This invention relates to semiconductor devices and systems for electronic power conversion circuits, and more particularly relates to devices and systems using high performance power transistors, such as gallium nitride high electron mobility transistors (GaN HEMTs).
The above referenced related patent applications disclose semiconductor devices, such as gallium nitride (GaN) semiconductor power devices, using an island electrode topology.
For example, as disclosed in the above referenced co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/020,712, entitled “Gallium nitride power devices using island topography”, GaN transistors with ultra-low on-resistance can be produced using Island Topology™. This particular island electrode topology provides a compact structure with a gate width more than double that of a conventional multi-finger design of a similar device size, with superior current handling per unit area. A breakdown voltage exceeding 1200V can be achieved.
Faults or defective areas may, for example, be caused by defects in the semiconductor layer, e.g. caused by faults in the growth of gallium nitride on a silicon substrate, which has a different crystal structure. While GaN may be grown on some substrates, e.g. SiC, with lower defect densities, it is desirable to be able to use less expensive GaN-on-silicon substrates, which are known to have a higher defect density per unit area.
A fault in the active channel region of a conventional large gate width, multi-finger GaN transistor design, such as shown in
As disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/020,712, in a GaN transistor using Island Topology™, such as illustrated in
As will be described in more detail below, in view of the degree of interconnection of the gate electrodes in this structure, and the gate width per gate connection, disconnection of only one gate contact significantly decreases the overall gate width Wg of the device. For example, for a defective middle gate connection, its removal or isolation effectively deactivates 7 adjacent sets of source/drain and gate connections. In such an arrangement, for a multi-island device fabricated on a GaN-on-silicon wafer, the yield of devices having an acceptable gate width Wg may be low, depending on the defect density per unit area of the substrate wafer.
Moreover, for large gate width transistors using a large number of island electrodes, it will be apparent that it becomes complex and time consuming to electrically test each element separately, i.e., to electrically test each source island, drain island and gate electrode combination, to find defective elements or defective areas of the semiconductor layer.
Thus, it would be desirable to provide systems and devices based on an island topology, which provide improved fault tolerance and/or which facilitate electrical testing for defect detection and mitigation.
The present invention seeks to overcome, or mitigate, one or more of the above mentioned limitations of these known systems and devices using an island topology, or at least provide an alternative.
Thus, aspects of the invention provide systems and devices based on an island topology that provide improved fault tolerance and/or facilitate electrical testing and defect isolation.
Aspects of the invention provide nitride semiconductor devices, including GaN transistors and diodes based on an Isolated Island Topology™.
One aspect of the invention provides a device structure for a nitride semiconductor transistor comprising:
a substrate having a nitride semiconductor layer formed on a device area of the substrate and defining a plurality of active regions for an array of islands of a multi-island transistor,
the array of islands extending in first and second directions over the device area, each of said active regions comprising a two dimensional electron gas (2DEG) region isolated from adjacent active regions by an intervening inactive region of the device area;
each island having a source electrode, a drain electrode and a gate electrode formed on a respective active region of the island, each source electrode having a plurality of source peninsulas, each drain electrode having a plurality of drain peninsulas, the source and drain peninsulas being interleaved and spaced apart over the active region of the island to define a channel region therebetween, and the gate electrode formed on the nitride semiconductor layer over the channel region, the gate electrode running between the source and drain peninsulas across the island;
the source, drain and gate electrodes of each island each having, respectively, a source contact area, a drain contact area and gate contact area; and
the source, drain and gate electrodes of each island of the array of islands being arranged so that at least some electrodes of each island are electrically isolated from electrodes of neighbouring islands in at least one of said first and second directions. The source, drain and gate electrodes contact areas of individual islands each comprise a contact pad having at least a minimum size required for electrical probing and testing, to identify defective islands.
The array of islands may comprise an n×m matrix of n rows and m columns of islands. In one arrangement, the source contact areas and gate contact areas of the nth and n−1 th rows of islands are positioned over inactive regions of the device area between the n−1th and nth rows of islands; and drain contact areas of the nth and n+1th rows of islands are positioned over inactive regions of the device area between the nth and n+1 th rows of islands.
In some embodiments, for each island, all electrodes (i.e., source, drain and gate electrodes) of each island are defined separately from, and electrically isolated from, all the electrodes of neighbouring islands, in both directions (i.e., row-wise and column-wise) of the array. Electrical isolation of each of the source, drain and gate electrodes of each island facilitates testing and isolation of defective islands during fabrication of the transistor.
The active area or region of each island defined by the 2DEG region of the nitride semiconductor hetero-structure may also be isolated from active regions of neighbouring islands. For example, for a gallium nitride/aluminum gallium nitride (GaN/AlGaN) hetero-structure, the GaN layer may extend over the entire device area, while the AlGaN layer is patterned to define a rectangular active area comprising a 2DEG region on each island of the array. In regions in between, the GaN layer only (without an overlying AlGaN layer) provides an inactive region of the semiconductor layer without a 2DEG region, which provides another level of isolation between neighbouring islands.
