Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates generally to the formation of silicon carbide class of films.
Background
The silicon carbide (SiC) class of thin films has unique physical, chemical, electrical, and mechanical properties and is used in a variety of applications, particularly integrated circuit applications. Examples of SiC class of thin films include oxygen and/or nitrogen doped SiC, such as silicon oxycarbide (SiOC), silicon carbon nitride (SiCN), and silicon oxycarbonitride (SiOCN). The composition of the SiC class of thin films may affect the desired physical, chemical, electrical, and mechanical properties of the thin films.
This disclosure pertains to a method of depositing silicon carbide films. The silicon carbide films can be doped or undoped. The method of depositing the silicon carbide film includes providing a substrate and flowing a first organo-silicon precursor and a second organo-silicon precursor together onto the substrate. The first and the second organo-silicon precursors are different from each other. The method further includes introducing one or more radicals in a substantially low energy state from a source gas, where the radicals react with the first and the second organo-silicon precursors to deposit the silicon carbide film on the substrate. The composition of the doped or undoped silicon carbide film can be tuned according to the choice of the combination of precursors and the ratio of the flow rates of the precursors. In some embodiments, a nitrogen doped silicon carbide film can be formed by mixing at least two organo-silicon precursors that have different ratios of silicon-carbon bonds to silicon-nitrogen bonds. In some embodiments, an oxygen doped silicon carbide film can be formed by mixing at least two organo-silicon precursors that have different ratios of silicon-carbon bonds to silicon-oxygen bonds. In some embodiments, a nitrogen and oxygen doped silicon carbide film can be formed by mixing an organo-silicon precursor with silicon-oxygen bonds and another organo-silicon precursor with silicon-nitrogen bonds. In some embodiments, an undoped silicon carbide film can be formed by mixing at least two organo-silicon precursors that have different ratios of silicon-carbon bonds. In some embodiments, the silicon carbide film can have a varying concentration of oxygen and nitrogen between a lower surface and an upper surface of the film. In some embodiments, the radicals are introduced by exposing the source gas to a remote plasma. The radicals may be produced from a source gas selected from the group consisting of: hydrogen, nitrogen, ammonia, and an amine.
This disclosure also pertains to an apparatus, including a reaction chamber, a plasma source configured to generate a plasma outside the reaction chamber, one or more first gas inlets coupled to the reaction chamber, a second gas inlet coupled to the reaction chamber, and a controller. The controller can be configured with instructions for perform: (a) flowing a first organo-silicon precursor through the one or more first gas inlets into the reaction chamber; (b) flowing a second organo-silicon precursor through the one or more first gas inlets into the reaction chamber to mix with the first organo-silicon precursor, where the second organo-silicon precursor is different from the first organo-silicon precursor; (c) providing one or more radical species in a substantially low energy state from the plasma in the plasma source; and (d) flowing the one or more radical species through the second gas inlet into the reaction chamber to react with the first and the second organo-silicon precursors to form a silicon carbide film on the substrate. In some embodiments, the silicon carbide film is doped with nitrogen and/or oxygen. In some embodiments, the controller is configured to flow each of the first and the second organo-silicon precursors at flow rates having a ratio of between about 1:1 and about 2:1. In some embodiments, the first and the second organo-silicon precursors each have one or more silicon-hydrogen bonds and/or silicon-silicon bonds. The radicals may be produced from a source gas selected from the group consisting of: hydrogen, nitrogen, ammonia, and an amine.
These and other embodiments are described further below with reference to the figures.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the presented concepts. The presented concepts may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail so as to not unnecessarily obscure the described concepts. While some concepts will be described in conjunction with the specific embodiments, it will be understood that these embodiments are not intended to be limiting.
Introduction
Manufacture of semiconductor devices typically involves depositing one or more thin films on a substrate in an integrated fabrication process. In some aspects of the integrated fabrication process, classes of thin films such as SiC, SiCN, and SiOC can be deposited using atomic layer deposition (ALD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), or any other suitable deposition method.
PECVD processes may use in situ plasma processing for the deposition of silicon carbide classes of thin films, where the plasma processing occurs directly adjacent to a substrate. However, it has been found that depositing high-quality silicon carbide classes of thin films can have several challenges. For example, such challenges can include providing silicon carbide classes of thin films with excellent step coverage, low dielectric constants, high breakdown voltages, low leakage currents, low porosity, high hermeticity, high density, high hardness, and coverage over exposed metal surfaces without oxidizing the metal surfaces, among other things.
While this disclosure is not limited by any particular theory, it is believed that the plasma conditions in typical PECVD processes produce undesirable effects. For example, PECVD process may provide direct plasma conditions that break the Si—O, Si—N, and/or Si—C bonds in the precursor molecules. Direct plasma conditions can include charged particle bombardment and high-energy ultraviolet irradiation, which can result in damaging effects in the thin film.
One such film-damaging effect resulting from direct plasma conditions can include poor step coverage. The charged particles in direct plasma conditions can lead to highly reactive radicals with increased sticking coefficients. A deposited silicon carbide film may have silicon, carbon, oxygen, and/or nitrogen bonds that are “dangling,” meaning that the silicon, carbon, oxygen, and/or nitrogen will have reactive unpaired valence electrons. The increased sticking coefficients of precursor molecules can lead to deposition of silicon carbide films with poor step coverage, as reactive precursor fragments may tend to stick to sidewalls of previously deposited films or layers.
Another film-damaging effect that may result from direct plasma conditions can include directionality in the deposition. This is due in part to the energy required to break up the precursor molecules can be at a low frequency, which creates a lot of ion bombardment at the surface. Directional deposition may further lead to deposition with poor step coverage.
Direct plasma conditions in PECVD may also lead to increased production of silicon-hydrogen bonding (Si—H) in the silicon carbide film. Specifically, broken bonds of Si—C can be replaced with Si—H. This can result in not only a reduced carbon content, but also result in films with poor electrical properties in some instances. For example, the presence of Si—H bonds can reduce breakdown voltages and increase leakage currents because the Si—H bonds provide a leakage path for electrons.
Furthermore, PECVD conditions typically include doping agents or co-reactants to control the doping of the silicon carbide material. Such doping agents can include carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), water (H2O), methanol (CH3OH), oxygen (O2), ozone (O3), nitrogen (N2), ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), acetylene (C2H2), and ethylene (C2H4). Fabrication of oxygen and/or nitrogen doped silicon carbide films generally require the use of such doping agents. For example, a silicon-containing precursor may be mixed with NH3 to fabricate a nitrogen doped silicon carbide (SiCN) thin film, or a silicon-containing precursor may be mixed with CO2 or O2 to fabricate an oxygen doped silicon carbide (SiOC) thin film. Because typical PECVD conditions utilize such doping agents to dope silicon carbide classes of thin films, this results in a reduced amount of carbon content.
In PECVD processes, one way to control the composition of the silicon carbide film is by changing the structure or choice of the precursor itself. For example, the concentration of carbon, oxygen, and/or nitrogen in a silicon carbide film can be largely tied to the stoichiometry of the precursor molecule. Alternatively, another way to control the composition of the silicon carbide film is to alter the flow rates of the precursor and/or change the reactant gas species to control the composition of the silicon carbide film. For example, tetra methyl silane (4MS) may be flowed to react with NH3 or CO2 to form SiCN or SiOC, respectively. The flow rate of 4MS may be very low and the flow rate of CO2 may be very high to form SiOC, where the amount of carbon content is low. The flow rate of 4MS may be very low and the flow rate of NH3 may be very high to form SiCN, where the amount of carbon content is also low. In fact, it is energetically more favorable to form Si—O bonds or Si—N bonds over Si—C bonds, resulting in low carbon content in these films. Thus, the control of composition in silicon carbide films, such as the carbon content, may be limited to a narrow range. And as discussed earlier herein, the use of PECVD can undesirably lead to a very high number of Si—H bonds even if the silicon carbide film is undoped.
Moreover, where typical PECVD processes introduce oxidizing species, such as O2, O3, and CO2, deposition of silicon carbide films with such oxidizing species can oxidize metal surfaces. For example, depositing silicon carbide films with oxidizing species over exposed copper surfaces can oxidize copper.
