer | Jan 1986 | A |
4751191 | Gonsiorawski et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4837289 | Mueller et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4885262 | Ting et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4927786 | Nishida | May 1990 | A |
4956582 | Bourassa | Sep 1990 | A |
4968384 | Asano | Nov 1990 | A |
5028560 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5088003 | Sakai et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5174881 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178682 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5195045 | Keane et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5249076 | Fujiwara et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5268320 | Holler et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5281546 | Possin et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282121 | Bornhorst et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5288684 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5298939 | Swanson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300331 | Schaeffer | Apr 1994 | A |
5314538 | Maeda et al. | May 1994 | A |
5364667 | Rhieu | Nov 1994 | A |
5407524 | Patrick et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413664 | Yagi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5504042 | Cho et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5552927 | Wheatly et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556549 | Patrick et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558717 | Zhao et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5582880 | Mochizuki et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5648175 | Russell et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5660895 | Lee | Aug 1997 | A |
5667592 | Boitnott et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5686054 | Barthel et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700844 | Hedrick et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5734187 | Bohr et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5789027 | Watkins et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812403 | Fong et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5840600 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849640 | Hsia et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851715 | Barthel et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858457 | Brinker et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876798 | Vassiliev | Mar 1999 | A |
5877095 | Tamura et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6015503 | Butterbaugh et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020035 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6090442 | Klaus et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098637 | Parke | Aug 2000 | A |
6132814 | Livesay et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136680 | Lai et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140252 | Cho et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150272 | Liu et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6171661 | Zheng et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6228563 | Starov et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232248 | Shinriki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239018 | Liu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6254689 | Meder | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268288 | Hautala et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270846 | Brinker et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6271273 | You et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280171 | Buazza | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284050 | Shi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288493 | Lee et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290589 | Tolles | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6316167 | Angelopoulos et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6329017 | Liu et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329062 | Gaynor | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333268 | Starov et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340628 | Van Cleemput et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348407 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365266 | MacDougall et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367412 | Ramaswamy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383466 | Domansky et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6383955 | Matsuki et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6386466 | Ozawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387453 | Brinker et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391932 | Gore et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392017 | Chandrashekar | May 2002 | B1 |
6394797 | Sugaya et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399212 | Sakai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407007 | Tsan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420441 | Allen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444036 | Chern et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6444715 | Mukherjee et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455417 | Bao et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467491 | Sugiura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475854 | Narwankar et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6479374 | Ioka et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479409 | Shioya et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485599 | Glownia et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6518130 | Ohno | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531193 | Fonash | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6534395 | Werkhoven et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6548113 | Birnbaum et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558755 | Berry et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563092 | Shrinivasan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566278 | Harvey et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6568346 | Pu et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6570256 | Conti et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6572252 | Rangarajan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6576300 | Berry et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6596467 | Gallagher et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596654 | Bagman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6635575 | Xia et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6644786 | Lebens | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6677251 | Lu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6677253 | Andideh et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6680262 | Andideh et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6734118 | Kloster et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740602 | Hendriks et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6740605 | Shiraiwa et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6756085 | Waldfried et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759098 | Han et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767836 | San et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770866 | Retschke et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797643 | Rocha-Alvarez et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800546 | Konishi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6805801 | Humayun et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812043 | Bao et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821906 | Wada et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830624 | Janakiraman et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831284 | Demos et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835417 | Saenger et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6848458 | Shrinivasan et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856712 | Fauver et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867143 | Furukawa et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875687 | Weidman et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6884738 | Asai et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890850 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899857 | Pheng et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902440 | Dougan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921727 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6958301 | Kim et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962871 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967160 | Paton et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6991959 | Goundar et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7005390 | Ramachandrarao et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7017514 | Shepherd et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7018918 | Kloster et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025831 | Butterbaugh et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7030041 | Li et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7094713 | Niu et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7097712 | Yamazaki et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7112541 | Xia et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7132334 | Lin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7132374 | Mak et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144606 | Huang | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7148155 | Tarafdar | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7166531 | Van den Hoek et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7169256 | Dhindsa et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176144 | Wang et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7195548 | Hardikar et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7208389 | Tipton et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7235459 | Sandhu | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241704 | Wu et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7244672 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247582 | Stern et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253125 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7256111 | Lopatin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264676 | Lai et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7265061 | Cho et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7304302 | Nunan et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7326444 | Wu et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7327948 | Shrinivasan et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7332445 | Lukas et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341761 | Wu et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7381659 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7381662 | Niu et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7390537 | Wu et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7394067 | Soltz et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7402532 | Clevenger et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7481882 | Won et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482265 | Chen et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7504663 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510982 | Draeger et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7538012 | Ohmi et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7611757 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7622162 | van Schravendijk et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7622400 | Fox et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7705431 | Sanganeria et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7790633 | Tarafdar et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7851232 | van Schravendijk et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7858533 | Liu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7906174 | Wu et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8043667 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8062983 | Draeger et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8063983 | Kotake et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8137465 | Shrinivasan et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8178443 | Rangarajan et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8211510 | Varadarajan et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8242028 | van Schravendijk et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8247332 | Rangarajan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8454750 | Shrinivasan et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8465991 | Varadarajan et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8512818 | Varadarajan et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8536073 | Rangarajan et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8629068 | Shrinivasan et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8647993 | Lavoie et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8715788 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8889233 | Kelman et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8980769 | Haverkamp et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9050623 | Varadarajan | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9337068 | Antonelli et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9659769 | Varadarajan et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
20010001501 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010014512 | Lyons et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020001973 | Wu et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015850 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020016085 | Huang et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034626 | Liu et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052124 | Raaijmakers et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064341 | Fauver et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020076946 | Kim et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094388 | Fonash | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106500 | Albano et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117109 | Hazelton et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123218 | Shioya et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123240 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020148563 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172766 | Laxman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187627 | Yuang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195683 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030013280 | Yamanaka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030015764 | Raaijmakers et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033983 | Song et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030049375 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064604 | Umeda | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030064607 | Leu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068881 | Xia et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077896 | Saito et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030134038 | Paranjpe | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157248 | Watkins et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030157267 | Waldfried et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030199603 | Walker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203321 | Ma et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227087 | Kakamu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228769 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228770 | Lee et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002617 | Rantala et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040004247 | Forbes et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018319 | Waldfried et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022960 | Rhee et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023513 | Aoyama et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029391 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040033662 | Lee et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040058090 | Waldfried et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062633 | Rice et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069410 | Moghadam et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040072405 | Yao et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082163 | Mori et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096593 | Lukas