Methods of fabricating contact regions for FET incorporating SiGe

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8822282
  • Patent Number
    8,822,282
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 26, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 2, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Structures and methods for fabricating high speed digital, analog, and combined digital/analog systems using planarized relaxed SiGe as the materials platform. The relaxed SiGe allows for a plethora of strained Si layers that possess enhanced electronic properties. By allowing the MOSFET channel to be either at the surface or buried, one can create high-speed digital and/or analog circuits. The planarization before the device epitaxial layers are deposited ensures a flat surface for state-of-the-art lithography.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the field of relaxed SiGe platforms for high speed CMOS electronics and high speed analog circuits.


Si CMOS as a platform for digital integrated circuits has progressed predictably through the industry roadmap. The progress is created through device miniaturization, leading to higher performance, greater reliability, and lower cost. However, new bottlenecks in data flow are appearing as the interconnection hierarchy is expanded. Although digital integrated circuits have progressed at unprecedented rates, analog circuitry has hardly progressed at all. Furthermore, it appears that in the near future, serious economic and technological issues will confront the progress of digital integrated circuits.


The digital and communication chip markets need an enhancement to Si CMOS and the maturing roadmap. One promising candidate material that improves digital integrated circuit technology and introduces new analog integrated circuit possibilities is relaxed SiGe material on Si substrates. Relaxed SiGe alloys on Si can have thin layers of Si deposited on them, creating tension in the thin Si layers. Tensile Si layers have many advantageous properties for the basic device in integrated circuits, the metal-oxide field effect transistor (MOSFET). First, placing Si in tension increases the mobility of electrons moving parallel to the surface of the wafer, thus increasing the frequency of operation of the MOSFET and the associated circuit. Second, the band offset between the relaxed SiGe and the tensile Si will confine electrons in the Si layer. Therefore, in an electron channel device (n-channel), the channel can be removed from the surface or ‘buried’. This ability to spatially separate the charge carriers from scattering centers such as ionized impurities and the ‘rough’ oxide interface enables the production of low noise, high performance analog devices and circuits.


A key development in this field was the invention of relaxed SiGe buffers with low threading dislocation densities. The key background inventions in this area are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,442,205 issued to Brasen et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,653 issued to Fitzgerald. These patents define the current best methods of fabricating high quality relaxed SiGe.


Novel device structures in research laboratories have been fabricated on early, primitive versions of the relaxed buffer. For example, strained Si, surface channel nMOSFETs have been created that show enhancements of over 60% in intrinsic gm with electron mobility increases of over 75% (Rim et al, IEDM 98 Tech. Dig. p. 707). Strained Si, buried channel devices demonstrating high transconductance and high mobility have also been fabricated (U. Konig, MRS Symposium Proceedings 533, 3 (1998)). Unfortunately, these devices possess a variety of problems with respect to commercialization. First, the material quality that is generally available is insufficient for practical utilization, since the surface of SiGe on Si becomes very rough as the material is relaxed via dislocation introduction. These dislocations are essential in the growth of relaxed SiGe layers on Si since they compensate for the stress induced by the lattice mismatch between the materials. For more than 10 years, researchers have tried to intrinsically control the surface morphology through epitaxial growth, but since the stress fields from the misfit dislocations affect the growth front, no intrinsic epitaxial solution is possible. The invention describes a method of planarization and regrowth that allows all devices on relaxed SiGe to possess a significantly flatter surface. This reduction in surface roughness increases the yield for fine-line lithography, thus enabling the manufacture of strained Si devices.


A second problem with the strained Si devices made to date is that researchers have been concentrating on devices optimized for very different applications. The surface channel devices have been explored to enhance conventional MOSFET devices, whereas the buried channel devices have been constructed in ways that mimic the buried channel devices previously available only in III-V materials systems, like AlGaAs/GaAs. Recognizing that the Si manufacturing infrastructure needs a materials platform that is compatible with Si, scalable, and capable of being used in the plethora of Si integrated circuit applications, the disclosed invention provides a platform that allows both the enhancement of circuits based on Si CMOS, as well as the fabrication of analog circuits. Thus, high performance analog or digital systems can be designed with this platform. An additional advantage is that both types of circuits can be fabricated in the CMOS process, and therefore a combined, integrated digital/analog system can be designed as a single-chip solution.


With these advanced SiGe material platforms, it is now possible to provide a variety of device and circuit topologies that take advantage of this new materials system. Exemplary embodiments of the invention describe structures and methods to fabricate advanced strained-layer Si devices, and structures and methods to create circuits based on a multiplicity of devices, all fabricated from the same starting material platform. Starting from the same material platform is key to minimizing cost as well as to allowing as many circuit topologies to be built on this platform as possible.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the invention provides a material platform of planarized relaxed SiGe with regrown device layers. The planarization and regrowth strategy allows device layers to have minimal surface roughness as compared to strategies in which device layers are grown without planarization. This planarized and regrown platform is a host for strained Si devices that can possess optimal characteristics for both digital and analog circuits. Structures and processes are described that allow for the fabrication of high performance digital logic or analog circuits, but the same structure can be used to host a combination of digital and analog circuits, forming a single system-on-chip.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a structure including a relaxed SiGe layer epitaxially grown on a Si substrate;



FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an exemplary structure showing that the origin of the crosshatch pattern is the stress fields from injected misfit dislocations;



FIG. 3 is a table showing surface roughness data for relaxed SiGe buffers produced by dislocation injection via graded SiGe layers on Si substrates;



FIGS. 4A–4D show an exemplary process flow and resulting platform structure in accordance with the invention;



FIGS. 5A–5D are schematic diagrams of the corresponding process flow and layer structure for a surface channel FET platform accordance with the invention;



FIGS. 6A–6D are schematic diagrams of the corresponding process flow and layer structure for a buried channel FET platform in accordance with the invention;



FIGS. 7A–7D are schematic diagrams of a process flow for a surface channel MOSFET in accordance with the invention;



FIGS. 8A and 8B are schematic block diagrams of surface channel devices with protective layers;



FIGS. 9A and 9B are schematic block diagrams of surface channel devices with Si layers on Ge-rich layers for use in silicide formation;



FIGS. 10 is schematic diagram of a buried channel MOSFET after device isolation in accordance with the invention;



FIG. 11 is a schematic flow of the process, for any heterostructure FET device deposited on relaxed SiGe, in accordance with the invention;



FIGS. 12A–12D are schematic diagrams of a process flow in the case of forming the surface channel MOSFET in the top strained Si layer in accordance with the invention;



FIGS. 13A–13D are schematic diagrams of a process flow in the case of forming the surface channel MOSFET in the buried strained Si layer in accordance with the invention; and



FIGS. 14A and 14B are schematic diagrams of surface and buried channel devices with Si1−yGey channels on a relaxed Si1−zGez layer.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a structure 100 including a relaxed SiGe layer epitaxially grown on a Si substrate 102. In this structure, a compositionally graded buffer layer 104 is used to accommodate the lattice mismatch between the uniform SiGe layer 106 and the Si substrate. By spreading the lattice mismatch over a distance, the graded buffer minimizes the number of dislocations reaching the surface and thus provides a method for growing high-quality relaxed SiGe films on Si.


Any method of growing a high-quality, relaxed SiGe layer on Si will produce roughness on the surface of the SiGe layer in a well-known crosshatch pattern. This crosshatch pattern is typically a few hundred angstroms thickness over distances of microns. Thus, the crosshatch pattern is a mild, undulating surface morphology with respect to the size of the electron or hole. For that reason, it is possible to create individual devices that achieve enhancements over their control Si device counterparts. However, commercialization of these devices requires injection of the material into the Si CMOS process environment to achieve low cost, high performance targets. This processing environment requires that the material and device characteristics have minimal impact on the manufacturing process. The crosshatch pattern on the surface of the wafer is one limiting characteristic of relaxed SiGe on Si that affects the yield and the ease of manufacture. Greater planarity is desired for high yield and ease in lithography.


The origin of the crosshatch pattern is the stress fields from the injected misfit dislocations. This effect is depicted by the exemplary structure 200 shown in FIG. 2. By definition, the dislocations must be introduced in order to accommodate the lattice-mismatch between the SiGe alloy and the Si substrate. The stress fields originate at the dislocations, and are terminated at the surface of the film. However, the termination at the surface creates crystal lattices that vary from place to place on the surface of the wafer. Since growth rate can be correlated to lattice constant size, different thicknesses of deposition occur at different points on the wafer. One may think that thick layer growth beyond the misfit dislocations will smooth the layer of these thickness differences. Unfortunately, the undulations on the surface have a relatively long wavelength; therefore, surface diffusion is typically not great enough to remove the morphology.



FIG. 3 is a table that displays surface roughness data for relaxed SiGe buffers produced by dislocation injection via graded SiGe layers on Si substrates. Note that the as-grown crosshatch pattern for relaxed Si0.8Ge0.2 buffers creates a typical roughness of approximately 7.9 nm. This average roughness increases as the Ge content in the relaxed buffer is increased. Thus, for any SiGe layer that is relaxed through dislocation introduction during growth, the surface roughness is unacceptable for state-of-the-art fabrication facilities. After the process in which the relaxed SiGe is planarized, the average roughness is less than 2 nm (typically 0.57 nm), and after device layer deposition, the average roughness is 0.77 nm with a 1.5 μm regrowth thickness. Therefore, after the complete structure is fabricated, over one order of magnitude of roughness reduction can be achieved.


The regrowth device layers can be either greater than or less than the critical thickness of the regrowth layer. In general, in any lattice-mismatched epitaxial growth, thin layers can be deposited without fear of dislocation introduction at the interface. At a great enough thickness, any lattice-mismatch between the film and substrate will introduce misfit dislocations into the regrown heterostructure. These new dislocations can cause additional surface roughness. Thus, if the lattice-mismatch between the regrowth device layers and relaxed SiGe buffer is too great, the effort of planarizing the relaxed SiGe may be lost since massive dislocation introduction will roughen the surface.


There are two distinct possibilities with respect to the regrowth thickness and the quality of surface. If the regrowth layers are very thin, then exact lattice matching of the regrowth layer composition and the relaxed buffer composition is not necessary. In this case, the surface roughness will be very low, approximately equal to the post-planarization flatness. However, in many applications for devices, the regrowth layer thickness will be 1–2 μm or more. For a 1% difference in Ge concentration between the relaxed SiGe and the regrowth layer, the critical thickness is approximately 0.5 μm. Thus, if optimal flatness is desired, it is best to keep the regrowth layer below approximately 0.5 μm unless excellent control of the uniformity of Ge concentration across the wafer is achieved. Although this composition matching is achievable in state-of-the-art tools, FIG. 3 shows that less precise matching, i.e., within 2% Ge, results in misfit dislocation introduction and introduction of a new crosshatch pattern. However, because the lattice mismatch is so small, the average roughness is still very low, approximately 0.77 nm. Thus, either lattice-matching or slight mismatch will result in excellent device layer surfaces for processing.


It is also noted that the relaxed SiGe alloy with surface roughness may not necessarily be a uniform composition relaxed SiGe layer on a graded composition layer. Although this material layer structure has been shown to be an early example of high quality relaxed SiGe, there are some disadvantages to this structure. For example, SiGe alloys possess a much worse coefficient of thermal conductivity than pure Si. Thus, for electronic devices located at the surface, it may be relatively difficult to guide the heat away from the device areas due to the thick graded composition layer and uniform composition layer.


Another exemplary embodiment of the invention, shown in FIGS. 4A–4D, solves this problem and creates a platform for high power SiGe devices. FIGS. 4A–4D show an exemplary process flow and resulting platform structure in accordance with the invention. The structure is produced by first forming a relaxed uniform SiGe alloy 400 via a compositionally graded layer 402 on a Si substrate 404. The SiGe layer 400 is then transferred to a second Si substrate 406 using conventional bonding. For example, the uniform SiGe alloy 400 on the graded layer 402 can be planarized to remove the crosshatch pattern, and that relaxed SiGe alloy can be bonded to the Si wafer. The graded layer 402 and the original substrate 404 can be removed by a variety of conventional processes. For example, one process is to grind the original Si substrate away and selectively etch to the SiGe, either by a controlled dry or wet etch, or by embedding an etch stop layer. The end result is a relaxed SiGe alloy 400 on Si without the thick graded layer. This structure is more suited for high power applications since the heat can be conducted away from the SiGe layer more efficiently.


The bond and substrate removal technique can also be used to produce SiGe on insulator substrates, or SGOI. An SGOI wafer is produced using the same technique shown in FIGS. 4A–4D; however, the second substrate is coated with a SiO2 layer before bonding. In an alternative embodiment, both wafers can be coated with SiO2 to enable oxide-to-oxide bonding. The resulting structure after substrate removal is a high quality, relaxed SiGe layer on an insulating film. Devices built on this platform can utilize the performance enhancements of both strained Si and the SOI architecture.


It will be appreciated that in the scenario where the SiGe layer is transferred to another host substrate, one may still need to planarize before regrowing the device layer structure. The SiGe surface can be too rough for state of the art processing due to the substrate removal technique. In this case, the relaxed SiGe is planarized, and the device layers are regrown on top of the high-quality relaxed SiGe surface.


Planarization of the surface via mechanical or other physical methods is required to flatten the surface and to achieve CMOS-quality devices. However, the field effect transistors (FETs) that allow for enhanced digital and analog circuits are very thin, and thus would be removed by the planarization step. Thus, a first part of the invention is to realize that relaxed SiGe growth and planarizaion, followed by device layer regrowth, is key to creating a high-performance, high yield enhanced CMOS platform. FIGS. 5 and 6 show the process sequence and regrowth layers required to create embodiments of surface channel and buried channel FETs, respectively.



