The present disclosure relates to an electrical circuit structure constructed using a liquid crystal polymer (“LCP”) dielectric material, and a corresponding methods that merge processes for printed circuit boards (“PCB”) and semiconductor processing.
As semiconductor and electronics markets have progressed, several technical factors have emerged that have significant impact to the electrical interconnects for “systems” whether they be computer, handset, tablet, automotive, medical, telecomm, data centers. Extreme increases in data traffic driven by internet, streaming video, smart phone, tablet and cloud computing are driving need for significant increases in bandwidth. Increases in data rate and functionality are driving significant wide scale architecture evolution. Advances in semiconductor packaging are driving significant density and routing challenges. Power and thermal management are challenges with low voltage systems to preserve battery life. Advances in semiconductor geometries have outpaced printed circuit geometries.
Traditional printed circuits are often constructed in what is commonly called rigid or flexible formats. The rigid versions are used in nearly every electronic system, where the printed circuit board (PCB) is essentially a laminate of materials and circuits that when built is relatively stiff or rigid and cannot be bent significantly without damage.
Flexible circuits have become very popular in many applications where the ability to bend the circuit to connect one member of a system to another has some benefit. These flexible circuits are made in a very similar fashion as rigid PCB's, where layers of circuitry and dielectric materials are laminated. The main difference is the material set used for construction. Typical flexible circuits start with a polymer film that is clad, laminated, or deposited with copper. A photolithography image with the desired circuitry geometry is printed onto the copper, and the polymer film is etched to remove the unwanted copper.
Flexible circuits are processed similar to that of rigid PCB's with a series of imaging, masking, drilling, via creation, plating, and trimming steps. The resulting circuit can be bent, without damaging the copper circuitry. Flexible circuits are solderable, and can have devices attached to provide some desired function. The materials used to make flexible circuits can be used in high frequency applications where the material set and design features can often provide better electrical performance than a comparable rigid circuit. Flexible circuits are very commonly used in many electronic systems such as notebook computers, medical devices, displays, handheld devices, autos, aircraft and many others.
Flexible circuits are connected to electrical system in a variety of ways. In most cases, a portion of the circuitry is exposed to create a connection point. Once exposed, the circuitry can be connected to another circuit or component by soldering, conductive adhesive, thermo-sonic welding, pressure or a mechanical connector. In general, the terminals are located on an end of the flexible circuit, where edge traces are exposed or in some cases an area array of terminals are exposed. Often there is some sort of mechanical enhancement at or near the connection to prevent the joints from being disconnected during use or flexure.
In general, flexible circuits are expensive compared to some rigid PCB products. Flexible circuits also have some limitations regarding layer count or feature registration, and are therefore generally only used for small or elongated applications.
Rigid PCBs and package substrates experience challenges as the feature sizes and line spacing are reduced to achieve further miniaturization and increased circuit density. The use of laser ablation has become increasingly used to create via structures for fine line or fine pitch structures. The use of lasers allows localized structure creation, where the processed circuits are plated together to create via connections from one layer to another. As density increases, however, laser processed via structures can experience significant taper, carbon contamination, layer-to-layer shorting during the plating process due to registration issues, and high resistance interconnections that may be prone to result in reliability issues. The challenge of making fine line PCBs often relates to the difficulty in creating very small or blind and buried vias.
The printed circuit industry has been driven by the mobile and handset market to achieve finer lines and spaces with higher density. The domestic circuit market has adopted laser direct imaging systems and laser drilled micro-vias over the last several years as advancements in fabrication techniques. In general, domestic suppliers can supply 75 micron lines and spaces with multi-layer construction, with the availability of 50 micron lines and spaces in some cases. The supplier pool is dramatically reduced below 50 micron lines and spaces, with blind and buried vias likely required.
Material sets available to traditional fabrication combined with the line and space capabilities drive the overall stack up for impedance control. For high speed applications, loss associated with glass weave and solder mask are an issue, and conventional via technology has become a major source of impedance mismatch and signal parasitic effects.
In general, signal integrity, high aspect ratio vias and line and space requirements limit the relationship between semiconductor packaging and the printed circuit board the chips are mounted to. Whether the application is a multi-layer rigid PCB, a flex circuit, or rigid flex there is a need for a high speed high density alternative.
The present disclosure uses a liquid crystal polymer (“LCP”) material as a circuit bearing dielectric material. The LCP can be used in several forms, such as a cast film, an injection molded coupon or wafer as well as in liquid resin form or a composite liquid material that includes LCP particles.
The present disclosure is directed to creating a circuit architecture that uses LCP material in ways that can be processed with the same equipment used to produce conventional circuits, as well as the laser system used to produce connector and socket products. LCP has properties that make it ideal for high speed circuit fabrication. LCP have a low dielectric constant of 2.9 and is virtually impermeable to moisture. The ablation point is well suited for UV laser processing, and it has the unique availability of multiple melting temperatures. The present disclosure leverages those properties to create a method of creating circuits where the LCP material can either be pre-clad with copper or processed to accept electro-less copper deposition and fusion bonded using conventional lamination techniques.
The present disclosure is directed to a method of making a fusion bonded circuit structure. First and second major surface of a substrate are provided with first and second seed layers of a conductive material about 5 microns or less thick. First and second resist layers are deposited on the first and second major surfaces of the first LCP substrate, respectively. The first and second resist layers are processed to create a plurality of first and second recesses corresponding to a desired first and second circuitry layers. The first and second recesses expose portions of the first and second seed layers of conductive material, respectively. The first and second major surfaces of the substrate are simultaneously electroplated to create first and second conductive traces defined by the first and second recesses, respectively. The first and second seed layers of conductive material act as an electrical bus for the electroplating process. The first, and second resist layers are removed to reveal the first and second conductive traces. The first LCP substrate is etched to remove exposed portions of the first and second seed layers of conductive material adjacent the first and second conductive traces, respectively. Unetched portions of the first and second seed layers of conductive material remain between the first and second conductive traces and the first LCP substrate. First and second LCP layers are fusion bonded to the first and second major surface of the first LCP substrate to encapsulate the first and second conductive traces in an LCP material.
A first resist layer is deposited on the seed layer of conductive material that serves as an electrical bus for the electroplating process. The first resist layer is processed to create first recesses corresponding to a desired first circuitry layer. The first recesses expose portions of the seed layer of conductive material. The substrate is electroplated to create first conductive traces defined by the first recesses. The first resist layer is removed to reveal the first conductive traces. The substrate is etched to remove exposed portions of the seed layer of conductive material adjacent the first conductive traces. A portion of the seed layer of conductive material remains between the first conductive traces and the substrate. A first layer of LCP is fusion boned to the first major surface of the substrate to encapsulate the first conductive traces in an LCP material.
In an alternate embodiment, the first layer is an alternate fusion bonding material that encapsulates the first conductive traces. The first substrate and the first fusion bonding layer preferably have dielectric constants that differ less than about 20%, and more preferably differ less than about 10%.
The first resist layer is preferably deposited as a liquid and imaged to create the first recesses. The first conductive traces can have a pitch in the range of about 25 microns and a thickness of about 0.001 inches. The first conductive traces have a generally rectangular cross-sectional shape, with minimal undercuts. In one embodiment, the first conductive traces are planarized before the step of removing the first resist layer.
In some embodiments, a laser is used to drill a plurality of first vias through the first layer of LCP to the first conductive traces. Bulk plating is deposited in the plurality of first vias to form a plurality of conductive pillars of solid metal that substantially fill the vias. In one embodiment, electro-less plating is applied to the first vias before the electrolytic plating is deposited. A second circuitry layer is optionally attached to the first major surface of the substrate. The conductive pillars are used to electrically couple to the second circuitry layer.
