Solid state drive (SSD) devices commonly employ NAND flash memory chips and a flash controller to manage the flash memory and to transfer data between the flash memory and a host computer. Uncorrectable Bit Error Rates (UBER) requirements for client and enterprise Solid State Drives (SSD's) are very stringent, requiring UBER of 10−15 for client SSD's and 10−16 for enterprise SSD's. Error correction codes have been widely adopted to obtain the low Bit Error Rate (BER) required to achieve these low UBER requirements. Driven by cost, the NAND industry keeps pushing hard on process technology shrink. Technology shrink has been successful in increasing the number of Gbit per mm2, but this success has resulted in increased BER of NAND flash memory chips and SSD's that use NAND flash memory chips.
Standard read operations are performed over the lifetime of the SSD. However, as the NAND devices in the SSD age and are subjected to numerous read, program and erase (P/E) cycles, the BER increases, ultimately resulting in decode failures in which the decoding process is unsuccessful in recovering the stored codeword. Conventional flash management techniques have extended the lifetime of SSD's by performing a read retry immediately after a failed standard read operation, allowing the SSD to recover the codeword that was not recovered in the original read operation. However, the price that is paid for this extension of the SSD's life is increased read latency. When read retry is triggered as a result of a decode failure, the latency of the SSD is increased by the time required to perform the standard read operation plus the time required for the read retry operation. This presents a problem. Accordingly, there is a need for a method and apparatus that will reduce read latency and that will meet stringent UBER requirements.
A nonvolatile memory system is disclosed that includes a status circuit configured to determine at least one usage characteristic of a nonvolatile memory device. A background reference positioning circuit is coupled to the status circuit and is configured to perform, upon the occurrence of one or more of an endurance event, a retention timer event and a read disturb event at a closed block, background reads of representative pages of each page group of the closed block at offsets to each threshold voltage that is required for reading the representative pages of each page group of the closed block to identify a set of updated threshold voltage offset values for each page group of the closed block. A read circuit is coupled to the status circuit and to the background reference positioning circuit. The read circuit is configured to determine whether a determined usage characteristic meets a usage characteristic threshold. When the usage characteristic is determined to meet the usage characteristic threshold, the read circuit is configured to perform subsequent host-requested reads of the nonvolatile memory device using a threshold voltage shift read instruction, and wherein subsequent host-requested reads of pages of the closed block are performed using the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read.
A method for reducing latency of a nonvolatile memory controller is disclosed that includes identifying a plurality of page groups in each block of a nonvolatile memory device. After a block of the nonvolatile memory device is closed, and upon the occurrence of one or more of an endurance event, a retention timer event and a read disturb event at the closed block, background reads of representative pages of each page group of the closed block are performed at offsets to each threshold voltage that is required for reading the representative pages of each page group of the closed block to identify a set of updated threshold voltage offset values for each page group of the closed block. The method further includes determining whether a usage characteristic of the nonvolatile memory device meets a usage characteristic threshold and when a usage characteristic is determined to meet the usage characteristic threshold, performing subsequent host-requested reads of pages of the closed block using a threshold voltage shift read instruction and using the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention, and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A nonvolatile memory system 1 is shown in
Nonvolatile memory controller 11 is configured to receive read and write instructions from a host computer through host connector receptacle 12 of
In the present embodiment each nonvolatile memory device 20 is a packaged semiconductor die or “chip” that is coupled to nonvolatile memory controller 11 by conductive pathways that couple instructions, data and other information between each nonvolatile memory device 20 and nonvolatile memory controller 11. In the embodiment shown in
Referring now to
An exemplary memory array 30 is shown in
In the embodiment shown in
Threshold voltage shift reads are performed by sending a threshold voltage shift read instruction to a NAND device 20 that includes one or more threshold voltage offset value that is to be used by the NAND device 20 in performing the read. Threshold voltage offset values, that may also be referred to hereinafter as simply “offset values” or “offsets” indicate the amount by which the threshold voltage that is used to perform the read is to be offset from a corresponding default threshold voltage and are specified by the manufacturer of the NAND device 20. In the present embodiment NAND devices 20 will perform threshold voltage shift reads using offset values of −2, −1, 0, +1 and +2. For MLC NAND devices and TLC NAND devices, reads are required at more than one threshold voltage to identify the value of a particular bit. Therefore, threshold voltage shift read instructions for MLC NAND or TLC NAND devices 20 will include two or more threshold voltage offset values, one threshold voltage offset value for each voltage position required to identify the particular bit being read. In response to receiving a threshold voltage shift read instruction that includes the required threshold voltage offset values, NAND device 20 is operable to perform reads at threshold voltages corresponding to the indicated threshold voltage offset values to generate a codeword that indicates the read results.
An erased block of a NAND 20 may be referred to as a “free block.” When data is programmed into a block the block is referred to as an “open block” until all pages of the block have been programmed. Once all pages of the block have been programmed the block is referred to as a “closed block” until it is erased.
Nonvolatile memory controller 11 includes write circuit 2, memory storage 4, a status circuit 3 that is coupled to a read circuit 9, a background reference positioning (BRP) circuit 6 that is coupled to status circuit 3 and to read circuit 9, a decoder circuit 8 that is coupled to read circuit 9 and a local reference positioning (LRP) circuit 7. Memory storage 4 is configured to store data indicating threshold voltage shift read parameters and corresponding index values. In one embodiment data indicating threshold voltage shift read parameters and corresponding index values are stored in memory storage 4 on nonvolatile memory controller 11. Alternatively, the data indicating threshold voltage shift read parameters and corresponding index values can be stored in one or more nonvolatile memory devices 20 or in a separate discrete device 13 that may be, for example a DRAM. In the present embodiment the threshold voltage shift read parameters are stored in one or more tables shown as background reference positioning (BRP) table 5.