In some embodiments, an active area/region comprising a 2DEG region may extend laterally through a group or set of neighbouring islands, e.g., a row of islands or a column of islands, or a group of neighbouring islands in a row-wise and/or column-wise direction.
In other embodiments, only some electrodes are electrically isolated from those of neighbouring islands, and some electrodes may be electrically connected. For example, in some embodiments, one or more neighbouring islands share a common source electrode. In some embodiments, electrodes of a set of neighbouring islands are interconnected in one direction of the array, e.g., in a row-wise direction of the array of islands, while electrodes of each island are electrically isolated in a second direction, i.e., in a column-wise direction of the array.
The device structure for a transistor further comprises an overlying interconnect structure comprising one or more dielectric (insulating) layers and metallization layers providing: a source interconnection (e.g., one or more source straps) interconnecting the source electrodes of multiple neighbouring islands in parallel;
a drain interconnection (e.g., one or more drain straps) interconnecting the multiple neighbouring drain electrodes in parallel; and
a gate interconnection (e.g., one or more gate straps) interconnecting the gate electrodes of multiple islands to form a common gate, having a large gate width Wg.
Advantageously, the source, drain and gate interconnections are configured to provide electrical isolation of one or more of source, drain and gate electrodes of any defective islands, to enable yield enhancement.
For example, for a defective island, the electrical isolation comprises a layer of electrically insulating material isolating the source, drain and gate contacts of the defective island from the respective overlying source, drain and gate straps.
In other embodiments, the source, drain and gate contacts of defective islands may be selectively isolated from the overlying gate, source and drain interconnections.
Another aspect of the invention provides a device structure for a nitride semiconductor diode comprising: a substrate having a nitride semiconductor layer defining active regions of a device area on the substrate, said active regions comprising 2DEG regions; the device area comprising an array of islands extending in first and second directions over the device area; each island having an anode electrode and a cathode electrode formed on an active region of the island, spaced apart over the active region of the island to define a channel region therebetween; each anode electrode having an anode contact area, each cathode electrode having a cathode contact area; at least some the anode and cathode electrodes of each island of the array of islands being arranged so as to be electrically isolated from anode and cathode electrodes of neighbouring islands in at least one of said first and second directions.
In diodes according to some embodiments, all anode and cathode electrodes are electrically isolated from anode and cathode electrodes of neighbouring islands in both directions. The device structure for a diode further comprises an overlying interconnect structure comprising one or more dielectric (insulating) layers and metallization layers providing: an anode interconnection interconnecting the anode electrodes in parallel; a cathode interconnection interconnecting the cathode electrodes in parallel.
Advantageously, the anode and cathode interconnections are configured to provide electrical isolation of anode and cathode electrodes of defective islands.
Another aspect of the invention provides a testing and isolation methodology, i.e., a method for testing and fabrication of a device structure for a transistor, comprising the steps of: providing a device structure as described above, probing and electrically testing electrodes of each island of the array of islands, identifying and/or mapping defective islands; and selectively providing source, drain and gate electrical interconnections only to respective source, drain and gate electrodes of islands other than said defective islands, thereby electrically isolating defective islands of the transistor.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides a hybrid device/system/assembly comprising: a GaN-on-silicon substrate, at least one large-area GaN isolated island topology transistor formed on an area of the substrate, a MOSFET (Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor) driver mounted on the substrate adjacent to the GaN transistor, directly interconnected in cascode configuration.
Thus, device structures, devices and systems are provided based on an isolated island topology, wherein a nitride semiconductor layer defines active regions of a device area on the substrate, said active regions comprising 2DEG regions, for an array or matrix of a plurality of islands. Each transistor island has a respective source electrode, a drain electrode and a gate electrode. Each diode island has a respective anode and cathode electrode. At least some electrodes of each island are electrically isolated from corresponding electrodes of neighbouring islands, in at least one direction.
In a large gate width transistor of some embodiments, for example, isolation of islands comprises selective isolation of some or all of the source, drain and gate electrodes of each island from source drain and gate electrodes of neighbouring islands, in one or both directions laterally. Additionally, patterning of the active region comprising the 2DEG regions may allow for inactive areas of the semiconductor layer between islands or between sets of islands in at least one direction. After electrical testing to identify defective islands, the overlying interconnect structure is then formed to provide source, drain and gate interconnections to all good islands, while defective islands are electrically isolated.
In this arrangement, all electrodes of each island can be individually electrically tested independently of electrodes of neighbouring islands. Thus, a map of good islands and defective islands across the entire area of the device, or entire wafer, can be generated. Furthermore, because each island of the array is isolated, when islands are interconnected to form a multi-island transistor or diode, electrodes of defective islands are not connected, thus isolating defective islands. For example, in a large area transistor, in each defective island, each of the source, drain and gate electrodes can be isolated with minimal disruption to connections to source, drain and gate electrodes of neighbouring good islands. Removal of all connection elements for an island, i.e., each of the source, drain, and gate connections, may be advantageous to reduce any residual capacitances, electrical shorts, or other issues.