Method
Rather than using doping agents such as NH3, CO2, O2, O3, and the like to form doped silicon carbide films, the disclosed implementations described herein involve using radicals to react with an organo-silicon precursor to form doped or undoped silicon carbide thin films. In addition, the composition of the doped or undoped silicon carbide film can be controlled by flowing multiple organo-silicon precursors as co-reactants.
The process 100 continues at step 120, where a first organo-silicon precursor is flowed onto the substrate. In some implementations, the first organo-silicon precursor has one or more silicon-oxygen (Si—O) bonds and/or one or more silicon-nitrogen (Si—N) bonds. The organo-silicon precursor also has one or more silicon-carbon (Si—C) bonds and, in some implementations, one or more silicon-silicon (Si—Si) and/or silicon-hydrogen (Si—H) bonds. For a doped silicon carbide film, the carbon to nitrogen (C:N) ratio or the carbon to oxygen (C:O) ratio of the resulting doped silicon carbide film when reacting the first organo-silicon precursor with hydrogen radicals can substantially depend on the choice of the first organo-silicon precursor.
The process 100 continues at step 130, where a second organo-silicon precursor is flowed together with the first organo-silicon precursor. In some implementations, the second organo-silicon precursor has one or more Si—O bonds and/or one or more Si—N bonds. However, the second organo-silicon precursor is different from the first organo-silicon precursor. Co-flowing at least two different organo-silicon precursors can achieve greater compositional control over the resulting silicon carbide film compared to reacting a single organo-silicon precursor with one or more doping agents. Reacting a single precursor may produce a limited range of C:N or C:O ratios that may be limited to the stoichiometry of the chosen precursor, flow rates of the precursor and doping agents, and choice of the doping agent.
Flowing the first organo-silicon precursor together with the second organo-silicon precursor can be achieved simultaneously or sequentially. Simultaneous flow enables the first and the second organo-silicon precursors to mix at the same time. Sequential flow enables the first and the second organo-silicon precursors to mix after the second organo-silicon precursor is delivered.
In some implementations, the first and the second organo-silicon precursors can be different combinations of organo-silicon oxide and organo-silicon nitride precursors. Specifically, an organo-silicon oxide precursor can combine with an organo-silicon nitride precursor to form a nitrogen and oxygen doped silicon carbide (SiOCN). An organo-silicon oxide precursor can combine with another organo-silicon oxide precursor to form oxygen doped silicon carbide (SiOC). An organo-silicon nitride precursor can combine with another organo-silicon nitride precursor to form nitrogen doped silicon carbide (SiCN).
To form SiOCN, the first organo-silicon precursor can have one or more Si—O bonds and the second organo-silicon precursor can have one or more Si—N bonds. To form SiOC, the first organo-silicon precursor and the second organo-silicon precursor can each have different ratios of Si—C bonds to Si—O bonds. To form SiCN, the first organo-silicon precursor and the second organo-silicon precursor can each have different ratios of Si—C bonds to Si—N bonds.
The process 100 continues at step 140, where one or more radicals are introduced from a source gas in a substantially low energy state to react with the first and the second organo-silicon precursors. The reaction leads to the deposition of a silicon carbide film on the substrate. The radicals are produced from a source gas, and the source gas can include hydrogen, nitrogen, ammonia, and/or an amine. In some instances, the radicals are substantially hydrogen radicals. The first and the second organo-silicon precursors react with the radicals so that the composition of the resulting silicon carbide film is largely tied to the flow rates and the choices of the first and the second organo-silicon precursors. In some implementations, the radicals are substantially ground state hydrogen radicals. In some implementations, the radicals are introduced by exposing the source gas to a remote plasma.
Environment at the Substrate Surface During Deposition
The organo-silicon precursors can include one or more Si—O bonds and/or one or more Si—N bonds. In some implementations, the organo-silicon precursors can include one or more Si—H bonds and/or one or more Si—Si bonds. Without being limited by any theory, the process conditions for the radicals reacting with the organo-silicon precursors may include radicals having sufficient energy to break Si—H bonds or Si—Si bonds, but substantially preserve Si—O, Si—N, and/or Si—C bonds. As the Si—H and/or Si—Si bonds are broken, they can serve as reactive sites for forming bonds between the organo-silicon precursors in the silicon carbide film 201. The broken bonds can also serve as sites for cross-linking during thermal processing conducted during or after deposition. Bonding at the reactive sites and cross-linking can form a primary backbone or matrix collectively in the resulting silicon carbide film 201.
Generally, the described reaction conditions exist at the exposed face of the substrate 200 (the face where the silicon carbide film 201 is deposited). They may further exist at some distance above the substrate 200, e.g., about 0.5 microns to about 150 millimeters above the substrate 200. In effect, activation of the organo-silicon precursor can happen in the gas phase at a substantial distance above the substrate 200. Typically, the pertinent reaction conditions will be uniform or substantially uniform over the entire exposed face of the substrate 200, although certain applications may permit some variation.
The environment adjacent the substrate 200 can include one or more radical species, preferably in a substantially low energy state. While such radical species can include hydrogen atom radicals, other radical species may also be included or substituted with hydrogen atom radicals, such as elemental nitrogen radicals, ammonia radicals, and amine radicals. Examples of amine radicals include but are not limited to radicals of methylamine, dimethylamine, and aniline. In some embodiments, all or substantially all the radicals can be in the ground state, e.g., at least about 90% or 95% of the radicals adjacent the substrate 200 are in the ground state. In some embodiments, as discussed in further detail below, the radical species can be produced by a remote plasma source.
In some embodiments, the process conditions will have radical species in a substantially low energy state to break Si—H bonds and/or Si—Si bonds while substantially preserving Si—O, Si—N, and Si—C bonds. The process conditions will not have substantial amounts of ions, electrons, radical species in high energy states, such as states above the ground state, or ultraviolet (UV) radiation. In some embodiments, the concentration of ions in the region adjacent the film is no greater than about 107/cm3. The presence of substantial amounts of ions, UV, or high energy radicals may tend to break Si—O, Si—N, or Si—C bonds, which can produce films with undesirable electrical properties (e.g., high dielectric constants and/or low breakdown voltages) and poor conformality and uncontrolled composition. It is also believed that an excessively reactive environment produces reactive precursor fragments that can have high sticking coefficients (representing a propensity to chemically or physically stick to work piece sidewalls), and resulting in poor conformality.
However, it is understood that the process conditions adjacent to the substrate 200 may not necessarily break Si—H and/or Si—Si bonds to form the silicon carbide film 201. Si—H and/or Si—Si bonds may be absent from the chosen precursor molecules. In fact, the process conditions may also include ions, electrons, radical species in high energy states, or UV radiation to break other bonds, including Si—O, Si—N, or Si—C bonds, and form the silicon carbide film 201.
Without being limited by any theory, the reaction mechanism in forming the silicon carbide film 201 can occur through a series of activation, growth, and cross-linking steps. By way of example, dimethyl amino dimethyl silane (DMADMS) can undergo some of the following reaction mechanisms:
The organo-silicon precursors can be present in relative proportions with other species in the environment adjacent to the substrate 200. In particular, the organo-silicon precursors may be present with the radical species and other species, including other reactive species and/or carrier gases. In some embodiments, the organo-silicon precursors may be introduced in a mixture. Upstream from the deposition reaction surface, the organo-silicon precursors can be mixed with an inert carrier gas. Example inert carrier gases include, but are not limited to, nitrogen (N2), argon (Ar), and helium (He).
The temperature in the environment adjacent to the substrate 200 can be any suitable temperature depending on the application of the device containing the silicon carbide film 201. The temperature in the environment adjacent to the substrate 200 can be largely controlled by the temperature of a pedestal on which a substrate 200 is supported during deposition of the silicon carbide film 201, for example. In some embodiments, the operating temperature can be between about 50° C. and about 500° C. For example, the operating temperature can be between about 250° C. and about 400° C., such as in many integrated circuit applications. In some embodiments, increasing the temperature can lead to increased cross-linking on the surface of the substrate 200.