Status circuit 3 is configured to determine usage characteristics of nonvolatile memory devices 20. The determined usage characteristics may be stored in memory storage 4 of nonvolatile memory controller 11. Alternatively, the determined usage characteristics can be stored in one or more nonvolatile memory devices 20 or in a separate discrete device 13 that may be, for example a DRAM. The term “usage characteristic” as used in the present invention is a value determined during usage of a nonvolatile memory device that indicates the historical usage of the nonvolatile memory device up to a particular point in time which may be, without limitation, the number of program and erase cycles or the bit error rate (BER) of a block or a group of blocks of a nonvolatile memory device 20.
Wordlines are grouped into topological groups (upper pages, middle pages and lower pages) and in categories according to their topological shifting behavior. In the present embodiment topological shifting behavior is categorized by assigning different wordlines to different categories. In one illustrative embodiment wordlines are grouped into the following categories:
First: wordline 0 to wordline 24.
Second: wordline 25 to wordline 84.
Third: wordline 85 to wordline 119.
Fourth: wordline 120 to wordline 127.
It can be seen that different wordline groups do not necessarily include the same number of wordlines or the same number of memory cells. In the present embodiment wordline groups are determined by analyzing the characteristics of NAND devices in a lab to identify groupings that have similar error behavior. In the present illustrative embodiment nonvolatile memory devices 20 are TLC NAND devices in which each memory cell can store three different bits of information. Since there are three page types in a TLC NAND device, this gives the following page groups:
Page Group 1: upper pages of wordlines 0-24.
Page Group 2: middle pages of wordlines 0-24.
Page Group 3: lower pages of wordlines 0-24.
Page Group 4: upper pages of wordlines 25-84.
Page Group 5: middle pages of wordlines 25-84.
Page Group 6: lower pages of wordlines 25-84.
Page Group 7: upper pages of wordlines 85-119.
Page Group 8: middle pages of wordlines 85-119.
Page Group 9: lower pages of wordlines 85-119.
Page Group 10: upper pages of wordlines 120-127.
Page Group 11: middle pages of wordlines 120-127.
Page Group 12: lower pages of wordlines 120-127.
Accordingly, in an embodiment in which nonvolatile memory device system 1 includes 128 nonvolatile memory devices, and 2048 blocks per nonvolatile memory device, system 1 will include 3,145,728 (128×2048×12) page groups.
In one embodiment, in addition to grouping pages, blocks are grouped to reduce the number of page groups that need to be managed. In one exemplary embodiment the blocks of each nonvolatile memory device are divided into 32 block groups that may correspond to channels of nonvolatile memory system 1, reducing the number of page groups of each nonvolatile memory device 20 to 768 and reducing the number of page groups in nonvolatile memory system 1 to 98,304.
The number of reads of each block of each nonvolatile memory device 20 is counted 102. In the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment when blocks are open the time that the block is open is determined and the block is closed if the block open time exceeds a predetermined threshold (e.g. 1 hour) to make sure that blocks do not stay open too long. The block may be closed by programming all unprogrammed pages of the open block with dummy data. Also, in embodiments of the present invention, if the block read count exceeds a predetermined open-block read count threshold (e.g., 150,000 reads) the block is sent to reclamation and is copied and erased to prevent read errors in the open block.
When a block is closed 103 a block retention timer is started 104. In the embodiment shown in
Upon the occurrence one or more of an endurance event 105, a retention timer event 106 and a read disturb event 107 at the closed block, a background reference positioning operation is performed 117. In the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment step 105 is performed by determining whether the block P/E count exceeds an endurance threshold and step 106 is performed by determining whether the block retention time exceeds a retention time threshold and step 107 is performed by determining whether the block read count exceeds a block read threshold. In one embodiment the endurance threshold, the retention time threshold and the block read threshold are user programmable so that they may be changed to accommodate the characteristics of different types of NAND devices 20.
BRP circuit 6 is operable to perform background reference positioning operations 117 by performing background reads of representative pages of each page group of the closed block at offsets to each threshold voltage that is required for reading the representative pages of each page group of the closed block to identify a set of updated threshold voltage offset values for each page group of the closed block. Background reference positioning operations 117 continue to be performed on endurance, retention timer and read disturb events as long as a block is closed as shown by line 125. When the block becomes free 115-116, such as when the block is erased, background reference positioning operations 117 and local reference positioning operations 118 are no longer performed as shown by line 121 until the block is again closed 103.
In embodiments of the present invention BRP circuit 6 is operable to perform background reads by sending read instructions to read circuit 9. Read circuit 9 is operable upon receiving the instructions to perform reads by assigning a lower priority to background read instructions performed in step 117 than the priority assigned to read instructions generated in response to read requests from a host computing device. In another embodiment read circuit 9 is operable to assign priority values to read instructions including a high priority value, a medium priority value and a low priority value and is operable to assign a high priority value to read instructions generated in response to read requests from a host computing device, and is further operable to prioritize between background read instructions performed in step 117 and read instructions for housekeeping operations by assigning either the medium priority value or the low priority value to a particular read instruction.
Offsets to threshold voltages required to read the representative pages are set 202 to the offset determined in a previous background reference partitioning operation. If no previous background reference partitioning operation has been performed, all threshold voltage offsets are set to zero. One of the threshold voltages required to read the representative pages is then identified to be updated 203. A background read of a representative page is performed 204 using a threshold voltage shift read instruction at an offset to the identified threshold voltage. In one embodiment BRP circuit 6 is operable to perform steps 201-203 and is operable to perform step 204 by sending a background read instruction to read circuit 9 that is operable to send a threshold voltage shift read instruction to the NAND device 20 being read.
