Patent Application
20210405523
The present invention involves process (method) and apparatus for treating fibers, filaments, films, sheets, plates, netting, mesh, and other woven and non-woven (e.g. air/laid or laminated) forms of implants such as hernia mesh and other soft or hard medical implants and similar articles such as are used for industrial or laboratory purposes, in processing chemicals and biologics subject to adverse bacterial colonization and resulting products. The objects of the inventions include enabling such materials to inhibit (wholly prevent or substantially reduce adverse bacterial colonization without reliance on antibiotics or like antagonists.
The present invention further relates generally to methods for treating a surface to inhibit attachment of platelets thereto and to objects with surfaces thus treated and to promote the attachment and/or proliferation of endothelial cells on surfaces. More specifically, it relates to treatment of a surface of an object using a gas-cluster ion-beam (GCIB) or an accelerated Neutral Beam derived from an accelerated GCIB. The Neutral Beam is preferably an accelerated neutral monomer beam derived from a GCIB. The object may be a medical device intended for surgical implant into a subject.
Certain medical devices intended for implant in an animal or human subject, in applications where the device contacts blood or blood components may suffer from the problem that platelets attach to and/or activate on the surface of the device, with subsequent formation of or initiation of a blood clot or undesirable attachment of blood components to the device. One example for illustrative purposes is a vascular stent (which may be an expandable metal stent) for insertion into a vascular lumen to treat a disease condition. Such a stent may be formed from a metal material or other material and may, for example, be used to support the lumen of a blood vessel in the vicinity of a cerebral vascular aneurism. In such a case, the tendency for platelet attachment and/or activation, with possible subsequent blood clot formation on the luminal surface of the stent may have the undesired effect of resulting in luminal stenosis or complete obstruction of the blood vessel, resulting in an unfavorable treatment outcome for the implant subject. It is desirable to inhibit or delay the attachment and/or activation of platelets on such surfaces.
In certain cases where inhibition of platelet attachment is beneficial, it is also beneficial to facilitate attachment and/or proliferation of endothelial cells on the surface of an object that may be a medical device such as a stent. Endothelialization of the surface can promote integration of the device following surgical implant, resulting in a more rapid and/or favorable outcome.
In recent years there has been interest in using a GCIB to modify surface properties because of a GCIB's ability to effect very shallow processing while producing very little damage to a substrate.
Ions have long been favored for use in many processes because their electric charge facilitates their manipulation by electrostatic and magnetic fields. This introduces great flexibility in processing. However, in some applications, the charge that is inherent to any ion (including gas-cluster ions in a GCIB) may produce undesirable effects in the processed surfaces. GCIB has a distinct advantage over conventional ion beams in that a gas-cluster ion with a single or small multiple charge enables the transport and control of a much larger mass-flow (a cluster may consist of hundreds or thousands of molecules) compared to a conventional ion (an ionized single atom, molecule, or molecular fragment.) Particularly in the case of insulating materials, surfaces processed using ions often suffer from charge-induced damage resulting from abrupt discharge of accumulated charges, or production of damaging electrical field-induced stress in the material (again resulting from accumulated charges.) In many such cases, GCIBs have an advantage due to their relatively low charge per mass, but in some instances may not eliminate the target-charging problem. Furthermore, moderate to high current intensity ion beams may suffer from a significant space charge-induced defocusing of the beam that tends to inhibit transporting a well-focused beam over long distances. Again, due to their lower charge per mass relative to conventional ion beams, GCIBs have an advantage, but they do not fully eliminate the space charge beam transport problem.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide methods for treating a surface of an object to inhibit or delay the attachment and/or activation of platelets on the object.
It is another object of this invention to provide methods for treating a surface of an object to inhibit or delay the formation of a blood clot on the object.
It is a further object of this invention to provide medical devices treated to inhibit or delay attachment and/or activation of platelets on a surface thereof.
It is still another object of this invention to provide medical devices treated to inhibit or delay the formation of a blood clot upon a surface thereof.
It is another object of this invention to provide methods for treating a surface of an object to inhibit or delay the formation of a blood clot on the object while simultaneously promoting attachment and/or proliferation of endothelial cells on the object.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a medical device treated to inhibit or delay attachment and/or activation of platelets on a surface thereof while simultaneously promoting attachment and/or proliferation of endothelial cells on the device.
It is still another object of this invention to provide a medical device treated to inhibit or delay the formation of a blood clot upon a surface thereof while simultaneously promoting attachment and/or proliferation of endothelial cells on the device.
Further acts of the invention include arbitration of adverse bacterial colonization as evenly and more generally and more particularly in hard or soft implants into humans and other life forms, and in laboratory and industrial products such as membranes, filters, fluid processing or storage apparatus (e.g., pumps, labs, tubes, tanks and the like), using proteins effective as antagonists to bacterial colonization.
Since the discovery of penicillin back in 1928 by Sir Alex Flemings, hundreds of new antibiotics have been developed with the aim to fight bacterial infections, especially those related to implantable devices. However, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics trigger genetic modification in bacteria, leading to the development of one of the most disturbing health concerns that society is facing nowadays: antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to antibiotics. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has indicated several bacterial strains ranked as urgent or serious threats, meaning that there are only a few available antibiotics to treat their drug-resistant phenotypes. For instance, Staphylococcus aureus (SA), commonly found on skin, developed resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, such as methicillin, hence leading to the appearance of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), one of the most proliferative killers in the healthcare system. Many people carry MRSA leading to thousands of invasive infections, with high percentage of associated deaths, more than the number of deaths by AIDS/HIV. Data from the CDC shows a majority of all reported staphylococcus infections in the US are caused by MRSA, which represents a 300% increase in 10 years. The CDC has also predicted that by 2050 more deaths will occur from all AMR bacteria than all cancers combined; leading to one person dying every 3 seconds from AMR. There is an urgent need to find new approaches to defeat AMR, which are far away from the current use of antibiotics.
Polypropylene is the most commonly used biomaterial for surgical hernia meshes. Ventral hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) associated with wound or mesh complications has been reported to be as high as 27.7% in open surgical procedures and 10.5% laparoscopically. SSI lead to very high costs associate with the mesh infection hospital cost as well as follow-up costs. While the average cost of a mesh-based hernia repair without complications in the US circa 2020 is approximately $38,700 plus $1,400 in follow-up costs, mesh infections could raise the total charges to $82,800 in hospital costs and $63,400 in follow-up costs. Decreasing bacterial infections of implanted mesh materials is extremely important.
Reducing bacterial infections on implanted biomaterials could involve modifying the surface to be resistant to bacteria attachment, therefore, if bacteria are present there is an increased chance the immune system will clear them. Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam (ANAB) technology is a low energy accelerated particle beam gaining acceptance as a tool for easy nano-scale surface modification of implantable medical devices. ANAB is created by acceleration of neutral argon (Ar) atoms with very low energies under a vacuum which bombard a material surface, modifying it to a shallow depth of 1-3 nm. This is a non-additive technology that results in modifications of surface topography, wettability, and surface chemistry. These modifications are understood to be important in cell-surface interactions on implantable medical devices since they change surface energy and initial protein interactions for which cells rely on to adhere. Controlling surface properties of biomaterials is vital in improving the biocompatibility of devices by enhancing tissue integration and reducing bacterial attachment.
