The present invention relates to a semiconductor process and, more specifically, relates to a barrier structure on the outer edge of bonded wafers including individual die for protection from corrosion and contamination in a three-dimensional (3-D) wafer-to-wafer vertical stack.
Integrated circuits (ICs) form the basis for many electronic systems. Essentially, an integrated circuit (IC) includes a vast number of transistors and other circuit elements that are formed on a single semiconductor wafer or chip and are interconnected to implement a desired function. The complexity of these integrated circuits (ICs) requires the use of an ever increasing number of linked transistors and other circuit elements.
Many modern electronic systems are created through the use of a variety of different integrated circuits; each integrated circuit (IC) performing one or more specific functions. For example, computer systems include at least one microprocessor and a number of memory chips. Conventionally, each of these integrated circuits (ICs) is formed on a separate chip, packaged independently and interconnected on, for example, a printed circuit board (PCB).
As integrated circuit (IC) technology progresses, there is a growing desire for a “system on a chip” in which the functionality of all of the IC devices of the system are packaged together without a conventional PCB. Ideally, a computing system should be fabricated with all the necessary IC devices on a single chip. In practice, however, it is very difficult to implement a truly high-performance “system on a chip” because of vastly different fabrication processes and different manufacturing yields for the logic and memory circuits.
As a compromise, various “system modules” have been introduced that electrically connect and package integrated circuit (IC) devices which are fabricated on the same or on different semiconductor wafers. Initially, system modules have been created by simply stacking two chips, e.g., a logic and memory chip, one on top of the other in an arrangement commonly referred to as chip-on-chip structure. Subsequently, multi-chip module (MCM) technology has been utilized to stack a number of chips on a common substrate to reduce the overall size and weight of the package, which directly translates into reduced system size.
Existing multi-chip module (MCM) technology is known to provide performance enhancements over single chip or chip-on-chip (COC) packaging approaches. For example, when several semiconductor chips are mounted and interconnected on a common substrate through very high density interconnects, higher silicon packaging density and shorter chip-to-chip interconnections can be achieved. In addition, low dielectric constant materials and higher wiring density can also be obtained which lead to increased system speed and reliability and reduced weight, volume, power consumption and heat dissipation for the same level of performance. However, MCM approaches still suffer from additional problems, such as bulky package, wire length and wire bonding that gives rise to stray inductances that interfere with the operation of the system module.
An advanced three-dimensional (3D) wafer-to-wafer vertical stack technology has been recently proposed by researchers to realize the ideal high-performance “system on a chip” as described in “Face To Face Wafer Bonding For 3D Chip Stack Fabrication To Shorten Wire Lengths” by J. F. McDonald et al., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) presented on Jun. 27–29, 2000 VMIC Conference, and “Copper Wafer Bonding” by A. Fan et al., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2 (10) 534–536 (1999). In contrast to the existing multi-chip module (MCM) technology which seeks to stack multiple chips on a common substrate, 3-D wafer-to-wafer vertical stack technology seeks to achieve the long-awaited goal of vertically stacking many layers of active IC devices such as processors, programmable devices and memory devices inside a single chip to shorten average wire lengths, thereby reducing interconnect RC delay and increasing system performance.
One major challenge of 3-D wafer-to-wafer vertical stack integration technology is the metal bonding between wafers and between die in a single chip and the wafer protection from possible corrosion and contamination caused or generated by process steps after the wafers are bonded from reaching active IC devices on the bonded wafers. Therefore, a need exists to erect a barrier structure on the outer edge of bonded wafers and individual die to protect the bonded wafers and die against corrosion and contamination in a three-dimensional (3-D) wafer-to-wafer vertical stack.
A more complete appreciation of exemplary embodiments of the present invention, and many of the attendant advantages of the present invention, will become readily apparent as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference symbols indicate the same or similar components, wherein:
The present invention is applicable for use with all types of semiconductor wafers and integrated circuit (IC) devices, including, for example, MOS transistors, CMOS devices, MOSFETs, and new memory devices and communication devices such as smart cards, cellular phones, electronic tags and gaming devices which may become available as semiconductor technology develops in the future. However, for the sake of simplicity, discussions will concentrate mainly on exemplary use of a dielectric recess for metallic wafer-to-wafer and die-to-die bonding in a three-dimensional (3-D) wafer-to-wafer vertical stack, although the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto.
Attention now is directed to the drawings, and particularly to
In a typical 3-D vertical stack 100 shown in
Typically, the interwafer vias 104 are prepared on the top wafer 120 as shown in
However, there are still limitations regarding the use of dielectric (ILD) layer 102 and interwafer vias 104 in direct 3-D integration. For example, the interwafer vias 104 between adjacent wafers 110 and 120 is typically deep which lead to some interconnect RC delay in active IC devices. In addition, the dielectric (ILD) layer 102 used for wafer bonding can also be cost-prohibitive for mass production.
In order to reduce the use of dielectric (ILD) layers 102 between adjacent wafers 110, 120 and 130, and to minimize the interconnect RC delay in active IC devices through the interwafer vias 104, proposals have been made to use metallic lines (metal bonding pads) arranged on the surface of adjacent wafers 110, 120 and 130 to serve not only as electrical connections to active IC devices on adjacent wafers 110, 120 and 130 on a 3-D wafer-to-wafer vertical stack 100 but also to bond the adjacent wafers 110, 120 and 130. In addition, dummy metal bonding pads can also be made to increase the surface area for wafer bonding and serve as auxiliary structures such as ground planes or heat conduits for the active IC devices.
