The invention relates to the field of MOS transistors, particularly those fabricated with epitaxial source and drain regions.
Delta-doped transistors are described in Noda et al. “0.1 μm Delta-Doped MOSFET Using Post Low Energy Implanting Selective Epitaxy,” VLSI Technology 1994, Digest of Technical Papers. The motivation for the Delta-doped transistor is that higher mobility (less impurity scattering) is achieved with an un-doped or lightly doped channel. Such devices are also described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,060,576, titled “Epitaxially Deposited Source/Drain,” assigned to the assignee of the present application.
The fabrication of these transistors relies in large part upon the difference in the doping levels between the heavily doped substrate and the lightly doped or un-doped epitaxially formed surface of the substrate. An etchant is able to discriminate between the surface region and the main body of the substrate because of this difference in doping levels. One problem that occurs, however, is that when the gate structures are formed, relatively high temperature processing is needed to, for instance, activate the doping in a polysilicon gate. This causes the diffusion of the dopant from the substrate into the channel region, thereby deteriorating the performance of the transistors.
A process for fabricating complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) field-effect transistors and the resultant transistors are described. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth such as specific dopant concentration levels, specific chemicals, etc. in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required to practice the present invention. In other instances, well-known processing steps, such as cleaning steps, are not described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the following disclosure.
In
Following the doping of the substrate, a epitaxial layer, shown as a monocrystalline silicon layer 12, is formed on the upper surface of the substrate 10. For instance, the deposition of the epitaxial silicon layer 12 is carried out using dichloro-silane based chemistry in a single wafer CVD reactor, such as ASM E3000 reactor. The film is deposited with gas flows of 140-250 sccm of dicholoro silane (SiH2Cl2), 100-150 sccm HCl, 20 slm of H2 at 825° C. and a process pressure of 20 Torr. Under these processing conditions, a deposition rate of 10-15 nm/min is achieved for silicon on the exposed substrate while achieving an excellent selectivity for spacer and oxide regions. The layer 12 may have the thickness of approximately 85 nm, and its doping concentration will be, for example, less than 1/100 of the buried peak doping concentration of the substrate.
Following the formation of the layer 12, an insulative layer 13 is formed on layer 10. Layer 13 may be a thin, thermally grown oxide layer or a deposited silicon dioxide layer. Next, a polysilicon layer 14 is deposited on the insulative layer 13. As will be seen, gates formed from the layer 14 are sacrificial. They are subsequently removed and metal is substituted for the regions occupied by these polysilicon gates. A hard mask 15 is formed on the polysilicon layer 14.
Next, as shown in
As shown in
Now, the layer 12 is etched to form a channel body 12a. The etching undercuts the gate structure as shown by the undercuts 20 in
The layer 12 may be etched with a variety of hydroxide-based solutions. However, for high selectivity to the heavily doped substrate, relatively mild processing conditions and a wet etchant are employed. One method is treatment with an aqueous ammonium hydroxide solution in the concentration range 2-10% by volume at 25 degrees Celsius with a sonication transducer which dissipates ultra- or mega-sonic energy at a power of 0.5 to 5 W/cm2.
Source and drain regions are then grown to establish a shallow, highly doped source/drain tip (extension) that laterally extends the distance under the gate edge to the channel body 12a. Separate processing is used for the p-channel and n-channel transistors with each of the source and drain regions being grown in different processing steps, both with in-situ doping. This results in the source and drain regions being highly doped, in one case with a p-type dopant, and in the other case with an n-type dopant.
In forming a PMOS transistor, the source/drain extension (tip) are raised source/drain regions formed by selectively depositing epitaxial boron (B) doped silicon or SiGe with germanium concentrations up to 30%. Under the processing conditions of 100 sccm of dichlorosilane (DCS), 20 slm H2, 750-800° C., 20 Torr, 150-200 sccm HCl, a diborane (B2H6) flow of 150-200 sccm and aGeH4 flow of 150-200 sccm, a highly doped SiGe film with a deposition rate of 20 nm/min, B concentration of 1E20 cm−3 and a germanium concentration of 20% is achieved. A low resistivity of 0.7-0.9 mOhm-cm resulting from the high B concentration in the film provides the benefit of high conductivity in the tip source/drain regions and thereby reduced Rexternal. SiGe in the source/drain regions exerts compressive strain on the channel, which in turn results in enhanced mobility and improved transistor performance.
For an NMOS transistor, the source/drain regions are formed using in-situ phosphorous doped silicon deposited selectively under processing conditions of 100 sccm of DCS, 25-50 sccm HCl, 200-300 sccm of 1% Ph3 with a carrier H2 gas flow of 20 slm at 750° C. and 20 Torr. A phosphorous concentration of 2E20 cm−3 with a resistivity of 0.4-0.6 mOhm-cm is achieved in the deposited film.
After the source/drain regions are formed as illustrated in
Ion implantation now occurs to from the source/drain regions 26 in the substrate 10. Again, separate ion implantation processes are used for the p-type dopant and n-type dopant. The regions 26 may be implanted to a level of 1020 atoms/cm3.
As shown in
In
Now, CMP is used to provide a planarized surface and to remove the salicide from the top of the gates 14b and 14c. The resultant structure is illustrated in
Next, a photoresist layer 32 is formed over the p-channel transistors, and a wet etchant is used to remove the polysilicon from the n-channel transistors. The underlying insulative layer is also removed, forming the opening 34 depicted in
Now, as shown in
CMP is next used to planarize the surface, thereby removing the metal layer 38, except within the region formerly occupied by the polysilicon, gate. The resultant gate 38b and the underlying insulative layer 37b are illustrated in
A wet etchant is used to remove the polysilicon gate associated with the p-channel transistors. Again, the underlying insulative layer is also removed so that a more appropriate insulative layer may be formed. The opening 42 of
A metal layer 44 is formed over the structure of
After the deposition of the p-metal, CMP is used to planarize the structure with the resultant structure being shown in
There are several advantages to the transistors of
The shallow tip junction depths allow fabrication of shorter gate lengths without increasing off-state leakage current. Tip doping is needed under the gate edge to assure a low resistance path between the inversion layer under the gate and the highly doped source/drain tip region. The low resistance permits higher drive currents which are critical for circuit switching speed.
An advantage of the metal gate is that the processing can occur at lower temperatures. This is in addition to the better performance achieved with the metal gate when compared to a polysilicon gate. In the processing described above, lower temperature options are used to reduce the total thermal exposure. This as mentioned earlier, prevents the dopant from the substrate from diffusing into the channel region.
Thus, a delta-doped transistor with a metal gate and method of fabrication have been described.
The present patent application is a Divisional of application Ser. No. 10/955,669, filed Sep. 29, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,332,439.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4198250 | Jecmen | Apr 1980 | A |
5627097 | Venkatesan et al. | May 1997 | A |
6171910 | Hobbs et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6214679 | Murthy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6326664 | Chau et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6524920 | Yu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6753230 | Sohn et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6777761 | Clevenger et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6881987 | Sohn | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7078284 | Trivedi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084025 | Phua et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20030011037 | Chau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030107088 | Inumiya et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050087801 | Lindert et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1416156 | May 2003 | CN |
58-201363 | Nov 1983 | JP |
WO2005041288 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080142840 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10955669 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 12011439 | US |