Silicon device on SI:C-OI and SGOI and method of manufacture

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9040373
  • Patent Number
    9,040,373
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 13, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 26, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A semiconductor structure and method of manufacturing is provided. The method of manufacturing includes forming shallow trench isolation (STI) in a substrate and providing a first material and a second material on the substrate. The first material and the second material are mixed into the substrate by a thermal anneal process to form a first island and second island at an nFET region and a pFET region, respectively. A layer of different material is formed on the first island and the second island. The STI relaxes and facilitates the relaxation of the first island and the second island. The first material may be deposited or grown Ge material and the second material may deposited or grown Si:C or C. A strained Si layer is formed on at least one of the first island and the second island.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The invention generally relates to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture and, more particularly, to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture which imposes tensile and compressive stresses in the device during device fabrication.


2. Background Description


Mechanical stresses within a semiconductor device substrate can modulate device performance. That is, stresses within a semiconductor device are known to enhance semiconductor device characteristics. Thus, to improve the characteristics of a semiconductor device, tensile and/or compressive stresses are created in the channel of the n-type devices (e.g., nFETs) and/or p-type devices (e.g., pFETs). However, the same stress component, either tensile stress or compressive stress, discriminatively affects the characteristics of an n-type device and a p-type device.


In order to maximize the performance of both nFETs and pFETs within integrated circuit (IC) chips, the stress components should be engineered and applied differently for nFETs and pFETs. That is, because the type of stress which is beneficial for the performance of an nFET is generally disadvantageous for the performance of the pFET. More particularly, when a device is in tension (e.g., in the direction of current flow in a planar device), the performance characteristics of the nFET are enhanced while the performance characteristics of the pFET are diminished. To selectively create tensile stress in an nFET and compressive stress in a pFET, distinctive processes and different combinations of materials are used.


For example, a trench isolation structure has been proposed for forming the appropriate stresses in the nFETs and pFETs, respectively. When this method is used, the isolation region for the nFET device contains a first isolation material which applies a first type of mechanical stress on the nFET device in a longitudinal direction (e.g., parallel to the direction of current flow) and in a transverse direction (e.g., perpendicular to the direction of current flow). Further, a first isolation region and a second isolation region are provided for the pFET and each of the isolation regions of the pFET device applies a unique mechanical stress on the pFET device in the transverse and longitudinal directions.


Alternatively, liners on gate sidewalls have been proposed to selectively induce the appropriate stresses in the channels of the FET devices (see, Ootsuka et al., IEDM 2000, p. 575, for example). By providing liners, the appropriate stress is applied closer to the device than the stress applied as a result of the trench isolation fill technique.


Also, there have been many proposals to improve both nFET and pFET device performance using tensile and compressive stresses, respectively, which include modulating spacer intrinsic stresses and STI (shallow trench isolation) material changes individually for two MOSFETs using masks. Tensilely strained Si on relaxed SiGe has also been proposed as a means to apply this stress. Unfortunately, the tensilely strained Si on relaxed SiGe can apply only biaxial tensile stress on the Si cap as used in stack form. This constrains the regime of Ge % that is useful because of the nature of pFET sensitivity to stress. The nFET performance monotonically improves with biaxial tension; however, the pFET is degraded with biaxial tension until about 3 GPa at which point it begins to improve.


In order to improve both the pFET and nFET simultaneously, the Ge % needs to be high, approximately greater than 25-30% (or equivalent to approximately greater than 3-4 GPa in stress). This level of Ge % is difficult to implement into processes and is not very manufacturable with major issues including surface roughness, process complexity, defect and yield control, to name but a few. Given that a high Ge % is hard to use for the pFET (since it would be detrimental because of the relatively low levels of tension), other methods must be devised to improve the device performance.


Additionally, Si:C is know to grow epitaxially on Si where it is inherently tensile. A 1% C content in the Si:C/Si material stack can cause tensile stress levels in the Si:C on the order of 500 MPa. In comparison, in the SiGe/Si system about 6% is needed to cause a 500 MPa compression. This 1% level of C can be incorporated into Si during epitaxial growth as shown in Ernst et al., VLSI Symp., 2002, p. 92. In Ernst, the Si/Si:C/Si is in a layered channel for nFETs. However, the Si:C part of the structure is not relaxed. Instead, in Ernst, an unrelaxed Si:C is used as part of the channel, itself, with a very thin Si cap. The problem with this approach is that the mobility is not enhanced, but retarded, depending on the C content, from scattering.