Certain medical devices intended for implant in an animal or human subject, in applications where the device contacts blood or blood components may suffer from the problem that platelets attach to and/or activate on the surface of the device, with subsequent formation of or initiation of a blood clot or undesirable attachment of blood components to the device. One example for illustrative purposes is a vascular stent (which may be an expandable metal stent) for insertion into a vascular lumen to treat a disease condition. Such a stent may be formed from a metal material or other material and may, for example, be used to support the lumen of a blood vessel in the vicinity of a cerebral vascular aneurism. In such a case, the tendency for platelet attachment and/or activation, with possible subsequent blood clot formation on the luminal surface of the stent may have the undesired effect of resulting in luminal stenosis or complete obstruction of the blood vessel, resulting in an unfavorable treatment outcome for the implant subject. It is desirable to inhibit or delay the attachment and/or activation of platelets on such surfaces.
Various embodiments of the present invention are directed to the use of a GCIB or an accelerated Neutral Beam derived from an accelerated GCIB for treating a surface of an object to inhibit or delay the attachment and/or activation of platelets thereon and to inhibit the formation of blood clots on the object and/or further for promoting attachment and/or proliferation of endothelial cells on the object
Various embodiments of the present invention are directed to the use of a GCIB or an accelerated Neutral Beam derived from an accelerated GCIB for treating a surface of an object to inhibit or delay the attachment and/or activation of platelets thereon and to inhibit the formation of blood clots on the object and/or further for promoting attachment and/or proliferation of endothelial cells on the object.
One embodiment may include medical devices having surfaces processed by GCIB and/or Neutral Beam that have inhibited or delayed platelet attachment characteristics.
Another embodiment may include medical devices having surfaces processed by GCIB and/or Neutral Beam that have enhanced endothelial cell attachment characteristics.
A further embodiment may include medical devices having some surfaces processed by GCIB and/or Neutral Beam that have inhibited or delayed platelet attachment characteristics and that also have enhanced endothelial cell attachment characteristics.
Yet another embodiment may include medical devices having some surfaces processed by GCIB and/or Neutral Beam that have inhibited or delayed platelet attachment characteristics and other surfaces processed by GCIB and/or Neutral Beam that have enhanced endothelial cell attachment characteristics.
One embodiment of the present invention provides a method of modifying a surface of an object so as to inhibit attachment of platelets thereto, the method comprising: forming a beam derived from a gas-cluster ion-beam in a reduced-pressure chamber; introducing an object into the reduced-pressure chamber; and irradiating at least a portion of the surface of said object with the beam to inhibit attachment of platelets thereto.
The method may further comprise cleaning the portion of said surface prior to irradiating said at least a portion of said surface. The formed beam may be a gas-cluster ion-beam. The formed beam may be a Neutral Beam. The Neutral Beam may be an accelerated neutral monomer beam. The portion of the surface may be adapted to promote the attachment or proliferation of non-platelet cells. The non-platelet cells may be endothelial cells. The object may be a medical device intended for surgical implant into a subject. The portion of the surface may comprise a metal, a ceramic, a polymer, or a glass an oxide, a metal alloy, a plastic, a polymer, a copolymer, a solid resin, a glass, quartz, a ceramic, sapphire, a glassy material, titanium, titania, an alloy of titanium, a cobalt-chrome alloy, a cobalt-chrome-molybdenum alloy, tantalum, or a tantalum alloy. The portion of the surface may comprise nitinol. The platelet attachment inhibition may comprise any of: reduced or delayed attachment; reduced or delayed activation; or reduced or delayed clotting of platelets on the surface. The medical device may be a vascular stent. The formed beam may consist essentially of any of: argon; a mixture of argon with O2; a mixture of argon with N2; or a mixture of argon with CH4.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a medical device for surgical implant, comprising a device having a surface modified by beam irradiation to inhibit or delay attachment or activation or clotting of platelets. The modified surface may be adapted to promote attachment or proliferation of endothelial cells. The medical device may be a vascular stent. The surface may comprise any of a metal, a ceramic, a polymer, or a glass an oxide, a metal alloy, a plastic, a polymer, a copolymer, a solid resin, a glass, quartz, a ceramic, sapphire, a glassy material, titanium, titania, an alloy of titanium, a cobalt-chrome alloy, a cobalt-chrome-molybdenum alloy, tantalum, or a tantalum alloy. The surface may comprise nitinol. The beam may be a gas-cluster ion-beam or a Neutral Beam.
Methods of forming GCIBs and accelerated GCIBs are known in the prior art. Methods and apparatus for forming Neutral Beams by first forming an accelerated charged GCIB and then neutralizing or arranging for neutralization of at least a fraction of the beam and separating the charged and uncharged fractions are disclosed herein. The Neutral Beams may consist of neutral gas clusters, neutral monomers, or a combination of both. The use of an accelerated Neutral Beam provides a physical surface modification method that may result in a thinner modification of the surface layer of the material processed, and in minimized introduction of charging effects at the surface (especially important when the material is not an electrically conducting material) or when surface charging can harm the material, as for some polymers and other similar materials.
Beams of energetic conventional ions, accelerated electrically charged atoms or molecules, are widely utilized to form semiconductor device junctions, to modify surfaces by sputtering and etching, and to modify the properties of thin films. Unlike conventional ions, gas-cluster ions are formed from clusters of large numbers (having a typical distribution of several hundreds to several thousands with a mean value of a few thousand) of weakly bound atoms or molecules of materials that are gaseous under conditions of standard temperature and pressure (commonly oxygen, nitrogen, or an inert gas such as argon, for example, but any condensable gas can be used to generate gas-cluster ions) with each cluster sharing one or more electrical charges, and which are accelerated together through large electric potential differences (on the order of from about 3 kV to about 70 kV or more) to have high total energies. After gas-cluster ions have been formed and accelerated, their charge states may be altered or become altered (even neutralized) by collisions with other cluster ions, other neutral clusters, or residual background gas particles, and thus they may fragment or may be induced to fragment into smaller cluster ions or into monomer ions and/or into neutralized smaller clusters and neutralized monomers, but the resulting cluster ions, neutral clusters, and monomer ions and neutral monomers tend to retain the relatively high velocities and energies that result from having been accelerated through large electric potential differences, with the accelerated gas-cluster ion energy being distributed over the fragments.
As used herein, the terms “GCIB”, “gas-cluster ion-beam” and “gas-cluster ion” are intended to encompass not only ionized beams and ions, but also accelerated beams and ions that have had a portion of their charge states modified (including neutralized) following their acceleration. The terms “GCIB” and “gas-cluster ion-beam” are intended to encompass all beams that comprise accelerated gas-cluster ions even though they may also comprise non-clustered particles. As used herein, the term “Neutral Beam” is intended to mean a beam of neutral gas clusters and/or neutral monomers derived from an accelerated gas-cluster ion-beam and wherein the acceleration results from acceleration of a gas-cluster ion-beam. As used herein, the term “monomer” refers equally to either a single atom or a single molecule. The terms “atom,” “molecule,” and “monomer” may be used interchangeably and all refer to the appropriate monomer that is characteristic of the gas under discussion (either a component of a cluster, a component of a cluster ion, or an atom or molecule). For example, a monatomic gas like argon may be referred to in terms of atoms, molecules, or monomers and each of those terms means a single atom. Likewise, in the case of a diatomic gas like nitrogen, it may be referred to in terms of atoms, molecules, or monomers, each term meaning a diatomic molecule.
Furthermore a molecular gas like CH4, may be referred to in terms of atoms, molecules, or monomers, each term meaning a five atom molecule, and so forth. These conventions are used to simplify generic discussions of gases and gas clusters or gas-cluster ions independent of whether they are monatomic, diatomic, or molecular in their gaseous form.
