The present disclosure relates to gas delivery systems, and more particularly to gas delivery systems for substrate processing systems.
The background description provided here is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
Substrate processing systems include a processing chamber and a pedestal. A substrate such as a semiconductor wafer is arranged on the pedestal during processing. The substrate processing systems may be used to deposit, etch or otherwise treat film on the substrate.
Gas delivery systems are used to deliver gas mixtures into the processing chamber. The gas mixtures include one or more process gases and/or precursor gases. Different gas mixtures are supplied to the processing chamber during various steps of a process or recipe. Supplying the different gas mixtures quickly and accurately without intervening downtime reduces overall processing time.
Current gas delivery systems include a gas delivery sub-system with gas sources connected by mass flow controllers (MFCs) to a manifold. An outlet of the manifold is connected to the processing chamber where substrate processing takes place. A separate gas supply may supply a gas or a mixture of gases to a second zone of the processing chamber.
Referring now to
In order to allow the mixture of gases to the second zone of the processing chamber to be changed, additional gas sources and MFCs may be provided along with a second manifold. Alternately, a gas connection to a MFC is changed, which requires reconfiguration and usually cannot be carried out between process steps or recipes. In another approach, flow from a controller that was supplying the processing chamber is supplied instead to the second zone using a second manifold with valves that switch gas flow between the first manifold and the second manifold.
A gas delivery system for a substrate processing system includes a first manifold and a second manifold. A gas delivery sub-system selectively delivers N gases from N gas sources. The gas delivery sub-system is configured to deliver a first gas mixture including P of the N gases to the first manifold and to deliver a second gas mixture including Q of the N gases to the second manifold, where N, P and Q are integers. P plus Q is less than or equal to N, and N is greater than two. A gas splitter includes an inlet in fluid communication with an outlet of the second manifold, a first outlet in fluid communication with an outlet of the first manifold, and a second outlet. The gas splitter splits the second gas mixture into a first portion at a first flow rate that is output to the first outlet of the gas splitter and a second portion at a second flow rate that is output to the second outlet of the gas splitter. A first zone of the substrate processing system is in fluid communication with the first outlet of the gas splitter and a second zone of the substrate processing system is in fluid communication with the second outlet of the gas splitter.
In other features, the gas delivery sub-system includes N gas channels each including a first valve including an inlet in fluid communication with one of the N gas sources. A mass flow controller includes an inlet in fluid communication with an outlet of the first valve. A second valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with an outlet of the mass flow controller and an outlet in selective fluid communication with the first manifold. A third valve includes an outlet in fluid communication with the outlet of the mass flow controller and an outlet in selective fluid communication with the second manifold.
In other features, a first valve is in communication with a ballast gas source to selectively supply ballast gas to the second manifold. A second valve is in fluid communication with the ballast gas source to selectively supply ballast gas to the second outlet of the gas splitter. The first valve supplies the ballast gas to the second manifold when a flow rate of the second gas mixture is insufficient to create a choked flow condition through the gas splitter.
In other features, the gas splitter includes M valves and M restricted orifices in communication with a corresponding one of the M valves. At least two of the M restricted orifices have different orifice sizes.
A substrate processing system includes the gas delivery system and a processing chamber. A substrate support is arranged in the processing chamber. A first injector is arranged at a first location of the processing chamber. The first injector corresponds to the first zone. A second injector is arranged at a second location of the processing chamber spaced from the first location. The second injector corresponds to the second zone.
In other features, the processing chamber includes a dielectric window. The first injector is arranged in an opening of the dielectric window. The processing chamber includes side walls. The second injector is arranged on at least one of the side walls.
In other features, a first valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the first outlet of the gas splitter and an outlet in fluid communication with vacuum. A second valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the second outlet of the gas splitter and an outlet in fluid communication with vacuum.
In other features, a controller calculates relative flow rates of the first portion of the second gas mixture and the second portion of the second gas mixture.
In other features, a pressure sensor is arranged in the processing chamber and communicates with the controller. The controller calculates the relative flow rates of the first portion of the second gas mixture and the second portion of the second gas mixture by opening the first valve to vacuum and closing the second valve to vacuum; measuring a rate of rise in pressure of the first portion of one of a calibration gas and the second gas mixture in the processing chamber; opening the second valve to vacuum and closing the first valve to vacuum; and measuring a rate of rise in pressure of the second portion of the one of the calibration gas and the second gas mixture in the processing chamber.