While these methods do provide structures that have tensile stresses being applied to the nFET device and compressive stresses being applied along the longitudinal direction of the pFET device, they may require additional materials and/or more complex processing, and thus, resulting in higher cost. Further, the level of stress that can be applied in these situations is typically moderate (i.e., on the order of 100s of MPa). Thus, it is desired to provide more cost-effective and simplified methods for creating large tensile and compressive stresses in the channels nFETs and pFETs, respectively.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing a structure includes forming shallow trench isolation (STI) in a substrate and providing a first material and a second material on the substrate. The first material and the second material are mixed into the substrate by a thermal anneal process to form a first island and second island at an nFET region and a pFET region, respectively. A layer of different material is formed on the first island and the second island. The STI relaxes and facilitates the relaxation of the first island and the second island. In an embodiment, the first material is deposited or grown Ge material and the second material is deposited or grown Si:C or C.


In another aspect, a method of manufacturing a structure includes forming a substrate and shallow trench isolation in the substrate with a first material. A second material over a pFET region and an nFET region is formed, and is then thermally annealed into the substrate to form a first island and a second island of mixed material. A Si layer is grown on the first island in a first region. The Si layer is strained.


In yet another aspect, the method of manufacturing includes forming a substrate and shallow trench isolation of high temperature stable amorphous material, preferably oxide, in the substrate. The method further includes thermally annealing at least one material into the substrate to form a first island and a second island of mixed material and growing a Si layer on at least the first island. The Si layer is strained. In embodiments:

    • (i) the at least one material is Ge and the first island and the second island is comprised substantially of a mixed material of relaxed SiGe,
    • (ii) the at least one material is C or Si:C and the first island and the second island is comprised substantially of a mixed material of relaxed Si:C, and
    • (iii) the at least one material is Ge and Si:C: or C and the first island are comprised substantially of SiGe and the second island is comprised substantially of Si:C.


In another aspect of the invention, a semiconductor structure includes a substrate and a relaxed shallow trench isolation of high temperature stable amorphous material, preferably oxide, formed in the substrate. A first island of thermally annealed mixed material is formed in the substrate at a pFET region and a second island of thermally annealed mixed material is formed in the substrate at an nFET region. A strained Si layer is formed on at least one of the first island and the second island.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1 through 6 represent a fabrication process to form an intermediate structure in accordance with the invention;



FIGS. 7 through 11 represent a fabrication process to form an intermediate structure in accordance with another aspect of the invention; and



FIGS. 12
a and 12b are representative structures of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

This invention is directed to a semiconductor device and method of manufacture which provides desired stresses in the nFET channel and the pFET channel of CMOS devices for improved device performance. In one approach, a SiGe island is obtained through thermally mixing deposited Ge material into an SOI thin film. Similarly, a Si:C island is obtained through thermally mixing deposited Si:C or C into the Si or SOI thin film. By using the method of the invention, the required Ge % is not large and thus does not cause defect issues. Also, relaxation of SiGe and/or Si:C islands in the channels of the pFET and nFET, respectively, can be achieved by the invention to thus provide improved performance as compared to blanket (SiGe or Si:C) substrates. This is because, in the implementations of the invention, a high temperature thermal mixing step, for example, is provided such that shallow trench isolation (STI) can relax and facilitate the relaxation of the SiGe and Si:C islands.


Prior to the invention, placement of at least two crystal islands with different relaxed crystal lattice (different dimensions between the atoms) was only feasible by wafer bonding techniques where the islands have a relatively large size; however, in the invention, the methods yield a unique substrate with small crystal islands which have a relaxed but different crystal structure. In one implementation, the nontrivial element of such structure is the use of high temperature stable amorphous material, e.g., SiO2, between the islands and the crystal on insulator structure. The unique structure with different (crystal) islands allows for the placement of differently strained layers of optionally different crystals. In a first aspect, the differently strained layers are tensile and compressive Si layers. In another aspect of the invention, the different layers are a tensile Si layer and SiGe layer or a compressive Si layer and Si:C layer.


The invention has a seminal and important contribution to the art of making substrates with islands on insulator with multiple crystal lattice constants. In the invention, for example, a first island (crystal 1) has a lattice constant a≧aSi and the second island (crystal 2) has a lattice constant a≦aSi. In one aspect of the invention, as discussed in greater detail below, a Si epitaxial layer of the invention can be selectively grown, which will strain tensilely and compressively on SiGe and Si:C, respectively. This particular application is suitable, for example, in strained planar nFETs and pFETs.


Additionally, it should be understood that holes are known to have excellent mobility in SiGe, but reliable thermal based oxides are hard to form on this material. However, in one implementation of the invention, a dielectric, high K material, for example, is deposited, such that it is possible to use only relaxed SiGe (crystal 1) for the pFET in tandem with crystal 1 (again relaxed SiGe) with the tensilely strained Si for the nFET. It is also contemplated by the invention to use Si:C with compressively stressed Si for the pFET. Thus, the invention is capable of generalizing to the concept of multiple lattice constant islanded substrates.