The nature of the present process provides the potential for significant enhancement to traditional circuit techniques not generally possible with the normal circuit fabrication process alone. By combining methods used in the PCB fab and semiconductor packaging industries, the present disclosure enables fine line high density circuit structures not currently produced with attractive cost of manufacture. In addition, the high density circuit can be treated as a system of its own by incorporating printed transistors or other passive and active function.
The present disclosure permits the creation of circuit structures with lines and spaces below 50 micron, and preferably below 20 microns, and supports signal integrity beyond 40 GHz. The material sets can be processed with conventional circuit fabrication techniques and equipment. The solid metal vias provide superior electrical performance over conventional barrel plated or micro vias. The present disclosure is applicable to rigid, flexible and rigid flex circuits, as well as semiconductor packaging.
The present disclosure permits bulk conductive material to be added to create a very small low resistance vias to increase density and reduce line and feature pitch of the high density circuit. The printed circuit can be produced to replicate a traditional circuit, or it can be an interconnect to one or more members of a system embedded or incorporated.
The present high density high performance circuit structure can be configured as a low cost, high signal performance electrical interconnect assembly, which has a low profile that is particularly useful for desktop and mobile PC applications. In another embodiment, the high density circuit structure can also be a portion of a socket or semiconductor package.
Liquid crystal polymers (“LCP”) are a preferred dielectric material of producing the high density, higher performance multi-layer electrical circuits of the present disclosure. The LCP has favorable properties for directly attaching bare die silicon devices, integrated circuits, antenna, and other electrical components (“IC device”) on a very fine termination pitch. LCP can be used in applications with a method called fusion bonding where the base LCP material is laminated with sufficient heat and pressure to cause multiple layers of LCP to bond to each other or fuse to resemble a contiguous material set consisting of LCP. The lamination control of these structures is critical such that the material is processed close to melt temperature without escaping into the liquid phase and a resulting loss of definition, material movement, circuit movement and circuit embossing. Several variants of LCP are available with multiple melt temperatures providing some latitude in lamination temperature and pressure ranges. LCP also has optical properties that allow subsequent layers to registered to circuit geometry in previous layers.
A limitation of this use of LCP is reached when a circuit stack beyond 4 to 5 layers is desired with fine circuit geometry contained within the stack. The sequential lamination required to build multi-layer constructions challenges the material set where previously created fusion bond interfaces weaken and embedded circuitry is disrupted. The physical bond of the LCP to LCP can be disrupted, and in general the bond of LCP to copper is inadequate to survive required reliability in many cases resulting in delamination.
The disclosure is directed to using a liquid crystal polymer material as a circuit bearing dielectric material. The disclosure proposed a combination of LCP films, dielectric material either in liquid form (and subsequently cured) or sheet form, and a series of additive and subtractive steps to create very thin high performance circuit structures that can replicate or replace conventional technologies as well as provide opportunity for increased circuit density. LCP material has many benefits from an electrical and mechanical standpoint. It has a lower dielectric constant than traditional materials, can be processed to accept direct metal deposition, does not absorb moisture, and has low loss at high frequency.
Another aspect of this disclosure is the ability to precisely control the dielectric separation between layers by adding a feature or material supporting member outside of the desired circuit pattern region such that a specific thickness control or hard stop is created to prevent lamination variance. This thickness control feature can be external to the field of circuit creation or it can be a component that becomes embedded within the circuit stack but not in the circuit regions and is cut away when the finished circuit stack is routed.
Another aspect of the disclosure is the ability to start with a given thickness of LCP and apply heat and controlled pressure to reduce the thickness of the base LCP to a specific desired dielectric thickness prior to incorporating into a circuit stack in an effort to precisely control the separation relative the circuit patterns for impedance match. The resultant thinning can also be accomplished with a plasma removal of excess material.
If the end product is a flexible circuit, the base layer 54 can be a material such as polyimide or liquid crystal polymer. If the final product is a rigid circuit board, the base layer 54 can be FR4 or one of many high speed laminates or substrates. If the final product is a semiconductor package, the base layer 54 can be a material such as FR4, BT resin of any one of a variety of laminate or substrate materials. In the illustrated embodiment, the copper foil 52 can be pre-formed circuitry layer 56 or can be formed using a fine line imaging step to etch copper foil as is done with many PCB processes. The circuitry layer 56 can include fine line etching with spacing between copper traces of about 25 microns. It will be appreciated that conventional copper etching may be used to pattern thicker copper sheets (e.g., ¼ ounce to ½ ounce), followed by fusion bonding of layers as discussed herein.
A fusion bonding material 58 is then applied to the surface 60. The fusion bonding material 58 can be a liquid crystal polymer (“LCP”), a derivation of LCP, a thermoplastic material with a melt or extrusion temperature lower than that of the base layer 54 such that the base layer 54 does not flow or extrude significantly during the fusion bonding process. The fusion bonding material 58 preferably has a dielectric constant approximating that of LCP so the resulting high aspect ratio conductive traces and vias are surrounded by a like or common dielectric constant material. In one embodiment, the fusion bonding material 58 has a dielectric constant within about 20%, and more preferably within 10% of the dielectric constant of the base layer 54.
In the illustrated embodiment, liquid crystal polymer 58 is applied to surface 60 such that the circuitry 56 is at least partially in contact with the LCP 58. The LCP layer 58 may be a film or a liquid. The LCP layer 58 can be applied by screen printing, stencil printing, jetting, flooding, spraying etc. The LCP material is then imaged to create the recesses or vias 62 that expose the circuit locations 64. One benefit of imaging the LCP 58 is that the vias 62 do not need to be round as with traditional drilled vias. Any shape that can be imaged and will result in a grown full metal via 68 of the desired shape. Alternatively, the recesses or vias 62 can be formed using a laser direct imaging process known as LDI.
Liquid crystal polymers are a class of aromatic polyester polymers that are extremely unreactive and inert so as to be useful for electrical applications. Liquid-crystal polymers are available in melted/liquid or solid form. In solid form the main example of lyotropic LCPs is the commercial aramid known as Kevlar. In a similar way, several series of thermotropic LCPs have been commercially produced by several companies (e.g., Vectran/Ticona). LCP materials have a dielectric constant (K) of about 2.9 at a frequency of about 20 GHz, a co-efficient of thermal expansion of about 8 to about 17 ppm/degree C., and a dimensional stability of less than about 0.1%.
In one embodiment, the core LCP material 58 is processed to enable electro-less copper plating to adhere to the side walls 66 of the recesses 62, such as by using one or more of plasma treatment, permanganate, carbon treatment, impregnating copper nano-particles to activate the surfaces 66 to promote electroplating. The electro-less copper plating applied to the side walls 66 creates conductive structures 67 that are electrically coupled to the circuit layer 56. Additional discussion of the use of electro-less plating of the dielectric structure is disclosed in Ser. No. 14/238,638, filed Feb. 12, 2014, and entitled DIRECT METALIZATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT STRUCTURES, the entire of disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
As illustrated in
In another embodiment, the circuitry layer 56 is used to electroplate the circuit locations 64. The copper plating 68 adheres primarily to the base copper 58 at the locations 64. The LCP 58 and base layer 54 act as a resist to prevent copper plating except in the recesses 62. The resulting copper pillar 68 is preferably a solid copper structure, without voids.
The plating process can be controlled to a certain degree, but in some cases with fine pitch geometries and high speed circuits, the upper surfaces 70 of the copper pillars 68 may vary in topography or height relative to the exposed surface 72 of the LCP. Also, the LCP may vary in thickness slightly especially if liquid material is used. The copper pillars 68 are preferably planarized and the thickness of the LCP controlled between steps if needed to create a controlled dimension and flat reference plane 73 for the subsequent processing steps and layers.
