Integrated circuit packaging
Efforts are being made to stack chips or dice to increase performance without taking more space (e.g., more surface area) on a printed circuit board. This is particularly driven by requirements for sophisticated cell phones, smart phones, and other mobile devices. Chip makers have combined dynamic and static random access memory (DRAM and SRAM), flash and other memory in a connected integrated circuit structure or stack, but have historically been restrained by the added space requirements of wiring (e.g., wire bonding) that connects the chips. Chip or die stacking technology bonds two or more dies together to form a connected integrated circuit structure. The chips or dies may be connected together with interconnect wiring along the sides of the stack or metal vias at the die-die interfaces.
One common approach for chip or die stacking is referred to as face-to-face bonding. In this configuration, the device sides of, for example, two respective dies are stacked so that their device sides are facing one another and metal vias electrically connect the dies at the die-die interface. In one representation of a face-to-face bonded connected integrated circuit structure, a central processing unit (CPU) or logic die and a memory die (e.g., SRAM or DRAM die) are stacked together in a face-to-face bonding configuration. A heat sink may be attached to the bulk of the CPU or logic die and the power and input/output (I/O) connections to the package or circuit board are made with bump technology attached to the bulk of the memory die. Through-silicon vias (TSVs) may be used to pass through the memory die and connect to the metal die-to-die interface.
In the above example, since the through-silicon vias pass through the active silicon area of the memory of the second die (e.g., a memory die), sufficient area must be allocated in the circuitry to permit the through-silicon vias. These vias can typically be large (greater than 10 times) the minimum design rules for a given process due to power delivery requirements. Power for both dies is supplied by the through-silicon vias. Power requirements will dictate an approximately one through-silicon via per bump contact. In flip chip packaging, the bumps are usually arranged in a widely spaced uniform pattern across an entire two-dimensional die allowing for a high number of uniform power and ground connections at the top metal layer. This requires that the circuitry in the second die (e.g., memory die) be designed to accommodate these vias with proper spacing to adjacent geometries. This implies that the second die would need to be custom designed to exactly match the via requirements of the first die.
Another bonding configuration is a face-to-back bonding configuration. Using the example of a CPU die and a memory die, in a face-to-back bonding configuration, the position of the two die might be swapped. For example, the first die (CPU die) signal and power connections would be attached to the package in a typical way using standard bump technology. Power and signal connections for the second die (e.g., memory die) would pass through the first die using through-silicon vias. The power requirements of a memory die are usually much lower than a CPU or logic die and therefore the number of through silicon vias required to pass through the first die (e.g., CPU die) is considerably less and need not be uniformly spaced across the die. This makes the design and layout of a CPU die much less impacted by the three-dimensional bonding of a second die.
Features, aspects, and advantages of embodiments will become more thoroughly apparent from the following detailed description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings in which:
Memory dice (e.g., SRAM, DRAM) are readily available in either die or wafer form. These dice are commonly used in wire-bonded applications. Representatively, these dice may have 4-32 I/O plus power bond pads per die. These bond pads are usually arranged in a narrow one to two bond pad wide column through the center of the die.
In one embodiment die 110 may be a multi-core processor. A multi-core processor generally has multiple complete execution cores in one physical processor, each running at the same frequency. Each core typically shares the same packaging. Referring to
In one embodiment, die 110 and dice 210 are connected in a face-to-back bonding configuration. Referring to
In some embodiments, through-silicon vias associated with die 110 will not be aligned with contacts (e.g., bond pads) of dice 210. In such situations, an electrically conductive redistribution layer, such as a metal (e.g., copper) layer, may be patterned on either the back side of die 110 or the device side of dice 210. Such a redistribution layer can serve as an interconnect between the contact points (e.g., bond pads) of dice 210 and through-silicon vias 130.
Where necessary, a spacer material may be formed of, for example, a dielectric material in conjunction with the redistribution layer on a surface of die 110 or dies 210 to account for any gaps between the dies.
In the description with reference to
Referring to
Having determined the memory requirements, a number of memory dice are then selected such that a sum of the surface area of multiple dice approximate the surface area (e.g., a back side surface area) of a CPU logic die (block 720). For example, where a surface area of a CPU or logic die is 400 mm2, and one Gb DRAM memory chips are available having a surface area of 100 mm2, four DRAM memory chips (4×100 mm2) approximates a surface area of the CPU or logic die.
Following the selection of the memory dice, the contact points (power and I/O contact points) of the memory dice are examined and a pattern compared to a pattern of through-silicon vias desired for the CPU logic die. At that point, a determination is made whether a redistribution layer is necessary (block 730). If no redistribution layer is necessary, the contacts may be patterned on the back side of CPU or logic die (block 740). If a redistribution layer is necessary, a redistribution layer is patterned on a back side surface of a CPU or logic die and contacts established to the redistribution layer (block 750).
Once contacts are established on a surface (e.g., back side surface) of a CPU die, the multiple memory dies are connected to the CPU or logic die by, for example, solder connections (block 760). Following the connection of the memory dies to the CPU or logic die, the connected die stack may be connected to a substrate package including the through-silicon vias that extend to the memory dies (block 770). A heat sink and any other processing techniques typically utilized in assembling package substrates may then follow.
In the preceding detailed description, reference is made to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the following claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5485039 | Fujita et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5702984 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5973392 | Senba et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5990564 | Degani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6025638 | Pogge et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6052287 | Palmer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6255899 | Bertin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6348728 | Aiba et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362525 | Rahim | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6461897 | Lin et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6483043 | Kline | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507115 | Hofstee et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6563205 | Fogal et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6593644 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6620647 | Kröner | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6642610 | Park et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661086 | Zelsacher | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677668 | Lin | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6696765 | Kazama et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6717251 | Matsuo et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731009 | Jones et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6798049 | Shin et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6815808 | Hyodo et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6911730 | New | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6929976 | Chan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6961231 | Alexander et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7030470 | Ho et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7035113 | Fraley et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045892 | Kyung | May 2006 | B2 |
7058247 | Crow et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060601 | Savastiouk et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7061092 | Akram et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064005 | Takaoka | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7078818 | Fujimoto et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7109068 | Akram et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112887 | Swan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7132753 | St. Amand et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7161810 | Fraley et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7202554 | Kim et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7239012 | Pepe et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7242100 | Oka | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247932 | Lin et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7279795 | Periaman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7402442 | Condorelli et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7486525 | Knickerbocker | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498668 | Kawabata et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514775 | Chao et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7518225 | Emma et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7586183 | Kawabata et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595559 | Baek | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7692278 | Periaman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7746656 | Shim et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7768005 | Condorelli et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7893540 | Ishino et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020016021 | Sutherland | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020074637 | McFarland | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020140069 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030123240 | McIlnay et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040021139 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056342 | Cobbley et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040075170 | Degani et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040115867 | Shibata | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050127490 | Black et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060043569 | Benson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077749 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060202317 | Barakat et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060267171 | Lee | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275957 | Shibata | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278979 | Rangel | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070045788 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070126085 | Kawano et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138653 | Bartley et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152313 | Periaman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070294479 | Emma | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080054489 | Farrar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083975 | Chao et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20100032820 | Bruennert et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080150088 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |