1. Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture and, more particularly, to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture which imposes tensile and compressive stresses in the device during device fabrication.
2. Background Description
Mechanical stresses within a semiconductor device substrate can modulate device performance. That is, stresses within a semiconductor device are known to enhance semiconductor device characteristics. Thus, to improve the characteristics of a semiconductor device, tensile and/or compressive stresses are created in the channel of the n-type devices (e.g., nFETs) and/or p-type devices (e.g., pFETs). However, the same stress component, either tensile stress or compressive stress, discriminatively affects the characteristics of an n-type device and a p-type device.
In order to maximize the performance of both nFETs and pFETs within integrated circuit (IC) chips, the stress components should be engineered and applied differently for nFETs and pFETs. That is, because the type of stress which is beneficial for the performance of an nFET is generally disadvantageous for the performance of the pFET. More particularly, when a device is in tension (e.g., in the direction of current flow in a planar device), the performance characteristics of the nFET are enhanced while the performance characteristics of the pFET are diminished. To selectively create tensile stress in an nFET and compressive stress in a pFET, distinctive processes and different combinations of materials are used.
For example, a trench isolation structure has been proposed for forming the appropriate stresses in the nFETs and pFETs, respectively. When this method is used, the isolation region for the nFET device contains a first isolation material which applies a first type of mechanical stress on the nFET device in a longitudinal direction (e.g., parallel to the direction of current flow) and in a transverse direction (e.g., perpendicular to the direction of current flow). Further, a first isolation region and a second isolation region are provided for the pFET and each of the isolation regions of the pFET device applies a unique mechanical stress on the pFET device in the transverse and longitudinal directions.
Alternatively, liners on gate sidewalls have been proposed to selectively induce the appropriate stresses in the channels of the FET devices (see, Ootsuka et al., IEDM 2000, p. 575, for example). By providing liners, the appropriate stress is applied closer to the device than the stress applied as a result of the trench isolation fill technique.
Also, there have been many proposals to improve both nFET and pFET device performance using tensile and compressive stresses, respectively, which include modulating spacer intrinsic stresses and STI (shallow trench isolation) material changes individually for two MOSFETs using masks. Tensilely strained Si on relaxed SiGe has also been proposed as a means to apply this stress. Unfortunately, the tensilely strained Si on relaxed SiGe can apply only biaxial tensile stress on the Si cap as used in stack form. This constrains the regime of Ge % that is useful because of the nature of pFET sensitivity to stress. The nFET performance monotonically improves with biaxial tension; however, the pFET is degraded with biaxial tension until about 3 GPa at which point it begins to improve.
In order to improve both the pFET and nFET simultaneously, the Ge % needs to be high, approximately greater than 25-30% (or equivalent to approximately greater than 3-4 GPa in stress). This level of Ge % is difficult to implement into processes and is not very manufacturable with major issues including surface roughness, process complexity, defect and yield control, to name but a few. Given that a high Ge % is hard to use for the pFET (since it would be detrimental because of the relatively low levels of tension), other methods must be devised to improve the device performance.
Additionally, Si:C is know to grow epitaxially on Si where it is inherently tensile. A 1% C content in the Si:C/Si material stack can cause tensile stress levels in the Si:C on the order of 500 MPa. In comparison, in the SiGe/Si system about 6% is needed to cause a 500 MPa compression. This 1% level of C can be incorporated into Si during epitaxial growth as shown in Ernst et al., VLSI Symp., 2002, p. 92. In Ernst, the Si/Si:C/Si is in a layered channel for nFETs. However, the Si:C part of the structure is not relaxed. Instead, in Ernst, an unrelaxed Si:C is used as part of the channel, itself, with a very thin Si cap. The problem with this approach is that the mobility is not enhanced, but retarded, depending on the C content, from scattering.