The number of errors in the read of step 204 is determined 205 and the determined number of errors is summed 206. In the present embodiment the results of each read operation are received at read circuit 9 and are sent to decoder 8 that is operable to decode the read results and determine the number of errors found in the decode operation.
This process is repeated for all representative pages 208, 216 and offset values are changed 207 and the process is continued 209, 217 until all representative pages have been read at all offsets values for the threshold voltage identified in step 203 (with other threshold voltage offsets remaining at the values determined in step 202 until selected in step 203). After the representative pages have been read at all offset values the threshold voltage offset producing the least number of errors is determined 210. In one embodiment step 210 includes determining the error sum from the summing of errors from each read at an offset voltage 206 and identifying the threshold voltage offset corresponding to the error sum determined to have the least number of errors. The updated threshold voltage offset is stored 211 as the updated threshold voltage offset value for the identified threshold voltage. After the threshold voltage offset values have been updated for a selected threshold voltage the process is repeated 218 at different identified threshold voltages 203 and using the updated threshold voltage offset stored in step 211 (instead of the corresponding threshold voltage offset from step 202) in subsequent reads 204 of the background reference partitioning operation 200, until all threshold voltages have been updated 212 and the process ends 213. In the present embodiment BRP circuit 6 is operable to perform steps 207-212.
In the present example the page group that is being read in step 204, which is identified as exemplary page group 501, is a lower-page page group consisting of only lower pages. Accordingly, the set of threshold voltages that will be required to read each of the pages in the background read 204 will be lower page threshold voltages in regions 1 and 5. Therefore, each threshold voltage shift read instruction for a lower page will include two threshold voltage offsets, and the threshold voltage shift read instruction may be represented as BRPREAD (VO1, VO5), where “VO1” is the threshold voltage offset for reading region 1 and “VO5” is the threshold voltage offset for reading region 5.
In the present exemplary embodiment the threshold voltage offset for region 1 and the threshold voltage offset for region 5 are both set at 0 in step 202 based on updated threshold voltage offsets calculated in a previous background reference partitioning operation 200. Threshold voltage 45 of region 5 is selected first for updating in step 203. In the example 40B shown in
Threshold voltage 41 of region 1 is identified next to be updated 203 and reads are performed at different offsets in region 1 until all five pages have been read at all possible offsets as shown by lines 216-217 while maintaining the threshold voltage offsets to all other regions at the updated threshold offset from step 211 or at the value set in step 202 if the particular threshold voltage has not yet been selected 203 for updating. In the example 40C shown in
In the event that data from read 204 is uncorrectable or the determined number of errors 205 exceeds a specific threshold, the closed block may be marked as a “weak block” and the retention time threshold is halved, the endurance threshold is halved and the block read threshold is halved for subsequent steps 105-107 on the weak block. Alternatively, the closed block may be marked as a bad block.
In one embodiment each time that an updated threshold voltage offset value is determined based on the occurrence of an endurance event it is stored as VBRPENDURANCE for the page group (which represents the most recently determined endurance threshold voltage offset value for the page group) in BRP table 5. Each time that an updated threshold voltage offset value is determined based on the occurrence of a retention timer event, or a read disturb event, the updated threshold voltage offset value is stored as VBRPRET_RD for the page group. The threshold voltage offset value stored as VBRPRET_RD for the page group thus represents the most recently determined updated threshold voltage offset value for the page group, and may be from an endurance event, a retention timer event or a read disturb event, and is a temporary voltage threshold offset value that takes into account the changes to the threshold voltage while the block is closed. When the next endurance event occurs, the calculated VBRP for the page group is stored as VBRPENDURANCE (e.g., by overwriting the previous VBRPENDURANCE value). Each time that VBRPENDURANCE is calculated, it is also stored as VBRPRET_RD for the page group (e.g., by overwriting the previous VBRPRET_RD value). Each time that an updated threshold voltage offset is determined based on the occurrence of a retention timer event or a read disturb event it is stored as VBRPRET_RD for the page group (e.g., by overwriting the previous VBRPRET_RD value).
In one embodiment that is illustrated in
At endurance events the VBRP calculated in the most recent endurance event (VBRPENDURANCE) for the page group is used as the starting reference threshold voltage offset in step 202 of
Upon the occurrence of a retention timer event the most recently calculated updated threshold voltage offset value is used as the starting reference threshold voltage offset in step 202, which can be an updated VBRP calculated in response to the occurrence of an endurance event, a retention timer event or a read disturb event. Since each VBRP calculated from an endurance event is stored as both VBRPRET_RD and VBRPENDURANCE, the value VBRPRET_RD always reflects the most recent updated threshold voltage offset for the page group. Accordingly, upon the occurrence of retention timer event 75 (12-hour retention timer event) VBRPRET_RD from 1K P/E event 74 is used as the starting reference threshold voltage offset in step 202. Upon the occurrence of a second retention timer event 76 (24-hour retention timer event) VBRPRET_RD (from the 12-hour retention timer event 75) is used as the starting reference threshold voltage offset in step 202 of
Upon the occurrence of a read disturb event 79, the most recently calculated updated threshold voltage offset value is used as the starting reference threshold voltage offset in step 202, which can be an updated VBRP calculated in response to the occurrence of an endurance event, a retention timer event or a read event. Since each VBRP calculated from an endurance event is stored as both VBRPRET_RD and VBRPENDURANCE, the value VBRPRET_RD always reflects the most recent updated threshold voltage offset for the page group. Accordingly, at an exemplary 50,000 read-count read disturb event 79 VBRPRET_RD (1K, 36, 0) is used as the starting threshold voltage offset in step 202 and the resulting VBRP (1K, 36, 50K) is stored as VBRPRET_RD.