FIGS. 5A–5D are schematic diagrams of a process flow and resulting layer structure in accordance with the invention. FIG. 5A shows the surface roughness 500, which is typical of a relaxed SiGe alloy 502 on a substrate 504, as an exaggerated wavy surface. Note that the substrate is labeled in a generic way, since the substrate could itself be Si, a relaxed compositionally graded SiGe layer on Si, or another material in which the relaxed SiGe has been transferred through a wafer bonding and removal technique. The relaxed SiGe alloy 502 is planarized (FIG. 5B) to remove the substantial roughness, and then device regrowth layers 506 are epitaxially deposited (FIG. 5C). It is desirable to lattice-match the composition of the regrowth layer 506 as closely as possible to the relaxed SiGe 502; however, a small amount of mismatch and dislocation introduction at the interface is tolerable since the surface remains substantially planar. For a surface channel device, a strained Si layer 508 of thickness less than 0.1 μm is then grown on top of the relaxed SiGe 502 with an optional sacrificial layer 510, as shown in FIG. 5D. The strained layer 508 is the layer that will be used as the channel in the final CMOS devices.



FIGS. 6A–6D are schematic diagrams of the corresponding process flow and layer structure for a buried channel FET platform in accordance with the invention. In this structure, the regrowth layers 606 include a lattice matched SiGe layer 602, a strained Si channel layer 608 with a thickness of less than 0.05 μm, a SiGe separation or spacer layer 612, a Si gate oxidation layer 614, and an optional sacrificial layer 610 used to protect the heterostructure during the initial device processing steps.


Once the device structure has been deposited, the rest of the process flow for device fabrication is very similar to that of bulk Si. A simplified version of the process flow for a surface channel MOSFET in accordance with the invention is shown in FIGS. 7A–7D. This surface channel MOSFET contains a relaxed SiGe layer 700 and a strained Si layer 702. The device isolation oxide 704, depicted in FIG. 7A, is typically formed first. In this step, the SiN layer 706, which is on top of a thin pad oxide layer 708, serves as a hard mask for either local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS) or shallow trench isolation (STI). Both techniques use a thick oxide (relative to device dimensions) to provide a high threshold voltage between devices; however, STI is better suited for sub-quarter-micron technologies. FIG. 7B is a schematic of the device area after the gate oxide 716 growth and the shallow-source drain implant. The implant regions 710 are self-aligned by using a poly-Si gate 712 patterned with photoresist 714 as a masking layer. Subsequently, deep source-drain implants 718 are positioned using conventional spacer 720 formation and the device is electrically contacted through the formation of silicide 722 at the gate and silicide/germanides 724 at the source and drain (FIG. 7C). FIG. 7D is a schematic of the device after the first level of metal interconnects 726 have been deposited and etched.


Since there are limited-thickness layers on top of the entire structure, the removal of surface material during processing becomes more critical than with standard Si. For surface channel devices, the structure that is regrown consists primarily of nearly lattice-matched SiGe, and a thin surface layer of strained Si. Many of the processes that are at the beginning of a Si fabrication sequence strip Si from the surface. If the processing is not carefully controlled, the entire strained Si layer can be removed before the gate oxidation. The resulting device will be a relaxed SiGe channel FET and thus the benefits of a strained Si channel will not be realized.


A logical solution to combat Si removal during initial processing is to make the strained Si layer thick enough to compensate for this removal. However, thick Si layers are not possible for two reasons. First, the enhanced electrical properties originate from the fact that the Si is strained and thick layers experience strain relief through the introduction of misfit dislocations. Second, the misfit dislocations themselves are undesirable in significant quantity, since they can scatter carriers and increase leakage currents in junctions.


In order to prevent removal of strained Si layers at the surface, the cleaning procedures before gate oxidation must be minimized and/or protective layers must be applied. Protective layers are useful since their removal can be carefully controlled. Some examples of protective layers for surface channel devices are shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B. FIG. 8A shows a strained Si heterostructure of a relaxed SiGe layer 800 and a strained Si channel layer 802 protected by a surface layer 804 of SiGe. The surface SiGe layer 804 should have a Ge concentration similar to that of the relaxed SiGe layer 800 below, so that the thickness is not limited by critical thickness constraints. During the initial cleans, the SiGe sacrificial layer is removed instead of the strained Si channel layer. The thickness of the sacrificial layer can either be tuned to equal the removal thickness, or can be made greater than the removal thickness. In the latter case, the excess SiGe can be selectively removed before the gate oxidation step to reveal a clean, strained Si layer at the as grown thickness. If the particular fabrication facility prefers a Si terminated surface, a sacrificial Si layer may be deposited on top of the SiGe sacrificial cap layer.



FIG. 8B shows a structure where a layer 806 of SiO2 and a surface layer 808 of either a poly-crystalline or an amorphous material are used as protective layers. In this method, an oxide layer is either grown or deposited after the epitaxial growth of the strained Si layer. Subsequently, a polycrystalline or amorphous layer of Si, SiGe, or Ge is deposited. These semiconductor layers protect the strained-Si layer in the same manner as a SiGe cap during the processing steps before gate oxidation. Prior to gate oxidation, the poly/amorphous and oxide layers are selectively removed. Although the sacrificial layers are shown as protection for a surface channel device, the same techniques can be employed in a buried channel heterostructure.


Another way in which conventional Si processing is modified is during the source-drain silicide-germanide formation (FIG. 7C). In conventional Si processing, a metal (typically Ti, Co, or Ni) is reacted with the Si and, through standard annealing sequences, low resistivity silicides are formed. However, in this case, the metal reacts with both Si and Ge simultaneously. Since the silicides have much lower free energy than the germanides, there is a tendency to form a silicide while the Ge is expelled. The expelled germanium creates agglomeration and increases the resistance of the contacts. This increase in series resistance offsets the benefits of the extra drive current from the heterostructure, and negates the advantages of the structure.


Ti and Ni can form phases in which the Ge is not rejected severely, thus allowing the formation of a good contact. Co is much more problematic. However, as discussed above for the problem of Si removal, a protective layer(s) at the device epitaxy stage can be applied instead of optimizing the SiGe-metal reaction. For example, the strained Si that will become the surface channel can be coated with a high-Ge-content SiGe alloy (higher Ge content than the initial relaxed SiGe), followed by strained Si. Two approaches are possible using these surface contact layers. Both methods introduce thick Si at the surface and allow the conventional silicide technology to be practiced without encountering the problems with SiGe-metal reactions.


The first approach, shown on a surface channel heterostructure 900 in FIG. 9A, uses a Ge-rich layer 906 thin enough that it is substantially strained. The layer 906 is provided on a strained Si channel layer 904 and relaxed SiGe layer 902. In this case, if a subsequent Si layer 908 is beyond the critical thickness, the compressive Ge-rich layer 906 acts as a barrier to dislocations entering the strained Si channel 904. This barrier is beneficial since dislocations do not adversely affect the silicide process; thus, their presence in the subsequent Si layer 908 is of no consequence. However, if the dislocations were to penetrate to the channel, there would be adverse effects on the device.


A second approach, shown in FIG. 9B, is to allow a Ge-rich layer 910 to intentionally exceed the critical thickness, thereby causing substantial relaxation in the Ge-rich layer. In this scenario, an arbitrarily thick Si layer 912 can be applied on top of the relaxed Ge-rich layer. This layer will contain more defects than the strained channel, but the defects play no role in device operation since this Si is relevant only in the silicide reaction. In both cases, the process is free from the metal-SiGe reaction concerns, since the metal will react with Si-only. Once the silicide contacts have been formed, the rest of the sequence is a standard Si CMOS process flow, except that the thermal budget is carefully monitored since, for example, the silicide-germanicide (if that option is used) typically cannot tolerate as high a temperature as the conventional silicide. A major advantage of using Si/SiGe FET heterostructures to achieve enhanced performance is the compatibility with conventional Si techniques. Many of the processes are identical to Si CMOS processing, and once the front-end of the process, i.e., the processing of the Si/SiGe heterostructure, is complete, the entire back-end process is uninfluenced by the fact that Si/SiGe lies below.


Even though the starting heterostructure for the buried channel device is different from that of the surface channel device, its process flow is very similar to the surface channel flow shown in FIGS. 7A–7D. FIG. 10 is a schematic block diagram of a buried channel MOSFET structure 1000 after the device isolation oxide 1016 has been formed using a SiN mask 1014. In this case, the strained channel 1002 on a first SiGe layer 1010 is separated from the surface by the growth of another SiGe layer 1004, followed by another Si layer 1006. This Si layer is needed for the gate oxide 1008 since gate-oxide formation on SiGe produces a very high interface state density, thus creating non-ideal MOSFETs. One consequence of this Si layer, is that if it is too thick, a substantial portion of the Si layer will remain after the gate oxidation. Carriers can populate this residual Si layer, creating a surface channel in parallel with the desired buried channel and leading to deleterious device properties. Thus, the surface layer Si must be kept as thin as possible, typically less than 50 Å and ideally in the range of 5–15 Å.


Another added feature that is necessary for a buried channel device is the supply layer implant. The field experienced in the vertical direction when the device is turned on is strong enough to pull carriers from the buried channel 1002 and force them to populate a Si channel 1006 near the Si/SiO2 interface 1012, thus destroying any advantage of the buried channel. Thus, a supply layer of dopant must be introduced either in the layer 1004 between the buried channel and the top Si layer 1006, or below the buried channel in the underlying SiGe 1010. In this way, the device is forced on with little or no applied voltage, and turned off by applying a voltage (depletion mode device).



FIG. 11 is a schematic flow of the process, for any heterostructure FET device deposited on relaxed SiGe, in accordance with the invention. The main process steps are shown in the boxes, and optional steps or comments are shown in the circles. The first three steps (1100,1102,1104) describe the fabrication of the strained silicon heterostructure. The sequence includes production of relaxed SiGe on Si, planarization of the SiGe, and regrowth of the device layers. Once the strained heterostructure is complete (1106), MOS fabrication begins with device isolation (1112) using either STI (1110) or LOCOS (1108). Before proceeding to the gate oxidation, buried channel devices undergo a supply and threshold implant (1114), and any protective layers applied to either a buried or surface channel heterostructure must be selectively removed (1116). The processing sequence after the gate oxidation (1118) is similar to conventional Si CMOS processing. These steps include gate deposition, doping, and definition (1120), self-aligned shallow source-drain implant (1122), spacer formation (1124), self-aligned deep source-drain implant (1126), salicide formation (1128), and pad isolation via metal deposition and etch (1130). The steps requiring significant alteration have been discussed.


One particular advantage of the process of FIG. 11 is that it enables the use of surface channel and buried channel devices on the same platform. Consider FIGS. 12A–12D and FIGS. 13A–13D, which show a universal substrate layer configuration and a process that leads to the co-habitation of surface and buried channel MOSFETs on the same chip. The universal substrate is one in which both surface channel and buried channel devices can be fabricated. There are two possibilities in fabricating the surface channel device in this sequence, shown in FIGS. 12 and 13. The process flows for combining surface and buried channel are similar to the previous process described in FIG. 7. Therefore, only the critical steps involved in exposing the proper gate areas are shown in FIGS. 12 and 13.



FIGS. 12A and 13A depict the same basic heterostructure 1200,1300 for integrating surface channel and buried channel devices. There is a surface strained Si layer 1202,1302, a SiGe spacer layer 1204,1304, a buried strained Si layer 1206,1306, and a relaxed platform of SiGe 1208,1308. Two strained Si layers are necessary because the buried channel MOSFET requires a surface Si layer to form the gate oxide and a buried Si layer to form the device channel. The figures also show a device isolation region 1210 that separates the buried channel device area 1212,1312 from the surface channel device area 1214,1314.


Unlike the buried channel device, a surface channel MOSFET only requires one strained Si layer. As a result, the surface channel MOSFET can be fabricated either in the top strained Si layer, as shown in FIGS. 12B–12D, or the buried Si layer channel, as shown in FIGS. 13B–13D. FIG. 12B is a schematic diagram of a surface channel gate oxidation 1216 in the top Si layer 1202. In this scenario, a thicker top Si layer is desired, since after oxidation, a residual strained Si layer must be present to form the channel. FIG. 12B also shows a possible position for the buried channel supply implant 1218, which is usually implanted before the buried channel gate oxide is grown. Since the top Si layer is optimized for the surface channel device, it may be necessary to strip some of the top strained Si in the regions 1220 where buried channel devices are being created, as shown in FIG. 12C. This removal is necessary in order to minimize the surface Si thickness after gate oxide 1222 formation (FIG. 12D), and thus avoid the formation of a parallel device channel.


When a surface channel MOSFET is formed in the buried strained Si layer, the top strained Si layer can be thin, i.e., designed optimally for the buried channel MOSFET. In FIG. 13B, the top strained Si and SiGe layers are removed in the region 1312 where the surface channel MOSFETs are formed. Because Si and SiGe have different properties, a range of selective removal techniques can be used, such as wet or dry chemical etching. Selective oxidation can also be used since SiGe oxidizes at much higher rates than Si, especially under wet oxidation conditions. FIG. 13C shows the gate oxidation 1314 of the surface channel device as well as the supply layer implant 1316 for the buried channel device. Finally, FIG. 13D shows the position of the buried channel gate oxide 1318. No thinning of the top Si layer is required prior to the oxidation since the epitaxial thickness is optimized for the buried channel device. Subsequent to these initial steps, the processing for each device proceeds as previously described.


Another key step in the process is the use of a localized implant to create the supply layer needed in the buried channel device. In a MOSFET structure, when the channel is turned on, large vertical fields are present that bring carriers to the surface. The band offset between the Si and SiGe that confines the electrons in the buried strained Si layer is not large enough to prevent carriers from being pulled out of the buried channel. Thus, at first, the buried channel MOSFET would appear useless. However, if enough charge were present in the top SiGe layer, the MOSFET would become a depletion-mode device, i.e. normally on and requiring bias to turn off the channel. In the surface/buried channel device platform, a supply layer implant can be created in the regions where the buried channel will be fabricated, thus easing process integration. If for some reason the supply layer implant is not possible, note that the process shown in FIG. 11 in which the surface channel is created on the buried Si layer is an acceptable process, since the dopant can be introduced into the top SiGe layer during epitaxial growth. The supply layer is then removed from the surface channel MOSFET areas when the top SiGe and strained Si layers are selectively etched away.