Because the energies of individual atoms within a large gas-cluster ion are very small, typically a few eV to some tens of eV, the atoms penetrate through, at most, only a few atomic layers of a target surface during impact. This shallow penetration (typically a few nanometers to about ten nanometers, depending on the beam acceleration) of the impacting atoms means all of the energy carried by the entire cluster ion is consequently dissipated in an extremely small volume in a very shallow surface layer during a time period of less than a microsecond. This differs from conventional ion beams where the penetration into the material is sometimes several hundred nanometers, producing changes and material modification deep below the surface of the material. Because of the high total energy of the gas-cluster ion and extremely small interaction volume, the deposited energy density at the impact site is far greater than in the case of bombardment by conventional ions. Accordingly, GCIB modification of a surface tends to produce a shallower region of atomic mixing and has thus been favored as an etching beam for depth profiling in analytical instruments. Neutral Beam processing of a surface can produce even shallower modification of a surface with less surface electrical charging.
When accelerated gas-cluster ions are fully dissociated and neutralized, the resulting neutral monomers will have energies approximately equal to the total energy of the original accelerated gas-cluster ion, divided by the number, NI, of monomers that comprised the original gas-cluster ion at the time it was accelerated. Such dissociated neutral monomers will have energies on the order of from about 1 eV to tens or even as much as a few thousands of eV, depending on the original accelerated energy of the gas-cluster ion and the size of the gas-cluster ion at the time of acceleration.
Gas-cluster ion-beams are generated and transported for purposes of irradiating a workpiece according to known techniques. Various types of holders are known in the art for holding the object in the path of the GCIB for irradiation and for manipulating the object to permit irradiation of a multiplicity of portions of the object. Neutral Beams may be generated and transported for purposes of irradiating a workpiece according to techniques taught herein.
Various embodiments of the present invention may employ a high beam purity method and system for deriving from an accelerated gas-cluster ion-beam an accelerated neutral gas cluster and/or preferably monomer beam that can be employed for a variety of types of surface and shallow subsurface materials processing and which is capable, for many applications, of superior performance compared to conventional GCIB processing. A Neutral Beam apparatus can provide well-focused, accelerated, intense neutral monomer beams with particles having energies in the range of from about 1 eV to as much as a few thousand eV. This is an energy range in which it has heretofore been impractical with simple, relatively inexpensive apparatus to form intense neutral beams.
These accelerated Neutral Beams are generated by first forming a conventional accelerated GCIB, then partly or essentially fully dissociating it by methods and operating conditions that do not introduce impurities into the beam, then separating the remaining charged portions of the beam from the neutral portion, and subsequently using the resulting accelerated Neutral Beam for workpiece processing. Depending on the degree of dissociation of the gas-cluster ions, the Neutral Beam produced may be a mixture of neutral gas monomers and gas clusters or may essentially consist entirely or almost entirely of neutral gas monomers. It is preferred that the accelerated Neutral Beam is a fully dissociated neutral monomer beam.
An advantage of the Neutral Beams that may be produced by the methods and apparatus of this disclosure, is that they may be used to process electrically insulating materials without producing damage to the material due to charging of the surfaces of such materials by beam transported charges as commonly occurs for all ionized beams including GCIB. For example, in some applications, ions often contribute to damaging or destructive charging of thin dielectric films such as oxides, nitrides, etc. The use of Neutral Beams can enable successful beam processing of polymer, dielectric, and/or other electrically insulating or high electrical resistivity materials, coatings, and films in applications where ion beams may produce undesired side effects due to surface or other charging effects. Examples include (without limitation) processing of corrosion inhibiting coatings, and irradiation cross-linking and/or polymerization of organic films. Further examples include Neutral Beam processing of glass, polymer, and ceramic materials as well as thin film dielectric coatings such as oxides, nitrides, glasses, etc.
Another advantage of accelerated neutral monomer beams derived from an accelerated GCIB, when used in surface modification applications, is that they form a much shallower disrupted layer in the processed surface when compared even with GCIBs used in the same way.
Since the parent GCIB, from which accelerated Neutral Beams may be formed by the methods and apparatus of this disclosure, comprises ions it is readily accelerated to desired energy and is readily focused using conventional ion beam techniques. Upon subsequent dissociation and separation of the charged ions from the neutral particles, the neutral beam particles tend to retain their focused trajectories and may be transported for extensive distances with good effect.
When neutral gas clusters in a jet are ionized by electron bombardment, they become heated and/or excited. This may result in subsequent evaporation of monomers from the ionized gas cluster, after acceleration, as it travels down the beamline. Additionally, collisions of gas-cluster ions with background gas molecules in the ionizer, accelerator and beamline regions also heat and excite the gas-cluster ions and may result in additional subsequent evolution of monomers from the gas-cluster ions following acceleration. When these mechanisms for evolution of monomers are induced by electron bombardment and/or collision with background gas molecules (and/or other gas clusters) of the same gas from which the GCIB was formed, no contamination is contributed to the beam by the dissociation processes that results in evolving the monomers.
There are other mechanisms that can be employed for dissociating (or inducing evolution of monomers from) gas-cluster ions in a GCIB without introducing contamination into the beam. Some of these mechanisms may also be employed to dissociate neutral gas-clusters in a neutral gas-cluster beam. One mechanism is laser irradiation of the gas-cluster ion-beam using infra-red or other laser energy. Laser-induced heating of the gas-cluster ions in the laser irradiated GCIB results in excitement and/or heating of the gas-cluster ions and causes subsequent evolution of monomers from the beam. Another mechanism is passing the beam through a thermally heated tube so that radiant thermal energy photons impact the gas-cluster ions in the beam. The induced heating of the gas-cluster ions by the radiant thermal energy in the tube results in excitement and/or heating of the gas-cluster ions and causes subsequent evolution of monomers from the beam. In another mechanism, crossing the gas-cluster ion-beam by a gas jet of the same gas or mixture as the source gas used in formation of the GCIB (or other non-contaminating gas) results in collisions of monomers of the gas in the gas jet with the gas clusters in the ion beam producing excitement and/or heating of the gas-cluster ions in the beam and subsequent evolution of monomers from the excited gas-cluster ions. By depending entirely on electron bombardment during initial ionization and/or collisions (with other cluster ions, or with background gas molecules of the same gas(es) as those used to form the GCIB) within the beam and/or laser or thermal radiation and/or crossed jet collisions of non-contaminating gas to produce the GCIB dissociation and/or fragmentation, contamination of the beam by collision with other materials is avoided.
As a neutral gas-cluster jet from a nozzle travels through an ionizing region where electrons are directed to ionize the clusters, a cluster may remain un-ionized or may acquire a charge state, q, of one or more charges (by ejection of electrons from the cluster by an incident electron). The ionizer operating conditions influence the likelihood that a gas cluster will take on a particular charge state, with more intense ionizer conditions resulting in greater probability that a higher charge state will be achieved. More intense ionizer conditions resulting in higher ionization efficiency may result from higher electron flux and/or higher (within limits) electron energy. Once the gas cluster has been ionized, it is typically extracted from the ionizer, focused into a beam, and accelerated by falling through an electric field. The amount of acceleration of the gas-cluster ion is readily controlled by controlling the magnitude of the accelerating electric field. Typical commercial GCIB processing tools generally provide for the gas-cluster ions to be accelerated by an electric field having an adjustable accelerating potential, VAcc, typically of, for example, from about 1 kV to 70 kV (but not limited to that range—VAcc up to 200 kV or even more may be feasible). Thus a singly charged gas-cluster ion achieves an energy in the range of from 1 to 70 keV (or more if larger VAcc is used) and a multiply charged (for example, without limitation, charge state, q=3 electronic charges) gas-cluster ion achieves an energy in the range of from 3 to 210 keV (or more for higher VAcc). For other gas-cluster ion charge states and acceleration potentials, the accelerated energy per cluster is qVAcc eV. From a given ionizer with a given ionization efficiency, gas-cluster ions will have a distribution of charge states from zero (not ionized) to a higher number such as, for example, 6 (or with high ionizer efficiency, even more), and the most probable and mean values of the charge state distribution also increase with increased ionizer efficiency (higher electron flux and/or energy). Higher ionizer efficiency also results in increased numbers of gas-cluster ions being formed in the ionizer. In many cases, GCIB processing throughput increases when operating the ionizer at high efficiency results in increased GCIB current. A downside of such operation is that multiple charge states that may occur on intermediate size gas-cluster ions can increase crater and/or rough interface formation by those ions, and often such effects may operate counterproductively to the intent of the processing. Thus for many GCIB surface processing recipes, selection of the ionizer operating parameters tends to involve more considerations than just maximizing beam current. In some processes, use of a “pressure cell” (see U.S. Pat. No. 7,060,989, to Swenson et al.) may be employed to permit operating an ionizer at high ionization efficiency while still obtaining acceptable beam processing performance by moderating the beam energy by gas collisions in an elevated pressure “pressure cell.”