In other features, the first manifold includes a first mixing manifold in fluid communication with the gas delivery sub-system and a first valved manifold in fluid communication with the first mixing manifold. The second manifold includes a second mixing manifold in fluid communication with the gas delivery sub-system and a second valved manifold in fluid communication with the second mixing manifold.
A gas delivery system for a substrate processing system includes a first manifold and a second manifold. A gas delivery sub-system selectively delivers N gases from N gas sources. The gas delivery sub-system is configured to deliver a first gas mixture including P of the N gases to the first manifold and to deliver a second gas mixture including Q the N gases to the second manifold, where N, P and Q are integers, P plus Q is less than or equal to N, and N is greater than two.
A first gas splitter includes an inlet in fluid communication with an outlet of the first manifold, a first outlet and a second outlet. The first gas splitter splits the first gas mixture into a first portion that is output to the first outlet of the first gas splitter, and a second portion that is output to the second outlet of the first gas splitter. A second gas splitter includes an inlet in fluid communication with an outlet of the second manifold, a first outlet, a second outlet, and a third outlet. The second gas splitter splits the second gas mixture into a first portion that is output to the first outlet of the second gas splitter, a second portion that is output to the second outlet of the second gas splitter, and a third portion that is output to the third outlet of the first gas splitter. A first zone of the substrate processing system is in fluid communication with the first outlet of the first gas splitter and the first outlet of the second gas splitter. A second zone of the substrate processing system is in fluid communication with the second outlet of the first gas splitter and the second outlet of the second gas splitter. A third zone of the substrate processing system is in fluid communication with the third outlet of the second gas splitter.
In other features, the gas delivery sub-system includes N gas channels each including a first valve and a mass flow controller including an inlet in fluid communication with an outlet of the first valve. A second valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with an outlet of the mass flow controller and an outlet in selective fluid communication with the first manifold. A third valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the outlet of the mass flow controller and an outlet in selective fluid communication with the second manifold.
In other features, a first valve is in fluid communication with a ballast gas source to selectively supply ballast gas to the first manifold. A second valve is in fluid communication with the ballast gas source to selectively supply ballast gas to the second manifold. The second valve supplies the ballast gas to the second manifold when a flow rate of the second gas mixture is insufficient to create a choked flow condition through the second gas splitter.
In other features, the first gas splitter includes M valves and M restricted orifices in communication with a corresponding one of the M valves. At least two of the M restricted orifices have a different orifice size.
In other features, a first valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the first outlet of the second gas splitter and an outlet in fluid communication with vacuum. A second valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the second outlet of the second gas splitter and an outlet in fluid communication with vacuum. A third valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the third outlet of the second gas splitter and an outlet in fluid communication with vacuum. A fourth valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the third outlet of the second gas splitter and an outlet in fluid communication with the third zone.
In other features, a controller is configured to close the first valve, the second valve and the fourth valve and to divert the third tuning gas mixture to vacuum when flow rates of the first tuning gas mixture and the second tuning gas mixture are insufficient to create a choked flow condition through the second gas splitter.
A substrate processing system includes the gas delivery system, a processing chamber, a substrate support arranged in the processing chamber, and a first injector arranged at a first location of the processing chamber and including a center injector and a side injector. The center injector corresponds to the first zone and the side injector corresponds to the second zone. A second injector is arranged at a second location of the processing chamber spaced from the first location. The second injector corresponds to the third zone.
In other features, the processing chamber includes a dielectric window. The first injector is arranged in a cavity in the dielectric window. The processing chamber includes side walls. The second injector is arranged on at least one of the side walls.
In other features, a first valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the first outlet of the second gas splitter and an outlet in fluid communication with vacuum. A second valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the second outlet of the second gas splitter and an outlet in fluid communication with vacuum. A third valve includes an inlet in fluid communication with the third outlet of the second gas splitter and an outlet in fluid communication with vacuum.
In other features, a controller calculates relative flow rates of the first portion of the second gas mixture, the second portion of the second gas mixture and the third portion of the second gas mixture.
In other features, a pressure sensor is arranged in the processing chamber and communicates with the controller. The controller calculates the relative flow rates of the first portion of the second gas mixture, the second portion of the second gas mixture and the third portion of the second gas mixture by opening the second valve and the third valve to vacuum, closing the first valve to vacuum, measuring a first rate of rise in pressure of the first portion of one of a calibration gas and the second gas mixture in the processing chamber, opening the first valve and the third valve to vacuum, closing the second valve to vacuum; measuring a second rate of rise in pressure of the second portion of the one of the calibration gas and the second gas mixture in the processing chamber; opening the first valve and the second valve to vacuum; closing the third valve to vacuum; and measuring a third rate of rise in pressure of the third portion of the one of the calibration gas and the second gas mixture in the processing chamber.