In the processes described in FIGS. 10, 12 and 13, it is assumed that the desire is to fabricate a buried channel MOSFET. If the oxide of the buried channel device is removed, one can form a buried channel device with a metal gate (termed a MODFET or HEMT). The advantage of this device is that the transconductance can be much higher since there is a decrease in capacitance due to the missing oxide. However, there are two disadvantages to using this device. First, all thermal processes after gate definition have to be extremely low temperature, otherwise the metal will react with the semiconductor, forming an alloyed gate with a very low, or non-existent, barrier. Related to this issue is the second disadvantage. Due to the low thermal budget, the source and drain formation and contacts are typically done before the gate definition. Inverting these steps prevents the gate from being self-aligned to the source and drain, thus increasing the series resistance between the gate and the source and drain. Therefore, with a carefully designed buried channel MOSFET, the self-aligned nature can be a great advantage in device performance. Another benefit of the MOSFET structure is that the gate leakage is very low.


The combination of buried n-channel structures with n and p type surface channel MOSFETs has been emphasized heretofore. It is important to also emphasize that in buried n-channel devices as well as in surface channel devices, the channels need not be pure Si. Si1−yGey channels can be used to increase the stability during processing. FIGS. 14A and 14B are schematic diagrams of surface 1400 and buried 1450 channel devices with Si1−yGey channels 1402 on a relaxed Si1−zGez layer 1404. The devices are shown after salicidation and thus contain a poly-Si gate 1410, gate oxide 1408, silicide regions 1412, spacers 1414, and doped regions 1416. In the surface channel device 1400, a thin layer 1406 of Si must be deposited onto the Si1−yGey layer 1402 to form the gate oxide 1408, as previously described for buried channel devices. In the buried Si1−yGey channel device 1450, the device layer sequence is unchanged and consists of a buried strained channel 1402, a SiGe spacer layer 1418, and a surface Si layer 1420 for oxidation.


To maintain tensile strain in the channel of an nMOS device, the lattice constant of the channel layer must be less than that of the relaxed SiGe layer, i.e., y must be less than z. Since n-channel devices are sensitive to alloy scattering, the highest mobilities result when the Ge concentration in the channel is low. In order to have strain on this channel layer at a reasonable critical thickness, the underlying SiGe should have a Ge concentration in the range of 10–50%.


Experimental data indicates that p channels are less sensitive to alloy scattering. Thus, surface MOSFETs with alloy channels are also possible. In addition, the buried channel devices can be p-channel devices simply by having the Ge concentration in the channel, y, greater than the Ge concentration in the relaxed SiGe alloy, z, and by switching the supply dopant from n-type to p-type. This configuration can be used to form Ge channel devices when y=1 and 0.5<z<0.9.


With the ability to mix enhancement mode surface channel devices (n and p channel, through implants as in typical Si CMOS technology) and depletion-mode buried channel MOSFETs and MODFETs, it is possible to create highly integrated digital/analog systems. The enhancement mode devices can be fabricated into high performance CMOS, and the regions of an analog circuit requiring the high performance low-noise depletion mode device can be fabricated in the buried channel regions. Thus, it is possible to construct optimal communication stages, digital processing stages, etc. on a single platform. These different regions are connected electrically in the backend of the Si CMOS chip, just as transistors are connected by the back-end technology today. Thus, the only changes to the CMOS process are some parameters in the processes in the fabrication facility, and the new material, but otherwise, the entire manufacturing process is transparent to the change. Thus, the economics favor such a platform for integrated Si CMOS systems on chip.