For higher aspect ratio via connections 68, the process can be performed in a number of steps. For example, another layer of LCP 58 can be applied and imaged to expose the upper surfaces 70 of the previous copper pillars 68, with the next plating step increasing the height of the copper pillar 68 incrementally. Planarization is preferably performed between each layer.
As best illustrated in
As illustrated in
In one embodiment, resist layer 562 is applied to exposed surface 564 of the seed layer 556 and imaged to create recesses 566 corresponding to a desired circuit pattern 568. The electrolytic plating operation to the seed layer 556 first fills the vias 552 with plating 570 and then the recesses 566 to create circuit pattern 568.
As illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, the circuit locations 98 are electrically coupled with the tops surfaces 122 of the pillars 82 and connect to the circuit layer 94. The resist layer 96 protects circuit layers 56, 94 that are not to be etched and provides contact points to the previous pillar 68, 82.
As illustrated in
A solder mask 136 can be applied on circuitry layer 138 and imaged to expose device termination locations 140. The solder mask 136 can also be laser direct imaging. In one embodiment, the solder mask 136 is a LCP. The locations 140 are configured to correspond to solder balls 142 on BGA device 144. In the illustrated embodiment, bottom dielectric layer 146 is optionally deposited on circuitry layer 56 in a manner to expose selective regions 147.
As illustrated in
In one embodiment, the pillar 160 is planarized to facilitate flip chip attach to the structure directly (see e.g.,
In another embodiment, the layers 153A, 153D can be LCP or fusion layer or combination of LCP plus fusion layer as final mask of the circuit structure 152. These layers 153A, 153D act as the solder mask when growing the copper pillars 160, 168. The IC devices 162, 166, 172 can optionally be attached directly to the LCP layer 153A.
On the system interconnect side the structure can be processed to accept a traditional ball grid array attachment 182 for an area array configuration or plated with solder/tin etc. for a no lead peripheral termination. The structure can also be fashioned to have pillar or post extensions 184 to facilitate direct solder attach with paste and to provide a natural standoff.
Dielectric material 224, such as a LCP, is optionally applied to the surface 226 of the low density circuit 220 so the location of the high density circuits 222 is at least partially defined and isolated. The dielectric material 224 may be a film or a liquid dielectric, such as a liquid crystal polymer. The dielectric material 224 can be a preformed structure or printed to expose the circuit locations 228 for the high density circuits 222, improving alignment of vias on the lower density main core 220 with the high density circuits 222. In embodiments where the surface 226 includes a LCP, the LCP circuit structures 222 can be bonded using heat and pressure, as discussed herein.
If the circuit assembly 230 is a flexible circuit, the base layer can be a material such as polyimide or liquid crystal polymer. If the circuit assembly 230 is a rigid circuit board, the base can be FR4 or one of many high speed laminates or substrates. If the circuit assembly 230 is a semiconductor package, the base can be a material such as FR4, BT resin of any one of a variety of laminate or substrate materials. If the circuit assembly 230 is an electrical connector or socket, the base can be molded LCP, machined plastic, or a variety of films or substrate materials.
The liquid, crystal polymer circuit structures 222 (also referred to as “coupons”) are preferably made using the process described below. The liquid crystal polymer circuit structures 222 are then optionally merged with the low density circuit 220. In another embodiment, the liquid crystal polymer circuit structures 222 can be fabricated in-situ directly on the low density circuit 220 using the processes described herein. The present method permits the liquid crystal polymer circuit structures 222 to be formed directly in the circuit locations 228, without having to extend the processing across the entire low density circuit 220. Additional discussion of such structures is found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/408,205, entitled HYBRID PRINTED CIRCUIT ASSEMBLY WITH LOW DENSITY MAIN CORE AND EMBEDDED HIGH DENSITY CIRCUIT REGION, filed Dec. 15, 2014, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/408,039, entitled HIGH SPEED CIRCUIT ASSEMBLY WITH INTEGRAL TERMINAL AND MATING BIAS LOADING ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY, filed Dec. 15, 2014, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Base layer 252 has a thickness of about 0.002 inches and is coated with ¼ ounce copper layer 258. The copper layer 258 can be etched using conventional techniques to create the desired circuitry layer. The base layer 252 can optionally have copper foil located on both sides. In another embodiment, the base layer 252 can be a bare sheet of LCP that is processed to accept electro-less.
In one embodiment, the LCP layer 260 is clad with about 3 micron to about 5 micron thick copper on the top surface. The laser ablation used to create vias 262 penetrates the about 3-5 micron thick copper and the LCP 260 without damaging the base copper layer 258. In an alternate embodiment, a top copper layer is electro-lessly plated onto the LCP layer 260 during a subsequent operation. Additional flash copper plate can be added to increase the thickness of the copper layer 268 as needed.
LCP layer 260 is located on the circuitry layer 258. Laser ablation is used to create via 262, without damaging the circuit structure 264 at the base of via 262. The vias 262 preferably has a diameter of about 0.0005 inches to about 0.005 inches. The vias 262 preferably have an aspect ratio (height:diameter) of about 2:1 to about 1:1.
As shown in
The present method permits the creation of solid or nearly solid filled, blind, or buried via 266 on very tight pitch of 25 micron or below. The LCP process permits via stacks that are 50 micron, 100 micron, and 150 micron high, about 25 times shorter than conventional PCB. The nature of the dielectric application and imaging structure allows for variable material content by position, by layer, and within various points on a given layer. The stack may be partly or completely produced digitally without tooling. Terminal shapes can be created in a variety of geometries depending on the terminal connected. Multiple interface points can be implemented to provide increased reliability or lower contact resistance. Electrical enhancements can include internal intelligence, test functions, data storage, shielding, RF antennae, power or signal management, capacitive coupling, analog to digital conversion, decoupling, Led indicators, display functions, battery capability, and the like.
As shown in
Also illustrated in
As shown in
The present processing encompasses many variations depending on the intended design and results can be used directly as a flexible circuit or a rigid flex with a bonded stiffening member as appropriate. Multi-layer constructions with blind and buried vias basically combine layer stacks with some limitations regarding sequential build up with stacked vias. More complicated multi-layer constructions are also possible. The first uses the LCP layers for the fine lines and signal integrity, while the center region is a conventional rigid PCB constructed using conventional methods. A second method is a mother board—daughter card approach where the high density regions are fabricated with the LCP circuit stack and then merged with a larger format board built with conventional construction.
As illustrated in
Patterning of the resist layer 312 to define pattern plating structures, such as vias 314, with fine definition can be accomplished with laser direct imaging in either a developed film process or direct ablation of cured resist.
As illustrated in
In an alternate embodiment, one or more of the layers 302, 330, 332 are fabricated using conventional means. For example, the core layer 302 may be a conventional PCB, while the layers 330, 332 are fabricated using the techniques disclosed herein. In another embodiment, the ground and power layers can be located on a conventions circuit structure, with the signal layers located on LCP layers fabricated as discussed herein.
In another embodiment, the LCP film 320 has a thickness of about 1 mils to about 4 mils. Subsequent layers of LCP can be selected with a thickness to achieve impedance targets. By combining various film thicknesses the proper dielectric separation can be achieved.
One or both of the layers 304, 306 are a copper seed layer about 3 microns to about 5 microns thick, for example, applied using electro-less deposition. A circuit structure including circuit traces and vias is imaged in the resist 312. In one embodiment, the resist 312 is about 1 mils thick. The very thin copper seed layer 304, 306 are used as a base for circuit pattern 318 electrolytic build-up using a resist 312 defined pattern plate technique. The circuit pattern is plated to the top of the resist 312 resulting in circuit traces 304, 306, 318 that are about 28 microns thick. The resist 312 is then stripped and a differential etch process is used to remove some or all of the base copper 304, 306, leaving the circuit patterns 318 intact with nearly vertical sidewalls. The resulting circuit traces 304, 306, 318 are about 25 microns wide, about 25 microns thick, and have a pitch of about 25 microns. Full metal vias with a diameter of about 25 microns to about 50 microns can also be created during this process.