While these methods do provide structures that have tensile stresses being applied to the nFET device and compressive stresses being applied along the longitudinal direction of the pFET device, they may require additional materials and/or more complex processing, and thus, resulting in higher cost. Further, the level of stress that can be applied in these situations is typically moderate (i.e., on the order of 100s of MPa). Thus, it is desired to provide more cost-effective and simplified methods for creating large tensile and compressive stresses in the channels nFETs and pFETs, respectively.
In a first aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing a structure includes forming shallow trench isolation (STI) in a substrate and providing a first material and a second material on the substrate. The first material and the second material are mixed into the substrate by a thermal anneal process to form a first island and second island at an nFET region and a pFET region, respectively. A layer of different material is formed on the first island and the second island. The STI relaxes and facilitates the relaxation of the first island and the second island. In an embodiment, the first material is deposited or grown Ge material and the second material is deposited or grown Si:C or C.
In another aspect, a method of manufacturing a structure includes forming a substrate and shallow trench isolation in the substrate with a first material. A second material over a pFET region and an nFET region is formed, and is then thermally annealed into the substrate to form a first island and a second island of mixed material. A Si layer is grown on the first island in a first region. The Si layer is strained.
In yet another aspect, the method of manufacturing includes forming a substrate and shallow trench isolation of high temperature stable amorphous material, preferably oxide, in the substrate. The method further includes thermally annealing at least one material into the substrate to form a first island and a second island of mixed material and growing a Si layer on at least the first island. The Si layer is strained. In embodiments:
In another aspect of the invention, a semiconductor structure includes a substrate and a relaxed shallow trench isolation of high temperature stable amorphous material, preferably oxide, formed in the substrate. A first island of thermally annealed mixed material is formed in the substrate at a pFET region and a second island of thermally annealed mixed material is formed in the substrate at an nFET region. A strained Si layer is formed on at least one of the first island and the second island.
a and 12b are representative structures of the invention.
This invention is directed to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture which provides desired stresses in the nFET channel and the pFET channel of CMOS devices for improved device performance. In one approach, a SiGe island is obtained through thermally mixing deposited Ge material into an SOI thin film. Similarly, a Si:C island is obtained through thermally mixing deposited Si:C or C into the Si or SOI thin film. By using the method of the invention, the required Ge % is not large and thus does not cause defect issues. Also, relaxation of SiGe and/or Si:C islands in the channels of the pFET and nFET, respectively, can be achieved by the invention to thus provide improved performance as compared to blanket (SiGe or Si:C) substrates. This is because, in the implementations of the invention, a high temperature thermal mixing step, for example, is provided such that shallow trench isolation (STI) can relax and facilitate the relaxation of the SiGe and Si:C islands.
Prior to the invention, placement of at least two crystal islands with different relaxed crystal lattice (different dimensions between the atoms) was only feasible by wafer bonding techniques where the islands have a relatively large size; however, in the invention, the methods yield a unique substrate with small crystal islands which have a relaxed but different crystal structure. In one implementation, the nontrivial element of such structure is the use of high temperature stable amorphous material, e.g., SiO2, between the islands and the crystal on insulator structure. The unique structure with different (crystal) islands allows for the placement of differently strained layers of optionally different crystals. In a first aspect, the differently strained layers are tensile and compressive Si layers. In another aspect of the invention, the different layers are a tensile Si layer and SiGe layer or a compressive Si layer and Si:C layer.
The invention has a seminal and important contribution to the art of making substrates with islands on insulator with multiple crystal lattice constants. In the invention, for example, a first island (crystal 1) has a lattice constant a≧aSi and the second island (crystal 2) has a lattice constant a≦aSi. In one aspect of the invention, as discussed in greater detail below, a Si epitaxial layer of the invention can be selectively grown, which will strain tensilely and compressively on SiGe and Si:C, respectively. This particular application is suitable, for example, in strained planar nFETs and pFETs.
