1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to semiconductor packaging. More particularly, the present invention relates to wafer level multichip packaging such as, for example, a system in a package solution.
2. State of the Art
Semiconductor chips (also referred to as die/dice herein) are found in many electronic products today. As semiconductor dice get smaller and more complex, the problem of making electrical connections between semiconductor dice, connections to carrier substrates such as printed circuit boards, and connections to intermediate substrates such as multichip modules which are, in turn, connected to carrier substrates has been addressed with a variety of constantly evolving solutions.
One of the earlier solutions included wire bonding from signal connection devices, such as bond pads of a semiconductor die, to pins or leads of a lead frame contained in a ceramic or plastic package. Finished packages are mounted to a carrier substrate, such as a printed circuit board, where the pins or leads make electrical connection with contact pads on the carrier substrate.
The term “signal connection devices” as used herein regarding semiconductor devices includes not only contact pads of a substrate and bond pads of a semiconductor device but also I/O connections for a semiconductor device created by adding circuitry from bond pads located on the active surface of the semiconductor device to different locations on the active surface of the semiconductor device. Such additional circuitry is typically effected using a so-called “redistribution layer” extending over the active surface or a surface of a semiconductor die.
An evolution of electrical connection technology occurred when multiple semiconductor dice were mounted on an intermediate substrate. In this instance, the semiconductor dice are typically connected to a lead frame by way of bonding wires. Signals, or electrical connections, required for coupling with an external device, such as a circuit board, are brought out to contact pads, pins or leads of the multichip module package. Other signals or electrical interconnections may be established between multiple semiconductor dice by way of circuitry formed on the intermediate substrate.
In these solutions, using wires for connecting a semiconductor die to a substrate and wire bonding processes can create problems. Such problems may include, for example, size and pitch (spacing) requirements for the bond pads of the semiconductor die and contact pads of the substrate; inductance in the signals due to the long curved wires; wire bond breakage and wire sweep causing shorting between adjacent wires; and high signal frequency semiconductor dice making the wire bonding process difficult and expensive.
Flip-chip technologies using solder balls or bumps have helped to alleviate some of these problems. For example, instead of wire bonding, conductive bumps such as, for example, balls of solder may be formed at the locations of the bond pads of a semiconductor die. A specialized lead frame, a dielectric tape carrying circuit traces as used in tape automated bonding processes, or other carrier substrates, such as a printed circuit board, may have electrical connection locations such terminals, which correspond to the placement of the solder balls on the bond pads of the semiconductor die. The semiconductor die is “flipped” upside down so the solder balls are placed, for example, on the contact pads of a carrier substrate. A solder reflow process heats the solder balls until the solder begins to flow and bond with a corresponding contact pad of a carrier substrate. Upon cooling, the solder forms both mechanical and electrical connections between the carrier substrate and the semiconductor die. This packaging solution may alleviate at least some of the inductance problems, allowing for higher frequency performance and better signal integrity of the semiconductor die. Also, to a certain extent, it allows the contact pads of a substrate where conductive bumps were formed to be larger, more widely pitched and placed anywhere on the semiconductor die active surface rather than just around the periphery or down the center thereof.
Chip scale packaging has evolved from various standard flip-chip processes to a configuration wherein the size of a package is reduced to only slightly larger than the size of the semiconductor die. Chip scale packages are typically created using an interposer substrate. The semiconductor die, with solder balls or bumps such as described above, is attached and electrically connected to the interposer substrate and an encapsulation material is applied over the chip for protection thereof from the elements. The interposer substrate can redistribute signal connections to new locations so they are physically positioned in a desired pattern or arrangement, or to just a different pitch more suitable for mounting to an interposer substrate. An additional set of conductive bumps may then be formed at other contact pad locations on the interposer substrate. The resulting package may then be attached to a carrier substrate such as a printed circuit board.