In one embodiment, an endurance event is determined to have occurred when the P/E count is greater than the endurance threshold and within an endurance margin (that is added to each endurance threshold). In one exemplary embodiment the endurance margin is 30, so if the P/E is 500-530 P/E cycles, 1,000-1030 P/E cycles, 1500-1530 P/E cycles, etc. an endurance event is determined to have occurred. When performing background reference positioning operations for endurance events, it has been found that better results are obtained when the read count is not too high. Accordingly, in embodiments of the present invention, a limit on the number of read counts is applied when determining whether or not a background reference positioning operation should be performed. In one embodiment, when the number of P/E cycles is within the endurance margin and would otherwise be determined to constitute an endurance event, the calculation of background reference positioning step 117 is not performed when the read count exceeds a quality threshold (e.g., 25,000 reads).
When a block is free 63, previously determined values of VBRPRET_RD are no longer useful for determining voltage threshold correction. Therefore, the background reference positioning operation 117 immediately following the block erase will use the VBRP calculated in the most recent endurance event (VBRPENDURANCE) for the page group as the starting reference threshold voltage offset in step 202 of
As previously discussed, after a block is free 63, previously determined values of VBRPRET_RD are no longer useful. Accordingly, in embodiments of the present invention, when reads are performed after a block is closed and before a first VBRPRET_RD is determined for the closed block, reads continue to be performed using the VBRP calculated in the most recent endurance event (VBRPENDURANCE) for the page group until the first VBRPRET_RD is determined following the closed block event.
In one embodiment, upon each close block event (each time that a block is closed) a determination is made as to whether a read disturb event has occurred by determining whether the read count exceeds a block read threshold. In one exemplary embodiment, if the read count is between 50,000 and 100,000, a 50,000-read-count read disturb event is determined to have occurred. If the read count is between 100,000 and 150,000, a 100,000-read-count read disturb event is determined to have occurred.
Following is an exemplary program segment illustrating an exemplary closed block event 65 from
Referring now to step 118 of
In the present embodiment the LRP correction values stored in LRP table 10 include three values, an endurance correction value (SHIFT_A), a retention timing correction value (SHIFT_B) and a read disturb correction value (SHIFT_C) and the LRP circuit 7 is operable to identify either the endurance value, the retention timing correction value or the read disturb correction value and add the identified value to the voltage shift value of each of the threshold voltages in the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the closed block to obtain a first set of local reference positioning threshold voltage offset values. A different one of the endurance value, the retention timing correction value and the read disturb correction value is then identified and is added to the voltage shift value of each of the threshold voltages in the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the closed block to obtain a second set of LRP threshold voltage offset values. The one of the endurance value, the retention timing correction value and the read disturb correction value that has not yet been used is then identified and is added to the voltage shift value of each of the threshold voltages in the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the closed block to obtain a third set of LRP threshold voltage offset values.
Following is a chart illustrating the logic of an exemplary LRP table:
In one embodiment the values in the LRP table are determined in a test lab by characterizing large numbers of exemplary test NAND devices having the same manufacturer, the same part number, and preferably the same manufacturing batch as NAND devices 20. In one embodiment the conditions in the LRP table are recreated in test NAND devices to identify corresponding voltage shifts that will produce the lowest bit error rate. Shift_A, which may also be referred to as an endurance threshold voltage shift value indicates the effects of the number of P/E cycles being close to the next endurance threshold. Shift_B, which may also be referred to as a retention time threshold voltage shift value indicates the effects of block retention time being close to the next retention time threshold. Shift_C, which may also be referred to as a read disturb threshold shift value indicates the effects of the block read count being close to the next block read threshold. The values for Shift_A, Shift_B and Shift_C represent the change to threshold voltage shift values and may be positive or negative.
LRP circuit 7 is operable to generate an index value that indicates the endurance events, retention timer events and read disturb conditions for the closed block. In one embodiment the endurance index (e.g., a logical “1” or a logical“0”) indicates whether the number of P/E cycles for the closed block is closer to the previous endurance threshold or to the next endurance threshold that may be calculated using the following equation P/E>[PE(BRP)+PESTEP/2] where P/E is the current number of P/E cycles for the closed block, PE(BRP) is the number of PE cycles in the most recent calculation of VBRPENDURANCE for the closed block and PESTEP/2 is the step size for endurance events (e.g., 500 P/E cycles). In one embodiment the retention timing index (e.g., a logical “1” or a logical“0”) indicates whether the retention time for the closed block is closer to the previous retention time threshold or to the next retention time threshold, and may be calculated using the following equation RETENTION_TIME>[RT(BRP)+RTSTEP/2] where RETENTION_TIME is the current retention time for the closed block, RT(BRP) is the retention time of the most recent calculation of VBRPRET_RD for the closed block that resulted from a retention event and RTSTEP/2 is the step size for retention events (e.g., 12 hours). In one embodiment the read disturb index (e.g., a logical “1” or a logical“0”) indicates whether the number of reads for the closed block is closer to the previous read disturb threshold or to the next read disturb threshold, and may be calculated using the following equation BLOCK_READ_COUNT>[RD(BRP)+RDSTEP/2] where BLOCK_READ_COUNT is the number of reads for the closed block, RD(BRP) is the number of reads of the most recent calculation of VBRPRET_RD for the closed block that resulted from a read disturb event and RDSTEP/2 is the step size for read disturb events (e.g., 50,000 reads).