Referring now to FIG. 1, a silicon wafer is shown. Such wafers are commercially available starting substrates for various discrete and integrated circuit (IC) semiconductor device applications. In one implementation, silicon on glass (SOI) wafer may be fabricated using the SIMOX (Separation by IMplanted OXygen) process, which employs high dose ion implantation of oxygen and high temperature annealing to form a BOX layer in a bulk wafer. As another example, the wafer can be fabricated by bonding a device quality silicon wafer to another silicon wafer (the substrate layer) that has an oxide layer on its surface. The pair is then split apart, using a process that leaves a thin (relative to the thickness of the starting wafer), device-quality layer of single crystal silicon on top of the oxide layer (which has now become the BOX) on the substrate layer. The SOI wafer may also be formed using other processes.


Still referring to FIG. 1, an Si layer 20 is formed and patterned to form shallow trench isolation (STI) 25 using standard techniques of pad oxidation, pad nitride deposition, lithography based patterning, reactive ion etching (RIE) of the stack consisting of nitride, oxide, and silicon down to the buried oxide, edge oxidation, liner deposition, fill deposition, and chemical mechanical polish. The STI formation process is well known in the art. In one implementation, high temperature stable amorphous material, e.g., SiO2, is used for the STI.


Referring to FIG. 2, an epitaxial Ge material (layer) 30 is deposited over the surface of the structure using conventional techniques such as chemical vapor deposition methods. For example, ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD) may be used in a conventional manner to deposit the Ge layer 30. Other conventional techniques include rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD), limited reaction processing CVD (LRPCVD) and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). In one embodiment, the thickness of the Ge material may range from 5 to 50 nanometers, or other dimension depending on the thickness of the underlying Si layer which may, for example, range from 30 to 100 nanometers.


An nFET hard mask 35 is provided on a portion of the Ge layer 30 (e.g., at locations of a yet to be formed nFET device). The nFET hard mask 35 may be a nitride hard mask formed using a conventional deposition process such as spin-on coating, CVD, plasma-assisted CVD, ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD), rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD), limited reaction processing CVD (LRPCVD) and other like deposition processes.


In FIG. 3, the exposed Ge layer 30 is etched and the nFET mask 35 is stripped using techniques known in the art. For example, the Ge layer 30 may be selectively etched using RIE, wet or dry etching.


As shown in FIG. 4, a Si:C material 40 (or optionally C) is deposited on the structure, including over the epitaxially deposited Ge material 35. For example, ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD) may be used in a conventional manner to deposit the Si:C (or optionally C) material 40. Other conventional techniques include rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD), limited reaction processing CVD (LRPCVD) and other like processes. In one embodiment, the thickness of the Si:C or C material may range from 5 to 50 nanometers, or other dimension depending on the thickness of the underlying Si layer which may, for example, range from 30 to 100 nanometers. In another aspect, when using C, the thickness may range from 1 to 30 nanometers.


A pFET hard mask 45 is provided on a portion of the Si:C material 40 at locations of the yet to be formed pFET. The pFET hard mask 45 may be a nitride hard mask formed using a conventional deposition process such as spin-on coating, CVD, plasma-assisted CVD, ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD), rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD), limited reaction processing CVD (LRPCVD) and other like deposition processes.


As shown in FIG. 5, the exposed Si:C layer 40 is then etched and the pFET mask 45 is stripped using techniques known in the art. For example, the Si:C and pFET may be etched using standard etching techniques such as, for example, RIE, wet or dry etching and the like.


In FIG. 6, the structure then undergoes a thermal annealing process. During this process, for the nFET device, the deposited Ge material 30 is mixed into the underlying SOI film to form an island 50 of substantially SiGe material. Similarly, in this process, for the pFET, the deposited Si:C or optional C material is mixed into the underlying SOI film forming an island 55 of substantially Si:C material. The thermal annealing process takes place, for example, at about 1200° C. to 1350° C. between 1 hour and 10 hours, with one implementation at 1200° C. for approximately 5 hours.


By using the method of the invention, the required Ge % is not large (e.g., less than 25% and in one implementation 10 to 20%) for the nFET and thus does not cause defect issues. Also, due to the high temperature thermal mixing step, for example, the STI 25 can relax and facilitate the relaxation of the SiGe island 50 and Si:C island 55. This is due, in part, because the STI comprises oxide material, which is a viscous material at the high temperature, e.g., becomes a low viscosity material at high temperature.


Also, it should now be understood that the SiGe island 50 and the Si:C island 55 have different relaxed crystal lattice (different dimensions between the atoms) which yield a unique substrate with small crystal islands. The relaxation of the SiGe island 50 and the Si:C island 55 provides improved performance as compared to blanket (SiGe or Si:C) substrates. In an implementation, high temperature stable amorphous material, e.g., SiO2, between the SiGe island 50 and the Si:C island 55 and the crystal on insulator structure are thus used in accordance with the invention.


As further shown in FIG. 6, a Si epitaxial layer 60 is selectively grown on the SiGe island 50 and the Si:C island 55 by known processes. In one aspect of the invention, the selectively grown Si epitaxial layer 60 will strain tensilely and compressively on the SiGe island and the Si:C island, respectively. The Si layer 60 may range in thickness, for example, between 5 and 20 nanometers. As with all dimensions and the like, it is contemplated that other dimensions, temperatures, etc. may be used with the invention depending on, for example, the thickness of the underlying substrate.


Now, in implementation, the SiGe island 50 has a lattice constant a≧aSi and the Si:C island 55 has a lattice constant a≦aSi. That is, standing alone, the Si normally has a lower lattice constant than the SiGe layer; namely, the lattice constant of the Si material does not match the lattice constant of the SiGe layer. However, in the structure of the invention, the lattice structure of the Si layer will tend to match the lattice structure of the SiGe island. Thus, by virtue of the lattice matching of the Si (which normally is smaller) to the SiGe layer, the Si layer is placed under a tensile stress. This area will act as a strained channel for the nFET. In one embodiment, the Ge content of the SiGe layer may be less than 25% in ratio to the Si content.


Also, standing alone, Si would normally have a larger lattice constant than the Si:C island. That is, the lattice constant of the Si material does not match the lattice constant of the Si:C. However, in the structure of the invention, the lattice structure of the Si layer will tend to match the lattice structure of the Si:C. By virtue of the lattice matching of the Si (which normally is larger) to the Si:C island, the Si layer is placed under a compressive stress. That is, similar to the occurrence with the SiGe, the surrounding areas of the Si:C island will try to obtain an equilibrium state thus resulting in a compressive stress of an epitaxial Si layer formed on the Si:C island. This area will act as a strained channel for the pFET. In one embodiment, as deposited, the C content may be from about up to 4% in ratio to the Si content.



FIGS. 7-11 show another aspect of the invention. In FIG. 7, a silicon wafer such as SOI is shown. As in the previously described structure, the SOI may be fabricated using the SIMOX process or other well known processes. An Si layer 20 is patterned to form shallow trench isolation (STI) 25 using standard techniques of pad oxidation, pad nitride deposition, lithography based patterning, reactive ion etching (RIE) of the stack consisting of nitride, oxide, and silicon down to the buried oxide, edge oxidation, liner deposition, fill deposition, and chemical mechanical polish. The STI formation process is well known in the art.


Referring to FIG. 8, a pFET mask 40 is provided on a portion of the structure at locations of the yet to be formed pFET. The pFET hard mask may be deposited using convention techniques such as chemical vapor deposition methods. For example, such techniques may include spin-on coating, CVD, plasma-assisted CVD, evaporation ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD), rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition (RTCVD), limited reaction processing CVD (LRPCVD) and other like deposition processes.


An epitaxial Ge layer 30 is selectively grown over the exposed surface of the yet to be formed nFET using conventional techniques. In one embodiment, the thickness of the Ge material may range from 5 to 50 nanometers, or other dimension depending on the thickness of the underlying Si layer which may, for example, range from 30 to 100 nanometers. The hard mask 45 is stripped using well known processes, as discussed above.


In FIG. 9, an nFET mask 35 is provided on a portion of the structure at locations of the yet to be formed nFET. The nFET hard mask may be deposited using conventional techniques such as chemical vapor deposition methods as discussed throughout and which should be known to those of ordinary skill.


An Si:C layer 40 is selectively grown over the exposed surface of the structure at the yet to be formed pFET using conventional techniques such as chemical vapor deposition method, as discussed above. In one embodiment, the thickness of the Si:C material may range from 5 to 50 nanometers, or other dimension depending on the thickness of the underlying Si layer which may, for example, range from 30 to 100 nanometers. The C may even be thinner ranging from 1 to 50 nanometers.


As shown in FIG. 10, the nFET hard mask 35 is then removed using well known processes. The structure then undergoes a thermal annealing process. During the annealing process, for the nFET device, the Ge material 30 is mixed into the SOI film forming an island 50 of substantially SiGe material. Similarly, for the pFET, the Si:C or optionally C material is mixed into the SOI film forming an island 55 of substantially Si:C material. This process also forms a BOX layer, as the substrate. The thermal annealing process takes place, for example, at about 1200° C. to 1350° C. between 1 hour and 10 hours, with one implementation at 1200° C. for approximately 5 hours.


As discussed above, and similar to the previous implementations, by using the method of the invention, the required Ge % is not large (e.g., less than 25% and in one implementation from 10 to 20%) and thus does not cause defect issues. Also, due to the high temperature thermal mixing, for example, the STI 25 can relax and facilitate the relaxation of the SiGe island 50 and Si:C island 55. As previously discussed, the relaxation of SiGe and Si:C provides improved performance as compared to blanket (SiGe or Si:C) substrates. In one implementation of the invention, the element of such structure is the use of high temperature stable amorphous material, e.g., SiO2, between the islands and the crystal on insulator structure.


As further shown in FIG. 11, Si epitaxial material 60 is selectively grown on the SiGe island 50 and Si:C island 55. The Si layer 60 may range in thickness, for example, between 5 and 20 nanometers. In this aspect of the invention, the different layers become a tensile Si layer or a compressive Si layer. The tensile Si layer will act as a strained channel for the nFET and the compressive Si layer will act as a strained channel for the pFET.


In another aspect of the invention, C can be implanted at high dose into the pFET region which can produce concentrations much greater than the 1-4% C in the Si:C upon thermal annealing. The dose may be about 1 e 16#/cm2 or greater such as 5 e 16#/cm2.


In the illustrative example of FIG. 12a, in one implementation, SiGe may be used for both the nFET and the pFET, excluding Si:C or C. In this implementation, a strained Si will be placed on the nFET region but not on the pFET region. Upon fabrication, the nFET will then be in a tensile stress. A high K dielectric 100, though, to begin the fabrication process of the device, is then selectively grown on the structure; that is, the high K dielectric 100 may be grown over the strained Si layer and the exposed SiGe layer. The high K dielectric 100 may be zirconium oxide or aluminum oxide, for example.


Alternatively, Si:C may be used for both the nFET and the pFET, excluding SiGe. In this implementation, a strained Si will be placed on the pFET region but not on the nFET region. Upon fabrication, the pFET will then be in a compressive stress. A high K dielectric 100, though, to begin the fabrication of the device, is then selectively grown on the structure; that is, the high K dielectric 100 may be grown over the strained Si layer and the exposed Si:C layer. The high K dielectric 100 may be zirconium oxide or aluminum oxide, for example. This is also representative of FIG. 12b. The processes for using Si:C or SiGe remain the same, as discussed above.


The structures formed, as shown in FIG. 6, FIG. 11 and FIGS. 12a and 12b, are intermediate structures that accommodate formation of semiconductor devices, such as pFETs and nFETs, in accordance with the principles of the invention. To form the final device, standard CMOS processes may be performed to form devices such as field effect transistors on the structure, as is well known in the art. For example, the devices may include ion implantation of source and drain regions separated by the semi-conducting channel of strained Si (or Si and SiGe and Si and Si:C). That is, the nFET will be formed over the tensilely strained Si channel and the pFET will be formed over the compressively strained Si channel. A gate oxide is provided atop the strained Si channel, and a gate conductor is provided on top of the gate oxide. Spacers are also provided. These components are found in typical field effect transistors and further explanation is not needed for one of ordinary skill in the art to readily understand the fabrication process of the FET device.


While the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, the invention can be readily applicable to bulk substrates.

Claims
  • 1. A semiconductor structure, comprising: a substrate;a shallow trench isolation (STI) in the substrate;a first island of mixed material and a second island of mixed material in the substrate, wherein the first island and the second island have a different relaxed crystal lattice with different dimensions between atoms; anda first Si layer on the first island and a second Si layer on the second island,wherein the STI is high temperature stable amorphous material.
  • 2. The semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein the first Si layer is strained and the second Si layer is strained.
  • 3. The semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein the STI comprises a material that has a lower viscosity as the temperature rises.
  • 4. The semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein the first island has a lattice constant a≧aSi and the second island has a lattice constant a≦aSi.
  • 5. The semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein: the first island comprises SiGe and contacts the STI; andthe second island comprises Si:C and contacts the STI.
  • 6. The semiconductor structure of claim 5, wherein: the first Si island is tensile strained; andthe second Si island is compressive strained.
  • 7. A semiconductor structure, comprising: a substrate;a shallow trench isolation (STI) in the substrate;a first island of mixed material and a second island of mixed material in the substrate. wherein the first island and the second island have a different relaxed crystal lattice with different dimensions between atoms; anda first Si layer on the first island and a second Si layer on the second island,wherein one of the first Si layer and the second Si layer is tensile strained, and another one of the first Si layer and the second Si layer is compressively strained, respectively.
  • 8. A semiconductor structure, comprising: a substrate;a shallow trench isolation (STI) in the substrate;a first island of SiGe in the substrate and contacting the STI;a second island of Si:C in the substrate and contacting the STI;a first strained Si layer on the first island; anda second strained Si layer on the second island.
  • 9. The semiconductor structure of claim 8, wherein the first island and the second island have a different relaxed crystal lattice with different dimensions between atoms.
  • 10. The semiconductor structure of claim 8, wherein the STI is high temperature stable amorphous material.
  • 11. The semiconductor structure of claim 8, wherein the STI comprises a material that has a lower viscosity as the temperature rises.
  • 12. The semiconductor structure of claim 8, wherein the first island has a lattice constant a≧aSi and the second island has a lattice constant a≦aSi.
  • 13. The semiconductor structure of claim 8, wherein: the first Si island is tensile strained; andthe second Si island is compressive strained.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/278,667, filed on Oct. 21, 2011, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/757,883, filed on Jun. 4, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,119,472, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/715,400, filed on Nov. 19, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,247,534, the contents of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (164)
Number Name Date Kind
3602841 McGroddy Aug 1971 A
4478655 Nagakubo et al. Oct 1984 A
4665415 Esaki et al. May 1987 A
4853076 Tsaur et al. Aug 1989 A
4855245 Neppl et al. Aug 1989 A
4952524 Lee et al. Aug 1990 A
4958213 Eklund et al. Sep 1990 A
5006913 Sugahara et al. Apr 1991 A
5060030 Hoke Oct 1991 A
5081513 Jackson et al. Jan 1992 A
5108843 Ohtaka et al. Apr 1992 A
5134085 Gilgen et al. Jul 1992 A
5310446 Konishi et al. May 1994 A
5354695 Leedy Oct 1994 A
5371399 Burroughes et al. Dec 1994 A
5391510 Hsu et al. Feb 1995 A
5459346 Asakawa et al. Oct 1995 A
5471948 Burroughes et al. Dec 1995 A
5557122 Shrivastava et al. Sep 1996 A
5561302 Candelaria Oct 1996 A
5565697 Asakawa et al. Oct 1996 A
5571741 Leedy Nov 1996 A
5592007 Leedy Jan 1997 A
5592018 Leedy Jan 1997 A
5670798 Schetzina Sep 1997 A
5679965 Schetzina Oct 1997 A
5683934 Candelaria Nov 1997 A
5698869 Yoshimi et al. Dec 1997 A
5763905 Harris Jun 1998 A
5840593 Leedy Nov 1998 A
5861651 Brasen et al. Jan 1999 A
5879996 Forbes Mar 1999 A
5880040 Sun et al. Mar 1999 A
5891769 Liaw et al. Apr 1999 A
5898203 Yoshitomi et al. Apr 1999 A
5940716 Jin et al. Aug 1999 A
5940736 Brady et al. Aug 1999 A
5946559 Leedy Aug 1999 A
5960297 Saki Sep 1999 A
5981356 Hsueh et al. Nov 1999 A
5989978 Peidos Nov 1999 A
5994756 Umezawa et al. Nov 1999 A
6008126 Leedy Dec 1999 A
6025280 Brady et al. Feb 2000 A
6046464 Schetzina Apr 2000 A
6066545 Doshi et al. May 2000 A
6080637 Huang et al. Jun 2000 A
6090684 Ishitsuka et al. Jul 2000 A
6093621 Tseng Jul 2000 A
6107143 Park et al. Aug 2000 A
6117722 Wuu et al. Sep 2000 A
6133071 Nagai Oct 2000 A
6165383 Chou Dec 2000 A
6221735 Manley et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228694 Doyle et al. May 2001 B1
6246095 Brady et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255169 Li et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261964 Wu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265317 Chiu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271100 Ballantine et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274444 Wang Aug 2001 B1
6281532 Doyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6284623 Zhang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6284626 Kim Sep 2001 B1
6361885 Chou Mar 2002 B1
6362082 Doyle et al. Mar 2002 B1
6365484 Nowak et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368931 Kuhn et al. Apr 2002 B1
6399970 Kubo et al. Jun 2002 B2
6403486 Lou Jun 2002 B1
6403975 Brunner et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406973 Lee Jun 2002 B1
6410371 Yu et al. Jun 2002 B1
6461936 Von Ehrenwall Oct 2002 B1
6476462 Shimizu et al. Nov 2002 B2
6483171 Forbes Nov 2002 B1
6492216 Yeo et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493497 Ramdani et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498358 Lach et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501121 Yu et al. Dec 2002 B1
6506652 Jan et al. Jan 2003 B2
6509618 Myers et al. Jan 2003 B2
6521964 Jan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6531369 Ozkan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6531740 Bosco et al. Mar 2003 B2
6551871 Takamura Apr 2003 B2
6583060 Trivedi Jun 2003 B2
6620664 Ma et al. Sep 2003 B2
6696348 Xiang Feb 2004 B1
6703271 Yeo et al. Mar 2004 B2
6717216 Baie et al. Apr 2004 B1
6724290 Ohnmacht et al. Apr 2004 B1
6743705 Mehrotra et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764908 Kadosh et al. Jul 2004 B1
6774409 Baba et al. Aug 2004 B2
6825529 Chidambarrao et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831292 Currie et al. Dec 2004 B2
6855642 Tanabe et al. Feb 2005 B2
6891192 Chen et al. May 2005 B2
6900103 Fitzgerald May 2005 B2
6905923 Paton et al. Jun 2005 B1
6939814 Chan et al. Sep 2005 B2
6974981 Chidambarrao et al. Dec 2005 B2
6977194 Belyansky et al. Dec 2005 B2
6982229 Suvkhanov et al. Jan 2006 B2
7015082 Doris et al. Mar 2006 B2
7034362 Rim Apr 2006 B2
7037770 Chidambarrao et al. May 2006 B2
7049660 Bedell et al. May 2006 B2
7115954 Shimizu et al. Oct 2006 B2
7138310 Currie et al. Nov 2006 B2
7198995 Chidambarrao et al. Apr 2007 B2
7303949 Chen et al. Dec 2007 B2
7342289 Huang et al. Mar 2008 B2
20010003364 Sugarawa et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010009784 Ma et al. Jul 2001 A1
20020061615 Kawagoe et al. May 2002 A1
20020063292 Armstrong et al. May 2002 A1
20020074598 Doyle et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020086472 Roberds et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020086497 Kwok Jul 2002 A1
20020090791 Doyle et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030032261 Yeh et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040158 Saitoh Feb 2003 A1
20030057184 Yu et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030067035 Tews et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030162348 Yeo et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040005750 Chen et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040029323 Shimizu et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040106267 Beyer et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040124476 Miyano Jul 2004 A1
20040132267 Sadana et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040135138 Hsu et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040142537 Lee et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040150042 Yeo et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040195623 Ge et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040212035 Yeo et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040217437 Franke et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040238914 Deshpande et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040253776 Hoffmann et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040256614 Ouyang et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262683 Bohr et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262784 Doris et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050035470 Ko et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050040460 Chidambarrao et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050082616 Chen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050082634 Doris et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050085022 Chidambarrao et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050093030 Doris et al. May 2005 A1
20050093104 Ieong et al. May 2005 A1
20050098829 Doris et al. May 2005 A1
20050106799 Doris et al. May 2005 A1
20050145954 Zhu et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050148146 Doris et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050194699 Belyansky et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050236668 Zhu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245017 Belyansky et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050280051 Chidambarrao et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050282325 Belyansky et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060027868 Doris et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060057787 Doris et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060060925 Doris et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060220119 Lin et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070298566 Moroz et al. Dec 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
6476755 Mar 1989 JP
07169926 Jul 1995 JP
07183237 Jul 1995 JP
0897163 Apr 1996 JP
2002203912 Jul 2002 JP
2002217413 Aug 2002 JP
2005039171 Feb 2005 JP
19980024235 Oct 1998 KR
20030058571 Jul 2003 KR
0243151 May 2002 WO
2005013375 Feb 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (29)
Entry