In other features, the controller determines relative flow rates of the first portion of the second gas mixture, the second portion of the second gas mixture and the third portion of the second gas mixture based on the first rate of rise, the second rate of rise and the third rate of rise.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description, the claims and the drawings. The detailed description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In the drawings, reference numbers may be reused to identify similar and/or identical elements.
Gas delivery systems and methods according to the present disclosure allow different mixtures of main process gas and tuning gas to be provided to two or more zones in a processing chamber while allowing the use of single mass flow controllers to supply the same gas to more than one of the zones (without duplicating the gas source). This allows the gas mixtures to be provided to the zones with reduced cost and complexity.
Gases are supplied via mass flow controllers (MFCs) to one of two or more manifolds, sometimes referred to herein as a main process gas manifold and a tuning manifold. The destination manifold for each gas can be selected using valves. In some examples, flow from the main process gas manifold may optionally be split into two or more flows each with the same gas composition at different flow rates. In some examples, the flows are supplied to different zones of the processing chamber using multi-zone injectors, two or more injectors, a showerhead, side injectors, etc.
In some examples, the main process gas split is performed using a continuously controllable first gas flow splitter or selectable banks of flow restricting orifices. Flow from the tuning gas manifold is split using a second gas flow splitter that typically has one more outlet than the first gas flow splitter used for the main process gas flow. In some examples, flow from one branch of the second gas flow splitter is directed to a further region of the processing chamber, typically the outermost zone outboard of the periphery of the wafer (such as side tuning gas (STG)).
Flows from the second gas flow splitter may be recombined with the main gas flows downstream from the first gas flow splitter. A separate delivery of a ballast gas may be combined with the side tuning gas (STG) flow to increase the flow in the side tuning gas mixture to a predetermined minimum level. The result is that many desired mixtures of gases may be delivered to the zones of the processing chamber without increasing the count of costly MFCs. Furthermore any process gas that is supplied to the delivery system may be used as a side tuning gas while also being used at the same time in the main process gas flow (without providing hardware to deliver the same gas twice).
The systems and methods of the present disclosure recombine gas from the tuning gas manifold with flow from the main process gas manifold to minimize the number of gas control sticks while providing flexible choice of gas delivery to different zones of the processing chamber.
Referring now to
A second mixing manifold 30 is in fluid communication with outputs of the gas delivery sub-system 20. One or more outputs of the second mixing manifold 30 are in fluid communication with a second valved manifold 34. An output of the second valved manifold 34 (including a tuning gas mixture) is in fluid communication with a dual gas feed (DGF) 38. A first portion of the tuning gas mixture from the DGF 38 is combined with the main process gas output by the first valved manifold 26 and then output to a first zone of the processing chamber. In some examples, the first zone corresponds to an injector located on a top surface the processing chamber.
A second portion of the tuning gas mixture from the DGF 38 is selectively combined with ballast gas (from a ballast gas source 40 via valve 44) and output to a second zone of the processing chamber. In some examples, the second zone corresponds to side tuning gas (STG) locations located along side walls of the processing chamber. In some examples, the ballast gas includes helium (He), although one or more other inert gases or any other ballast gases may be used. The ballast gas may optionally be supplied to the second mixing manifold 30 during some operating modes as will be described below.
For example, when the tuning gas mixture is supplied at relatively low flow rates, there may be insufficient flow to create a choked flow condition at restricted orifices in the DGF 38. Choked flow conditions are typically present when there is over a 2 times pressure drop across the restricted orifice. When the choked flow condition is present, flow across the orifice is independent of the downstream pressure. Therefore, the ballast gas may be supplied to the second mixing manifold 30 when the tuning gas mixture has a lower flow rate than is necessary to create a choked flow condition. The ballast gas increases the flow rate to create the choked flow condition. For example, the choked flow condition may occur around 50 sccm. When the tuning gas flow is less than 50 sccm, the ballast gas can be supplied to the second mixing manifold 30 to increase the flow rate. For example if 10 sccm of tuning gas is supplied, 40 sccm of ballast gas can be supplied to the second mixing manifold 30 to create a choked flow condition with the tuning gas in the DGF 38.