Applicant has determined circuit traces 318 about 25 micron wide with about 25 micron spacing between adjacent traces 318 that are surrounded by about 25 microns of LCP provide almost exactly 50 ohms single ended impedance. Using full metal copper vias with a diameter of about 25 microns results in a very high speed, high dentistry circuit structure.
A fusion bonding process is used to encapsulate the circuit patterns 318 in a manner that provides dielectric separation, leveling of the circuit pattern where spaces between circuits are filled, as well as a dielectric bond to a substrate or previous dielectric layer. In one embodiment, the LCP covering layer is fusion bonded to the circuit traces 304, 306, 318 (see e.g., LCP film 350 in
The embodiments disclosed herein achieve fine line low loss signal performance beyond 40 GHz. The use of thin sections of LCP material allows for a very tight control of impedance profiles (1-3%) with geometries 318 in the range of about 25 microns, and more preferably, about 10 microns to about 15 microns on rigid, flexible and semi-rigid printed circuits and package substrates. The process results in very well defined fine line circuit patterns with vertical sidewalls that are completely surrounded with a homogenous, near hermetic low dielectric constant material, with solid copper via options providing vertical interconnect.
A final LCP fusion layer is optionally used to complete external circuit layers, with final metal layer exposure for component mounting. The final LCP layer is used in place of conventional solder mask (which is very lossy from a signal integrity standpoint). That is, the final LCP surface acts as the solder mask, providing a high speed path through the circuit all the way to the device terminal. The present embodiment provides increased circuit density at very well defined 15-50 micron lines and spaces and a material set that allows for very tight impedance control (1-3%), 20-75 micron solid copper vertical interconnects, and omission of solder mask with a final circuit stack often much thinner than comparable conventional circuits.
The present embodiment provides a number of benefits. The circuit stack includes solid copper vias grown and, stacked along with pattern plate. Internal capture pads are not needed. Drilled and barrel plated through holes can be added as needed, as can solid copper full metal blind and buried vias. The traces and vias are completely surrounded by common dielectric. The stack up is thinner than conventional fabrication, providing better aspect ratios for plating. The final LCP layer acts as solder mask and is optically translucent with circuits visible for alignment.
The current embodiment is also applicable to a hybrid high density/low density base board structure illustrated in
The layers 330, 350, 302, 354, 332 are laminated and the LCP layers 350, 354 are fusion bonded to the adjacent layers. The copper pillars 318 are inserted into the plated vias 334 to form a mechanical and an electrical connection. The low melt temperature material in the layers 350, 354 fills the spaces between the traces of the circuitry layers 340, 304, 306 as it semi-flows in the fusion bonding process. The present process eliminates air entrapment that can cause blisters or bubbles during lamination. The process is self-leveling so planarity of the adjacent layers 330, 302, 332 is maintained. Surrounding the circuitry layers 340, 304, 306 in a common dielectric LCP provides a significant benefit from a signal integrity standpoint.
The outer layer circuitry 364 is pattern plated to the proper thickness. During this plating process the vias 334 are preferably filled with bulk copper 368 that mechanically and electrically couples with the copper pillars 318. In an alternate embodiment, the barrel plating 310 is eliminated in favor of the bulk copper 368 deposited in the vias 334.
Any through holes are drilled and barrel plated as well. Solder mask is applied and final finish and legend print completes the construction. Any via locations that are not 100% filled with copper during the pattern plate operation are typically capped by solder mask.
The present disclosure enables circuit structures that are about 0.008″ thick compared to 0.125″ thick for the conventional back-drilled construction. The resulting performance is 60% improved over conventional construction beyond 20 GHz with equivalent design rules. Patterning of thin resist to define pattern plating structures with fine definition is accomplished with laser direct imaging in either a developed film process or direct ablation of cured resist. Fine definition of 25 micron traces with 37 micron spaces with base LCP material are possible. Very fine definition of 100 micron copper pillar metal via formations on 300 micron pitch can be used for layer to layer interconnect.
Other circuit structures to which the present disclosure applies are disclosed in Ser. No. 13/410,943 entitled Area Array Semiconductor Device Package Interconnect Structure with Optional Package-to-Package or Flexible Circuit to Package Connection, filed Mar. 2, 2012; and Ser. No. 13/700,639 entitled Electrical Connector Insulator Housing, filed Nov. 28, 2012, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
In one embodiment, the center conductors 404 have cross-sectional side dimensions of about 25 micrometers. The center conductors 404B, 404C are preferably separated by about 25 micrometers of LCP material. The co-axial conductors 406A, 406B also preferably have a width 410 of about 25 micrometers and are separated from the center conductors by about 25 micrometers of LCP material.
The center conductors 404 are optionally fabricated by creating a metalized layer 410 on the LCP to permit bulk copper plating to be formed in the channel formed by either a resist or the LCP material, as discussed herein. In one embodiment, the co-axial structures 400 are fabricated as two components that are subsequently fused along bonding lines 412.
The challenge for normal etching of thicker copper, such as the copper layer 460, is that the resulting circuit traces have a taper or trapezoidal cross-section due to the fact that upper surface 462 of the copper layer 460 etches faster than the lower surface 464. In order to etch down to the top surface 456 of the LCP layer 458, the spacing between adjacent circuit traces is usually larger than the actual trace, limiting the effective line and spacing between traces.
Basically, the copper layer 460 is ablated down to a very thin layer 470 at the same time as the resist layer 468 is ablated. This approach allows starting with the thicker copper layer 460 and ablating down to the thin layer 470 using the laser to define the resist pattern 466, as well as give the etching a head start by removing most of the copper 460 that would normally need to be etched away. The present embodiment is able to define a circuit structure 480 (see
After processing with the laser, the circuit structure 450 is etched to remove the remaining copper 470 in the recesses 472. The resist layer 468 protects the upper surface 462 of the copper layer 460 during the etching. The about 3 microns to about 5 microns copper 470 at the base of the recesses 472 is etched away very quickly during the differential etch, without degrading the remaining circuit pattern excessively.
As illustrated in
When the fusion bond layer is applied, the space 486 between the traces 482 and any undercut adjacent to the traces 482 created during etching of the thin copper layer 470 are filled with LCP. Additionally, the circuit traces 482 are relatively thick (about 0.0007 inches to about 0.007 inches) with very straight, rectangular side walls 486 and little or no taper. The traces 482 preferably have an aspect ratio (height:diameter) of about 2:1 to about 1:1.
A series of recesses 508 corresponding to a desired circuit pattern 512 (see
As best illustrate in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The present embodiment discloses a fine line, low loss signal performance beyond 40 GHz. The use of thin sections of LCP material allows for a very tight control of impedance profiles (1-3%) with geometries of the conductive traces 514 in the range of about 25 microns, and more preferably, about 10 microns to about 15 microns on rigid, flexible or semi-rigid printed circuits and package substrates. The process results in very well defined fine line circuit patterns with vertical sidewalls that are completely surrounded with a homogenous, near hermetic low dielectric constant material, with solid copper via options providing vertical interconnect.
In one embodiment illustrated in
The present embodiment provides a number of benefits. The circuit stack includes solid copper vias grown and stacked along with pattern plate. Internal capture pads are not needed. Drilled and barrel plated through holes can be added as needed, as can solid copper full metal blind and buried vias. The traces and vias are completely surrounded by common dielectric. The stack up is thinner than conventional fabrication, providing better aspect ratios for plating. The final LCP layer acts as solder mask and is optically translucent with circuits visible for alignment.
