Patent Grant
8039974
The invention relates to the field of integrated circuits. In particular, the invention is directed to the wire bonds between a circuit board and the contact pads on the integrated circuit die.
The following application has been filed by the Applicant:
The disclosure of this co-pending application is incorporated herein by reference.
Various methods, systems and apparatus relating to the present invention are disclosed in the following US Patents/Patent applications filed by the applicant or assignee of the present invention:
An integrated circuit fabricated on the silicon wafer is often referred to as a ‘die’. For the purposes of this specification, the term die will be used as a reference to an integrated circuit fabricated on a wafer substrate using lithographic the well known etching and deposition techniques commonly used in semiconductor fabrication. Integrated circuit (IC) dies are electrically connected to printed circuit boards by wire bonds. The wire bonds are very thin wires—around 25 to 40 microns in diameter—extending from contact pads along the side of the wafer substrate to contacts on the printed circuit board (PCB). Wire bonding is a widely used electrical interconnection technique because of the speed and accuracy of modern wire bonding machines, commonly referred to as wirebonders.
Wirebonders are automated devices that weld small lengths of wire from conductors on the PCB to the contact pads on an integrated circuit die. Wire is fed through a bonding tool that uses some combination of pressure, heat and/or ultra-sonic energy to attach the wire to the bond pads via a solid phase welding process. The two most common types of wire bonder are referred to as wedge bond and ball bond. These refer to the bonding tool and the configuration of the wire bond itself. With both types of wirebonders, the individual wire bonds extend in an arc from the bond pad on the integrated circuit (IC) die to the conductor on the PCB. This is because wires from the contact pads to the PCB are made longer than necessary to accommodate changes in the gap between the PCB and the bonds pads due to thermal expansion, flex in the components and so on.
To protect and strengthen the wire bonds, they are sealed within a bead of epoxy called encapsulant. The top of the wire arc is often about 300 microns above the contact pads although some wire bonding may extend even higher. As the name suggests, the encapsulant needs to encapsulate the full length of the wire so the encapsulant bead will extend 500 microns to 600 microns proud of the contact pads.
If the die is purely an electronic microprocessor, there is little need to keep close control of the encapsulant bead dimensions. However, if the die is a micro-electro mechanical systems (MEMS) device with an active upper surface, it may be necessary or desirable to bring the active surface of the die onto close proximity with another surface. One such situation applies to inkjet printheads. The proximity of the print media to the nozzle array influences the print quality. Similarly, if a cleaning surface is wiped across the nozzles, the bead of encapsulant can hamper the wiping contact.
Another problems arises because of sides of the encapsulant bead are not straight. One commonly used technique for depositing the encapsulant involves extruding it from a needle directly onto the line of wire bonds. The encapsulant volume and placement on the die is not very accurate. Variations in the pressure from the pump or slight non-uniformities in the speed of the needle cause the side of the bead contacting the active surface to be reasonably crooked. As the side of the bead is not straight, it has to be generously spaced from any active parts on the active surface to comfortably accommodate the perturbations. Spacing the electrical contacts away from the active portions (say for example, inkjet nozzles) of the active surface uses up valuable wafer real estate and reduces the number of dies that can be fabricated from a wafer disc.
In light of the widespread use of inkjet printheads, the invention will be described with specific reference to its application in this field. However, the ordinary worker will appreciate that this is purely illustrative and the invention is equally applicable to other integrated circuits wire bonded to a PCB or other support structure.
According to a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of profiling a series of wire bonds between a line of contact pads on a die, and a corresponding set of conductors on a supporting structure, the method comprising the steps of:
electrically connecting each of the contact pads on the die to a corresponding conductor on the supporting structure with a respective wire bond, each of the wire bonds extending in an arc from the contact pad to the conductor; and,
pushing on each of the wire bonds individually to collapse the arc and plastically deform the wire bond such that the plastic deformation maintains the wire bond in a flatter profile shape.
The strength of the wire bond is known to be relatively small; of the order of 3 to 5 grams force. However, the Applicant's work has found that the wire bond structure is robust enough to withstand a certain degree of work hardening from plastic deformation. The arc of the wire bond can be deformed into a flatter profile without compromising the electrical connection with the PCB. The Applicant's above referenced U.S. Ser. No. 11/860,539 discloses a technique for simultaneously pushing some or all of the wire loops in the line of wire bonds. This so called gang wire pushing technique is effective but further development has shown that individually collapsing each wire bond is more controlled and easier to implement in a high volume manufacturing process.