Valves 46 and 48 selectively connect gas outputs to vacuum during flow rate calibration as will be described further below.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
For example, in some circumstances the process gas mixture entering the second mixing manifold 30 may be received at one end of the second mixing manifold 30. Subsequently, other gases may be received in the middle of the second mixing manifold 30 or at an opposite end of the second mixing manifold 30. The valves 62 are switched and controlled to ensure that gas from a prior step in a recipe is properly evacuated from the second mixing manifold 30 and the valved manifold 34.
Referring now to
Referring now to
As can be appreciated, states of the valves 82 and 84 can be selected to supply the first zone or the second zone using the restricted orifice 76. The other one of the first zone or the second zone is supplied through one of the plurality of restricted orifices 72. In some examples, the controller opens one or more of the valves 70 to allow process gas to flow through the corresponding restricted orifice(s). As can be appreciated, the relative gas flows of the first portion and the second portion of the tuning gas mixture to the first zone and the second zone, respectively, may be adjusted.
Referring now to
An injector 90 may be arranged adjacent to or mounted on the dielectric window 85 to inject process gases into the processing chamber 86. In some examples, the injector 90 includes a center injection location 91 and one or more edge injector locations 92. The center injection location 91 injects process gas in a generally downward direction towards the substrate. The edge injector locations 92 inject process gas at an outward angle relative to the direction of the center injection location 91. The processing chamber further includes: one or more side tuning gas injection locations 93 arranged in sidewalls of the processing chamber 86; and an opening 94.
Referring now to
Referring now to
N process gas sources and a ballast gas such as helium are connected to a gas delivery sub-system 110 including valves and MFCs, where N is an integer greater than two. In some examples, N is equal to 17, although other values may be used. A first valved manifold 114 is in fluid communication with outputs of the gas delivery sub-system 110. An output of the first valved manifold 114 is in fluid communication with triple gas feed (TGF) 116, which controls flow rates of tuning gases for first, second and third zones of the processing chamber. In some examples, the third zone may correspond to side tuning gas (STG) and the first and second zones may correspond to the injector center location and the injector edge locations, respectively.
A second valved manifold 130 is in fluid communication with outputs of the gas delivery sub-system 110. An output of the second valved manifold 130 is in fluid communication with a dual gas feed (DGF) 134. Outputs of the DGF 134 control flow rates of process gases at variable flow rates to first and second zones.
A ballast gas output 129 of the gas delivery sub-system 110 is connected to a valve 120. A first output of the TGF 116 is in fluid communication with inputs of valves 122 and 128. Outputs of the valves 120 and 122 are supplied as side tuning gas (STG). First gas outputs of the DGF 134 and the TGF 116 are input to a divert valve 124. Second gas outputs of the DGF 134 and the TGF 116 are input to a divert valve 126. A third gas output of the TFG 116 is input to a divert valve 128 and a valve 122.
The divert valves 124, 126 and 128 may be used for calibration. Likewise, the valves 46 and 48 in
In some examples, the DGF 134 includes a two-way variable splitter similar to that shown in
As can be appreciated, the valves 162 and 164 can be positioned to supply one of the first zone or the second zone using the restricted orifice 156. The other one of the first zone or the second zone is supplied through one of the plurality of restricted orifices 152. In some examples, the controller opens one or more of the valves 150 to allow process gas to flow through the corresponding one or more of the restricted orifices. As can be appreciated, the relative gas flows to the first zone and the second zone may be adjusted.
Referring now to
Referring now to
As can be appreciated, the valves 182 and 184 can be positioned to supply tuning gas to either one of the first zone or the second zone using the restricted orifice 176. The other one of the first zone or the second zone is supplied through one of the plurality of restricted orifices 172. In some examples, the controller opens one or more of the valves 170 to allow process gas to flow through the corresponding one or more of the restricted orifices. As can be appreciated, the relative gas flows of tuning gas to the first zone and the second zone may be adjusted.
An inlet of the TGF 116 is in fluid communication with inlets of valves 190-1, 190-2, . . . , and 190-F (collectively valves 190). Outlets of the valves 190 are in fluid communication with restricted orifices 192-1, 192-2, . . . , and 192-F (collectively restricted orifices 192), respectively. F is an integer greater than one. In some examples, at least two of the restricted orifices 192 have different orifice sizes. Outputs of the restricted orifices 192 supply the side tuning gas location.