With Neutral Beams there is no downside to operating the ionizer at high efficiency—in fact such operation is sometimes preferred. When the ionizer is operated at high efficiency, there may be a wide range of charge states in the gas-cluster ions produced by the ionizer. This results in a wide range of velocities in the gas-cluster ions in the extraction region between the ionizer and the accelerating electrode, and also in the downstream beam. This may result in an enhanced frequency of collisions between and among gas-cluster ions in the beam that generally results in a higher degree of fragmentation of the largest gas-cluster ions. Such fragmentation may result in a redistribution of the cluster sizes in the beam, skewing it toward the smaller cluster sizes. These cluster fragments retain energy in proportion to their new size (N) and so become less energetic while essentially retaining the accelerated velocity of the initial unfragmented gas-cluster ion. The change of energy with retention of velocity following collisions has been experimentally verified (as for example reported in Toyoda, N. et al., “Cluster size dependence on energy and velocity distributions of gas-cluster ions after collisions with residual gas,” Nucl. Instr. & Meth. in Phys. Research B 257 (2007), pp 662-665). Fragmentation may also result in redistribution of charges in the cluster fragments. Some uncharged fragments likely result and multi-charged gas-cluster ions may fragment into several charged gas-cluster ions and perhaps some uncharged fragments. It is understood by the inventors that design of the focusing fields in the ionizer and the extraction region may enhance the focusing of the smaller gas-cluster ions and monomer ions to increase the likelihood of collision with larger gas-cluster ions in the beam extraction region and in the downstream beam, thus contributing to the dissociation and/or fragmenting of the gas-cluster ions.
In an embodiment of the present invention, background gas pressure in the ionizer, acceleration region, and beamline may optionally be arranged to have a higher pressure than is normally utilized for good GCIB transmission. This can result in additional evolution of monomers from gas-cluster ions (beyond that resulting from the heating and/or excitement resulting from the initial gas cluster ionization event). Pressure may be arranged so that gas-cluster ions have a short enough mean-free-path and a long enough flight path between ionizer and workpiece that they must undergo multiple collisions with background gas molecules.
For a homogeneous gas-cluster ion containing N monomers and having a charge state of q and which has been accelerated through an electric field potential drop of VAcc volts, the cluster will have energy of approximately qVAcc/NI eV per monomer, where NI is the number of monomers in the cluster ion at the time of acceleration. Except for the smallest gas-cluster ions, a collision of such an ion with a background gas monomer of the same gas as the cluster source gas will result in additional deposition of approximately qVAcc/NI eV into the gas-cluster ion. This energy is relatively small compared to the overall gas-cluster ion energy (qVAcc) and generally results in excitation or heating of the cluster and in subsequent evolution of monomers from the cluster. It is believed that such collisions of larger clusters with background gas seldom fragment the cluster but rather heats and/or excites it to result in evolution of monomers by evaporation or similar mechanisms. Regardless of the source of the excitation that results in the evolution of a monomer or monomers from a gas-cluster ion, the evolved monomer(s) have approximately the same energy per particle, qVAcc/NI eV, and retain approximately the same velocity and trajectory as the gas-cluster ion from which they have evolved. When such monomer evolutions occur from a gas-cluster ion, whether they result from excitation or heating due to the original ionization event, a collision, or radiant heating, the charge has a high probability of remaining with the larger residual gas-cluster ion. Thus after a sequence of monomer evolutions, a large gas-cluster ion may be reduced to a cloud of co-traveling monomers with perhaps a smaller residual gas-cluster ion (or possibly several if fragmentation has also occurred). The co-traveling monomers following the original beam trajectory all have approximately the same velocity as that of the original gas-cluster ion and each has energy of approximately qVAcc/NI eV. For small gas-cluster ions, the energy of collision with a background gas monomer is likely to completely and violently dissociate the small gas cluster and it is uncertain whether in such cases the resulting monomers continue to travel with the beam or are ejected from the beam.
Prior to the GCIB reaching the workpiece, the remaining charged particles (gas-cluster ions, particularly small and intermediate size gas-cluster ions and some charged monomers, but also including any remaining large gas-cluster ions) in the beam are separated from the neutral portion of the beam, leaving only a Neutral Beam for processing the workpiece.
In typical operation, the fraction of power in the neutral beam components relative to that in the full (charged plus neutral) beam delivered at the processing target is in the range of from about 5% to 95%, so by the separation methods and apparatus it is possible to deliver that portion of the kinetic energy of the full accelerated charged beam to the target as a Neutral Beam.
The dissociation of the gas-cluster ions and thus the production of high neutral monomer beam energy is facilitated by 1) Operating at higher acceleration voltages. This increases qVAcc/N for any given cluster size. 2) Operating at high ionizer efficiency. This increases qVAcc/N for any given cluster size by increasing q and increases cluster-ion on cluster-ion collisions in the extraction region due to the differences in charge states between clusters; 3) Operating at a high ionizer, acceleration region, or beamline pressure or operating with a gas jet crossing the beam, or with a longer beam path, all of which increase the probability of background gas collisions for a gas-cluster ion of any given size; 4) Operating with laser irradiation or thermal radiant heating of the beam, which directly promote evolution of monomers from the gas-cluster ions; and 5) Operating at higher nozzle gas flow, which increases transport of gas, clustered and perhaps unclustered into the GCIB trajectory, which increases collisions resulting in greater evolution of monomers.
Measurement of the Neutral Beam cannot be made by current measurement as is convenient for gas-cluster ion-beams. A Neutral Beam power sensor is used to facilitate dosimetry when irradiating a workpiece with a Neutral Beam. The Neutral Beam sensor is a thermal sensor that intercepts the beam (or optionally a known sample of the beam). The rate of rise of temperature of the sensor is related to the energy flux resulting from energetic beam irradiation of the sensor. The thermal measurements must be made over a limited range of temperatures of the sensor to avoid errors due to thermal re-radiation of the energy incident on the sensor. For a GCIB process, the beam power (watts) is equal to the beam current (amps) times VAcc, the beam acceleration voltage. When a GCIB irradiates a workpiece for a period of time (seconds), the energy (joules) received by the workpiece is the product of the beam power and the irradiation time. The processing effect of such a beam when it processes an extended area is distributed over the area (for example, cm2). For ion beams, it has been conveniently conventional to specify a processing dose in terms of irradiated ions/cm2, where the ions are either known or assumed to have at the time of acceleration an average charge state, q, and to have been accelerated through a potential difference of, VAcc volts, so that each ion carries an energy of q VAcc eV (an eV is approximately 1.6×10−19 joule). Thus an ion beam dose for an average charge state, q, accelerated by VAcc and specified in ions/cm2 corresponds to a readily calculated energy dose expressible in joules/cm2. For an accelerated Neutral Beam derived from an accelerated GCIB as utilized herein, the value of q at the time of acceleration and the value of VAcc is the same for both of the (later—formed and separated) charged and uncharged fractions of the beam. The power in the two (neutral and charged) fractions of the GCIB divides proportional to the mass in each beam fraction. Thus for the accelerated Neutral Beam as employed herein, when equal areas are irradiated for equal times, the energy dose (joules/cm2) deposited by the Neutral Beam is necessarily less than the energy dose deposited by the full GCIB. By using a thermal sensor to measure the power in the full GCIB PG and that in the Neutral Beam PN (which is commonly found to be about 5% to 95% that of the full GCIB) it is possible to calculate a compensation factor for use in the Neutral Beam processing dosimetry. When PN is a PG, then the compensation factor is, k=1/a. Thus if a workpiece is processed using a Neutral Beam derived from a GCIB, for a time duration is made to be k times greater than the processing duration for the full GCIB (including charged and neutral beam portions) required to achieve a dose of D ions/cm2, then the energy doses deposited in the workpiece by both the Neutral Beam and the full GCIB are the same (though the results may be different due to qualitative differences in the processing effects due to differences of particle sizes in the two beams.) As used herein, a Neutral Beam process dose compensated in this way is sometimes described as having an energy/cm2 equivalence of a dose of D ions/cm2.