Accordingly another aspect of the invention provides a nitride semiconductor device comprising:
a substrate having a nitride semiconductor layer formed on a device area of the substrate and defining a plurality of active regions for an array of islands of a multi-island transistor, the array of islands extending in first and second directions over the device area;
each of said active regions comprising a two dimensional electron gas (2DEG) region isolated from adjacent active regions by an intervening inactive region of the device area;
each island having a source electrode, a drain electrode and a gate electrode formed on a respective active region of the island, each source electrode having a plurality of source peninsulas, each drain electrode having a plurality of drain peninsulas, the source and drain peninsulas being interleaved and spaced apart over the active region of the island to define a channel region therebetween, and the gate electrode formed on the nitride semiconductor layer over the channel region, the gate electrode running between the source and drain peninsulas across the island;
each source electrode having a source contact area, each drain electrode having a drain contact area, each gate electrode having a gate contact area;
the source, drain and gate electrodes of each island of the array of islands being arranged so that each island is electrically isolated from neighbouring islands in at least one of said first and second directions;
an overlying isolation layer providing contact openings only to contact areas of non-defective islands while isolating contact areas of defective islands;
a source interconnection interconnecting the source electrodes in parallel; a drain interconnection interconnecting the source electrodes in parallel; a gate interconnection interconnecting the gate electrodes;
said source, drain and gate interconnections thereby selectively connecting non-defective islands and providing electrical isolation of defective islands.
Another aspect of the invention provides a nitride semiconductor device comprising:
a substrate having a nitride semiconductor layer formed on a device area of the substrate and defining a plurality of active regions for an array of islands of a multi-island diode, the array of islands extending in first and second directions over the device area;
each of said active regions comprising a two dimensional electron gas (2DEG) region isolated from adjacent active regions by an intervening inactive region of the device area;
each island having an anode electrode and a cathode electrode formed on a respective active region of the island, spaced apart over the active region of the island to define a channel region therebetween;
each anode electrode having an anode contact area, each cathode electrode having a cathode contact area;
the anode and cathode electrodes of each island of the array of islands being arranged so that each island is electrically isolated from neighboring islands in at least one of said first and second directions;
an overlying isolation layer providing contact openings only to contact areas of non-defective islands and isolating contact areas of defective islands;
an anode interconnection interconnecting the anode island electrodes in parallel;
a cathode interconnection interconnecting the cathode island electrodes in parallel; and
said anode and cathode interconnections thereby selectively connecting non-defective islands and providing electrical isolation of defective islands.
As will be apparent, this isolated island structure is also applicable to multi-island diodes using a similar multi-island topology with selective interconnection of non-defective islands. This technology is particularly applicable to increasing yield when fabricating large area devices on substrates with higher defect densities per unit area. For example, the test methodology and interconnect scheme is particularly applicable to nitride semiconductors, such as those comprising a GaN hetero-structure formed on lower cost silicon substrates.
In one embodiment, the semiconductor device structure comprises an array of island electrodes, the array being arranged as a plurality of islands, each island containing at least one pair of island electrodes acting respectively as source and drain electrodes with a gate electrode extending between each pair of island electrodes, and respective contacts to each source, drain and gate electrode, and each island being completely electrically isolated from its neighbours. Thus, a multi-island device structure is provided that facilitates electrical testing of each individual island, for identification and mapping of good and bad (non-defective and defective) islands of the array.
Following testing, and identification of good and bad islands, electrical connections between islands of the array are selectively provided with isolation of defective islands. For example, bad islands, which are defective or fail to meet electrical specifications, may be isolated after testing by providing a dielectric insulating coating to one or more of the gate, source, and drain contact (test) pads of the defective island. Alternatively, a dielectric insulating layer may be provided over the entire array, and then contact openings selectively opened to source, drain and gate electrodes of all good islands, as required, while defective islands are isolated by the insulating layer over their contacts. The insulating layer may, for example, comprise a layer of a suitable polyimide dielectric, which may be patterned to define the openings over each contact area that is to be electrically interconnected. Deposition of polyimide may comprise 3D printing techniques or materials. For example, after electrical testing and mapping of defective cells, patterning of a photosensitive negative-tone polyimide dielectric layer may be accomplished by a combination of conventional mask based exposures, followed by a selective optical exposure using an optical system such as a computer numerical controlled (CNC) two axis machine capable of producing a light beam of similar diameter to the contact pad area to selectively expose and close contact areas of defective cells.
Any suitable interconnect metallization technology may be used for interconnection of good islands. In one embodiment, the electrical interconnect (i.e., good island interconnections) comprises a copper redistribution layer (RDL). While the wasted die area is limited by the interconnect technology, i.e., interconnect pad size, the RDL allows for use of smaller interconnections. Embodiments for systems comprising GaN power transistors may comprise various patterns of interconnect metallization for source, drain and gate connections, e.g., a GaN-on-silicon substrate, on which is defined by one or more multi-island devices. In another alternative, a direct-write e-beam method may be used to define metal tracks to interconnect all good islands.
In some embodiments, contacts may be arranged to facilitate simultaneous testing of pairs or groups of neighbouring islands, and then if a pair or group fails a group test, individual islands in this group can be tested separately to isolate one or more defective islands. For example, if a group or row of islands passes the test, no further sub-testing is required, thus saving a significant amount of test time.