Dearnaley, et al., “Electrical Phenomena in Amorphous Oxide Films”, Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 33, No. 3; Sep. 1970, pp. 112-1191.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 5, 2007 in PCT Application No. PCT/US04/20904.
Ray et al. “Comparison of Si1-yCy Films Produced by Solid-Phase Epitaxy and Rapid Thermal Chemical Vapour Deposition”, Thin Solid Films Elsevier-Sequoia S.A. Lausanne, CH, vol. 294, No. 1-2; Feb. 15, 1997, pp. 149-152.
Kobayashi et al., “Synthesis of Metastable Group-IV Alloy Semiconductors by Ion Implantation and Ion-Beam-Induced Epitaxial Crystallization”, Applied Surface Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 100-101, Jul. 2, 1996, pp. 498-502.
Randa et al., “A Novel Elevated Source/Drain PMosfet formed by Ge-B/Si Intermixing”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, Issue 4, Apr. 2002, pp. 218-220.
Zhang et al., “A New ‘Mixed-Mode’ Reliability Degradation Mechanism in Advanced Si and SiGe Bipolar Transistors”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 49, No. 12, Dec. 2002, pp. 2151-2156.
Momose et al., “Temperature Dependence on Emitter-Base Reverse Stress Degradation and its Mechanism Analyzed by MOS Structures”, IEEE Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting, Sep. 18-19, 1989, pp. 140-143.
Huang et al., “Temperature Dependence and Post-Stress Recovery of Hot Electron Degradation Effects in Bipolar Transistors”, IEEE Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting, Sep. 9-10, 1991, pp. 170-173.
Sheng et al. ,“Degradation and Recovery of SiGe HBTs Following Radiation and Hot-Carrier Stressing”, IEEE Semiconductor Device Research Symposium, Dec. 10-12, 2003, pp. 14-15.
Yang et al., “Avalanche Current Induced Hot Carrier Degradation in 200 Ghz SiGe Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors”, IEEE Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings, Mar. 30-Apr. 4, 2003, pp. 339-434.
Li et al., “Design of W-Band VCOs with High Output Power for Potential Application in 77 GHz Automotive Radar Systems”, IEEE Gallium Arsenide Integrated Circuit (GaAs IC) Symposium, Nov. 9-12, 2003, pp. 263-266.
Wurzer et al., “Annealing of Degraded Non-Transistors-Mechanisms and Modeling”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 41, No. 4, Apr. 1994, pp. 533-538.
Doyle et al., “Recovery of Hot Carrier Damage in Reoxidized Nitrided Oxide MOSFETs”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 1992, pp. 38-40.
Momose et al., “Analysis of the Temperature Dependence of Hot Carrier-Induced Degradation in Bipolar Transistors for Bi-CMOS”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 41, No. 6, Jun. 1994, pp. 178-987.
Khater et al., “SiGe HBT Technology with Fmax/Ft=350/300 Ghz and Gate Delay Below 3.3 ps”, Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 13-15, 2004, pp. 247-250.
Bean et al., “GEz Si 1-x/Si Strained-Layer Superlattice Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2 (2), Apr.-Jun. 1984, pp. 436-440.
Van Der Merwe, “Regular Articles”, Journal of Applied Physics, Vo. 34, No. 1, Jan. 1963, pp. 117-122.
Matthews et al., “Defects in Epitaxial Multilayers”, Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 27; 1974, pp. 118-125.
Iyer et al., “Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors Using a Si-Ge Alloys”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 36, No. 10, Oct. 1989, pp. 2043-2064.
Van De Leur et al., “Critical Thickness for Pseudomorphic Growth of Si/Ge Alloys and Superlattices”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 64, No. 6, Sep. 15, 1988, pp. 3043-3050.
Houghton et al., “Equilibrium Critical Thickness for Si 1-x GEx Strained Layers on (100) Si”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 56, No. 5, Jan. 29, 1990, pp. 460-462.
Quyant et al., “Two-Dimensional Bandgap Engineering in Novel Si/SiGe pMOSFET with Enhanced Device Performance and Scalability”, IEEE, 2000, pp. 151-154.
Rim et al., “Transconductance Enhancement in Deep Submicron Strained-Si n-MOSFETs”, IEEE International Electron Device Meeting, Dec. 6-9, 1998, pp. 707-710.
Rim et al., “Characteristics and Device Design of Sub-100 nm Strained Si N- and PMOSFETs”, IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, Jun. 11-13, 2002, pp. 98-99.
Scott et al., “NMOS Drive Current Reduction Caused by Transistor Layout and Trench Isolation Induced Stress”, IEEE Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 5-8, 1999, pp. 827-830.
Ootsuka et al., “A Highly Dense, High-Performance 130 nm Node CMOS Technology for Large Scale System-on-a-Chip Application”, IEEE Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 10-13, 2000, pp. 575-578.
Shinya et al., “Mechanical-Stress Effect of Etch-Stop Nitride and its Impact on Deep Submicron Transistor Design”, IEEE Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 10-13, 2000, pp. 247-250.
Shimizu et al., “Local Mechanical-Stress Control (LMC): New Technique for CMOS-Performance Enhancement”, IEEE Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 2-5, 2001, pp. 19.4.1-19.4.4.
Ota et al., “Novel Locally Strained Channel Technique for High Performance 55 nm CMOS”, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, Feb. 2002, pp. 27-30.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140103366 A1 Apr 2014 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11757883 Jun 2007 US
Child 13278667 US
Parent 10715400 Nov 2003 US
Child 11757883 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13278667 Oct 2011 US
Child 14105899 US