Although the present invention has been shown and described with respect to several preferred embodiments thereof, various changes, omissions and additions to the form and detail thereof, may be made therein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: providing a gate stack disposed above a first area of a substrate, the gate stack comprising a gate oxide disposed beneath a conductive gate material, the substrate comprising a strained layer over a first relaxed layer;epitaxially depositing a SiGe layer in at least one area of said substrate adjacent to the first area of said substrate;providing a metal layer over said SiGe layer, said metal layer comprising Ni; andreacting said metal layer with said SiGe layer to form a region comprising at least one of silicide or silicide/germanicide disposed over and in direct contact with unreacted SiGe,wherein the region comprising at least one of silicide or silicide/germanicide forms a contact region for a source or a drain of a FET, and wherein a channel region of the FET comprises a portion of the strained layer.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said SiGe layer is substantially strained.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said gate stack defines the channel region disposed thereunder.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of reacting said metal layer with said SiGe layer comprises thermal annealing.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the strain in the strained layer is induced by lattice mismatch to the first relaxed layer.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said substrate has a first Ge concentration and said SiGe layer has a second Ge concentration exceeding the first Ge concentration.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming a shallow trench isolation region such that said region comprising at least one of silicide and silicide/germanicide is disposed proximate to said shallow trench isolation region.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising implanting dopants into said at least one area of the substrate prior to epitaxially depositing said SiGe layer.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming a spacer proximate said gate stack prior to providing said metal layer.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein said substrate comprises an insulator layer, the first relaxed layer being over and adjoining the insulator layer.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein said substrate comprises Si.
  • 12. The method of claim 2, wherein said SiGe layer is compressively strained.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein said strained layer comprises Si.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the strained layer consists essentially of Si.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein said SiGe layer is substantially strained.
  • 16. A method comprising: providing a gate stack disposed above a first area of a substrate, the gate stack comprising a gate oxide disposed beneath a conductive gate material, the substrate comprising a strained layer over a relaxed layer;epitaxially depositing a first semiconductor layer in at least one area of the substrate adjacent to the first area of the substrate;providing a metal layer over the semiconductor layer, the metal layer comprising Ni; andreacting the metal layer with the semiconductor layer to form a reacted region comprising a semiconductor material reacted with a metal, the reacted region being disposed over and in direct contact with an unreacted portion of the relaxed layer,wherein the reacted region forms a contact region for a source or a drain of a FET, and wherein a channel region of the FET comprises a portion of the strained layer.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the substrate comprises an insulator layer, the relaxed layer being over and adjoining the insulator layer.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the substrate comprises a second semiconductor layer over the strained layer, the second semiconductor layer having a different composition than the strained layer.
PRIORITY INFORMATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/906,534, filed Jul. 16, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,830,976, which claims priority to and benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 60/273,112, filed Mar. 2, 2001, the entire disclosure of each application being incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (388)
Number Name Date Kind
4010045 Ruehrwein Mar 1977 A
4522662 Bradbury et al. Jun 1985 A
4649859 Wanlass Mar 1987 A
4710788 Dambkes et al. Dec 1987 A
4717681 Curran Jan 1988 A
4749441 Christenson et al. Jun 1988 A
4755478 Abernathey et al. Jul 1988 A
4803539 Psaras et al. Feb 1989 A
4857986 Kinugawa Aug 1989 A
4963506 Liaw et al. Oct 1990 A
4969031 Kobayashi et al. Nov 1990 A
4987462 Kim et al. Jan 1991 A
4990979 Otto Feb 1991 A
4994866 Awano et al. Feb 1991 A
4997776 Harame et al. Mar 1991 A
5013681 Godbey et al. May 1991 A
5034348 Hartswick et al. Jul 1991 A
5089872 Ozturk et al. Feb 1992 A
5091767 Bean et al. Feb 1992 A
5108946 Zdebel et al. Apr 1992 A
5155571 Wang et al. Oct 1992 A
5166084 Pfiester Nov 1992 A
5177583 Endo et al. Jan 1993 A
5198689 Fujioka Mar 1993 A
5202284 Kamins et al. Apr 1993 A
5207864 Bhat et al. May 1993 A
5208182 Narayan et al. May 1993 A
5212110 Pfiester et al. May 1993 A
5212112 Lynch May 1993 A
5217923 Suguro Jun 1993 A
5221413 Brasen et al. Jun 1993 A
5225703 Nakatani et al. Jul 1993 A
5240876 Gaul et al. Aug 1993 A
5241197 Murakami et al. Aug 1993 A
5242847 Ozturk et al. Sep 1993 A
5243207 Plumton et al. Sep 1993 A
5250445 Bean et al. Oct 1993 A
5285086 Fitzgerald Feb 1994 A
5291439 Kauffmann et al. Mar 1994 A
5294564 Karapiperis et al. Mar 1994 A
5298452 Meyerson Mar 1994 A
5304834 Lynch Apr 1994 A
5310451 Tejwani et al. May 1994 A
5316958 Meyerson May 1994 A
5334861 Pfiester et al. Aug 1994 A
5336903 Ozturk et al. Aug 1994 A
5346840 Fujioka Sep 1994 A
5346848 Grupen-Shemansky et al. Sep 1994 A
5374564 Bruel Dec 1994 A
5399522 Ohori Mar 1995 A
5413679 Godbey May 1995 A
5424243 Takasaki Jun 1995 A
5426069 Selvakumar et al. Jun 1995 A
5426316 Mohammad Jun 1995 A
5442205 Brasen et al. Aug 1995 A
5461243 Ek et al. Oct 1995 A
5461250 Burghartz et al. Oct 1995 A
5462883 Dennard et al. Oct 1995 A
5476813 Naruse Dec 1995 A
5479033 Baca et al. Dec 1995 A
5484664 Kitahara et al. Jan 1996 A
5496750 Moslehi Mar 1996 A
5496771 Cronin et al. Mar 1996 A
5523243 Mohammad Jun 1996 A
5523592 Nakagawa et al. Jun 1996 A
5534713 Ismail et al. Jul 1996 A
5536361 Kondo et al. Jul 1996 A
5540785 Dennard et al. Jul 1996 A
5571373 Krishna et al. Nov 1996 A
5572043 Shimizu et al. Nov 1996 A
5596527 Tomioka et al. Jan 1997 A
5617351 Bertin et al. Apr 1997 A
5630905 Lynch et al. May 1997 A
5633202 Brigham et al. May 1997 A
5659187 Legoues et al. Aug 1997 A
5659194 Iwamatsu et al. Aug 1997 A
5683934 Candelaria Nov 1997 A
5698869 Yoshimi et al. Dec 1997 A
5705421 Matsushita et al. Jan 1998 A
5710450 Chau et al. Jan 1998 A
5714413 Brigham et al. Feb 1998 A
5714777 Ismail et al. Feb 1998 A
5728623 Mori Mar 1998 A
5739567 Wong Apr 1998 A
5759898 Ek et al. Jun 1998 A
5777347 Bartelink Jul 1998 A
5786612 Otani et al. Jul 1998 A
5786614 Chuang et al. Jul 1998 A
5792679 Nakato Aug 1998 A
5808344 Ismail et al. Sep 1998 A
5821577 Crabbé et al. Oct 1998 A
5844260 Ohori Dec 1998 A
5847419 Imai et al. Dec 1998 A
5849612 Takahashi et al. Dec 1998 A
5869359 Prabhakar Feb 1999 A
5876796 Regolini et al. Mar 1999 A
5877070 Goesele et al. Mar 1999 A
5877535 Matsumoto Mar 1999 A
5891769 Liaw et al. Apr 1999 A
5906708 Robinson et al. May 1999 A
5906951 Chu et al. May 1999 A
5912479 Mori et al. Jun 1999 A
5933741 Tseng Aug 1999 A
5943560 Chang et al. Aug 1999 A
5963817 Chu et al. Oct 1999 A
5966622 Levine et al. Oct 1999 A
5976939 Thompson et al. Nov 1999 A
5998807 Lustig et al. Dec 1999 A
6008111 Fushida et al. Dec 1999 A
6008128 Habuka et al. Dec 1999 A
6013134 Chu et al. Jan 2000 A
6030887 Desai et al. Feb 2000 A
6030889 Aulicino et al. Feb 2000 A
6033974 Henley et al. Mar 2000 A
6033995 Muller Mar 2000 A
6058044 Sugiura et al. May 2000 A
6059895 Chu et al. May 2000 A
6066563 Nagashima May 2000 A
6074919 Gardner et al. Jun 2000 A
6096590 Chan et al. Aug 2000 A
6096647 Yang et al. Aug 2000 A
6103559 Gardner et al. Aug 2000 A
6107653 Fitzgerald Aug 2000 A
6111267 Fischer et al. Aug 2000 A
6117750 Bensahel et al. Sep 2000 A
6121100 Andideh et al. Sep 2000 A
6130453 Mei et al. Oct 2000 A
6132806 Dutartre Oct 2000 A
6133124 Horstmann et al. Oct 2000 A
6133799 Favors et al. Oct 2000 A
6140687 Shimomura et al. Oct 2000 A
6143636 Forbes et al. Nov 2000 A
6153495 Kub et al. Nov 2000 A
6154475 Soref et al. Nov 2000 A
6159852 Nuttall et al. Dec 2000 A
6159856 Nagano Dec 2000 A
6160303 Fattaruso Dec 2000 A
6162688 Gardner et al. Dec 2000 A
6184111 Henley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187657 Xiang et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191007 Matsui et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191432 Sugiyama et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194722 Fiorini et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204529 Lung et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207977 Augusto Mar 2001 B1
6210988 Howe et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214679 Murthy et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218677 Broekaert Apr 2001 B1
6228694 Doyle et al. May 2001 B1
6232138 Fitzgerald et al. May 2001 B1
6235567 Huang May 2001 B1
6235568 Murthy et al. May 2001 B1
6235575 Kasai et al. May 2001 B1
6242324 Kub et al. Jun 2001 B1
6242327 Yokoyama et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246077 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249022 Lin et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251755 Furukawa et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251780 Sohn et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261929 Gehrke et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266278 Harari et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268257 Wieczorek et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271551 Schmitz et al. Aug 2001 B1
6271726 Fransis et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281532 Doyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6291321 Fitzgerald Sep 2001 B1
6294448 Chang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306698 Wieczorek et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313016 Kibbel et al. Nov 2001 B1
6313486 Kencke et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315384 Ramaswami et al. Nov 2001 B1
6316301 Kant Nov 2001 B1
6316357 Lin et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319799 Ouyang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319805 Iwamatsu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323108 Kub et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326281 Violette et al. Dec 2001 B1
6326664 Chau et al. Dec 2001 B1
6329063 Lo et al. Dec 2001 B2
6335546 Tsuda et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339232 Takagi Jan 2002 B1
6342421 Mitani et al. Jan 2002 B1
6344375 Orita et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350311 Chin et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350993 Chu et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352909 Usenko Mar 2002 B1
6362071 Nguyen et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368733 Nishinaga Apr 2002 B1
6368927 Lee et al. Apr 2002 B1
6369438 Sugiyama et al. Apr 2002 B1
6372356 Thornton et al. Apr 2002 B1
6372593 Hattori et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376318 Lee et al. Apr 2002 B1
6380008 Kwok et al. Apr 2002 B2
6391798 DeFelice et al. May 2002 B1
6399970 Kubo et al. Jun 2002 B2
6403975 Brunner et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406973 Lee Jun 2002 B1
6406986 Yu Jun 2002 B1
6407406 Tezuka Jun 2002 B1
6410371 Yu et al. Jun 2002 B1
6420937 Akatsuka et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425951 Chu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429061 Rim Aug 2002 B1
6444578 Cabral et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455894 Matsumoto et al. Sep 2002 B1
6461960 Lee Oct 2002 B2
6486520 Okuno et al. Nov 2002 B2
6492216 Yeo et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498359 Schmidt et al. Dec 2002 B2
6500694 Enquist Dec 2002 B1
6503833 Ajmera et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509587 Sugiyama et al. Jan 2003 B2
6521041 Wu et al. Feb 2003 B2
6521508 Cheong et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524935 Canaperi et al. Feb 2003 B1
6555839 Fitzgerald Apr 2003 B2
6555880 Cabral et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562703 Maa et al. May 2003 B1
6563152 Roberds et al. May 2003 B2
6566718 Wieczorek et al. May 2003 B2
6573126 Chen et al. Jun 2003 B2
6573160 Taylor, Jr. et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583015 Fitzgerald et al. Jun 2003 B2
6591321 Arimilli et al. Jul 2003 B1
6593191 Fitzgerald Jul 2003 B2
6593625 Christiansen et al. Jul 2003 B2
6593641 Fitzgerald Jul 2003 B1
6597016 Yuki et al. Jul 2003 B1
6602613 Fitzgerald Aug 2003 B1
6603156 Rim Aug 2003 B2
6605498 Murthy et al. Aug 2003 B1
6607948 Sugiyama et al. Aug 2003 B1
6617654 Oishi et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621131 Murthy et al. Sep 2003 B2
6624478 Anderson et al. Sep 2003 B2
6646322 Fitzgerald Nov 2003 B2
6649480 Fitzgerald et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657223 Wang et al. Dec 2003 B1
6674150 Takagi et al. Jan 2004 B2
6677192 Fitzgerald Jan 2004 B1
6682965 Noguchi et al. Jan 2004 B1
6686617 Agnello et al. Feb 2004 B2
6689211 Wu et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690043 Usuda et al. Feb 2004 B1
6699765 Shideler et al. Mar 2004 B1
6703144 Fitzgerald Mar 2004 B2
6703271 Yeo et al. Mar 2004 B2
6703648 Xiang et al. Mar 2004 B1
6703688 Fitzergald Mar 2004 B1
6709903 Christiansen Mar 2004 B2
6709929 Zhang et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713326 Cheng et al. Mar 2004 B2
6723621 Cardone et al. Apr 2004 B1
6723661 Fitzergald Apr 2004 B2
6724008 Fitzergald Apr 2004 B2
6724019 Oda et al. Apr 2004 B2
6727550 Tezuka et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730551 Lee et al. May 2004 B2
6737670 Cheng et al. May 2004 B2
6743651 Chu et al. Jun 2004 B2
6743684 Liu Jun 2004 B2
6750130 Fitzgerald Jun 2004 B1
6764908 Kadosh et al. Jul 2004 B1
6765227 Yu et al. Jul 2004 B1
6787864 Paton et al. Sep 2004 B2
6797571 Nagaoka et al. Sep 2004 B2
6812086 Murthy et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818537 Cheong et al. Nov 2004 B2
6818938 Naem et al. Nov 2004 B1
6825086 Lee et al. Nov 2004 B2
6828632 Bhattacharyya Dec 2004 B2
6830976 Fitzgerald Dec 2004 B2
6855649 Christiansen Feb 2005 B2
6855990 Yeo et al. Feb 2005 B2
6858502 Chu et al. Feb 2005 B2
6861318 Murthy et al. Mar 2005 B2
6876053 Ma et al. Apr 2005 B1
6879053 Welches et al. Apr 2005 B1
6881360 Stange et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881630 Song et al. Apr 2005 B2
6881632 Fitzgerald et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885084 Murthy et al. Apr 2005 B2
6887762 Murthy et al. May 2005 B1
6887773 Gunn, III et al. May 2005 B2
6890835 Chu et al. May 2005 B1
6900103 Fitzgerald May 2005 B2
6909186 Chu Jun 2005 B2
6929992 Djomehri et al. Aug 2005 B1
6933518 Braithwaite et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936509 Coolbaugh et al. Aug 2005 B2
6940089 Cheng et al. Sep 2005 B2
6946371 Langdo et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953972 Yeo et al. Oct 2005 B2
6974733 Boyanov et al. Dec 2005 B2
6982433 Hoffman et al. Jan 2006 B2
6982474 Currie et al. Jan 2006 B2
6992355 Mouli Jan 2006 B2
6995430 Langdo et al. Feb 2006 B2
7091520 Nakajima et al. Aug 2006 B2
7256142 Fitzgerald Aug 2007 B2
20010001724 Kwok et al. May 2001 A1
20010003269 Wu et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010003364 Sugawara et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010009303 Tang et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010031535 Agnello et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010045604 Oda et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020001948 Lee Jan 2002 A1
20020011628 Takagi Jan 2002 A1
20020019127 Givens Feb 2002 A1