Chip scale packaging enables small packages using desired ball grid arrays or fine ball grid arrays. However, the interposer substrate is typically made of an organic material which is the same as, or similar to, that used for printed circuit boards. There is conventionally a significant mismatch in the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) of the interposer substrate and the semiconductor die, often resulting in substantial stress on the mechanical and electrical interconnections formed between the semiconductor die and interposer substrate (e.g., a reflowed solder connection) during the normal thermal cycling during normal operation of the semiconductor die. The use of a ceramic substrate may alleviate some of the CTE mismatch concerns but at a considerably higher cost relative to more conventional interposer substrates.
Another advance in the area of multichip modules includes wafer scale integration. Wafer scale integration generally comprises fabricating multiple types of functional semiconductor dice on a single wafer. For example, a four-chip system may be created by placing a microprocessor next to a memory controller and two memory-type semiconductor dice. This pattern may then be repeated across the entire wafer. After fabrication, the wafer is sawed into individual segments with each segment containing the four different functions. However, this approach has not been a very satisfactory solution due to yield problems created by the variations in processes for forming processors and various types of memory-type semiconductor dice. For example, if a defect causes any one of the four functions to be inoperable, the entire segment is defective and not usable.
In addition to that described above, there have been advances in bump technologies where the conductive bumps act as the signal connection device. Conventional solder bumps, in some cases, have been replaced by stud bumps. Stud bumps have conventionally been gold, but copper and plated-type stud bumps have also been used recently. The stud bumps may actually comprise short wires or wire stubs applied to a semiconductor die using a conventional wire bonding process. Stud bumping has the advantages of using a more cost effective wire bonding process for application of the bumps in comparison to the more complex, multistep solder bumping process. Further, conductive and conductor-filled adhesives have also been employed to attach the conductive bumps to a carrier substrate. The conductive or conductor-filled adhesive may provide an amount of flexibility to the mechanical and electrical connection, thereby compensating for some of the problems associated with the mismatch of CTE often associated with solder bump processes as discussed above.
However, in light of the advances made in fabricating semiconductor device packages, there is a continued need for a reliable, cost effective solution with a higher integration of various functional semiconductor dice in a single package to produce, for example, a system on a semiconductor die solution. There is also a need to create smaller packages with more consistent thermal expansion properties while enabling the redistribution of signal connection devices of the various semiconductor dice to a more convenient, possibly denser, and optionally standard configuration for attachment to a carrier substrate.
Finally, it would be advantageous to provide a system on a chip packaging solution using known good dice, such use thereby increasing the yield of usable packages and, thus, improving the efficiency and cost effectiveness associated with producing such packages.
The present invention includes new packaging implementation methods to solve or at least reduce some of the problems encountered in the prior art. Generally, the present invention provides a multichip multilayer system on a chip-type solution. Greater integration is accomplished using a plurality and variety of known good dice contained within cavities formed in a separate silicon substrate. The term “variety” includes semiconductor dice of not only different types (microprocessor, logic, memory, etc.) but functionally similar semiconductor dice of different dimensions and I/O arrangements. The present invention also contemplates the use of so-called “known good die,” or KGD, as the semiconductor dice to be packaged.
The present invention enables the use of processes for making silicon-type semiconductor dice for creating additional redistribution and interconnect layers in the same plane or same planes vertically offset from the multichip arrangement. These additional layers may then be terminated with conductive bumps, optionally in a standard configuration, at the top layer for typical flip-chip application of the assembly to a carrier substrate such as printed circuit board or other multichip module substrate.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a plurality of cavities is etched into the top of a substrate, such as a silicon wafer. The cavities are sized, configured and located to physically receive signal connection devices of a plurality and variety of types of semiconductor dice. The signal connection devices on the semiconductor die may be formed, for example, as gold stud bumps. A semiconductor die attach material adhesive with a high dielectric constant is applied to the top surface of the substrate and in the cavities. The substrate, a wafer, having the semiconductor dice thereon is flipped upside down and placed such that the signal connection devices are received by the cavities with the bond pads on the active surface of each semiconductor die making contact with the die attach material. A layer of molding compound is formed over the top of the substrate and over the backs of the various semiconductor dice. This molding compound creates the package structure, adds mechanical stability, and protects the semiconductor dice from the elements. A portion of the back surface of the substrate is removed, such as by back-grinding or another suitable process, until the signal connection devices are exposed through the back surface of the substrate. With the signal connection devices exposed, a dielectric layer is formed over the entire back surface of the wafer. The dielectric layer is then etched to expose the signal connection devices for use in connection to higher-level packaging.