LRP circuit 7 is also operable for indexing the table with the generated index value to identify the one of the local reference positioning correction values to be added to each of the threshold voltage offsets in the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read to obtain the first set of local reference positioning threshold voltage offset values, to identify the one of the local reference positioning correction values to be added to each of the threshold voltages in the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read to obtain the second set of local reference positioning threshold voltage offset values and to identify the one of the local reference positioning correction values to be added to each of the threshold voltage offsets in the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read to obtain the third set of local reference positioning threshold voltage offset values.
In one embodiment there is a single LRP table 10 that is used for identifying local reference positioning correction values. Alternatively, there is a LRP table 10 for each page group and the LRP table 10 that is used to identify local reference position correction values is the LRP table 10 corresponding to the page group for which local reference positioning threshold voltage offsets are being calculated.
In the example shown in
In one embodiment the LRP correction voltages are concatenated to the set of updated threshold voltage offset values and stored as threshold voltage read parameters (VREAD) for the page group. For example, for page group 501, the threshold voltage read parameters could be expressed as VREAD501=VBRP501, VLRP501-1, VLRP501-2, VLRP501-3 with each of VBRP501, VLRP501-1, VLRP501-2 and VLRP501-3 including a set of two or more threshold voltage offset values.
Referring back to
When the usage characteristic does not meet a usage characteristic (UC) threshold 108 a normal read operation (READ instruction) is performed 109. When the usage characteristic meets a usage characteristic (UC) threshold 108, subsequent reads are performed using a threshold voltage shift read operation that uses a threshold voltage shift read instruction 110.
In the embodiment shown in
More particularly, read circuit 9 is configured to determine whether a usage characteristic of the nonvolatile memory devices 20 meets a usage characteristic threshold by querying status circuit 3 to identify the usage characteristic and comparing the identified usage characteristic to a usage characteristic threshold stored in registers or in memory storage 4. In one embodiment the usage characteristic is the number of program and erase cycles for the closed block and normal reads are performed until the number of program and erase cycles for the block have reached a program and erase cycle threshold. In one embodiment a threshold of 600 program and erase cycles is used. In another embodiment the usage characteristic is the BER for the closed block and normal reads are performed until the BER for the closed block have reached a BER threshold.
Once the usage characteristic threshold is reached 108 for a block 22 of a nonvolatile memory device 20 host-requested reads of that block are performed using a threshold voltage shift read operation using a set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read, even after the block has become free 115-116, 127. All other blocks continue to be read using a normal read instruction as shown by steps 108-109 and line 129 and using a conventional error recovery operation.
The usage characteristic threshold is chosen so as to move from performing a normal read operation 109 to a threshold voltage shift read 110 before a read using a normal read instruction 109 results in a decode failure, requiring error recovery operation. Thereby, the latency from the read using the normal read instruction 109 and the latency of the resulting error recovery operation is avoided. More particularly, conventional read failure processes require two reads to recover the codeword, the normal read and the read of a subsequent error recovery read retry, resulting in significant latency. By setting the usage characteristic threshold at a bit error rate below the bit error rate where decode errors from the NAND device 20 reach the uncorrectable bit error rate, the latency that would have occurred as a result of using a normal read instruction 109 is avoided, providing a method and apparatus with reduced latency and extending the useful lifetime of nonvolatile memory devices 20.
In one embodiment, when a usage characteristic is determined to meet the usage characteristic threshold 108, all subsequent host-requested reads of pages of the closed block are performed using a threshold voltage shift read instruction using a set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read using VBRPRET_RD when the block is closed or VBRPENDURANCE when the block is not closed. Thereby, while the block is closed the temporary variations in voltage threshold from retention time and from read disturb of the block are taken into account in reads, and after the block has been erased these temporary variations in voltage threshold are no longer considered until the block is again opened. At times other than when the block is open the more permanent effects of aging, as indicated by the number of P/E cycles is used in reads. Thereby, the number of read errors is reduced. Furthermore, BER is reduced, extending the time that each NAND device can operate before uncorrectable errors start to occur and thereby extending the useful life of nonvolatile memory controller 1.
In an alternate embodiment the usage characteristic threshold is a block group threshold (e.g., determining the number of P/E cycles for all blocks in a block group or the greatest number of P/E cycles for any block in the group and comparing it to a corresponding block group P/E threshold), and all subsequent reads of blocks in the block group meeting the usage characteristic threshold are performed using a threshold voltage shift read instruction.
In one embodiment, when a usage characteristic is determined to meet the usage characteristic threshold 108, all subsequent reads of pages of the closed block are performed using a threshold voltage shift read instruction using a set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read. Accordingly, all subsequent host-requested reads and all subsequent housekeeping operation reads on pages of the closed block are performed using a threshold voltage shift read operation using a set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read using VBRPRET_RD when the block is closed or using VBRPENDURANCE when the block is not closed.
Read circuit 9 is operable to perform reads using threshold voltage shift read instructions by indexing the BRP table with an index value corresponding to the page that is being read to obtain threshold voltage shift read parameters to use in the threshold voltage shift read operation (updated threshold voltage offset values and LRP threshold voltages for the page group of the page being read) that are used to generate corresponding threshold voltage shift read instructions that are sent to the NAND 20 device to be read.