20020024395 Akatsuka et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020043660 Yamazaki et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020048910 Taylor, Jr. et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052084 Fitzgerald May 2002 A1
20020056879 Wieczorek et al. May 2002 A1
20020063292 Armstrong et al. May 2002 A1
20020068393 Fitzgerald et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020072130 Cheng et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020079427 Xu et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020084000 Fitzgerald Jul 2002 A1
20020096717 Chu et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020100942 Fitzgerald et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123167 Fitzgerald Sep 2002 A1
20020123182 Rabkin et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020123183 Fitzgerald Sep 2002 A1
20020123197 Fitzgerald et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020125471 Fitzgerald et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020125497 Fitzgerald Sep 2002 A1
20020140031 Rim Oct 2002 A1
20020168864 Cheng et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020190284 Murthy et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030003679 Doyle et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030013323 Hammond et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025131 Lee et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030034529 Fitzgerald et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030057439 Fitzgerald Mar 2003 A1
20030080361 Murthy et al. May 2003 A1
20030089901 Fitzgerald May 2003 A1
20030102498 Braithwaite et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030113971 Nagaoka et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030162348 Yeo et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030199126 Chu et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030203600 Chu et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215990 Fitzgerald et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030218189 Christiansen Nov 2003 A1
20030227029 Lochtefeld et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030227057 Lochtefeld et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040005740 Lochtefeld et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040007724 Murthy et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040014276 Murthy et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040014304 Bhattacharyya Jan 2004 A1
20040031979 Lochtefeld Feb 2004 A1
20040041210 Mouli Mar 2004 A1
20040061191 Paton et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040070035 Murthy et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075148 Kumagai et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075149 Fitzgerald et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040084735 Murthy et al. May 2004 A1
20040119101 Schrom et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121564 Gogoi Jun 2004 A1
20040142545 Ngo et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040173815 Yeo et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040175893 Vatus et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040217430 Chu Nov 2004 A1
20040219726 Fitzgerald Nov 2004 A1
20040253774 Boyanov et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040253776 Hoffmann et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040256613 Oda et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262631 Fitzgerald Dec 2004 A1
20040262683 Bohr et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050009263 Yeo et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050042849 Currie et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050077511 Fitzergald Apr 2005 A1
20050112048 Tsakalakos et al. May 2005 A1
20050130454 Murthy et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050156169 Chu Jul 2005 A1
20050156180 Zhang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156210 Currie et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050161711 Chu Jul 2005 A1
20050167652 Hoffmann et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050176204 Langdo et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050250298 Bauer Nov 2005 A1
20050277272 Singh et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050280026 Isaacson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050280098 Shin et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060008958 Yeo et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009001 Huang et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060057825 Bude et al. Mar 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (51)
Number Date Country
41 01 167 Jul 1992 DE
0390661 Oct 1990 EP
0 514 018 Nov 1992 EP
0 587 520 Mar 1994 EP
0 683 522 Nov 1995 EP
0 828 296 Mar 1998 EP
0 829 908 Mar 1998 EP
0 838 858 Apr 1998 EP
1 020 900 Jul 2000 EP
1 174 928 Jan 2002 EP
2 701 599 Sep 1993 FR
2 342 777 Apr 2000 GB
61141116 Jun 1986 JP
2210816 Aug 1990 JP
3036717 Feb 1991 JP
4-74415 Mar 1992 JP
4-307974 Oct 1992 JP
5-166724 Jul 1993 JP
6-177046 Jun 1994 JP
6-244112 Sep 1994 JP
6-252046 Sep 1994 JP
7-094420 Apr 1995 JP
7-106446 Apr 1995 JP
7-240372 Sep 1995 JP
10-270685 Oct 1998 JP
11-233744 Aug 1999 JP
2000-021783 Jan 2000 JP
2000031491 Jan 2000 JP
201319935 May 2000 JP
2002-076334 Mar 2002 JP
2002-164520 Jun 2002 JP
2002-289533 Oct 2002 JP
2002-324765 Nov 2002 JP
9859365 Dec 1998 WO
9953539 Oct 1999 WO
0048239 Aug 2000 WO
0054338 Sep 2000 WO
0122482 Mar 2001 WO
0154202 Jul 2001 WO
0193338 Dec 2001 WO
0199169 Dec 2001 WO
0213262 Feb 2002 WO
0215244 Feb 2002 WO
0227783 Apr 2002 WO
0247168 Jun 2002 WO
02071488 Sep 2002 WO
02071491 Sep 2002 WO
02071495 Sep 2002 WO
02082514 Oct 2002 WO
2004006311 Jan 2004 WO
2004006327 Jan 2004 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (372)
Entry
Koester et al, “Extremely High transconductance Ge/SiGe/Ge p-MODFET's grown . . . By UHV-CVD,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 3, (Mar. 2000), pp. 110-112.
Ku et al, “HighPerformance pMOSFET with Ni(SiGe)/Poly-Si-Ge Gate,” IEEE—2000 Symposium on VLSI technology Digest of Technical Papers. 2000, 114-115.
Armstrong et al., “Design of Si/SiGe Heterojunction Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistors,” IEDM Technical Digest (1995 International Electron Devices Meeting), pp. 761-764.
Borenstein et al., “A New Ultra-Hard Etch-Stop Layer for High Precision Micromachining,” Proceedings of the 1999 12th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMs) (Jan. 17-21, 1999), pp. 205-210.
Bouillon et al., “Search for the optimal channel architecture for 0.18/0.12 μm bulk CMOS experimental study,” IEEE, (1996), pp. 21.2.1-21.2.4.
Bruel et al., “® Smart Cut: A Promising New SOI Material Technology,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International SOI Conference (Oct. 1995), pp. 178-179.
Bruel, “Silicon on Insulator Material Technology,” Electronic Letters, vol. 31, No. 14 (Jul. 6, 1995), pp. 1201-1202.
Bufler et al., “Hole transport in strained Si1−xGex alloys on Si1 −yGey substrates,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 84, No. 10 (Nov. 15, 1998), pp. 5597-5602.
Burghartz et al., “Microwave Inductors and Capacitors in Standard Multilevel Interconnect Silicon Technology,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, No. 1 (Jan. 1996), pp. 100-104.
Carlin et al., “High Efficiency GaAs-on-Si Solar Cells with High Voc Using Graded GeSi Buffers,” IEEE (2000), pp. 1006-1011.
Chang et al., “Selective Etching of SiGe/Si Heterostructures,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, No. 1 (Jan. 1991), pp. 202-204.
Cheng et al., “Electron Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si n-MOSFETs Fabricated on SiGe-on-Insulator (SGOI) Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 22, No. 7 (Jul. 2001), pp. 321-323.
Cheng et al., “Relaxed Silicon-Germanium on Insulator Substrate by Layer Transfer,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 30, No. 12 (2001), pp. L37-L39.
Cullis et al., “Growth ripples upon strained SiGe epitaxial layers on Si and misfit dislocation interactions,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol. 12, No. 4 (Jul./Aug. 1994), pp. 1924-1931.
Currie et al., “Carrier mobilities and process stability of strained Si n- and p-MOSFETs on SiGe virtual substrates,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B, vol. 19, No. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2001), pp. 2268-2279.
Currie et al., “Controlling Threading Dislocation in Ge on Si Using Graded SiGe Layers and Chemical-Mechanical Polishing,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 72, No. 14 (Feb. 1998), pp. 1718-1720.
Eaglesham et al., “Dislocation-Free Stranski-Krastanow Growth of Ge on Si(100),” Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, No. 16 (Apr. 16, 1990), pp. 1943-1946.
Feijoo et al., “Epitaxial Si-Ge Etch Stop Layers with Ethylene Diamine Pyrocatechol for Bonded and Etchback Silicon-on-Insulator,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 23, No. 6 (Jun. 1994), pp. 493-496.
Fischetti et al., “Band structure, deformation potentials, and carrier mobility in strained Si, Ge, and SiGe alloys,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 80, No. 4 (Aug. 15, 1996), pp. 2234-2252.
Fischetti, “Long-range Coulomb interactions in small Si devices. Part II. Effective electronmobility in thin-oxide structures,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, No. 2 (Jan. 15, 2001), pp. 1232-1250.
Fitzgerald et al., “Dislocation dynamics in relaxed graded composition semiconductors,” Materials Science and Engineering, B67 (1999), pp. 53-61.
Fitzgerald et al., “Relaxed GexSi1−x structures for III-V integration with Si and high mobility two-dimensional electron gases in Si,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, (Jul./Aug. 1992), pp. 1807-1819.
Fitzgerald et al., “Totally Relaxed GexSi1−x Layers with Low Threading Dislocation Densities Grown on Si Substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 59, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 1991), pp. 811-813.
Gannavaram et al., “Low Temperature (<800° C.) Recessed Junction Selective Silicon-Germanium Source/Drain Technology for sub-70 nm CMOS,” IEEE, (2002), pp. 437-440.
Garone et al., “Silicon vapor phase epitaxial growth catalysis by the presence of germane,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 56, No. 13 (Mar. 26, 1990), pp. 1275-1277.
Ge et al., “Process-Strained Si (PSS) CMOS Technology Featuring 3D Strain Engineering,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2003) pp. 73-76.
Ghani et al., “A 90nm High Volume Manufacturing Logic Technology Featuring Novel 45nm Gate Length Strained Silicon CMOS Transistors,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2003), 11.6.1-11.6.3.
Godbey et al., (1990) “Fabrication of Bond and Etch-Back Silicon Insulator Using a Strained SI0.7GE0.3 Layer as an Etch Stop,” Journal of the Electrical Society, vol. 137, No. 10 (Oct. 1990) pp. 3219-3223.
Gray et al., “Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits,” John Wiley & Sons, 1984, pp. 605-632.
Grillot et al., “Acceptor diffusion and segregation in (AlxGa1−x)0.5 In0.5P heterostructures,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 91, No. 8 (2002), pp. 4891-4899.
Grützmacher et al., “Ge segregation in SiGe/Si heterostructures and its dependence on deposition technique and growth atmosphere,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 63, No. 18 (Nov. 1, 1993), pp. 2531-2533.
Hackbarth et al., “Strain relieved SiGe buffers for Si-based heterostructure field-effect transistors,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 201/202 (1999), pp. 734-738.
Halsall et al., “Electron diffraction and Raman studies of the effect of substrate misorientation on ordering in the AlGalnP system,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 85, No. 1 (1999), pp. 199-202.
Hamada et al., “A New Aspect of Mechanical Stress Effects in Scaled MOS Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 4 (Apr. 1991), pp. 895-900.
Höck et al., “Carrier mobilities in modulation doped Si1−xGex heterostructures with respect to FET applications,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 336 (1998), pp. 141-144.
Höck et al., “High hole mobility in Si0.17 Ge0.83 channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 26 (Jun. 26, 2000), pp. 3920-3922.
Höck et al., “High performance 0.25 μm p-type Ge/SiGe MODFETs,” Electronics Letters, vol. 34, No. 19 (Sep. 17, 1998), pp. 1888-1889.
Hsu et al., “Surface morphology of related GexSi1−x films,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 61, No. 11 (1992), pp. 1293-1295.
Huang et al., (2001) “Carrier Mobility enhancement in strained Si-on-insulatoir fabricated by wafer bonding”, 2001 Symposium on VLSI Technology, Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 57-58.
Huang et al., “High-quality strain-relaxed SiGe alloy grown on implanted silicon-on-insulator substrate,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 19 (May 8, 2000), pp. 2680-2682.
Huang et al., “The Impact of Scaling Down to Deep Submicron on CMOS RF Circuits,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, No. 7 (Jul. 1998), pp. 1023-1036.
Huang et al., “Isolation Process Dependence of Channel Mobility in Thin-Film SOI Devices,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 17, No. 6 (Jun. 1996), pp. 291-293.
Huang et al., “LOCOS-Induced Stress Effects on Thin-Film SOI Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 4 (Apr. 1997), pp. 646-650.
Huang et al., “Reduction of Source/Drain Series Resistance and Its Impact on Device Performance for PMOS Transistors with Raised Si1−xGex Source/Drain,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 9 (Sep. 2000), pp. 448-450.
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “Optimal Growth Technique and Structure for Strain Relaxation of Si-Ge Layers on Si Substrates,” vol. 32, No. 8A (Jan. 1990), pp. 330-331.
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “2 Bit/Cell EEPROM Cell Using Band to Band Tunneling for Data Read-Out,” vol. 35, No. 4B (Sep. 1992), pp. 136-140.
Iida et al., “Thermal behavior of residual strain in silicon-on-insulator bonded wafer and effects on electron mobility,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 43 (1999), pp. 1117-1120.
Ishikawa et al., “Creation of Si-Ge-based SIMOX structures by low energy oxygen implantation,” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International SOI Conference (Oct. 1997), pp. 16-17.
Ishikawa et al., “SiGe-on-insulator substrate using SiGe alloy grown Si(001),” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, No. 7 (Aug. 16, 1999), pp. 983-985.
Ismail, “Si/SiGe High-Speed Field-Effect Transistors,” International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C. (Dec. 10, 1995), pp. 20.1.-20.1.4.
Ito et al., “Mechanical Stress Effect on Etch-Stop Nitride and its Impact on Deep Submicron Transistor Design,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2000), pp. 247-250.
Kearney et al., “The effect of alloy scattering on the mobility of holes in a Si1−xGex quantum well,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 13 (1998), pp. 174-180.
Kim et al., “A Fully Integrated 1.9-GHz CMOS Low-Noise Amplifier,” IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, vol. 8 No. 8 (Aug. 1998), pp. 293-295.
Koester et al., “Extremely High Transconductance Ge/Si0.4Ge0.6 p-MODFET's Grown by UHV-CVD,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 3 (Mar. 2000), pp. 110-112.
König et al., “P-Type Ge-Channel MODFET's with High Transconductance Grown on Si Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 14, No. 4 (Apr. 1993), pp. 205-207.
König et al., “SiGe HBTs and HFETs,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 38, No. 9 (1995), pp. 1595-1602.
Langdo et al., (2002) “Preparation of Novel SiGe-free Strained Si on Insulator Substrates” IEEE International SOI Conference, pp. 211-212 (XP002263057).
Larson, “Integrated Circuit Technology Options for RFIC's—Present Status and Future Directions,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, No. 3 (Mar. 1998), pp. 387-399.
Lee et al., “CMOS RF Integrated Circuits at 5 GHz and Beyond,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, No. 10, (Oct. 2000), pp. 1560-1571.
Lee et al., “Strained Ge channel p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown on Si1−xGex/Si virtual substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 20 (Nov. 12, 2001), pp. 3344-3346.