The pressure in the environment adjacent to the substrate 200 can be any suitable pressure to produce reactive radicals in a process chamber. In some embodiments, the pressure can be about 35 Torr or lower. For example, the pressure can be between about 10 Torr and about 20 Torr, such as in embodiments implementing a microwave generated plasma. In other examples, the pressure can be less than about 5 Torr, or between about 0.2 Torr and about 5 Torr, such as in embodiments implementing a radio-frequency (RF) generated plasma. In some examples, the pressure can be between about 0.5 Torr and about 10 Torr, or between about 1.5 Torr and about 7 Torr.
The process conditions described earlier herein can provide a film structure that is highly conformal. The relatively mild process conditions can minimize the degree of ion bombardment at the surface of the substrate so that the deposition lacks directionality. Moreover, the relatively mild process conditions can reduce the number of radicals with high sticking coefficients that would have a tendency to stick to the sidewalls of previously deposited layers or films. In certain embodiments, for an aspect ratio of about 6:1 the silicon carbide film 201 can be deposited with a conformality of between about 25% and about 100%, and typically between about 50% and about 80%.
In some embodiments, a silicon carbide film 202 can have a graded or layered structure. It may be desirable in some instances to form a graded or layered silicon carbide film 202, where the composition of the silicon carbide film 202 changes as the thickness changes. Two different organo-silicon precursors can be flowed simultaneously at a time t0, and then followed by one or more different organo-silicon precursors at a time t1. Alternatively, one or more organo-silicon precursors can be flowed at a time t0, and then followed by two different organo-silicon precursors at a time t1. The organo-silicon precursors in each of these process flows can react with radicals, such as hydrogen radicals, to form different layers of silicon carbide films.
In one example, an initial portion of the deposition can use an organo-silicon nitride precursor to form a silicon carbide film 202 substantially comprising SiCN. This can be followed by deposition using a mixture of organo-silicon oxide and organo-silicon nitride precursors to substantially form SiOCN over SiCN in the silicon carbide film 202. In addition or in the alternative to depositing SiOCN over SiCN, the process can be followed by deposition using an organo-silicon oxide precursor to substantially form SiOC over the SiOCN and/or SiCN in the silicon carbide film 202. Thus, the combination of precursors can change at specific points in time to form the layered or graded silicon carbide film 202.
In another example, flow rates of the precursors can also change gradually to form the graded or layered silicon carbide films 202. Two different organo-silicon precursors can be flowed simultaneously having a given ratio of flow rates, and then changed gradually or instantaneously so that the precursors have another ratio of flow rates. By way of example, a mixture of an organo-silicon oxide precursor and an organo-silicon nitride precursor can be flowed simultaneously such that a ratio of flow rates between the two precursors is between about 1:1 and about 2:1. If the ratio of the flow rates between the organo-silicon oxide precursor and the organo-silicon nitride precursor is changed to be greater than about 2:1, then the resulting SiOCN film can have an increased concentration of oxygen relative to nitrogen as the thickness increases.
The layered or graded silicon carbide films 202 can have several applications. For example, SiOC films may be desirable as an etch stop or diffusion barrier layer over copper. However, SiOC films may exhibit poor adhesion over exposed copper surfaces. Thus, it may be desirable to initially deposit one or more layers of SiCN, which has greater adhesion on exposed copper surfaces, followed by deposition of one or more layers of SiOC.
Chemical Structure of Precursors
As discussed earlier herein, the precursors employed in forming doped or undoped silicon carbide films can include organo-silicon precursors. In some embodiments, the organo-silicon precursors can include at least one Si—O bond and/or at least one Si—N bond. In some embodiments, the organo-silicon precursors also contain at least one Si—H bond and/or at least one Si—Si bond.
In some embodiments, the organo-silicon precursors may fall into one of several chemical classes. It is understood that any appropriate chemical classes of organo-silicon precursors may be employed and that the organo-silicon precursors are not limited to the chemical classes discussed below.
First, the organo-silicon precursor can be a siloxane. In some embodiments, the siloxane may be cyclic. Cyclic siloxanes may include cyclotetrasiloxanes, such as 2,4,6,8-tetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane (TMCTS), octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS), and heptamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (HMCTS). Other cyclic siloxanes can also include but are not limited to cyclotrisiloxanes and cyclopentasiloxanes. Embodiments using cyclic siloxanes are ring structures that can introduce porosity into a silicon carbide film, with the size of the pores corresponding to the radius of the ring. For example, a cyclotetrasiloxane ring can have a radius of about 6.7 Å.
In some embodiments, the siloxane may have a three-dimensional or caged structure.
In some embodiments, the siloxane may be linear. Linear siloxanes may include but are not limited to disiloxanes, such as pentamethyldisiloxane (PMDSO) and tetramethyldisiloxane (TMDSO). PMDSO and TMDSO may be used to form SiOC films.
Second, the organo-silicon precursor can be an alkoxy silane. The alkoxy silanes include a central silicon atom with one or more alkoxy groups bonded to it and one or more hydrogen atoms bonded to it. Examples include but are not limited to trimethoxysilane (TMOS), dimethoxysilane (DMOS), methoxysilane (MOS), methyldimethoxysilane (MDMOS), diethoxymethylsilane (DEMS), dimethylethoxysilane (DMES), dimethylaminomethoxysilane (DMAMES), and dimethylmethoxysilane (DMMOS). Many of these precursors may be used to form SiOC films.
Third, the organo-silicon precursor can be an alkyl silane. The alkyl silanes include a central silicon atom with one or more alkyl groups bonded to it as well as one or more hydrogen atoms bonded to it. In certain embodiments, any one or more of the alkyl groups contain 1-5 carbon atoms. The alkyl groups may be saturated or unsaturated. Examples include but are not limited to tetramethylsilane (4MS), trimethylsilane (3MS), dimethylsilane (2MS), and triethylsilane (TES). In some embodiments, these alkyl groups may be used to SiC films.
Other types of alkyl silanes can include alkylcarbosilanes, alkylaminosilanes, and alkyldisilazanes. Alkylcarbosilanes can have a branched polymeric structure with a carbon bonded to a silicon atom as well as alkyl groups bonded to a silicon atom. Examples include dimethyl trimethylsilyl methane (DTMSM) and bis-dimethylsilyl ethane (BDMSE). Alkylaminosilanes include amines with alkyl groups and bonded to a silicon atom. Examples include dimethylamino dimethylsilane (DMADMS), bis-dimethylamino methylsilane (BDMAMS), and tris-dimethylamino silane (TDMAS). In some embodiments, these alkyl silanes can form SiCN films. Alkyldisilazanes include silizanes and alkyl groups bonded to two silicon atoms. An example includes 1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisilazane (TMDSN). In some embodiments, TMDSN can form SiCN films.
Additionally, disilanes, trisilanes, or other higher silanes may be used in place of monosilanes. An example of one such disilane from the alkyl silane class is hexamethyldisilane (HMDS). Another example of a disilane from the alkyl silane class can include pentamethyldisilane (PMDS), which can be used to form SiC films. In some embodiments, one of the silicon atoms can have a carbon-containing or alkoxy-containing group exclusively attached to it, and one of the silicon atoms can have a hydrogen atom exclusively attached to it.
In some embodiments, the precursor can include multiple chemical groups combined into a single precursor. For example, a single precursor can include alkoxy, amino, and alkyl groups, such as DMADMS.
In depositing the silicon carbide film, multiple organo-silicon precursors can be present in the process gas. For example, a siloxane and an alkyl silane may be used together, or a siloxane and an alkoxy silane may be used together. The relative proportions of the individual precursors can be chosen based on the chemical structures of precursors chosen and the application of the resulting silicon carbide film. For example, the amount of siloxane can be greater than the amount of silane in molar percentages to produce a porous film.
Composition of the Deposited Film
The deposited silicon carbide film may include relative proportions of silicon, carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen. The desired composition of the doped or undoped silicon carbide film can be achieved by: (1) choosing an appropriate combination of organo-silicon precursors and (2) adjusting the flows or the ratio of the flow rates of the organo-silicon precursors. By adjusting these parameters, it is possible to change the bulk composition of a silicon carbide film. In addition, it is possible to change the composition of a silicon carbide film with as the thickness changes.