Advantageously, identification and mapping of defective islands in a large area semiconductor device, e.g. a 10 mm×10 mm device, with a large array of island electrodes enables each semiconductor device to be binned based on specifications such as aggregate gate width Wg or other parameters. Thus, the method provides the possibility of obtaining close to 100% yield of devices that are binned based on different specifications.
This testing methodology allows for semiconductor devices to be produced on really large dies, while facilitating practical approaches to testing for defect detection and mapping of large dies, with significantly reduced test time. It then becomes economically feasible to fabricate large area devices with higher yield.
Systems may further comprise one or more respective MOSFET driver circuits mounted on and directly interconnected on the substrate. As an example, for GaN power devices such as switching transistors, the GaN device is fabricated on a large area die, such as a 5 mm×7 mm die, which comprises a 5 mm×5 mm GaN transistor and an adjacent die area to which a driver MOSFET device is mounted and directly electrically connected in cascode configuration, so as to provide a normally-off device. For example the driver MOSFET may be provided with a back side/substrate drain contact, which directly contacts the source connection of the GaN transistor. This provides a silicon-on-GaN-on-silicon device structure, with a very low inductance interconnection between the two devices.
Advantageously, embodiments of devices and systems provide structures which allow for at least one of improved fault tolerance, device testing and defect isolation.
The foregoing and other objects, features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, of preferred embodiments of the invention, which description is by way of example only.
In the drawings, identical or corresponding elements in the different Figures have the same reference numeral, or corresponding elements have reference numerals incremented by 100 in successive Figures.
In practice, to provide a large area GaN power transistor with a large gate width Wg, e.g., for use in high voltage and high current applications, a device structure 100 such as shown in
As the device area increases, for a given defect density in the semiconductor layer, the probability of one or more faults or defects increases.
A schematic diagram showing a GaN power transistor 200 A based on an island electrode topology with castellated island electrodes is shown in
Each of the source island electrodes 220 comprises a plurality of source peninsulas 230 that extend from sides of the source island electrodes 220 over the channel region. Similarly, each of the drain island electrodes 222 comprises a plurality of drain peninsulas 232 that extend from sides of the drain island electrodes 222 over the channel region. The source and drain electrodes 220 and 222 are arranged so that the respective source and drain peninsulas, 230 and 232 respectively, are interleaved over the active channel regions 224. Except for islands near edges of the array, the source and drain peninsulas, 230 and 232 respectively, extend from four sides of each respective source and drain island. A plurality of interconnected gate electrodes 226 are formed on the semiconductor surface running in the channel regions 224 that extend between each source and drain electrode peninsula, 230 and 232 respectively. The interconnected gate electrodes 226 are connected to a common gate pad 246. This interconnection topology provides a very large gate width Wg per unit area of the substrate. For example, the structure shown in
As disclosed in the above referenced related patent applications, advantageously, the island electrode topology allows for a plurality of low inductance source and drain island connections to be distributed over the active area of the device structure, so that in operation, current is distributed over the device area. Also, as disclosed, selective connection or disconnection of the gate connections, and source and/or drain connections allows for faults to be isolated.
Nevertheless, referring to
In the structure shown in
A simplified view of a semiconductor device structure 300 comprising a GaN power transistor according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown schematically in
A further enlarged view of one building block (repeating cell) 302 of the array, comprising four isolated islands 304-1, 304-2, 304-3, and 304-4, is shown schematically in
In this matrixed structure, in each “column” of the array or matrix (except at edges of the array), each source electrode is adjacent a source electrode of a neighbouring island, and each drain electrode is adjacent a drain electrode of a neighbouring island, so as to provide isolation or inactive regions 370 between neighbouring islands in a x (row-wise) direction. Thus, as illustrated in
In each “row” of the array or matrix, at edges of islands, the edge peninsulas of the source electrodes are placed next to edge peninsulas of the neighbouring source electrodes, and edge peninsulas of the drain electrodes are placed next to edge peninsulas of the neighbouring drain electrode. This arrangement provides isolation or inactive regions 370 between the islands in a y (column-wise) direction. These inactive regions 370 extend between the islands in each of the x and y directions.
Thus, in the resulting multi-island structure, electrodes of each island of the array are electrically isolated from electrodes of neighbouring islands. Additionally, inactive regions 370 of the substrate separate active regions 372 comprising 2DEG regions of each island.
It will be apparent that the electrode arrangement on each island has a similar structure, but its orientation is related to that of an adjacent island by a particular symmetry operation (reflection or rotation about a column-wise or row-wise axis), i.e., adjacent islands have mirror symmetry relative to the direction of a y (column-wise) axis between them and each adjacent island has 180 degree rotational symmetry relative to the direction of a x (row-wise) axis between them. The building blocks are arranged like tiles, in a repeating pattern as a tiled array or wallpaper like pattern. Each building block (or “primitive cell”, to use group theory notation) thus comprises 4 islands, arranged with a line group symmetry of p2 mg using IUC notation, or 22* using Orbifold notation.