Lee et al., “Strained Ge channel p-type MOSFETs fabricated on Si1−xGex/Si virtual substrates,” Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 686 (2002), pp. A1.9.1-A1.9.5.
Leitz et al., “Channel Engineering of SiGe-Based Heterostructures for High Mobility MOSFETs,” Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 686 (2002), pp. A3.10.1-A3.10.6.
Leitz et al., “Dislocation glide and blocking kinetics in compositionally graded SiGe/Si,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 90, No. 6 (Sep. 15, 2001), pp. 2730-2736.
Leitz et al., “Hole mobility enhancements in strained Si/Si1−yGey p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown on relaxed Si1−xGex (x<y) virtual substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 25 (Dec. 17, 2001), pp. 4246-4248.
Li et al., “Design of high speed Si/SiGe heterojuction complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors with reduced short-channel effects,” Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol. 20, No. 3 (May/Jun. 2002), pp. 1030-1033.
Lochtefeld et al., “Investigating the Relationship Between Electron Mobility and Velocity in Deeply Scaled NMOS via Mechanical Stress,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 22, No. 12 (2001), pp. 591-593.
Lu et al., “High Performance 0.1 μm Gate-Length P-Type SiGe MODFET's and MOS-MODFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 8 (Aug. 2000), pp. 1645-1652.
Maszara, “Silicon-On-Insulator by Wafer Bonding: A Review,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, No. 1 (Jan. 1991), pp. 341-347.
Meyerson et al., “Cooperative Growth Phenomena in Silicon/Germanium Low-Temperature Epitaxy,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 53, No. 25 (Dec. 19, 1988), pp. 2555-2557.
Mizuno et al., “Advanced SOI-MOSFETs with Strained-Si Channel for High Speed CMOS-Electron/Hole Mobility Enhancement,” Digest of Technical Papers, 2002 Symposium on VLSI Technology, Honolulu, Jun. 13-15, New York, NY, pp. 210-211.
Mizuno et al., “Electron and Hole Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si MOSFET's on SiGe-on-Insulator Substrates Fabricated by SIMOX Technology,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 5 (May 2000), pp. 230-232.
Mizuno et al., “High Performance Strained-Si p-MOSFETs on SiGe-on-Insulator Substrates Fabricated by SIMOX Technology,” IEEE IDEM Technical Digest, (1999 International Electron Device Meeting), pp. 934-936.
Nayak et al., “High-Mobility Strained-Si PMOSFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 43, No. 10 (Oct. 1996), pp. 1709-1716.
Ootsuka et al., “A Highly Dense, High-Performance 130nm node CMOS Technology for Large Scale System-on-a-Chip Applications,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2000), pp. 575-578.
Ota et al., “Application of heterojuction FET to power amplifier for cellular telephone,” Electronic Letters, vol. 30, No. 11 (May 26, 1994), pp. 906-907.
Ota et al., “Novel Locally Strained Channel Technique for High Performance 55nm CMOS,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2002), pp. 27-30.
Öztürk et al., “Advanced Si1−xGex Source/Drain and Contact Technologies for Sub-70 nm CMOS,” IEEE, (2000), pp. 375-378.
Öztürk et al., “Low Resistivity Nickel Germanosilicide Contacts to Ultra-Shallow Si1−xGex Source/Drain and Junctions for Nanoscale CMOS,” IEEE, (2003) 4 pages.
Öztürk et al., “Selective Silicon-Germanium Source/Drain Technology for Nanoscale CMOS,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Prac., vol. 717 (2002) C4.1.1-C4.1.12.
Öztürk et al., “Ultra-Shallow Source/Drain Junctions for Nanoscale CMOS Using Selective Silicon-Germanium Technology,” Extended Abstracts of International Workshop on Junction Technology, (2001) 5-1-1-5-1-6.
Papananos, “Radio-Frequency Microelectronic Circuits for Telecommunication Applications,” (1999), pp. 115-117, 188-193.
Ransom et al., “Gate-Self-Aligned n-channel and p-channel Germanium MOSFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 12 (Dec. 1991), p. 2695.
Reinking et al., “Fabrication of high-mobility Ge p-channel MOSFETs on Si substrates,” Electronics Letters, vol. 35, No. 6 (Mar. 18, 1999), pp. 503-504.
Rim, “Application of Silicon-Based Heterostructures to Enhanced Mobility Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1999, pp. 1-184.
Rim, et al., “Enhanced Hole Mobilities in Surface-channel Strained-Si p-MOSFETs,” IEEE, (1995), pp. 517-520.
Sakaguchi et al., “ELTRAN by splitting porous Si layers,” Proceedings of the 195th Int. SOI Symposium, Electrochemical Society, vol. 99-3 (1999), pp. 117-121.
Schäffler, “High-Mobility Si and Ge Structures,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 12 (1997), pp. 1515-1549.
Shimizu et al., “Local Mechanical-Stress Control (LMC): A New Technique for CMOS-Performance Enhancement,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2001), pp. 433-436.
Sugimoto et al., “A 2V, 500 MHz and 3V, 920 MHz Low-Power Current-Mode 0.6 μm CMOS VCO Circuit,” Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, vol. E82-C, No.7 (Jul. 1999), pp. 1327-1329.
Ternent et al., “Metal Gate Strained Silicon MOSFETs for Microwave Integrated Circuits,” IEEE (Oct. 2000), pp. 38-43.
Thompson et al., “A Logic Nanotechnology Featuring Strained-Silicon,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 4 (Apr. 2004), pp. 191-193.
Thompson et al., “A 90 nm Logic Technology Featuring 50nm Strained-Silicon Channel Transistors, 7 layers of Cu Interconnects, Low k ILD, and 1um2 SRAM Cell,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2002), pp. 61-64.
Tiwari et al., “Hole Mobility Improvement in Silicon-on-Insulator and Bulk Silicon Transistors Using Local Strain,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (1997), pp. 939-941.
Tsang et al., “Measurements of alloy composition and strain in thin GexSi1−x layers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 75, No. 12 (Jun. 15, 1994), pp. 8098-8108.
Tweet et al., “Factors determining the composition of strained GeSi layers grown with disilane and germane,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 65, No. 20 (Nov. 14, 1994), pp. 2579-2581.
Uchino et al., “A Raised Source/Drain Technology Using In-situ P-doped SiGe and B-doped Si for 0.1-μm CMOS ULSIs,” IEEE, (1997), 479-482.
Welser et al., “Electron Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si N-Type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 15, No. 3 (Mar. 1994), pp. 100-102.
Xie et al., “Semiconductor Surface Roughness: Dependence on Sign and Magnitude of Bulk Strain,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 73, No. 22 (Nov. 28, 1994), pp. 3006-3009.
Xie et al., “Very high mobility two-dimensional hole gas in Si/ GexSi1−x/Ge structures grown by molecular beam epitaxy,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 63, No. 16 (Oct. 18, 1993), pp. 2263-2264.
Xie, “SiGe field effect transistors,” Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 25 (1999), pp. 89-121.
Yamagata et al., “Bonding, Splitting and Thinning by Porous Si in ELTRAN; SOI- Epi Wafer,” Material Research Society symposium Proceedings, vol. 681E (2001), pp. 18.2.1-18.2.10.
Yeo et al., “Nanoscale Ultra-Thin-Body Silicon-on-Insulator P-MOSFET with a SiGe/Si Heterostructure Channel,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 4 (Apr. 2000), pp. 161-163.
Zhang et al., “Demonstration of a GaAs-Based Compliant Substrate Using Wafer Bonding and Substrate Removal Techniques,” IEEE, (1998), pp. 25-28.
Antoniadis et al., “SOI Devices and Technology,” SOI devices and technology, Neuilly sur Seine, France, (1999), pp. 81-87.
Aoyama et al., “Facet formation mechanism of silicon selective epitaxial layer by Si ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition,” Journal of Crystal Growth, 136 (1994), pp. 349-354.
Armstrong, “Technology for SiGe Heterostructure-Based CMOS Devices,” Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (Jun. 30, 1999).
Arst et al., “Surface planarity and microstructure of low temperature silicon SEG and ELO,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 6, No. 4 (Apr. 1991), pp. 784-791.
Augendre, “Elevated Source/Drain by Sacrificial Selective Epitaxy fo rHigh Performance Deep Submicron CMOS: Process Window versus Complexity,” IEEE Transactins on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 7 (Jul. 2000), pp. 1484-1491.
Augusto et al., “Proposal for a New Process Flow for the Fabrication of Silicon-based Complementary MOD-MOSFETs without ion Implantation,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 294, No. 1-2, pp. 254-257 (Feb. 15, 1997).
Barradas et al., “RBS analysis of MBE-grown SiGe/(001) Si heterostructures with thin, high Ge content SiGe channels for HMOS transistors,” Modern Physics Letters B, 2001 (abstract).
Canaperi et al., “Preparation of a relaxed Si-Ge layer on an insulator in fabricating high-speed semiconductor devices with strained epitaxial films,” Intern. Business Machines Corporation, USA, 2002 (abstract).
Cao et al., “0.18-μm Fully-Depleted Silicon-on-Insulator MOSFET's,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 6 (Jun. 1997), pp. 251-253.
Chieh et al., “Low-Resistance Bandgap-Engineered W/Si1−xGex/Si Contacts,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 17, No. 7 (Jul. 1996) pp. 360-362.
Choi et al., “30nm ultra-thin body SOI MOSFET with selectively deposited Ge raised S/D,” 58th Device Research Conference (2000) pp. 23-24.
Choi et al., “Nanoscale Ultrathin Body PMOSFETs With Raised Selective Germanium Source/Drain,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 22, No. 9 (Sep. 2001), pp. 447-448.
Drowley et al., “Model for facet and sidewall defect formation during selective epitaxial growth of (001) silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, 52 (7) (Feb. 15, 1988), pp. 546-548.
Eaglesham et al., “Growth Morphology and the Equilibrium Shape: The Role of “Surfactants” in the Ge/Si Island Formation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, No. 7 (Feb. 15, 1993), pp. 966-969.
Gallas et al., “Influence of doping on facet formation at the SiO2/Si interface,” Surface Science, 440 (1999), pp. 41-48.
Glück et al., “CoSi2 and TiSi2 for Si/SiGe heterodevices,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 270 (1995) pp. 549-554.
Goulding, “The selective epitaxial growth of silicon,” Materials Science and Engineering, B17 (1993), pp. 47-67.
Greve et al., “Growth Rate of Doped and Undoped Silicon by Ultra-High Vacuum Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 138, No. 6 (Jun. 1991), pp. 1744-1748.
Hackbarth et al, “Alternatives to Thick MBE-Grown Relaxed SiGe Buffers,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 369, pp. 148-151 (2000).
Herzog et al., “SiGe-based FETs: Buffer Issues and Device Results,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 380, No. 1-2, pp. 36-41 Dec. 12, 2000.
Huang et al., “Electrical and Compositional Properties of Co-Silicided Shallow P+-n Junction Using Si-Capped/Boron-Doped Si1−xGex Layer Deposited by UHVCME,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 148, No. 3 (2001) pp. G126-C131.
Ilderem et al., “Very low pressure chemical vapor deposition process for selective titanium silicide films,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 53, No. 8 (Aug. 22, 1988) pp. 687-689.
Ishitani et al., “Facet Formation in Selective Silicon Epitaxial Growth,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 24, No. 10 (Oct., 1985), pp. 1267-1269.
Ismail et al., “Modulation-doped n-type Si/SiGe with Inverted Interface,” Applied Physics Letters, 65 (10), pp. 1248-1250 Sep. 5, 1994.
Jang et al., “Phosphorus doping of epitaxial Si and Sil-xGex at very low pressure,” Applied Physics Letters, 63 (12) (Sep. 20, 1993), pp. 1675-1677.
Jastrzebski, “SOI by CVD: Epitaxial Lateral Overgrowth (ELO) Process—Review,” Journal of Crystal Growth, 63 (1983), pp. 493-526.
Kamins et al., “Kinetics of selective epitaxial deposition of Sil-xGex,” Applied Physics Letters, 61 (6) (Aug. 10, 1992), pp. 669-671.
Kandel et al., “Surfactant Mediated Crystal Growth of Semiconductors,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, No. 14 (Oct. 2, 1995), pp. 2742-2745.
King, “Silicon-Germanium: from Microelectronics to Micromechanics,” Presentation to the Thin Film Users Group Meeting, AVS Northern California Chapter, Apr., 17, 2002.
Kitajima et al., “Lattice Defect in Selective Epitaxial Silicon and Laterally Overgrown Regions on SiO2,” Journal of Crystal Growth, 98 (1989), pp. 264-276.
Konig et al., “Design Rules for N-Type SiGe Hetero FETs,” Solid State Electronics, vol. 41, No. 10, pp. 1541-1547 Oct. 1, 1997.
Kummer et al., “Low energy plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition,” Materials Science and Engineering, B89 (2002), pp. 288-295.
Kurosawa et al., “A New Bird's Beak Free Field Isolation Technology for VLSI Devices,” IEDM Technical Digest, Washington, D.C., Dec. 7-9, 1981, pp. 384-387.
Kuznetsov et al., “Technology for high-performance n-channel SiGe modulation-doped field-effect transistors,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 13(6), pp. 2892-2896 (Nov./Dec. 1995).
Langdo, “Selective SiGe Nanostructures,” Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
Li et al., “Modeling of facet growth on patterned Si substrate in gas source MBE,” Journal of Crystal Growth, 157 (1995), pp. 185-189.
Lochtefeld, “Toward the End of the MOSFET Roadmap: Investigating Fundamental Transport Limits and Device Architecture Alternatives,” Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
Lynch, “Self-Aligned Contact Schemes for Source-Drains in Submicron Devices,” IEDM Technical Digest (1987) pp. 354-357.
Maillard-Schaller et al., “Role of the substrate strain in the sheet resistance stability of NiSi deposited on Si(100),” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 85, No. 7 (Apr. 1, 1999) pp. 3614-3618.
Maiti et al., “Strained-Si Heterostructure Field Effect Transistors,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 13, pp. 1225-1246 (1998).
Mercier et al., “Selective TiSi2 Deposition with no Silicon Substrate Consumption by Rapid Thermal Processing in a LPCVD Reactor,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 19, No. 3 (1990) pp. 253-258.
Meyer, “Elevated Source/Drain Structures,” The ASM Epitaxy Newsletter of Continuous Improvement, (Spring 1998) pp. 1-3.
Meyerson et al., “Phosphorus-Doped Polycrystalline Silicon via LPCVD,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 131, No. 10 (Oct. 1984), pp. 2366-2368.
Miyano et al., “Facet-Free Si Selective Epitaxial Growth Adaptable to Elevated Source/Drain MOSFETs with Narrow Shallow Trench Isolation,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. vol. 38, Part 1, No. 4B (Apr. 1999), pp. 2419-2423.
Moon et al., “Application of interferometric broadband imaging alignment on an experimental x-ray stepper,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, B 16(6) (Nov./Dec. 1998), pp. 3631-3636.
O'Neill et al., “SiGe Virtual Substrate N-Channel Heterojunction MOSFETs,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 14, pp. 784-789 (1999).
Osburn et al., “Low parasitic resistance contacts for scaled ULSI devices,” Thin Solid Films, 332 (1998), pp. 428-436.
Öztürk et al., “Rapid Thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition of Germanium and Germanium/Silicon Alloys on Silicon: New Applications in the Fabrication of MOS Transistors,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 224 (1991) pp. 223-234.
Parker et al., “SiGe Heterostructure CMOS Circuits and Applications”, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 43, pp. 1497-1506 (1996).
Pfiester et al., “A Self-Aligned Elevated Source/Drain MOSFET,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 11, No. 9 (Sep. 1990), pp. 365-367.
Raaijmakers et al., “Enabling technologies for forming and contacting shallow junctions in Si: HF-vapor cleaning and selective epitaxial growth of Si and SiGe,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, B 17(5) (Sep./Oct. 1999), pp. 2311-2320.
Ren et al., “A Novel Implantation Free Raised Source/Drain MOSFET Process Using Selective Rapid Thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition of In-Situ Boron Doped SixGe1−x,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 303 (1993) pp. 37-41.
Reynolds et al., “Selective titanium disilicide by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 65, No. 8 (Apr. 15, 1989) pp. 3212-3218.