The relative atomic concentrations of the silicon carbide film can vary depending on the choice of the combination of organo-silicon precursors. The choice of the organo-silicon precursor can directly affects the C:N ratio or the C:O ratio of a doped silicon carbide film. In addition, the choice of the organo-silicon precursor can directly affect the carbon concentration of a doped or undoped silicon carbide film. Because the stoichiometry of the organo-silicon precursor is indicative of the relative number of carbon and nitrogen atoms or the relative number of carbon and oxygen atoms in a precursor molecule, the choice of the organo-silicon precursor directly affects the C:N ratio or the C:O ratio of a resulting doped silicon carbide film. However, it is understood that the stoichiometric ratio of the precursor molecule may not be exactly the same as the C:N ratio or the C:O ratio of the doped silicon carbide film due to effects such as cross-linking. In other words, just because a precursor molecule has 5 atoms of carbon to 2 atoms of nitrogen does not necessarily equate to a C:N ratio of 2.5:1 in a nitrogen doped silicon carbide film.
By way of example, the DMADMS precursor molecule has a higher C:N ratio than the BDMAMS precursor molecule, and the BDMAMS precursor molecule has a higher C:N ratio than the TDMAS precursor molecule. Thus, using DMADMS gives a higher C:N ratio in a SiCN film than using BDMAMS, and using BDMAMS gives a higher C:N ratio in a SiCN film than using TDMAS.
The C:N or C:O ratio for a given precursor molecule can be discrete. As a result, the C:N ratio of a SiCN film or the C:O ratio of a SiOC film can be limited by the discrete ratios. Put another way, if DMADMS produces SiCN films having a C:N ratio of about 2.0, and if BDMAMS produces SiCN films having a C:N ratio of about 1.5, it may be challenging to produce a SiCN film having a C:N ratio between 1.5 and 2.0. In some embodiments, higher C:N or C:O ratios may be achieved by selecting precursors with more silicon atoms, including disilanes, trisilanes, and higher order silanes. However, tuning the composition precisely for a SiC class of films may be challenging without being limited to the discrete C:N ratio or C:O ratio for a given precursor molecule.
By flowing at least two different organo-silicon precursors simultaneously, silicon carbide films of varying compositions may be achieved. If a first organo-silicon precursor molecule has a discrete C:N or C:O ratio when flowed independently and a second organo-silicon precursor molecule has another discrete C:N or C:O ratio when flowed independently, the resulting C:N or C:O ratio when the two organo-silicon precursor molecules are flowed simultaneously can be between the discrete C:N or C:O ratios of the independently flowed precursor molecules. Taking from the example used earlier herein, flowing DMADMS and BDMAMS together can actually produce a SiCN film having a C:N ratio between about 1.5 and about 2.0.
Flowing at least two different organo-silicon precursors may not only produce silicon carbide films of varying compositions, but may also produce SiOCN films. Mixing organo-silicon precursors that are used for SiNC and SiOC films together enables deposition of SiOCN films. Therefore, co-flowing an organo-silicon nitride precursor, such as DMADMS, and an organo-silicon oxide precursor, such as DEMS, together can produce a SiOCN film.
Varying individual concentrations of silicon, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen in SiCN, SiOC, and SiOCN films may not only be determined by the choice of the combination of the precursors, but may also be determined by the ratio of the precursor flow. For example, if the ratio of the flow rates between DMADMS and BDMAMS is about 1:1, and yields a given C:N ratio in a SiCN film, then increasing the ratio of the flow rates to greater than 1:1 can yield a greater C:N ratio in the SiCN film. In some embodiments, the ratio of the flow rates between a first organo-silicon precursor and a second organo-silicon precursor is between about 1:1 and about 2:1. In some embodiments, the ratio of the flow rates between a first organo-silicon precursor and a second organo-silicon precursor is greater than about 2:1. Thus, the composition of a silicon carbide film can be tuned according to the ratio of the flow rates of two different organo-silicon precursors.
In some embodiments, the composition of the silicon carbide film can be layered or graded. In other words, the silicon carbide film can have a varying concentration of nitrogen and oxygen between a lower surface and an upper surface of the film. In some instances, the choice of the precursor combinations can change at a given point in time. For example, deposition of SiCN may occur initially by flowing DMADMS independently, followed by deposition of SiOCN by flowing DMADMS and DEMS simultaneously. In other instances, the ratio of the flow rates between the precursors can change gradually or at any given point in time. For example, deposition of varying concentrations of SiOCN may occur by initially flowing TDMAS and DEMS simultaneously and having a ratio of flow rates between TDMAS and DEMS of about 2:1, followed by gradually or instantaneously changing the ratio of flow rates to be about 1:2. This can result in a SiOCN film having a high concentration of nitrogen and a low concentration of oxygen at a lower surface of the film, and a low concentration of nitrogen and a high concentration of oxygen at an upper surface of the film.
By mixing the appropriate combination of precursors with the appropriate ratio of flow rates, a desired composition of a silicon carbide film can be achieved. The desired composition of the silicon carbide film can be related to the desired application of the film. Tuning the individual concentrations of silicon, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen can yield film structures with a desired breakdown voltage, leakage current, dielectric constant, hermeticity, density, adhesion to metal surfaces such as copper, stress, modulus, and hardness, among other properties. In addition, tuning the individual concentrations of silicon, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen can yield film structures with desired etch rates, resistance to oxidation for underlying films during subsequent processing, resistance to high temperature annealing operations or rapid thermal processing, and desired impact of UV radiation during UV curing of ultra low-k dielectrics.
For example, a silicon carbide film can have reduced leakage currents by reducing carbon content or increasing oxygen or nitrogen content. By introducing oxygen or nitrogen into a silicon carbide class of material, leakage paths provided by Si—H bonds and/or Si—CH2—Si bonds may be blocked. Alternatively, by reducing carbon content, fewer leakage paths provided by Si—CH2—Si bonds are available. This can lead to improved electrical properties while maintaining a relatively low dielectric constant.
Moreover, a silicon carbide film can have a lower dielectric constant with reduced carbon content. A deposited film that contains an increased number of Si—N bonds or Si—O bonds than Si—C bonds can lower the effective dielectric constant of the film. However, it is understood that in some instances, a higher concentration of carbon can result in a lower effective dielectric constant (e.g., adding carbon to silicon oxide or silicon nitride), especially in PECVD methods. The amount of cross-linking with Si—O and Si—N is reduced, polarity is reduced, and density is reduced due to terminal methyl groups. Nevertheless, typically a pure silicon carbide film has a high effective dielectric constant, due at least in part to increased cross-linking and density. Generally, silicon carbide films produced using the methods described herein fall into this category, where a high carbon concentration leads to a higher effective dielectric constants due to increased cross-linking and density. Hence, a higher C:N or a higher C:O ratio results in a higher dielectric constant. For example, silicon carbide films produced using DMADMS have a higher C:N ratio that results in a higher dielectric constant than BDMAMS.
In some embodiments, the internal structure of the organo-silicon precursor is maintained in the deposited film. This structure may preserve all or most of the Si—C, Si—O, and Si—N bonds in the precursor, while linking or cross-linking individual precursor moieties through bonds at locations where Si—H bonds and/or Si—Si bonds existed in the precursor molecules and/or through additional condensation reactions on the growing surface if sufficient thermal energy is provided. In various embodiments, the silicon carbide film has an effective dielectric constant of about 4.0 or lower, and in some cases about 3.5 or lower, and in some cases about 3.0 or lower, and in still other implementations about 2.5 or lower. The effective dielectric constant can depend on the bonding and density.
In some embodiments, it may be desirable to tune the dielectric constant of the silicon carbide film. By selecting an appropriate precursor to produce certain C:N or C:O ratios, the effective dielectric constant may be adjusted. In some embodiments, the dielectric constant of the silicon carbide film may be between about 8.5 and about 2.5.