According to another embodiment of the invention, a plurality of cavities is formed in the top surface of a substrate. The cavities are formed to receive the substantial entirety of each of the various semiconductor dice of a plurality to be packaged. Therefore, the cavities are individually sized and configured to correspond with the bond pads of each individual semiconductor die type that is used. It may be desirable to configure the cavities such that the active surface of a semiconductor die placed therein is approximately flush with the surface of the substrate. A die attach material is placed in the die cavities and the semiconductor dice are placed in the cavities with the active surface of each semiconductor die facing upwards and such that the back surfaces of the semiconductor dice contact the die attach material in the bottoms of the cavities. A dielectric layer is formed over the tops of the semiconductor dice, over the top of the substrate and into any gaps between the dice and the cavity sidewalls. Finally, vias are formed in the dielectric layer to expose signal connection devices on the various semiconductor dice.
The semiconductor device packages according to the present invention may further undergo a redistribution layer (RDL) process to form signal interconnections between semiconductor dice of the package or to redistribute signals from the signal connection device locations of the various types of semiconductor dice to more convenient and optionally standard locations for interconnection with an external device or component. In the redistribution layer process, a metal layer is deposited and patterned to create an interconnect layer from the exposed signal connection device (e.g., contact pad or conductive bump) locations to other locations.
Additional signal layers may be formed if so desired. This signal layering process includes three primary acts: first, a new dielectric layer is formed on the wafer; next, vias are formed in the dielectric layer so connections to an underlying metal layer may be formed; and finally, a new layer of metal is deposited and patterned to create an interconnect on this new layer as well as connections to the underlying layer through the vias.
Once the signal layering process is completed for the number of additional interconnect layers desired, a final interconnect layer is formed. At this juncture, a new dielectric layer is formed on the wafer. Next, openings are formed in the dielectric layer sufficient for the formation of new signal connection devices and for connections to the underlying metal layer. Finally, the new signal connection devices, such as conductive bumps in the form of solder balls, are formed in the openings.
At this point, if desired, testing may be accomplished through the solder balls on each of the individual silicon wafer segments containing a complete system on a wafer segment including various types of semiconductor dice. Finally, the process is completed by sawing the wafer into multichip segments, creating a plurality of individual multichip multilayer systems on chip packages, each ready for test and assembly.
In the drawings, which illustrate what is currently considered to be the best mode for carrying out the invention:
Referring to drawing
Referring next to drawing
As shown in
In addition, for simplicity, drawing
With the semiconductor dice 114 attached to the substrate 102, a molding or encapsulating layer 119 is formed over the top surface 104 of the substrate 102 and the back side 120 of the semiconductor dice 114 as shown in drawing
After the molding layer 119 is disposed on the top surface 104 of the substrate 102 and properly cured, a portion of the substrate 102 along its new bottom surface 106′ is removed as is shown in drawing
To prepare the wafer for a redistribution layer (RDL) process, a dielectric layer 122 is formed covering the new bottom surface 106′ of the wafer and the conductive bumps 116, as shown in drawing
Before describing the redistribution layer process, another embodiment of the present invention is described as shown in drawing
As shown in drawing
The RDL process, which is applicable to both of the exemplary embodiments discussed above, is shown and described with respect to drawing
The RDL process may incorporate metallization layer deposition and etching processes well known in the art to form the pattern of openings and first circuit connection layers 308. Further, the metal layer may be formed of a material including, for example, aluminum, copper, or other alloys known and utilized in the art. It is also noted that signal connection devices (e.g., the conductive bumps 116 of drawing
A predetermined number of additional metal layers may be added in a basic three-step signal connection layering process as shown in drawing
As shown in drawing
With the new signal device connections 320 formed, if desired, testing could be accomplished through connection with the new signal device connections 320 of each of the individual multichip packages.