Referring now to
The gas delivery sub-system 110 also supplies first, second and third tuning gases 204, 206 and 208 to the valved manifold 114. The tuning gas mixture output by the valved manifold 114 is in fluid communication with an input of the TGF 116. The TGF 116 splits the tuning gas mixture into the first, second and third zones. The tuning gas for the first and second zones is in fluid communication with the corresponding outputs of the DGF 134. The tuning gas for the third zone is supplied via the valve 122 to the third zone. In some examples, the tuning gas flow is greater than or equal to 50 sccm for this configuration. The ballast gas may be introduced downstream of the TGF 116 to the side tuning gas location(s) using the valve 120.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
During calibration, a single calibration gas (
Calibrated split ratios are calculated by dividing the individual rates of rise by the sum of the rates of rise. The process is repeated for another desired split ratio until all desired calibrations have been performed. In order to check that the measurements are being performed in choked conditions, calibration tests are run with multiple incoming gas flow rates. If the ratio results agree, then both conditions were choked.
In
In
Referring now to
Referring now to
The foregoing description is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses. The broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent upon a study of the drawings, the specification, and the following claims. It should be understood that one or more steps within a method may be executed in different order (or concurrently) without altering the principles of the present disclosure. Further, although each of the embodiments is described above as having certain features, any one or more of those features described with respect to any embodiment of the disclosure can be implemented in and/or combined with features of any of the other embodiments, even if that combination is not explicitly described. In other words, the described embodiments are not mutually exclusive, and permutations of one or more embodiments with one another remain within the scope of this disclosure.
Spatial and functional relationships between elements (for example, between modules, circuit elements, semiconductor layers, etc.) are described using various terms, including “connected,” “engaged,” “coupled,” “adjacent,” “next to,” “on top of,” “above,” “below,” and “disposed.” Unless explicitly described as being “direct,” when a relationship between first and second elements is described in the above disclosure, that relationship can be a direct relationship where no other intervening elements are present between the first and second elements, but can also be an indirect relationship where one or more intervening elements are present (either spatially or functionally) between the first and second elements. As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C should be construed to mean a logical (A OR B OR C), using a non-exclusive logical OR, and should not be construed to mean “at least one of A, at least one of B, and at least one of C.”
In some implementations, a controller is part of a system, which may be part of the above-described examples. Such systems can comprise semiconductor processing equipment, including a processing tool or tools, chamber or chambers, a platform or platforms for processing, and/or specific processing components (a wafer pedestal, a gas flow system, etc.). These systems may be integrated with electronics for controlling their operation before, during, and after processing of a semiconductor wafer or substrate. The electronics may be referred to as the “controller,” which may control various components or subparts of the system or systems. The controller, depending on the processing requirements and/or the type of system, may be programmed to control any of the processes disclosed herein, including the delivery of processing gases, temperature settings (e.g., heating and/or cooling), pressure settings, vacuum settings, power settings, radio frequency (RF) generator settings, RF matching circuit settings, frequency settings, flow rate settings, fluid delivery settings, positional and operation settings, wafer transfers into and out of a tool and other transfer tools and/or load locks connected to or interfaced with a specific system.
Broadly speaking, the controller may be defined as electronics having various integrated circuits, logic, memory, and/or software that receive instructions, issue instructions, control operation, enable cleaning operations, enable endpoint measurements, and the like. The integrated circuits may include chips in the form of firmware that store program instructions, digital signal processors (DSPs), chips defined as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or one or more microprocessors, or microcontrollers that execute program instructions (e.g., software). Program instructions may be instructions communicated to the controller in the form of various individual settings (or program files), defining operational parameters for carrying out a particular process on or for a semiconductor wafer or to a system. The operational parameters may, in some embodiments, be part of a recipe defined by process engineers to accomplish one or more processing steps during the fabrication of one or more layers, materials, metals, oxides, silicon, silicon dioxide, surfaces, circuits, and/or dies of a wafer.