Use of a Neutral Beam derived from a gas-cluster ion-beam in combination with a thermal power sensor for dosimetry in many cases has advantages compared with the use of the full gas-cluster ion-beam or an intercepted or diverted portion, which inevitably comprises a mixture of gas-cluster ions and neutral gas clusters and/or neutral monomers, and which is conventionally measured for dosimetry purposes by using a beam current measurement. Some advantages are as follows:
1) The dosimetry can be more precise with the Neutral Beam using a thermal sensor for dosimetry because the total power of the beam is measured. With a GCIB employing the traditional beam current measurement for dosimetry, only the contribution of the ionized portion of the beam is measured and employed for dosimetry. Minute-to-minute and setup-to-setup changes to operating conditions of the GCIB apparatus may result in variations in the fraction of neutral monomers and neutral clusters in the GCIB. These variations can result in process variations that may be less controlled when the dosimetry is done by beam current measurement.
2) With a Neutral Beam, any material may be processed, including highly insulating materials and other materials that may be damaged by electrical charging effects, without the necessity of providing a source of target neutralizing electrons to prevent workpiece charging due to charge transported to the workpiece by an ionized beam. When employed with conventional GCIB, target neutralization to reduce charging is seldom perfect, and the neutralizing electron source itself often introduces problems such as workpiece heating, contamination from evaporation or sputtering in the electron source, etc. Since a Neutral Beam does not transport charge to the workpiece, such problems are reduced.
3) There is no necessity for an additional device such as a large aperture high strength magnet to separate energetic monomer ions from the Neutral Beam. In the case of conventional GCIB the risk of energetic monomer ions (and other small cluster ions) being transported to the workpiece, where they penetrate producing deep damage, is significant and an expensive magnetic filter is routinely required to separate such particles from the beam. In the case of the Neutral Beam apparatus, the separation of all ions from the beam to produce the Neutral Beam inherently removes all monomer ions.
Such process steps and apparatus can be applied to materials and production cited above to enable product surfaces (including full surfaces or surface portions) to have a surface energy substantially matching surface energy beneficial peptides that can coat and adhere to surfaces to prevent or substantially reduce bacterial colonization thereon essentially without utilization of antibiotics.
As an illustrative example:
Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam (ANAB) technology was used in a study to modify polypropylene (a preferred material for hernia mesh medical products) to inhibit bacteria colonization in vitro after 24 hours without the use of drugs or antibiotics. Specifically, the ANAB parameter designed and used to increase the surface energy of polypropylene to be closer to surface energy of two critical proteins (mucin and casein) contained in bodily fluids that if adsorbed to a material surface can decrease bacteria colonization. Materials were characterized using atomic force microscopy demonstrating an expected greater surface roughness and surface area for the ANAB-treated samples compared to controls. A wide range of gram-positive, gram-negative, and antibiotic resistant bacteria were tested here (including Staph. epidermidis, Staph. aureus, MRSA, multi-drug resistant E. coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and demonstrated on average an over a 3-log reduction in bacteria after 24 hours. Further, this study confirmed a greater adsorption of mucin and casein on ANAB-treated polypropylene as the mechanism to decrease bacteria colonization. Lastly, this study utilized an aggressive cleaning procedure and showed strong durability of the ANAB-treated surfaces. This study demonstrates a way to potentially decrease implant infections on polypropylene based implants using ANAB irradiation modification without using antibiotics.
The inhibition of bacterial colonization and infection feature of the invention can be combined with other beneficial features such as increasing desirable bioactivity, for such purpose as wound repair, grafts, doing so in vitro targeting attachment of desirable host cells to the products described above or external cells applied in vitro (optionally derived from the host or other sources). Such inhibition method and apparatus can also be used in other products such as hard or soft implants into humans, other mammals and other life forms, and in laboratory and industrial products such as membranes, filters, fluid processing or storage apparatus (e.g., pumps, vials, tubes, tanks and the like), using proteins effective as antagonists to bacterial colonization.
The treated surfaces of platelets control or inhibition of central colonization or like antagonists also can be any of platelet attachment inhibition comprises any of: reduced or delayed attachment; reduced or delayed activation; or reduced or delayed clotting of platelets on the surface.
a show_live/dead data after 24 h treatment by Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, drug resistant Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa;
In the following description, for simplification, item numbers from earlier-described figures may appear in subsequently-described figures without discussion. Likewise, items discussed in relation to earlier figures may appear in subsequent figures without item numbers or additional description. In such cases items with like numbers are like items and have the previously-described features and functions, and illustration of items without item numbers shown in the present figure refer to like items having the same functions as the like items illustrated in earlier-discussed numbered figures.
Reference is now made to
A workpiece 1160, which may (for example) be a medical device, a semiconductor material, an optical element, or other workpiece to be processed by GCIB processing, is held on a workpiece holder 1162, which disposes the workpiece in the path of the GCIB 1128. The workpiece holder is attached to but electrically insulated from the processing chamber 1108 by an electrical insulator 1164. Thus, GCIB 1128 striking the workpiece 1160 and the workpiece holder 1162 flows through an electrical lead 1168 to a dose processor 1170. A beam gate 1172 controls transmission of the GCIB 1128 along axis 1154 to the workpiece 1160. The beam gate 1172 typically has an open state and a closed state that is controlled by a linkage 1174 that may be (for example) electrical, mechanical, or electromechanical. Dose processor 1170 controls the open/closed state of the beam gate 1172 to manage the GCIB dose received by the workpiece 1160 and the workpiece holder 1162. In operation, the dose processor 1170 opens the beam gate 1172 to initiate GCIB irradiation of the workpiece 1160. Dose processor 1170 typically integrates GCIB electrical current arriving at the workpiece 1160 and workpiece holder 1162 to calculate an accumulated GCIB irradiation dose. At a predetermined dose, the dose processor 1170 closes the beam gate 1172, terminating processing when the predetermined dose has been achieved.
Any workpiece surfaces that are non-planar, for example, spherical or cup-like, rounded, irregular, or other un-flat configuration, may be oriented within a range of angles with respect to the beam incidence to obtain optimal GCIB processing of the workpiece surfaces. The workpiece holder 1202 can be fully articulated for orienting all non-planar surfaces to be processed in suitable alignment with the GCIB 1128 to provide processing optimization and uniformity. More specifically, when the workpiece 1160 being processed is non-planar, the workpiece holder 1202 may be rotated in a rotary motion 1210 and articulated in articulation motion 1212 by an articulation/rotation mechanism 1204. The articulation/rotation mechanism 1204 may permit 360 degrees of device rotation about longitudinal axis 1206 (which is coaxial with the axis 1154 of the GCIB 1128) and sufficient articulation about an axis 1208 perpendicular to axis 1206 to maintain the workpiece surface to within a desired range of beam incidence.