Rim and Hoyt, “Fabrication and Analysis of Deep Submicron Strained-Si N-MOSFET's”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 7, Jul. 2000, pp. 1406-1415.
Robbins et al., “A model for heterogeneous growth of Si1−xGex films from hydrides,” Journal of Applied Physics, 69 (6) (Mar. 15, 1991), pp. 3729-3732.
Rodder et al., “Raised Source/Drain MOSFET with Dual Sidewall Spacers,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 12, No. 3 (Mar. 1991), pp. 89-91.
Sadek et al., “Design of Si/SiGe Heterojunction Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistors,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, Aug. 1996, pp. 1224-1232.
Samavedam et al., “Elevated source drain devices using silicon selective epitaxial growth,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, B 18(3) (May/Jun. 2000), pp. 1244-1250.
Savina et al., “Faceting of a growing crystal surface by surface diffusion,” Physical Review, E 67, 021606 (2003), pp. 1-16.
Sedgwick et al., “Growth of Facet-Free Selective Silicon Epitaxy at Low Temperature and Atmospheric Pressure,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 138, No. 10 (Oct. 1991), pp. 3042-3047.
Shibata et al., “High Performance Half-Micron PMOSFETs with 0.1UM Shallow P+N Junction Utilizing Selective Silicon Growth and Rapid Thermal Annealing,” IEDM Technical Digest (1987) pp. 590-593.
Sidek et al., “Reduction of parasitic bipolar transistor action and punchthrough susceptibility in MOSFETs using Si/Si1−xGex sources and drains,” Electronics Letters, vol. 32, No. 3 (Feb. 1, 1996), pp. 269-270.
Sun et al., “A Comparative Study of n+/p Junction Formation for Deep Submicron Elevated Source/Drain Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 144, No. 10 (Oct. 1997), pp. 3659-3664.
Sun et al., “The Effect of the Elevated Source/Drain Doping Profile on Performance and Reliability of Deep Submicron MOSFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 9 (Sep. 1997), pp. 1491-1498.
Sun et al., “Impact of Epi Facets on Deep Submicron Elevated Source/Drain MOSFET Characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 6 (Jun. 1998), pp. 1377-1380.
Tromp et al., “Local Dimer Exchange in Surfactant-Mediated Epitaxial Growth,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, No. 7 (Feb. 17, 1992), pp. 954-957.
Uchino et al., “MOSFETs with Utrashallow Junction and Minimum Drain Area Formed by Using Solid-Phase Diffusion from SiGe,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 48, No. 7 (Jul. 2001) pp. 1406-1411.
Uhrberg et al., “Electronic and atomic structure of arsenic terminated Si(100),” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, A 4 (3) (May/Jun. 1986), pp. 1259-1264.
Usami et al., “Spectroscopic study of Si-based quantum wells with neighboring confinement structure,” Semicon. Sci. Technol., 1997 (abstract).
Violette et al., “Facet-Free Selective Silicon Epitaxy by Reduced-Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition: Process Evaluation and Impact on Shallow Trench Isolation,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 146 (5) (1999), pp. 1895-1902.
Welser et al., “Evidence of Real-Space Hot-Electron Transfer in High Mobility, Strained-Si Multilayer MOSFETs,” IEDM, pp. 545-548 (1993).
Welser et al., “NMOS and PMOS Transistors Fabricated in Strained Silicon/Relaxed Silicon-Germanium Structures,” IEEE, pp. 1000-1002 (1992).
Welser, “The application of strained-silicon/relaxed-silicon germanium heterostructures to metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University Dept. of Electrical Engineering, 1995.
Wolf and Tauber, Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era Vol. 1: Process Technology, Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA, 1986, pp. 384-386.
Wong et al., “Elevated Source/Drain MOSFET,” IEDM Technical Digest, 28 (1984), pp. 634-637.
Xiang et al., “Interfacet mass transport and facet evolution in selective epitaxial growth of Si by gas source molecular beam epitaxy,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, B 14(3) (May/Jun. 1996), pp. 2381-2386.
Yew, “Growth and Characterization of Low Temperature Silicon Selective Epitaxy,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, 1990, pp. 1-210.
Yu et al., “Doping reaction of PH3 and B2H6 with Si(100),” Journal of Applied Physics, 59 (12) (Jun. 15, 1986), pp. 4032-4037.
Aldrich et al., “Stability of C54 Titanium Germanosilicide on a Silicon-Germanium Alloy Substrate,” J. Appl. Phys., 1995, 77(10):5107-5114.
Aubry-Fortuna et al., “Phase Formation and Strain Relaxation During Thermal Reaction of Zr and Ti with Strained Si1−x−yGexCy epilayers,” Journal of Applied Physics, 2000, 88(3):1418-1423.
Detavernier, et al., “CoSi2 Nucleation in the presence of Ge,” Thin Solid Films, 2001, 384(2):243-250.
Eberhardt et al., “Ni/Ag Metallization for SiGe HBTs using a Ni Silicide Contact,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., 2001 16(9):L47-L49.
Freiman et al., “Kinetics of Processes in the Ti-Si1−xGex Systems,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 1996, 69(25):3821-3823.
Freiman et al., “Titanium Metallization of Si/Ge Alloys and Superlattices,” Thin Solid Films, 1997, 294:217-219.
Hsiao et al., “Advanced Technologies for Optimized Sub-Quarter-Micrometer SOI CMOS Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1998, 45(5):1092-1098.
Huang et al., “Study on Ge/Si ratio, Silicidation, and Strain Relaxation of High Temperature Sputtered Co/Si1−xGex Structures,” Journal of Applied Physics, 2000, 88(4):1831-1837.
Jungemann et al., “Full-Band Monte Carlo Simulation of a 0.12 μm-Si-PMOSFET with and without a Strained SiGe-Channel”, IEEE Electron Devices Meeting, 1998, pp. 897-900.
King et al., “A Polycrystalline Si1−xGex-Gate CMOS Technology”, IEEE, vol., No., 1990, pp. 253-256.
Ku et al., “High Performance pMOSFETs with Ni(SixGe1−x)/Poly-Si0.8Ge0.2 Gate,” IEEE—2000 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 2000, 114-115.
Lai et al., “Effects of Composition on the Formation Temperatures and Electrical Resistivities of C54 Titanium Germanosilicide in Ti-Si1−xGex Systems,” 1999, Journal of Applied Physics, 86(3):1340-1345.
Okada et al., “Epitaxial Growth of Heavily B-Doped SiGe Films and Interfacial Reaction of Ti/B-Doped SiGe Bilayer Structure Using Rapid Thermal Processings,” Thin Solid Films, 2000, 369:130-133.
Qin et al., “Structure and Thermal Stability of Ni/Si1−xGex Contacts for VLSI Applications,” Electronics Letters, 2000, 36(21):1819-1821.
Ponomarev et al., “High-Performance Deep SubMicron CMOS Technologies with Polycrystalline-SiGe Gates,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 4, Apr. 2000, pp. 848-855.
Yasuda et al., “Interfacial Reactions of Ti/ and Zr/Si1−xGex/Si Contacts with Rapid Thermal Annealing,” Thin Solid Films, 2000, 373:73-78.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 98 931 529.6-2203, dated Jan. 10, 2002, 4 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 98 931 529.6-2203, dated May 9, 2003, 5 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 01 973 651.1-1528, dated Mar. 22, 2004, 3 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 01 989 893.1-1235, dated Aug. 16, 2004, 5 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 01 973 651.1-1528, dated Nov. 12, 2004, 9 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 02 709 406.9-2203, dated May 11, 2004, 3 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 02 709 406.9-2203, dated Mar. 24, 2005, 5 pages.
International Search Report for Patent Application No. PCT/US 98/13076, dated Oct. 27, 1998, 4 pages.
Notice of Preliminary Rejection for Korean Patent Application No. 10-1999-7012279, dated Feb. 21, 2002, 2 pages (English translation attached).
Notice of Final Rejection for Korean Patent Application No. 10-1999-7012279, dated Feb. 25, 2003 2 pages (English translation attached).
Fitzgerald et al., “Dislocations in Relaxed SiGe/Si Heterostructures,” Physica Status Solidi A, Applied Research, Berlin, DE, vol. 171, Nr. 1, p. 227-238, Jan. 16, 1999.
Klauk et al., “Thermal stability of undoped strained Si channel SiGe heterostructures,” American Institute of Physics, Apr. 1, 1996, pp. 1975-1977.
Rosenblad et al., “Strain relaxation of graded SiGe buffers brown at very high rates,” Materials Science and Engineering B, Elsevier Sequoia, Lausanne, CH, vol. 71, Nr. 1-3, p. 20-23, Feb. 2000.
Abstreiter et al., “Silicon/Germainium Strained Layer Supertattices,” Journal of Crystal Growth, 95:431-438 (1989).
Ahlgren et al., A SiGe HBT BICMOS Technology for Mixed-Signal RF Applications, 1977 IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Tech. Meeting 195.
Ahn et al., Film Stress-Related Vacancy Supersaturation in Silicon Under Low-Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposited Silicon Nitride Films, 64 J. Applied Physics 4914 (1988).
AmberWave Systems Corporation's Second Supplemental Responses to Intel's Third Set of Interrogatories, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (Jul. 12, 2006).
Antonelli et al., Pressure and Strain Effects on Diffusion, 163 Materials Res. Soc'y Symp. Proc. 523 (1989).
Auberton-Herve et al., “Smart Cut®: The Basic Fabrication Process for UNIBOND® SO1 Wafers,” IEICE Transactions on Electronics, E80-C(3):358-363 (1997).
Badenes et al., A High Performance 018 um, CMOS Technology Designed for Manufacturability, 1997 Proc. 27th European Solid-State Device Res. Conf. 404.
Badenes et at., Optimization of Critical Parameters in a Low Cost, High Performance Deep Submicron CMOS Technology, 1999 Proc. 29th European Solid-State Device Res. Conf. 628.
Borland, Novel Device Structures by Selective Epitaxial Growth (SEG), 1987 Int'l Electron Devices Meeting Tech. Dig. 12.
Borland et al., Low Temperature Low Pressure Silicon Epitaxial Growth and Its Application to Advanced Dielectric Isolation Technology, 1986 Extended Abstracts 18th Int'l Conf. on Solid State Devices and Materials 53 (1986).
Cams et al, Hole Mobility Measurements in Heavily Doped Si 1-x Gex Strained Layers, 41 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 1273 (1994).
C. Carter et al., Residual Defects Following Rapid Thermal Annealing of Shallow Boron and Boron Fluoride Implants into Preamorphized Silicon, 44 Applied Physics Letters 459 (1984).
Chau et al., “Advanced CMOS Transistors in the Nanotechnology Era for High-Performance, Low-Power Logic Applications,” pp. 26-30 (2004).
Corrected Request for Ex Part Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,703,688, Aug. 11, 2006.
Cowern et al., Diffusion in Strained Si(Ge), 72 Physical Review Letters 2585 (1994).
Cressler, SiGe HBT Technology: A New Contender for Si-Based RF and Microwave Circuit Applications, 46 IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech. 572 (1998).
Czaja, Conditions for the Generation of Slip by Diffusion of Phosphorus into Silicon, 37 J. Applied Physics 3441 (1966).
Daembkes et al., The N-Channel SiGe/Si Modulation-Doped Field-Effect Transistor, 33 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 633 (1986).
Eichinger et al., “Characterization of MBE Growth SiGe Superlattices with SIMS and RBS,” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Silicon Molecular Beam Epitaxy, 85(7):367-375 (1985).
Endo et al., Novel Device Isolation Technology with Selective Epitaxial Growth, 1982 Int'l Electron Devices Meeting Tech. Dig. 241.
Endo et al., Scaled CMOS Technology Using SEG Isolation and Buried Well Process, 33 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 1659 (1986).
Fahey et al., Point Defects and Dopant Diffusion in Silicon, 61 Reviews of Modem Physics 289 (1989).
Fair, “Concentration Profiles of Diffused Dopants in Silicon,” Impurity Doping Processes in Silicon, Chapt. 7, pp. 318-442 (1981).
Fair, “Quantified Conditions for Emitter-Misfit Dislocation Formation in Silicon,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 125(6):923-926 (1978).
Fair, Boron Diffusion in Silicon-Concentration and Orientation Dependence, Background Effects and Profile Estimation, 122 J. Electrochemical Soc'y 800 (1975).
Fathy et al., “Formation of epitaxial layers of Ge on Si substrates by Ge implantation and oxidation,” Applied Physics Letters, 51(17):1337-1339 (1987).
Fitch, Selectivity Mechanisms in Low Pressure Selective Epitaxial Silicon Growth, 141 J. Electrochemical Soc'y1046 (1994).
Fuller et al., Diffusion of Donor and Acceptor Elements in Silicon, 27 J. Applied Physics 544 (1956).
Gaworzewski et al., Electrical Properties of Lightly Doped P-Type Silicon-Germanium Single Crystals, 83 J. Applied Physics 5258 (1998).
Ghani et al., “Effect of oxygen on minority-carrier lifetime and recombination currents in Si1-xGex heterostructure devices,” Applied Physics Letters, 58(12):1317-1319 (1991).
Gibbons et al., “Limited reaction processing: Silicon epitaxy,” Applied Physics Letters, 47(7):721-723 (1985).
Godbey et al., “A Si0.7Ge0.3 Strained Layer Etch Stop for the Generation of Bond and Etch Back SOI,” IEEE SOS/SOI Tech. Conf. Proc., pp. 143-144 (1989).
Goo et al., Scalability of Strained-Si nMOSFETs Down to 25 nm Gate Length, 24 IEEE Electron Device Letters 351 (2003).
Gronet et al., “Growth of GeSi/Si strained-layer superlattices using limited reaction processing,” 61 J. Applied Physics, No. 6, pp. 2407-2409 (1987).
Gwoziecki et al., Suitability of Elevated Source/Drain for Deep Submicron CMOS, 1999 Proc. 29th European Solid-State Device Res. Conf. 384. —.
Harame et al., A High-Performance Epitaxial SiGe-Base ECL BiCMOS Technology, 1992 Int'l Electron Devices Meeting Tech. Dig. 19.
Hobart et al., “Ultra-cut: A Simple Technique for the Fabrication of SOI Substrates with Ultra-Thin (<5 nm) Silicon Films,” Proceedings 1998 IEEE International SOI Conference, pp. 145-146 (1998).
Holländer et al., “Reduction of Dislocation Density of MBE-Grown Si1-xGex Layers on (100) Si by Rapid Thermal Annealing,” Thin Solid Films, 183:157-164 (1989).
Hopkins et al., Enhanced Diffusion in Boron Implanted Silicon, 132 Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2035 (1985).
Hu et al.. “Channel and Source/Drain Engineering in High-Performance Sub-0.1 um NMOSFETs Using X-Ray Lithography,” 1994 Symp. On VLSI Technology, Digest of Technical Papers 17.
Huang et al., “SiGe-on-insulator prepared by wafer bonding and layer transfer for high-performance field-effect transistors,” Applied Physics Letters, 78(9):1267-1269.
Huang et al., N-Channel MOS Transistors Below 0.5 um with Ultra-Shallow Channels Formed by Low Temperature Selective Silicon Epitaxy, 387 Materials Res. Soc'y Symp. Proc. 347 (1995).
Hull et al., “Structural Studies of GeSi/Si Heterostructures,” Proceedings of the First International Sysposium on Silicon Molecular Beam Epitaxy, 85(7):376-384 (1985).
Intel's Responses and Objections to AmberWave's Second Set of Interrogatories, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ, Feb. 3, 2006.
Intel's Responses and Objections to AmberWave's Second Set of Requests for Production, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ, Feb. 3, 2006.
Intel's Amended and Supplemented Responses and Objections to AmberWave's Second Set of Interrogatories, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ, Aug. 7, 2006.
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/03688, dated Feb. 7, 2002, 4 pages.
Ishitani et al., “Local Loading Effect in Selective Silicon Epitaxy,” 23 Japanese Journal of Applied Physics L391 (1984).
Ismail et al., “Extremely high electron mobility in Si/SiGe modulation-doped heterostructures,” Applied Physics Letters, 66(9):1077-1079 (1995).
Ismail et al., “Gated Hall effect measurements in high-mobility n-type Si/SiGe modulation-doped heterostructures,” Applied Physics Letters, 66(7):842-844 (1995).
Ismail et al., “Identification of a Mobility-Limiting Scattering Mechanism in Modulation-Doped Si/SiGe Heterostructures,” Physical Review Letters, 73(25):3447-3452 (1994).
Jain et al., Theoretical Calculations of the Fermi Level and of Other Parameters in Phosphorus Doped Silicon at Diffusion Temperatures, 21 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 155 (1974).
Kasper, “Growth and Properties of Si/SiGe Superlattices,” Surface Science, 174:630-639 (1986).
Kato, The Annealing Time and Temperature Dependence of Electrical Dopant Activation in High-Dose BF2 Ion Implanted Silicon, 141 Journal of the Electrochemical Society 3158 (1994).
Kandel et al., Surfactant Mediated Crystal Growth of Semiconductors, 75 Physical Review Letters 2742 (1995).