The controller, in some implementations, may be a part of or coupled to a computer that is integrated with the system, coupled to the system, otherwise networked to the system, or a combination thereof. For example, the controller may be in the “cloud” or all or a part of a fab host computer system, which can allow for remote access of the wafer processing. The computer may enable remote access to the system to monitor current progress of fabrication operations, examine a history of past fabrication operations, examine trends or performance metrics from a plurality of fabrication operations, to change parameters of current processing, to set processing steps to follow a current processing, or to start a new process. In some examples, a remote computer (e.g. a server) can provide process recipes to a system over a network, which may include a local network or the Internet. The remote computer may include a user interface that enables entry or programming of parameters and/or settings, which are then communicated to the system from the remote computer. In some examples, the controller receives instructions in the form of data, which specify parameters for each of the processing steps to be performed during one or more operations. It should be understood that the parameters may be specific to the type of process to be performed and the type of tool that the controller is configured to interface with or control. Thus as described above, the controller may be distributed, such as by comprising one or more discrete controllers that are networked together and working towards a common purpose, such as the processes and controls described herein. An example of a distributed controller for such purposes would be one or more integrated circuits on a chamber in communication with one or more integrated circuits located remotely (such as at the platform level or as part of a remote computer) that combine to control a process on the chamber.
Without limitation, example systems may include a plasma etch chamber or module, a deposition chamber or module, a spin-rinse chamber or module, a metal plating chamber or module, a clean chamber or module, a bevel edge etch chamber or module, a physical vapor deposition (PVD) chamber or module, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) chamber or module, an atomic layer deposition (ALD) chamber or module, an atomic layer etch (ALE) chamber or module, an ion implantation chamber or module, a track chamber or module, and any other semiconductor processing systems that may be associated or used in the fabrication and/or manufacturing of semiconductor wafers.
As noted above, depending on the process step or steps to be performed by the tool, the controller might communicate with one or more of other tool circuits or modules, other tool components, cluster tools, other tool interfaces, adjacent tools, neighboring tools, tools located throughout a factory, a main computer, another controller, or tools used in material transport that bring containers of wafers to and from tool locations and/or load ports in a semiconductor manufacturing factory.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/199,031, filed on Jul. 30, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3534753 | Ollivier | Oct 1970 | A |
4262686 | Heim | Apr 1981 | A |
4374698 | Sanders et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4431477 | Zajac | Feb 1984 | A |
4793897 | Dunfield et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
5220515 | Freerks | Jun 1993 | A |
5329965 | Gordon | Jul 1994 | A |
5413145 | Rhyne | May 1995 | A |
5520969 | Nishizato | May 1996 | A |
5605179 | Strong, Jr. | Feb 1997 | A |
5660673 | Miyoshi | Aug 1997 | A |
5662143 | Caughran | Sep 1997 | A |
5683517 | Shan | Nov 1997 | A |
5702530 | Shan | Dec 1997 | A |
5744695 | Forbes | Apr 1998 | A |
5762714 | Mohn et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5907221 | Sato et al. | May 1999 | A |
6022809 | Fan | Feb 2000 | A |
6042687 | Singh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044534 | Seo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050283 | Hoffman | Apr 2000 | A |
6060400 | Oehrlein et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062256 | Miller | May 2000 | A |
6074959 | Wang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6152168 | Ohmi | Nov 2000 | A |
6206976 | Crevasse et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210593 | Ohkuni et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217937 | Shealy | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6294466 | Chang | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6376386 | Oshima | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6492774 | Han et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6589352 | Yudovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6736931 | Collins et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744212 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6818560 | Koshimizu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6841943 | Vahedi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6896765 | Steger | May 2005 | B2 |
6898558 | Klekotka | May 2005 | B2 |
6962879 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7129171 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7288482 | Panda et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7309646 | Heo et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7338907 | Li et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7757541 | Monkowski | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7758698 | Bang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7968469 | Collins et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8137463 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8291935 | Merritt | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8552334 | Tappan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8555920 | Hirata | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8592328 | Hausmann et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8889024 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8956980 | Chen et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8999106 | Liu et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011637 | Yamamoto | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9051647 | Cooperberg et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9059678 | Long et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9142391 | Yamamoto | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9318343 | Ranjan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9471065 | Koyomogi | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9640409 | Yang et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
10591934 | Gopalakrishnan | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20010002581 | Nishikawa | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010004903 | Ohmi | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010013363 | Kitayama | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010035530 | Udagawa | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020038669 | Yamagishi | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042205 | McMillin | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045265 | Bergh | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046991 | Smith et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048536 | Bergh | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072240 | Koike | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088542 | Nishikawa et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020160125 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174905 | Latino | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175144 | Hung et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003696 | Gelatos | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030116195 | Weissgerber | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130807 | Ambrosina | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030201069 | Johnson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030213560 | Wang | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030230239 | Shan | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236592 | Shajii | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236638 | Shajii | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236643 | Shajii | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040007176 | Janakiraman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040053428 | Steger | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040060595 | Chittenden | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089240 | Dando et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094206 | Ishida | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112538 | Larson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112539 | Larson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112540 | Larson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040149389 | Fink | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163601 | Kadotani et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168719 | Nambu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040173270 | Harris | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200529 | Lull | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040250600 | Bevers | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261492 | Zarkar | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005994 | Sugiyama | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050067021 | Bevers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082007 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050155625 | Jangjian et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050199342 | Shajii | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050241763 | Huang | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060011237 | Tison | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060060141 | Kamaishi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060090797 | Olander | May 2006 | A1 |
20060097644 | Kono | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124169 | Mizusawa | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060207595 | Ohmi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212233 | Wong | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060237063 | Ding | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070026684 | Parascandola et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066038 | Sadjadi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070158025 | Larson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175391 | Mizusawa | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204797 | Fischer | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070204914 | Kurosawa | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233412 | Gotoh | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240778 | L'Bassi | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256785 | Pamarthy | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070256786 | Zhou | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070259112 | Ishikawa | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080115834 | Geoffrion | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121177 | Bang | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121178 | Bang | May 2008 | A1 |
20080202588 | Gold | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202609 | Gold | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202610 | Gold | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080223873 | Chen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236749 | Koshimizu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090056629 | Katz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061083 | Chiang | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061640 | Wong | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061644 | Chiang | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090067954 | Lanee et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090090174 | Paul | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090095364 | Itoh | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151419 | Doniat | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090183548 | Monkowski | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183549 | Monkowski | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090197423 | Koshimizu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221117 | Tan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236313 | Qiu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090272717 | Pamarthy | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090320754 | Oya | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012310 | Christensen | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025369 | Negishi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030390 | Yamaguchi | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071438 | Davis | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100144539 | Bergh | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145633 | Yasuda | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100178770 | Zin | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100229976 | Hirata | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264117 | Ohmi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269924 | Yasuda | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110019332 | Chistyakov | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031111 | Kobayashi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110094596 | Sugiyama | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110135821 | Ding | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110253225 | Beeby | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265883 | Cruse | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110265951 | Xu | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287631 | Yamamoto | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110303696 | Kelekar | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120031500 | Hirose | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120034786 | Dhindsa et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120097266 | Cobb | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120149213 | Nittala et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152364 | Hashimoto | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120156363 | Quinn | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120174990 | Yasuda | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190208 | Ozu | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120238102 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238103 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244715 | Lebouitz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120247386 | Sanchez | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289057 | DeDontney | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298221 | Takeuchi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120305184 | Singh et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328780 | Yamagishi | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000731 | Singh | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130008607 | Matsumoto | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025715 | Yamaguchi | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029494 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029496 | Bauer | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130045605 | Wang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130085618 | Ding | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104996 | Oh | May 2013 | A1 |
20130106286 | Banna et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131300 | Olmscheid | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145816 | Lowe | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130157388 | Grimbergen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130220433 | Sawada | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130255784 | Ye | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270997 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130288477 | Rieschl et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140020764 | Woelk | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033828 | Larson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140080308 | Chen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140120737 | Swaminathan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141621 | Ren et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140144471 | Kahlon | May 2014 | A1 |