Preferably, adjacent wire bonds in the line of wire bonds are sequentially pushed. In a further preferred form, the step of forming the line of wire bonds uses a wirebonder that has a bonding tool for moving between the contacts pads and their respective corresponding conductors, and the line of wires bonds are sequentially pushed by a wire engaging structure on the wirebonder. Preferably, the wire engaging structure and the bonding tools are configured for synchronized movement. Preferably, the wire engaging structure pushes the wire bond immediately adjacent the wire bond currently being formed by the bonding tool. Preferably, the wirebonder is a wedge type wirebonder and the bonding tool is a wedge with a wire clamp at a distal end such that during use, the wire clamp holds a piece of wire in contact with one of the contact pads on the die to form a weld connection before moving to the corresponding conductor on the PCB to weld the other end of the wire and formal wire bond, and the wire engaging structure has a wire pushing surface that contacts the wire bond, the wire pushing surface is adjacent to, and 1.0 mm to 1.6 mm behind the wire clamp with respect to the movement of the wedge towards the IC die. In a particularly preferred form, the wire pushing surface is between 50 microns to 400 microns closer to the PCB and the wire clamp. In some embodiments, the line of wire bonds does not extend more than 150 microns above the contact pads of the IC die. In preferred embodiments, the line of wire bonds does not extend more than 50 microns above the contact pads of the IC die. In a particularly preferred form, the wire bonds are attached to the contact pads with a bond strength greater than 3 g force.
Preferably the contact pads are spaced from the corresponding conductors on the PCB by more than 1 mm. In a further preferred form, the contact pads are between 2 mm and 3 mm from the corresponding conductors on the PCB. In some embodiments, the PCB has a support structure and the flex PCB and need to the support structure such that the conductors are adjacent the contact pads on the die. In particular embodiments, the support structure has a chip mounting area for supporting the die, the die having a back surface in contact with the chip mounting area and an active surface opposing the back surface, the active surface having the contact pads, and the chip mounting area being raised relative to the remainder of the support structure such that the contact pads are raised relative to the conductors. In a particularly preferred form, the support structure is a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) molding. Preferably, the active surface has functional elements spaced less than 260 microns from the contacts pads of the die. In a particularly preferred form, the die is an inkjet printhead IC and the functional elements are nozzles through which ink is ejected. In some embodiments, the support structure is a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) molding.
Preferably, the wire bonds are covered in a bead of encapsulant, the bead of encapsulant extending less than 200 microns above the active surface of the die.
Preferably, the wire bonds are covered in a bead of encapsulant, the bead of encapsulant having a profiled surface that is flat, parallel to and spaced less than 100 microns from the active surface.
Preferably, the line of wire bonds are covered in a bead of encapsulant, the bead of encapsulant having a profiled surface that is flat and inclined relative to the active surface.
Preferably, the wire bonds are covered in a bead of encapsulant, the encapsulant being an epoxy material that is thixotropic when uncured.
Preferably, the wire bonds are covered in a bead of encapsulant, the encapsulant being an epoxy material has a viscosity greater than 700 cp when uncured.
In a particular embodiment, the printhead IC is mounted in a printer such that during use the nozzles are less than 100 microns from the paper path.
According to a second aspect, the present invention provides a wirebonder for electrically connecting an integrated circuit die with conductors on a printed circuit board, the wirebonder comprising:
a bonding tool for attaching wire bonds from the integrated circuit die to the conductors of the printed circuit board; and,
a wire engaging structure for deforming the wire bonds.
Preferably, the wire engaging structure pushes on the wire bonds to plastically deform them.
Preferably, the wire engaging structure is configured to push the wire bonds onto an adhesive surface positioned between the integrated circuit and the conductors of the printed circuit board.
Preferably, the wire engaging structure is flexible relative to the bonding tool.
Preferably, the wire engaging structure is configured for synchronized movement with the bonding tool.
Preferably, the bonding tool moves from the integrated circuit to the conductors when forming one of the wire bonds and the wire engaging structure has a wire pushing surface positioned 1.0 mm to 1.6 mm behind the bonding tool with respect to its direction of movement when forming the wire bonds.
Preferably, the integrated circuit die is mounted to a supporting surface and the wire pushing surface is 50 microns to 400 microns closer to the supporting surface than the bonding tool. Preferably, the wirebonder is a wedge type wirebonder and the bonding tool is a wedge with a wire clamp at a distal end such that during use, the wire clamp holds a piece of wire in contact with one of the contact pads on the die to form a weld connection before moving to the corresponding conductor on the PCB to weld the other end of the wire and formal wire bond. Preferably, the wire pushing surface is formed from a material that has a hardness less than that of the wire bonds.
Preferably, the wire bonds are formed from lengths of wire with a gauge between 15 microns and 75 microns. In a particularly preferred form, the gauge is about 25 microns.
In some embodiments, the wire bonds attach to respective contact pads on the IC die and the wire bonds do not extend more than 150 microns above the contact pads of the IC die. In preferred embodiments, the line of wire bonds does not extend more than 50 microns above the contact pads of the IC die.