In some embodiments, the silicon carbide film can also serve as a hermetic or diffusion barrier. When the density of the silicon carbide film is increased, the hermeticity and diffusion barrier properties of the silicon carbide film are improved. Increasing the density can be achieved by increasing the amount of cross-linking. By introducing a slight amount of oxygen and/or nitrogen into a silicon carbide film, cross-linking increases to improve hermeticity and diffusion barrier properties. Thus, precursors with a relatively high C:N or C:O ratios can improve hermeticity and diffusion barrier properties.
In some embodiments, the deposited film can be porous. As discussed earlier herein, the organo-silicon precursors can include cyclic siloxanes and caged siloxanes. Thus, the cyclic siloxanes and caged siloxanes can introduce porosity into the structure of the deposited film. Porosity in the deposited film can further lower the dielectric constant. In some embodiments, the porosity of the silicon carbide film is between about 20% and 50%. The pore size of porous film may track with that of the selected cyclic or caged precursor. In certain embodiments, the film's average pore size is between about 5 Å and 20 Å, such as about 16 Å.
Apparatus
One aspect of the disclosure is an apparatus configured to accomplish the methods described herein. A suitable apparatus includes hardware for accomplishing the process operations and a system controller having instructions for controlling process operations in accordance with the present disclosure. In some embodiments, the apparatus for performing the aforementioned process operations can include a remote plasma source. A remote plasma source may minimize the harsh reaction conditions otherwise caused by a direct plasma.
During operation, gases or gas mixtures are introduced into the reaction chamber 410 via one or more gas inlets coupled to the reaction chamber 410. In some embodiments, a plurality of gas inlets is coupled to the reaction chamber 410. A precursor gas delivery source 450 may include a plurality of first gas inlets 455 coupled to the reaction chamber 410 for the delivery of precursor gases. Each of the plurality of first gas inlets 455 may enable multiple precursor gases to be co-flowed together into the reaction chamber 410, which can occur simultaneously or sequentially. A second gas inlet 465 may be coupled to the reaction chamber 410 via the showerhead assembly 420 and connected to a remote plasma source 460. The second gas inlet 465 may be connected to the showerhead assembly 420 for the delivery of radical species. The second gas inlet 465 may be connected to a vessel 470 which provides a source gas for the radical species. In embodiments including remote plasma configurations, the delivery lines for the precursors and the radical species generated in the remote plasma source 460 are separated. Hence, the precursors and the radical species do not substantially interact before reaching the substrate 430.
One or more radical species may be generated in the remote plasma source 460 and configured to enter the reaction chamber 410 via the second gas inlet 465. Any type of plasma source may be used in the remote plasma source 460 to create the radical species. This includes, but is not limited to, capacitively coupled plasmas, microwave plasmas, DC plasmas, inductively coupled plasmas, and laser-created plasmas. An example of a capacitively coupled plasma can be a radio-frequency (RF) plasma. A high-frequency plasma can be configured to operate at 13.56 MHz or higher. An example of such a remote plasma source 460 can be the GAMMA®, manufactured by Lam Research Corporation of Fremont, Calif. Another example of such a RF remote plasma source 460 can be the Astron®, manufactured by MKS Instruments of Wilmington, Massachusetts, which can be operated at 440 kHz and can be provided as a subunit bolted onto a larger apparatus for processing one or more substrates in parallel. In some embodiments, a microwave plasma can be used as the remote plasma source 460, such as the Astex®, also manufactured by MKS Instruments. A microwave plasma can be configured to operate at a frequency of 2.45 GHz.
The remote plasma source 460 may include a plasma dome or other shape to form a volume for delivering the source gas from the vessel 450. Examples of remote plasma sources may be described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,084,339 , U.S. Pat. No. 8,217,513 , U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/533,960 , U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/616,324 , U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/493,655 , U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/062,052 , and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/209,526 , each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. In some embodiments, the remote plasma source 460 may include an inlet 475 connected to the vessel 470 with a plurality of holes configured to distribute the source gas into the internal volume of the remote plasma source 460.
When the source gas enters the remote plasma source 460, a plasma may be generated using the radio-frequency (RF) coils (not shown), which may be connected to an RF source 480 via a matching network. The plasma may generate radical species, such as hydrogen radicals, from a hydrogen source gas that flows towards the showerhead assembly 420. The radical species may flow through a plurality of holes in the showerhead assembly 420 from the second gas inlet 465 to distribute the radical species into the reaction chamber 410. At the same time, precursor gases may be distributed from the first gas inlets 455 into the reaction chamber 410 to mix with the radical species. The precursor gases may be flowed into the reaction chamber 410 at a controlled flow rate. Reactions with the precursor gases and the radical species may take place in the reaction chamber 410 above and adjacent to the substrate 430.
The radical species formed in the remote plasma source 460 is carried in the gas phase into the reaction chamber 410 toward the substrate 430. The remote plasma source 460 may be substantially perpendicular to the substrate 430 so as to direct the radical species in a substantially transverse direction to the surface of the substrate 430 from the showerhead assembly 420. It is understood, however, that the remote plasma source 460 may be oriented in any number of directions relative to the surface of the substrate 430. The distance between the remote plasma source 460 and the substrate 430 can be configured to provide mild reactive conditions such that the ionized species generated in the remote plasma source 460 are substantially neutralized, but at least some radical species in substantially low energy states remain in the environment adjacent to the substrate 430. Such low energy state radical species are not recombined to form stable compounds. The distance between the remote plasma source 460 and the substrate 430 can be a function of the aggressiveness of the plasma (e.g., adjusting the RF power level), the density of gas in the plasma (e.g., if there's a high concentration of hydrogen atoms, a significant fraction of them may recombine to form H2 before reaching the reaction chamber 410), and other factors. In some embodiments, the distance between the remote plasma source 460 and the reaction chamber 410 can be greater than about 10 cm, such as between about 10 cm and 50 cm. Also, for some of the same or similar reasons, the distance between the showerhead assembly 420 and the first gas inlets 455 may be greater than about 5 cm, such as between about 5 cm and about 20 cm.
The controller 440 may contain instructions for controlling process conditions and operations in accordance with the present invention for the apparatus 400. The controller 440 will typically include one or more memory devices and one or more processors. The processor may include a CPU or computer, analog and/or digital input/output connections, stepper motor controller boards, etc. Instructions for implementing appropriate control operations are executed on the processor. These instructions may be stored on the memory devices associated with the controller 440 or they may be provided over a network. Machine-readable media containing instructions for controlling process operations in accordance with the present invention may be communicatively coupled to the controller 440.
In certain embodiments, the controller 440 controls all or most activities of the semiconductor processing apparatus 400 described herein. The controller 440 may be configured, for example, to control the gas flows of the precursor gases into the reaction chamber 410. The controller 440 may also control the RF source 480 to power the RF coils. The controller 440 may also control the flow rate of the coolant or the temperature of the cooling/heating element for the pedestal 435. The controller 440 may control all or most activities of the semiconductor processing apparatus 400 associated with depositing protective layers and removing sacrificial materials. The controller 440 may execute system control software that include sets of instructions for controlling the timing, gas composition, gas density, flow rates, chamber pressure, chamber temperature, RF power levels, substrate position, and/or other parameters. Other computer programs, scripts, or routines stored on memory devices associated with the controller 440 may be employed in some embodiments. To provide relatively mild reactive conditions at the environment adjacent to the substrate 430, parameters such as the RF power levels, gas density, and timing of the plasma can be adjusted by controller 440. Additionally, adjusting the substrate position may further reduce the presence of high-energy radical species at the environment adjacent to the substrate 430.
The process conditions and the process flow itself can be controlled by the controller 440 which comprises program instructions for monitoring, maintaining and/or adjusting certain process variables. For example, instructions specifying flow rates or a ratio of flow rates may be included. Instructions may also include parameters for pre-clean, passivation, protective layer formation, non-protective layer, pinning operations, other post-deposition treatments, etching, partial filling, and the like. The controller 440 may comprise different or identical instructions for different apparatus stations, thus allowing the apparatus stations to operate either independently or synchronously.
In some embodiments, the controller 440 may include instructions for performing operations such as flowing two or more organo-silicon precursors through the first gas inlets 455 into the reaction chamber 410 together to mix, providing radical species in a substantially low energy state in the remote plasma source 460, and flowing the radical species through the second gas inlet 465 into the reaction chamber 410 to react with the two or more organo-silicon precursors to form the silicon carbide film on the substrate 430.