et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096672 | Lukas et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099915 | Takayama et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099952 | Goodner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101633 | Zheng et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102031 | Kloster et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040115933 | Jung et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040151845 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152239 | Bao et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161535 | Goundar et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166240 | Rhee et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175501 | Lukas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040175957 | Lukas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040178169 | Desphande et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185679 | Ott et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040221871 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224496 | Cui et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266214 | Suguro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016687 | Shinriki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025892 | Satoh et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050026454 | Konishi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032293 | Clark et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045206 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056369 | Lai et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064712 | Andreas | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064726 | Reid et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079717 | Savas et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095840 | Bhanap et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101154 | Huang | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112282 | Gordon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050153533 | Hoshino et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156285 | Gates et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161821 | Lee et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164497 | Lopatin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050170104 | Jung et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191803 | Matsuse et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050194619 | Edelstein et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050208758 | Lu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050233598 | Jung et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050255712 | Kato et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260357 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260420 | Collins et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263719 | Ohdaira et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050264218 | Dhindsa et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272220 | Waldfried et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060024976 | Waldfried et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060027929 | Cooney et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040507 | Mak et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046516 | Weber | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063662 | Hata et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060105106 | Balseanu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110931 | Fukazawa et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110936 | Hill et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060118817 | Haisma | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121208 | Siegel | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141806 | Waldfried et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142143 | Abrevaya et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145304 | Boyanov et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189133 | Dimitrakopoulos et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060216433 | Fukazawa et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216839 | Shemesh et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220251 | Kloster | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246672 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260538 | Ye et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265868 | Rueger et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269693 | Balseanu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009673 | Fukazawa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070015355 | Lin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020940 | Ohmi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032024 | Peidous et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042581 | Sano et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070054504 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065578 | McDougall et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077751 | Chen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070105292 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128882 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070132054 | Arghavani et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134821 | Thakur et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134907 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141812 | Zagwijn et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161230 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189961 | Iacopi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196011 | Cox et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196972 | Shima | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070207624 | Chua | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215377 | Aoki | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222081 | Chen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224824 | Chen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228570 | Dimitrakopoulos et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070254204 | Shin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264839 | Van Gompel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275569 | Moghadam et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281497 | Liu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287240 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080009141 | Dubois et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080020591 | Balseanu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080026579 | Lai et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080053615 | Sago et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080099754 | Enicks | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132055 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080194105 | Dominguez et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199977 | Weigel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242118 | Dimitrakopoulos et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254643 | Clevenger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080286697 | Verhaverbeke et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080305600 | Liao et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080305648 | Fukazawa | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318437 | Kim et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080318438 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090017640 | Huh et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039475 | Shioya | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090042402 | Morioka | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059406 | Powers et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090207624 | Ma et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090243001 | Ramkumar et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090269507 | Yu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278116 | Yamate | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100018460 | Singh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100216303 | Ohkura | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100261349 | Van Schravendijk et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267231 | Van Schravendijk et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100308463 | Yu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317198 | Antonelli et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110045610 | Van Schravendijk et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110111533 | Varadarajan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110117678 | Varadarajan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133313 | Rangarajan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110135557 | Rangarajan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110236593 | Okino et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120040535 | Wang | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120061718 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120241089 | Dielmann et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120276752 | Rangarajan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130157466 | Fox et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140080324 | Shrinivasan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140094038 | Haverkamp et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140175617 | Antonelli et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150114292 | Haverkamp et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160138160 | Lambert et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1531749 | Sep 2004 | CN |
1624895 | Jun 2005 | CN |
101005023 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101111930 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101536191 | Sep 2009 | CN |
102074500 | May 2011 | CN |
1 172 845 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 186 685 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1 703 328 | Sep 2006 | EP |
62-229833 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-307740 | Dec 1988 | JP |
01-107519 | Apr 1989 | JP |
05-031735 | Feb 1993 | JP |
05-138658 | Jun 1993 | JP |
09-306892 | Nov 1997 | JP |
11214364 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001-104776 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-160547 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002-176100 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-217189 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2004-247725 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2006-165573 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007-508691 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-158000 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-194582 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008-529296 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2010-103151 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2000-0043888 | Jul 2000 | KR |
10-2009-0121361 | Nov 2009 | KR |
10-1201039 | Nov 2012 | KR |
535253 | Jun 2003 | TW |
200405437 | Apr 2004 | TW |
200803988 | Jan 2008 | TW |
200839884 | Oct 2008 | TW |
200908138 | Feb 2009 | TW |
201130045 | Sep 2011 | TW |
201214512 | Apr 2012 | TW |
201237959 | Sep 2012 | TW |
201240012 | Oct 2012 | TW |
WO 0221593 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 03005429 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2006104583 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2006127463 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007043206 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007116492 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008156680 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2012087620 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2004 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/672,311. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2004 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/672,311. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/672,311. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/672,311. |
US Office Action (Supplemental), dated Jan. 10, 2006, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/672,311. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated May 22, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/672,311. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/825,888. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/825,888. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 4, 2007 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/825,888. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/824,049. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/824,049. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 22, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/824,049. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/566,514. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 13, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/566,514. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,209. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2012 issued in Ussn 13/275,209 [NOVLP088C3]. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2013 issued in Ussn 13/275,209 [NOVLP088C3]. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 9, 2014 issued in Ussn 13/275,209 [NOVLP088C3]. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2006 issued in Ussn 10/800,377 [NOVLP089]. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 10, 2006 issued in Ussn 10/800,377 [NOVLP089]. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2005 issued in Ussn 10/860,340 [NOVLP099]. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/860,340. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 20, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/860,340. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2007 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/146,456. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/146,456. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 10, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/146,456. |
U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 15, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/146,456. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/369,384. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 19, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/369,384. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 14, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/519,445. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/519,445. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/519,445. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/519,445. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 21, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/519,445. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/519,445. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 2, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 1, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 22, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief (filed Nov. 20, 2013) Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board on Mar. 13, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. 2nd or Subsequent Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief (filed Nov. 20, 2013) Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board on Apr. 2, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Decision on Appeal Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board dated Apr. 25, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 29, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 17, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,311. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,102. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,102. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,102. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,102. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 24, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,102. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,048. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 17, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,048. |