Under certain conditions, depending upon the size of the workpiece 1160, a scanning system may be desirable to produce uniform irradiation of a large workpiece. Although often not necessary for GCIB processing, two pairs of orthogonally oriented electrostatic scan plates 1130 and 1132 may be utilized to produce a raster or other scanning pattern over an extended processing area. When such beam scanning is performed, a scan generator 1156 provides X-axis scanning signal voltages to the pair of scan plates 1132 through lead pair 1159 and Y-axis scanning signal voltages to the pair of scan plates 1130 through lead pair 1158. The scanning signal voltages are commonly triangular waves of different frequencies that cause the GCIB 1128 to be converted into a scanned GCIB 1148, which scans the entire surface of the workpiece 1160. A scanned beam-defining aperture 1214 defines a scanned area. The scanned beam-defining aperture 1214 is electrically conductive and is electrically connected to the low-pressure vessel 1102 wall and supported by support member 1220. The workpiece holder 1202 is electrically connected via a flexible electrical lead 1222 to a faraday cup 1216 that surrounds the workpiece 1160 and the workpiece holder 1202 and collects all the current passing through the defining aperture 1214. The workpiece holder 1202 is electrically isolated from the articulation/rotation mechanism 1204 and the faraday cup 1216 is electrically isolated from and mounted to the low-pressure vessel 1102 by insulators 1218. Accordingly, all current from the scanned GCIB 1148, which passes through the scanned beam-defining aperture 1214 is collected in the faraday cup 1216 and flows through electrical lead 1224 to the dose processor 1170. In operation, the dose processor 1170 opens the beam gate 1172 to initiate GCIB irradiation of the workpiece 1160. The dose processor 1170 typically integrates GCIB electrical current arriving at the workpiece 1160 and workpiece holder 1202 and faraday cup 1216 to calculate an accumulated GCIB irradiation dose per unit area. At a predetermined dose, the dose processor 1170 closes the beam gate 1172, terminating processing when the predetermined dose has been achieved. During the accumulation of the predetermined dose, the workpiece 1160 may be manipulated by the articulation/rotation mechanism 1204 to ensure processing of all desired surfaces.
The Neutral Beam 1314 contains a repeatable fraction of the initial energy of the accelerated GCIB 1128. The remaining ionized portion 1316 of the original GCIB 1128 has been removed from the Neutral Beam 1314 and is collected by the grounded deflection plate 1304. The ionized portion 1316 that is removed from the Neutral Beam 1314 may include monomer ions and gas-cluster ions including intermediate size gas-cluster ions. Because of the monomer evaporation mechanisms due to cluster heating during the ionization process, intra-beam collisions, background gas collisions, and other causes (all of which result in erosion of clusters) the Neutral Beam substantially consists of neutral monomers, while the separated charged particles are predominately cluster ions. The inventors have confirmed this by suitable measurements that include re-ionizing the Neutral Beam and measuring the charge to mass ratio of the resulting ions. As will be shown below, certain superior process results are obtained by processing workpieces using this Neutral Beam.
In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, nickel titanium alloy, also known as nitinol, a material favored for certain types of vascular stents was treated by GCIB and Neutral Beam processing to inhibit or delay the attachment and/or activation of platelets on surfaces thereof and to inhibit subsequent formation of blood clots.
Electro-polished and cleaned nitinol coupons (10 mm diameter, 1 mm thick) were divided into the following groups (n=3 for each condition): 1) Unprocessed (except for cleaning) control; 2) cleaned and argon Neutral-Beam-processed; 3) cleaned and argon GCIB-processed; 4) cleaned and Neutral-Beam-processed using each of several source gas mixtures (each of CH4, O2, N2) each used at 10%, 5%, 2%, 1% mixture concentration with the balance argon; 5) GCIB processed using each of several source gas mixtures (each of CH4, O2, N2) each used at 10%, 5%, 2%, 1% mixture concentration with the balance argon.
For each GCIB treatment, a surface of the coupon was irradiated using a GCIB (gas or mixture indicated above) irradiation dose of 5×1014 gas-cluster ions/cm2, the beam was accelerated using VAcc of 30 keV. For each Neutral Beam treatment, a surface of the coupon was irradiated using a Neutral Beam (gas or mixture indicated above) irradiation dose of 2.5×1017 neutral atoms/cm2, the parent GCIB was accelerated using VAcc of 30 keV. The Neutral Beam was an essentially fully dissociated beam. The Neutral Beam dose of 2.5×1017 neutral atoms/cm2 was determined to be approximately the thermal equivalent of the 5×1014 gas-cluster ions/cm2.
Each of the nitinol coupons (controls and all processed conditions) were placed in individual wells of non-tissue culture plates treated 24 well plates (BD Falcon 351147). 500 μl of citrated human whole blood was placed in each well and the plates (with blood and coupons) were incubated for one hour at 37° C., 5% CO2 in humidified air. Blood, all taken from the same batch, was used in each well. Following incubation, the blood was removed from the wells and all coupons were gently rinsed 3 times with 500 μl 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Washed coupons were then fixed in 2% gluteraldehyde in PBS buffer with a pH of 7.4 for 1 hour. Each coupon was then rinsed three times in 500 μl PBS for 5 minutes. Nitinol coupons were then fixed in a secondary fixative using 1% osmium tetra-oxide (OsO4) in H2O. They were then rinsed 3 times with distilled water for 5 minutes each. Following the washes, coupons were serially dehydrated in 30%, 50%, 70%, 90% ethanol concentration, 5 minutes each, followed by 2 times of 5 minutes in 100% ethanol. Coupons were then gold sputter-coated and imaged by scanning electron microscope (SEM).
In each instance the GCIB- or Neutral-Beam-processed (using argon alone or one of the gas mixtures) coupons showed reduced platelet attachment and/or activation and reduced clotting as compared to the control coupons. For this set of tests, the best results for both GCIB and Neural Beam treatment were obtained using a CH4/argon mixture at a concentration of 2.5% and 5% (both concentration results approximately the same) as the source gas employed for beam generation.
In another test, nitinol was treated by GCIB and Neutral Beam processing to determine the effects of the beam processing on subsequent attachment and/or proliferation of endothelial cells on the surface.
Electro-polished and cleaned nitinol coupons (10 mm diameter, 1 mm thick) were divided into the following groups (n=3 for each condition): 1) Unprocessed (except for cleaning) control; 2) cleaned and argon Neutral-Beam-processed; 3) cleaned and argon GCIB-processed; 4) cleaned and Neutral-Beam-processed using each of several source gas mixtures (each of CH4, O2, N2) each used at 5% and 1% mixture concentration with the balance argon; 5) GCIB processed using each of several source gas mixtures (each of CH4, O2, N2) each used at 5% and 1% mixture concentration with the balance argon.
For each GCIB treatment, a surface of the coupon was irradiated using a GCIB (gas or mixture indicated above) irradiation dose of 5×1014 gas-cluster ions/cm2, the beam was accelerated using VAcc of 30 keV. For each Neutral Beam treatment, a surface of the coupon was irradiated using a Neutral Beam (gas or mixture indicated above) irradiation dose of 2.5×1017 neutral atoms/cm2, the parent GCIB was accelerated using VAcc of 30 keV. The Neutral Beam was an essentially fully dissociated beam. The Neutral Beam dose of 2.5×1017 neutral atoms/cm2 was determined to be approximately the thermal equivalent of the 5×1014 gas-cluster ions/cm2.