Additionally, it should be understood that holes are known to have excellent mobility in SiGe, but reliable thermal based oxides are hard to form on this material. However, in one implementation of the invention, a dielectric, high K material, for example, is deposited, such that it is possible to use only relaxed SiGe (crystal 1) for the pFET in tandem with crystal 1 (again relaxed SiGe) with the tensilely strained Si for the nFET. It is also contemplated by the invention to use Si:C with compressively stressed Si for the pFET. Thus, the invention is capable of generalizing to the concept of multiple lattice constant islanded substrates.
Referring now to
Still referring to
Referring to
An nFET hard mask 35 is provided on a portion of the Ge layer 30 (e.g., at locations of a yet to be formed nFET device). The nFET hard mask 35 may be a nitride hard mask formed using a conventional deposition process such as spin-on coating, CVD, plasma-assisted CVD, ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD), rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD), limited reaction processing CVD (LRPCVD) and other like deposition processes.
In
As shown in
A pFET hard mask 45 is provided on a portion of the Si:C material 40 at locations of the yet to be formed pFET. The pFET hard mask 45 may be a nitride hard mask formed using a conventional deposition process such as spin-on coating, CVD, plasma-assisted CVD, ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD), rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD), limited reaction processing CVD (LRPCVD) and other like deposition processes.
As shown in
In
By using the method of the invention, the required Ge % is not large (e.g., less than 25% and in one implementation 10 to 20%) for the nFET and thus does not cause defect issues. Also, due to the high temperature thermal mixing step, for example, the STI 25 can relax and facilitate the relaxation of the SiGe island 50 and Si:C island 55. This is due, in part, because the STI comprises oxide material, which is a viscous material at the high temperature, e.g., becomes a low viscosity material at high temperature.
Also, it should now be understood that the SiGe island 50 and the Si:C island 55 have different relaxed crystal lattice (different dimensions between the atoms) which yield a unique substrate with small crystal islands. The relaxation of the SiGe island 50 and the Si:C island 55 provides improved performance as compared to blanket (SiGe or Si:C) substrates. In an implementation, high temperature stable amorphous material, e.g., SiO2, between the SiGe island 50 and the Si:C island 55 and the crystal on insulator structure are thus used in accordance with the invention.
As further shown in
Now, in implementation, the SiGe island 50 has a lattice constant a≧aSi and the Si:C island 55 has a lattice constant a≦aSi. That is, standing alone, the Si normally has a lower lattice constant than the SiGe layer; namely, the lattice constant of the Si material does not match the lattice constant of the SiGe layer. However, in the structure of the invention, the lattice structure of the Si layer will tend to match the lattice structure of the SiGe island. Thus, by virtue of the lattice matching of the Si (which normally is smaller) to the SiGe layer, the Si layer is placed under a tensile stress. This area will act as a strained channel for the nFET. In one embodiment, the Ge content of the SiGe layer may be less than 25% in ratio to the Si content.
Also, standing alone, Si would normally have a larger lattice constant than the Si:C island. That is, the lattice constant of the Si material does not match the lattice constant of the Si:C. However, in the structure of the invention, the lattice structure of the Si layer will tend to match the lattice structure of the Si:C. By virtue of the lattice matching of the Si (which normally is larger) to the Si:C island, the Si layer is placed under a compressive stress. That is, similar to the occurrence with the SiGe, the surrounding areas of the Si:C island will try to obtain an equilibrium state thus resulting in a compressive stress of an epitaxial Si layer formed on the Si:C island. This area will act as a strained channel for the pFET. In one embodiment, as deposited, the C content may be from about up to 4% in ratio to the Si content.
Referring to
An epitaxial Ge layer 30 is selectively grown over the exposed surface of the yet to be formed nFET using conventional techniques. In one embodiment, the thickness of the Ge material may range from 5 to 50 nanometers, or other dimension depending on the thickness of the underlying Si layer which may, for example, range from 30 to 100 nanometers. The hard mask 45 is stripped using well known processes, as discussed above.
In
An Si:C layer 40 is selectively grown over the exposed surface of the structure at the yet to be formed pFET using conventional techniques such as chemical vapor deposition method, as discussed above. In one embodiment, the thickness of the Si:C material may range from 5 to 50 nanometers, or other dimension depending on the thickness of the underlying Si layer which may, for example, range from 30 to 100 nanometers. The C may even be thinner ranging from 1 to 50 nanometers.