The present process can be used to create vertical or 3-D like structure to simulate the principle of a rectangular or square cross section coax like construction. The 3-D structures can be created on a single substrate or as separate assemblies that are subsequently stacked and fusion bonded as discussed herein.
In one embodiment, a temporary resist layer is applied to create the next layer of conductive structures 554 (See e.g.,
In another embodiment, each LCP layers 552 is processed to create recesses, such as by laser drilling, into which the metal is deposited to create the next layer of conductive structures 554. The LCP layers 552 can be processed to create the recesses before or after being fused with the underlying LCP layer. The surfaces of the recesses in the resist or LCP are optionally metalized with electro-less plating to facilitate the bulk copper deposition.
As best illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The embodiment of
The fusion layer 702 is intended to have a processing window sufficiently different from the adjacent layers 708, 710 such that the fusion layer 702 has an extrusion temperature that is lower adjacent layers 708, 710 and does not disrupt adjacent LCP layers 708, 710 or the circuits 712, 714 they contain. An important aspect of the lamination process is precise control of the very thin dielectric spacing 716 between the circuit traces 704 and circuit layers 712, 714 to achieve extreme impedance control. The fusion layer 702 can also be a different material set varied by layer with similar electrical properties.
LCP substrate 812 includes contact pads 814 that electrically couple with BGA device 806. Contact pads 816 protrude above the substrate 812 into the cavity 804 and couple with IC device 808. In some embodiments the IC devices 806, 808 are soldered to terminals 814, 816. The IC device 810 includes terminals 818 facing up. After the next fusion step illustrated in
In another embodiment, the LCP based module 800 leverages an industry trend for fan out redistribution of circuitry of die in a reconstituted wafer structure. Traditional module assembly has dies and components mounted to a substrate that contains required routing already intact. The structure begins with a LCP film 812 that is populated with full metal copper vias 814, 816 plated into a pre-defined pattern of die terminal patterns corresponding to the final module layout desired. The pre-defined LCP via field 814 is populated with die and components 806, 808, 810, with the option to place die face up.
The populated LCP module assembly 800 can be tested at the assembled state by probing the underside via sites 814, 816 with rework and replacement of die or components prior to continued module fabrication. A LCP frame or housing layer 802 is added either by injection overmolding or fusion bonding a cavity layer to provide walls and protection around devices assembled the LCP base layer. The assembled components 806, 808, 810 are encapsulated or overmolded to create an embedded assembly. The base LCP layer 812 with components processing and die assembled and overmolded is flipped to enable LCP circuit stack routing and processing as described with LCP circuit stack creation with die and components already in place and embedded in the final assembly.
As illustrated in
Laser ablation is used to create the circuit pattern 860 illustrated in
As illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, first LCP circuit structure 872 includes a copper base layer 874, LCP layer 876, and an array of conductive traces 878. Electroplated copper pillar 880 extends above surface 882 of the LCP layer 876. Second LCP circuit structure 883 includes LCP layer 884, metal layer 886, and via 888 formed using laser ablation. The metal layer 886 optionally includes a circuit pattern.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As best illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The resulting stack benefits from a significant ability to control the dielectric separation as the fusion materials 938 encapsulate the circuit patterns 930 without disruption of the base LCP 922 layers due to the lower fusion temperature than required to fuse LCP alone to itself.
The dielectric separation can be the thickness of the LCP film in the event to fusion material completely fills the spaces between circuit patterns, while the most likely situation is there is a thinner section of fusion material in between the LCP and the exposed surfaces of the circuit patterns. The control of the dielectric separation can also be amended by adding hard stops in the lamination set-up where the lamination sequence stops at a desired distance. The ability to control the dielectric separation is very critical to impedance control.
As the size of circuit structures and spaces between the structures are reduced, the thickness of the dielectric is very important for dielectric separation. As the dielectric layer thickness thins, it is increasingly difficult to process films. Applying LCP in very fine powder form to the exposed circuit patterns 954 and fusion bonding the particles to the copper circuit patterns 954 and the base core LCP 958 with a lamination process can melt the LCP particles 952 very quickly without melting the base LCP 958 due to the small fine size of the LCP particle 952 and lower thermal mass.
Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the embodiments of the disclosure. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges which may independently be included in the smaller ranges is also encompassed within the embodiments of the disclosure, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either both of those included limits are also included in the embodiments of the present disclosure.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the embodiments of the present disclosure belong. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the embodiments of the present disclosure, the preferred methods and materials are now described. All patents and publications mentioned herein, including those cited in the Background of the application, are hereby incorporated by reference to disclose and described the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited.
The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present disclosure is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. Further, the dates of publication provided may be different from the actual publication dates which may need to be independently confirmed.
Other embodiments of the disclosure are possible. Although the description above contains much specificity, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the disclosure, but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this disclosure. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the present disclosure. It should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed embodiments of the disclosure. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present disclosure herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above.
Thus the scope of this disclosure should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents. Therefore, it will be appreciated that the scope of the present disclosure fully encompasses other embodiments which may become obvious to those skilled in the art, and that the scope of the present disclosure is accordingly to be limited by nothing other than the appended claims, in which reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more.” All structural, chemical, and functional equivalents to the elements of the above-described preferred embodiment(s) that are known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. Moreover, it is not necessary for a device or method to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the present disclosure, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. Furthermore, no element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims.
This application claims the benefit of United Provisional Application No. 62/441,617, filed Jan. 3, 2017, entitled High Density, High Performance Electrical Interconnect Circuit Structure, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. This application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/070,026, filed Mar. 15, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,506,722, entitled Fusion Bonded Liquid Crystal Polymer Electrical Circuit Structure, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/140,038, filed Mar. 30, 2015, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. This application is a continuant-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/864,215, filed Sep. 24, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,159,154, entitled Fusion Bonded Liquid Crystal Polymer Circuit Structure, which claims the benefit of a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2014/045856, entitled FUSION BONDED LIQUID CRYSTAL POLYMER ELECTRIC CIRCUIT STRUCTURE, filed Jul. 9, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/845,088, filed Jul. 11, 2013 and 61/915,194 filed Dec. 12, 2013, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3672986 | Schneble | Jun 1972 | A |
4188438 | Burns | Feb 1980 | A |
4295700 | Sado | Oct 1981 | A |
4489999 | Miniet | Dec 1984 | A |
4922376 | Pommer et al. | May 1990 | A |
4959515 | Zavracky | Sep 1990 | A |
4964948 | Reed | Oct 1990 | A |
5014159 | Butt | May 1991 | A |
5046238 | Daigle | Sep 1991 | A |
5071363 | Reylek et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5072520 | Nelson | Dec 1991 | A |
5090116 | Henschen | Feb 1992 | A |
5096426 | Simpson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127837 | Shah et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5129573 | Duffey | Jul 1992 | A |
5161983 | Ohno | Nov 1992 | A |
5167512 | Walkup | Dec 1992 | A |
5208068 | Davis et al. | May 1993 | A |
5237203 | Massaron | Aug 1993 | A |
5246880 | Reele et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5286680 | Cain | Feb 1994 | A |
5334029 | Akkapeddi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5358621 | Oyama | Oct 1994 | A |
5378981 | Higgins, III | Jan 1995 | A |
5419038 | Wang et al. | May 1995 | A |
5454161 | Beilin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5479319 | Werther et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5509019 | Yamamura | Apr 1996 | A |
5527998 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534787 | Levy | Jul 1996 | A |
5562462 | Matsuba et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5596178 | Christian | Jan 1997 | A |
5619018 | Rossi | Apr 1997 | A |
5659181 | Bridenbaugh | Aug 1997 | A |
5674595 | Busacco et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5691041 | Frankeny et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5716663 | Capote et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5741624 | Jeng et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746608 | Taylor | May 1998 | A |
5761801 | Gebhardt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764485 | Lebaschi | Jun 1998 | A |
5772451 | Dozler et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785538 | Beaman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787976 | Hamburgen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802699 | Fjelstad et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802711 | Card et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819579 | Roberts | Oct 1998 | A |
5880590 | Desai et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904546 | Wood et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913109 | Distefano et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921786 | Slocum et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925931 | Yamamoto | Jul 1999 | A |
5933558 | Sauvageau et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973394 | Slocum et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6020597 | Kwak | Feb 2000 | A |
6062879 | Beaman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080932 | Smith et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6107109 | Akram et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114240 | Akram et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118426 | Albert | Sep 2000 | A |
6120588 | Jacobson | Sep 2000 | A |
6137687 | Shirai et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6172879 | Cilia et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177921 | Comiskey | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178540 | Lo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181144 | Hembree et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200143 | Haba et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207259 | Iino et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6225692 | Hinds | May 2001 | B1 |