In some embodiments, there may be a user interface associated with controller 440. The user interface may include a display screen, graphical software displays of the apparatus and/or process conditions, and user input devices such as pointing devices, keyboards, touch screens, microphones, etc.
The computer program code for controlling the above operations can be written in any conventional computer readable programming language: for example, assembly language, C, C++, Pascal, Fortran, or others. Compiled object code or script is executed by the processor to perform the tasks identified in the program.
Signals for monitoring the process may be provided by analog and/or digital input connections of the system controller. The signals for controlling the process are output on the analog and digital output connections of the apparatus 400.
The system software may be designed or configured in many different ways. For example, various chamber component subroutines or control objects may be written to control operation of the chamber components necessary to carry out the deposition processes. Examples of programs or sections of programs for this purpose include substrate positioning code, process gas control code, pressure control code, heater control code, and plasma control code.
A substrate positioning program may include program code for controlling chamber components that are used to load the substrate onto a pedestal or chuck and to control the spacing between the substrate and other parts of the chamber such as a gas inlet and/or target. A process gas control program may include code for controlling gas composition and flow rates and optionally for flowing gas into the chamber prior to deposition in order to stabilize the pressure in the chamber. A pressure control program may include code for controlling the pressure in the chamber by regulating, e.g., a throttle valve in the exhaust system of the chamber. A heater control program may include code for controlling the current to a heating unit that is used to heat the substrate. Alternatively, the heater control program may control delivery of a heat transfer gas such as helium to the wafer chuck.
The apparatus/process described herein above may be used in conjunction with lithographic patterning tools or processes, for example, for the fabrication or manufacture of semiconductor devices, displays, LEDs, photovoltaic panels and the like. Typically, though not necessarily, such tools/processes will be used or conducted together in a common fabrication facility. Lithographic patterning of a film typically includes some or all of the following operations, each operation enabled with a number of possible tools: (1) application of photoresist on a workpiece, i.e., substrate, using a spin-on or spray-on tool; (2) curing of photoresist using a hot plate or furnace or UV curing tool; (3) exposing the photoresist to visible or UV or x-ray light with a tool such as a wafer stepper; (4) developing the resist so as to selectively remove resist and thereby pattern it using a tool such as a wet bench; (5) transferring the resist pattern into an underlying film or workpiece by using a dry or plasma-assisted etching tool; and (6) removing the resist using a tool such as an RF or microwave plasma resist stripper.
Applications
The present disclosure may be further understood by reference to the following applications for high-quality doped or undoped silicon carbide films, in which the applications are intended to be purely exemplary. The present disclosure is not limited in scope by the specified applications, which are simply illustrations of aspects of the disclosure. Various modifications of the present disclosure in addition to those described herein will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the foregoing description. Moreover, such modifications fall within the scope of the appended claims.
In some embodiments, a silicon carbide film, such as an oxygen doped silicon carbide film, may be deposited over exposed metal, such as copper. In some instances, the exposed copper surface may be pre-cleaned to reduce copper oxides prior to depositing the oxygen doped silicon carbide film. In depositing the oxygen doped silicon carbide film, reaction conditions adjacent to the substrate can be free of oxidants, such as O2, O3, and CO2, including radicals thereof. Thus, the oxygen doped silicon carbide film may be deposited directly over the exposed copper without oxidizing copper (e.g., creating cupric oxide). Such films can serve as etch stop layers, which can also serve as copper diffusion barriers. The presence of the oxygen doped silicon carbide film can provide a sufficiently low dielectric constant with excellent leakage properties to serve as a diffusion barrier. The oxygen doped silicon carbide film can be an etch stop and/or diffusion barrier either by itself or as a bilayer stack, e.g., SiOC/SiNC bilayer deposited over exposed copper. As discussed earlier herein, SiNC may be deposited as an adhesion layer over the exposed copper, and then SiOC may be subsequently deposited by adjusting the precursors and/or flow rates. In some embodiments, the oxygen doped silicon carbide film can be placed in between adjacent metallization layers that are typically produced by a damascene process. The oxygen doped silicon carbide film can resist etching and can be sufficiently dense to minimize the diffusion of copper ions into adjacent regions of dielectric material. In some embodiments, the precursor employed for the oxygen doped silicon carbide film can be non-cyclic. Non-cyclic precursors can include PMDSO, TMDSO, DEMS, or DMES. The non-cyclic precursor can provide a sufficiently high density to serve as a hermetic or diffusion barrier. In some embodiments, nitrogen may be incorporated into the film by flowing nitrogen-containing precursors.
In some embodiments, a silicon carbide film may be deposited as vertical structures adjacent to metal or semiconductor structures. Deposition of silicon carbide films provides excellent step coverage along sidewalls of the metal or semiconductor structures to create the vertical structures. In certain embodiments, the vertical structures may be referred to as spacers or liners.
In another example,
In some embodiments, a silicon carbide film may be deposited on the sidewalls of patterned porous dielectric materials. Ultra low-k dielectric materials can be made from a porous structure. The pores in such materials can provide areas for ingress of metal during deposition of subsequent layers, including the deposition of diffusion barriers containing a metal such as tantalum (Ta). If too much metal migrates into the dielectric material, the dielectric material may provide a short circuit between adjacent copper metallization lines.
In some embodiments, a silicon carbide film may be deposited as an ultra low-k dielectric material itself. Ultra low-k dielectrics are conventionally defined as those materials that have a dielectric constant lower than that of 2.5. In such configurations, the ultra low-k dielectric material of silicon carbide can be a porous dielectric layer. The pores of the dielectric layer can be introduced by using cyclic or caged precursor molecules, including the cyclic siloxanes and silsesquioxanes. In one example, the porosity of the ultra low-k dielectric layer of silicon carbide can be between about 20% and 50%. Further, the ultra low-k dielectric layer can have an average pore size of less than about 100 Å, such as between about 5 Å and 20 Å. For example, a cyclosiloxane ring can have a radius of about 6.7 Å. While increasing the number and size of the pores can lower the dielectric constant, the mechanical integrity of the dielectric layer can be compromised if it is too porous.
In some embodiments, a doped or undoped silicon carbide film may provide encapsulation for various memory device applications. In magneto-resistive random access memory (MRAIVI) applications, the silicon carbide film may be used as a hardmask and/or with a hardmask to protect various layers of the MRAIVI device, including pinning layers, conductive lines, soft layers, etc. The silicon carbide film may have low etch rates and protect sidewalls and top surfaces of underlying layers, such as metal layers, during etch. Furthermore, the silicon carbide film may be used for protective encapsulation during and after patterning of magnetic tunnel junction (MJT) stacks.
In resistive random access memory (RRAM) applications, the silicon carbide film may encapsulate and protect one or more underlying layers of an RRAM device. When a gap between two electrodes in a RRAM device is being filled with oxide, the silicon carbide film may provide protection against oxidation of underlying films. In addition, an SiCN film or SiC film with a low energy band gap may be used to replace a tunnel oxide in a NAND or switching layer in a RRAM device.
While the silicon carbide film may serve to protect underlying layers or serve to replace switching layers in memory device applications, the functional aspects of the silicon carbide film is not limited to only memory device applications. More generally, the silicon carbide film may also be utilized as etch stop liners and hardmasks in several other device applications because of its high quality, high conformality, low wet etch rate, and low dry etch rate, among other properties.
Although the foregoing has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the processes, systems, and apparatus described. Accordingly, the described embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive.