As shown in
As discussed above, and similar to the previous implementations, by using the method of the invention, the required Ge % is not large (e.g., less than 25% and in one implementation from 10 to 20%) and thus does not cause defect issues. Also, due to the high temperature thermal mixing, for example, the STI 25 can relax and facilitate the relaxation of the SiGe island 50 and Si:C island 55. As previously discussed, the relaxation of SiGe and Si:C provides improved performance as compared to blanket (SiGe or Si:C) substrates. In one implementation of the invention, the element of such structure is the use of high temperature stable amorphous material, e.g., SiO2, between the islands and the crystal on insulator structure.
As further shown in
In another aspect of the invention, C can be implanted at high dose into the pFET region which can produce concentrations much greater than the 1-4% C in the Si:C upon thermal annealing. The dose may be about 1 e 16#/cm2 or greater such as 5 e 16#/cm2.
In the illustrative example of
Alternatively, Si:C may be used for both the nFET and the pFET, excluding SiGe. In this implementation, a strained Si will be placed on the pFET region but not on the nFET region. Upon fabrication, the pFET will then be in a compressive stress. A high K dielectric 100, though, to begin the fabrication of the device, is then selectively grown on the structure; that is, the high K dielectric 100 may be grown over the strained Si layer and the exposed Si:C layer. The high K dielectric 100 may be zirconium oxide or aluminum oxide, for example. This is also representative of
The structures formed, as shown in
While the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, the invention can be readily applicable to bulk substrates.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/278,667, filed on Oct. 21, 2011, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/757,883, filed on Jun. 4, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,119,472, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/715,400, filed on Nov. 19, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,247,534, the contents of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3602841 | McGroddy | Aug 1971 | A |
4478655 | Nagakubo et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4665415 | Esaki et al. | May 1987 | A |
4853076 | Tsaur et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855245 | Neppl et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4952524 | Lee et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958213 | Eklund et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5006913 | Sugahara et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5060030 | Hoke | Oct 1991 | A |
5081513 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5108843 | Ohtaka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5134085 | Gilgen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5310446 | Konishi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354695 | Leedy | Oct 1994 | A |
5371399 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391510 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5459346 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471948 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5557122 | Shrivastava et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561302 | Candelaria | Oct 1996 | A |
5565697 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571741 | Leedy | Nov 1996 | A |
5592007 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5592018 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5670798 | Schetzina | Sep 1997 | A |
5679965 | Schetzina | Oct 1997 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5698869 | Yoshimi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5763905 | Harris | Jun 1998 | A |
5840593 | Leedy | Nov 1998 | A |
5861651 | Brasen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5879996 | Forbes | Mar 1999 | A |
5880040 | Sun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891769 | Liaw et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898203 | Yoshitomi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5940716 | Jin et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940736 | Brady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946559 | Leedy | Aug 1999 | A |
5960297 | Saki | Sep 1999 | A |
5981356 | Hsueh et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989978 | Peidos | Nov 1999 | A |
5994756 | Umezawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6025280 | Brady et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6046464 | Schetzina | Apr 2000 | A |
6066545 | Doshi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080637 | Huang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090684 | Ishitsuka et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093621 | Tseng | Jul 2000 | A |
6107143 | Park et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117722 | Wuu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133071 | Nagai | Oct 2000 | A |
6165383 | Chou | Dec 2000 | A |
6221735 | Manley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228694 | Doyle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246095 | Brady et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255169 | Li et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261964 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265317 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271100 | Ballantine et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274444 | Wang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281532 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284623 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6284626 | Kim | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6361885 | Chou | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362082 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365484 | Nowak et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368931 | Kuhn et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6399970 | Kubo et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6403486 | Lou | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403975 