U.S. Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 8, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,048. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/608,056. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/608,056. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 2, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/608,056. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 4, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/688,695. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,694. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 12, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,694. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,792. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,792. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,792. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,792. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,792. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 8, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,792. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 9, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,792. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/593,046. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 1, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/593,046. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/897,838. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 2, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/897,838. |
U.S. Office Action, dated Jan. 3, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,051. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 22, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,051. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,060. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,060. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,060. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,060. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 5, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,060. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,830. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,830. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 25, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,830. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,830. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,830. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,830. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,830. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,830. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,830. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,549. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,549. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,549. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,549. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2013 issued in Application No. CN 201010539625.7. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2013 issued in Application No. CN 201010539625.7. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated May 23, 2014 issued in Application No. CN 201010539625.7. |
Chinese Fourth Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2015 issued in Application No. CN 201010539625.7. |
Chinese Fifth Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2015 issued in Application No. CN 201010539625.7. |
Chinese Sixth Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201010539625.7. |
Chinese Seventh Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201010539625.7. |
Korean Notification of Provisional Rejection dated Jul. 12, 2011 issued in Application No. KR 10-2010-0066153. |
Korean Notification of Provisional Rejection dated Mar. 26, 2012 issued in Application No. KR 10-2010-0066153. |
SG Examination Report dated Apr. 25, 2012 issued in Application No. SG 2010079747. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2013 issued in Application No. TW 099123184. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 26, 2012, issued in PCT/US2011/064246. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Jul. 4, 2013, issued in PCT/US2011/064246. |
Korean Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2013, issued in Application No. KR 20137019282. |
Korean Second Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2013, issued in Application No. KR 2013-7019282. |
Taiwan Search Report dated Aug. 20, 2013 issued in Application No. TW 100147212. |
Arghavani et al., (2007) “Strain Engineering in Non-Volatile Memories,” Reed Business Information, 6 pp. |
Chaabouni, H. et at , (2007) “Sidewall restoration of porous ultra low-k dielectrics for sub-45 nm technology nodes,”Microelectronic Engineering 84:2595-2599. |
Chaabouni, H. et al., (Sep. 2008) “Porous SiOCH Ultra Low-K recovery treatments after direct CMP process,” Advanced Metallization Conference, 2 pp. |
Cho et al., (2001) “Plasma Treatments of Molecularly Templated Nanoporous Silica Films,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 4(4): G35-G38. |
Daumont et al., (1992) “Ozone UV Spectroscopy I: Absorption Cross-Sections at Room Temperature,” Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 15:145-155. |
Deshmukh, et al., (Mar./Apr. 1993) “Remote Plasma Etching Reactors: Modeling and Experiment,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 11(2):206-215. |
Gangpadhyay et al., “The First International Surface Cleaning Workshop,” Northeastern University, Nov. 11-14, 2002, 24 pp. |
Ghani et al., “A 90nm High vol. Manufacturing Logic Technology Featuring Novel 45nm Gate Length Strained Silicon CMOS Transistors,” IEEE, ©2003, 3 pp. |
Huang, H. et al., “O2 Plasma Damage and Dielectric Recoveries to Patterned CDO Low-k Dielectrics,” Advanced Metallization Conference, Sep. 2008, 6 pp. |
Ityaksov, D. et al., (2008) “Deep-UV absorption and Rayleigh scattering of carbon dioxide,” Chemical Physical Letters, 462:31-34. |
Jan, C.H., et al., 90NM Generation, 300mm Wafer Low k ILD/Cu Interconnect Technology, 2003 IEEE Interconnect Technology Conference, 3 pp. |
Lewis, R.J. Sr., Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 12th Edition, Van Nostrad Reinhold Co., New York, 1993 (no month), excerpts pp. 916-918 & 1123-1124. |
Li, Shuang et al., (Mar. 9, 2005) “Organic-functionalized pure-silica-zeolite MFI low-k films,” Chem. Mater., 17:1851-1854. |
Malicet et al., (1995) “Ozone UV Spectroscopy. II. Absorption Cross-Sections and Temperature Dependence,” Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 21:263-273. |
Morin P. et al., (May 2005) “Tensile contact etch stop layer for nMOS performance enhancement: influence of the film morphology,” ECS meeting, 6 pp. |
Nagayoshi et al., (Jul. 1, 1992) “Residual Stress of a Si1-x Nx : H Films Prepared by Afterglow Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition Technique,” Jpn. I Appl. Phys., 31:L867-L869 Part 2, No. 7A. |
Rodriquez, J.A. et al., “Evolution of the mechanical stress on PECVD silicon oxide films under thermal processing,” Journal ofMaterials Science Letters 19, 2000, pp. 1399-1401. |
Singer, Peter “New Materials and Designs to Improve Transistor Performance,” Apr. 1, 2004, Semiconductor International, 4 pp. |
Smith, D.L et al., (1990) “Mechanism of SiN3 -SiH4 Llasma,”J. Electrochem. Soc., 137(2):10 pp. |
Takagi et al., (1997) “High Rate Deposition of a-SiNx :H by VHF PECVD”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Materials Research Society, 467:6 pp. |
Takagi et al., (1998) “High Rate Deposition of a-Si:H and a-SiNx :H by VHF PECVD,” Vacuum, 51(4): 751 -755. |
van Dishoeck, et al., (Jun. 20, 2011) “Molecular photodissociation,” Modern Concepts in Laboratory Astrochemistry, arXiv:1106.3917v1 [astro-ph.IM], 18 pp. |
Varadarajan et al., “Development of High Stress SiN Films for Use with Strained Silicon Technologies,” Proc. 68th Symp. On Semiconductors and IC Tech. Kyoto 2005, 4 pp. |
Varadarajan, Bhadri N. (Aug. 21, 2003) “Tensile Silicon Nitride — P1264 NESL,” C & F Study, 11 pp. |
Venot, O. et al., (2013) “High-temperature measurements of VUV-absorption cross sections of CO2 and their application to exoplanets,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, 551:A131. |
Yu, J.J. et al., (2002) “UV Annealing of Ultrathin Tantalum Oxide Films,” Applied Surface Science, 186:57-63. |
Yung et al., (2001) “Spin-on Mesoporous Silica Films with Ultralow Dielectric Constants, Ordered Pore Structures, and Hydrophobic Surfaces,” Adv. Mater., 13(14):1099-1102. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 20, 2005, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/849,568. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 31, 2006, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/849,568. |
US Office Action, dated Oct. 18, 2006, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/849,568. |
US Final Office Action, dated Mar. 27, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/849,568. |
US Office Action, dated Jun. 22, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/849,568. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 18, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/849,568. |
US Final Office Action, dated Sep. 25, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/849,568. |
US Office Action, dated Jan. 22, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/849,568. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 10, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/849,568. |
US Office Action, dated May 22, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/376,510. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 27, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/376,510. |
US Supplemental Notice of Allowance, dated May 1, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/376,510. |
US Office Action, dated Dec. 12, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,658. |
US Office Action, dated Jul. 8, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,658. |
US Final Office Action, dated Mar. 18, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,658. |
US Office Action, dated Aug. 28, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/639,661. |
US Office Action, dated Feb. 24, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/639,661. |
US Final Office Action, dated Nov. 5, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,661. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 10, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/631,691. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 24, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/631,709. |
US Notice of Allowance, dated May 15, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/546,937. |
US Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/105,026. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 29, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/105,026. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 issued in Application No. 201010569747.0. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2014 issued in CN Application No. 201010569747.0. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2015 issued in CN Application No. 201010569747.0. |
Japanese Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2014 issued in Application No. 2010-256165. |
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2017 issued in Application No. KR 10-2010-0123145. |
Taiwan Notice of Allowance and Search Report dated Jul. 8, 2015 issued in Application No. TW 099140866. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 104126278. |
Taiwan Examination Report dated Mar. 14, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 102146997. |
Hoffman et al., (May/Jun. 1995) “Plasma-enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition of Silicon, Germanium, and Tin Nitride Thin Films from Metalorganic Precursors”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.A 13(3):820-824. |
International Sematech Ultra Low-K Workshop. (2002) p. 1. |
Szekeres, A. et al. (2006) “Plasma-assisted chemical vapor deposited silicon oxynitride as an alternative material for gate dielectric in MOS devices,” Microelectronics Journal 37, pp. 64-70. |
Wang et al. (2003) “Reduction of Oxygen Plasma Damage by Postdeposition Helium Plasma Treatment for Carbon-Doped Silicon Oxide Low Dielectric Constant Films,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 6 (1) F1-F3. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/056,926, dated Jan. 24, 2002, Gaynor. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/295,965, dated Nov. 15, 2002, Schulberg et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/301,013, dated Nov. 21, 2002, Watkins et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,661, dated Jan. 22, 2007, Cho et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/807,680, dated Mar. 23, 2004, Wu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,654, dated Nov. 5, 2004, Cho et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/840,192, dated Jul. 20, 2010, Tarafdar et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/972,084, dated Oct. 22, 2004, Varadarajan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,834, dated Nov. 20, 2006, Kamian et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,409, dated Jan. 11, 2007, Shaviv et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,423, dated Jan. 11, 2007, Schravendijk. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,732, dated Nov. 21, 2013, Shrinivassan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,581, dated Mar. 30, 2007, Haverkamp et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/172,089, dated Jul. 11, 2008, Wu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/975,473, dated Oct. 18, 2007, Varadarajan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,683, dated Sep. 7, 2007, Jiang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,060, dated Sep. 12, 2008, Haverkamp et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,658, dated Mar. 6, 2006, Wu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,661, dated Mar. 29, 2007, Wu et al. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,661. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,661. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 19, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,661. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,661. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,661. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,661. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2007 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/807,680. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/807,680. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,654. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,654. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,654. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/840,192. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/840,192. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 20, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/840,192. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/840,192 . |
U.S. Office Action dated May 21, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,834. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,834. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,409. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,409. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,423. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,423. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/940,324. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,732. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,732. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,581. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,581. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,581. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,581. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,581. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,581. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,581. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/026,894. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/026,894. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 31, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,263. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,263. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,263. |
U.S. Final Office Action, dated Aug. 7, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,263. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/172,089. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/172,089. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/975,473. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/975,473. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/975,473. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/975,473. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/975,473. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 29, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,683. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,683. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,990. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,990. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 7, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/593,046. |
Taiwan Examination Report dated Aug. 8, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 102146997. |