Kim et al., Properties of C-Axis-Oriented Freestanding GaN Substrates Prepared on Fused Silica Glass by Hydride Vapor Phase Epitaxy, 33 Journal of the Korean Physical Society L1 (1998).
King et al., Si/Si1-x Gex Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors Produced by Limited Reaction Processing, 10 IEEE Electron Device Letters 52 (1989).
Kitajima et al., Crystalline Defects in Selectively Epitaxial Silicon Layers, 22 Japanese Journal of Applied Physics L783 (1983).
Kubota M. et al., “New SOI CMOS Process with Selective Oxidation,” IEEE Iedm Tech. Dig., pp. 814-816 (1986).
Kuo, et al., Effects of Strain on Boron Diffusion in Si and Si1-xGex+, 66 Applied Physics Letters 580 (1995).
Lee et al., High Quality Thin Epitaxial Silicon Layers Deposited Selectively by Rapid Thermal Lee et al., High Quality rs Processing, 1989 Proc. Second Int'l Symp' on Ultra Large Scale Integration Sci. Tech. 233.
Loechelt et al., “Measurement and Modeling of Boron Diffusion in Si and Strained Si1-xGex Epitaxial Layers During Rapid Thermal Annealing,” 74 J. Applied Physics 5520 (1993).
Lunnon et al., “Furnace and Rapid Thermal Annealing of P+/n Junctions in BF2+ -Implanted Silicon,” 132 Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2473 (1985).
Maleville et at., “Physical Phenomena Involved Involved in the Smart-Cut® Process,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 96(3):34-46 (1996).
Maseeh et al., Plastic Deformation of Highly Doped Silicon, A21-A23 Sensors & Actuators 861 (1990).
Mazuréet al., Facet Engineered Elevated Source/Drain by Selection Si Epitaxy for 0.35 Micron MOSFETS, 1992 Int', Electron Devices Meeting Tech. Dig, 853.
Mehregany et al., Anisotropic Etching of Silicon in Hydrazine, 13 Sensors and Actuators 375 (1988).
Meyerson, “Low-Temperature Silicon Epitaxy by Ultrahigh Vacuum/Chemical Vapor Deposition,” 48 Applied Physics Letters 797 (1986).
Mieno et al., “Selective Doped Polysiticon Growth,” 134 Journal of the Electrochemical Society 11, 2862-2867 (1987).
Ming et al., “Microscopic structure of interfaces in Si1-xGex/Si heterostructures and superlattices studied by x-ray scattering and flourescence yield,” Physical Review B, vol. 47, No. 24, pp. 373-81, Jun. 15, 1993.
Ming et al., “Interfacial roughness scaling and strain in lattice mismatched Si0.4Ge0.6 thin films on Si,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 67, No. 5, Jul. 31, 1995, pp. 629-631.
Mistry et al., “Delaying Forever: Uniaxial Strained Silicon Transistors in a 90nm CMOS Technology,” Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of of Technical Papers, pp. 50-51 (2004).
Mirabedini et al., Submicrometre Elevated Source and Drain MOSFET Technology Using E-Beam Evaporated Silicon, 33 Electronics Letters 1183 (1997).
Miyake et al., Transient Enhanced Diffusion of Ion-Implanted Boron in Si During Rapid Thermal Annealing, 63 J. Applied Physics 1754 (1988).
Miyauchi et al., “Low-Temperature (850°C) Silicon Selective Epitaxial Growth on HF-Treated Si (100) Subtrates Using SiH4-HCI-H2 Systems,” 138 Journal of the Electrochemical Society 3480 (1991).
Mizuo et al., “Anomalous Diffusion of B and P in Si Directly Masked with Si3N4,” 21 Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 281 (1982).
Moslehi et al., Single-Wafer Integrated Semiconductor Device Processing, 39 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 4 (1992).
Monroe et al., “Comparison of mobility-limiting mechanisms in high-mobility Si1-xGex heterostructures,” Journal of Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 11(4):1731-1737 (1993).
Moriya et al., “Boron Diffusion in Strained Si1-xGex Epitaxial Layers,” 71 Physical Review Letters 883 (1993).
Moriya et al., “Doping and Electrical Characteristics of In Situ Heavily B-Doped Si1-xGex Films Epitaxially Grown Using Ultraclean LPCVD,” 343-344 Thin Solid Films 541 (1999).
Murota et al., “CVD Si1-xGex Epitaxial Growth and Its Doping Control,” 27 Journal of the Japanese Ass'n. For Crystal Growth 171 (2000).
Nakahara et al., Ultra-Shallow In-Situ-Doped Raised Source/Drain Structure for Sub-Tenth Micron CMOS, 1996 Symp. on VLSI Tech., Dig. Tech. Papers 174.
Nishi et al., “Handbook of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology,” Marcel Dekker AG, New York, NY, 2000, pp. 1-22.
Noble et al., “Reduction in misfit dislocation density by the selective growth of Si1-xGex/Si in small areas,” Applied Physics Letters, 56(1):51-53 (1990).
Noda et al., “Doping and Electrical Characteristics of In-Situ Heavily B-Doped Si1-x-yGexCy Films Epitaxially Grown Using Ultraclean LPCVD,” 380 Thin Solid Films 57 (2000).
Notice of Final Rejection for Korean Patent Application No. 10-1999-7012279, dated Feb. 25, 2003, 2 pages. (English translation attached).
O'Neill et al., “Deep Submicron CMOS Based on Silicon Germanium Technology,” Fellow, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 43 No. 6 Jun. 1996, pp. 911-918.
Park et al., Analysis of Ion-Implanted Amorphous and Polycrystalline Silicon Films as Diffusion Sources for Ultrashallow Junctions, 70 J. Applied Physics 1397 (1991).
Patton et al., Silicon-Germanium-Base Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors by Molecular Beam Epitaxy, 9 IEEE Electron Device Letters 165 (1988).
Pfiester et al., Anomalous Co-Diffusion Effects of Germanium on Group III and V Dopants in Silicon, 52 Applied Physics Letters 471 (1988).
Powell, “Activation of Shallow, High-Dose BF2+ Implants into Silicon by Rapid Thermal Processing,” 56 J. Applied Physics 2837 (1984).
Prinz et al., “The Effects of Base Dopant Outdiffusion and Undoped Si1-xGex Junction Spacer Layers in Si/Si1-xGex/Si Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors,” 12 IEEE Electron Device Letters 42 (1991).
Prinz et al., “The Effect of Base-Emitter Spacers and Strain Dependent Densities of States in Si/Si1-xGex/Si Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors,” 1989 Int'l Electron Devices Meeting Tech.Dig. 639.
Rim et al, Characteristics and Device Design of Sub-100 nm Strained Si N- and PMOSFETs, 2002 Symp. on VLSI Tech.. Digest Tech. Papers 98.
Rim et al., Low Field Mobility Characteristics of Sub-100 nm Unstrained and Strained Si MOSFETs, 2002 Int'l Electron Devices Meeting Tech. Dig. 43.
Rim et al., Strained Si NMOSFETs for High Performance CMOS Technology, 2001 Symp. on VLSI Tech., Digest Tech. Papers 59.
Rodrigues et al., “Strain Compensation by Heavy Boron Doping in Si1-xGexLayers Grown by Solid Phase Epitaxy,” 12 J. Materials Res. 1698 (1997).
Ryssel et al., High Concentration Effects of Ion Implanted Boron in Silicon, 22 Applied Physics 35 (1980).
Schäffler, “Letter to the Editor, High-electron-mobility Si/SiGe heterostructures: influence of the relaxed SiGe buffer layer,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., 7:260-266 (1992).
Schumann et al., Impact of Elevated Source/Drain on the Reverse Short Channel Effect, 1999 Proc. 29th European Solid-State Device Res. Conf. 572.
Shifren et al., “Drive current enhancement in p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors under shear uniaxial stress,” Applied Physics Letters, 85(25):6188-6190 (2004).
Simard-Normandin, “Electrical Characteristics and Contact Resistance of B+- and BF2+- Implanted Silicon Diodes with Furnace and Rapid Thermal Annealing,” 32 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 1354 (1985).
Solmi et al., High-Concentration Boron Diffusion in Silicon: Simulation of the Precipitation Phenomena, 68 J. Applied Physics 3250 (1990).
Song et al., Facet Formation in Selectively Overgrown Silicon by Reduced Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition, 1998 Dig. Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology '98 240.
Stach et al., Anomalous Boron Diffusion in Silicon from Planar Boron Nitride Sources, 121 Journal of the Electrochemical Society 722 (1974).
Stivers et al., Growth Condition Dependence of SEG Planarity and Electrical Characteristics, 1987 Proc. Tenth Int'l Conf. on Chemical Vapor Deposition 389.
Subbanna et al., “How SiGe Evolved into a Manufacturable Semiconductor Production Process,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, pp. 56, 67, 446 (1999).
Sugii et al., “Role of Si1-xGex buffer layer on mobility enhancement in a strained-Si channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor,” 75 Applied Physics Letters No. 19, pp.2948-2950 (1999).
Sugiyama et al., “Formation of strained-silicon layer on thin relaxed-SiGe/SiO2/Si structure using SIMOX technology,” Thin Solid Films, 369:199-202 (2000).
Sun et al., “Elevated n+/p Junctions by Implant into CoSi2 Formed on Selective Epitaxy for Deep Submicron MOSFETs,” 45 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 1946 (1998).
Sun et al., Parasitic Resistance Considerations of Using Elevated Source/Drain Technology for Deep Submicron Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors, 145 Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2131 (1998).
Suzuki et al., Effects of Si-Ge Buffer Layer for Low-temperature Si Epitaxial Growth on Si Substrate by RF Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition, 54 J. Applied Physics 1466 (1983).
Tanno et al., Selective Silicon Epitaxy Using Reduced Pressure Technique, 21 Japanese Journal of Applied Physics L564 (1982).
Taraschi et al., “Relaxed SiGe on Insulator Fabricated via Wafer Bonding and Layer Transfer: Etch-Back and Smart-Cut Alternatives,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 2001(3):27-32 (2001).
Taraschi et al., “Strained-Si-on-Insulator (SSOI) and SiGe-on-Insulator (SGOI): Fabrication Obstacles and Solutions,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 745:105-110 (2003).
Taraschi et al., “Relaxed SiGe-on-insulator fabricated via wafer bonding and etch back,” Journal of Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 20(2):725-727 (2002).
Tsai et al., “Recrystallization of Implanted Amorphous Silicon Layers. I. Electrical Properties of Silicon Implanted with BF+2 or Si++ B+a ),” 50 J. Applied Physics 183 (1979).
van Dort et al., Influence of High Substrate Doping Levels on the Threshold Voltage and the Mobility of Deep-Submicrometer MOSFET's, 39 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 932 (1992).
van Meer et al., High Performance Raised Gate/Source/Drain Transistors for Sub-0.15 μm CMOS Technologies, 1999 Proc. 29th European Solid-State Device Res. Conf. 388.
van Oostrum et al., Characterization of Epitaxial Layers by the Depth Dependence of Boron Diffusivity, 61 Applied Physics Letters 1513 (1992).
Vossen et al., “Thin Film Processes II,” Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, 1991, pp. 370-442.
Waite et al., A Novel Deep Submicron Elevated Source/Drain MOSFET, 1998 Proc. 28th European Solid-State Device Res. Conf. 885.
Walker et al., Shallow Boron Junctions and Preamorphization for Deep Submicron Silicon Technology, 73 J. Applied Physics 4048 (1993).
Wang, Identification and Measurement of Scaling-Dependent Parasitic Capacitances of Small-Geometry MOSFETs, 43 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 965 (1996).
Weldon et al., Raised Source-Drains Using Selective Silicon Deposition for Sub-Half Micron CMOS Devices, 94-2 Extended Abstracts Fall Meeting Electrochemical Soc'y 756 (1994).
Wong, Beyond the Conventional Transistor, 46 IBM J. Res. & Dev. 133 (2002).
Yamakawa et al., Drivability Improvement on Deep-Submicron MOSFETs by Elevation of Source/Drain Regions, 20 IEEE Electron Device Letters 366 (1999).
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US03/19528, dated Sep. 23, 2003, 4 pages.
König, “SiGe rf- Electronic: Devices, Circuits, Competitors, Markets,” 533 Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., pp. 3-17 (1998).
Rim at al., “Transconductance Enhancement in Deep Submicron Strained-Si n-MOSFETs,” 1998 IEDM Tech. Dig., pp. 707-710.
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,122,449, Oct. 17, 2006.
Aoki et al., “Optimum Crystallographic Orientation of Submicron CMOS Devices,” 1985 IEDM 577-580.
Bowling, “Single-Wafer Processing and Real-Time Process Control for Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Manufacturing,” 1994 Int'l Symp. on Semiconductor Manufacturing, pp. 31-33.
Chau, “A 50 nm Depleted-Substrate CMOS Transistor (DST),” 2001 IEDM 621-624.
Saddow et al., “Lateral Epitaxial Overgrowth and Pendeo Epitaxy of 3C-SiC on Si Substrates,”.
C346 Office action in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,703,688, Mar. 12, 2007.
AmberWave Systems Corporation's Responses to Intel's Fourth set of Requests for Production, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated) (May 5, 2006).
Intel's Responses and Objections to AmberWave's Third Set of Requests for Production, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated) (Mar. 15, 2006).
Intel's Responses and Objections to AmberWave's Fourth Set of Requests for Production, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated) (Aug. 17, 2006).
AmberWave Systems Corporation's Responses to Intel's Second Set of Requests for Production, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ, (Feb. 3, 2006).
AmberWave Systems Corporation's Responses to Intel's Third Set of Interrogatories, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated), (Feb. 3, 2006).
AmberWave Systems Corporation's First Supplemental Responses to Intel's Third Set of Interrogatories, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated), (Mar. 27, 2006).
AmberWave Systems Corporation's Responses to Intel's Third Set of Requests for Production, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated), (Feb. 10, 2006).
AmberWave Systems Corporation's Responses to Intel's Fourth Set of Interrogatories, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated), (Feb. 27, 2006).
AmberWave Systems Corporation's Responses to Intel's Fifth Set of Requests for Production, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated), (Jun. 30, 2006).
AmberWave Systems Corporation's Responses to Intel's Fifth Set of Interrogatories, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated), (Jun. 19, 2006).
Intel's Responses and Objections to AmberWave's Fourth Set of Requests for Production, U.S.D.C., District of Delaware, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated), Aug. 17, 2006.
AmberWave Systems Corporation's Responses to Intel's Sixth Set of Interrogatories, C.A. No. 05-301-KAJ (consolidated) (Sep. 5, 2006).
AmberWave Systems Corporation's First Supplemental Responses to Intel's First Set of Interrogatories, C.A. No. 05-837-KAJ (Jul. 12, 2006).
Bera et al., “Gas Source Molecular Beam Epitaxy Grown Strained-Si Films on Step-Graded Relaxed Si1-xGex for MOS Applications,” 28 J. Electron. Mat. 2, pp. 98-104 (1999).
Corrected Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,649,480, Jan. 12, 2007.
Intel's Amended and Supplemented Responses and Objections to AmberWave's First Set of Interrogatories, Civil Action No. 05-301-KAJ (Aug. 7, 2006).
Intel's Responses and Objections to AmberWave's First Set of Requests for Production, Civil Action No. 05-837-KAJ (Feb. 3, 2006).
Intel's Amended Responses and Objections to AmberWave's First Set of Interrogatories, Civil Action No. 05-837-KAJ (Feb. 3, 2006).
Intel's Responses and Objections to AmberWave's First Set of Interrogatories, Civil Action No. 05-837-KAJ (Feb. 3, 2006).
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US01/46322, mailed Jan. 22, 2003.
John et. al., “Strained Si n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor transistor on relaxed Si1-xGex formed by Ion Implantation of Ge,” 74 Applied Physics Letters 14, pp. 2076-2078 (1999).
Office action in Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,649,480, Mar. 23, 2007.
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,649,480, Oct. 24, 2006.
Wolf and Tauber, Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era vol. 1: Process Technology, Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA, 1986, pp. 124-160.
Wolf and Tauber, Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era vol. 1: Process Technology, 2nd Ed., 2000, p. 203, Table 6-3.
Steegan et al., “Silicide Induced Pattern Density & Orientation Dependent Transconductance in MOS Transistors,” 1999 IEDM, pp. 497-500.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040219726 A1 Nov 2004 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60273112 Mar 2001 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09906534 Jul 2001 US
Child 10854556 US