6247938 | Rathburn | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252564 | Albert | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255126 | Mathieu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263566 | Hembree et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270363 | Brofman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288451 | Tsao | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312971 | Amundson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6313528 | Solberg | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320256 | Ho | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350386 | Lin | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359790 | Meyer-Berg | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6413790 | Duthaler | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422687 | Jacobson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428328 | Haba et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6433427 | Wu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437452 | Lin | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6437591 | Farnworth et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459418 | Comiskey | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461183 | Ohkita | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6462418 | Sakamoto et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6462568 | Cram | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477286 | Ouchi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490786 | Belke et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494725 | Lin et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6506438 | Duthaler et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6521489 | Duthaler | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6545291 | Amundson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6572396 | Rathburn | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6574114 | Brindle et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6593535 | Gailus | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603080 | Jensen | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614104 | Farnworth et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626526 | Ueki | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6639578 | Comiskey | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642127 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652075 | Jacobson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661084 | Peterson et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662442 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6709967 | Evers | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6744126 | Chiang | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6750473 | Amundson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758691 | McHugh | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765288 | Damberg | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773302 | Gutierrez et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6796810 | DelPrete | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800169 | Liu et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809414 | Lin et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6821131 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823124 | Renn | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825829 | Albert | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6827611 | Payne et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6830460 | Rathburn | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6840777 | Sathe et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853087 | Neuhasu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856151 | Cram | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6857880 | Ohtsuki | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861345 | Ball et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6910897 | Driscoll et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6946325 | Yean et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962829 | Glenn et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965168 | Langhorn | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967640 | Albert | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971902 | Taylor | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6987661 | Huemoeller et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6992376 | Jaeck | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009413 | Alghouli | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7025600 | Higashi | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029289 | Li | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040902 | Li | May 2006 | B2 |
7045015 | Renn | May 2006 | B2 |
7049838 | Kagami | May 2006 | B2 |
7064412 | Geissinger et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070419 | Brown et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7095090 | Nakajiman et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101210 | Lin | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114960 | Rathburn | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118391 | Minich et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121837 | Sato et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121839 | Rathburn | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129166 | Speakman | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7138328 | Downey et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145228 | Yean et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7148128 | Jacobson | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154175 | Shrivastava et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157799 | Noquil et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7180313 | Bucksch | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7217996 | Cheng et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220287 | Wyrzykowska et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7229293 | Sakurai et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7232263 | Sashinaka et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7244967 | Hundt et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249954 | Weiss | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7276919 | Beaman et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7297003 | Rathburn | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301105 | Vasoya | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7321168 | Tao | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326064 | Rathburn | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7327006 | Svard et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337537 | Smetana, Jr. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7382363 | Albert et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402515 | Arena et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410825 | Majumclar et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7411304 | Kirby et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417299 | Hu | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417314 | Lin et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7423219 | Kawaguchi et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427717 | Morimoto et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7432600 | Klein et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7458150 | Totokawa et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7459393 | Farnworth et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485345 | Renn | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7489524 | Green et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508076 | Japp et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7527502 | Li | May 2009 | B2 |
7531906 | Lee | May 2009 | B2 |
7535114 | Agraharam et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7536714 | Yuan | May 2009 | B2 |
7537461 | Rathburn | May 2009 | B2 |
7538415 | Lin et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7563645 | Jaeck | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7595454 | Kresge et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7619309 | Drexl et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621761 | Mok et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628617 | Brown et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632106 | Nakamura | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645635 | Wood et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651382 | Yasumura et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658163 | Renn | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7658617 | Brodsky | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7674671 | Renn | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7726984 | Bumb et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7736152 | Hougham et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748110 | Asahi et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758351 | Brown et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7800916 | Blackwell et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7833832 | Wood et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836587 | Kim | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7868469 | Mizoguchi | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874847 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7897503 | Foster et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7898087 | Chainer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7950927 | Kazama | May 2011 | B2 |
7955088 | Di Stefano | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7999369 | Malhan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8004092 | Lin | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8044502 | Rathburn | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8058558 | Mok et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072058 | Kim et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8120173 | Forman et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8144687 | Mizoguchi | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8148643 | Hirose et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8154119 | Yoon et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8158503 | Abe | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8159824 | Cho et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8178978 | McElrea et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8203207 | Getz | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8227703 | Maruyama et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8232632 | Rathburn | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8247702 | Kouya | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8278141 | Chow et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299494 | Yilmaz et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8329581 | Haba et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8344516 | Chainer | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373428 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8421151 | Yamashita | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8525322 | Kim et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8525346 | Rathburn | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8536714 | Sakagushi | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8536889 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8610265 | Rathburn | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8618649 | Rathburn | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8704377 | Rathburn | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8758067 | Rathburn | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8789272 | Rathburn | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8803539 | Rathburn | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8829671 | Rathburn | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8911266 | Kawate | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8912812 | Rathburn | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8928344 | Rathburn | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8955215 | Rathburn | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8955216 | Rathburn | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8970031 | Rathburn | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8981568 | Rathburn | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8981809 | Rathburn | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8984748 | Rathbun | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8987886 | Rathburn | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988093 | Rathburn | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9054097 | Rathburn | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9076884 | Rathburn | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9093767 | Rathburn | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9136196 | Rathburn | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9184145 | Rathburn | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9184527 | Rathburn | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9196980 | Rathburn | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9231328 | Rathburn | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9232654 | Rathburn | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9276336 | Rathburn | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9276339 | Rathburn | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9277654 | Rathburn | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9318862 | Rathburn | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9320133 | Rathburn | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9320144 | Rathburn | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9350093 | Rathburn | May 2016 | B2 |
9350124 | Rathburn | May 2016 | B2 |
9350214 | Rathburn | May 2016 | B2 |
9414500 | Rathburn | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9536815 | Rathburn | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559447 | Rathburn | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9603249 | Rathburn | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9613841 | Rathburn | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9660368 | Rathburn | May 2017 | B2 |