The AlGaN layer of the GaN/AlGaN hetero-structure is patterned to define active regions 324 of each island 304-1, 304-2, 304-3, and 304-4, which extend beneath the interleaved source and drain peninsulas, close to the rounded ends of the source and drain peninsulas, 320 and 330 respectively. The source, drain and gate contacts, 340, 342 and 346 respectively, are arranged on portions of the source, drain and gate electrodes which extend over the inactive regions 370.
In this arrangement, each drain electrode is spaced from and adjacent to another drain electrode, and each source electrode is spaced from and adjacent to another source electrode. Preferably, the gate contacts 346 are located away from high voltage drain electrode contacts 342. Thus, as illustrated in
The electrodes are shaped to provide sufficient contact area for conventional bond pads, which allow for electrical probing and testing of each electrode. That is, the contact areas must have a suitable minimum size, e.g. 80 μm diameter, for electrical probing. In a column-wise direction, where drain electrodes are placed next to another drain electrode, the adjacent drain electrodes 322 are shaped so as to taper and provide a promontory 341 for a drain contact area 342, and the promontories are arranged in an interlocking fashion to provide denser packing of the island electrodes. Similarly, where there are adjacent source electrodes in the column-wise direction, each source electrode 320 has a promontory 321 to provide sufficient area for the source contact 340. Drain contact areas 342 of sufficient size are arranged in the resulting spaces between the source electrodes. The promontories may vary in size and shape depending on the contact area required and the contact technology being used.
Thus, apart from the promontories for the contact areas, each building block 302 shown in
Referring to
Since each island is electrically isolated, testing to locate faults may be carried out island by island, i.e., by electrically probing the source electrode, drain electrode, and gate electrode for each island in turn. If a fault is detected, e.g., fault 550 in the respective island IF shown in
In a variant of this embodiment, as illustrated in
Thus, as illustrated in
In practice, for isolation of defective cells, the approach illustrated in
In one embodiment, to facilitate integration with a standard process flow, the following process steps may be used for selective isolation of defective cells, using a single dielectric layer. After forming source, drain and gate contacts, the wafer is probed and electrical testing is performed to identify defective cells in each die, and to obtain data which defines coordinates of contact areas of source, drain, and gate contact areas to be isolated, i.e., to map good and bad cells in each die. A layer of a suitable dielectric is deposited on the wafer, e.g., a photosensitive negative-tone polyimide dielectric is spun on over the entire wafer. A standard photoresist mask based exposure is made to pattern the dielectric, i.e., expose areas where a polyimide layer is to be provided, and to leave all source, drain and gate contact pads open (unexposed). Before conventional process steps are performed to remove unexposed polyimide from all contact areas, an additional step is performed. The additional step uses an optical system that can selectively identify and expose (close) the contact pads of defective cells to be isolated. Since defective cells will differ from die to die, the dielectric layer for each die is patterned individually. The optical system may comprise a computer numerical controlled (CNC) two axis machine, capable of producing a light beam the diameter of, or marginally larger than a contact pad to be isolated. Using data from electrical testing, which identifies the location or coordinates of contact areas of faulty cells, a map is defined for each contact area or pad to be closed. The wafer is then optically scanned with the CNC machine, using the map or coordinates of defective islands, to control the light beam to selectively expose (close) contact areas of faulty or defective cells. After the CNC exposure, or “touch-up”, to expose and close contact areas of defective cells, the wafer is returned to the regular process flow. The resulting polyimide dielectric layer provides source, drain and gate contact openings only to cells that tested good, and contact areas to defective cells are covered in dielectric, so that they are isolated from overlying interconnect metallization.
In a variant of the latter process, instead of using a standard mask to first define all contact areas in the polyimide layer, the CNC machine may be used to optically scan or “paint” the polyimide layer to individually pattern the polyimide layer for each die, to provide a dielectric insulating layer as required, including selectively closing contact areas/pads of defective cells, while leaving source, drain and gate contact areas to good cells open.
As shown in
To isolate a defective island, it is necessary only to disconnect/isolate the drain and gate of the faulty/defective island. Since the source of the faulty island is not disconnected, there is a penalty in having a common source connection, in that the remaining source connection introduces some stray capacitance. Nevertheless, this penalty is small when compared to the total capacitance of the large size of the device.
While each island may be individually tested electrically to locate faults, another more efficient approach to testing is to connect and test each row of islands as a whole, to determine if the row is good or bad. For example, it may be expected that only 2% to 3% of islands will have a fault, whereas most islands and rows of islands will be good. When a bad row is detected, individual islands, or sets of islands in that row are then tested to locate any island(s) having a fault. Faulty islands can thus be located, mapped, and/or isolated more quickly.
In embodiments described above, faulty islands may be isolated by placing insulation, as appropriate, on one or more of the source, drain and/or gate pads of defective islands, i.e., to block electrical connections when the metal interconnect layers are subsequently formed. However, another approach is to proceed with making electrical contacts to all source, drain and gate pads and then selectively connecting only good islands by custom pattering of the interconnect metallization, i.e., the next level of interconnect, by patterning the source, drain, and gate straps to connect to only good islands, based on a map of good and bad islands generated by testing.
Any known method of selective formation of one or more metallization layers may be used. A direct write e-beam method may be used to define interconnect metal to connect all good islands.