In an alternate embodiment memory storage 4 includes more than one BRP table, with a first table (page group table) including index values identifying pages and indexes identifying the corresponding page group. A second table (BRP-page group table) includes index values identifying page groups and corresponding threshold voltage shift read parameters. In this embodiment, to perform a threshold voltage shift read, read circuit 9 is operable to index the page group table using an index value that identifies the page that is to be read to obtain an index value that identifies the page group of the page that is to be read. The index value of the page group is then used to index the BRP-page group table to obtain the threshold voltage shift read parameters to be used in the read operation.
When a decode failure 111 of a read of a page of the closed block occurs, a local reference positioning read operation is performed 112 by reading the failed page with a threshold voltage shift read operation using a set of the LRP threshold voltage offset values for the page group of the failed page. If the decode of step 111 fails the number of failures is determined and is compared to a local reference positioning (LRP) limit 113, and local reference positioning reads continue to be performed as shown by steps 112-113 until the LRP limit is reached. After the LRP limit is reached a conventional error recovery operation is performed 114. The conventional error recovery operation 114 can be, for example, soft reads or/and a RAID operation.
In the present embodiment read circuit 9 is operable to perform steps 111-113. More particularly, read circuit 9 received a first set of LRP threshold voltage offsets, a second set of LRP threshold voltage offsets, and a third set of LRP threshold voltage offsets and the set of updated threshold voltage offset values for the failed page prior to performing the read of step 110. On the first decode failure 111, read circuit 9 is operable for reading the failed page with a threshold voltage shift read operation using the first set of LRP threshold voltage offset values for the page group of the failed page. On the second decode failure 111, read circuit 9 is operable for reading the failed page with a threshold voltage shift read operation using the second set of LRP threshold voltage offset values for the page group of the failed page. On the third decode failure 111, read circuit 9 is operable for reading the failed page with a threshold voltage shift read operation using the third set of LRP threshold voltage offset values for the page group of the failed page. In the present embodiment a local reference positioning limit of three is used in step 113. Though the present embodiment uses three sets of LRP threshold voltage offset values, in other embodiment more or fewer sets of LRP threshold voltage offset values may be used.
In the present embodiment every time that a read with a threshold voltage shift read instruction of step 110 fails, the local preference positioning read process of steps 112-114 is used. Accordingly, when a usage characteristic is determined to meet the usage characteristic threshold 108, all subsequent reads of pages of the closed block are performed using a threshold voltage shift read instruction using a set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read and all failures of the subsequent reads of pages of the closed block use the error recovery process of steps 112-114. In embodiments in which all subsequent host-requested reads of pages of the closed block are performed using a threshold voltage shift read instruction using a set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read all failures of the subsequent host-requested reads of pages of the closed block use the error recovery process of steps 112-114.
In one embodiment the method of
By using local reference positioning table 10 to determine which LRP correction value is to be added to generate the first, second and third sets of local reference positioning threshold voltage offsets, local reference positioning circuit 7 identifies the most likely to be successful LRP threshold voltage correction value for use in the first read, the second most likely in the second read and the third most likely in the third read. Furthermore, since the correction value that is used first will correspond most closely to the current conditions for the particular block of the NAND device being read, the likelihood of the first local reference positioning read 112 being successful is much greater than that of error recovery operations in prior art systems that do not take into account local conditions. Therefore, fewer error-recovery related read operations are required as compared to error recovery operations in prior art systems, resulting in decreased latency.
Even though the methods of
In the embodiment shown in
Once a block is identified as an outlier block, background reference partitioning operations 305 and local reference partitioning operations 306 are performed to identify a set of threshold voltage shift read parameters to be used in subsequent reads of the outlier block in the same manner as disclosed in methods 5-6. More particularly, in step 305 background reads of representative pages of each page group of the outlier block are performed at offsets to each threshold voltage that is required for reading the representative pages of each page group of the outlier block to identify a set of updated threshold voltage offset values for each page group of the outlier block and in step 306 local reference positioning threshold voltage offset values are determined and the BRP and LRP threshold voltage offset values are stored as shown by step 307. In one embodiment the results of the background reference positioning operation 305 are stored as a VBRPENDURANCE value. The results may also be stored as a VBRPRET_RD value.
In the present embodiment local reference positioning operations 306 are performed by determining the order in which a set of local reference positioning correction values are to be applied to decode failures by determining whether the current number of program and erase cycles for the page being read is near the next endurance threshold, determining whether the current read count for the page being read is near the next read disturb threshold and whether the current retention time is near the next retention time threshold, and based on the determined order, adding local reference positioning correction values to each of the threshold voltages in the set of updated threshold voltage offset values obtained in step 305 to obtain sets of local reference positioning threshold voltage offset values in step 306 for each page group of the outlier block.
As shown by steps 308-310 background reference positioning operations 309 and local reference positioning operations 310 are performed on the occurrence of one or more of an endurance (E) event, a retention timer (RT) event and a read disturb (RD) event at a closed block to identify a set of updated threshold voltage offset values for each page group of the closed block in the same manner as in
Each time that a host-requested read operation is performed a normal read will be used as shown by block 314 and line 324 until one or more usage characteristic is determined to meet one or more usage characteristic threshold. Upon meeting the one or more usage characteristic threshold, all subsequent host-requested reads of pages of each block meeting the one or more usage characteristic threshold are performed using a threshold voltage shift read instruction and using the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read as shown by step 315. In the present embodiment read circuit 9 is configured to determine whether a usage characteristic meets one or more usage characteristic threshold and, when the usage characteristic is determined to meet the one or more usage characteristic threshold, the read circuit 9 is configured to perform subsequent host-requested reads of pages of each block meeting the one or more usage characteristic threshold using a threshold voltage shift read instruction and using the set of updated threshold voltage offset values corresponding to the page group of the page being read.