Referring now to drawing
Referring now to drawing
Referring now to drawing
Specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein; however, the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms. It should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention includes all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/229,914, filed Aug. 27, 2002, now, U.S. Pat. No. 6,964,881, issued Nov. 15, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3679941 | LaCombe et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3903590 | Yokogawa | Sep 1975 | A |
4613891 | Ng et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4714516 | Eichelberger et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4783695 | Eichelberger et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4835704 | Eichelberger et al. | May 1989 | A |
4866501 | Shanefield | Sep 1989 | A |
4878991 | Eichelberger et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4884122 | Eichelberger et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4894115 | Eichelberger et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4918811 | Eichelberger et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4933042 | Eichelberger et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4937203 | Eichelberger et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5019946 | Eichelberger et al. | May 1991 | A |
5048179 | Shindo et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5055907 | Jacobs | Oct 1991 | A |
5073814 | Cole et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5091769 | Eichelberger | Feb 1992 | A |
5094709 | Eichelberger et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108825 | Wojnarowski et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5111278 | Eichelberger | May 1992 | A |
5144747 | Eichelberger | Sep 1992 | A |
5149662 | Eichelberger | Sep 1992 | A |
5154793 | Wojnarowski et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5157589 | Cole et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5161093 | Gorczyca et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5169678 | Cole et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192716 | Jacobs | Mar 1993 | A |
5200810 | Wojnarowski et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5206091 | Beuhler et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5206712 | Kornrumpf et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5225023 | Wojnarowski et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5241456 | Marcinkiewicz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250843 | Eichelberger | Oct 1993 | A |
5255431 | Burdick | Oct 1993 | A |
5257178 | Hatfield et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258647 | Wojnarowski et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5280192 | Kryzaniwsky | Jan 1994 | A |
5285571 | Gorczyca et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5300812 | Lupinski et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5302547 | Wojnarowski et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5315486 | Fillion et al. | May 1994 | A |
5324687 | Wojnarowski | Jun 1994 | A |
5331203 | Wojnarowski et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336928 | Neugebauer et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5353195 | Fillion et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5353498 | Fillion et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355102 | Kornrumpf et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359496 | Kornrumpf et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366906 | Wojnarowski et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5384691 | Neugebauer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5401687 | Cole et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5422513 | Marcinkiewicz et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5422514 | Griswold et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432675 | Sorimachi et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432677 | Mowatt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434751 | Cole et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5449427 | Wojnarowski et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452182 | Eichelberger et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455459 | Fillion et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5497033 | Fillion et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5524339 | Gorowitz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527741 | Cole et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546654 | Wojnarowski et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548099 | Cole et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554305 | Wojnarowski et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559363 | Immorlica, Jr. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561085 | Gorowitz et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565706 | Miura et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5576517 | Wojnarowski et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5658827 | Aulicino et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5675310 | Wojnarowski et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683928 | Wojnarowski et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691245 | Bakhit et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5736448 | Saia et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745984 | Cole et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757072 | Gorowitz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5786628 | Beilstein et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796164 | McGraw et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817541 | Averkiou et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841193 | Eichelberger | Nov 1998 | A |
5844304 | Kata et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849623 | Wojnarowski et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861322 | Caillat et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866952 | Wojnarowski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872040 | Wojnarowski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874770 | Saia et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5888837 | Fillion et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897337 | Kata et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5936305 | Akram | Aug 1999 | A |
5946546 | Fillion et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973908 | Saia et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5998291 | Bakhit et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5998859 | Griswold et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6025258 | Ochiai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040226 | Wojnarowski et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057593 | Iovdalsky et al. | May 2000 | A |
6093971 | Oppermann et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6150719 | Saia et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159767 | Eichelberger | Dec 2000 | A |
6175161 | Goetz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181569 | Chakravorty | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6214642 | Chen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228687 | Akram et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229203 | Wojnarowski | May 2001 | B1 |
6236109 | Hsuan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239367 | Hsuan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239482 | Fillion et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239980 | Fillion et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242282 | Fillion et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255137 | Gorczyca et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271469 | Ma et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274391 | Wachtler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284564 | Balch et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294407 | Jacobs | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306680 | Fillion et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323096 | Saia et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350668 | Chakravorty | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365438 | Ishida et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368896 | Farnworth et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6389689 | Heo | May 2002 | B2 |