Yet another embodiment is shown in Figures to 10A to 10E. As illustrated in
In summary, embodiments of the invention are described that provide a large area, large gate width GaN power transistor based on an isolated island topology, which facilitates testing and fault isolation. As will be appreciated, a similar isolated island topology is also applicable to GaN diodes.
As described above, GaN power transistor structures according to specific embodiments of the invention are described, where the GaN semiconductor layer comprises a GaN/AlGaN hetero-structure layer to provide a 2DEG channel region, formed on a silicon carbide or silicon substrate. Although these structures are described, by way of example, as normally-on nitride semiconductor transistors, the isolated island structure may also be used for normally-off nitride semiconductor transistors.
Depending on the contact structure, i.e., whether, for example, ball/bump or via contact technology is used, the substrate may be conductive or not conductive, and may comprise silicon carbide, or silicon, or other suitable material. A buffer layer may be provided on the substrate if required, to enable formation of epitaxial layers to form a nitride semiconductor hetero-junction structure, such as the GaN/AlGaN hetero-layer described above. The epitaxial layers are patterned by a suitable known process to define an active region comprising a 2DEG region of the device structure for each island.
The structures described above allow for a novel testing and fault isolation methodology, i.e., method for testing/fabricating a device structure comprising the steps of: testing in sequence each island; identifying and mapping defective islands; selectively interconnecting good islands and isolating bad islands. The testing sequence may involve testing each island individually. Alternatively, sets of islands may be tested, e.g., an entire row of islands. Then, faulty sets may be further tested in subsets of islands or individual islands to identify faulty islands.
Fabrication and testing sequences may be implemented in different ways. For example, testing may be done after passivation and forming electrical contacts for each island, in the form of contact pads of sufficient size to allow for electrical probing and testing. Then, after testing, the overlying interconnect structure would be completed in a different facility. Alternatively, if possible, electrical testing may be done during wafer fabrication, followed by completion of the overlying interconnect structure in the wafer fabrication facility.
A chip 1000 comprising a GaN high electron mobility transistor (GaN HEMT) according to an embodiment of the invention is shown in
Thus, nitride semiconductor device structures, devices and systems are provided based on an isolated island topology. In this arrangement each island can be individually electrically tested independently of its neighbours. Thus, a map of good islands and defective islands across the entire area of the device or wafer can be generated. Furthermore, because each island of the array is isolated, when good islands are interconnected to form a multi-island device, defective islands are not connected and thus isolated. For example, in a large area transistor, in each defective island, each of the source, drain and gate electrodes can be isolated with minimal disruption to connections to source, drain and gate electrodes of neighbouring good islands. Removal of all connection elements for an island, i.e., source, drain and gate connections, may be advantageous to reduce any residual capacitances, electrical shorts, or other issues.
As will be apparent, this isolated island structure is also applicable to multi-island diodes using a similar multi-island topology. This technology is particularly applicable for increasing yield when fabricating large area devices on substrates with higher defect densities per unit area. For example, the test methodology and interconnect scheme is particularly applicable to nitride semiconductors, such as those comprising a GaN hetero-structure formed on a lower cost silicon substrate.
A multi-island device structure for GaN power transistors or diodes is provided that facilitates electrical testing of each individual island, and identification and mapping of good and bad (defective) islands of the array.
Following testing, and identification of good and bad (defective) islands, electrical connections between islands of the array are selectively provided with isolation of defective islands. For example, bad islands, which are defective or fail to meet electrical specifications, may be isolated after testing by providing a dielectric insulating coating to one or more of the gate, source, and/or drain contact (test) pads of the defective island. Alternatively, a dielectric insulating layer may be provided over the entire array, and then contact openings selectively opened to source/drain and gate electrodes of all good islands, as required, while defective islands are isolated by the insulating layer over their contacts.
In summary, isolation between islands in one or both directions may be provided by appropriate layout and placement of the source, drain and gate electrodes of each island, and/or by appropriate patterning of active 2DEG regions of the array of islands over the device area. Thus, in embodiments described herein, an active region requires a source electrode or source peninsula suitably spaced from a drain electrode or drain peninsula, a gate electrode in between, and an underlying GaN/AlGaN 2DEG region (i.e., S-G-D on 2DEG).
If the GaN/AlGaN hetero-layer is not present in the channel region between adjacent source and drain regions, or between neighbouring islands, then the region is not active and will provide electrical isolation between islands, without any further isolation means being required.
If there is a 2DEG region between two S-S or two D-D regions and no gate, then those two regions would be electrically connected, in fact shorted together by the 2DEG region. The gate is present to turn the 2DEG channel on or off. In some embodiments, where neighbouring islands share a common source, a gate is not needed in the region between the islands.
In some embodiments, contacts may be arranged to facilitate simultaneous testing of pairs or groups of neighbouring islands, and then, if a pair or group fails a group test, individual islands in this group can be tested separately to isolate one or more defective islands.