Each of the nitinol coupons (controls and all processed conditions) were placed in individual wells of non-tissue culture plates treated 24 well plates (BD Falcon 351147). Each nitinol coupon was seeded with 2000 human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC; Lonza Group Ltd, Muenchensteinerstrasse 38, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland; Lonza #C2519A) in 1 ml of endothelial cell growth media (Lonza EGM-2), and the plates (with media and coupons) were incubated at 37° C., 5% CO2 in humidified air. Media in the wells was changed every 3 days. At day 7 and day 10, plates corresponding to those time points were removed, media was removed, cells were fixed for 30 minutes in 500 μl 10% buffered formalin at room temperature. Formalin was removed and 500 μl crystal violet stain (Sigma #HT90132; diluted 1:100 in 1× phosphate buffered saline) was added to each well and placed on a shaker with gentle agitation for 30 minutes. Crystal violet stain was removed and excess stain was washed off in tap water until clear. Nitinol coupons were then air dried overnight, 500 μl elution buffer (2% NaOH; 10% Trichloroacetic acid; 50% Methanol; in H2O) was placed in each well to allow dye elution from coupons. 100 μl samples of each well in duplicates (two samples from each well, thus 6 samples per condition [2×n]) were placed in a 96 well plate and absorbance at 570 nm for each well was read on a plate reader. Absorbance was compared to a standard curve and cell numbers were determined. T-tests were used to determine significance compared to controls. Endothelial cells attached and proliferated on the surface of nitinol coupons treated by either argon or mixtures of Argon with CH4, O2, or N2 using either GCIB or Neutral Beam. However, the best results were obtained using GCIB, and Table 1 shows the results for the GCIB-processed coupon.
Generally, GCIB allowed better HUVEC attachment and proliferation as compared with Neutral Beam. As Table 1 shows, at day 7, only Argon GCIB and CH4 1% GCIB were significantly better than the control, all others were not significantly different from controls. By day 10, only O2 1% GCIB did not produce significant increase in HUVEC attachment and proliferation compared to the controls, all others were significantly better.
The best results for platelet and clotting inhibition were observed for GCIB treatment using CH4 mixtures in argon while the best results for endothelial cell attachment and proliferation were observed for GCIB treatment using N2 or O2 mixtures in argon. However, it is seen that nitinol coupons receiving identical GCIB processing using 5% CH4, 5% O2, or 5% N2 mixtures in argon all show significant platelet delay and/or inhibition as well as significantly enhanced endothelial cell attachment and/or proliferation. Other combinations also produce both desirable outcomes using either GCIB or Neutral Beam treatments.
Although the invention has been described, for exemplary purposes, as using a GCIB or a Neutral Beam derived from a GCIB for processing a surface of a nitinol object, it is understood by the inventors that benefits obtained by application of such surface processing are not limited to that specific metallic material and that the methods and apparatus described herein may be used for successful processing of other metals and other materials including, without limitation, ceramics, polymers, glasses, oxides, metal alloys, plastics, polymers and copolymers, solid resins, quartz, sapphire, glassy solids, titanium, titania, alloys of titanium, cobalt-chrome alloys, cobalt-chrome-molybdenum alloys, tantalum, and tantalum alloys. Although the invention has been described, for example, with reference beams derived from mixtures of argon and methane gases, it is understood by the inventors that useful treatments also result from employing noble gases, gases such as N2, O2, CO2, and other gases and from employing gas mixtures in various mixture concentrations, and it is intended that all such applications are included within the scope of the invention.
Commercial grade polypropylene sheets (0.75 mm thick; Misumi Plastics) were cut into 12 mm diameter disks and cleaned in 70% isopropanol for 30 min followed by 3×15 min washes in deionized H2O. Polypropylene was prepared as a control or treated by ANAB using argon (Ar) gas on an accelerated particle beam system (nAccel 100, Exogenesis Corp.) with a deflector to remove charged clusters as described in detail previously[4]. Briefly, Ar gas was flowed at 200 SCCM through a 100 mm diameter nozzle to create weakly bonded clusters consisting of a few hundred to a few thousand Ar atoms. These clusters are then impact ionized by electron impact ionization resulting in a +1 or +2 charged cluster which is then accelerated by introducing it to a 30-kV electrostatic field. Once accelerated, the cluster is then immediately broken apart by orchestrating its collisions with residual Ar gas atoms present along the beam path in the acceleration chamber. These collisions break the weak van der Waals bonds thus releasing individual neutral atoms along with smaller, charged clusters. The remaining clusters are then pushed away with an electrostatic deflector allowing the neutral atoms to maintain their initial momentum until they reach and collide with the material surface. The effective dose of the ANAB was 2.5×1017 Ar atoms per cm2.
An important objective of the present study was also to assess how durable the ANAB-treated surfaces were to minimize bacteria colonization. For this, some samples were cleaned by serially soaking and sonicating in acetone and ethanol for 10 minutes each, respectively, and were re-used in the surface characterization, bacteria, and protein adsorption experiments.
Samples were characterized for surface energy and bacteria functions. Nine replicates were selected corresponding for each sample type and placed into 12-well plates. The well plates containing the coupons were subsequently transferred to a clean room equipped with a Phoenix 150 Contact Angle Analyzer. A three-solvent system, i.e., deionized water, ethylene glycol, and glycerol, was adopted for evaluating the surface energies of the coupons. Specifically, 16 μl per solvent were dropped onto the coupon surfaces in triplicate for each of the coupon identities, and images were obtained after 2 s. Contact angles were measured using the DropSnake plugin on Fiji. The surface energy of each substrate was determined by applying the Owens/Wendt theory in tandem with contact angle data and solvent surface tension values, of which the latter were obtained from the literature. The Owens/Wendt model structurally follows the mathematical formulation shown in Equation I below, where of and at are the dispersive and polar components, respectively, of the wetting liquid's surface tension, where of and of are the dispersive and polar components, respectively, of the substrate's surface energy, and where 8 is the contact angle that the solvent makes with the substrate surface. The goal was to use ANAB to modify the polypropylene surface until a surface energy close to the surface energy of two endogenous proteins known to reduce bacteria colonization (mucin and casein) was achieved.
AFM measurements were taken using a Park Systems XE-70 instrument in non-contact mode. Silicon tips with a resonant frequency of—330 kHz and a force constant of 42 N/m were used (PointProbe® Plus, Nanosensors). 1 μm2 regions of the polypropylene were imaged and the arithmetical mean roughness (Ra) and ten-point mean roughness (Rz) was measured across this region.
Standard colony counting procedures were implemented for determining bacterial functions on the polypropylene coupons for supporting bacterial attachment and proliferation. Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 35984), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli; ATCC 25922) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa; ATCC 27853) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and cultured overnight in 4 ml of a 3% Tryptic soy broth (TSB) solution.
After a minimum of 16 hours inside a shaking incubator which operated at 37° C. and 110 rpm, the bacteria were diluted in TSB (inside a sterile Class II biological safety cabinet) to a concentration of 1×109 CFU/ml. Bacterial concentrations were measured using a SpectraMax M3 series plate reader, whereby an absorbance output reading of 0.52 at the wavelength Aa=562 nm corresponded to a bacterial density of 1×109 CFU/ml. The microbial suspensions were diluted further in TSB to a concentration of 1×106 CFU/ml, which were used to treat the coupons inside separate 24-well plates. Surfaces were sterilized, decontaminated and cleaned using 70% ethanol.