Any page identified as an outlier page in step 304 will be determined to meet a usage characteristic and all subsequent host-requested reads of outlier blocks will be performed using a threshold voltage shift read operation as shown by step 315. In this embodiment a first usage characteristic is the number of errors in the background read of the indicator page and a first usage characteristic threshold is the error threshold. Accordingly, the usage characteristic will meet the one or more usage characteristic threshold when the number of errors in any background read of an indicator page of the block exceeds the error threshold.
In the present embodiment a usage characteristic such as the number of program and erase cycles is used in the same manner as discussed in
Upon a decode failure as shown by steps 316-318, 325 the failed page is read 317 until the number of local reference positioning reads 317 reaches the local reference positioning limit as shown by step 113. Then, a conventional decode failure operation is performed 319. More particularly, the failed page is read 317 a using the sets of local reference positioning threshold voltage offset values for the page group of the page being read in the order determined in the local reference positioning operation 306, 310 to correct decode failures until the maximum number of decode failures have been reached as shown by step 318. In the present embodiment the process of steps 316-319 is performed in the same manner as described in the methods of
The use of both background reference positioning and local reference positioning results in fewer decode errors and hence fewer soft read operations, providing a nonvolatile memory system 1 with reduced latency as compared to systems that use conventional read operations. Moreover, BER is reduced, extending the lifetime of nonvolatile memory system 1.
In various embodiments, the system of the present invention may be implemented in a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC).
In an alternate embodiment of the present invention the threshold voltage shift read instructions of step 110 are performed whether or not a UC threshold is reached in step 110, and such embodiments may include some or all of steps 100-107 and 109-118. For example, the reads of step 110 may be performed during the entire lifetime of the nonvolatile memory device, or only after some other triggering event, which may be, without limitation, a global timing event.
Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that modifications to the described embodiment may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention will be defined by the attached claims and not by the above detailed description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
815137 | Beecher | Mar 1906 | A |
5615235 | Kakuishi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5732092 | Shinohara | Mar 1998 | A |
5822244 | Hansen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5875343 | Binford et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6115788 | Thowe | Sep 2000 | A |
6148360 | Leak et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6412041 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6539515 | Gong | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567313 | Tanaka et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6633856 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6725409 | Wolf | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6789227 | De Souza et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6871168 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6895547 | Eleftheriou et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6934804 | Hashemi | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6963507 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6976194 | Cypher | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976197 | Faust et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7032081 | Gefen et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7050334 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7116732 | Worm et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7206992 | Xin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209527 | Smith et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7237183 | Xin | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7324559 | McGibney | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7376015 | Tanaka et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7450668 | Ghosh et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457906 | Pettey et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7472331 | Kim et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484158 | Sharon et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7529215 | Osterling | May 2009 | B2 |
7567472 | Gatzemeier et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7620784 | Panabaker et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7650480 | Jiang et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7694047 | Alston | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7708195 | Yoshida et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7739472 | Guterman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752346 | Talayco et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7801233 | Chow et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7860930 | Freimuth et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7904793 | Mokhlesi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930623 | Pisek et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937641 | Amidi | May 2011 | B2 |
7945721 | Johnsen et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7958430 | Kolokowsky et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7975193 | Johnson | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8094508 | Gatzemeier et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8140930 | Maru | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8176367 | Dreifus et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8219894 | Au et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8223745 | Johnsen et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8228728 | Yang et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8244946 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245112 | Hicken et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245117 | Wu | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8250286 | Yeh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8254112 | Yang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8255770 | Park et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8259498 | Yogev et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8259506 | Sommer et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8261136 | D'Abreu et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8281217 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8281227 | Inskeep et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8286004 | Williams | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8307258 | Flynn et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8327220 | Borchers et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8335977 | Weingarten et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8341502 | Steiner et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8351258 | Yang et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8359522 | Gunnam et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8392789 | Biscondi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402201 | Strasser et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8418023 | Gunnam et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429325 | Onufryk et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429497 | Tu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8473812 | Ramamoorthy et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8493791 | Karakulak et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8504885 | Haratsch et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8504887 | Varnica et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8555140 | Gunnam et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8621318 | Micheloni et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8638602 | Horn | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8640005 | Wilkerson et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8645613 | Tan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8656257 | Micheloni et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8665648 | Mun et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8694849 | Micheloni et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8694855 | Micheloni et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8706956 | Cagno et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8707122 | Micheloni et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8737141 | Melik-Martirosian | May 2014 | B2 |
8739008 | Liu et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8755229 | Visconti et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8762620 | Prins et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8769374 | Franceschini et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8775913 | Haratsch et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787428 | Dai et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8856622 | Ramamoorthy et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8898372 | Yeh | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8917734 | Brown | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8924824 | Lu | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8953373 | Haratsch et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8958247 | Asaoka et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8959280 | Ma et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8984216 | Fillingim | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995197 | Steiner et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8995302 | Brown et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9025495 | Onufryk et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9058289 | Tai et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9142314 | Beltrami et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9164891 | Karamcheti et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9244763 | Kankani et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9251909 | Camp et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9257182 | Grunzke | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9268531 | Son et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9292428 | Kanamori et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9294132 | Peleato-Inarrea | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9397701 | Micheloni et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9444655 | Sverdlov et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9590656 | Micheloni et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9842022 | Motwani | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9886214 | Micheloni et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9916906 | Wu et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
20020051501 | Demjanenko et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020129308 | Kinoshita et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020181438 | McGibney | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030033567 | Tamura et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030104788 | Kim | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030225970 | Hashemi | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040088636 | Cypher | May 2004 | A1 |