20140182689 | Shareef | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213055 | Himori et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140248780 | Ingle et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140262038 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140273460 | Reyland et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010381 | Cai | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150017810 | Guha | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150059859 | Takahashi | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150099066 | Huotari | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150181684 | Banna et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150184287 | Tsung | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150234390 | Koyomogi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150287572 | Daugherty | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150340209 | Koltonski | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150371831 | Rozenzon | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160111258 | Taskar | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160181116 | Berry, III et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160211165 | McChesney et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160211166 | Yan et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160215392 | Yudovsky | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160247688 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160293431 | Sriraman | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170018407 | Kondo | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170069511 | Yang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170110335 | Yang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170200586 | Treadwell et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170213758 | Rice et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170236688 | Caron et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236694 | Eason et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236741 | Angelov et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170236743 | Severson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170278679 | Angelov et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170287682 | Musselman et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170287753 | Musselman et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180053629 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190013232 | Yan et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190279888 | Gopalakrishnan | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200049547 | Spyropoulos | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102243977 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102315150 | Jan 2012 | CN |
103730318 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104299929 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104752141 | Jul 2015 | CN |
104851832 | Aug 2015 | CN |
105336561 | Feb 2016 | CN |
107093569 | Aug 2017 | CN |
0424299 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0424299 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0838842 | Apr 1998 | EP |
2001-230239 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2015201552 | Nov 2015 | JP |
20040050080 | Jun 2004 | KR |
20050008792 | Jan 2005 | KR |
20080023569 | Mar 2008 | KR |
20130137962 | Dec 2013 | KR |
20140001540 | Jan 2014 | KR |
101974420 | May 2019 | KR |
101974422 | May 2019 | KR |
50623 | Oct 2002 | TW |
201207933 | Feb 2012 | TW |
201324653 | Jun 2013 | TW |
201436089 | Sep 2014 | TW |
WO-0040776 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-2007008509 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2011051251 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2013123617 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2014068886 | May 2014 | WO |
WO-2014163742 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,6407: filed Jan. 22, 2015, in the names of Joseph Yudovsky et al., & entitled “Injector for Spatially Separated Atomic Layer Deposition Chamber” pp. 1-68. (Year: 2015). |
US PPA No. 62065497, entitled “Gas Supply Delivery Arrangement Including a Gas Splitter for Tunable Gas Flow Control,” filed Oct. 17, 2014, in the names of Mark Taskar et al. (Year: 2014). |
D. A. Jobson. “On the Flow of a Compressible Fluid through Orifices.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. 169[1](1955). pp. 767-776. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1955_169_077_02 (Year: 1955). |
Cashco, Inc. “Fluid Flow Basics of Throttling Valves.” 1999. pp. 1-56. Available Mar. 24, 2020 online at: https://www.controlglobal.com/assets/Media/MediaManager/RefBook_Cashco_Fluid.pdf. (Year: 1999). |
O'Keefe Controls Co. “Choked Flow of Gases.” in Catalog 11. 2003. pp. 20-24 & 48. (Year: 2003). |
Christophe Corre. “Lecture 5: Quasi-1 D compressible Flows” in “Fundamentals of Compressible and Viscous Flow Analysis—Part II.” 2018. pp. 94-148. École Centrale de Lyon. Fluid Mechanics and Acoustics Laboratory (LMFA ). http://lmfa.ec-lyon. (Year: 2018). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/399,692, Treadwell et al. |
Blain (Mar./ Apr. 1999) “Mechanism of nitrogen removal from silicon nitride by nitric oxide,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 17(2):665-667. |
Blain et al. (Jul./Aug. 1996) “Role of nitrogen in the downstream etching of silicon nitride,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 14(4):2151-2157. |
Bohr, Mark, “The New Era of Scaling in an SoC World” Intel Logic Technology Development; ISSCC; 2009; 66 Pages. |
Dusa, Mircean et al., “Pitch Doubling Through Dual Patterning Lithography Challenges in Integration and Litho Budgets,” Optical Microlithography XX, vol. 6520, 65200G, (2007); 10 pages. |
European Extended Search Report dated May 30, 2016 issued in EP 15 199 363.1. |
Kastenmeier et al. (Nov./Dec. 1999) “Highly selective etching of silicon nitride over silicon and silicon dioxide,” J. Vac. Sci. Techno!, A, American Vacuum Society, I7 (6):3179-3184. |
Kastenmeier et al. (Sep./Oct. 1996) “Chemical dry etching of silicon nitride and silicon dioxide using CF4/02/N2 gas mixtures,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A14(5):2802-2813. |
Oehrlein et al. (1996) “Study of plasma-surface interactions: chemical dry etching and high-density plasma etching,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 5:193-199. |
Tajima et al. (2013) “Room-Temperature Si Etching in NO/F2 Gases and the Investigation of Surface Reaction Mechanisms,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 117:5118-5125. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2015 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/576,020. |
U.S. Final Ofice Action dated Feb. 26, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/576,020. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/576,020. |
Yun et al. (2007) “Large Etch Rate Enhancement by NO-Induced Surface Chemical Reaction during Chemical Dry Etching of Silicon Oxide in F2 Remote Plasmas,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 154(4):D267-D272. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/013,400, filed Feb. 2, 2016, Yang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/014,539, filed Feb. 3, 2016, Yang et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/275,537, filed Jan. 7, 2016, Treadwell et al. |
MP125E N-470 Linear Drive User Manual; Version 1.1.0; Date Sep. 18, 2014; 54 Pages; Physik Instrumente (PI) GmbH & Co. KG, Auf der Roemerstr. 1, 76228 Karlsruhe, Germany. |
First Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2017 corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 201610032252.1, 12 Pages. |
First Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2018 corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 201710036188.9, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170032982 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62199031 | Jul 2015 | US |