Preferably the contact pads are spaced from the corresponding conductors on the PCB by more than 1 mm. In a further preferred form, the contact pads are between 2 mm and 3 mm from the corresponding conductors on the PCB. In some embodiments, the PCB has a support structure and the flex PCB and need to the support structure such that the conductors are adjacent the contact pads on the die. In particular embodiments, the support structure has a chip mounting area for supporting the die, the die having a back surface in contact with the chip mounting area and an active surface opposing the back surface, the active surface having the contact pads, and the chip mounting area being raised relative to the remainder of the support structure such that the contact pads are raised relative to the conductors. In a particularly preferred form, the support structure is a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) molding. Preferably, the active surface has functional elements spaced less than 260 microns from the contacts pads of the die. In a particularly preferred form, the die is an inkjet printhead IC and the functional elements are nozzles through which ink is ejected. In some embodiments, the support structure is a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) molding.
According to a third aspect, the present invention provides an electronic device comprising:
an integrated circuit die with a plurality of contacts pads;
a printed circuit board with a plurality of conductors corresponding to each of the contact pads respectively;
wire bonds electrically connecting each of the contact pads to the corresponding conductors; and,
an adhesive surface positioned between the contacts pads and the corresponding conductors; wherein,
the wire bonds are secured to the adhesive surface.
According to a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a method of reducing wire bond loop heights in wire bonds electrically connecting an integrated circuit die with a contact pad to a printed circuit board with a conductor, the method comprising the steps of:
mounting the integrated circuit die such that the contact pad is spaced from the conductor;
positioning an adhesive surface between the contact pad and the conductor on the printed circuit board;
attaching wire to one of the contact pad or the conductor;
drawing the wire towards the other of the contact pad or the conductor;
allowing the wire to contact the adhesive surface; and,
attaching the wire to the other of the contact pad of the conductor to form a wire bond adhered to the adhesive surface and a point intermediate its ends.
These aspects of the invention are placed on the realisation that wire bonds can be adhered to an underlying supporting structure without detrimental effects to their bond strength or function. Adhering the wire bonds between their ends provides a reliable and control production in the wire bond loop height. The resulting wire bond heights can be smaller than that achieved by inducing plastic deformation as the individual wire is unable to spring back up when the wire engaging structure disengages. It will be appreciated that plastically deforming a wire bond also involves initially elastically deforming the wire. The elastic deformation is removed when the wire pushing structure is retracted.
The wire bond can be adhered while the bonds are being formed by the wirebonder without any modification to the bonding tool. The applicant has found that wire bond is will typically allow the wire to touch the surface between the die and the conductors on the printed circuit board as the bond is being formed. Once the wire has been welded to the contact pad on the die, the bonding tool draws is towards the conductors on the printed circuit board. As it is drawn across the gap between the die and printed circuit board, the wire drapes downwardly and rests on the underlying surface. The only once the bonding tool has welded the other end of the wire to the conductor, and the wire clamp immediately behind the bonding tool breaks off the feed wire by pulling until tensile failure, does residual tension in the loop cause it to bow upwards. If the wire is brought down to touch an adhesive surface before the ultrasonic weld on the printed circuit board, it is not able to bow upwards.
Preferably, the wire bond is moved into contact with the adhesive surface by a wirebonder is the wire bond is being formed.
Preferably, the adhesive surface is one side of a double-sided adhesive tape. Preferably, the integrated circuit die and the PCB are mounted to a supporting structure such that they are adjacent and spaced from each other. Preferably, the PCB is a flexible PCB and the supporting structure is a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) molding. Preferably, the integrated circuit die is mounted to the supporting structure by a die attach film, and the adhesive surface is provided by a portion of the die attach film.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The wire bonds 16 are covered in a bead on encapsulant 2 to protect and reinforce the bonds. The encapsulant 2 is dispensed from a discharge needle 18 directly onto the wire bonds 16. Often the encapsulant bead 2 is three separate beads—two beads of so-called ‘dam’ encapsulant 20, and one bead of ‘fill’ encapsulant 22. The dam encapsulant 20 has a higher viscosity than the fill encapsulant 22, and serves to form a channel to hold the fill encapsulant bead. The height H of the bead 2 above the die 4 is usually about 500-600 microns. In most electronic devices, this does not pose a problem. However, if the die has an active surface that needs to operate in close proximity to another surface, this bead can be an obstruction.
Elevating the Die Relative to the Flex PCB
With the die 4 raised above the flex PCB 8 by 410 microns, the height of the wire bonds 16 above the die is about 34 microns. With the die raised 610 microns above the flex PCB, the wire bond height is around 20 microns. Raising the die even further has shown little or no further reduction in wire bond height with a step of 710 microns having a wire bond height of around 20 microns.