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406973 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410371 | Yu et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6461936 | Von Ehrenwall | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476462 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483171 | Forbes | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492216 | Yeo et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493497 | Ramdani et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498358 | Lach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501121 | Yu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506652 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509618 | Myers et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6521964 | Jan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531369 | Ozkan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531740 | Bosco et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6551871 | Takamura | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6583060 | Trivedi | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6620664 | Ma et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6696348 | Xiang | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703271 | Yeo et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717216 | Baie et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724290 | Ohnmacht et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6743705 | Mehrotra et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764908 | Kadosh et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6774409 | Baba et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6825529 | Chidambarrao et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831292 | Currie et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6855642 | Tanabe et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6891192 | Chen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900103 | Fitzgerald | May 2005 | B2 |
6905923 | Paton et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6939814 | Chan et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6974981 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977194 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6982229 | Suvkhanov et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015082 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7034362 | Rim | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037770 | Chidambarrao et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7049660 | Bedell et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7115954 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7138310 | Currie et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7198995 | Chidambarrao et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7303949 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7342289 | Huang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20010003364 | Sugarawa et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010009784 | Ma et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020061615 | Kawagoe et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063292 | Armstrong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020074598 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086472 | Roberds et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020086497 | Kwok | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090791 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030032261 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040158 | Saitoh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057184 | Yu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067035 | Tews et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030162348 | Yeo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040005750 | Chen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029323 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040106267 | Beyer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124476 | Miyano | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040132267 | Sadana et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135138 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142537 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150042 | Yeo et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040195623 | Ge et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212035 | Yeo et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217437 | Franke et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238914 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253776 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256614 | Ouyang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262683 | Bohr et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262784 | Doris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050035470 | Ko et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050040460 | Chidambarrao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082616 | Chen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082634 | Doris et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085022 | Chidambarrao et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093030 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050093104 | Ieong et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098829 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106799 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050145954 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148146 | Doris et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194699 | Belyansky et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236668 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245017 | Belyansky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280051 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282325 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060027868 | Doris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057787 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060925 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060220119 | Lin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070298566 | Moroz et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6476755 | Mar 1989 | JP |