6389691 | Rinne et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396148 | Eichelberger et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396153 | Fillion et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6423570 | Ma et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426545 | Eichelberger et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426564 | Ball | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444560 | Pogge et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475877 | Saia et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489185 | Towle et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6492737 | Imasu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506664 | Beyne et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515370 | Hashimoto | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6518163 | Sakuyama et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521530 | Peters et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6531022 | Tsukahara | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548189 | Gunasekaran et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548329 | Saia et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555906 | Towle et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555908 | Eichelberger et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6602739 | Rose et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6617687 | Akram et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6671948 | Burdick et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6673698 | Lin et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6706624 | Kapusta et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707124 | Wachtler et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709897 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709898 | Ma et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713859 | Ma | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6734534 | Vu et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6737297 | Pogge et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746898 | Lin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756662 | Infantolino et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759268 | Akagawa | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767764 | Saia et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773962 | Saia et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6774467 | Horiuchi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6774473 | Shen | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785447 | Yoshimura et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790703 | Saia et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794222 | Kraft et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6808962 | Tsubosaki | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818544 | Eichelberger et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825553 | Chua et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6838776 | Leal et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845184 | Yoshimura et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6855623 | Ball | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867499 | Tabrizi | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876554 | Inagaki et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6894384 | Shizuno | May 2005 | B1 |
6894395 | Oshima | May 2005 | B2 |
6908561 | Foust et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911737 | Wood et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916682 | Gerber et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921975 | Leal et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921980 | Nakanishi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933813 | Burdick et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6951811 | Sorimachi | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6975035 | Lee | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6982380 | Hoffmann et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7019406 | Huang et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7049697 | Pogge et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071024 | Towle et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7074650 | Honda | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078788 | Vu et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087460 | Lee | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112467 | Eichelberger et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7122907 | Lee | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134198 | Nakatani et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7161237 | Lee | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189596 | Mu et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
20010009779 | Fillion et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010023993 | Kawashima | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010026021 | Honda | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020050585 | Masayuki et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064935 | Honda | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070443 | Mu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072152 | Urushima | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075107 | Burdick et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020132391 | Saia et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020142513 | Fee et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173080 | Saia et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020197767 | Saia et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030013232 | Towle et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030015342 | Sakamoto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036257 | Masumoto et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038378 | Jacobs | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057544 | Nathan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030087475 | Sterrett et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030116845 | Bojkov et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124835 | Lin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030164541 | Lee | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030164548 | Lee | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030164551 | Lee et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030166312 | Lee | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030214036 | Sarihan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227095 | Fujisawa et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040014317 | Sakamoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040038442 | Kinsman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040099947 | Burdick et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104261 | Sterrett et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040145040 | Fukuda et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040159957 | Lee | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168825 | Sakamoto et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180486 | Hashimoto | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197952 | Lee | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040197955 | Lee | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203244 | Oshima | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050034888 | Hoffmann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048759 | Hsu | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050116337 | Chua et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050116354 | Kashiwazaki | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63-69258 | Mar 1988 | JP |
408060103 | Mar 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050116337 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10229914 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 11028374 | US |