After the samples were inoculated with 1 ml of 1×106 CFU/ml bacteria, the 24-well plates were left, over a period of 24 hours, inside a stationary incubator with internal conditions of 37° C. and 5% CO2. After 24 hours of incubation, the plates were removed, consecutively, from the controlled environment and washed gently with 1 ml of sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove unattached and non-adherent bacteria from the sample surfaces. The coupons were carefully removed, using sterile spatulas, from the initial wash solution and immersed in 1 ml of sterile PBS, which had been pre-injected into the wells of new 24-well plates. The coupons were washed once more with 1 ml of sterile PBS (3× washes total per sample) and distributed into polypropylene conical tubes containing 10 ml of sterile PBS. The tubes and their contents were subsequently agitated using a Branson water bath sonicator for 15 min. This facilitated the detachment of bacteria from the coupon surfaces, and the resulting suspensions were serially diluted 10−106×. 10 μl of each dilution were dropped, in triplicate, onto Trypticase soy agar (TSA) plates, and left to air dry in a sterile BSC-II. After complete deposition of the bacteria onto the TSA, the plates were lidded, inverted (to disable condensate from washing away or disturbing the bacterial colonies), and placed inside a stationary incubator (37° C., 5% CO2). The plates were removed from the incubator after 15 hours, and the bacterial colonies were counted manually, with the assistance of the Cell Counter plugin on ImageJ.
For the live/dead assay, at the end of the prescribed time period, the substrates were vortexed for 60 seconds in a Tris-buffered saline (TBS) solution comprised of 42 mM Tris-HCl, 8 mM Tris Base, and 0.15 M NaCl (Sigma Aldrich). Samples were then incubated for 15 minutes with the BacLight Live/Dead solution (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) dissolved in TBS at the concentration recommended by the manufacturer. Substrates were rinsed twice with TBS and placed into a 50% glycerol solution in TBS prior to imaging. Substrates were checked by staining with the BacLight Live/Dead staining procedure mentioned above to ensure that all of the bacteria were removed during vortexing. After it was found that all the bacteria were removed from the substrate, each vortexing solution was combined and tested for live/dead bacteria using the procedure outlined above. Similar volumes were maintained for all samples to ensure the same dilution. It has been found that when bacteria are stained via the BacLight Live/Dead stain they can still be subsequently by stained by crystal violet, adding a third way bacteria colonization was assessed in the present study. For this, bacteria were visualized and counted using a Leica DM5500 B fluorescence microscope with image analysis software captured using a Retiga 4000R camera. Using standard techniques, separate aliquots of the vortexed bacteria solution were also obtained and tested for crystal violet.
Samples were soaked in the bacteria culture media described above for 24 hours. At the end of the prescribed time period, proteins were desorbed from the surface by soaking samples in 10% SDS for 5 minutes. All samples were checked to ensure all proteins were removed through this soaking. The protein eluant supernatant was then analyzed using ELISA assays to determine which proteins adsorbed and how much adsorbed, with a special focus on mucin, lubricin, and casein which are all proteins known to reduce bacteria attachment.
Lastly, to correlate the increased adsorption of key proteins from the bacteria culture media to the samples of interest for inhibition of bacteria colonization, samples were first coated with various concentrations (from 1 microgram/ml to 100 micrograms/ml) of proteins that demonstrated an increased adsorption trend on the sample through simple soaking for 1 hour. Proteins were purchased from Sigma. Then, the bacteria experiments mentioned in the bacteria experiments section above were conducted on the protein pre-adsorbed samples. Since the polypropylene samples were created to have a surface energy close to that of mucin and casein, it was expected that we would measure decreased bacteria adsorption on the ANAB-treated samples that adsorbed more anti-bacterial adhesive proteins, thus, providing a mechanism of why the samples decreased bacteria attachment.
All cell experiments were run in triplicate and repeated a minimum of three times per substrate type. Numerical data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA); values of p <0.05 were considered significant. Duncan's multiple range tests were used to determine differences between means.
Following from the contact angle analyses section, the angles that 16 μl droplets of deionized water, ethylene glycol, and glycerol formed with the solid interfaces were quantified, and the results are tabulated and summarized graphically in Table 1. The ANAB-treated sample was significantly more wettable compared to the untreated control, as designed.
Results of the present study demonstrated significantly increased nanoscale surface roughness, as measured by atomic force microscopy for the ABAN-treated compared to control samples (
The
Bacterial adhesion to the various polypropylene coupons was evaluated using the plating technique described previously. Impressively, all bacteria colonization decreased on the ANAB-treated samples compared to controls after 24 hours no matter if they were drug-resistant bacteria or gram positive bacteria or gram negative bacteria as shown in
Such results are significant since no drug or anti-biotic coating was used in the study and typically, different antibiotics are needed for gram positive versus gram negative bacteria. In this study, the same nanoroughing approach via the ANAB-treatment significantly decreased both gram negative and gram positive bacteria close to values typically seen for antibiotics.
a show live/dead data after 24 h treatment by Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, drug resistant Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. [Data=mean±standard deviation: N=3, all ANAB-treated samples were significantly less (p<0.01) than controls].
Results of the present study also confirmed the significantly less S. aureus colonization on the ANAB-treated compared to control samples after 24 h of culture (
Results of protein adsorption studies showed significantly greater levels of both mucin and casein adsorption of ANAB-treated samples compared to controls (0.9 μg/ml compared to 0.1 μg/ml for mucin and 0.4 μg/ml compared to 0.1 μg/ml for casein respectively). There were no differences observed for another key protein which decreases bacteria colonization, lubricin.
Lastly, results supported significantly less bacteria colonization after 24 hours onto ANAB-treated samples coated with mucin and casein compared to controls (
Lastly, as can be observed by the low standard deviations throughout this study, it was clear that the cleaning procedure employed did not significantly alter surface characterization, bacteria colonization, and the measured mechanism of action; although more studies are required, this implies a strong surability of the ABAN-treated samples.
Results of this study showed that polypropylene can be treated by Accelerated Neutral Atom Beam (ANAB) to generate a surface energy close to the surface energy of key proteins contained in the body (mucin and casein) to in turn inhibit bacteria colonization after 24 hours, all without resorting to the use of antibiotics. Such results are significant as they were demonstrated for both gram positive, gram negative, and multi-drug resistant bacteria.
The present invention is applicable to objects such as medical devices and natural or synthetic body parts implanted temporarily or indefinite duration (e.g., hernia mesh, catheter, stent, port, knee or hip replacement), in humans or other mammals or other life forms and also to usage in other ways including laboratory and industrial processes and apparatus for control of platelet formation and/or inhibition of bacterial colonization from the usage environments thereof such as membrane surfaces or of processing equipment the treated surface may be of material described above.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/909,482 filed Mar. 1, 2018 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,971,324, issued Apr. 6, 2021) which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 14/655,361 filed Jun. 25, 2015, now abandoned, which is a Continuation-in-Part of application Ser. No. 14/496,412 filed Sep. 25, 2014, which is a section 371 international phase entry from PCT application Ser. No. PCT/US13/77646 filed Dec. 24, 2013 which claims priority from provisional applications 61/757,905 (1/29/13) and 61/746,329 (12/27/12) and is also a Divisional of application Ser. No. 13/215,514 filed Aug. 23, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,847,148, which claims priority from provisional applications 61/490,675 (5/27/11), 61/484,421 (5/10/11), 61/473,359 (4/8/11) and 61/376,225 (8/23/10).
No U.S. or foreign government support was given for the invention described in this application.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61757905 | Jan 2013 | US | |
| 61746329 | Dec 2012 | US | |
| 61490675 | May 2011 | US | |
| 61484421 | May 2011 | US | |
| 61473359 | Apr 2011 | US | |
| 61376225 | Aug 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13215514 | Aug 2011 | US |
| Child | 14655361 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15909482 | Mar 2018 | US |
| Child | 17222467 | US | |
| Parent | 14655361 | Jun 2015 | US |
| Child | 15909482 | US |