20040123230 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136236 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181735 | Xin | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040234150 | Chang | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040252791 | Shen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268015 | Pettey et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010846 | Kikuchi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050226355 | Kibune et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248999 | Tamura et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050252791 | Pechtold et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286511 | Johnsen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060039370 | Rosen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050694 | Bury et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060126728 | Yu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060206655 | Chappell et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060282603 | Onufryk et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070050688 | Thayer | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070089031 | Huffman et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101225 | Moon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118743 | Thornton et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136628 | Doi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147489 | Sun et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070217253 | Kim et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233939 | Kim | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239926 | Gyl et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080005382 | Mimatsu | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016425 | Khan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049869 | Heinrich et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077843 | Cho et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080148129 | Moon et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080229079 | Flynn et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229164 | Tamura et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256280 | Ma | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256292 | Flynn et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263265 | Litsyn et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267081 | Roeck | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276156 | Gunnam et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080320214 | Ma et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027991 | Kaizu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090067320 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077302 | Fukuda | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090164694 | Talayco et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090290441 | Gatzemeier et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296798 | Banna et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303788 | Roohparvar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307412 | Yeh et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327802 | Fukutomi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100085076 | Danilin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100162075 | Brannstrom et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185808 | Yu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199149 | Weingarten | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211737 | Flynn et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211852 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226422 | Taubin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246664 | Citta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262979 | Borchers et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293440 | Thatcher et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110010602 | Chung et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110055453 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055659 | Tu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066902 | Sharon et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072331 | Sakaue et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110119553 | Gunnam et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110161678 | Niwa | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110209031 | Kim et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225341 | Satoh et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246136 | Haratsch et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246842 | Haratsch et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246853 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110296084 | Nango | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307758 | Fillingim et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008396 | Park et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120051144 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120054413 | Brandt | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120096192 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120140583 | Chung et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120141139 | Bakhru et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166690 | Regula | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167100 | Li et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179860 | Falanga et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203986 | Strasser et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239991 | Melik-Martirosian et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254515 | Melik-Martirosian et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120311388 | Cronin et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311402 | Tseng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013983 | Livshitz et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130024735 | Chung et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130060994 | Higgins et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086451 | Grube et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094286 | Sridharan et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094290 | Sridharan et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130117616 | Tai et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117640 | Tai et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145235 | Alhussien et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130148435 | Matsunaga | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163327 | Karakulak et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163328 | Karakulak et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130176779 | Chen et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185598 | Haratsch et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198451 | Hyun et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205085 | Hyun et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130314988 | Desireddi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130315252 | Emmadi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318422 | Weathers et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140029336 | Venkitachalam et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040704 | Wu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140053037 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068368 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140068382 | Desireddi et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140072056 | Fay | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140085982 | Asaoka et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140101510 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140164881 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181426 | Grunzke et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181617 | Wu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185611 | Lie et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198569 | Kim et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198581 | Kim et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215175 | Kasorla et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219003 | Ebsen et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229774 | Melik-Martirosian et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140258590 | Kochar | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281767 | Alhussien et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281771 | Yoon et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281800 | Micheloni et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281808 | Lam et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281822 | Wu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281823 | Micheloni et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150039952 | Goessel et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150043286 | Park et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150046625 | Peddle et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150127883 | Chen | May 2015 | A1 |
20150131373 | Alhussien et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149871 | Chen et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150169468 | Camp et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186055 | Darragh | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150221381 | Nam | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150242268 | Wu et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150332780 | Kim et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150371718 | Becker et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160034206 | Ryan et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160049203 | Alrod et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160071601 | Shirakawa et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160072527 | Tadokoro et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160155507 | Grunzke | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160179406 | Gorobets et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160247581 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160293259 | Kim et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160342494 | Yang | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160365158 | Yang | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170147135 | Higashibeppu | May 2017 | A1 |
20170213597 | Micheloni et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180033490 | Marelli et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
NVM Express, revision 1.0; Intel Corporation;, Jul. 12, 2011, pp. 103-106 and 110-114. |
NVM Express, Revision 1.0; Intel Corporation, Mar. 1, 2011, pp. 1-122. |
RapidIO, PCI Express, and Gigabit Ethernet Comparison: Pros and Cons of Using Three Interconnects in Embedded Systems; RapidIO Trade Association, Technical White Paper, Revision 03,, May 2005, 1-36. |
PCI Express Base Specification Revision 3.0 (PCI Express Base Expression, PCISIG, hereinafter “PCIExpress”), Nov. 10, 2010, 1-860. |
RFC 793: Transmission Control Protocol, RFC 793, University of Southern California, IETF,, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-89. |
Cai, et al., “Data Retention in MLC NAND Flash Memory: Characterization, Optimization, and Recovery”, 2015 IEEE 21st International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA); Carnegie Mellon University, LSI Corporation, 2015, pp. 551-563. |
Chen, et al., “Increasing flash memory lifetime by dynamic voltage allocation for constant mutual information”, 2014 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), 2014, pp. 1-5. |
Peleato, et al., “Probabilistic graphical model for flash memory programming”, Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP), 2012 IEEE, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
Wu, et al., “Reducing SSD Read Latency via NAND Flash Program and Erase Suspension”, Proceedings of FAST'2012; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, 2012, pp. 117-123. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 23, 2017 International application No. PCTAJS2017/044037. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 10, 2017, International application No. PCT/US2017/043799. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180033490 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62378145 | Aug 2016 | US | |
62367789 | Jul 2016 | US |