9689897 | Rathburn | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9699906 | Rathburn | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9755335 | Rathburn | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9761520 | Rathburn | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20010012707 | Ho et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016551 | Yishio et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020011639 | Carlson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020027441 | Akrma et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020062200 | Mori et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020079912 | Shahriari et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088116 | Milkovich et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098740 | Ooya | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105080 | Speakman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020105087 | Forbes et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020160103 | Fukunaga et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020179334 | Curcio | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003779 | Rathburn | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030096512 | Cornell | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114029 | Lee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117161 | Burns | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030141884 | Maruyama et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156400 | Dibene et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162418 | Yamada | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164548 | Lee | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188890 | Bhatt et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189083 | Olsen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030231819 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016995 | Kuo et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029411 | Rathburn | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048523 | Huang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054031 | Jacobson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070042 | Lee et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077190 | Huang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040104451 | Ooi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040174180 | Fukushima et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183557 | Akram | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184219 | Otsuka et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217473 | Shen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243348 | Minatani | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050020116 | Kawazoe et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050048680 | Matsumani | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100294 | Nguyen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101164 | Rathburn | May 2005 | A1 |
20050162176 | Bucksch | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164527 | Radza et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050196511 | Garrity et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050253610 | Cram | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060001152 | Hu | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060006534 | Yean et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012966 | Chakravorty | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024924 | Haji et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060044357 | Andersen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063312 | Kurita | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060087064 | Daniel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060125500 | Watkins et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145338 | Dong | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149491 | Flach et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157103 | Sheats et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060160379 | Rathburn | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060186906 | Bottoms et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060208230 | Cho et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216603 | Choi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060265919 | Huang | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258912 | Belson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261827 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274510 | Nakada | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281303 | Trezza et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021002 | Laurx et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035030 | Horton | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070057382 | Liu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059901 | Majumdar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070145981 | Tomita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148822 | Haba et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070170595 | Sinha | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070182431 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201209 | Francis et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070221404 | Das | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224735 | Karashima et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232059 | Abe | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070026999 | Di Stefano | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070259539 | Brown et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070267138 | White et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273394 | Tanner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287304 | Eldridge | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289127 | Hurwitz et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290306 | Muramatsu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296090 | Hembree | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008822 | Kowalski | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080020566 | Egitto et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080020624 | Nikaido et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080041822 | Wang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080057753 | Rathburn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060838 | Chen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073110 | Shioga et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093115 | Lee | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080115961 | Mok et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080117606 | Karlsson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080143358 | Breinlinger | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143367 | Chabineau-Loygren | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156856 | Barausky et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080157361 | Wood et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185180 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080197867 | Wokhlu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080220584 | Kim et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233672 | Heck | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237884 | Hsu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080241997 | Sunohara et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246136 | Haba et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248596 | Das et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250363 | Goto et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080265919 | Izadian | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080290885 | Matsunami | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309349 | Sutono | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090039496 | Beer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090047808 | Ma | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058444 | McIntyre | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061089 | King | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090071699 | Hsu | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090127698 | Rathburn | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133906 | Baek | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158581 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180236 | Lee et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090224404 | Wood et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241332 | Lauffer et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267628 | Takase | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090309212 | Shim | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321915 | Hu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100133680 | Kang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100143194 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100182717 | Ishibashi | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188112 | Yoshida | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100213960 | Mok et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100244872 | Yoshida | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290501 | De Bruyker | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100030734 | Ables et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100300734 | Ables | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110083881 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101540 | Chainer | May 2011 | A1 |
20120003844 | Kumar | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120017437 | Das et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120043119 | Rathburn | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120043130 | Rathburn | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120043667 | Rathburn | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044659 | Rathburn | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120049342 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120049877 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120051016 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120055701 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120055702 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056332 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056640 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120058653 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061846 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061851 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062270 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068727 | Rathburn | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120161317 | Rathburn | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164888 | Rathburn | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168948 | Rathburn | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120171907 | Rathburn | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120182035 | Rathburn | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120199985 | Rathburn | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202364 | Rathburn | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120244728 | Rathburn | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120252164 | Nakao et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257343 | Das et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268155 | Rathburn | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130002285 | Nelson | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130078860 | Rathburn | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130105984 | Rathburn | May 2013 | A1 |
20130203273 | Rathburn | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130206468 | Rathburn | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210276 | Rathburn | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223034 | Rathburn | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130244490 | Rathburn | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130283922 | Qualtieri | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130330942 | Rathburn | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130334698 | Mohammed | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140041919 | Huang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140043782 | Rathburn | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140045350 | Taylor | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140080258 | Rathburn | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140192498 | Rathburn | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140220797 | Rathburn | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225255 | Rathburn | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231961 | Lin | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140242816 | Rathburn | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140273641 | Light | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150009644 | Rendek | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150013901 | Rathburn | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150091600 | Rathburn | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150136467 | Rathburn | May 2015 | A1 |
20150162678 | Rathburn | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150181810 | Rathburn | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160014908 | Rathburn | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
05254023 | Oct 1993 | JP |
2003217774 | Jul 2003 | JP |
3274601 | Mar 2009 | JP |