Advantageously, identification and mapping of defective islands in a large area semiconductor device, perhaps a 10 mm by 10 mm device, with a large array of island electrodes, enables each semiconductor device to be binned based on specifications such as aggregate gate width Wg or other parameters. Thus, the method provides the possibility of obtaining close to 100% yield of devices that are binned based on different specifications.
This testing and fault isolation methodology allows for semiconductor devices to be produced on large dies, while facilitating practical approaches to testing for defect detection and mapping of large dies, with significantly reduced test time. It then becomes feasible to fabricate large area devices with much higher yield.
This approach to fault detection in large area dies also makes it practically feasible to consider hybrid integration of the GaN devices with a MOSFET (Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor) on a common substrate. As an example, for GaN power devices such as switching transistors, this allows for the GaN device to be fabricated on a large area die, such as a 5 mm×7 mm die, which comprises a 5 mm×5 mm GaN transistor and an adjacent die area to which a driver MOSFET device is mounted and is directly electrically connected in cascode configuration, so as to provide a normally-on device. For example, the driver MOSFET may be provided with a back side/substrate drain contact, which directly contacts the source connection of the GaN transistor. This provides a silicon-on-GaN-on-silicon device structure with a very low inductance between the GaN transistor and the driver MOSFET.
Device structures according to other embodiments (not illustrated) may comprise large area diodes. For example, a nitride semiconductor diode comprising: a substrate having a nitride semiconductor layer defining active regions of a device area on the substrate, said active regions comprising 2DEG regions. An array of islands is defined on the nitride semiconductor layer, the array of islands extending in first and second directions over the device area. Each island has an anode island electrode and a cathode island electrode formed on an active region of the island, spaced apart over the active region of the island to define a channel region therebetween, with a respective contact area on each electrode. The anode and cathode island electrodes of each island of the array of islands are arranged so that each island is electrically isolated from neighbouring islands in at least one of said first and second directions. An anode interconnection interconnects the anode island electrodes in parallel and a cathode interconnection interconnects the cathode island electrodes in parallel, and the anode and cathode interconnections are configured to selectively connect good islands and to provide electrical isolation of defective islands.
The isolated island topology for GaN power transistors and diodes disclosed herein facilitates testing for fault detection and mapping, and subsequently enables selective interconnection of source, drain and gate electrodes of each island of the array of islands, with electrical isolation of defective islands. This topology is also more generally applicable to power transistors and diodes using nitride semiconductor technologies and for both normally-on and normally-off transistors.
Although embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated in detail, it is to be clearly understood that the same is by way of illustration and example only and not to be taken by way of limitation, the scope of the present invention being limited only by the appended claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/896,871, entitled “Fault Tolerant Design for Large Area Nitride Semiconductor Devices” filed Oct. 29, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/388,694, entitled “Island matrixed gallium nitride microwave and power switching transistors”, which is a national entry of PCT International application no. PCT/CA2010/001202, filed Aug. 4, 2010, designating the United States, and which claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/231,139, filed Aug. 4, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/641,003, entitled “High density gallium nitride devices using island topology”, which is a national entry of PCT International application no. PCT/CA2011/000396, filed Apr. 13, 2011, designating the United States, and which claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/323,470, filed Apr. 13, 2010; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/020,712, entitled “Gallium nitride power devices using island topography”, filed Feb. 3, 2011, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 13/388,694 and 13/641,003, claiming priority from U.S. provisional patent applications Nos. 61/231,139 and 61/323,470. All these applications are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2014/000762 | 10/28/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/061881 | 5/7/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3783349 | Beasom | Jan 1974 | A |
4152714 | Hendrickson et al. | May 1979 | A |
4636825 | Baynes | Jan 1987 | A |
4819042 | Kaufman | Apr 1989 | A |
4821084 | Kinugasa et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5068603 | Mahoney | Nov 1991 | A |
5087950 | Katano | Feb 1992 | A |
5355008 | Moyer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5447876 | Moyer et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5633479 | Hirano | May 1997 | A |
5643832 | Kim | Jul 1997 | A |
5714784 | Ker et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5767546 | Williams et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5789791 | Bergemont | Aug 1998 | A |
5852315 | Ker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5883407 | Kunii et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6037822 | Rao et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6084266 | Jan | Jul 2000 | A |
6100549 | Weitzel et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6159841 | Williams et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6264167 | Hamazawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6353290 | Glenn et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6388292 | Lin | May 2002 | B1 |
6477023 | Tang et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6514779 | Ryu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6555873 | Disney et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6639277 | Rumennik et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653740 | Kinzer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6713793 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713823 | Nickel | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6737714 | Masuda et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6777278 | Smith | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6878593 | Khan et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6897561 | Nemtsev et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6903460 | Fukuda et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6930329 | Koide | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958543 | Nakayama | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6972464 | Shen | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7033936 | Green | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7078775 | Yi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7132717 | Su et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7166898 | Briere | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7233028 | Weeks et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233610 | Lan et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7250641 | Saito et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7253486 | Green et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7294892 | Chen | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7327007 | Shimizu | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335916 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7352016 | Nagy et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7398498 | Teig et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7449762 | Singh | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7491986 | Kumagae et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7550821 | Shibata et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7622318 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622779 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7675131 | Derderian | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7727332 | Habel et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7732306 | Arena et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750369 | Ohta et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8085553 | Lacap et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8134205 | Tang et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8680676 | Jergovic et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8791508 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9153509 | Klowak | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20010015447 | Shinomiya | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020013042 | Morkoc | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020076851 | Eden et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020179005 | Koike et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197841 | Nagai et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030032288 | Kozaki et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030062622 | Pavier et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030136984 | Masuda et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030183160 | Fujikura et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030209759 | Blanchard | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218246 | Abe et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040048409 | Biwa et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040125577 | Vinciarelli et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050056865 | Tsuchiya et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050093099 | Koike et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050167775 | Nagy et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050274977 | Saito et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060049417 | Li et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060895 | Hikita et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073621 | Kneissel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060131745 | Yutani | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138565 | Su et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060273347 | Hikita et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070072320 | Frayssinet et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070096262 | Takasone | May 2007 | A1 |
20070210333 | Lidow et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080073670 | Yang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083932 | Briere | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080087915 | Uemoto et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080093638 | Kobayashi | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080128752 | Wu | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149940 | Shibata et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149965 | Kaibara et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173898 | Ohmaki | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080224332 | Tam | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230786 | Heikman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080246058 | Nagy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274621 | Beach et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303042 | Minato et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090026506 | Matsumiya et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090045394 | Smeeton et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090086506 | Okumura | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090242961 | Tang et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267188 | Piner et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090315123 | Wu | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100019850 | Nagy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100059761 | Horii et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100072489 | Mclaurin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100072576 | Arena | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100133548 | Arena et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163979 | Hebert | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100258843 | Lidow et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100297960 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110031529 | Miura et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110031532 | Kikkawa et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110041890 | Sheats | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110057311 | Yutani | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079795 | Nagai | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110115029 | Van Den Boom | May 2011 | A1 |
20110186858 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110193096 | Imada | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120119305 | Chen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126290 | Uemoto et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138950 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120306024 | Hilt et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120315743 | Kikkawa et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130049010 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130228789 | Yamamura | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150318353 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2351368 | Mar 2001 | CA |
1321123 | Nov 2001 | CN |
0221431 | May 1989 | EP |
1142721 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1973163 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2151852 | Feb 2010 | EP |
5047575 | Apr 1975 | JP |
5089263 | Jul 1975 | JP |
5181067 | Jun 1976 | JP |
S55-113378 | Sep 1980 | JP |
S57-106174 | Jul 1982 | JP |
5868954 | Apr 1983 | JP |
H 5-56864 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H08-181307 | Jul 1996 | JP |
11214408 | Aug 1999 | JP |
H11-214408 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000208759 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001-28425 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2006-229218 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007103451 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007305954 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-108794 | May 2008 | JP |
2008-159681 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008177527 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2013-520000 | May 2013 | JP |
2010015302 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2011014951 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011127568 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011127568 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Karmalkar et al., “Enhancement of Breakdown Voltage in AIGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors Using a Field Plate”, 2001, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 48, No. 8, p. 1515-1521. |
Koudymov et al., “Mechanism of Current Collapse Removal in Field-Plated Nitride HFETs”, 2005, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 26, No. 10, p. 704-706. |
Xing et al., “High Breakdown Voltage AlGaN-GaN HEMTs Achieved by Multiple Field Plates”, 2004 IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 4, p. 161-163. |
Wai Tung NG et al.; “High SPeed CMOS Output Stage for Integrated DC-DC Converters”; Solid state and Integrated Circuit Technology 2008; ICSICT 2009; pp. 1909-1912. |
A. Yoo et al. “High Performance Low-Voltage Powers MOSFETs with Hybrid Waffle Layout Structure in a 0.25 μm Standard CMOS Process”, 20th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPD '08). p. 95 (2008). |
S. Lee. “Distributed Effects in Power Transistors and the Optimization of the Layouts of AlGaN/GaN HFETs”. Doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Ohio State University, Ohio State University. (2006). |
Sang Lam et al. An enhanced compact waffle MOSFET with low drain capacitance from a standard submicron CMOS technology. Solid State Electronics 47 (2003). Pergamon Press. pp. 785-789. |
R. Vemuru. “Layout Comparison of MOSFETs with Large W/L Ratios”. Electronic Letters. vol. 28. No. 25. pp. 2327-2329. (1992). |
L. Baker et al. “A ‘Waffle’ Layout Technique Strengthens the ESD Hardness of the NMOS Transistor”. EOS/ESD Symp. Proc. EOS-11. pp. 175-181. (1989). |
Ming-Dou Ker et al. “Area-Efficient Layout Design for CMOS Output Transistors”. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. vol. 44. No. 4. Apr. (1997). |
W. Saito et al., “High Breakdown Voltage AlGaN-GaN Power-HEMT Design and High Current Density Switxhing Behaviour”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, No. 12, p. 2528-2531, (2003). |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection with cited references; JP 2013-50477; Roberts, et al. (Applicant's related application). |
European Search Report issued on European Patent Application No. 14859004.5 dated Aug. 23, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160284829 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61896871 | Oct 2013 | US |