This patent application is a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/907,699, filed May 31, 2013, titled “METHOD TO OBTAIN SiC CLASS OF FILMS OF DESIRED COMPOSITION AND FILM PROPERTIES,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4177474 | Ovshinsky | Dec 1979 | A |
4656110 | Yamazaki | Apr 1987 | A |
4895789 | Motte et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4952658 | Kalchauer et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5034355 | Tani et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5108965 | Tani et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5324690 | Gelatos et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5447816 | Kodama et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5464699 | Baldi | Nov 1995 | A |
5518572 | Kinoshita et al. | May 1996 | A |
5567243 | Foster et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5654208 | Harris et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5739579 | Chiang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5807615 | Sindzingre et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5958324 | Bujalski et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6045877 | Gleason et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6100587 | Merchant et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6150719 | Saia et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159871 | Loboda et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6197688 | Simpson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6242686 | Kishimoto et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262445 | Swanson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6316167 | Angelopoulos et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6352945 | Matsuki | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365527 | Yang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383299 | Yuda et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6383898 | Kishimoto | May 2002 | B1 |
6383955 | Matsuki et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395150 | Van Cleemput et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399484 | Yamasaki et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410419 | Merchant et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417092 | Jain et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424044 | Han et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432846 | Matsuki | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448186 | Olson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455409 | Subramanian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465366 | Nemani et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465372 | Xia et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6506692 | Andideh | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6576345 | Van Cleemput et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6624064 | Sahin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6670715 | Yang et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6764958 | Nemani et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6767836 | San et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774489 | Russell et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790767 | Lee | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790788 | Li et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6846391 | Papasouliotis et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6849561 | Goundar | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6851384 | Yuda et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855645 | Tang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6875687 | Weidman et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6881683 | Matsuki et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890850 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6919270 | Satoh et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6930013 | Choi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935553 | Suga et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6949450 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6967405 | Yu et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6991959 | Goundar et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7064088 | Hyodo et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7091137 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115534 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7163889 | Yu et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7200460 | Campana et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7239017 | Yu et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7253125 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7256139 | Moghadam et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7282438 | Yu et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7381662 | Niu et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7420275 | Yu et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7468290 | Lukas et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7524735 | Gauri et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7573061 | Yu et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7622400 | Fox et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7662355 | Kamisako et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7709063 | Yuda et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7736728 | Loboda et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7842604 | Yu et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7915166 | Yu et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7923385 | Wu et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7968436 | Yu et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8021992 | Liou et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8053372 | Greer et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8124522 | Wu et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8168268 | Ovshinsky | May 2012 | B2 |
8173537 | Chattopadhyay et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8178168 | O'Neill et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8178443 | Rangarajan et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8247332 | Rangarajan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8669181 | Yu et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8846525 | Rangarajan et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8927442 | Angyal et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9234276 | Varadarajan | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9337068 | Antonelli et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9371579 | Varadarajan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9391086 | Soda et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9837270 | Varadarajan et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
10002787 | Yu et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10211310 | Varadarajan | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10325773 | Varadarajan et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20010021491 | Chen et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020000202 | Yuda et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016085 | Huang et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019148 | Hawryluk et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024117 | Russell et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020039625 | Powell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020106891 | Kim et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132101 | Fonash et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030001275 | Sambucetti et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030008528 | Xia et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036215 | Reid | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030049460 | O'Neill et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057553 | DelaRosa et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064154 | Laxman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068881 | Xia et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030082296 | Elers et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030089992 | Rathi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030154141 | Capazario et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162033 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030176030 | Tsuji et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030194496 | Xu | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030232150 | Arnold et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232514 | Kim et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040067308 | Zheng et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084680 | Ruelke et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040084774 | Li et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040089924 | Yuasa et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113279 | Chen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040115876 | Goundar et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040115954 | Todd | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040121085 | Wang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124531 | Venkatraman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161535 | Goundar et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040178169 | Desphande et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194706 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207084 | Hedrick et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040232552 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050014361 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050042889 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050100682 | Fukiage et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050202685 | Huang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050230831 | Clevenger et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233555 | Rajagopalan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236711 | Wang | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245071 | Wu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050255714 | Iyer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277302 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287790 | Owada et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287811 | Inukai | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014384 | Lee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014399 | Joe | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019486 | Yu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060040507 | Mak et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046520 | Padhi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060091559 | Nguyen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110931 | Fukazawa et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060160376 | Padhi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060216916 | Tsai et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060252273 | Lakshmanan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070004204 | Fukazawa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070141812 | Zagwijn et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070166546 | Ichikawa et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070190266 | Fu | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070232071 | Balseanu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070264839 | Van Gompel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281496 | Ingle et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070281497 | Liu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080050933 | Ozaki et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063809 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064173 | Hung | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070396 | Budrevich et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080099754 | Enicks | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122103 | Bonilla et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128907 | Yang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173984 | Lin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178805 | Paterson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080217746 | Morita et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233366 | Edelstein et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080254641 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277765 | Lane et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090017227 | Fu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042402 | Morioka | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090082240 | Nukui et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090215282 | Moore et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218699 | Torres et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090258487 | Lin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264277 | Raj et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090294925 | Lin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325364 | Sasagawa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100075077 | Bicker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100081293 | Mallick et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100207274 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100255667 | Seino et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100308463 | Yu | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110027957 | Berry | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110045676 | Park | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110074044 | Lin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110111533 | Varadarajan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110111590 | Edelstein et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114994 | Mandlik et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110117678 | Varadarajan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110135557 | Rangarajan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110146568 | Haukka | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110180866 | Matsuda et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193230 | Nogami et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204492 | Xie et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110236594 | Haverkamp et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120009802 | LaVoie et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120077349 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120122302 | Weidman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120142172 | Fox et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120241089 | Dielmann et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120329287 | Gates et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130043514 | Grill et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056818 | Iino et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130075455 | Shimizu | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130084711 | Liang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130119406 | Notsu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129940 | Xiao et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130157466 | Fox et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130242493 | Shenoy et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130319290 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130330932 | Rangarajan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130330935 | Varadarajan | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140175617 | Antonelli et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140197470 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140264780 | Yim et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264925 | Chen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140302690 | Underwood et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140356549 | Varadarajan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150118394 | Varadarajan et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150179466 | Takayama et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150303056 | Varadarajan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160020089 | Thadani et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160268286 | Tamura | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160276140 | Varadarajan et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160284615 | Kitajima et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160314964 | Tang et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170365462 | Varadarajan et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180033614 | Chandra et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180096842 | Varadarajan | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180144977 | Yu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180330945 | Varadarajan et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180330985 | Yu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180347035 | Weimer et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190181004 | Tang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190259604 | Varadarajan et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