WO 1991014015 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 2006039277 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006124597 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2008156856 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2010138493 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141264 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141266 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141295 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141296 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141297 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141298 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141303 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141311 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141313 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141316 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141318 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010147782 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010147934 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2010147939 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011002709 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011002712 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011097160 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011139619 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2011153298 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012061008 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012074963 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2012074969 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2012078493 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2012122142 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012125331 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2013036565 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2014011226 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2014011228 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2014011232 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2015006393 | Jan 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 30, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036043. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 21, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036047. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 28, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036363. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report, and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 28, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036377. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 30, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036388. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 27, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036397. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 30, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036055. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 4, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036288. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report arid the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 4, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036285. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 30, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036282. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 30, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036295. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 30, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036313. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 3, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/037619. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Sep. 7, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/038600. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 18, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/038606. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Sep. 1, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/040188. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 20, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/040197. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Apr. 14, 2011 in International Application No. PCT/US2011/023138. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 17, 2011 in International Application No. PCT/US2011/033726. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Sep. 27, 2011 in International Application No. PCT/US2011/038845. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 8, 2012 in International Application No. PCT/US2011/056664. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 26, 2012 in International Application No. PCT/US2011/062313. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 20, 2012 in International Application No. PCT/US2012/027813. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 19, 2012 in International Application No. PCT/US2012/027823. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Nov. 29, 2012 in International Application No. PCT/US2012/053848. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 3, 2013 in International Application No. PCT/US2013/031395. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International,Searching Authority dated Jun. 19, 2013 in International Application No. PCT/US2013/030981. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 7, 2013 in International Application No. PCT/US2013/030856. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 27, 2014 in International Application No. PCT/US2014/045856. |
Tarzwell, Robert, “A Real Printed Electronic Replacement for PCB Fabrication,” PCB007 Magazine, May 19, 2009. |
Tarzwell, Robert. “Green PCB Manufacturing Announced,” Electrical Engineering Times, May 18, 2009. |
Tarzwell, Robert, “Can Printed Electronics Replace PCB Technology?” PCB007 Magazine, May 14, 2009. |
Tarzwell, Robert, “The Bleeding Edge: Printed Electronics, Inkjets and Silver Ink,” PCB007 Magazine, May 6, 2009. |
Tarzwell, Robert, “Integrating Printed Electronics and PCB Technologies,” Printed Electronics World, Jul. 14, 2009. |
Tarzwell, Robert, “Printed Electronics: The Next Generation of PCBs?” PCB007 Magazine, Apr. 28, 2009. |
Liu, et al, “All-Polymer Capacitor Fabricated With Inkjet Printing Technique,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 47, pp. 1543-1548 (2003). |
Print—Definition of Print by The Free Dictionary. htttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/print. Aug. 13, 2014. |
European Search Report for EP 16 16 2703 A3 dated Sep. 9, 2016. |
European Search Report for EP 14 82 2548 dated Nov. 2, 2016. |
European Patent Office Article 94(3) Communication in Application No. 16162703.9 dated Feb. 26, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/266,486, filed Oct. 27, 2011, 2012/0055701, U.S. Pat. No. 8,955,215, High Performance Surface Mount Electrical Interconnect. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,663, filed Feb. 13, 2015, 2015/0162678, U.S. Pat. No. 9,660,368, High Performance Surface Mount Electrical Interconnect. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/266,522, filed Oct. 27, 2011, 2012/0068727, U.S. Pat. No. 8,803,539, Compliant Wafer Level Probe Assembly. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/266,573, filed Oct. 27, 2011, 2012/0061846, U.S. Pat. No. 9,054,097, Compliant Printed Circuit Area Array Semiconductor Device Package. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/266,907, filed Oct. 28, 2011, 2012/0268155, U.S. Pat. No. 8,928,344, Compliant Printed Circuit Socket Diagnostic Tool. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/318,038, filed Oct. 28, 2011, 2012/0062270, U.S. Pat. No. 8,912,812, Compliant Printed Circuit Wafer Probe Diagnostic Tool. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/318,171, filed Oct. 31, 2011, 2012/0049877, U.S. Pat. No. 8,789,272, Compliant Printed Circuit Peripheral Lead Semiconductor Test Socket. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/318,181, filed Oct. 31, 2011, 2012/0044659, U.S. Pat. No. 8,955,216, Compliant Printed Circuit Peripheral Lead Seimconductor Package. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/318,200, filed Oct. 31, 2011, 2012/0056332, U.S. Pat. No. 9,136,196, Compliant Printed Circuit Wafer Level Semiconductor Package. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/318,263, filed Oct. 31, 2011, 2012/0043667, U.S. Pat. No. 8,618,649, Compliant Printed Circuit Semiconductor Package. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,029, filed Nov. 21, 2013, 2014/0080258, U.S. Pat. No. 9,076,884, Compliant Printed Circuit Semiconductor Package. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/320,285, filed Nov. 14, 2011, 2012/005702, U.S. Pat. No. 9,414,500, Compliant Printed Flexible Circuit. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/318,369, filed Nov. 1, 2011, 2012/0043119, U.S. Pat. No. 9,277,654, Composite Polymer-Metal Electrical Contacts. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/318,382, filed Nov. 1, 2011, 2012/0043130, U.S. Pat. No. 9,231,328, Resilient Conductive Electrical Interconnect. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/319,120, filed Nov. 7, 2011, 2012/0061851, U.S. Pat. No. 8,981,568, Simulated Wirebond Semiconductor Pakage. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/319,145, filed Nov. 7, 2011, 2012/0049342, U.S. Pat. No. 8,970,031, Semiconductor Die Terminal. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/319,158, filed Nov. 7, 2011, 2012/0051016, U.S. Pat. No. 9,320,144, Semiconductor Socket. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/319,203, filed Nov. 7, 2011, 2012/0056640, U.S. Pat. No. 8,981,809, Compliant Printed Circuit Semiconductor Tester Interface. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/319,228, filed Nov. 7, 2011, 2012/0058653, U.S. Pat. No. 8/984,748, Singulated Semiconductor Device Separable Electrical Interconnect. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/575,368, filed Jul. 26, 2012, 2013/0203273, Abandoned, High Speed Backplane Connector. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,436, filed Oct. 25, 2012, 2013/0105984, U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,145, Semiconductor Device Package Adapter. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/700 639, filed Nov. 28, 2012, 2013/0078860, U.S. Pat. No. 9,184,527, Electrical Connector Insulator Housing. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/879,783, filed Apr. 16, 2013, 2013/0223034, U.S. Pat. No. 9,232,654, High Performance Electrical Circuit Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/879,883, filed Apr. 17, 2013, 2013/0244490, U.S. Pat. No. 9,093,767, High Performance Surface Mount Electrical Interconnect. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/880,231, filed Apr. 18, 2013, 2013/0210276, U.S. Pat. No. 9,276,339, Electrical Interconnect IC Device Socket. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/880,461, filed Apr. 19, 2013, 2013/0206468, U.S. Pat. No. 9,320,133, Electrical Interconnect IC Device Socket. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/410,914, filed Mar. 2, 2012, 2012/0164888, U.S. Pat. No. 9,276,336, Metalized Pad to Electrical Contact Interface. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/410,943, filed Mar. 2, 2012, 2012/0161317, U.S. Pat. No. 9,613,841, Area Array Semiconductor Device Package Interconnect Structure With Optional Package-to-Package or Flexible Circuit to Package Connection. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,870, filed Mar. 6, 2012, 2012/0171907, U.S. Pat. No. 8,758,067, Selective Metalization of Electrical Connector or Socket Housing. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/271,801, filed May 7, 2014, 2014/0242816, U.S. Pat. No. 9,350,093, Selective Metalization of Electrical Connector or Socket Housing. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,032, filed Mar. 6, 2012, 2012/0182035, U.S. Pat. No. 8,988,093, Bumped Semiconductor Wafer or Die Level Electrical Interconnect. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/413,724, filed Mar. 7, 2012, 2012/0168948, U.S. Pat. No. 8,987,886, Copper Pillar Full Metal Via Electrical Circuit Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/255,083, filed Apr. 17, 2014, 2014/0225255, U.S. Pat. No. 9,930,775, Copper Pillar Full Metal Via Electrical Circuit Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/418,853, filed Mar. 13, 2012, 2012/0244728, U.S. Pat. No. 9,196,980, High Performance Surface Mount Electrical Interconnect With External Biased Normal Force Loading. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/448 865, filed Apr. 17, 2012, 2012/0199985, U.S. Pat. No. 8,610,265, Compliant Conductive Nano-Particle Electrical Interconnect. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/058,863, filed Oct. 21, 2013, 2014/0043782, U.S. Pat. No. 8,829,671, Compliant Core Peripheral Lead Semiconductor Socket. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,914, filed Apr. 17, 2012, 2012/0202364, U.S. Pat. No. 8,525,346, Compliant Core Peripheral Lead Semiconductor Test Socket. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/969,953, filed Aug. 19, 2013, 2013/0330942, U.S. Pat. No. 8,704,377, Compliant Conductive Nano-Particle Electrical Interconnect. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/138,638, filed Feb. 12, 2014, 2014/0192498, U.S. Pat. No. 9,603,249, Direct Metalization of Electrical Circuit Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/408,205, filed Dec. 15, 2014, 2015/0181710, U.S. Pat. No. 9,699,906, Hybrid Printed Circuit Assembly With Low Density Main Core and Embedded High Density Circuit Regions. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/408,039, filed Dec. 15, 2014, 2015/0136467, U.S. Pat. No. 9,350, 124, High Speed Circuit Assembly With Integral Terminal and Mating Bias Loading Electrical Connector Assembly. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/408,338, filed Dec. 16, 2014, 2015/0279768, U.S. Pat. No. 9,536,815, Semiconductor Socket With Direct Selective Metalization. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/254,038, filed Apr. 16, 2014, 2014/0220797, U.S. Pat. No. 9,318,862, High Performance Electrical Connector With Translated Insulator Contact Positioning. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,916, filed Jul. 10, 2014, 2015/0013901, Matrix Defined Electrical Circuit Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/864,215, filed Sep. 24, 2015, 2016/0014908, U.S. Pat. No. 10,159,154, Fusion Bonded Liquid Crystal Polymer Electrical Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/565,724, filed Dec. 10, 2014, 2015/0091600, U.S. Pat. No. 9,689,897, Performance Enhanced Semiconductor Socket. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/062,136, filed Mar. 6, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 9,559,447, Mechanical Contact Retention Within an Electrical Connector. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/062,137, filed Mar. 6, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 9,761,520, Electrodeposited Contact Terminal for Use as an Electrical Connector or Semiconductor Packaging Substrate. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/070,026, filed Mar. 15, 2016, 2016/0212862, Fusion Bonded Formable Liquid Crystal Polymer Electrical Circuit Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/062,138, filed Mar. 6, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,755,335, Low Profile Electrical Interconnect With Fusion Bonded Contact Retention and Solder Wick Prevention. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180124928 A1 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62441617 | Jan 2017 | US | |
61845088 | Jul 2013 | US | |
61915194 | Dec 2013 | US | |
62140038 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14864215 | Sep 2015 | US |
Child | 15842310 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2014/045856 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 14864215 | US | |
Parent | 15842310 | US | |
Child | 14864215 | US | |
Parent | 15070026 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 15842310 | US |