Shaping the Encapsulant Bead with a Profiling Blade
The encapsulant bead 2 may be a plurality of separate beads as shown in
It will be appreciated that the relative movement of the blade 30 and the die 4 can be precisely controlled. This allows the height H to be determined by the tolerance of the wire bonding process. As long as H is greater than the nominal height of the wire bond arc above the die, plus the maximum tolerance, the encapsulant 2 will cover and protect the wire bonds 16. With this technique, the height H can be easily reduced from 500-600 microns to less than 300 microns. If the heights of the wire bond arcs are also reduced, the height H of the encapsulant bead can be less than 100 microns. The Applicant uses this technique to profile encapsulant on printhead dies down to a height of 50 microns at its lowest point. As shown in
Plastic Deformation of the Wire Bond Arcs
As shown in
Referring now to
The collapse of the wire bonds is uncontrolled and leaves the wire bonds somewhat randomly deformed. However, pushing the wire bonds closer to the die provides more uniformly shaped collapsed wire bonds. The Applicant's work has shown that engaging the wires about 200 to 300 microns for the die provides the best results.
As shown in
Applying Encapsulant with Profiling Blade
Applying the encapsulant with the profiling blade avoids the problems caused by the flowrate fluctuations from the discharge needle. As shown in
In
Encapsulant Front Control
When the encapsulant material is dispensed from the discharge needle, minor variations in the flowrate can cause the bead to bulge at points of higher flow. Consequently, the side of the bead that contacts the active surface of the die is not straight, but has significant perturbations. These perturbations have to be accommodated between the contact pads and any functional elements on the active surface. The spacing between the contacts pads and the functional elements consumes valuable ‘chip real estate’. The Applicant has previously developed printhead dies with a spacing of 260 microns between the contact pads and the first row of nozzles. Better control of the encapsulant front reduces the space between the contacts and operational elements, and so the overall dimensions of the die. Hence the design can be more compact and more chips fabricated from the original wafer disc.
As shown in
As shown in
Collapsing the Wire Bonds Arcs with the Wirebonder
The wire bonder 46 is commonly known in the industry as a “wedge type” wire bonder. The wedge 48 receives a stock of feed wire 56 at its tip. Using some combination of pressure, heat and ultrasonic energy, the end of the wire bond 16 is welded to one of the conductors 12 on the flex PCB 8, or one of the contact pads 10 on the printhead integrated circuit 4.
The wire engaging structure 50 is formed from a material with the surface hardness less than that of the wire. This avoids surface indentations on the wire which may later become stress concentration sites.
Adhering the Wire Bond to Reduce Loop Heights
The adhesive surface 62 may be double sided tape, an adhesive paste or resin jetted onto the LCP 6 when the die 4 and the flex 8 are fixed, or it could simply be an extension of the die attach film 58.
The invention has been described herein by way of example only. The ordinary will readily recognize many variations and modifications which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the broad inventive concept.
The present application is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/046,453 filed on Mar. 12, 2008 which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. Ser. No. 11/860,539 filed Sep. 25, 2007, the contents of which are incorporated herein by cross reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4595938 | Conta et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4933744 | Segawa et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 5008736 | Davies et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5468999 | Lin et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5530278 | Jedicka et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5577319 | Knecht | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5771157 | Zak | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5863488 | Moriya | Jan 1999 | A |
| 6022583 | Falcone et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6071427 | Raulinaitis | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6097100 | Eguchi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6143588 | Glenn | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6166433 | Takashima et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6291884 | Glenn et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6313519 | Gainey et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6326240 | Liaw | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6359335 | Distefano et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6372625 | Shigeno et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6414849 | Chiu | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425655 | Patil | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429515 | Glenn | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6644782 | Ward et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6709893 | Moden et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6789879 | Khalid | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6790473 | Papathomas et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6805541 | Hashimoto | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6836962 | Khandros et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6844632 | Shiono et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6885093 | Lo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6888259 | Ishikawa et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6908843 | Baldonado et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 7005009 | Aoki et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7074651 | Lien | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7078264 | Yang | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7199477 | Cheah | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7262074 | Hall et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7268436 | Aigner et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7275308 | Kim et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7408119 | Qin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7928587 | Tamba et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 20010014486 | Glenn | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020089069 | Lamson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020127776 | Nakajo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166687 | Tornovist et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020185752 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030160311 | Ismail et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040241906 | Chan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050073552 | Smoot et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050242159 | Yajima | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060163331 | Babinetz | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070045872 | Fee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105280 | Li | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080099895 | Kwak | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158298 | Serbicki et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080237887 | Takiar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080315411 | Dahilig et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090032926 | Sharifi | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 03006230 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100244282 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12046453 | Mar 2008 | US |
| Child | 12813472 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11860539 | Sep 2007 | US |
| Child | 12046453 | US |