Turning now to
As shown in
The metal bonding process may be performed in a vacuum and, as a result, dielectric recess 107 can be created to surround the metal bonding areas to facilitate direct metal bonding between adjacent wafers or between die to ensure that adjacent wafers (210 and 220 shown in
In an example 4-wafer vertical stack 300 shown in
Turning now to
As shown in
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the barrier structure 520 is a tight pitch, uniform metal grid (checkerboard pattern) with 80% metal density erected on the outer edge of the usable die of the wafer pair 500. Such a barrier structure 520 can be erected using a special edge reticle to create a dense grid of connected copper (Cu) lines. Copper (Cu) may be desired because of its low electrical resistivity, high electromigration resistance and high diffusivity. However, other metallic materials can also be used, including, for example, gold and tin and tin alloy. The barrier structure 520 may also be erected using the same reticle as used for the majority of the wafer to pattern just the wafer edges. However, the metal density may not be as high as with the special edge reticle and may leave a long path open between the interior and the edge of the wafer pair 500. As a result, the barrier structure 520 can dramatically improve the mechanical stability of the bonded wafer pair 500 by increasing the total bonding area and decreasing the effective lever arm by several orders of magnitude(2 um rather than 2 cm) that can work against the wafer edge when the bonded wafer pair 500 is cut into individual die.
Independently from the barrier structure 520 used for the entire wafer pair 500 at the wafer level as described with reference to
For example,
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the die barrier structure 620 may be formed by a single guard ring (barrier line) or multiple concentric guard rings (barrier lines) used to provide for effective passivation for the metallic lines (metal bonding pads) 730A–730N which are exposed to ambient after the die sawing process. Similar to the barrier structure 520 used for the entire wafer pair 500 at the wafer level as described with reference to
Multiple guard rings 620 can also offer the additional benefit of additional backup layers for containment of both oxygen and water. For example if the outer guard ring becomes sufficiently oxidized to make it permeable to oxygen, the second, third, fourth and fifth layers can still provide for effective passivations. For multiple guard rings 620, the concept of a sacrificial guarding getting low levels of oxygen is also possible. In addition, the orientation of the guard rings 620 parallel to the perimeter not only enables them to serve as passivation barriers, but also permits them to extend all the way into the saw cut since the guard rings 620 are self contained and will not serve as to promote delamination.
As described in this invention, the barrier structure as shown in
While there have been illustrated and described what are considered to be exemplary embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art and as technology develops that various changes and modifications may be made, and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the true scope of the present invention. Many modifications may be made to adapt the teachings of the present invention to a particular situation without departing from the scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the various exemplary embodiments disclosed, but that the present invention includes all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/066,668, filed on Feb. 6, 2002, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,661,085 on Dec. 9, 2003, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. This application is related to the following patents and pending patent applications, which are assigned to the assignee of this application: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/066,643, filed on Feb. 6, 2002; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/066,645, filed on Feb. 6, 2002; U.S. Pat. No 6,762,076, filed on Feb. 20, 2002 and issued on Jul. 13, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/695,328, filed on Oct. 27, 2003; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/855,032, filed on May 26, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3648131 | Stuby | Mar 1972 | A |
3705332 | Parks | Dec 1972 | A |
4607779 | Burns | Aug 1986 | A |
4689113 | Balasubramanyam et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4897708 | Clements | Jan 1990 | A |
4954875 | Clements | Sep 1990 | A |
4998665 | Hayashi | Mar 1991 | A |
5045914 | Casto et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5229647 | Gnadinger et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5241450 | Bernhardt et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5283107 | Bayer et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5366906 | Wajnarowski et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5401672 | Kurtz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404044 | Booth et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5419806 | Huebner | May 1995 | A |
5455445 | Kurtz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473197 | Idaka et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5510655 | Tanielian | Apr 1996 | A |
5545281 | Matsui et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5608265 | Kitano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627106 | Hsu | May 1997 | A |
5640049 | Rostoker et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656554 | Desai et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5699611 | Kurogi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717247 | Koh et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5751556 | Butler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5773986 | Thompson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5825080 | Imaoka et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5880010 | Davidson | Mar 1999 | A |
5886535 | Budnaitis | Mar 1999 | A |
5901050 | Imai | May 1999 | A |
5998808 | Matsushita | Dec 1999 | A |
6100181 | You et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6238951 | Caillat | May 2001 | B1 |
6255726 | Vindasius et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297072 | Tilmans et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6340608 | Chooi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6355501 | Fung et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355976 | Faris | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373130 | Salaville | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391669 | Fasano et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6461890 | Shibata | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468098 | Eldridge | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6495924 | Kodama et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504253 | Mastromatteo et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6559042 | Barth et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6583512 | Nakaoka et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6593645 | Shih et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594025 | Forouhi | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608371 | Kurashima et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6643920 | Hori | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6661085 | Kellar et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6724084 | Hikita et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6762076 | Kim et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6882045 | Massingill et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
20010038148 | Mastromatteo et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020017710 | Karashima et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024628 | Walker et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020163072 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020195673 | Chou et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030079836 | Lin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030148596 | Kellar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030157782 | Kellar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040014308 | Kellar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040142540 | Kellar et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0293459 | Jul 1992 | EP |
WO008804829 | Jun 1988 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040014308 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10066668 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10613006 | US |