07169926 | Jul 1995 | JP |
07183237 | Jul 1995 | JP |
0897163 | Apr 1996 | JP |
2002203912 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002217413 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2005039171 | Feb 2005 | JP |
19980024235 | Oct 1998 | KR |
20030058571 | Jul 2003 | KR |
0243151 | May 2002 | WO |
2005013375 | Feb 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dearnaley, et al., “Electrical Phenomena in Amorphous Oxide Films”, Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 33, No. 3; Sep. 1970, pp. 112-1191. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 5, 2007 in PCT Application No. PCT/US04/20904. |
Ray et al. “Comparison of Si1-yCy Films Produced by Solid-Phase Epitaxy and Rapid Thermal Chemical Vapour Deposition”, Thin Solid Films Elsevier-Sequoia S.A. Lausanne, CH, vol. 294, No. 1-2; Feb. 15, 1997, pp. 149-152. |
Kobayashi et al., “Synthesis of Metastable Group-IV Alloy Semiconductors by Ion Implantation and Ion-Beam-Induced Epitaxial Crystallization”, Applied Surface Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 100-101, Jul. 2, 1996, pp. 498-502. |
Randa et al., “A Novel Elevated Source/Drain PMosfet formed by Ge-B/Si Intermixing”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, Issue 4, Apr. 2002, pp. 218-220. |
Zhang et al., “A New ‘Mixed-Mode’ Reliability Degradation Mechanism in Advanced Si and SiGe Bipolar Transistors”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 49, No. 12, Dec. 2002, pp. 2151-2156. |
Momose et al., “Temperature Dependence on Emitter-Base Reverse Stress Degradation and its Mechanism Analyzed by MOS Structures”, IEEE Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting, Sep. 18-19, 1989, pp. 140-143. |
Huang et al., “Temperature Dependence and Post-Stress Recovery of Hot Electron Degradation Effects in Bipolar Transistors”, IEEE Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting, Sep. 9-10, 1991, pp. 170-173. |
Sheng et al. ,“Degradation and Recovery of SiGe HBTs Following Radiation and Hot-Carrier Stressing”, IEEE Semiconductor Device Research Symposium, Dec. 10-12, 2003, pp. 14-15. |
Yang et al., “Avalanche Current Induced Hot Carrier Degradation in 200 Ghz SiGe Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors”, IEEE Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings, Mar. 30-Apr. 4, 2003, pp. 339-434. |
Li et al., “Design of W-Band VCOs with High Output Power for Potential Application in 77 GHz Automotive Radar Systems”, IEEE Gallium Arsenide Integrated Circuit (GaAs IC) Symposium, Nov. 9-12, 2003, pp. 263-266. |
Wurzer et al., “Annealing of Degraded Non-Transistors-Mechanisms and Modeling”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 41, No. 4, Apr. 1994, pp. 533-538. |
Doyle et al., “Recovery of Hot Carrier Damage in Reoxidized Nitrided Oxide MOSFETs”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 1992, pp. 38-40. |
Momose et al., “Analysis of the Temperature Dependence of Hot Carrier-Induced Degradation in Bipolar Transistors for Bi-CMOS”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 41, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 178-987. |
Khater et al., “SiGe HBT Technology with Fmax/Ft=350/300 Ghz and Gate Delay Below 3.3 ps”, Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 13-15, 2004, pp. 247-250. |
Bean et al., “GEz Si 1-x/Si Strained-Layer Superlattice Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2 (2), Apr.-Jun. 1984, pp. 436-440. |
Van Der Merwe, “Regular Articles”, Journal of Applied Physics, Vo. 34, No. 1, Jan. 1963, pp. 117-122. |
Matthews et al., “Defects in Epitaxial Multilayers”, Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 27; 1974, pp. 118-125. |
Iyer et al., “Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors Using a Si-Ge Alloys”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 36, No. 10, Oct. 1989, pp. 2043-2064. |
Van De Leur et al., “Critical Thickness for Pseudomorphic Growth of Si/Ge Alloys and Superlattices”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 64, No. 6, Sep. 15, 1988, pp. 3043-3050. |
Houghton et al., “Equilibrium Critical Thickness for Si 1-x GEx Strained Layers on (100) Si”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 56, No. 5, Jan. 29, 1990, pp. 460-462. |
Quyant et al., “Two-Dimensional Bandgap Engineering in Novel Si/SiGe pMOSFET with Enhanced Device Performance and Scalability”, IEEE, 2000, pp. 151-154. |
Rim et al., “Transconductance Enhancement in Deep Submicron Strained-Si n-MOSFETs”, IEEE International Electron Device Meeting, Dec. 6-9, 1998, pp. 707-710. |
Rim et al., “Characteristics and Device Design of Sub-100 nm Strained Si N- and PMOSFETs”, IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, Jun. 11-13, 2002, pp. 98-99. |
Scott et al., “NMOS Drive Current Reduction Caused by Transistor Layout and Trench Isolation Induced Stress”, IEEE Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 5-8, 1999, pp. 827-830. |
Ootsuka et al., “A Highly Dense, High-Performance 130 nm Node CMOS Technology for Large Scale System-on-a-Chip Application”, IEEE Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 10-13, 2000, pp. 575-578. |
Shinya et al., “Mechanical-Stress Effect of Etch-Stop Nitride and its Impact on Deep Submicron Transistor Design”, IEEE Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 10-13, 2000, pp. 247-250. |
Shimizu et al., “Local Mechanical-Stress Control (LMC): New Technique for CMOS-Performance Enhancement”, IEEE Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 2-5, 2001, pp. 19.4.1-19.4.4. |
Ota et al., “Novel Locally Strained Channel Technique for High Performance 55 nm CMOS”, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, Feb. 2002, pp. 27-30. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140103366 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11757883 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 13278667 | US | |
Parent | 10715400 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 11757883 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13278667 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 14105899 | US |