868641 | Apr 1971 | CA |
1714168 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1735945 | Feb 2006 | CN |
101017834 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101065834 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101111930 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101536191 | Sep 2009 | CN |
102171796 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102187450 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102468434 | May 2012 | CN |
102652353 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102892922 | Jan 2013 | CN |
1 172 845 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 186 685 | Mar 2002 | EP |
10-092742 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2001-160547 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002-176100 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-217189 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2004-247725 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-051096 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2007-158000 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008-529296 | Jul 2008 | JP |
10-2006-0134964 | Dec 2006 | KR |
10-2009-0121361 | Nov 2009 | KR |
10-1334640 | Nov 2013 | KR |
261689 | Nov 1995 | TW |
476807 | Feb 2002 | TW |
535253 | Jun 2003 | TW |
200405437 | Apr 2004 | TW |
200600984 | Jan 2006 | TW |
200803988 | Jan 2008 | TW |
200839884 | Oct 2008 | TW |
200903635 | Jan 2009 | TW |
200908138 | Feb 2009 | TW |
201124553 | Jul 2011 | TW |
201214512 | Apr 2012 | TW |
201214563 | Apr 2012 | TW |
201240012 | Oct 2012 | TW |
201405659 | Feb 2014 | TW |
WO 2007116492 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Taiwan Office Action [no translation] dated Nov. 6, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 103119100. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,627. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/616,435. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/616,435. |
U.S. Examiner's Answer to the Appeal brief [filed May 19, 2017] before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board dated Sep. 22, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/616,435. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,627. |
U.S. Final Office Action, dated May 19, 2017, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,627. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,836. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,836. |
US Examiner's Answer to the Appeal brief [filed Apr. 28, 2017] before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board dated Sep. 25, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,836. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2016 issued in Application No. CN 201410576747.1. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2017 issued in Application No. CN 201510566292.X. |
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2017 issued in Application No. KR 10-2010-0123145. |
Taiwan Examination Report dated Mar. 14, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 102146997. |
Taiwan Examination Report dated Aug. 8, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 102146997. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/283,159, filed Sep. 30, 2016, Varadarajan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/382,137, filed Dec. 16, 2016, Varadarajan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/696,045, filed Sep. 5, 2017, Varadarajan. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/382,137. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 22, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/382,137. |
Tan et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,627, filed Apr. 21, 2015 entitled , “Gap Fill Using Carbon-Based Films.” |
Wu et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,661, filed Mar. 29, 2007 entitled “Methods for Improving Performance of ODC Film With Dielectric Constant < 4.0 .” |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,699. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 14, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,699. |
U.S. Advisory Action and Examiner Initiated Interview Summary dated Aug. 12, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,699. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 10, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/907,699. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,648. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 19, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,648. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/616,435. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/616,435. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/670,660. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 11, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/234,808. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 3, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/915,117. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/915,117. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/915,117. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 26, 2007 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/915,117. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 1, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/373,847. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance and Allowed Claims dated Jul. 1, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/373,847. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/805,356. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/805,356. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/805,356. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance and Allowed Claims dated Jul. 26, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/805,356. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/869,474. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2007 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/869,474. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2007 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/869,474. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 26, 2007 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/869,474. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,490. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,490. |
U.S. Office Action (Ex Parte Quayle) dated Jan. 27, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,490. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,490. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,322. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance and Allowed Claims dated Mar. 11, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/497,322. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance and Allowed Claims dated Nov. 24, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/710,652. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,661. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,661. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,661. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,617. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,617. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,617. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,617. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,617. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 9, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,617. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/082,496. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/082,496. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 26, 2011 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/082,496. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 10, 2012 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/631,691. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/967,832. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated May 30, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/967,832. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 5, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/967,832. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/105,026. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 29, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/105,026. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,836. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,836. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 5, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,836. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,836. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,836. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 issued in CN Application No. 201010569747.0. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2014 issued in CN Application No. 201010569747.0. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2015 issued in CN Application No. 201010569747.0. |
Japanese Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2014 issued in JP Application No. 2010-256165. |
Taiwan Notice of Allowance and Search Report dated Jul. 8, 2015 issued in Application No. TW 099140866. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2016 issued in Application No. TW 104126278. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2015 issued in Application No. TW 102120742. |
Benilan et al., (Oct. 4, 2011) “Optimization of microwave Hydrogen plasma discharges to mimic Lyman α(121.6 nm) solar irradiations,” EPSC-DPS2011-1317, EPSC-DPJ Joint Meeting 2011, EPSC Abstracts, 6:2pp. |
Blaszczyk-Lezak et al., (2005) “Silicon Carbonitride Films Produced by Remote Hydrogen Microwave Plasma CVD Using a (Dimethylamino)dimethylsilane Precursor,” Chemical Vapor Deposition, 11(1):44-52. |
“Development of Current Atomic Theory,” Emission Spectrum of Hydrogen, [downloaded at http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch6/bohr.html on Sep. 23, 2015], 7 pp. |
“Dummies' Guide to Hydrogen,” Molecular Hydrogen Foundation, MHF, [downloaded at http://www.molecularhydrogenfoundation.org/core-information/dummies-guide-to-hydrogen on Sep. 23, 2015], 2 pp. |
Fozza et al., (Jan./Feb. 1998) “Vacuum ultraviolet to visible emission of some pure gases and their mixtures used for plasma processing,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, American Vacuum Society, 16(1):72-77. |
Fozza et al., (Jul. 2000) “Vacuum ultraviolet to visible emission from hydrogen plasma: Effect of excitation frequency,” Journal of Applied Physics, 88(1):20-33. |
Grubbs et al. (May/Jun. 2006) “Attenuation of hydrogen radicals traveling under flowing gas conditions through tubes of different materials,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 24(3):486-496. |
Hatanaka et al., (2000) “Experiments and analyses of SiC thin film deposition from organo-silicon by a remote plasma method,” Thin Solid Films, 368:287-291. |
Holländer et al., (May 1994) “Vacuum ultraviolet emission from microwave plasmas of hydrogen and its mixtures with helium and oxygen,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 12(3):879-882. |
Huran, J., et al., (2004) “RBS study of amorphous silicon carbide films deposited by PECVD,” Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 54(Suppl. C):C1006-C1010. |
“Radical (chemistry)” From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, [downloaded at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_(chemistry) on Sep. 23, 2015), 11 pages. |
Xu, Ying-Yu, et al., (1999) “Preparation of SiC Thin Film Using Organosilicon by Remote Plasma CVD Method,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 544:185-189. |
Jones et al., (Nov. 30, 2001) “Silicon Containing Polymers: The Science and Technology of Their Synthesis and Applications,” Springer, p. 705. |
Lemaire, P.J., Walker, K.L., Kranz, K.S., Huff, R.G. and DiMarcello, F.V., (1990) “Diffusion of Hydrogen Through Hermetic Carbon Films on Silica Fibers,” AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 172, 12 pages, © 1990 Materials Research Society. |
Maeda et al. (Sep. 1989), “A Low-Permittivity Interconnection Using an SiBN Interlayer,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 36(9). |
Sugino, Takashi et al. (2001), “Synthesis of boron nitride film with low dielectric constant for its application to silicon ultralarge scale integrated semiconductors,” Diamond and Related Materials, pp. 1275-1379, Elsevier Science B.V. |
Wróbel et al. (2001) “Oligomerization and Polymerization Steps in Remote Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition of Silicon-Carbon and Silica Films from Organosilicon Sources,” Chem. Mater, 13(5):1884-1895. |
Wróbel et al., (2010) “Reactivity of Organosilicon Precursors in Remote Hydrogen Microwave Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition of Silicon Carbide and Silicon Carbonitride Thin-Film Coatings,” Appl. Organometal. Chem., 24:201-207. |
Wu et al. (Oct. 17-19, 2006), “Ultra Low k Dielectrics Prepared by PECVD Using a Single-Precursor and Treated by UV Assisted Thermal Processing,” Advanced Metallization Conference (AMC) 2006, pp. 1-6, San Diego, CA. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/283,159. |
Singapore Notice of Allowance & Supplemental Exam Report dated Nov. 30, 2017 issued in Application No. SG 10201402381U. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201610084166.5. |
Korean First Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2018 issued in Application No. KR 10-2017-0147917. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISA/KR) dated Dec. 26, 2017 issued in PCT/US2017/051794. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISA/KR) dated Mar. 15, 2018 issued in PCT/US2017/062882. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISA/KR) dated Mar. 19, 2018 issued in PCT/US2017/064024. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,291, filed Jan. 17, 2017, Yu et al. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 7, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,291. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2017 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,291. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/169,530. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated May 16, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,627. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/283,159. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 2, 2018 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/494,836. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2017 issued in Application No. TW 103119100. |
Taiwan Notice of Allowance and Search Report dated Jun. 14, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 103136697. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201610084166.5. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201610251266.2. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,153, filed Jul. 20, 2018, Weimer et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/194,102, filed Nov. 16, 2018, Tang et al. |
U.S. Final Office Aciton dated Mar. 5, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/169,530. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 4, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/616,435. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 7, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/283,159. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/972,554. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/969,045. |
Taiwan Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 8, 2019 issued in Application No. TW 107126975. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2018 issued in Application No. CN 201710307116.3. |
Taiwan First Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2018 issued in Application No. TW 107123391. |
Taiwan Second Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2019 issued in Application No. TW 107123391. |
Chinese Second Office Action [Decision of Final Rejection] dated Jan. 25, 2019 issued in Application No. CN 201610251266.2. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 11, 2019 (ISA/KR) dated Apr. 11, 2019 issued in PCT/US2017/051794. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/240,133, filed Jan. 4, 2019, Varadarajan. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability (ISA/KR) dated Jun. 27, 2019 issued in PCT/US2017/064024. |
Korean First Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2019 issued in Application No. KR 10-2013-0066728. |
Taiwanese Third Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2019 issued in Application No. TW 107123391. |
Taiwanese First Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2019 issued in Application No. TW 105103396. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2019 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,153. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160090649 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13907699 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14961637 | US |